Culture Club - July 25, 2022


Naarmcore Isn't An Aesthetic

Topics
When Kindness Becomes Clickbait Why Is Everyone Mad At Taylor Swift?

Episode Stats


Length

47 minutes

Words per minute

163.79

Word count

7,790

Sentence count

93

Harmful content

Misogyny

13

sentences flagged

Toxicity

13

sentences flagged

Hate speech

7

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 Kylie Jenner labelled a climate criminal,
00:00:10.200 Emrata's cheating rumours and why Namcor is not an aesthetic.
00:00:15.020 We're Jasmine and Maggie and you're listening to Culture Club,
00:00:18.160 our weekly chat about pop culture, current affairs, the internet and our lives.
00:00:22.780 we acknowledge that the Wurundjeri Woi Wurrung people are the traditional custodians of this
00:00:34.240 land we are on today we would like to pay our respects to elders past present and emerging
00:00:40.040 we'd also like to celebrate the rich history of first nations culture and storytelling that
00:00:45.620 we are continually learning from this always was and always will be aboriginal land
00:00:51.120 i feel like after a couple of years of you know being stuck in melbourne and whatnot
00:00:59.720 both you and i have been on quite a few flights this year is that
00:01:03.260 right like like half sydney siders in a way yeah i'd agree with that like last week we're in sydney
00:01:09.980 tuesday i'm going to queensland a few weeks after that i'm actually going overseas which is insane
00:01:15.420 first time in three years so yeah that's like been weighing quite heavily on my mind especially
00:01:19.240 going overseas i'm like oh god like it's so bad for the environment but this week i felt kind of
00:01:25.160 more not even better about it but just more like angry at myself for feeling that guilt
00:01:31.260 okay well this is always a push and pull right it's like individual responsibility or collective
00:01:38.240 action it's a bit of everything and it's a weird thing because i think we we are and we should be
00:01:44.580 allowed to be happy about travel right oh my god why did i feel like nervous saying that but it's
00:01:48.700 obviously it's like a an obvious moment um but yeah there can be some guilt attached to it when
00:01:55.560 we're thinking about like co2 emissions and stuff but you are right i feel like our kind of personal
00:02:01.860 travel activity has been put kind of in place um and in perspective this week because of miss
00:02:08.820 kylie jenner yes so kylie jenner has made headlines around the world this week after
00:02:14.420 taking a 17-minute flight on her private jet.
00:02:17.500 It all started when Kylie posted a picture of her
00:02:19.800 and partner Travis Scott embracing in front of two jets.
00:02:23.480 And the caption reads,
00:02:24.480 You want to take mine or yours?
00:02:27.020 Iconic rich person Instagram post.
00:02:29.620 Honestly, when I saw that, I wasn't even overly surprised.
00:02:32.660 But yes, it did incite some fury.
00:02:35.200 Me too.
00:02:35.640 And Kylie actually ended up turning off comments 1.00
00:02:39.340 because of the hate that she was receiving. 0.95
00:02:41.340 because according to an automated Twitter account that tracks celebrity flights,
00:02:46.500 Kylie's 17-minute flight took her from Van Nui in Los Angeles
00:02:51.500 to the nearby town of Camarillo.
00:02:54.400 And she'd earlier taken a 27-minute trip in her jet,
00:02:57.540 a $72 million jet also to Van Nui from Thermal, California.
00:03:04.800 So this 17-minute flight that she just went on,
00:03:07.720 it's actually estimated that the flight would have created one ton of co2 emissions okay to
00:03:15.060 put this in perspective because um i saw this number floating around and i was like i don't
00:03:19.080 know how much that is this is about one quarter of the total annual carbon footprint of an average
00:03:26.860 person so this is essentially how much carbon footprint hang on bear with me everybody um that
00:03:35.600 i would create in three months three months in 17 minutes oh my god it is a math and science class
00:03:41.980 today we are them girlies gone from astrology now we're doing science okay so the story gets worse
00:03:49.460 when you realize that kylie's trip would have only taken 40 minutes by car that's literally
00:03:55.340 like my house to your house yeah imagine no but imagine if i was like maggie i want to come over
00:04:02.220 and see you today we're in the same city or like close by 40 minutes but I'm gonna get on a private
00:04:08.700 jet to cut that travel time in half that is like psychotic behavior sorry like how are you that
00:04:16.260 far removed from reality that that is like a normal thought in your head like sorry I'm so angry
00:04:21.940 but fair enough like 40 minutes we are on the tarmac for 40 minutes we are like in the security
00:04:28.760 lines for 40 minutes like us normies just have to put up with this but I guess when you're rich
00:04:34.820 and time is money and you've got unlimited money like why not save excuse me let me do the maths
00:04:40.680 something like 28 minutes or whatever it is it's like the old 24 hours in a day from Beyonce quote
00:04:47.400 like of course everyone doesn't have the same time but obviously this got people quite angry
00:04:54.140 Lots of people on Twitter were going off.
00:04:56.120 One person wrote, Europe is on fire.
00:04:58.160 Meanwhile, Kylie Jenner is taking 15-minute trips in her private jet.
00:05:02.180 Another one said, I could recycle everything, buy all my clothes secondhand, compost, and
00:05:07.100 grow my own food for the rest of my life, and it wouldn't even begin to offset the footprint 0.98
00:05:11.380 from one of her flights.
00:05:12.960 That's an exaggeration.
00:05:14.260 Yeah, I was going to say.
00:05:15.180 But you get where they're coming from.
00:05:20.020 Completely.
00:05:20.500 um there's been so many memes about you know us having to use paper straws while they you know
