For The Wild - August 09, 2018


JANINE BENYUS on Redesigning Society Based on Nature ⌠ENCORE⌡ ⧸71

Topics
ROBIN WALL KIMMERER on Indigenous Knowledge for Earth Healing ⌠ENCORE⌡ ⧸35 STEPHEN HARROD BUHNER on Plant Intelligence & The Imaginal Realm, Part 2 ⌠ENCORE⌡ ⧸14

Episode Stats


Length

59 minutes

Words per minute

137.18

Word count

8,114

Sentence count

272

Harmful content

Hate speech

1

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 Hey for the wild community, it's Ayanna here speaking to you from the northern Boreal forest.
00:00:06.060 Madison and I are en route to southeast Alaska for the Tongass campaign and being amongst these trees and the mosses
00:00:13.700 remind me of the episode we did with Ariel Duranger on the tar sands in this ecosystem.
00:00:19.860 So if you want to learn more about where we're at and the threats that are facing this ecosystem,
00:00:24.800 listen to the episode with Ariel Duranger, it's really one of my favorites.
00:00:27.820 we are building up our one million redwoods research team so if you're interested in
00:00:33.920 supporting our research if you have a background if you are in academia or not and you'd like to
00:00:40.520 get involved email us at engage at for the wild dot world all this month we'll be releasing staff
00:00:47.580 picked episodes it's a real treat for us to dig back through the glorious archive and share a few
00:00:54.020 the encores of the ones that have really stuck with us the most. This week is Andrew Storzpick,
00:00:59.920 our producer and editor. He's such an incredible member of the team, and thank goodness he's a
00:01:04.860 Capricorn. And lastly, if you value this podcast, please become a member on Drip. We're about to
00:01:11.640 release a new batch of bonus material and other goodies, so you can sign up at d.rip.4-the-wild.
00:01:20.400 This podcast could not continue without your support, so we are so extremely grateful for
00:01:25.900 those of you who have supported us on DRIP, and if you haven't, please consider becoming a member.
00:01:31.200 All right, now on to the show.
00:01:34.620 Hi there, I'm Andrew Storrs, the editor and producer of For the Wild podcast, speaking to
00:01:42.120 you from my home in the high desert of Yucca Valley, California. In last week's Encore episode,
00:01:49.840 Robin Wall Kimmerer spoke to the need for revitalizing our ability to learn from the land.
00:01:56.580 This week, Janine Benyus describes how she puts a practice like that into action around the globe,
00:02:04.000 looking to nature as model, measure, and mentor, encouraging us to be more plant-like,
00:02:10.640 in order to, and I quote,
00:02:13.080 create conditions conducive to life.
00:02:19.180 The silence is broken by somebody crying
00:02:29.480 Trying to be heard, never a word
00:02:32.960 Always the attitude, sort out your own
00:02:36.500 Always alone
00:02:38.280 Wishing for something the world is denying
00:02:42.160 Out in the wilderness somebody's crying
00:02:47.320 Somebody wishing for something to happen
00:03:00.640 Wishing to tell, wishing to help
00:03:04.060 Someone was listening, someone who cared
00:03:07.880 Never despaired
00:03:09.760 Someone to lean on and someone to trust
00:03:14.400 Who needs your assistance and finds your disguise?
00:03:28.800 Hello and welcome to For the Wild podcast. I'm Ayanna Young.
00:03:33.900 Today we are speaking with Janine Benyus.
00:03:37.320 Janine is known worldwide for her influence in naming the practice of biomimicry
00:03:42.080 in her seminal book, Biomimicry, Innovation Inspired by Nature.
00:03:47.660 Her work is shaping the practice as an innovation tool
00:03:50.700 that can solve some of humanity's most pressing challenges.
00:03:55.060 She is the co-founder of Biomimicry 3.8,
00:03:58.320 the world's leading bio-inspired consultancy,
00:04:01.460 and the Biomimicry Institute,
00:04:03.800 a nonprofit that empowers people to create nature-inspired solutions for a healthy planet.
00:04:09.420 Undoubtedly the most recognized thought leader in the field, Janine's legacy includes inspiring
00:04:14.800 millions through her work as an innovator, speaker, and as the biologist at the design table,
00:04:21.080 using 3.8 billion years worth of brilliant time-tested solutions. So Janine, I am sincerely
00:04:29.280 honored to have you on the show today. Your life's work energizing humanity to once again
00:04:35.480 live humbly as a fledgling organism on earth is just truly incredible. And my deepest welcomes
00:04:43.020 to you, Janine. Oh, thank you for having me. I just want to jump right into biomimicry and
00:04:49.860 the idea to look to nature for innovation. And it really sparks awe of the brilliant
00:04:56.220 adaptations that surround us in every ecosystem. I've heard you say that amidst such immense
00:05:02.680 earthly diversity, life carries a hidden unity. So I'd love if you could begin by telling us some
00:05:09.080 of the unifying principles of life and how our industrial approach to science and synthetic
00:05:14.940 chemistry are fundamentally incompatible with such life-sustaining principles.
00:05:21.300 That's a great place to start. I've spent my life in the natural world and reading about
00:05:27.680 the natural world and writing about the natural world. And there is this hidden unity in the
00:05:34.980 diversity. It's what gives me hope, actually, because we are part of nature, obviously. And so
00:05:42.160 the impulse to do this is within us as well. What organisms do is they find a way over long
00:05:52.820 periods of evolutionary time this is rewarded over and over again this impulse which is to
00:05:59.100 continue life over the long haul and to fit in over the long haul and what organisms are always
00:06:07.200 doing of course is taking care of their of their offspring but what they really do the really the
00:06:14.760 ones that have succeeded and have been here you know over this 3.8 billion years they're the ones
00:06:21.180 that have figured out that in order to take care of your offspring, not just in this generation,
00:06:25.820 but 10,000 generations from now, the only way you can do that is to take care of the place that's
00:06:31.820 going to take care of your offspring. So what life has learned to do is build soil, clean air,
00:06:40.880 purify water, and cycle nutrients. And in that, in everything that life does,
00:06:48.460 life creates conditions conducive to life so that really for me is the design brief
