For The Wild - May 31, 2023


ISMAIL LOURIDO ALI on Building Informed Drug Culture ⧸335

Topics
The Edges in the Middle, III: Báyò Akómoláfé and Indy Johar SAMANTHA ZIPPORAH on The Womb Continuum ⧸336

Episode Stats


Length

58 minutes

Words per minute

168.24

Word count

9,771

Sentence count

338

Harmful content

Toxicity

2

sentences flagged

Hate speech

1

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 To listen to the extended version of this episode, support us on patreon.com slash for the wild.
00:00:10.040 Hello and welcome to For the Wild podcast. I'm Ayanna Young. Today we are speaking with Ismael
00:00:17.320 Larito Ali. How do we fit these modalities that increase our vulnerability, that increase our
00:00:24.500 tenderness? Like how can we safely bring those into a world that is so brutal? How do we create
00:00:29.900 environment where when people go deep into themselves or they go deep out of themselves,
00:00:34.720 that they can do so safely. Ismael Lorido Ali, JD, He, Him, or They, Them, is the Director of
00:00:43.300 Policy and Advocacy at the Multidisciplinary Association of Psychedelic Studies, MAPS. He
00:00:50.640 has been personally utilizing psychedelics and other substances in celebratory and spiritual
00:00:56.680 context for over 15 years. Ismail works with, is formally affiliated with, or has served in
00:01:03.480 leadership or board roles for numerous organizations in the drug policy reform ecosystem,
00:01:10.040 including Alchemy Community Therapy Center, formerly Sage Institute, Psychedelic Bar
00:01:16.060 Association, Students for Sensible Drug Policy, Chakruna Institute, and the Ayahuasca Defense Fund.
00:01:26.680 Oh, Ismael, it is so wonderful to have you back on the show.
00:01:33.120 I was so moved and curious and inspired by our last conversation.
00:01:40.660 So I'm really happy that we get to do it again.
00:01:43.840 Yeah, thank you, Ayanna.
00:01:44.840 I really love the invitation to be back and just appreciate the willingness that you've
00:01:51.580 had both to extend this conversation and just to bring in so many, yeah, just complex layers and
00:01:58.100 also simple core truths into this, I think, ongoing conversation that you're having with me
00:02:04.120 and with other guests around just what do we do? What are we doing? How do we adjust? How do we
00:02:09.000 stay creative and light as we move into the future? So just grateful for this platform and
00:02:13.040 for the conversation and really glad to be back. Thank you for that. Yeah, it's great. You really
00:02:20.440 offer a lot of stuff we need to hear and a lot of things that feel taboo and like we don't really
00:02:30.120 want to touch it in our culture, but we are touched by it and are touching it all the time.
00:02:36.060 And so we need to actually have nonjudgmental conversations and maybe we just dive into
00:02:44.520 the topic of culture because I think it would be so interesting to start dreaming with you about
00:02:52.140 building an informed drug culture. And I know this topic comes up a lot in your work with MAPS,
00:02:58.360 and I would just love to hear more about what an informed drug culture could look like and
00:03:04.140 what it means when we think about drugs through the lens of a culture rather than just something
00:03:10.740 for individual consumption? Yeah, no, this is a great starting point. I appreciate the question.
00:03:16.540 Well, maybe I'll start by zooming out a bit and kind of situating my response or my perception
00:03:20.880 of the response. We recently crossed over the 50th anniversary of the capital W, capital D war
00:03:28.060 on drugs. So we've now hit a point where even from a chronological sense, we can say we've tried
00:03:34.800 this. We've tried this approach. And I think I touched on this a little bit in our last
00:03:39.780 conversation, but we're really not just dealing with 50 years of momentum for the current drug
00:03:46.180 control strategy. We're really dealing with 150 or maybe even 500 years, depending on how you
00:03:51.840 interpret the timeline. So I start with that to say that the environment that we're in today,
00:03:59.680 thinking about your question, what would this kind of more complete, holistic, thoughtful
00:04:05.100 drug culture look like within our society, we're in some ways coming from a place of resistance,
00:04:11.040 of like reacting to the momentum of history. And that can be pretty intimidating. And I think
00:04:18.400 that's one reason among many, and maybe we could go into this down the line, why you see both a lot
00:04:24.200 of progress and exciting advancement in the field of drug policy. And you also see, and we also see
00:04:29.700 kind of a constriction and a reaction. Like when some things move too fast, people kind of revert
00:04:36.260 to the more constricted or conservative or kind of fear scarcity oriented approach. So I think
00:04:42.820 that we're kind of saying both of those, both that expansion and contraction occur simultaneously as
00:04:48.060 we have both the exciting kind of momentum of psychedelic policy reform, the shifts that are
00:04:54.600 happening with cannabis, the kind of general sense of awareness within the culture, drug
00:04:59.660 culture and in the US and beyond about psychedelic substances and plant medicines and ceremony
00:05:05.080 and ritual and these other aspects that are all tied to that.
00:05:07.580 And you're seeing a lot of like exciting growth in that area.
00:05:10.680 And at the same time, we're seeing a lot of reaction within drug policy, I think in
00:05:15.380 particular to fentanyl and the overdose epidemic and the drug poisoning epidemic and the fact
00:05:20.940 that there's counterfeit pills everywhere.
00:05:22.360 Like we're really in, in some ways, it feels like a different paradigm, even if we're still responding to many of the same kind of circumstances that the last 50, 150, 500 years have been navigating.
00:05:33.620 So all that context to say that when I think about what a kind of destigmatized or safer or more holistic or more educated drug culture looks like, the first thing I'm thinking about is reconciling the simultaneous glamorization and I guess you could say like a grotesque place within society that drugs fall into.
00:05:58.820 And there's a whole conversation we had here, maybe not today, about how we often treat sex and sexuality the same way in our culture, where it's like highly glamorized, but also seen as very grotesque, very stigmatized, but also very emphasized.
00:06:11.800 And I think there's a lot of that energy with drugs and I would say altered states in general. I think maybe we see the most of this with alcohol culture because of that's kind of like the baseline I guess we sort of have in a lot of Western society because it's been so incorporated into our day to day social and cultural fabric.
00:06:30.760 But I think that part of what I'm seeing and what I think is necessary is to pull back the association of drugs, drug use, substance use, and so on away from either the glamorized edge or the edge where it's treated as grotesque.
00:06:48.540 I think that the taboo nature of these activities, these human activities of altering our states and participating in whether it's ritual or ceremonial systems or in a personal or celebratory situations or environments, in any of those cases, there's this sense that we need to attach shame or hide.
00:07:09.740 um and in some ways there's an aspect of alcohol culture that that incorporates that like oh when
00:07:16.200 you're inebriated you're suddenly less responsible for your behavior and obviously that's not
