For The Wild - January 12, 2022


VIJAY PRASHAD on Capitalism’s Erosion of Morality [ENCORE] ⧸268

Topics
TRICIA HERSEY on Rest as Resistance [ENCORE] ⧸267 DONNA HARAWAY on Staying with the Trouble [ENCORE] ⧸269

Episode Stats


Length

57 minutes

Words per minute

155.68

Word count

9,023

Sentence count

460

Harmful content

Misogyny

2

sentences flagged

Toxicity

4

sentences flagged

Hate speech

10

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.360 Welcome to For the Wild podcast. I'm Ayanna Young. This week we are rebroadcasting our interview with Vijay Prasad, originally aired in February of 2021. We hope you enjoy this special encore episode.
00:00:14.960 this is a canary in the coal mine not of social systems that are not working and so on it's a
00:00:24.680 canary in the coal mine about feeling about the compassion sense of compassion in a country
00:00:30.340 Vijay Prashad is the director of Tricontinental Institute for Social Research chief editor at
00:00:38.260 Left Word Books and chief correspondent for Globetrotter his most recent book is Washington
00:00:44.040 Bullets, just out from Monthly Review Press, with a preface by Ivo Morales Aime.
00:00:52.360 Well, Vijay, thank you so much for coming on to For the Wild.
00:00:56.800 Great. It's great to be with you. And I just love the name of this podcast,
00:01:01.280 For the Wild. It's very resonant of, you know, so much about the way we live in the world where,
00:01:07.980 you know well the wild where is it now? Absolutely yeah I think about that a lot as I'm
00:01:16.260 in the world and what I stand for and thank you for picking up on that. So Vijay as a journalist
00:01:26.180 and commentator I'd like to start our conversation in recognition of how the corporate media is
00:01:32.460 manipulating us today. Certainly the US media has always ideologically censored that which critiques
00:01:39.320 the state. But what I'm really noticing now is the ways in which right-winged media and left-wing
00:01:46.180 media are both pushing the narrative that the country is in peril because of the other side.
00:01:51.880 And it seems to me that we're being fed a great contradiction where if neither end of the spectrum
00:01:58.140 is happy and both are blaming one another, we're left to wonder what is actually happening.
00:02:04.780 Specifically, I'm thinking about how many of us have become captivated by the sensationalized
00:02:10.740 nature of hate and violence and whether or not you think we're becoming deeply addicted to this
00:02:16.440 type of media. If so, how does this prevent us from having nuanced conversations and reaching
00:02:23.780 out to one another? And how does this continue to serve the ruling class?
00:02:30.260 It's a great way to begin. For this, I think you have to plumb more than just the media. You have
00:02:37.080 to go deeper into the kind of cultural stasis that exists, not only in the United States,
00:02:44.880 but in a number of advanced capitalist countries, you know, in Western Europe, maybe even in
00:02:50.660 countries like Brazil and India. You have to go deeper into a kind of cultural malaise which has
00:02:57.000 set in. The way I see it is about maybe 40, 50 years ago as a consequence of changes in the way
00:03:06.040 goods are produced rather than have big factories inside one country, inside a territory. The new
00:03:13.020 technological developments allowed firms to be broken up and you create what's known as the
00:03:19.260 global commodity chain, you create disarticulated production, a car factory isn't one big factory,
00:03:25.900 you make, you know, 50, 60, 100 components of the car in 100 factories, you know, which are based in
00:03:32.660 20 countries, and the goods are moved back and forth, and then they're assembled in one place.
00:03:37.840 What this did was, it enabled the people who would have invested money in a factory in, say,
00:03:45.140 Detroit, it enabled them to actually not invest much in the world. See, when you have a big
00:03:50.880 factory, you have to invest a lot of money into that factory, you know, let's say millions of
00:03:55.220 dollars. If you've broken it up into 20 different factories, the investment in each factory is
00:04:00.780 lessened. Because these factories or these manufacturing plants are in Mexico or in,
00:04:06.660 you know, Malaysia or in Indonesia, wherever they are, they're often subcontracted. So somebody in
00:04:12.740 Malaysia has to raise the funds, much less than starting a big car factory. They have to raise 0.83
00:04:19.260 the funds, they invest the money. And so the auto manufacturer doesn't actually have to invest a lot
00:04:24.500 of money overseas. You see this actually quite dramatically with Apple. Apple doesn't make
00:04:30.140 iPhones. iPhones are made by Foxconn, which is a Taiwanese company based in Shenzhen, China.
00:04:36.380 Apple doesn't make anything. They just design brands, they develop some technology and so on,
00:04:42.220 and they patent it. But they don't invest in China. That's a Taiwanese company that does
00:04:47.860 that investment. So these firms were able to first not invest a lot of money around the world
00:04:53.860 to do manufacturing. At the same time, they collected huge amounts of rent on the goods
00:05:00.100 that they sold. This money wasn't going towards taxation, because the big companies were basically
00:05:07.300 buying out the political system, and they bought out the media, and they sold this story that low
00:05:15.120 taxation is good for the whole country, for everybody. Well, they didn't pay tax. They
00:05:20.640 corrupted the political system in general, also the media. I mean, look who owns the media now.
00:05:25.700 Oh, well, Washington Post. Who's the owner of the Washington Post, I wonder? And so on.
00:05:30.380 It's no longer a family that owns it, that's committed to the media. It's big business that
00:05:35.520 owns these things. If you look at American broadcast networks, they're owned by arms
00:05:39.940 dealers, whether it's NBC or whoever, they're all owned by companies that manufacture weapons.
00:05:47.820 So you have this situation where they stop paying taxes, essentially, what we at our
00:05:53.420 institute call a long-term tax strike. They go on strike, they just don't pay taxes.
00:05:58.760 they use the enormous wealth they have to go into tax havens or they you know buy media outlets and
00:06:07.540 so on and start to produce a version of reality they influence the culture and at the same time
00:06:13.140 municipalities and so on are staff for funds and they start privatizing and really you know eroding
00:06:19.980 the basis of social life I mean it's a perfect storm of to some extent worsened job prospects
00:06:27.520 for people, because a lot of manufacturing goes global, precarious conditions in the service
00:06:33.040 economy for a lot of people, a media that's basically pretending that it tells you a universal
00:06:39.740 or truthful story, when in fact, it often just represents the viewpoints of the very rich.
00:06:45.780 You have a government that basically succumbs to the very rich. In the presidential election between
00:06:51.840 Joe Biden and Donald Trump, $14 billion was spent on that election. It's an incredible amount of
