In Bed With The Right - March 04, 2024


Episode 16: Kate Manne on Anti-Fatness

Topics
Episode 15: Taylor Swift Episode 17: Otto Weininger, or Gender and Anti-Semitism

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 11 minutes

Words per minute

165.56

Word count

11,829

Sentence count

309

Harmful content

Misogyny

23

sentences flagged

Toxicity

28

sentences flagged

Hate speech

51

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 that gives rise to a sense of like, oh, this fat person must be doing something wrong. 0.96
00:00:04.880 They're unhealthy. They're unvirtuous. 0.98
00:00:08.040 Whereas, no, this person is actually just existing in their body.
00:00:23.180 Hello, I'm Adrian Dobb.
00:00:24.840 And I'm Moira Donegan.
00:00:25.740 And whether we like it or not, we're in bit with the right.
00:00:27.920 So Adrienne, today we are joined by the brilliant, the illustrious, the gift to American intellectual life, Kate Mann, who is a moral philosopher from Cornell, and she is most recently the author of Unshrinking, How to Face Fat Phobia.
00:00:44.280 Kate is the author of Down Girl, The Logic of Misogyny, which did this kind of insane thing, or at least a very rare thing, which is it is a book of academic philosophy that became a mainstream hit.
00:00:58.000 I use this book a lot. I think a lot of people use this book a lot to elucidate the meaning of misogyny in the wake of Hillary Clinton's 2016 loss to Donald Trump.
00:01:07.220 And I find myself continually going back to Down Girl to explore Kate's really systematic approach to how misogyny functions and its disciplining role in women's lives and in our public life.
00:01:23.000 And now she's turned her same critical eye with unshrinking to the phenomenon of anti-fatness, which I think normally gets understood as a manifestation of misogyny.
00:01:35.520 but Kate makes a really compelling case in this book for understanding anti-fatness as a broader
00:01:40.760 phenomenon that affects our politics on its own terms. Kate, thank you so much for being with us.
00:01:45.720 Thanks so much for having me. It's great to connect again, Moira, and great to meet you,
00:01:49.620 Adrian. It's really lovely to meet you. And in discussing the episode beforehand,
00:01:54.020 you already mentioned that the book feels like a tougher sell than Down Girl, for instance. And
00:01:59.720 this is something that I think the book kind of anticipates. And I thought maybe we could start
00:02:04.000 by talking about that part of it.
00:02:06.680 In your intro, you talk about three myths about fatphobia.
00:02:09.580 And the third, I think, struck me as the most surprising in some way,
00:02:13.920 which is that fatphobia is not ancillary.
00:02:16.460 It's not second to.
00:02:18.380 It's not less than.
00:02:19.780 It's actually integral to all these other forms of bias and of domination.
00:02:25.620 You dash off this sort of point where you're like, you know,
00:02:27.880 there are plenty of left-leaning folks who would want to correct themselves
00:02:32.180 the moment they make a racist or homophobic point but who will indulge in fat phobia you know uh
00:02:39.420 kind of reflexively and unreflectedly and will in fact defend that when they're called out on it
00:02:43.720 and i'll say that that landed that it definitely is that that squares with my observations i thought
00:02:50.080 maybe you could say a little bit about that that third point that to me was the one that sort of
00:02:53.820 jumped out we're like okay now we're cooking this is why this maybe even more so than down girl
00:02:58.680 needed to be needed to be written can you say a little bit more about it yeah i'd love to thank
00:03:03.140 you i mean that really goes to the heart of what i think we're often up against with this issue which
00:03:08.260 is there is a kind of complacency about fat phobia on the left and even amongst very progressive
00:03:16.160 people people of my political genre broadly speaking there is this sense that it doesn't
00:03:21.460 really matter and we see this in certain statistics you know one of the really striking
00:03:27.000 studies that I looked at when writing this book showed that fat phobia was really the only form
00:03:33.060 of implicit bias that they studied. And they didn't study every form of bias, but these Harvard
00:03:39.300 researchers studied race, skin tone, disability, sexuality, age, and weight bias was the only one
00:03:47.180 that was increasing when it came to implicit bias. And it was also the form of explicit bias that was
00:03:53.120 decreasing the most slowly. And I want to be really careful here because there is no such
00:04:00.020 thing ever, unfortunately, as a last acceptable prejudice, if only. But what I do think is,
00:04:06.760 yeah, there is this sense of complacency and also complicity among especially left-wing people
00:04:13.300 about fatphobia, which really doesn't make sense when you think about the way that not only is
00:04:19.620 fatphobia something systemic and structural, as I argue in the book, but I think it also intersects
00:04:25.280 with every other major system of oppression. So I think wonderful work by Sabrina Strings and
00:04:31.320 Deshaun Harrison has shown that fatness is something which has had an association with
00:04:37.780 blackness and that fatphobia in fact has its origins in anti-black racism. There's also a
00:04:44.460 potent intersection that I've been very interested in, given my background of misogyny and fat
00:04:50.700 phobia. So the way that girls and women being asked to shrink ourselves continually is a powerful
00:04:56.220 weapon in oppressing girls and women and making us small, meek, quiet, pliable. And there's also
00:05:04.360 a really powerful intersection, just to name one other, between fat phobia and transphobia,
00:05:09.740 where trans folks' bodies are policed, and one of the huge forms of gatekeeping to which trans
00:05:16.440 folks are subject to is being denied access to life-saving, gender-affirming care on the basis
00:05:23.200 of BMI. So yeah, I think we really need to take fatphobia seriously, both in and of itself, but
00:05:29.180 also because you really can't address these other forms of oppression that people claim to care
