00:26:10.500It also, a curator described it as church.
00:26:13.020because of this mass incantation quality and because of the latency of it's impossible to
00:26:20.280have everyone start these stories at the exact same time so they're all like a half second off
00:26:24.140and it just creates this very musical din um it makes me think that this is the closest I will be
00:26:30.700to being a musician because it feels like a choir or something like this like you're conducting
00:26:37.040yes right I'm like the omniscient roaming narrator um and everyone's looking at their
00:26:44.500phone in a dark room yeah so you feel very alone but together how have people from different
00:26:50.240countries um responded to the piece it feels like a mirror of the city that you're in and most
00:26:56.160performances are this way because performances are great because they are you create a scaffolding
00:27:03.440or a structure that feels constant regardless of how many times you perform it but there's also
00:27:09.480so many components that are variable and they need to be accepting of those things the venue
00:27:14.660will feel different the audience feels different the sound is very different so in this case because
00:27:21.880it is participatory the the the tenor of each city really comes through so like when we did
00:27:28.420in Tokyo or Antwerp very very shy societies and you could feel like the pain the repression of
00:27:37.700speaking out loud because it's just not it's not as culturally acceptable or encouraged as let's
00:27:42.840say New York where like those performances feel very rowdy and they're jam-packed people want to
00:27:49.720be performers people are laughing out loud so it's there's a mirror of the society in that way but
00:27:55.940also a mirror of the infrastructure so berlin for example notoriously has very bad wi-fi very bad
00:28:03.260cell service as we learned when we tried to remote call yeah exactly when we were trying to do this
00:28:08.360zoom immediately it starts chugging because it just cannot handle this bandwidth so then this
00:28:14.300performance relies on cell service and if you don't have that a half second latency becomes a
00:28:19.960couple seconds which feels like cacophony but again it's not really about trying to correct
00:28:26.820these things but just instead trying to like bring light to them because they all feel like
00:28:31.680different components of why this performance feels quite different depending on how you do it
00:28:36.520this one I think will be rather large like the Brisbane one was I think 60 or so people I think
00:28:43.460this one will be several hundred so that also very much changes the tone and temperature of
00:28:48.440the performance. And what's kind of your message behind this? Because I love the title, A Sexual
00:28:54.620History of the Internet. But what do you mean by that? So in some ways, it feels like a revisionist
00:29:01.000history in that when we think about internet history, we think about all the grandfathers
00:29:07.360who made the architecture and protocol and it emerging from ARPANET and this military industrial
00:29:16.080complex and things like this but even thinking about the military the military has very close
00:29:23.440attachments with sexuality embodiment that it's constantly trying to confront or bury like don't
00:29:29.560ask don't tell for example but if you actually think about what we're trying to enliven here is
00:29:36.820I'm quoting 45 of my peers or scholars or sex worker friends or artist friends activist friends
00:29:44.320who have mapped these different stories of how the internet history is so entangled with embodiment
00:29:54.500and sexuality the first jpeg was a playboy model that this team at usc used just to test their
00:30:02.820compression algorithm and that play that playmate she was published as lena schlublum i can't
00:30:10.040pronounce the Swedish name. Her real name is Lena Forsen. She was not asked about this. She did not
00:30:15.820receive any compensation for it. At this point now, if you use her image, computer science
00:30:21.440journals will not accept it. But that was her only nude photo shoot. She was very young at the time.
00:30:27.180She didn't do a single nude shoot after. And this has kind of become an unwarranted legacy.