00:06:56.720 of our time you know if we as a part of nature and as as you said a young species on this planet
00:07:04.920 if we're going to become a welcome species on this planet we have to learn to create systems
00:07:11.880 that in everything we do the byproduct is creating conditions conducive to life
00:07:16.800 and life you know life does that in in life-friendly ways okay so you mentioned for
00:07:23.600 instance how we make things how we relate to the material world life has to manufacture
00:07:32.060 its shells and its its webs and its nests in the same in or near its own body so in order to do
00:07:44.240 that, it has learned how to use non-toxic chemicals and to create non-toxic chemicals,
00:07:52.400 how to make materials at body temperature and in water. You know, if you think about a spider's
00:07:59.240 web, five times stronger ounce for ounce than steel. And yet it's basically, you know, the
00:08:05.920 flies and crickets that fly into the web. And then those are manufactured at room temperature,
00:08:11.740 right at body temperature and in water using this safe subset of the periodic table when you start
00:08:20.860 to see we call them life's principles we've basically looked at what do all organisms have
00:08:25.520 in common or most organisms have in common and that's one of the things is how they make things
00:08:32.680 you know they use current solar energy they make things in ways that allow them to live in or near
00:08:38.840 their manufacturing plant. And you think about, well, could we possibly do that? And there are
00:08:44.540 people working on that, working on these fields of green chemistry, self-assembly, water-based
00:08:51.020 chemistry, rather than toxic solvents, low-pressure chemistry, low-temperature chemistry.
00:08:59.000 There are people working on this. And when you learn how to do chemistry in that way,
00:09:04.380 And, you know, that's the basis of everything that we make. You are starting to be more and more plant-like, right? You're becoming more like the organisms that are outside my window right now and in every moment are creating miracle materials silently and in ways that I don't need to wear a hard hat or eye goggles, right, or a gas mask.
00:09:28.460 so that's our future if we're going to fit in here is to figure out how to how to do everything we do
00:09:34.720 not just in making things but how we build and how we power ourselves how we grow our food in ways
00:09:40.000 that create conditions conducive to life goodness thank you so much for that just beautiful
00:09:47.460 introduction and this is a thought that i sometimes struggle with and i see that as there are infinite
00:09:56.020 unique expressions of earth there's also infinite innovations to possibly develop
00:10:03.100 but i question how we make decisions on where our creative impetus and energy is best put
00:10:11.620 i'm so excited about biomimicry for earth renewal but i'm also wary of corporations and industry
00:10:20.440 abusing biomimetic principles to perpetrate this over-consumptive death culture. And I would just
00:10:29.280 love to hear your thoughts on how and where we draw the line to ensure biomimicry is not exploited
00:10:36.120 to prolong the unnecessary selfish comforts of human civilization, but instead helps humans
00:10:43.440 find a harmonious place for the long haul? Let's look at that. I certainly do. You know,
00:10:51.460 20 years ago when I started to see this field evolving, emerging, it was a very faint signal
00:10:58.440 at that point. And I also thought, wow, is this going to be the next gold rush that we,
00:11:09.120 as Francis Bacon said torture nature for her secrets and then use use that knowledge to
00:11:16.760 to build a more efficient well right that more efficient way to extract from from the earth
00:11:24.340 I thought long and hard about what are the questions when you come to the natural world
00:11:30.580 with with a question about how you should how shall we live here the questions are
00:11:38.060 what would nature do here whenever you're about to design something? What would nature do here?
00:11:43.560 And the here is very important because it has to do with what's appropriate locally because the
00:11:48.280 world is not monolithic. And the second question is what wouldn't nature do here, which is just
00:11:55.660 as important. So biomimics also look at what is not very common in the natural world. Transgenic
00:12:02.960 engineering putting you know finding fish genes inside strawberries to produce frost resistant
00:12:09.920 strawberries that doesn't happen right and there's something teaching us in that and the third
00:12:18.320 questions after what would nature do here and what wouldn't nature do here the question is why
00:12:25.020 and why not because if you're looking at nature as model emulating nature you can do that and
00:12:33.100 create a torpedo that is shaped like a penguin which has been done but if you don't ask that
00:12:39.860 next question which is what wouldn't nature do here right so would nature use these things in
00:12:44.720 the service of destroying wantonly no no and why and why not that's that's nature as
00:12:54.680 as mentor, right? Looking at nature as mentor. So you look at nature as model,
00:12:58.440 as measure, and as mentor. Asking why and why not, that's where we sort of learn the ropes of
00:13:08.340 how to be an earthling, right? You look at the natural world and you say, how is it that nature
00:13:16.240 is not just creating more stuff? You know, nature doesn't create things, it creates things that
00:13:21.100 disappear into systems when you do biomimicry at a deeper level not just a shallow we're going to
00:13:28.900 recreate the form or the shape of something um we ask the people that we work with to also look at
00:13:36.540 not just the form but also how would nature make this you know what's the process
00:13:41.720 and then what is the ecosystem level strategy you know what is this necessary this thing that
00:13:50.400 we're building? Is it beautiful? Does it fit within an ecosystem that will eventually regenerate the
00:13:58.900 planet? And when we work with corporations, at this time in history, you're working with the
00:14:04.980 people who make our world. So they are us. We use what they make for us. So it's our system right
00:14:12.340 now. And we believe that if we're not working there, we're not going to get through this
00:14:19.180 evolutionary knothole. I mean, we really, in order to scale these kinds of ideas,
