For The Wild - May 04, 2022


Dr. BAYO AKOMOLAFE on Slowing Down in Urgent Times [ENCORE] ⧸285

Topics
Dr. KIM TALLBEAR on Reviving Kinship and Sexual Abundance [ENCORE] ⧸284 ALOK on Unruly Beauty [ENCORE] ⧸286

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 27 minutes

Words per minute

135.8

Word count

11,858

Sentence count

526

Harmful content

Misogyny

3

sentences flagged

Toxicity

4

sentences flagged

Hate speech

38

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 Welcome to For the Wild podcast. I'm Ayana Young. Today we are speaking with author,
00:00:08.480 speaker, renegade academic, and proud father, Bayo Akomolafai.
00:00:14.760 in trying to climb out of the pits that we've dug for ourselves the pit becomes resilient
00:00:34.160 in trying to escape the prison the prison gains its form so in a in a very critical sense we are
00:00:42.040 in a crisis of form. And this form is the indeterminacy of things. The background has
00:00:49.400 crashed into the figure, into the foreground. And so sense-making is at a crisis point now.
00:00:55.360 We need trickster approaches. We need ways of dancing away or dancing to fugitive spaces,
00:01:04.500 dancing to sanctuaries where we can shapeshift. And I think grieving, mourning, even allowing
00:01:11.020 ourselves to partake in pleasurable activities in the face of the storm, which might sound like a
00:01:17.220 very, very privileged thing to do, I know. And yet, you know, doing that, I think, might be
00:01:23.260 productive in ways that I do not even want to talk about.
00:01:29.720 Bayo is globally recognized for his poetic, unconventional, and counterintuitive take on
00:01:35.720 global crises, civic action, and social change. He is director and chief curator for the Emergence
00:01:42.380 Network and a visiting professor at Middlebury College. Bayo has also authored two books,
00:01:48.900 We Will Tell Our Own Story, and These Wilds Beyond Our Fences,
00:01:53.640 Letters to My Daughter on Humanity's Search for Home, and has penned forewords for many others.
00:01:58.900 welcome bio it is such a delight to have you on the show and i feel so grateful to have you
00:02:12.500 in this space today with us to explore some of the deep philosophical threads of this time
00:02:17.980 we're living into particularly as we step across the threshold of the new year thank you so much
00:02:24.220 for having me here. Well to begin I'd like to offer you the opportunity to share a bit more
00:02:31.020 about your background and honor the people or places that you wish to carry into this conversation
00:02:36.320 and I wonder how the religious lineages of your childhood or cultural traditions of your family
00:02:43.260 have served as important touchstones or change agents along the path that has brought you here
00:02:48.480 today? Well, first and foremost, I'm sitting here in Chennai, just to acknowledge my presence
00:02:55.940 and my grounds. I'm sitting here in Chennai, India, where we spend perhaps half of our time
00:03:04.120 in a year, six months in a year in the other part in the United States. And I'm here because
00:03:11.620 my children made it possible. My wife, EJ, our kids, Alethea and Kea made it possible.
00:03:19.520 They make everything I do possible. And their yes is my liberation, if you will, is my emancipation.
00:03:27.500 To go back further, I come from Nigeria. I was born in Nigeria. And in Nigeria, in Lagos,
00:03:36.180 probably the most populous city in Nigeria and Africa, I reckon. And I grew up in a very
00:03:43.980 highly Christianized world, a world of binaries, a world of not many gray areas. The world was 0.82
00:03:52.120 split schizophrenically into black territories and white territories, almost geopolitically as well. 0.94
00:03:59.700 And in that world, I learned to see the universe as this construct between good and evil. 0.71
00:04:08.100 And I grew up a Christian. 0.67
00:04:10.500 This would take a long while to get through.
00:04:12.500 So I'm just going to say that in growing up a Christian, I met many, many crossroads,
00:04:19.880 many places where I was challenged to rethink my faith, and many places where I fell,
00:04:26.440 but worked hard to get up again.
00:04:28.560 But one solemn day, I fell and I couldn't get up again. I couldn't recover from the fall, which I now think of as the gift of the planet. It's the gift of my ancestors. And I started to see through the colonial, imperial interruptions of my received faith.
00:04:50.940 And today I'm on a decolonial journey, a decolonial path that is bringing me to deeper crossroads, bringing me to deeper new materialist, feminist Yoruba mythologies about the planet and about the times we're in.
00:05:09.600 Ironically, these spaces that are opening up in my journey are not a dismissal of the places that I've been, where I'm coming from.
00:05:20.120 The past is not yet done. So even though I say that I fell away from my faith, I can never say that I have abandoned it. I mean, not practice Christianity, but in a sense, we never abandon anything in the relational universe so that I'm still entangled with the past that I think I've done this. There's no walking away from stuff like that.
00:05:42.920 So I'm here because of this entangling chiasmus of mother and father and three sisters and beautiful Christianized settings with their shadows and troubles and meeting this beautiful, ravishingly beautiful Indian, African, Iranian woman, falling in love with her and becoming a father and becoming myself in small doses every day.
00:06:11.980 Oh my goodness. Just the way you speak, your depth of love and your connection to your family is so, it's so beautiful. And it's, I think it speaks to a buried part in myself. And so when you speak, this unburiedness begins in me. And I just want to really thank you for that.
00:06:35.280 Now, I know much of your writing circles around the many existential urgencies and processes of change that are rising up in this moment of planetary transformation.
00:06:47.740 And in your essay, What Climate Collapse Asks of Us, you said a number of historical and contemporary articulations of climate change, from the early terminology of global warming to the tragedy of the commons to the Green New Deal.
00:07:02.740 And despite the abundance of new models and vocabularies to deal with the climate collapse,
00:07:08.360 however, you note that, quote, the current frameworks stretch and yawn, gasp and pant,
00:07:15.300 choke and ache to name and localize a phenomenon that resists our taming, end quote.
00:07:22.220 So I wonder if you could help orient us within this too small container we've imagined to hold
00:07:28.400 the overflowing complexity of this time and lead us into some of the philosophical inquiries that
00:07:34.340 you're exploring at the heart of our unwieldy ecological crisis. What does it mean for climate
00:07:40.900 change to be unthinkable or incalculable? Beautiful. So one of the most persistent
00:07:51.300 and sticky habits of perception that has possessed those of us gestating in modern civilizations is
00:08:01.340 we tend to see things as separate from each other. The mic is separate from the one who speaks into
00:08:08.200 the mic. The podcast is separate from the computer that broadcasts the podcast. Cars are separate from
00:08:14.960 their drivers. We are separate from our technologies. We see things as boundaried and as atomized in
00:08:23.520 some Newtonian, Cartesian sort of way. And it's a good strategy. It's a strategy that has produced
00:08:31.300 a kind of world. I'm not in the habit of naming it as evil or bad, even though that's a strategy
00:08:38.780 in itself too but i see the strategy of separation is to create safety permanence fixity for once and
00:08:48.160 for all to name things in a final way that's the modern impulse i would say now you run into trouble
00:08:55.340 when things like what's happening today start to crop up the first thing i'll say is that we are
00:09:02.100 slowly coming to terms in a world that is more entangling and more relational and more processual
00:09:09.320 than our modern habits of seeing can allow us to notice or appreciate. So we are noticing that
00:09:19.140 we are not so much as distanced from our technologies as modernity would have us
00:09:24.880 believe we are. In shaping computers, we are shaped by computers. In participating in networks,
00:09:32.100 we are conducting and performing emotional labor of some form
00:09:36.340 and reshaping ourselves in that way.
00:09:39.840 In very practical terms, we now consume more dairy products
00:09:43.620 than human beings thousands of years ago.
00:09:47.880 Our bodies are now used to it.
00:09:49.760 And there are artistic impressions and experiments
00:09:53.040 that are trying to decipher how we would look like
00:09:56.120 if we continue to drive cars, for instance,
00:09:58.680 and if we continue to sit in cubicles.
00:10:00.780 how would we look like in the next 100 years?
00:10:04.220 I don't want to conjure macroevolution here,
00:10:07.300 except as if we're heading for a predestinated space.
00:10:12.460 But to say that we are changing
00:10:14.540 and we are not as human as we think we are,
00:10:18.220 does this mean for this rude thing called climate change?
00:10:21.780 It means that we think, act, behave, see, want, yearn, practice, perform,
00:10:30.780 do things only with the world or only with others, basically.