00:05:26.420 rich people get to just fly off on their private jets um and it's interesting that this has been
00:05:33.820 such a massive topic this week um i've seen it along twitter especially um because you know
00:05:39.680 obviously kylie jenner is not the only celebrity who has a private jet and uses it so just recently
00:05:47.540 drake flew from hamilton in ontario to toronto which took just 18 minutes and caused five tons
00:05:56.800 of co2 emissions mark walberg flew from las vegas to california in 40 minutes and emitted four tons
00:06:05.400 of co2 which again is what one person's average emissions is across the globe it's so sickening
00:06:13.260 so that makes sense right like one ton is one quarter four tons is equals you know what everyone
00:06:19.640 would put out on average oh yes on a year in a year in a year i just don't understand how they
00:06:25.360 can like justify that i just i guess they just like they don't care like they must not think
00:06:30.000 about it it must just be like oh i have access to a private jet i'm just going to use it without
00:06:33.200 actually knowing like the science behind it or something i don't know but anyway leonardo
00:06:37.380 dicaprio also came under fire back in 2016 so this conversation has been kind of happening for a while
00:06:42.600 for flying on a private jet to receive an environmental award that's hilarious i mean
00:06:49.260 like comedy is literally writing itself here and then he was in don't look up like so like i said
00:06:54.400 before it does make me annoyed for feeling guilty on the weekend when it was raining in melbourne
00:07:00.060 freezing cold and i had to wash two bed sheets and i had to use a tumble dryer to dry them so i
00:07:05.740 could sleep on them that night and i was putting them in a tumble dryer and i was like god tumble
00:07:08.760 drives are so bad for the environment i'm using so much energy right now like i've got to use the
00:07:12.780 heater tonight because it's so cold and like those thoughts of like oh god like i'm contributing to
00:07:17.100 climate change and then you have people like like celebrities who are doing this it just is very
00:07:23.620 it's very helpless feeling i think for me though i have to say that i do get tired when we do
00:07:31.380 point fingers at celebrities sometimes because in the back of my head the whole time right when i'm
00:07:36.040 seeing these memes and articles I'm like oh but it's like corporations are still you know the
00:07:40.640 mass contributors to this and almost like again pinning it to one person is an extension of that
00:07:46.540 like personal responsibility personal onus to climate change so it's a tough one because I
00:07:51.960 think there's different layers to that right you're so right even if we're looking at individuals
00:07:56.100 when we're trying to do stuff and then you see other people doing nothing or making things worse
00:08:02.000 you feel crap but then on the layer on top of that I'm just like well behind them we've got
00:08:07.260 like the big corporations that are just like laughing laughing like the owners of the jets 0.86
00:08:13.940 or the owners of the fuel companies that are flying the jets yeah I was going to ask you like
00:08:19.600 do we think that Kylie in particular right now is being used as a target for all of our helplessness
00:08:24.920 around climate change like because she is high profile and she has a face and a name and we can
00:08:29.660 comment on her Instagram she's the one who's been called a climate criminal when it is corporations
00:08:34.960 yeah I think it's like entertaining for people to also you know get annoyed and get riled up
00:08:40.840 at celebrities like that's more fun than lol sorry political episode when you know labor's
00:08:48.240 opening new gas and coal mines but that's not that fun to chat about on air it's just sad
00:08:54.400 true yeah so some celebrities do have a conscience it seems back in 2019 Bella Hadid took to Instagram
00:09:01.620 to share that she'll be offsetting her carbon emissions by planting trees the model said
00:09:06.940 donating 600 trees to be planted 20 for each flight I took these past three months and probably will
00:09:13.240 continue for the rest of the year Bella continues it makes me sad how much my job affects my carbon
00:09:18.680 footprint and how brutally climate change is obviously affecting the world so how do you feel
00:09:24.100 about models like Bella or celebrities like Bella who are at least attempting to offset their
00:09:30.380 emissions like it's kind of it's really complicated right because on one hand you're like oh good for
00:09:36.260 you like I haven't planted 600 trees this year like you know you're doing something but on the
00:09:41.240 other hand she's still like a wealthy celebrity who is taking all these flights most likely in
00:09:46.500 private jets yeah I'm always a bit skeptical when celebs sometimes speak up about things like this
00:09:52.820 especially when it's um I guess the result is just like trees being planted slash like donating to
00:09:58.340 charities where trees are being planted like that is not going to solve the crisis and nor am I
00:10:03.620 putting the climate crisis on the shoulders of the of Bella sorry Bella um but I'm actually glad
00:10:09.480 that she did say something I think especially that line she said it makes me sad how much my
00:10:13.800 job affects my carbon footprint like that felt really real and relatable right um so that's nice
00:10:20.020 and I think that gets people to reflect perhaps on their own job
00:10:22.740 or their own footprint.
00:10:24.740 I think a lot of these celebrities, like,
00:10:27.880 why don't they just fly first class?
00:10:29.760 Like that's still very private, right?
00:10:32.120 Yeah, I'll take that.
00:10:34.540 And you still get like this amazing experience.
