For The Wild - August 15, 2015


CURT STAGER on the Deep Future of Earth’s Climate ⧸25

Topics
PETER MICHAEL BAUER on the Survival of the Wildest ⧸24 VANDANA SHIVA on the Emancipation of Seed, Water and Women ⧸26

Episode Stats


Length

57 minutes

Words per minute

152.39

Word count

8,817

Sentence count

380

Harmful content

Misogyny

2

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 It's high on a mountain, the warm winds are blowing, and where the winds are blowing to,
00:00:26.400 There ain't no way of knowing
00:00:29.400 The mountain grass is short
00:00:32.680 It's dry and close to burning
00:00:35.440 Crying out for water
00:00:38.680 As the season's turning
00:00:41.820 Sweet smell of the pine
00:00:45.240 Tall western cedar
00:00:48.380 Drifting on the wind
00:00:51.820 Through the mountains like a river
00:00:56.400 Hello, and welcome to Unlearn and Rewild, where we explore radical ideas relating to earth renewal.
00:01:03.600 On this program, we speak with authors of many disciplines, activists, cultural figures, mystics, philosophers, scientists, and other weavers of vision for an ecologically based society.
00:01:17.240 Today, it's a thrill to be speaking with Dr. Kurt Steger about his 2011 book, Deep Future, The Next 100,000 Years of Life on Earth.
00:01:26.400 and his brand new book, Your Atomic Self,
00:01:29.620 The Invisible Elements That Connect You to Everything in the Universe.
00:01:34.040 Kurt Steger has a PhD in biology and geology from Duke University.
00:01:39.720 He has published more than three dozen climate and ecology-related articles
00:01:43.780 in major journals, including science and quaternary research,
00:01:48.900 and has written for popular audiences in periodicals such as National Geographic.
00:01:53.680 He teaches at St. Paul's College in the Adirondack Mountains of upstate New York, and he holds a research associate post at the University of Maine's Climate Change Institute, where he investigates the long-term history of climate in Africa, South America, and the polar regions.
00:02:12.180 He has also produced Natural Selections, a weekly radio short on North County Public Radio for the last 25 years in New York.
00:02:20.620 Thank you for being on the program, Kurt.
00:02:23.680 Oh, happy to be here.
00:02:25.360 It's exciting to talk with a paleoclimatologist, ecologist, slash geologist, and to ask similar
00:02:34.200 questions we might ask to a mystic philosopher, and to hear similar or at least complimentary
00:02:40.760 insights.
00:02:42.560 You're a champion of new paradigms in science, and having studied in the old paradigm and
00:02:48.520 experiencing this shift during your career, I'd love to hear about how you came to grasp
00:02:56.620 the connections between living things and between ecological processes and the continuities
00:03:04.900 throughout the universe. Well, it was a gradual process, really. It's sort of a lifetime of
00:03:10.580 interest in trying to find our place in the world and in the universe, where we come from,
00:03:15.320 who we are and things like that so it was sort of an evolution i guess would go way back you know
00:03:21.920 decades and things but just little by little doing my research into climate history environmental
00:03:27.700 history over centuries and thousands of years around the world you get used to imagining the
00:03:33.340 hidden connections that really are there and can be traced with science and one of the things that
00:03:39.720 goes with ecology is the movement of matter and energy through food chains around the planet so
00:03:46.660 you start getting familiar with things like phosphorus and carbon and where they're moving
00:03:51.800 around and then eventually you start realizing gosh you know i'm made out of that stuff too
00:03:57.420 and that's kind of what the transition was doing deep future was sort of following
00:04:03.180 carbon around the world and seeing how long our carbon pollution will be around
00:04:07.680 and that was a real eye-opener that the atoms are really permanent and the co2 combinations
00:04:15.400 that trap the heat are here for much longer than we thought but that then got me used to thinking
00:04:20.260 on the atomic level and then i realized well gosh you know if we can learn to see that
00:04:25.780 infinitely small invisibly small stuff that really only science can help you detect
00:04:31.220 it actually shows you that a lot of the old traditions of being connected to the world
00:04:37.260 into each other were correct,
00:04:39.700 but we can now nail it down with precision,
00:04:43.560 with science, too.
00:04:44.800 So it adds strength to those kinds of profound insights.
00:04:49.280 You write about deciphering the unseen realities
00:04:52.920 using the tools of science.
00:04:55.600 And this passage from your book sums up the message.
00:04:58.840 Quote,
00:04:59.660 Rather than rely solely on our limited senses
00:05:02.960 as early ancestors did,
00:05:04.680 we can now use new information about the previously hidden atomic nature of things
00:05:11.020 to better interpret what our senses tell us,
00:05:14.640 and we may hope to produce more sound and sustainable ways of living as well.
00:05:21.060 Yeah, it's kind of ironic.
00:05:22.720 You think with this modern science, you would get more and more isolated from nature
00:05:26.660 or from these sort of old, I suppose you could call them animist views,
00:05:31.520 where people shapeshift and turn into owls and other creatures and things.
00:05:38.240 But in fact, in a way, the science, once you really dig into this,
00:05:42.220 is showing us, it's kind of taking us back to those views again.
00:05:46.020 And it's just a really exciting time.
00:06:01.520 The Harvard Conservation Biologist
00:06:30.660 E.O. Wilson said, quote, perhaps the time has come to cease calling it the environmentalist view
00:06:37.020 as though it were a lobbying effort outside the mainstream of human activity and to start calling
00:06:43.040 it the real world view, unquote. I think the message of interconnectivity that science is
00:06:50.220 revealing is redefining environment. The environment includes human habitat, future worlds,
00:06:57.160 past worlds, and many people inhabit virtual worlds these days, all of which need to be
00:07:04.840 considered while moving towards a regenerative society. I'd love to hear your take on what
00:07:14.160 stands in the way of an ecologically based society and what we need to do to overcome it.
00:07:20.900 E.O. Wilson wrote about a truly radical plan to limit human activity to half the earth while
00:07:26.680 conserving the rest of the earth for the other 8 million species. What would you offer to this
00:07:31.880 discussion? Well, these are enormous, enormous issues. And the world is more complicated than
00:07:40.800 any one person can grasp. Even some of these narrower topics of, you know, how can you be a
00:07:48.320 pile of atoms and yet also be yourself and be connected to all these things through time and
00:07:53.880 space so i think it's important number one actually to learn how to communicate with each
