For The Wild - October 31, 2019


JADE BEGAY & JULIAN BRAVE NOISECAT on Restorying Power for a Just Transition ⧸143

Topics
SEFRA ALEXANDRA on Seed Remembrance ⧸142 PAVINI MORAY on Alchemizing Trauma and Ancestral Healing ⌠PART 1⌡ ⧸144

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 7 minutes

Words per minute

150.12

Word count

10,116

Sentence count

178

Harmful content

Misogyny

3

sentences flagged

Toxicity

5

sentences flagged

Hate speech

10

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.340 For the Wild podcast is brought to you in part by the Calliopeia Foundation.
00:00:05.220 The Calliopeia Foundation envisions a future grounded in compassion, respect, dignity,
00:00:11.300 reverence for nature, and care for each other in the earth.
00:00:14.420 To learn more, visit calliopeia.org.
00:00:17.700 Hey For the Wild listeners, Ayana here.
00:00:20.860 I wanted to take a moment to tell you that we are proud to have the support of the sweet
00:00:25.320 city of Bend, Oregon, which occupies land belonging to the Wasco, Tonino, and Paiute
00:00:31.620 tribes.
00:00:33.220 I remember the first time I visited Bend, Oregon, I was just completely enraptured by
00:00:38.740 this place nestled between high desert plains and swaths of forest amidst the Cascade Range.
00:00:45.340 Bend is home to incredible autumn colors of aspen, soft purple, lupine-filled springs,
00:00:51.500 and strong riparian habitat that nourishes native sockeye.
00:00:55.320 Of course, these abundant lands are almost always vulnerable to exploitative tourism, and Bend, Oregon takes this seriously, which is why Bend is a proud member of Pledge for the Wild, a group of mountain towns that support responsible tourism through the preservation of land.
00:01:12.400 For the Wild wants to remind our listeners that enjoying nature through outdoor recreation and exploration requires responsibility.
00:01:19.080 If you're going to travel and explore outdoor places, we hope you look into towns that are supporting their local economy, respecting the land, and caring for their service and industry workers.
00:01:30.020 If you're in the area, consider supporting and visiting one of my favorite destinations, Bend, Oregon, and help protect the land by giving back at PledgeWildBend.com.
00:01:41.440 Again, learn more at PledgeWildBend.com.
00:01:44.980 Welcome to For the Wild podcast. I'm Ayanna Young. Today you will be hearing a conversation
00:01:53.600 with Jade Begay and Julian Brave Noisecat recorded at the Bioneers Conference. Jade Begay is a
00:02:00.940 filmmaker, communications strategist, impact producer, and climate justice activist. Jade's 0.91
00:02:07.760 work explores indigenous futurism, inclusion, and representation in the media landscape.
00:02:13.580 Jade has partnered with organizations like Resource Media, United Nations Universal Access Project, 350.org, Indigenous Environmental Network, Sierra Club, Bioneers, Indigenous Climate Action, the Women's Earth and Climate Action Network,
00:02:30.980 allied media projects, and tribal nations from the Arctic to the Amazon to create content,
00:02:36.820 develop strategies, and storytelling campaigns to mobilize and create more engagement around
00:02:41.940 these urgent, complex, and sensitive issues of our time. Jade is also the creative director at
00:02:47.980 NDN Collective, an Indigenous-led organization that builds Indigenous power through decolonizing
00:02:54.400 the world of philanthropy and creates direct funding opportunities for Indigenous and Native
00:02:59.120 communities. Julian Brave Noisecat is director of Green New Deal Strategy at Data for Progress,
00:03:06.120 a think tank, and narrative change director with the Natural History Museum. He is a correspondent
00:03:12.800 for Real America with Jorge Ramos and contributing editor for Canadian Geographic. His writing has
00:03:20.260 appeared in The Guardian, The Nation, The Paris Review, and many other publications.
00:03:25.220 ayana here from for the wild we are live at bioneers 2019 with some pretty lovely folks
00:03:37.080 one of my very besties jade begay who is joining us today and julian brave noise cat and i think
00:03:48.180 because we're here sitting next to these uh seabirds on this pond that we'll just jump right
00:03:53.320 into it. Let's jump into the Green New Deal first to orient ourselves. And I want to hear both of
00:03:58.540 your critiques, your interest in it, and how you think it can shift our current predicament. 0.80
00:04:10.100 So I guess I'll just back up and just explain what the Green New Deal is. The Green New Deal
00:04:14.780 is a progressive climate platform that aims to take on the twin crises of climate change
00:04:25.520 and inequality in tandem. It has been crystallized most firmly in the form of a
00:04:33.580 resolution that was introduced by Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Senator Ed Markey
00:04:39.760 back in february and its sort of broader policy planks are still being written so i work at a
00:04:48.260 think tank called data for progress and we put out a blueprint for a green new deal over a year ago
00:04:53.540 in september 2018 and we're still working with a broad array of movement actors and experts and
00:05:01.280 politicians, to sort of develop what these sort of really wide array of legislative actions could
00:05:10.400 be under a Green New Deal. Let's talk about those legislative actions a little bit more.
00:05:16.020 Can you break that down for us? It's hard to break down. So I guess there's like
00:05:22.940 a lot of different sectors in the economy that contribute to emissions. And if we are serious
00:05:30.340 about decarbonizing on the timeline set forward by the IPCC,
00:05:36.100 which one of the big, I think it's important for people to understand
00:05:39.120 that one of the big things that happened is that last October,
00:05:43.000 the UN put forward its 1.5 degrees Celsius report,
00:05:47.060 which if we recall, the Paris Agreement was a 2 degrees Celsius agreement.
00:05:52.060 So one of the things that happened is that people saw that report,
00:05:54.980 saw what the projections were scientifically about where we're headed,
00:05:58.300 and the difference between a 1.5 and a 2 degrees celsius world and everybody started actually to
00:06:04.760 revise their sort of policy positions about the the speed at which we need to decarbonize in order
00:06:12.820 to avoid the 2 degrees celsius or sorry to to try to like hit the 1.5 degrees celsius target so one
00:06:21.440 of the things that really actually happened is that like the goalposts shifted towards more
00:06:25.560 ambition and that in a lot of ways is sort of the political and like expert context in which
00:06:37.960 the green new deal arrived and you know in order to you know meet the the ipcc report on 1.5 degrees
00:06:46.820 celsius said that we need to basically cut emissions in half by 2030 which is how you get
00:06:53.360 I think a lot of people will have recalled the we have 12 years sort of line that a lot of people are putting forward.
00:06:59.160 That's where that originated.
00:07:00.980 And then the IPCC report said globally we need to fully reach net zero emissions by 2050.
00:07:08.260 Which if you think about like all the different ways in which our economy produces emissions,
00:07:15.140 would be an incredible undertaking to achieve that.
00:07:18.160 So not only do we need to change, I think most people will think about the energy sector
00:07:22.680 and the way in which we get power.
00:07:25.020 There's a seagull who just landed right next to us.
00:07:27.780 He has some thoughts about this.
00:07:29.840 Not only do we need to change the way in which we get power,
00:07:33.000 another huge source of emissions is the transportation sector,
00:07:36.660 which is going to be particularly unruly and difficult to decarbonize in the U.S.
00:07:41.640 because everybody owns a car,
00:07:43.180 and our entire urban planning and the way in which we've built cities
