If Books Could Kill - March 14, 2024


Lean In

Topics
"The Better Angels of Our Nature" Part 1: You're Not Wrong, Pinker. You're Just An *sshole Who's Afraid of Naomi Wolf? [TEASER]

Episode Stats


Length

57 minutes

Words per minute

181.89

Word count

10,441

Sentence count

622

Harmful content

Misogyny

117

sentences flagged

Toxicity

76

sentences flagged

Hate speech

76

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 Michael. Peter. What do you know about Lean In? All I know is that it's the perfect book
00:00:05.200 for women who want to start a family and also help Mark Zuckerberg do some genocides. 0.74
00:00:22.980 Lean In. Women, work, and the will to lead. We're experts on all three. People come to
00:00:28.680 this podcast for triple expertise. You know, I read so many reviews of this book, but I think
00:00:35.600 that there's one thing that we can offer that none of those reviews could. And that's a male 1.00
00:00:42.080 perspective. They said two men couldn't have a podcast. We prove them wrong every day. The first
00:00:47.280 two guys to do it, folks. What do you know about Sheryl Sandberg? All I know is what was in the 0.99
00:00:53.240 zinger that she's like she's like a facebook lady like a sort of number two for mark zuckerberg
00:00:59.340 and uh yeah and we've reached i was going to go somewhere with that sentence but we've reached
00:01:04.180 the limits of my knowledge i don't think i'd ever heard of her before this book came out i think the
00:01:07.900 i think that's true of most people she's a harvard mba she went to work for a young google and then
00:01:14.580 a young facebook she was an early innovator in driving ads which is of course how both of those
00:01:20.760 companies became ludicrously profitable. So she got very rich. Hundreds of millions of dollars 0.80
00:01:27.380 at the time of this publication. Now something just south of two billion. Oh, wow. When she
00:01:32.400 wrote this book, she had been Facebook's COO for about five years. So that's sort of where she is
00:01:38.840 professionally. She was a big deal. When she's writing this, I think just to contextualize us 0.93
00:01:43.560 culturally, we're sort of in the midst of or maybe even near the end of this era of like
00:01:49.540 corporate feminism. There's this sort of like cottage industry of books and other media
00:01:55.860 targeted towards helping women advance in the workplace, especially in white collar jobs,
00:02:01.940 right? Sandberg rises to some mainstream acclaim when she gives a TED talk in 2010 titled Why We
00:02:09.780 Have Too Few Women Leaders, which lays out the core thesis that she ultimately turns into this book,
00:02:16.780 which she publishes in 2013. 1.00
00:02:19.320 Is it because not enough of them can afford constant child care? 0.99
00:02:22.600 Can't get decent paying jobs?
00:02:24.300 So usually we talk about books that like haven't received too much scrutiny.
00:02:29.200 Oh, yeah.
00:02:29.660 But I think the opposite is true of Lean In.
00:02:32.220 The cultural and political tide has really turned against this book in the past few years.
00:02:37.720 When it came out, it was broadly popular.
00:02:41.020 Sandberg was getting some good press, especially in like the business world.
00:02:44.480 She was doing that talk circuit.
00:02:46.780 But there was also pretty widespread criticism, especially from feminist theorists and thinkers. 0.99
00:02:52.540 And even like the favorable reviews tended to hedge their praise a bit.
00:02:56.440 And then you get a few things happening.
00:02:58.920 You get the Me Too era where there's been a lot of writing and reflection both on the book and the shortcomings of this type of feminism generally.
00:03:07.580 And then you also get like the Cambridge Analytica scandal.
00:03:10.960 You get the Myanmar genocide that Facebook might have helped facilitate.
00:03:15.700 All of that sort of washes whatever residual sheen there was off of Sheryl Sandberg and Lean In.
00:03:22.540 She lost her title as airport royalty, parentheses derogatory.
00:03:25.960 To give you a sense of its initial reception, when it comes out, The Guardian called it infantilizing.
00:03:32.060 The Baffler and Dissent published like withering reviews.
00:03:36.740 But you also had some generally favorable reviews from The New York Times, The New Yorker. 1.00
00:03:42.480 And maybe more importantly, from like a PR perspective, she's partnering with a ton of big companies and female leaders to build this lean in brand, which generates a ton of press and attention.
00:03:56.340 So even though there's this sort of backdrop of negative reviews from very serious thinkers, the public perception is just like big hit book.
00:04:05.300 Right. I remember the backlash to this book happening roughly eight minutes after it came out.
00:04:10.020 I don't remember the lash.
00:04:11.640 I don't remember like people taking this up enthusiastically, but maybe that's just like
00:04:15.580 indicative of my internet usage.
00:04:17.560 You're too woke.
00:04:18.460 You're the person who's who reads the baffler.
00:04:21.520 And that's their first impression of lean in. 1.00
00:04:23.780 It's funny how she managed to capture both turning of the tide against this like white 0.99
00:04:28.200 corporate feminism and also turning of the tide against the tech sector. 1.00
00:04:32.120 Right. 1.00
00:04:32.420 The only thing that could have made it worse is if she was somehow involved in making
00:04:35.320 season eight of Game of Thrones.
00:04:37.040 just like the culture was not like into this anymore so when the cambridge analytica scandal
00:04:43.280 hits in 2018 you there was like this final wave of bad press that really seemed to just sort of be
00:04:50.280 the the nail in the coffin here the washington post publishes a piece titled the end of leaning
00:04:55.920 in the nation publishes one called lean in has been discredited for good michelle obama gave a
00:05:02.280 speech in 2018 where she said that leaning in doesn't always work whoa yeah when you lose
00:05:07.580 michelle obama i'm trying to think of all of the other like mainstream institutions that could have 0.99
00:05:11.800 turned against her like the the gilmore girls did a special episode about how much she sucks 0.99
00:05:16.080 brene brown issues an emergency press release fuck this lady so given all of that you know i was i 0.98
00:05:22.620 was almost a little bit wary to do this episode because a ton of criticism has already been 1.00
00:05:26.860 leveled at the book. But then I saw a Substack post by Danielle Kurtzleben, who's a political
00:05:32.320 reporter for NPR, titled One Cheer for Lean In, where she basically makes the argument that like
00:05:38.100 every criticism that's been leveled at Lean In is basically right, but that she still found value 1.00
00:05:44.740 in the book as a feminist. And I thought that was sort of refreshing because to a lot of feminists
00:05:50.880 and people on the left, the book is almost like a punchline at this point, right? So I went into it
00:05:56.220 with like an open mind and after reading it in the micro there is a lot of good stuff in the book
00:06:02.100 it's relatively research heavy it's easy to read there's plenty of reasonable advice there's also
00:06:09.380 a lot of stuff that trickled into our public consciousness in a way that lacks nuance but in
00:06:15.880 the book is like relatively nuanced that said i think that after absorbing it and thinking about
00:06:22.700 it for a little bit. I do ultimately believe that this is a work of great evil.
00:06:28.920 Upon reflection, our podcast that dunks on books has decided to dunk on this book.
00:06:35.600 The broad premise of the book is very simple. She lays out a bunch of the challenges that women face
00:06:41.060 in the workplace, and then she talks about how women can address them. Right off the bat,
00:06:46.040 she says that it's a book targeting the internal obstacles that women face,
00:06:50.420 which really leads to the primary critique, which is that this is a set of individualized 0.59
00:06:56.380 solutions to structural problems. She will set out a bunch of very real phenomena that appear to
00:07:01.940 hold women back in the workplace. And for the most part, she actually explains those problems 0.99
00:07:05.920 really well, even though whenever the examples are personal to her, it's not really relatable.
00:07:10.780 She'll be like, I was getting mentorship from Larry Summers. Well, I don't, what am I supposed
00:07:15.000 to do with this. One of the ongoing motifs in the book is that the first 90 percent of a chapter