00:10:36.720 You get to lie down.
00:10:38.420 You can have your own little cabin or something for privacy
00:10:40.400 and you have your security guard next to you.
00:10:42.920 Because according to The Guardian,
00:10:44.920 private jets are responsible for around 4% of all aviation emissions.
00:10:48.960 the Guardian also reported that private aircraft still emit more than 33 million tons of greenhouse
00:10:55.020 gases which is more than the country of Denmark and because they carry so few people they are 5
00:11:00.960 to 14 times more polluting than commercial planes per passenger and 50 times more polluting than
00:11:06.560 trains so that also makes me feel better like when I'm crammed in economy like a bloody cow
00:11:12.940 and cattle um you know going over to the uk that it's like me and all these hundreds of people on 0.71
00:11:20.300 this plane are like doing so much less damage than like the kardashian jenna family of like
00:11:26.520 five of them whatever going you know across the country yeah i like how that puts it in perspective
00:11:32.700 as well um yeah look at us science lessening up culture club i have actually learned so much
00:11:40.900 to this segment. Just recently two of Gen Z's internet darlings Addison Rae and Emma Chamberlain
00:11:53.660 have been in quirky high editorial photo shoots and we want to talk about it because I think it's
00:12:01.420 really interesting. So these two photo shoots that have really just come out in about the last week
00:12:07.640 are markedly different to their previous you know kind of youthful influencer image and vibe and
00:12:14.440 shoots they've been a part of um okay so jazz you have seen these photos or what do you think of
00:12:20.020 them i think they are very very cool it sounds so lame too cool for us though right very cool
00:12:29.400 sweetie i'm so proud of you they feel very editorial very like paper magazine but like a
00:12:35.660 bit more grungy um and i think it's definitely signaling new directions for both of them
00:12:42.900 particularly addison ray because you know she kind of went from like southern bell tiktoker
00:12:48.960 to cali tiktoker to netflix darling rom-com comedy gal and now it seems like she's trying
00:12:56.980 to be more high fashion which is fascinating and i i don't mind addison i think she seems like a
00:13:02.460 sweet girl um yeah no no complaints yeah no great way of putting the photos I feel like that's how
00:13:10.440 I feel about them too we'll quickly try to describe them but we will post them to our 0.80
00:13:15.660 Instagram so for Emma we saw her with long peroxide blonde hair and she's kind of in an
00:13:22.600 office setting an at-home gym in a bedroom uh they're shot on flash it kind of gives like that
00:13:28.680 old digital flash family camera that you had at home vibes and they're a bit eerie, bit outer
00:13:34.920 worldly, interesting. As you can tell it's hard to describe these images so definitely look at
00:13:40.300 them yourselves but for Addison she's got long black extensions in, she's got bleached brows 0.99
00:13:47.240 as does Emma actually. Addison's wearing this very Y2K fit of like headbands wrap around sunnies and 1.00
00:13:54.440 this I don't know little matching skirt jacket number what's really cool about both of these
00:14:01.640 I think is that both of them were styled by Melbourne born artist Ghadir Rajab. Both aren't
00:14:09.900 actually tied to any projects or publications which usually would be the case when you see
00:14:14.860 those like high editorial shoots it seems like it's purely for brand image and experimentation
00:14:20.520 which is lovely to like I know it's just nice to see people be creative I guess and I think I mean
00:14:26.220 of course on Instagram most people following Addison and Emma are fans of theirs so the
00:14:31.700 reception's been really positive but I just think it's so interesting to compare these photos to
00:14:37.520 just a few years ago those iconic like Coachella influencer shoots that like especially Emma was a
00:14:43.960 part of you know it's very visco cam high saturation really stylized and like pinterest
00:14:50.500 girly i guess this is such such an exit from that and they're really i think trying to stray away
00:14:57.600 from um that brand image you know emma herself you know she deletes her old youtube video she
00:15:03.240 archives her instagram photos so there's really like you know she's really i think trying to take
00:15:08.920 control of her image and it's interesting to see the projects that she's really focusing
00:15:13.600 on at the moment such as her podcast and her coffee brand oh my god I could talk about her
00:15:20.340 all day this is so funny um but yeah I just wanted to kind of see like is this a new direction
00:15:26.460 that's for influencers um to be taken seriously as artists because yeah I wouldn't be surprised
00:15:34.100 if we saw more influencers do more projects like this yeah I agree because even looking at Addison
00:15:40.920 Ray's um Instagram just then like it's still quite um youthful colorful um she's just done like a
00:15:49.060 collaboration with a Barbie doll company and then you look at these and it's very like paparazzi-esque
00:15:54.660 Britney Spears it's like Lindsay Lohan era of those paparazzi shoots shot on like a little
00:15:59.900 flip phone so yeah i'll be interested to see where both of them go i think emma chamberlain to me is
00:16:05.240 already very high fashion very stylish she's not an influence to me she's like more than an 0.54
00:16:11.540 influencer if that makes sense like girl she's an old girl yeah so i think you're right and i would
00:16:19.740 love to hear what um culture club listeners actually think about these shots because i'm
00:16:23.760 not gonna lie especially addison's photos are like they look like they were shot on like a flip phone
00:16:28.620 like your mum took them at a weird angle but that is the vibe so I do want everyone to hop