00:05:34.800 about without also addressing fatphobia. I'm grateful that you touched on Sabrina Springer,
00:05:39.520 whose work I think really gets a lot of grateful recognition in your book. I was struck by that
00:05:46.720 passage because, you know, there's a moment that I had as, you know, an American high schooler,
00:05:53.520 right, where I was taken on a tour of an art museum. And, you know, we're exposed to these,
00:05:58.540 like, Raphaelite nudes that look, you know, different than the sort of, you know, ideals
00:06:05.000 of female beauty were being i was being presented in the 2000s and like a calvin klein ad right
00:06:09.740 and you know this this museum docent explains that the ideal of beauty was you know different
00:06:16.600 at that time and it's just like thunderclap it's like oh my god desire what if desire is
00:06:20.400 historically contingent oh my god um uh what if it's shaped by these social factors uh
00:06:26.800 And I think you do a really elegant history of how historical conditions created fat phobia
00:06:37.160 through the sort of necessity of creating a moral justification for anti-Blackness, right? Could
00:06:41.840 you walk our listeners through that really quick? Because I think it's so useful.
00:06:44.860 Yeah, I'd love to. I think it's really interesting to look at how recent fat phobia is. I mean,
00:06:51.800 look, there are dribs and drabs of fat phobia. And by the way, I use the terms fat phobia,
00:06:56.800 and anti-fatness interchangeably just for any listeners wondering about the terminology here
00:07:02.200 but yeah there are dribs and drabs of fat phobia throughout human history but oftentimes the
00:07:08.200 relationship to the fat body was really quite positive at least ambivalent but often pretty
00:07:13.860 positive fatness was often seen unsurprisingly as a sign of wealth and luxury and abundance
00:07:20.500 especially in food environments where calories were kind of in scarce supply it was a sign you
00:07:26.340 had enough money to make your body larger. And that really changed very, very recently compared
00:07:33.840 to something like misogyny, which, as you both know, misogyny is kind of as old as agriculture.
00:07:39.420 And so it's very hard to kind of figure out where it came from. And that contrasts with fat phobia,
00:07:44.120 where Sabrina Strings, this brilliant UCLA sociologist has shown that it was in the mid 0.76
00:07:50.720 18th century that this association between fatness and blackness began to be drawn by these white 0.98
00:07:58.200 racist garbage pseudoscientists who were coming up with a pretext essentially from distinguishing 0.99
00:08:05.520 white bodies from the black bodies who were being enslaved so brutally and in ever-burgeoning 1.00
00:08:11.800 numbers in the transatlantic slave trade. And so once the association between fatness and blackness 0.97
00:08:19.460 was drawn, which, by the way, wasn't based on any empirical data or even observation. This was
00:08:24.240 armchair garbage science by people who had never been to the relevant parts of Africa. 0.96
00:08:29.820 But once that association was drawn, fatness came to be derogated shortly thereafter, 0.97
00:08:35.280 and associated with things like being primitive, quote unquote, or being depraved and being 0.93
00:08:41.260 basically deserving of the horrifically racist fate that black bodies were being subjected to 0.96
00:08:46.980 under white colonialism. So yeah, what I think String shows so powerfully is that it wasn't that
00:08:55.240 fatness was derogated and then association with blackness, it actually went the other way. 0.57
00:09:00.520 Fatness was quite positive until we had this association drawn between fatness and blackness, 0.65
00:09:06.280 and then fatness came to be derogated shortly thereafter. And then that kind of created a very 0.82
00:09:12.040 new aesthetic for especially white American Protestant women throughout the 19th century 0.99
00:09:18.360 and then into the 20th, where it became a sign of being kind of refined of mind, of being physically
00:09:24.460 dainty and frail and vulnerable. And it was really tied to a kind of misogynistic beauty ideal that
00:09:30.760 has remained in place throughout the 20th century with, again, minor variations. We see with that
00:09:37.740 There are some eras where slightly curvier bodies are in fashion, but really it's an enduringly thin body throughout the 20th and 21st centuries that has been celebrated with, again, minor variations in fat distribution.
00:09:51.240 Right, which is always an index of extreme amounts of work, right?
00:09:54.300 It's never the voluptuous body as such.
00:09:56.760 it's always like very select places and you have a beautiful part of the book where you talk about
00:10:01.400 the redistribution of fat through surgery which like goes in different directions at different
00:10:07.320 times right and it's like you know and it's it's a sign of it's supposed to be a proxy for effort
00:10:12.600 for accommodation it's really a form of pliancy yeah it's compliant kind of voluptuousness that 0.81
00:10:19.800 we see in someone like rubens that's exactly right i mean sucking out someone's buckle fat
00:10:26.000 which is basically your cheek pads for those listeners who don't know it's now a trendy
00:10:30.580 surgery and you know taking out that fat in the face and having recently the trend has reversed
00:10:38.600 but for some time the BBL was quite a popular surgery where fat would be inserted into the
00:10:44.700 buttocks in a way that was reflective of a kind of new norm or at least style of fat distribution
00:10:51.320 but yeah it really is about showing yourself to be willing to be compliant with these kinds of
00:10:58.200 fat distribution trends regardless of the natural size and shape of your body which is tremendously
00:11:03.300 variant in ways that yeah show that you're willing to spend the coin of your capitalist dollar in
00:11:09.600 order to make your body conform to these pernicious and very mercurial norms but that's
00:11:17.120 the other part of it too. I think these trends in increasing thinness also have a lot to do with
00:11:22.640 the fact that in a calorie abundant social environment, it's increasingly expensive to be