00:07:22.580 accepted to an extreme but there is kind of this sort of psycho-emotional interpersonal free pass
00:07:28.800 that we give or get sometimes that's part of this like hiding the behaviors even from ourselves
00:07:34.020 hiding parts of ourselves from ourselves and i think that's where right now for better or worse
00:07:38.440 drugs and altered states kind of fit in into our society. They're like, oh, they're the place where
00:07:42.280 we can hide these things from ourselves or from each other. The irony obviously being that often
00:07:47.940 these substances and altered states reveal to us, you know, what we're actually trying to hide the
00:07:52.460 whole time. And I think that there's a little bit of a backfiring that happens. But yeah, just coming
00:07:56.940 back to your original question, I guess I would say like the reconciling of the marginalized
00:08:02.120 placement of these substances, behaviors, traditions, and so on in our society would be a starting
00:08:07.940 point to just say, okay, this isn't going to be inside our circle. This is something we're going
00:08:13.740 to be tracking. You know, there's a number of practices and tribes that when they have ceremony,
00:08:18.000 they'll have some sort of sacred clown or kind of a diablito, like a character that plays the
00:08:23.560 shadow, but that character isn't exiled. It's not permitted to participate. And I think that's kind
00:08:30.900 of what I'm seeing on a big picture. Like how do we give those sides of ourselves permission to
00:08:35.380 participate in our day-to-day environment or culture? And how does that allow us to repress
00:08:41.180 less, have access to more, and thus be more honest with ourselves and each other?
00:08:46.760 Ooh. Gosh.
00:08:48.980 Just a start.
00:08:49.760 Just to bring it in the beginning, my goodness. You sparked so many thoughts for me and
00:08:56.740 super interested to hear more about a few of these topics you brought up.
00:09:02.760 the hiding part what are we hiding from what's allowed to be shown when we're in altered states
00:09:12.020 and then the fact that we have to hide the culture is also about hiding because of the
00:09:18.380 legality issues and the shame and the stigma that comes and then what you said about the
00:09:26.940 connection to sexuality where it's so glamorized but at the same time people are so judged and then
00:09:34.120 the whole other part where you were speaking about um we'll have these expansions and policy
00:09:41.900 but then you get the contraction and to me i'm wondering okay does that contraction come from
00:09:47.560 fear and sure fear of overdose is real fear of pain and suffering and death is real but it's
00:09:57.520 there seems to be even more than that because as a culture we're not afraid of a lot of things that
00:10:03.500 cause a ton of suffering and pain and death and so why this why is this something that gets so
00:10:11.880 much more attention than how our culture uplifts very poisonous things every day so i don't even
00:10:18.840 know which one i want you to start with what theme but i really appreciate everything you
00:10:25.760 shared with us and i'm trying to wrap my mind around these bigger cultural concepts and how
00:10:34.980 they i mean i think in a lot of ways we see how they are manifested but getting to the root of
00:10:41.000 these cultural concepts would be really interesting with you. So wherever you want to take it, I could
00:10:46.520 also, of course, ask you something more concrete. No, let's go into the hiding topic, if that's
00:10:53.240 okay. There's a lot there. There's a lot there. Yeah. And I think the word that a lot of people
00:10:59.540 use to describe some of this, and I think that you've even had guests on your podcast before
00:11:04.520 talk about the shadow and how we think about the shadow within society and what that means when
00:11:10.100 it's interpreted through the lens of an individual versus a society versus a culture. So I guess
00:11:15.820 maybe one thing to continue with is this idea of what we repress and we will allow to be
00:11:22.840 witnessed. And one of the reasons I've always appreciated studying and engaging with this
00:11:29.020 topic, which, you know, some people you can interpret as drug policy or substance use, or
00:11:34.280 to me, and I think we talked about this a bit in the first conversation we had too, like it's really
00:11:38.660 so much of it has to do with these channels for our core human experience to come through.
00:11:46.240 And I think that looking at the way, for example, the theory behind psychedelic therapy or
00:11:52.540 psychedelic healing modalities work, it's so often not about just how do you package complex
00:11:59.600 repressed things into a box that can then be easily unwrapped and understood. It's instead,
00:12:06.980 how actually do you temporarily at least remove the edges of that box so you can see at least to
00:12:14.040 the extent that you're able to in that moment so you can see what's happening and what's happening
00:12:19.120 being like what is the core what is or what is the core what are some of the core motivators to
00:12:24.400 your behavior and I think that you know kind of bringing this all together when when I think about
00:12:29.320 this concept of the shadow or kind of the repressed self or these aspects that in many ways run our
00:12:35.300 behavior, run our day-to-day actions, our mood, but are often unseen, I think of two things. One,
00:12:41.960 that the human mind has this absolutely incredible capacity to forget and, you know, to dissociate
00:12:49.880 and separate. And I think that that is a legitimate survival mechanism. I don't begrudge people for
00:12:55.000 the need that we often have to dissociate or repress, whether it's from like larger kind of
00:13:01.680 environmental or circumstantial traumas or challenges or from, you know, personal things
00:13:07.700 that have happened to us. It's not uncommon for people who have gone through trauma to repress
00:13:11.520 some aspect of that. If not, you know, allow their memories to completely wipe it, at least
00:13:16.860 temporarily, at least in like the immediate availability. So when tying these subjects
00:13:22.420 together, it makes me think about how the very modality of psychedelic therapy or healing
00:13:27.860 of unblocking some of those structures.
00:13:32.400 On one hand, it's very beautiful
00:13:33.900 because it allows people to look more clearly
00:13:36.180 and thus maybe kind of more precisely within themselves,
00:13:39.580 which, you know, depending on their circumstances
00:13:42.220 and situation can take months or years or a lifetime.
00:13:46.200 But it also, I think the flip side to that
00:13:49.000 is a mirror of how our society,
00:13:52.380 and this is going to your other point,
00:13:53.380 our society has really encouraged
00:13:56.280 and actively supports behavior that tends to be harmful for the individual.
00:14:01.640 And I think that that's really scary because when you open yourself up to the possibility
00:14:06.140 of unblocking internal repressed selves or internal aspects that have dissociated or
00:14:14.760 been forgotten or whatever to protect you, suddenly when you have access to those things
00:14:19.800 without necessarily all of your coping mechanisms or the ways that your mind has blocked them
00:14:25.900 not before, that puts people into a very vulnerable state. And I think part of the stigma or fear
00:14:32.580 that I think is associated with altered states, whether it's getting too drunk or doing psychedelics
00:14:38.500 or doing anything else, has to do with this fear of what's really in there. I'm sure you've heard,
