Dreaming Against the Machine - June 09, 2026


Episode 9: Algorithmic Bias, with Safiya Noble

Topics
Episode 8: Horrible Little Guys, with Isabel J. Kim and Amanda Silberling Episode 10: Better Off Regulated, with Ed Zitron

Episode Stats


Length

48 minutes

Words per minute

161.63

Word count

7,767

Sentence count

378

Harmful content

Misogyny

5

sentences flagged

Toxicity

8

sentences flagged

Hate speech

4

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:01.000 Welcome back to Dreaming Against the Machine. I'm your host, Adam Becker. This week's guest
00:00:05.820 is Sophia Noble, a professor at UCLA and my friend and someone who I've wanted to have
00:00:11.040 on this podcast since I started it. Because she is someone who was very, very early to
00:00:17.580 the conversation on algorithmic bias and problems in the tech industry, and has been really
00:00:25.720 good not only at sounding the alarm on that, but also building a community around it.
00:00:29.620 I've only known her actually for a few months, but it feels like I've known her for longer
00:00:33.820 because she's just a very warm and genuine person.
00:00:36.800 And also, we're both very angry about many of the same things, which is actually kind
00:00:41.500 of how we met, as I explain in our interview.
00:00:45.080 So it was a really great conversation, and I hope you enjoy it.
00:00:49.140 Let's get to it.
00:00:52.620 Sophia, welcome to Dreaming Against the Machine.
00:00:55.480 Thanks, Adam.
00:00:56.160 So great to be here.
00:00:57.100 No, I'm really glad that we're able to find the time for this.
00:01:00.880 So, wow.
00:01:03.500 So how do I introduce you?
00:01:05.000 You wear so many hats.
00:01:07.620 Too many.
00:01:08.160 And that's a problem.
00:01:09.300 Yeah, it's true.
00:01:10.720 I think of you as a professor and research rock star.
00:01:16.660 Oh, that's nice.
00:01:18.200 And author and just all around wonderful person who tries to help the community of people
00:01:25.120 fighting against the power of big tech.
00:01:27.100 you know when i was in high school i did one of that uh what color is your parachute you know
00:01:31.720 the career center your senior year is trying to like get you on a career path and um i failed
00:01:38.740 to land on any meaningful career based on my interests with the exception of rock star that's 0.88
00:01:47.500 literally what the day i'm seeing dead isn't that hilarious but i'm seeing for shit so here we are 0.85
00:01:54.060 i guess i mean i guess this is like the next closest thing i could get which is to 0.97
00:02:01.300 run my mouth all day as a professor i don't know that and uh and you moonlight doing uh stand-up
00:02:06.960 comedy i do moonlight doing stand-up yes now the world knows i guess we can't keep things a secret
00:02:13.120 it thanks adam if you want if you want us to cut that it's fine you gotta be there to see it yeah
00:02:21.660 no i i need to come down to la and see it yeah but yeah you're a professor at ucla and also the
00:02:27.600 author of algorithms of oppression and i'm probably forgetting things that you would want me to say
00:02:33.960 about you i feel like that's good and we met on a panel in washington dc uh god the better part of
00:02:42.940 a year ago now yeah a very spicy panel yes i was in awe because let me tell you i'm usually the
00:02:51.000 spicy one and then i was like okay chili pepper what is happening over here with adam oh my gosh
00:02:58.880 i felt like at one point i was like i gotta like raise the ante i gotta and then i was like let's
00:03:04.460 just let him cook just because there's no way i mean he's got it on fire i'm here i'm with him
00:03:11.280 that's kind of what it turned into that makes me so happy
00:03:17.740 because i think of you my favorite part of that day was uh the woman standing up and trying to
00:03:26.300 chastise you and i was like oh ma'am please don't this is not this isn't the right venue for that
00:03:32.800 And then you just were like, let me start with my CVS receipt of facts to refute everything you just said.
00:03:43.080 And then really everybody had to go eat and get a drink of water after that.
00:03:47.580 Yeah, no, that was a lot of fun.
00:03:49.620 We got to do that again.
00:03:51.140 We do.
00:03:54.860 Okay, so for our listeners, I think one of the things that I really want to emphasize about you
00:04:01.720 and how amazing your work is, is you are one of or the like original algorithmic bias person.
00:04:12.160 I would say there were certainly people for a long time, I mean, for a century who've been
00:04:18.600 critical of science and technology, let's say. But yes, we are in that tradition. But I do think I was
00:04:26.620 a person who threw it all on the line to argue that the algorithm is not only biased and doing
00:04:34.020 things, which people like Frank Pasquale had been saying, and Siva Vaidyanathan had been saying,
00:04:38.980 and maybe even Dana Boyd. But I was like, oh, but it's also racist and sexist. And I added that
00:04:45.040 nuance to it. And that's probably what I'm most known for in our field of many contributions
00:04:54.460 that many people are making. But this was what algorithms of oppression came out in what 2013,
00:05:00.520 I think. No, it came out in 2018. Um, it was, but it was, it was a dissertation that deposited in
00:05:09.360 2012. So it was, and I ripped a, uh, you know, an article out of it and like 2011 or so. So yeah,
00:05:18.740 Yeah, you know, I started talking about it in earnest by 2011, for sure.
00:05:24.600 Wait, hold on.
00:05:25.380 You defended your PhD in 2012?
00:05:27.540 I did.
00:05:28.280 Okay, this is awful.
00:05:29.820 This is terrible for me.
00:05:31.380 I defended my PhD in 2012.
00:05:33.880 Oh, my gosh.
00:05:35.760 Except that you're, like, 20 years younger than me, so you were, like, on time, and I
00:05:40.220 was, like, late to the party.
00:05:41.380 I know, but on the other hand, like, you're, like, a big-shot professor at UCLA, and you
