A Bit Fruity with Matt Bernstein - October 10, 2024


Jubilee Must Be Stopped

Topics
The Cult of Stan Culture (with Amanda Montell) Riley Gaines: Tie for 5th, Grift for Life

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 26 minutes

Words per minute

179.32

Word count

15,599

Sentence count

472

Harmful content

Misogyny

39

sentences flagged

Toxicity

107

sentences flagged

Hate speech

53

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 I was feeling so in my echo chamber until I watched an hour and 17 minutes of, is being that a choice?
00:00:12.400 Hello, hello, and welcome back to A Bit Fruity. Today, we've assembled a cast of five homosexuals 1.00
00:00:21.080 and five people who think that all homosexuals should be stoned to death on live television. 0.99
00:00:26.860 can they find middle ground tune in to find out do you think that was good 0.98
00:00:32.480 i like how even a melodic your voice was for that that's really how they talked they're really like
00:00:40.180 the apple of online magazine youtube channels you know they speak with this sort of calming
00:00:46.480 monotone like they just want to bring the volume down you know totally we just want to bring the
00:00:50.420 volume down which is why we found the most insane conspiracy theorists on reddit to come and argue 1.00
00:00:56.220 why the earth is flat should homosexuals be allowed to live or should they be allowed to 0.89
00:01:03.340 be stoned to death on live television the truth surely is somewhere in the middle and if there's 1.00
00:01:08.300 one thing we accomplished on today's episode we will be finding the middle ground i hate this
00:01:13.700 okay today we are going to be talking about the jubilee youtube channel it's a youtube channel
00:01:22.960 with over 9 million subscribers currently it's a media company it's a headache and if you aren't
00:01:32.000 familiar with the jubilee youtube channel a you're about to find out what it is and b you probably
00:01:37.920 already know what it is because you've probably seen clips of the ever more ridiculous debates
00:01:43.240 that they host for you know viral outrage content come up on your facebook or instagram or twitter
00:01:49.700 or TikTok feeds.
00:01:51.420 You'll never meet a Republican that uses pronouns.
00:01:53.660 It's just a fact.
00:01:54.700 It's only a lab.
00:01:55.000 Everybody uses pronouns.
00:01:56.420 Just some people choose to announce their pronouns.
00:01:57.240 Okay, well, my pronouns now for the rest of the time
00:01:59.100 are a pretty princess.
00:02:00.180 That's not a pronoun.
00:02:01.240 And I'll step out and say,
00:02:02.300 I'm sure everybody here has said something racist
00:02:04.220 in their life.
00:02:05.240 That doesn't make you a racist.
00:02:07.100 It's kind of like if you weigh 400 pounds
00:02:08.800 and you eat celery, you're not skinny. 1.00
00:02:10.980 I think that infringing upon women's right 1.00
00:02:12.580 to bodily autonomy, bodily integrity, 1.00
00:02:13.940 all because they want to preserve the life
00:02:15.400 of a non-sentient...
00:02:16.460 Did your mom think, thought that about you?
00:02:18.300 She was about to, like, she thought that you were just some cells?
00:02:22.080 My mom, when I was where?
00:02:23.400 I mean, it doesn't care what she thought, I was that.
00:02:26.100 So you were just a bunch of cells, so that's what you're just believing?
00:02:28.800 Unfortunately, some people have emotional stuff that happened, traumatic stuff that's happened,
00:02:33.740 so you can't discount and just say, oh, because they're fat. 0.81
00:02:36.340 Boo-hoo, man.
00:02:36.980 Like, there's way worse stuff going out in the world versus people saying, oh, my God,
00:02:41.780 I'm sad, I'm going to eat some ice cream.
00:02:43.320 It's like, no, dude, it's like, you're fat, you made that decision, you live in the best
00:02:46.980 country ever.
00:02:47.460 if you live in a civilized first world country where you have electricity internet power etc 0.99
00:02:51.260 you deserve to be bullied it's ridiculous to me that we have all these fat people running around 0.98
00:02:55.240 meanwhile people are being bombed in gaza it's ridiculous i am going to be hopefully making the 1.00
00:03:00.340 case for why it is time for jubilee what is it time for jubilee to die is that what you're about
00:03:07.160 i've had it to help us do that i have asked my friend big joel you might recognize him from his
00:03:19.160 youtube channel big joel or perhaps his second youtube channel little joel he is an excellent
00:03:25.400 content creator a great political thinker a great tweeter and i'm so excited that he is here today 0.82
00:03:31.800 welcome to the show big joel hi are you i'm ready to fucking let's 0.79
00:03:37.360 i i should i should have had some sort of thing raring to go but i really didn't 0.90
00:03:44.780 in fairness we we both did spend the last 36 hours watching as much jubilee content as we could
00:03:52.240 so that we could be as ready to have this conversation as possible so we're both working
00:03:57.620 on like semi-functioning brains right now.
00:03:59.900 So please forgive the gaffes.
00:04:01.980 I'm excited.
00:04:02.880 You know, I've been enjoying watching Jubilee videos
00:04:06.980 and there's something about them
00:04:08.560 that there's something oddly addictive about it.
00:04:10.840 These days less so
00:04:11.840 because all their videos are endless.
00:04:13.680 They're like an hour and a half long
00:04:15.240 and they get their people to go on these
00:04:17.220 just endless tirades
00:04:19.040 where they say the same things over and over again.
00:04:21.620 But, you know, I'm a both sides lover.
00:04:24.640 It was a labor of love for me.
00:04:25.960 It was a labor of love for me to watch three credited scientists debate three self-identified
00:04:33.940 free thinkers about the shape of the earth.
00:04:36.480 Okay, before we get in too far, you might be a little bit confused, so let me explain
00:04:41.240 a little bit of background for what Jubilee is and why we are here today.
00:04:45.900 Jubilee is a media company and content farm that has been rapidly growing in popularity
00:04:51.600 lately and over the last several years.
00:04:54.800 It's known primarily for, like I mentioned, its YouTube channel with over 9 million subscribers
00:05:00.880 currently. The slogan of Jubilee is provoke understanding and create human connection.
00:05:08.900 Jubilee is known for its often viral debate style content where it sometimes casts sort of online
00:05:16.700 political celebrities like the right wing provocateur Charlie Kirk or, you know, random
00:05:22.100 college students to debate those right-wing celebrities. Jubilee has an ongoing series
00:05:28.140 called Middle Ground, where they cast a group of people from one side of a contentious debate
00:05:33.000 to, you know, quote-unquote debate people from the other side of that contentious debate, like
00:05:38.460 feminists versus male rights activists, scientists versus anti-vaxxers. I'll read you some YouTube
00:05:46.760 titles men's rights activists versus feminists is toxic masculinity real flat earthers versus
00:05:53.080 scientists can we trust science can 25 liberal college students outsmart one conservative
00:05:59.560 can one woke teen survive 25 conservatives he doesn't spoiler alert he dies he died in that
00:06:07.520 video he was over after that the 25 conservatives ate him 0.95
00:06:13.200 uh six straight men versus one secret gay man who is the gay man
00:06:21.440 think the gay man is me can trump supporters and immigrants see eye to eye and perhaps my 0.81
00:06:29.200 personal favorite can you stop being gay lgbtq people versus former lgbtq people 0.81
00:06:37.280 Like I mentioned, if you haven't ever watched any of these videos, all of which, by the way, have millions upon millions upon millions of views, if you've never watched them of your own volition, you have almost definitely been served bite-sized clips of them to your social media feeds, where they often go viral and spark very angry comment sections. 0.56
00:06:58.220 i think jubilee is rage bait at best and i think it's dangerous at worst and that's a thesis we
00:07:07.080 are going to spend the rest of this episode unpacking i thought could we start by saying
00:07:13.560 like what do we like about jubilee because on this podcast i try to give everyone grace
00:07:18.300 you're so kind matt it's crazy how kind and sweet you are i can't believe it sometimes
00:07:25.140 I don't know. I think that there's things to appreciate about Jubilee's middle ground. Okay, so there's this one video that they made called like, can pro-life women and pro-choice men find a middle ground, right? And on one hand, like, are we platforming pro-life opinions? Yeah, of course we are doing that.
00:07:44.960 On the other hand, this is a conversation, a debate that we have a national stake in, right? We're forced to debate this question constantly. It's something we're all very worried about. And I don't know if inevitably I could just come to the conclusion, get rid of this kind of forum, get rid of this kind of conversation that interacts with people that I don't like and disagree with.
00:08:09.860 I also would say, as another pro to them, that the people who enter these conversations as the normal guy presence in the room, I think they tend to be smart enough, you know? I don't think I'm smarter than any of them. I don't think that I'd be able to conjure better points than they do in disagreement. Much of the time, I'm having a thought and they express it. It's not like it's a totally stacked deck, although there is a sense in which the deck is stacked, I'd say.
00:08:36.560 Yeah, I think what Jubilee would claim, and we're actually going to be reading some of their mission statements, but I think that what Jubilee would claim is that their goal is to get us out of our online political echo chambers, right? And I think that's a noble goal.
00:08:52.340 i don't know if i agree that it's a noble goal but like no i don't know wait really everyone's
00:08:58.360 so anti-echo chamber i'm i'm i'm a i'm a centrist on the echo chambers we're we're exposed to the
00:09:04.160 craziest shit all day every day now has it made our politics better has it depolarized our country 0.96
00:09:09.600 has twitter being overtaken by nazis made us more clever or thoughtful or open-minded people no it's 1.00
00:09:16.440 ruined us it's ruined our brains i don't i'm i'm a centrist on the echo chamber i think the debate
00:09:21.980 is important but like this constant like you need to open your mind thing like i don't know maybe
00:09:28.040 maybe we do maybe we don't do you think we can find middle ground on echo chambers yeah
00:09:32.900 pro echo chamber versus anti echo chamber the middle ground coming next week
00:09:40.060 it's just echo chamber sounds really bad but like community is another word you might have
00:09:46.080 for echo chamber right a space where people who are like-minded communicate with each other
00:09:50.940 and where certain ideas are broadly accepted
00:09:53.840 is another way of defining echo chamber, right?
00:09:56.680 So it's difficult.
00:09:58.460 It's nuanced, I'd say.
00:09:59.580 That's fair.
00:10:00.140 Sorry, I don't need to debate you right now.
00:10:01.880 No, we can debate.
00:10:03.340 We can debate.
00:10:04.460 In the spirit of talking about Jubilee, we can debate.
00:10:06.600 But I think to your point,
00:10:08.260 like I'm not, you know,
00:10:09.540 people are going to come to this episode of my podcast
00:10:12.560 and say, well, you're just against hearing opinions
00:10:15.640 from people who don't agree with you.
00:10:16.820 You can't hear from someone who is, you know, anti-choice. You can't hear from someone who, whatever, who has opposing views. And that's not my problem with Jubilee. My problem with Jubilee is not that they platform people I disagree with.
00:10:35.060 sometimes I have problems with who they platform and we'll get into that too. But I think if their
00:10:40.960 goal was to earnestly break open echo chambers, earnestly foster human connection, as is their