00:14:43.960 I hear all the time, people are like, oh, you know what? I'm afraid of my own mind. I'm afraid
00:14:47.980 of what's in there. People don't even have the confidence or feel safe enough to go into the
00:14:53.400 material that they know that they have. And I think that's for good reason, because they know
00:14:57.100 that doing that makes them vulnerable, makes it hard for them to survive in a world that demands
00:15:01.840 ongoing productivity and ongoing participation in a system. So it's a big catch 22, because on one
00:15:08.300 hand, yes, it's exciting to know. And it's, I think, very inspiring, I think, in some cases,
00:15:14.140 if not intimidating also, for people to know, oh, there's actually a way that we can safely
00:15:18.460 traverse these realms inside of ourselves, these hidden parts, the parts that we've been taught to
00:15:23.380 shame, to avoid, to repress, and so on, or done so out of necessity. And yet, I think as exciting
00:15:29.940 as that might be conceptually, it's just practically very difficult. And I think that's
00:15:33.840 where some of the more crunchy issues that we hear about in the drug policy field, especially
00:15:38.340 in psychedelics, start to come up. What about corporatization? What about cost? What about
00:15:43.040 how do we fit these modalities that increase our vulnerability, that increase our tenderness?
00:15:48.480 Like, how can we safely bring those into a world that is so brutal to that tenderness?
00:15:53.680 Like, that is a hard, hard thing to square.
00:15:56.240 And I think that that, to me, brings in a responsibility of supporting the creation,
00:16:02.680 you know, doula-ing, I guess you could say, the creation of a society that can hold that tenderness.
00:16:07.600 But as I know you know, this is something that you talk a lot about on the show,
00:16:11.840 like, that is challenging work, important work, but it's challenging work to do more than just,
00:16:16.160 Oh, I'm going to fix something in my niche area that I have expertise and excitement in, but rather how do we create an environment broadly where when people go deep into themselves or they go deep out of themselves, however the modalities are, whatever the routes are, that they can do so safely.
00:16:32.000 And that to me is like the channel from how do we talk about the shadow individual repression, psychedelic therapy, all that exciting stuff. And how does that extend to, okay, so what do we do about everything else that's going on? It's kind of daunting. It's kind of daunting, but it's hard for me to not tie those things together.
00:16:50.220 Even though it's nice to have and important to have all these channels of hope and inspiration, I think part of the responsibility of tracking that possibility is, okay, well, what are we doing about the larger society that we're, for lack of a more gentle term, spitting people back out into? It's rough out there.
00:17:09.240 Yeah, it is. And I think that we're all a lot more tender and fragile than we give ourselves space to be or others. And of course, colonial capitalism wants us to be desensitized and productive, you know, where we're not getting to feel our feelings.
00:17:34.340 And so much I think about the Anthropocene extinction that we're dealing with, dominant
00:17:44.720 culture doesn't really want us to be feeling grief all the time.
00:17:48.320 Because if we felt grief, if we really felt what it is to lose so many of our kin, we
00:17:56.860 might change, we might uprise, we might do a lot of things if we felt our feelings.
00:18:03.520 And of course, not all of those things would be, would feel good either. So yeah, there's just,
00:18:10.660 there's so much there that ties into our psychological states and what we feel like
00:18:18.960 we have to repress to keep going in this culture. And yeah, the question of what would happen if we
00:18:25.780 allowed ourselves to feel, to unravel, to rest, to pause. Dominic culture doesn't want us to pause.
00:18:33.040 So it's really hard to give ourselves space to be in the realities of where we are.
00:18:40.280 yeah and if I could just jump onto one thing that you just said about like what we're expected to do
00:18:46.480 um and what what does it mean to feel things you know it's really hard like one of the things I
00:18:51.500 think about when you say that and that I know is just up for a lot of people is how we navigate
00:18:55.320 this conception of like sanity and madness and psychosis and neurosis and um how that shows up
00:19:02.440 when it emerges in public I've just been reflecting a lot on that point you just made and like not
00:19:08.940 only are we asked to repress grief and like the full feeling you know the full awareness of the
00:19:14.620 feeling that we're experiencing right now but also if you were to feel all those things and
00:19:20.560 then express them there's also this additional layer of stigma and a fear that kind of gets
00:19:26.120 associated with that and i think about this a lot with the realm of psychedelics because
00:19:29.520 there's a certain level where i think people want the kind of healing clearing uh extraction
00:19:37.920 of the shadow, whatever process to be linear and clean and clear. And I think that, you know,
00:19:45.120 going to the point earlier about people being afraid of what's in their minds, I think that
00:19:48.180 people are afraid of feeling that extreme grief that you're describing. I think that people
00:19:52.660 recognize that the enormity of the task of feeling into what's happening, what's experiencing around
00:20:00.480 them is for lack of a, again, more generous term, like literally crazy making. Like, and I mean that
00:20:06.020 both in a colloquial and a literal sense, it really turns our conception of the world upside
00:20:10.620 down and it makes it harder to function. So I said to say that it's also challenging to
00:20:16.080 over-separate or not associate the space that we need to feel our feelings in general with
00:20:23.780 the space that is made with psychedelic substances in the right environment and what's possible there
00:20:30.080 with what happens when people actually don't have control over their ability to feel their
00:20:34.240 feelings or feel what's going on, whether or not their substance is involved. And I think that that
00:20:38.520 is more of a spectrum than people want to acknowledge. And one of the ways that I've,
00:20:45.160 and the team at MAPS and other people that I work with have tried to respond to this has been by
00:20:49.860 saying the psychological crisis that people are dealing with on the street is not so different
00:20:57.520 from other kinds of psychological crisis that people experience, whether they're under the
00:21:03.320 of substances or otherwise. And so maybe we should consider how do we navigate this problem
00:21:08.300 with people having crisis period, like regardless of the source, you know, that can look like a lot
00:21:13.180 of things, unarmed crisis response or better education or better training or whatever. Like
00:21:17.500 there's a lot of ways that we can kind of improve on the margins of that. But I just say that to
00:21:21.460 say that there's a tie between this larger conversation we're having within the United
00:21:26.460 States in particular about how do we navigate public crisis and how do we navigate the fact
00:21:32.500 that people are getting less and less space to feel that in the comfort of their own homes if
00:21:36.720 they have a home in the first place. So that's just, it's just hard because I think that even
00:21:41.000 people who are resourced and sheltered are themselves barely holding it together. And