00:10:37.900 That is the perceptual stickiness or the assumption that we act as individuals
00:10:44.240 is already being haunted by the idea of an entangled world.
00:10:49.880 That when Ayana thinks about building a house, that is something ancestral as well.
00:10:56.880 That is something ecological as well.
00:10:59.080 That is the lives and breadth and size and hopes of multitudes and the manifold that are mostly invisible seeping through and being performed so that we are always intergenerational, so that our failures are shared by a community that are not always noticeable or perceptible.
00:11:18.120 So this idea that we are in community also has its risks because it means that there are ways of behaving that become resilient and that is very difficult to shake off.
00:11:29.740 And basically, my work in thinking about climate change through the prisms of indigenous realities and poetry and entanglement is basically to notice that, yeah, those ways have become very sticky and they've become troublesome.
00:11:50.600 And so we need to find other places of power with which we might respond to something that is beyond us.
00:11:56.680 we're responding within a machine and the machine is tired and exhausted yes this machine is tired
00:12:05.100 and exhausted and i cannot wait to hospice this machine to its next sleeping area as you've named
00:12:14.240 we're spurred to action by catastrophe and crisis and it's this desire to fix to solve to post on
00:12:23.020 social media to quantify and measure. Now, in contrast to this cultural twitch of frenetic
00:12:29.540 production, you've invited us to consider a kind of slowness and deep listening that I think many
00:12:36.460 are calling into this movement. This idea of, quote, coming to a place of an elderly silence
00:12:42.940 so compelling that one yields oneself to its operations, longing to be defeated,
00:12:48.780 a place of creative surrender the end of thought end quote so i'd love if you could share a little
00:12:56.180 bit more on the teachings of slowness defeat and surrender and what is activated when we are
00:13:03.040 finally still right you know i was really grateful that you started our conversation with
00:13:09.340 inviting me to notice where i come from because i've been very fascinated with the wealth and
00:13:16.800 abundance and the beautiful gifts of thought and conceptualization that were always around me that
00:13:25.420 but I couldn't notice it wasn't time to notice that then the Yoruba people mainly in West Africa
00:13:32.180 but also in Brazil as well in the so-called new world prostrate before their elders when they see 0.90
00:13:39.880 And it's a deeper form of genuflection.
00:13:43.820 And the Yoruba people call it dobale.
00:13:47.480 A man literally falls flat on the ground and is still until the elder says rise. 0.57
00:13:55.760 For the ladies, it's called ikule. 0.90
00:13:59.260 And the lady just bends her knees a bit and rises just briefly.
00:14:03.840 I was shocked to learn that there's deep mythological significance to prostration.
00:14:11.400 It's not just a gesture in, you know, it goes deeper than that.
00:14:16.760 That to literally prostrate is to be still in the face of the storm.
00:14:22.960 That is how you're about. People see it mythologically.
00:14:26.060 that there is this great god called Shongo,
00:14:29.900 who is the god of thunder and seismic shifts and upheavals.
00:14:34.000 And when he shows up, you don't run.
00:14:36.920 You don't run away.
00:14:38.540 You don't fight it, too.
00:14:40.780 The habits of war are already being heard
00:14:44.140 when we say things like we're going to fight climate change,
00:14:47.780 we're going to defeat climate change, and stuff like that.
00:14:50.780 That's war lending itself again to how we're framing it.
00:14:54.640 But these other teachings tell us to stay still, you know, to be perfectly still in the face of the storm.
00:15:02.580 And it's from these that I was able to tease out this beautiful idea that the times are urgent.
00:15:08.500 Let us slow down. Slowing down has been interpreted by many communities as basically doing what we're doing, but at slower speed.
00:15:17.820 that is we're literally slowing down the pace of things we are not typing our memos as fast as we
00:15:26.120 once were i literally had a german brother write to me and say that i'm you're slowing down
00:15:32.840 invocation isn't working because my bosses are still on my neck slowing down to type a memo
00:15:39.140 isn't really working and i responded by saying slowing down is not a function of speed it's a
00:15:44.100 function of awareness. And I don't want to make awareness a mental construct. It's a function of
00:15:50.140 presence. So when I invite slowing down, I'm inviting us to research, to perform research
00:15:57.200 into the ancestral tentacularities that proceed from us. I'm asking us to touch our bodies and
00:16:04.940 touch our colonial bubbles. I'm asking us to listen, as you say, to witness. No, not just to
00:16:11.700 witness, to with-ness, to be with land and community and ancestor and progeny and children
00:16:19.820 in a way that isn't instrumental. Activism is increasingly instrumental. So it's performing a
00:16:26.460 form of power that is tied to the logic and algorithm of the status quo, which makes activism,
00:16:33.840 even in a search for justice, a creature of the status quo, which makes hope and justice,
00:16:38.840 as ironic as that sounds, a creature of the things we're trying to leave behind.
00:16:44.300 So slowing down seems to be a hacking of the machine. It's like we're taking on other forms
00:16:49.240 of body, of embodiment that allows us to penetrate into different kinds of realities,
00:16:55.520 other worlds, if you will. Let me stop there for now. I could go on and on.
00:17:01.060 Well, I do want to go on and I really do want to lean further into this topic.
00:17:05.560 and I've been meditating on the real challenge and friction of slowing down. Now, Trisha Hersey
00:17:12.120 of the Nat Ministry describes rest as a radical threat to the system that feeds on the grind of
00:17:17.940 urgency, writing, quote, we are living and participating in violence via a machine level
00:17:24.380 pace of functioning. Anyone who goes against this pace is living as an outlier and a risk taker.
00:17:31.260 It is warrior-style resistance to push back and disrupt this reality, end quote.
00:17:37.320 In context of so-called modern capitalist life, I find that rest can only be non-threatening insofar as it's carved out of the shadow of work, as say, consuming or vacationing rather than a generative expression and worthy endeavor in its own right.
00:17:54.980 So how can we reorder this kind of dualistic thinking around work versus rest or progress versus stagnation and embody the power of a slow, humble pace?
00:18:07.360 I would think of rest. Let me apply Fred Moulton's, let me do some wrapping here, even though I don't wrap at all, and stretch. I think the beautiful gift of wrapping is to disrupt linearity and binaries, is to tease out branches, what the French philosopher Deleuze would call deterritorialization, is to tease out branches from the singular,
00:18:36.220 to tease out the many streams from the mainstream. I would take that word rest and stretch it
00:18:42.040 further. How about we think of rest as marionage? Marionage being the process of extricating
00:18:49.060 oneself from slavery, and rest as fugitivity, that is, moving away from sites of productivity.
00:18:59.180 That is, are there other ways we can be generative and productive without taking on the
00:19:05.480 singular definitions of a capitalist neoliberal structure? Are there other ways that we can defy
00:19:12.320 the stentorian voice of progress? If we're not progressing, then there's something wrong with
00:19:19.180 us as a community, as individuals. If we're not producing, what if rest is, as I've said before,
00:19:26.380 listening to one's elders, dreaming? What if that's a form of rest? What if working is play
00:19:31.780 or what children do you know the university structure is one example of a colonial imposition
00:19:39.300 that sees study and learning as only one thing if you're not studying in some disciplinary manner
00:19:46.000 then you're not studying that's not real learning that's what the university will tell you but what
00:19:50.740 if having a conversation with a friend is a form of study so um yes i agree that rest is
00:19:58.860 decolonial in its relational entanglements with a capitalist structure. Like you said,
00:20:06.060 I don't want to see it as a binary thing, rest versus non-rest. I want to move outside of that
00:20:10.080 binary altogether and create fugitive communities where rest takes on new meanings altogether. 0.74
00:20:15.460 And I don't know what that is. Only in the performing of it can we speak about it. 0.99
00:20:21.200 And that's just fine. It makes me think of an interview I did with a dear friend, Bronte
00:20:28.060 Velez where she speaks of Fred Moten. I know Bronte. Oh, amazing. Right. Great. Yeah. Yes.
00:20:35.800 Yeah. I'm definitely going fugitive and you bringing those things up. I'm thinking of them
00:20:41.260 so clearly in this moment. So I'm happy we're bringing Bronte into this. Yes. Right. So
00:20:47.440 within our connection to this dynamic, fluid universe, I'm also thinking about quietness
