If Books Could Kill - November 28, 2023


Pundit Portraits: Kathleen Parker and Chris Cillizza [TEASER]

Topics
The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck The Identity Trap

Episode Stats


Length

29 minutes

Words per minute

179.94

Word count

5,337

Sentence count

369

Harmful content

Misogyny

20

sentences flagged

Toxicity

51

sentences flagged

Hate speech

10

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 Michael. Peter. What do you know about political pundits?
00:00:03.560 All I know is that the only job easier than their job is doing a podcast about political pundits.
00:00:21.940 So we were we were bouncing around premium content for our dedicated listeners.
00:00:29.480 or paying customers, you know, we are at the end of the day, a media criticism podcast that has
00:00:36.400 sort of taken a firm position against opinion columnists.
00:00:41.520 An anti-pundit position, anti-pundit stance.
00:00:44.080 And so what better way to highlight that stance and dig in than to have a series
00:00:50.800 where we explain some to each other and to our audience.
00:00:54.980 Where we introduce each other to specific pundits and their punditry.
00:00:59.480 Yeah, especially because I think a lot of these people sort of blend together in my mind, right, where I have a sense that if I hear a name, oh, that's a dummy.
00:01:09.380 Yeah.
00:01:09.800 But I couldn't quite pin specific opinions on them.
00:01:12.560 Also, I think there's something interesting with punditry and maybe with, like, everybody on the Internet where it's like they just come to you fully formed.
00:01:19.280 You're like, this is just a political pundit whose views I'm hearing.
00:01:22.620 And oftentimes you don't know, like, wait, who is this person?
00:01:24.920 Yeah.
00:01:24.980 I feel like this is also an opportunity to, like, go into the background of some of these people.
00:01:29.060 Yeah.
00:01:29.900 Although I won't be doing that too much.
00:01:31.080 I was subtweeting my own segment, but maybe we're not going to do that for years.
00:01:36.040 Well, my pundit portrait is Kathleen Parker, columnist for The Washington Post, who is pretty distinctly uninteresting in terms of her history.
00:01:46.660 Just like as a person.
00:01:47.580 Now, what do you know about Kathleen Parker?
00:01:49.540 I literally know nothing. 0.93
00:01:50.900 You said you wanted to start this series with some like more obscure pundits.
00:01:54.420 And like this is as obscure as it gets.
00:01:56.220 I literally know her name and where she works.
00:01:57.860 That's it. 0.81
00:01:58.220 Yeah, she's at the Post. She's been a columnist since 1987. She started off with the Orlando Sentinel, eventually makes her way to the Post where she remains because that's the kind of job you get and you die with. It's like a Supreme Court appointment.
00:02:12.940 It is really weird to me that like this is just like background noise of these fucking columnists. They just have their jobs for life. 0.99
00:02:20.020 And you will see as we go through some of her greatest hits.
00:02:23.700 It doesn't matter how wrong you are.
00:02:25.720 Yes.
00:02:25.960 If anything, being wrong about a past column, that's a new column.
00:02:30.080 Yeah.
00:02:32.040 So she's now like just over 70 years old.
00:02:35.780 So has spent like half of her life as an opinion columnist in major newspapers. 0.90
00:02:40.500 And you can see the effects of that on her brain.
00:02:44.420 She's mostly just like a generic moderate Republican, which I guess is sort of like
00:02:49.440 the most common kind of opinion columnist, right? 0.90
00:02:52.300 She is really just sort of a window into the politics of like insulated, wealthy, suburban
00:03:01.080 Republicans.
00:03:02.140 I have selected some writings of hers to show you.
00:03:05.580 It's possible that when I send you these columns, you will remember it.
00:03:10.980 I just love that the editors of these pages are like,
00:03:12.880 we've heard from lots of people who are correct about things but what about balance what about
00:03:17.420 the people who are incorrect all the time well that's that's what's great about the selection 0.91
00:03:21.900 that i'm going to show you because parker does have plenty of like just dumb fluffy columns in
00:03:27.440 the same way that most columnists do right uh she's very weird about race in like a very conventional 1.00