00:08:01.700 other in a civil manner so that all of our different brains can come together and figure
00:08:08.260 these things out like i absolutely admire eo wilson i think he's a genius and a visionary and
00:08:13.900 a real important person to listen to and yet even he can't figure out if you know really should we
00:08:19.620 do the 50% of saving it for us and the other half for other species,
00:08:24.260 or maybe somebody has another idea.
00:08:26.520 So I don't so much have the exact solution for what the best ideas are to do,
00:08:33.360 but what I'm feeling like it's very important even just to understand what the situation is.
00:08:39.520 And a lot of us aren't there yet.
00:08:41.800 So maybe one way to think of it is by looking at longer time views than we normally do,
00:08:50.060 or looking at ourselves in the context of the atomic world.
00:08:55.360 Those kinds of things, I think, are transformative and important.
00:08:59.160 And if we can get more people thinking along those lines, which, as Wilson says, is actually the real world view,
00:09:06.780 then I'm hoping we can all come up with better ideas from all of us as to what to do.
00:09:14.380 So maybe one way to look at it is, by doing this, I sort of feel like I'm a map maker.
00:09:19.580 I'm trying to map out what the real physical reality is with the help of science and such,
00:09:24.800 and then passing that around, hoping that we get some very capable navigators, too, to use that map.
00:09:31.980 another aspect of humanity's influence in this anthropocene era is our meddling with the nitrogen
00:09:39.940 cycle half of all nitrogen is now man-made using the haber bosch process where we artificially
00:09:48.320 pulled nitrogen out of the atmosphere for use as fertilizer and also half of all the protein in
00:09:55.700 human tissue was originally made this way. So what would happen if these industries had to go
00:10:02.840 offline and we stopped fixing nitrogen? Would it take a while to regain the balance and have any
00:10:10.420 ecosystems become dependent on our man-made contributions? Well, this interestingly of
00:10:18.740 looking at our atomic connections to the nitrogen cycle really opened my eyes to something I never
00:10:26.440 thought I would come around saying you know I'm so interested in what you might call a natural
00:10:30.320 world you know the forest and the lake and the oceans and things and but really I feel like in
00:10:36.360 this new epic of earth history this anthropocene epic the age of humans we're realizing that we
00:10:42.300 really are not distinct from nature and we're just as much a part of it we're made of the same stuff
00:10:47.840 as all the other species and uh and so i've been increasing my empathy and sympathy for the human
00:10:56.380 race by doing this and so when you find something like half of the human bodies on the planet
00:11:05.340 couldn't exist without this technology of trapping nitrogens from nitrogen from the air
00:11:11.620 which otherwise couldn't be done without the help of bacteria, basically.
00:11:15.600 If we stop that supply, probably half of humanity would die in a very short time.
00:11:23.380 I wouldn't consider that a good thing.
00:11:25.840 You know, maybe you can sort of chuckle and roll your eyes.
00:11:28.060 Oh, wouldn't it be nice if there weren't so many of us?
00:11:29.740 But, I mean, let's talk reality here.
00:11:31.860 What a horrible, horrible disaster that would be.
00:11:34.760 And what sustains that is the human version of ecology.
00:11:38.840 It's civilization, where we all interconnect just like other parts of any ecosystem and sustain all of our lives.
00:11:47.440 And so I feel like we need to see our place in the big picture so that we don't damage the environment that we need to keep us alive
00:11:55.620 and see the value and the connectedness to the rest of the species and the rest of the ecosystems
00:12:00.560 so that we don't destroy one while trying to favor ourselves.
00:12:06.620 But right now, basically, we're running around with, you could say, heavy equipment blindfolded,
00:12:12.600 not realizing what we're damaging and what we're about to run into with all this stuff.
00:12:17.760 We need to open our eyes and learn how to do this in a conscious level.
00:12:22.320 And science is our clearest window on this truth.
00:12:25.760 So, again, getting back to the basics, I feel like even the struggle of getting people to acknowledge that science is so important,
00:12:34.160 a very precious gift, not just for our civilization and our technology, but now for the whole planet.
00:12:41.080 I feel like that's an important mission and an important challenge.
00:12:46.160 A really neat thing you wrote about is how plants and fungi are constantly excreting enzymes that
00:12:52.020 break down rock. And apparently every year, 20 billion metric tons of rock is broken down and
00:12:59.400 washed a sea. According to one article you reference, the continents are being ground down
00:13:05.560 in this way so much that Earth's molten mantle churns more violently. What are the long-term
00:13:12.860 implications of this? Could the continents theoretically grind away ad infinitum,
00:13:19.760 except where volcanoes can form new land? Yeah, it just makes the world an amazing place.
00:13:26.620 If you can see this connection of something as small and slow as lichens slowly grinding down the face of a boulder when you're walking past it in the woods and seeing what that adds up to, like you said, it can change the circulation of the earth's mantle and the drifting and erosion of continents.
00:13:47.300 So that is pretty amazing, but as you continue along that path of kind of grasping what that's all about,
00:13:54.140 you realize, well, this is actually what has been happening ever since life's been on Earth.
00:14:00.400 We've had the continents drifting around, and you can even look up maps of where we think they were
00:14:06.220 and what they used to look like and things like that, too.
00:14:09.900 So this actually is what it's like living on a partially molten planet.
00:14:13.520 And you can even look at, if you hunt around online on this topic, you could find maps of where the continents are likely to be in a million, 10 million, 100 million years as well.
00:14:24.100 So that story's not over by any means.
00:14:27.680 I live on the West Coast, and I'm completely in love with the temperate rainforest.
00:14:32.580 forest. There's the largest trees in the world here, although only a few percent have been spared
00:14:40.240 the furious logging of the last century and a half. British Columbia has by far the largest
00:14:47.280 remaining ancient forest, with 53 million acres relatively untouched in the very steep, wet
00:14:54.960 coastal mountains. You know, all the rain helps, but the real growth factor is the compost. Every
00:15:01.740 year, salmon spawn up countless rivers and streams to lay their eggs and die. And their nitrogen-rich
00:15:08.500 flesh ends up in the trees. So can you explain this incredible process and how we can reconstruct
