In Bed With The Right - February 10, 2026


Episode 121 -- Moira's in the Epstein Files

Topics
Episode 120 -- The Murder of Alex Pretti Episode 122 -- Tech's Vibe Shift and AI Discourse

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 7 minutes

Words per minute

173.28

Word count

11,628

Sentence count

714

Harmful content

Misogyny

47

sentences flagged

Toxicity

86

sentences flagged

Hate speech

25

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 Never ask a man his salary, a woman her age, or a sex radical what she was saying about boy lovers in the 80s.
00:00:07.100 That's the meme.
00:00:09.580 That's rough.
00:00:10.840 I love how we started with your lawsuit and it's just like lawsuit bait all the way through now.
00:00:16.200 You're like, come up, you bros.
00:00:17.600 I will get sued again.
00:00:18.740 I am still judgment-proof, so that's the good news.
00:00:22.720 Oh, yeah.
00:00:23.120 hello i'm adrian dawg and i'm where we're not again whether we like it or not we're in the
00:00:33.080 epstein files excuse me adrian only i am in the epstein files that's right stolen valor i'm sorry
00:00:41.700 the only reason you know this i believe is because i told you right yeah no i wouldn't have known if
00:00:45.780 you hadn't texted me so what happened is tuesday morning it was like 7 a.m i was putting on makeup
00:00:52.420 because, in fact, I was about to go on camera to do a podcast for The Guardian UK
00:00:58.040 about newly released Epstein disclosures, of which there were like six million, right?
00:01:03.020 So one challenge of covering this is that you have to write about it
00:01:06.940 when you necessarily don't know everything that's in it
00:01:09.420 because just no editor on earth is going to give you the amount of lead time
00:01:13.760 that you would need to read three million documents.
00:01:16.980 So I was going to talk about, you know, some of the high-level revelations
00:01:21.900 about Epstein's closeness with powerful people
00:01:25.600 even long after his 2008 initial conviction
00:01:29.860 on child sex abuse charges.
00:01:31.980 And then I get a text from Adrienne saying,
00:01:34.620 heads up, Moira, you're in the Epstein files.
00:01:37.160 Yeah.
00:01:37.980 And I was like, what?
00:01:39.860 Now, in her defense, she was just there to snorkel.
00:01:42.120 Like Frank Reynolds, she was just there to...
00:01:44.440 No, to explain, I don't tend to just put
00:01:48.140 Moira's name randomly into search engines.
00:01:50.980 What happened was that...
00:01:52.120 I'm so offended, Adrian.
00:01:53.360 You should be Googling me like a jealous ex-girlfriend.
00:01:56.380 Like, what am I to you? 0.99
00:01:58.060 Like, I just go to like random court dockets
00:02:01.800 and I'm like, Donegan.
00:02:04.540 No, what happened was that the names
00:02:06.680 that sort of started coming up were, in my case,
00:02:09.920 often old friends and very heavy quotation marks,
00:02:12.660 meaning that this was a lot of anti-woke punditry.
00:02:15.120 And then I thought, well, gee,
00:02:16.400 I'm typing in a bunch of names.
00:02:18.180 And I have to say that there were also people
00:02:19.500 that I thought were going to be in there that weren't.
00:02:21.280 And, you know, my hat is off to them.
00:02:22.740 Low bar.
00:02:24.040 It's a low bar, but I'm sure you got that email
00:02:26.040 and you didn't answer it.
00:02:27.200 Like, hey, that's not nothing.
00:02:29.200 Thank you.
00:02:30.040 But then I thought, well, what about cases
00:02:32.680 that would have attracted discussion, right?
00:02:35.620 As I was sort of noticing,
00:02:36.600 like this is almost a network of these men
00:02:39.460 who were engaged in an active rollback of Me Too,
00:02:42.960 which is going to be the topic of today's conversation.
00:02:45.840 I was like, well, what are some focal points
00:02:47.860 of that discussion?
00:02:48.620 Oh, wait, I happened to co-host a podcast with one of them, and bingo, there was Maura Donegan.
00:02:54.160 Yeah.
00:02:54.700 In a pretty interesting exchange, I thought.
00:02:57.160 So, listeners might not know my lore, and I'm going to get into it in a second, but like, broadly speaking, Jeffrey Epstein, who, as we said, was initially convicted on child sex abuse charges in 2008, but got this kind of sweetheart deal that got him out of jail very quickly.
00:03:16.360 His jail conditions were very, very lenient. And because he was not meaningfully incarcerated with a sentence proportionate to his crimes, he was free to go out in the world and continue raping and abusing children for another 11 years until his death.
00:03:36.640 So this is a guy like the failures of the legal system to take seriously abuse, making the state effectively complicit in sexual abuse.
00:03:48.540 Like this is a great case study in Jeffrey Epstein.
00:03:51.700 But when the Me Too movement sort of erupted in October, November, December 2017 into early 2018, Epstein was very, very interested.
00:04:02.780 He was paying very close attention to the progression of the Me Too movement. He was exchanging a lot of communications about the Me Too movement, both with men who were being accused of sexual impropriety during that time, for whom he often served as sort of like an ad hoc, informal PR advisor, legal advisor, sort of strategic advisor, as well as just sort of a fellow traveler and shoulder to cry on.
00:04:32.780 He was a sort of clearinghouse for anti-Me Too sentiment among many powerful people, such as, you know, Sunni Previn, the daughter slash wife of Woody Allen, you know, powerful elite lawyers, powerful publicists, men who feel put upon, who would both, you know, go to him to talk about how Me Too had gone too far because they knew that their friend, the convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, would understand and would also like sympathize with him.
00:05:02.020 Right. So like Noam Chonsky, the linguist and genocide apologist, as it happens, talked about how horribly Epstein was being treated when Julie K. Brown of the Miami Herald revived interest in his abuses with a case and referred to the Me Too movement as hysteria.
00:05:20.520 And so he was really invested. And one thing that some people wanted Jeffrey Epstein to do was affirmatively support efforts towards backlash.
00:05:31.480 So he was sort of cultivating backlash sentiment in his own elite circles, but he was also being approached to materially support formal backlash efforts.
00:05:42.640 And that's where I come in.
00:05:44.600 So like in 2017, I was a editorial assistant at a New York based magazine.
00:05:51.180 Some listeners might know about this.
00:05:52.920 I'm assuming some don't.
00:05:55.140 And I was just like this kind of low level magazine worker.
00:05:57.840 I was making $40,000 a year.
00:06:00.320 And I had no HR protections.
00:06:03.680 I had no union.
00:06:05.540 I had no access to a lawyer.
00:06:08.220 I had no faith in the police to deal with sexual violence.
00:06:11.740 But I was being subjected to sexual violence and sexual harassment by men in my field, right?
00:06:17.220 And so were all of the women in my field who were sort of in my peer age group.
00:06:22.420 And what I did was I created a Google document in October 2017.
00:06:28.400 I called it Shitty Media Men.
00:06:29.520 It became known as the Shitty Media Men List.
00:06:31.740 And it was just a Google document where women could anonymously,
00:06:35.140 and the thought was therefore without risk,
00:06:37.420 posit their experiences of sexual harassment and abuse by men
00:06:41.060 in the magazine and publishing industries without fear of retaliation, right?
00:06:45.140 Like you can say this here, you won't get fired.
00:06:47.320 You can say this here, you won't get sued.
00:06:48.860 You can say this here, you won't get beat up.
00:06:50.800 And that list went viral.
00:06:53.500 I immediately got fired from my job.
00:06:55.420 and I eventually got sued.
00:06:59.580 I got sued for defamation by a guy
00:07:02.380 who was accused of sexual abuse on the list.
00:07:05.160 I never met this guy, plaintiff.
00:07:07.580 I don't know who accused him of anything.
00:07:10.660 A couple of other women have since come forward
00:07:12.600 to talk about abusive experiences
00:07:15.000 that they say they have had with him.
00:07:17.420 Also, one or two of those disclosures about him
00:07:20.280 had happened before the list.
00:07:22.000 But he sued me for defamation.
00:07:24.440 I got pro bono lawyers,
00:07:26.480 which was good because I couldn't afford real lawyers.
00:07:28.420 I was broke and unemployed.
00:07:31.300 I couldn't afford to pay lawyers.
00:07:33.240 These were real lawyers.
00:07:34.200 They were fancy people from the world of elite law
00:07:37.540 who like walked really fast 0.99
00:07:39.460 and said fuck a lot into their cell phones. 0.99
00:07:41.480 They were like the lawyers 1.00
00:07:42.700 who would appear on an episode of Succession, you know?
00:07:44.520 I was going to say, yeah.
00:07:45.500 And they took my case on
00:07:46.960 because they thought it would be really good PR for them.
00:07:50.440 This is the kind of thing that would never happen now,
00:07:51.960 but it happened in 2018.
00:07:52.980 And something they told me at the time was like, look, our sources are telling us that this lawsuit is funded, that a third party is paying for this plaintiff's lawyers because he doesn't have money to pay his lawyers by the hour.
00:08:09.600 And you don't have any money for them to collect in an eventual settlement and take a cut of.
00:08:15.740 So it's not clear why he would get lawyers for this case otherwise.
00:08:20.960 Right.
00:08:21.220 That's what they told me.