00:16:33.060 down on the Instagram and leave us a thought or a comment. Supermodel and new mum Emily Ratajkowski
00:16:43.660 is reportedly filing for divorce from her film producer husband Sebastian Bear McLeod. An
00:16:49.300 alleged source close to her told Page Six that yeah he cheated he's a serial cheater it's gross
00:16:55.840 he's a dog which very candid for these alleged source right they're usually pretty um pretty 0.70
00:17:03.680 calm and civil uh but yeah there's been rumors for a couple weeks now um that kind of started
00:17:10.620 when em was spotted without her wedding ring and then more recently on the 18th of july another
00:17:17.680 source told people quote they split recently it was em's decision she is doing okay she is strong
00:17:24.720 and focus on her son she loves being a mom so we need to go back a little bit in time if you're
00:17:30.060 unaware the pair announced their relationship in february 2018 and two weeks later they got married
00:17:35.580 then in march 2021 the pair welcomed their first son sylvester so we don't really talk about cheating
00:17:42.300 rumors i feel like that much on culture club they kind of just come and go but i think what's um
00:17:48.240 different about this one was a commentary around it was pretty interesting there was this tiktok
00:17:53.440 video by user victoria.ilario which framed these celeb cheating stories in a new light
00:18:00.540 so the caption to the video read i'll never understand the people caring more about emily
00:18:06.100 rada getting cheated on than themselves getting cheated on so in the video she talks about the 0.95
00:18:11.980 comments that are thrown around like what hope do we have if em rada is cheated on or why would
00:18:18.140 anyone ever cheat on Beyonce she asked why we don't carry this energy for ourselves or for our
00:18:23.920 own friends where we're almost like more accepting of the infidelity yeah I thought this conversation
00:18:29.840 was so interesting and really revealed a lot of kind of feminist theory almost or like 0.98
00:18:37.640 feminist thinking of like why do we find it so shocking when men cheat on beautiful women
00:18:44.340 like what's the difference you know yeah a lot of the comments were kind of reflecting on that as
00:18:52.840 well you know one read just because you're conventionally attractive and famous doesn't
00:18:57.220 mean you're excluded from being cheated on someone else actually argued quote it's not about them
00:19:02.760 being celebrities it's about them functioning at perceived optimum capacity if said optimum
00:19:08.840 isn't enough than what is god that's such like a capitalist sentence like optimum capacity like
00:19:15.400 little robots oh my god no true actually i actually like that in the sense of like okay
00:19:20.420 they are performing at their peak this is like the oh my god this is quite growy language but
00:19:26.620 like alpha like you know what i mean like they're top of their game yet they're still being cheated
00:19:30.780 on but you're right that is kind of weird wording writer jesse stevens wrote a piece for mamma mia
00:19:36.480 which read this commentary betrays our most basic assumptions that when a man cheats on a woman it
00:19:42.260 is due to her own lack of desirability when women are cheated on we are programmed to search for
00:19:47.220 fault within ourselves a voice whispers in our ear perhaps if we were just thinner or put in more 0.84
00:19:52.580 effort or if we'd had more sex or if we'd been more attentive or if we just looked a little bit
00:19:57.560 more like say Emily Ratajkowski he wouldn't have strayed the term strayed does a fantastic job of
00:20:04.280 putting the onus on the woman in this scenario as though she wasn't working hard enough to keep
00:20:08.300 his attention it just like shivers over the whole like straying rhetoric as well completely and i
00:20:17.780 think um it really calls into question i think this emrata thing of like wow we really do look
00:20:23.860 at the person that's being cheated on and like ask why or put not necessarily blame on them but
00:20:30.840 You kind of try to understand the cheating by looking at the individuals in the relationship
00:20:38.340 but more so on the person that's being cheated on usually, I think.
00:20:43.500 So, yeah, I like the way that this is kind of questioned or made a lot of people question
00:20:48.920 the way they look at cheating even in their own circles of friends and whatnot.
00:20:53.680 Yeah, because it's like, oh, if she's being cheated on, what help do I have?
00:20:56.920 which is just so like self-depreciative and like just an awful thing to say about yourself like 1.00
00:21:03.940 no one should be cheated on but also beautiful women aren't immune to being cheated on so like
00:21:09.620 i don't know yeah and it's just like is it even about the person that's being cheated on rather
00:21:15.260 than it's just a cheater yeah you know like it's very almost victim blaming right yeah that's like
00:21:21.240 we're talking about like oh what if amrata has been cheated on what hope do i have but
00:21:25.220 it's not even anything to do with emirana it's like to do with her husband or whoever the cheater
00:21:30.460 is to you know have this affair the internet loves to put labels on aesthetics from calling
00:21:43.260 everything an era to chucking core at the end of buzzwords we love to categorize different
00:21:49.040 subcultures and styles. But what happens when it becomes problematic? Over on social media there's
00:21:55.660 been a rise of Gormcore. The hashtag on TikTok has over 659,000 views already. So just an
00:22:04.760 explanation on what Gormcore is supposed to represent. It's a distinct type of Melbourne
00:22:10.920 fashion. You know the one it's like edgy cool north side. As fashion journal writer Hazel Lee