00:21:45.820 then we're holding these wildly high standards of people who don't have those resources. So it's
00:21:50.560 just, I just wanted to name that as something that's tying together what I see happening
00:21:54.100 out in public and in the discourse and in media and da, da, da, and also simultaneously happening
00:21:59.600 at the individual level about, you know, how do we navigate our healing journey, our move toward
00:22:04.260 tenderness, our desire for society to protect us, all while, as you said earlier, kind of navigating
00:22:10.100 the fact that we apparently still have to keep making money to survive, and so on.
00:22:15.300 No, it is crazy making. I mean, that's part of what's so just terrible about the dominant culture
00:22:23.080 is that it sets us up to be wounded and then it also makes us feel shame that we're wounded
00:22:34.080 and then we're supposed to be unfazed and productive would we know too that that
00:22:42.580 productivity is also in many ways feeding ecocide and so yeah that's crazy man truly i mean it is
00:22:51.960 literally like it is insane that we are supposed to feel nothing about killing our home and
00:22:59.520 ourselves and we should actually just want to keep going bigger and bigger but don't feel anything
00:23:04.460 it's like wait what is going on here and it's used against us it's like um our feelings are
00:23:12.260 weaponized against us and i mean there's so many other things to talk to you about but before we
00:23:18.100 move on i do want to go back to comparing this with sexuality because i think that also is
00:23:25.300 weaponized and again that has its own form of crazy making within our culture the repression
00:23:32.300 but then the exploitation and just how you know all of us have experience with this
00:23:41.880 meet with the media. And I could go on, but I want you to go on. So yeah, take us there.
00:23:49.920 Yeah, no, I so the first thing I'll say is, I'm not an expert on sex and sexuality within society
00:23:56.240 and culture. But I will speak a little bit to your question. Because, again, like I was saying
00:24:01.700 earlier, like, I feel like it's hard to not see the parallels. And maybe one way to start the
00:24:08.040 conversation or to continue and i could say would be to see sex and sexuality both in like an
00:24:15.520 interpersonal relational sense as well as on like a personal level of exploring sensuality and power
00:24:21.340 and substances drugs medicine however they're framed contextualized utilized and so on
00:24:27.740 as technologies and as modalities that can both enhance and dull our already existing antenna,
00:24:40.740 you could say. So if we have a capacity as humans for a certain level of consciousness,
00:24:46.480 and I don't necessarily mean that here in the woo sense, although sometimes I do,
00:24:50.360 But really in the sense of like our ability to track and navigate our world, to notice patterns, to learn, to develop wisdom based on knowledge, like all of those things.
00:25:04.060 insofar as there are tools that help us do that and sex and drugs you know put bluntly are maybe
00:25:10.660 two of those tools i can see how again going to that kind of glamorization grotesque dichotomy
00:25:19.120 how the way that use of either can enhance society's ability to reduce input to repress
00:25:31.940 thought to simplify, to allow for coping with the system are encouraged, while more kind of
00:25:41.280 liberatory, expansive approaches tend to be undermined. And that's a pretty simplistic way
00:25:48.060 to put it. Like, I do think that there's more nuance to that. And I don't quite think,
00:25:51.240 I'm not necessarily at a place now where I'm like, all consciousness raising technology is banned 0.96
00:25:58.300 because the government wants us to be dumb.
00:26:00.600 Like there's for sure a level of that that's going on, 0.97
00:26:03.400 but I do feel like even in a more kind of grounded sense,
00:26:07.040 there is definitely kind of a convenience factor
00:26:09.920 to it for society.
00:26:10.920 Okay, well, these types of behaviors are convenient
00:26:13.440 and they allow us to encourage or enhance
00:26:17.120 the types of quote unquote pro-social behaviors
00:26:20.500 that we want to see more of.
00:26:22.460 But when they undermine those behaviors
00:26:25.060 or when they get in the way of them,
00:26:27.060 again, to your earlier point, when they reduce productivity, when they increase friction among
00:26:33.220 society or people who are participating in it, then things start to get sketchy. And if it goes
00:26:38.720 too far in that direction, then we're just going to just straight up criminalize it, like we're
00:26:41.540 just going to make it illegal or try to. So I do think that the metaphor works in that sense,
00:26:48.340 because I do see a way where those two, these two powerful modalities, both sexuality and
00:26:54.580 substance use, yeah, are utilized in the convenience of the super or for the convenience
00:26:59.400 of the superstructure of the larger systemic of the larger system. And I think that one one thing
00:27:04.580 that I've been landing at more recently, that is still kind of an emergent thought is the idea that
00:27:10.240 it's not a binary. It's not that some drug use or some sexual behavior is safe and okay.
00:27:16.300 And it's it's good for you. And some is not I think that the the general stigmatization of,
00:27:22.080 you know, quote unquote, recreational use or pleasure, or even like the association of the
00:27:27.360 word hedonism has led to certain value judgments. And even me talking about it here, I can hear the
00:27:34.400 value judgment in my own approach, even though I've really thought about it and tried to avoid
00:27:38.580 that just because of the way that the different behaviors are framed. And I think that, you know,
00:27:44.260 there's a number of authors and writers and others that have been speaking about over the last few
00:27:48.600 years around bringing back pleasure and recreation and creativity into the light and kind of
00:27:55.020 pulling it back from this kind of stigmatized, associated with hedonism, associated with
00:27:59.740 selfish behavior kind of approaches.
00:28:01.580 And I like to think that as so many things are, the truth is, you know, a spectrum and
00:28:06.440 somewhere in the middle where we can actually bring back this seeking of pleasure of interpersonal
00:28:13.860 joy and creativity and recreation, while also staying in touch with the responsibility of
00:28:20.600 our consciousness, of our presence on the earth at this time. And I think that I try to avoid
00:28:25.900 myself at least going too far in either direction. I am a raver. I love going to parties. I organize
00:28:32.120 them. I love participating in celebratory events. And I think that we need to make sure that those
00:28:38.220 behaviors, whether they're sexual, whether they're drug-related, whatever, maintain a certain level
00:28:43.300 of protection and openness so we can be honest about the way that they show up with respect to
00:28:48.400 power and interpersonal dynamics and all those things and also I'm resistant to so focusing on
00:28:55.700 or emphasizing that like in the name of resistance that we actually lose our teeth that we lose our
00:29:01.500 ability to stay in kind of uh the words the words that are coming up are like adversarial or militant
00:29:07.660 but neither of those really capture what I'm trying to get at but we are actually holding a value set
00:29:12.140 And I think this is something you also talk about a lot in this show is like there actually is a value set. It's not, you know, it's not totally morally relativistic that we're trying to support the earth here. Like if there is actually a direction that's attached to this.