00:15:17.200 the history of salmon through tree rings and lake sediment analysis? And from that research,
00:15:24.400 Are there any clues about the current decline of salmon?
00:15:29.280 Sure. I was just blown away by the ability to trace the atoms from the ocean into the fish,
00:15:38.800 then up the rivers, into the bears that eat the salmon,
00:15:43.020 and then the other things that eat the wastes and the leftover salmon pieces,
00:15:46.460 but then turn into flowers and trees,
00:15:48.580 to the extent that then you can take a little section of a tree trunk
00:15:53.740 and look at the rings of wood that were laid down year after year
00:15:56.440 and watch the amount of nitrogen-15 fluctuating from year to year in the rings
00:16:01.780 in just the same way the abundance that the salmon did,
00:16:05.860 and those salmon runs from year to year.
00:16:08.520 So in a way, they call them salmon forests for that reason.
00:16:12.840 The atoms in the trees are former salmon atoms.
00:16:18.640 So that alone was pretty mind-blowing.
00:16:20.620 But then to move it on, as you suggested there, to my research specialty,
00:16:24.860 which is looking at sediment layers under lakes and reconstructing history that way.
00:16:29.740 You see a similar thing in the lakes.
00:16:31.400 When salmon would come up and spawn in the lakes,
00:16:34.580 their atoms would remain in those sediments too,
00:16:36.860 and you can count them back even farther than the tree rings.
00:16:40.100 So this then leads from exploring the atomic world to exploring deep time again,
00:16:47.100 because some of these cores go back thousands of years.
00:16:50.620 And the study you referenced had a really, really interesting finding, which is, if you look at what we normally consider to be long-term, oh, the last few decades, we've got this decline in salmon.
00:17:02.740 And you may remember hearing stories maybe from older folks or Native American traditions saying, oh, in the old days, the salmons were so numerous you could walk across the river on their backs, things like that.
00:17:15.100 So we say, well, gosh, the normal state was millions of salmon, and now we're losing it, so it's got to be us.
00:17:20.620 And that's probably true in this case, but if you look over the long term, you find out about 2,000 years ago, there was a gigantic drop in the nitrogen-15 concentrations in the lake sediments, and the most reasonable conclusion is the salmon almost disappeared way back then for centuries, which then raises a really interesting question.
00:17:44.880 Number one is, well, gosh, you know, what made that happen?
00:17:49.280 And we still don't know to this day why that happened.
00:17:52.440 That's a work in progress.
00:17:54.240 But the other funny thing is maybe it was strange that there were so many salmon a century ago.
00:18:00.900 Maybe that wasn't normal.
00:18:02.800 And it makes you wonder, like, well, then why were there so many?
00:18:06.040 And we don't even know that, which then raises the question of what do we really know about the fish?
00:18:13.080 and their place in the world and what can they sustain.
00:18:18.140 Well, it really does make them healthy or numerous or rare
00:18:22.120 and shows that we really still have a lot to learn about how the world works.
00:18:43.080 Thank you.
00:19:13.080 I'd like to turn to your book, Deep Future.
00:19:21.160 And in your book, you go way past the typical time frame of climate prediction.
00:19:26.020 So what if we zoom out to 100,000 years?
00:19:30.100 What kind of climate trends do you think the Earth will see?
00:19:34.880 Well, that was what really got me to want to write the book.
00:19:38.080 was there are climate researchers for the last 10 years have been mapping this out
00:19:43.840 in ways that are just mind-bending or astonishing,
00:19:47.780 and yet they're founded in relatively simple, rock-solid scientific concepts.
00:19:54.040 And the basic one is, remember that these greenhouse gases are made of atoms and molecules,
00:20:00.180 and those atoms and molecules don't vanish when they go in the air.
00:20:03.440 They stay around on the planet.
00:20:04.940 so in theory you should be able to trace where they go just like the salmon nitrogen and in fact
00:20:09.560 we can so by doing just a little bookkeeping these folks are measuring where the carbon will go
00:20:18.000 and how long it takes and the most obvious place first of all is the oceans because water absorbs
00:20:24.740 gases from the air so most of it's going to end up in the oceans between three quarters and four
00:20:31.300 fifths of it the rest is going to be stranded in the air kind of like leftovers from a big old
00:20:38.280 banquet when the oceans are full of it and will slowly be reacting with rocks and soils on the
00:20:45.920 dry land and taking the carbon out of the air that way and slowly washing that back into the
00:20:51.460 oceans with rivers and such kind of like an antacid pill so the ocean can take up the last bits
00:20:57.640 So those are the two places, the oceans mostly, a little bit on land that then delivers it to the ocean.
00:21:03.380 But the most shocking thing is how long it takes.
00:21:06.840 So for the oceans to absorb most of the stuff until they can't take anymore is on the order,
00:21:12.380 not just of decades, the end of the century, it's thousands of years.
00:21:17.800 And the reactions with the rocks and the soils is tens of thousands of years to finish that job.
00:21:26.960 So when you add it all together, the choices we're going to make in the next few decades are, if you want to simplify it, you could say we either switch from these fossil fuels quickly, in which case we won't release all of the fossil carbon that's here into the air, or if we go ahead as we basically are now and just go and go and go until we have to switch because we burned it all, depending on which of those two choices we make.
00:21:53.140 either way we're still going to have to switch from fossil fuels but if we take another century
00:21:58.780 or two and burn the stuff the difference is enormous the the least impact we would have is
00:22:06.320 the quick switch in which case things probably won't come back to the way they are now for
00:22:12.260 between 50,000 and 100,000 years and that's the mild case so it's virtually permanent on a human
00:22:20.800 scale. But if we go the profligate route and burn as much as we can and then are forced to switch
00:22:28.060 later, the impacts are much, much larger. We'll set in motion other processes that amplify those
00:22:35.520 changes, and the recovery probably won't be complete until maybe half a million years in the
00:22:42.020 future. It's fascinating, depressing, and exhilarating all at once. I find it fascinating
00:22:49.040 as a scientist, it's like, wow, how can you even figure this stuff out?
00:22:51.800 But, oh, my gosh, study after study shows it.
00:22:54.720 And, of course, it even makes common sense when you really think about it.