00:08:22.160 I don't know if it's true. I don't know if the lawsuit was funded. I don't know who funded it, if it was funded. But that's like what they told me was going on or was likely going on. And that's why these emails sort of like, frankly, when you sent them to me, I was really freaked out. I was like very upset.
00:08:40.440 I was not thrilled to find out that I was in the Epstein files, but this is a conversation in which people who have an ideological opposition to Me Too are talking about my case to Jeffrey Epstein.
00:08:55.900 And he says, I'll help however I can.
00:08:57.840 Yeah. Maybe I'll read some of these to people. And I must say, I shared your sense. Like on the one hand, when I saw these, there was a feeling of just queasiness. I realized immediately what this was, precisely because I had wondered who had funded the lawsuit against you.
00:09:17.000 And on the other hand, there was a little bit of a thrill
00:09:19.280 in that something that I had long suspected,
00:09:22.100 not necessarily Epstein, but I was like,
00:09:23.440 these are going to be men that have an above average
00:09:26.680 rooting interest in making sure that survivors
00:09:29.880 are not believed and are reluctant to come forward.
00:09:34.120 You know, this isn't, they could have gone
00:09:35.460 to the Koch brothers.
00:09:36.560 They could have gone to just regular right-wing freaks.
00:09:39.280 And I was like, I don't think so.
00:09:40.860 I think they probably went to people
00:09:42.120 with some fairly credible and extremely gnarly
00:09:44.780 allegations against them. Or in this case, I didn't know convictions, but I guess in this
00:09:48.660 case, even convictions. So the first email that I saw is from Lauren Stein, one of the people on
00:09:54.860 the list. The former editor of the Paris Review, a very fancy guy, sort of renowned for his
00:10:00.320 fundraising capacity and for his widely rumored tendency to allegedly sexually abuse women who
00:10:08.440 worked for him or who were seeking publication in his journal. And also someone who read Paris
00:10:13.120 review in spite of the name uh extremely new york and very tony it's like very posh it's very up
00:10:18.460 market it's like a beautiful object they throw a big gala every year that i am somehow not invited
00:10:24.240 to but like paris review is like like i'm sticking my pinky out like i'm drinking a 0.96
00:10:31.320 cup of tea you know it's fine for rich people it's not chardonnay moron yeah
00:10:35.680 but the reason i'm bringing this up is because there's also kind of a new york link
00:10:41.340 Like, the Epstein files, as we're seeing them, feature a shocking amount of academics and a shocking amount of sort of very elite media.
00:10:50.400 And it's worth noting, I've been just plugging names in that I know.
00:10:54.300 I've been studying Me Too Backlash for the last five years.
00:10:56.720 For instance, there's a bunch of Hollywood stuff and or like about sexual abuse and hip hop that's left no trace here at all.
00:11:03.960 Really famous people who just don't show up.
00:11:06.220 This is a New York story.
00:11:07.780 This is a kind of intellectual story.
00:11:10.440 This is a kind of almost adjacent to academia story.
00:11:14.100 It's also an overwhelmingly white and Asian story.
00:11:16.900 Yeah.
00:11:17.040 I think like one of the closest parallels to Jeffrey Epstein is like Diddy, whose allegations imply the same sort of like network of coordinated enablers, right?
00:11:29.800 And a large number of alleged victims.
00:11:32.460 But that's a group of primarily black people, black accomplices, black victims, right? 0.84
00:11:38.460 And this is a pretty white story. 0.97
00:11:40.120 You see some Gulf state financiers and businessmen here.
00:11:45.120 You see some, like, Joy Ito, the Japanese technologist, is all over these files. 0.59
00:11:50.800 But broadly, this is, like, East Coast white people. 0.70
00:11:53.080 Yeah.
00:11:53.720 So, anyway, so this is an email from Lauren Stein, August 31st, 2018.
00:11:57.780 Who is he emailing?
00:11:58.720 So he's emailing, this is interesting, Michael Wolff.
00:12:01.660 And who is Michael Wolff for our listeners?
00:12:03.540 So Michael Wolff, he's the journalist who writes these books about Trump, 1.00
00:12:06.500 who follows Trump around and, like, gets him to say insane shit into a microphone, right? 0.99
00:12:11.020 Yeah, and then he publishes the big book right after the election. 0.99
00:12:13.700 He's an access journalism guy.
00:12:15.320 Yeah, and this is, I guess, how you get access.
00:12:17.340 He forwards this to Jeffrey Epstein.
00:12:20.720 The email from Lauren Stein contains what he explicitly calls the writer that ended up suing you, his pitch.
00:12:28.540 You know, the way you'd pitch an article.
00:12:30.200 This guy's pitching, help me sue this person.
00:12:34.020 And this is what Lauren Stein forwards to Michael Wolff alongside a link to the writer's Wikipedia page, which is interesting because his Wikipedia page is blocked out.
00:12:46.540 It's like his name's in here, but the Wikipedia page is blocked out.
00:12:49.840 The Justice Department didn't have time to block his fucking Wikipedia page and protect his identity that way.
00:12:54.880 Somehow, like, there are names of Epstein victims in these files. 0.92
00:12:58.720 So great job, you guys.
00:12:59.780 There are images of Epstein victims in sexually compromised.
00:13:03.340 There's like child sexual abuse material that was published unredacted in these files.
00:13:08.820 The Justice Department's decisions regarding redactions are very conspicuously nonsensical, right?
00:13:17.740 Yeah.
00:13:18.620 And then Michael Wolff writes to Jeffrey, jeevacation at gmail.com, in case you want to email him.
00:13:26.180 At first, being like the lower email is almost self-explanatory, kind of making the connection that all these men have been accused, and then finishing up with thoughts.
00:13:36.880 And then he follows up, not actually very long after that, give it some further thought if you would.
00:13:43.980 I think there is an opening here.
00:13:46.040 What you need is an excuse or opportunity to make the public argument.
00:13:49.080 And that's where Epstein replies exactly the way you said, I'll help any way I can if you like.
00:13:55.940 So after this exchange, I got sued about six weeks later.
00:14:01.080 What wound up happening was the lawsuit dragged on for five years.
00:14:05.020 And during those five years, the cultural tide sort of turned against me too.
00:14:09.800 My case wound up being a lot less publicity and a lot more work than the lawyers who initially took it on had anticipated.
00:14:17.620 So like they weren't getting a lot of good press
00:14:19.780 and they were having to spend a lot of
00:14:21.880 what would have otherwise been billable hours 0.93
00:14:23.700 on this girl who wasn't paying them.
00:14:26.740 So they were pressuring me to settle.
00:14:29.080 And also like, frankly,
00:14:30.600 I don't want to be like too vulnerable in public,
00:14:33.460 but like the experience of having attorneys
00:14:36.820 and judges tell you over and over again
00:14:39.280 that you do not have the right to object to sexual violence
00:14:41.580 is really distressing.
00:14:44.120 I was really exhausted.
00:14:45.220 And the longer the lawsuit went on,
00:14:46.680 the more likely it became that other women who had used the document would have their names 0.82
00:14:50.800 exposed and would become more vulnerable as well. So we went into settlement negotiations.
00:14:57.620 I didn't have any money to pay this guy to go away, right? So what happened is there was actually
00:15:02.440 a GoFundMe that had been started on my behalf that raised about $116,000. The guy who sued me
00:15:09.500 really wanted to be able to say that it was a six-figure settlement. So he got of that GoFundMe
00:15:15.100 money $102,000. I don't know how much went between him and his attorneys. And then they gave me the
00:15:22.360 remaining like $14,000, which I had to like basically pay out in taxes. So I was incredibly
00:15:28.940 lucky. The generosity of friends and supporters and my feminist community is the only reason that
00:15:36.660 I did not be bankrupted by this guy's retaliatory lawsuit. And I'm really glad that I have that
00:15:42.560 community behind me and i would rather have them than jeffrey epstein yeah and i mean i think the
00:15:47.940 epstein files releases this year feel i don't know if you feel this way like it's it's me too
00:15:54.120 coming around one more time but this time under totally different circumstances like this time
00:15:59.580 it's like almost like rushomon you're watching the same story but out of a slightly different
00:16:04.040 perspective and you're you're realizing that a that like connections that you intuited the first
00:16:09.620 time around were probably true. And that in my case, I have to admit that there were things that
00:16:13.600 I just chalked up to just generalized societal misogyny was something far more conspiratorial
00:16:19.000 than that. I thought like, oh, these guys recognize themselves in these people. It's like, no,
00:16:23.700 they're literally on the same email thread. Yeah. I mean, I knew that there were like sort
00:16:30.220 of solidarity networks of allegedly, allegedly, allegedly like rapists and abusers, right? I knew
00:16:36.000 that they saw themselves as having common interests and saw themselves as being sort of on the same 1.00
00:16:43.540 team in a way that candidly is just like much harder for feminists to get women to do. Men and 1.00
00:16:49.600 like abusive men, like misogynist men have incredible gendered class solidarity. These guys
00:16:55.360 see themselves in every date raping frat boy. They see themselves in every handsy boss, you know, 0.99