00:10:48.940 slogan, then the content would look extraordinarily different. People don't respect sex workers
00:10:55.680 because it's easy to take your clothes off. That's why they don't respect them. It's also 1.00
00:10:59.900 people respect things that are hard and sex work only fans that's not hard and so part of my thesis
00:11:07.560 today is that jubilee is i think self-aware about the fact that they are not creating the type of
00:11:12.560 content that aligns at all with what they claim to be about yes i'd say that if there's one critique
00:11:18.180 i have for jubilee to boil it down to one sentence it would be they're not breaking over open echo
00:11:24.200 chambers primarily, what they're really doing is inventing opening the echo chamber. You know,
00:11:30.780 there isn't a lot of Americans who are flat earthers. It's not a real kind of person that
00:11:35.580 you meet in your day to day life. You don't meet flat earthers at the coffee shop. You know, a lot 0.97
00:11:41.880 of them. Well, you know, I have friends who are flat earthers because I think it's important to
00:11:46.240 surround myself with people who disagree with me. You know, it's, it's a fake conversation. It
00:11:51.020 doesn't actually exist. And so they're not getting people out of their rote bullshit. They're exposing 1.00
00:11:57.440 the freaks to the normal guys. That's what their actual spectacle is. It's not primarily about
00:12:04.100 conversation, about issues that bear down on people's lives and about which reasonable minds
00:12:09.460 sometimes differ. Although they do have that. A lot of the time it's just random, vaguely
00:12:15.300 reactionary feeling spectacle. I love how this is our answer to my prompt, which was,
00:12:19.980 can we start by saying something we like about jubilee okay i will say that as you know a content
00:12:28.300 creator i understand that part of making content is capturing people's attention i think the people
00:12:35.100 who run the jubilee youtube channel have found a gold mine as far as being able to capture people's
00:12:40.500 attention being able to get people emotionally involved in your content i think they are very
00:12:45.980 very good content creators. I think it's ultimately for the worse. But I think that
00:12:51.940 they have had some really creative ways to rage bait people, essentially.
00:12:58.500 And look, just as one final pro to them is that, you know, we can laugh, we can look at a 0.64
00:13:03.640 conversation between, you know, former LGBTQIA plus people versus current gay people. We can 0.57
00:13:11.380 we can laugh at that idea we can laugh at the fact that they're platforming uh conversion
00:13:15.780 therapy advocates although they would say they're not conversion therapy advocates that's a different
00:13:19.800 matter i suppose but at the end of the day there are going to be gay religious teenagers watching
00:13:26.400 that jubilee video and they're going to be processing uh the ideas from uh christians who 0.96
00:13:34.320 are gay and who have their faith and who don't believe that they're going to hell for it and
00:13:38.340 it's gonna make a gay teenager's life better it will do that in certain cases and it's it's not 0.96
00:13:45.660 a conversation that it's for me to have i don't think gay people are going to hell i don't believe 0.82
00:13:50.040 in all that but it's a conversation that some people really do take seriously so it speaks to
00:13:57.380 somebody it helps somebody you know it's it's not all bad i don't think okay that was that was
00:14:04.540 like a really specific pro about like one of their 7,000 videos. Yes, that's true. Well,
00:14:10.900 you know, abortion, you know, they get a 45-year-old guy to say, you have a right to
00:14:14.620 abortion. You know, maybe that'll make a woman feel safer. I don't fucking know.
00:14:19.220 I would like to give a little bit of background on the history of Jubilee. Would you mind? 0.93
00:14:25.040 I wouldn't, no. So Jubilee is the brainchild of Jason Lee, who is a graduate from the University
00:14:33.020 of Pennsylvania Wharton School of Business, prestigious business school. He's a business guy.
00:14:38.060 After he graduated, he was a business consultant making, as he tells it, six figures by the time
00:14:44.640 he was 21. And in 2010, he launches the Jubilee Project, as it was then known, as a non-profit
00:14:53.280 and a YouTube channel. The first video that he makes, which is still the first video on Jubilee's
00:15:00.420 channel it only has like 40 000 views now was basically just a little like vlog he made of him
00:15:07.820 going to uh the union square subway stop in new york city and singing you know the way that people 0.99
00:15:15.640 sing in public places for for for money so that he could raise money for the victims of the haiti
00:15:22.620 earthquake in that video he raised he raises 85 dollars and one cent and two euros which i think
00:15:29.820 it's like really sweet that's cute yeah he seems you know like just like very happy to be like
00:15:36.020 finding a creative way to make content out of doing charity work it you know it's a sweet
00:15:40.740 short video it bears no resemblance at all to anything on that channel now but uh yeah for
00:15:49.900 the first couple of years really all of the videos were just like various charity spotlights and you
00:15:56.600 know they got really low traffic mr beast type guy i mean mr beast type guy sure jason eventually
00:16:08.000 realized that he he has no business plan he had like quit his job to make this work and he's not
00:16:13.580 making any money eventually he shuts down the non-profit jubilee project and relaunches it in
00:16:20.400 2017 as jubilee a for-profit company that at that point he had raised 650 000 in funding for
00:16:29.740 he raised 650k for a youtube channel yeah who's investing in one i don't know what does that mean
00:16:36.240 yeah who's gonna half a million dollars in my youtube channel that's crazy it is crazy and so
00:16:43.220 immediately the you know the charity stuff stops and what emerges is a series of videos that he's
00:16:49.020 doing at this point seven years ago called Both Sides. That's the name of the series. And the
00:16:54.940 videos are things like married couple secretly share both sides of a love story where they're
00:16:59.860 both sitting at a table talking to each other, hooked up to microphones, essentially just having
00:17:04.220 an intimate conversation about their relationship, but on camera. And he does this with a lot of
00:17:09.100 couples. He does this with best friends. And it's innocuous. You know, it's like kind of sweet
00:17:14.500 human interest type content. It's kind of a look into people's interior worlds and relationships.
00:17:21.240 It's a feel-good thing, which of course Jubilee still claims it's about making feel-good content,
00:17:26.580 but this was kind of the last time the content was ever feel-good. The first middle ground video
00:17:33.220 was called Atheists and Christians Debate Truth and Belief. That video gets six million views.
00:17:41.200 this is capitalism baby if you find the thing that makes you more money you're off to the races with
00:17:47.120 it and so we were off to the races meaning the race to the bottom of what jubilee would become
00:17:53.340 i think it's kind of you know like it's a funnel that we all go down in our lives you know we start
00:17:58.940 off just wanting to make people happy and then we find out that people actually want to be made to
00:18:02.500 be miserable and angry and that that's what they'd rather engage with and then we spend our lives
00:18:07.520 just getting people angrier and angrier and make ourselves wealthier and wealthier. And then we all
00:18:13.820 die. That's the situation, I guess, a lot of content creators find themselves in. Jubilee's
00:18:18.520 by no means alone in this regard. This sort of content, this sort of buzzfeed, like, do you know
00:18:24.080 your wife's darkest secret type content? It had its place, but it's super dated now. Nobody watches
00:18:30.520 videos like that. Nobody cares. You need to have an angry man somewhere in the room that everybody
00:18:37.120 hates otherwise you know what are you gonna do and even if sorry to be going off here but even
00:18:41.320 if you go on like even these more human interest pieces like you know a dating show it still has
00:18:46.880 like a lot of tension and mean guys there's a lot of judgment going on you know you're not going to
00:18:51.860 find content as much that's just feel good you know children react to titanic type videos it's
00:18:59.120 not as common anymore this is capitalism though right it's like he's he started as like a sweet
00:19:04.500 charity youtube channel and look i'm not saying you have to do that forever like
00:19:07.640 my podcast isn't for charity my podcast is my job too but you know i guess you just
00:19:14.180 follow the money wherever it leads you and when it leads you to a place of like
00:19:19.060 total rage and platforming nonsense and legitimizing nonsense oftentimes dangerous
00:19:24.400 nonsense like okay that's where we'll go i agree and i think that as we'll no doubt get into
00:19:30.440 I think the greatest sin of Jubilee or one of the greatest sins of Jubilee is that it continues to present itself as this kind of neutral, friendly platform where they're just bringing on people who have some beliefs, not sort of acknowledging the fact that they are part of an online ecosystem that exists to platform and expose other people to reactionaries who are themselves famous and who themselves want to spread their message.
00:19:55.200 They didn't go on the street to find MRAs. They found MRA influencers to go in a room and act and do the thing that they do. They're part of the job of celebrities, right? It's part of the grind of having divergent beliefs is going hopefully on Jubilee, which seems like a problem. It seems weird.
00:20:12.920 mra being uh not the thing that's in the vaccine but uh men's rights activists oh i'm sorry yes
00:20:19.600 for normal people who don't know this stuff um speaking of aspiring to go on jubilee i should
00:20:27.520 give a disclaimer now that i was once invited to go on jubilee it's true i i so i actually like
00:20:35.700 went back into the email that i got from my manager who reached out to me to say jubilee
00:20:42.340 is casting and they wanted to see if you would be in their video to play the role of in quotations
00:20:51.260 male feminist in the in the video male feminist versus male anti-feminist which is a video that
00:20:58.460 ended up coming out without me because i said no the only thing that i could think that justifies
00:21:03.220 being a feminist today is you must just want to get laid there's no reason to believe in all of 1.00
00:21:08.360 these crazy things that seek to strip you of your masculinity perpetuate these terrible ideas that 1.00
00:21:13.100 men are evil and all these things that has to be the reason why why didn't you get on there why
00:21:17.460 didn't you why didn't you embrace the grind set what are you doing you need right now you want to
00:21:22.680 be talking to me i well i know had i gone on jubilee i might have raised six hundred thousand 0.96
00:21:27.600 dollars for this podcast at this point fuck me but no i mean i honestly though i was like totally
00:21:34.480 confounded when I got this email because the thing that I thought then, which is still what 0.96
00:21:40.720 I think now, even though now I understand that this is the basic premise for their casting and
00:21:44.540 how their channel works, is like, what qualifications do I have to go on this YouTube 0.97
00:21:50.360 channel in front of millions of people and argue about feminism? Of course, I am a male who
00:21:56.640 identifies as a feminist, but I'm not a scholar. I don't have, I don't have like, I haven't written
00:22:02.940 books on this and i was like i i'm i'm most definitely going to say something that is
00:22:08.600 unpolished and i and i don't want to upset people and i don't want to do a disservice to feminism
00:22:13.180 by fucking it up and then i watched these videos in preparation for this episode and every time