00:06:58.260 money, you know, in an election. I mean, it's in a democratic process. It's insane. The culture
00:07:05.680 gets corroded over these 40 years. You know, we have more and more people feeling precarious about
00:07:11.320 their prospects. They're listening to quite toxic things in the media. And nobody, I mean, you know,
00:07:18.800 Ayana, I mean this. Nobody, none of the major political forces seems to have a project for the people that resonates in a way that is genuine and sincere.
00:07:31.360 Instead, what you get is political projects that just appear insincere at best and hateful at worst.
00:07:40.500 In other words, insincere, where politicians come and tell you just retrain for the next generation jobs.
00:07:46.840 You're a 50-year-old person who's just lost a job. It's not easy to retrain. That's an insincere thing to say to somebody. And on the other side, you get this horrible, toxic stuff about, well, you've lost your job, blame it on an immigrant, and most likely on a body that's colored slightly different than yours.
00:08:04.980 The range of political projects we have in most of the advanced countries now are therefore between insincerity and hate. And my God, that should make everybody a little sick.
00:08:17.340 yeah absolutely um in one of tri-continental's newsletters from this year you write quote
00:08:26.980 the idea of social bonds or even of society is so compelling in our time it is getting harder
00:08:34.280 and harder to experience society in a civil manner political discourse seems to have emerged
00:08:39.820 from the sewers and a general compassion for suffering seems to have evaporated as the
00:08:44.720 neo-fascist propagate the hard steel of toxic machismo. This is not merely a problem of the
00:08:51.620 political class. It is a problem that should be associated with the erosion of state and social
00:08:57.400 institutions that would otherwise make individual lives richer, end quote. And yeah, this idea
00:09:05.700 dovetails with what we've been talking about, but also offers a reality check for many that
00:09:11.460 the disappearance of dignified discourse cannot solely be blamed on individual failures,
00:09:17.440 but is a byproduct of the gradual and calculated divestments from our social and state institutions.
00:09:24.580 So before we go on to discuss the shortcomings of the left and the West,
00:09:28.900 I wonder if you can begin by talking about how this moment in the United States culturally
00:09:34.600 is deeply connected to the privatization of life, the starving of economies of care,
00:09:40.360 and the bolstering of war industries.
00:09:43.880 There's so much to say here again, Ayana,
00:09:46.200 and this is something I feel desperately moved by
00:09:49.640 because, you know, as a consequence of the lockdown
00:09:53.120 and this pandemic,
00:09:55.340 we estimate that hunger rates have gone up dramatically.
00:09:59.180 And I don't know, maybe half the world's population
00:10:01.980 struggles with hunger.
00:10:03.920 And there's something just obscene about our world
00:10:07.640 that we can do so many incredible things
00:10:10.560 You and I are talking to each other through a computer.
00:10:13.620 It's incredible, Ayana.
00:10:14.760 You are in Portland, Oregon.
00:10:16.400 We're just chatting as if you're sitting in the same room as me.
00:10:19.160 Your voice is very clear.
00:10:21.140 We can do all these amazing things.
00:10:23.000 We could put our cameras on if we'd like and see each other.
00:10:26.480 It's incredible.
00:10:27.500 And yet, just five minutes from where I am, somebody will be hungry. 1.00
00:10:32.040 A young person can't study properly.
00:10:34.400 Their brains are not developing because their nutritional rates are down. 1.00
00:10:38.560 Stay with the United States.
00:10:40.220 roughly 567,000 people struggle with homelessness.
00:10:44.600 You know, half a million people struggle with homelessness
00:10:46.700 in this extraordinarily rich country.
00:10:50.080 This is a canary in the coal mine,
00:10:52.240 not of social systems that are not working and so on.
00:10:56.780 It's a canary in the coal mine about feeling,
00:10:59.820 about the compassion, sense of compassion in a country.
00:11:02.880 I mean, how does a country claim to be a civilization?
00:11:07.620 You know, if you just have no way, no project to address the fact that half a million people struggle with homelessness and that increasing numbers of people struggle with hunger.
00:11:22.280 I mean, how do you go on with your own life?
00:11:24.740 You know, there's something wrong with that when a country doesn't have that as its first priority.
00:11:30.540 You know, the principal priority in an election campaign should be, we're going to just not have people be homeless. It should be, we're just not going to have people be hungry. We need nutritious food for people. And it's not a question of creating giant, ugly, you know, nature-destroying factory farms.
00:11:50.940 Let's be creative in thinking of ways to, you know, grow nutritious food near where people live, decentralize, you know, food regimes and so on.
00:12:01.640 Let's have that conversation and let's be serious about it.
00:12:04.880 Let's not say this is some marginal thing for hippies and, you know, people on the side. 0.98
00:12:09.680 It's a ridiculous attitude. 0.90
00:12:11.000 This should be at the center. 0.72
00:12:12.500 Why isn't a mainstream political party putting at its heart the question of homelessness and hunger and so on?
00:12:20.260 And they don't. And for me, what that says is that's the canary. That's an indictment of a culture. It's nothing to do with this party or that party.
00:12:30.240 You know, the squad, you know, Alexander Ocasio-Cortez, Ayanna Pressley, Ilhan Omar, and Rashida Tlaib have put together these seven bills, and others with them have put together seven bills to directly address the question of, you know, homelessness or houselessness, as you see fit to say.
00:12:49.980 they're very pragmatic and good steps that they're asking for there's nothing utopian about it you
00:12:55.960 know but it's a direct challenge to the banks to people with money to property owners and so on
00:13:01.440 and it's the same with hunger I mean we know that there's enough food produced in the world and you
00:13:06.860 know I have my critiques of how food is produced but let's leave that for a moment there's enough
00:13:11.920 food produced in the world and I often you know think I often think about this that you know
00:13:17.400 there's a place, there's a warehouse of food, and then there's hungry people. What prevents the
00:13:23.200 hungry people from getting the food from the warehouse? Well, what prevents the hungry people
00:13:28.020 from eating that food is they don't have money. And if you don't have money, then you are condemned
00:13:32.760 to starvation. There's something just vulgar about the fact that we have people without homes,
00:13:38.360 people without food, people without health, people without access to education. And what prevents
00:13:43.940 them from getting these things which we have is the lack of money now this is what the capitalist
00:13:50.280 system has done it has eroded the sense of morality in in a culture where people in a in a society