00:11:28.440 thin. So part of what we see in terms of the fat phobia increasing in the 19th and 20th century is
00:11:35.840 also just as you get more calories widely available in society, it's no longer a sign of wealth and
00:11:42.100 elitism and just sheer abundance and luxury to have a fatter body. Instead, it's a sign of
00:11:49.020 actually low socioeconomic status. And elites, especially white elites, are increasingly wanting
00:11:56.760 to spend their money to show signs of social prestige by doing the things that increasingly
00:12:04.700 need to be done to get a very thin body, like the expensive Peloton bike, the overpriced salad
00:12:10.380 delivery kit service. And increasingly too, weight loss drugs like Ozempic and Wegovi are also a sign
00:12:17.460 of this social status and this ability to invest in your thin physique. So yeah, that's been part
00:12:24.260 of the changing norms of beauty as well. What is easiest to do, namely oftentimes for many people
00:12:32.120 to gain weight tends to be the thing thought of as less than, whereas what's harder to do, namely
00:12:37.480 to make ourselves very lean, especially for those of us who aren't genetically predisposed towards
00:12:41.920 that, that's thought of as better. So I call it the harder, better fallacy. That which is harder
00:12:47.460 is seen as more worthy, despite the fact that that's really fallacious. It doesn't follow.
00:12:53.900 Yeah. I really like, there's a moment in the book where you point out that, you know,
00:12:57.380 one thing that clearly gets routed through anti-fat bias is, I think you make the point
00:13:02.500 that like, if you look at Victorians looking at the poor, right? Like we would be shocked at the
00:13:07.060 level of disgust they were able to muster but then you point out that like the level of disgust
00:13:11.540 people routinely muster and are supposedly mustering for a good cause for some bizarre
00:13:17.560 good cause today it's the same thing we're just we've we found a way to route it through bodies
00:13:23.440 and not to say we're horrified at immiserations like we're horrified allegedly at their lack of
00:13:29.640 health or their poor health outcomes etc etc which are empirically not given but like it is a place
00:13:34.760 where we sort of where class becomes spectacular, where it gets written on the body in ways that
00:13:39.800 like we normally associate with Victorian England, basically. Yeah, I think that's exactly right. I
00:13:45.720 mean, fatness is a powerful proxy and marker for certain kinds of marginalized racial and class
00:13:53.200 statuses. And so the way Paul Campos put it in his fantastic book, The Obesity Myth is kind of,
00:13:59.180 I think very telling and revealing and just true, which is for a thin white elite, many people at
00:14:06.800 least wouldn't feel comfortable jeering at a Mexican American woman going into Walmart as
00:14:12.720 such, but they feel totally fine showing contempt and derision and even jeering at her body and
00:14:19.420 calling her quote unquote morbidly obese. And the pretext for that is, oh, we're so worried about
00:14:25.160 her health but really it's about an excuse to indulge in a kind of classism and racism
00:14:31.640 that is veiled in the more acceptable garb of fat phobia and oftentimes like there are stereotypes
00:14:38.520 about this that are incredibly powerful again even among liberals and progressives that according to
00:14:44.980 this common narrative poverty and obesity quote unquote because it's a word i don't love um are
00:14:51.900 in lockstep. And it's just not true. It's actually not true that the fattest people in America are
00:14:59.140 the poorest ones or that there's a reliable relationship between getting richer and getting
00:15:04.180 thinner. It's true for some demographics, but not most. So for example, amongst men,
00:15:10.540 the fattest group of American men are in the middle income bracket. And the thinnest group 0.98
00:15:15.060 is actually the poorest men with a similar amount of so-called obesity prevalence. Again,
00:15:21.320 And it's a stigmatizing word I don't use.
00:15:23.380 I use in scare quotes when I'm reporting scientific and epidemiological studies.
00:15:28.920 But yeah, the richest men have a similar quote unquote obesity level.
00:15:33.420 And for women, it's a different picture.
00:15:35.760 But the only group of women who reliably and statistically significantly get thinner as 1.00
00:15:41.620 they get richer is white women.
00:15:44.400 So for other groups of women, and this is especially we just don't see any patterns 0.75
00:15:49.020 among Black women for obesity prevalence being higher in lower socioeconomic groups.
00:15:55.960 So yeah, there is this trope on the left that fatness is bad because it's associated with
00:16:01.040 or caused by poverty.
00:16:02.180 And of course, poverty is indeed a scourge in this country, among many others.
00:16:07.120 But it's firstly a kind of guilt by association.
00:16:10.160 And secondly, and more importantly, it's just not really true.
00:16:13.080 It's much more a marker of low socioeconomic status than actually a simple reflection.
00:16:19.020 of someone's socioeconomic status in America today.
00:16:22.040 I think it's also interesting that you bring up this tricky correlation and causation
00:16:27.540 issue with class and weight, because one of the things I learned from your book that made me
00:16:34.180 alarmed and enraged, one of several, was that there is such a dramatic income gap between women who are
00:16:41.720 fat and thin. 0.88
00:16:43.160 Well, exactly. So the question is, and I think, to be clear, this goes both ways,
00:16:48.140 but are white women fatter because they're poorer or are they poorer because they're fatter?
00:16:54.300 And I think that the latter possibility is at least part of the story plausibly because what
00:16:59.880 we find is amongst millennial women, and this is true across racial demographics, so I should
00:17:06.080 add that as a caveat, but amongst millennial women, between very fat women and very thin women,
00:17:12.920 there is a $40,000 annual average wage gap. And so as a woman is in the category of people who 1.00
00:17:21.920 are very fat, her income, her earning power will be markedly affected for the worse. And so there's 0.67