00:17:05.040 and obviously this is highly conditioned on, like,
00:17:06.840 race and class differences among men,
00:17:08.740 but I'm really shocked at how quickly they come together
00:17:11.960 across other differences.
00:17:13.300 Yeah.
00:17:13.440 And, like, frankly, it was, I read an email chain
00:17:17.940 in which four men, three of whom I personally know
00:17:22.000 to be either convicted or accused sexual predators,
00:17:27.100 are conspiring against me personally
00:17:30.000 and trying to initiate a retaliatory legal proceeding
00:17:34.360 that like really did derail my life and permanently alter it.
00:17:38.360 And like that was, gotta be real with you, Adrian.
00:17:41.520 It threw me off for the rest of the day.
00:17:44.500 Yeah, I can't even imagine.
00:17:46.180 I think that there's, it's also worth pointing out 0.95
00:17:49.120 things like the shitty media men list 0.63
00:17:51.280 were very much at the forefront of punditry 0.94
00:17:54.580 as it pivoted to the cancel culture discourse
00:17:56.940 that I study and that I've always argued
00:17:59.420 is essentially Me Too backlash
00:18:01.060 with a couple of extra steps thrown in.
00:18:03.900 And what's really telling about these documents to me as someone who's been studying this stuff is, you know, I've thought about the media man list basically since it went viral in October of 2017.
00:18:15.260 And the whole fear of cancer culture that sort of washed over establishment journalism and academia, et cetera, et cetera, right?
00:18:23.540 Especially the fields that were represented on disclosure lists and series of disclosures like this was all about the idea that like, oh, there's this big faceless mob out there uniting against these poor single men.
00:18:37.640 But I realized in reading this email that, like, in some way, that story is a complete inversion of the reality.
00:18:47.000 My guess is that no two women who submitted a story onto that list have ever spoken about it, right?
00:18:55.560 I imagine that they don't know who each other is, and I'm guessing they, after what happened with your lawsuit, are very likely not to admit to the fact that I wrote those words into the Google Doc, right? 0.51
00:19:07.300 Meanwhile, the guys on the list used it as a fucking Rolodex to get in touch with each other.
00:19:14.500 It's not just class solidarity. 0.97
00:19:16.420 It's really that, like, the solidarity that we've been told to fear, right?
00:19:20.160 The online mob that lobs accusations turned out to be essentially, I mean, I think that, you know, in a broader sense, like, yes, it brought feminist consciousness to the front.
00:19:29.480 It, like, got people to think about and talk about this stuff.
00:19:31.880 That is important.
00:19:32.940 But that was essentially, that was an intangible.
00:19:34.780 That was about changing the zeitgeist, maybe. 0.80
00:19:37.620 But the people who were actually using that Google Doc to find friends were the people who were, you know, the shitty media men, right?
00:19:46.540 One thing I noticed about men who were named on the list is that some of them seemed to understand it as like a point of pride or a testament to their own virility.
00:19:56.740 A couple seemed kind of embarrassed and sort of pivoted away from their naming on that document as quickly as they could.
00:20:03.760 It's like 75 people, you know, there's variations among the group, but some of them really made it a badge of their identity going forward and will sort of remind people of this.
00:20:14.540 And I think that's partly cynical, right?
00:20:17.180 They were trying in the years when cancel culture was kind of a more reliable way to make money for people on the right to enhance their own careers through their proximity to this scandal.
00:20:29.980 They were trying to enhance their own careers like sort of simultaneously as victims of an overwrought feminist mob and also as men whose masculinity and virility could be attested to by the fact that they were accused of sexual abuse.
00:20:45.060 Right, right.
00:20:45.640 Like they're like, it both makes me a victim and also it kind of shows that I'm important.
00:20:49.820 It kind of shows that I'm a real man.
00:20:51.220 And they took a little bit of pride in it.
00:20:52.840 And some of them made like very affirmative efforts to reshape their careers as sort of like cancel culture victims.
00:21:01.560 And I think that's kind of part of what you see in this email thread about me, which I promise we're going to get away from, even though I'm obviously the most important person in the Epstein story and the most important person on earth.
00:21:14.520 But I think what you see is not just an effort to find a lawyer and maybe find some funding for a retaliatory anti-feminist lawsuit, but I also think you see some people using the professional networks that have been made more open to them by their entrance into this like sort of comradely group of allegedly, allegedly abusive men to try and further their professional prospects.
00:21:40.860 Yeah, I was thinking about that.
00:21:42.020 Like, Michael Wolff is doing very well.
00:21:44.680 He does not seem to have been significantly, like, professionally damaged by the ongoing revelations of his apparently quite close relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
00:21:54.140 Yeah.
00:21:54.460 He's got a gig at the Daily Beast.
00:21:56.600 His books still sell.
00:21:58.160 Lauren Stein was working for McNally Editions for a long time.
00:22:02.860 Now he is the editor-in-chief of the Zionist magazine Tablet.
00:22:07.360 You know, like, these guys are fine.
00:22:08.980 Like a lot of the post-MeToo accused men, they've been restored to their prior status.
00:22:14.660 And I think that's also something that Epstein served as a model for, for a lot of these guys, right?
00:22:19.000 Right.
00:22:19.280 Because at the time, he had gotten away with it.
00:22:22.340 And that's, I think, something that we really see when we look more broadly at his reactions to the MeToo movement.
00:22:29.440 So, like, we can really see in the Epstein files, and I've spent a shocking amount of time in that.
00:22:36.020 My wife is visiting.
00:22:37.280 she's here for the week
00:22:39.060 and she and I have both been on
00:22:41.260 jmail.world which is
00:22:43.200 kind of really depressing website
00:22:45.280 where you can search for Jeffrey Epstein's emails
00:22:47.060 it's formatted like a Gmail inbox
00:22:48.580 and you can also see like everything he bought on Amazon
00:22:51.340 which includes some really disturbing
00:22:53.140 things like schoolgirl uniforms you know
00:22:55.000 but also like my wife keeps
00:22:57.260 sending me all of his sleep apnea
00:22:59.160 purchases he apparently he must have
00:23:01.240 had a really bad sleep apnea 0.90
00:23:02.520 because she keeps being like
00:23:05.240 yeah here's something he bought to make his
00:23:07.100 CPAP machine more comfortable. Like you can spend a morbid hour just going through a lot of Jeffrey
00:23:15.000 Epstein's life. And it's an interesting view, both into this world of people of extreme privilege
00:23:20.280 who are completely unburdened by principle, you know, I'm hesitant to make sort of like a class
00:23:25.420 exception of Jeffrey Epstein, because I think the casualness with which he talks about sexual abuse
00:23:29.560 and the way in which it became sort of a mark of his credibility among other men in his circles
00:23:34.020 is actually not exclusive to the billionaire elite.
00:23:37.200 I think that's like pretty common up and down the class hierarchy.
00:23:39.660 Yeah.
00:23:40.440 But I do think there's a way in which his money
00:23:44.120 and the money of everybody around him
00:23:45.980 furthered the way in which they were unburdened by principle.
00:23:50.200 Yeah.
00:23:50.700 Like they didn't need honor.
00:23:53.420 They didn't need self-respect.
00:23:55.220 They had a lot of ego, but they didn't need dignity
00:23:58.100 because they had so much money.
00:23:59.820 And it's a really interesting way and dark way
00:24:03.200 of seeing the world that has given me a little more understanding
00:24:06.720 of like the psyches of the people who rule over us.
00:24:09.360 But like one thing you can really see just from a historian's perspective
00:24:13.100 is this like real-time account of how powerful men responded
00:24:18.280 to the Me Too movement, right?
00:24:19.480 And how like these networks of solidarity and mutual assistance
00:24:23.800 sprang up among allegedly abusive men
00:24:26.380 and how like the moneyed and the powerful all aligned 0.97
00:24:29.660 to, like, try and stop and reverse this nascent feminist movement.
00:24:34.200 It's just fascinating as a document of what seem like these very, as you said, Adrian,
00:24:39.340 these kind of, like, nascent and echoic processes of societal misogyny.
00:24:44.100 You can really see, like, in the granular detail how they were put in motion.
00:24:48.660 so I think we can also sort of use these as a little bit of a way to like take apart the machine
00:24:59.260 of anti-feminist backlash and just like see how it worked and how anti-feminist men use it and how
00:25:04.980 they see themselves and I have identified three themes in Jeffrey Epstein's anti-feminism both
00:25:13.720 like during the Me Too era which is kind of in the last couple years of his life
00:25:16.660 and then like much more broadly as these documents show us of like how men responded to his position
00:25:25.420 as sort of an example of masculinity, an example of heterosexual success as a lot of them seem to
00:25:31.540 see it. So I'm thinking of him as like a grantor of permission, one, as a strategist and fixer for
00:25:39.280 abusive men, two, and then like really as an ideological anti-feminist and sort of like a