00:13:58.560 just get inured they come to terms with this they see homeless people on the street they just turn
00:14:03.900 their face and walk by they see hungry people they just don't know what to do they feel they feel
00:14:09.060 assaulted by the presence of the hungry person there on the street. It's as if the hungry person
00:14:14.160 is hurting them by just being there, you know, instead of taking that hurt that you feel when
00:14:20.360 you see somebody hungry and saying, I need to construct a political project. I need to be
00:14:25.200 involved in something to just end this, you know, to not allow this. And again, this in your sense
00:14:33.000 of break where people just don't feel like the hungry, the homeless, the people without medical
00:14:39.500 care, the sense that they are not part of me, they are alien to me, you know, we are alienated
00:14:45.740 from them. That predates the pandemic. I mean, that's been a long time in motion. And, you know,
00:14:52.400 I think that there is really something quite significant about trying to create a political
00:14:58.180 project that in a way breaks the alienation of human beings from each other and breaks the
00:15:05.120 alienation of human beings from nature. You know, it's the same sort of detachment. I am detached
00:15:12.520 from other people, especially those who are struggling. I don't want to deal with them. I
00:15:17.720 don't want to see them. We'll move them away. We'll evict them and remove them. And I'm also
00:15:22.820 detach from nature. I don't want to deal with the vagaries of nature, the sense of nature. I just
00:15:28.560 want to give you an example. In Cuba, every year, as you know, there are hurricanes, and the hurricane
00:15:34.620 tears through the island as it tears through other islands. It's a decentralized society.
00:15:40.560 So in every village or town, there is a committee to defend the revolution, and in their committee,
00:15:47.420 there's often electricians. When the storm is coming, they leave their homes, they go and they
00:15:52.180 take down the power lines. They just dismantle it. They remove it because they know that the
00:15:56.660 lines will otherwise snap. So they preemptively put people without power. Then the storm blows
00:16:02.840 right through. Then they go and put the power line back up. In other words, they're planning
00:16:06.640 for a certain eventuality and then they remedy it. In these countries, like let's say the United
00:16:13.620 States, example, Puerto Rico, nothing is done. And then the storm comes in, knocks down the power
00:16:19.600 line and a population is completely disorganized you know they're not uh able to do these things
00:16:25.520 these skills haven't been produced so then now you have to wait for the electricians to come
00:16:30.840 from the mainland or somewhere else to put up the power again and then you go weeks and weeks
00:16:35.520 without power i mean this is it's an example of two different models you've got the cuban model
00:16:40.940 where they put people before profits you know where they where people are organized they're
00:16:45.800 trained. They work in community to deal with adversity, to deal with challenges. You have the
00:16:51.300 other side where people basically are alienated from each other. They don't know, they don't have
00:16:55.700 these skills. You have to pay money to get these skills and so on. And then you get these disasters
00:17:00.920 and really COVID has shown us that, you know, 29,000 Cuban medical students went door to door
00:17:07.600 and tested all 11 million Cubans to see if they had COVID-19. In the United States, most people,
00:17:13.940 and I would hazard almost like to say everybody.
00:17:16.700 Nobody has seen anybody from the government come to their door,
00:17:20.720 knock on the door and say, can I test you?
00:17:22.780 It just is not happening.
00:17:24.300 And yet it happened in a poor country like Cuba. 0.68
00:17:26.920 It's a different attitude to human beings.
00:17:30.100 That model says people come before profit.
00:17:33.480 In this very rich society of the United States,
00:17:36.340 there's no doubt that profit always comes before people
00:17:39.860 and profit always comes before nature.
00:17:43.940 Come, come, come, come into, come into, come into, into the darkness, darkness, darkness.
00:18:03.040 Come, come, come, come into, come into, come into, come into, into the darkness, darkness, darkness.
00:18:17.640 Come, come, come, come and fight
00:18:22.600 Come and fight, come and fight
00:18:26.100 Would you have lost, lost a long, long time
00:18:32.620 Now, now, now, now it's time
00:18:37.240 Now it's time, now it's time
00:18:40.720 You've long vocalized that so-called leftists in the United States have continuously failed
00:18:51.360 to capture the power of community organizing and instead settling for liberal identities.
00:18:58.940 And there's just so much to ask, but I think listeners would like to know as a precursor
00:19:04.600 why you think it is that we have remained so limited in our ability to pursue social
00:19:10.620 and economic transformation. Why do we need to rectify, or what do we need to rectify in order
00:19:17.180 to ensure that future generations, and the current one, do not remain stymied in their
00:19:22.600 efforts to build a movement to address labor exploitation, global austerity measures, and
00:19:27.860 climate chaos? You know, I mean, Ayanna, let's take two incidents, recent incidents. One is
00:19:34.860 the killing of George Floyd and before him, Eric Garner. Why was Eric Garner killed? Eric Garner
00:19:41.500 was killed because the police officers saw a black man in the streets of New York selling
00:19:46.660 loose cigarettes. That's what they alleged, that he was selling loose cigarettes. Now, I'll come
00:19:52.120 back to that in a minute. Why was George Floyd killed? Allegedly, because this black man passed
00:19:58.240 a counterfeit $20 bill. They alleged that he passed a counterfeit $20 bill. In both cases,
00:20:04.860 These were men.
00:20:06.580 If indeed it is true that Eric Garner was selling loose cigarettes
00:20:10.200 and George Floyd was trying to pass a $20 bill,
00:20:13.820 if this is indeed true,
00:20:15.000 we have an example of two black men
00:20:17.700 who are attempting in a very, very challenging economy,
00:20:22.660 challenging economic situation to get by,
00:20:26.700 I mean, to take care of their families.
00:20:28.720 These are economic crimes in a way.
00:20:32.380 If indeed they are true,
00:20:34.240 One, selling loose cigarettes.
00:20:36.120 It's a crime against the excise department.
00:20:38.480 And then passing a counterfeit bill.
00:20:40.180 These are crimes, but they're not crimes.
00:20:44.700 Many years ago, Marx wrote something really important.
00:20:47.680 He said that peasants used to go into the forests in Germany,
00:20:53.540 and they would collect fallen wood for firewood.
00:20:56.820 When a branch fell on the ground, they would go into a forest,
00:21:00.440 collect the branch, bring it, it was firewood.
00:21:02.360 And when the government in these parts of Germany, it was not yet Germany, but in these parts of what would become Germany, Silesia, etc., governments passed a law saying this is private property, you can't come and collect firewood.