00:29:29.000 So I think that that's the part that can get lost again, going back to what you were saying earlier, can get lost in the commodification of recreational behavior, the commodification of interpersonal cultural experiences.
00:29:42.220 Like I love raves and I love ceremonies for different reasons.
00:29:47.200 And I can see how both of those environments are moving toward or have already moved toward commodification, not just because people are inauthentic, because they don't really believe in the things,
00:29:58.340 But because people have to survive and every pressure that so many people are receiving from the indigenous people in the Amazon to people in, you know, major cities across the U.S., across the world and everywhere in between, like everyone has to figure out how do they survive under the current paradigm.
00:30:17.400 And that pushes all of our best, you know, best intention behaviors toward a certain paradigm. And going back to your original question, I think that we see that with or attempt to see that with sexuality, with substance use.
00:30:28.840 And then when you have an option to experience sex and sexuality or substance use outside of those paradigms, whether that looks like, you know, the large expanding conversation that's happening around consensual non-monogamy and polyamory, whether it's about the large expanding conversation that's happening around community psychedelic use, entheogens, personal engagement with the substances, reclaiming interrupted lineages, working with traditional practices, like when all of that stuff comes up, when it's all in the air and the ethos,
00:30:57.080 I think that we do have both duty and opportunity to engage with the liberatory aspects of that while also tracking and being aware of the tendency of everything we do to be moving back toward, you know, that need to survive, that need to produce, that need to participate in the kind of ever-expanding consumption of things.
00:31:19.540 Anyway, that got a little bit darker than I expected, but that is one of the ways that I think I can see that connection happening.
00:31:27.080 As you were speaking, 1.00
00:31:55.580 of course i was thinking about how do we incorporate people who make their livelihoods
00:32:02.680 off of drug production into the more broad frame of drug culture and how do we institute practices
00:32:09.600 of care for producers as well as consumers of course because the chain of people whose hands
00:32:16.660 who touch the substances that especially we in the global North consume are many and aren't
00:32:25.680 oftentimes treated fairly, get paid fair wages, have access to housing, et cetera, et cetera.
00:32:33.860 And so there was a question that came up for me about that. But also when we're having the
00:32:40.800 conversation around synthetic substances versus plant substances it was interesting to hear
00:32:48.980 because my mind was trying to find some kind of confirmation of like well what is better for the
00:32:57.960 earth or for the producers or what's better for our bodies or our minds and of course being who
00:33:05.980 I am, I tend to move towards the plant world. But also there's just so much tied into all of it. So
00:33:13.120 I'm really trying to decipher how to even think about it. This is such an important question that
00:33:20.320 ultimately this is going to be really dissatisfying, but ultimately we have to
00:33:23.640 decide for ourselves. But to your question and point, this comes up a lot in this psychedelic
00:33:29.300 field, I think both because of this idea of exceptionalism where we're like, well, the drugs
00:33:33.100 that I do are better than the drugs that the other people do. But also like your question
00:33:36.800 about synthetics versus plants is not just like a preference, like, woo, what is your spiritual
00:33:42.100 framework question? It's a very practical one to your point. And I wish that we spoke about it more
00:33:47.680 through that lens, because it's very complicated. It's like, on one hand, I'm like, really sympathetic
00:33:53.560 to the people who are like, well, we've been working with plants for, you know, eons, thousands
00:33:58.400 of thousands of years, historically, that must be okay. And I'm like, yeah, like, there's definitely
00:34:02.980 good arguments to say that the plants are potentially um at the very whether without
00:34:09.460 putting like a better for you worse for you kind of binary on it to say well there's something that
00:34:13.600 we're more familiar with as a species that's probably true um and i think and and again to
00:34:20.280 your point like you filter that through the lens of our currently kind of uh scaled globalized
00:34:27.420 capitalism and suddenly we're like well does that mean that everybody gets to get them does that
00:34:31.600 we have to produce enough for every person to have access to a plant. What does that mean for
00:34:36.740 the labor dynamics that are required to do that? It's a very good question. And, you know, we can
00:34:40.560 apply this to, again, tomatoes, we can apply this to any of these things, but it's a very good
00:34:45.240 question. And I think, you know, what really shifted my mind, and just to share my bias,
00:34:50.700 I've always been interested in and curious about synthetics from like the alchemical angle, like
00:34:55.700 it's pretty magical to just create these molecules that can do so much with so little. But one thing
00:35:00.820 that's really shifted my mind or kind of been a factor here in this particular aspect of the
00:35:05.060 conversation is this sustainability carrying capacity aspect. And I think a good example
00:35:11.680 of this is with mescaline. This has come up a lot recently where, you know, there is a small
00:35:17.560 geographic region where the peyote cactus grows. Peyote is not the only source of mescaline. San
00:35:22.500 Pedro proving towards those other faster growing cacti that contain mescaline. And there's been a
00:35:28.300 big debate over the last few years uh or conversation about you know what does it mean
00:35:32.860 to be decriminalizing something like peyote when we know or when there's a concern particularly
00:35:37.260 from the native american church in the united states of like over harvesting to get to this
00:35:42.440 thing it's like okay well now if we're dealing with a species it's not extinct thankfully is
00:35:47.380 retin species i think is the current kind of category it's like the um not quite the most
00:35:52.560 dire situation but close and this is a situation where you know people are like oh is the is the
00:35:57.760 more ethical option here to either use one of these other fast growing cacti that contain
00:36:03.720 mescaline, or do we just move towards synthetic? And you're seeing the same thing happening with
00:36:07.940 5-MeO-DMT and the bufo toad, where people are like, okay, is it better? Is the more natural
00:36:13.580 option that involves agitating this animal and getting its venom and then smoking it,
00:36:20.200 is that better because it's closer to nature than synthesizing something that doesn't require us
00:36:26.860 to deal with stressing out an animal.
00:36:29.580 And I don't mean that in like a value judgment way.
00:36:31.840 I think that there's ways to frame both
00:36:34.640 that can be appropriate and that can be problematic.
00:36:37.260 But I think all that to say
00:36:38.260 that it just problematizes the whole thing.
00:36:39.920 It does complicate our kind of like ethical analysis,
00:36:43.260 I guess you could say, of the situation.
