In Bed With The Right - April 28, 2026


Episode 132 -- "Repeal the 19th"

Topics
Episode 131 [PATREON PREVIEW] -- Dining, Flavortowns and Gender Episode 134: Natural Law

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 10 minutes

Words per minute

181.8

Word count

12,869

Sentence count

802

Harmful content

Misogyny

91

sentences flagged

Toxicity

78

sentences flagged

Hate speech

131

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 So, Adrienne, you may have seen the hashtag, or you may have seen the t-shirts, or you
00:00:21.640 may have read the social media posts made by the Secretary of Defense, or maybe you've
00:00:27.380 heard the jeers coming from a nearby frat house. So today I'm going to ask you, what do you know
00:00:34.040 about hashtag repeal the 19th? I mean, I don't know much. And I was looking forward to this
00:00:40.720 episode partly because I'm trying to figure out what the fuck this is. Like, is this a genuine 0.91
00:00:46.620 movement? Is it a genuine mainstreaming of a once fringed demand, right, to repeal the 19th 0.87
00:00:53.140 Amendment and end women's right to vote? Or is this about a few exceedingly well-placed weirdos? 0.58
00:01:01.320 Is this a mass movement or is this just that some of the worst people on the planet have
00:01:06.340 the ear of our government? It's a little bit of both, I think. So today we are going to talk
00:01:12.040 about the call, the movement, and the mainstreaming of this once-fringed demand to repeal the 19th
00:01:19.460 Amendment and end women's right to vote. And before we get too deep into it, Adrian, just tell
00:01:25.180 our listeners about the 19th Amendment. Yeah, it passed in 1920, and it guarantees the right to
00:01:32.560 vote to women. In effect, it only affected white women in 1920. The 19th Amendment bars bans on 0.97
00:01:43.160 the franchise that are based on sex. It says nobody, neither the federal government nor any
00:01:47.360 states nor any municipality within those states may say that voters who are citizens cannot vote 0.99
00:01:53.960 in our elections because they're women that was a framework this like we're banning uh any kind of
00:02:00.960 discrimination on the basis of sex it was taken from the 15th amendment right we're banning any
00:02:04.560 discrimination on the basis of race in the franchise as we know what happened to the 15th
00:02:10.120 amendment it got curtailed in the jim crow era by a like large amount of voter disenfranchised
00:02:16.740 efforts that then had to be sort of dismantled via the Voting Rights Act and which are now sort
00:02:21.800 of being put back in place because the Roberts Court hates the Voting Rights Act. But the deal
00:02:27.660 with the 19th Amendment is that large numbers of women did enter the electorate after it was passed. 1.00
00:02:32.540 Yeah. And, you know, black women living in southern states, like black men living in
00:02:35.660 southern states, had to get the franchise sort of around and with the end of those Jim Crow laws
00:02:42.940 that were in effect.
00:02:44.000 Right.
00:02:44.420 Although actually a really interesting story
00:02:46.200 of the 19th Amendment 0.93
00:02:47.080 is that women in Southern states, 1.00
00:02:48.980 white women in Southern states, 1.00
00:02:49.940 after the 19th Amendment passed, 1.00
00:02:51.900 started lobbying to get poll taxes repealed
00:02:54.860 because they didn't want to have to pay them themselves.
00:02:57.480 It didn't work,
00:02:58.380 but it is a really nice little footnote in that history.
00:03:00.900 And we should say that that's where
00:03:02.760 the repeal of the 19th Amendment comes from,
00:03:06.240 which is that the Roberts Court,
00:03:09.160 you know, it can't overturn the Reconstruction Amendments,
00:03:11.500 But whatever is closest to that, it's trying to do very clearly.
00:03:16.440 Like, it hates those amendments.
00:03:17.680 It wants to roll them back as much as humanly possible.
00:03:20.640 And as you say, the 19th is modeled on those amendments.
00:03:23.960 It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that, like, hey, maybe we could lob a few softballs to John Roberts and hope that he'll take a whack at this one, too.
00:03:32.660 Adrienne, you're being way too generous to the people who are promoting this idea.
00:03:36.620 These guys don't have a legal strategy.
00:03:38.600 They don't have a vision of how this is going to happen, really. 0.81
00:03:41.500 They have vitriol for women.
00:03:44.220 So this isn't something that's exactly yet being cooked up in like federal society dinners.
00:03:50.400 It wouldn't shock me if it was later.
00:03:52.620 This is mostly something that's really happening online.
00:03:55.160 Right.
00:03:55.320 And it's being pushed by two groups.
00:03:56.820 I know one of them very well.
00:03:59.320 The main group that has been on this beat for longer is the fundies, the fundamentalist far-right Christians.
00:04:05.220 Yeah.
00:04:05.600 More recently, this idea has also been taken up by the techies.
00:04:09.500 Oh, yeah.
00:04:09.780 So it's a preacher creep alliance, right?
00:04:12.800 One of many.
00:04:13.580 These guys, the fundamentalist Christians and the sort of like new masculinist tech right or like male supremacist tech right, they're not actually a very particularly masculine bunch.
00:04:22.060 But those guys, they're having this kind of like synthesis in the rise of the manosphere.
00:04:27.360 And this male supremacist internet has moved the, quote-unquote, issue of repealing the 19th Amendment from the, like, really marginal, even for the far-right, fringes of discourse into a new prominence.
00:04:40.960 Guys are using the hashtag repeal the 19th.
00:04:43.500 Like, it's in a lot of my, like, Twitter replies now.
00:04:46.120 There's T-shirts that are viral.
00:04:47.900 You'll hear people yelling it at, like, Trump rallies sometimes, although those don't happen as much anymore.
00:04:52.460 Well, Peter Thiel is famous for essentially saying that the 19th Amendment was a mistake.
00:04:56.640 Yes, yes.
00:04:57.660 In, what is it, a 2009-2010 essay for the Cato Institute or something like that.
00:05:02.460 Given that we just did an episode on Elizabeth Cady Stanton, I'm interested to sort of hear how the tech right comes to this.
00:05:09.920 I have my theories, but it is kind of fascinating because it's clear where the fundies get it.
00:05:15.220 And this is something that we didn't talk so much about in the Elizabeth Cady Stanton episode. 1.00
00:05:20.040 One objection to women's suffrage in the 19th century was what was then called complementarianism, 0.78
00:05:25.580 but really what is kind of a communitarianism where you say, well, the paterfamilias votes for the whole family.
00:05:31.560 So it's somewhat redundant to give his, you know, helpful handmaiden also the vote, right?
00:05:38.100 Like in some way they should be deciding on this together, ideally.
00:05:41.540 She should be feeding it with her emotions and he should be doing it with his intellect, right?
00:05:45.440 And so this idea is very, very key for a lot of these fundamentalist Christians.
00:05:51.320 And I'm guessing that that's behind a lot of this repeal of the 19th Amendment as well.
00:05:56.500 We're going to get there, Adrian. 0.97
00:05:57.560 But what the fuck does a tech creep have to do with that, right? 0.97
00:06:00.060 Like, they're not steeped in that. 0.98
00:06:01.700 They don't come out of that kind of a paterfamilias model.
00:06:04.920 Yeah, you're right, Adrian.
00:06:05.880 The funnies have, like, a pretty, like, coherent, we all know it, lineage of Christian theology,
00:06:11.820 although I do think that they fudge it quite a bit.
00:06:14.020 Oh, yeah.
00:06:14.340 That gets them to this idea of first complementarianism and then later the more extreme biblical patriarchy.
00:06:23.580 Like they feel that the revocation of women's suffrage, it's just core to their religious worldview of male dominion over women, right?
00:06:30.080 They don't think that women should vote because they don't think women should ever roll in public life for any kind of pretensions to independence or equality with men.
00:06:39.240 The techies, on the other hand, they're not like the main intellectual force in the repeal of the 19 movements, but they have been an accelerant.
00:06:47.880 And their technologies like AI drive the creation of a lot of anti-women suffrage content.
00:06:54.540 Their platforms like Elon Musk X host an algorithmically advantage anti-19th Amendment content.
00:07:01.260 It's huge on X.
00:07:02.260 and their money like Peter Thiel's money pumps into the think tanks the churches and these like 1.00
00:07:08.420 media slop houses where this idea that women shouldn't vote is being promulgated so they're
00:07:14.160 not like the originators of repeal the 19th but they are working quite efficiently to usher this
00:07:20.000 stuff into the mainstream and I wanted to like just spend a minute on the techies before we go
00:07:24.500 really into the lineage among like the preacher class and what I think is happening with this
00:07:29.180 like fundamentalist christian world that is starting to oppose women's suffrage in like
00:07:33.900 bigger and bigger platforms closer and closer to the halls of power because like the techies
00:07:39.500 have really come to see women's suffrage and public sphere participation as the like root cause 0.98
00:07:46.620 of this problem they diagnose in society that they're trying to fix with their tech right 1.00
00:07:52.720 their cultural enemy they'll talk about it they want their like masculine technologies 0.89
00:07:57.520 to obliterate the vestiges of democracy and enforce the like permanent achievement of their 1.00
00:08:06.200 policy preferences. And they think that women's suffrage is one of the last obstacles to that
00:08:10.980 happening. So as you mentioned, Adrian, Peter Thiel famously wrote in a 2009 essay that women's
00:08:17.920 suffrage made libertarian outcomes less likely and was therefore bad. He wrote,
00:08:23.540 quote, since 1920, the vast increase in welfare beneficiaries and the extension of the franchise
00:08:29.160 to women, two constituencies that are notoriously tough for libertarians, libertarians definitely
00:08:35.000 don't know any women, have never met any. These, he says, have rendered the notion of capitalist 0.94
00:08:41.640 democracy into an oxymoron. This is that essay where he starts to talk about how democracy and
00:08:46.920 freedom are becoming incompatible. One of the sources for that problem, he locates as being
00:08:51.980 women's suffrage, right?
00:08:53.460 Well, partly because he thinks that it commits the government to care.
00:08:57.800 And that's something that all these guys are extremely allergic to. 0.66