00:21:16.680 And so the police would ride into these forests and they would beat peasants who were coming to collect firewood, as was their customary practice, and in some cases even killed people.
00:21:28.820 And Marx wrote with great feeling.
00:21:31.040 He said the peasants understand the punishment.
00:21:34.960 The punishment they are facing is they are getting arrested,
00:21:37.960 they are getting beaten, and in some extreme cases, they are killed.
00:21:41.300 They understand the punishment.
00:21:43.000 What they don't understand is the crime.
00:21:45.220 What's the crime in coming and collecting firewood?
00:21:48.500 They are collecting firewood in a customary way for warmth.
00:21:52.200 What's the crime?
00:21:52.980 They don't understand the crime.
00:21:54.120 They don't understand that there is a crime here.
00:21:55.960 Well, it's a crime against private property. In the same way, in a society where there are large numbers of people who are without a home, who are struggling because of lack of proper income to feed their families, where there's no government support for this or minimal, anemic government support, people are trying to get by.
00:22:15.020 and this is not seen as a crime because you're trying to feed your family you know you're doing
00:22:20.180 just trying to get by I mean imagine that and then you get killed the punishment is easy to
00:22:27.280 understand the crime is not clear why is that a crime I'm trying to get by meanwhile big corporate
00:22:34.000 banker or somebody steals hundreds of millions of dollars and they don't get killed in fact they
00:22:39.720 sometimes don't even get punished but we're getting killed for this we can see the crime
00:22:44.280 the punishment we don't see the crime so what's happened because of this lack of an understanding
00:22:49.900 of class in the united states is the punishment is what is seen there in other words when we say
00:22:56.400 black lives matter we say black lives matter meaning black lives matter that means that
00:23:02.320 police killing must stop that police killing must stop in other words the punishment must stop
00:23:08.400 Well, what about the so-called crime? When you say Black Lives Matter, you surely don't just mean that the killing must stop. Surely you mean that the precious lives of human beings must have access to food, must have access to housing, must have access to education, healthcare, broad range of services, and so on.
00:23:31.840 Surely it means that whole preciousness of life, not just that, oh, you should be allowed to live. What's the point of living if I can't live with dignity, you know, is the issue. So in that sense, you know, there is no project that's articulated, particularly in the Democratic Party, which addresses the broader question of life.
00:23:57.060 You know, again, it's not enough to say
00:23:58.860 we have to go and check the police and so on,
00:24:01.520 because it's not just about the police.
00:24:03.280 It's about the whole system is wretched.
00:24:05.840 People don't have the ability to feed themselves.
00:24:08.600 They don't have the ability to take care of their children.
00:24:11.900 They don't have the ability, you know,
00:24:13.660 to have their health monitored on a regular basis.
00:24:16.340 Public services have faced total attrition.
00:24:19.100 That kind of broad, bold project needs to be articulated.
00:24:23.080 You know, you need something like that.
00:24:25.020 And it's out of a bold project like that, that you have to risk creating a majority, you know, a majority, as we say, is not found, it has to be made, you can't find a majority of people to back you, you have to make a majority, you have to make a majority around a program that unifies people and people will be unified by programs such as everybody agrees that feeding people is paramount.
00:24:52.440 People must have a full dignity of their precious lives.
00:24:56.380 And so that's what I think.
00:24:57.660 You know, I think that what's happened with identity politics and so on
00:25:00.860 is that we've ended up focusing on the punishment.
00:25:05.240 We've forgotten that we need to attack the idea that certain things are crimes.
00:25:11.020 There is no crime in trying to survive.
00:25:13.780 You know, survival is heroic.
00:25:15.320 and we need to find a way for us mutually to survive without having to hurt other people,
00:25:22.560 in other words, theft and so on. There are ways. We have to look at that as not a crime,
00:25:28.020 but as survival and make survival not something that requires a person to surrender their dignity,
00:25:34.880 you know, to steal from others and so on. But survival must be something you can do with
00:25:39.320 dignity. I think it's from there that you build a majority.
00:25:44.580 Thank you for that analysis. Well, I'd like to transition our conversation to explore how
00:25:51.280 countries have responded to COVID-19, because our media in the States has certainly been
00:25:57.460 fairly limited and biased in terms of what information is disseminated around COVID
00:26:02.480 responses. Tricontinental Institute published a study titled Corona Shock and Socialism,
00:26:09.800 which pointed out that there is a, quote, marked difference in the management of the pandemic by
00:26:15.960 countries with bourgeoisie governments and countries with socialist governments. The latter
00:26:21.460 has a science-based public sector, public action, and internationalist attitude, which has meant
00:26:28.240 that the areas of the world governed by socialists have experienced less of a catastrophe than the
00:26:34.320 countries of the bourgeoisie order, end quote. Now this shouldn't come as a surprise, but I do
00:26:40.920 wonder if you can speak to some of the most glaring differences between socialist and
00:26:46.080 bourgeoisie governments and what this implies for future crisis, or what this implies for future
00:26:52.180 crises? And perhaps what climate catastrophe responses will look like under socialist
00:26:58.240 governments? Well, the last question is very difficult, and I hope we can get there. But
00:27:04.200 there's something quite, I don't like to use the word ironic, by the way, because that song ruined
00:27:10.120 the word ironic. I understand that it's often a misunderstood word, but there is something quite
00:27:15.820 odd about how people assume that, let's say, China is authoritarian and the United States
00:27:22.980 is democratic. That's the basic Western framework. When the pandemic was finally understood in China
00:27:31.140 by about the 20th of January of this year, 2020, in other words, by the time it was clear to
00:27:38.380 medical experts that there was human-to-human transmission, and when the government in Hubei
00:27:43.900 province shut down Wuhan city and they put really emergency measures in built a big hospital and so
00:27:49.440 on that's what the government did that was what the state did but suddenly underneath that you
00:27:55.440 saw a whole different set of activities begin so just to give an example Chinese society not the
00:28:03.360 state is highly organized people are organized in all kinds of associations whether it's neighborhood
00:28:08.400 associations, you know, professional associations, and so on. And what you saw in Wuhan City