00:07:48.640 and entire economies and regions is rooted in highways and automobile infrastructure.
00:07:56.260 So that's going to be a significant challenge.
00:07:58.360 Those two in combination, actually, it's worth adding that if we do switch to electric vehicles,
00:08:05.580 not only are we going to have to decarbonize the existing power sector that we have,
00:08:09.360 but you also have to add all of the capacity that will be required to charge electric vehicles.
00:08:16.720 So in essence, not only do you have to reach like 100% clean energy, you actually also
00:08:23.660 have to grow the amount of energy that you're producing because everybody's going to be
00:08:26.840 plugging their car into the grid to get, you know, energy to drive to work or whatever.
00:08:33.380 So that's going to be an enormous task.
00:08:35.660 In addition, we have to decarbonize or wring emissions out of the agricultural sector,
00:08:41.200 The way in which we heat and put appliances into buildings, we're going to have to change that because a lot of that is built around natural gas.
00:08:51.640 So we're going to have to basically electrify everything, buildings, housing.
00:08:56.740 And there's also a lot of different interventions that we're going to have to make with regards to manufacturing and industry.
00:09:03.480 So there are really key industrial processes that are carbon intensive.
00:09:09.820 So the production of concrete, the production of steel, like a lot of these different sort of really bedrock manufacturing processes need to change.
00:09:20.720 And then there's also like broader things that knit all that together, like land use planning, you know, conservation of existing sort of carbon sinks and like wildlife areas and all that sort of stuff that we're going to need to maintain and potentially even grow to, you know, get all that carbon out of the atmosphere.
00:09:36.740 So when you really sort of look at the whole elephant, which I think is what the Green New Deal pushes us to do, the scale of the task and the number and permutations of things that have to change are quite remarkable.
00:09:50.960 And of course, it's important to keep in mind also that even if we did enact a Green New Deal next year or 2021, it's not like you get to reverse climate change.
00:10:00.900 It's not like you reverse warming or it stops, right?
00:10:02.940 there's already feedback mechanisms and emissions and carbon in the atmosphere that would continue
00:10:09.580 to heat the planet for the next coming decades and years. And so it is really a pretty challenging
00:10:16.080 context. But I think one of the points of hope that the Green New Deal points to is that when
00:10:21.240 we do all of these interventions into how we make things, into the infrastructure, into, you know,
00:10:27.860 clean energy, that we can produce a lot of jobs and actually sort of achieve a more just and
00:10:33.760 equitable democracy. This is sort of the notion of a just transition. So on the one hand, we have
00:10:39.160 a lot of work to do, but actually if we do that work in a good way, in a fair way, in an equitable
00:10:44.960 way, in a democratic way, it could actually produce a lot of good as well. One thing that
00:10:51.840 sends a maybe a red flag is the right word is this idea of an entirely new infrastructure setup
00:11:01.920 because to transition us into this green new deal there seems to be a lot of resources to
00:11:11.560 transition everything and a lot of resources in connecting the infrastructure of a new energy
00:11:18.280 program like I set up solar panels in an off the grid little cabin that I do the podcast out of
00:11:25.060 usually and just seeing what it took to get water to my cabin seeing what it took to actually set
00:11:30.320 up a very small solar system the amount of resources that takes is actually quite unbelievable
00:11:36.320 and so I want to hear from you Jade some of the things that we need to really understand
00:11:43.600 And as this bird understands, they're really, you know, calling us right now into this conversation is let's talk about the side that isn't so flashy about the Green New Deal.
00:11:58.300 I want to hear your thoughts on just the immense amount of resource extraction that will have to happen in order to transition us into a different type of way of using energy.
00:12:09.020 and then also you know julian brought up the narrative of the 12 years and i wonder okay
00:12:17.020 and it's funny and yeah i wonder how i wonder how this urgent narrative is playing into how
00:12:29.900 we're setting up systems because when we feel like we only have a decade left as this bird
00:12:35.940 clearly knows then what okay I don't want to throw anything at you bird because I respect you I really
00:12:48.760 So the question is, let's talk about the other side of this infrastructure debacle
00:13:07.880 and how the narrative of 12 years and that urgency might be shifting the way that we go about it.
00:13:16.120 Okay, we're going to friendly ask this bird to go party somewhere else.
00:13:26.320 You joined the wrong party, bird. 0.99
00:13:31.620 Ayana is currently talking with this crow or this raven.
00:13:40.380 He's really persistent and stubborn, apparently.
00:13:46.120 there you go okay so we're at bioneers and the way that the conference is set up is 0.98
00:13:57.040 when you enter the indigenous forum is at the very front of the conference it's it's right
00:14:04.340 there when you enter the the conference grounds and i think so they've placed the indigenous
00:14:11.360 forum at the front, which is really, I think, a beautiful thing. This conference is about
00:14:19.380 environmental social change and justice and highlighting the leaders who are bringing
00:14:27.260 all of that forth. But they have done, thanks to the work of people like Cara Romero and Alexis
00:14:35.200 Boudin, the two people who direct the indigeneity program here at Bioneers, yeah, they've centered
00:14:43.060 the knowledge and wisdom that needs, and not just centered it, put it in the front. I think if we're 0.82
00:14:49.300 talking about the Green New Deal, the same thing needs to happen. And that's kind of the approach 0.92
00:14:56.000 that my organization, the NDN Collective, has taken on this. We've developed a Green New Deal
00:15:04.600 position paper that actually Julian edited and I'll let him talk about that and thoughts on that 0.75
00:15:11.920 but that document really underscores the fact that we need to in order to bring in a just
00:15:20.780 transition that is just for all communities including indigenous because like you said if
00:15:27.180 we're gonna replace fossil fuels with solar panels where are those minerals coming from
00:15:32.040 They're coming from Brazil. They're coming from lands that are within the territories of various indigenous communities globally.
00:15:43.360 So, yeah, we need to incorporate those those things into the way we're going to foster in this just transition eventually.
00:15:52.660 and yeah within that position paper like julian was saying that ipc has given us this 12 years
00:16:00.300 thing well in also the last couple years they've acknowledged finally that indigenous knowledge
00:16:07.600 is key for mitigating adapting and dealing with climate crisis they've really put an emphasis on
00:16:16.020 that in the last year, I believe. And so again, just our stance as the NDN Collective is that
00:16:23.520 we're in a really unique position right now to inform the Green New Deal, to be thinking of
00:16:29.300 these things and incorporating indigenous knowledge and wisdom and traditional ecological
00:16:33.280 knowledge in a bold way, not just to mitigate and manage the climate crisis, but also into
00:16:43.220 building these solutions? So the IPCC published a trilogy of reports and is now going to be silent
00:16:49.580 until after the 2020 election, which is actually going to be a big sort of communications backstory