00:09:00.660 And that apparently male suffrage would never extend any kind of care.
00:09:03.700 And then so therefore it's a genuine libertarian, genuinely muscular in that way.
00:09:07.720 If you'd like to hear more about this, what Tech Calls Governing drops on August 18th.
00:09:12.920 So it has a whole chapter on this.
00:09:15.200 Peter Thiel really is the Ernst Rome of our time, right? 0.99
00:09:18.200 Like we need to eradicate all traces of femininity and of women so that I can have my little like masculinist gay Nazi utopia in Miami. 0.99
00:09:26.500 Let's be clear. 0.96
00:09:27.520 We're offering the opinion that there are things about him that resemble Ernst Röhm for the purposes of any lawsuits.
00:09:35.240 We have not yet incorporated, Donegan.
00:09:37.040 I don't need this.
00:09:38.140 I don't need this.
00:09:39.560 So that kind of posture has also been taken up by one of Peter Thiel's protégés, Alex Karp of Palantir. 1.00
00:09:48.200 He of the receding hairline and Afro at the same time. 0.99
00:09:52.680 Yes. 1.00
00:09:53.020 What if regrettable was a person?
00:09:56.560 Just this year, I think in March, Alec Karp said as a bonus that he expects AI to diminish women's voting power.
00:10:04.620 He said, AI is a technology that will lessen the power of, quote, highly educated, often female voters who mostly vote Democrat.
00:10:11.780 at. So Karp's words are always a little bit like difficult to follow, at least for me,
00:10:16.920 since he seems to be doing, frankly, a lot of his interviews from like IK hole, you know,
00:10:21.160 allegedly, allegedly, but this statement was largely understood as a pitch to the GOP for
00:10:30.760 more AI investment. Like, look, we will push women out of the workforce and we will make them more 0.99
00:10:35.540 dependent and we will make them therefore less likely to vote. And this is something that I think 0.97
00:10:40.620 is really core to the repeal the 19th conversation is that women vote for Democrats, right? Not all
00:10:48.160 of them, but most. Men vote for Republicans. Not all of them, but most. I mean, I vote for a
00:10:56.060 Republican. I just feel like, you know, I get into that booth and the white chromosome kicks in. I'm 0.87
00:11:00.580 like, fuck, did I just do that? But like, this was something, you know, friend of the show, 0.98
00:11:04.380 Matt Sitman, we did that great Roy Cohn episode with him. He said on his excellent podcast,
00:11:09.120 know your enemy. That back when he was a conservative, a young conservative working
00:11:12.780 for like the Heritage Foundation, it was always a quote unquote joke that, you know, if only women
00:11:18.660 didn't vote, we'd run the table every time. You know, this is something that's long been understood
00:11:22.940 on the political right. And that's like an extension of something we've talked about
00:11:27.500 before, which is that the right is masculine coded, but it is actually put into power
00:11:32.300 overwhelmingly by men. Yeah. And we got that interesting discussion after the 2024 election
00:11:36.780 about their supposed racial realignment
00:11:38.300 and really what it was,
00:11:39.480 was the same gendered effects
00:11:41.580 that had for a little while
00:11:43.160 mostly tracked among white men,
00:11:45.380 now tracking more or less across the spectrum.
00:11:49.380 But it was so striking
00:11:50.720 that it was understood as a racial realignment,
00:11:52.720 not like, okay, no,
00:11:54.100 these gendered voting patterns 0.99
00:11:56.160 are now becoming even stronger,
00:11:58.620 partly because the GOP made a,
00:12:01.560 I would say,
00:12:02.260 unprecedentedly naked appeal to them, right?
00:12:05.240 It's always been there, right?
00:12:06.560 Reagan had a masculinism to his message and to his appeal. But allying with Andrew Tate and being
00:12:14.340 like, I love Pete Hegseth, like, okay, like now it's just out in the open. You're like here with
00:12:18.640 a party of dick swingers, right? And it's really remarkable, both the nakedness of the appeal and 1.00
00:12:24.300 the fact that then in the endless analysis of that election, that rarely ever was sort of made
00:12:32.000 explicit. It became a kind of racial realignment as opposed to saying like, no, it's the gendered
00:12:37.180 alignment being kind of pushed to ever greater acuteness. Yeah. I mean, misogyny is like a
00:12:44.100 discursively invisible oppression in American politics. Like it's taken for granted. People
00:12:49.160 don't seem to really notice it, let alone like object to it. But you're right, right? Like what
00:12:53.780 Donald Trump put together in 2024 was depicted by the media as this like, quote unquote,
00:12:58.700 multi-racial working class coalition when really what it was was a multi-racial male supremacist
00:13:03.360 coalition right like latino women voters did not shift to trump at all yeah women black voters did
00:13:08.160 not shift to trump at all you know this is a identity category that is not recognized as such
00:13:15.120 but has a very animating identity politics on the right and it's a male identity politics it's a
00:13:20.820 misogynist identity politics but like democrats and liberals meanwhile are not just like feminized
00:13:26.940 They are not just cast as, like, decadent and weak.
00:13:30.020 They are literally made up of more women. 0.96
00:13:33.080 So this stuff is ideological, but let's be clear that it's also, like, highly partisan.
00:13:38.020 The proposal to disenfranchise women is also a proposal to ensure permanent one-party Republican rule.
00:13:45.420 But there's also a set of beliefs that is gaining mainstream exposure and, like, a little more mainstream acceptability.
00:13:52.220 Absolutely, it's just, like, nadir of this post-MeToo anti-feminist backlash that we're in.
00:13:56.940 And I think part of the repeal of the 19th Amendment movement is like not exactly a serious policy proposal.
00:14:05.380 And let's just be like very clear off the bat.
00:14:07.260 There is no path for these people to amend the Constitution to remove women's right to vote.
00:14:11.880 Like that's not going to happen. 0.74
00:14:13.000 The 19th Amendment is not being removed from the U.S. Constitution.
00:14:16.560 Even on a long timeline, I don't see any path for them to build a coalition where they can get both houses of Congress and then three quarters of the states to agree to do that.
00:14:26.700 It's not to say that they can't make any kind of policy interventions that will make it harder for women to vote.
00:14:30.780 And we're going to get to those.
00:14:31.720 But I think what's really going on with like hashtag repeal the 19th is more a way of mainstreaming ideas about what sexual difference is and what it means.
00:14:41.720 Yeah.
00:14:41.960 And it's about what women are and what rights and privileges and freedoms and dignities they can claim.
00:14:47.860 And I see it also as kind of a bit of a yardstick for the forces of the, like, masculinist right that are increasingly organizing, you know, across the MAGA factions, across this, like, internally contentious and contradictory Republican coalition.
00:15:05.520 More and more, they're uniting those factions with male supremacy, with misogyny.
00:15:10.700 Yeah, I mean, it's kind of analogous to the way far right parties in the United States and Europe have kind of started leaning into more and more extreme positions on immigration.
00:15:23.120 How like suddenly Republicans are sort of trying to walk away from this mass deportations now, right?
00:15:28.580 Or in Europe, this would be the remigration thing.
00:15:30.920 Five years ago, they're like, how dare you accuse us of advocating for this? 1.00
00:15:34.260 And then three years later, they're like, hey, let's try it out.
00:15:36.480 And then today they're like, yeah, we're into this.
00:15:38.620 Now I guess they're partly trying to walk away from it again, but like, it is exactly that, right? You have this extreme kind of demand, you disidentify with it and say like, how dare you imply that that's what we're doing? We have plenty of, you know, non-white people in our party, we have plenty of women in our party, blah, blah, blah. And then like, you're like, except, right? Like, and then eventually, again, no, I'm actually, I identify with this, this policy demand.
00:16:02.700 You're right, Adrian.
00:16:03.380 It's like a way for them to see how far they can go and like what they can get away with, like who they can bring on board, what they can popularize.
00:16:09.560 And I think the most interesting part is this other thing the repeal of the 19th Amendment is doing.
00:16:14.300 I think it's a way for a sect of the male right that has been in the woods for a bit over the past couple of years to try and redefine themselves and get ahead of the curve and reintegrate into the MAGA movement that has like kind of left them behind.
00:16:30.480 because one of the theses I have about the repeal of the 19th movement
00:16:33.840 is that it's about the revival of a new kind of preacher masculinity.
00:16:39.400 Nice. I hadn't thought about that. Interesting.
00:16:41.600 So, Adrian, could you tell our listeners who might not know
00:16:44.480 about our signature in-bed-with-the-right taxonomy of right-wing manhood?
00:16:49.820 Who are the preachers and where do they fit into this world?
00:16:52.840 Yeah, I realized that the light bulb went off for literally just me in that moment
00:16:56.160 and probably every other listener is like, wait, what?
00:16:58.060 But yes, so early on in this podcast,
00:17:00.980 we, or you really came up with this taxonomy
00:17:03.220 to figure out like,
00:17:05.000 what are these different forms of misogyny
00:17:07.020 and how are they suddenly able to speak the same language,
00:17:09.780 even though when you listen to them,
00:17:11.820 it'd be hard to confuse them for one another
00:17:13.540 in terms of their style of masculinity,
00:17:15.580 to their demand, their self-presentation, et cetera, et cetera.
00:17:18.600 The preacher is basically,
00:17:20.740 in fact, we had an episode on with of the preachers.
00:17:22.900 With Kristen Cobes-Dumay, who is wonderful.
00:17:25.080 Who is fantastic, yeah.
00:17:26.300 Where we sort of said like,
00:17:27.380 these people seem to be a little out in the wilderness right now.
00:17:30.380 Like of the three, they're doing the worst.
00:17:32.280 So the preachers are basically your Christian right, traditionalist,
00:17:39.000 really usually Protestant fundamentalist men
00:17:42.280 who want to get back to a kind of biblically based masculinity
00:17:47.520 and who are ultimately like anti-sex as well as anti-gender equality. 0.92
00:17:54.240 The pervert, by contrast, often professes to love women.