00:22:19.400 they come up on my feed over the last few years and i realized because this was in 2022 that they 0.90
00:22:24.200 invited me and i realized that like oh no one that they cast has any sort of qualifications to talk
00:22:30.760 about it that's that's not true sometimes the scientists do yeah yeah yeah you know sometimes
00:22:34.840 but like for the most part they're just like who can we rile up no i kind of think it's like it's
00:22:40.260 it's two problems at once i think that'd be a good show to have somebody like you go on and 0.99
00:22:45.560 and debate a guy who who's a piece of shit who's just sort of walking around like no you're not a 0.99
00:22:51.180 scholar but do you need to be a scholar to affirm women's rights like do you need to be that probably 1.00
00:22:57.060 not, you know? And I think that you could have a good crude conversation that exposes humans to 1.00
00:23:02.200 other humans. I think the problem comes in when it's not quite random people who have no stake
00:23:08.820 in it, but they're not scholars either. They're just random fucking people who want to make a 0.98
00:23:13.440 name for themselves on the internet. It's not this sort of every man conversation, which I think 0.99
00:23:17.740 could have some, some value to somebody, you know? Yeah, that's fair. No, that's totally fair. I was
00:23:24.380 just like i'm gonna say something wrong and get totally roasted for this and i'm glad i didn't do
00:23:28.540 it well maybe you've turned me around on this issue maybe i should email them back two years
00:23:32.060 later and be like jubilee i'm ready i would like to take a quick break from the show to give a huge
00:23:40.260 thanks to incogni for sponsoring today's episode isn't it nice to imagine an internet that just has
00:23:46.240 less of your personal information out there floating around on it information that you may
00:23:50.980 have entered into a form at a specific time for a specific reason like your address your phone
00:23:56.880 number your employment history your social security number and then suddenly out of nowhere you're
00:24:02.100 getting spammy emails and texts from companies and people who have no business knowing that
00:24:07.560 information but somewhere along the way got hold of it incogni is a service that helps you get your
00:24:12.900 personal information back off the market by reaching out to the hundreds of data brokers
00:24:18.000 that are buying and selling and trading your information every day and making sure that
00:24:22.940 they delete your information, which is something that you are able to do yourself.
00:24:26.720 But if you try to do it yourself, would be a full-time job.
00:24:30.880 Incogni makes it their full-time job.
00:24:32.980 Incogni is incredibly easy to use.
00:24:35.520 And for as long as you're subscribed, it will continually stay on top of the tireless task 0.99
00:24:40.340 of making sure that all of these different data brokers are deleting your shit. 0.71
00:24:44.660 If you would like to get your data out of the hands of data brokers, I highly recommend checking 0.98
00:24:49.800 it out. You can take a look and get 60% off your Incogni plan over at incogni.com slash fruity
00:24:57.360 with the code fruity. That is incogni.com slash fruity with the code fruity. Now let's get back
00:25:05.320 to the show. What are we doing talking about Jubilee when we could just watch Jubilee? I have
00:25:13.540 pulled some selects i i started by pulling a video that came out nine days ago called men's rights
00:25:19.500 activists versus feminists uh this is an hour and 34 minutes long why but i but i picked this one
00:25:27.940 to start with because i think it's really the kind of feminist versus anti-feminist is is at this
00:25:34.200 point like a subgenre within the jubilee universe they know that this specific debate gets so many
00:25:41.860 views which is why they've done it over and over and over and over and over again so i pulled uh
00:25:47.780 actually just a list of these to read we have men's rights activists versus feminists which is
00:25:52.160 the one that i we're going to play a little bit of does feminism include trans women female
00:25:56.300 feminists versus anti-feminists do women really have it harder male feminists versus anti-feminists
00:26:01.680 white feminists versus poc anti-feminists that's a really weird premise can non-feminists agree on
00:26:09.220 gender equality men's rights versus feminists is toxic masculinity real are men falling behind 0.61
00:26:15.440 male feminists versus female anti-feminists and five feminists versus one secret anti-feminist
00:26:21.740 oh no what is she doing here but they they really find new and you know impossibly more
00:26:32.020 painful ways to explore the same quote-unquote debate i feel like these days this sort of battle
00:26:38.480 between feminism and men's rights activism is like most of the internet's engagement with
00:26:44.100 feminism as a concept so there's a lot riding on this there's a lot of conversation about it
00:26:48.680 yeah yeah well and all of these videos get millions and millions and sometimes tens of
00:26:52.520 millions of views so they've found a way to milk this continuously which is the only reason they
00:26:57.260 continue to do it and everything that they do on their channel but uh the specific one that i pulled
00:27:02.920 Men's rights activists versus feminists. 1.00
00:27:05.820 Men should have access to their children. 1.00
00:27:07.940 It's 50% their DNA. 0.97
00:27:09.960 They should get 50% custody off the bat.
00:27:12.660 Because you mentioned that earlier, and correct me if I'm wrong,
00:27:16.100 you were saying that men are not encouraged to speak about their feelings.
00:27:21.080 I would say largely that's true, yeah.
00:27:23.340 Yet you're bringing them down in your conversation.
00:27:26.420 You're saying that being sexist towards a man is not as big of a deal as being towards a woman.
00:27:32.460 I mean, there's more laws in the U.S. that are disfavored to men than women.
00:27:36.380 Why is that? 0.51
00:27:36.940 Like, which laws? Like, the inconsequential draft?
00:27:40.100 No. 0.98
00:27:41.260 Since I have been a kid, it has been common in the media to refer to men as trash, 1.00
00:27:45.680 to say that men are the problem, men are terrible, etc., etc., 0.99
00:27:49.200 to the point that on national TV, a guy got his chopped off, 0.98
00:27:53.760 and they were laughing about it.
00:27:55.440 And nobody said anything, and nobody cared.
00:27:58.120 And if the reverse happened, I don't think it would be the same outrage.
00:28:02.460 I mean, this video is deranged. But one of the things that is really striking about it is that on the anti-feminist side, first of all, they diversity cast a lot. So they're like, we need to have a woman who is on the anti-feminist side. And the person who they cast in that position is Hannah Pearl Davis, known mononymously online as sometimes Pearl. Who is Pearl?
00:28:26.580 she's kind of like this nazi for hire type person like she kind of just goes to events and speaks 0.99
00:28:33.540 strikingly that vapidly about subjects as you can see in that video but she doesn't she just 0.51
00:28:39.840 kind of sticks to like five or six stock lines she recently not recently but like a year ago
00:28:45.080 saying a song about um the jewish question and how she's starting to question the role of adolf
00:28:50.920 hitler in the history of humanity which i thought was you know pretty pretty bad um but do you
00:28:56.400 Remember that song, Matt?
00:28:57.420 Do you remember the Just Asking Questions song?
00:28:59.560 Oh, I remember it well.
00:29:00.700 It was Hannah Pearl Davis uploaded a video to YouTube, which has since been taken down.
00:29:05.960 And she's playing the guitar and singing an original song called Why Can't We Talk About the Jews?
00:29:11.980 Mm-hmm. 0.95
00:29:13.620 And they got her on Jubilee to argue the anti-feminist position. 1.00
00:29:17.180 And, and this goes to my point, do not acknowledge that she is a fucking neo-Nazi in the video. 0.99
00:29:22.420 Nobody talks about it. 0.99
00:29:23.520 Nobody cares.
00:29:24.420 It's so weird to me.
00:29:25.300 I did watch all hour and a half of this debate debate and I did watch it in two times speed
00:29:31.700 because I had a lot to get through yesterday and her asking the Jewish question does not come up 0.57
00:29:37.980 but it's just like this is we're we're gonna get into like the glorification of centrism that is
00:29:45.660 at the heart of this YouTube channel and and also how they construct like what exactly the middle
00:29:51.080 ground is in these debates that they frame. But the thing is like, I watched this whole video
00:29:56.260 and in it, the people on the feminist side have what at this point are extremely like broadly
00:30:02.100 popular opinions about like the basic tenets of modern feminism, like, you know, the wage gap and
00:30:08.760 like women are disproportionately affected by gender-based violence. These things that are like 1.00
00:30:13.820 widely studied, well-documented, and they turn these like facts, like is the wage gap real
00:30:19.760 and are women more likely to be targeted by gender-based violence these are facts and they
00:30:25.700 use them as prompts to say is the wage gap real step forward if you think it's true and then step
00:30:31.500 forward on this side if you think it's not true and it's like what this is not a debate this is 1.00
00:30:35.680 not a debate and then they have the feminists in this particular video arguing like i said broadly 0.92
00:30:40.980 like popular and accepted positions and then on the anti-feminist side they find these extraordinarily
00:30:47.420 primarily fringe cast members and this is kind of representative of what they do in all of these
00:30:52.000 videos they go on like neo-nazi.com and find user i have questions about the jews one two three 0.87
00:31:00.220 and send them an email being like will you come on jubilee and it's fucking hannah pearl davis 0.92
00:31:05.320 like yeah why one year after someone creates a fucking ukulele song on youtube about can i 0.97
00:31:11.300 why can't we talk about the jews why are you casting them yeah and it's it's particularly 0.88
00:31:15.580 strange in this debate because the entire idea of finding a middle ground, it usually presupposes
00:31:24.780 the internal consistency of both sides of the debate. But the problem that we face with the
00:31:29.920 MRAs is that men's rights activism is not an internally consistent ideology, right? And what
00:31:35.640 I mean by that is there's this one point where I watched this video. At one point, they asked the
00:31:40.380 people like, do you think that men have equal rights? And H. Pearl Davis comes out and says,
00:31:46.020 no, because they lose in divorce courts more often than women do. Men are biased against. Now,
00:31:52.540 that's a very complicated question and it doesn't seem entirely true. But leaving that aside for a
00:31:56.920 second, the feminists process this information and respond to her like, well, you want more 1.00
00:32:03.160 masculine men. You want women to stay at home and for men to be in the workforce. And so it's only 1.00
00:32:08.780 reasonable then that we'd expect bias against men in the divorce court situation and pearl davis has
00:32:14.960 literally no response to this whatsoever she just stares vacantly back and repeats her party line
00:32:20.960 because it's not just a matter of we have to find a middle ground between two ideas we have to 1.00
00:32:25.460 actually tease out what these people believe which is impossible when they're dumb as shit 0.99
00:32:30.460 uh reactionaries like they don't have consistent beliefs so what are we what is the debate about 0.99
00:32:35.100 what's the conversation it's so weird it's so odd uh it's just pulling up that
00:32:43.780 is being fat a choice because that's the next one that i had a great one
00:32:48.560 he's being fat a choice okay the next one that i had listed down this is another hit
00:32:57.540 from jubilee is being fat a choice fit men versus fat men middle ground
00:33:04.040 important question of our day this has eight million views good so we have six people in
