Bitchy History - January 04, 2026


Heresy, Sedition, and Other Names for Women Talking


Episode Stats


Length

39 minutes

Words per minute

179.85

Word count

7,153

Sentence count

440


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
00:00:00.280 Hi everybody, I hope you all had a great holiday season. I personally drank too much wine,
00:00:05.740 ate too much cheese, and possibly did ungodly things with carbs for the last two weeks.
00:00:11.140 Alas, we are now back in the real world and I have papers to write, a PhD proposal to
00:00:16.020 submit, and still I have to somehow find the time to research, write, and record this podcast.
00:00:22.120 A thankless task, truly. If you ever want to make it a little less thankless, you could
00:00:27.160 remember to leave a review wherever you listen, share it with friends, and maybe even subscribe
00:00:32.080 to my sub stack. It's pretty much entirely a free sub stack. You can, however, become a paid
00:00:37.660 subscriber if you feel like the spirit is moving you. You can also feel free to just leave a
00:00:42.520 comment on YouTube to let me know you're listening, which is actually a great segue
00:00:46.360 into the start of the show today. A while ago, someone, a man obviously, left a comment on one
00:00:52.440 of my YouTube videos saying that I teach feminism, not history. So I did what any self-respecting
00:00:58.400 historian with the podcast would do. I decided to make any cold open for an episode. Hi, Gunter.
00:01:04.100 The video he was commenting on was basically one where I had been venting about not getting to
00:01:08.840 teach a women's history course that semester, one that I had taught previously at my university,
00:01:13.160 and that the new instructor was insisting that she wanted it to be about women whose struggles
00:01:18.580 and accomplishments speak for themselves and not a class focused on feminism. And I just kept
00:01:24.280 coming back to the same question. How exactly do you tell the story of women's struggles and
00:01:29.640 accomplishments without talking about the system that made everything a struggle in the first
00:01:34.260 place? Like, what do you even say? Here are some cool ladies who did impressive things for no
00:01:40.120 particular reason in a totally neutral environment, definitely not while wading through a knee-deep
00:01:45.160 swamp of legal, religious, and cultural misogyny. Please don't ask any follow-up questions.
00:01:50.420 When people say, don't make it about feminism, just teach history, what they usually mean is,
00:01:55.520 don't talk about power, don't talk about patriarchy, don't talk about why these women
00:02:00.380 had to fight so hard. Just give us inspirational biographies that make us feel good about the past
00:02:05.760 and bad about nobody in particular. Feminism, in a history class, is not a side quest. It's
00:02:12.140 literally the part where we notice the rigged game. It's the part where we say, wow, this woman
00:02:17.740 did something extraordinary and look at the barriers built to stop her. You cannot pull that
00:02:23.380 lens out without turning women's history into a series of random fun facts. So today, instead of
00:02:29.240 pretending that you can separate women's struggles from these structures that made them struggle,
00:02:34.060 we're going to go straight into a case study that makes the whole thing obvious. We're going to talk
00:02:38.840 about a group of women whose lives make absolutely no sense unless you talk about patriarchy, power,
00:02:44.740 and men losing their minds over women speaking with authority. Quaker women. Boston, 1656. A ship
00:02:52.840 docks. Two Quaker women step onto the pier, and the city upon a hill immediately responds like
00:02:58.480 it's being attacked by a biological weapon. They're not carrying guns. They're carrying
00:03:03.380 convictions and pamphlets and the terrifying belief that God might speak directly to them,
00:03:09.400 women, without checking in with a pastor, a magistrate, or the fragile male ego of the
00:03:14.320 entire colony. That's the thing about Quaker women. They didn't overthrow governments or
00:03:19.540 lead armies. In the 17th century, they did something else that was incredibly unthinkable.
00:03:24.940 They spoke in public with spiritual authority. They preached. They traveled. They wrote.
00:03:29.660 they refused to shut up, and authorities reacted the way they always do when women step into a
00:03:35.660 space that they have been told is forbidden, with laws, with violence, and with a whole lot of
00:03:40.840 righteous panic. If you try to tell this story without feminism, all you're left with is a vague
00:03:46.360 tale about some devout ladies who people mysteriously hated. But if you put power back
00:03:51.520 in the frame, religious, legal, and gendered, you see it clearly. These women weren't just pious,
00:03:57.360 they were dangerous because they claimed the right to hear from God and act on it without
00:04:01.640 male permission. So today we're talking about the Quaker women who turned be still and quiet
00:04:07.060 into a personal challenge. Margaret Fell with her scripture-based clapbacks, Mary Dyer walking back
00:04:13.140 into Boston knowing exactly what the state was going to do to her, and the countless unnamed
00:04:18.180 women who got whipped, jailed, strip-searched, and humiliated for the crime of having a voice
00:04:23.380 and using it. Yes, this is feminism. It's also history. It's the part where we stop pretending
00:04:29.640 that women's stories speak for themselves and start listening to what they're actually saying
00:04:34.220 about the world that tried to shut them up. I'm Professor Meredith, and this is Bitchy History.
00:04:39.560 Welcome to Heresy, Sedition, and Other Names for Women Talking.
00:04:44.980 Something that's, you know, kind of bitchy.
00:04:47.280 Ready to cheek.
00:04:48.280 Bitchy?
00:04:49.020 I know.
00:04:49.480 It's just, you know, bitchy.
00:04:51.100 Well, first of all, you're a little bitchy. That's next-level bitchy.