00:16:54.800 of the way that the climate conversation rolls for the next year or so. And the second paper in
00:17:01.100 that trilogy was their lands paper, in which they talked about the different challenges that we're
00:17:07.380 going to face in providing agriculture in a climate strand context, in protecting and creating
00:17:14.460 carbon sinks. And they did a number of different projection scenarios for different combinations
00:17:21.080 of those actions. And the big picture takeaway, reading between the lines, was that to a large
00:17:29.440 extent different conflicts and scarcities over resources are going to be like pretty much
00:17:38.660 inevitable and there will be trade-off decisions that we're going to have to make in terms of how
00:17:44.040 we use lands and resources and who has access to them and all that sort of stuff which you know
00:17:49.800 of course is like native people like the whole history of this continent and of modernity is
00:17:57.000 in large part one of us losing everything and and people taking while i think the critique
00:18:04.080 of the transition to a clean or renewable energy economy you know is an important one like obviously
00:18:11.300 we we have real no real choice but to but to take action like the no action scenario is
00:18:17.100 pretty unconscionable i think it's also important to just be like pretty realistic about
00:18:21.800 the real issues that already exist in that transition.
00:18:27.360 So for example, I was just in Chibugamou, Quebec, which is in northern Quebec,
00:18:33.300 which has been a mining-based economy for the last 100 years or so.
00:18:39.580 And the current story in that part of Quebec,
00:18:43.060 which is where there's a number of creek communities that have been impacted by mining,
00:18:46.740 is now that there's a lot of Chinese investment coming in to do lithium mining,
00:18:50.780 because lithium is obviously a very important mineral for batteries.
00:18:54.840 And if we're going to shift to renewable energy,
00:18:56.780 we're going to need more lithium to make those batteries.
00:19:00.040 And the other reason why it's happening in northern Quebec
00:19:03.160 is that there's now potential for a shipping terminal to go in in northern Quebec
00:19:07.380 because when the ice is melted, there will be a fast shipping lane
00:19:10.260 from northern Quebec to China, which is going to be, you know,
00:19:14.260 there's 1.4 billion Chinese people in the world,
00:19:16.440 which means that their middle class is about four times the size
00:19:19.500 of the american middle class their elite is four times the size of the american elite there will
00:19:23.500 be four times as many billionaires at least in china and that's a lot of stuff at the end of the
00:19:28.380 day that that group is going to demand in the world is going to demand and so the story for
00:19:35.180 the cree in northern quebec is going to be to a certain extent a lot more of the same right the
00:19:40.740 mining will continue um there's not going to be so much of a transition it's just going to be
00:19:44.820 it's not going to be gold anymore, or it's not going to be gold, it's going to be lithium.
00:19:49.780 I mean, we need to be real about that. And then, you know, secondly, also, there's going to be
00:19:54.060 continued siting issues. You know, basically, the narrative here is that we need to be very
00:20:00.420 thoughtful about how we build out a renewable and clean energy grid, because a lot of the
00:20:07.140 same siting issues that we've seen with pipelines could be perpetuated with transmission lines. So
00:20:12.640 if you're going to have a grid that runs on renewable energy you need to be able to balance
00:20:17.060 out the places where the sun is shining and where it's not where the wind is blowing where it's not
00:20:22.140 and that means that you basically just need more connectivity regionally and nationally which means
00:20:27.640 you need need more transmission lines and you know as a tendency has been forever pretty much
00:20:33.800 you know the folks who are going to have those developments happen in their communities are
00:20:39.260 going to be people of color going to be working people are going to be indigenous people um and
00:20:45.600 my take on this is that like you know if a transmission line was being built through the 0.51
00:20:51.480 standing rock communities you know ancestral grave sites like they would fight it just the
00:20:56.700 same as as a as a pipeline and so i think that the way in which we think about land use you know
00:21:05.480 community input on how we do these things and power i mean really at the end of the day a lot
00:21:09.880 of this comes down to who has power and who doesn't those things are all going to be very
00:21:13.700 relevant and i think it's you know it's important to point out that like it's not like we pass a
00:21:18.260 green new deal and it's like you know game over we won yay you know a lot of the same
00:21:23.040 challenges that we face already in in policy making and and socially you know where the jobs
00:21:30.540 go, where the infrastructure goes, who owns those things, all that sort of stuff is going
00:21:36.380 to remain relevant, if not even more, more prescient than it already is.
00:21:43.360 I mean, the only thing I would just build on with that is, that's one of the reasons
00:21:49.980 why the NDN Collective exists, is to really scale up how we look at indigenous power.
00:21:57.760 I mean, that's our whole mission, building indigenous power through decolonizing philanthropy.
00:22:03.440 And we actually use a lot of that data by the IPC, some of this 12-year narrative.
00:22:09.700 But also, we have those narratives.
00:22:12.120 We've been talking about this, I mean, for so long.
00:22:15.340 But, you know, if we want to say, like, in the movement space, at least since the 90s, about, you know, these predictions.
00:22:22.700 And so that's what we're up to.
00:22:25.600 we're trying to really scale up the way we donate and give and fund and give resource and also power
00:22:32.640 to indigenous communities so that they can more easily build the solutions that are working for
00:22:39.500 their communities. I mean, we're, we totally believe that like the people closest to the pain
00:22:44.280 know exactly what to do and we want to empower them, embolden them in having that self-determination
00:22:51.520 and sovereignty to design what it is that will give them that power to navigate the transformations,
00:22:59.200 the changes that we're seeing. I want to bring up my skepticism around just transition because
00:23:06.160 it's something that I've been thinking about a lot. And Jade, you and I have gone through
00:23:10.040 so many conferences, protests, events together where a just transition has been brought up time
00:23:16.680 and time again and when I first learned about it I thought okay great the frontline communities who
00:23:23.940 are suffering the most should be in control of their own power transition they should be given
00:23:30.080 power to own their own grids to be the bosses of the solar companies that are doing the work in
00:23:36.860 those communities or whatever natural renewable energy source and I thought that made a lot of
00:23:41.440 sense and then I was thinking about some of the folks we worked with down in Louisiana like Monique
00:23:47.220 like Sharif Whiteland and I know they've talked about just transition a lot and so I'm thinking
00:23:52.680 about them and then fast forward I'm driving up to Alaska I stop in British Columbia I meet up with
00:23:59.880 Jacinda Mack who was one of the founders of Native Women for Responsible Mining in British Columbia
00:24:05.080 that was created or given a lot of energy into because of the Mount Pauly mining tailings
00:24:12.300 disaster, the biggest tailings pond disaster in the world.
00:24:16.060 And the reason I'm bringing this up right now is because here I am in northern British