00:22:58.260 And then the depressing thing is, oh, my gosh, what have we done?
00:23:02.420 That this is so huge, and it's big, too big for most of us to grasp
00:23:07.900 because we're not used to thinking in these big numbers.
00:23:10.960 And it's so huge it moves slowly on our time frame,
00:23:14.340 which makes it easy to think it's not happening.
00:23:16.200 like there's no urgency because i can't see it happening well you know every decade we continue
00:23:22.740 just amplifies this effect for thousands of years and the exhilarating part gets me back to this
00:23:29.880 civilization thing and seeing our place in the world you once you kind of get over the shock
00:23:35.760 you say well gosh you know look at the huge impacts we're having without even trying we're
00:23:42.320 not doing this on purpose it's happening blindly can you imagine the power we have to do the right
00:23:47.500 thing if we know what's going on see our place and do the right thing and there's this great
00:23:53.840 quote that i think sums it up it's from the 1800s a scientist called thomas henry huxley
00:23:58.960 he was involved in a controversy of his day which was darwin and evolution and he was defending
00:24:05.460 darwinism and people said well why do you even like this topic you know when you argue it just
00:24:10.280 upsets people, which is what you might say about climate change, right?
00:24:14.360 But he said, we have to know what is true in order to do what is right.
00:24:20.820 And I feel like that's a great motto for us to really face facts, see how powerful we've
00:24:27.880 become, maybe be a little scared by the effects we have on the planet, but not be paralyzed
00:24:33.480 or depressed by the fear.
00:24:34.880 Instead, be empowered to realize what a powerful force of nature we've become
00:24:40.720 and what a force for good we can be.
00:24:43.800 We are in this amazing time in Earth history.
00:24:47.360 Literally, the generations of people on Earth today are going to make decisions
00:24:51.480 that are going to echo on down into the future for tens of thousands of years.
00:24:56.440 So that means every single one of us is hugely important.
00:25:00.180 and we're interconnected into this global system of an empowered human race.
00:25:07.820 So literally, the contents of our hearts and our minds are huge forces of nature.
00:25:16.600 And so therefore, just simply, like I said, cleaning up and focusing what's in our heads and knowing what's going on is really, really important.
00:25:26.180 so much of the climate denial and failure to act comes from you know a lack of clarity on where
00:25:34.780 we're headed the predictions vary wildly you know should we be preparing for a temperature spike or
00:25:42.060 you know a polar vortex induced ice age what is your current thinking on where the climate
00:25:47.940 it is heading this century? Well, the current thinking is, although, you know, when you have
00:25:55.920 a weird year of weather, it makes headlines. And sometimes the weird weather fits the big picture,
00:26:01.840 like, oh, you have these hurricanes, you know, that you'd probably expect some of those from
00:26:06.180 a warmer world. And yet now we've got like wicked cold, right? So how's that fit? You can take this
00:26:11.080 short term thing, people are talking about, oh, did global warming stop in recent years? You know,
00:26:15.780 It's like, no, it didn't.
00:26:17.420 The heat's going into the ocean, and when the currents change around again,
00:26:21.920 we're going to be warming again like we were before.
00:26:24.940 The real big-picture long-term thinking is, okay, let's not get distracted too much by these short-term things,
00:26:31.100 even over a year or two or even a couple of decades.
00:26:33.600 That's weather we're talking about there.
00:26:36.040 The climate stuff is big.
00:26:38.060 It's global-type averages over large areas.
00:26:42.700 And that's the scale of things we're talking about with the future and the carbon and things.
00:26:48.140 So the latest thinking is best I've been able to find in the literature is
00:26:52.400 we're not going to see an average change of the world overall
00:26:57.400 that's going to be wildly different from what we know until another few decades,
00:27:02.000 probably mid-century is when you're finally going to say, yes, okay,
00:27:05.640 it's definitely global warming on average and it's really due to us
00:27:09.640 and the world has changed measurably, noticeably, and consistently from the last century.
00:27:17.400 So these are things that are playing out over the giant scale.
00:27:21.000 We're not going to trigger an ice age.
00:27:24.100 We're stopping ice ages with this.
00:27:27.120 In fact, we've already stopped the next one, pretty certainly.
00:27:31.120 You can see the natural cycles that make ice ages come and go.
00:27:34.120 and the next one without us on the planet, let's say,
00:27:37.820 would have happened in about 50,000 years from now.
00:27:40.980 And even in the mild case of us switching quickly from fossil fuels,
00:27:45.380 there will be enough extra fossil carbon in the air
00:27:48.600 to trap enough heat to raise the Earth's temperature just enough,
00:27:52.360 even 50,000 years from now, to stop that next ice age.
00:27:57.680 Which I guess you could say is a good thing if you live in Canada.
00:28:01.480 Again, to show us our power.
00:28:02.840 But the ideas of triggering an ice age and things, those are from movies and some ideas which are sort of taken out of context from the scientific literature.
00:28:14.700 There was one cool event in the North Atlantic, for example, near the end of the last ice age from some giant flooding events from Meltwater.
00:28:21.920 And it did cool things in certain parts of like Europe and stuff.
00:28:25.300 But that was, you know, way blown out of proportion kind of in the storytelling modes.
00:28:32.840 So by mid-century, we're going to definitely see that we're in a state of warming.
00:28:39.820 Oh, yeah. I mean, you can sort of sense it now, but people like Jim Hansen get a lot of credit or blame, you could say, for being the first to announce that global warming is real.
00:28:50.780 He may turn out to be right, but that was not a scientifically well-supported, solid claim.
00:28:56.520 He was gambling on that, but to really have it nailed down as there's no question,
00:29:02.240 the average trend, blah, blah, blah.
00:29:03.620 These are slow and large things that it makes sense that by mid-century,
00:29:10.400 it will definitely not just be year-to-year variation or sunspot cycles or any of these.
00:29:16.040 The whole baseline will be noticeably warmer all around the planet.
00:29:21.960 And, of course, sea level is going to be going up.
00:29:23.580 even after the temperature peak, right?
00:29:26.720 Because it'll be hotter than now, even after the peak passes.
00:29:30.800 So the ice will continue melting
00:29:33.000 even while the temperature recovery is happening.
00:29:36.400 So sea level is just going to be going up and up and up and up.