00:25:44.440 comrade in this anti-Me Too and like anti like feminist rape politics project. So he sort of
00:25:51.920 encourages and grants permission for this kind of amoral behavior. He strategizes how to deal with
00:25:59.760 and minimize consequences and how to avert the possibility of accountability. And then he's like
00:26:05.480 just sort of also a comrade, right? He's somebody they can come to for commiseration and like moral
00:26:10.740 support when they are confronted with the idea that some people think rape is wrong.
00:26:16.300 So let's start with this first bucket where Epstein functioned as a grantor of permission
00:26:24.740 for men who wanted to behave towards women something like the way he did.
00:26:32.160 Yeah.
00:26:32.360 Do you want to talk a little bit about what you've seen of this?
00:26:35.040 Yeah.
00:26:35.300 I mean, the classic example of this would be Larry Summers.
00:26:39.840 I don't think we have to say allegedly.
00:26:41.160 Those are his text messages.
00:26:42.960 Larry Summers was pursuing,
00:26:45.600 oh, pursuing, he was harassing.
00:26:47.800 I mean, in these text messages,
00:26:49.480 his own account is that this woman
00:26:50.660 was kind of unwilling and begrudging
00:26:52.640 participants in whatever kind of relationship they had.
00:26:57.260 She was a Chinese-born economist,
00:26:59.080 some years his junior.
00:27:00.440 And he had for her the charming epithet, Peril.
00:27:05.000 Yeah, they call her Peril throughout, both of them.
00:27:07.840 Yeah.
00:27:08.040 And Yellow Peril, for those of you lucky enough not to know, was a racist epithet for Asian immigrants in the 19th century.
00:27:16.000 I believe that when the word peril was first introduced into the Epstein discourse, people were like, well, you don't know whether it's a reference to Yellow Peril.
00:27:23.940 Well, the new texts have the word Yellow Peril in it. 1.00
00:27:27.560 So if you were trying to run interference there, just go fuck yourself. 0.99
00:27:30.720 But yeah, so just to give you an idea of what this can sound like, and I'm just picking at random here, right? 0.99
00:27:35.980 On April the 9th, 2019, Epstein texts Larry Summers, all quiet on the yellow front, and Larry Summers will reply, fairly, I've worked hard on her IMF presentation and professed some ardor. She is warm but reluctant to plan. Right? Between the lines, like, I think this is someone that is having a horrible time with this quite powerful older man who is exerting real pressure on her.
00:28:04.660 One thing, Larry Summers text to Jeffrey Epstein,
00:28:07.300 odds of success, I think another encounter at some point, one-third.
00:28:10.800 Sustained series, one-fifth.
00:28:12.480 Best shot for me. 1.00
00:28:13.500 She gives up on marriage.
00:28:14.720 Finds me invaluable and interesting. 1.00
00:28:16.700 And get her to conclude she can't have it without romance slash sex.
00:28:21.840 Jeffrey Epstein replies, over time, she is doomed to be with you.
00:28:27.280 These are not men who understand themselves, I would venture to guess,
00:28:30.900 as describing a robustly consensual relationship, right? 0.95
00:28:34.740 Doomed, concludes she can't get what she wants without sex,
00:28:38.000 which is presumably what she doesn't want, right? 0.90
00:28:40.520 So that's Larry.
00:28:43.420 Have you heard anything about Steve Tisch?
00:28:46.000 I have not.
00:28:47.200 Do you know who Steve Tisch is?
00:28:48.580 I think I do.
00:28:50.160 Who do you think he is? 1.00
00:28:51.460 This will also be like a fun conversation between two homosexuals 0.99
00:28:54.520 trying to name this very straight man. 1.00
00:28:57.360 Well, I mean, I think of the Tisch School.
00:28:59.120 Is that the Tisch of the Tisch School?
00:29:00.900 He's the scion of a very, very wealthy family.
00:29:03.840 His father was a Hollywood producer and also the postmaster general at one point.
00:29:09.260 But he is a big, fancy, rich guy who inherited a boatload of money.
00:29:13.900 And most notably, he owns the New York Giants, which is a football team.
00:29:19.140 Have you heard of American football, Adrian?
00:29:21.460 There's a game in our hometown this weekend.
00:29:23.820 I did not know that. 1.00
00:29:26.600 The Giants are not in it because I think they suck ass. 1.00
00:29:29.540 But he is the owner of the Giants. 1.00
00:29:30.900 I believe it is between the Seattle seagrass and the New York Bostonians.
00:29:38.840 So Steve Tisch frequently emailed Epstein, asking Epstein to introduce him to various women.
00:29:47.400 It's like, oh, your assistant's friend.
00:29:49.280 I had lunch with her.
00:29:50.160 Who is she?
00:29:51.180 He keeps asking Epstein if various women are, quote, pro or civilian.
00:29:56.640 Wait, I don't even understand that. 0.86
00:29:58.000 He's asking if they're prostitutes. 0.92
00:29:59.400 Oh. 0.70
00:29:59.600 And Epstein is writing back in his typical typoed way, like, you know.
00:30:06.760 This is something, if people haven't read these, like, rich people apparently just like, do not know how to spell and do not mind confessing to crimes over email.
00:30:14.680 They put everything in writing.
00:30:16.260 It's like, crew mine. 0.99
00:30:17.740 And you're like, I think you're saying crime, but this would not stand up in court because your spelling is fucking horrible. 0.92
00:30:22.620 At one point, Epstein writes to Tish saying, I have a present for you in New York. 0.92
00:30:28.040 This turns out to be a woman who Epstein describes as Tahitian and mostly speaks French.
00:30:34.640 So there's that.
00:30:36.080 There's like the people who seem to be, I think you can see this with both Summers and Tish.
00:30:40.940 They're looking to Epstein not exactly as a pimp, but as somebody who can guide them and offer them sort of like expertise and even mentorship in their dealings with women.
00:30:51.360 And I want to emphasize this is all after he has served jail time for child sexual abuse, right?
00:30:57.460 And there's also, of course, Mr. Elon Musk, Nazi salute rocket man, who he said in September, he was tweeting this, he's like, Epstein invited me to his island and I refused, all caps.
00:31:11.440 And in fact, from a 2012 email, we can see that it was Elon Musk who was requesting an invitation to Epstein's island going, what day slash night will be the wildest party?
00:31:22.400 Yeah, he says, I've been working to the edge of sanity this year, and so once my kids head home after Christmas, I really want to hit the party scene in St. Bart's or elsewhere and let loose.
00:31:32.140 The invitation is much appreciated, but a peaceful island experience is the opposite of what I'm looking for.
00:31:37.000 Okay.
00:31:37.800 So I think what we see in this kind of bucket, these guys going to Epstein for advice about women, going to Epstein because they want to join him for these wild parties, is the sense of Epstein as an aspirational figure.
00:31:52.400 The sense of Epstein as somebody whose dealings with women, whose like sort of pursuits of pleasure are what these guys want to emulate, right?
00:32:03.020 It's clearly like a kind of like kid brother relationship, even with men who were significantly older than him, who see him as sort of having mastered something about masculinity and about manhood and about like male heterosexuality that they want for themselves.
00:32:18.960 And once again, this is fully after his pedophilia conviction.
00:32:22.400 Yeah, we should be clear on this. Like, it's Google-able. They had Google in 2012 when Elon Musk was sending this.
00:32:28.280 I mean, like, these men deny wrongdoing, and they frequently say that they were not aware of the extent of Jeffrey Epstein's abuse or the nature of what he had been charged with.
00:32:40.400 They sort of plead ignorance, right?
00:32:42.700 I'm going to say the amount that I know about people in my tertiary social circle who I've like never had an extended conversation with, especially now in the age of like Instagram, you know, like gossip does not stay localized.
00:32:58.460 Other people's sex lives are very interesting to a lot of people.
00:33:02.480 And this is not the kind of information that would remain secret.
00:33:07.740 It's the kind of information that people may have made judgments about what to do with that they now find embarrassing or inconvenient.
00:33:16.600 But I think the notion that it wasn't available to them, that they didn't know, is something that I think we can be more skeptical of.
00:33:23.460 You know, one lens with which I approach some of these emails, especially the ones having to do with universities, is as someone at Stanford who deals with donors.
00:33:32.960 And it did occur to me at some point, like, as colleagues are, frankly, justifiably getting raked over the coals for how long they took money from this guy.
00:33:43.060 Gee, would I know?
00:33:44.760 I mean, the Klayman Institute is at very low risk of taking money from sex pests in the sense that we have wonderful donors who are, you know. 1.00
00:33:52.900 Women.
00:33:53.900 Well, I was going to say, who are also very sensitized to gender issues and tend to be better about this stuff.
00:33:58.500 Yeah, I don't think Jeffrey Epstein is lining up to give money.
00:34:02.080 to a gender studies think tank, no.
00:34:04.500 No, exactly. 0.77
00:34:05.180 But it is true that like
00:34:06.880 one doesn't do a full background check.
00:34:09.440 Universities might,
00:34:10.500 but I'm not even sure they do.
00:34:12.180 But if someone ended up
00:34:13.280 with like $20,000 of Epstein money
00:34:15.100 for their foundation
00:34:16.500 and sort of didn't understand
00:34:17.780 who this guy was,
00:34:18.880 like I'm inclined