00:24:20.680 Columbia where there's 2,000 plus abandoned mines, the biggest gold mining in the world.
00:24:26.280 A lot of this mining is for renewable energy.
00:24:29.000 And so I'm like, but wait, Jacinda's ancestral lands don't get a just transition.
00:24:35.080 Like her lands are being exploited, raped, poisoned, so that somebody else somewhere else can have a just transition.
00:24:44.500 And so how do we wrestle with that?
00:24:48.620 How do we wrestle with somebody who's still going to live in a sacrifice zone?
00:24:52.320 There's this part of me that goes, are we still doing the same thing where some people will get the just transition and other people will live in the sacrifice zones so that some people can have renewables?
00:25:02.580 I mean, that's a really good question.
00:25:04.780 It's a huge question. I wish I could tell you that there would not need to be any more mining, that we would find ways to build all the things without it going through someone's backyard or community or, you know, sacred site.
00:25:23.640 But I also know that that's not true. And I think that, if anything, from my perspective, the reality that the decisions we make in policy and as a society about who benefits, who are the winners and losers of different policies, is always a relevant question.
00:25:45.520 who has health care who does not have health care where do we put where are police stationed where
00:25:52.440 are they not stationed where do we build military installations and where we don't if anything the
00:25:59.360 fact that those are relevant questions i think that that makes the conversation about you know
00:26:05.540 frontline communities environmental justice communities indigenous sovereignty worker power
00:26:11.440 equity justice even more pressing because those decisions and who has power and representation
00:26:20.060 and who doesn't are going to remain increasingly important in a society that is trying to
00:26:27.480 transition on the one hand to clean and renewable energy to transform a lot of the ways in which we
00:26:32.940 do things and on the other hand is going to face the constraints and impacts of and harm i should
00:26:40.380 just like say it straightforwardly of warming and those include of course and we've seen this
00:26:46.460 already in in europe and elsewhere the fact that unfortunately you know climate induced migration
00:26:53.220 is often accompanied by a rise in xenophobia and hate and that we're going to need to figure out
00:26:59.300 ways that you know we justly bring in new people to societies that are already primed for that kind
00:27:05.980 of reaction and backlash. The fact that conflict over resources is going to become an increasingly
00:27:12.440 common thing and is already happening in many regions of the world. The fact that military
00:27:18.780 conflict is going to become much more important. The fact that we're going to have to relocate
00:27:23.500 entire cities and the way in which we do that sort of, you know, retreat from the shoreline
00:27:29.500 is could either be, you know, more orderly or it could be more like Mad Max.
00:27:33.260 you know those are all really really relevant questions and I think and this is where like
00:27:42.800 media and structure and all those sorts of things come into play because who is at the table when
00:27:49.420 we're discussing these sort of problems who has the ear of lawmakers and people in power and who
00:27:55.420 is in power when those things happen is going to make an enormous enormous difference and we've
00:28:00.380 seen that you know throughout history of course yeah you actually took the words out of my mouth
00:28:05.860 I was gonna say yeah who's at the table and I agree my work is really involved in narrative
00:28:12.940 change work I do a lot of storytelling work and really the mission or the goal with that work is
00:28:23.420 to stop erasure and yeah really bring my folks indigenous people communities to these tables
00:28:34.940 and so that's yeah that's kind of where I see my role fitting into this is by amplifying those
00:28:42.080 voices amplifying our stories and holding like the IPC accountable when they say things like
00:28:48.500 indigenous knowledge and wisdom is critical for how we navigate all of this that there's
00:28:55.840 accountability there and we really mean it and we put it into policies and we put it into
00:29:01.060 even the conversations we have at conferences when we know like there's resources here to be
00:29:07.080 given and shared and so yeah again just I think it Julian's right that it just depends on
00:29:14.680 how we're deconstructing power systems and doing that institutionally systemically so that as we
00:29:24.520 continue to figure how we deal with all of the changes that we'll be seeing that there's
00:29:32.000 really important voices to say like this is not going to work for us and how can we
00:29:38.500 create some balance in this quote-unquote solution i would like to add i guess that there's like
00:29:45.460 this has kind of been a little downer or like realism conversation but there are also
00:29:49.180 sort of win-win in my view sort of scenarios here like there are there are some places where we get
00:29:55.640 to both empower the the exact communities that we want to be empowered and fight climate change
00:30:03.060 together and that there won't actually be necessarily like a clear zero-sum winner
00:30:07.740 loser type scenario. And in large part, that actually is coming out of the fact that Indigenous 0.99
00:30:12.900 peoples have played, I would say, a disproportionately significant role in driving the climate
00:30:19.140 conversation over the last 10, 20 years, maybe even more. I mean, the extent to which Indigenous
00:30:25.500 movements have been fighting pipelines, have been calling attention more recently to the burning of
00:30:32.160 the Amazon, you know, all of these sorts of things, we, you know, might only be a small portion of
00:30:37.320 the overall population but i'd say that actually in the ways in which we've been engaged on this
00:30:42.820 we've been a sort of leading voice a leading community and i think that's really important
00:30:48.020 the examples where we might actually be able to do you know do all things for all people
00:30:52.720 are i think most notably with uh to jade's point about indigenous knowledge you know there are a
00:30:59.060 lot of places in the world that are going to need to be protected and conserved as carbon sinks is
00:31:04.800 sort of the ugly term we use I think like more precisely just as like places that need to remain
00:31:12.080 you know ecologically intact to absorb carbon to maintain ecosystems to do all that sort of work
00:31:19.060 and already you know indigenous nations indigenous communities indigenous sovereignty
00:31:24.300 indigenous rights are the mechanism through which you are actually going to be able to do that and
00:31:29.420 people already are doing it whether that be first nations in the great bear rainforest in Canada
00:31:34.680 or, you know, indigenous communities in the Amazon
00:31:37.540 or, you know, many different people throughout the world.
00:31:42.440 And that is an example, I would say,
00:31:43.960 where native people, indigenous people,
00:31:46.040 the people who have been bearing the brunt
00:31:48.420 of an extractive economy and pollution
00:31:51.000 and all that sort of stuff
00:31:51.980 can actually also be empowered through a transition.
00:31:56.860 And so there are, I don't want to like be all gloomy
00:31:58.800 and be like, oh, it's going to be a bunch of hard decisions.
00:32:00.520 Like there are some actions that we can take
00:32:03.300 that can be really empowering for people.
00:32:07.600 And actions like Rights of Nature,
00:32:09.700 which is an Indigenous-led model, solution,
00:32:14.500 that does combat false solutions such as carbon offsetting.
00:32:21.000 But I think before we jump to Rights of Nature conversations,
00:32:25.740 we do still have so much groundwork