00:04:56.120 Let's picture that Boston pier for a moment. The creek of the rigging, the smell of tar and salt and livestock, the whole busy colonial ballet of barrels and bodies and shouted instructions.
00:05:06.960 And then into that very male, very regulated space walk two women in plain gray gowns and broad-brimmed hats, looking like they've shown up to underwhelm everybody.
00:05:16.860 No jewels, no silk, no dramatic accessories,
00:05:19.740 just that Quaker uniform that basically says,
00:05:22.380 I don't have time for your earthly nonsense.
00:05:24.300 I'm too busy listening to God.
00:05:26.280 The women are Mary Fisher and Ann Austin.
00:05:28.360 Within a few hours, the good godly authorities of Boston, Massachusetts,
00:05:32.580 decided that these two are a walking spiritual contagion.
00:05:35.920 Their trunks are searched, their books and pamphlets confiscated and burned,
00:05:39.580 they're arrested, strip-searched, allegedly to check for witch's marks, of course,
00:05:43.880 and then thrown into jail.
00:05:45.560 Windows are boarded. No visitors are allowed.
00:05:48.080 They're kept half-starved until the ship that brought them can take them back out.
00:05:51.780 This is the first major Quaker landing in Boston,
00:05:54.760 and the colony reacts like they've been hit with a theological smallpox blanket.
00:05:58.960 You can almost hear the panic behind the official language.
00:06:02.180 If women can just show up and start preaching, what's next?
00:06:04.960 Servants? Enslaved people? The neighbor who already mutters under her breath too much?
00:06:09.120 The Puritan leadership calls Quakerism a heresy, a threat to order, doctrine, and salvation itself.
00:06:14.760 But you can see what really bothers them in how they respond.
00:06:18.020 They don't just ban books, they target bodies, those particular bodies.
00:06:22.260 They fine ship captains for bringing Quakers to the colony.
00:06:25.540 They order whippings, brandings, the cropping of ears.
00:06:28.320 And every time, when you look closely, the punishments seem to land hardest on the women who refuse to stay in their assigned lane.
00:06:35.900 Women who travel without a husband.
00:06:37.840 Women who preach without permission.
00:06:39.580 Women who insist that they answer to God before they answer to the governor.
00:06:43.920 Four years after that first arrival, another woman will walk into the same city and refuse to leave.
00:06:49.340 Her name is Mary Dyer. She's already been banished once.
00:06:52.520 She knows the new law. If any Quaker returns after banishment, they die.
00:06:56.620 It's meant to be a deterrent. She decides to treat it more like a dare.
00:07:00.700 By the morning of June 1, 1660, the whole town knows that something is happening.
00:07:05.880 People pour into the streets, then up toward the common, following the soldiers and the drums.
00:07:10.060 At the center of it all is a gallows, and a woman in a plain dress, hands-bound, walking steadily forward.
00:07:16.500 This is still the city upon a hill, the shining Christian example John Winthrop boasted of on the voyage over.
00:07:23.020 In every sermon, every law, every smug little preamble,
00:07:26.020 the colony insists it has been specially chosen by God to serve as a model of righteousness for the rest of the world.
00:07:32.560 And here, in that model city, they are about to hang a woman, not for witchcraft or murder,
00:07:37.280 but for refusing to shut up about God in public while being a woman.
00:07:42.120 Mary Dyer had choices.
00:07:43.680 She could have stayed in Rhode Island, where Quakers were tolerated.
00:07:46.520 She could have retreated into private piety,
00:07:48.780 praying quietly at home like a good, non-threatening 17th century lady.
00:07:53.260 Instead, she walked back into Boston again and again
00:07:56.280 to stand with other Quakers who were fined, jailed, whipped, and mutilated.
00:08:00.760 The authorities read this as treason, as defiance, as satanic stubbornness.
00:08:05.000 But listen to how she explains herself in her letters.
00:08:08.060 She keeps saying it's about obedience to the light of Christ within her,
00:08:12.180 to God as she understands God.
00:08:14.280 She's not staging a coup, she's staging a refusal.
00:08:17.180 She will not accept that men in black hats have the final say over her soul.
00:08:21.860 So when she climbs the ladder beneath the gallows,
00:08:24.400 what's on trial is not just Quaker heresy.
00:08:26.840 It's the idea that a woman might stand in public and claim that God speaks through her,
00:08:31.220 that her conscience, her discernment, her voice are enough.
00:08:35.000 The colony can't let that stand.
00:08:37.500 They wrap it in Bible verses and legal languages, but underneath it's the same old fear.
00:08:42.280 If one woman can do this and live, others will follow.
00:08:45.480 The walls between who gets to speak and who has to listen might start to crack.
00:08:50.300 Mary Dyer becomes a warning, a spectacle, and eventually a martyr, depending upon who's telling the story.
00:08:56.000 But she's not alone.
00:08:56.880 Across the Atlantic and England, Quaker women are preaching in marketplaces, disrupting services,
00:09:02.220 writing tracts, and being beaten, jailed, and dragged through the streets for it.
00:09:06.120 Margaret Fell is about to sit down and write one of the earliest feminist biblical arguments
00:09:10.480 for women speaking in church, using the same scriptures men love to weaponize against them,
00:09:15.240 and turning those verses into her own ammunition.
00:09:18.520 The pattern is already there.
00:09:20.320 Women step into the space of a public religious authority,
00:09:23.320 and the state, church, and social order all start shrieking in harmony.
00:09:27.100 So that's where we're headed today.
00:09:28.520 We're going to walk back into that Boston courtroom, into English meeting houses, into prison cells, and the shadows of the gallows.