00:14:23.880 we have to have small companies, NGOs, municipalities, communities, and corporations
00:14:31.780 starting to follow some of these design principles. Otherwise, I fear we'll lose a lot more of the
00:14:39.560 biodiversity that we love if we're not working to change from the inside out. And I mean,
00:14:46.500 from the inside of the person out the people we work with the champion adapters we call them
00:14:51.240 the champions inside of these companies they're sort of roller skating in the halls of power
00:14:57.020 many of them are people who want to see their grandchildren have a different life
00:15:04.220 so they're trying to change things from within and for us that means changing how we make things
00:15:11.160 and also how we actually run the companies that we work in.
00:15:15.420 What's interesting now is that can we ask questions like how does nature cooperate?
00:15:21.060 How does nature communicate?
00:15:23.200 How does nature network?
00:15:25.040 But all of these things have to, just like anything, biomimicry is an innovation methodology,
00:15:32.500 a way to find new solutions, new solutions that have been on the planet for long, long
00:15:38.160 periods of time, new to us.
00:15:39.380 and it can be used for any ideology so the question of what's worth doing with biomimicry
00:15:50.820 is enormously important and we answer that question by asking what would nature do here
00:15:58.960 what wouldn't nature do here why and why not because life on earth has figured out
00:16:04.560 what works what's appropriate what lasts and also what's worth doing the deeper why lessons why are
00:16:13.380 we doing this can also come from the natural world that's what we're trying to bring to
00:16:18.300 innovators everywhere i think about how we can do things on scale with integrity and it's a
00:16:27.740 question that i think we need to ask ourselves just like how you're saying
00:16:32.420 what would the earth do? Why would the earth do? In what way? And it feels so necessary to be able
00:16:41.360 to bring those questions in when we are designing the systems that we want to live in. Now I'd like
00:16:49.480 to ask you about biomimicry and regional landscape and urban design. And I was just astounded to read
00:16:57.500 about the project you worked on in Lavasa near Mumbai, which receives 27 feet of water during
00:17:04.980 monsoon season. And from what I understand, the development, which was inspired by the native
00:17:10.800 forest capacity to withstand such intense rains without significant erosion, yielded a 30%
00:17:18.020 reduction in carbon emissions, 65% reduction in potable water consumption, and a 95% reduction
00:17:26.180 in waste sent to the landfill. So would you tell us more about or how this design came about
00:17:32.820 and then how does it emulate the native forest and does it incorporate the concept of a
00:17:38.640 circular economy which is guided by waste-free flows in the natural world?
00:17:44.340 This was a development and it was a master plan for development and we've been asked quite a bit
00:17:52.060 in the last 20 years to work on city planning, urban planning, all the way down to the building
00:17:58.200 scale, regional urban planning, all the way down to the building scale. And the question became,
00:18:02.700 what is a biomimetic community? What is it? And for us, if you want your community
00:18:10.340 to function like an ecosystem, the gold standard for that, the ideal for that,
00:18:16.420 would be to look for local ecosystems, the healthiest local ecosystems you can find,
00:18:23.740 the wildland next door. Go there and ask, what are the ecosystem services, that is the beneficial
00:18:32.100 services being produced by this healthy ecosystem? Because really that's the exhale of a healthy
00:18:38.120 ecosystem. It's the signature of a healthy ecosystem is what it gives away. So clean air,
00:18:44.380 How much air does it clean a year? How much per acre? How much water does it clean? How much water does it store in a storm? How much sediment does it retain and keep from eroding? That's what we do. We call these ecological performance standards. We say that a community should be functionally indistinguishable from the wildland next door.
00:19:05.980 and that's a really aspirational goal for any community i mean right now you know living
00:19:14.280 building challenge and other things are looking at net zero creating you know basically meeting
00:19:19.560 your own needs on site the next step is can we actually produce positive ecosystem services
00:19:25.540 right can the air leaving our community be cleaner than it was when it came in
00:19:30.240 is just incredible can we create corridors for wildlife right can we store the amount of water
00:19:37.420 that we need and then some to send on more water downstream this is what ecosystems do right so
00:19:44.460 we're challenging ourselves to meet those metrics we call them generous cities because we see
00:19:51.800 ecosystems as being generous you know what we did in lavasa one of the cool things we did know we
00:19:58.080 Our reference habitat, our healthy habitat, was the Western Ghats, which is an ecological hotspot that's been heavily studied, thank goodness for us.
00:20:06.260 The land that we were working with was a very hilly area.
00:20:11.740 And again, in these monsoons, just rivers of red earth would run into the lakes and paint the lakes red, literally.
00:20:20.180 They were bringing bulldozers down into the lake dump trucks and getting the sediment back and bringing it back up on the hillsides.
00:20:26.460 It was incredible.
00:20:27.160 But when we went to the Western Ghats, we saw that there was even in these monsoons, there was very little erosion. So that became 100% erosion control became the goal of this so that they changed the way they did the foundations, they changed the way they did the roadways, all kinds of things on the landscaping to make sure that there was, you know, there were awnings and the buildings and the ecostructure or the green spaces.
00:20:56.440 We ask those cumulatively to produce these ecosystem services, right?
00:21:01.120 So we were saying, okay, well, one of the ways that this rainfall is intercepted is in all the layers of the moist, deciduous forest.
00:21:10.140 So can we recreate that layering in our buildings with awnings, with kinds of landscaping that's going to cover the ground completely,
00:21:18.820 and also the kinds of vegetation that's going to intercept raindrops so they lose all of their damaging energy?