00:32:28.480 on understanding what Indigenous rights mean.
00:32:31.880 I think because of just hundreds of years of erasure, there's a really big gap in just the average person's understanding of what indigenous rights mean for us.
00:32:47.660 I think it's fair to say that people, even our own people, don't understand treaties and whether they're helpful or not.
00:32:54.980 And so I think there's still just a lot of education that needs to happen.
00:32:58.340 And that's the work that I'm really excited about doing and doing with NDN and our partners like Illuminative,
00:33:05.680 bringing this knowledge, this research, this education that most American children and people were not given,
00:33:15.120 giving that to them now so that we can have these bigger conversations about how indigenous rights play a role in climate justice.
00:33:24.980 In the center of heaven, floating in space, spinning in circles, the hunter and the chased,
00:33:40.300 Both show love for you
00:33:46.400 Cause that's what feels true
00:34:01.440 In the middle of nature
00:34:05.120 With animals and plants
00:34:09.060 There's a rhythm playing for the dead to dance
00:34:17.060 To show their love for you
00:34:23.080 Cause that's what feels most true
00:34:31.400 I wanted to ask you more about that, Jay, specifically, because you're mentioning,
00:34:43.100 yeah, there's these reports coming out. They're saying we need to listen to Indigenous people.
00:34:46.480 Indigenous people hold 80% of the biodiversity in their lands. You know, we hear these.
00:34:50.880 It's a buzzword.
00:34:51.680 Yeah, it's a buzzword. It's a trend, and it's trendy to support Indigenous rights,
00:34:57.180 quote unquote whatever the hell that means support indigenous sovereignty what does that mean when we
00:35:04.100 see it whether we see it in reports whether we see it from politicians or whether we see it
00:35:09.000 from our hip friend on instagram who's telling us to support indigenous rights or whatever but we're
00:35:15.400 not actually talking about what does that logistically mean what does indigenous
00:35:20.160 sovereignty actually look like within a governmental context in a social cultural context
00:35:26.200 in a city planning context and so i would like to maybe take a moment to dive into some indigenous
00:35:32.360 futurism talk around how do we actually logistically implement indigenous sovereignty
00:35:38.500 and get it out of either the ivory tower or get it out of these government papers get it out of our
00:35:44.140 social social media networking and really bring it into this conversation and ground these buzz
00:35:51.020 terms so that we're not just throwing them out throwing them out throwing them out and then more
00:35:54.580 and more people want to cling on to them because it makes them feel connected to something yeah i
00:35:59.940 guess that's the second part of the question do you see groups actually implementing these promises
00:36:06.240 well maybe we could talk about some of them maybe we could talk about some of the ones that aren't
00:36:10.520 working but yeah i really do want to ground into what does indigenous sovereignty indigenous rights
00:36:15.620 indigenous leadership within the climate movement within the global movement actually look like for
00:36:21.000 both of you individually maybe jade you can start because you're already rolling in this
00:36:26.400 yeah i think you're right to point out there's what you say as like what does that really mean
00:36:34.380 and do people like really get that i think there we're still caught up in some we're still
00:36:40.680 grappling with like romanticization of of indigenous peoples and communities and fetishizing
00:36:49.420 our role i think i i see that um a lot in the climate justice movement and it's not talked
00:36:55.720 about enough julian please build on this because you just wrote a pretty dope article on how the
00:37:03.020 environmental movement needs to face its racism but um i think that's one of the barriers so i'm
00:37:09.820 not answering the question just yet because i want to name some of those barriers that aren't
00:37:14.480 that are, yeah, just that.
00:37:16.520 They're challenges in getting to this place where we can really honor
00:37:20.540 what sovereignty, what self-determination, what indigenous rights mean.
00:37:24.980 I just want to build on what Jade just said because I think it's so true.
00:37:28.420 And I've been a little bit guilty of producing some of the propaganda
00:37:31.820 that leads to this viewpoint, but, you know,
00:37:35.040 there are lots of different types of stereotypes about indigenous peoples.
00:37:39.160 You know, some of the more problematic ones are about our people being,
00:37:43.580 you know quote-unquote savages or barbarians but there's also you know an equally deep
00:37:50.640 history of outsiders people like you know the French philosopher Rousseau viewing us as like
00:37:58.480 sort of quote-unquote noble savages right and one of the sort of related stereotypes around that is
00:38:04.500 that like indigenous peoples are like the first environmentalists or the first conservationists
00:38:09.280 And while there is obviously a great deal of truth to the fact that our knowledge systems, our philosophies, our cosmologies, our economies were rooted in direct relationships with the land, with the water, because they had to be, you know,
00:38:26.840 i think that that idea can get taken to unhelpful extremes wherein it becomes in another way still
00:38:35.300 difficult to actually see native people as people and we become sort of this like fetishized
00:38:41.380 caricature of you know like the avatars in like in that yeah yeah and um you know i mean i grew
00:38:50.960 up in the bay area and there's obviously a fair amount of fair amount of that kind of thinking
00:38:54.340 that happens in the Bay Area. And it's not completely unhelpful, because it can be a pathway
00:38:59.000 for people to get more interested in our cultures and to learn more, and to turn to us more, which
00:39:04.500 I think then will help them see us more as full and honestly often complicated people. But, you
00:39:11.600 know, I think that as an endpoint is not where we want to be. And I think this is where culture and
00:39:18.140 media and literature and film, you know, all these ways in which you have to see people not
00:39:25.780 as two-dimensional signifiers, but as three-dimensional real life beings can be really
00:39:32.060 helpful. So for example, you know, I grew up in Oakland. Last year, Tommy Orange wrote a
00:39:36.440 Pirzo Pride's finalist book about urban Native people in Oakland, New York Times bestseller,
00:39:43.220 seller a really remarkable book and pretty much none of it had anything to do with and he even
00:39:50.660 has a line in a very memorable sort of passage where he talks about you know how for him like
00:39:56.040 his relationship to place and land as a native person had very little to do with mountains and
00:40:02.500 streams and wildlife and ancient teachings and instead had a lot more to do with you know city
00:40:07.940 blocks and the BART and that sort of rhythm of of life and place and I think that you know that kind
00:40:14.020 of uh conversation and realization was really helpful for people because actually like the
00:40:19.140 majority of native people live in cities and people probably don't really realize or or know
00:40:23.840 that so what's your thoughts on on this I don't know this might be straying from the original
00:40:29.360 question but I think that point just underscores something else that's really that's going to be
00:40:35.240 really important to unpack and dissect and it makes things all the more complex but yeah like
00:40:44.440 native peoples aren't like just rural peoples they're urban and they live in the burbs and so
00:40:51.600 I think there's just even for ourselves you know in designing yeah what what is just transition