00:20:54.980 as an elemental ingredient of relationships and enactment of reciprocity, how is cultivating
00:21:02.160 a humble quietness imperative to creating alliances and collaborations with our beyond
00:21:07.240 human relatives for our collective earthly survival? And I want to just make a personal
00:21:13.540 note on this. Since I've been living out in the forest, I do realize that it isn't until
00:21:20.100 I get quiet and I get humble that I'm able to listen and connect with the more than human world
00:21:27.720 I realize that if I'm too busy or I'm too crowded with the distractions of modernity
00:21:34.560 the voices from the more than human world won't enter me they I can't hear them and so I really
00:21:42.160 feel that my relationship with the forest and with the more than human world has come from me
00:21:48.380 quieting down and really offering a lot of myself patience and trusting in this connection that
00:21:59.420 will come if I'm just able to, like I said, kind of leave modernity at the door and walk away from
00:22:06.480 it for a while. Yeah. I'm happy for you, sister. Not many people have the privilege, the space,
00:22:17.680 the opportunity to be in the space that you are in you know to to go to the forest to build a cabin
00:22:26.520 and to live it's entirely unimaginable to do that in a place like Chennai for instance
00:22:34.800 where there there's hardly any green life here it's almost entirely structures and asphalt and
00:22:43.700 steel and buildings and parking lots. So it's almost unfortunate, but I envy you.
00:22:53.420 And at the same time, your question inspires me to think about quietude as not an event or not a
00:23:02.240 space or a moment that is internal, like in one's subjectivity, in one's mind, but quietude as an
00:23:12.020 enlistment of bodies just like a wind rushing into a space and making everything shiver like
00:23:19.240 making the leaves rust shudder and making the the hollow spaces and the branches sing
00:23:26.940 just enlisting all these bodies to perform the world in a particular way i want to think of
00:23:32.780 quietude as as an assemblage of bodies and if i were to do that i would be very much invited to
00:23:41.640 notice that it can happen here. This space of slowing down, this place of achieving rest,
00:23:47.160 this place of critiquing or diffracting modernity, right in the belly of modernity,
00:23:53.100 right in the city. And I say this this way most of the time, that enchantment is never a short
00:24:00.940 supply. Most of us, and it's beautiful again what you're doing, sister, but I want to stress that
00:24:07.760 most of us are caught in the habit of thinking of escape as a way towards the sacred. That is,
00:24:17.120 the sacred lies in the distance. If we can leave the mundane and the banal behind, then we will
00:24:24.460 find the sacred. But I think the sacred is more pervasive, more fugitive than just something that
00:24:33.220 is exterior to the conditions we want to live behind. I think fugitive spaces, and I think
00:24:38.660 they're very beautiful examples of a fugitive space. The Great Dismal Swamp is one example.
00:24:44.220 That is, it's a swampy place. It's smaller now, but in the 17th century, when slavery was really
00:24:51.500 beginning, it was this fugitive space between Virginia and North Carolina, where African
00:24:59.300 Americans, Maroons, they call them, built new communities in the swamp, basically. And it was
00:25:06.880 in the heart of empire they did this. It was right there in the heart of the slavery enterprise that
00:25:12.440 they built their fugitive communities. So I feel invited, I feel led and inspired to ask if quietude,
00:25:20.780 if rest, if fugitivity isn't a space of reckoning with the banal, isn't a space of teasing out the
00:25:29.280 sacred from the mundane. Isn't the space of actually noticing that being with one's computer
00:25:34.760 can be a time of quietude, a time of ancestral connections, that our imaginations of what the
00:25:42.520 sacred looks like often gets in the way of our transformation and that we can be enlisted in
00:25:48.680 ways that are surprising and unexpected to slow down. And it's not our work to do that. It's not
00:25:54.880 our work to come up with a
00:25:56.900 final answer on how to do that. It's our
00:25:58.860 work to know how to be ready when it calls
00:26:00.980 And it's all you may wander beyond and between.
00:26:26.180 Return
00:26:30.740 And though you may chase
00:26:37.900 The outer realm of space
00:26:43.180 Return
00:26:46.540 And though you may exchange
00:26:52.900 You're a traveling shape
00:26:55.980 For the length and the breadth
00:27:02.540 Of the path that you pace
00:27:07.020 Greater
00:27:10.720 The path has neither dimension
00:27:17.940 No beginning
00:27:20.060 No end
00:27:25.020 Return
00:27:29.020 Wow, Bayou.
00:27:32.580 That was really profound.
00:27:34.640 And I'm really glad that you spoke to
00:27:37.460 how to find this quietness and rest
00:27:41.700 beyond what many of us think we need
00:27:46.020 in order to gain those perspectives.
00:27:50.320 And I do feel the privilege
00:27:54.420 of living in the forest and with that privilege for me has come this feeling of immense responsibility
00:28:01.680 of how do I take this honoring of being in relationship with a land like this and support
00:28:10.700 communities and support the land in their own survival and so I think it's such a complex
00:28:16.580 time to be alive and there's no one size fits all or blanket solution that everyone can achieve
00:28:25.420 in the same way so how do we challenge our assumptions of how to find self-care and find
00:28:32.960 what we need in our particular circumstances and now i'd really like to call the words of two
00:28:40.220 thinkers that have helped me navigate the dark waters of extinction and the existential immensity
00:28:47.140 of climate change deborah bird rose and tom van duran in keeping faith with the dead mourning
00:28:54.240 and de-extinction they write quote mourning is a process of learning and transformation to
00:29:00.260 accommodate a changed reality mourning is about dwelling with a loss and so coming to appreciate
00:29:05.980 what it means, how the world has changed and how we must ourselves change and renew our
00:29:11.640 relationships, end quote. Could you take us deeper into this notion of tending grief as an opportunity
00:29:18.800 for transformation or rebirth? And within your answer, perhaps you could speak to your project,
00:29:25.620 Vulture, Courting the Otherwise in a Time of Breakdown with the Emergence Network.
00:29:31.160 oh thank you sister those are powerful words um and mourning i know it in my bones not just in a
00:29:41.100 poetic sense when my father died in in nigeria um we traveled to the village to bury him he was
00:29:48.220 an important figure in the country's politics and governance we're approaching the village in a
00:29:53.980 convoy and i remember the uh the market women women i'd never seen before women i'd never heard 0.55
00:30:00.860 of before. Literally tearing their clothes, you know, as the cars approached and as his coffin 0.99
00:30:06.800 was seen, wailing by the side of the street, crying, shedding tears. And then I felt in a
00:30:14.460 moment annoyed because I felt they were taking my moment to cry. Like, who are these guys? Who
00:30:22.680 are these people crying for daddy? They didn't know daddy. Daddy didn't know them. So who are
00:30:29.320 these ones to be crying. I felt it was a politics of scarcity. Like, if I cry, then you shouldn't,
00:30:37.920 or if we cry, at least acknowledge a hierarchy of grief here. I should be the one noticed here,
00:30:46.400 the son, the only son of my father. And then I learned again, as part of my decolonial journey,
00:30:52.940 about grief as ceremony grieving as ceremony that is when we when we grieve it's not instrumental
00:31:02.300 to anything but that it's an opening it's an opening it's an it's a performance of indeterminacy
00:31:09.080 that is somewhat stifled by the psychological um i should say the psychological military
00:31:16.840 industrial complex. An ironical, but mantle of words, yes. But as a practicing or as a recovering
00:31:26.560 psychologist, I was taught to help the grieving subject recover, to probably offer pills or
00:31:37.480 something, to help you get back in the game, to get back into the cycle of productivity,
00:31:42.400 You know, to pull yourself together, if you will. And this noticing is what has manifested in my writing as a need for us to find spaces where we can fall apart, which is what I call grieving.
00:31:56.660 I think of grief as a falling apart, not as a falling apart in only human terms, but as a falling apart that is part of the motions, part of the processes that is stitched into the fabric of matter itself.
00:32:13.840 the materializing world is grieving. Wherever movement is, there's always loss. And wherever
00:32:20.280 loss is, there is the desire for grief. There is grieving. There is a need to fall down.
00:32:27.240 Unfortunately, in modern settlements, we hardly have spaces for falling apart. We don't know how
00:32:34.620 to stay in the indeterminacy and the slowness of the compost. We want to get back into the game
00:32:41.580 quickly. Applied to the climate change discourse, you can sense the techno-materialist