00:21:25.340 So that became really a design model for the development.
00:21:30.480 But the coolest thing was that we realized that the moist deciduous forest from the top, like if you were flying over it, you'd see this rolling canopy of dark, dark leaves and trees at different heights.
00:21:46.260 But they have this rolling appearance.
00:21:48.460 And what happens is that wind going over that during the monsoon, up to 30 percent of the water is turned into water vapor and is volleyed back up into the clouds.
00:22:01.640 And those clouds go to inland India and water inland India.
00:22:07.100 So they call it a monsoonal engine.
00:22:10.760 And what we're doing when we cut those trees, we lose that capability.
00:22:16.680 Now, on this site, this site had been degraded for about 400 years.
00:22:20.540 It hadn't had trees on it for 400 years.
00:22:23.580 It had been degraded by overgrazing of goats.
00:22:27.020 And so what we were doing was a restoration project in many ways.
00:22:30.960 But we said that the buildings themselves, they were sort of these townhouses close.
00:22:36.500 Think of like Italian Hill country sort of housing.
00:22:40.260 And we said, why don't we make the roof lines different heights and with green roofs?
00:22:45.680 So we recreate this hydro canopy, we called it, in our building, and we contribute to watering inland India.
00:22:57.380 That idea, we would never have asked ourselves if we hadn't compared the function to how the wildland next door was performing.
00:23:08.180 And this is what's really interesting to me about this exercise of comparing yourself to the wildland next door.
00:23:16.500 The designs are very different as a result because the questions are different.
00:23:21.820 For so long, we've asked, you know, will our buildings keep us well, right?
00:23:26.040 That's the new thing now, well.org, you know, well buildings.
00:23:30.020 When we're inside the building, is the air quality good for us?
00:23:33.640 Does it remind us of nature being inside the building?
00:23:36.160 And I'm thinking, let's also extend that wellness outside the walls of the buildings, right? Do our buildings create well conditions for all life? When you have a framework like the ecosystem services framework, which is essentially, you know, things like pollinator support, biodiversity support, how much soil is being built each year, how much nitrogen and phosphorus is being cycled each year.
00:24:02.100 you're asking yourself questions that normally we would never ask that of our buildings you know
00:24:09.500 how much nitrogen and phosphorus are you cycling right but in asking that question you might
00:24:14.360 actually wind up with composting toilets you might wind up with green roof that you know you're
00:24:20.900 looking at the soil and building soil there building soil on every surface that you possibly
00:24:25.760 can right if you're sequestering if you're asking to sequester carbon to have these buildings
00:24:30.880 to sequester carbon dioxide. You might use the coral reef inspired concrete from Blue Planet,
00:24:38.860 a company called Blue Planet in California, that's bubbling CO2 through brine to create
00:24:45.240 limestone and the raw materials for concrete and road aggregate. But it sequesters CO2.
00:24:52.300 You might use timbers in your interior to sequester CO2, sustainably grown timbers.
00:24:59.920 That's something we didn't ask ourselves before.
00:25:02.680 And I think if we're going to be a welcome species on the planet, you get to stay here when you learn to fit in.
00:25:09.940 And learning to fit in means being a contributor to all the cycles, actually a welcome contributor, positive benefits for all.
00:25:29.260 On that cold, hot of night
00:25:35.680 We adore the fading sky
00:25:40.860 Tried our wings and began to fly
00:25:46.120 Only shadows revealed our flight
00:25:51.260 Taking breaths beyond our lungs
00:25:57.080 Speaking words without our tongue
00:26:01.940 Let our feet guide us on our way
00:26:07.160 Into this brand new day
00:26:12.080 Well, to move from Mumbai to Northern California,
00:26:18.780 I'm a forest dweller dedicated to the biodiversity of the Coast Redwood Forest.
00:26:23.760 and I was just delighted to read about the concept of hydraulic redistribution in a recent
00:26:31.220 interview with you and I'm wondering if you could explain this concept of hydraulic
00:26:37.080 redistribution and bioirrigators it's super important it's a new word I haven't heard it
00:26:45.700 very much you know as as biomimics we're constantly looking at organisms and learning
00:26:53.340 about their superhero powers right what they can do hydraulic redistribution is it was first noticed
00:27:02.580 in the amazon actually because researchers at berkeley noticed that even though it hadn't
00:27:09.980 rained you know the rainforest does has dry seasons even though it hadn't rained for a while
00:27:14.320 there were still clouds forming above the trees the trees were still transpiring and where did
00:27:20.100 that come from right what was happening there and they found out that in the rainforest you know we
00:27:25.260 think about the shallow rooted trees but there are some deep rooted shrubs and these are called
00:27:30.800 bioirrigators and they're deep rooted and what happens is during the rainy season they do have
00:27:37.780 shallow roots as well and they take in the water from the shallow roots and they actually push that
00:27:42.740 water down the root counterintuitively down the root and then out into the soil where they bank
00:27:49.700 that water. Ten percent of all annual rainwater is banked in this way. And then during the dry
00:27:56.760 season, that water moves into the taproot. It goes up and it goes out the shallow roots of
00:28:05.380 these shrubs, thereby watering the forest around them. And the bioirrigators are throughout the
00:28:13.480 forest. And I can imagine a time, especially in a climate-stressed world, where we would begin to
00:28:20.360 plant bioirrigators in our landscape now that we know about them. I mean, this is what I mean by
00:28:26.680 generosity, is that these bioirrigators are not just keeping the water. They're pushing the water
00:28:34.380 out into the soil around them, the upper layers, and watering the trees around them, which is
00:28:42.460 really interesting. It goes against this idea that, you know, nature read in tooth and claws,