00:07:20.460 will be like a relatively well-researched, thorough, but accessible explanation of a
00:07:26.120 problem facing women in the workplace. And then the last 10 percent is just the worst prescription 0.78
00:07:31.860 that you could imagine. And it feels like it came from someone who didn't really process the first
00:07:37.120 90 percent of the chapter. Right. Spend a month at Costa Rica just unwinding. Yeah, that would
00:07:43.220 probably help lots of people. So the first substantive chapter of the book is about the
00:07:47.460 ambition gap between men and women. She cites a McKinsey survey of thousands of employees,
00:07:53.200 mostly at large companies, that found that 36% of men wanted to be in the C-suite, whereas only
00:07:59.540 18% of women did. There's also research showing that men are generally more interested in
00:08:04.040 management than women. And she traces a line of research that found similar sentiments in
00:08:09.440 young adults and children with like middle school boys aspiring to higher powered careers than the
00:08:15.820 girls, for example. And from there, she cites a pretty massive body of research about how
00:08:20.800 this might stem from early childhood. She says, from the moment we are born,
00:08:25.460 boys and girls are treated differently. Parents tend to talk to girl babies more than boy babies.
00:08:30.260 Mothers overestimate the crawling ability of their sons and underestimate the crawling ability of 0.56
00:08:34.300 their daughters. Reflecting the belief that girls need to be helped more than boys,
00:08:38.040 mothers often spend more time comforting and hugging infant girls and more time watching
00:08:42.720 infant boys play by themselves. That sounds true. That sounds bad. Absolutely. And again, 0.84
00:08:47.600 the first 90% of every chapter is pretty good. I'm going to send you the next portion of this.
00:08:53.920 I feel like I need to do my Elizabeth Holmes voice for these, my C-suite lady voice.
00:08:57.940 Not all C-suite ladies sound like Elizabeth Holmes. The thing is, I'm allowed to be 8%
00:09:02.640 more problematic about gender than you because I'm a homosexual and I'm closer to women.
00:09:06.360 That's true, even though I, I mean, I don't really agree. 0.99
00:09:09.340 I think that I choose to live with one.
00:09:12.140 I've committed my life to one.
00:09:14.660 You are going to keep them at arm's length for the rest of your existence. 1.00
00:09:17.240 As a straight man, you are actually more qualified to speak about the problems of women than a gay man. 1.00
00:09:21.820 Fair, fair. 1.00
00:09:22.780 All right, I just sent you a little paragraph.
00:09:26.040 Okay, she says, other cultural messages are more blatant.
00:09:29.200 Jim Bere once sold onesies proclaiming smart like daddy for boys and pretty like mommy for girls.
00:09:34.980 The same year, JCPenney marketed a t-shirt to teenage girls that bragged,
00:09:39.300 I'm too pretty to do homework, so my brother has to do it for me.
00:09:42.840 These things did not happen in 1951.
00:09:45.100 They happened in 2011.
00:09:47.180 Yeah, those are horrific shirts, man. 1.00
00:09:48.680 What the fuck? 1.00
00:09:49.520 I mean, Jesus Christ, right? 1.00
00:09:50.940 That's so fucked up. 0.99
00:09:51.800 I feel like we've sort of, we moved on from this quickly enough that it's maybe no longer 0.99
00:09:57.200 part of the cultural memory of young people. 0.99
00:09:59.860 But shit like that, as bad as it sounds, sounds very familiar to me. 0.98
00:10:04.400 Before Lean In came out and changed everything, these eras were very regressive. 0.99
00:10:08.760 So she builds on this by talking about stereotyping, by talking about the lack of parental leave in the United States, all of these different factors coming together.
00:10:17.120 And overall, it's like a very comprehensive, fairly compelling case that the difference in ambition between men and women is in some large part socially constructed.
00:10:26.820 Right. But then she gets to the end of the chapter where she translates this into advice for women.
00:10:32.940 I'm going to send you what she says.
00:10:34.840 Here are the onesies you should buy for your child. 0.88
00:10:37.560 She says, fear is the root of so many of the barriers that women face. 1.00
00:10:41.660 Fear of not being liked. 0.98
00:10:43.100 Fear of making the wrong choice.
00:10:44.720 Fear of drawing negative attention.
00:10:46.380 Fear of overreaching.
00:10:47.560 Fear of being judged.
00:10:48.640 Fear of failure.
00:10:49.520 And the holy trinity of fear, the fear of being a bad mother slash wife slash daughter.
00:10:53.920 Without fear, women can pursue professional success and personal fulfillment and freely 0.93
00:10:58.720 choose one or the other or both.
00:11:00.480 At Facebook, we work hard to create a culture where people are encouraged to take risks.
00:11:05.200 We have posters all around the office that reinforce this attitude.
00:11:08.560 In bright red letters, one declares, fortune favors the bold.
00:11:12.000 Another insists, proceed and be bold.
00:11:14.880 My favorite reads, what would you do if you weren't afraid?
00:11:18.800 We also have kitten posters in the office that say, hang in there.
00:11:23.440 So she's in the like prescriptive phase of this chapter.
00:11:26.620 And all of a sudden it sounds like a script for like a Super Bowl commercial for Facebook at Facebook.
00:11:32.500 We work hard to create a culture like, OK, so she lays out this sprawling problem with all of these complex cultural and political causes.
00:11:42.880 And you're like nodding along. And then her solution portion is like, don't be afraid.
00:11:48.940 Right. It feels so deeply inadequate after you read the first 90 percent of the chapter.
00:11:53.640 Yeah. Even just as like a matter of individualized advice. Right. There is no like research about strategies for overcoming all of these social and cultural biases or anything. There isn't really research about being less scared. There's right. There's nothing practical. It's just like, get out there.
00:12:12.180 What if I'm afraid of starting a union, Cheryl? What should I do then? How bold should I be?
00:12:17.100 It's so weird when companies do this. Like fortune favors the bold. But like I'm at a job where I can
00:12:22.140 get fired for any reason. It's America. We have at will employment. So like you can be bold under
00:12:27.240 very prescribed conditions in American workplaces. You can imagine advice that's just like a little
00:12:34.160 more grounded in reality, a little more practical, right? Here are ways that you can be unafraid,
00:12:41.100 right right but in a vacuum it's just not really meaningful right like act without fear okay uh
00:12:49.060 what am i gonna yell at my boss more like that's what that means to me there's a weird sort of 0.97
00:12:53.560 chicken and egg thing too where like one of the reasons why women are less likely to kind of be 1.00
00:12:58.220 bold in the workplace is mostly because when women are bold they get called shrill yeah so it's not 1.00
00:13:03.560 just like well women need to be bold it's more like people need to interpret women's boldness
00:13:07.360 as the same way they interpret men's boldness
00:13:09.620 as like leadership or whatever.
00:13:10.940 Oh, we will get there, Michael.
00:13:12.140 We will get there so soon.
00:13:13.800 Before we do, I want to talk about
00:13:16.060 the imposter syndrome chapter.
00:13:18.640 This is the second chapter.
00:13:19.820 It's called Sit at the Table.
00:13:21.160 I imagine you have a good sense
00:13:22.840 and our listeners have a good sense
00:13:23.980 of what imposter syndrome is.
00:13:25.420 Because I'm an imposter.
00:13:26.260 Is that what you mean?
00:13:27.040 I imagine you know what it's like
00:13:28.740 to be an imposter, Mike.
00:13:29.940 But I want to give a quick overview
00:13:31.420 of like the research,
00:13:32.360 where the research comes from.
00:13:33.620 In 1978, a pair of researchers at Oberlin
00:13:36.840 Pauline Clance and Suzanne Imes published a paper about high-achieving women experiencing the imposter phenomenon, a perpetual feeling of inadequacy that seems to persist despite consistent success and this parallel feeling that your fraudulence will soon be exposed, right?
00:13:55.960 The paper is very popular, spawns a ton of literature.
00:14:00.220 In general, women appear to be more likely to attribute their failures to their own shortcomings,
00:14:04.640 while men will more often attribute their failure to external factors.