00:17:58.560 The example we've often brought up here is someone like Norman Mailer, right? 0.99
00:18:01.520 Someone who's like, who has a lot of sex, who hangs out with a lot of women. 0.99
00:18:04.420 Yeah, they love sex. 1.00
00:18:05.500 They don't love women. 0.99
00:18:06.200 I think it's the preachers who profess to love women.
00:18:08.100 They're like, no, no, no.
00:18:08.820 I just think that you're so beautiful and delicate in your special nature and you don't need to be burdened with rights.
00:18:13.760 You know, that kind of thing.
00:18:14.840 They tend to be a little more gentle. 0.97
00:18:16.440 But then we get like your Andrew Tates or your perverts. 0.95
00:18:19.640 Yeah.
00:18:19.740 Yeah, or I think the barstool guy, Dave Portnoy, was an example of this, right?
00:18:24.320 Like people who in the end put women in their place by being kind of boorish and kind of gross around them or to them or about them.
00:18:33.780 And then the creep is yet another interesting kind of exemplar because the creep almost avoids women a little bit or like doesn't know what to do with them when he encounters them.
00:18:44.620 But is also obsessed with sort of disposing of them in ways that to him feel safe or feel like they empower him.
00:18:52.440 And there, I mean, Elon Musk is a good example.
00:18:55.140 And this is one of those things that we were interested in, the fact that like, give a tech billionaire enough time, money, and cook his brain enough on Twitter.
00:19:03.740 and suddenly he'll have the exact same inclinations 0.87
00:19:06.880 as a fundamentalist Mormon in St. George, Utah,
00:19:12.060 namely to start a compound
00:19:13.660 and like lock up all his women there. 0.99
00:19:15.400 And you're like, how the fuck did we get here? 0.99
00:19:17.480 That like these two people who, yes, 0.98
00:19:18.920 like if you watch them for a day,
00:19:21.560 would be very different in the way they present
00:19:23.440 and the way they talk
00:19:24.600 and the way they seem to see the world. 0.99
00:19:27.220 Like, and therefore I must find my four wives 0.98
00:19:29.960 and put them all in the same compound. 1.00
00:19:31.620 And they all need to be 12, yeah.
00:19:33.740 Yeah, right?
00:19:34.740 Yeah, so there's these three genres of guys, and they do all kind of tend to converge on, like, domineering polygamy, right?
00:19:44.760 Like, Andrew Tate has a harem, Elon Musk has a harem, and, like, Warren Jeffs has a harem, but we style them differently, right?
00:19:51.920 But they all do ultimately understand women as, like, trophies to be collected at best and sort of animals to be corralled at worst.
00:20:01.600 Yeah, I mean, as I say in my book, the creep often thinks of them as non-player characters in video games, right?
00:20:07.660 NPCs, they're people to be deployed, moved around like pieces on a game board.
00:20:12.400 And like in many ways, you know, there's been a lot of proclamations of a new religious revival among Gen Z men. 0.60
00:20:18.800 That turned out to be empirically overstated.
00:20:21.300 But the preachers have like, they've lost ground, right?
00:20:24.640 They've lost influence in the right wing gender politics of the MAGA era because of the rise of the Trump pervert model, like the Christian rights style of like a prohibitive sexuality, by which I mean, you know, heterosexual marital chastity and a kind of like conspicuous, like almost reverential continence.
00:20:44.480 Yeah. Calling your wife mother. 0.58
00:20:46.200 Yes, exactly. Like that stuff fell way out of fashion.
00:20:49.980 And on the right now, the dominant model of male sexual politics is this like swaggering, violent sexual entitlement embodied by the pervert, like from Donald Trump to Andrew Tate. 0.69
00:21:02.700 Those are the men who are in the sort of limelight or presented as the right wing ideal. 0.52
00:21:07.980 And those are not guys who are disciplining their appetites in a kind of dignified self-restraint for the sake of the Lord, right?
00:21:14.940 Those are guys who are pursuing a sexuality of performative contempt.
00:21:20.660 So, like, Mike Pence is nowhere to be found.
00:21:24.260 The Manosphere doesn't have a lot of guys like him in it.
00:21:27.220 Yeah, the preacher masculinity is the one that says, like, oh, I have to sleep in separate beds for my wife.
00:21:32.640 And then there's a Trump model which comments on, you know, his 13-year-old daughter's body, right?
00:21:38.100 Like, you only have to watch five-second clips and be like, whoa, this is a very different thing.
00:21:41.740 But like the point of the model, as you proposed it back then, is that at base, they're not actually that different.
00:21:47.480 Right. Yeah. These are different routes to the same place.
00:21:50.220 Yeah. Right. But like, meanwhile, the MAGA alliance that brought Trump back to power in 2024 has really been between perverts and creeps.
00:21:59.380 Yeah. Between the kind of sexual ethos that like valorizes rape and this like eugenics obsessed odiousness of the Silicon Valley nerds. 0.95
00:22:09.660 And here I include everybody from like Elon Musk, who seems to have understood his support for Trump as like a contiguous project to the maintenance of his global breeding harem.
00:22:18.560 Like they definitely come from the same ideological place to like Nick Fuentes, who I also call a creep, who refuses sexuality.
00:22:25.800 He's like a voluntary incel. He's like sort of made a point of pride out of his own social failure and cultivated resentment.
00:22:33.000 So, like, Nick Fuentes is the ultimate creep, and he's, like, really good friends with Andrew Tate, who I'd say is the ultimate pervert, right?
00:22:40.780 Yeah.
00:22:41.100 And that's an alliance that the preacher guy doesn't have an obvious place in.
00:22:45.800 It's like, what does he contribute when they all hang out?
00:22:48.100 It also seems to me that the bet on the manosphere for Trump was a bet on certain media conduits.
00:22:55.580 Above all, podcasts, right, like YouTube, et cetera, et cetera.
00:22:59.820 And that's a place where sort of preacher content also doesn't do that well.
00:23:04.820 It's hard to have a funny podcast when you're like, oh, well, I don't talk to my wife at all and I don't want to talk about her here.
00:23:10.740 It's like, no, no, no, no, no, no.
00:23:11.960 This has to be transgressive. 0.99
00:23:13.460 This has to be kind of shitty. 1.00
00:23:15.160 This has to be like presented with a shit-eating grin. 1.00
00:23:18.000 And it's like it's just a vernacular that the Christian right traditionally has real trouble with. 0.99
00:23:22.940 We had that example of Ben Shapiro's sister who sort of tried to become a YouTube celebrity.
00:23:28.920 She's not the Christian right, they're the Jewish right.
00:23:30.600 The Jewish right, but yeah, it's like a religious right. 0.96
00:23:32.940 They're in a creature model, yeah. 0.94
00:23:33.840 And all that happened is that people kept commenting on her boobs, right?
00:23:36.920 Because it's just like somewhat inhospitable. 1.00
00:23:39.840 It's not inhospitable to gender conservatism at all, 0.95
00:23:42.080 but the kind of religiously based stuff that really goes along with,
00:23:46.060 as you say, emphasized calls for continence is a tough sell
00:23:49.980 in the media that Trumpism 2.0 has sort of worked its way through.
00:23:56.420 Yeah, I think there's like a joyous vulgarity on the internet
00:23:59.880 that is part of the internet tradition 1.00
00:24:01.600 and the sort of reverence of the typical Christian right
00:24:06.020 hasn't always fit there. 0.81
00:24:07.400 But I think what's happening with Repeal the 19th
00:24:09.380 is that they're trying to find a way to fit in there.
00:24:11.520 Yeah.
00:24:11.740 Like they're trying to make themselves a place.
00:24:13.600 And they're doing that by transitioning away
00:24:16.220 from what was their like long-term style of sexism.
00:24:20.280 Right, faux protective.
00:24:22.320 Yeah, like it's patronizing, it's condescending.
00:24:25.760 It's like rhetoric about women being made for beauty and softness and care and all these promises that men will like protect and provide.
00:24:34.860 They're moving away from that. 0.62
00:24:36.320 I actually think like this is a little bit of a tangent, but I think a bit of a weird nostalgia for this is now being peddled to women by other women in the trad wife zone.
00:24:45.240 Yeah.
00:24:45.760 Like in part because this rhetoric has stopped coming from actual men, you know.
00:24:50.640 Right. 0.96
00:24:50.860 It's a more appealing pitch to women to be like, I'll protect you than to be like, I'm going to dominate and beat you, which is like what's been coming from the rest of the right.
00:24:58.100 but like men on the christian right are moving away from that kind of like patronizing paternalistic
00:25:04.720 sexism towards what we might call hostile sexism yeah under like our religious guise because it's
00:25:10.680 like that hostility and that contempt for women not the condescension or the emphasis on difference
00:25:16.160 or any conception of how like you know you can make the hierarchy benevolent somehow right like
00:25:22.240 None of that is the rights uniting project right now.
00:25:26.320 Their uniting project is like actual hate and violence towards women and anger towards women.
00:25:31.660 And it's a thing that all of their factions love and all of them can agree on. 0.96
00:25:35.460 So I think what we're seeing is priests trying to speak creep and pervert.
00:25:40.200 Yeah. 0.91
00:25:40.580 Yeah.
00:25:41.120 Yeah.
00:25:41.320 They're trying to hang out with the cool guys again.
00:25:43.240 And they're doing that by being as ostentatiously misogynist and like contemptuously misogynist
00:25:48.080 as they can within the bounds of sort of like the genre that they've established for themselves.
00:25:52.780 That's fascinating. So who are these people? Like, walk me through, who the fuck is this?
00:25:57.660 Well, like, look, I think the actual leaders such as they are of this movement are guys who are like 0.99
00:26:04.080 fairly marginal. Like, let's be real. This isn't a very well-organized movement right now.
00:26:10.300 So most of them are far-right Christian fundamentalists leading comparatively kind
00:26:15.620 of small and extremist churches in rural parts of the southwest and mountain west right so this guy
00:26:22.540 in arizona there's a guy in idaho there have always been opponents to women's right to vote
00:26:27.820 but that position has not taken on like gotten a ton of purchase even among like really committed
00:26:35.200 personal and ideological misogynists and that's because something that you adrian alluded to a
00:26:41.100 couple of weeks ago on our Elizabeth Cady Stanton episode, which is that like husbands pretty quickly