00:28:15.200 is that neighborhood associations kicked in, and so did the Communist Party. So what did they do?
00:28:22.140 Well, in every neighborhood, the neighborhood associations started to do temperature checks
00:28:26.460 of people who live in the neighborhood. You didn't need high expertise. They were quickly trained.
00:28:31.280 You had to go with masks and with gloves and go and take temperatures of people. If there are
00:28:35.880 spikes in temperature immediately you know medical experts must come test them and so on they can be
00:28:41.580 isolated they did contact tracing not through the government but through these decentralized
00:28:47.800 neighborhood committees secondly these neighborhood committees went made sure did surveys of they
00:28:53.620 already had information but did surveys of neighborhoods who are the elderly where do they
00:28:58.280 live do they need medicines do they need food delivered and so on so this is the kind of way
00:29:04.600 in which society started to take care of itself.
00:29:07.800 You know, remember I said,
00:29:09.180 we have this vision China authoritarian state
00:29:11.800 and therefore no society.
00:29:14.120 Everybody's dominated by the state.
00:29:15.720 State does everything.
00:29:16.480 It's not true.
00:29:17.500 There, the neighborhood associations
00:29:18.860 took care of a lot of the basic functions
00:29:21.000 during the lockdown.
00:29:22.240 And Wuhan and Hubei province
00:29:24.240 were able to beat the pandemic.
00:29:25.620 It's quite amazing, that story
00:29:27.260 of the city and the province both.
00:29:30.400 In the place like the United States,
00:29:32.860 it's a really good comparison because you see, you can say, look, I'm free, but you're also
00:29:38.800 thoroughly disorganized. What did you not see in the United States? You saw people just waiting
00:29:44.760 for the government to do things. Even trade unions didn't come out there and feed people.
00:29:50.280 You didn't see the NGOs. I mean, what's happened in a way is you've commodified public action in
00:29:57.960 the West, in the capitalist countries. But public action has become the province of
00:30:03.660 non-governmental organizations that get grants and they have professionals running them and so on.
00:30:08.280 You don't have masses of people organized into neighborhood committees and so on. You just don't
00:30:14.380 have that kind of broad public action. You don't have the habit for it. So because you don't have
00:30:20.920 the habit for it, what you did see is in some small localities, you saw decent people sometimes
00:30:26.680 organized in some left groups, conduct mutual aid, you know, try to raise funds to go and buy
00:30:33.220 groceries, deliver it to people who couldn't afford, and so on. So there were small instances
00:30:38.940 of mutual aid conducted by really sensitive, decent people, but it wasn't scaled up. You know,
00:30:44.420 we didn't see trade unions participate. In Kerala, for instance, which is a state in India governed
00:30:51.040 by the left front, communist
00:30:52.880 government. Their trade
00:30:55.160 unions came, they built sinks
00:30:56.820 next to bus stations, so when people
00:30:58.900 got off buses, they would wash their hands.
00:31:01.080 The trade unions didn't wait for the
00:31:02.900 government to come and build the sinks, 0.98
00:31:04.780 they just built the sinks. Youth 0.70
00:31:06.540 organizations in public opened
00:31:08.680 kitchens. They would cook
00:31:10.040 basic food in public under tents
00:31:12.760 and anybody could come and take
00:31:14.740 food and go home. This was to
00:31:16.700 ensure that people were being fed during
00:31:18.720 the pandemic. Schools,
00:31:20.660 public schools said, whatever lunch you get children at school, we would like to have it
00:31:26.680 delivered to your home. So student organizations from colleges said, we volunteer to pick up the
00:31:32.920 food from the school and deliver it to people's homes. I mean, this is public action. This is
00:31:39.420 the habit that develops in these societies. They haven't attacked trade unions. They haven't
00:31:46.700 attack the organization of students and so on. You just don't see this in the West where people
00:31:52.400 live much more atomized lives. You know, there is a greater sense that the culture promotes
00:31:58.320 individualism. You need to get by, don't work collaboratively or cooperatively. And the
00:32:04.220 cooperative spirit has eroded deeply in these societies. It's not like the United States didn't
00:32:10.560 have this at one time. You know, let's go back to the readings of 19th century fiction, you know,
00:32:16.520 where you see or I guess even the history books where a community would come together to raise
00:32:21.460 somebody's barn you know their barn needed to be raised the whole community would provide their
00:32:26.140 labor nobody asked to be paid they just did it together as a community because they knew they
00:32:31.320 relied on each other that's mutual aid you you don't need uh you know anarchism to teach you
00:32:37.000 about mutual aid mutual aid is a basic common human decent thing to do but that decency has
00:32:43.300 eroded because of individualism because rather than call your neighbors and say listen can you
00:32:48.780 people please come and help me move my stove you call up somebody a handyman or whatever to come
00:32:54.560 and do things like that and that culture of commodifying all social relations it doesn't
00:33:01.000 prepare you for a pandemic and how to respond to the pandemic in the end in the places like
00:33:06.640 the united states you wait for the state to act and otherwise you're paralyzed in your home
00:33:11.040 in in these kind of countries in country where you've essentially commodified so many social
00:33:18.080 relations you know where when you need help from for something you try to either hire somebody to
00:33:24.660 do it for you uh you know by paying them directly or you use your credit card or whatever it is but
00:33:31.080 this idea of mutual community support is deeply eroded in in in the system and it has its impact
00:33:39.060 to the time of a pandemic absolutely yeah i mean you just brought up so many important points
00:33:46.780 about our mutual aid being eroded and i feel that and you've been working to outline what a post
00:33:56.040 covet 19 agenda needs to look like for parts of the world who have been long held captive by global
00:34:03.640 austerity measures and i'd like to explore how the pandemic is projected to affect the world
00:34:09.040 in the long term and what strategies and policies need to be centered.
00:34:14.520 But before I ask about the 16-point agenda, I wonder if you can remind listeners about
00:34:20.200 the extent of global debt servitude and just the amount of external debt countries have
00:34:26.020 been forced to bear while trillions of dollars sit in tax havens and billionaires offer,
00:34:31.740 you know, paltry philanthropic donations.
00:34:35.840 I mean, this is extraordinary.
00:34:37.500 Like, you know, it should be a slogan. I mean, I would like to make a T-shirt, Ayana, which says, no philanthropy, only taxation. Look, the problem with philanthropy is they give money and then they expect you to genuflect in front of them, name buildings after them, praise them to the skies.