00:30:33.540So we have examples of that, which maybe feel a bit more towards extraction. But we also have
00:30:38.160examples of innovation, like thinking about sex workers who pushed forward the rise of e-com or
00:30:45.600streaming services, how things like Pornhub are actually tech companies, not adult entertainment
00:30:51.780companies. They pushed forward Aliyev Nox, sex worker who pushed forward cryptocurrencies and
00:30:56.920made them shippable before at the time when it was very, very speculative commodity.0.94
00:31:01.320um liara ru talks about pussy capital and how platforms often extract labor from women and1.00
00:31:09.440then erase it once the platform feels more stabilized like patreon for example so all of
00:31:15.760these things are kind of woven in in a very narrative citation based way and it also because
00:31:21.320of my background in art history there's a lot of contemporary examples of art and women who
00:31:27.480have negotiated these different topics like hannah bear or sarah friend um nodding to works
00:31:36.000like shauna michael and holloway or arvida bystrom or people like this so it's a mix of a lot of
00:31:43.620different things but generally like my writing style feels like a tapestry of like other people's
00:31:49.380works and i kind of weave them together and this feels like a like a verbalized or articulated
00:31:56.580version of that yeah like a curator yeah role as you said sex workers have always been early
00:32:03.660adopters of emerging tech like the cryptocurrency that you referenced how are web one and web 3.0
00:32:11.160which we're living in now and sex work interlinked web 1.0 was very much defined by what they call
00:32:18.780reading and writing you heard these terms to read to write it sounds obvious but it essentially
00:32:24.560referred to, if you want to use the internet, you need to know how a website works and how to
00:32:30.700upload it and how to code it. That's the writing part. And then you can also access it, which is
00:32:36.940the reading part. But then as we enter like early web 2.0, this is replaced by you only have to know
00:32:46.200how to access things. And we see the rise of websites that templatize things like Blogspot
00:32:52.960or tumblr or whatever it is there were sites that suddenly became aggregators like we see
00:33:00.480early google or yahoo or ask jeeves or these search engine type things um and then web 2.0
00:33:08.120late web 2.0 is very much characterized by platform oligopoly so that means not only are
00:33:14.360we using websites that templatize everything we're all using the same five which is very much what
00:33:20.180we're living in now. So everyone's using Instagram, Google, whatever it is. Web3 is a bit different
00:33:28.080because this was characterized by decentralized networks, which did exist in Web 1.0, like
00:33:34.840torrenting, right? This is an early example of web or of decentralized networks. But in these days,
00:33:41.800Web3 feels like it's kind of taken over by blockchain and crypto. But it could really be
00:33:48.060anything that's decentralized. Like when this was booming again in like 2018, there was like
00:33:54.120Beaker Browser and the DAT protocol and IPFS and all of these different attempts to create
00:33:59.360different types of decentralized networks. But blockchain really came out on top because of
00:34:05.460crypto and because of this new financial market and acceleration of that rather than like kind
00:34:12.760of the utopic principles of trying to be anti-capital which is kind of how it was originally
00:34:18.940framed and then web 4 is meant to be a bit more three-dimensional four-dimensional so thinking
00:34:25.220about sensory landscapes and sound augmentation and haptic sensations and things like this
00:34:31.940right so just different types of interfaces are we in web 4.0 now then depending on who you talk
00:34:37.740to, it's very blurry, right? Because we're in a multi, we're living in a society that's
00:34:43.520technologically literate across different spectrums. So like, is my mom existing in
00:34:48.820Web3? Definitely not. Do I have friends who are using a bit of Web4? For sure. But I would say
00:34:55.600most of us at this point are still pretty much in late Web 2.0, right? Unless you're actively
00:35:01.600using decentralized networks, which I don't think many people are because we saw the decline of
00:35:06.960crypto yeah even though there was a big boom in yeah pre-pandemic yeah oh the boom was pre-pandemic
00:35:14.400because i think of nfts and crypto as like 2021 22 actually you might be right because pandemic
00:35:20.180it's so interesting thinking about these hype cycles because pandemic was the push towards
00:35:27.620metaverse right so we the rise of streaming and augmented realities and virtual realities and
00:35:33.720things like this. And then I guess in 2022, you're right. It was Web3, blockchain, crypto, NFTs,
00:35:41.700all economies, etc. And then 2024 was this big AI boom. But what's different is AI is so much
00:35:50.120easier to access and integrate that I do think is here to stay. Whereas metaverse and crypto had
00:35:57.920such a learning curve it prevented a lot of access unless you were very tech literate but like who