00:17:30.140 certainly a possibility, and some fat studies scholars have argued this, that part of what
00:17:35.240 we're seeing here isn't getting fatter because poorer, but rather poorer because fatter and just 0.68
00:17:41.780 not having that same earning power especially as a woman whereas we do see some income gaps for
00:17:47.560 fat and thin men but it tends to kick in at much higher weights and it's also not as reliable a
00:17:53.280 correlation um for women there just really are these huge effects like gaining even 25 pounds
00:18:00.400 as a woman um has been shown to have a causal effect on her earning power to the tune of about
00:18:07.680 fifteen thousand dollars annually so yeah this is um this is really stuff that should affect our
00:18:15.240 how we think about race and class but in a complicated way not the kind of classic hand 0.60
00:18:20.860 wringing over oh these poor fat racialized groups who are fat because of this you know inability to
00:18:29.240 access fresh food or what have you the actual picture is more complex and is a lot more 0.96
00:18:34.340 implicating of white elites in perpetuating noxious stereotypes that are racist, classist,
00:18:41.360 and fat phobic in a way that they're walking hand in hand and very much in lockstep a lot of the 0.87
00:18:46.920 time. I can tell you that in your chapter on the discipline of philosophy, where you've spent your
00:18:53.740 career, I saw a lot of parallels just anecdotally to my own career working in media, where you look
00:18:59.240 at women on an org chart, and the further you go up the org chart, the thinner the women get. 0.56
00:19:06.080 And there is sort of a moral logic at play that those women's discipline and self-deprivation 1.00
00:19:13.460 and supposed seriousness that they bring to disciplining their bodies and depriving their 0.97
00:19:18.920 bodies is a similar ethos to what they bring to their work. And I wanted to tease out this moral
00:19:23.600 logic from you a little bit more. We touched on it earlier with your like harder, better fallacy.
00:19:30.100 But I think there's something at play that almost valorizes not just difficulty, but really 0.90
00:19:36.380 suffering and sort of masochistic endeavors, particularly by women and sort of the logic 0.98
00:19:44.520 of a diet culture. Yeah, I think that's really well put, Myra. And I think being in these spaces, 1.00
00:19:51.420 I have just long felt so anomalous as a woman in philosophy and as a fat woman. And I should say, 0.70
00:19:58.800 like I speak now from a place of relative privilege. Like I identify now as a small fat
00:20:03.460 woman. And for those listeners who don't know, there is a kind of spectrum of fatness that fat
00:20:08.540 activists have long recognized from small fat, mid fat and large fat to recognize relative degrees
00:20:14.380 of privilege. So yeah, one way of putting this is even as someone who now identifies as a small fat
00:20:20.560 person, my body is markedly anomalous in the incredibly white male and I would say thin and 0.52
00:20:28.980 non-disabled spaces that I occupy in the discipline of philosophy, which is very much a microcosm of 0.98
00:20:37.640 an intellectual elite, for lack of a better term, that has so many gatekeeping and noxious 1.00
00:20:43.640 tendencies that I think are really pernicious. And I do think a lot of it is connected with
00:20:48.920 this idea that we're really in tight control of our body size. And the equally pernicious idea
00:20:55.180 that exercising control over what you eat in a fine grained and tightly rigorous kind of way,
00:21:04.600 that that is somehow a sign of how well disciplined you are as a worker. And also,
00:21:11.940 yeah, as a thinker. There was a woman who, a friend of mine who told me when I was writing
00:21:18.920 this book and allowed me to include this anecdote that her PhD advisor once asked her or said
00:21:26.420 rhetorically of her, if she can't discipline what she eats, how can she discipline how she thinks?
00:21:33.720 And that's a really common way of thinking about it. It's obviously kind of false and obnoxious
00:21:39.300 when you put it clearly. And yet our implicit expectations about the bodies we'll find
00:21:45.060 in spaces like this, yeah, they persist. And I think it's worth maybe just being clear to hear
00:21:53.500 about the huge limitations in actually controlling body size that we know people are subject to.
00:22:00.720 I mean, study after study after study shows the same thing. Really every study that is longitudinal
00:22:08.700 and goes for four to five years shows that people who diet and exercise can lose a moderate amount
00:22:14.860 of weight in the short term, maybe 10 to 15% of their starting weight if they're very quote
00:22:20.960 unquote successful. But the weight comes back really inexorably for the vast majority of people.
00:22:27.140 And so for between one third and two thirds of people who do subject themselves to these diets,
00:22:34.440 they'll end up heavier than they started, probably because of overshooting their kind
00:22:39.560 of natural set point weight, which I think, you know, reading between the lines has various
00:22:45.100 determinants, but genetics is a big part of it. So, you know, another striking finding based on
00:22:51.540 identical twin studies is that upwards of 70% of the variation in body mass we find across the
00:22:58.020 human population is due to genetics, making the heritability of weight just a little bit less
00:23:03.780 than height. Height is about 79%. So it's a bit higher, but not that much. And it just points to
00:23:11.400 this, yeah, really persistent myth that we can and should control our body size, in virtue of which
00:23:21.540 I think we're being unjust to certain people in really deep ways. But we're also missing out on
00:23:26.520 a lot of fat talent. I mean, I think of some of the writers who I most admire and regard as some
00:23:33.300 of the most luminary minds in just working in cultural criticism and sociology and journalism 0.98
00:23:41.340 today and there are many of those people are fat women where if these norms had worked even more 1.00
00:23:49.020 successfully we wouldn't hear from these voices and so many other fat women's voices are simply 0.98