00:03:32.840 older white person way black white or purple but what i think sets her apart a little bit
00:03:39.160 is her willingness to make very bold and specific predictions,
00:03:43.760 leading to her being proven very wrong repeatedly and publicly for years on end.
00:03:51.280 I'm going to drop a piece that was published by her on November 4th, 2016.
00:03:59.980 Okay.
00:04:00.660 Oh, nice.
00:04:01.780 Go ahead and read me that headline, if you will.
00:04:04.540 It says,
00:04:06.000 Calm down.
00:04:06.880 We'll be fine no matter who wins.
00:04:09.160 And it's a photo of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.
00:04:11.880 This is right before the election.
00:04:13.780 And she's just being like, can you all relax?
00:04:16.680 Everyone chill out.
00:04:17.640 Everything's basically the same.
00:04:19.340 Nothing matters.
00:04:20.480 She says, as November 9th dawns, Americans are sure to be mad as hell.
00:04:24.800 Those happy with the victor will be re-angry soon enough when they realize they won't be
00:04:29.700 getting what they were promised.
00:04:31.320 This is the good news.
00:04:32.640 Thanks to the brilliance of our tripartite government, nobody gets to be a dictator.
00:04:37.340 Hell yeah.
00:04:37.720 And despite what nearly everyone seems to believe, our, quote, broken government works pretty well most of the time.
00:04:44.940 I love that it's like I've dedicated my life to political punditry and also politics doesn't really matter, you guys.
00:04:51.740 I'm going to send you a specific excerpt.
00:04:54.960 I like that mine is like this kind of three-dimensional, like, tragic figure and yours is just like a one-dimensional dunk fest. 1.00
00:05:00.100 Just like, look how much this lady sucks. 1.00
00:05:02.320 If you go into a pundit portrait looking for three-dimensional characters, you're not going 1.00
00:05:08.440 to find that many.
00:05:09.960 I've misunderstood the brief, potentially.
00:05:12.700 OK.
00:05:13.700 She says, if Trump wins, he'll be held more or less in check by the House and Senate because
00:05:18.320 that's the way our system of government is set up.
00:05:21.020 Not even Republicans are eager to follow Trump's lead.
00:05:24.120 There won't be a wall.
00:05:25.420 He won't impose any religion-based immigration restrictions because even Trump isn't that
00:05:30.220 lame-brained.
00:05:31.000 He'll dress up and behave at state dinners and be funny when called upon.
00:05:35.240 He'll even invite the media to the White House holiday party.
00:05:38.140 He won't nuke Iran for rude gestures.
00:05:40.460 He won't assault women.
00:05:41.840 He and Vladimir Putin will hate each other respectfully. 1.00
00:05:44.940 Holy shit. 0.99
00:05:46.220 This is like eight for ten of just like wrong predictions. 0.99
00:05:51.140 How – like you could flip a hundred coins and everything, you know what I mean?
00:05:56.360 This is like this is just an insane series of really terrible predictions and they don't make sense.
00:06:04.080 Like there won't be a wall. There already is a wall.
00:06:07.460 There already is a wall. And that's sort of that was like a big part of like the serious people critique of Trump.
00:06:13.360 Right. He won't impose any religion based immigration restrictions because even Trump isn't that lame brained.
00:06:21.140 What is that supposed to mean when this was like one of his primary campaign promises? 0.85
00:06:25.560 right the muslim ban he literally the the nuking iran is the only one that she was right about
00:06:30.920 all the other ones are arguably like she says he and vladimir putin will hate each other that's
00:06:35.460 not really true i mean i guess he didn't assault women in the white house but we or that we know
00:06:40.740 of but we have right he assaulted it appears every other woman he's interacted with i love that that
00:06:46.220 is like don't worry donald trump won't assault women in the white house like i wasn't like
00:06:53.160 I'm particularly worried about that, I guess.
00:06:55.320 Yeah, it's not the specific, like, location of the assaulting that bothers me.
00:06:59.220 Yeah.
00:06:59.560 This is what makes pundits so special.
00:07:01.640 They can just be, like, outrageously bad at their job, not just in view of their bosses, but in public, in view of everyone.
00:07:11.300 This is cannibalizing my little pundit section.