00:09:35.060 And look at what happens when women insist that the inner light isn't gendered.
00:09:39.360 When a woman says, God told me to speak, why do men get to tell her no?
00:09:44.060 And why, every single time, does it turn into a crisis for the men in charge?
00:09:49.540 Before we zoom in on any one woman at the gallows, we need to step back and look at the absolute chaos that they're walking into.
00:09:56.480 17th century Europe is in the middle of a long, exhausting religious hangover.
00:10:00.900 The Protestant Reformation has shattered the Catholic monopoly,
00:10:03.960 and now you've got Lutherans, Calvinists, Anglicans, Catholics, and a dozen smaller groups
00:10:08.400 all insisting they alone have the direct hotline to God.
00:10:12.300 Everyone's burned out, paranoid, and watching everyone else for signs of heresy.
00:10:16.740 In that world, religion isn't just private belief.
00:10:19.560 It's state infrastructure.
00:10:21.160 Your king or magistrate doesn't just care what church you attend.
00:10:24.460 his political authority is literally braided together with your religious obedience.
00:10:29.480 To challenge the church is to challenge the state.
00:10:31.800 To challenge the minister is to challenge the magistrate.
00:10:34.600 Everything is fused.
00:10:36.020 Now drop into New England.
00:10:37.580 The Puritans who sail to Massachusetts aren't coming to start a cozy little live-and-let-live experiment,
00:10:42.900 no matter what your elementary school teacher told you about religious freedom.
00:10:46.760 They are coming to build a purified Christian commonwealth,
00:10:49.820 a model society, the famous city on a hill, where, as John Winthrop warned, the eyes of the world are
00:10:56.260 on them. If they get it wrong, they believe God will smack them down in real time with plagues,
00:11:01.460 storms, and enemy attacks. In that mindset, religious disagreement isn't just uncomfortable,
00:11:06.880 it's dangerous. One loud dissenter might bring divine wrath on the entire colony.
00:11:12.060 So when the authorities in Boston look out at their rocky little settlement, they don't see
00:11:16.060 diverse spiritual journeys, they see a fragile fortress barely hanging on between indigenous
00:11:21.460 nations that they've dispossessed, rival European empires, and a god who is, in their theology,
00:11:27.400 perpetually one bad sermon away from rage-quitting the entire project.
00:11:31.780 Into that mix comes a very specific set of gender expectations. Puritan theology talks a big game
00:11:38.020 about all souls being equal before god, but in practice, men occupy the pulpit and the town
00:11:43.820 meeting, while women are meant to be pious, supporting characters. Ministers preach that
00:11:48.500 women are weaker vessels, emotionally, intellectually, morally. A godly woman is supposed to pray,
00:11:54.680 read her Bible, teach children, obey her husband, and keep her spiritual life within her proper
00:11:59.820 sphere. She can have feelings about God. She isn't supposed to stand up and express those
00:12:04.500 feelings aloud to a mixed audience, though. Public religious speech is a male space. The pulpit,
00:12:09.940 the lecture, and the interpretation of scripture, those are reserved for ordained men and in
00:12:14.720 practice for respectable laymen. Women's religious intensity is fine as long as it's confined to
00:12:21.080 acceptable outlets, private prayer, perhaps small gatherings with other women, and maybe
00:12:26.140 carefully supervised testimony under male control. The basic rule is simple. Men talk, women listen.
00:12:32.960 This is the script most people are operating under. It doesn't matter whether you're in
00:12:36.760 England or Massachusetts, Anglican or Puritan, Catholic or Reformed, if a woman starts preaching
00:12:42.100 to strangers, especially to men, the reaction is not, oh wow, how empowering. The reaction is,
00:12:47.820 what exactly is speaking through her? Because it sure doesn't look like the Holy Spirit we ordered.
00:12:52.440 Which brings us back to the Quakers. The people who eventually become known as Quakers,
00:12:56.440 officially the Society of Friends, begin in the 1640s amid the wreckage of England's civil wars.
00:13:02.000 They're part of a swirl of radical religious movements, all of which in different ways are
00:13:06.500 are very tired of the rigid church hierarchies
00:13:09.280 and national churches that are bossing everyone around.
00:13:12.960 George Fox, the movement's central figure,
00:13:15.360 begins preaching that you don't actually need
00:13:17.460 priests, sacraments, or liturgies to encounter God.
00:13:21.020 What you need is to listen to the inner light,
00:13:23.380 the direct living presence of God within each person.
00:13:26.880 And here's where things get a little spicy.
00:13:29.300 If you take that seriously,
00:13:30.620 it means God can speak through anyone,
00:13:32.280 not just the highly educated guy with a salary and a pulpit.
00:13:35.820 The anyone here includes women, servants, poor men who never went to university,
00:13:40.080 and people who are not supposed to have public voices at all.
00:13:43.200 In Quaker meetings, you gather in silence and wait.
00:13:46.120 If the Spirit moves you, you stand and speak.
00:13:48.740 No one has a reserved official right to talk.
00:13:51.780 There's no ordained clergy.
00:13:53.360 Authority is supposed to come from the Spirit,
00:13:55.480 not from your gender, social rank, or a degree from Cambridge.
00:13:58.680 If you're used to a world where everything is stratified,
00:14:01.820 king, subject, priest, layperson, husband, wife,
00:14:04.820 This isn't just weird, it's destabilizing.
00:14:08.440 Quakers lean into that destabilization in daily life, too.
00:14:12.120 They refuse to take oaths in court because they believe you should tell the truth all the time,
00:14:16.180 not just when someone makes you put your hand on a Bible.