00:28:48.660 Tennyson said. It looks more like, as we learn about the wood wide web and things like bio
00:28:53.700 irrigators, it looks like the system, you know, creating conditions conducive to life in the
00:29:00.420 system has been rewarded by natural selection over long periods of time. Our new move in agriculture,
00:29:08.640 for instance for a long time we've been focused on the plant so focused that we're even genetically
00:29:15.660 engineering the plant and i think the next stage for us needs to be to learn to help the helpers
00:29:21.840 you know those myriad microbes that are in symbiotic relationship with plants and helping
00:29:29.320 them do everything from germinate on time to resist pathogens to get phosphorus and water and
00:29:37.120 exchange alarm signals among plants. I mean, these helpers, including the bioirrigators,
00:29:43.340 maybe our job is not to quote unquote manage any longer, but rather to be in this role of helping 0.98
00:29:50.760 the helpers. What do the microbes need? What do the bioirrigators need to do the job that they
00:29:57.820 have done over long periods of time, right? To keep the system healthy and humming. It's a
00:30:03.960 different role for us uh as western industrial humans you know but we can learn it gosh that
00:30:12.620 hits on this question that i've been sitting with so long in the one million redwoods
00:30:19.220 reforestation project really questioning what is our role in large-scale restoration
00:30:29.380 of damaged ecosystems, whether that's reforestation of redwoods or working in
00:30:35.980 the juniper forest of New Mexico. I mean, any ecosystem really that has been damaged, which
00:30:42.660 the majority of them have. And how do we not keep that human supremacist mindset on the ways that
00:30:53.700 we even try to help? And it's something that I've been really sitting with. And I love this
00:30:58.620 thought process of helping the helpers supporting those who do it best and that's not always the
00:31:06.580 human many times it's not it's akin to us now starting to take care of our microbiome in our
00:31:14.980 own gut right um and i'm really happy about that because it gives people an analogy that they can
00:31:20.000 understand um and they can you know a good metaphor to warm their hands around the biomimetic
00:31:27.880 process is you know if we want to learn for instance how to create a low energy desalination
00:31:36.040 we ask how does nature take salt out of water you know every fish in the ocean is living on
00:31:41.240 freshwater but living in salt water so the answers are there and in the same way when we're working
00:31:49.720 at a systems level this idea of going to a healthy ecosystem quieting our cleverness
00:31:55.840 listening literally saying what is it that makes this so healthy and learning about a healthy
00:32:05.100 system and all the design principles within a healthy system all the players the actors
00:32:11.320 making this work well and then creating conditions conducive to their lives in the systems that we
00:32:21.200 are human influenced settled and systems that we're working in agriculture and in forestry
00:32:27.300 it's the stage of going to the healthy system with our notebooks open and our ears and our
00:32:36.860 hearts open and learning that's that humility step is also it's the new scientific method for me
00:32:45.320 It is the method of going and learning from a healthy ecosystem, not just about it.
00:32:53.900 There's a big difference there.
00:32:55.620 And biomimicry, really, the definition of it is that you're learning from, not just about.
00:33:01.520 That means a whole different set of questions.
00:33:04.200 It means a different way of watching, different way of observing.
00:33:08.520 It actually means, we call it internally in our company, we call it muddy knees and epiphanies.
00:33:14.540 and that's what we try to to help our our clients we do a lot of workshops in natural
00:33:21.300 areas um and we bring people who design our world we bring architects and material scientists and
00:33:27.320 chemists and and um physicists out into the natural world Costa Rica and South Africa and
00:33:35.980 Montana places that they normally wouldn't go and we have them immersed for a week and muddy knees
00:33:43.520 and epiphanies is what happens right we take them and we we take them to like for instance in costa
00:33:49.400 rica we'll take our folks to all these designers people who have been building the same skyscraper
00:33:54.520 for 30 years right over and over again not the same one but it looks the same um and we bring
00:34:02.840 them outside and we bring them to eight different habitat types so we bring them through the mangrove
00:34:08.060 forest we bring them and we say what are the what are organisms here faced with what are their
00:34:14.080 challenges what are their opportunities what are their limitations how do they adapt and then we'll
00:34:19.840 take them to you know a breeding bird colony with the sun baking down on rocks and how are these
00:34:25.920 organisms handling this heat and this intense uv rays you know how did we'll snorkel with them
00:34:33.680 right underwater how are these organisms meeting meeting their needs right we go to eight different
00:34:39.300 places we wind up at a 12 000 foot peak in the paramo in costa rica where it's you know an alpine
00:34:46.420 fog cold fog forest and everything is getting down on your hands and knees and looking with
00:34:52.620 you know hand lenses and seeing that what these organisms face and what they do with the
00:35:02.240 riches that they do have, it really changes people. They do have epiphanies. And the number
00:35:11.040 one epiphany is that, you know, organisms are not all that different from this human homo sapien
00:35:17.360 organism, right? We're all trying to find something to eat, build our homes, power ourselves, put our
00:35:25.940 kids to bed at night. And therefore, that opens the way to this different kind of scientific
00:35:32.060 method, which is, can I learn from these organisms? I'm not that different. Our needs are not that
00:35:38.780 different. Our ways right now are very different. So can I learn from them? And when you see a
00:35:46.040 switch go on in people, that sort of humility switch, right, where their lens is forever
00:35:51.880 shifted, they now see the natural world as full of consummate organisms, consummate, consummate
00:35:58.140 engineers, you know, consummate architects in the natural world. That stance of respect