00:36:45.260 So where I've landed at least,
00:36:46.540 for what it's worth in your own exploration,
00:36:48.260 where I've landed is that the intention
00:36:51.440 and awareness of the source to me
00:36:54.280 becomes the most important thing.
00:36:55.800 It's similar to how I treat, I guess, like meat eating where, yes, like it's it can be edgy for people to know that there's ritual or kind of particular kinds of animal sacrifice.
00:37:07.020 I'm thinking in particular, and I'm a Muslim and for Eid for our big celebration, sometimes we'll sacrifice a goat or a lamb.
00:37:14.120 And that's done in a very intentional way. The animal is raised very carefully.
00:37:17.960 That meat is distributed among the community, both for charity as well as for family and friends.
00:37:21.980 And I'm like, I can see how someone would be concerned about that. And also, I'm putting that in the context of the frenzied consumer's ritual of mass scale meat production. I'm like, it's all relative here. At the very least, we can say this approach seems like it better aligns with my values, even if it's complicated.
00:37:44.540 So I don't know, like going back to what I said earlier, the synthetic versus natural question comes up a lot. I do think it's a thing that people have to land at personally. And where I've landed myself is that like it really, it's really context specific. There's definitely synthetic drugs that even if they don't have as much of a like land based ecological impact do have other kinds of toxic impacts.
00:38:06.060 One of the intense things about clandestine meth labs is that when they're dumped in places, they usually include a lot of toxic waste that aren't carefully dumped.
00:38:14.660 And that's partially a function of prohibition also that there's nowhere for that to go.
00:38:18.060 And that that does cause negative damage on the environment.
00:38:20.560 I can say, you know, it's really important that we maintain the rights and protection and support for people who use the drugs and maybe need support in how they navigate that.
00:38:30.500 You know, I can say that while also holding like, oh, there's a very real negative ecological impact that we should be tracking.
00:38:35.580 It's the same thing with large marijuana grows. This is, I think, less of a problem now than it used to be. But, you know, large, ecologically damaging grows or other systems like those exist. And I think that, you know, we can't all know every detail about where everything we consume comes from. But to me, part of being a responsible consumer is just attempting to know that or getting as much of that information as possible. Again, obfuscated by the system, but it's a starting point, at least.
00:38:59.680 so much there so i want to ask a question about trends around drug use and then understanding
00:39:06.720 the risk and in columbia university's public health department they explained quote hallucinogen use
00:39:14.400 has increased since 2015 overall and particularly among adults 26 and older while use decreased in
00:39:21.300 adolescents aged 12 through 17 according to a new study by research at columbia university
00:39:27.360 mailman school of public health and columbia university irving medical center an estimated
00:39:33.360 5.5 million people in the u.s used hallucinogens in the past year in 2019 which represents an
00:39:40.800 increase from 1.7 percent of the population age 12 years and over in 2002 to 2.2 percent in 2019
00:39:50.580 Now, first of all, I, you know, I'm not even sure that these statistics reflect the reality
00:39:58.160 of drug use, but I do want to ask, it seems like there is a growing, a growing use of
00:40:07.440 hallucinogens and the reality is more people are being introduced to psychedelics and coming
00:40:11.860 to understand their effects.
00:40:13.620 So I'm wondering how do we facilitate open and honest conversations about risks and effects
00:40:19.280 of psychedelics without, you know, either overly romanticizing them or overly inducing fear?
00:40:27.640 Yeah, this is a great question too. So one thing I'll add, which tracks actually with the data you
00:40:32.780 just shared, and that is my own anecdotal observation, is that not only is psychedelic
00:40:38.860 use increasing in people ages 26 and up, but also I would say that there is more of an
00:40:45.380 intergenerational use of psychedelics occurring, which is to say more people that are not
00:40:52.600 millennials and Gen Z are starting to use more psychedelics, partially because two factors,
00:40:58.020 one being the reduced stigma, the increased awareness, you know, for better or worse,
00:41:02.940 the increased hype, kind of sort of what you were saying. And also the fact that kind of the same
00:41:08.960 reason we saw a lot of increase in cannabis use in older populations is that as people age,
00:41:14.800 the benefits of some of these substances becomes clearer. So I think both of those things is
00:41:19.380 happening simultaneously. And I'm sure, you know, Michael Pollan's books and other media that is
00:41:24.800 geared more toward older generations, instead of just kind of the hype machine of like the
00:41:30.660 youth psychedelia culture or whatever, is affecting those demographics. So I do think
00:41:36.060 that that's the increase is true. I agree with you. I don't think that that those numbers fully
00:41:40.620 reflect what's really going on. I suspect that the numbers are higher because most of these
00:41:44.580 Most of this research is obviously self-reported and people are incentivized not to report.
00:41:49.780 But the trend is real.
00:41:50.960 I'm going to your question about like, you know, what do we do about that?
00:41:53.860 I've been really struggling slash engaging with this a lot lately.
00:41:57.740 So maybe as some background, you know, there's been a huge increase in policy reforms or
00:42:02.960 attempted policy reforms across the country to create more access, more safe, responsible
00:42:08.300 access to psychedelics.
00:42:09.320 And that looks like a lot of different things.
00:42:10.640 Sometimes that means reducing or eliminating criminal penalties for personal use to increase.
00:42:15.860 Sometimes it means creating protections for community or group use so people can guide
00:42:20.460 or offer services in the underground.
00:42:22.300 Sometimes it creates a whole additional perfection and regulated industry within a state level
00:42:27.020 program, not so different from a medical marijuana or regulated adult use program that we see
00:42:33.040 in some states.
00:42:33.660 So there's, and of course, there's also the whole research angle.
00:42:37.000 So there's a lot of different ways that these channels are opening.
00:42:39.460 And I think to your question, different kinds of education are needed for different channels. But I do feel like it is the responsibility of those of us, you know, myself included, MAPS included, a lot of other orgs included, to insofar as all of the hype and research and excitement are increasing interest, whether or not people are able to access these substances in legal regulated settings, whether that's a clinical trial or a state level program or whatever, there is increased use.
00:43:08.100 that increased use is occurring, whether we like it or not. And people can say all they want about
00:43:12.440 wanting it to be in this context or that context. But at the end of the day, most people use
00:43:16.020 psychedelics in illegal settings. And we still need to make sure that those people are getting
00:43:20.560 proper services and getting properly taken care of and getting the right education and so on.