00:22:17.460 describes it, quote, walking down Swanson Street, dressed in your best gawp core drip, showing off
00:22:23.840 your khaki parachute pants, walking past people in Brunswick slash Fitzroy, wearing the most
00:22:30.080 outrageously ugly outfits, and wearing salamons. So in recent weeks, people have been speaking out
00:22:36.120 against this careless use of the phrase, including several First Nations people. But before we get
00:22:41.420 into that conversation, we just want to give a brief explainer on the word naam. And thanks to
00:22:46.580 Clothing in the Gaps for this information. While most people think that NARM is just used to refer
00:22:52.560 to Melbourne, it's actually used by both Wurundjeri, Woiwurrung and Boonwurrung language groups of the
00:22:57.660 Kulin Nation. In Woiwurrung language, NARM is referred to, quote, the scrub land, which is known
00:23:03.960 as the modern day Melbourne CBD. And in Boonwurrung language, NARM is referred to as the Bay, which is
00:23:09.780 known as Port Phillip Bay. And we'll also play a snippet from Sianna Cthulhu from Clothing in the Gaps
00:23:15.140 about this i think it is great that people switch out their place names for traditional place names
00:23:21.800 it makes aboriginal people feel seen and heard and it is part of the truth telling that needs
00:23:27.140 to happen in this country however using aboriginal language to fit a trending aesthetic dismisses
00:23:34.180 65 000 years of history and depth of aboriginal languages cultures and practices so ditch nam
00:23:41.620 call it is not an aesthetic and instead celebrate the true custodians of this country by raising
00:23:46.380 awareness of our campaigns and causes and spend your time celebrating black business it always
00:23:52.120 was it always will be aboriginal land if you'd like to listen to that full video we'll have it
00:23:58.340 linked in our show notes and we also recommend you listening to our interview with sienna which
00:24:03.720 is also linked in the show notes so last month a video by user at punisher.mp3 questioned
00:24:11.000 this aesthetic saying are we redefining nam for a white aesthetic now punisher.mp3 aka lily
00:24:18.540 is non-indigenous and it was a really interesting video because i think it touched on what a lot of
00:24:26.180 us were thinking about perhaps talking about um i know me and you actually had a discussion
00:24:32.380 about it um you know privately after we saw this video because it did feel a bit icky i personally
00:24:40.300 felt when i was seeing all these like nam core memes and yeah aesthetic videos yeah and it being
00:24:48.420 used as like almost a punchline right like especially on twitter i saw a lot of like
00:24:54.240 now i'm presenting baddie at gas and like uh those like instagram shit posting where there's
00:25:00.320 just like they're really anonymous like you don't know who is running them but they get so many um
00:25:05.640 so much interaction but they get so much interaction because like they are so niche to
00:25:10.000 like melbourne or whatever it is um so i was already seeing them being like oh this feels
00:25:15.080 gross but then there was a lily's video but first nations creator model and tiktoker tarik
00:25:23.240 junaid is matt finally also said what many people are thinking and that is that nam core isn't a
00:25:29.400 joke or an aesthetic we'll play a snippet from their tiktok that has been viewed close to 100
00:25:34.560 thousand times. We told you to use Naam and to start embracing our culture and learning that
00:25:48.080 it's still here. You may think that it's like not that deep, but it kind of is. Naam is a place
00:25:59.300 name it's a place name it's not like your little fashion moment kind of thing like it's not
00:26:08.900 we wanted to hear more from tarik so we got him to answer a few questions here they are in their
00:26:17.020 own words when did you first notice that namcore was becoming an aesthetic i first realized that
00:26:24.380 Namco was becoming like a little bit of a TikTok aesthetic not long after Melbourne Fashion started
00:26:31.200 posting um the videos of like people in the city wearing kind of baggy outfits with you know kind
00:26:40.280 of ugly shoes hoodies those like crossbody bags whatever tie-dye bleach shirts
00:26:48.980 I think that's when I started noticing it um and I honestly didn't pay that much attention to it
00:26:56.560 because I don't really live like in that kind of north area um and honestly my TikTok is usually
00:27:06.580 just full of videos of kind of embarrassing like just Bella Hadid because she's beautiful
00:27:14.720 and yeah I kind of just didn't really pay attention to it at all because I was just like
00:27:21.620 this is just another little TikTok thingy whatever not my vibe um a bit strange though
00:27:29.240 so I kind of just scrolled past it until I saw a video from another creator um and she wasn't
00:27:37.540 really sure how to talk about it because she's not Indigenous. And I realised, oh, like, this
00:27:44.880 is a thing. I didn't realise it was because I don't surround myself with those kinds of
00:27:50.220 people. And then when I saw what it was, that it was, I, you know, decided to make that
00:27:57.600 video because I'm Indigenous and I have a lot of thoughts about it. So I'd like to speak
00:28:05.000 about it as a first nations person how does it make you feel to see that the term naam is being
00:28:10.340 co-opted intentionally or otherwise it hurts to see that something that belongs to us which
00:28:20.380 i i mean some people say you know oh like are we allowed to even use naam at all
00:28:28.960 um because a lot of the time you know we'll say it's an indigenous word yeah obviously you can
00:28:37.360 use it but you need to remember that this isn't like it's not a European word it's not like
00:28:46.660 Melbourne it's not like named after some old colonizer that once lived here or lived in