00:32:49.240 machine doing its work all over again, producing bits, binaries, ones and zeros. It's either
00:32:56.920 climate justice or climate chaos. That's it. That's all this machine produces. And I wonder
00:33:04.740 if there aren't worlds in between that we are not able to notice. I wonder if the trickster
00:33:10.520 isn't beckoning at the wilds beyond our fences, wanting us to dance between the binary, between
00:33:16.900 the ones and the zeros, to notice a place for climate grief. What if that was actually an
00:33:22.520 objective of UNESCO, you know, to gather people together and to just grieve? That doesn't seem
00:33:29.800 instrumental to salvation or redemption, but it's a place of noticing that the world is shrewder,
00:33:37.460 wiser and more trickstery than our systems know how to appreciate so there are other sites of
00:33:45.200 power the otherwise is shining if you will it's it's being illuminated by poetry today and i'm
00:33:54.220 and i'm still giving to it my work with the emeritus network is and some of our projects
00:34:00.300 like vulture even vunja which is a festival we're holding in brazil next year is to notice these
00:34:06.620 other many streams in between these other multiple worlds between that lie between justice and
00:34:13.560 failure the worlds between victory and defeat the worlds between the ones and the zeros the space
00:34:19.860 between the stories we tell what if there were a climate saudade you know what if there were a
00:34:25.780 climate ambido i'm using queer words you know a place of nostalgia what if there's a place of
00:34:33.360 just sitting with the trouble of noticing that the things we've lost may never come back to us?
00:34:39.840 What if there's a place of just doing that? That can be funded, I guess. Most people who are hearing
00:34:45.700 this right now would say, what good does that do? You know, we need to save the world for our
00:34:50.440 children. We need to get into shape as quickly as possible. We need to call out the capitalist
00:34:57.740 structures, the people, the enemies that knew about this shit storm before it happened, before 1.00
00:35:04.540 it began to spill through our doors. Yes, I think there's a space for that. But I think 0.97
00:35:09.560 most of the time in doing that, in pursuing justice, we're reinforcing the system we're
00:35:14.980 trying to escape. In trying to climb out of the pits that we've dug for ourselves, the pit becomes
00:35:21.780 resilient in trying to escape the prison. The prison gains its form. So in a very critical
00:35:29.340 sense, we're in a crisis of form. And this form is the indeterminacy of things. The background
00:35:37.000 has crashed into the figure, into the foreground. And so sense-making is at a crisis point now.
00:35:43.460 We need trickster approaches. We need ways of dancing away or dancing to fugitive spaces, dancing to sanctuaries where we can shapeshift. And I think grieving, mourning, even allowing ourselves to partake in pleasurable activities in the face of the storm, which might sound like a very, very privileged thing to do, I know.
00:36:08.360 And yet, you know, doing that, I think, might be productive in ways that I do not even want to talk about.
00:36:16.480 I resonate really deeply with that bio.
00:36:20.020 And I have been sitting with this thought the last year, year and a half or so, with one of my mentors.
00:36:30.860 And I don't know if I'll say it super clearly at the moment.
00:36:33.840 But this question I'm asking myself of what would I do if I accepted that the Anthropocene will not be stopped? What would I do with my life? Who would I be? How would I live?
00:36:49.840 And I don't mean that necessarily in where would I move to or what would I do with my job so much. It's more an internal questioning of how will I live in my body, in my spirit, if I'm not clinging on to the hope of solutions as a way to fix everything that's gone wrong?
00:37:11.560 What if things can't be fixed in the way that I hope they could be? And I think this speaks to what you're saying. What would happen if we sit in the grief of this and not grasp for a way out, but rather just realize this is what's happening?
00:37:29.640 And I do struggle with feeling that there could be a type of deep connection on the other side of sitting in that. I struggle between that and then this feeling of duty, this feeling of responsibility that I have to quote unquote fight or I have to figure quote unquote figure things out.
00:37:55.500 And I don't even like those words, because I think that it's the terminology that has been used in the environmental movement, climate change, justice movements, this power behind this urgency, which, and of course, it also makes sense. People are suffering. We're all suffering in our own ways. The planet is suffering.
00:38:14.860 I'm thinking about Australia and all of the humans and more than humans that are burning right now.
00:38:24.040 And what do we do in the face of what feels like an apocalypse?
00:38:29.160 And I really appreciate what you're saying and thinking about what you won't talk about in terms of what could be on the other side of this sitting with the grief, sitting with the trouble.
00:38:41.720 It reminds me of Donna Haraway and the interview we did with her.
00:38:44.860 So, yeah, I'm really I'm with you. And I I wonder how we can not stop our work to to serve justice, because I think serving justice is is an ethical way to live.
00:39:03.840 I think it's a moral way to connect with being alive is to see the injustices of our world and try to be strong figures or at least figures that are standing and saying no, but at the same time realizing that it is so complex, the trouble that we're in and urgency and that type of mentality of the fight may not be what quote unquote saves us or quote unquote saves the world, whatever that means.
00:39:33.840 i really resonate with you so thank you bio i want to talk about one of your lectures and
00:39:41.140 you share that the etymology of the word demise traces back to the transference of property
00:39:47.200 and if we hold this time as an expression of a greater collective demise a system malfunction
00:39:54.020 and you know the categorical collapse of the quote human then i wonder how this could give
00:40:00.340 away to a radical recomposition of power? How are the dominant logics of mastery and white supremacy
00:40:07.360 swallowed up inside the compost pile of the Anthropocene? And how can our movements of
00:40:13.180 justice actively tend decomposition? So many things swirling, and let me see if I can pick
00:40:20.700 one strand. I got a question from a magazine recently. A German magazine asked me to answer
00:40:28.080 a question like what are the skills and capacities you think we need to develop in order to meet the
00:40:36.200 Anthropocene and I wrote back and I said I'm quite reluctant to name a skill you know to say
00:40:45.200 this is a skill without disparaging your question or throwing it away I want to hold it in deep
00:40:52.160 tension with what I'm feeling, but here's what I'm feeling, that I think instead of capacity
00:40:58.160 development, which seems to privilege the same old human development paradigm of us developing
00:41:04.780 new skills in response to an environment in disrepair, adapting, becoming more sophisticated,
00:41:12.780 that same narrative tends to you know sneak back in so i wonder if it's not a question of
00:41:22.300 capacity development i wonder if it's a it's a question of incapacitation that is i wonder if
00:41:28.660 this isn't a call to die to die well and here's where demise plays a role like what if this is a
00:41:38.620 time to fall down to to know how to die to notice the myth of permanence and to trace out the how
00:41:47.740 bodies tend to congeal take on resilience take on weight take on structure and also lose structure
00:41:56.020 what if we're in cycles of creation and destruction and modernity has shaped us in such a way that we
00:42:04.460 believe in this idea of stability? What if this is nature, what I rudely would call nature,
00:42:11.000 and nature is a destabilization of itself. But what if what we conveniently call nature is
00:42:16.540 calling us to a composting? And so I once asked the question of myself, you know, I'm on a
00:42:23.500 decolonial journey, and this is not my journey. There isn't a sense of arrival. There isn't a
00:42:29.260 sense of victory. It's a journey that my children might complete for me. And it's a journey that my
00:42:35.080 grandchildren may start for them, their own parents, so that it's really an intergenerational
00:42:41.320 fabric we're weaving of endings and beginnings. No totalitarian thing here. But I'll ask myself
00:42:48.280 a question. If our gods are really powerful in Yoruba land, how come they didn't rise up to stop 1.00
00:42:54.420 the europeans from taking away those african bodies to the new world you know what if i'm 0.99
00:43:00.120 wrong that the why shouldn't i just give in to this colonial idea that white always means right 0.70
00:43:06.520 or white always equals might because really think about it they're more powerful they came with guns
00:43:14.040 they came with gunpowder they came with the bible and they defeated us so where is our power what
00:43:21.740 does it mean to have other places of power if our own indigenous realities were unable to meet or 0.95