00:29:39.840 So see the Everglades while you can.
00:29:42.300 I was just actually down in southern Florida
00:29:45.240 and it was really kind of a mind trip to see homes and high rises
00:29:51.200 and all these buildings literally built on the sand.
00:29:55.180 I thought to myself, oh my gosh,
00:29:57.540 you know, so much, not just Florida,
00:29:59.420 but so much of the world's large cities
00:30:01.840 are built on waterways.
00:30:05.100 Sure.
00:30:06.140 And what an unimaginable world that would look like.
00:30:10.440 Well, you can see the practical effects
00:30:12.760 of the dangers of not using long-term thinking.
00:30:17.560 Exactly what you described,
00:30:18.760 building on beaches, building on floodplains.
00:30:22.020 You think about it, you know, people found places to live
00:30:26.920 during the short time span of their, you know, their active lives, let's say.
00:30:32.960 Gosh, look at this place. There's a river right there.
00:30:35.760 That's neat. And look at all that flat land around it.
00:30:38.700 What a perfect place to build a house and then a town and roads.
00:30:43.060 Isn't that great?
00:30:43.880 And then you never stop to think, why is the land flat all around that river, you know?
00:30:48.760 And so when it happens, because we're still in this short-term thinking, you don't even, you call it like an act of God, a disaster.
00:30:56.340 No, it's a floodplain.
00:30:59.540 If you build on it, this is going to happen.
00:31:02.660 And same with the beaches.
00:31:03.960 Only now, it's permanent virtually because the sea level's coming up and is going to be doing it for centuries.
00:31:12.580 And so progressively, on average, the flood events from hurricanes and things are just going to get farther and farther and farther inland.
00:31:21.000 You're living on borrowed time if you build on beaches now.
00:31:24.600 I remember maybe a few months ago, there was a National Geographic map.
00:31:29.180 They had this huge pullout map inside that was showing time increments and sea level rise around the world.
00:31:36.640 And it was really jaw-dropping.
00:31:38.700 So much short-term thinking.
00:31:40.420 It's a lesson learned or will be learned.
00:31:43.240 Yeah, it's a matter of life and death to not think long term in those habitats, especially to not realize that it's not a question of if, but when the big one is going to come.
00:31:54.600 She was always walking
00:32:05.740 Singing to her footsteps
00:32:10.040 Dirt ditch paths and pine cones
00:32:14.280 Digging up glass bottles
00:32:19.000 Rusty springs from feather beds
00:32:25.400 Old hubcaps on the picket fence
00:32:29.420 She planted beds of flowers
00:32:32.420 Stayed outside for hours 0.70
00:32:38.140 In spirit she's drifted to the ocean
00:32:45.240 Going back to the topic of the temperature rise, what do you make of James Lovelock's theory that the Earth could tip to a hot state that's inhospitable to intelligent life?
00:33:01.160 Well, if you look at the facts and figures that I present in the book, I went through a large part of the scientific peer-reviewed literature on this to get these estimates of the warming.
00:33:15.260 And Lovelock's original estimates of it killing billions of people,
00:33:19.300 even he has backed away from those now.
00:33:22.600 Jimmy Hansen also had a thing called the Venus Syndrome,
00:33:25.560 which he put in his book, what is it, Storms of My Grandchildren, I think it's called,
00:33:29.800 terrified a lot of people.
00:33:31.640 And his idea was, having studied Venus before with his research,
00:33:35.540 he said, well, gosh, maybe we could have a runaway greenhouse,
00:33:39.120 boil off the oceans, put all the water in the air, 0.97
00:33:41.660 and that makes a super greenhouse and all of life on earth will be killed.
00:33:46.060 He has backed off from that too.
00:33:47.860 It's not going to happen.
00:33:49.900 And a lot of us would say, well, you know,
00:33:52.120 that kind of gives science a black eye at a time when we need to really be taken seriously.
00:33:57.520 We don't need the extreme stuff to acknowledge the seriousness of these issues.
00:34:06.400 And even if it's slow, even if people are around, like, as I said,
00:34:11.240 You know, Lovelock is back off from that now, and even he says this, the extreme alarmism is a disservice, actually.
00:34:16.620 But if you think about it, it's not saying don't worry about it.
00:34:21.340 Maybe one way to say it is, you know, oh, just to say that people are going to live through it sounds like, well, don't worry about it.
00:34:27.620 No, people will live through this.
00:34:30.980 It's not something that's going to happen to an uninhabited planet.
00:34:34.260 The things we're setting in motion in the far future are going to be endured by people.
00:34:40.000 So it adds a stronger ethical dimension, if anything, to what we're doing.
00:34:44.960 We're affecting the grandchildren of our grandchildren's grandchildren.
00:34:49.160 By mid-century, what type of temperature rise are we expecting,
00:34:52.320 and why does that matter to people when people are just thinking,
00:34:56.140 oh, it's warmer winters?
00:34:58.180 Right, right.
00:34:59.080 Well, it's important not to be too broad brush with some of these things.
00:35:06.260 there if you warm the average temperature of the planet first of all don't forget
00:35:12.040 individual locations will warm more or less like right now there's no question global average
00:35:19.360 temperature's gone up in the last century but there are certain places like northeastern canada
00:35:24.040 because of the ocean currents has not warmed significantly and so there will be places on
00:35:31.100 earth that you could argue would become more habitable you know that's no argument for not
00:35:38.160 doing something to stop it i mean first of all there's a million reasons to switch from fossil
00:35:42.520 fuels anyway for economic reasons social cultural reasons too but i mean when you change the average
00:35:50.640 temperature of the planet you're not just raising the thermostat and everything goes up the same
00:35:55.700 amount of the small amount it disrupts entire ways things operate so you change wind tracks
00:36:02.980 for example so it's likely the westerly winds that bring most of the rain and snow let's say
00:36:09.380 across the middle of north america they're likely to shift more towards the north and it's even more
00:36:16.520 likely that's going to happen in the southern hemisphere and that alone just shifting where
00:36:21.620 the winds blow as the winds move closer to the pole let's say as the things warm up and the ice
00:36:28.520 goes away well like one example was my research in south africa looking at the climate history
00:36:35.420 when it gets warmer in the past the the rain that only hits south africa that kind of arid
00:36:44.140 beautiful place where people in the landscape really depend on the winter rains because there's
00:36:50.100 almost none any other time of year it's winter when it when those storm tracks kind of brush