00:28:55.060 England and did some work in Australia whatever like you need to remember that
00:29:03.040 it has meaning behind it and at the end of the day it's a place name
00:29:07.940 it's not an aesthetic um and we gave you this word sort of so that you can always remember that
00:29:18.220 we're still here and we're always going to be here and as much as this government wants to
00:29:24.780 destroy us and put us down. Our culture will always be here. And this always was, always will
00:29:31.660 be Aboriginal land. So it hurts to see that people have taken this word and sort of twisted it into
00:29:41.980 this little aesthetic, which completely is so far from any sort of Indigenous meaning. 0.74
00:29:52.360 it's so far from it like and it's a bit ridiculous honestly um it's quite silly seeing 0.80
00:30:01.120 naam core everywhere like it doesn't make sense because at the end of the day when you see the
00:30:07.840 naam core you think oh that's like melbourne stuff blah blah blah and it's like exactly
00:30:11.700 exactly you just proved my point you don't actually know what naam means because when you
00:30:17.360 see it, you think this is Melbourne, but you call it Namco just because it sounds like you're trying
00:30:25.120 to be woke. You're trying to sound educated. I don't have hate for these people. It's just
00:30:31.440 disappointing that people don't take the time to educate themselves. They rely on people of colour. 1.00
00:30:37.780 They rely on black indigenous people of colour to constantly educate them because they either 1.00
00:30:45.280 can't be bothered or they just don't see that it's a problem. And that in itself is a problem 1.00
00:30:53.160 that people aren't seeing that it's a problem. You see the world around you every day. You wake
00:30:59.460 up, you go outside, you see the world, you see the horrible things, you see the good things,
00:31:02.900 beautiful things, bad things. You see all of that. Why can't you see the stuff, the things
00:31:08.660 that you're doing in your life that make negative impacts on us? It doesn't make sense.
00:31:14.620 I'm not one of those people that despise someone for getting it wrong. I don't think we should do
00:31:21.420 that because everyone makes mistakes, everyone says the wrong things, I say the wrong things
00:31:29.020 and I obviously can't speak for other ethnicities and other races when it comes to people saying
00:31:38.120 offensive things. I can only speak for myself and my experiences as an Indigenous and Pakistani
00:31:45.880 person. But this country just doesn't educate its people. There's no real sort of education system
00:31:58.460 based around other cultures and other religions, ethnicities, races. This country doesn't really
00:32:06.400 teach that even indigenous culture it's so shocking that my father who grew up in pakistan 1.00
00:32:14.880 knew more about indigenous people from high school than they teach here like it's ridiculous 0.52
00:32:24.720 um so i don't think that we should have hate for these people that aren't educated
00:32:29.680 just to remind them that you don't rely on us to educate you once you've done something wrong
00:32:38.960 just there's no harm in just looking stuff up just researching sure it might be boring
00:32:46.660 sure at the end of the day you might find nothing sure you might find something wrong and make a
00:32:51.920 mistake but that's the whole process of educating yourself is that you make mistakes and you learn
00:32:58.740 from them and you don't do it again and you try not to do it again and i think that's what a lot
00:33:08.140 of us want to put out there there's no harm in educating yourself because you will make mistakes
00:33:14.880 but that's the whole part of the process do you think that this is virtue signaling
00:33:22.200 do you think it's people being mindless about what they're saying or do you think it's people
00:33:28.040 genuinely thinking they're trying to be inclusive by saying Naam or putting Naam in their bio etc
00:33:33.640 etc I do think there's there is a difference between you know using Naam as a place name
00:33:40.160 perhaps having it in your bio instead of Melbourne and using something like Naam Core which is you
00:33:47.260 know an aesthetic a style like you mentioned before kind of like a punchline at times I think
00:33:54.320 I think it's virtue signaling because people it seems are trying to appear woke by just you just
00:34:05.160 using the language of it and I think what's worse and what's making me feel the most icky it's almost
00:34:11.380 for personal gain right they're using the arm core to be associated and closer to wokeness in a way
00:34:18.360 to show that oh yes you know I'm knowledgeable about indigenous culture and history but I'm
00:34:27.340 actually using it just for myself you know this is how I interpret it and it doesn't in any way
00:34:34.460 pay any respect to the thousands of years of history that's already been there I also feel 0.79
00:34:41.540 like by you know that beautiful line that Lily had you know are we redefining Nam for a white
00:34:47.400 aesthetic is that not just recolonization like we are taking language and putting a white gaze on
00:34:54.480 top of it like oh that is that is painful but I want to hear what you think yeah I think I agree
00:35:02.560 with all of that and I just think it is definitely people getting caught up in the internet as well
00:35:07.940 and like all of us crave to be in groups and to be seen and we're going to be part of something
00:35:15.860 But when you actually don't think about like words mean something, I feel like I say that quite often in this podcast, like your words have so much impact and kind of taking a word from a First Nations language and using it for your own gain, whether that's social clout, TikTok clout, getting views or just like you said, being associated with wokeness or Indigenous culture.