00:34:19.760 from my own professional experience
00:34:21.020 to be like, well, there's a chance
00:34:22.200 that you just didn't do your homework 0.99
00:34:23.760 and that sucks, 0.95
00:34:24.980 but like, 0.88
00:34:25.700 and you probably should apologize for it,
00:34:27.200 but like that can happen.
00:34:28.900 But then these emails
00:34:30.660 become all the more interesting 0.94
00:34:31.780 Because as you say, this guy becomes sort of this Bengali.
00:34:35.460 There's an AI researcher who's in these files that, according to the emails, 0.65
00:34:39.860 like asks Epstein to sort of help fund his kid's education, right?
00:34:44.220 The idea that I would ask any Stanford donor to like fund river schooling
00:34:48.280 is absurd to me to begin with.
00:34:50.680 But certainly if you were to do that, you would then Google, you know,
00:34:55.280 Epstein plus unsafe free allegations before you do that, right?
00:34:58.580 Like, it's just astonishing the level of intimacy.
00:35:01.940 I have to admit that, like, with some of the stuff, like the Joe Ito stuff that you talked about,
00:35:05.480 I did sort of gulp and was like, well, gee, like, I don't know if I would catch this either
00:35:09.460 if I had a small outfit that was running background on these people.
00:35:14.020 But then you see the extent of the communication and what they actually go to him with.
00:35:18.220 And you're like, well, no, the girls, the island, the sex stuff isn't unspoken in the background and they don't know.
00:35:26.920 it's the social lubricant
00:35:28.640 pardon my French
00:35:29.540 it's the thing that makes the connections 0.76
00:35:31.160 in the first place
00:35:31.880 what's so scandalous
00:35:32.920 is that these connections wouldn't exist 0.79
00:35:34.380 if it weren't for the trafficking women
00:35:36.080 yeah you know
00:35:36.840 there's plausible deniability
00:35:38.540 and then there's Epstein's email
00:35:40.140 to Joy Ito saying
00:35:41.620 in I believe October 2017
00:35:43.420 like oh my god
00:35:44.180 all these accused men are coming to me
00:35:45.620 for advice
00:35:46.920 and my stock is really going up
00:35:48.520 because I have been accused of sexual abuse
00:35:50.540 and indeed served in jail
00:35:51.560 you know like
00:35:52.000 this is not something he is hiding
00:35:53.620 he understands himself
00:35:55.500 as an avatar and sort of like a mascot for accused men,
00:35:59.260 particularly after the Me Too movement gained steam.
00:36:02.600 So it seems like the sex stuff and like his masculinity
00:36:05.940 and like these kind of performances of reality
00:36:07.860 that he was inflicting on these women and girls
00:36:10.620 were pretty core to his sense of self, right?
00:36:13.240 It's not something he was like hiding
00:36:14.400 or just doing on the off hours.
00:36:16.840 This is allegedly quite constant
00:36:19.160 and seemingly quite out in the open.
00:36:21.760 Yeah, yeah.
00:36:22.600 And then that brings us to bucket two, which is Epstein as a strategist and fixer for abusive men, working with them after allegations about their misconduct come forward to try and like tell them what to do and how to handle it.
00:36:39.500 They come to him and say, what should I do in this situation?
00:36:43.160 You were in this situation before, right?
00:36:46.260 You know how this works or I want the kind of outcome that you got.
00:36:52.040 How do I get it?
00:36:53.580 I think the most prominent example here is Lawrence Krauss.
00:36:57.920 Do you want to tell us about Lawrence Krauss?
00:36:59.520 I believe at the time he was at Case Western University.
00:37:01.760 He was at the, also Arizona State for a while.
00:37:04.080 Yeah, Lawrence Krauss is a physicist who, I must admit, came onto my radar only because of Me Too,
00:37:12.160 only because he was accused, I believe, of misconduct,
00:37:16.160 and then sort of turned that into a kind of anti-woke punditry career,
00:37:22.740 including a book that we're going to do an episode on
00:37:25.340 with none other than Michael Hobbes called The War on Science.
00:37:27.960 Wait, is The War on Science, like,
00:37:30.000 these libs think that there's, you know, more than two genders?
00:37:32.980 Is it that kind of thing? 1.00
00:37:33.900 Yeah, and feminists are out of control and they're, you know, destroying science. 1.00
00:37:37.700 Oh, yeah. They don't even want to be groped in office hours. 1.00
00:37:41.620 Yeah.
00:37:41.900 Or, like, asked out on dates as your undergrads, Lawrence Krauss,
00:37:45.620 He was accused of sexual misconduct by colleagues and students, which led to a BuzzFeed article and also a Title IX investigation, I believe at Case Western.
00:37:57.520 I think that's where he was when this all happened.
00:37:59.940 And he went to Epstein right away.
00:38:01.580 And Epstein seems to have really been his confidant.
00:38:04.960 when Krauss went to like hire one of these men's rights lawyers to defend him in the Title IX
00:38:10.680 proceeding. He wrote an email to his lawyer, Krauss did, specifically asking for his lawyer
00:38:19.460 to work directly with Jeffrey Epstein. So he says, Jeffrey is not only friends with most of
00:38:24.440 the famous people from finance to business to Hollywood who have either been brought down
00:38:28.220 during hashtag me too. And he also speaks regularly with people ranging from the awful
00:38:33.020 White House people, who he is friends with, to Ken Starr, etc. Like, these guys also can't write
00:38:36.860 a sentence. It's like, you think you're the smartest guy in the world and you can't write
00:38:41.260 a sentence. Lawrence Krauss, also a prominent, like, new atheist. That's kind of his big claim
00:38:46.000 to fame. He seems to be less significant as a physicist than as, like, sort of a cultural
00:38:51.720 commentator and a man about town with all the fedora that that implies. But, like, this is a
00:38:57.260 guy who's not just going to Epstein privately. This is a guy who's trying to draft Epstein into
00:39:01.800 his legal team. And he's running all of the BuzzFeed reporters' questions about him and about
00:39:08.900 these allegations against him by Jeffrey Epstein, right? He's talking to him about the Title IX
00:39:14.700 tribunal at his university. And he goes, oh, well, luckily, the Title IX lady who seems to be in
00:39:20.140 charge of my investigation is like an old sweetheart and not a young Me Too bitch. 1.00
00:39:24.420 Great. 0.96
00:39:24.700 This is like something that also other men seem to do. At one point,
00:39:28.840 Jeffrey Epstein is connected to Brett Ratner through, I believe, a publicist who's saying
00:39:34.380 him like, hey, I've got Brett Ratner on my cell phone.
00:39:36.300 Can you get on the call?
00:39:37.760 And then later, Jeffrey Epstein says, send this to Bratner.
00:39:42.380 And it's a Washington Post or I'm sorry, a Washington Times article, much less respectable
00:39:48.420 than the Washington Post.
00:39:49.440 Yeah.
00:39:49.740 A Washington Times article about a woman who accused Brett Kavanaugh of sexual abuse and
00:39:53.840 then retracted.
00:39:55.260 And he says, send this to Bratner.
00:39:56.460 Brett Ratner was accused of sexual violence by some number of women.
00:40:01.740 I think it was like a few women.
00:40:04.260 And he never faced a criminal trial, but did just recently direct the documentary about Melania Trump for Amazon.
00:40:12.500 We need to do an episode on.
00:40:13.900 People have been telling us.
00:40:14.960 Dude, I'm dreading it.
00:40:16.280 I'm dreading it.
00:40:17.420 Adrian had the idea that we should sneak our mics into a screening because it will definitely be empty.
00:40:22.840 And then, yeah, and then just like do it live until they kick us out.
00:40:25.760 I think we just have to have, like, popcorn night.
00:40:27.980 Yeah, yeah.
00:40:28.640 And do a screening.
00:40:29.820 Yeah, or do, like, salvia and just trip balls while watching the Melania movie.
00:40:37.120 So he's also, like, really clearly scheming with his allies to, like, try and develop their own sense of what Me Too means and what it will mean specifically for him.
00:40:49.740 So one of the things he says to Michael Wolff, the author of Fire and Fury, that axis journalist who tried to conscript Jeffrey Epstein into an effort against me personally, love Michael Wolff.
00:41:02.320 He and Jeffrey were emailing about all these men who were being accused of sexual violence and like losing positions of prominence.
00:41:10.500 Michael Wolff was very worried about Lauren Stein losing his job at the Paris Review.
00:41:14.380 They're talking about Louis C.K. and Charlie Rose and Les Moonves.
00:41:20.080 And one of the things Epstein says is you and I are old news.
00:41:24.380 And that was conspicuous to me, right?
00:41:27.040 He clearly seems to think on the one hand that Me Too has elevated his status among abusive men
00:41:34.200 and made him sort of an authority on how to navigate and get away with this kind of controversy
00:41:40.360 that a lot of men are going through now.
00:41:44.380 but also he thinks that it makes him look good
00:41:48.580 because there's sort of like new, more distracting controversies
00:41:52.580 or he doesn't understand his own predation on children
00:41:55.200 as being as serious as some of what these other people are being accused of.
00:41:59.160 Yeah. So then what's the third bucket?
00:42:01.680 The third bucket is Epstein is an ideological anti-feminist 1.00
00:42:05.020 and somebody who, people who are annoyed or frightened or angry 1.00
00:42:10.080 about Me Too feminists and about their sort of moral claims 0.62
00:42:13.760 entering in the public sphere, can go to for solidarity and commiseration in their sort of 1.00