00:14:19.080 They refuse to remove their hats to social superiors because why should you honor one man more than another?
00:14:24.780 They call everyone, thee and thou, the familiar forms of address that English speakers normally use for inferiors and close friends,
00:14:31.840 because they believe God flattens social distinctions.
00:14:35.600 They won't swear loyalty in the way that governments want,
00:14:38.240 they won't behave deferentially to the way that elites expect,
00:14:41.880 and they insist that their ultimate allegiance is to God, not to king or colony.
00:14:46.960 So imagine you're a 17th century magistrate.
00:14:49.820 Your authority, as far as you're concerned, comes from God.
00:14:52.960 You uphold godly order.
00:14:54.740 You keep women in their place and servants in theirs,
00:14:57.140 and you absolutely do not need some scrappy little sect
00:15:00.380 marching in to announce that your neat hierarchy is irrelevant because God might choose to speak
00:15:05.480 through a teenage girl in a homespun dress rather than through you. To you, as that magistrate,
00:15:11.100 Quakers look like spiritual anarchists. And then you learn that in their meetings, women speak,
00:15:16.700 not just in small side groups, but in the main gathering. Women travel as ministers. In some
00:15:22.460 cases, women confront clergy in their own churches and tell them that they are preaching falsehoods.
00:15:27.840 Women write and publish spiritual texts under their own names.
00:15:32.040 Women insist that when Paul said there is neither male nor female,
00:15:35.720 for you are all one in Christ Jesus, he meant it.
00:15:38.960 This is the moment where the Puritan anxiety dial goes from mildly concerned to absolutely losing it.
00:15:45.800 Because the Quaker idea of the inner light doesn't just threaten the monopoly of ordained male ministers,
00:15:50.820 it threatens the entire gender order.
00:15:52.720 If God can choose to speak right now through a woman's body in public to a mixed audience,
00:15:57.840 then no amount of weaker vessel rhetoric can keep women permanently silent.
00:16:02.140 You can quote Paul about women keeping quiet all you want.
00:16:05.340 The Quakers will quote other passages right back at you and say,
00:16:08.480 if God is pouring out the Spirit on sons and daughters,
00:16:11.480 who are you to tell the daughters to sit down?
00:16:14.260 Crucially, this is not happening in a vacuum.
00:16:16.500 New England already has a history of women who push at this boundary.
00:16:19.840 A couple of decades before Quaker women come on the scene,
00:16:23.660 Anne Hutchinson lands in Massachusetts
00:16:25.480 and begins holding gatherings in her own home where she critiques ministers and shares her
00:16:30.920 own spiritual insights. For a while, male leaders tolerate it, until they don't. When she draws too
00:16:36.680 many followers and starts publicly challenging the colony's ministers, they put her on trial,
00:16:41.360 condemn her, and banish her. The message is clear. Women who assert too much spiritual authority
00:16:46.660 are not welcome here. So when the word reaches Boston that Quakers are on their way, and not
00:16:52.100 just male Quakers, but women who preach. The authorities are already primed to see this as
00:16:56.760 Anne Hutchinson dialed up to 11. They respond accordingly. Within a few years of those first
00:17:02.260 landings, Massachusetts passes laws that specifically target Quakers. Severe sentences
00:17:07.600 were decreed for that cursed set of heretics, called Quakers, coming again into this jurisdiction.
00:17:14.240 Beginning in 1656, laws forbade any captain from landing Quakers in the area. Any individual of
00:17:20.540 the church was to be committed at once to the House of Correction to be severely whipped on his
00:17:25.200 or her entrance, and kept it constantly at work, and none were allowed to speak to them. The
00:17:30.900 following year, it was decreed that any Quaker arriving in the colony should have one of his
00:17:35.060 ears cut off. If he committed another offense, he would lose the other ear. If he committed another
00:17:41.500 offense, his tongue was to be bored through with a hot iron. They also thought that every Quaker
00:17:47.480 woman should be severely whipped. Not for offenses, necessarily, just, you know, in general. A sentence
00:17:53.160 of death was ordered and executed in several cases in Boston, which we will talk about later in this
00:17:58.200 episode. A 1661 law ordered that any wandering Quakers be apprehended, stripped naked from the
00:18:05.420 middle upward, tied to a cart's tail, and whipped through the town. The colony that advertises itself
00:18:11.980 as a shining city upon a hill is so terrified of a handful of dissenters that it builds an entire
00:18:17.840 police state to keep them out. And underneath all the high-flown language about heresy and sedition,
00:18:23.920 there's a quieter fear that nobody quite says out loud. If you let Quaker ideas about the inner
00:18:29.180 light spread, if you let women stand up and speak as God might be speaking through them,
00:18:33.800 what else might start to unravel? If God can speak directly to a woman, maybe husbands aren't
00:18:39.740 the final word at home. Maybe ministers aren't the final word in church. Maybe magistrates aren't the
00:18:45.280 final word in court. Maybe the same spirit that leads a woman to preach in a meeting house might
00:18:50.420 also lead her to question why some people are enslaved and others are free, why some are rich
00:18:55.840 and others are poor, and why laws always seem to land hardest on those with the least power.
00:19:01.620 You don't have to consciously think all of that for it to feel threatening. It's enough to see,
00:19:06.240 with your own eyes, women doing things they are not supposed to do. Traveling without male
00:19:11.280 guardians, speaking to strangers, contradicting ministers, refusing to obey orders, and to feel,
00:19:17.040 on a gut level, that something is wrong with your world. That's the tension humming beneath
00:19:22.120 everything in this story. On one side, you have a political, religious project obsessed with order,
00:19:27.300 hierarchy, and control, convinced that its survival depends upon keeping everyone in their place.