00:05:48.120 have a whole center and stuff and i'm just some guy don't do this don't do this we're not doing
00:05:54.620 that and you're just a guy who's out here really nuancing and taking on the world of these horrible
00:06:03.660 terrible people who want to take everything that's beautiful away from us so don't do not
00:06:11.180 minimize what you're up to okay also let's just be real you have a phd in physics yeah so that's
00:06:19.640 a whole thing that is incredible and meaningful and hard and um now you're an investigative
00:06:26.400 journalist am i interviewing you i'm just saying i know uh that that is actually really important
00:06:33.600 and you know to me i think about this too because i went to library and information science school
00:06:39.100 at Illinois. And I think of myself as an information scientist, as well as a social
00:06:44.800 scientist. But I think there's something when you come out of these STEM fields and you levy
00:06:51.460 the critique that is different, let's say, than other people. So I'm just so grateful that you
00:06:59.620 did do a PhD in physics, quite frankly, and then you bring the heat because people listen to that
00:07:05.860 differently yeah no thank you this is dreaming against machine uh hosted by sophia noble
00:07:11.100 thanks for joining adam yeah
00:07:17.920 no thank you sophia that means a lot especially coming from you
00:07:23.720 on this show we try to have conversations i think of it as having conversation not
00:07:28.740 doing interviews i feel like that's more casual and fun and can be more meaningful
00:07:35.480 but yeah you're interviewing me that's what we're doing this week i know that's what happens god
00:07:41.240 when i was first starting out as a journalist i i found out the thing that i think every journalist
00:07:46.800 discovers and everyone who does like interviews with people like oral historians and stuff like
00:07:52.020 that they all discover this which is if you're not careful the interview reverses and suddenly
00:07:57.400 the interviewee is asking you about yourself and if you don't keep a leash on the conversation
00:08:02.600 it starts running around in circles. And as a physicist who just jumped into journalism with
00:08:09.300 no journalistic training to speak of, when I started out in journalism, which was right after
00:08:16.180 my PhD, 2013, the only real journalistic experience I'd had before that, real, the only journalistic
00:08:23.340 experience I'd had before that was I was on my high school newspaper. So it was, I definitely
00:08:29.880 got dropped in the deep end. Yet does it count? I don't know. My high school is pretty small.
00:08:34.840 Well, you know, student journalists are so earnest. That counts for a lot.
00:08:40.820 I want to go back to you.
00:08:42.600 Okay, let's do it.
00:08:44.720 How did you end up being so early to that party? I mean, yes, there were people who were working
00:08:52.260 on similar things before you, as you said. And I think it's important to acknowledge that this is
00:08:58.900 a big community and nobody works alone and nobody's work stands alone but nonetheless you were pretty
00:09:03.840 early to that party um you know these days people talk about like oh you know ai has intrinsic bias
00:09:13.000 based on the training set and you know obviously there are people who don't like it when you say
00:09:18.200 that but that's not a particularly controversial thing to say but in 2011 2012 most people were
00:09:26.280 not thinking about this stuff. Yeah, it's true. I think of that. I often characterize
00:09:31.160 trying to mainstream that idea as like pushing a boulder up a mountain because, you know, I can
00:09:41.020 remember in my qualifying exams before I finished my dissertation, one of my committee members was
00:09:50.480 a computer scientist. And I was arguing that the algorithm holds values and that those values are
00:09:57.700 both expressed by the programmers themselves and the way in which they write code. Because I had
00:10:03.600 worked in tech and I really understood the way in which programmers thought of their work
00:10:11.220 subjectively, like art. They programmed in different languages. They had a point of view
00:10:17.200 about different languages. They love to roast each other about each other's code, who had the
00:10:24.240 most beautiful and elegant code. I mean, people don't understand the nerd culture. Do you know
00:10:29.440 what I'm saying? That there's like, there's, there's heat in there too. So I was working in
00:10:34.280 tech. I had left corporate America and advertising. I really understood I'd been on the internet for
00:10:39.660 a long time. And, you know, I thought this was a pretty obvious argument to make that when you
00:10:46.440 looked at the output of search results because I was, at the time, the reason I was looking at
00:10:52.360 Google was because I was in the Library and Information Science School. So you have to
00:10:56.140 remember that I went into graduate school thinking, how do we preserve knowledge, particularly
00:11:02.260 of minoritized or oppressed people for the long haul, which is the kind of information question
00:11:09.080 that people who go to library school might ask because librarians are concerned with preserving
00:11:14.880 human intelligence and knowledge, maybe not intelligence, but certainly knowledge, for
00:11:20.660 thousands of years, the arc of time, the way we think and are trained to think is very
00:11:26.600 different.
00:11:27.540 And I was thinking about, well, what does it mean that these new technical systems and
00:11:32.420 platforms on the internet, we were just even starting to talk about platforms, like, you
00:11:36.480 know, that was also kind of like newer language.
00:11:39.340 So I was concerned because so many libraries and librarians were starting to emulate Google.
00:11:47.300 You could go to the front page of the academic library's webpage, and now they have a search box for keyword searching, which is very different than the early days of the internet and how we did discovery.