00:07:14.880 But, like, there's also the thing of, like, why is it their job to predict stuff?
00:07:19.000 Right?
00:07:19.360 It's like, I think this person's going to win.
00:07:20.740 Or, like, this is what's going to happen.
00:07:21.840 well why don't we just like wait and see what happens i just the the whole project of people
00:07:27.760 thinking that their job is to tell people what's going to happen it's just very odd to me this
00:07:33.720 reminds me of a uh i'm sorry to say something that you will relate to so little but this reminds me
00:07:39.100 of like a football game pre-show oh when the the talking head football analysts make their
00:07:45.720 predictions about who's gonna win and you might think about it rationally and be like well why
00:07:51.320 the fuck are we even listening to this the game is about to happen yeah just the game is about to 0.92
00:07:55.840 happen let's watch the game but of course what's actually happening is that they are just doing it 0.99
00:08:00.120 as entertainment every relationship i have with a straight person eventually culminates in them
00:08:04.760 explaining sports commentary to me here's how i've explained sports to straight women i will ask if
00:08:11.520 they do straight women stuff like watch bravo okay do they talk about bravo shows with their friends 0.97
00:08:17.420 Maybe like The Bachelor, right? 0.82
00:08:19.920 The only difference between straight men and straight women in this regard is that I think 0.99
00:08:24.000 you can get most straight women to admit that that stuff is stupid, whereas men will try 0.98
00:08:28.820 to convince you forever that there is something about sports that is somehow important. 0.97
00:08:32.500 It is 8.45 a.m. and I've watched three makeup tutorials, so I'm not going to sit here and
00:08:38.020 pretend that I don't also imbibe frivolous commentary.
00:08:42.060 I think that is sort of quintessential Kathleen Parker.
00:08:45.560 And the only thing I can say in her favor here is that in 2020, she apologized for this take.
00:08:52.840 Oh, did she?
00:08:53.640 Okay.
00:08:54.620 She was like, okay, look, I got it wrong.
00:08:58.840 Although what she sort of focused on was like, look, he has sort of eroded and undermined these very important institutional norms.
00:09:09.000 And she was also very critical of his coronavirus response.
00:09:12.860 And so she's like, okay, sorry, I got that wrong.
00:09:15.080 She wasn't like, oh, by the way, he did, in fact, take steps to ban Muslims from entering
00:09:20.660 the country, you know, like sentence by sentence.
00:09:23.160 Yeah, right.
00:09:23.700 Like the actual things that she got, like materially incorrect, she doesn't really address.
00:09:28.300 I also think it's very funny with Trump specifically, too, that it's like the actual
00:09:31.840 pundit view over and over again is like, yeah, he says he'll do a bunch of authoritarian
00:09:36.720 stuff, but it's not going to happen.
00:09:39.160 Shouldn't the fact that he's saying authoritarian stuff constantly like that?
00:09:43.040 That seems like a really big deal.
00:09:45.080 Like, we haven't had that before.
00:09:46.520 How can you tell me that bad things are going to happen when a bad thing has never happened to me in my entire life?
00:09:53.060 Yeah, exactly.
00:09:54.080 Let's step forward a couple of years. 1.00
00:09:57.240 September 18th, 2018, Kathleen drops a heater.
00:10:03.020 This is during the Brett Kavanaugh nomination drama.
00:10:07.420 He's in the midst of his confirmation hearings, and they have been sort of derailed by a very credible, very detailed accusation of sexual assault made by Professor Christine Blasey Ford.
00:10:21.120 Kavanaugh, of course, denies the accusation.
00:10:24.400 And then before either Ford or Kavanaugh so much as testified, we get this piece, which I'm going to send you.
00:10:32.440 Oh, no.
00:10:34.600 It says, is there a Kavanaugh doppelganger? 0.95
00:10:39.360 Was this this fucking deranged thing where it's like she misidentified someone who was also there and it was based on like Google Street View analysis? 0.95
00:10:49.320 That's the Ed Whelan spinoff from this op-ed. 0.98
00:10:54.080 That happens after.
00:10:55.940 Okay. 0.80
00:10:56.120 But this is basically Kathleen doing, I don't want to call it analysis.
00:11:02.180 it's something less than that but kathleen is trying to square two things in her brain 0.99