00:33:13.500 is being fat a choice fit men versus fat men three of them are visibly muscular men three of them are
00:33:20.500 fat men and they basically argue about whether being fat is morally wrong basically yes whether
00:33:27.880 being fat is morally wrong and again it's like it's easy when you talk about any of these videos
00:33:34.400 and we've started to do a little of this and i'm like avoiding it myself but it's very easy to
00:33:39.320 start getting into how you feel about the content of what people are saying yes it's so easy to get
00:33:45.260 sucked into like i can't believe h pearl davis said in in her video that people don't quote
00:33:50.720 people don't respect sex workers because sex work is easy like that that's a refrain that she 0.95
00:33:55.700 repeats like 17 times that video that sex work is easy which is just like a completely unbelievable
00:34:00.440 claim but like it's so hard not to get sucked into the exact thing jubilee wants you to get 1.00
00:34:06.860 sucked into which is the ridiculous shit that people are spewing on their enormous youtube 0.95
00:34:10.620 channel but like i'm trying to stay focused here on the form yes who did they cast what are they 0.99
00:34:17.140 positioning as debatable points that to me is what's interesting don't they cast the fresh and
00:34:23.380 fit guy yeah so that's what i wanted to point out with this one can you explain fresh and fit 1.00
00:34:27.340 podcast is something i see on twitter where they bring on um instagram women and insult them for
00:34:34.020 being sluts right that's what they do on that podcast basically yeah it's fresh and fit it's 0.98
00:34:39.640 like this like extraordinarily misogynistic right-wing disgusting like andrew tate adjacent 1.00
00:34:44.880 yeah they have one of the co-hosts of fresh and fit on as the jacked in the in the jacked men 0.84
00:34:50.620 section and the whole time like his opening statement at the one minute mark of this video
00:34:57.260 is well it's unacceptable to be fat okay that's a great start it is unacceptable to be fat
00:35:05.500 what's the what's the middle ground when you're talking to someone like that and they cast him
00:35:11.320 knowing that he's going to say stuff like that at a minute 42 he says being fat is unacceptable
00:35:16.280 because you control every single morsel of food that goes into your mouth.
00:35:19.480 Okay.
00:35:20.040 It shows a lack of discipline.
00:35:21.380 It shows a lack of character.
00:35:22.440 It shows a lack of temperance.
00:35:23.740 And when you're fat, it's an outward manifestation of your inadequacies.
00:35:27.660 At 2 minutes 45 seconds, he says, 0.99
00:35:30.420 You're fat.
00:35:31.000 You made that decision. 0.99
00:35:32.260 You live in the best country ever.
00:35:33.340 If you live in a civilized first world country where you have electricity, internet power, etc.,
00:35:37.560 you deserve to be bullied. 0.99
00:35:38.680 It's ridiculous to me that we have all these fat people running around. 1.00
00:35:41.200 Meanwhile, people are being bombed in Gaza. 0.99
00:35:42.540 that i found that when him bringing invoking gaza like that to be one of the most deranged
00:35:48.520 like where does he even get this from like where does he pull these talking points from can you
00:35:53.700 just invoke ongoing atrocities and like use them as justification for anything you ever want to say
00:35:58.920 it's so strange yeah i mean it's completely fucking unbelievable but again it's like jubilee casts this
00:36:05.100 person knowing that this is exactly the type of stuff they're going to say on the jubilee channel 0.61
00:36:09.940 because it's what they say in their own content.
00:36:12.340 I mean, presumably they reached out to me
00:36:14.340 because they wanted me to say the kinds of things
00:36:16.580 that I say online to a lot of people,
00:36:18.900 which, you know, are typically in favor of like human rights
00:36:22.480 and being kind to other people.
00:36:23.700 But they cast him because they want him to say
00:36:25.660 that as he says at three minutes, 30 seconds of this video.
00:36:28.680 We need to bring shaming back in so many other regards besides obesity. 1.00
00:36:31.120 We need to do it with sluts. 1.00
00:36:32.280 We need to do shame. 1.00
00:36:33.140 Fat people, we need to shame everybody.
00:36:34.940 It's also so weird because the entire structure of the episode 0.90
00:36:39.760 presupposes that there's an innate conflict between fit people and fat people which is not
00:36:45.580 not true it's not like a real conflict that needs to exist that these aren't two categories of
00:36:51.840 people doomed to hate each other and in fact when you watch that video it's just fat people
00:36:55.540 defending themselves against baseless attacks against their characters the fat people aren't
00:36:59.900 mad at the fit people what does this even mean you and i were talking yesterday when we were
00:37:04.760 watching these videos about how like these are invented conflicts yeah when the middle ground
00:37:10.480 started right that first video atheists versus christians that as a debate format with those
00:37:16.800 two sides like i can understand right because those are two beliefs that are in conflict
00:37:22.880 philosophically theologically with one another but now they're like milking this format for
00:37:29.400 for for years and years and it's they're they're coming up with these arguments that aren't
00:37:34.360 arguments no they're reifying the positions that they're pretending to debate about right they're
00:37:39.320 they're inventing the category of the pro fat hater the the most people in society if you ask
00:37:47.100 do you hate fat people even if they do hate fat people which is a lot of people don't aren't like
00:37:52.260 militant anti-fat people that's not a kind of person that exists it's a fictional identity
00:37:57.480 that exists in order to get eyeballs on the screen there's no such thing right so in this video again
00:38:02.920 like the construction of the middle ground we're saying the middle is somewhere between like these
00:38:08.400 normal fat guys who are just like i'm fat and i want to exist in the world and then these these 1.00
00:38:14.240 other men who are like you're an ugly amoral piece of shit who doesn't deserve kindness or 1.00
00:38:20.320 human happiness and we're supposed to think that the middle is something in between that the 1.00
00:38:24.780 acceptable place to like stake out your opinion is something in between these two no it's that 0.99
00:38:29.940 fat people should fucking exist and like what are we doing here do they find a middle ground in that 0.98
00:38:34.800 one do they get there do they ever come to any kind of conclusion in these episodes no that's 1.00
00:38:41.080 the funniest thing all of these episodes are how long is this one this is being fat a choice is
00:38:46.560 one hour and 17 minutes long yeah and i watched all of it it's interesting because the on the on
00:38:55.820 the fit guy group i remember that video and i remember there was like one of the guys who was
00:38:59.420 like i harm my body with a lot of steroids and like this is a very difficult thing for me and i
00:39:04.560 can't do that anymore and like you know a person like that you could be reasoned with you could
00:39:09.740 talk to him constructively about the concept of fat phobia the problem is is that they they need
00:39:15.460 to have one evil satan type guy to enable the conversation to be interesting because the reality
00:39:21.760 of the situation is that talking about fat phobia for an hour and 17 minutes i could kind of pass
00:39:27.160 on it if i'm being honest like i don't know i think i kind of get the idea after 10 minutes
00:39:31.280 and it's like is this breaking echo champ what have i learned what's what's their stated goal
00:39:35.840 fostering human connection have we fostered human connection by subjecting these three men to like
00:39:41.540 the most vitriolic and disgusting fat phobia for an hour and 17 minutes no and they didn't sign up
00:39:47.160 for this they didn't sign up for it they signed up to be in a in a debate about uh this the
00:39:53.520 position of fat phobia and culture they didn't sign up to be personally assault like verbally
00:39:57.960 assaulted by a man who just genuinely hates them and wishes they were dead like that's it's a
00:40:03.240 different category of conversation i remember there was a tiktok where one of the guys who was
00:40:07.300 in that conversation was really upset about it and had trouble with it you should we could probably
00:40:11.680 i could probably find it for you it's interesting and sad hey friends you may have noticed that i
00:40:15.640 was on jubilee's most recent episode of the middle ground fit men versus fat men when i was invited
00:40:21.000 on the show and they said we want you to be on jacked versus fat that was the original title
00:40:25.820 um i remember my first question was i was unaware the two sides had any problems with one another
00:40:32.840 but i was excited to have a thoughtful and meaningful conversation where two sides can
00:40:37.380 learn from one another and share an empathy and respect and learn and grow and disagree civilly
00:40:42.680 however i was completely unaware that a certain individual had been invited to be a part of this
00:40:48.340 episode the cast was unaware of who else was in the cast until the moment we had filmed and i know
00:40:53.060 myself and several others would have refused to have taken part having known that he was there
00:40:57.380 but we tried to keep it professional keep the conversation going and not get too sidetracked
00:41:02.920 into his hateful misogynistic transphobic homophobic ideology i think it is shameful of the producers
00:41:10.720 of jubilee to have invited this man on and platformed him for the world to see to spout 0.63
00:41:16.540 such hate i want to shout out to the other seven guys on the panel everyone came there respectfully
00:41:21.780 with open hearts and a beautiful chance was ruined by a platform rage baiting their fans
00:41:31.080 i want to read some of the prompts that they use in this video to like agree or disagree about one
00:41:37.820 of them is i have felt disgusted looking at a fat body that's when they debate the question is so
00:41:44.080 hurtful like it's such a mean thing to say as a question like the next one is agree or disagree
00:41:49.960 jacked men are more attractive than fat men the next one is the body positivity movement is
00:41:56.440 problematic a lot of times that what jubilee posits as like debatable kind of neutral points 0.80
00:42:04.320 are just like right-wing talking points yeah and like the problem with a question like is the
00:42:09.020 body positive movement problematic is the answer is A, yes, every movement is problematic, right?
00:42:15.660 There's no like, it's not easy to find a movement that has nobody weird saying anything in it.
00:42:20.380 And what this means is that it's an open-ended question, not on the merit of the issue of
00:42:25.080 whether we should be positive about our bodies, but a sort of referendum on our definition of
00:42:30.160 the word body positive movement, which is a phrase that could mean anything you can imagine,
00:42:35.160 right? It's just, it doesn't mean anything. At around eight minutes, the
00:42:38.800 fresh and fit guy is basically just yelling at the fat people being like if you were you know
00:42:43.940 a more morally righteous person you would lose weight and you wouldn't be fat and then one of
00:42:47.980 the men on the fat side says i don't think anyone's debating that weight loss is impossible
00:42:53.580 here i think the question is why do you hate fat people and that is the question that is the
00:43:00.920 question why do these men hate fat people but that's not how jubilee has arranged you know to
00:43:07.460 be the question. No, is it appropriate to hate fat people would be the name of the video. But
00:43:12.440 that's a framing that is inherently critical of the wrong position. Whereas the name of the video
00:43:19.980 that's given is so, I don't know if I want to say it's value neutral or slightly weight against fat