00:12:00.780 And so I was concerned that, one, what was happening in Silicon Valley was kind of usurping these other very long thought about concerns about finding knowledge that seemed important that now everybody was like just Googling it.
00:12:19.740 And so I wanted to kind of reverse engineer and say, okay, well, then what happens to minoritized people in these systems, in these ad tech systems?
00:12:31.200 And I didn't just look at Google.
00:12:32.960 I looked at other, you know, Yahoo and other search engines.
00:12:36.080 But at the end of the day, I ended up really making the case around Google because 80% of the market was using Google search.
00:12:42.120 And that seemed like, well, that's the place you have to look at.
00:12:45.120 And what I did is I took the census racial and ethnic categories and the gender categories at that time, and I just crossed them and I looked at them as groups to see. So I looked at white men, white women, white boys, white girls, Latina, Latino, Black, African American. I kind of used all the categories.
00:13:04.700 What I saw with my sociology eyes was the hierarchy of racial discrimination and racism in the United States replicated in the way in which people were represented across all of these.
00:13:20.840 So you just could see the racial hierarchy.
00:13:24.200 You could see the way in which whiteness was not even coded as ethnicity.
00:13:29.480 It would be like white men's shirts, you know?
00:13:32.540 So white men weren't even a racial or ethnic category.
00:13:38.200 That's what I read about. 0.59
00:13:40.060 And of course, Black women and girls, Latinas, Asian women and girls were mostly represented, misrepresented with pornography. 0.84
00:13:51.400 Most of the results on the first page were porn sites.
00:13:55.080 And, you know, I had to ask the question, who's testing on these keywords?
00:14:00.060 Who cares about these keywords?
00:14:01.640 who cares about these identities? Why are they for sale to the porn industry? Why are they
00:14:07.280 hyper-optimized so that you don't even have to add the word sex or the word porn? Black women, 1.00
00:14:12.440 Asian women, Latinas were just synonymous with porn. And what does this mean for women and girls 0.99
00:14:19.340 of color who will use these, but also for anybody who's not in those identities, who's experiencing
00:14:27.020 these groups in these ways? And what are, you know, what does it mean when a big information
00:14:32.660 monopoly, a tech monopoly, an advertising tech monopoly controls ideas, images, and knowledge
00:14:41.400 and the world turns to that instead of to other kinds of sources and resources? Of course, this
00:14:48.240 is also at the time that the Google Book Digitization Project was going on. This is when
00:14:54.860 provosts of universities are saying things. I mean, I'm getting these like anecdotal reports
00:15:00.740 from colleagues around the country and they're like, oh yeah, our provost just said,
00:15:04.080 why do we need the university library when we have Google? The mythology about what Google is
00:15:10.400 and organizing all the world's knowledge, right? It's tagline. Like it reaches a fever pitch
00:15:15.860 at the time that I am writing this book. And of course, then the first election of Donald Trump
00:15:23.060 happens as this book is going to press and, uh, and our whole strategy that we had thought,
00:15:30.940 which was regulation, you know, in that book, in the dissertation, in fact, in 2012, this is so
00:15:35.720 funny. I said, we need to call upon the federal trade commission. And also at that time, everyone
00:15:42.000 was focused on net neutrality and the FCC. And I was like, no, no, no, we need to be over here with
00:15:47.080 the FTC talking about regulating these because these are products and they are causing consumer
00:15:53.300 harm and like we need to be in that channel. So I was definitely early to that conversation too.
00:15:59.380 Of course, even with the selection of Lina Khan to chair the FTC, which I thought was,
00:16:05.900 you know, absolutely incredible. I mean, all of that work that people have worked on for
00:16:11.300 almost 20 years now has just been undone. And in fact, I think so many of us were so effective
00:16:17.840 in mainstreaming ideas about algorithmic bias, algorithmic discrimination, that technology can
00:16:23.780 harm people, that, you know, casting a light on big tech, making even the phrase big tech
00:16:29.980 a mainstream. Like, there were people who did that. And most of us were scholars and journalists
00:16:35.280 who were doing that and some activists.
00:16:37.360 And that's why we were so threatening
00:16:39.780 that all that work has been undone in this current Trump 2.0,
00:16:46.320 all the way to the point, I think,
00:16:47.700 of trying to create penalties for states
00:16:51.460 who try to put guardrails in.
00:16:54.560 I mean, that to me is a signal
00:16:56.720 that we were and are doing the right things
00:16:59.820 and that that's a threat.
00:17:01.780 But also, wow, we've got a lot of work ahead of us now.
00:17:05.280 Oh, well, we're not dreaming against the machine right now, but no, but this is this is an important part of thinking of a better future. Right. Is identifying the problem.
00:17:16.180 Certainly. I mean, look, yes, Trump was elected for the second time right after I sent off more everything forever to print.
00:17:27.840 So like and and he was elected the first time when I was working on my first book, which is on something pretty much unrelated.
00:17:33.680 And my publisher will kill me if I don't plug right here that at the end of this year, the paperback is coming out and there's going to be a new afterward about everything that's happened.
00:17:42.980 Let's go. I love that.
00:17:44.760 Yeah, no, I just sent off a draft of that afterward, actually, to the publisher.