00:36:55.860 against the southernmost tip of the continent if you pull those closer to antarctica they won't hit
00:37:02.260 south africa anymore and then there won't be any rain at any time of year so a shift of a small
00:37:11.780 amount of temperature could have massive local effects from things like that and so for people
00:37:19.160 to belittle it just shows they don't know what they're talking about. It's again, not, you know,
00:37:23.660 short-term thinking, small thinking, or not thinking clearly at all. Something I think about
00:37:30.620 is with the temperature rise, the inability to grow native plants in their native regions
00:37:36.960 by diversity loss, but then you throw in the wind and the rains and... Come back to this idea of,
00:37:43.780 you know, should we get depressed and alarmist and stuff? You know, you can point to Greenland
00:37:47.120 and say, well, it's great for the native folks there in a way
00:37:49.740 because, you know, as the ice shrinks and it warms,
00:37:52.600 they can grow vegetables more.
00:37:53.880 And you get fresh food that can only be brought in at great expense now
00:37:56.960 and all these knock-on positive things.
00:37:59.900 But if you really think in the big picture,
00:38:02.880 who has the right to make these decisions for everybody in the world?
00:38:07.500 And, yes, maybe Greenland benefits,
00:38:08.880 but is that ethical to give them that boost
00:38:12.060 by taking away the rain from South Africa?
00:38:14.320 We need to see the whole picture here, and the science really helps us do that.
00:38:20.660 You were recently doing research in the Peruvian Andes, where many of the tropical glaciers are endangered,
00:38:26.520 and several have completely disappeared, forcing indigenous farmers to relocate to find an irrigation source.
00:38:34.440 With the uncertainty around freshwater, I'm curious what will happen to precipitation in the tropics this century,
00:38:41.380 In particular, in the Amazon, where there's massive tree death and drought-related fires.
00:38:48.680 Well, unfortunately, we don't have 100% reliable models yet.
00:38:57.320 But temperature stuff is not that difficult to model, and you could sort of almost do it in your head, right?
00:39:04.120 I mean, the air mixes completely within a year around the world.
00:39:09.120 And if you put more greenhouse gases in it, the average temperature goes up.
00:39:12.580 I mean, I could have told you that without a climate model, right?
00:39:15.460 But precipitation is really complicated.
00:39:18.820 It has to do with how much evaporated here, and then where does it go on the air from there in vapor form,
00:39:26.320 and then what cools it enough to make it condense.
00:39:29.720 Was it uplift? Was it, you know, all these different things.
00:39:33.100 And if you think about it, just how rainy weather works, you could be sitting here and get a big deluge on you,
00:39:40.940 and the person the next town over didn't get any.
00:39:43.300 And your two towns would then register a dry summer or a wet summer, and they're almost a walking distance apart.
00:39:49.060 So imagine that complexity.
00:39:51.440 And then try to map it on a global scale, and the models just fall flat with the rainfall stuff.
00:39:57.940 So always be careful of that.
00:39:59.660 And if someone says, oh, the model told us that Amazon's going to get wetter,
00:40:03.940 oh, the model told us it's going to get drier, you say, well, which model?
00:40:07.900 And what are its strengths and weaknesses?
00:40:09.980 And so we actually don't even, I've heard conflicting weather analyses for the Amazon,
00:40:17.100 even the historical measurements as to whether as a whole it's getting wetter or drier.
00:40:21.760 It's probably a patchwork here and there.
00:40:24.480 And so we really don't know exactly, but there are some common sense generalities you could make.
00:40:33.200 And one of them is, if the air is warmer, the oceans get warmer.
00:40:38.480 And if the oceans get warmer, they evaporate more.
00:40:41.740 So that's common sense.
00:40:42.920 So more vapor in the air, on average, should mean more intense, heavier precipitation, on average, in the places where it happens.
00:40:52.700 and some of those places are predictable like in the little tropics you got these air circulation
00:40:58.820 systems that have warm moist rising air and they make the monsoony kinds of rains
00:41:04.260 so common sense is you know probably a lot of those are going to get wetter
00:41:09.520 and then there are opposite places where the air is sinking and drying and cooling so you say well
00:41:16.460 gosh you know maybe the dry places are going to get drier but then you also have the shifting of
00:41:21.960 the winds so my best guess from looking at these conflicting climate models let's say for africa
00:41:28.040 where i did most of my work is a lot of the inner tropics might get more moisture on average
00:41:33.980 although we don't really know but just guessing probably on average more of that which could be
00:41:39.580 good in a way but also bad with flooding more and insect-borne disease and then the dry parts
00:41:45.980 which are farther out from the equator,
00:41:49.680 like up near the Sahara and then down south near the Kalahari.
00:41:53.080 If the wind belts are shifting towards the poles,
00:41:55.500 those could spread north and south.
00:41:59.860 So maybe like northern Africa, parts of Morocco, Libya, Egypt,
00:42:04.820 would get some rain sometimes now.
00:42:07.480 Maybe those rain belts would be pushed off the northern part of the continent
00:42:10.920 into the Mediterranean or up into Europe.
00:42:12.640 So these are just things that we can only speculate about, but common-sense, broad-brush things like that maybe are better than some of the models right now.
00:42:23.300 If hypothetically the Amazon dried up in the next few decades, and then rainfall patterns changed, and it became water again, would the biodiversity return, or would we be looking at a novel ecosystem with a less diverse species composition?
00:42:42.640 Well, you can't have the trees without the water.
00:42:45.780 But it's important to remember, again, if you have this picture of us being in this new epoch of Earth's history,
00:42:52.940 this is the Anthropocene epoch.
00:42:54.320 We've had dry times and wet times before.
00:42:56.460 We've had hot times and cold times before.
00:42:58.160 What's different is we are all over the planet with our technology and our settlements and our interconnectedness.
00:43:04.520 So in the old days, if you had a massive climatic shift, which did happen in the Amazon and did happen in the rainforest of West Africa, it was the last ice age.
00:43:17.300 When it got cooler on average, the monsoons were almost shut down in a lot of ways.
00:43:22.660 And the rainforest gradually over the centuries, you know, they shrank or they moved and things like that.
00:43:29.460 So in theory, if things didn't happen too fast, maybe that could happen again.
00:43:34.220 But the problem is, in this Anthropocene epoch, there's nowhere to go.