00:40:59.520 look for our own communities like we have to be thinking on all those all those levels of rural
00:41:05.840 urban in between and it's complex we ourselves are dealing with a lot of internal stuff around
00:41:14.240 our identities and the complexities there so it's yeah i think it's just all relevant
00:41:20.240 to the conversation just because yeah we're all seeing these changes together and experiencing
00:41:26.560 them and um there's yeah there's just when you say like communities need to come together and
00:41:33.560 work for you know this just transition together like that it's so it's so complicated and i i just
00:41:41.120 you know want to push back on this idea that all native peoples are just like out there
00:41:47.960 building amazing solutions like we are you know there's so much complex stuff within within our
00:41:55.020 own tribal nations within you know we're trying to get in some cases trying to decolonize our
00:42:01.460 own tribal governments because they're often sometimes not on our sides not on the side of
00:42:06.300 you know whatever climate justice approach or strategy there is there's some tribes that are
00:42:12.260 way backwards so there's just a lot of politics there and I yeah I'm like I said I think I might
00:42:18.500 be straying off in an in a new direction um and adding more complexity to the conversation but
00:42:25.240 that's it's it's there and it's real yeah i mean i just want to say that i guess like humans are
00:42:30.120 complicated and like you know people who survived a genocide are just as complicated as as anyone
00:42:37.540 else and i think that that becomes especially relevant in a political and organizing kind of
00:42:48.320 context because you know to effectively organize people to inspire people to reach people I think
00:42:55.600 you have to meet them where they're at and you know I think that one of the mistakes that can
00:43:01.040 happen in a number of different ideological and social and political and cultural contexts is
00:43:07.440 that there can be you know we can preach to a choir that's not actually the singers who we think
00:43:13.460 they are and i think that you know in order to i mean for example like jade and i do a lot of stuff
00:43:18.800 on the internet and native people are like intensely i would say online like my dad who's
00:43:25.440 just turned 60 this year is like one of the most online people i know and you know if we were like
00:43:30.920 pretending that like the best way to reach them was through non-digital means or whatever i think
00:43:37.200 we'd be missing a whole bunch of the community and so i think that like that kind of empirical
00:43:43.620 realistic assessment of where people are at and how complicated things are is really important to
00:43:49.300 actually create you know strategies and networks and relationships that are grounded in the truth
00:43:56.080 yeah this is the juice that i was looking for because like i said it's really easy to sit in
00:44:01.680 a 20 minute keynote and walk away being like yeah like we have the solution and we got it and people
00:44:07.180 are going to do these things but then when you walk away from that and you start to really unravel
00:44:12.860 what it would take and what what does a just transition actually look like and for who
00:44:17.360 who's the externality and also what I'm hearing too is the people who are going to protect their
00:44:24.060 land are the people who have a hell of willpower and a lot of creativity and a lot of willingness
00:44:31.020 to be flexible and nimble and continue shifting tactics and strategies and yeah it's I don't like
00:44:40.300 the word sad necessarily but knowing that not everybody will win even in a green new deal even
00:44:48.380 in a quote just transition not everybody will win and having to take that in is I think really
00:44:58.000 important for those of us especially that want to be involved want to be engaged want to be
00:45:03.040 supportive to communities and earth communities human and otherwise
00:45:07.360 for us to know both sides of the story because i can say that i for too long
00:45:12.720 see that people who are so willing to learn get sold one side constantly and then think about
00:45:21.160 all of the energy the resource of energy love money time that goes into things that are not
00:45:27.020 discussed clearly i was just gonna say i think the reason my train of thought is kind of just
00:45:34.580 like waxing and waning because it's a nice sunday and i'm feeling kind of mellow but um
00:45:41.300 i was just gonna say the reason why i i brought up this complexity of like our communities and
00:45:48.140 our identities is because just like you're saying the just transition is going to look different for
00:45:54.460 every single community that's designing one. I've in the last three years have moved back to my
00:46:01.120 my homelands my ancestral homelands and I'm often on the road for the work that I do but
00:46:08.840 my experience in being in that place and reconnecting with that place-based knowledge has
00:46:15.620 been I mean I know what I want like I so clearly know what I want in the next like five ten years
00:46:23.060 and to design a just transition for myself and for my community.
00:46:28.100 And I've understood how my specific skills in media and media production,
00:46:35.460 media like art, can help with cultural revitalization or language preservation.
00:46:41.220 And yeah, it's taking that localization to really make it real for me.
00:46:47.120 And I think that's not everyone has the privilege of going back to their homelands.
00:46:51.980 But I think, yeah, there's something there about going back to small community and prioritizing that as we learn to have some sort of balance in our lives during the climate crisis.
00:47:08.560 Yes, I want global indigenous, like that's a futurism for sure that I like envision is just like global understanding of indigenous rights and solidarity.
00:47:18.440 But when I imagine like into the future of what a just transition or climate justice looks for me, it's very specific to my community.
00:47:30.080 I really loved hearing you say, questioning what a just transition is for Jade, because that's something really unique that I actually haven't heard.
00:47:40.900 usually when I hear dress transition it feels really out there it doesn't feel internal and it
00:47:45.960 doesn't feel like I'm hearing it what does it look like for me as a person what does it look
00:47:51.240 like for my local community what does it look for my township what does it look for my state
00:47:55.680 and really expanding out from the person first but the elections are really right around the
00:48:03.240 corner and for those of us who are media makers are narrative producers it's important for us to
00:48:10.220 think about that now because it feels like it's going to come up so quickly and it does make a
00:48:16.940 difference we've seen what the last election did it makes our involvement is really important
00:48:22.700 but i do think that people have become so bamboozled by the political mumbo jumbo i'll use
00:48:30.960 those words as well that you know i i want to really speak to those folks in this conversation
00:48:38.320 right now and be like yeah I want to kind of hear like meta view election thoughts and then maybe
00:48:43.900 some specifics that you want to throw in for us whether that's state specific things whether that's
00:48:51.160 certain resource extraction projects whether that's certain candidates to watch yeah I really
00:48:57.200 just want to dive into this because I know you both are seeing it from a really strategic vantage
00:49:03.060 point my meta view on elections is that they matter a lot and that there was for a long time
00:49:09.460 i think on i identify as a lefty as a leftist i guess and i think for a long time there was an
00:49:15.520 aversion to party politics and and and electoral politics as not where the primary work should be