00:11:09.060 one she is not a psycho on like sexual assault issues generally so when she hears an accusation
00:11:17.900 she doesn't think like oh this is fraudulent right she believes her but kavanaugh has put
00:11:24.520 out a statement denying that it happened right and kathleen parker is a republican who likes
00:11:29.900 Brett Kavanaugh. Right. But also she wants him to get confirmed. So how can you hold both of these
00:11:35.580 thoughts at once? And where she lands is what if it wasn't Kavanaugh, but someone who looked like
00:11:42.700 him? So she just like made this up? This is made up. Here's a quote. As crazy as this sounds,
00:11:50.420 it wouldn't be unheard of. And given the high regard in which Kavanaugh has been held throughout
00:11:54.920 his life, including during high school, it would make the most sense. Could there be a Kavanaugh
00:12:00.980 doppelganger? The most sense, Michael. The most sense. I love thinking of all news events as
00:12:06.880 basically like a short story prompt. Just like, well, what if? Kathleen continues. Could there
00:12:12.500 have been another Kavanaugh-ish looking teen at the house that night who might have attacked Ford?
00:12:17.400 You've got to be kidding me. Cases of mistaken identity are far from rare. People with the same
00:12:22.120 name are often confused, as was the case with Ford herself. On Monday, Drudge Report tweeted
00:12:28.260 a link to an article on another site that seemed intended to discredit her with negative comments
00:12:33.520 by her former students. But it turned out that the reviews pertain to another California professor
00:12:39.300 named Christine Ford. Wait, what? This has nothing to do with anything. Mistaking someone's name
00:12:44.860 is not the same as mistaking someone's appearance. You have to really think about this because this
00:12:50.000 is a an incredible feat of reasoning the drudge report of course essentially a far-right gossip
00:12:55.500 blog that is a one-hit wonder they broke the lewinski scandal so once these accusations
00:13:00.780 were public they try to smear professor ford but they misfire and they end up smearing some other
00:13:08.240 random professor right who has a similar name right parker is using this as evidence against
00:13:15.220 the veracity of ford's testimony right when what it actually is is evidence that people on the right
00:13:22.220 were engaged in like a shameless effort to discredit professor ford an effort that parker
00:13:28.720 is participating in right now yeah she's now joining this effort yeah yeah she goes on to
00:13:35.580 talk about how in the 1930s john dillinger famously had a doppelganger who was like
00:13:40.840 arrested multiple times what it's literally like well what if she was tripping on acid like yeah 0.97
00:13:46.360 fucking just let's just keep throwing out shit that could possibly explain this yeah what if 1.00
00:13:52.380 she's a russian spy fuck it all this is is an attempt to moderate claims that she's lying right 1.00
00:13:58.340 it's like oh you actually don't need to believe that she's lying or crazy or power hungry or 1.00
00:14:05.780 whatever we can sort of thread that needle and just say that she's mistaken but the outcome is
00:14:11.700 the same right we're still protecting our boy as in all of these things the real problem is with
00:14:16.360 the editors the fact that people looked at this and we're like yes yes let's put this in like one
00:14:21.260 of the nation's most prestigious newspapers just fully just like wish casting like this might have 0.98
00:14:26.140 happened it's wild that no one i mean this is always my fucking issue with these columnists 0.87
00:14:29.940 is that like no one is like hey sorry we we really need some actual basis for this they're like well 0.92
00:14:35.380 you're a columnist with lifetime tenure the basis is that brett kavanaugh denied it
00:14:40.180 i'm now gonna send you the closing paragraph wait i know i was just i was just about to google and
00:14:46.700 find the actual text of this because i'm like there's a little part of me that's like this
00:14:50.660 can't this can't really be what she's doing right like it can't actually be this bad trust me trust
00:14:56.420 me okay she says thus giving both the benefit of the doubt it seems possible to believe both that
00:15:02.200 Ford was assaulted just as she's described and also that Kavanaugh didn't do it. In a case without