00:19:32.480 On the other, you have a movement daring to suggest that God might not care about those
00:19:37.200 assignments at all. And when those two worldviews collide on an actual street, in an actual meeting
00:19:42.840 house, in front of an actual crowd, the person standing there with a message from God seems to
00:19:47.900 always be women. So let's talk about Margaret Fell, because if Mary Dyer is the dramatic martyr
00:19:53.620 moment, Margaret Fell is the one quietly rewiring the whole system in the background.
00:19:59.520 When we meet her in the 1650s, she's not just some marginal crank.
00:20:03.160 She is Lady Fell of Swarthmore Hall in northwest England, married to a judge, running a large
00:20:09.280 household, and very much embedded in the local elite.
00:20:12.540 Swarthmore is a place of legal authority and social stability.
00:20:16.000 It is exactly the kind of respectable home where women are expected to manage servants,
00:20:20.540 raise children, and maybe host the occasional safe, boring religious conversation over dinner.
00:20:26.360 Then George Fox shows up.
00:20:28.640 Fox is already gathering the following as he wanders around preaching this scandalous idea
00:20:33.340 that the living Christ is present in people, not locked up in sacraments and church buildings.
00:20:38.560 He ends up at Swarthmore, and Margaret listens.
00:20:41.440 She does what she is not supposed to do.
00:20:43.720 She tests his words against her own experience, against scripture, and decides that he's right.
00:20:49.160 She becomes convinced.
00:20:50.640 And when Margaret Fell becomes convinced, she doesn't do it halfway.
00:20:54.880 Swarthmore Hall transforms from a respectable judicial household
00:20:58.360 into something like an early Quaker co-working space
00:21:01.400 and religious underground railroad hub.
00:21:04.080 Traveling ministers stay there.
00:21:05.660 Letters fly in and out.
00:21:07.320 Meetings for worship are held in the hall.
00:21:09.580 Phil's husband is not thrilled.
00:21:12.240 The local establishment is even less thrilled,
00:21:14.060 but this is where you see something crucial about Quaker women.
00:21:17.080 They don't just speak.
00:21:18.140 They organize.
00:21:19.320 Margaret doesn't put on a plain dress and wander off alone.
00:21:21.820 she uses every tool she already has her literacy her social position her house her networks to
00:21:27.800 support a movement that deliberately refuses to play by the rules one of the most important things
00:21:32.840 she does is pick up a bible and say all right you want to talk scripture let's talk scripture
00:21:37.600 you have to understand how wild that is for generations men have used isolated bible verses
00:21:43.260 especially paul's first corinthians 14 34 through 35 to justify silencing women in case you aren't
00:21:50.520 familiar, this is the verse in question. Let the women keep silent in the churches, for it is not
00:21:56.120 permitted unto them to speak, but let them be in subjection, as also saith the law. And if they
00:22:02.560 would learn anything, let them ask their own husbands at home, for it is shameful for a woman
00:22:07.020 to speak in the church. It's really nice to be able to have the excuse of, it's not us, it's God
00:22:12.340 saying this. When women feel called to speak, they're told to sit down and shut up in the name
00:22:17.120 of obedience to Christ. Margaret Fowle looks at those same pages and verses and essentially says,
00:22:23.520 but what happens if I just speak? In the 1660s, she writes what will become her most famous work,
00:22:30.460 a tract called Women's Speaking Justified. The title alone is audacious. She isn't begging for
00:22:36.520 a special exception. She isn't asking for a tiny carve-out where women might possibly be allowed
00:22:41.680 to whisper politely in the back row, she is justifying women speaking, declaring it theologically
00:22:47.380 valid, biblically grounded, and heresy of heresies, in line with the will of God. How does she do it?
00:22:54.940 She does the thing that terrifies patriarchal religion the most. She reads, she studies
00:23:00.400 scripture and collects every example she can find of women speaking with divine authority.
00:23:05.460 The women at the tomb, the first to proclaim the resurrection, the prophetic women in both
00:23:09.660 Testaments, the line from Joel, picked up again in Acts, that in the last days of God will pour
00:23:15.020 out the Spirit on the sons and daughters and they shall prophesy. She lines them up like little
00:23:20.260 witnesses in a courtroom and lets them testify themselves. If God trusted these women to speak,
00:23:26.300 she argues, who exactly are you to say that their daughters have to be quiet? When she gets to the
00:23:31.720 famous keep silent passages from Paul, she doesn't just ignore them, she contextualizes them,
00:23:37.640 reinterprets them and explains how they were addressing specific problems and cannot be
00:23:42.560 turned into a universal muzzle for half the church. In other words, she does theology.
00:23:48.320 She uses the tools men had claimed for themselves, textual analysis, argument,
00:23:53.180 citation, and turns them against the men. No wonder male authorities found this unnerving.
00:23:58.760 Men had spent years telling each other that God thought that they were the most important voice
00:24:03.140 in the room, and a woman comes along and calls that inaccurate and self-serving. It's important
00:24:09.240 to see this as part of a broader pattern. Margaret is not a lone genius shouting into the void.