00:26:46.760 learned that either by persuasion or by force, their wives would vote the way they did, right?
00:26:51.340 Their wives' votes would become their votes and sort of double their votes. So I actually wanted 0.97
00:26:55.740 to turn your attention to this like very controversial pro-Kamala ad about this reality
00:27:01.640 from the 2024 election. Your turn, honey. In the one place in America where women still have a right
00:27:08.240 to choose. You can vote any way you want. And no one will ever know. 1.00
00:27:20.800 Did you make the right choice? Sure did, honey. Remember, what happens in the booth stays in the
00:27:26.600 booth. Do you remember this? Yeah, I do remember this. Yes. It's Julia Roberts reminding us that
00:27:32.380 what we do in the voting booth stays in the voting booth. This idea, it's like, oh, ladies, 0.82
00:27:36.960 it's just our little secret. You don't have to tell your husband that you're voting for the
00:27:41.960 Democrat. You can pretend that you're voting for the Republican and like keep harmony in your home.
00:27:46.820 It's your vote. It's your choice. I always thought it was kind of a bad look or like a preemptive
00:27:52.080 admission of defeat from the Democrats that they acknowledged that some people were going to be
00:27:55.880 voting for them in secret. You know, so you don't have to tell anybody. It's like, oh, you're losing.
00:28:00.320 But this idea that the true freedom of married women's votes is always a bit conditional or contingent has been around for a long time, right?
00:28:10.320 It's this idea that like women might acquiesce to husbands who have more time to spend on politics than they do and just say, okay, he knows more about it than I do. 0.70
00:28:17.460 I'm going to just do what he says. 0.68
00:28:19.440 Or they might feel that their husbands are smarter than them or they might have their husbands threaten them or they might just like not want to make a fight about it.
00:28:27.300 Like this isn't as important to me as it is to him.
00:28:30.020 It is like pretty well established that men spend a lot more time consuming the news as
00:28:34.200 entertainment than women do, which might be one reason why the electorate shifted so far to the
00:28:39.700 right. But this ad got made fun of a ton for being overwrought at the time, right? And for the record, 1.00
00:28:47.240 I do think that like the absolute vast majority of American women voters are simply voting for
00:28:51.560 who they want to without particularly worrying about what their male partners are going to think
00:28:55.500 about it but it's not like absolutely crazy right this does happen and historically it used to
00:29:00.720 happen kind of a lot yeah but there's also always been this sect of the far right particularly the
00:29:05.940 christian right that has opposed women's suffrage like kind of on like principled grounds right like 0.92
00:29:11.900 we don't think women should have their own rights we don't think that women should be working we
00:29:17.960 certainly don't like abortion we don't think that there should be birth control we don't think that 0.99
00:29:23.280 women should be able to earn their own money that their husbands don't control. We don't think that 0.96
00:29:29.020 women should be independent legal entities responsible for like their own crimes, for 1.00
00:29:33.000 instance. And also we don't think that women should have the right to, you know, not be beaten 1.00
00:29:39.360 in marriage or raped in marriage, like that kind of thing. So it's a re-envision of like a 0.76
00:29:44.880 coverture style marriage in which women are like sort of owned property without personal rights. 0.99
00:29:53.280 And that is a vision that's always been around, but it's now getting a lot more attention because, as you said, Adrienne, we've got a couple of well-placed weirdos who are getting a lot of attention and have sort of the ears of power. 0.99
00:30:06.880 Yeah.
00:30:07.300 So the first guy I want to turn our attention to is somebody named Dale Partridge.
00:30:12.340 Has you ever heard of Dale Partridge?
00:30:14.740 Is he a member of the family?
00:30:18.360 He's only 41.
00:30:20.340 He looks rough, but he's only 41.
00:30:24.340 And he is a Christian pastor and influencer from Prescott, Arizona.
00:30:29.700 He runs a church called Kingsway. 1.00
00:30:32.340 You know, bumblefuck nowhere. 1.00
00:30:33.760 It's like an old mining town. 0.98
00:30:35.500 He had a failed athletic career.
00:30:37.300 He wanted to be a baseball player.
00:30:39.040 Then he had a failed business career.
00:30:41.220 He briefly owned like a rock climbing gym in Riverside.
00:30:45.140 But around 2020, he pivoted hard to Christ.
00:30:49.080 Can I ask about the Arizona part of this?
00:30:51.120 You sort of, in passing, mentioned that this was mostly the Southwest and the Mountain West.
00:30:56.140 And that's kind of interesting for two reasons.
00:30:58.360 My spidey sense as a gender historian went off on two counts here.
00:31:02.300 One is, we talked a couple of weeks ago about Elizabeth Kitty Stanton and the fight for women's suffrage.
00:31:06.980 Now, the first women's suffrage bills that did pass and the first time women really were allowed to vote in U.S. election were all in the Mountain West and the Southwest, right?
00:31:16.840 It's the Wyoming Territory, I believe, in 1869.
00:31:20.780 Then it's, I think, Utah.
00:31:22.380 It's pretty soon then, like, Idaho and then Colorado.
00:31:26.900 So, like, this is also where it sort of started, interestingly enough.
00:31:29.700 So, the path to the 19th Amendment sort of starts in the same place where you're saying there's now this kind of opposition coming up.
00:31:37.520 The second thing is that in Jennifer Holland's wonderful book, Tiny You, she points out that that's where the anti-abortion movement really started in the 1970s.
00:31:47.640 Yes, these are hotbeds of the anti-abortion movement.
00:31:50.400 They're places that first allowed women to vote in state elections back in the late 19th century.
00:31:56.040 They're also, I would point out, strongholds of Mormonism, like large Mormon populations in places like Idaho and Arizona.
00:32:02.520 So there's a history of, you know, women's comparative emancipation or relative emancipation in these communities.
00:32:10.540 And then there is also a long history of reaction in which there's organized opposition to women's rights in the form of the anti-abortion movement.
00:32:17.980 And there's also a long tradition of, you know, a very gender conservative new religious movement that, among other things, also has and continues to have a long tradition of polygamy.
00:32:29.640 Right.
00:32:29.840 So there's competing forces, let's say, in this part of the country.
00:32:35.340 But Dale Partridge is 41.
00:32:37.140 He's got this small parish.
00:32:39.160 There's about 100 regular parishioners, but a ton of people like come to visit. 0.74
00:32:42.760 Like it's kind of a tourist attraction and like curiosity for members of the Christian far right.
00:32:47.620 So like people will come from like Indiana or like Colorado to like go to church with him on a Sunday. 0.58
00:32:54.580 But I think he makes most of his money from his podcast because like every white millennial man, Dale Partridge has a podcast. 0.97
00:33:11.320 And on his podcast, he is a fucking shock jock, right? 0.95
00:33:15.800 He is really leaning in to the Internet vernacular of vulgarity, of incendiary statements, of like impassioned statements. 0.98
00:33:25.760 Right. He has earned a following that way by sort of mimicking his, I guess, competitors in the male Internet space in terms of like being shocking, of trying to get clicks, of trying to incite strong emotions and of taking like more and more extreme positions.
00:33:43.300 And among them, he does not believe that women should have the right to vote.
00:33:46.880 We're not trying to think of like a zoo crew, a Christian zoo crew. 0.97
00:33:51.480 It's Jebediah and the whore of Babylon or something like that, right? 0.99
00:33:55.140 Isn't it always like a guy and an animal? 1.00
00:33:57.660 Like his weird like cackling sidekick is like the gator or like some weird shit. 0.99
00:34:01.980 Well, he does have a wife and these wives always seem like sort of like changed dogs a little bit. 0.99
00:34:07.340 They're just shrinking several steps behind their men and then dutifully saying into the microphone that they agree with everything their husband says, you know, this church that Dale Partridge runs has really, really strict gendered traditions. 0.86
00:34:22.160 So like women are required to cover their hair, at least in church, which is something you see some of the tradcast doing now. 0.97
00:34:29.020 It's like gotten rid of in Vatican II. 0.99
00:34:31.620 But if you go to like the wrong Catholic church on a Sunday morning, you'll see some creepy looking like Gen Z women with little doilies on their heads because it's like trying to revive a former tradition of, you know, a sign of submission. 1.00
00:34:44.200 Right. 1.00
00:34:44.560 Yeah.
00:34:44.740 And the married couples in these churches are instructed to submit to something called biblical patriarchy, which we will get into.
00:34:52.160 There's also a guy named Douglas Wilson. This one is the Moscow, Idaho-based preacher who is the spiritual advisor to one Pete Hegseth, our drunk and alleged sexual assaulter Secretary of Defense. 0.66
00:35:13.160 Hegseth, a couple months back, retweeted a video of Wilson calling to end women's suffrage.
00:35:18.800 And he also had Wilson come to lead a prayer at the Pentagon recently. 1.00
00:35:24.660 Doug Wilson refers to himself, I think this is important for our listeners to know, as D-dubs. 1.00
00:35:30.100 So take with that information what you will. 1.00
00:35:33.500 And before Doug Wilson started calling for the end of women's suffrage,
00:35:36.600 he was best known for his positive public statements about American slavery. 0.57
00:35:41.980 Oh, just loves unfreedom.
00:35:44.060 It's like I see unfreedom, I just get a little pep in my step.
00:35:47.360 Yeah, he did a podcast where he talked about his position on women's suffrage.
00:35:52.260 He's like, I've been getting a lot of questions lately from the media about my stance on the 19th Amendment.
00:35:58.820 And instead of doing any actual interviews with these actual journalists,
00:36:01.920 I'm going to fantasize an interview in which a feminist magazine comes to interview me 1.00
00:36:10.340 and I answer all of their questions. 1.00
00:36:13.420 God, they're just such cosplayers.
00:36:15.680 Yeah.
00:36:16.220 No, it's so cringe, dude.
00:36:17.880 He like writes this whole scene
00:36:19.400 that he just reads into a microphone.