00:17:48.180 So my publisher will also kill me that I'm going to say I have been wanting to write an update to algorithms of oppression that would account for chat GPT and large, large language models.
00:18:01.520 And like, again, they're not interested.
00:18:04.460 Are you serious?
00:18:05.760 Yeah.
00:18:06.940 Yeah.
00:18:07.420 Oh, man.
00:18:07.980 Yeah.
00:18:08.560 Yeah.
00:18:08.900 Oh, come on.
00:18:09.760 I don't know.
00:18:10.340 It's very demotivating to figure out like how to keep that kind of through line.
00:18:15.340 I don't know.
00:18:16.360 i i understand you know publishers are kind of like leave a good thing alone you know like you
00:18:21.700 don't need to mess with it but on the other hand i don't know maybe somebody will help me get my
00:18:27.100 copyright and i can go write it you know and update it somewhere else yeah i mean i think you should
00:18:32.860 yeah it's easier said than done i completely get it i mean i'm lucky that my publisher wants me to
00:18:37.700 do this i gotta say so many incredible books have come out since algorithms of oppression and of
00:18:43.920 course you know that i'm a big fan of more everything forever and i like i tell everybody
00:18:50.740 everywhere to read it i also tell them don't read it at night before you go to bed it's just like
00:18:56.260 it's like a Saturday morning kind of read you know what i mean like
00:18:59.440 keep it before noon you know what i mean it's like the coffee don't have it in the afternoon
00:19:06.140 you'll be up all night so you know more everything forever is a little bit that
00:19:10.320 but also so many incredible books are being written and you know there's a whole field
00:19:17.280 now of people working on this and I gotta say I look out here and I'm like you know I made a
00:19:23.640 little contribution and now there's an avalanche of contributions that are incredible so I'm glad
00:19:30.800 you're doing this podcast I'm glad that you're you know inviting people to come and yes we do
00:19:35.640 need to understand the history and we have to have the contours of the problem in order to solve it
00:19:41.580 and I do think that you know our work even though it is frightening to some people it is it's like
00:19:49.540 let's have a sober look at what we're dealing with no it's so great to be a guest here on your
00:19:54.500 podcast I don't know I'm sorry I am not a trained journalist and yet here we are no no no this is
00:20:03.820 great. Um, look, you know, I'll just sit here all day and you just tell me how great my book is.
00:20:09.180 That's, uh, that's what we do on this podcast now, apparently. Um, geez. Uh, thank you,
00:20:14.620 Sophia. No, it means a lot. Just cut all this out. Yeah. Yeah. Um, no, I, I think that Nick
00:20:19.300 is not going to cut all this out. Um, I think he's just going to leave it in. He's, uh, he's a
00:20:23.180 wild man. Unfortunately, we still live in capitalism and that means we need to talk about
00:20:28.560 our partners and sponsors, but fortunately our partners and sponsors are great. And if you want
00:20:33.680 To support Dreaming Against the Machine directly, you can join us on Patreon, where $5 a month
00:20:38.880 gives you the chance to ask questions of upcoming guests and a dedicated stream of cat pictures.
00:20:45.600 We love our patrons, and we also love being a part of the Multitude Collective at multitudeshows.com.
00:20:51.680 Multitude is a podcast company made up of passionate people creating shows you can count on.
00:20:56.160 Shows like Simple and Clean.
00:20:58.320 Simple and Clean is a show where hosts Misha Stanton and Mayanna Barron and friends
00:21:03.200 talk about Kingdom Hearts,
00:21:05.080 a little video game franchise
00:21:06.540 about really big feelings.
00:21:08.900 Join them as they discuss the plot,
00:21:10.960 characters, world building, music,
00:21:13.260 fashion, fan base,
00:21:14.700 and societal impact of a thing
00:21:16.620 that by all means
00:21:17.640 probably shouldn't even exist.
00:21:20.200 Never heard of Kingdom Hearts?
00:21:21.860 That's okay.
00:21:22.940 They're here to break it down for you,
00:21:24.540 explain why they love it,
00:21:25.640 and hopefully to convince you
00:21:27.100 that this weird little story
00:21:28.340 deserves a place in your heart.
00:21:30.160 Each week, they attempt to unravel
00:21:32.120 how this deceptively expansive game series
00:21:34.400 has touched an entire generation
00:21:36.280 of deeply earnest weirdos.
00:21:38.200 And along the way,
00:21:39.100 realize that what they're talking about
00:21:40.640 might not be just a video game,
00:21:42.760 but a whole lot more.
00:21:44.280 New episodes every Sunday,
00:21:46.020 wherever you listen to your podcasts.
00:21:48.000 And here's a word from our sponsors.
00:21:50.460 One of this week's sponsors is Shaker and Spoon,
00:21:52.720 a monthly cocktail and mocktail subscription.
00:21:55.600 Full disclosure,
00:21:56.420 they sent me a free box this month,
00:21:58.120 and I'm excited to try it on a night off soon.
00:22:00.660 Each box includes three original recipes from reward-winning bartenders
00:22:04.480 with enough ingredients to make four of each of those drinks for at least 12 drinks in total.
00:22:09.660 And each box includes everything you need to make the drink except for the alcohol.
00:22:14.260 And they're built around one spirit per box,
00:22:16.480 so you really just need one bottle of something that you probably already have on hand if you drink.
00:22:21.220 And if you don't drink, every box includes zero-proof options for every recipe,
00:22:26.260 and some of the drinks are designed to be completely spirit-free from the start.
00:22:30.060 The boxes come with recipe cards that include guidance on mixing techniques and glossary of terms that teach you how to shake, stir, build, and garnish these unusual cocktails with eclectic ingredients.
00:22:42.260 And they also include everything else that you need to try out these drinks, like custom syrups, bitters, extracts, garnishes, and aromatics, and so you can try the drinks without going off and buying full bottles of niche ingredients that you'll never use again.