00:43:27.860 rise to the occasion of colonial interruptions? But you see, I was working with a very conventional
00:43:34.920 notion of power, power as dominion over an other, power as control, power as supremacy.
00:43:42.700 There is a different view of power that is possible, that is faintly discerned in a relational universe, and that is power as how bodies gain difference and power as how bodies become similar.
00:44:00.280 Let me explain. In some maroon conceptual islands of Yoruba cosmology, there is an understanding that Eshu, who is the trickster archetype in the pantheon of Yoruba gods, he's quite popular in, I should say Shihib, since he defies gender, but that's too complicated.
00:44:22.100 He is in Brazil.
00:44:23.800 He's in many spaces in South America.
00:44:27.020 Eshu is worshipped across the world, is what I want to say.
00:44:30.940 Now, Eshu is said to have been the one that brought the ships to our shores in the first place.
00:44:38.080 Think about that for a second. 0.94
00:44:39.820 Our own gods permitted the slavery to happen. 0.93
00:44:41.960 It said that the god of war, Ogun, rose up and was in furious haste to stop the shipping from happening, to stop the chattel slavery from happening. 0.95
00:44:53.940 But Eshu approached him and gave him alcohol and made him drunk.
00:44:58.640 And Ogun slept on the road and forgot what he was supposed to do. 0.91
00:45:02.100 and Ishu traveled with the slaves and became the Creolized bodies and universes and economies 0.91
00:45:11.080 that are now present in the new world. Without Ishu doing that, there wouldn't have been rap, 0.93
00:45:16.760 there wouldn't have been Rastafari, there wouldn't have been the marvelous people and
00:45:22.360 communities and social technologies and realities that we now experience in the so-called new world.
00:45:28.640 Now, this is not a justification of slavery. It's a noticing that the world is and exceeds our notions of power and justice.
00:45:37.960 What if in opening my back with your whip, you were also undoing yourself?
00:45:44.720 What if in unzipping my shorelines and ravaging our villages, you are also undoing your worlds and introducing new worlds in the process?
00:45:56.660 What if in rendering me useless, you were also participating and waltzing with me in creating new realities?
00:46:07.840 What if in burying me as a seed, you were allowing me to grow into something different?
00:46:13.060 That is a different notion of power altogether.
00:46:16.600 What I would tend to notice about activism and movements around justice today, and I've been speaking, I teach at Pacifica Graduate Institute. 0.51
00:46:24.120 And in my recent lecture there, I pointed out that intersectional theories of Black feminism are, unfortunately, still tethered to modern power, still tethered to a modern notion of power.
00:46:39.580 And the highest you can reach in this assemblage of bodies is representation.
00:46:45.200 That is, more people represented.
00:46:47.040 And we can speak about identity politics, which is a beautiful strategy, but has deep limitations and shadows of its own. So it's again a noticing that most modern movements to the contemporary movements are tied, they're anchored to this island of power.
00:47:04.960 They know no other way of being in the world except for claiming inclusivity or seeking inclusivity.
00:47:11.780 I am itching to move away from the inclusivity, exclusivity paradigm.
00:47:18.740 That is, I tend to notice due to the demands placed on me by my own body that even getting included is a form of violence.
00:47:29.440 Even becoming a citizen, if I were a refugee like many of my sisters and brothers are,
00:47:34.160 knocking on the doors of America or knocking on the doors of Europe,
00:47:38.020 even with all of this, even to get accepted is a form of violence. 1.00
00:47:42.360 There is a procrustean bed dynamic that is at work that cuts away the flesh of the refugees and the immigrants 0.95
00:47:49.380 and makes them adapt to a way of being that is not theirs. 0.96
00:47:54.000 So I wonder if there aren't fugitive justices.
00:47:57.280 fugitive hopes fugitive spaces unspeakable apophatic realities that are outside of this
00:48:06.100 performance of power that we can notice there might be scandalous to the modern ear like saying
00:48:12.380 for instance that issue traveled with the slaves condoned all that suffering and yet was using that
00:48:19.840 as a way of ritualizing other bodies into being and so this is my question this is the question
00:48:25.860 that animates my work with the Emerges Network, to hold the gift of this inclination, I call it
00:48:32.020 post-activism, these thoughts, not to signal a move away from contemporary activism, not to say
00:48:38.660 we're the new guys on the block, not to say there's a sacred kind of activism that is materialized by
00:48:44.800 tethering contemporary activism to Eastern spiritualities. No, it's none of that. It's
00:48:51.080 basically a way of asking what if the ways we respond to crisis is part of the crisis what if
00:48:56.800 there are other spaces of power and what if we could touch these spaces of power and be touched
00:49:01.480 in return what happens i would love to know what happens yeah i think what may happen is something
00:49:09.880 that i certainly can't begin to comprehend and yes that feeds me that nourishes me in a way to
00:49:19.900 think about the things that i cannot even begin to metabolize in my mind and i think when
00:49:28.000 human supremacy white supremacy tell us that we can understand everything it's really detrimental
00:49:35.920 to our own connection with ourselves and with the world yeah in preparation for this interview i
00:49:45.060 listening to a lecture you gave last year in Victoria, BC, and I was really profoundly
00:49:50.500 affected by the response you shared with an audience member on their question about allyship.
00:49:55.620 And you said, quote, even our failure matters. A failed star shines brighter than a coherent one
00:50:02.540 because a failed star has burst its guts into the universe and become stardust and come into our
00:50:08.400 skin and made us human. It doesn't end with you. It doesn't end with me. End quote.
00:50:15.060 And I'm just interested to hear what are we hospicing out of our movement cultures when we hold space for failure beyond the paradigm of good allyship?
00:50:27.180 How does accountability and agency take shape differently in the shared process you call making sanctuary?
00:50:34.480 It's always a good moment to be thankful to our white brothers and sisters and fathers and mothers.
00:50:42.440 If I could prostrate to them, even though it embarrasses some of them, people that I deeply respect.
00:50:48.140 Karen Barad being one of them. Helena Noberg is one of them.
00:50:53.440 People who have touched my life and whose milk I suck and it nourishes my bones in my mind, in my spirit.
00:51:03.800 I would do that every day.
00:51:04.940 So it's always a good moment to offer gratitude to allyship.
00:51:09.740 It's from reading and struggling and wrestling with these revered ones that it is possible to notice that everything in the world, and it's not just white allyship, is, as it is dimensional, as it is three-dimensional, it is also fraught with tensions.
00:51:31.540 And there isn't some kind of self-sufficient progress narrative that we can latch onto, like holding a basket to a butterfly catcher to a comet and zooming into another universe.
00:51:47.140 There isn't a place of those that would ease away or release us from the trouble of just being alive. 0.92
00:51:54.300 But I will say this, that, and again, it's in response to what you notice about white allyship, that it's a beautiful thing. It's a struggling and a yearning to be present for suffering, to stay with suffering, to notice the ways that some bodies are privileged in a power structure to the detriment of other bodies. 0.76
00:52:18.820 And I've been so grateful.
00:52:20.800 I've been so blessed in my own work.
00:52:23.220 Everywhere I travel, the people that come out to hear me speak, the people that put me in their homes, you know, that's a form of allyship that we rarely talk about.
00:52:32.260 But it's, I'm grateful for that.
00:52:34.380 At the same time, sister, I tend to think of white allyship in the same vein as the intersectional politics that I've just referenced.
00:52:42.980 Because it's still, in centralizing the body and the experiences of Black women, for instance, it ironically creates a savior narrative for white people or for whiteness.
00:53:00.000 As a Yoruba person and dwelling with our cosmologies, identity is not a stable thing for me. So I even hesitate to label people white or Black. And I'm not colorblind either.
00:53:12.980 It's a tension here. But yes, white allyship seems to be a creature of intersectional politics. It's still tethered to that same place of power, kind of centered paradoxically, we centers, it makes possible a savior narrative that is problematic. 0.59
00:53:32.400 and it incarcerates black bodies into positions of eternal victimhood so that because this is 0.79
00:53:40.120 your identity we're going to predispose you to behaving in this way you're going to antagonize 0.91
00:53:46.760 you're going to be angry all the time you're going to demand your own say you're going to 0.76