00:36:21.720 And at one point, 1.00
00:36:23.000 the like imaginary feminist women are like, 1.00
00:36:25.620 why are you on the table, sir? 1.00
00:36:27.660 You know, and they like all clearly fall in love
00:36:29.760 with him by the end in this reading.
00:36:31.840 They're not smart guys, I gotta say.
00:36:35.180 So they are all following on the work of Doug Phillips,
00:36:39.600 who was the guy who invented this concept of biblical patriarchy
00:36:42.880 and also the sort of proposed franchise model that these guys have,
00:36:47.760 which they call household voting.
00:36:49.960 So he, Doug Phillips, he's now the former pastor
00:36:53.280 of the now defunct Vision Forum Ministries in San Antonio,
00:36:57.940 which is a very influential church.
00:37:00.080 Phillips Church is now defunct, and he is not the pastor anymore
00:37:03.420 because in 2013 he had, you guessed it, a sex scandal.
00:37:07.580 Yep.
00:37:08.780 Wow.
00:37:09.600 Least surprising plot twist in history.
00:37:13.280 He resigned after an internal investigation found that he had a relationship that was, quote, inappropriately affectionate and romantic with a woman who was not his wife.
00:37:21.640 The following year, he was sued by his family's former nanny, who alleged years of sexual abuse.
00:37:28.460 So he resigned and the church liquidated its assets.
00:37:31.200 He's not around anymore.
00:37:32.680 Or I think he's alive, but he's not working.
00:37:34.720 But Phillips in the 2000s and the late 90s was instrumental in radicalizing the gender politics of the evangelical world.
00:37:43.460 So like these guys are the three main characters, Dale Partridge, Douglas Wilson and Doug Phillips.
00:37:50.420 And Dale Partridge is kind of the one who's getting the most attention right now because Dale Partridge is coming out with a book.
00:37:59.160 19 Reasons to Repeal the 19th Amendment
00:38:03.300 forthcoming. I don't know when it's coming out, so
00:38:06.900 allegedly it's coming. But he has been doing a little bit of
00:38:11.180 media touring and interview touring to try and drum up
00:38:15.080 interest in this book. And Adrian, I have linked
00:38:18.580 a video of Dale Partridge.
00:38:22.280 The damage that has been done through the 19th Amendment.
00:38:26.380 Oh, he looks exactly the way you think. 0.75
00:38:29.220 He looks like a Nazi, yeah. 0.65
00:38:30.340 ...against scripture. 0.72
00:38:31.320 He's in a suit that doesn't fit.
00:38:32.460 It's too small.
00:38:34.000 But why it's never been done throughout history from any other nation, and any other nation 0.99
00:38:39.660 that embraces such a view where you're putting women in charge of making decisions for a 0.53
00:38:44.620 particular nation, that nation falls. 0.63
00:38:46.040 And so I think there's going to be a lot of evidence, a lot of research, a lot of even
00:38:50.600 looking at women suffer more from women's suffrage.
00:38:53.720 Also, that you have, when the 19th Amendment first came to be,
00:38:58.500 that there was a massive group of women that were against it.
00:39:01.360 And so you never hear some of these narratives.
00:39:03.140 So the history of it, the argument against it, and many reasons justifying it,
00:39:06.820 I think that by the end, people are going to go, 1.00
00:39:08.620 wow, I think women at the end are going to go, we must repeal this. 0.99
00:39:12.500 And that's my hope, is that we can get thousands of people. 0.97
00:39:14.480 Okay, so a couple of things here.
00:39:16.860 All of this is wrong.
00:39:18.800 Oh, yeah.
00:39:19.620 Like, all presumes facts, not in evidence.
00:39:22.360 First of overturning a Supreme Court decision
00:39:24.680 is not like repealing an amendment.
00:39:26.600 There's a process for this.
00:39:28.020 We did it with prohibition.
00:39:29.540 It's a fuck ton of work. 0.90
00:39:30.740 It'd be good for him to know that. 0.82
00:39:32.100 We did it with the 19th Amendment, in fact.
00:39:34.020 It was a fuck ton of work that he's clearly not up to doing.
00:39:37.360 Yeah. 0.95
00:39:37.520 He doesn't even know how it works.
00:39:38.900 The idea that no other country has done this is like,
00:39:41.380 well, it's the sort of opinion that you have
00:39:43.160 if you've never left your country, I guess.
00:39:45.660 Yeah, no other country has ever had women's suffrage.
00:39:49.440 I like the idea of this man writing a book
00:39:51.580 and being like,
00:39:52.560 my one restriction
00:39:53.560 that I placed on myself
00:39:54.720 was no Googling.
00:39:57.660 It's like,
00:39:58.180 I tried to avoid,
00:39:58.980 I only looked at Conservapedia.
00:40:00.760 Any other nation
00:40:01.580 that embraces such a view 0.93
00:40:02.820 where you're putting women 1.00
00:40:03.560 in charge of making decisions 1.00
00:40:04.700 for a particular nation,
00:40:05.760 that nation fails,
00:40:06.780 Partridge claimed.
00:40:08.300 That's also not true
00:40:10.140 since every other
00:40:11.040 like major Western country 1.00
00:40:12.400 has had a female head of state 1.00
00:40:13.580 and been fine. 0.58
00:40:15.020 Like they're all
00:40:15.640 actually kind of doing
00:40:16.460 a little better
00:40:17.180 than the U.S. is right now, right?
00:40:19.640 So there's,
00:40:20.420 I'm going to be real with you,
00:40:21.180 Adrian,
00:40:21.360 And one reason I don't think this is a real political possibility and my sense of like what the Overton window is, what the realms of possibility has become like really changed and a lot more cynical over the past decade.
00:40:32.800 I don't think these guys are going to be able to repeal the 19th Amendment because I don't think they know how.
00:40:40.360 Yeah.
00:40:40.660 I don't think they have the like skills to develop the political will.
00:40:44.100 I don't think they have the appeal to create a decent appealing message.
00:40:49.140 I don't think they have a worldview that they're going to be able to convince people to join.
00:40:55.520 But I also think that they just don't know how it would happen. 1.00
00:40:58.340 I think these are incredibly stupid men, right? 1.00
00:41:01.860 This is definitely one of the dumber things I've seen in my life, yeah. 1.00
00:41:04.620 There's a reason Doug Wilson won't do an interview with an actual feminist journalist, 0.97
00:41:09.860 but will only like sort of fantasize about them.
00:41:12.000 It's because if he actually had to sit down with the likes of like Oren Carmon,
00:41:16.660 she would make him cry, you know? 0.97
00:41:18.480 Like, these guys know that they don't have the Jews. 0.97
00:41:21.080 They know that they're hacks. 1.00
00:41:22.400 That's why they're doing this little trolly shit. 0.99
00:41:25.580 So those are the three guys. 0.99
00:41:27.020 But they are building off of an escalation from complementarianism, the sort of traditional model of right-wing Christian misogyny, into something called biblical patriarchy.
00:41:40.780 So, Adrian, do you want to gloss complementarianism for us and, like, where it comes from?
00:41:44.960 Sure.
00:41:45.900 Complementarianism is the idea that you actually do hold men and women in equally high esteem,
00:41:51.260 but that God has endowed them with different and complementary characteristics
00:41:57.700 that predestine some of them more to some kinds of tasks and others more to others.
00:42:04.440 The doctrine of complementarianism is not named, I think, until like sort of the late 80s or 90s.
00:42:09.840 It's really something that I think tradcasts and like Protestant right pastors cook up.
00:42:15.280 But this idea has been around for centuries, and it often sort of came out of actually what you were saying, the kind of oikos model, the household model of political representation, right?
00:42:25.460 The state is a big household that gathers all the small households, and the node between those two is the paterfamilias, is the man who leaves the household to participate in the polis.
00:42:37.620 There's a version of this already in Aristotle, but it becomes very strong and sort of like early modern justification of the divine right of kings.
00:42:47.720 Something like Robert Filmer's Patriarcha comes out of that tradition.
00:42:51.760 But Rousseau has something like that, too.
00:42:53.380 Like there are people that we think of as more progressive that have this kind of idea that like, no, what makes the family such a unique and indestructible unit is the fact that the members are not like members in a state where they all are exactly equal.
00:43:11.660 is that they're precisely unequal.
00:43:13.540 They're separate, if you will.
00:43:15.040 And while they're equal in dignity,
00:43:17.420 they are not equal in what they bring to the table
00:43:20.120 or what exactly their role is
00:43:23.260 in this particular little society. 0.76
00:43:25.680 Yeah, it's a notion that across gender, 0.94
00:43:28.260 there is different capacities, 0.63
00:43:30.000 different impulses, different talents, right?
00:43:33.300 And that these are kind of like divided
00:43:35.040 between the genders,
00:43:36.140 not distributed variously among them.
00:43:38.420 And it presumes,
00:43:40.220 or maybe I should say pretends to like have this difference be contained with an equality of gender,
00:43:47.840 right? It's separate but equal for gender. But Doug Phillips, the guy who resigned because of
00:43:53.380 that quote-unquote inappropriate relationship from his church in San Antonio, he looked at 0.99
00:43:58.020 complementarianism and said, you know, that's bullshit. Like men and women are not equal. 0.99
00:44:03.100 There should be no pretensions to equality in marriage because the Bible says we're not equal.
00:44:08.900 And by the Bible here, he really means St. Paul.
00:44:12.740 And by St. Paul, he means the epistle to the Ephesians, chapter 5, verses 21 to 33.
00:44:20.100 Adrian, could you read this little selection?
00:44:22.760 I use the King James Version because I think it's the prettiest.
00:44:25.540 I'm sorry, Moira, but as a matter of principle, I don't read other people's mail.
00:44:30.400 All right. 0.82
00:44:32.020 Wives, submit yourselves unto your husbands as unto the Lord. 0.57
00:44:35.080 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church,
00:44:38.820 and he is the savior of the body. 0.96
00:44:40.540 Therefore, as the church is subject unto Christ, so let wives be to their own husbands in everything.
00:44:46.140 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church and gave himself for it.
00:44:50.460 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother,
00:44:53.380 and shall be joined unto his wife, and they too shall be one flesh.
00:44:57.940 This is a great mystery, but I speak concerning Christ and the church.
00:45:01.280 Nevertheless, let every one of you in particular so love his wife,