00:24:15.620 From the beginning, Quaker women are writing letters, testimonies, prison narratives,
00:24:20.420 spiritual autobiographies. When they're thrown into jail, they describe the conditions. When
00:24:25.160 they're beaten in the streets, they describe the blows. When magistrates mock and threaten them in
00:24:30.040 court, they write that down too. Persecution becomes copy. These texts circulate among friends
00:24:36.380 and beyond. They feed a growing sense that women are not just auxiliaries to this movement. They
00:24:42.060 are central witnesses to what the spirit is doing, and they have the receipts on paper to prove it.
00:24:47.940 And one of the things that really hits me reading through all of the details of these women's lives
00:24:52.660 is how often the trouble starts not in the pulpit, but on the road. Remember, for a woman in the 17th
00:24:58.560 century, simply moving through public space without a male escort is already suspicious.
00:25:04.200 Respectable women are supposed to be anchored to a household, someone's daughter, someone's wife,
00:25:08.860 someone's servant, moving within a clearly supervised orbit. The moment a woman travels
00:25:14.120 as an independent adult, her own person, the rumors start. She must be immoral or insane or
00:25:20.040 under some sort of evil influence. Now imagine that woman not only traveling, but also showing
00:25:25.560 up in towns she's never seen before, walking into parish churches she's never attended,
00:25:31.220 and publicly challenging ministers during their sermons. That's a 17th century Quaker woman.
00:25:36.800 They were kind of looking for trouble. Elizabeth Hooten, one of the earliest Quaker women preachers,
00:25:42.300 spends years being arrested, whipped, and driven out of towns, only to return again and again.
00:25:47.720 Dorothy Wagg is imprisoned, branded, and subjected to public humiliation. Others are dragged through
00:25:53.240 the streets at the cart's tail, stripped to the waist for whipping, searched for witches' marks,
00:25:57.640 and locked in filthy cells with little food. When they are officially punished, it is for disorder,
00:26:03.160 disturbing the peace, heresy, sedition. What they're really being punished for is daring to
00:26:08.100 treat themselves as spiritual authorities whose call does not run through mail permission.
00:26:13.460 Every time they're arrested, there are conversations, arguments, interrogations.
00:26:17.300 Who sent you? Who do you think you are? Why do you not obey the laws of this realm?
00:26:22.260 Over and over, Quaker women give the same answer.
00:26:24.920 The Lord sent me. I'm just obeying God.
00:26:27.780 You can feel the frustration on the magistrates.
00:26:30.540 The existing system assumes that authority flows in one neat chain.
00:26:34.780 God, king, magistrate, minister, husband, woman, child.
00:26:38.620 If a woman steps out of that chain and says,
00:26:41.000 actually, I got a memo directly from the top,
00:26:43.480 the whole structure starts to get a little wobbly.
00:26:46.480 The state's response is to insist that that memo is forged.
00:26:50.120 They try to prove that these women are unstable, deluded, demonic.
00:26:53.480 They search their bodies as if the truth might be written on their skin.
00:26:56.840 They shut them up in dark cells for months, hoping that the movement will forget them.
00:27:00.880 They publicly display their punishments to make an example of them.
00:27:04.560 The Quakers' response is to write it all down and share it.
00:27:07.800 This is where the prison writings become so important.
00:27:09.960 A woman is arrested for disrupting a church service in York or London or Bristol.
00:27:14.580 She sits in a jail cell.
00:27:15.660 She writes about what happened, why she did it, and what she said in court, and how God sustained her.
00:27:21.020 That manuscript is smuggled out, copied, printed, and circulated.
00:27:24.920 Suddenly, her disorderly outburst becomes a coherent narrative of faithfulness.
00:27:29.980 From the authorities' perspective, they are trying to contain a virus.
00:27:33.660 From the Quaker women's perspective, every attempt at containment becomes another opportunity to broadcast the message.
00:27:39.960 Behind so many of these stories, tucked away in letters and records,
00:27:43.420 you can see Margaret Fowl again, writing to officials,
00:27:46.440 petitioning for imprisoned friends, and defending women's right to speak, travel, and minister.
00:27:51.480 She is the one who famously asks, in effect,
00:27:54.160 whether the same spirit that spoke through male prophets and apostles
00:27:57.120 has somehow lost the ability to speak through women.
00:28:00.460 It's such a simple question, but it's a little bit devastating.
00:28:03.920 Because if you answer yes, you're not only insulting women, you're insulting the spirit.
00:28:08.200 You're claiming that God's power is now limited by the shape of the human body it inhabits.
00:28:13.540 If you answer no, you've just admitted that God might, in fact, be the one sending these
00:28:17.920 women to annoy you.
00:28:19.580 That logic trap is what Margaret Fell's theology does.
00:28:22.740 It corners patriarchy by using its own story.
00:28:25.680 If God's power is absolute, if he is almighty, then why is it impossible for him to speak
00:28:30.340 through a woman?
00:28:31.680 All of this is swirling in the background as we return across the Atlantic to Boston
00:28:36.100 and to Mary Dyer.
00:28:38.200 Dyer's story is often told as a tragic epilogue to Anne Hutchinson's.
00:28:42.080 I've been guilty of telling it that way myself in the classroom.
00:28:45.340 You might remember the basic narrative.
00:28:47.200 Hutchinson, a charismatic Puritan woman, holds meetings in her house,
00:28:51.220 criticizing ministers and emphasizing an immediate experience of grace.
00:28:54.840 The male leadership freaks out, accuses her of antinomianism, and banishes her.
00:29:00.560 Dyer is one of her supporters.
00:29:02.340 She is recorded as suspicious in the court records because she leaves the court with Hutchinson.
00:29:07.620 For years, that moment is how Mary Dyer appears in the archive, as someone's follower,
00:29:12.900 a secondary figure, a supporting character in someone else's story.