00:34:55.620 This is medieval. This is how kings and noble people said, look, I am giving you something, and then you had to fall on the ground before them. What's the difference? The donor comes. Oh, my God, the donor is coming tomorrow. Everybody is smart enough, and you're like, hello.
00:35:13.680 This is medieval. The attitude towards philanthropy is positively medieval. I don't want philanthropy. Pay your taxes fair and square, and then let's have a democratic discussion of how to utilize that money.
00:35:30.260 not allow one rich person to define the agenda, you know, with society, when you have somebody
00:35:36.220 like Bezos, you know, $700 billion plus, you know, that they're sitting on, you know, they have more
00:35:45.080 money than the wealth of countries, you know, they can move enormous agendas by their whim.
00:35:51.680 That's what I mean by it being medieval. I mean, what gives one person the right to move a major
00:35:57.440 social agenda, you know, whether good or bad, you know, I'm not judging it. It's just the structure
00:36:03.040 is wrong. You know, we should have democratic control over our social wealth, not allow whim
00:36:08.200 to define it. Well, you know, we know that right now the situation with debt is just obscene. You
00:36:17.380 know, it's literally obscene. You know, the best estimates show us that there is about $11 trillion
00:36:23.660 dollars in external debt um in the developing world and the wealthy bondholders they just
00:36:31.200 don't want to give these countries a break i mean right now if you're smart and we live in a smart
00:36:37.160 world we'd say oh wait a minute let's just forgive all the debt you know this 11 trillion dollars i
00:36:42.360 mean after all after all there's 32 trillion dollars sitting in tax havens and that's that's
00:36:48.580 just the number that we were able to find, you know, $32 trillion. And I, you know, we went in
00:36:54.820 and looked at this $32 trillion is more than the total value of gold that has ever been brought up
00:37:03.280 from under the earth. All the known gold reserves are less than $32 trillion. So we've got $32
00:37:12.420 trillion sitting in tax havens. Let's use some of that money, which is sitting idle,
00:37:17.900 to essentially forgive the debt.
00:37:19.940 These countries, for instance,
00:37:22.260 if you take an example, Ethiopia,
00:37:24.860 Ethiopia doesn't need aid.
00:37:27.520 It just needs complete debt cancellation.
00:37:30.020 If you cancel the debt to Ethiopia,
00:37:32.520 they have enough resources in their society
00:37:34.700 to drive an agenda.
00:37:35.860 The reason these countries have to keep coming 0.94
00:37:38.580 with the begging bowl
00:37:39.760 is because their resources are essentially sapped
00:37:43.860 by this vacuum cleaner of debt servicing,
00:37:47.220 which is endless and perpetual it's a perpetual debt machine you know countries have to keep
00:37:53.380 servicing the debt you know i said 11 trillion dollars is owed this year sorry is currently owed
00:38:00.400 as external debt the servicing on that debt this year um about two months ago was about 3.9 trillion
00:38:07.880 So just about 40% or 37% of the total principal is owed as interest.
00:38:17.960 I mean, that's how miserable the situation is.
00:38:37.880 Yeah, you got money.
00:39:07.880 you've long called for the need to push the debate about the environmental crisis to not
00:39:27.220 only include more nuance and complexity but to also acknowledge labor and land struggles
00:39:33.180 And to address the question of deprivation, and I've heard you share sentiments that point out what is the point of a climate strike that speaks of an uninhabitable earth when people on this earth presently cannot eat, which is something you were just referring to.
00:39:48.220 And so this question is open-ended, but I wonder if you could speak to what agricultural workers could teach us about reorganizing the system and how does an extended movement actually translate into a stronger movement?
00:40:03.180 You see, right now, we have, in a place like India, we have increasing and long-term and what looks to be permanent agrarian distress.
00:40:14.840 You know, agriculture has been commercialized.
00:40:18.580 You know, big firms dominate the landscape, determine the outcome.
00:40:24.380 They are growing things essentially for markets all over the world, and they're growing at massive scale.
00:40:30.580 In order to grow at massive scale, they use just poisonous things that are ruining the soil, you know, that is both insecticide, fertilizer, they use seeds that are, you know, God knows what seeds, they basically plow enormous landscapes, you know, and with no interest in the integrity of the soil or anything.
00:40:54.600 I mean, it's basically treating, as we say, treating the field like a factory and hoping that the attrition of soil, the soil's depletion and so on can be reversed by using intensive chemicals and so on and clever seeds and even sometimes in some cases, you know, computerization in the field itself.
00:41:19.420 So this is the great hope. And what this has meant is it's completely taken the power away from the cultivators. And also it has thrown a lot of people off work because you've mechanized. And in a place like India, 70% or so people in the countryside, it has created enormous agrarian distress and small farmers have found it very hard to survive.
00:41:41.280 So for a long period, suicide rates among farmers were very high.
00:41:46.320 In recent period, agricultural workers and farmers in India have been leading these very large marches,
00:41:53.660 particularly in the states of Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, and Rajasthan.
00:41:57.880 These marches are very important because it shows that the leadership in trying to transform rural areas
00:42:04.760 is coming from the agricultural workers, the small farmers, and so on.
00:42:08.820 You can't do this from policy to farm. It has to be from worker to policy. There is no other way, you know, because you have to build mass support for some of these ideas.
00:42:20.320 And this is a long-term rebuilding project because around the world, farm worker organizing, farm worker strength has been greatly depleted in the face of giant corporations coming in with the full support of governments and basically eroding the capacity of agricultural workers and small farm owners to live with dignity.
00:42:45.760 I mean, that's what they were eroded. So, you know, we can talk as much as we want about agroecology, organic farming, good stewardship of the land and all that. All of that stuff is abstractions, Ayanna. All of it is abstractions, because it's not a question of having the right ideas.
00:43:01.740 You know, you can have the right ideas. You can say, oh, look, you know, you shouldn't use so much fertilizer. Don't use so much this. Some scientists will come in and say, no, the optimum is to use only so much chemicals in the land or don't grow three cycles, leave one fallow.