00:53:52.540 seek a seat at the table and this is how you should be as a black body and leftist politics
00:53:58.460 has kind of embraced this stratagem,
00:54:01.840 this way of seeking and asking for a space.
00:54:06.160 But a space in a pyramid or in a pyramid
00:54:10.320 or a space in a prison cell
00:54:12.560 isn't exactly an abundant space.
00:54:16.180 It's still incarceration. 0.86
00:54:18.000 It's still a loveless economy of bodies.
00:54:21.020 It's still a loveless structure that we're,
00:54:23.500 though we don't know what a wiser economy
00:54:25.700 or wiser politics might look like,
00:54:27.620 maybe we can gesture towards it and this is why i speak about failure because white allyship comes
00:54:34.680 with a righteousness model or morality or ethical code that is just as binding and incarcerating
00:54:42.160 as the politics it wants to liberate black bodies from because it says if you're not a good
00:54:47.540 white ally then there's something wrong with you you know if you need to be a good white ally you 0.72
00:54:55.320 need to do your work. And all of that is important, very important. Yet at the same time, I have to 0.51
00:55:03.040 speak in a double sense here and say that I also notice it is deeply flawed and problematic
00:55:09.620 because you're trapped in an ethical code that doesn't allow you to spill, doesn't allow your
00:55:15.620 body to move, doesn't allow us to notice the intergenerational dance of bodies that we sometimes
00:55:23.040 glibly call failure or success. So I wonder if there aren't other ethical spaces where we can
00:55:30.560 spill into each other that doesn't constitute a spiritual bypass, that doesn't dismiss identity
00:55:37.260 politics as the rantings of the left, and also doesn't dismiss the conservatism, those MAGA hat
00:55:45.860 wearing Trump tags, as a Twitterati would call them, that doesn't dismiss their concerns about
00:55:53.600 identity politics, and also doesn't perform some kind of milquetoast reconciliation, but holds the
00:56:01.380 tensions of these many worlds, the universe that exceeds all of them. So yes, my sister,
00:56:07.780 failure, I've been learning about failure from the likes of Jack Halberstam, The Queer Art of 0.97
00:56:13.900 failure. Her book shook me and exploded my world. And I learned, you know, how even a failed star 0.95
00:56:21.740 shines brighter than a coherent one, an integral one. That is a world beyond wholeness. And I
00:56:30.160 learned when I listened to Indian mythology, and I learned about Akilandeshwari, the goddess who
00:56:36.780 is never not broken. This idea of brokenness is missing in our conversations because we're
00:56:43.140 looking for wholeness, righteousness. We want to get it right. We want to stick by the script.
00:56:47.800 And in doing so, we're becoming, ironically, brittle bodies, breakable. We can't even have
00:56:55.000 a conversation about mistakes anymore as a result of the operations performed on us by social
00:57:02.220 networks. So I'm leaning into failure. I'm wondering about the promises of monsters.
00:57:08.720 I'm wondering about how brokenness can redeem us from the incarceration of wholeness.
00:57:14.040 I'm wondering about other spaces of power that can help us perform spillages, a maroonage,
00:57:21.440 a marooning body, runaway fugitives from ethical codes of righteousness.
00:57:38.720 Thank you.
00:58:08.720 Thank you.
00:58:38.720 I'm feeling inarticulate
00:59:08.220 and speechless after what you just said because i was yeah there's no way for us not to make
00:59:16.340 mistakes there's no way for us to not fail yeah um the pressure of being a quote perfect human
00:59:21.940 it feels fake it doesn't even it doesn't feel authentic and i think it completely severs our
00:59:28.640 ability to connect with each other when one we put each other on these pedestals of perfection
00:59:34.400 moral perfection activist ally perfect whatever we whatever tag we want to put on that or category
00:59:41.460 and then i think it also makes us feel separate because yeah the pressure that we put on ourselves
00:59:47.960 to not fail and the pressure we put on others to not fail and it's not even possible and so it is
00:59:53.500 a type of prison and it doesn't allow for growth and it really it severs the future of what a deep
01:00:02.840 relationship can be and I am thinking even about one of my dear friends who we got in a
01:00:11.160 an argument or not an argument it was it was just a point of disconnection and it wasn't until we
01:00:18.540 actually were able to come together and feel embarrassed or feel a little ashamed or guilty
01:00:24.780 whatever it was that we actually were able to grow closer together we were able to grow closer
01:00:29.660 through our imperfections through our mistakes and there's a world a whole world of connection
01:00:36.240 when we make a wrong step and then are able to sit with one another and learn from that so
01:00:42.860 i mean that's just one almost surface level example but i what social media has done to us
01:00:51.260 especially with call out culture yes is insanity it's insanity and people are so afraid i have so
01:00:58.300 many people coming to me being afraid of being involved because they're afraid they're going to
01:01:03.220 do something wrong or make a mistake and then be ousted from the community forever and i think to
01:01:11.900 myself my goodness our movement is already so small we can't afford to lose people who are
01:01:17.280 willing to give their hearts souls bodies resources whatever it is that they're offering
01:01:22.360 we don't have the luxury of just sending people away and so oh gosh anyway so many levels so
01:01:30.020 many rabbit holes there but I do want to ask this next question because it's something that I feel
01:01:37.600 you are so unique you're such a unique human with your intimate lens of fatherhood and
01:01:45.780 and it's this this theme that comes up again and again in your work and I've been so touched by
01:01:52.040 your invitation to quote treat our children as elders and you've also said quote children now
01:01:59.280 come out of the earth dragging the textures of wisdoms gone before and bringing it up with them
01:02:04.820 they're not tabula rasas they're not empty slates they're alive in the wisdom of ancestors that are
01:02:11.720 still folded in the thick present pay homage to the multiple that is lingering within them end
01:02:18.280 quote speaking from your experience as a father and a teacher how can we follow young people as
01:02:26.580 ethnographic guides into the divine realm of imagination and what is important about this
01:02:33.660 space of wonder bewilderment and vital curiosity yeah that's such a beautiful question i just
01:02:44.760 I wish I could just say good night and just go dream and sit with that question.
01:02:51.000 I think good questions transcend the answers we give them.
01:02:55.260 I think they should be taken in their own right and just received and embraced.
01:03:00.160 So thank you for that question.
01:03:02.980 Ethnographic surveys into the world.
01:03:07.640 Well, one very impoverished way I would respond to that beautiful invocation, sister, is I don't know that our present educational systems, writ large, are able to hold or appreciate children.
01:03:27.840 Children are resources to be, generically speaking, resources to be fashioned into proper citizenry.
01:03:37.640 good citizens. And that is deeply problematic. It's because we're creating the spares for the
01:03:47.840 system. We're creating the spares for a machine, a spare bolt, a spare knot, a spare nail here and
01:03:55.720 there. And teaching in university, my wife and I, even before we got married, we just decided
01:04:03.840 is that we're going to experiment with this.
01:04:06.720 I have to admit that we had very romantic notions
01:04:10.000 of what unschooling, which is what we called it,
01:04:12.760 which is what we still sometimes call what we're doing
01:04:15.680 in our best moments.
01:04:19.400 But there was a time we had very romantic visions about it.
01:04:23.840 It didn't quite pan out that way.
01:04:25.680 Yes, our kids don't go to school.
01:04:27.880 Our kids are six and two.
01:04:30.240 Alethea has never been to school.
01:04:32.400 She's heard about school.
01:04:33.840 She has ideas about school, some of them imprinted by our own conversations.
01:04:40.800 But by and large, she's a being in her own self.
01:04:45.760 And the things she can do and the things she can say and the things she's permitted to say, the places she's already probing, you know, shocks even us, her parents.
01:04:57.900 We're like, you never do that as children.
01:05:00.220 And yes, maybe a general argument could be made that even schooled kids do that.
01:05:06.400 But there's a sense in which we notice there's a difference here with what's happening with Aletheia.
01:05:13.480 And I wonder if that isn't a sacred dance with wonder.
01:05:19.340 There's something deeply political about what we're doing as well.
01:05:22.480 It's not divorced from climate change or Trump or Bolsonaro or Modi here in India or the rise of ethno-nationalist fascism.
01:05:32.540 What we're trying to do, and I think we'll tell ourselves this in many articulate moments,
01:05:39.720 what we're trying to do is we're trying to twat the productivity of the status quo.
01:05:45.960 We're trying to learn again how to play.