00:43:39.700 We're in the way.
00:43:41.580 Our farms, our ranches, our towns, our roads and things are blocking the one big adaptive tool that life on Earth has always had.
00:43:52.120 It's the mobility.
00:43:54.280 And plus we do other things, right?
00:43:55.720 Besides climate, we can cut the trees and move things around and pollute things.
00:44:00.120 And so, really, it's the big picture of who we are, how do we run our civilization,
00:44:06.420 and how do we see our place on the Earth that's going to determine this as much as the climate alone.
00:44:11.720 Onward from vast uncharted space, forward through timeless void.
00:44:21.480 Into us all there's search and race, the measureless might of the wind.
00:44:30.120 In the steep, steep silence of thin blue air, I hold a lonely ledge.
00:44:39.460 Where the air is clear and clean and rare, I give to the wind my pledge.
00:44:49.220 By the strength of my arm, by the side of my eye, by the side of my face.
00:44:54.340 Like you were saying earlier, climate change will bring some surpluses with the shortages,
00:45:00.320 such as extraglacial melt water for farms until the glaciers are gone one day.
00:45:05.640 And it'll be tempting to accordingly scale up agriculture and keep feeding a population boom.
00:45:11.480 But you caution multiple times against short-sightedness and call for building reservoirs and canals.
00:45:19.220 We recently spoke with Mark Shepard, who spoke about the strategy of key line design to slow the water down, to contain and soak in as much water as possible, which is being used to restore desertifying landscapes far and wide.
00:45:35.000 But what are some of the other short term bonanzas that climate change may bring when ice free Arctic comes to mind, for example?
00:45:43.120 And how can these new conditions factor in a long term sustainability plan?
00:45:48.940 Right, yeah, exactly.
00:45:50.680 Well, there's the science, you know, like where are the rainier drying places?
00:45:57.860 Where are the warming and cooling places?
00:45:59.340 Where's the ice melting?
00:46:00.620 How's the sea level coming up?
00:46:02.480 These are mechanical things that a scientist, a mapmaker like myself, you'd say, could map out for us.
00:46:08.380 But as I was sort of alluding to before, we need not just mapmakers like myself,
00:46:13.440 but wise navigators who know what to do with that information.
00:46:17.340 And so the key here is not just what are the physical constraints of our environment
00:46:23.460 and our effects on it.
00:46:24.440 It's how do we think, act, and respond.
00:46:28.460 So when you see a short-term bonanza, well, maybe if you were really smart about it,
00:46:33.600 you could take advantage of it but be agile and say, well, be ready to move on
00:46:37.740 because it's only short-term and then we're going to have to adjust.
00:46:40.040 But how do you make people do that?
00:46:43.760 Or should you make people do that?
00:46:45.860 and who decides these things and who's going to carry it on from generation to generation.
00:46:50.840 These are things that you figure out by being a human being in the Anthropocene
00:46:55.140 where you learn how to communicate with each other and respect science
00:47:00.420 but also learn how to be a citizen of the planet.
00:47:05.380 So it's not just science.
00:47:07.920 It's human interactions and human values and human ethics
00:47:11.700 that are now built into the ecology of the planet.
00:47:16.260 So maybe one way to sort of sum this up is, you know,
00:47:19.860 people say, like, how many people can the planet support?
00:47:22.740 Or, you know, can we save the Amazon but also farm it?
00:47:28.580 It's, well, if you do it wisely, with the big picture in mind,
00:47:33.800 sometimes you can pull this stuff off and still have lots of people.
00:47:37.340 But it's how you live your life.
00:47:39.200 So one way to think of it is, you know, you have a lifeboat out in the ocean.
00:47:43.180 You know, you've had a shipwreck and you're in this lifeboat.
00:47:45.600 Okay, well, if you could cram, you know, two dozen people into a lifeboat,
00:47:51.160 if everybody cooperates and you share resources and help get water and trap it when it rains
00:47:57.740 and, you know, you help each other, you could make it to shore eventually.
00:48:02.980 So it's not just what is the situation or just how many of us are.
00:48:07.240 It's how we live our lives.
00:48:09.200 and what our perspectives are and what our ethics are.
00:48:12.620 That's a real key thing.
00:48:14.200 So I think the big take-home message of science and the Anthropocene
00:48:20.040 is we are part of nature too.
00:48:23.180 And so therefore, the more we can learn about ourselves and each other,
00:48:26.620 the better off we're going to be too.
00:48:30.240 Many of the variables we're discussing are within our control,
00:48:34.020 and many are way out of our hands.
00:48:36.940 and I believe that we should do everything we possibly can to safeguard living communities
00:48:43.040 and we should go out on limbs and take on things that require a kind of faith that society will
00:48:50.580 eventually join in. I'm interested in the question though what would happen climatically
00:48:57.080 if we do nothing proactive and continue business as usual? Yeah isn't that ironic you know if you
00:49:05.060 If you put it that way, it sounds like you could describe it as,
00:49:09.940 gosh, what if we just take the simple, non-dramatic route
00:49:14.160 and just keep doing what we do versus the radical thing?
00:49:18.540 And then you think, no, no, no, that's backwards.
00:49:21.360 Right.
00:49:21.880 If we keep doing what we're doing, that's the radical decision
00:49:24.980 because the consequences are enormous.
00:49:29.900 I mean, not only this half a million year recovery
00:49:33.780 as opposed to 50,000 or 100,000 years, but the scale of the warming.
00:49:39.480 I mean, we will lose all ice on the planet if we do this.
00:49:44.280 The sea level will come up 230 feet.
00:49:48.280 The continents will be smaller.
00:49:51.020 It's not like there will be tiny little islands, but Florida won't exist.
00:49:54.620 It will be a sandbar off the coast of that corner of North America.
00:50:01.400 I mean, that's the radical stuff.
00:50:04.580 But because it's spread out on this gigantic timescale, it's hard to see it as that.
00:50:11.840 So, yeah, if we go on about business as usual, we are heading for the extreme version of runaway climate change.
00:50:21.120 What do you make of methane releases that are happening in the Arctic?
00:50:25.280 Does the clathorite gun potentially represent an all bets off situation?
00:50:31.120 Yeah, that's an interesting idea.
00:50:32.860 Yeah, I spoke with one of the fellas some years ago who was sort of involved in this whole discovery
00:50:41.760 of how much frozen methane there is in the ocean sediments and the permafrost and things like that
00:50:48.220 all around the world, just stunning amounts of natural gas.
00:50:52.780 And this isn't the fracking stuff, this is meltable methane ice.