00:43:24.320 people. Is being fat a choice is itself a question that doesn't really mean that much? Is what we
00:43:30.900 mean by that question, do we have a choice over what food we eat? Because the answer is, I guess,
00:43:35.040 I guess we do. Of course, being fat just generically is not a choice. It's a question
00:43:39.500 that implicitly judges fat people, I'd say. Absolutely. Absolutely. Well, that's what
00:43:44.280 gets clicks. And that's what Jubilee is about. Getting clicks and fostering human connection.
00:43:48.920 Of course. Think on for them. You're so brave. I was feeling so in my echo chamber until I watched
00:43:54.840 an hour and 17 minutes of is being fat a choice? Why are they so long, Matt? Well, what are they
00:44:01.200 doing why are they so long because you can insert more dynamic advertisements in the middle of
00:44:06.660 longer youtube videos you know this you're a youtuber come on true i don't insert dynamic
00:44:11.240 advertisements in the middle of my video i don't either because they don't let me because i curse 0.95
00:44:15.440 too much the next video that i marked down was do women really have it harder male feminists
00:44:22.480 versus anti-feminists this is another you know feminism one but the reason that i put this down
00:44:27.380 is because once again the statements that Jubilee posits as the like which side of this do you stand
00:44:35.000 on are just so asinine one of them is women should be encouraged to be financially independent
00:44:43.920 of men what the answer is yes yes people should have financial autonomy like are we in the 0.99
00:44:51.900 fucking 1970s at 28 minutes they say this fucking blew my mind the debatable statement women are 0.98
00:44:59.340 fit to be president and then one of them makes this argument that like women are too emotional 0.99
00:45:04.560 to be to be president did they find middle ground on that did they decide at the end
00:45:09.000 if women if their periods were too intense yeah the middle ground is that women can be vice
00:45:13.820 president okay good yeah yeah we found it at 33 minutes the gender pay gap is real
00:45:20.720 again like what this isn't a debate oh my god can you take the mic because i'm
00:45:26.660 i'm getting out of control no they like to ask empirical questions i i remember like they like
00:45:33.140 to ask questions about facts and then have both sides like inexplicably decide different stuff on
00:45:38.460 it they asked at one point in their homeschooling video which is one of my favorites are children
00:45:43.120 safer in homeschool or in public school and everybody disagreed but the reality is is that
00:45:49.920 we know that kids are more put in danger by having parents that they don't get to have any escape
00:45:56.600 from, having no support system outside of their homes. That's a proven thing that harms them a
00:46:02.680 lot. This is a fact about the world. What does the debate even look like? And I think that they
00:46:08.300 ask these kinds of questions because they conjure up a lot of feelings without any ability for one
00:46:15.220 person to rebut another. So one person says, this is the information on the subject. The other
00:46:19.660 person says i have negative feelings about that i want to continue being a reactionary even though
00:46:24.280 that's true and so you can sort of bypass thinking about a subject if you ask an obvious enough
00:46:29.880 fact-based question are there any other specific videos for now that you want to let's see if i 1.00
00:46:34.860 have any if i have anything i have the white feminist video it's white feminist women versus 1.00
00:46:41.160 anti-feminist poc women which is already one of the weirdest like why what are you talking about 1.00
00:46:49.260 they like to find like the three of them that exist and uh be mad about it but 1.00
00:46:53.380 they spend the whole time like the people of color women the women of color the women of color thank 1.00
00:46:58.660 you um they spend the whole time being like it's bad that white feminists don't do enough advocacy 1.00
00:47:05.820 which i suppose is a valid reason to criticize white feminists but not necessarily a very good 1.00
00:47:11.540 reason to criticize feminism it's a good gotcha but it doesn't mean very much but then one of the
00:47:16.480 women who's like this devout Muslim is like, I believe in submitting to my husband. I believe
00:47:20.780 fundamentally the opposite of what feminists believe. I think men should have power in society
00:47:25.520 and women should submit to them and be in the home. And it really clarifies the extent to which 1.00
00:47:30.720 the debate is so often a smokescreen for just completely unchangeable core beliefs that people
00:47:36.780 have. They're trying to get people out on whether they're a good enough feminist or 1.00
00:47:41.960 how valid their feminism really is. But secretly, the whole conversation is I don't think that women 1.00
00:47:47.080 are equal to men. That's the real heart of the conversation. And it's not something they're
00:47:52.060 really prying into. They're not like going deep into these conversations.
00:47:56.500 Totally. And listen, debate content online as a whole, I always say this, but it's not for the
00:48:04.540 people involved doing the debating. It's for an audience. You know, Charlie Kirk and the woke
00:48:11.120 college student probably aren't changing each other's minds but in theory debate content is
00:48:16.960 supposed to force the viewer to ask questions about their own belief and consider all sides
00:48:22.480 but the thing is this doesn't do that it's it's entirely again rage baiting and it's also just
00:48:29.260 like they claim that they want to break down echo chambers and get us to talk to each other and get
00:48:34.880 us to question our beliefs but every conversation and every comment section and every viral tweet
00:48:40.340 i've ever seen around a jubilee clip is just people hardening their own positions and taking
00:48:46.120 the side of the person they already agree with no it's profoundly unmoderated uh they don't leave
00:48:51.560 space really there's there's very often like a man on the bad side who's significantly angrier
00:48:58.980 than everybody else and he just sops up every ounce of attention in the room and leaves like
00:49:05.740 zero space to have like a constructive dialogue between people who are at least sometimes on
00:49:10.820 jubilee trying to be kind to each other genuinely trying to see things the other person's way and 0.99
00:49:15.820 there are better and worse episodes of course have you seen the gay one the conversion therapy one
00:49:20.540 the current lgbt versus x lgbt yes have you seen that of course it's a classic 0.81
00:49:25.380 there's a guy i watch it once a morning 1.00
00:49:28.560 there's an intersex woman on there and he's like you're not a woman you're a man fuck off 1.00
00:49:34.320 like he's so mean he's so mean what is this there's kind of like yeah to your point there's 1.00
00:49:39.840 usually someone who's just there to be outrageous yeah who's just trying to get internet points and
00:49:46.320 it usually ruins the whole thing and it usually garners millions of views i'd like to take a
00:49:52.720 quick break from the show to thank the sponsor of today's episode blueland who along with my
00:49:59.820 supporters over on Patreon make it possible for me to spend 12 hours a day going down right-wing
00:50:06.820 online rabbit holes, which you know what? When I put it that way, maybe we should all stop enabling
00:50:11.960 this behavior. Maybe we need to stop. Blueland is on a mission to eliminate single-use plastic by
00:50:17.140 reinventing cleaning essentials that are better for you and the planet. So you know those dishwasher
00:50:22.380 pods that we all use? I thought those just like dissolve completely because it looks like they do,
00:50:27.980 but actually they leave hundreds of microplastics that end up back in the water supply. I didn't
00:50:33.740 know this. Maybe that makes me dumb. I recently switched over to Blueland dishwasher tablets which 0.99
00:50:38.840 just like everything else in their line both in the product and the packaging and the delivery
00:50:42.840 system has no single-use plastic. You know I feel like sometimes when you switch over to like the
00:50:48.240 eco-friendly or sustainable version of an everyday product a lot of times you're sacrificing on
00:50:53.100 quality. But I now live in a basically entirely Blueland household. And I will tell you, my dishes
00:51:00.260 are as white as they've ever been. My clothes are as clean as they've ever been. You're really not
00:51:05.220 sacrificing on quality. And you're really not paying an arm and a leg either. Because with
00:51:09.460 Blueland's really efficient refill system on all of their products, you're not only taking on a
00:51:13.520 more sustainable way to keep your home clean, but you're also saving a good amount of money over
00:51:17.220 time. And I know this isn't really the point, but I will say having an entirely Blueland household,
00:51:24.400 it is kind of nice to go to my cleaning supply drawer and everything is in these like beautiful
00:51:31.520 pastel tins and bottles looking uniform, looking chic. It really does beat all of the, you know,
00:51:38.320 garish drugstore stuff. There are so many reasons to love Blueland. If you would like to try it out,
00:51:44.000 you can go to blueland.com slash fruity for 15% off your first order. Again, that is blueland.com
00:51:52.080 slash fruity. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you to Blueland for sponsoring this show. And now let's
00:51:58.940 get back to it. I kind of mentioned this, but I want to read Jubilee's mission statement
00:52:04.180 because I know that they know that what they claim to be doing is not what they are doing.
00:52:10.500 So on their website, which I went to, Jason Lee wrote a little letter, and in it he said,
00:52:17.360 Sometimes it feels like the world is becoming more divided, chaotic, and cluttered.
00:52:24.020 But if I've learned anything in my time growing Jubilee, it's this.
00:52:29.120 We are all inextricably linked and want to live for something deeper.
00:52:33.360 living for empathy and human good is a resilient vision and one that is worthy of pursuit
00:52:41.020 sincerely jason lee and then at the bottom of the website it says jubilee media it's a digital
00:52:48.800 media company that pushes boundaries tackles taboos and breaks the rules we believe discomfort
00:52:55.040 and conflict are pivotal forces in creating human connection in short we are not afraid
00:53:01.660 to go there hmm very peculiar whatever it's so interesting because like if you really wanted 1.00
00:53:10.940 anti-feminists and feminists to connect you'd probably you know make them play monopoly or 0.67
00:53:15.440 something you wouldn't make them debate if women are okay that's not the way to get people to
00:53:20.900 connect it's fundamentally against the spirit of connection i mean it just sounds like they wrote
00:53:26.280 those mission statements not at all considering what their actual product is like I read those
00:53:33.060 and I'm like oh yeah that's nice we should foster empathy we should you know not be so divided yada
00:53:38.420 yada yada like I'm sure whatever and then they're like we're going to create the most divisive
00:53:44.320 you know most sympathetic towards bigotry legitimizing you know anti-science views
00:53:51.740 We're just going to put it all out there and then cover it in a blanket of flowery language around human connection and building empathy. 0.99
00:53:59.440 And it's total bullshit all the way through. 0.99
00:54:02.060 Yes, I agreed. 1.00
00:54:03.880 There's this huge problem with like enlightened centrist types where it's actually really easy to say like, hey, guys, let's turn the volume down.
00:54:12.300 You don't actually hate this kind of person.
00:54:14.640 Come on, guys.
00:54:15.280 You can you can be friends with people you disagree with.
00:54:17.640 The problem is that actually doing that, turning the volume down, isn't something that anyone's fundamentally interested in doing.