00:23:54.740 not being heard because yeah we are being gatekept out of these spaces and these professions in ways 1.00
00:24:02.380 that are such a waste as well as so unjust.
00:24:06.320 I love that you bring up the marginalization of fat voices from the sort of like institutional 0.92
00:24:12.260 avenues that lift up different ways of thinking, because something that I really was intrigued
00:24:16.720 about by your book is that you said you came to fat activism, not through your work as
00:24:21.940 an academic philosopher, but like sort of in this personal interest that you discovered
00:24:27.360 these communities on the internet from.
00:24:28.920 And this is something that, you know, you brought into an academic setting, like Adrienne and I were doing this podcast on conservative understandings of sex and gender, where there's a lot of panic on the right about like ideas from the academy, supposedly corrupting the youth, you know, and filtering down into these internet spaces.
00:24:48.060 But what you've identified and done is this sort of like backwards path where you took something that was in these like, you know, nonprofessional vernacular communities of just people trying to articulate their own experiences with similarly situated folks and brought it into like the seriousness of philosophical work.
00:25:08.880 Do you have any thoughts on that on that trajectory?
00:25:10.900 Yeah, I mean, I wonder too, partly if some of these really brilliant thinkers maybe haven't been given the institutional recognition that is so sorely deserved. I mean, because I, exactly as you said, Maura, I cut my teeth after having been a chubby girl in high school and really mercilessly teased on that basis.
00:25:30.500 I discovered somehow, I can't even remember how I stumbled upon it, communities like Fatchinista
00:25:37.560 and Kate Harding's Shapely Prose website. And there were bloggers like Leslie Kinzel and Marianne
00:25:44.100 Kirby and Kate herself. They were and are such brilliant thinkers, but I'm not convinced they
00:25:50.440 have been given the full institutional recognition that they are so owed. And, you know, we see
00:25:56.280 some increasing recognition within areas like fat studies of how important this
00:26:02.600 school of thought is, but we still don't see the kind of recognized, you know, certainly fat studies
00:26:10.220 departments are incredibly thin on the ground. And it's a very, very niche kind of interest.
00:26:16.160 Still, I still feel as a philosopher that when I described to colleagues who were fully on board
00:26:22.540 with my projects about misogyny that I'm now thinking about fatphobia and the intersection
00:26:27.960 of fatphobia and misogyny, they look at me strangely, like I've taken a funny turn. Whereas
00:26:34.100 for me, it feels like such a natural transition, because this is something which is such a powerful 1.00
00:26:41.360 weapon of misogyny, among other things, in keeping women's energy and time and money bound up in a 0.99
00:26:49.040 futile, ultimately a project that for most people, for most bodies is doomed to fail. And so it's
00:26:55.580 just a great way of keeping us from, you know, staging a revolution. But yeah, I think there is
00:27:01.980 certainly a sense of this as work that doesn't demand the kind of prestige or recognition
00:27:08.960 that would really place it into the mainstream. And maybe part of that too, just to talk about
00:27:15.640 one other piece of it is that it is hard to to get that political momentum so part of what we're
00:27:22.260 up against here is that for many fat people they don't really want to identify as fat they don't
00:27:27.600 really want to think about being in a larger body as something that is likely permanent at least
00:27:36.760 will endure for quite a long time and that is the basis for shared solidarity and momentum and
00:27:43.740 political activism we tend to have this illusion that there's a thin person waiting inside waiting
00:27:49.780 to emerge victorious after the next diet or peloton bike scheme but that is largely illusory so i think
00:27:58.560 part of what is going on here too is that although that activism has been around and important for a
00:28:05.640 long time it's not quite as mainstream as it deserves to be in many ways i never sort of
00:28:11.140 thought about the fact that how doubly ironic it is that you come from from the discipline of
00:28:15.640 philosophy right which already has trouble sometimes with the fact that we're embodied
00:28:19.920 humans at all when we start working with our concepts and the and of course the the thin
00:28:27.860 body is one that we can forget is a body a fat body is one that we that will always impress us
00:28:33.480 with its bodiliness right like as a lifelong inhabitant of a body that can't gain weight
00:28:39.040 No one's ever remarked on that. I'm allowed to forget it at all times. I sort of experience a weird mirror image of what millions of Americans experience, and no one's ever commented on it at all. I'm allowed to forget this constantly. I'm sure it's an inverse of those biological processes. Unless I read a book like yours, it just doesn't enter my consciousness.
00:29:01.220 And of course, so much of our traditional disciplines are, right, they are, the word discipline is there for a reason. It's about abstracting from the creaturely, from the right, and like everything that about the 18th century extraction of fatphobia that you sort of trace so beautifully is about the fact that those who cannot abstract from their body are somehow, or less than, are not quite attaining the Socratic heights of whatever it is that philosophy or what thought
00:29:31.080 ought to be doing it's it strikes me as extremely wonderful that that you're coming specifically out
00:29:36.140 of that this is this is the these are the the questions that we need to be asking um the other
00:29:42.640 thing i wanted to briefly think about just because it's you know this is a podcast about as more as
00:29:47.880 saying conservative ideas like i'm not sure fat phobia is ultimately like that conservative in
00:29:53.360 where it crops up given that like as you point out like progressive people are perfectly capable
00:29:57.880 of being absolutely monstrous about this.