00:50:57.440 like in theory if you can pull it up from the ocean floor
00:51:01.280 you can make snowballs out of it and then ignite the snowballs
00:51:05.060 and throw flaming snowballs of methane ice
00:51:07.540 but the scale of this means that it's an important climate changing gas
00:51:14.440 and it looks like 55 million years ago
00:51:16.980 something happened to release a lot of that stuff into the atmosphere
00:51:19.960 and we had a runaway giant global greenhouse
00:51:23.460 So the question is, could we do that again now by warming the oceans and the air and thawing the permafrost off?
00:51:30.140 So coming up with that idea when it was new said, well, let's make a dramatic term for it.
00:51:35.880 We'll call it the clathrate.
00:51:37.820 Well, clathrate is the methane ice.
00:51:39.480 This is the clathrate gun, and we could fire it off by warming it, warming the world, thawing this methane ice, and letting it into the air.
00:51:50.180 and it's a giant greenhouse gas, and it'll just kind of get away from us
00:51:54.140 and sort of, you say, blow up the climate or something.
00:51:57.420 But the question now is, how likely is that to go off like a climate gun all at once?
00:52:05.920 And that's an area of active investigation now.
00:52:09.980 The question is, where is all of this ice and how well insulated is it?
00:52:15.560 And if it's under hundreds of feet of mud or hundreds of feet of teat,
00:52:20.180 It's well insulated.
00:52:22.800 So some of this stuff, you know, we've had warmings before between the ice ages.
00:52:27.980 Some of this stuff has been through, you know, multiple ice ages
00:52:30.520 and didn't thaw all the way down through.
00:52:33.600 So some of the researchers are skeptical that we should maybe think of it
00:52:38.120 as an all-at-once release that we're headed for, more like a clathrate dribble.
00:52:44.420 But the fact is we don't really know.
00:52:47.040 And that's one of the things that makes it a little bit unnerving.
00:52:50.180 to have such a big thing there that we don't fully understand yet.
00:52:58.520 To get a glimpse into your career,
00:53:00.980 what are some things you could share about your recent research?
00:53:05.980 As far as critical findings in my new research go,
00:53:09.800 I've been looking closer to home recently with my sediment core studies.
00:53:14.440 I live in upstate New York in the Adirondack Mountains.
00:53:18.080 and we have 3,000 lakes and ponds around here.
00:53:21.640 I was realizing we know less about this corner of the world
00:53:25.000 than we know about Africa, where I was working before, in Peru.
00:53:29.760 So I've been literally digging around here in the Adirondacks
00:53:33.700 with my students and colleagues,
00:53:35.220 and boy, we're finding some really interesting things about climate
00:53:39.200 in this corner of the world over the last 1,000 years,
00:53:42.340 especially that have to do with rainfall.
00:53:43.780 all so one of the big things that these are preliminary but it looks like it's right in
00:53:52.180 lake after lake here when we pull up these cores they're these sort of um you could call them
00:53:57.880 breaks little hiatuses in the sediment layers when you get down about the mid 1700s that are
00:54:05.800 look pretty much like a gigantic drought happened here in the mid 1700s enough to
00:54:12.000 We got it from Lake George, Lake Champlain, up around Lake Placid area, up in here.
00:54:17.960 And it looks like it was like a huge, decades-long, massive drought
00:54:24.100 that could have dropped the levels of the lakes maybe 10 feet or more,
00:54:27.680 which would have had pretty big effects on people, you would think,
00:54:30.560 but it's not in any of the history books.
00:54:33.040 So we're calling it the mystery drought at this point,
00:54:36.360 but it shows you that we can have dramatic climate shifts
00:54:39.140 that would be really important to people happening right here at home.
00:54:42.780 And what I hope to do by extending this back to the last thousand years is, you know, when was it wet?
00:54:47.600 When was it dry?
00:54:48.480 And when we had natural warm or cool times in the past, how did it affect rainfall?
00:54:53.120 And is there a pattern that we can then use to look into the future and say, well, since the climate models are disagreeing,
00:55:00.540 well, maybe history can tell us what happens here when it warms up.
00:55:04.760 And that's the direction I'm looking at now is bringing this all down home and applying the deep view of the past
00:55:11.840 to hopefully help see where we're headed here
00:55:16.240 in the future in New York.
00:55:18.740 Is there anything you'd like to close a conversation with,
00:55:21.880 any last remarks that you feel really passionate about sharing?
00:55:27.200 How important I think it is to embrace our place in history
00:55:33.080 and embrace our connectedness to the whole planet
00:55:36.700 and embrace science as one of our most precious gifts
00:55:40.760 because, as I said, I consider it our clearest window on the truth
00:55:46.840 for all its foibles and all our human stuff.
00:55:48.980 This system really helps us cut through the things we wish were true
00:55:53.360 or believe are true that are not.
00:55:56.160 And at this critical time in history,
00:55:58.340 clarity of vision and solidity and reliability of information
00:56:02.500 are just so critical, not just for our well-being,
00:56:06.300 but even for the survival of an entire species.
00:56:08.520 So I think it's really time to acknowledge that just learning how to learn, learning how to communicate with other folks, think for yourself, and judge good arguments and good information carefully is every bit as important now in this Anthropocene age as being the person who invents the new technology
00:56:36.000 or the new way of running a society.
00:56:39.800 If we're not well-informed, then we can't support these ideas
00:56:45.000 when they show up and can be distracted by things that are wrong.
00:56:49.380 So I just want to welcome everybody to the Anthropocene.
00:56:53.360 Welcome to the realization of how important you are
00:56:56.320 and challenge you to become the best informed
00:57:00.720 and well-intentioned citizen of the planet you can be.
00:57:03.940 thank you so much for this conversation
00:57:07.320 it's expanded my
00:57:09.260 views of how miraculous
00:57:11.020 this living organism that we're
00:57:13.280 a part of really is
00:57:14.660 so thank you again
00:57:16.900 Kurt
00:57:17.540 thank you for what you're doing
00:57:19.120 this has been a conversation with
00:57:27.120 Kurt Steger on Unlearn
00:57:29.100 and Rewild
00:57:29.920 I'm Ayanna Young
00:57:31.540 the music you heard
00:57:33.680 was Ayahuasca
00:57:34.940 by Don Pedro Guerra Gonzalez
00:57:37.820 From the River to the Ocean
00:57:40.240 by Hamid Drake
00:57:41.980 and Fred Anderson
00:57:43.100 The Ocean by Alila Diane
00:57:45.600 and Pledge to the Wind
00:57:47.640 by Dan Byrne
00:57:49.080 Our producer is March Young