00:15:07.420 evidence, witnesses or corroboration, mistaken identity would provide a welcome resolution to
00:15:12.540 this terrible riddle. Anyone? I love that she ends like, is this anything? Cool rule of thumb.
00:15:20.260 When you have to end a column by saying anyone, it's probably best to just not publish that column.
00:15:26.600 You know, what this column should actually be titled is like how I sleep at night while still supporting Brett Kavanaugh.
00:15:35.540 She says, OK, a case of mistaken identity would provide a welcome resolution to this terrible riddle.
00:15:43.640 What's the riddle?
00:15:44.580 The riddle is just they can't both be lying. 1.00
00:15:46.700 But like men lie about sexually assaulting women all the fucking time. 0.99
00:15:50.040 I love that what she's sort of implying almost is an alternate reality where Kavanaugh immediately confesses. 1.00
00:15:55.940 It's also weird. It's like she's doing this as if Blasey Ford was like assaulted in like a crowded subway car.
00:16:01.860 Right. Like she was in a small group.
00:16:04.440 It was like a social event where she knew who was there.
00:16:07.780 It was like a very finite number of people.
00:16:10.080 And she obviously feels confident enough that years later.
00:16:13.740 Yeah. She like stood up knowing that it would ruin her reputation.
00:16:17.080 And for those who aren't aware, like she tried to keep her identity private in this because she knew she was going to get dragged in the mud, which of course she was.
00:16:25.060 And then ultimately she got up there and testified like how confident she felt.
00:16:29.940 Right. You know, I know that people on the right sort of imagine that there are like rewards for people who accuse powerful men of sexual assault.
00:16:38.220 But of course, the opposite is true. That's all incredibly strong evidence that she's confident about his identity.
00:16:43.860 Yeah. And Kathleen Parker just can't hold those two thoughts at once.
00:16:46.960 She needs to be able to support Brett Kavanaugh. And so she's just working her way there without going off the deep end like Matt Drudge.
00:16:54.020 This is me continuing to follow Azalea Banks on Instagram. I don't want to like her, but I still like her.
00:16:59.700 She's not always right, but when she's right, ooh.
00:17:01.520 Ooh, I know. Fair enough, Azalea.
00:17:04.500 There's just so much going on here, you know, like complete speculation being published as like a plausible theory.
00:17:10.780 The theory itself being a way for her to like reassure herself that it's okay to support this man.
00:17:16.640 and we are now and like on top of that you you get in like this sort of implicit discrediting
00:17:24.500 of a sexual assault victim it's also an acknowledgement that kavanaugh's basically 0.99
00:17:28.520 just like a generic white guy she's like yeah everyone kind of looks like this fucking guy 0.99
00:17:32.180 that is the strongest part of the argument just kind of replacement level you could walk multiple 0.98
00:17:36.960 brett kavanaugh's by someone on the sidewalk like one after another and they wouldn't notice that
00:17:42.360 it was weird. There's one more article I want to discuss. This one is actually from a couple months
00:17:48.400 before the Kavanaugh one. This is July 3rd, 2018. As she's writing this, Anthony Kennedy has stepped
00:17:55.420 down from the Supreme Court and he's going to be replaced by Trump. Brett Kavanaugh is the likely
00:18:00.520 candidate, although there's there's been no like investigation, no opposition research onto him
00:18:05.520 or anything. So we're just sort of in the early phases here. And she publishes this heater.
00:18:10.680 Oh, yeah.
00:18:11.320 Classic stuff.
00:18:12.320 She says, calm down.
00:18:14.400 Roe v. Wade isn't going anywhere.
00:18:16.920 God, there were so many of these, Peter.
00:18:19.320 Jesus Christ.
00:18:20.600 This is one of the most prominent of this type.
00:18:22.420 But first, is that headline read familiar to you?
00:18:25.600 Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:18:26.340 Calm down. 1.00
00:18:26.860 This is like the tactic that like angry guys use when they're in a fight with their wives.
00:18:33.360 Is this the thing like Roberts won't destroy the reputation of the Supreme Court or whatever?