00:45:04.620 even as himself, and the wives see that she reverends her husband.
00:45:10.200 I skipped some verses in the middle there, but you got the gist.
00:45:13.240 Wives, submit yourselves unto your husbands. 0.95
00:45:15.740 The husband is the head of the wife. 0.96
00:45:18.000 They shall be as of one flesh, right? 0.88
00:45:20.900 This is interpreted to mean women are subordinate to men. 1.00
00:45:25.920 They need to obey men. 0.99
00:45:27.260 And because they are, quote unquote, one flesh,
00:45:29.320 they do not have a separate identity from men.
00:45:32.400 So marriage is a sort of personhood-obliviating institution, right? It puts women sort of underneath men in this total, complete, and permanent way. If you guys ever read right-wing women in the chapter Jews and Homosexuals, Andrea Dworkin has a very long argument with St. Paul, among other things, is about this. 0.91
00:45:52.960 And also when this came up in my church once, the priest was like, this is a really controversial reading, but I am going to read it anyway.
00:46:03.340 I'm not going to skip it like some cowardly priest because I think my parishioners need to know what marriage is really like.
00:46:11.320 And I'm like, bro, you're a Catholic priest. 0.97
00:46:13.620 You're a virgin. 0.61
00:46:16.080 Don't tell me about marriage.
00:46:18.320 Is he though? 0.99
00:46:19.020 I think Phoebe Waller-Ridge did a great disservice by depicting a millennial priest as, like, dreamy and, like, nice in this Andrew Scott way because what they actually are are fucking rancid incels. 0.98
00:46:30.920 Like, they're not nice guys. 0.99
00:46:32.860 Oh.
00:46:33.420 We saw some hot priests in the Vatican.
00:46:35.180 We were in the Vatican and—
00:46:36.500 Did you get the calendar?
00:46:37.520 I figure they sell a calendar.
00:46:39.020 Oh, my God.
00:46:39.720 There's a lot of hot priest calendars, but we did not buy them.
00:46:42.080 But we were in St. Peter's and there was a group of—I mean, what a smoke show, I got to say.
00:46:47.220 You don't want to hear them talk, all right? You want them to be quiet.
00:46:50.200 Hosanna in the highest is all I can say.
00:46:55.620 So like from this passage in St. Paul, these far-right fundamentalist evangelicals extrapolated their new vision of gender relations.
00:47:06.440 Or maybe I should say that with this passage, they constructed a post-hoc rationalization for the more misogynistic and contemptuous gender politics that they wanted all along anyway.
00:47:17.220 But that concept is a more extreme form of Christian misogyny that they call biblical patriarchy.
00:47:23.220 Essentially like complementarianism plus domination, right?
00:47:27.480 It's complementarianism without the fig leaf of equal dignity, right?
00:47:30.600 So it's the gender model that these guys use to get from the merely degrading and misogynist complementarianism to the more violent and domineering world in which women lose their right to vote.
00:47:43.220 in complementarianism women and their husbands like can disagree and argue it's just that like
00:47:49.260 what the man says always wins um but in biblical patriarchy women are quote-unquote in submission
00:47:55.680 to their husbands which functionally means that they lose the freedom to diverge from their
00:48:00.180 husbands in preference or an opinion and defiance is punished with what these people and with what
00:48:06.380 the new york times in a recent profile of them chose to refer to as quote-unquote discipline
00:48:12.080 Because I'm not here to lie to our listeners, I'm going to say that in biblical patriarchy, women's aspirations to individuality are met with domestic abuse.
00:48:18.760 Right. 1.00
00:48:19.280 Beatings. We're talking about physical violence.
00:48:21.220 We're also talking about marital rape, which is ubiquitous in these relations, right?
00:48:26.640 There is no right to decline sex with your husband and this vision of like, quote unquote, biblical patriarchy.
00:48:32.800 Oh, boy.
00:48:33.280 So this is a worldview that justifies men meeting women's difference, independence, or aspiration to dignity with violent physical force, right?
00:48:42.380 This is not in like an excess of passion as domestic violence apologists usually frame it, but actually as a matter of principle.
00:48:49.260 And this is a side note, but like a lot of times when you try to discuss this Christian right stuff online or in the left liberal circles that I kind of run in in my real life, people will start laughing this off as a kink. 0.72
00:49:00.820 Yeah.
00:49:01.160 And I want to take a minute here to explain why I'm really uncomfortable with that framing.
00:49:05.980 Because I think it's a move that mistakes kink as being somehow apolitical, as if like sexual desires and sexual practices don't have any like political content.
00:49:16.960 Or at worst, it's as if like violence that happens in sex and as sex, like that is like sexual violence, is like not real violence.
00:49:24.900 It's like a trivializing gesture.
00:49:26.500 Yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:49:26.960 And it's a way to, like, laugh off and avoid confronting the actual, like, violence and abuse and injustice that men are perpetuating against women in these scenarios.
00:49:35.540 That's a way of saying that, like, if something happens in a home or in a marriage or in a family or in the context of a sexual relationship, then, like, that private sphere of abuse is, like, less serious and less real. 1.00
00:49:46.200 I just want to be like, fuck you. 1.00
00:49:47.220 It is serious and it is real. 1.00
00:49:48.480 Like, this stuff is abuse.
00:49:50.040 This is violence.
00:49:51.000 This is power.
00:49:52.420 And therefore, it is political. 1.00
00:49:54.080 Like, no amount of, like, giggling about kink absolves you of your obligation to, like, reckon with that stuff morally. 1.00
00:50:01.340 But anyway, I'll get off my soapbox. 0.93
00:50:02.840 Because, like, now we're talking about, like, this is the biblical patriarchy that, like, Doug Phillips created.
00:50:07.280 And it was from Doug Phillips that would get the idea of, quote, unquote, household voting.
00:50:12.320 Yeah, I mean, it's as extremely old as the argument by which they get to this.
00:50:18.000 This was one of the main objections to women's suffrage in the 19th century, right?
00:50:22.240 A couverture, you're saying like, well, they already can vote. 1.00
00:50:25.020 They do it through their husbands. 1.00
00:50:26.940 It's the delegation system.
00:50:28.460 You delegate certain powers to your husband who then exercises his right to vote, right?
00:50:33.320 That's how they see it, right?
00:50:34.920 They think like, well, it should really be the head of household. 0.99
00:50:38.920 And then the wife can use suasion or whatever to moralize his vote. 1.00
00:50:43.960 But that's all she can do. 1.00
00:50:45.420 Yeah, it's like this notion that married women should not have their own votes, 0.86
00:50:49.120 but should be represented by their husbands as a quote unquote household, like one household,
00:50:54.660 one vote. It's a kind of suffrage coverture, right? I think this kind of disincentivizes 0.99
00:50:59.120 marriage, right? Like not if you're simultaneously pushing policies that purge women from paid work 0.99
00:51:05.220 and from the public sphere and therefore like require them to become more dependent as already 0.92
00:51:09.980 happens and is happening. Like if you ban abortion, if you ban DEI, if you make it more
00:51:16.180 expensive and onerous to get birth control. If you like got the federal organizations that are
00:51:21.240 tasked with enforcing like civil rights, non-discrimination and sexual harassment law,
00:51:25.600 like all of that makes it harder to avoid marriage. And it's also harder for women to 0.84
00:51:29.480 just say like, well, to hell with marriage. I want to vote on my own and be the head of my own 1.00
00:51:32.840 household. If you're like also attacking like no fault divorce and divorce access as increasingly
00:51:37.920 like Republican state parties are trying to do. But still, it would lead to a situation
00:51:43.120 where single women would vote for themselves. 1.00
00:51:49.220 And I'm going to guess that's a way more democratic constituency 1.00
00:51:52.440 than the married women of America, 1.00
00:51:55.080 who in this case would be disenfranchised. 1.00
00:51:56.980 It's like you're shooting yourself in the dick 0.99
00:51:58.940 on top of it all being really weird. 1.00
00:52:01.240 One version of this, right?
00:52:02.660 One argument for this kind of household voting
00:52:04.540 is that it is a way to restrict the franchise
00:52:07.380 that could at least facially be gender neutral
00:52:09.980 and which therefore would not, at least in theory,
00:52:13.120 impose upon this movement the burden of like actually trying to overturn the 19th Amendment.
00:52:20.100 It's like a loophole, supposedly, like they think of it as like a loophole for some states
00:52:24.240 and jurisdictions to like functionally restrict women's voting rights without having to say that 0.99
00:52:29.000 they're in defiance of the 19th Amendment. They would actually be also in defiance of the 14th 1.00
00:52:33.540 Amendment, but they don't like that either. But also, I'm no lawyer, but like you can't do that,
00:52:40.140 right? You can't be like, oh, well, you have the right, but you can only exercise it through
00:52:44.480 another person. It's like, well, that's not having the right, is it? No. I mean, like,
00:52:48.280 there's all kinds of rights that no longer have remedies because of the federal judiciary that
00:52:51.620 we have. But like, I don't think this is going to fly even with this federal judiciary, let's say
00:52:56.240 that. But like the idea is you could say like, okay, we believe that marriage obviates a woman's 0.82
00:53:00.980 individuality because according to scripture, like husband and wife are one flesh, yada, yada.
00:53:05.260 and therefore it is religiously vulgar or at least this is our pretext for husbands and wives to both
00:53:11.560 vote then you say that there can only be one vote per household and you leave it up to individual
00:53:16.980 families to decide whose vote that will be with the knowledge that men will enforce their ownership
00:53:21.540 over that vote like potentially with violence right or sorry uh with discipline to quote the
00:53:26.660 new york times but what this does is it halves the conservative vote and it leans the electorate
00:53:32.560 towards those who live alone, 1.00
00:53:34.320 which is, you know, decadent single people
00:53:36.160 with college educations. 1.00
00:53:37.480 Cat ladies. 0.99
00:53:38.040 Living in like Ridgewood apartments. 0.94