00:42:19.500 like anti-feminist feelings. And this is a role Epstein serves for his circles even before Me Too.
00:42:24.720 He was fiercely committed to the idea that women who accuse men of rape are liars who are conspiring
00:42:32.180 and are out for money, right? So this is something that's like really conspicuous. In July of 2011,
00:42:40.200 He sends a series of emails to different people about this notion of, I think it was Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the French finance minister, who allegedly raped somebody, and one of his accusers retracted her testimony.
00:42:58.360 Epstein sent several versions of the same email to different people with a story about this incident.
00:43:04.520 And he says over and over again, the story is false allegations, a world of Google, unpunished accusers, fear of appearing insensitive.
00:43:13.540 My favorite takeaway line from the Strauss-Kahn feminazis, these revelations mean little. 0.99
00:43:18.160 Don't forget that even liars can be raped. 0.98
00:43:20.660 The accuser in Strauss-Kahn has been found to be a liar. 0.99
00:43:24.020 The accuser in Andrew's case is worse.
00:43:26.080 The accuser in the Andrews case, by the way, being Virginia Giuffre, the woman who was trafficked by Epstein and accused Prince Andrew of rape under Epstein's auspices, who died by suicide in Australia last year.
00:43:40.060 That's right.
00:43:40.620 Story was brought by News of the World.
00:43:42.600 In the Strauss-Kahn case, she hoped to get money in the future and told her boyfriend, unfortunately for her, it was recorded, that she had hoped to get money.
00:43:50.080 Not one English newspaper questioned the veracity of Andrews' accuser, all being too frightened of the feminist backlash.
00:43:55.100 I attach readily accessible police record.
00:43:58.300 She also accused Alan Dershowitz, Ehud Barak,
00:44:00.500 and a number of other celebrity figures of sexual misdeeds.
00:44:02.980 He's like describing the accusations against him
00:44:06.160 as this conspiracy against him, 1.00
00:44:08.400 as this woman scheming and like manipulating others 0.55
00:44:13.840 in order to extract from him something that she wants,
00:44:18.900 which goes back to your point, Adrienne, about projection.
00:44:21.840 Like what seems to have happened or what is alleged to have happened
00:44:25.080 in the Epstein case
00:44:26.860 is that Epstein was habitually
00:44:28.860 and prolifically sexually abusing children. 0.84
00:44:31.300 Yeah. 0.96
00:44:31.860 That he was tolerated,
00:44:34.020 if not aided in this effort
00:44:35.580 by a pretty large group of people,
00:44:38.020 notably Ghislaine Maxwell,
00:44:39.480 but allegedly also others.
00:44:41.160 And that the people around him,
00:44:44.560 including people in power,
00:44:46.100 like the then U.S. attorney Jim Acosta,
00:44:47.680 who later became Trump's labor secretary,
00:44:50.480 deliberately shielded him from consequences
00:44:52.100 and deliberately allowed him 1.00
00:44:53.440 to continue raping and abusing girl children. 1.00
00:44:57.200 So this is something that he continues to talk about. 1.00
00:45:02.500 He's like, these feminists, Jeffrey Epstein, 0.99
00:45:05.400 billionaire pedophile sex trafficker, 1.00
00:45:07.440 is saying these feminists are crazy 1.00
00:45:09.200 to say that there's such a thing as rape culture. 1.00
00:45:12.200 Yeah, yeah. 1.00
00:45:13.380 Walking rape culture says that rape culture is a myth, right?
00:45:15.780 So this is a email he is writing to Ken Starr.
00:45:22.620 Remind our listeners who Ken Starr is.
00:45:24.620 Ken Starr was the special prosecutor during the Clinton-Lewinsky investigations.
00:45:32.460 Well, the Whitewater investigation that became the Jennifer Flowers investigation
00:45:36.120 that became the Monica Lewinsky investigation.
00:45:39.560 Is that right?
00:45:40.340 Yeah, the famous Republican prosecutor.
00:45:43.380 Classic right-wing lawyer guy who's most famous for being the lead prosecutor
00:45:48.240 in the impeachment of Bill Clinton.
00:45:49.400 So Ken Starr is somehow involved with some kind of Title IX case.
00:45:53.920 It's not clear from the context of the emails what his relationship to the case is, who is being accused, but it's some kind of like campus sexual violence situation that Ken Starr is involved with and is talking to Epstein about.
00:46:08.260 So Ken Starr writes to Epstein, thank you, you're a prince.
00:46:11.580 Good points.
00:46:12.320 A professional editor is chewing on it as I write.
00:46:14.960 Disagree regarding off campus.
00:46:16.700 I think that's hugely relevant.
00:46:18.500 Gratefully, Ken.
00:46:19.400 Sent from my iPhone, to which Jeffrey Epstein in November 2016 writes back, relevant to the facts, but doesn't rebuff the culture issue that the feminazis propagate. 0.50
00:46:29.460 Yeah, so he's keeping this man who is a right-wing ideologue, for all I know, sort of on message.
00:46:35.240 This guy, it sounds like Ken Starr is making comments on a specific case, and Epstein is the one who's pulling him to the generalities.
00:46:41.240 This is saying, hey, this is not whatever case it is that you're, maybe you're representing someone, maybe you're somehow involved in it, but he's saying it's not just this case.
00:46:51.560 This is about the feminazis, right?
00:46:52.900 Yeah, no, this is not a guy who is understanding himself as being very well attuned to the peculiar nuances of individual rape accusations and the surrounding circumstances, right?
00:47:03.100 This is a guy who sees himself on the side of men in a war of men against women.
00:47:08.420 Yeah, yeah.
00:47:09.260 And I mean, that's the other thing, right?
00:47:10.320 We tend to think of these kinds of ties existing between powerful people across society, and sometimes they involve sex and gender.
00:47:23.300 Not always, but sometimes.
00:47:25.060 Well, it seems like with Epstein, when you got in touch with him, it was because you had a gendered grievance as a man, and you were hoping for some kind of male-on-male help from him.
00:47:35.980 The number of people who show up here, and when I Google them, it's like, is a London Times editor or writer known for his controversial and counterintuitive views on society? 0.99
00:47:47.300 Like, which views, motherfucker? 0.99
00:47:49.020 Which views? 1.00
00:47:50.320 Right?
00:47:50.660 It's like, it's very obvious.
00:47:52.420 Some of it is a little bit more in line with Epstein's own intellectual pretensions.
00:47:57.900 So that is to say, stuff about evolutionary psychology, stuff about he seems to be kind of a climate denier, possibly.
00:48:05.280 He's just like—
00:48:06.420 I mean, with that many trips on the Lolita Express, you know, you have to do something to justify several of the moral violations, and I think one of them might be the carbon footprint.
00:48:17.940 Oh, my God.
00:48:19.180 That is dark.
00:48:20.120 But, you know, like, which is a thing that you recognize with Silicon Valley billionaires, right?
00:48:25.140 Like, that they have these kind of weird fixations that they throw a bunch of money at, and that exists here.
00:48:31.580 But you are right that, like, depending on how much of the files we now can look at, it is really striking how central this kind of anti-feminist grievance was in gathering that network around him in the first place, right?
00:48:46.640 You don't see him going out of his way to give money or support to someone on a totally unrelated thing.
00:48:54.040 It does tend to be like, unless there's a rape accusation within walking distance of this person, Jeffrey Epstein is not going to get interested.
00:49:02.260 It's really, it is a network all about that, it seems.
00:49:05.320 I will say, like, Jeffrey Epstein is not, like, necessarily a great friend. 0.97
00:49:08.240 One thing you see sometimes is him, like, consoling somebody in one email and then talking shit about them in another. 0.85
00:49:14.980 He does this with Brett Ratner. 0.97
00:49:16.180 Oh, I hadn't seen that yet. That's great.
00:49:17.220 Yeah, no, he's a little bitch. 0.99
00:49:18.120 like a gossipy queen who among us I can think of like at least two bad things Jeffrey Epstein has 1.00
00:49:24.680 done that I've never done but talking shit is is not among them but he does seem to have been 0.97
00:49:33.680 particularly loyal to Woody Allen yeah you know how like one of the the lines when Donald Trump's 0.91
00:49:42.340 relationship with Jeffrey Epstein was coming to light is like this kind of seems to be
00:49:47.120 the only real friend that Donald Trump ever had.
00:49:50.840 And I would say that like maybe something like that
00:49:53.740 is how we see the relationship
00:49:55.240 between Jeffrey Epstein and Woody Allen.
00:49:56.800 They seem to have been very, very close.
00:49:58.820 Wow.
00:49:59.080 There's tons of emails and text exchanges
00:50:02.420 between Woody Allen, Jeffrey Epstein, and Suni Previn.
00:50:06.700 And that brings us to one beat I wanted to hit
00:50:08.800 before we transitioned to our final thought,
00:50:12.420 which is the women in the Epstein files
00:50:13.900 who are contacting Jeffrey Epstein
00:50:15.940 specifically with grievances about Me Too.
00:50:18.900 Yeah. 1.00
00:50:19.440 Suni Previn, a woman who has accomplished absolutely nothing in her life 1.00
00:50:23.500 aside from fucking her father, 0.99
00:50:25.300 writes several missives about the injustice of Me Too, 1.00
00:50:29.960 about how these women are taking advantage of men and exploiting them. 0.89
00:50:33.420 She calls a 15-year-old girl who allegedly received
00:50:37.020 inappropriate sex messages from former Congressman Anthony Weiner, 1.00
00:50:41.160 a despicable and disgusting person. 0.99
00:50:44.000 She talks about the unfairness faced by accused men. 0.98