00:18:38.220 It's almost it's less sophisticated than that. Here's what's going on here. Big picture. Anthony Kennedy was generally considered the fifth vote for Roe v. Wade. He was a supporter of it. And so he's stepping down. He's going to be replaced by Trump. Several legal analysts, notably Jeffrey Toobin, flagged the distinct possibility that Roe v. Wade was going to be overturned.
00:19:02.000 She says, quote, what new justice would want to be that man or woman who forevermore would be credited with upending settled law and causing massive societal upheaval?
00:19:12.980 What? They would get more fishing trips to Wisconsin or whatever the fuck Clarence Thomas is doing. 0.99
00:19:17.680 Why would someone not want to do that? 0.94
00:19:19.000 She says, quote, only Clarence Thomas would likely vote to overturn Roe v. Wade.
00:19:25.080 Swing and a miss.
00:19:26.260 Oh, yeah, that's rough. That's rough.
00:19:28.020 This is someone who in 2018 thought that Sam Alito was a vote to uphold Roe v. Wade.
00:19:34.180 Sam Alito has like six Breitbart tabs open in his browser right now.
00:19:38.020 Right, right.
00:19:38.680 Like, how can you look at this guy and be like, no, no, he's a lock.
00:19:41.540 OK, I'm going to send you another key paragraph here.
00:19:44.300 Oh, my God.
00:19:45.220 She says, many Americans, including some conservatives, would rather Trump not have access to the employee suggestion box, much less the Supreme Court.
00:19:53.920 Then again, Gorsuch, whom he nominated upon taking office, is hardly a radical wingman.
00:19:59.100 And though true that Trump promised during his campaign to select justices who would send abortion back to the states, he doesn't actually get to dictate how they rule.
00:20:06.960 Oh, this is again like although he says explicitly he wants to overturn Roe v. Wade, he's not going to overturn Roe v. Wade.
00:20:13.880 Yeah, that's why I like this paragraph so much, because once again, Donald Trump is saying something very specific.
00:20:20.360 I'm going to select justices that will overturn Roe v. Wade.
00:20:24.540 And she's like, no.
00:20:26.060 She says he doesn't get to dictate how they rule, which is true, but he does get to choose
00:20:31.280 the justices.
00:20:32.860 Whether or not they would rule to overturn Roe v. Wade is the litmus test for choosing
00:20:36.620 them. 0.90
00:20:37.020 Right.
00:20:37.300 So it's like it's a it's a distinction without a difference.
00:20:39.400 So there were columns, including one in The Washington Post itself, that were like, let's
00:20:45.560 take a quick review of who was wrong about Roe v. Wade.
00:20:48.960 they call out Kathleen Parker herself and they contact her and they say do you stand by it
00:20:56.720 and she says and I quote 100% what at the time it was written it was accurate what it was on the
00:21:03.860 nose the thing is I can see standing by a wrong prediction if you're talking about like some sort
00:21:08.940 of act of god like I I thought the next marvel movie would make a billion dollars but then the
00:21:14.100 coronavirus pandemic happened and nobody went to movies for two years. Something like that,
00:21:18.740 like based on the information I had, I made the correct prediction. But that's not the case here.
00:21:24.260 She had the previous decisions of these specific Supreme Court justices to go on,
00:21:31.680 and she just got it wrong. At the time that I said that you would not be stabbed,
00:21:37.940 the knife-wielding maniac was 15 feet away from you. Here's the kicker if you're ready for this
00:21:43.640 one had the jackals of the abortion rights movement not protested at kavanaugh's house 1.00
00:21:49.380 parker said he might well have switched sides oh fuck off so it's the problem of the leftists 0.99
00:21:55.440 so not only was i not wrong but to the extent i was wrong it's sort of your fault for being 0.99
00:22:02.280 mean to brett kavanaugh who by the way just happens to look like the guy who did a sexual
00:22:09.460 assault back in 1982. Maybe they didn't even protest in front of his house. Maybe it was
00:22:13.440 just a guy that looked like him. Kathleen, follow it, follow it through. That is sort of a rundown
00:22:18.160 of my quintessential Kathleen Parker columns. I do want to be clear that although these are
00:22:23.380 three of her most aggressively incorrect columns, she does have the sort of dumb bullshit that every 1.00