00:54:23.700 And it's also something that's really hard to do.
00:54:26.160 So as admirable as a goal as it might be, it's not – who cares about doing it?
00:54:30.160 Nobody on the internet is turning the volume down.
00:54:32.320 If you want the volume turned down, talk to people.
00:54:35.280 Well, it's also just not their goal.
00:54:36.680 Right. No.
00:54:37.460 It's what they say is their goal, but it's so clearly not.
00:54:40.200 And I went – I searched for evidence, Lady Gaga.
00:54:44.500 I went looking for proof to, I was like, I know that they know that this is not what they're
00:54:49.600 doing. I went to their Instagram and just, you know, over the last few weeks, you, the listener
00:54:55.620 have probably caught wind of some of this, but they did these two mega, mega viral videos.
00:55:01.800 One was Charlie Kirk versus 25 woke students. And one was one woke student versus 25 Charlie
00:55:07.840 Kirk's various clips from these videos have gone extraordinarily viral and they posted something
00:55:16.080 in reference to these videos on their Instagram that big Joel I would like to send you and have
00:55:21.040 you describe if that's okay oh okay so there's four people of different ages and walks of life
00:55:28.440 seemingly quite angry with each other they don't look all too pleased Charlie Kirk in particular
00:55:35.640 looks concerned do you want me to read the text beside it just the caption choose your fighter
00:55:41.180 yep choose your fighter yeah okay that was kind of all i needed i like how they all have different
00:55:47.700 personalities and are kinds of guys now like they like they're building new new kinds of archetypes
00:55:53.820 of our new political millennia right they kind of abstract from from their youtube videos of real
00:56:00.060 human beings arguing with one another like characters that you can identify with who do
00:56:06.000 you choose um i did watch this video and i choose naima i like her uh nose a piercing yeah yeah she
00:56:14.080 did great she she roasted and toasted charlie kirk was she the one who said his smile was weird
00:56:18.460 because i saw that viral clip and i thought that was pretty funny yeah she did say that what does
00:56:22.080 fetus mean a fetus is in utero what does fetus mean in latin what the i'm sorry it means it means
00:56:29.440 little human being this smile is very creepy okay um smiling is creepy no your smile specifically
00:56:36.580 got it but let's go back to we're losing track here that's good good for her but i saw this
00:56:42.000 instagram and i saw that the they made the caption choose your fighter from their own video and i was
00:56:47.060 like okay fine you guys you guys know what you're doing you're not building empathy you're not
00:56:51.060 building bridges this isn't a kumbaya moment i mean you could have just looked at the name of
00:56:54.780 the video, can one woke teen survive an onslaught of MAGA soldiers? That's not a coming together
00:57:03.580 moment. That's about being mean. And also the entire structure of that type of video is like
00:57:09.480 whenever somebody is about to like say something they maybe shouldn't have, they all raise their
00:57:13.960 hands and send in a new MAGA guy to be angry. You know, it's all about distractions. It's all about
00:57:19.880 like trying to keep people on their toes i mean it's very much like an extrapolation of i don't
00:57:24.960 know if you're familiar with the online debate scene at all but it's very much like destiny
00:57:28.920 right i'm not familiar with the online debate scene i try not to be but in spirit share your
00:57:35.160 insights well you know i think even destiny who's probably the biggest online debater right now would
00:57:40.100 happily admit that what he's doing is not bringing coming together with all manner of bigot and freak
00:57:47.660 I think what he's doing is putting on a show and he does a reasonable job of it.
00:57:51.800 I think that it's all about getting people out on points and like pointing out hypocrisy is a lot of it.
00:57:58.560 It's about catching people off guard, presenting studies they're not familiar with.
00:58:02.500 These things can be fine. 0.96
00:58:03.580 I'm not here to, you know, shit on anybody's entertainment. 0.96
00:58:06.840 That's fine. 0.91
00:58:08.100 But at the same time, you know, what it's certainly not doing is bringing us closer together.
00:58:13.300 You know, I don't think I don't think there's a plausible argument for that.
00:58:16.200 Yeah, for sure. And I've had people who listen to this podcast ask me before over, you know, emails and DMs, why don't you have people with opposing viewpoints as your guests? Why don't you do debate style content? And I don't do that because to your point, like, debate is a sport.
00:58:37.120 It's difficult.
00:58:37.900 Not only is it difficult, but it's a spectacle and it's a sport and it's not about human connection. It's about one upping. It's it's about knowing how to dodge and dive and duck dip, whatever they say in dodgeball. And like, I am not interested in doing that. I think what you said earlier was was really spot on, which is that the way to foster human connection with people you disagree with is to sit down and talk to them. But it is probably not to sit down and talk to them in front of studio lights and a camera.
00:59:07.160 Sure. And, you know, being correct might help in a debate. I often think that the people with the normal guy position come off better than the people with the freak positions. I think, on average, they seem like more normal, well-adjusted people, and I think they argue their positions probably more persuasively. So I think it's fair to say that, you know, being correct, being normal has its benefits. That's not to say, though, that debate, it tests on skills that are certainly not being correct or the more moral party.
00:59:35.760 no and also people don't speak in front of lights and cameras and microphones the way that they
00:59:41.680 would at a kitchen table no having the confidence of the fresh and fit guy is not something that
00:59:46.840 comes to people naturally at all right and it may maybe it makes for a good youtube video but like
00:59:51.840 i have disagreements with people that i love all the time especially like within my family
00:59:56.920 and we sit down and talk about it and like those conversations in which we actually dig into our
01:00:03.600 beliefs and attempt to understand each other look very different than any kind of debate content
01:00:08.800 that you see online because we're not performing for an audience we're not trying to like one up
01:00:14.480 in a way that basically in practice always just comes out being mean and that's like a lot of
01:00:20.880 these videos i categorize jubilee videos uh into into two kinds of bad content one of them
01:00:29.460 is normalizing bigotry and the other is legitimizing straight up mis or disinformation.
01:00:36.780 The normalizing bigotry stuff is, you know, we've already talked about a good amount of that, like, 0.98
01:00:41.980 you know, laundering these anti-feminist, you know, women are too emotional to be president,
01:00:47.680 anti-trans, anti-LGBTQ, anti-fat bigotry through the lens of, well, that's just an opinion and
01:00:54.180 all opinions are equally valid. The legitimizing straight up mis and disinformation and like,
01:00:59.460 conspiracy theories all through this frame of like well it's just a point of view so let's hear it
01:01:04.020 out and all points of view are equal i think everything we've already been discussing about
01:01:08.520 their content is represents why it's like dangerous and bad but this is just kind of like another level
01:01:14.620 of like this is this is fucking crazy and like we're calling into question science just a list
01:01:20.680 of their videos that really get into like this anti-science realm some of those include should 0.92
01:01:27.040 everyone these are middle ground videos should everyone get the covid19 vaccine provax versus
01:01:33.540 anti-vax flat earthers versus scientists can we trust science do miracle healings exist doctors
01:01:41.680 versus holistic healers pro vaccine versus anti-vaccine should your kids get vaccinated
01:01:48.620 climate change activists versus skeptics could they see eye to eye could they do
01:01:55.320 i love you digesting all of these titles it's like normal normal things to make youtube videos
01:02:01.840 about i want to empathize with the concept of jubilee for a second and say we're in difficult
01:02:08.880 times right now for having serious conversations about things because you know we can sit you know
01:02:14.600 in our normal urban world and say, nobody should talk about whether or not vaccines are good or
01:02:22.100 bad. But like a lot of Americans are vaccine hesitant, right? For that reason, I think it
01:02:28.180 makes sense to have content directed at these people, perhaps to feature them in some way.
01:02:33.560 I'm not against in spirit debating or talking to people who believe things that are blatantly
01:02:40.280 anti-scientific. A problem I have is that people who believe things for fundamentally anti-scientific
01:02:46.040 reasons do not have debate points and arguments to make on behalf of those beliefs. The person
01:02:54.200 who is vaccine hesitant is simply not vaccine hesitant because of the state of the science.
01:02:58.740 That is simply not the psychological motivation for being worried about the COVID-19 vaccine.
01:03:04.020 so what is the conversation about like we're presenting this as a middle ground but we're
01:03:10.120 taking people so on what they say and not actually interpreting like where they're coming from or why
01:03:15.760 that it seems like we're not actually going to learn anything from it and i do agree that if
01:03:20.320 you're going to do that you're normalizing horrible beliefs well i watched them i mean it's it's it's
01:03:25.300 not about science it's first of all all of these videos are like as with the sort of more like
01:03:32.580 socio-political based ones, the science ones are just like, we found three scientists and we found
01:03:38.820 three people who identify as truth seekers. Like, maybe they all have equally valid points.
01:03:45.500 I'm Spencer Marks, one of the senior members of the CFI investigations group, science advocate.
01:03:51.360 I am Marina Yeri. I'm a theoretical physicist and I'm with the University of Irvine.
01:03:57.200 i'm shelly lewis i'm a graduate of west point critical thinker and jumped out of airplanes
01:04:03.420 my name is dan glattman i work as dan the water man in the drinking water filtration industry and
01:04:08.800 a truth seeker you know the truth seeking self-identifying critical thinker side it
01:04:14.980 they don't have science but they are they are of course always doing their research
01:04:19.020 um you know and they'll say some like weird study or finding that the scientists are like what
01:04:25.740 what what are you talking about and they'll take that as some some small victory that they stumped
01:04:31.020 the scientists for a minute right because they said something like absolutely batshit but you're
01:04:36.180 right we we need to i've i've mentioned this book i think in my last episode but doppelganger by
01:04:42.580 naomi klein yeah is a really interesting book where she's trying to empathetically understand
01:04:48.860 how people so many people in the last several years have gone down these anti-science conspiratorial
01:04:55.720 rabbit holes, especially with the starting point for so many of them being the COVID vaccine
01:04:59.900 conspiracies. But the way that we seek to understand this issue of kind of conspiratorial
01:05:05.920 thinking is not by making these videos where we platform the scientists and the conspiracy theorists
01:05:12.680 as having equally credible positions. That's, I mean, my biggest thing with all the science
01:05:18.840 videos is like, it's false equivalence all the way down. It's so ineffectual too, you know,
01:05:24.380 nobody's going to watch the video and stop being, maybe they are, maybe someone's going to watch the
01:05:28.420 video and stop liking vaccines. I have a hard time accepting this person. To me, it feels so,