00:50:48.320 She sends him one email where the subject line is just,
00:50:52.040 Me Too has gone too far and so has Botox.
00:50:54.360 Huh.
00:50:54.740 Like just simmering grievance.
00:50:56.700 I'm shocked that she wasn't able to place this at the free press.
00:51:01.240 I would require her to actually write,
00:51:02.980 which she's not very good at, according to these emails.
00:51:05.060 I know.
00:51:06.740 You know, I think like Suni Priven, like at 17,
00:51:09.380 she was a victim at like 57 or whatever she is now.
00:51:12.600 she's a mark she's a completely complicit yeah you also see a lot a lot of communications
00:51:19.980 with a very prominent publicist peggy siegel who also discusses the me too movement with epstein
00:51:29.580 she is really throughout this like talking to him about the me too movement as something that is
00:51:37.960 driven by like frivolous, annoying women that is like unfair to men and that is sort of like
00:51:43.860 laughably unserious. The world is topsy-turvy, she writes. That has been going on since the 0.67
00:51:49.160 beginning of time and that is not an excuse. Has suddenly erupted in our day of massive global
00:51:53.360 information as a new moral code of behavior. You suffered for a few years and now you are
00:51:57.920 the least of this witch hunt. When did she write this? November 2017. Interesting. Yeah. So some
00:52:04.100 of these people, of course, sort of show up in and around Me Too cases. And I believe
00:52:09.540 that Peggy Siegel's close association, close ties with Epstein became public through the
00:52:14.260 New York Times in 2019. It's interesting, right, that like in some way the solidarity
00:52:19.480 does not sort of come about from public disclosure. Like, well, shit, now we're thrown into this 0.98
00:52:24.260 together kind of thing. Like, no, this is in fact a proactive thing that predates often 0.99
00:52:30.380 media reports. These people could keep their distance if they wanted to. They choose not to.
00:52:36.420 One person he emails with very, very frequently is Kathy Rumler. Do you know who Kathy Rumler is?
00:52:43.000 I don't.
00:52:43.520 She is the former White House counsel to Barack Obama. So very, very prominent person
00:52:49.800 in the Obama administration. Right now, she is the general counsel for Goldman Sachs.
00:52:54.380 So imagine the most vulgar, excessive amount of money that any one person could possibly have. 1.00
00:52:59.600 And Kathy Rumler probably has about two, three times that much. 0.97
00:53:02.540 And she has a pretty close relationship with Epstein.
00:53:07.700 So Kathy Rumler and Epstein actually workshop together what he's going to say about new accusations from Virginia Giuffre.
00:53:17.700 He says, I thought we might suggest something like we would hope that after the UVA debacle,
00:53:24.140 that journalists should be more on notice
00:53:26.660 regarding their obligations
00:53:27.660 to verify the veracity of tabloid allegations, right?
00:53:30.000 So he's saying like,
00:53:30.880 let's make Herger look like a liar 0.62
00:53:34.440 and sort of implicitly threaten 0.90
00:53:35.640 that we're going to sue for defamation.
00:53:37.600 We should say the UVA story
00:53:38.980 is going to be a reference
00:53:39.740 to the Rolling Stone article,
00:53:41.120 A Rape on Campus, right?
00:53:42.320 Right, which the magazine was sued for.
00:53:45.200 Right.
00:53:45.580 The media is loathe to use the L word, liar. 1.00
00:53:48.620 So, you know, these are women 1.00
00:53:49.560 who are actively conspiring
00:53:51.780 and working with Jeffrey Epstein 0.86
00:53:53.780 who once again is a known and convicted pedophile
00:53:56.240 over how to undermine the Me Too feminist movement 1.00
00:54:00.880 and try to make accusers look bad. 1.00
00:54:03.520 I think a lot of women, 1.00
00:54:04.600 I think Suni Privin is probably the easiest example, 1.00
00:54:07.840 but a lot of women get their status 1.00
00:54:09.600 through their proximity to men 1.00
00:54:11.260 or through their permissiveness towards men.
00:54:13.300 And to keep that status,
00:54:14.940 they therefore have to often quite demonstrably
00:54:18.080 and conspicuously like throw other women under the bus.
00:54:20.640 And I think that's what you can see happening here. 1.00
00:54:22.220 Not all women are feminists, folks. 1.00
00:54:23.780 Some of them are in the Epstein files for bad reasons. 1.00
00:54:29.020 Yeah, you caught yourself there at the end.
00:54:32.760 Yeah, the other thing that I think we'll see more of and that's going to be interesting to think about is that, like, by and large, these are not Republican group chats.
00:54:41.440 These are Democrats.
00:54:42.440 There's a lot of Democrats.
00:54:43.440 But this is also a story of how elites that ostensibly are often aligned with, not left-wing, but at least not conservative causes, are huge engines of gender conservatism.
00:54:57.000 And I think that's another story here that it's going to take a little bit more delving into, but it's something that I would like to do on this podcast eventually.
00:55:03.040 Because I think it's fascinating to see that it's not that the Democrats have generally okayed gender politics and then sometimes they get it wrong.
00:55:11.140 It's that there are Democratic elites that have, for all intents and purposes, Republican gender politics.
00:55:18.860 Yeah, I mean, I think there's been a lot of commentary on how DNC-style elite liberals and Democratic donors were really freaked out by the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests.
00:55:30.800 Yeah.
00:55:31.180 And were in revolt at their own sense of endangerment and revulsion at that cultural shift.
00:55:36.540 I think that Me Too is also a really central piece of that puzzle.
00:55:41.140 Both because it implicated a lot of their friends.
00:55:45.340 Harvey Weinstein wasn't making those big donations to Republicans, you know.
00:55:48.580 That's right. 1.00
00:55:48.920 But also because feminism is in its radical and meaningful forms, as opposed to its sort of like watered down Pantsuit Nation forms. 1.00
00:56:01.400 Meaningful feminism, particularly meaningful feminist sex politics, are really loathed by elites. 1.00
00:56:06.900 Yeah. 0.99
00:56:07.220 And really are treated with a lot of alarm and contempt.
00:56:10.300 Yeah, because they're ultimately predicated on the idea that even if you're a celebrity, even if you're rich and famous, they don't necessarily let you do it.
00:56:18.540 There is accountability.
00:56:20.020 Power does not come with seignorial privileges in a democracy.
00:56:23.440 It comes with accountability.
00:56:25.300 And yeah, for some reason, elites don't like hearing that.
00:56:28.440 So, Adrienne, before we wrap up, I wanted to take us to one final beat, which is something that's happened really since this latest batch of declassified files, which is some pundits, both on the right for the likes of Richard Hanania and in what we might call like sort of the reactionary centrist vein with the likes of Megan McArdle,
00:56:53.920 are now trying to say that the Epstein scandal is overblown,
00:57:00.980 that there is a sort of excessive or disproportionate interpretation
00:57:07.220 of the wrongness of his sexual abuse of teenagers
00:57:10.040 and that the sense that the scandal implicates the broad elite class
00:57:15.000 is overstated and wrongheaded.
00:57:17.240 Do you want to talk about some examples of this trend that's emerged?
00:57:22.480 Yeah, I mean, I will say that the pipeline
00:57:24.400 from left-wing censoriousness has gotten out of control
00:57:27.220 to it's a febophilia, really,
00:57:29.360 is a very short one, it turns out.
00:57:31.640 Yeah, I mean, I think that basically what we're seeing
00:57:34.080 is a lot of discourses that were covert Me Too backlash
00:57:39.240 all along kind of getting mobilized against this.
00:57:42.960 So there's a kind of anti-Russia gate kind of thing
00:57:46.300 being revived, which was also understood 0.99
00:57:48.460 to be sort of like women with pussy hats going crazy, 0.99
00:57:51.460 basically. There's a bunch of Me Too rejection getting revived. And there is a kind of cancel 0.99
00:57:59.060 culture discourse being revived again for this set of facts that really doesn't seem to fit it.
00:58:04.520 But I must admit that I didn't read the McArdle piece.
00:58:07.300 Well, there's Megan. I'm thinking of Richard Hanania recently put out a podcast, Epstein,
00:58:12.000 Moral Panic and Racism, in which he argues that sexual attraction to teenagers is a kind of
00:58:20.780 standard part of male heterosexuality and that that's good, actually. There was also a very
00:58:27.540 interesting article in the UK Telegraph headlined, The Epstein Scandal Has Morphed Into a Moral
00:58:34.960 Panic. And then on Central Air, the podcast between Josh Barrow, Megan McArdle, and Ben
00:58:41.820 Dreyfuss, the son of the actor Richard Dreyfuss, they have a podcast called We're All in the
00:58:48.080 Epstein files. And in that, I believe it's McArdle who makes the argument. And let me read here.
00:58:56.640 I think that you're going to find the evidence of a pedophile ring where he is actively trapping
00:59:00.740 these girls because until Me Too, it's not like a pedophile, right? There are 16-year-old girls
00:59:05.680 around who are vulnerable and can be exploited, but not in this like there's a mastermind who's
00:59:10.280 going on the dark web and selling these girls to you. They're just around and they're close enough
00:59:14.980 to the age of consent
00:59:15.800 that a lot of people probably felt like
00:59:17.080 it was okay to hit on them.
00:59:18.800 Wow.
00:59:20.160 This idea that like the moral seriousness
00:59:22.920 of adult billionaire men 0.97