00:43:24.720 So how does that happen? I mean, my dream world is one in which state governments are funding
00:43:30.800 harm reduction in education services.
00:43:33.120 I think it's a total travesty that civil society, that philanthropy and nonprofits have to basically
00:43:40.640 fill that gap to provide the education, harm reduction, and crisis response services that
00:43:45.680 to me are obvious public health goods.
00:43:48.260 And again, going back to what I was saying earlier, not only because of psychedelic use,
00:43:51.380 but because people have crisis and we should support people in crisis.
00:43:54.180 We should be putting lots and lots and lots of money toward systems that support people
00:43:59.400 crisis that don't involve armed intervention. Like that is just a general point. So that to me
00:44:05.460 is like a, I guess, like a safety net sort of social baseline that I would like to see as a
00:44:10.980 starting point. And then besides that, I would really like to see more of these state governments
00:44:16.900 funding this kind of, in addition to crisis response, also this other kind of education
00:44:21.100 to make sure people get accurate information, you know, to your point that doesn't overly
00:44:27.140 rely on the hype machine, but also isn't in the kind of hysteria land that also doesn't
00:44:34.120 give a full picture. Now, that's one aspect. And we all know that not everyone listens to
00:44:38.960 government. So that's not like a perfect solution. The other angle that I think is really important
00:44:42.980 has to do with people who have businesses or offering services in the space. And I think this
00:44:48.980 is true of people who are operating in the gray market. Maybe you've seen, I'm sure a lot of people
00:44:54.620 listening have seen that there's quite a sophisticated underground market now for a
00:44:59.540 lot of these substances, you know, whether it's mushroom chocolates or wafers or other kind of
00:45:04.700 things that exist that are out there. And I do think that there was a responsibility, even if
00:45:09.680 you're operating in the great market, I do think there's a responsibility for, you know, good
00:45:13.700 education for whether it's services or products that are being offered. And I do wish that there
00:45:22.440 was not just better education and better information, but less profit-oriented advertising
00:45:28.600 and more disclaimers about what actually is realistic.
00:45:32.940 But that's, again, going back to the theme we've had in this whole conversation, there's
00:45:36.120 a tension between what's the right thing to do that's best for people and what's the
00:45:40.260 thing that sells the product that allows something to go forward.
00:45:43.220 So going back to your original question, I think that understanding that there's different
00:45:46.920 demographics that are engaging with these substances through these different channels,
00:45:50.140 some in the underground, some in celebratory settings, some in regulated settings,
00:45:54.340 some through the range, through the realm of like treating an indication like depression or PTSD or
00:45:59.580 whatever, and are attempting to treat and then some through like a purely kind of celebratory,
00:46:05.440 social or interpersonal route. And I think that, you know, a lot of the education is similar.
00:46:10.600 A lot of the information that people need for like basic safe access is similar. But I do think
00:46:14.940 that different contexts require different angles. And I think one actually maybe last thing I'll
00:46:18.660 mentioned on this has to do with the double-edged sword of associating psychedelics with healing.
00:46:25.040 On one hand, it's really encouraging that compared to when I started using drugs, you know,
00:46:29.800 more than 15 years ago, people are actually talking about utilizing substances for their
00:46:35.000 personal growth and healing, not purely for recreational purposes. And again, not to demonize
00:46:40.900 recreational purposes. I love them, but I do think it's cool that there's now a conversation among
00:46:46.100 like teenagers, that there's actually a converse, which, you know, freaks some people out because
00:46:50.460 they're like, oh, my God, they're young. But a lot of people start using drugs when they're
00:46:53.240 teenagers hate to break it to you. So I'll just say that, like, I do think it's really cool that
00:46:57.060 there's more of that visibility around kind of healing modality, which is great. And I think
00:47:01.720 the flip side to that is that it puts vulnerable and desperate people into a position that's more
00:47:07.500 easy to manipulate. And that is one thing that I worry about where I see both with elders as well
00:47:12.000 as with young people, like, you know, the exaggerated sales claims or claims about what
00:47:17.800 psychedelics can do or what they can help with, that does freak me out. And, you know, you see
00:47:22.180 that even in like Instagram ads for legitimate ketamine businesses and stuff where it's just
00:47:27.340 like, oh, how, like how much protection do we actually have to have for the consumer here when
00:47:32.500 we're dealing with tools that are being framed as kind of silver bullets, which they're intensely
00:47:37.960 not. But, you know, obviously, it's convenient to frame them that way when you're part of that
00:47:42.640 market. But one other thing I want to say related to what you were mentioning earlier about drug
00:47:46.400 sellers, this is actually a really important point, because I think that we have evolved,
00:47:51.860 I don't know if that's the right word, but we have kind of gotten to a point within society that
00:47:54.800 there is an increasing consensus, maybe not a full general consensus, but certainly an increasing
00:47:59.580 consensus that personal drug use is not a moral failing. And so criminalizing personal use,
00:48:06.500 whether it's through the lens of dependency or addiction or just personal use as an adult is
00:48:12.420 maybe not the direction we should be going. That's exciting because we're seeing a little
00:48:15.720 bit more of an openness toward decriminalization and to these kind of safety mechanisms, harm
00:48:20.220 reduction, crisis response, all the stuff we were just talking about. And that's exciting.
00:48:24.560 And I think the flip side to that, to that kind of shift is that not only do we have the worry
00:48:31.860 about people being potentially taken advantage of.
00:48:34.660 But I think we also have to square with the fact that as long as we are being treated
00:48:43.180 like consumers of a product, and this is true of like the larger kind of industry or field,
00:48:48.760 we are incentivized or society and the economy is incentivized, again, to keep obfuscating
00:48:53.540 the source of those things.
00:48:55.160 And that's why the source of those substances are the source of those behaviors.
00:48:57.380 So I think that that's why I like the idea of moving toward a more localized economy when possible, because it also allows people to be in a more relational state with respect to what it is they're consuming.
00:49:09.840 So much easier said than done. We are leagues away from that being possible. But I think that that is the general direction that we'd like to move in to avoid being in a situation where we continue to obfuscate, separate, and avoid the origins of what it is that we're engaging with.
00:49:39.840 Thank you.
00:50:09.840 so gosh you brought up so many amazing points and a few thoughts came to me some of them being like
00:50:21.020 what kinds of healing are we even craving as a culture and how might intentional and conscientious