00:43:19.080 So, you know, okay, that's all fine, but these abstractions, they have to be picked up and made alive by people, by people's movements, and so on, you know, you can't save the world by building a small organic experimental farm somewhere that proves that small experimental farms are correct, you need hundreds of millions of people who work the land to be gripped by the idea that we need to have a different way of doing agriculture.
00:43:44.880 And that's why I want to emphasize the importance of these agricultural workers' movements, farm workers' movements, these big marches being held in India, because in the marches, they are also articulating and debating their agenda.
00:43:59.640 And in that is certainly an agenda about letting the cultivator set the course for what agriculture should look like, listen to the cultivators, and so on.
00:44:09.580 And I think this is not just happening in India. In Brazil, for instance, the landless workers movement, they have experimented, built cooperatives, worked on the construction of, you know, of what they call agroecological production and so on.
00:44:25.900 And that's entirely driven by formerly landless farmers and workers who now live in these collective settlements where they are experimenting with new forms of not agriculture for boutique consumption, you know, rich for the rich and so on, but agroecological food for themselves, for the communities around them and so on.
00:44:47.460 So I say that the beginning of the transformation doesn't come from, you know, a book somebody has written somewhere about, you know, let's do agriculture like this.
00:44:59.700 It comes from these experiments and struggles of peasants, farm workers, who are literally, literally with their fingers in the dirt, trying to understand how to draw food from the earth without destroying it.
00:45:15.720 And I think we need to actually take the lead from them.
00:45:20.800 I loved how you spoke to that.
00:45:23.540 And especially the part where, you know, it's not just about good ideas.
00:45:28.000 It's about the people on the ground.
00:45:29.660 And I've been so disenchanted with just the folks who have the mic and have the power and how they try to, yeah, push their armchair philosophical ideas onto those who are actually the ones working with the land.
00:45:49.960 And I think that's just such a powerful point.
00:45:52.920 So, yeah, thank you for that.
00:45:54.580 And Navija, you've been very vocal about the recent coup in Bolivia and its relationship to lithium mining, as over 50% of the world's lithium resides amidst Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile.
00:46:07.780 So can you talk a bit about the United States' role in interfering with this election in order to gain fuller access to lithium?
00:46:15.320 And if you think more and more coups will ensue in the coming decades as corporate miners seek to propel, quote, clean energy forward.
00:46:24.580 Yeah, so, you know, I mean, I think the idea of the Green New Deal sounds great. And who's going to disagree with that? You know, we do want to transition away from fossil fuel energy. Of course, we want to transition from fossil fuel energy.
00:46:38.720 But what are we transitioning to? We're transitioning to energy that is derived from the sun, solar. We're looking to wind. We're looking to maybe tidal energy, different forms of energy from the earth, from the sun, as I said.
00:46:57.620 But of course, these forms of energy are erratic. Solar energy is not available at night. You need energy at night. Therefore, you need to somehow capture the energy. In order to capture energy, whether it's any of these non-fossil or what we call renewable energy, to capture these, you need batteries.
00:47:16.880 And thus far, the most efficient batteries we have use cobalt, use lithium, and other such minerals and so on.
00:47:26.940 But cobalt and lithium are two important ones.
00:47:29.340 Well, where do you get cobalt from?
00:47:32.140 Cobalt comes from the tailing mines of copper.
00:47:35.180 And the largest amount of cobalt comes out of the Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Congo,
00:47:41.200 where some companies with hideous records
00:47:45.340 like Glencore domiciled in Switzerland.
00:47:49.280 These companies are the ones that essentially
00:47:52.120 by outsourcing the gathering of cobalt
00:47:56.180 from the tailing mines make a ton of money,
00:47:59.360 you know, ton of money.
00:48:00.340 So the people who are mining this,
00:48:02.400 you know, families, including children
00:48:04.340 are paid almost nothing.
00:48:05.680 And these companies make a ton of money.
00:48:08.460 So in Congo, you don't need to do a coup
00:48:10.000 because basically these corporations have enormous control of parts of the country already.
00:48:16.260 Then with lithium, there's big lithium production in Australia, but it's not enough.
00:48:22.280 The real scaled-up green transition takes place.
00:48:25.660 You're going to need a lot more lithium than is currently being mined out of Australia.
00:48:31.560 You know, there's lithium available in Cornwall in England,
00:48:34.480 but let me tell you, I don't think they're going to be mining in Cornwall.
00:48:37.620 This kind of dirty mining, it's always in somebody else's backyard. So the big, big dump of lithium is in that ABC triangle, Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile. And in these countries, there is considerable lithium.
00:48:54.360 evo morales government when he was in power 14 years improved the conditions of his people
00:49:01.080 immensely he insisted that the government mining company would be in charge of the sale of the
00:49:08.660 lithium or going into joint ventures that you cannot privatize the mines you know and they
00:49:14.360 also started making a deal which would allow them to process the lithium and make batteries in
00:49:21.280 Bolivia government run factory. In fact, they also mass produced a small car, which Evo Morales was
00:49:29.120 the first to drive off the lot in Bolivia. They were interested not just in selling raw materials,
00:49:34.000 but in going from lithium all the way out to electric cars with their own lithium batteries
00:49:40.120 in it and so on. And then the coup happens because, you know, this is unacceptable. Because who
00:49:44.780 actually should control the lithium? Not the Bolivian people and their government. No, 0.99
00:49:49.460 Certainly not. It has to be controlled by big multinational corporations. And that's the scandal. You're asking, will there be more coups in the future? Well, of course there will be, because this seems not to end. And these coups are getting more and more sophisticated as time goes by, because the apparatus to make you believe it's not a coup is quite sophisticated.
00:50:09.380 I mean, even people, sensitive people, people who lean toward the left after this coup in Bolivia, they spent weeks saying it's not a coup. Morales should not have run again. I mean, who are you to say who should or who shouldn't run again?
00:50:26.340 You know, I mean, this is something that can be settled in the ballot box in Bolivia. You know, somebody sitting in Vermont shouldn't have the license to dictate to other parts of the world what should or shouldn't happen. You're entitled to your opinion. But in this case, your opinion is not merely an opinion. You're being weaponized by the CIA, by the US State Department.
00:50:47.760 if you come out there and join the chatter saying well you know he's he's been there too long