00:14:09.540 And of course, there's all sorts of theory about what is causing this. 0.91
00:14:12.380 And there appear to be like numerous inputs, including the fact that women are often socially
00:14:18.320 and professionally punished for expressing confidence, right?
00:14:21.920 Yeah.
00:14:22.000 So Sandberg's solution has two components, one of which I think is reasonably good, and it's just that there should be more public awareness of this phenomenon such that bosses, hiring managers, et cetera, might have some context for these differences in behavior.
00:14:38.120 I guess, yeah. 0.97
00:14:38.780 The other the specific advice for women is just fake it till you make it to just manufacture confidence and eventually it will generate real confidence, which I think is OK. 0.93
00:14:50.380 But again, it does feel after like after going through an entire chapter of like, here's what this imposter syndrome is. 0.93
00:14:58.240 Here's what it might stem from.
00:14:59.840 There's all these cultural factors, you know, just be confident and just like fake confidence.
00:15:05.380 It's just it it just like hits you as like, OK, it's just very unsatisfying.
00:15:09.980 I will say after 42 years of faking it, I don't know that it ever instills real confidence.
00:15:14.080 I don't know.
00:15:14.540 I don't know if this is ever going to go away, honestly.
00:15:17.280 Also, does anybody not feel like this?
00:15:19.420 So first of all, I think the answer to that is generally men feel this less.
00:15:22.820 There's some indications that women of color feel it less that actually feel like they
00:15:26.680 are competent and are not being treated as such. 1.00
00:15:30.720 Right.
00:15:30.900 Right.
00:15:31.040 I think we're at a point now where one critique of this that keeps popping up is that we're actually oversaturated with this idea.
00:15:38.680 And, like, people are, like, over-diagnosing imposter syndrome, which, of course, is not an actual syndrome.
00:15:43.320 And that's another problem with it.
00:15:44.660 We're at a point where, like, people are using it so much that it's no longer productive.
00:15:48.420 That, like, not every feeling of insecurity you have can be described or should be described as imposter syndrome.
00:15:54.200 And also the bigger problem is probably that the country is being run by people who are 0.99
00:15:58.120 fucking imposters and who are mediocre and shouldn't be in their positions. 1.00
00:16:02.060 That's the other side of it. 1.00
00:16:03.080 In 2021, there was a really popular Harvard Business Review piece called Stop Telling
00:16:08.160 Women They Have Imposter Syndrome.
00:16:09.560 The basic premise is that the idea of imposter syndrome has become so common that it is now 0.57
00:16:14.600 treated like women having imposter syndrome is itself the problem rather than what's really
00:16:20.640 happening, which is this is the output of a set of misogynistic norms, right? The problem isn't
00:16:26.900 just that women lack confidence. It's also that men are rewarded for overconfidence. And in turn, 0.88
00:16:33.680 there is data showing that overconfidence is a bad quality in leadership. So yes, imposter syndrome
00:16:39.540 is real in the sense that it is describing a real phenomenon, but it's part of a fabric where
00:16:45.420 companies are overvaluing traits displayed by men and undervaluing traits displayed by women.
00:16:51.680 Right.
00:16:51.900 You can't just say, oh, be more confident as like an effective solution to all this. 0.99
00:16:55.940 Women lacking confidence is a subset of the actual problem, right?
00:17:00.580 It's not that confidence isn't being valued. 1.00
00:17:02.840 It's that competence isn't being valued.
00:17:04.960 Right.
00:17:05.100 And confidence is being mistaken for competence.
00:17:07.760 Right.
00:17:07.940 Right.
00:17:08.080 You don't solve an issue like this by just like being more bold in meetings. 0.73
00:17:12.320 This is almost like if someone was looking at hiring patterns and realizing that men are being hired way more than women and they're looking at all the data and they're like, well, I think women should be wearing more suits. 0.65
00:17:23.460 Right. 0.69
00:17:23.620 Right.
00:17:23.840 It's like, no, the fact that people wearing suits are being hired at a higher rate is actually an output of a much broader issue.
00:17:30.460 When the real solution is pantsuits.
00:17:32.060 To be fair, there was a subset of professional women who thought that was a solution for a while there. 0.92
00:17:37.600 All right.
00:17:38.500 So let's talk about something that we've sort of been circling around.
00:17:41.020 the third chapter is called Success and Likability. And the first thing she talks about
00:17:45.840 is this famous Heidi Howard study. So basically in 2003, a couple of professors, Frank Flynn and
00:17:52.680 Cameron Anderson, ran a study where they told the story of Heidi Roizen, an entrepreneur,
00:17:57.860 to a bunch of business students. Heidi Roizen is a real person. They described her success and her
00:18:02.740 personality a bit, and they polled the students about their impressions of Heidi. And then they
00:18:06.780 did the same thing again, except they change Heidi's name to Howard. Lo and behold, the students were
00:18:12.960 way more likely to view Howard as someone you'd want to work for as a good colleague. So the
00:18:19.280 basic lesson, of course, is that yes, sexism is real. And all of these pre-existing gender 1.00
00:18:27.160 stereotypes are built into how women are perceived in the workplace, right?
00:18:31.540 There was the other famous, I mean, this is just an anecdote, but there was also the thing where 0.94
00:18:34.160 two colleagues with basically the same job switched email signatures. So they were doing
00:18:38.560 the same thing. But, you know, Tom became Jennifer or whatever and vice versa. And Tom immediately
00:18:44.160 was just like, why is everyone speaking to me this way? Like, why is everyone being even just
00:18:48.080 like on a daily, like normal ass email correspondence way? The hostility just 0.51
00:18:53.920 immediately ramped up by like 15 percent. When you said email signatures, I initially thought
00:18:58.140 that you meant like a little quote below your name or whatever. It's like live, laugh, love
00:19:02.600 or something. I shouldn't. Yeah, don't don't put your love languages in yours, Peter. That's why
00:19:07.260 your emails are hostile. Peter Shimshuri, quality time. That's what I do instead of pronouns. I
00:19:13.600 focus on what matters. So this leads into a discussion of the negotiation gap. Sandberg
00:19:20.920 cites a bunch of research showing that women negotiate less often and less aggressively than
00:19:25.840 men. One study of master's students graduating from Carnegie Mellon showed that men negotiated 0.73
00:19:31.040 for a higher starting salary 57% of the time and women 7% of the time. 0.99
00:19:37.680 Holy shit. 0.99
00:19:38.080 Massive difference. 0.97
00:19:39.000 Other research has shown smaller but still very significant gaps.
00:19:43.340 This is another area where I think Lean In deserves a lot of credit because the idea
00:19:47.940 of the negotiation gap was a popular topic in academic circles, but I don't think that
00:19:53.900 it was super well known before the book.
00:19:55.920 On the other hand, it's also an area where I think the public discourse didn't quite process the point.
00:20:02.780 I think a lot of people sort of understand the problem as just women need to negotiate more, right? 0.95
00:20:07.880 I've seen more than one layperson basically interpret this as like, yeah, women are just worse at this. 0.52
00:20:13.500 That's what's happening here, right? 0.91
00:20:15.120 These phenomena are very interesting as like a descriptive matter, right? 1.00
00:20:18.540 Like women are less likely to negotiate than men. 0.63
00:20:20.360 That's like really interesting.
00:20:21.440 But that's not the cause of the problem.
00:20:23.380 And fixing that will not fix the problem.
00:20:25.240 Right.
00:20:25.620 I think academics on this probably understand this in a much more nuanced way than people
00:20:29.380 who just hear this little factoid.
00:20:30.640 And they're like, oh, and that's why you got to negotiate, ladies. 1.00
00:20:33.700 Exactly.
00:20:34.220 And I want to be clear.
00:20:35.320 Sandberg actually sort of lays this out in much more detail. 0.63
00:20:38.500 She says, look, there are real drawbacks for women who negotiate because, like, for example,
00:20:44.120 women who take credit for their successes are often viewed less favorably.