01:05:48.940 Not that we believe that this is a fix-all,
01:05:52.320 that unschooling is some kind of self-sufficient paradigm.
01:05:56.040 And if you keep your child away from school,
01:05:59.000 that is tantamount or equal to some kind of sacred activism.
01:06:06.680 There's no single brushstroke here.
01:06:10.400 But at the same time, there's something really powerful
01:06:14.120 about noticing children as beyond individual,
01:06:18.200 good citizens in the making. That twist of perception, that plot twist allows us to
01:06:25.520 say, for instance, to our children that you don't have to grow up to be an artist. You can do it
01:06:31.220 right now, right here. And it allows my daughter to say, what if two plus two isn't four? That kind
01:06:38.240 of emancipatory, that kind of poetic liberty seems like what will happen in fugitive spaces.
01:06:46.300 In many senses, we are fugitives, what my wife and I are doing.
01:06:50.120 And in many other senses, all of us are fugitives
01:06:53.380 because the Anthropocene is rendering us homeless.
01:06:57.580 It's removing the hieroglyphics on the wall
01:07:00.840 that made home and stability possible. 0.92
01:07:03.640 It's wiping it away in the insurgency of the pagan. 0.79
01:07:07.240 And as it does that, I think we need, in response to it,
01:07:11.880 to listen to our children,
01:07:14.420 to bring all the data in.
01:07:16.800 And part of doing that is to listen,
01:07:18.560 to perform research with our children
01:07:20.320 as if they were philosophers of the wise already,
01:07:23.980 not in the making,
01:07:25.360 but as if they're already wise,
01:07:28.200 as if they are entangled with the world,
01:07:30.520 as if they can teach us something.
01:07:33.180 Because I've found in my own experience
01:07:34.900 that they very well can.
01:07:37.720 And I think that's what the Anthropocene
01:07:39.540 makes space for,
01:07:41.560 makes space for our children to be powerful.
01:07:44.420 What an inspiration to realize that there's other ways. There's other ways of being and growing and learning. And I think that part of the prison of the dominant culture of capitalism, imperialism, colonialism, and so on and so forth is having us believe that there isn't another way.
01:08:12.340 That there is this one way and that is the way. It's the way of raising citizens. It's the way of school. It's the way of urgency. It's the way of instant gratification, so on and so forth.
01:08:25.580 And I think this dominant culture has come in and infiltrated our minds to have us believe that there aren't other options or not only either even tangible options, but even options in our own imaginations.
01:08:43.340 And so when I imagine your daughter and the space you give her and her imagination to go beyond 2 plus 2 equals 4, I mean, just that in and of itself is revolutionary that you are allowing her in this time frame especially to question everything and not just feel like she has to believe what she's being given.
01:09:10.180 And I think so many of us just don't even know that we can question what we're being really like forced down our throats.
01:09:22.040 So now I'd really love to think more about the resilience held within the bonds of intergenerational lineages of struggle and resistance.
01:09:32.600 And a few months ago, I came across the word Atavia, meaning great, great, great grandmother in Latin.
01:09:40.180 And related to the word atavism, which in biology refers to an ancestral trait that reappears in an individual after having been lost in previous generations through evolutionary change.
01:09:52.080 so as i'm meditating on this word my mind wanders to the hopeful re-emergence and turning of worlds
01:09:58.960 that we can't always see worlds that camouflage in our dna or hide in our bones flow through our
01:10:06.360 blood memory or unfurl as seeds and i just think there is an immense resource of wisdom
01:10:13.600 in life's ongoingness and thorny will to survive that is far beyond our capacity to understand or
01:10:20.140 quantify. And so I'm wondering, how can we learn to place trust in these temporalities?
01:10:27.240 And how can we be partners to the mysterious and the unseen, to healing a vibrant mythic cosmos
01:10:34.120 that perhaps lives beyond our human perception? And I know we've been touching on this thread a
01:10:40.060 little bit as we've been speaking, but I would really like to focus on this for a moment with
01:10:44.820 you right right well i would say it's already happening sister it's um in many ways it's not
01:10:51.960 something that we now have to do like let's put this in the plan now we know how to do it again
01:10:58.840 agency is not a human property agency is is the movement of is the movement of material it's
01:11:08.880 mattering is the becomingness of things so there isn't um the efforts you know we tend to speak
01:11:16.880 about decoloniality as a human project when it's so anchored to humanism it it tends to um
01:11:25.680 it tends to occlude the uh the work of the post-human it tends to occlude the as you
01:11:32.860 beautifully say the turning of other worlds the ways that technology the inhuman the non-human
01:11:39.920 the modern human is also at work asking these questions experimenting with the concepts and
01:11:48.520 breaking through and writing into being as an example of some of the ways that we are
01:11:56.420 you are beginning to notice the invisible if you will and this is another instance of irony
01:12:04.400 is the development of the ancestry testing DNA testing technology if I were to ask you
01:12:13.380 what is ancestry testing made of it's made of those biological instruments it's made of
01:12:22.260 capitalist systems of profit and profit making is made up of the endless hours of servitude it's
01:12:30.460 made of very problematic things and yet this very problematic thing we call ancestry testing
01:12:37.220 is allowing us to you know is territorializing modernity that is it is hacking at the heart of
01:12:47.960 modernity is the hacking of modernity just like quantum physics becomes this which is produced
01:12:55.980 in modernity becomes this tool that disturbs and unfounds modernity unfurls modernity ancestry
01:13:04.580 testing is allowing us to notice keener worlds that you know disturbs the story the dominant
01:13:11.740 story of identity. The dominant story of identity is that our identities are more or less fixed.
01:13:22.040 Take one box. You're either white or you're black or you're brown or you're something else. 0.78
01:13:29.180 You always fall within a box. The very conditions that make those boxes possible, those categories 0.99
01:13:35.620 as possible are the same conditions that is producing these technologies that is allowing
01:13:42.860 us to say, for instance, that I am not just white, I am brown and green and yellow and
01:13:51.340 the enemy of my ancestors, also my ancestor, as Stephen Jenkinson would say, so that I am wide,
01:13:59.280 I am a multitude and I make no apologies for it.
01:14:03.940 I am so incoherent, so chaotic that the product of identity making, the identitarian dynamics of modern settlements and modern epistemologies break down in the face of what I am.
01:14:19.220 In fact, I am is a rude remark to make in the face of what I am becoming.
01:14:26.100 and language cannot bear hold the thing that is me and so that is a noticing of worlds that
01:14:35.300 that that is made possible by that is made possible by the conditions around us so it's
01:14:40.520 not just something we must do to create space for it is something that is happening around us
01:14:46.480 it's in art it's in technology it's in um spiritual sensitivities and and new movements
01:14:54.200 in contemplation and the movements
01:14:56.960 between contemplation and activism.
01:14:58.980 It's a place of shape-shifting,
01:15:01.180 which brings me to the concept of sanctuary.
01:15:04.520 I think and talk about sanctuary,
01:15:08.060 reclaiming this medieval practice
01:15:10.520 of allowing the fugitive a place of rest
01:15:14.440 to escape the fugitive's accusers,
01:15:18.940 which was practiced in England,
01:15:21.520 but became wiped out when our juridical systems started to emerge,
01:15:27.020 the systems of laws and legislation and judges and courts of law.
01:15:32.020 Prior to all that, we had sanctuary.
01:15:35.740 And sanctuary also being this pagan, I love the word pagan, 0.95
01:15:43.360 pagan technology that the Christian establishment pilfered,
01:15:48.520 stole for themselves because it was such a powerful thing. I asked myself, where are the 0.70
01:15:54.240 places of sanctuary today? Where do we run to with the Anthropocene breathing down on us?
01:16:01.980 Running away is not a function of escape for me. I think of sanctuary as a place of the monster,
01:16:10.020 sanctuary as a place of shape-shifting, because I noticed that in the architecture of
01:16:15.720 those old sanctuaries, the monster was always on the front door. It always had this haggle day
01:16:21.620 or a door knocker that was shaped in the ferocious figure of a gargoyle or some other monster,
01:16:29.580 a lion or something. And I always ask myself, was this just a trend or why was the monster
01:16:35.940 on the face of, on the door, the very first thing that welcomed you into sanctuary?
01:16:41.640 And I think to myself that sanctuary is the place where we gain different shapes