00:29:16.840 However, when she encounters Quakers, she assumes her own role.
00:29:20.520 Like the English women we've been discussing, Dyer becomes convinced that the inner light is real,
00:29:25.720 that God speaks directly to individuals, and that obedience to the light sometimes means disobeying human authorities.
00:29:32.460 She leaves the safety of the much more tolerant Rhode Island to travel and bear witness as a
00:29:37.020 friend. Eventually, that witness brings her back to the very place that exiled her,
00:29:41.580 this time with a different label, not suspect Puritan, but Quaker criminal.
00:29:46.960 Massachusetts by this point has escalated from anxiety to a full-blown panic that puts the New
00:29:51.800 England witch trials to shame. The laws against Quakers grow harsher with each new wave of
00:29:56.620 rivals. Fines don't work. Whippings don't work. Ear croppings don't work. So the general court
00:30:02.500 takes what, to them, is the logical next step. They pass a law that any Quaker banished from
00:30:07.700 the colony who returns will be put to death. They say it's about protecting the flock from wolves.
00:30:13.400 Mary Dyer decides to test exactly how serious they are. She is banished. She leaves. Then she
00:30:19.580 comes back. She's arrested again, sentenced to death, and brought to the gallows with two male
00:30:24.020 friends, William Robinson and Marmaduke Stevenson. At the last moment, the governor announces that
00:30:30.080 her life has been spared, thanks to the intercession of influential friends and family,
00:30:35.000 and that she will be sent away again. They fully expect her to take the hint. She does not.
00:30:41.280 The day after Dyer was pulled from the gallows, she wrote a letter to the general court refusing
00:30:45.780 to accept the provision of the reprieve. In this letter, she wrote, and pardon me while I get
00:30:51.500 through this, the language is a bit dated. My life is not accepted, neither availeth me,
00:30:57.400 in comparison with the lives and liberty of the truth and servants of the living God,
00:31:01.820 for which in the bowels of love and meekness I sought you. Yet nevertheless, with wicked hands
00:31:07.240 have you put two of them to death, which makes me feel that the mercies of the wicked is cruelty.
00:31:12.700 I rather choose to die than to live, as from you, as guilty of their innocent blood.
00:31:19.740 If this law stands, if it is right to kill people for obeying their conscience before God,
00:31:25.140 then it is not enough for her to survive. She must return and testify against it.
00:31:29.960 And so she does. She walks back into the city, knowing exactly what the gallows looks like in
00:31:34.960 the morning light, knowing exactly what the drums will sound like when they try to drown out her
00:31:39.460 words, knowing exactly how the rope will feel against her neck. It's not that she wants to die.
00:31:45.060 It is that she has come to believe that faithfulness might cost her life, and she has already decided
00:31:50.000 what she values more. Again, the colony's leaders insist that this is about maintaining order and
00:31:56.100 punishing sedition. They write in the stern, impersonal voice of law. But if you listen
00:32:01.180 underneath, you can hear that same nervousness about a woman who will not accept her place.
00:32:06.680 Because here's the nightmare scenario for patriarchal theocracy, a woman who is calm,
00:32:11.600 articulate, scripturally literate, absolutely unafraid of their punishments, and visibly more
00:32:17.240 committed to her understanding of God than they are to theirs. Executed Quakers like to say that
00:32:23.520 they seal their testimony with their blood. It's a grisly metaphor, but also a revealing one. The
00:32:29.160 state hopes to seal off a contagion by cutting off the carrier. The Quakers interpret the same act
00:32:34.580 as sealing a covenant, making the message permanent. When Mary Dyer dies, she does not
00:32:39.700 end a movement. She amplifies it. Her story is written, copied, and preached. It circulates
00:32:45.980 among friends and beyond, making Boston look less like a shining example of godliness and more like
00:32:52.040 a place where authorities are so afraid of dissent that they hang middle-aged mothers for refusing
00:32:56.620 to follow the rules that they've made up. Over time, even people who aren't Quakers begin to
00:33:02.000 use her as a cautionary tale, not against her, but against the colony. She becomes, in various
00:33:07.820 retellings a symbol of conscience, a gentle martyr, a piece of moral leverage in debates
00:33:12.840 about tolerance. Later authors will sand down her rough edges and make her safer, but in the moment
00:33:18.600 what makes her powerful is her stubbornness. I came to keep blood guiltiness from you, desiring
00:33:24.060 to repeal the unrighteous and unjust law of banishment upon pain of death, made against the
00:33:29.560 innocent servants of the Lord. Therefore my blood will be required at your hands who willfully do
00:33:35.020 it. If you read that slowly, you can hear the subtext. You may hang me, but I am not the one
00:33:40.540 who will have to answer for this before God. Authorities can't argue with that. They can
00:33:45.240 only pull a lever. Meanwhile, back in the wider Quaker world, something else is happening that
00:33:50.400 will matter in the long run. Women are not just speaking as individuals anymore. They're building
00:33:55.680 their own structures. As the movement stabilizes, especially in places like Pennsylvania, founded
00:34:01.020 under Quaker leadership. Friends begin to formalize their communal life. They hold regular meetings
00:34:06.340 for worship and meetings for business, where they address discipline, charity, marriages,
00:34:10.960 and disputes. Crucially, they also establish separate but parallel meetings for women.
00:34:16.460 On paper, this might look like segregation. Women over here, men over here. In practice,
00:34:22.360 these women's meetings become places where women exercise real authority over matters that concern
00:34:27.140 them. They review proposed marriages, deciding whether a couple is spiritually and materially
00:34:32.400 ready. They oversee charitable aid. They handle discipline among female members. They write
00:34:37.940 epistles, letters of counsel and encouragement to other women's meetings across the Atlantic.