00:20:48.040 So the point isn't that women are responsible for not negotiating more.
00:20:52.700 It's that this is all a minefield for women.
00:20:55.180 And now what's really interesting about this is that the latest research actually shows 1.00
00:20:59.540 that the negotiation gap may not really exist anymore, or at least is much smaller than
00:21:03.580 it used to be.
00:21:04.560 There was research published last year by Laura Cray, Jessica Kennedy, and Margaret
00:21:08.940 Lee, where they found that basically over the last several decades, the negotiation
00:21:13.960 gap has significantly waned and has now possibly reversed.
00:21:17.800 Is that the influence of this book or are there like other reasons for this?
00:21:20.880 Like what explains that?
00:21:21.580 So the trend predates the book.
00:21:23.620 Okay.
00:21:23.800 They surveyed business school graduates and they found that more women said that they negotiated their salary than men.
00:21:30.000 And yet the gender pay gap in that population was still 22 percent in favor of men.
00:21:35.740 This also builds on some research from 2016 that found that while there are situations where it's productive for women to negotiate more, negotiating more across the board actually decreases average salary for women.
00:21:48.220 So the research from last year also included studies that showed that the more someone attributes gender pay disparities to the negotiation gap, the more likely they are to oppose pay equity legislation.
00:22:00.820 Oh, that makes sense. Yeah.
00:22:02.180 And moreover, people who are exposed to the idea of the negotiation gap are actually more likely to believe certain gender stereotypes.
00:22:10.280 Right. Because that's basically a proxy for conservative beliefs about gender.
00:22:13.500 Absolutely. Absolutely. So there's like a real concern that the proliferation of this negotiation gap idea has been to some degree counterproductive. Right. I just think that the way that this was digested by the public is very clearly women negotiate less and should negotiate more.
00:22:30.800 Yeah. They're lacking the killer instinct. Right. When in reality, the problem is that there are downsides for women who try to negotiate aggressively and women respond rationally to that by negotiating less than men do in many situations. Right. Whereas I have always taken the tactic of just not negotiating and being underpaid. We exist. We matter. I always just say, what's the most you're willing to pay me? That's the question. 1.00
00:22:55.960 they ask me what my weakness is i say i work too hard no one's ever thought of that before
00:23:01.640 this is the this is the trick that we don't tell women about so you know the sort of like tapestry
00:23:07.440 of the negotiation gap issue is actually really complex and interesting it's also another area
00:23:13.260 where sandberg's practical advice really falls flat given the scope of the problem that she has
00:23:19.020 outlined some tips she gives she says to use we instead of i when negotiating oh no it's word tips
00:23:25.860 She says to provide justifications for the negotiation when you do it because that tends to work for women, even though it doesn't actually help men. 0.96
00:23:34.100 This is like that shit from 4-Hour Workweek where he's like, don't say I have to get up early. 0.98
00:23:38.340 Say I get to get up early. 0.99
00:23:40.160 I don't think words have this magical power.
00:23:43.060 Your alarm going off at 5 and you're like, hell yeah.
00:23:45.840 Was that – wait, was that 4-Hour – I think that might have been Atomic Habits. 0.82
00:23:48.520 I don't even know anymore.
00:23:50.000 One book, Michael.
00:23:50.660 It doesn't matter.
00:23:52.400 The book that we have talked about on this show.
00:23:54.500 Yeah.
00:23:55.860 All right, hold on. 1.00
00:23:57.220 Some negotiating tips for women from Sheryl Sandberg. 1.00
00:24:01.540 She says, just being nice is not a winning strategy. 0.78
00:24:04.640 Nice sends a message that the woman is willing to sacrifice pay to be liked by others. 0.98
00:24:08.100 This is why a woman needs to combine niceness with insistence, a style that Mary Sue Coleman, 1.00
00:24:13.340 president of the University of Michigan, calls relentlessly pleasant. 0.96
00:24:16.860 This method requires smiling frequently, expressing appreciation and concern,
00:24:20.900 invoking common interests, emphasizing larger goals,
00:24:23.620 and approaching the negotiation as solving a problem as opposed to taking a critical stance.
00:24:28.460 Most negotiations involve drawn out, successive moves. 1.00
00:24:31.240 So women need to stay focused and smile. 0.97
00:24:34.640 Dude, this is, I feel like this is so much advice to women where it's like that thing 1.00
00:24:38.760 in Ocean's Eleven where they're like, you have to go in there and be friendly, but not 0.87
00:24:42.580 memorable.
00:24:43.360 You have to tell jokes, but don't be funny.
00:24:45.340 It's like this very, very, very narrow band of acceptable behavior.
00:24:50.880 That's the thing.
00:24:51.700 is like these aren't I guess bad pieces of advice in a vacuum it just seems like her advice adds up 0.77
00:24:57.440 to like pay negotiations are a minefield for women so my advice is to navigate that minefield 0.97
00:25:04.120 perfectly yeah it's just sort of it's not super productive because there are just there's just 0.86
00:25:10.500 too many obstacles here to dodge around and not to mention it sort of feels a little bit gross to
00:25:16.840 have the advice from someone very powerful basically be to like deal with sexist tropes
00:25:22.240 like smile yeah don't forget to smile this is always i think just like an inherent limitation
00:25:26.520 of these books because oftentimes what they're doing they're giving advice about how to thrive
00:25:30.540 in an unjust society right in a society where like homophobia is rampant here's how to be a 0.99
00:25:35.880 gay person in the workplace and like not have like slurs thrown at you that's super fucked up but 0.99
00:25:40.720 also people do need advice like this right like 100 feels fucked up to say like women should smile 0.99
00:25:45.940 during pay negotiations. But we do live in an extremely sexist society where like some of this 0.95
00:25:52.320 fake fucking femininity that you have to perform at work will actually help you rise up the ladder. 1.00
00:25:57.220 But then the obvious critique to advice like this is like, fuck you, you're not giving any 1.00
00:26:01.000 advice to fix the fucking larger problem. You just can't thread the needle in these books. 1.00
00:26:07.600 Right. I mean, and there's like a rich tradition in marginalized communities of like sharing this
00:26:13.320 type of advice, right? A lot of like black writers and thinkers have talked about teaching
00:26:18.480 their kid how to behave around police. They're not endorsing the fact that they are disproportionately
00:26:24.520 affected by police violence. They're just trying to guide their child through it. You can sort of
00:26:29.640 see Sandberg's advice in that vein. But what's sort of notably odd about Sandberg's advice is that
00:26:38.720 not only is the advice itself just not very practical, but Sandberg is a very powerful
00:26:44.980 person who is in a position to do more than just give women helpful tips, right?
00:26:49.960 Right. Because in the police brutality metaphor, she's the cop. She's the one with power in this
00:26:55.820 situation. She's on the other side of the negotiating table. 0.98
00:26:58.620 There's a glaring omission in the negotiation gap prescription, which is that if the problem
00:27:05.240 we're trying to overcome is the stereotyping and bias that appear in individualized negotiations,
00:27:12.000 one pretty potent solution would be to rely on collective negotiations, right? The gender pay 0.69
00:27:19.180 gap among unionized workers still exists, but is considerably smaller. And women in unions earn
00:27:24.660 higher wages and better benefits almost across the board. There is not a single mention of unions in
00:27:30.240 this entire book, which shouldn't surprise anyone, but just sort of speaks to the walls
00:27:36.280 that you run up against here, because Sheryl Sandberg is worth hundreds of millions of
00:27:42.020 dollars.
00:27:42.660 That's because she smiles so much in the interviews, though.
00:27:44.660 Smiling my way to the top of the Sheryl Sandberg story.
00:27:47.440 So this discussion segues pretty nicely into what might be the second most prominent criticism 0.98