00:50:52.800 you're just legitimizing what they are doing by force on the ground and i find that to be quite
00:50:58.920 shameful i mean people need to really introspect next time there's a coup and as i said there will
00:51:04.380 be a coup somewhere hopefully not in bolivia but somewhere people need to really think about what
00:51:10.780 they are saying and in whose interest they are saying what you know uh look you may not like
00:51:16.460 the way somebody is governing. That doesn't give you the right to allow your government to overthrow
00:51:20.980 them. I want to go back to Tri-Continental and in the ruins of the present, it's written, quote,
00:51:28.860 the culture of commodities and the idea of people as consumers has desecrated the idea of the human.
00:51:35.700 Bolivian socialists have looked deeply into their own traditions and elaborated a vocabulary to talk
00:51:41.060 about human character, of a human society that is not subsumed by capitalist social norms.
00:51:47.220 David Choke Iwanka, the executive secretary of the Bolivian Alliance of the Peoples of
00:51:52.280 Our Americas, speaks of kapaknian, the path of the good life, with the need to create
00:51:59.200 not consumers and owners, but iamba, a person without an owner.
00:52:04.380 being a person without an owner is as choki wanca says the future the path of people who look for
00:52:12.300 the good life such efforts to revive the idea of the human and to revive ideas of the need to tend
00:52:18.820 to the creation of human community requires a great deal of effort end quote and as we come
00:52:26.060 to a close i wonder if i can ask you to speak about the world the mass movements and lives
00:52:33.180 being lived outside of the West remind you about the authentic agency that still exists
00:52:39.000 and a sense of satisfaction that isn't sought through consumerism?
00:52:44.180 Well, before I answer that, I would just like to say that you quoted from our first document
00:52:50.160 and you quoted within that from David Chokyuanca.
00:52:54.900 David has just been elected the vice president of Bolivia.
00:52:58.740 He was the vice presidential candidate with Luis Arce.
00:53:01.880 and I'm very pleased that he is the vice president
00:53:06.480 because what the sentiment that you read out
00:53:09.720 from our first document
00:53:10.980 is something that I deeply believe in.
00:53:14.260 You know, when he articulates the view
00:53:17.280 that a person without an owner,
00:53:20.120 you know, that's the future.
00:53:22.200 You know, that's what a good life will be.
00:53:24.520 We want everybody to feel like they don't have an owner
00:53:27.620 and whether it's a tangible, real owner, another person
00:53:31.440 or it's us being owned by money, by, you know, by mortgages, by these sorts of attachments to
00:53:40.000 things rather than other people. I mean, that's a beautiful way to try to construct a world.
00:53:46.160 And I'm very, very pleased that David is the vice president of Bolivia. And I know that he will be
00:53:52.580 alongside Luis Arce and all the people there, including Patricia Arce, who was such a brave
00:53:59.440 person who was beaten during the coup and looked directly in the camera as they cut her hair,
00:54:05.420 put red paint on her face, threw gasoline over her. She looked directly at a camera and said,
00:54:10.320 we are not afraid. And she has just been sworn in as a senator in the Senate in Bolivia. What a
00:54:17.380 brave person Patricia is. So these are the people, in a sense, Ayana, who are going to construct with
00:54:23.900 us the future. These are the kinds of people, this is the caliber of person in the movements
00:54:29.880 around the world. You know, these are sensitive people. These are people who believe we have
00:54:34.820 great faith in the capacity of other people. They're not afraid of people. You know, you've
00:54:39.860 got to listen more. You've got to build projects in unity with other people, whether it be
00:54:45.380 in Bolivia, as we see here, or it's in, you know, places where, like in South Africa and Durban, 0.87
00:54:53.240 where Abaklali-based Majondolo, the shack dwellers movement, you know, has incredible resilience. 0.87
00:55:00.400 You know, mostly these women who built networks, political networks of Abaklali inside the 0.93
00:55:07.560 neighborhoods of the poor in Durban, but other parts of South Africa as well, which stood
00:55:12.500 attacks and murder by, you know, property developers and so on to give themselves dignity.
00:55:18.400 You know, if you go to Colombia in the northern part of South America, where social movement leaders are being killed almost one a day, you know, at that rate. Nonetheless, people still stand up, unafraid, stand up to the kind of mafia state that's led by Ivan Duque. These are brave people. I mean, you know, it breaks my heart every time I hear the name of somebody who's been killed because they are trying to create a sensitive world.
00:55:45.600 It breaks my heart.
00:55:46.660 I mean, it's a very sad thing that these people, what is their crime?
00:55:50.880 You know, back to that old thing, right?
00:55:52.680 Remember, we know the punishment, we're getting killed, but what is our crime?
00:55:57.700 My crime is I'm sensitive and want to create an end to hunger.
00:56:02.700 You know, that's my crime, and for that you killed me.
00:56:04.860 Why did they kill Thomas Sankara in Burkina Faso in 1987?
00:56:09.600 Well, Thomas wanted to create diversified food regimes.
00:56:14.220 He said on every Wednesday, he said, we forbid women to work in the kitchen.
00:56:19.540 We forbid women to do any housework, any childcare, anything on every Wednesday, because men must get a taste of reproductive labor.
00:56:30.140 You know, you must see what it is. And if you see what it is, you'll start to enjoy it. 1.00
00:56:34.920 And then you can truly share with the women in the household the practice of reproductive labor.
00:56:40.660 what a fast-sighted intelligent way to go you know instead of um just talking talking talking
00:56:47.060 about uh the need for men to involve themselves he said we're going to pass a law like it or not
00:56:52.140 guys you got to just go and try it try the kitchen try the laundry try taking care of your children
00:56:58.060 you'll find something beautiful in it initially you're terrified of it you think it's women's work
00:57:03.340 you think oh i can't do it you'll you'll find beauty in it you'll be like that child who
00:57:08.920 eventually jumps in the pool and doesn't want to get out. You'll say, wow, I really do enjoy
00:57:14.020 cooking. I feel less alienated, you know, when I do this, when I see the happy faces of my family,
00:57:19.580 when they eat what I've cooked. But he had to be killed. They killed him. You know, sensitive 0.52
00:57:25.500 person. What was his crime? His crime was, he said, I want to make a better world. I want to
00:57:30.880 make a better world. In our world, apparently, that's illegal.
00:57:38.920 thank you for listening to for the wild podcast the music you heard today was by jonathan yance
00:57:47.460 nathan keck lisabeth russo and cd torre for the wild is created by ayana young
00:57:53.760 erica ekram francesca glassbell and melanie younger