00:53:39.580 Yeah, I imagine like, okay,
00:53:41.220 there's household voting. 0.91
00:53:42.840 And that means that like two non-binary adult roommates
00:53:45.880 in Oakland are like debating over which one of them
00:53:49.080 could vote for Bernie Sanders harder.
00:53:51.140 You know, like you cut your own voting power
00:53:55.160 as a conservative movement that way.
00:53:57.260 And it should probably be said
00:53:59.140 that in the actual communities
00:54:00.660 where these ideas of repealing the ninth are coming up. 1.00
00:54:04.540 Like the women do vote right now.
00:54:06.480 They are voting regularly 0.99
00:54:08.040 and they are voting right wing the way they want to
00:54:10.560 and also the way their husbands want them to
00:54:12.500 and the way their husbands are voting, right?
00:54:14.620 So that's, let's say, a partial solution
00:54:17.100 to this household voting idea.
00:54:18.920 Sometimes these people are a little more coherent
00:54:20.960 and say there would be something more like family voting,
00:54:23.900 in which case unmarried women would still not be able to vote,
00:54:27.660 but they would be quote unquote represented 1.00
00:54:29.660 in the votes of like fathers, brothers, uncles, what have you. Surely there's some man somewhere,
00:54:35.800 but this is like an all-male electorate, right? But the talk of a quote-unquote household vote 1.00
00:54:41.780 allows these like anti-women suffrage people to emphasize, and they do this like with shockingly
00:54:48.640 straight faces, to like emphasize like community and consultation and harmony and these like gauzy
00:54:55.780 imprecise words that are meant to evoke like peacefulness and virtue, when they're talking
00:55:00.840 to reporters, that is, right? When they're talking to people outside the movement, they actually
00:55:05.580 emphasize a lot of those traditional preacher masculinity qualities, right? Things like
00:55:09.640 deliberativeness, responsibility, self-discipline, generosity. They seem to sense that those are a
00:55:16.200 better sell, but that is different from the way they talk about this when they're talking to the
00:55:21.200 in-group. Yeah. It's like there's the pitch you have to the dummies of the New York Times,
00:55:24.480 And then there's what you say on the podcast that the New York Times could also watch, but chooses for some weird reason not to.
00:55:31.420 Right. So like when they are talking to other far right people, they are tailoring their tone to much better fit the MAGA ethos.
00:55:39.440 Because when they're talking to their right wingers, the anti-women suffrage people are like very much like not conciliatory.
00:55:47.220 They're not calm. They're much more contemptuous. They're sneering. They're angry.
00:55:52.700 That's when they don't just talk in the kind of patronizing, like, soft focus terms about relieving women of the burden of having rights so that they can focus on, like, being feminine and pretty or whatever.
00:56:03.780 They talk about women as a corrosive moral and political force. 0.54
00:56:08.600 Yeah. 1.00
00:56:09.100 Not people in need of, quote-unquote, protection, but people who need to be controlled, punished, and even eradicated or at least eradicated from any place that's, like, public, meaningful, and important.
00:56:18.780 Yeah.
00:56:19.100 The kind of stuff that Peter Thiel likes, yeah.
00:56:20.700 Yeah.
00:56:21.000 Yeah. So as I said, this is not feasible politically. There's no legal way to get there. This is not going to happen. But it's much more feasible that we see a replay of what Republicans have done with the Voting Rights Act protections for the black vote since 2013.
00:56:36.760 Like, the idea that they could apply similar tactics to the women's vote is not so crazy. 0.78
00:56:42.120 And that would look like a slow, piecemeal increase in obstacles to the franchise that, like, disproportionately burden women and not men, and thereby create a redder and mailer electorate. 0.53
00:56:54.620 And this is already at play with the SAVE Act, which Republicans can't pass through Congress with a majority but are, like, trying to sneak in through budget reconciliation.
00:57:02.580 Adrian, do you know much about the SAVE Act?
00:57:04.720 Yeah, a little bit.
00:57:05.540 It's pretty wild.
00:57:06.440 So the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act is basically an act that would combat the non-existent problems of voter impersonation and non-citizen voting.
00:57:17.760 And basically, it would require you to use certain forms of identification to register to vote and then provide similar or sometimes identical forms of identification when trying to vote.
00:57:31.900 This would often be a passport, which is a huge problem because a lot of Americans do
00:57:35.480 not have a passport for our international listeners.
00:57:38.420 This is something kind of unusual about our country, but this is the facts.
00:57:42.160 I think there's something like 60 million Americans that do not have a passport, 70
00:57:45.440 million or something like that.
00:57:46.860 And depending on, I think there are different versions of this law have been around for
00:57:50.640 a while now.
00:57:51.240 There are versions that, for instance, say your passport has to match the name you were
00:57:57.560 assigned at Perth, which is tough for women who have taken their husband's name, which again is
00:58:03.520 one of those things where it's like, you know, that's going to target, right? I mean, something
00:58:07.520 like 90% of women who get married take their husband's names. It's still, this is nonsensical 0.62
00:58:12.960 to me, but it's still far and away the more common practice, including among liberals. Yeah. What are
00:58:17.400 you doing, ladies? Vast, vast majority of women do this. And the thing about the SAVE Act is, I mean, 1.00
00:58:22.620 first of all, it's functionally a poll tax, right? Because these documents cost money to get.
00:58:27.360 You're not just entitled to a copy of your own birth certificate.
00:58:29.960 You're not just entitled to a passport.
00:58:31.600 Those are fines. 0.54
00:58:32.940 But also, as you said, Adrian, it means that women who have changed their names, as a majority of women do, suddenly they're not eligible.
00:58:40.860 Well, again, I'm guessing that there is a way to remedy that.
00:58:44.000 But the point in all these cases is like the large number.
00:58:47.760 You could apply for a passport, but maybe you don't.
00:58:50.680 You could probably figure out a way to document that.
00:58:53.320 Like, yes, I changed my name when I got married.
00:58:55.460 And that would be fine.
00:58:56.240 but like it's another step, another step, another step.
00:58:58.640 And with every barrier that you create to be able to vote,
00:59:02.240 like you will peel some people off, right?
00:59:04.580 And so the question here,
00:59:05.720 like in a country of hundreds of millions of people,
00:59:08.200 you're going to lose a very serious number of voters
00:59:10.980 every step of the way.
00:59:12.420 And this, the SAVE Act,
00:59:14.220 piles on several of these levels,
00:59:16.000 which will likely disenfranchise millions.
00:59:20.320 Yeah, the harder you make it to do something,
00:59:22.240 the fewer people are going to do it.
00:59:23.360 A lot of people, you give them a little friction
00:59:25.180 and they opt out, right?
00:59:26.380 They're like, well, I'm not going to get it together.
00:59:28.460 Think about like how long it takes me
00:59:29.900 to go pick up my dry cleaning,
00:59:31.320 which is a walk of maybe six blocks, you know?
00:59:35.800 And I will fail to get that done for weeks, you know?
00:59:40.100 And that kind of just small friction in people's lives
00:59:44.360 really does dissuade the outcomes, right?
00:59:47.160 Yeah.
00:59:47.840 So this stuff is like on the table, it's in the air, right?
00:59:51.500 There's already a political movement 1.00
00:59:53.220 to make it harder for women to vote.
00:59:55.180 Because there's a sense that will benefit the Republican Party, but also increasingly the diagnosis made by the repeal of the 19th people is being shared by people on the right even who aren't advocating for that position, right?
01:00:09.660 So there's this idea on the one hand that giving women the right to vote has like quote unquote atomized families and caused loneliness, alienation by encouraging women, and I guess also men, but they're only ever talking about women, to like think of themselves as independent individuals.
01:00:26.220 I feel like this is actually what was kind of a fascinating undercurrent of the response to the Kamala ad that we talked about at the beginning,
01:00:33.920 which was that people were sort of accusing Democrats of family alienation, the way that like Christian conservatives often are like,
01:00:40.320 You want her to lie to her husband?
01:00:43.420 Husband, right? And it's like the same way that they're like, you want that child to say what you did to them?
01:00:48.940 Like, think of what that's doing to that family, right?
01:00:50.860 Like you have these kind of family alienation, like witnesses testifying at custody hearings or often at abuse trials, like basically flat out, like peddling junk science to be like, you know, they should really move in with their abuser, right?
01:01:04.900 Listeners, if you ever want to feel really, really sad, look up the pseudoscience of quote unquote parental alienation syndrome and its deployment to protect sexual and domestic abusers and guarantee them continued access to children and sometimes women to victimize.
01:01:20.040 Horrifying stuff, yeah.
01:01:21.200 Yeah.
01:01:21.680 But it's the same thing, right?
01:01:23.000 It's saying, how dare you drive a wedge between the sacred bond of the family, right, by telling her she has rights and giving them to her, more importantly.
01:01:31.920 And acknowledging that her interests are not totally subsumed by that of, you know, daddy-husband.
01:01:36.640 Yeah.
01:01:36.880 That she remains her own person with her own rights, dignity, and interests.
01:01:41.260 And also, like, I will say this pay-on to, like, the unity of the family is also theologically tricky. 0.96
01:01:47.240 Because the Christianity that these guys practice for all that one flesh shit, they actually are placing a lot of emphasis on the individual. 0.92
01:01:54.680 Like their theology does not say that husband and wives go to heaven or hell as pairs. 0.99
01:01:59.380 Oh, yeah, that's true.
01:02:00.440 It doesn't say, it says that they go one by one.
01:02:02.400 It doesn't say that parishioners are like saved or counseled as families.
01:02:06.940 It says that they are saved and counseled one by one, right?
01:02:10.120 So preach to one by one, delivered from sin one by one.