00:59:25.240 having sex with teenage girls
00:59:27.400 has been overstated 0.97
00:59:28.660 and that that is a new idea
00:59:30.980 that is only emerged in the Me Too era
00:59:33.920 and as a result of the Me Too era's
00:59:36.000 sort of like hysterical moral excesses,
00:59:38.080 I think it's like both ahistorical
00:59:40.080 and also really revealing, right?
00:59:41.740 Yeah.
00:59:42.080 Because what they're saying is like,
00:59:43.300 this didn't seem like a big ideal to us.
00:59:44.820 Yeah. It's like, yeah, because you have never thought about the experience of another fucking person in your lives because you are deprived of moral compass, because you would need to be thinking about right and wrong and about power and fairness and about a potential obligation to curb your own basest impulses ever, even once. And that's like not something you guys are doing. 0.67
01:00:06.240 Yeah, I mean, also, I think that's such an interesting throwaway line about the dark web here. You and I have both pointed out that QAnon has at its core clearly at least some adherence that come from a place of genuine hurt and genuine moral indignation over the predation of powerful elites, of men over young girls, largely.
01:00:30.360 And part of, I think, why victims advocates are so leery of QAnon in spite of that is that it tended to move predation into this kind of shadowy realm of, like, dressers named after kids and then, like, sold on Wayfair.com or something like that.
01:00:48.360 And that's what McArdle is kind of leaning into.
01:00:50.820 It's not like it's one of those crazy cabals.
01:00:53.640 Like, no, like, these cabals are not particularly sophisticated.
01:00:57.340 What did Harvey Weinstein's sexual predation empire look like?
01:01:00.520 It's like, come see me in my hotel room.
01:01:02.280 Here's the key.
01:01:03.480 We have a meeting.
01:01:04.300 Yeah.
01:01:04.540 Yeah.
01:01:04.760 Let's have a meeting.
01:01:05.360 This is something that the Me Too movement really exposed that this kind of discourse
01:01:10.120 trying to minimize Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of, once again, children is trying to
01:01:15.240 sort of like forcibly forget or willfully forget is the banality of rape.
01:01:20.600 Yeah.
01:01:20.860 Like the ubiquitous banality of sexual abuse that happens in everyday context by people
01:01:26.440 who don't seem particularly conniving or intelligent
01:01:28.900 or capable of grand conspiracy.
01:01:31.900 Yeah.
01:01:32.080 This is something that looks normal
01:01:35.520 because it has been normalized.
01:01:37.680 Yeah.
01:01:37.940 It looks like a guy who's, oh, a little bit naughty, tee hee,
01:01:41.260 and that's a funny joke for you on the private plane
01:01:46.400 and a life-altering...
01:01:48.520 Trauma.
01:01:49.280 Or like indignity and violence...
01:01:51.380 Yeah.
01:01:51.960 ...inflicted on a person you have minimized
01:01:55.620 into like an ornament and an object
01:01:57.780 and an accessory to your sense of your own
01:02:00.360 like transgressive naughtiness, you know? 0.65
01:02:02.420 I mean, that to me is the one true statement 0.99
01:02:04.640 in what McArdle is saying there
01:02:06.680 is they were probably just around.
01:02:09.180 Well, no, they were famously recruited and trafficked.
01:02:12.120 They were famously not just,
01:02:13.760 I'm sorry, a teenager is not just around
01:02:16.020 a 50-year-old man who has no children.
01:02:17.760 They were like taken from schools.
01:02:19.880 Yeah, but I guess I'm saying
01:02:20.540 in terms of the experience of,
01:02:22.900 the way Epstein operated
01:02:24.380 It was to just have young girls around, meaning that if and when something did happen, it would be unobservable and indistinguishable from the rest of it, right? 0.99
01:02:35.480 Which is, like, the reason why, like, the fucking Trump modeling pageants are so fucking creepy. 0.96
01:02:39.140 Like, does something happen to everyone who shows up at those? 0.99
01:02:41.780 No.
01:02:42.420 The problem is there's tons of them.
01:02:44.560 And, like, the whole point is to kind of create a structure of indifference or indistinction where things are very obviously intended to happen.
01:02:52.420 And that's why you have them all there, right?
01:02:54.160 A structure of opportunity, I would say, for abusers, right?
01:02:56.900 But also of invisibilization, right?
01:02:58.480 Like, where do you know where to direct your eyes, right?
01:03:00.560 If you're like, oh, this feels bad, but there are 200 of them, what do I do, right?
01:03:04.220 Like, it's really meant to kind of hide what's really going on in plain sight under the sheer surfeit that Meghan McArdle seems to have actually clocked, but she doesn't understand what it's there for.
01:03:15.380 And I think that might bring us to the final point I want to ask you about, Adrian, which is that something I'm seeing in this like final turn among the sort of like conservative and reactionary centrist pundit class towards trying to like rehabilitate or apologize or minimize Epstein is what I think is kind of like the logical conclusion of the cancel culture debate that you have worked on and written about so eloquently.
01:03:42.840 both because, like, it always has to say
01:03:45.940 that, like, a liberal or, like, social justice-oriented reaction
01:03:49.120 is, in fact, morally more serious than the underlying conduct.
01:03:51.580 Yeah.
01:03:51.840 But it also is something that, like, has historically,
01:03:54.780 over the past 10 years,
01:03:56.380 worked to displace conversations about values
01:03:59.340 into conversations about processes.
01:04:01.180 Yeah.
01:04:01.400 It's like, is this a conversation about a man
01:04:05.400 getting fired for groping his secretary?
01:04:08.100 No, it's a conversation about cancel culture.
01:04:09.880 It's a conversation about a woke mob.
01:04:11.180 It's a conversation about due process.
01:04:13.140 You know, those are process conversations.
01:04:15.680 Those are about, like, what is the right way to go about investigating or verifying these claims?
01:04:22.320 What is the right way to go about, like, judging an appropriate consequence, right?
01:04:26.480 And that was sort of a way to not have the conversation about, like, this guy's groping his secretary.
01:04:30.960 And I think what I'm seeing now from the likes of Barrow and McCardell and from the likes of Richard Hanania is this kind of like dispensing with the pretext of having a procedural conversation and just finally getting down to like the underlying values difference, which is like they don't think it's that bad for a 50-year-old man to pay a teenage girl for a handjob, right?
01:04:54.160 Yeah.
01:04:54.620 And like we do or I do.
01:04:56.880 Yeah, I'll sign on to that. 0.97
01:04:58.280 I think it's sexual violence.
01:04:59.100 You can speak for us here. 0.99
01:05:00.280 That's fine.
01:05:00.960 Adrian Dahl bravely comes out against pedophilia.
01:05:05.320 Yeah, no contest here.
01:05:07.240 The other thing, though, I mean, so I think there's two ways of thinking about it.
01:05:10.300 One is one could think like the mask is finally coming off.
01:05:14.240 The other possibility is that this is just a ramp up to the meta conversation, right?
01:05:19.100 There was a moment immediately, I think, after Enduring Me Too, where also people were like, well, this is just sort of like the locker room talk kind of argument.
01:05:27.100 and then it took like maybe three or four months
01:05:29.680 where people would be like,
01:05:30.220 oh, no, no, no, no, I'm not saying it's good.
01:05:32.260 I'm just saying our reaction to it
01:05:33.620 should really concern us, right?
01:05:35.020 Like our reaction as a society,
01:05:36.540 what does it say about our society?
01:05:37.640 Like, what does it say about our society
01:05:38.880 that Harvey Weinstein was able to do this?
01:05:40.840 It's like, oh, let's not talk about that.
01:05:42.220 What are your students up to, right?
01:05:43.800 So it could be that the mask is fully slipping
01:05:45.920 or it could be that that's just ramp up.
01:05:47.800 Because I think there is a moment
01:05:48.960 when they sort of find that
01:05:51.460 making the unvarnished argument,
01:05:53.960 Yes, young girls are powerful men's property is not majoritarian, even in this society that we live in.
01:06:01.800 And that's when you reach for the center of the discussion by being like, why have we not forgiven these people a mere three months after these emails got leaked or whatever, right?
01:06:13.740 You know, Jeffrey Epstein was a victim of cancel culture, actually.
01:06:17.280 And I think we really need to talk about male loneliness and the male suicide rate.
01:06:21.100 Yeah. 0.97
01:06:21.400 Because truly, the real victim in this was the pedophile billionaire. 0.94
01:06:26.140 All along. 0.96
01:06:27.700 All right.
01:06:28.680 Thank you for listening.
01:06:29.980 And my apologies to our intrepid producer, Mark Yoshizumi, who's going to have to cut a lot of my actionable commentary.
01:06:39.580 But we really appreciate you guys coming on this journey.
01:06:42.260 Please join us on Patreon if you haven't already.
01:06:44.800 We're having fun over there.
01:06:46.480 Rate and review us on iTunes.
01:06:47.760 Tell all your friends.
01:06:48.640 and thank you for trusting us
01:06:50.240 with this dark material
01:06:51.700 in our sick, sad world.
01:06:53.580 Thank you.
01:06:56.320 In Bit With The Right
01:06:57.020 is made possible
01:06:57.680 by hundreds of listeners
01:06:58.720 who support us via patreon.com.
01:07:00.920 Our episodes are produced
01:07:01.900 and edited by Mark Yoshizumi
01:07:03.460 and Katie Lau.
01:07:04.440 Our title music is by Katie Lau.