00:27:52.500 of Lean In, which is that Sheryl Sandberg is an exceedingly wealthy human being.
00:27:57.540 And the book reflects that and therefore is not super useful for the median woman. 1.00
00:28:03.580 Now, I think this critique is more or less right. 0.99
00:28:06.220 The entire book is geared toward white collar professional women who make a lot of money. 0.53
00:28:11.800 Nearly every anecdote is about upper class professionals.
00:28:15.020 The research is disproportionately about upper class professionals, both in the book and
00:28:19.380 generally.
00:28:19.920 There's just a ton of focus on elite jobs at big prestigious companies. 0.96
00:28:23.880 McKinsey does an annual report on the state of women in the workplace.
00:28:27.540 But the focus is specifically the corporate workplace.
00:28:30.680 And the data is based on a survey of employees and companies where in 2023, the most common
00:28:35.740 industry is asset management and investment.
00:28:38.520 That's not a survey on women in the workplace. 1.00
00:28:40.940 That's a survey on corporations.
00:28:43.900 One example of how this manifests in the book is when Sandberg is talking about child care
00:28:48.900 and the burdens that are placed on working women by simultaneously needing to work and
00:28:55.100 having the social obligation to care for the kids. 1.00
00:28:57.680 Which is a real thing because, of course, there's still all these bullshit gendered 1.00
00:29:00.220 expectations about like women having to stay home and fucking do everything, too. 1.00
00:29:03.280 It's like there's two like toxic set of gendered expectations going on at the same time. 0.97
00:29:08.000 So she speaks about this problem relatively eloquently, but I'm going to send you a bit 0.55
00:29:13.640 of her advice.
00:29:14.680 She says one miscalculation that some women make is to drop out early in their careers 0.99
00:29:18.860 because their salary barely covers the cost of child care. 0.96
00:29:21.780 Child care is a huge expense, and it's frustrating to work hard just to break even. 1.00
00:29:25.800 But professional women need to measure the cost of child care against their future salary 1.00
00:29:30.060 rather than their current salary. 0.99
00:29:31.860 Anna Feeler describes becoming a mom at 32 as the time when the rubber hits the road. 1.00
00:29:36.560 A rising star in marketing, Anna was concerned that her after-tax salary 1.00
00:29:39.960 barely covered her child care expenses. 0.98
00:29:41.900 With husbands often making more than wives,
00:29:44.100 it just seems like higher ROI to invest in his career, she told me.
00:29:47.800 But she thought about all the time and money she had already invested in her career
00:29:51.240 and didn't see how walking away made economic sense either.
00:29:54.080 So she made what she called a leap of blind faith
00:29:56.320 and stayed in the workforce.
00:29:58.140 Years later, her income is many times greater
00:30:00.080 than what she almost withdrew.
00:30:01.980 Must be nice.
00:30:03.300 Right.
00:30:03.460 Must be nice.
00:30:04.580 So to be clear, the advice is basically
00:30:07.980 when you pull out of the workforce,
00:30:10.320 you're hurting your future earnings.
00:30:12.460 So even though you're just breaking even with childcare now,
00:30:16.200 it'll pay off in the future.
00:30:17.420 And that's a really solid piece of advice 0.96
00:30:19.420 for wealthy white collar professional women who either have significant savings or a spouse 0.99
00:30:26.160 that makes good money. 1.00
00:30:27.200 Right.
00:30:27.740 But this is a complete non-starter for almost everyone in the country, right?
00:30:32.600 Normal human beings cannot just absorb the cost of nearly your entire salary as like
00:30:39.740 an investment that'll pay off in seven years or something.
00:30:42.960 Right. 0.68
00:30:43.140 Because the ultimate resolution to this story is this woman kept her job and paid a good 1.00
00:30:48.400 chunk of her salary to someone to look after her kids or a daycare or whatever but that's not an
00:30:53.040 option that a lot of people have a lot of people just like simply can't afford it this feels so
00:30:56.880 out of touch that it i was just waiting for her to be like yeah well obviously no one can do this
00:31:01.940 but like you need food and shelter i mean does she like even make i guess perfunctory mention
00:31:07.000 of like well not everybody can afford to do this i don't remember if she does it in this part of
00:31:10.480 the book but there are several parts of the book where she sort of gives these little asides like
00:31:14.440 not everyone can do this this won't work for everybody this is easier for certain people
00:31:18.560 she has this sort of like flickering awareness that this is unusual and that most people can't
00:31:25.280 live like this yeah but she is never able to actually provide advice to people who can't do
00:31:30.800 this stuff right one of the best portions of the book is when she is talking about what women should
00:31:36.440 demand of their partners essentially saying that men need to be responsible in the home if women
00:31:41.840 are going to succeed in the workplace, right?
00:31:43.580 Like there needs to be division of labor at home.
00:31:45.480 This is, this makes perfect sense.
00:31:47.500 You read this as a personal attack.
00:31:48.900 What about the shelves?
00:31:50.140 What about the nation's shelves?
00:31:51.820 I think this stands out because it's one of the few times that she seems to be asking
00:31:56.700 something of men in the book.
00:31:58.300 Okay, yeah.
00:31:58.800 But something interesting that bell hooks pointed out in her critique, bell hooks, of
00:32:03.840 course, the late great feminist theorist, is that Sandberg admits offhand that her husband
00:32:10.920 handles their finances okay now i don't entirely know what it means to handle the finances when
00:32:16.260 you're worth hundreds of millions of dollars yeah he like has two calls a year with their like
00:32:19.900 finance guy it's just like shooting emails to the accountant or whatever yeah but what hook says is
00:32:25.500 that this is actually a dangerous message to send to people who aren't rich because what hooks and 0.98
00:32:30.020 other feminist theorists and activists have been saying for a long time is that independence for 1.00
00:32:34.920 women requires control of money there's been a ton written about this but like in short part of 1.00
00:32:40.460 what perpetuates the subjugation of women is that within family units men control the money which 0.81
00:32:47.080 helps them dictate how families operate can pressure women to remain in bad and abusive
00:32:51.920 relationships etc etc right so this is sort of like a niche critique but i found it very telling
00:32:57.500 because not only is sandberg just a little too rich to give practical advice about this but it
00:33:04.100 feels like she hasn't engaged with the literature right quite to the degree that you would want from
00:33:09.080 someone who is giving, who is, you know, on a stage talking to all women in her own mind.
00:33:14.720 The thing, the only response to like rich people giving financial advice like this is to just be
00:33:19.780 like, how much does a banana cost? When rich people talk about financial management, like
00:33:24.000 dealing with our personal finances, it's a totally different experience than poor people dealing with
00:33:30.040 their finances, right? It's like one of them is like, should we do like an index fund or like a
00:33:34.240 target date mutual fund it's though it's like dealing with with structuring of excess there's
00:33:39.340 a disconnect with the ultra rich that like no amount of thoughtfulness is ever going to bridge 0.99
00:33:45.100 yeah the way that cheryl sandberg exists day to day is so different from a working class woman 1.00
00:33:52.200 yeah right she can't process what their lives are like in any meaningful way as opposed to 0.84
00:33:57.760 male podcasters i i did the work of talking to several women okay i talked to i talked to like
00:34:06.560 seven women about this book okay that's more than you've talked to in years i'm just saying this for 0.98
00:34:11.980 i don't know why i'm being mean that doesn't make sense the thing is i'm giving you shit about this 1.00
00:34:17.220 as if as if as if gay men are better than straight men on this but gay men are misogynistic as fuck 1.00
00:34:22.420 like it's so they think that it's like funny to be misogynistic and they're so fucking gross 1.00
00:34:27.780 so like i am not speaking from a group with like a great track record on this no like i like i said 0.97