00:34:43.040 If you're noticing that these are exactly the skills you need to become, say, a 19th century
00:34:47.860 feminist reformer, you're not wrong. During these meetings, women are learning to argue,
00:34:53.220 interpret rules, organize relief, navigate conflict, and lead. They are doing so within
00:34:58.680 a religious framework, under the banner of the inner light and Quaker order, but the habits are
00:35:03.500 going to carry over. A girl who grows up watching her mother go to women's meetings, come home with
00:35:08.740 stories of what they decided, and see something different from the standard patriarchal script.
00:35:13.920 She sees her mother not just as a private caregiver, but as a public actor in the community.
00:35:18.640 When that girl later hears a call to speak about slavery, war, or women's legal rights, there is a precedent already burned into her imagination.
00:35:28.100 Women can meet, women can deliberate, and women can speak and create change.
00:35:33.320 That's how you get someone like Lucretia Mott in the 19th century, raised in a Quaker environment, accustomed to female speakers, and highly comfortable speaking in mixed meetings.
00:35:43.520 looking around at the legal system and asking, essentially,
00:35:46.400 if we believe in equality before God, why are women treated as property under the law?
00:35:52.060 Her feminism doesn't drop out of the sky, it grows out of these earlier practices.
00:35:57.060 And all of that quietly connects back to Margaret Fell,
00:36:00.480 sitting with her Bible, insisting that there is no divine law against women speaking.
00:36:05.840 Of course, we have to be honest, this isn't a utopia.
00:36:09.060 Quaker women do not achieve full equality in every sense.
00:36:11.960 There are still tensions, pushback, moments when male friends worry that women are going too far
00:36:17.280 or becoming too visible. The same movement that nurtures radical women also disciplines plenty
00:36:22.680 of them for stepping outside of the accepted norms. But compared with almost every other
00:36:27.640 Christian group in the 17th century, Quakers offer women a staggeringly broad space for
00:36:32.980 spiritual agency, a space to preach, to travel, to write, to organize, to lead, a space to say
00:36:39.240 without flinching, God told me to speak and expect at least some portion of the community to back
00:36:44.700 them up. That is what makes them so frightening to everyone else. Because once people see it is
00:36:50.140 possible, once they have watched a woman stand in a meeting feeling the same trembling, the same
00:36:54.940 inner nudge, and open her mouth to speak truth to the room, there is no going back to pretending
00:37:00.020 women are naturally unfit for that kind of work. You can suppress it, punish it, bury it, that you
00:37:06.220 cannot honestly claim it never happened. The record is there. The tracks are there. The letters
00:37:11.500 are there. The stories of women like Mary, Elizabeth, Dorothy, and Margaret, and countless
00:37:16.640 unnamed friends are there, whispering from the archives. And the pattern they trace is painfully
00:37:22.460 familiar. A woman says, I have something to say that matters. The men in charge say, that's not
00:37:28.600 your place. She says, my authority doesn't come from you. They say, then we'll make you suffer
00:37:34.360 until you stop. Sometimes it's whips and gallows. Sometimes it's church discipline and social
00:37:39.760 ostracism. Sometimes it's online harassment, smear campaigns, and loss of livelihood.
00:37:45.360 The tools change. The impulse doesn't. We still live in a world where many denominations treat
00:37:50.320 women in pulpits as a current controversy. I personally was raised in the Southern Baptist
00:37:55.260 Church, where women have long been banned from serving as pastors. In many churches,
00:37:59.880 women who try to address abuse within religious institutions are labeled as divisive,
00:38:04.360 rebellious and unsubmissive. The idea that someone other than a straight cis man could
00:38:09.800 be the authoritative voice of God in a community triggers an almost reflexive panic. It's
00:38:15.120 the same nervous question echoing down the centuries. If we let her speak, what else
00:38:19.800 might people start questioning? Quaker women answered that question long ago by refusing
00:38:24.820 to wait for permission. They spoke, and then they built. They spoke, and then they took
00:38:29.480 minutes at meetings. They spoke, and then they crossed oceans, walked into hostile towns, and
00:38:34.860 wrote from prison. They spoke, and then they raised daughters who watched them do it. They did not ask
00:38:40.180 for a new role. They lived as though the role had always been theirs. Mary Dyer climbs the gallows
00:38:46.240 ladder in Boston. Margaret Fell dips her pen and ink in England. An unnamed woman somewhere in
00:38:51.640 between stands up in a quiet meeting and feels her heart pound as she says the first words that
00:38:56.200 have been burning inside her for months. None of them know what the 21st century will look like,
00:39:01.220 or what fights we'll still be having. They just know that in that moment, being obedient to God
00:39:06.660 looks less like submission to men and more like stubborn, public courage. And that is what
00:39:11.780 terrified men in charge. They called it heresy, sedition, madness. History has another word for it.
00:39:18.340 Resistance. I'm Professor Meredith, and this has been Bitchy History. If this episode made you
00:39:23.480 think about who gets to speak in your own communities and who gets punished for it,
00:39:27.760 share it with someone. Subscribe on Substack, leave a review, and maybe take a moment to
00:39:31.880 remember that somewhere, right now, another woman is standing up to say,
00:39:36.140 actually, I can speak just as well as you can. The least we can do is listen.
00:39:41.520 History. History. History. History.
00:39:45.520 What a bitch, right?