00:35:43.680 i think that is so damaging and i was speaking to some people about this at um a first nations
00:35:51.200 event yesterday and it does feel like especially with tarik's tiktok that it's and sienna's it's
00:35:58.520 almost being like nipped in the bud kind of like this has kind of been emerging and first nation
00:36:03.560 creators have like not they shouldn't have even had to in the first place like they should not 0.99
00:36:08.340 have even been a thing but it feels like they've kind of come out now and said like this is fuck 0.82
00:36:12.380 like what are you guys doing stop it and our our culture isn't an aesthetic it's not a joke it's 0.96
00:36:19.940 like thousands of years worth of history and culture um so i'm hoping that because of these 0.91
00:36:25.840 conversations that people are like oh shit like check themselves and you know actually help 0.89
00:36:33.540 indigenous people pay the rent show support show support for actual nam core brands so tarik in the 0.97
00:36:40.180 um tiktok says you know what actually is noncore it is brands like non-based black labels like
00:36:48.180 nagali house of dizzy roland vision and of course clothing in the gaps so like support those brands
00:36:55.020 don't like dress up in your car keys and sorry tarik also notes like the mr winston jumper like
00:37:00.340 you do that you do you but don't pretend like that is not like that is a nam aesthetic it's not
00:37:07.700 I'm having trouble verbalizing this point as well but I feel like this also just shows that
00:37:15.820 there is cultural capital and coolness that's afforded to people that I guess
00:37:23.100 are seen as allies or you know on the outer I don't know how to describe this but
00:37:30.580 like there's cultural capital afforded to people who are seen as allies to First Nations people
00:37:37.020 and that safety is not actually afforded to actual first nations people yes yes yes yes
00:37:43.300 yeah we signed up so well and i think yeah a lot of that came after the black lives matter movement
00:37:50.320 and just being seen like we have to do more than just putting nam in our bio sorry like
00:37:56.200 it should be a daily practice of like hey what am i doing to decolonize my life or my city or
00:38:05.280 even language like my my city it's not my city you know what i mean like things like that um
00:38:10.700 supporting just brands doing what you can to just uplift voices is so much more than getting
00:38:19.520 together with your friends in front of the state library dressed in your nam core drip you know
00:38:23.200 so i want to say a big thank you to tarik for taking the time to make the tiktok video in the
00:38:29.500 first place because i think it was such an important conversation to have on that particular
00:38:34.820 platform where Namcourt is really like emerging and for taking the time to answer our questions
00:38:41.820 today definitely give them a follow at literally Kate Bush on Instagram and TikTok they also
00:38:48.620 have the best fashion content as a side
00:38:51.320 it is time for recommendations Jazz I'm really excited to hear what you've loved reading listening
00:39:03.240 to all watching this week so kind of a controversial recommendation today because this movie has been
00:39:10.100 slated online but i have been reflecting on it the last day or two and i think i liked it it is
00:39:16.780 persuasion which is a jane austen adaptation it is available on netflix and is directed by carrie
00:39:23.300 cracknell who has a lot of um experience in the theater and it loosely follows the plot of austen's
00:39:30.720 original so we've got ann elliott who's played by dakota johnson she is rich pretty charming and 0.59
00:39:36.820 was once in love with a poor young sailor frederick wentworth they are engaged they were engaged to be
00:39:44.000 married but it's ann's friends and relatives who then convince her that she shouldn't you know
00:39:49.200 throw away herself at 19 or male with no money and so she breaks his heart and then we fast forward
00:39:55.200 to eight years later she's dealing with the fact that like she never had this like her love of her
00:40:01.260 life and she's now kind of resigned to like looking after her sister's children and she's
00:40:05.580 considered a spinster and like a difficult woman etc um meanwhile Wentworth has become like a navy
00:40:11.340 and he's rich and he ends up coming back to um where they live and stuff ensues I don't want
00:40:19.340 too much away but that is the basic plot of the film um so i loved this film because
00:40:26.620 if you don't compare it to jane austen it's actually such an easy watch like
00:40:32.420 it's an hour and 50 minutes it's beautiful costumes beautiful um scenery there's a scene
00:40:40.800 by the ocean she like swims in the ocean and it's just so stunning um set in bath which is
00:40:46.140 like beautiful Regency era stuff it's very Bridgerton you could tell they were trying to be
00:40:50.220 Bridgerton one thing I didn't like about it is the way Anne Elliot slash Dakota Johnson breaks the
00:40:57.100 fourth wall so she's the narrator and she speaks to the camera quite often and I just feel like
00:41:02.580 that takes me out of it I feel like I'm then watching a modern kind of show that was a lot
00:41:07.720 of the criticism as well was that um it's like the fleabagification of Jane Austen which is very
00:41:15.000 funny but so I kind of went in with an open mind and the next day I was like you know what I actually
00:41:23.360 did enjoy that one hour 50 minutes it was just yeah an easy watch and I loved this piece for
00:41:29.180 Cosmopolitan uh which is titled the new persuasion may not be for Jane Austen Puris but it is for
00:41:35.320 sad girls by Leah Marilla Thomas it reads maybe the biggest critique of the movie is that Johnson
00:41:41.420 as Anne doesn't look or talk like an Austin-era heroine. Sure, Johnson's Anne looks a bit like a