00:50:31.540 psychedelic use or you know how how can we tap into some of these needs not just as a solution
00:50:37.500 or a cure, but as one of many pathways, because like you were saying, it's not a silver bullet.
00:50:44.580 It's not a one-stop solution to health and healing, whether it's a spiritual experience
00:50:51.300 or a healing experience led by a great practitioner.
00:50:56.640 It's a tool in a healing process.
00:50:59.060 It's just one of the many constituents that play into creating health or wellness.
00:51:04.960 And if we could really understand what kinds of healing we're craving and then see these psychedelic experiences as a step in the healing process, maybe we could also not look at these experiences as instant gratification.
00:51:22.980 And if that's the case, we might also be able to respect the medicines more and not have so much biocultural appropriation that also comes from this way of trying to find healing.
00:51:37.740 I feel like the two words that come up when you say all that are balance and humility. And, you know, thinking about one of the approaches that I've just taken personally that I've, you know, learned from many wonderful teachers and friends over the years is the desire to work toward and seek balance as a value, as opposed to like something that I think I understand.
00:52:01.420 And I'm trying to impose, I think that to me, like it brings up this idea of balance and humility. There are factors outside of our knowledge and control. This is true of our ecological reality. This is true of our social, cultural, interpersonal realities. There's factors that we don't understand and they're outside of our control.
00:52:17.660 And to me, I think that where I've landed with some of what you were just describing
00:52:22.020 is humility to realize that my limited, sometimes puny human understanding and mind is not
00:52:28.880 able to grasp what an ideal outcome would be.
00:52:33.300 And this is like the constant reminder and experience on the micro level at work, on
00:52:36.960 the macro level and social environments and situations where I'm just like, I actually,
00:52:41.400 I don't actually know what the best outcome is most of the time.
00:52:44.940 And what I do know is that an outcome that seeks or encourages balance among many factors is one that's more likely to be beneficial or to be sustainable in a way and generative in a way that I'd like to see.
00:53:04.160 So where I've landed with that is the move is less prescriptive and persuasive, which is an edgy thing to feel in a realm, you know, as a lawyer and advocate, like an educator, it's been interesting to see within myself how deassociating, not dissociating, but reducing association with the narrative of knowing what is going on or what needs to happen has been quite confronting for my ego and my identity.
00:53:34.160 but it's allowed me to be more in tune with this again humility and awareness that I don't actually
00:53:41.520 know that most of the people that think or that are trying to sound like they know also don't
00:53:46.000 actually know and what that at least does for me is put me in a place of more openness and
00:53:51.760 spaciousness for what can emerge and then seeking that balance and equilibrium becomes its own value
00:53:57.620 instead of trying to make sure that we're getting to balance because I have this weight over here
00:54:02.780 on one edge. It's a very different approach for me personally, just as an advocate. And it's one
00:54:07.260 that I'm still trying to understand how to hold in the political climate that we are in that
00:54:14.380 requires so much aggressive advocacy and adversarial positioning. But yeah, I feel like
00:54:21.040 that there is an opportunity that we have here to step back from our knowing and to, you know,
00:54:28.320 it's kind of like the language shift from leading something to tending something or from
00:54:33.500 encouraging something to being in service for something. There's subtle differences in kind
00:54:39.280 of advocacy approaches, but I think are more in line because that combination allows us to get
00:54:45.540 to your question, which is what is it that we are trying to heal in the first place? And there's any
00:54:51.440 number of like things we can mention, whether it's like capitalism or patriarchy or racism,
00:54:56.920 There's like things that we can point to and say, oh, we need to heal from that. And I think that those are also important processes that have to happen. And also, I don't think that the end all be all is to heal from harm.
00:55:09.920 harm. I think that that is a means to an end of peace and balance and justice as opposed to its
00:55:17.640 own end. And I think that, you know, it's hard to feel that in an environment, in a social political
00:55:22.940 environment right now that demands so much clarity and demands so much direction, demands that we,
00:55:29.760 you know, I don't love framing it this way, but it's a very like masculine adversarial
00:55:33.880 positionality that we're expected to put into play as advocates or as people that are, you know,
00:55:39.920 defenders of the water or the earth or of the people. Like there's this sense that if you're
00:55:45.160 not doing that in this adversarial aggressive way, then you're going to get eaten alive by
00:55:48.900 the system. And that's a lot to hold. And I don't advocate for people to like, um, weaponize their
00:55:54.540 tenderness, you know, to be in a place where they have to fight or they have to, uh, concede
00:55:59.920 to fight that they have to concede their own humanity or concede their own capacity
00:56:04.380 to stay in the fight. But I don't, I can only see that there's, there's some level of, of
00:56:09.780 balance and equilibrium needed between these extremes. And to me, that that's the healing
00:56:14.440 arc. It's like moving away from those extremes, not in the interest of flattening everything,
00:56:19.980 but in the interest of finding balance in those things, like the far ends of all the spectrums,
00:56:24.440 kind of going back to the very beginning of this conversation, like there's a certain level of
00:56:28.080 glamorization or grotesqueness that I think we can keep with shamanic practices with these like
00:56:34.980 shadow uh ways of being these things that these forms and modalities that actually have been
00:56:40.220 protected for good reason for a long time and i don't think it's like we don't have to suddenly
00:56:45.600 say okay we're going to uncover it all everyone gets everything let's just reproduce the same kind
00:56:50.000 of consumerist dynamic that we've got with everything else but we also don't need to kind
00:56:54.840 of stay afraid and stay kind of unaware and separated from that aspect of ourselves um
00:57:00.980 And to me, I guess balance is the short answer to all of that, but it has so many other pieces,
00:57:05.360 it's hard to track sometimes.
00:57:07.220 Yeah.
00:57:07.460 I love the balance and humility.
00:57:10.220 Humility to me is just such a guiding force.
00:57:15.080 And every time I come back to that, it's an exhale and it brings me so much clarity.
00:57:24.060 So, oh my goodness, this conversation.
00:57:27.740 Thank you so much for your passion and your thought process and your sharing of so much.
00:57:36.640 I mean, I just really love speaking with you.
00:57:39.100 So thanks for taking the time today.
00:57:41.120 Thank you.
00:57:49.020 Thanks for listening to For the Wild.
00:57:51.440 The music in today's episode is by Santiago Cordoba, Public Access, and Camila Jade.
00:57:57.740 For the Wild is created by Ayanna Young, Erica Ekrem, Julia Jackson, Jackson Krupf, and Evan Tenenbaum.