01:05:33.280 so built to seem like it has meaning that it just doesn't have, you know, because the problem with
01:05:39.000 all these videos is that they're just not that persuasive. They're not that persuasive to either
01:05:42.700 point. Sometimes the scientists are able to give the impression that they just are just know much
01:05:49.320 more than the other people. And I'm sure maybe that could convince somebody, but the truth is,
01:05:54.020 is that for most of these anti-science people,
01:05:56.900 the fundamental thing they reject
01:05:58.620 is not some particular scientific premise or an other,
01:06:02.000 but the very concept of expertise, right?
01:06:04.860 They're against the position that people who know more
01:06:08.460 should have more importance in conversations about the subject.
01:06:12.220 You can't convince that away.
01:06:14.000 That's a gut belief, I think.
01:06:17.080 Oh, absolutely.
01:06:17.980 And it feels like on the part of Jubilee
01:06:20.320 that in making these videos
01:06:22.220 And by casting these anti-science people as having equal footing on these topics with, you know, physicians and other types of doctors and researchers and scientists, it's like Jubilee is inherently taking their side.
01:06:36.400 Yeah.
01:06:37.140 By legitimizing it.
01:06:38.320 It's taking the idea that somebody can be an anti-vaxxer in the way somebody is a pro-vaxxer, but pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine, while they look like the opposite of each other, they're really not.
01:06:48.700 pro vaccine is like a belief that just comes about because you're like paying attention to
01:06:53.540 what scientists say anti-vaccine is a belief that emerges from like getting way way too obsessed in
01:06:59.980 an online rabbit hole and destroying your life because of it they're not the same they're
01:07:03.540 genetically different beliefs they did like a pro vax versus anti-vax video before covid
01:07:09.680 and then once covid happened and the vaccine started coming out i'm sure jason lee was like
01:07:17.340 let's fucking go yeah exactly he was like we got some content on our hands
01:07:24.240 and so they did they did provax versus anti-vax covid edition but you know at this point hundreds 0.96
01:07:31.620 of thousands of people have died from covid and this is like a really active health issue i mean
01:07:37.100 you know vaccines kind of always are but i want to play you the first uh 45 seconds of that video
01:07:45.180 where Jason Lee himself sits down on camera and he's like,
01:07:49.520 I'm going to give you a little disclaimer.
01:07:54.260 Did you watch this one?
01:07:55.860 No, no. I'm excited though. I don't know why.
01:07:59.000 Hey guys, I know that we're doing both sides today,
01:08:01.540 but actually I just wanted to let you know that one of the sides causes people to die.
01:08:07.080 So consider that.
01:08:08.380 It's literally that. It's literally that.
01:08:11.240 Hey y'all, before we start this video,
01:08:12.660 just want to acknowledge that this is obviously a very sensitive topic, especially coming out of
01:08:17.940 what's been an incredibly difficult year battling the coronavirus pandemic. But as vaccines are
01:08:24.260 starting to roll out, this is also a very real and current conversation that we're seeing happen
01:08:30.260 within our communities and all around the country. So our goal with this video was to just earnestly
01:08:36.340 portray various perspectives that we were hearing and not necessarily that we condone these
01:08:42.020 these perspectives but to understand why people are feeling the way they might be as always please
01:08:47.260 seek out experts as you're making your own decisions and above all else we want to encourage
01:08:51.780 you to see each other's humanity and feel more empathy it's so interesting in a way it sort of
01:08:58.120 undermines the entire project of jubilee right if he feels the need to come out and gives it give a
01:09:03.340 disclaimer because people are literally dying from believing this then why isn't he doing it when
01:09:09.080 poor fat people are being brought on to be humiliated and bullied and why isn't he talking
01:09:13.940 why isn't he just claiming how conversion therapy doesn't work and how it's brutally cruel to treat 0.98
01:09:19.040 gay people like this you know it's so sad that he feels the need to do it on this subject because
01:09:23.800 he knows what he's doing he knows that he what he's really doing is exposing people to horrible 0.97
01:09:28.340 ideas that's sad it reminds me of the meme that's like you know i can excuse the racism but i draw
01:09:34.400 the line at animal cruelty he's like i can excuse the racism and the flat earthers and the misogyny
01:09:40.620 and the transphobia and the homophobia and the anti-fat stuff but i do draw the line at vaccines
01:09:46.080 anyway enjoy the video that we made where we platform both of them as equals it's even more
01:09:50.880 cowardly than that he doesn't say you should get the vaccine he says just so you know we don't
01:09:56.100 endorse whatever like what are you talking yeah and he doesn't even say which side he doesn't
01:10:00.220 endorse maybe he doesn't inside maybe he doesn't endorse the pro vaccine people not great i'm not
01:10:05.140 into it i'm not into it and then no my favorite part though is he finishes as always our goal is
01:10:11.320 to see each other's humanity and feel more empathy i think it's like it's like a dolores umbridge
01:10:16.840 thing with him where he's like forces himself to write in a notebook like 60 times a night
01:10:21.860 our goal is to perform is to see each other's humanity and feel more empathy our goal is to
01:10:27.200 see each other's humanity and feel more empathy like he doesn't believe it nobody believes it
01:10:31.720 this this youtube channel doesn't believe it and he's just like creating the most absurd dangerous
01:10:37.180 ridiculous maniacal bigoted content ever and then in being like as always our goal is to see each
01:10:44.980 other's humanity and feel more empathy so i imagine that if i talk to any of these people 0.96
01:10:50.560 they probably agree with me about most things they probably just be generic liberals right that's the
01:10:55.380 that's the true belief of behind the Jubilee channel you think right or do you think that
01:11:01.140 do you think that they're more balanced and actually actively reactionary I can tell you
01:11:06.340 that I think the content leans right just by legitimizing all of this stuff I don't know
01:11:11.980 about the people I think it seems like the the guy who runs this channel has just I don't know
01:11:18.700 based on that 45 seconds it sounds like he could be like a liberal guy but he's clearly like
01:11:23.880 divorced himself and and the ethics of what he's doing from the outcome like the tangible outcome
01:11:30.920 of this content that's true i wonder if he drinks the kool-aid or if he thinks he's actually doing
01:11:35.540 a public service with this kind of work i don't know what do you think maybe i mean look there's
01:11:41.640 things you can point to as successes of jubilee is that you could probably use to justify the project
01:11:47.080 people are being made to engage politically and sometimes that might be a valuable resource maybe
01:11:52.780 you know maybe it's better to think about abortion more rather than less and jubilee
01:11:59.220 enables people to do that right that's one argument in their favor i'm not confident though
01:12:04.960 that uh they could possibly look at like material that's so obviously is primarily about humiliating
01:12:12.620 people or at least partially about humiliating people i don't think it's primarily and say oh
01:12:17.460 this is going to help fat people this is actually going to make the world a more accepting fat
01:12:21.140 friendly place knowing full well that this guy this you know fresh and fit guy is getting a two
01:12:27.380 minutes to put on twitter and get 30 300 000 likes because he owned a fat guy right and everyone can
01:12:33.280 call him based and you know gas each other up that's not you can't possibly believe that that's
01:12:38.020 a benefit to society or that it's turning the volume down so they must be aware yeah i have no
01:12:43.260 idea how you how you manufacture content like that and then like go to bed thinking that you've like
01:12:49.020 fostered human connection i've been joking about that the whole time but it like actually
01:12:52.980 disappoints me and like yeah i don't know it makes me sad and angry as i don't know i don't
01:12:58.920 know if you've been able to tell okay i want to play you watch conjure points i do we all watch
01:13:06.940 conjure points we love conjure points you've done podcasts with her yeah yeah she's she's a friend
01:13:11.120 of the show natalie plays all sorts of characters in her videos and she has a recurring one called
01:13:17.640 Jackie Jackson, who is sort of a parody of a centrist podcast host. And I want to play a tiny
01:13:25.900 clip from one of Natalie's videos where she's acting as Jackie Jackson, because I think that
01:13:31.960 it is Jubilee personified. Hi, I'm Jackie Jackson. You're listening to The Freedom Pod,
01:13:38.700 where it doesn't matter what you say, it only matters that you say. We don't discriminate here
01:13:45.340 between what is true or false or even downright dangerous that's none of my business it's none
01:13:52.360 of america's business the important thing is that you never stop talking because that's what freedom
01:13:59.640 is all about i mean at the beginning of this uh conversation i said a centrist on echo chambers
01:14:06.240 right i'm not totally against the idea of communities where people generally share beliefs
01:14:11.860 I think that's how humanity is structured itself for a very, very long time to mixed outcomes, right? I don't know. I guess what I wanted to say is like, yeah, man, talking doesn't actually help everything all the time. Just having a conversation, it's not inherently a good thing, right? Conversations have to be productive to be productive. They're not just inherently good for people, I think.
01:14:34.540 Look at anorexia, right? Or school shooters. Think about the impact that spreading ideas has on people, especially young people. It seems like it can be deeply corrosive, right?
01:14:46.560 I was wondering what the through line from anorexia to school shooters was going to be, but I see what you're saying. This is where we have to talk about Jubilee's glorification of centrism and Jubilee's artificial construction of the middle ground because centrist beliefs are beliefs that exist between what we're defining as the endpoints of the more radical beliefs on either side.
01:15:09.720 And so when Jubilee says that the radical belief on the left side is, you know, fat people shouldn't have to lose weight and become thin to lead healthy and happy lives and be accepted and loved in society like a human being. 0.98
01:15:26.020 And the opposite side of that is like fat people are disgusting, horrible people who do not deserve happiness unless they lose weight and perform that weight loss for me. 0.83
01:15:36.040 If you're telling me that the middle ground must exist somewhere between these two positions that both have good points to make, it's just a dishonest debate. There's no middle ground there. 0.99
01:15:49.140 It's a debate that exists to get people toward a position that doesn't exist, right? There is no such thing as the centrist on fatphobia. You know, even on bigger issues like, say, abortion, you know, it's either you fundamentally want women to have access to abortions or you don't.
01:16:05.660 There is no, there's a lot of people who would characterize themselves as centrists regarding abortion, but they all have to make a binary choice. There's no, there's no where in between to go. There is no middle ground, right?
01:16:18.980 I also just think, I mean, Jubilee does this. I might actually put like a chart of like the Jubilee Overton window on the screen. The Overton window being at any point, the range of acceptable beliefs in a society. Jubilee creates the Overton window where they decide what the acceptable endpoints of what beliefs you can have.