00:22:56.300 It's a great idea for date nights or hosting a party or bringing a gift to someone else's party.
00:23:02.980 And you can always skip or swap boxes or even just buy individual kits or ingredients without subscribing.
00:23:10.380 So you can try this stuff out at their website, shakerandspoon.com.
00:23:15.060 Use code DATM for 10% off your purchase.
00:23:20.340 I take heart like you do from the fact that there are so many of us working on this.
00:23:25.660 But part of the reason I started this podcast or a lot of the reason I started this podcast is I feel like there is a lot of identifying what the problem is and maybe not enough or I haven't done enough thinking about what I want in place of what we have right now.
00:23:41.680 And so I'm going to put you on the spot, Sophia, because because it is my podcast and and ask, OK, so what would a better tech industry look like?
00:23:57.600 Oh, I mean, this is such an easy question to answer.
00:24:01.660 I don't think I don't know.
00:24:03.620 I mean, this is the part now nobody needed to listen to anything else.
00:24:09.080 This is the part they need to listen to.
00:24:10.640 Oh, wow.
00:24:11.680 So if we imagined a pro-social tech industry that respected our rights, our human rights, our civil rights, the environment, labor, the creative work of others and worked in concert rather than stealing it, which is quite frankly what we're doing now.
00:24:37.580 If we imagined that technology was also like that the profits that accrued from our collective engagement in it, then went back into our cities, our states, whatever, even if we have other kinds of imaginaries that aren't the nation state or the city, but that went back into our communities and communities.
00:25:03.320 because, you know, when I think about tech being, you know, seven of the 10 most well-capitalized
00:25:09.800 companies on planet earth or tech companies and imagine the profit that we, in fact, generated
00:25:19.600 for those companies coming back into our communities, our public institutions, into
00:25:25.660 all of the kinds of things. We would actually have a very glorious world because one, we wouldn't
00:25:32.000 make dangerous tech. We wouldn't make extractive tech. And then the way that we use the network
00:25:37.780 to collectively facilitate all kinds of things, we would all benefit from it because the network
00:25:44.780 effect is what makes it work, right? That's what kind of makes it go. So that to me is the thing
00:25:52.800 that the critics, quite frankly, all of us who have been doing this work, that's the thing that
00:25:58.200 isn't resourced. Because I actually think we have a lot of brilliant ideas and we work in
00:26:03.060 collaboration with communities, with grad students, you know, with journalists, with all kinds of
00:26:09.840 people who have their finger on the pulse of what a pro-social rights-respecting technological world
00:26:17.240 could look like, what its limits, where the limits should be. And nobody funds us to make it.
00:26:24.080 So that to me is like, of course, at the heart of that is the venture capital financing model, which is dubious. And I mean, I'm reaching for the adjectives that describe the most depraved waves of thinking about deploying capital and resources, right?
00:26:46.380 And so those who work in finance and capital and, you know, what we're seeing is the tech industry has really facilitated the greatest transfers of wealth out of the public coffers, too.
00:26:58.960 Yep.
00:26:59.260 I mean, that's what the whole Doge effort was, was just to transfer wealth.
00:27:03.980 I mean, every night we're watching the headlines.
00:27:06.400 It's like, you know, X billion leaving the U.S. Treasury and headed out to private hands, to companies or individuals, right?
00:27:16.160 I mean, the grift is just full display. No one seems to. I mean, in this country, we don't storm the Capitol for justice. You know what I mean? We like it's like swarmed for fascism. Yeah. On behalf of the worst ideas.
00:27:34.500 but you know i think that it's very easy to dream up the world we want i mean at the end of the day
00:27:41.940 they i've read studies coming out of the uk where they've polled americans on what they want and
00:27:48.760 guess what what no matter how you politically identify people all want the same thing they want
00:27:54.280 clean air water food they want an opportunity for their kids to do better than they did
00:28:00.700 They want affordable housing and, you know, a nice quality of life.
00:28:05.780 They want a good education that, again, is affordable.
00:28:09.580 I mean, everybody wants the same things.
00:28:11.740 We just have different strategies about how we imagine getting it.
00:28:15.720 And what I think the tech industry has done is it's really robbed us of the potential
00:28:21.980 and the resource.
00:28:23.200 I mean, we live here in California, you and I, and how can California's public schools
00:28:28.920 be in crisis?
00:28:30.220 I work in higher education. We are basically being defunded in the K through higher ed sector by the lack of taxes that are not paid by the tech industry into the coffers, by the exorbitant housing prices that happen when you live anywhere near a tech corridor, right?
00:28:52.160 All of the things that, again, the largesse of the industry, that if it just did what regular me and you people do, right, like just pay taxes like everybody else has to do, we would be flourishing.
00:29:06.360 But instead, we struggle.
00:29:08.020 I find this particularly upsetting because this is an industry that was built on the back of taxpayer investments.
00:29:17.620 Absolutely.
00:29:18.320 This is the part people don't realize.
00:29:20.320 And I know, I mean, I know you do.
00:29:22.160 But NSF, national science funding, NIH, I mean, all of it, that taxpayers, we fund basic research so that it can improve the quality of life, our health, our education, you know, all the things.