00:49:26.740 put, but I think that if anything, 2016 and then the election of, you know, a number of
00:49:33.540 really strong progressives, most notably like AOC and the squad in 2018, you know, off the
00:49:41.160 back of Bernie's 2016 presidential run, I think to me has really emphasized the importance
00:49:47.600 of the party as a vehicle for politics and as a vehicle to organize and engage a large
00:49:55.980 number of people. I think numbers at the end of the day do matter. Our ability to shape and
00:50:00.280 influence policy and laws and to move resources around that do matter a lot. So yeah, I mean,
00:50:08.560 I think elections matter. And then the second part of that as a journalist and someone who's
00:50:13.620 involved in the media is that the people who basically are going to choose who the next
00:50:18.240 president are uh as politics becomes increasingly national are the folks who book uh cable news
00:50:26.360 and uh for the for the wild podcast right like it's the it's media makers who are gonna decide
00:50:35.280 who the public gets to see and uh who's in the consideration set and who wins the nomination
00:50:41.180 and all that sort of thing and obviously donald trump has made a career basically not really as
00:50:46.760 a businessman but as a media figure first in new york and now you know someone who's been able to
00:50:52.240 manipulate the news cycle around his own twitter feed and shenanigans constantly and i think that
00:50:59.700 to a large extent if there is going to be someone who can effectively challenge and
00:51:04.760 and beat him they will also need to be able to create a convincing identity and narrative
00:51:12.840 and source of inspiration that'll really get people to show up at rallies and show up to vote
00:51:18.280 and do all that sort of thing. And, you know, communications is sort of the most immediate way
00:51:23.460 in which you do that. I mean, organizing obviously is really important too, but,
00:51:27.340 you know, the primary way in which a lot of these campaigns will reach people is through the news.
00:51:33.600 I mean, I don't have too much to add to that. It's pretty on point. I think the challenge that
00:51:40.560 everyday folks like us are gonna have to work with navigate is that there's gonna be so much
00:51:48.660 propaganda out there we just have to be extremely discerning about what we consume what we share
00:51:55.280 especially in the world of twitter and social media julian and i constantly are communicating 0.99
00:52:04.820 about just yeah the shit that goes down on social media and how it's it's tomfoolery it's harmful 0.96
00:52:13.780 sometimes makes us take two steps back you know um it derails important narratives so i just think 0.99
00:52:22.960 in the lead up to the election yeah we just really gotta be on it about does this message
00:52:31.160 about this candidate or that candidate really support us as like the left or as whatever you
00:52:39.920 want to identify as as beating Trump or is it dividing the progressive left side because I
00:52:48.980 definitely see more division going on especially when we're talking about social media and like
00:52:53.640 the messages that that world is sharing with each other cheering from the the
00:53:00.100 crowd as Jade punctuates her her thesis
00:53:23.640 There's a cold fire, there's a crossfire
00:53:49.660 And there's something inside, inside
00:53:58.660 And we'll never, never make it
00:54:03.660 And we'll never, never break it
00:54:07.660 On two, on two
00:54:19.660 well the about the divisiveness i do want to talk about this a little bit more because
00:54:36.120 yeah of course there's the divisiveness between the quote-unquote left and right
00:54:40.280 of course there's that type of divisiveness which i'm actually less interested in than the
00:54:45.880 divisiveness that happens within the movement space for instance like the thing that's happening
00:54:52.820 with Greta that I want to I want to dive into as an example not that I think the Greta thing
00:54:59.400 I'm more interested to hear about your political views but I just want to take that as an example
00:55:03.580 because it was so widely seen by probably so many of the people listening to this podcast right now
00:55:08.780 where it's Greta came out people thought she was a hero but then what started happening was there
00:55:14.400 was so much frustration around narrative that white European person was coming across the ocean 0.86
00:55:22.540 to the sailboat nonetheless yeah yeah exactly and and then and then coming to to colonize the
00:55:33.320 thought process or whatever so there was all this this trauma and narrative frustration around that
00:55:38.660 which I totally understand and at the same time then what I'm seeing on social media is all this
00:55:45.280 anti-Greta rather than anti-ExxonMobil rather than anti the stuff that we are trying to fight for
00:55:52.160 climate change sake so how do we balance yeah we do need to call out the narrative of Greta being
00:55:57.780 the white savior and we also need to stay really focused and not get divided within the movement
00:56:03.160 because we need to be really organized right now the choir needs to be tight not dispersed over
00:56:11.040 things that aren't the bigger issue in the room but I also don't want to say that people shouldn't
00:56:17.140 have been pissed about Greta but it's like how how many things can we be distracted by before we
00:56:22.100 realize holy shit there's no more ice left but we are fighting about Greta and now it's really
00:56:27.580 challenging around the divisiveness within the movement and Jade you had some amazing things to 0.60
00:56:33.000 say about the Greta situation I remember like you were like yeah this is weird stuff this is weird
00:56:38.440 white savior stuff and people let's not get it twisted because we only have so many posts that
00:56:44.180 we can look at a day and when social media is confusing us even more than we already are
00:56:49.080 confused it's not helpful so um yeah what was happening was the media was um centering Greta
00:56:57.560 and what ended up happening unfortunately was the internet went into up uproar about this young
00:57:06.860 white kid who was taking up all the space and my feedback that week was write the media like
00:57:17.200 stop getting mad on the internet like what to julian's point about how media is going to be
00:57:22.100 an influencer like a huge influencer in who is elected write those publications to include
00:57:30.100 more native folks more black folks whatever you know like it's we got super distracted and focused
00:57:37.880 on I think it was a little identity politics I think it was also a conversation about representation 0.99
00:57:42.940 and inclusion but we weren't talking about climate justice and we weren't holding those who do the
00:57:49.920 centering who do who put Greta in that position we're just shooting the messenger basically and
00:57:55.980 that's not going to help any of us at the end of the day so I think if we want to if we want to
00:58:01.200 continue to see our folks and our frontline communities represented we need to hold those
00:58:07.200 the institutions the media organizations the news accountable to do that for us
00:58:13.360 Yeah, I couldn't agree with that more. You know, the people who decide who's quoted in the publications, who's booked on cable news are not the speakers themselves. Usually it's the editors, the reporters, the publishers, the producers. And yeah, my thoughts on that situation are the same as Jade's.
00:58:37.480 I guess I would also just say that there are healthy types of conflict, competition, and tension, and there's unhealthy kinds.
00:58:46.660 So right now we're in the middle of a primary where we're going to decide who the Democratic nominee is for president.
00:58:53.500 And in a lot of ways, that creates a window wherein organizers, activists, movements can pressure the candidates to be better than each other.