01:16:39.400 the thing is they artificially skew what they're calling the middle ground way to the right because
01:16:45.160 what they define as the liberal end point is usually a very commonly held mainstream position
01:16:51.980 like it's a really good point like fat people are fine or people should be able to have abortions or
01:16:57.540 the earth is round or vaccines are good like these are all extremely popular positions and then on
01:17:03.360 the right side, they have extremely fringe positions from people who are like, fat people
01:17:08.480 must lose weight to deserve love, or the earth is flat, or this and that. And by deciding that
01:17:17.000 the middle is somewhere between those two points, which it's not, the middle is always very, very
01:17:22.720 close or entirely at what they're calling the left, they're artificially constructing a right
01:17:28.380 wing middle ground. It's a difficult thing because that's also what culture is, though.
01:17:33.640 There isn't as much fringe position on the left. People who lean left generally have more normal
01:17:39.400 beliefs than people who lean right. And there's a way deeper, crazy rabbit hole to go down if
01:17:45.140 you're going toward the right, right? There's no bottom to how crazy extremist conservative 0.96
01:17:50.240 beliefs can get. Many conservatives advocate, not that many, but a lot of conservatives advocate
01:17:56.360 or an ethnostate, want there to be absolutely no access to abortion, think that fat people should 0.64
01:18:01.320 be, you know, banished, think that trans people should be taken away from public spaces, right?
01:18:06.880 Whereas what is the liberal belief that is extreme? So is Jubilee doing culture or is it
01:18:12.340 reflecting it? I actually don't know. I guess I'd say they're magnifying currently existing
01:18:16.700 political trends. Damn. Maybe we all have to like look inwards and find the Jubilee inside of us all. 0.99
01:18:24.160 Yeah, the little middle ground. Yeah.
01:18:26.180 Maybe my problem is really with America, where like the far right is QAnon and the far left is health care.
01:18:31.860 That is the problem that Jubilee faces as a format, right?
01:18:36.400 I saw this trans debate between, you know, should kids receive trans health care? 0.85
01:18:40.160 And the people on the yes, they should side were like, of course it should be, you know, gatekept.
01:18:45.320 I mean, you know, parents should go through some hoops. Kids should go through various therapist appointments.
01:18:50.580 I'm just saying that this has been proven to be a beneficial treatment for a lot of
01:18:54.200 minors, and so we should allow it in particular cases. That's not an extreme leftist belief.
01:18:59.660 That's not the craziest you could go, but it is the farthest left that actual human beings
01:19:04.680 think. Nobody actually thinks anything much crazier than that.
01:19:08.800 Right. Whereas on the right, it's trans people should not exist. 1.00
01:19:12.040 Yes. 1.00
01:19:12.660 And in society and in Jubilee videos, to your point, which I guess are reflecting the unfortunate
01:19:17.320 a right-wing shift that we've had in America the last couple of years on a number of issues.
01:19:21.820 They're saying that the morally neutral place is to be somewhere in the center when it's
01:19:26.560 like, no, if one group of people says, I want rights, and another group of people says,
01:19:31.660 you cannot have rights, it is not morally or ethically or politically neutral to say
01:19:36.920 that everybody has good points and to say that we should listen to everybody equally
01:19:39.980 and to say that the answer is in the middle.
01:19:42.620 Like, that's my problem.
01:19:43.840 And it just so much of Jubilee is just laundering far right positions and telling you that like, well, where you really should land is basically like the center, right?
01:19:56.600 You mentioned that there's a lot of like morally righteous posturing that centrists do.
01:20:01.100 Can you explain that?
01:20:01.800 Because I think that's like very true of Jubilee in general.
01:20:05.160 Okay, so who's like the quintessential centrist?
01:20:07.300 I would say like Malcolm Gladwell, Jonathan Haidt, you know, they always enter conversations with the presumption that they've thought through the issue and they're serious people and people on the other sides are not serious people.
01:20:21.240 And if they were, they would arrive at this reasonable position that they've come to, even though, you know, it's sort of a rejection of politics, right?
01:20:29.660 That's what centrism is about.
01:20:30.780 It's about pretending that politics don't exist and that you don't have to take sides.
01:20:33.760 Yeah, yeah.
01:20:34.700 Yeah. And I mean, centrist, we've all heard centrist. I'm not left or right. I weigh all
01:20:39.980 sides and come to my own conclusion or I'm politically homeless. That's another one,
01:20:45.520 politically homeless, which is like literally every time someone says they're politically
01:20:48.420 homeless, I have never seen that happen where they are not just right wing. To your point,
01:20:54.140 I mean, they often think of themselves as like having ascended the political spectrum of like,
01:20:59.080 well, I don't get sucked into one side or the other. When in the reality, like these people
01:21:04.560 are just pawns, in my opinion, for the status quo. They don't stand for anything. I just think that
01:21:10.580 Jubilee basically just takes the position of the enlightened centrists.
01:21:15.420 Yes, I agree. The problem with it is, is that I think that centrism oftentimes pretends to not
01:21:20.700 have a guiding ideology or principles or a moral perspective. You know, we're just in the free
01:21:26.560 marketplace of ideas. It's a value neutral space and the cream will inevitably rise to the top.
01:21:32.300 The problem is, is that the machinery is not value neutral. Jubilee does believe certain
01:21:37.800 things. The fact checkers are, you know, they do have fact checkers and they do inform the audience
01:21:43.120 when people say stupid, idiotic things that are patently false or affirm things that are true. 0.99
01:21:47.860 They come up with the two sides of the debates that they're trying to find middle grounds on. 1.00
01:21:51.980 there is no value neutral way of doing this, right? So at the end of the day, they're just
01:21:57.700 like me. They're just like you. They're just politically advocating for things and doing
01:22:01.700 kind of a weird job of it. That's all they are. They're not like fundamentally different from
01:22:06.420 you and I, you know, they just sort of pretend. The last note that I had, which evidently you
01:22:12.780 don't agree with, but like I wrote that, you know, echo chambers online, like we can have
01:22:17.300 a meaningful conversation about you're already like looking at me skeptically. No, it's not that.
01:22:21.860 it's like of course you know look i i understand the anti-echo chamber position i'm not trying to
01:22:26.680 be i'm not trying to be belligerent here yeah it makes sense it all it all comes we we still
01:22:31.960 haven't found the middle ground on echo chambers but what i wrote was just that echo chambers
01:22:36.260 online more so the the thing that i'm interested in is criticizing the way that companies like
01:22:41.940 facebook profit from pushing people into very extreme political positions profit from you know
01:22:48.760 creating these bubbles of misinformation where that people go down and you know these crazy
01:22:54.320 anti-science rabbit holes and like how how those ultimately just serve to create profit for people
01:22:58.940 at the top of tech companies like i think that's interesting at the end of the day an echo chamber
01:23:03.380 is what it does right if an echo chamber is creating q anon devotees then it's a problem
01:23:10.440 that it's an echo chamber because the people are getting deranged while experiencing it it's just
01:23:14.760 like it's just like with everything else there's no value neutral word for echo chamber it's all
01:23:19.020 about whether or not it leads to outcomes that have these poor boomers going crazy or not and
01:23:25.000 i think it's unfortunate when the big crazy boomers go crazy yeah right and and you could
01:23:28.800 also i mean to your point echo chambers and communities could be synonymous i mean you
01:23:32.780 could say that some echo chambers online have helped trans kids feel like they're not alone
01:23:36.760 as a closeted gay kid 13 years old in new jersey i sought out gay online echo chambers that were
01:23:42.780 affirming spaces to feel good about myself so i see your point we found some middle ground that's
01:23:47.380 what it's all about it's what it's all about but again it's like if we're going to criticize
01:23:51.440 the forming and you know the online radicalization of people which i do think we should
01:23:56.200 then fine but like this careless rage bait content masquerading as a bridge to create
01:24:03.480 empathy and human connection is not the solution i don't want to leave jubilee lovers feeling like
01:24:09.260 they can't you know love hate watching jubilee but look if that's your thing that's your thing
01:24:14.300 but i i am proposing i just think that we should be tuning out of this youtube channel i think it
01:24:19.800 is making people more divided and not in a way that benefits anybody i i think it's good to talk
01:24:26.600 to people but talk to people don't set up your twitch live stream and don't go on instagram
01:24:32.280 live and like i i just talk to people without doing this like performative one-upping
01:24:38.780 bullshit like we we can talk to each other without milking it for content as i talk to someone
01:24:45.300 for content look there's way worse things in the world than jubilee you know if you're worried 1.00
01:24:51.560 about platforming people elon musk bought a website uh made all the nazis pay money to have
01:24:57.480 all their replies go to the top of every single thing and then they all just talk about killing
01:25:02.060 the jews you know like jubilee looks pretty good by comparison it could be a lot it could be a
01:25:07.120 little bit worse the internet's gone to some pretty bad lows so i don't know i don't begrudge
01:25:11.220 anyone for enjoying the channel personally but it's not good for you but i don't think most
01:25:15.280 people think it is you know i think most people i don't think most people are watching a jubilee
01:25:19.240 video going like oh i should take some notes oh what did the person who hates fat people say oh 0.99
01:25:24.160 that's going to expand my horizons like it's pure gladiatorial bullshit there's nothing to it it's 0.97
01:25:29.580 just fun look at that big joel we found the middle ground on the middle ground it's really 0.97
01:25:34.500 beautiful thank you so much for allowing me that fat w can the fat w find the middle ground with
01:25:44.660 the anti-fat w tune in next time to find out big joel thank you so much for being here today and 0.98
01:25:52.780 thank you so much for over the last like day and a half just going down an absolute fucking 0.68
01:25:56.780 it really did take i i yesterday was a jubilee day for me i enjoyed it i can't lie to you 0.72
01:26:03.600 i didn't where can people find more of you youtube nice go for it they know the people
01:26:14.800 know they'll get more of me if they want to i you know what period thank you so much for joining
01:26:22.880 today's episode i hope that maybe if you have been harboring feelings about maybe why you're
01:26:28.640 uncomfortable with this with the booming popularity of this youtube channel perhaps we gave you some
01:26:33.840 language to and and ideas to affirm those reasons maybe you're just gonna go binge watch jubilee 0.99
01:26:40.260 after this and in conclusion should we stone gay people to death on live television i don't know 0.98
01:26:46.760 but isn't it great that we talked about it and until next time 1.00
01:26:52.880 And until next time, stay fruity.
01:26:57.960 I like that that's the name of your podcast.