00:41:47.280 time traveller who has been resigned to her fate, but Keira Knightley's bangs were flopping around 0.99
00:41:51.620 in the 2005 Pride and Prejudice 2. This is a period piece for those of us who don't wait
00:41:56.600 until Pumpkin Spice is on the menu to listen to folklore, an important demographic. It's for
00:42:01.800 driving through the suburbs and crying. It's for those who are prone to self-sabotage and lie awake
00:42:06.560 spiralling about all the different ways things could have gone with a crush, another important
00:42:10.600 demographic this is a period piece for people who heard the word chuggy and shuddered a little bit
00:42:16.020 because they were like that might be me books do not go to bed at night dreaming about becoming
00:42:21.080 films when they grow up they're already grown if you're an austin purist and can't get past
00:42:26.160 all of this then by all means feel free to skip this one oh that is such a great line books do
00:42:32.780 not go to bed at night dreaming about becoming films when they grow up they're already grown
00:42:38.260 love it oh and I thought yeah like such a a good thing to remember like Jane Austen is over 200
00:42:45.340 years old her work is over 200 years old it's important for it to be like accessible to new
00:42:50.720 audiences and people who don't want to read through like hundreds of pages of like old
00:42:55.640 fashioned English um but I do I do understand like the flip side of it as well because apparently
00:43:02.260 the original is very like I haven't seen it or read it this is actually like my first interaction
00:43:07.560 with persuasion um it's like very romantic i feel like the most romance was like quickly
00:43:13.720 shoved into the end of the movie but anyway also there's a birdie song like an original song made
00:43:19.320 for the movie and i sobbed it's at the end of the movie and it's just so beautiful so there
00:43:25.060 were definitely positives and i feel like the internet can get on a bit of a momentum of a
00:43:29.020 hate train sometimes and like there's like four bad reviews so then everyone's like oh god oh and
00:43:34.100 like the social media machine continues so I feel kind of bad for this director so anyway
00:43:40.020 if you're into like Bridgerton and like lighter not super heavy kind of like your Emma like the
00:43:46.400 recent Emma adaption or Clueless etc watch this it's just like an easy romantic comedy if you
00:43:53.260 don't think about it as a Jane Austen movie yeah lovely I'm glad that you enjoyed it and I feel
00:43:58.980 like sometimes that's all you can really ask from a film like yeah i enjoyed sitting through that
00:44:04.040 like i can be enough so thank you jazz and what have you loved that you've read watched or listened
00:44:09.920 to this week i feel like i have been a bit slow this week to consume much content um but me and
00:44:16.780 you joined a book club and we had our first book this week and it was the seven husbands of evelyn
00:44:23.340 Hugo by Taylor Jenkins Reid so I think many of our followers would have at least heard of this
00:44:31.320 book if not read it it is this fun and enthralling romance book it's very hyped and very popular
00:44:38.760 it's also being adapted into a film which we agree that we will think will be great like it's a great
00:44:45.320 medium for it even though it's a grown book on its own so I went in knowing nothing about the plot
00:44:52.020 and it is about just very briefly a fictional old Hollywood star called Evelyn Hugo who at the age
00:45:00.320 of 79 gives a final interview to an unknown journalist Monique Grant. It kind of flip-flops
00:45:08.280 from this modern day interaction of this young journalist learning more and interviewing Evelyn
00:45:13.660 as well as jumping back to Evelyn's long life where as it says in the title she's had seven
00:45:20.900 husbands and a glittering film career. I found it quite salacious and a bit gripping. It's very
00:45:28.680 much like book club fodder. Like this, you know that the mums will love this as well. And I did
00:45:35.900 too. I finished it quite easily in about four days. I am unsure about the force of racial
00:45:42.440 representation in the book taylor jenkins reed is white um but evelyn hugo is cuban and monique
00:45:51.200 grant is a biracial black woman um but that's for another day i did want to add though i did
00:45:59.000 see the new minions movie this week which is funny um and they really randomly had great
00:46:06.580 Asian representation and it was actually done well and just goes to show like let's look to
00:46:14.260 Minions as a you know as a prime example um that was half a joke but no they actually did that
00:46:20.560 pretty well so just wanted to add that I love that we also got like a little Minions recommendation
00:46:25.000 in there actually I would not recommend it in the cinemas but like it's still a cute watch you know
00:46:29.560 but yeah why wouldn't you recommend it in like I wouldn't like buy it like spend that much money
00:46:34.320 on it oh gotcha gotcha gotcha yeah I also enjoyed this book um I listened to the audiobook um kind
00:46:41.740 of controversially but I found that just as enthralling and you can so visualize as a movie
00:46:48.480 or series like the characters feel so real and actually last night watched um like a little
00:46:55.180 Audrey Hepburn documentary because it was all about like this the glamorous stars of like the
00:47:00.320 50s and i think that was sparked by edwin hugo and just like wanting to see that like world
00:47:06.780 from you know 60 70 years ago so there we go that's all we have time for today thank you so
00:47:14.820 much for listening it's been super super fun um and we always appreciate your lovely words and
00:47:22.100 thank you to everyone who shares the podcast on instagram tags us we always appreciate it
00:47:28.540 and we will be in your ears next week bye