00:30:00.180 So it's not sure that a left-wing space
00:30:02.160 is that much better on this stuff necessarily.
00:30:04.380 But it seems like your book's kind of making the argument
00:30:06.780 that in some way, fatphobia is where a very old idea went
00:30:11.080 that we're no longer supposed to believe,
00:30:12.880 but that clearly subtends a lot of our politics still.
00:30:16.060 Namely, the idea that the body you happen to be born with
00:30:19.540 constitutes some kind of achievement, right?
00:30:22.720 We do that with race. 1.00
00:30:23.800 Everyone's like, whoa, that's messed up.
00:30:25.660 Please don't say that.
00:30:26.560 But when we do this, when we talk about the size and the shame of a body, suddenly this goes again.
00:30:32.900 It's like this really old idea that like your body constitutes an achievement.
00:30:37.520 It's something that like clearly still lives in our society everywhere.
00:30:40.760 People who think that something flows from the fact that they were born with a Y chromosome, right?
00:30:46.060 Totally.
00:30:46.820 But we can sort of see, we can see that for the noxious drivel that it is. 0.75
00:30:51.580 Same with, you know, racial animus. 0.86
00:30:54.180 But like here, it's sort of like still, it can survive and even be even sold as somehow caring and nice and like just telling it how it is or funny or whatever. Is that right? Am I striking too broad an arc here? Or is that what's going on?
00:31:10.600 no I think there's really something to that Adrian I think there is I mean first of all
00:31:17.240 I was thinking about what you said about whether fat phobia is a conservative idea I just want to
00:31:21.620 circle back to that because I must say that when the left isn't great on this but the right is
00:31:27.060 so awful and so vicious and it strikes me as really interesting that a lot of the
00:31:33.560 worst media around this book has come from like really transphobic sources right which i have
00:31:41.680 found interesting just because i thought there were sort of deep links between a trans liberation
00:31:47.220 politics and a fat acceptance politics that i explored in the last part of the book like a sense
00:31:54.180 that bodily autonomy is where it's at and you know this shouldn't be controversial but that
00:31:59.380 the idea that we would try to police and patrol and constrain and control the body like there's
00:32:05.280 some deep allyship here between transphobic thought and fat phobic thought yeah and you know
00:32:11.620 i think now when i'm looking at the british tabloids especially i think there have been
00:32:18.500 two telegraph pieces on my book two or three no up to three daily mail stories
00:32:25.280 to Sunday Times or Times, and none of them positive, I should add, all of these Murdoch
00:32:33.160 kind of rags have things to say about the book that I find hilarious. Like one of the Daily
00:32:38.880 Mail stories was, Kate Mann believes that fat people deserve hospital beds and to have 0.77
00:32:47.620 uh airplane seats and clothing yeah yes i do believe things 0.55
00:32:53.540 what's next i mean clothing come on next they'll have to treat trans people like human beings like
00:33:05.280 where does where does this end kate where does this end seriously like it feels like a very
00:33:10.480 similar and very allied strand in really horrifically noxious discourse that just
00:33:16.300 box at the idea that a body might need special forms of support, care, accessibility, compassion,
00:33:23.760 and just basic humanity. And that from my perspective, it is so manifestly unreasonable
00:33:30.960 to not be like, yes, you know, people should be recognized as the gender that they are and
00:33:36.640 respected in terms of their choice of name and pronoun and so on. And similarly, the idea that
00:33:41.660 we don't give people hospital beds that fit their bodies or clothing that you know that there's
00:33:46.780 something wrong with people coming in a variety of shapes and sizes and needing to wear clothes like
00:33:51.640 yeah the alternative is fascism right it's bodily fascism but so yeah I just wanted to drill into 0.59
00:33:58.620 that a little bit because I think I see a deep connection between fat pride and trans liberation
00:34:06.580 movements that could all be kind of put under the umbrella term of body liberation where of course
00:34:13.540 there are different groups within that that need to be recognized and respected with of course big
00:34:19.000 intersections but nevertheless yeah i see this pretty powerful link between the kind of transphobia
00:34:28.100 and the kind of fat phobia which we're up against well that it really brings something out for me
00:34:32.820 which is might be kind of crazy and half form but like it also says something about right that there
00:34:37.520 there is a mode of critiquing celebrities now on certain certain corners of the internet have you
00:34:44.120 seen this where they're basically oh this apparently cis woman uh celebrity is actually
00:34:50.060 secretly trans oh yeah and it's like the same gaze that was like oh has she gained weight right
00:34:54.740 yeah it's the exact same thing you're absolutely right they're they're like it's transferring the 0.94
00:34:59.540 logic barely bothering to update it and be like it worked for this so like why don't we why don't
00:35:04.780 we just apply it to to this yeah let's scrutinize let's patrol let's speculate on bodily states and
00:35:12.200 vulnerabilities and identities that are just none of our business i mean it's it's so alien to
00:35:20.120 sensibilities like ours and yet it's so incredibly common so yeah i just i wanted to comment on that 0.76
00:35:26.020 because yeah I think the left sucks on this but I think the right is even worse and I mean worse 0.91
00:35:32.980 in terms of more noxious more toxic more ostensibly awful the left has a sort of more subtle thing of 1.00
00:35:38.500 oh of course we shouldn't fat shame anyone but at the same time fat people are just so unhealthy
00:35:42.840 which as I go through in the book is you know it's actually a much more delicate nuanced complex
00:35:49.560 conversation on the relationship between fatness and health so the left loves to do concern trolling