01:16:45.940 because the monster is the dismissal or the diffraction of shape.
01:16:51.080 And I feel that what we rudely call climate change and the Anthropocene
01:16:56.680 is the de-territorialization of man, the figure of man,
01:17:02.020 is the dismissal of man, is the problematization of man, the figure of man.
01:17:10.840 and the stability of man.
01:17:13.500 So sanctuary, in the way I think and talk about it,
01:17:17.120 is this place where we gain different shapes,
01:17:19.240 where we lose shape, where we compost.
01:17:21.860 And how do we do that?
01:17:24.180 We do it by listening.
01:17:27.120 We do it by working together in ways
01:17:30.640 that are probably fugitive
01:17:33.040 and outside of the normative ways of producing food
01:17:38.540 or money or stories.
01:17:42.340 We do it by listening to our wounds,
01:17:45.720 by sharing wounds,
01:17:47.300 by sharing painful feelings,
01:17:49.440 by sharing our jealousy and our grief.
01:17:52.820 We do it by sitting with the trouble of being alive.
01:17:56.180 We do it in so many different ways.
01:17:58.780 The idea is emergent
01:18:00.740 and I'm leaning into it.
01:18:03.040 It's a deep invitation to me
01:18:04.900 and those around me at this point in time
01:18:07.500 to think about sanctuary as a pedagogy of kinship in urgent times.
01:18:15.460 So shapeshifting for me is this invitation to take on different dimensions,
01:18:21.360 to let identity spill, and to practice that so that it gains body,
01:18:28.780 to practice that in community so that it gains shape and resilience.
01:18:32.320 this is not an effort to centralize carbon reductionism not an effort to solve climate
01:18:39.700 change but it's a it's a different way of responding to the anthropocene not the correct
01:18:45.540 way i think the anthropocene resists questions like what's the correct way to respond to the
01:18:50.180 anthropocene i think we're in a different world altogether so sister and to cap this all it's
01:18:57.040 So the invitation to sanctuary is an invitation to incapacitation.
01:19:01.620 It's an invitation to shapeshift.
01:19:03.680 It's an invitation to descent.
01:19:05.180 It's an invitation to fall.
01:19:07.960 And descent and demise are shockingly generative spaces,
01:19:13.760 spaces where art and the aesthetics of the new can thrive.
01:19:19.040 I'm really looking forward to this year when this gains a greater intelligence
01:19:24.540 through the practices of people that I'm speaking with
01:19:28.540 and traveling with and doing work with.
01:19:33.160 I'm really looking forward to knowing what this could be.
01:19:37.660 What you're offering us isn't a linear type of outlined
01:19:43.580 understanding of the world.
01:19:45.640 It's really inviting me to,
01:19:48.840 i kind of imagine like a little me inside of my head pushing against the boundaries of my
01:19:58.380 skull it's like pushing the walls of my skull going no no there's much more than what you can
01:20:04.640 even grasp and it's really interesting to be in this place where i'm trying to expand
01:20:13.000 my capacity to understand things that I will never understand. And so it is really stretching
01:20:21.380 me to sit in this place that is about taking it in, but not trying to categorize what you're
01:20:28.120 saying, but just letting it sink and letting your words move me in this place that needs to stay in
01:20:37.860 the unknown and it's so hard for the western mind i know for my western mind to be comfortable with
01:20:45.480 that but i think that's also part of it it's not about being comfortable with these types of
01:20:51.200 questions or responses and so i you mentioned steven jenkinson and i am reminded of the
01:20:57.580 interviews i've done with steven because i felt similarly where he would say things that were so
01:21:02.720 profound that didn't have there was no end goal to them it wasn't about it wasn't about figuring
01:21:10.320 it out at the end of it and i think that in and of itself that acceptance of not trying to figure
01:21:19.700 it out is actually very healing from this western prison of reductionist thinking that many of us
01:21:29.080 have been imprisoned by so gosh I feel so moved and I thought that I could finish by reading a
01:21:37.260 short poem that kind of again will let our minds just swish in this water that we're yeah I guess
01:21:47.640 that's kind of what it feels like this like the ocean this kind of endlessness and it's a poem by
01:21:53.640 Ursula Le Guin called The Marrow.
01:21:58.140 Quote,
01:21:58.860 There was a word inside a stone.
01:22:02.000 I tried to pry it clear,
01:22:04.680 mallet and chisel,
01:22:06.160 pick and gad,
01:22:07.440 until the stone was dropping blood.
01:22:10.260 But I still could not hear.
01:22:12.280 The word of the stone had said,
01:22:14.740 I threw it down beside the road,
01:22:17.020 among a thousand stones.
01:22:19.180 And as I turned away,
01:22:20.360 it cried.
01:22:21.900 The word aloud within my ear,
01:22:23.640 and the marrow of my bones heard and replied.
01:22:30.080 So that's a little something to leave us with, but.
01:22:33.620 Can I just say something quickly?
01:22:36.040 Oh, please.
01:22:37.300 Yeah, please finish up in whatever way you feel called.
01:22:41.000 Yes.
01:22:42.480 There is a biblical passage, you know,
01:22:46.900 that I've been returning to in these returnings.
01:22:51.760 The old is never not new. It keeps coming back.
01:22:57.180 And this story in the Christian text speaks about a figure called Job, who is a good man who has suffered and gained wealth.
01:23:11.820 And one day, his wealth is taken away from him by the devil, I think.
01:23:17.880 He loses his cattle. He loses his gold. He loses his children, all of them in one day.
01:23:25.360 And all his friends just basically, there's this deep philosophical conversation that happens on the nature of suffering and pain.
01:23:35.380 And Job is a very, very central character in many theological conversations about the nature of pain and suffering.
01:23:43.080 and all his friends just basically say curse god curse god and die and job is you know he's angry
01:23:51.760 he's like i'm not going to do that and yet i have i need answers to my question why would a good
01:23:57.700 person suffer like this why would i keep all the commandments and do all the good stuff be a good
01:24:04.560 white ally if you will and still experience the world this way and shortly in the in the book
01:24:13.380 god appears to job and job poses those questions to the divine basically saying answer me you know
01:24:22.580 i've i lived by the book i lived i did everything you told me to do and yet here i am with sores on
01:24:29.160 my body. No food in my barn. My children are no longer sleeping in their beds. My cattle no longer
01:24:37.020 roaming in the fields. Why would you do this? Why would you allow this to happen to a good person?
01:24:43.100 And the way that God responds to Job is very fascinating. The answer to all suffering.
01:24:50.900 And God answers, have you noticed Pleiades?
01:24:56.540 Have you seen a deer?
01:24:59.060 Do you know the strength and the glory of Leviathan?
01:25:02.860 Have you witnessed this or that or the DNA structure?
01:25:08.160 Do you know the beauty of a volcano eruption?
01:25:11.060 In a sense, basically, God doesn't answer the question.
01:25:13.500 It feels like a politician's move.
01:25:15.680 He basically dances away from the question.
01:25:18.260 And I've always wondered about this passage.
01:25:20.240 Why would you so belittle the suffering of a person, a person in deep pain?
01:25:28.140 But I notice the wisdom now.
01:25:30.140 My head is in a different place.
01:25:31.660 My heart is in a different place.
01:25:33.100 And I like to say that sometimes the best answer to a pressing question is bewilderment.
01:25:40.680 It's not the answer itself.
01:25:42.620 It's not the correct answer.
01:25:44.020 It's the gift of bewilderment.
01:25:45.820 is a gift of strain away from the algorithms of easy arrival and my elders always taught me that
01:25:54.400 in some form whether through television or through their greetings or through their ancestral
01:26:00.820 wisdoms diffracting through christian ethics and morality kind of taught me that the answers are
01:26:08.240 not always going to be available and i know that you notice that sister and i just wanted to say
01:26:13.200 that. Thank you for holding this space for queer questions and uneasy arrivals, for tending to the
01:26:22.480 tense fields where new kinds of beings and becomings can thrive and grow. This work is really,
01:26:30.420 really important. And I use my presence here to bless it and bless you. Thank you.
01:26:35.820 Thank you for listening to another episode of For the Wild podcast.
01:26:43.920 I'm Ayanna Young.
01:26:46.160 The music you heard today was from Daniel Higgs.
01:26:49.400 I'd like to thank our podcast production team,
01:26:52.560 Aidan McCray, Andrew Storrs, Carter-Lou McElroy, Erica Ekrem, Aaron Wise,
01:26:59.280 Francesca Glaspell, Hannah Wilton, and Melanie Younger.
01:27:02.580 a few things before we go one if you haven't rated us on itunes please do so as it really
01:27:09.420 helps expand our community of listeners and sign up for our newsletter at for the wild
01:27:14.380 world to stay connected and to stay in touch all right until next week