00:34:33.300 earlier you are inherently more problematic in that you chose to abandon the traditional male 0.98
00:34:41.660 female dynamic and just have gay sex for the rest of your life i like that we're fighting over which 0.99
00:34:46.140 one of us is like slightly less problematic for talking about this like are we level nine or level 0.98
00:34:51.160 10 bad for doing this episode. That's the key to winning the trust of our audience.
00:34:56.780 It's fighting over who's less qualified demographically. So Sandberg does seem to be
00:35:03.060 somewhat aware that this is all really for rich women, but she never fully admits it.
00:35:08.200 She uses a ton of rhetoric that makes it seem like her concern is all women. But then when she
00:35:12.780 like really zones in, it's about white collar professionals, right? Her introductory chapter
00:35:18.100 has a bunch of stats about the wage gap. And she says, quote, my intention is to offer advice that
00:35:23.480 will resonate with women in a broad range of circumstances. But in the same paragraph, she
00:35:29.120 says, I believe that female leaders are key to the solution. If you recall, that was also like 0.99
00:35:34.880 the focus of her TED talk. Why aren't there more female leaders? It's all leadership oriented. 1.00
00:35:39.840 More than one reviewer has called this trickle down feminism, which I wrote down. I wrote down. 1.00
00:35:44.940 I thought of that.
00:35:45.820 I was like, ooh, trickle-down feminism, and I thought I was the most clever person in 0.61
00:35:48.580 the world. 0.54
00:35:49.160 Turns out I'm the thousandth person to describe it that way.
00:35:53.140 We just did the episode on the Claudine Gay plagiarism scandal.
00:35:56.320 It sounds like you plagiarized someone else, Peter, leaving your post.
00:36:00.760 One of the core problems with this book is that it's not entirely clear that this actually
00:36:05.760 works, that the presence of women in leadership results in better results for women across
00:36:11.540 an organization.
00:36:13.100 The research on this is really interesting.
00:36:15.460 For example, there's recent research showing that a female CEO is actually less likely
00:36:20.480 to promote women into senior management. 0.98
00:36:22.620 Yeah. 1.00
00:36:22.940 There's a study from a few years back showing that there's an implicit quota for women in
00:36:26.980 senior management, meaning that, and I'm quoting them, the presence of a woman on a top management
00:36:32.480 team reduces the likelihood that another woman occupies a position on that team. 0.59
00:36:37.020 I've heard enough. 1.00
00:36:37.520 We need more male CEOs in this country.
00:36:39.100 You can also see this implied a bit by the McKinsey women in the workplace data, because since 2015, there has been a 65 percent increase in the number of women in the C-suite at the surveyed companies, but seven to eight percent increases in the number of women in entry level and managerial positions.
00:37:02.040 This is something we've talked about for various other topics, too, that like representation is obviously a necessary condition, but it's not a sufficient condition.
00:37:08.460 I think it's also important that, like, maybe what's happening is that companies know that it looks good to have a higher percentage of women in the C-suite, so they pluck some out of senior leadership, and then they're like, all right, job's done.
00:37:20.560 Right, right, right.
00:37:21.100 Some interesting qualifiers here.
00:37:23.460 There's a good amount of evidence that a lot of these patterns change based on circumstance. 0.95
00:37:29.800 Women aren't just, like, innately opposed to hiring other women, right?
00:37:33.440 One study found that women in prestigious positions are much less likely to hire other women, but women in less prestigious positions are actually more likely to hire women than men.
00:37:45.420 That same study found that on teams that are majority female, the bias functionally drops away and they just hire other women at about a 50 percent rate, which indicates that what's happening is possibly that women in leadership positions often avoid hiring other women.
00:38:01.160 because they perceive an implied quota for women in leadership, right?
00:38:05.560 And they don't want to hire their own direct competition.
00:38:07.700 But once there are more women on the team, they get more comfortable, that perception
00:38:11.980 goes away, and their bias falls off completely, and they just start hiring women at a normal
00:38:17.040 rate.
00:38:17.680 So Sandberg is sort of like half right here, maybe. 1.00
00:38:20.140 The presence of women in leadership, once it reaches a critical mass, might beget more 1.00
00:38:24.240 women in leadership. 1.00
00:38:25.440 There's not a ton of evidence that it will just naturally trickle down the ladder to 1.00
00:38:29.660 more junior roles either. 1.00
00:38:30.940 There's also companies where the few women who are in management positions, there's so much friction and so much bullshit that you have to deal with as, like, one of the few women in the C-suite that those women get driven out. 1.00
00:38:44.080 Yeah. 0.97
00:38:44.200 One of my best friends in Seattle is, like, a middle manager at a large tech company, and she is always the only woman in the room. 0.96
00:38:52.120 And having to be the one who raises her hand and says, like, I don't think this is addressing, like, female users every fucking meeting. 0.99
00:39:00.440 Right. 1.00
00:39:00.600 And then she has all these like phone calls of people being like, we need a woman's perspective. 1.00
00:39:03.940 Can you be in this meeting?
00:39:04.740 And she's like, I have to do my actual job, too.
00:39:07.100 Right.
00:39:07.320 So like, yeah, reaching that saturation point can take an extremely long time and kind of goes and fits and starts and can be really hard on the women who have to actually do it.
00:39:16.740 There's also an argument that this is just too far downstream of the real problem, which is that women are getting pushed out in the middle because they're being forced to choose between their families and a job.
00:39:28.960 Right. 0.99
00:39:29.100 Right. Because we are not facilitating a world where women can have a child and maintain their position at work. Right. That pushes women in their like 20s and 30s, especially down the ladder a bit. And then 20 years later, there aren't going to be as many women in senior management. 1.00
00:39:47.240 You know, the men are sort of just at this advantage that is the result of all these cultural and political norms.
00:39:54.500 And, well, how do you address that?
00:39:56.900 A, by shifting those cultural norms, which I think Sandberg probably recognizes and does seem to recognize.
00:40:02.840 B, extensive family leave policies, perhaps, right?
00:40:06.820 Yeah.
00:40:07.100 And Sandberg does, I mean, she talks about family leave and the importance of it.
00:40:11.240 The policies at Facebook were sort of industry leading for a bit.
00:40:14.480 So I don't want to say that she deserves no credit there, but I do think that the actual solution from a policy perspective is much more comprehensive than someone like Sandberg is willing to accept.
00:40:26.940 There's a related criticism of the book related to like the to Sandberg's elitism that was made really forcefully by Susan Faludi, famous feminist author, wrote Backlash.
00:40:40.300 She wrote this review for The Baffler right after the book came out.
00:40:43.520 And the idea is that this book is, in effect, an act of corporate PR and one that mirrors a long history of efforts to co-opt the aesthetics and rhetoric of feminism and liberation in service of consumerism and capitalism.
00:41:00.160 Yeah. Here at Facebook, here's our posters. Absolutely.
00:41:02.840 That one line, like, shook me out of a stupor when I was reading it.
00:41:07.960 All right. I'm going to send you a quote.
00:41:09.680 She is talking here about how in the 1920s, when there were these nascent women's movements, they were undermined by consumerism.
00:41:18.940 The rising new forces of consumer manipulation, mass media, mass entertainment, national advertising, the fashion and beauty industries, popular psychology, all seized on women's yearning for independence and equality and redirected them to the marketplace.
00:41:31.640 Over and over, mass merchandisers promised women an ersatz version of emancipation, the fulfillment of individual and aspirational desire. 0.54