00:22:31.300 other columnist does too. And I'm just going to rattle off some headlines to give you a good 0.99
00:22:36.440 sense these are all from this year first a little uh a little uh crossover with a previous premium
00:22:43.960 episode of ours bud light started a fight it was bound to lose subheading in a time of culturally
00:22:50.560 encouraged identity confusion and gender fluidity anheuser-busch tried to exploit a 26 year old 1.00
00:22:58.320 actress on tiktok shame on them oh my god that's again the thing where she's trying not to be like 0.66
00:23:04.980 out and out transphobic while like defending transphobes and like echoing a bunch of transphobic 0.66
00:23:10.280 talking points all bud light did was um partner up for like an instagram promo with a trans
00:23:15.920 influencer yeah kathleen parker says that is exploiting a 26 year old actress uh how is that
00:23:22.640 it's literally giving her money just giving her money to do ads this is a normal i promise that 0.99
00:23:27.440 is the last one that'll make you angry the rest of them are just dumb dressing down for the senate 0.99
00:23:32.120 is just bad manners. 1.00
00:23:33.880 Oh my fucking, I may have read this one. 0.99
00:23:35.840 Yeah, this of course is just about Senator Fetterman 0.99
00:23:38.220 subheading,
00:23:39.180 Senators should no more come to the chamber
00:23:40.960 wearing a jogging suit
00:23:42.420 than they should wear a tuxedo to play tennis.
00:23:44.720 What would she have said at your wedding, Peter?
00:23:46.340 You came out in the tracksuit.
00:23:47.760 She would have been livid.
00:23:48.780 This is egregious.
00:23:49.760 That was the only reason I didn't invite her.
00:23:52.480 Okay, some more headlines.
00:23:54.560 Why I ordered 200 incandescent light bulbs.
00:23:57.960 What?
00:23:58.320 And that's just a story about how she likes 0.98
00:23:59.860 incandescent light bulbs.
00:24:01.120 Okay.
00:24:01.960 That one, I'm actually, I'll give her a pass. 0.98
00:24:03.760 When they're dumb, but not harmful, just like, you know what? 1.00
00:24:06.840 Have at it, Kathleen. 0.99
00:24:07.840 Here's one I like.
00:24:08.960 Want to be happy?
00:24:09.900 Then don't be a lawyer.
00:24:11.040 Ooh, that's true, Peter.
00:24:12.480 I mean, that's definitely true.
00:24:13.340 She could go on 5.4.
00:24:14.160 That's just a full column about a poll of lawyers that says that we're sad, which, of
00:24:19.340 course, there's like 100 of those published every year.
00:24:21.480 The real superheroes of TV?
00:24:23.300 The makeup artists.
00:24:24.280 Okay.
00:24:24.800 That's just about makeup artists.
00:24:25.880 Yeah, maybe we're watching the same tutorials.
00:24:27.460 That's really all I have for Kathleen Parker.
00:24:29.320 I feel like she is very emblematic of like a type of very insulated, rich white person, you know, like sort of moderately reactionary.
00:24:42.080 On the other hand, not totally nuts.
00:24:44.660 She she was like very pro mask and like wrote a lot about that during covid and was very critical of Trump's response. 0.62
00:24:52.060 But on the other hand, like she will never get behind trans rights.
00:24:56.420 Whenever partisan politics come to the front, she's pretty distinctly Republican. 0.92
00:25:01.580 And this thing of blaming like left wing activists for basically everything that the right wing does.
00:25:05.200 I feel like this is another like very common trope in these columns.
00:25:07.920 And I think a lot of what makes her so shitty is that a lot of what she writes about when she really gets into substantive issues is just sort of like, oh, it's not so bad.
00:25:18.440 Yeah, yeah, yeah. 0.77
00:25:19.040 And I think that's just a classic privileged person sort of position because for her, it's
00:25:25.840 not so bad, right?
00:25:27.300 And it won't be bad basically no matter what happens.
00:25:30.800 I like that what qualifies for balance in like the nation's most prestigious opinion
00:25:35.480 pages is like people who are comfortable in a mildly left-wing way and people who are
00:25:40.880 comfortable in like a mildly right-wing way.
00:25:43.120 All right.
00:25:44.080 We can do whoever yours is.
00:25:46.940 Okay.
00:25:47.260 Are we on me now?
00:25:48.460 I think we are.
00:25:49.460 Okay.
00:25:49.640 So you – I have kept this a secret from you.