00:29:37.700 And what the tech industry does, it works in, you know, in partnership with research universities, and it offloads the riskiest kinds of research that might be the least profitable, the most experimental, the potentially most dangerous.
00:29:55.500 It funds that with taxpayer dollars while it sifts through looking for where it can get its like 1000x opportunity.
00:30:03.920 So we also fund all of the failure instead of having our taxpayer dollars fund our success.
00:30:12.500 And when they are successful, it's not like we're shareholders, you know, and we get a return back.
00:30:21.540 So even their own model, they don't let us in on it.
00:30:24.980 But we get to fund in the billions of dollars many of their failed experiments or great ideas that come out of the university have to be commercialized through their logics because we don't have a public interest tech infrastructure.
00:30:40.680 And so this movement for public interest tech is also incredibly important.
00:30:45.420 And it's something that I, you know, I work on at UCLA and my colleagues around the country
00:30:49.620 work on because that's part of the dreaming of the future we need to, which is publicly
00:30:55.640 owned and controlled and beneficial technology.
00:31:00.220 So how do we get there?
00:31:01.440 Well, on some level right now, and then there's like current moment, 2026, where we really
00:31:08.780 have no organized will at the federal level. I think that the states have an incredible
00:31:16.140 opportunity. I mean, in California, one of the things that is important for us to do is, you
00:31:23.360 know, we're the fourth largest economy. I think I saw that last week. We've got to, we've got a lot
00:31:29.320 of opportunity to reimagine differently. That means we need, we're going to need a new incoming
00:31:35.640 governor that is willing to tackle these problems we need a legislature that isn't captured by
00:31:43.820 silicon valley and you know um silicon valley is up there in sacramento constantly trying to
00:31:49.720 aiify government which is like the worst possible idea um so they're going to be on the front lines
00:31:57.420 quite frankly in this coming next couple of years i think people are organizing and visibly
00:32:03.580 demonstrating their response, whether it's the, you know, no ice kinds of response, you know,
00:32:11.880 which is organizing against Flock and other kinds of surveillance tech that's in our neighborhoods,
00:32:16.860 you know, Waymo, all of these companies. I mean, people think of Waymo as like a ride share,
00:32:21.320 but it's really got 17 cameras on the car. And when it's not giving somebody a ride,
00:32:25.960 what it's doing is driving through your neighborhood and tracking people and then
00:32:30.120 feeding that to law enforcement. So people need to understand what these surveillance technologies
00:32:34.800 are, but people are organizing in response to that. Obviously people are all over the country
00:32:40.700 are refusing data centers, ICE detention centers, these kinds of things. So we're building strong
00:32:48.180 muscle that is like the muscle we have from, you know, organized labor in this country a hundred
00:32:55.460 years ago, uh, from the civil rights movements and, um, the abolitionist movement. So we know
00:33:02.860 how to do things in this country. It's not all loss. And of course I'm obsessed right now with
00:33:08.160 all of these, um, uh, Z's, Gen Z's that are graduating and are like booing the commencement
00:33:16.620 speakers who are like trying to throw a pro AI future on them. And they're like, absolutely not.
00:33:23.100 Eric Schmidt getting up there on the stage and being like, here's what I want you to do so my investments can make money.
00:33:32.060 And the students are like, no, come on, get the hell out of here.
00:33:37.740 Oh, my God.
00:33:38.920 No, it was great.
00:33:40.040 That was so good.
00:33:41.140 And listen, I can tell you after, I don't know, how many years have I been teaching in higher ed, like counting my TA years, like maybe like 17 years.
00:33:51.600 When the millennials were in the classroom, and I would say, look at this facial recognition technology that doesn't recognize Asian-American features, phenotypes, and is constantly asking, you know, are your eyes closed, right? 0.50
00:34:07.000 Did you blink, right?
00:34:08.240 I mean, you remember that story that was like when I, like the, or the soap dispenser that doesn't, if he doesn't recognize it, the sensor won't go off if you have melanated skin, right?
00:34:17.160 So the racist soap dispenser, right?
00:34:18.740 These were like the kinds of stories 17 years ago where we were trying to say, look, there's a there, there, like technology is designed in particular ways with like a certain kind of idea about the user.
00:34:31.480 And those like older millennials, they would be like, I just want to go a job at Google.
00:34:37.620 I don't want to hear it.
00:34:38.620 Like, it's the user's fault.
00:34:41.140 Algorithms are just math.
00:34:43.060 No, they were refusing.
00:34:44.880 And now the students are like, you better take your AI out of here.
00:34:49.900 I don't want to hear it.
00:34:51.440 Don't stop stealing our art.
00:34:54.060 Stop stealing our future.
00:34:55.900 Stop poisoning our world.
00:34:57.760 And this is why I think universities are under attack because we are educating people about reality, about facts, about and about different kinds of possibilities.
00:35:08.080 And that is why they always come after the intellectuals.
00:35:11.120 the 1%, you know, let's say they don't want people to be educated and to know and to have a voice and
00:35:17.340 to push back. And yet here we are where it's undeniable the harms and the students are so
00:35:24.120 incredible. And they have been for these past few years, standing up for their values and their
00:35:29.940 principles and saying no to genocide and saying no to a lot of things. And so that I, how can you