00:36:05.760 also changes the way they make things in ways that we can't even, that's the intangible.
00:36:12.880 It changes the way they design for sure, but it also changes,
00:36:17.800 you know, the heart with which they design because now nature has become mentor to them.
00:36:28.140 Put my feet in the soil
00:36:43.900 In fertile ground I grow
00:36:47.760 My roots grow strong
00:36:52.300 Cause I'm making this my own
00:36:56.220 Lie my fire in the earth of happiness
00:37:04.300 Blossoms of rich and woe will soon confess
00:37:12.300 Cause I live in a garden, a garden of dreams
00:37:20.700 Where the midnight sun shines down its blessings
00:37:28.000 Cause I live in a garden, a garden of trees
00:37:36.580 Where the midnight sun shines down its blessings
00:37:50.700 This question arises for me that our overstressed and oversimplified
00:38:18.220 agricultural systems, they speak to the toxic and competitive paradigm that has left
00:38:24.120 countless biological relationships compromised or just lost entirely. And it seems that
00:38:32.160 biomimetic agriculture is often less about innovation and more about humans learning
00:38:38.620 how to once again be mutualistic facilitators, like you've been speaking of. And for example,
00:38:45.640 restoring the fungal plant relationships in localized polycultures, which in turn,
00:38:51.220 it uses less water, it builds soil, enhances resilience. And so I'm curious, what is your
00:38:58.040 opinion on restoring historic biological partnerships in light of all that we don't
00:39:05.900 know that's been lost? Does it make sense to fixate on restoring historic partnerships that
00:39:11.500 now may be obsolete as the climate changes? Or is it more valuable to try and create conditions
00:39:19.900 where opportunity for mutualistic adaptation, you know, adaptation of interspecies relationships
00:39:26.480 is the greatest? I think it's the latter. I think we're at the point where, you know, just if you
00:39:36.140 think about how many species are on the move right now as a result of climate change you know they're
00:39:42.520 moving you know the meta studies have shown us that they're moving from south to north in order
00:39:48.660 to get cool you know because it's getting too hot they're moving their ranges in other words they're
00:39:52.980 moving from lower elevation to higher elevation the higher elevation organisms are having a really
00:39:58.900 hard time when you have that kind of movement going on not everybody's going to get there and
00:40:04.220 at the same time that's the fear right that that a flower moves and its pollinator doesn't yet
00:40:10.300 right so you're gonna have and it's bloodlessly called ecological decouplings
00:40:15.400 um and those are the things that really really really worry me when i work and i do for climate
00:40:24.480 change i'm on the board a drawdown and a project drawdown which is a project to reverse climate
00:40:30.200 change actually brings back to Holocene conditions. I do it as a biologist who knows that the world
00:40:38.020 that we're in right now did evolve to, to excel in these conditions, right? And organisms are
00:40:44.540 adaptable. Yes, they will move around, but not all of them will make it. So those historical
00:40:50.340 landscapes, they can teach us a lot about what that land would be, what would be growing there.
00:40:58.860 But I think we have to be a lot, lot more cognizant of the fact that the organisms that are inhabiting these places now may be somewhat different.
00:41:09.700 And they're trying to work out their mutualistic couplings.
00:41:13.760 You know, they're trying to imagine moving up into a new range and all of the adaptation that you have to do, right, to that climate changing condition, including the organisms that are in that habitat with you.
00:41:26.500 So creating healthy conditions for them is really, I think, what we can do.
00:41:33.680 I think that there's a move towards looking at functional traits of plant life, for instance, rather than fixating on species types.
00:41:45.580 So when we're working with our urban planners, for instance, we're looking at what are the landscape attributes?
00:41:54.240 we have an ipad enabled app that allows us to go into the reference habitat look at landscape
00:42:00.100 attributes that are causing things like cooling temperatures in the summer it's a certain amount
00:42:05.440 of shade cover certain amount leafy feria index and then when we go back to the built world site
00:42:10.860 we say look try to create this amount of leaf area index right and and you can do that with
00:42:18.200 perhaps different species right but the functional traits and of course using natives as much as you
00:42:25.240 possibly can because they are food and nesting and shelter sites for organisms that is super super
00:42:31.500 important but the functional traits now a lot of restoration ecologists are looking at these
00:42:36.060 do you have these functional traits even if you're unfortunately the kind of tree that used to be
00:42:43.580 able to survive there doesn't survive there can't survive there anymore you know in the southwest
00:42:48.240 they're saying we've got 40 years before the pignon pines are gone so what is the function
00:42:52.880 of the pignon pine and we have to get really smart about that it is a changing it's a changing world
00:43:00.140 it is so then the function that is most selected for is going to be adaptability and so how do we
00:43:11.760 can create conditions in which organisms can exercise their adaptive qualities. So in other
00:43:19.280 words, that means don't overstress them by overgrazing or give them something that they need.
00:43:26.460 I mean, in some cases where I'm living in the Bitterroot Valley, that's where holistic ranching
00:43:31.760 comes in, where you've got actually mob grazing that mimics the buffalo and other ungulates that
00:43:38.000 used to move in herds across the landscape. Can we mimic that? Because there's things happening
00:43:43.280 that actually help open up that soil, create divots for water, fertilize that soil with
00:43:50.440 urine and defecation. And can we sort of recreate some of those conditions that led to healthy,
00:43:59.080 diverse ecosystems? And in that case, looking back at historical regimes like fire regimes,
00:44:05.700 buffalo and mob mob grazing regimes i think those are pretty important but the focus on
00:44:13.060 individual species may have to change with climate change yes i've been feeling that