00:36:05.100wants to create a wallet like it's just such a barrier of entry whereas now ai it's the first
00:36:11.520thing you see when you google search anything it's embedded in my email like it's just it's
00:36:16.740become very ubiquitous very quickly even though it's highly unprofitable and basically all these
00:36:21.600companies are in extreme amounts of debt yeah i mean to that point as well there's this quote that
00:36:26.360you have said which reads I try to approach emerging technologies with curiosity rather
00:36:32.760than fear but I don't believe neutrality exists I stay attentive to power labor access and who
00:36:39.100gets a raise in the process of innovation so can you expand on this with AI in mind you may have
00:36:44.880heard this quote technology is not neutral right like people think oh it's not about the tool it's
00:36:52.300how you use it and that is true to a certain degree but the tool itself is designed by people
00:36:58.180who have very specific biases intentions expectations for the tool and in many ways
00:37:05.340once that's released people use the tool as designed right so us being addicted to instagram
00:37:12.200that is by design us using a pencil within a very specific way that's by design so all of
00:37:20.140these things are considered biases for the tool itself. What's different in this case is we have
00:37:27.700tools that are suddenly very literate and hallucinate on their own. So if I'm using AI,
00:37:36.400it's going to basically do this experimentation where it's using a calculus and predicting a
00:37:45.600word pattern and because it has access to millions of texts it understands what is a common word
00:37:52.820pattern. AI even more dangerously is at this point part of an arms race for companies to try to make
00:38:01.000as much profit as possible and within a capitalist capitalist model you have basically doing things
00:38:09.440for profit with as little labor or low labor as possible. So in this case, laborers and
00:38:19.040resources themselves need to then be very, very, very affordable, which is why there's zero
00:38:25.200incentive. This idea that AI will eradicate labor and redistribute leisure for the rest of us
00:38:31.080can never happen in a capitalist model because it will just create new forms of labor that will be
00:38:38.820extraordinarily cheaper and now we're just replacing a lot of skilled labor with the like
00:38:44.060its likeness um uh this great uh italian scholar like silvia federici and tizia terranova will
00:38:54.540always have talked about this type of labor force so when ai was first being developed in like the
00:39:00.1801940s 1950s there was this very utopic impulse toward it right it was emerging from a academic
00:39:07.060framework funded by military but there was no primary tech company that was pushing it forward
00:39:14.880and even when sam altman was creating open ai one of their top three principles was to be as
00:39:23.020value aligned as possible but with the arms race that we're seeing and this hyper acceleration
00:39:31.480now it's like oh we don't actually have time to morally align anything we are going to just try
00:39:36.820to capitalize this on as quickly as possible, or someone else will do it first. And now the rest of
00:39:42.140us are then being asked to use this thing, like, if you don't use this, you'll get left behind.
00:39:47.980But who is actually using this, and how is it being incorporated into industry? In the West,
00:39:57.500when AI was first rolled out in recent times, it was used as a, they kind of used creative
00:40:04.760generation as a way to demonstrate its capacity so like we're gonna look it can write an essay
00:40:10.320or it can write this poem whereas in China they were using it as an agentic AI and they were
00:40:17.640embedding it into different layers of the stack so it wasn't actually that consumer facing and
00:40:22.980it made industry quite fast but it didn't have the same existential crisis that we're very much
00:40:29.700seeing because the first thing that it's coming for is all the creative work rather than the
00:40:34.220administrative work that it promised to. But even like Meredith Whitaker, who's the CEO of Signal,
00:40:41.400also a great tech critic and et cetera. Agentic AI for the consumer is also quite dangerous because
00:40:47.400in some ways, yeah, it seems great to have an AI schedule your calendar and like book your flights.
00:40:54.520But what does it actually need access to in order to do that? It needs access to your bank accounts,
00:40:59.880It's access to your cloud files, to all of your passwords, to the calendars of all of your peers and contacts. Like it becomes incredibly invasive. And we have to decide as a community, what are the barriers of do we actually value the right to privacy, which is a very important human right, regardless of this idea of I don't have anything to hide.
00:41:24.940So I think we are seeing a reckoning right now.
00:41:27.780And I don't even remember what your question was, but I just spiraled into this whole thing about, yeah, a lot of the tech anxieties that I'm very rapidly observing across multiple generations.
00:41:41.480Yeah, it's just a fascinating time to exist full stop, but to be someone who's researching in this space.
00:41:47.680Like there's just so much to think about.