00:41:39.680 Why mount a collective protest against the exploitations of the workplace when it was so much more gratifying, not to mention easier, to advance yourself and only yourself by shopping for liberating products that express your individuality and signaled your seemingly elevated class status?
00:41:54.180 So she's making the case that lean-in fits into this mold, right?
00:41:58.800 Substituting solidarity with this individualized pursuit of corporate success.
00:42:04.480 I went into this being aware that there was like this wave of criticism for a lean-in.
00:42:09.000 I wanted to sort of go into it with an open mind and I read it and I was sort of giving it a ton
00:42:14.660 of credit in my brain until this review like shook me out of it. It was so good. This is like,
00:42:22.260 I mean, it's a review that everyone who wants to understand this book should read. She reaches out
00:42:26.280 to Facebook to ask for data on their demographics, which Facebook declines to provide. And what she
00:42:34.020 focuses on is that lean in is not just a book it is also a non-profit lean in.org that operates as
00:42:41.000 an initiative of sandberg's foundation and it has like community groups that you can join
00:42:45.840 as well as literally hundreds of corporate and celebrity sponsors from chevron to amazon to
00:42:53.120 oprah obviously facebook right to be a partner requires no material commitment of any kind
00:42:59.840 Nice. All of these power players very quickly signed on to the brand, which really makes it seem like the whole apparatus is essentially serving a PR function. Right. Right. Because you're not trying to hold companies accountable if you're just letting them latch on to your little feminist brand and declare themselves allies. Right.
00:43:19.040 We see this too with like John Roberts is a great little league coach or something.
00:43:22.620 And it's like, what matters in your life is what you do with power.
00:43:25.900 And the question is not whether Sheryl Sandberg is good at balancing her own career with her 0.83
00:43:30.600 own personal life. 0.60
00:43:31.660 It's like, what has she done with the immense power that she has? 0.70
00:43:35.540 And like, has Facebook been a force for gender equality on the world writ large?
00:43:40.880 The sort of like sum total of Facebook's contribution to material feminism is a slightly
00:43:47.780 more generous leave policy than most of their tech counterparts.
00:43:52.280 Right.
00:43:52.420 That's it.
00:43:53.100 When Chevron can very safely align themselves with Lean In, what's happening is that Lean 0.97
00:43:59.580 In is asking very little of Chevron because it's placing the burden on women themselves. 0.99
00:44:04.880 Right. 0.99
00:44:05.580 You know, recall the annual McKinsey Women in the Workplace report.
00:44:09.400 That report is now done in partnership with LeanIn.org.
00:44:13.240 Oh, nice.
00:44:14.100 I didn't know it was still around.
00:44:15.440 Oh, yeah.
00:44:15.940 It's around.
00:44:16.500 Okay.
00:44:16.980 To sort of give some color to this, in 2019, a Facebook employee, a mother who had just
00:44:23.040 had her third child, asked Facebook if she could work part-time from home while her baby
00:44:28.200 was still young.
00:44:29.200 They said no.
00:44:30.380 She said, okay, what about unpaid leave?
00:44:33.780 They said no again.
00:44:35.180 So she resigned and she left a very public post on the internal Facebook page voicing
00:44:41.200 her displeasure, which got so much attention that Sheryl Sandberg herself responded to
00:44:46.680 say that this is all stuff they want to do but can't do right now yeah this is a company that
00:44:51.720 of course the very next year when covet hit successfully went fully remote yeah just like
00:44:57.140 everyone else and also has invested 50 billion dollars in the metaverse since this all went down 0.99
00:45:03.720 i was wondering if you were going to bring that up you're like this motherfucker doesn't have legs 0.99
00:45:08.420 right the fucking the idea that they couldn't have done part-time remote work for a limited time for 1.00
00:45:14.700 new mothers come the fuck on yeah right give me a fucking break yeah it's just not true it's a 1.00
00:45:20.520 choice that they're making they're choosing to light billions of dollars on fire on the dumbest 1.00
00:45:25.980 idea in human history instead of doing this right this is like the bare minimum if you care about
00:45:31.660 this issue but the good news ladies you can get unpaid leave in the metaverse there will be a 0.95
00:45:39.060 virtual job with all the benefits that you dream of. So, you know, I will say the later chapters
00:45:47.020 of this book where Sandberg opens up, usually the later chapters of our books are the worst 0.97
00:45:51.240 because it's just the shit that gets shuffled to the later chapters. In Sandberg's case, 0.96
00:45:57.420 I would say they're like the least research heavy. They haven't resonated as much in the
00:46:02.860 public consciousness, but they contain a lot of like the sort of personal anecdotes that make
00:46:08.160 her seem a little more likable stories of her navigating through the business world in different
00:46:12.480 ways again there's a little too much larry summers for my taste but when she's speaking a little more
00:46:17.720 openly about just like you know the how it felt to be a woman in the workplace yeah this is something 0.78
00:46:23.120 i heard from a couple of women i talked to that there are more points of friction for women than
00:46:28.820 men in the workplace and that steadily drags on them over the course of their lives and it's sort
00:46:33.400 of proof to all women that like, this is a rot that stretches all the way up into the 0.99
00:46:39.820 upper classes, right? 1.00
00:46:41.200 Right, right. 1.00
00:46:41.920 If a woman who is worth hundreds of millions of dollars is still like, damn, this is the 1.00
00:46:46.920 shit is sexist, then it really does never end. 1.00
00:46:50.060 There's no escape. 1.00
00:46:50.960 Right.
00:46:51.280 I do think that there's like a version of these types of books that can be written responsibly.
00:46:56.540 It's just like, okay, here's, here's decent advice for like 6% of American women.
00:47:00.920 On one hand, I think that there is probably enough in this book that it's not a terrible introduction to certain feminist ideas for like a young woman in the white collar world.
00:47:12.800 You get introduced to wage gap stuff, to concerns about child care and all these cultural norms that swirl around it.
00:47:19.840 But I also think there's like a real danger that a generation of women might be viewing feminist thought through the lens of a billionaire who like when the chips are down will side with her corporation over struggling women, right?
00:47:34.940 It's not just that this is an introduction necessarily to feminist thought for a lot of people.
00:47:40.740 It might be the sum total of the feminist thought that they are being exposed to.
00:47:45.520 There's also such a missed opportunity with these like groups, these support groups that get together.
00:47:50.180 The idea of women meeting in their homes and being like, what challenges are we all facing as women this week? 0.94
00:47:55.160 It's actually a fucking great idea. 0.85
00:47:56.700 That's awesome. 0.98
00:47:57.560 Right.
00:47:57.820 But it's like, oh, sponsored, like Chevron presents Wednesday meetings at Marlene's house. 0.99
00:48:02.740 It's like super fucked up. 0.85
00:48:04.360 And the fact that it seems like they would be pruning those to a level where, like, you wouldn't have a broad range of people going to those things and you wouldn't have, like, a real conversation about, like, what can we actually do? 0.99
00:48:17.260 Right.
00:48:18.360 I want to also add before we move on, there is a common critique of this book that I just think is bad, which is that all of this has been said before and said better by other feminist theorists and thinkers, et cetera, et cetera. 0.99
00:48:31.680 That's definitely true.
00:48:32.960 I don't think that Sandberg views herself as someone who is introducing these ideas for the
00:48:37.840 first time. She's just aggregating and popularizing, right? Which is a real role that we need.
00:48:44.480 Despite the premise of this show, we both actually feel very strongly that like pop nonfiction
00:48:48.760 as a project is totally fine. We need this stuff. So the fact that somebody is mainstreaming a bunch
00:48:53.080 of stuff that has been around is like actually great. Yeah, absolutely. I mean, and there are
00:48:57.200 discrete ideas in this book that I think have resonated with the broader culture for good