00:35:36.060 not be hopeful and inspired i mean i'm gen x so i'm just like our long game was having gen z you
00:35:43.720 know what i'm saying we're like gone kids do it so i mean i'm an older millennial so you're just
00:35:49.800 ragging on me and my people uh i'm sorry here i am i told you you're like 20 years younger than me
00:35:58.580 And so I know we are. It's okay. You didn't go work at Google and Facebook. I don't even blame them. A lot of those, in fairness, those millennial tech workers are actually the ones who have been walking up, who have been fighting, who have been saying, absolutely not. You cannot put my labor in service of drones, drone technology that's going to go wipe out people we don't know.
00:36:24.800 so i have i have a thing to say in response to that but um first i think we got to talk about
00:36:31.300 your dog okay the dog she's she's annoying she's easily agitated and it's like groundhog day every
00:36:39.720 day in our house because it's the same male man that you're barking at that you saw yesterday
00:36:45.260 do you know yeah she's a rescue so she has been through some things yeah absolutely and she thinks
00:36:52.300 everyone that is walking across the street in front of other houses is here to take her so
00:36:58.400 oh man she has a lot to say yeah don't drive down our street is all i'm saying no it's okay i i have
00:37:05.380 a rescue cat and she um i mean she's actually amazing and very chill but i i get it there's
00:37:11.480 certain things she's afraid of shoes um but yeah i know i know that can't be anything good that
00:37:18.380 It can't be good.
00:37:19.420 I know.
00:37:20.040 No, it can't be.
00:37:21.160 But she's the greatest cat in the observable universe and the fearless leader of this podcast.
00:37:26.220 I love that.
00:37:26.700 What's her name? 0.70
00:37:27.360 Her name is Bobka.
00:37:29.120 I love it.
00:37:30.020 Yeah.
00:37:30.260 What's your dog's name?
00:37:31.460 Ellie.
00:37:32.260 Ellie.
00:37:32.760 Awesome.
00:37:33.360 Okay.
00:37:33.620 Now everyone can steal all of our passwords.
00:37:38.920 I'm going to have to log off now.
00:37:40.280 No.
00:37:40.540 Yeah, exactly.
00:37:41.200 Yeah.
00:37:41.800 But going back to what you were saying before Ellie interrupted us, listeners, Sophia did 0.76
00:37:47.440 warn me before we started that ellie was going to interrupt i told you so i said ellie's gonna be
00:37:54.240 up in this podcast and there's nothing we can do yeah but going back to what you're saying yeah i
00:37:58.700 mean look uh no i didn't go off and work at google but i do have a bunch of friends who did i i have
00:38:04.560 many friends who work or have worked at google and uh one of them uh who may be listening to this
00:38:10.480 podcast right now uh you you know who you are uh one of them has been working there for a very long
00:38:15.840 time and is now essentially, you know, just continuing to work there because he is helping
00:38:23.120 to lead the unionization efforts at Google. Um, let's go, let's go. Yeah, exactly. Yeah,
00:38:28.980 yeah, yeah. He's like, he also happens to be getting filthy rich, but that's not really why
00:38:35.360 he's there. I mean, let's, let's be real. He's been there. He's my age, right? He's been there
00:38:41.380 for a long time he he like he doesn't need the money anymore he's there tell him we need the
00:38:46.920 money tell him yeah we need the money we need him to come sponsor the podcast well now i'm worried
00:38:52.840 that he's listening sorry my bad it's okay it's okay
00:38:58.560 hey listen you know i gotta tell you yeah there are people out here who made a lot of money
00:39:07.220 in tech and want to atone for their sins. And I will tell you that I also lived a life where
00:39:13.940 I worked in advertising for 15 years and I went back to grad school to become a professor. And I
00:39:21.260 always have felt it was to atone for, you know, slinging booze and cell phones and cars and things
00:39:27.860 that I did that were part of my job. And, uh, when I was younger and I was like, Oh, you know,
00:39:33.920 well, it's like a carbon offset. I don't know. You know what I'm saying? Let me do something
00:39:41.120 different with the next half of my life. I don't know. So, you know. Well, but look,
00:39:45.040 you're doing it in a real way. I would argue that my friend at Google who's organizing the
00:39:49.500 workers there is doing it in a real way. I do think that there are also, I mean, I don't want
00:39:54.840 to name names here on this episode, but there are also, you know, there's the trope of the
00:40:01.940 prodigal tech bro the person who who makes their money and then goes out into the world
00:40:07.340 and says oh everything is awful and uh and i'm so sorry and now you're just rage baiting me
00:40:15.880 yeah i know i'm really sorry i know i am um yeah you you already know exactly who i'm thinking
00:40:22.540 about i know you know who i'm thinking about too i do i do yeah i was gonna say earlier when we
00:40:28.260 were talking about the people who did a lot of heavy lifting to make it legible that technology
00:40:35.220 is harmful we did all that work we're still doing that work but the the let's say the perpetrators
00:40:42.100 of the harm have gone to the front of the line and declared themselves the people who can fix it
00:40:50.340 and um that is i think i was talking to a colleague the other day and he said he had
00:40:56.840 done some research where they've shown how people who are originators of ideas once that that idea
00:41:09.000 spreads they become the least supported person in the entire ecosystem and he was like safia you
00:41:17.620 know that's what i feel like has happened to the black women like you and others in this field is 0.66
00:41:22.940 that you're the least resource, the least supported and everybody else has gone to the 0.85
00:41:26.640 front of the line. And I'm like, yeah. And it's the prodigal tech bros. It's the guys who did