00:35:54.960 and complacency. But yeah, I just don't want to understate the sort of toxicity that I think fat
00:36:00.200 people deal with from the right that does strike me as having a similar flavor to what trans folks 0.51
00:36:07.000 are up against in these really like just incredibly awful and debates that feel so
00:36:16.320 objectifying towards bodies in ways that, yeah, just are incompatible with basic human decency.
00:36:24.960 a part of your book that i really loved was uh your comparison at the end of like the fat and
00:36:49.460 trans rights causes and you know i think you have evoked really beautifully the like the destructive 0.86
00:36:57.520 power of like the disgust right the disgusted gaze level yeah at fat and trans people and that's 0.54
00:37:03.680 definitely i think a um a uniting theme in you know of our podcast like conservative responses
00:37:10.140 to these kinds of bodies but i also wanted to draw out the distinction you make between shame
00:37:16.680 and pride, right? Because the fact of the matter is that a big part of the like sort of obstacle
00:37:23.080 of a fat liberation politics. And I think something, a moral question that you explore
00:37:27.520 really beautifully in your book is the question of the self-directed disgust by the fat person
00:37:33.700 and the sort of the moral questions that that arises. You know, you were talking about how
00:37:37.940 fat people don't necessarily identify as fat people or don't want to understand themselves
00:37:42.700 as permanently fat people and something I kept coming back to while I read your book was this
00:37:47.360 metaphor that Susan Sontag makes about illness as this like country that all of us visit
00:37:51.300 at some point and you know fatness can sort of function a similar way like obviously there are
00:37:58.620 people who are always fat and there are people who are never fat and always thin but for the rest of
00:38:05.060 us there's this kind of like cycling or like sort of journey that brings us in and out of these
00:38:11.400 categories right and i think also something that is very uh influential and like impressive
00:38:17.380 part of a lot of women's experiences is noticing the difference in how they are received and
00:38:21.800 treated by others based on how their body looks and what size it is yeah and like witnessing the
00:38:27.740 disgust of others so i wanted to ask about the sort of like maybe moral or psychological process
00:38:33.460 wherein the disgust of others becomes an experience of shame yeah and what do with that experience
00:38:39.080 it's just, I got excited because it's such a good question because a lot of this, I think
00:38:45.300 a lot of fat phobia is a disgust based phenomenon. And it's sort of an interesting one because
00:38:51.280 something else I explore in the book is that there's often this myth that fat people are
00:38:55.440 just not found sexually attractive. And I think that's just not true. So I want to be clear that
00:39:00.860 I think fat bodies can be found very sexually desirable and that it's in fact a pretty common 0.70
00:39:05.240 sexual interest. So porn consumption suggests that fat women in particular are being searched 0.98
00:39:11.560 for a lot. It's one of the most common search terms in internet pornography search term history 0.93
00:39:18.040 studies. But what it suggests is that a certain kind of sexual desire for fat bodies shows women 0.75
00:39:26.480 who are in fat bodies to be, if I may, fuckable, but not lovable. And to be subject to a kind of 0.99
00:39:33.780 veneer of disgust that is overlaid with that desire and has this interesting role in making
00:39:40.440 certain women especially not seen as quote-unquote marriage material and having a low social status 0.92
00:39:48.420 when it comes to dating and again marriage markets and that very prevalent white ableist 0.95
00:39:58.040 and yeah, often implicitly fat phobic male gaze has this role in making us feel disgusted by 0.97
00:40:07.420 ourselves. Oftentimes, the way that I look at these men treating women often is sleeping with
00:40:13.760 these women or jerking after them in secret, but then not wanting to date, let alone have longer 0.99
00:40:20.700 relationships with fat women openly. And the analogy that I use there is sort of treating 0.95
00:40:26.660 women like Korean fat bodies as satiating, but vaguely disgusting, almost like the way some 0.94
00:40:32.960 people interact with junk food, sort of viewing it as quite satisfying and even delicious, but then 1.00
00:40:39.660 throwing away the wrapper kind of vaguely disgusted and brushing away the crumbs when
00:40:44.380 they're done with us. And so this is the kind of dominant gaze that becomes internalized very
00:40:53.080 easily. And the way that I think about shame is it has this second or third person character
00:41:00.440 that gives rise to disgust towards the self very easily. So disgust is in a way the internalized
00:41:07.340 echo of the shaming gaze from a second or third party saying you're shameful or she is shameful
00:41:15.120 or should be ashamed of herself. And so that disgust that many fat people feel towards their
00:41:21.140 own bodies. I mean, that's internalized fat phobia of a kind that is enormously destructive and
00:41:26.500 powerful. And it has this other effect too, which I think really worries me when it comes to both
00:41:33.740 transphobia and fat phobia is when you do have a disgust-based form of bigotry, what happens is,
00:41:40.800 and I think a lot of empirical evidence shows this, when people feel disgusted towards certain
00:41:46.080 stimuli, they confuse that visceral or aesthetic disgust with moral disgust. And so they come to
00:41:53.820 feel like certain people are just doing something wrong and are morally beyond the pale because
00:42:00.480 of the visceral disgust being easily confused with finding someone morally abhorrent.
00:42:06.900 And I think that explains a lot of the extreme moralism and policing that we find
00:42:11.700 within both fat phobia and transphobia where people feel this like weird visceral and aesthetic
00:42:18.220 disgust response that's already a bad thing to have people feeling but that gives rise to a