00:25:52.360 I'm doing a somewhat obscure – although I don't actually know if this is obscure to you because you're like a Twitter super user and this is a person that got yelled at on Twitter constantly, which is how I first heard of him.
00:26:03.640 So we are going to talk about Chris Saliza.
00:26:06.700 Are you familiar with Chris Saliza?
00:26:08.260 Yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:26:08.800 Of course I'm familiar with Chris Saliza.
00:26:12.080 He's – I think he's now former CNN, right?
00:26:15.040 Yes.
00:26:15.160 And that is sort of where he spent the last, I don't know, what, several years?
00:26:19.020 Yeah, 2017 to 2022.
00:26:20.960 Yeah, I don't, this is a perfect pundit portrait because I have a sense of him.
00:26:26.460 Yes.
00:26:26.620 Which is that he's just sort of like a horse-brained sort of dummy who gives these sort of like middling, hedging takes that are sort of like bizarrely critical of the left.
00:26:40.480 But I don't really know any actual details.
00:26:42.960 I've never paid attention to him.
00:26:44.440 It's true that I've seen him get dunked on on Twitter quite a bit, but I've never like dug in because he doesn't seem like the type of person that's worth digging into.
00:26:54.760 Well, this is I mean, I think this is like one of the core paradoxes of this show is that there's people that just aren't that interesting to talk about.
00:27:01.640 But also like his posts on The Washington Post would get three million views.
00:27:06.340 And he was one of the most popular pundits on CNN.
00:27:09.440 So like these are worlds that just don't interest us very much.
00:27:12.200 Yeah. TV news commentary, like the fucking Sunday morning talk shows. 0.99
00:27:16.280 Right. Also, like we ignore it at our peril because like these fucking self-help books that we talk about, people like listen to these people. 0.99
00:27:22.540 I mean, I think we're still sort of just haunted by the fact that old people vote and young people don't. 0.97
00:27:27.140 And like these people just have like the news on in their home. 0.90
00:27:31.000 Yeah. Just voices in the background.
00:27:32.780 And it's, you know, are you going to be a complete freak and have Fox News on? 0.90
00:27:38.940 or are you going to be just sort of a common dummy and have CNN on?
00:27:43.280 Whereas we get our news in a much more objective fashion
00:27:45.380 where we just look at who's getting yelled at on Twitter today.
00:27:47.900 Absolutely.
00:27:48.360 Top story, bean dad.
00:27:49.680 The whole nation is in an uproar.
00:27:52.060 I scroll my Twitter feed at 100 miles an hour, picking up keywords as I go,
00:27:59.320 and then I stare out upon the New York City skyline and I just kind of feel what the vibes are.
00:28:04.860 And that's how I absorb my news every day.
00:28:07.020 So Chris Eliza is actually, it turns out, fairly interesting as a person.
00:28:12.060 He grows up in Connecticut.
00:28:14.020 It appears that he like grew up in like a fairly middle class family, but he also went to an elite boarding school whose name I forget and I don't care about.
00:28:21.240 And he has no interest in politics.
00:28:24.560 He gets into it because he gets an internship with George Will when he's in college.
00:28:31.300 And the only reason he's even heard of George Will at the time is that George Will wrote a book about baseball.
00:28:36.480 And he's like a sports guy. And I actually, I mean, we talked about it briefly before, but like, I think the rise of people like Chris Silliza is part of this transformation of political journalism into essentially sports commentary.
00:28:51.260 Right.
00:28:51.300 After he works for George Will, he works for something called Roll Call, which is one of these like political who's up, who's down things. Then in 2005, he gets hired by the Washington Post and has a column called The Fix.
00:29:02.980 he gets famous when he starts doing these videos for Washington Post of like who had the best
00:29:09.540 and worst week in Washington oh yeah you remember this and there's like a wheel that he spins and
00:29:14.320 everything yeah yeah yeah I man this is this must have been when I was actually absorbing
00:29:19.980 political nonsense like this as like a young as a young guy I was living in DC for a bit after
00:29:28.020 college and uh reading the hot blogs and just absorbing absorbing trash into my brain so we're 0.98
00:29:36.080 gonna watch uh some of this trash oh god okay 0.98