00:44:20.040 as well thinking about trying to restore ecosystems to historical species arrangements
00:44:28.640 say 200 years ago but we're not living in the world 200 years ago and how do we
00:44:35.000 take what we understand now and apply it to what could perhaps survive and be resilient
00:44:41.960 into the future grazing the rotational grazing led me to this other thought i wanted to ask you
00:44:48.680 about bio sequestration and in this age of unnaturally plentiful atmospheric carbon
00:44:56.340 we're faced with just the overwhelming question of how to best draw it back down into the earth
00:45:03.080 in the soil and designs such as perennial polycultures and rotational grazing, they're
00:45:09.960 rising in recognition and practice. And I've also been hearing about methods that pull methane from
00:45:16.720 the atmosphere to create biodegradable plastic or concrete that's assembled from CO2 and seawater.
00:45:24.600 And I understand that carbon is a primary building block for life and that these techniques are
00:45:29.820 earth inspired, but I'm admittedly hesitant about more concrete and more plastic. And I want to ask
00:45:38.020 what happens when biomimetic plastic or concrete is left to degrade?
00:45:44.420 Well, the concrete, it's basically a limestone, you know, it crumbles. I mean, essentially,
00:45:52.520 when you take co2 and you sequester it into limestone or concrete you know you're doing
00:46:00.300 geo sequestration in that case and i think it's incumbent on us to make sure that that
00:46:09.120 that we continue to use that so in other words when it's no longer able to be used say in a
00:46:17.500 building and there's a pile of rubble and construction waste can we take that limestone
00:46:22.040 and then use it i was just talking to interface carpets who's a client of ours and and they're
00:46:27.620 looking at using that as a filler for some of their carpets rather than mining limestone
00:46:34.280 they want to look at co2 sequestering limestone and then and then using even at the end quote
00:46:42.120 unquote end of that life how can they use it as a filler if they're not using it in their buildings
00:46:47.200 And this idea of a circular economy, which you mentioned, is key. Because in any of these things, when you talk about making things, if you make them without any thought to how they are going to be remade, or remanufactured, or what they're going to turn into at the end of their current life, you're really not designing in a biomimetic way.
00:47:09.940 Because, you know, in an ecosystem, for instance, say you've got a log that has fallen. We have a mistaken idea that life basically takes that log and breaks it down into its component parts. And those are then in the soil for other things. And it's not quite that stark as how that happens.
00:47:31.760 What actually happens is that that log is then eaten by fungi.
00:47:37.140 So the materials in the log get upcycled into the fungi, and then the fungi might create
00:47:42.720 a mushroom and be nibbled on by a mouse, and that material gets upcycled into the mouse
00:47:48.120 body, and that gets eaten by a hawk, and it's upcycled into the hawk body, along with some
00:47:54.060 defecation and some heat loss, right?
00:47:56.680 But those materials are used again and again and again and again.
00:48:02.720 They're broken apart inside the mouse body, right, and recreating the mouse cells.
00:48:09.140 So if we were to really mimic in our circular economy, you wouldn't be creating lots and
00:48:16.900 lots and lots and lots more biodegradable plastic, right?
00:48:20.080 You would be taking that and at the end of its life, you would be turning it into something
00:48:26.120 else.
00:48:26.680 You know, if it's biodegradable plastic, hopefully you'd be turning it into organic carbon with the help of soil microbes, right?
00:48:35.200 You'd be composting that.
00:48:37.040 If it's in the technical loop, as a circular economy, folks talk about it.
00:48:41.700 If it's metal, say, you would be putting it into another product.
00:48:44.680 So the idea is not to make more products, but the idea is to get the products into cycles in which those materials of one product are put into another product quickly.
00:48:59.260 Life has those, life has very, very quick fluxes, they're called, where you go from all of a sudden you're, you know, you're sitting in a cellulose and then you're turned into fungi.
00:49:09.460 That's a very close flux.
00:49:11.020 it isn't like the cellulose is taken apart and it's transported somewhere to a landfill
00:49:16.900 right where then it'll be picked up it happens right it happens right there it happens locally
00:49:21.820 so i'm really excited about things like 3d printing because i'm hoping that we'll be using
00:49:32.080 local raw materials and we'll be able to take those local raw materials and print them into
00:49:39.640 a new product. You know, when you go into your neighborhood kitchen store, you'll bring in a
00:49:44.820 spatula that's broken, they'll put it into the 3D printer, an enzymatic bath will take that,
00:49:50.360 and then instantly it'll be brought back to life as a spoon or as another spatula.
00:49:56.680 With little leakage of material, you don't see a lot of leakage out of a healthy forest.
00:50:02.300 You know, it's using the material and reusing it over and over. That again is biomimicry at the
00:50:08.280 at the systems level it's not about creating more and more stuff we for 20 years now we've been
00:50:16.700 trying to answer you know what would nature do here and asking you know how does nature
00:50:20.900 working for people like patagonia and saying you know how does nature repel water it doesn't use
00:50:26.120 teflon you know and then we go and we learn in as many different ways as we can amoeba through zebra
00:50:31.600 we call it. How do bacteria repel water? How do fungi? How do plants? And then we bring those to
00:50:39.860 the inventors. But those incredible design principles are our scientific heritage. They
00:50:45.940 are our commons. We feel really strongly about that. So it worried me to think that people might
00:50:53.000 be learning how a gecko walks on walls. And then they might want to patent how a gecko walks on
00:51:00.660 walls and then be the only one who can make a tape or whatever, a non-toxic adhesive. That would be
00:51:07.700 an example of patenting the scientific knowledge. And I was worried about that because, you know,