00:49:02.780 reason. The idea that women are more frequently interrupted in meetings, right, was something that
00:49:08.100 several people I spoke to said they hadn't heard articulated before Lean In, but immediately
00:49:13.340 recognized when they heard it. That sort of stuff matters. It's important. Even if it's something
00:49:17.540 that's going to impact white collar women more, it's something that it's a dynamic that a huge
00:49:22.120 percentage of women have been exposed to and experienced. And yeah, I just, I think it's good 0.94
00:49:28.120 that there is like pop nonfiction talking about that. Yeah. Yeah. And also this, this is going
00:49:34.120 to sound like me being super problematic, but it's like, you also need to package these ideas
00:49:38.340 in ways that men can absorb them too. Right. And being like, I'm a corporate lady telling
00:49:42.320 corporate dudes that they need to stop being shitty is like actually pretty important and good. 0.89
00:49:46.620 Right. Although it doesn't sound like she's doing that much of that in the book, but in principle, 0.73
00:49:49.680 Frankly, she's not. There is sort of a – what I was hoping she would talk about a bit more is like there's cool research showing that like hedge funds run by women, for example, are more successful than hedge funds run by men.
00:50:04.120 One way to think about that is that maybe women are just better at managing money.
00:50:08.140 The smarter way to think about it is that women who are in those positions have done more to earn them than men and tend to just be performing better for that reason.
00:50:16.660 I think that sort of stuff is important because it shows that this sort of discrimination is obviously real and also has something to say to like elites, right?
00:50:28.740 Like, hey, the fact that you are allowing a culture of misogyny in your organization, that is harming your bottom line.
00:50:37.200 I like that we're doing the opposite of making up a guy to be mad at.
00:50:39.920 We're making up a lady who wrote a good book.
00:50:42.500 In principle, a book like this could have been fine.
00:50:45.900 One of our listeners who actually wrote that book is like crying right now.
00:50:51.720 Talk about a good book for once, Mike and Peter.
00:50:54.080 This is the most common feedback we get on our show about bad books.
00:50:58.320 Why don't you do a good book? 0.53
00:51:00.000 So to wrap this episode up, I think we should just have a big picture conversation about like the corporate feminist moment.
00:51:06.480 It does feel like Lean In was sort of the peak of this movement.
00:51:09.040 And now we've seen a pretty widespread backlash against it from the left, but also, of course, from the right.
00:51:16.340 I feel like it gets so much flack, the idea of like white corporate feminism, because the way that a lot of people see it is that rich white women are like in second place. 0.98
00:51:29.640 Right, right, right. 1.00
00:51:30.400 Above them is wealthy white men, below them, everyone else.
00:51:33.620 And so to build a political movement around their advancement is like very literally the shallowest form of liberation that you can imagine. 0.83
00:51:43.280 But the thing is, is that you can't fully disentangle corporate feminism from feminism
00:51:49.680 itself, right?
00:51:50.900 Now, despite cultivating straight guy vibes on this show, I do have like a weirdly large 0.99
00:51:58.820 number of friends and acquaintances who are like feminist scholars or academics of some
00:52:04.960 type.
00:52:05.420 I could tell from the whiff of soy when we met in person. 0.99
00:52:08.320 It sounded like a fucking tofu aisle at the grocery store. 0.98
00:52:10.360 And, yeah, I was able, like, you know, I sort of picked a lot of their brains very informally on this stuff. 0.98
00:52:15.860 You said, how do I not get yelled at doing an episode as a man about lean in?
00:52:20.780 This is a conversation I've had with my friends, too.
00:52:23.120 It's fun.
00:52:23.780 I gave them a list of the jokes I planned to make and they returned them to me all crossed out.
00:52:29.860 the one of the common threads i got was like all of them were hyper skeptical of lean in and like
00:52:39.940 lean in style corporate feminism but they all had like some concern that sort of circled around
00:52:46.720 this idea that like you know we live in a world where this type of feminism is heavily criticized
00:52:52.600 But if it is not replaced with an affirmative feminism, something that does work for a broad swath of women, then what we're left with is just the critique.
00:53:06.680 And if all that remains in our cultural memory is just this critique of corporate feminism, then it's hard to imagine a positive outcome.
00:53:16.640 It feels like maybe this just manifests in a critique of feminism itself or a world where like feminism is perceived to have produced a failed movement of some kind.
00:53:28.700 Do you have a narrative, Peter, like what explains the rise and fall of corporate feminism?
00:53:32.540 I've now read a lot about it. And the only thing that I can say with confidence is that there's like this broader narrative where women enter the workforce and we sort of reach a point where there are a few senior women, but clearly not enough. Right.
00:53:48.400 And as a society, we're telling ourselves that a lot of the problems with women's rights are in the rearview mirror.
00:53:57.120 And yet we are all staring at a leadership class that is clearly dominated by men. 0.61
00:54:04.740 And invested in the interests of men, even though it is more female than it used to be. 0.98
00:54:08.660 Right. I think that that's what sort of spurs this moment. 0.97
00:54:11.560 We have like there's a narrative that society is telling itself about how far we've come. 0.98
00:54:15.760 And then there's the fact that you can like look out at the Senate and be like, okay, well, what the fuck are we even talking about here? 0.98
00:54:22.440 Yeah. 0.98
00:54:22.820 I mean, one of the things I always think about is that at the moment of, you know, the Google memo, he wrote that whole thing of like, oh, women, their brains can't do math or whatever at a time when Google was 80% men. 0.81
00:54:33.620 Right. 0.82
00:54:34.220 Right.
00:54:34.400 It's like the sense of threat among men at, like, these extremely male-dominated workplaces becoming, like, slightly less male-dominated is, like, a very, very powerful force.
00:54:47.040 Yeah.
00:54:47.280 To sort of, like, process the scope of, like, male backlash against feminist progress, there's evidence that opposition to feminism has risen among young liberal men in the last, like, three years.
00:55:02.100 Oh, wow.
00:55:02.460 In 2020, there was a Pew study that said 60 percent of men across parties agreed that feminism was empowering and 34 percent said it was outdated. 0.94
00:55:13.720 In 2022, Southern Poverty Law Center did a poll where they found that 62 percent of young Republican men said feminism is a net negative for society. 0.99
00:55:26.400 46 percent of young Democratic men also said it was a negative.
00:55:31.920 Oh, so we're reaching the point where young democratic men are almost as a general matter opposed to feminism. 0.51
00:55:41.140 Right. What do you make of that? Like, what do you think explains it?
00:55:43.860 Their explanation was that this is reaction to me, too.
00:55:46.420 Yeah. This is sort of like overcorrection for what people perceive of as the excesses of me, too.
00:55:52.980 You mean like two famous rapists went to jail? 0.98
00:55:55.100 I love we're in this moment where the fucking backlash to progress is always so much bigger than the fucking alleged progress itself. 0.99
00:56:01.440 You're thinking about it pretty narrowly, but this is a time when we need the Cosby show more than ever. 0.98
00:56:07.520 God.
00:56:08.740 You know, there's also questions about like social media echo chambers where other than ours, every podcast that involves two men.
00:56:18.500 I know.
00:56:19.360 It's basically just two guys complaining about women.
00:56:22.660 Maybe that's maybe that's a problem.
00:56:24.260 The sense of threat among dudes to, like, trans people and, like, feminism and stuff is, like, genuinely the thing that I cannot, like, get my head around and feels so dangerous and scary. 0.90
00:56:35.440 Some men hate women so much that they choose to have sex with men.
00:56:41.800 You're going to bring this back to how I'm problematic. 0.95
00:56:44.140 I'm never letting up on this.
00:56:46.220 This is my thing.
00:56:54.260 We'll be right back.