00:41:32.900 the harm and some women and they've gone and, and some, you know, not just tech bros, but also
00:41:38.980 some journalists who platformed the hell out of these people for a decade. And now, you know,
00:41:45.480 they're uh on tv and you know they're they're doing their thing they're famous and it's that
00:41:54.460 kind of capture is also like puts us on a path where we have to invent new words and new frames
00:42:03.900 and i feel like again now i'm taking the mic back but i feel like your book did some of that
00:42:10.920 scaffolding to help people understand that we sound sometimes like um like what's your problem
00:42:19.240 you know why are you so upset then when when the effect of altruists are out here saying like well
00:42:25.940 we're just trying to make the world better and it's like yeah you know dot dot dot and they don't
00:42:32.180 really describe what that world is and better for whom and you know you've really named that for us
00:42:38.900 because, and as has like Tameet Jabrou and, you know, her collaborators and writing about the
00:42:46.520 test grills and, you know, like all of that, Shazita Ahmed, you know, people who are writing.
00:42:52.360 And I think of these women and their work, and I think of your work and how difficult it is for us
00:42:59.200 to disambiguate what we're talking about from what they're talking about. Because, you know,
00:43:04.440 I can't tell you how many times people say to me, well, you know, we're working with Anthropic because they're the ethical AI company.
00:43:11.980 That's exactly what I was about to say.
00:43:13.140 I was about to say, like, the Anthropic, oh, but everything's okay because Anthropic's the ethical one.
00:43:18.160 And like, no!
00:43:19.960 No, they're not.
00:43:20.660 They are not.
00:43:21.580 I know.
00:43:22.060 But then what do we sound like, you know?
00:43:24.140 It's like you got to write a book to show them how it's not.
00:43:28.920 and so that and and meanwhile they have i don't know going on a trillion dollar valuation or
00:43:35.360 something uh and we're over here with the tin cup so i trying to source you know and resource the
00:43:41.620 this work that's about not just taking on those kinds of folks who are ruining the planet ruining
00:43:48.280 democracy completely destroying civil and human rights because that is their project and stealing
00:43:55.540 all of our work to do it and selling us snake oil and decimating the workforce and all those
00:44:04.140 things. I mean, even if you just look at their own words, which is one of the things I try to
00:44:08.220 do in my work is I just like, well, here's what they said. Yeah. We won't need workers anymore.
00:44:14.160 Yep. Okay. Those are their words. People really fill in very generously what they think these
00:44:20.180 guys are up to because they don't really listen to what they're saying and we do but they've got
00:44:25.880 a lot of money to support their propaganda machines and so i think you know there are
00:44:31.060 parables in the world you know these david and goliath kinds of stories and i think we're in
00:44:35.460 that kind of a situation and i do think honestly we will prevail in because their vision of the
00:44:42.200 world cannot hold yeah and it's not a vision that most people want but people don't want to live in
00:44:49.160 a police state you know in the network state where yeah uh what is that srinivasan is that
00:44:55.860 you know up in san francisco who yeah wants like yeah to just use the police force to move out
00:45:02.700 anybody who isn't ideologically aligned who wants that i'm like we just want to go to the dog park
00:45:08.380 i don't know what are we doing like just like want to we don't want a latte to be 12 you know
00:45:15.480 like there's kind of we want to have clean water we don't want to see farm workers out here trading
00:45:22.020 their lives uh for our food you know we want people to have health care and people should
00:45:28.140 not be dying of the diseases and the holy man-made diseases that are the result of you know 73 percent
00:45:36.460 of the food in the grocery store being ultra processed like there's just really basic things
00:45:40.660 people want to figure out how we can be the best versions of ourselves. And ultimately, I know this
00:45:50.220 now I sound corny, but I do believe at the heart of it, we want love. We want to be loved. We want
00:45:57.980 to express love. We want to live in a loving world. And we are exhausted by the violence.
00:46:04.780 we're exhausted by hate. We're exhausted by a lack of empathy and care for each other. And for me,
00:46:12.220 that's ultimately the project that I'm working on. And then I think you're working on too.
00:46:18.580 I couldn't agree more. And I don't think there's anything wrong with being corny about the future
00:46:24.220 in that way. And I can't think of a better place to end it. So Sophia, thank you so much
00:46:28.900 for joining us here. Thanks for having me, Dr. Becker.
00:46:35.400 Thanks again to this week's guest, Sophia Noble.
00:46:38.400 Next week, our guest is Ed Zitron, the man himself.
00:46:42.560 And I try to see what happens if I ask him to be less grumpy.
00:46:49.520 To submit questions for future guests and to suggest other guests,
00:46:54.400 and to see more pictures of Babka, join the conversation on Patreon.
00:46:59.340 You can also find us on YouTube, on Instagram at DATMPod,
00:47:03.300 on the web and on Blue Sky at DreamingAgainstTheMachine.com
00:47:07.600 or just find us wherever you get your podcasts.
00:47:11.020 Dreaming Against the Machine is a proud member of Multitude Productions.
00:47:15.060 Our executive producer is Nick Karisimi.
00:47:17.840 Our associate producer is Rosie Thomas.
00:47:20.300 Our theme music is by Jared Emerson Johnson.
00:47:23.260 Our show logo is by Nick James.
00:47:26.000 And our fearless leader is Babka, the greatest cat in the observable universe.
00:47:30.600 I'm Adam Becker, and I'll see you next week.
00:47:33.300 Thank you.