00:59:03.640 And that's actually usually a very healthy kind of competition because it means that a lot of our demands that have been on the sort of fringe of what's politically possible are increasingly becoming embraced by, you know, broader number of leaders within the party.
00:59:18.840 So, you know, Medicare for all is a very classic example of this where, you know, Bernie was the only person who was talking about the fact that, you know, the government should be providing health care to every single resident of this country.
00:59:32.240 Now that is becoming an increasingly common position for candidates to stake out on on stage.
00:59:38.160 And that's because they have to differentiate each other from differentiate themselves from each other and also have to like try to keep up with being, you know, as good as one another.
00:59:45.900 the same thing can happen with the green new deal and has happened with the green new deal
00:59:49.040 and i think that you know that that can just be repeated across a number of different issue areas
00:59:54.080 and positions and that can be ultimately a good thing i think the questions here that are relevant
01:00:01.440 are to go back to jade's point like who specifically should we be holding accountable
01:00:07.920 like when we express our ire about something who should that ire specifically be directed
01:00:15.080 towards and secondly you know how do you both hold tension in sort of community or among different
01:00:26.000 you know professionals in a network or communities etc in a way that like doesn't erase the fact that
01:00:32.180 there are tensions and that there for example in the space that i work there is going to need to
01:00:36.900 be a significant change in terms of representation and power and resources between white environmentalists
01:00:43.860 and people of color in the movement like that is something that is an ongoing process it needs to
01:00:48.720 continue but that doesn't necessarily mean that you know we need to blow up the whole situation
01:00:54.940 and people should stop talking to each other and working with each other and you know one group is
01:00:59.580 completely off and always going to be sellouts which is not to say that there aren't people who
01:01:04.500 are like super problematic and taking up space and resources but like you know these are complicated
01:01:10.920 circumstances to navigate and i just wish that the thing is is that like social media like
01:01:16.700 runs on very limited number of emotional responses like it's either like i'm gonna clap for this
01:01:22.820 i'm gonna be angry at this or i'm gonna like laugh at it those are like really the only three
01:01:27.060 emotions that happen on on the internet and the way that the algorithms and the platforms are
01:01:33.260 sort of created uh i think it often can incentivize and reward more or less like
01:01:41.620 adults to do behave badly to put it like pretty crudely like i think people get rewarded for
01:01:49.480 being mean to each other far too often don't comment when they agree about something they 0.98
01:01:55.440 give it like a like and but like people comment when they disagree and there's crazy ass like 0.76
01:02:03.780 comment threads when people are upset and want to vent about and rant about something and so that's
01:02:10.600 what the algorithms are gonna reward so then those are the things you see highlighted on
01:02:16.520 and you know pop up in your feed more and more those kind of divisive conversations on the
01:02:23.160 internet that are they getting anyone anywhere I don't know I just want to give you both this space
01:02:32.280 to say anything that hasn't been said that feels alive in this moment whether it's about politics
01:02:37.340 whether it's about digital organizing social media you know anything that we've touched on today but
01:02:42.700 I just want to give you both the space to have a last thought before we close up shop I think that
01:02:48.860 this is a very troubling time but it's also in some ways a very promising time I see a lot of
01:02:59.220 different organizations and movements rising to the challenge of the moment and I think that
01:03:08.000 you know that kind of work needs support in the form of you know volunteering in the form of
01:03:14.460 donating you know all of that sort of stuff and so yeah i think that you know showing up to vote
01:03:21.880 is important but also like if there's a local you know if you're a young person who's involved in
01:03:28.220 the climate movement i think that like getting involved with the sunrise movement is like a
01:03:33.060 smart thing to do if you you know are engaged in like black lives matter then like there's a number
01:03:38.920 of different organizations like byp 100 that are doing great work wherever you are there is
01:03:44.260 certainly like an indigenous community and i'm sure that they're still fighting to protect their
01:03:48.980 rights and their land and their water and all that sort of stuff and figuring out ways to support
01:03:53.240 them respectfully i think is really worthwhile so uh you know at the end of the day like not
01:03:59.000 everyone has all the time to give you know some people just have like an hour or two to give every
01:04:02.920 week but like with that hour or two that you can give to that this kind of work doing that in a
01:04:09.340 strategic and thoughtful and impactful way i think it can make a big difference when a lot of people
01:04:14.640 are doing that you had asked a question earlier ayana about do we know any groups that are
01:04:20.080 modeling some of this this work around sovereignty around self-determination and
01:04:25.260 showing us what that looks like.
01:04:28.340 A few groups that come to mind are Thunder Valley CDC.
01:04:33.940 I also admire the work that the Black Mesa Water Coalition does
01:04:38.220 in creating self-determination in the form of having food sovereignty
01:04:44.880 in revitalizing traditions and around infrastructure,
01:04:50.620 like building hogans and bringing the language back
01:04:54.420 and things like that also yeah i do want to uplift the work that ndn collective is doing
01:05:00.720 because it's really it's really changing the game in philanthropy and putting the data in people's
01:05:08.580 face that 0.3 percent of philanthropy is given to indigenous communities and when we have the ipc
01:05:16.020 telling us ipcc telling us that our knowledge is critical for the moment we're in um
01:05:23.700 that number 0.3 percent is it's crazy we need to change that we need to drastically
01:05:30.780 change the way we give and donate and give direct funding to indigenous communities so um yeah look
01:05:38.820 into the ndn collective share our programming share the grants and fellowships that we're
01:05:45.120 creating and providing and who else follow jade begay on twitter and instagram and all the
01:05:52.320 platforms and follow julian i already say it all the time anyway but yeah can't not miss out on
01:06:00.940 what this guy is saying well i can say that for both these fine people sitting next to me right
01:06:06.640 now stylish intelligent you know i'm feeling pretty lucky this has been a beautiful conversation
01:06:16.100 that we have been sharing with these ducks geese seabirds under this willow tree thank you all for
01:06:21.840 tuning in to for the wild podcast live at Bioneers 2019 and uh stay tuned because we are gonna have
01:06:30.340 both Julian and Jade back on for some not with duck conversations soon so bye everyone love you much
01:06:51.840 Thank you for listening to For the Wild podcast.
01:07:03.660 I'm Ayanna Young.
01:07:05.700 The music you heard today was from Sea Stars and the Ancient Wild.
01:07:10.560 I'd like to thank our wonderful team,
01:07:12.820 Aidan McCray, Andrew Storrs, Carter Lou McElroy,
01:07:16.620 Erica Ekram, Aaron Wise, Francesca Glassfeld,
01:07:19.880 Hannah Wilton, Melanie Younger, and Suzanne Dollywall.