00:51:16.120 we can bring a bacterium to the patent office and if we've changed one gene, we can patent it and
00:51:21.800 own it. How do you keep this from happening with nature's ideas, with nature's designs? So what we
00:51:29.900 were told early on when we asked a lot of lawyers this is that you know the way a gecko walks is
00:51:37.120 written up in the scientific papers but it's not published in in a design context there because it
00:51:44.120 may just be a paper about geckos and how they attract mates and on the side it might be talking
00:51:49.060 about how they walk right how they stick to walls so they said what you want to do is you want to
00:51:56.300 publish that scientific information in a design context and then it becomes prior art what's
00:52:03.160 called prior art which keeps people from patenting the method of how a gecko walks they can patent
00:52:10.580 a tape that they make but they can't patent the gecko itself or the way it walks and so that's
00:52:17.840 when we started asknature.org which is a website that tries to we're trying to organize biological
00:52:25.040 information by design and engineering and management function by functions so how does
00:52:32.140 nature cooperate and up comes biological strategies or how does nature adhere to surfaces up comes
00:52:37.760 the gecko the fact that we have it published in a design context uh protects it so we are trying
00:52:46.240 so i would encourage everybody it's a wiki kind of a form and you can also upload strategies of
00:52:53.700 organisms that you love and just by putting them in a design context that is what might we learn
00:52:59.840 from this the minute you answer that question it becomes protected that's important to us
00:53:05.260 so important thank you for sharing that i feel like a lot of people in the audience
00:53:10.580 need to know that i think a lot of people in general need to know that information
00:53:16.240 and it's really something that we believe in it for the wild is open source information especially
00:53:23.360 when it's for the betterment of the entire earth. So thank you for making sure that we
00:53:29.600 heard that. And to go back to carbon sequestration, I would just really love to hear your thoughts on
00:53:38.380 why industrial reforestation is not the most effective way to sequester carbon. And how can
00:53:45.660 reforestation efforts be more biomimetic unfortunately you know this idea of plantation
00:53:52.920 growth trees and plantations right this is part of the human our tendency is to focus on one parameter
00:54:01.900 like growth or growth rate as you know as a proxy for sequestering more carbon well we now know it's
00:54:14.080 It's more complicated than that. Right. And that if you want if you want healthy soils, which is what where actually the lion's share of the carbon will be stored, you need deep rooted species.
00:54:30.840 You need a variety of root lengths and depths.
00:54:36.340 You need a diverse amount of species that are, in turn, feeding their sugars and starches to a diverse microbial ecology.
00:54:46.420 It's that diversity that allows us, that will allow us to store carbon, even in years that are dry or unusually wet.
00:54:56.460 There's two kinds of diversity in natural ecosystems.
00:55:00.060 And one is response diversity, which is there's enough diversity of different kinds of species that with different kinds of capabilities, some of them are really good in dry conditions.
00:55:13.540 Some of them are really good in wet conditions.
00:55:15.820 That response diversity is what we need.
00:55:19.340 So having one species of plantation tree is not the way to do that.
00:55:23.780 The other kind of diversity is called functional diversity.
00:55:26.800 and that's looking out at my pasture right now of native grasses that if we just had native grasses
00:55:33.800 it wouldn't have functional diversity we also have to have legumes we have to have nitrogen
00:55:39.040 fixers more than one kind of nitrogen fixer you know you've got lupines as well right you've got
00:55:45.040 then you've got response diversity so you never only have one nitrogen fixer so when we again
00:55:53.320 when we start to think functionally of how these, you know, mapping the relationships and looking,
00:55:59.100 asking each of these organisms, what are you doing? What are you doing? What are you doing?
00:56:02.980 You start to realize really the map of what it takes to have a healthy ecosystem, come what may.
00:56:11.160 And we've learned enough from industrial agriculture, one species for miles, pesticides
00:56:17.060 killing everything in the soil we've learned how brittle that is and so to apply that to forestry
00:56:24.020 is a is a repeating sins of our fathers and mothers right um so i'm glad we had this
00:56:30.720 conversation me too i know we'll see each other yeah at some point yeah i can't wait to meet you
00:56:36.620 in person well enjoy the spring the springing spring and um yeah i will right now yeah all
00:56:46.160 enjoy your day thank you bye thank you
00:56:49.640 it's high on a mountain the warm winds are blowing and where the winds are blowing to
00:57:01.620 there ain't no way of knowing the mountain grass is short it's dry and close to burning
00:57:10.640 Crying out for water
00:57:14.080 Thank you for listening to For the Wild podcast.
00:57:19.660 I'm Ayanna Young.
00:57:21.640 The music you heard today were submissions from our community
00:57:24.940 with Veed Geiger with Conflated
00:57:27.640 and Samuela Akert with Garden of Dreams.
00:57:31.500 Our theme music is Silence Returns by Bo
00:57:33.820 and Like a River from Kate Wolf.
00:57:36.640 I'd like to thank our amazing team,
00:57:38.860 our producers, March Young and Andrew Storrs,
00:57:43.080 our research director, Madison Magulski,
00:57:45.780 and media director, Molly Lebo.
00:57:48.380 If you haven't already, rate us on iTunes
00:57:51.300 so that we can keep spreading these messages
00:57:53.520 further and further.
00:57:55.220 Thanks so much, and until next time.
00:58:08.860 Through the mountains like a river
00:58:30.860 Now the dust lies thick and heavy
00:58:32.860 Where my feet are falling
00:58:34.860 There's nothing but the sound
00:58:36.860 The jaybirds call, my mind grows dry and thirsty, as the memories linger, drifting on the wind, through the mountains like a river, sweet smell of pine, tall western cedar, drifting on the wind, through the mountains like a river.
00:59:06.860 You