01:02:13.360 They have like individual souls.
01:02:14.760 souls. And this doesn't apply to the public sphere for some reason in a way that these guys never
01:02:20.420 articulate. They're just like, oh, but for for political rights, for material interests, then
01:02:25.220 you just have to do everything that your husband said. They also never explained why like men's 0.98
01:02:29.460 behavior doesn't alienate the family. I'm like, well, what about him like beating her? Like that's
01:02:34.220 allowed. That's not a dissolution of your like beloved union. Like it also says in that section
01:02:41.040 of St. Paul that husbands are supposed to care for their wives and never hate them. And it's like,
01:02:45.600 well, you guys all hate your wives. And I can tell by the way you're treating them, right?
01:02:48.880 Yeah. Another thing they say, and this is the part that is really, really caught on,
01:02:54.420 is that giving women the right to vote has led to a quote unquote feminization of American
01:03:00.560 politics. So Doug Wilson, in that like cringe ass imaginary interview he wrote for himself
01:03:06.700 with feminists, he quotes friend of the show, Helen Andrews, who we did an episode on, arguing 0.67
01:03:14.200 that women's entrance into the franchise, as well as their entrance into public life
01:03:18.580 more broadly, has led to what he calls the quote-unquote HR-ization of everything.
01:03:24.240 We need to do an HR episode. 0.59
01:03:26.000 Yeah, this is Helen Andrews' point.
01:03:27.900 Yeah, like, good job, Helen, with friends like these. 0.99
01:03:30.980 So they say that women's boasts have increased what they call suicidal empathy in American domestic and foreign policy. 0.91
01:03:38.360 We also have to do an empathy episode. 0.95
01:03:40.220 Yeah. 1.00
01:03:40.620 The idea here is that like women are kinder, more empathetic, less willing to aggressively hurt others for their own needs. 0.98
01:03:46.000 And this is like a bad thing. 0.92
01:03:47.800 Yeah. 0.99
01:03:48.500 I'm going to go out on a limb and say something kind of controversial, which is that I think women have a tremendous capacity for rage and at times a deep appetite for violence. 0.98
01:03:56.960 sometimes I just kind of start yapping in a very noncommittal way about like what I think should 0.88
01:04:03.260 happen to the leaders of this right-wing movement like what I think should happen to the likes of
01:04:06.420 like Alex Karp and Kat goes oh you're planning your gulag again uh I was gonna say if you want 0.86
01:04:13.540 to hear women capable of deep rage and a deep appetite for violence check out the stuff I cut 0.94
01:04:19.600 out of this podcast yeah you're moira off mike yeah yeah whoa well that's not that's not staying 0.95
01:04:28.160 in um like you know i do not particularly feel like uh burdened or blinded by empathy in those
01:04:34.480 moments right no it's one of your best features yeah but like the broader idea of empathy as a
01:04:42.560 force that leads to like immigrant rights civil rights expanded welfare state like the idea that
01:04:48.040 empathy is like this corrosive negative force that like betrays America's purpose and is
01:04:52.420 antithetical to its interest. That is getting a lot of steam on the way. Yes, yes. And it's being
01:04:57.220 advanced again by guys who had taken on this like particular preacher masculinity. Yeah. That has
01:05:02.480 been a bit like marginalized in the MAGA movement, but is now sort of coming back by being more
01:05:06.880 contemptuous, right? Yeah. So like last year, a guy named Joe Rigney, who's a pastor, put out a
01:05:13.320 book he called The Sin of Empathy. The Sin of Empathy, I remember that, yeah. Ben Shapiro, who's like a
01:05:18.200 Jewish, as we mentioned, a Jewish political commentator in the sort of sexually prohibitionist 0.58
01:05:22.500 pastor model, has also railed against toxic empathy. And the uniform consensus is that this
01:05:29.380 empathy is female, that is natural or innate trait of women, and that is women who bring it into our 0.69
01:05:34.720 politics. He has also railed against macaroni in a pot, but let's not go back there. This contrasts
01:05:40.080 with the rights, similar idea of women 1.00
01:05:42.400 as like gossiping, scheming bitches who don't forgive. 0.99
01:05:44.980 It's like, well, which is it? 1.00
01:05:45.720 Are we like softies or are we bitches? 0.85
01:05:47.600 But I do think, and this is like gonna be my last note here 0.90
01:05:50.020 because I've kept you for a very long time.
01:05:51.660 Thank you, Adrian.
01:05:53.320 I think that there's something really at play here
01:05:55.160 that doesn't get a lot of attention
01:05:56.580 in the like popular mainstream
01:05:59.200 and left liberal accounts of the repeal of the 19th movement,
01:06:01.920 which is that there is something consistent here. 1.00
01:06:05.560 Like these guys are stupid. 1.00
01:06:07.280 They're all over the map. 1.00
01:06:08.320 They're not particularly coherent
01:06:09.560 in their arguments and certainly not in their plans, but there is a strain of one coherent
01:06:17.640 vision, which is that women's citizenship needs to be lessened. It needs to be degraded. 0.96
01:06:24.120 That their citizenship, their fulsome citizenship requires things that are unacceptable to these
01:06:30.840 people. So like Doug Wilson, the Maso Idaho guy whose podcast I listen to and is the head of
01:06:37.680 Pete Hegs' denomination. He's not a smart guy, but he said something about this that was revealing to
01:06:43.120 me. He said that Roe v. Wade was the inevitable conclusion of the 19th Amendment. He said that
01:06:49.920 if you're going to have women be full citizens, citizens who can vote and stand for office as
01:06:54.720 the 19th Amendment allows them to do, then it is inevitable and like even kind of required 0.60
01:06:59.460 that you're also going to have to give them the right to get an abortion. Because to be a full 0.98
01:07:04.340 citizen. You cannot be subjected to laws that force pregnancy and childbirth on you. You cannot
01:07:09.380 be a full citizen if you are subjected to laws that deny you that fundamental degree of sovereignty
01:07:15.100 over your own body and your own life. You cannot participate in your society or in your government
01:07:20.620 with full access, full opportunity, and full dignity if you can be made to be pregnant against 1.00
01:07:25.160 your will, right? So right now, in the aftermath of the Dobbs decisions, women have already been
01:07:31.860 relegated to a more partial and abbreviated form of citizenship. And basically, it's been 1.00
01:07:37.060 politically accepted, right? Everybody's moved on. Yeah, I mean, it's meant to deprive women of
01:07:42.160 fulsome citizenship, but it's also using women as the guinea pigs to experiment what less than 1.00
01:07:50.200 fulsome citizenship would look like, right? Like what a citizenship minus would look like, right? 1.00
01:07:55.200 Like with a bunch of the duties of a citizen, but none of the, you know, rights and privileges.
01:08:00.480 It's also a way, and I think that's what it is for Thiel,
01:08:03.120 a way to kind of test out on people that they don't like
01:08:07.480 the idea of like, what would it take
01:08:10.720 to create two kinds of citizenships
01:08:12.820 where one is just like less than.
01:08:15.080 Right, I think one thing that makes that
01:08:17.740 a fruitful place of experimentation for them
01:08:20.660 is this sort of like non-recognition of misogyny
01:08:23.900 as a form of oppression in American politics, right?
01:08:26.420 They're like, well, nobody's looking at this.
01:08:27.940 Nobody really thinks this counts.
01:08:29.360 so we can play around with it.
01:08:31.240 But it's also just like to the anti-women suffrage people,
01:08:35.160 the removal of the 19th Amendment is not a fringe non-sequitur.
01:08:38.220 It's actually part of a project that is already underway, right?
01:08:42.540 They've already gotten some of what they want.
01:08:44.880 This is already happening.
01:08:46.660 So I don't think the repeal of the 19th Amendment is in the cards. 1.00
01:08:52.880 I hate to disappoint B-dubs, 1.00
01:08:55.800 but I do think that we are looking at the degradation of women's citizenship 1.00
01:08:58.800 in a real way. 0.50
01:08:59.920 And I think more people
01:09:02.060 should be pissed about it.
01:09:04.360 Well, thank you so much
01:09:05.340 for taking me through this.
01:09:06.400 I'm glad to hear that
01:09:07.460 they're as marginal as they are.
01:09:08.900 But, you know, I mean,
01:09:10.220 like they're really not that far
01:09:11.780 from the beating heart of power
01:09:13.300 right now in this country.
01:09:14.800 And we've seen, you know,
01:09:17.080 you can look at birthright citizenship
01:09:18.420 and sort of how the opposition
01:09:20.200 to birthright citizenship
01:09:21.040 went from an absolutely fringe position
01:09:23.040 to something that is clearly
01:09:24.020 fairly seriously entertained
01:09:25.600 by what is a third
01:09:26.900 of the Supreme Court.
01:09:27.820 this kind of project bears scrutinizing early on
01:09:31.720 because in the way the United States are set up
01:09:34.200 with a conservative movement
01:09:36.360 that kind of keeps pulling all of its energy
01:09:38.740 from its extreme, often extremely misogynistic wings
01:09:42.860 and then you have a kind of center
01:09:45.180 that figures out all these language games
01:09:47.920 with which to pay undue deference to these ideas
01:09:51.260 and try to whitewash them
01:09:52.280 and try to sort of package them with moral panics,
01:09:54.320 et cetera, et cetera, in order to launder them.
01:09:56.560 Like, we are uniquely set up for stuff like this.
01:09:59.760 It's not always going to happen, but we're uniquely set up for that kind of stuff to jump over and sort of become mainstream before we know it.
01:10:07.780 Yeah, you know, something that Dale Partridge said when he was profiled by The Times is like, you sound crazy, and then in a couple years, you're in the mainstream.
01:10:16.340 And he's right.
01:10:17.060 That has happened.
01:10:17.680 We've seen that happen over and over again.
01:10:19.240 And you do it by showing up in The New York Times.
01:10:21.260 Yeah, exactly.
01:10:22.260 They are helping.
01:10:23.620 Yes.
01:10:23.920 All right. Thank you, Adrian. It's always lovely to talk to you. And thank you to our beautiful
01:10:29.380 Patreon subscribers and all of our listeners. You guys really are very special to me.
01:10:37.360 In Bed With The Right is made possible by hundreds of listeners who support us via
01:10:40.620 patreon.com. Our episodes are produced and edited by Mark Yoshizumi and Katie Lau.
01:10:45.100 Our title music is by Katie Lau.