00:42:24.500 sense of like oh this fat person must be doing something wrong they're unhealthy they're
00:42:30.000 unvirtuous they're out of control they're not disciplined and they're quote-unquote
00:42:34.420 glorifying obesity whereas no this person is actually just existing in their bodies right
00:42:39.840 Yeah. And similarly with someone who's trans, just being who they are. 0.60
00:42:43.600 This brings me to a comparison I made to Adrian before we started recording, which is something I keep thinking about is this, you know, and a lot of fat, like sort of fat activist discourses will make the point that you made so eloquently earlier, which is that like, it's actually kind of empirically impossible for somebody who is sort of default, whose default is to be fatter, to become thinner, right?
00:43:06.680 So there's that like debunking of the myth of volition around fatness.
00:43:12.840 But then there's also like, and I think maybe you just answered this question, but there's
00:43:16.840 also the idea of like, it's hard for me to distinguish what a person would be doing morally
00:43:24.360 wrong if they were choosing to be fat or choosing to, you know, say like, per the myth, like
00:43:33.300 eat to excess or whatever it is.
00:43:34.860 And it reminds me a little of, you know, Adrian and I recorded one of our first episodes on the marriage equality movement, where there was a lot of, I think, like reasonable insistence by marriage equality activists that being gay was not a choice. But it also almost that line of argument almost cedes the ground that it would be a bad thing to choose. Right. And so I think we see this a lot with fat activism. There's a lot of explaining to people who have this moralizing disgust reaction, that it's not a choice.
00:44:01.820 but fat phobia never has to justify why being fat is morally wrong. It's just sort of taken
00:44:07.800 as a given. Yeah. That's so smart because I mean, the argument has to have this really
00:44:12.800 delicate even if structure because look, fatness is very typically not something that's chosen
00:44:20.840 because it's hard to be fat in a fat phobic world. And people are actually working super hard to
00:44:26.520 be thinner in ways that are just not feasible for most of us in the longterm. If we are
00:44:31.160 genetically predisposed towards fatness. However, and here is the even if part of it,
00:44:36.240 even if fatness were a choice and people were choosing to eat more adventurously or copiously
00:44:41.220 or comfortingly to live their lives in the way they want to and had a fatter body as a result of
00:44:47.820 that, that's a completely valid choice as far as I'm concerned. It doesn't need to be subject to
00:44:55.480 this, well, it's not a choice, so it's fine kind of discourse, which is problematic, both in the
00:45:00.100 case of being gay and in the case of being fat. And one way that we see that it's not a problem
00:45:05.800 is, look, again, you know, even if someone does choose to be fatter, and it has something to do
00:45:11.380 with their eating habits, and again, I think this is not the case for the majority of fat people,
00:45:16.580 but for some, it probably is. People take risks with their bodies all the time in order to live
00:45:23.100 the lives that they want to. And we do not see the kind of moralism that we see with regard to
00:45:28.180 fat people when it comes to people who do much more dangerous things like grand prix racing and
00:45:33.460 mountain climbing and skydiving and deep sea whatever i mean we're trying to lose tons of
00:45:38.820 weight which turns out to be seriously i mean people who are going on you know very extreme
00:45:46.120 diets are even taking the kind of heavy duty amphetamines that i have very much gone in for
00:45:53.280 I mean, that's a genuinely dangerous choice, both in terms of the physical health effects, in terms of the mental health effects. Yeah, but you just don't get this kind of moralism about presumptively thin, fit, non-disabled people doing what they want to do with their bodies. 0.92
00:46:10.800 I mean, there we have the appropriate attitude that within a certain range, when we're not hurting other people and when we're not doing things that are egregiously imprudent, that we could very easily do something more prudent, like wearing a motorcycle helmet or wearing a seatbelt are good examples of like very, very minor things that we can do to safeguard our own health for the sake of society.
00:46:34.900 when it falls outside those narrow parameters we regard people's bodies generally as up to them to
00:46:42.560 do what they want with except when we fall into these ways of regarding bodies that are incredibly
00:46:48.880 bigoted so yeah I think there is just a really good argument to be made that fatness usually
00:46:54.740 isn't a choice but even if it was like what is with the level of moralism that we see
00:47:00.060 and it's an immense double standard and a wrong-headed one i mean it's it's also noticeable
00:47:06.480 right that like people will then sort of draw in these like frankly fantastical seeming estimates
00:47:11.740 of how much it costs everyone right like so much of that is garbage it's costing us this much money
00:47:18.960 or whatever and it's like wait what's your solution here what do you what do you think
00:47:23.200 it's a way to moralize an issue that's clearly not really readily moralized so many of those
00:47:29.000 cost estimates are garbage because what they do is they just assume that either all or a large
00:47:35.960 percentage of the health costs of people who are in the overweight or obese categories of the BMI 0.95
00:47:40.900 are due to weight. And that's just straightforwardly not true. I mean, first of all, between, you know,
00:47:49.400 two thirds and three quarters of Americans fit that category, depending on the statistics that
00:47:53.860 you look at. So of course, a large percentage of healthcare costs that we have will be attached to
00:47:58.840 fat bodies because the majority of americans are in that category but also the idea of assuming
00:48:05.040 without argument that someone's health problems or what they need medical support for is because
00:48:10.380 they're fat just because they're in a fat body is horribly fallacious especially since we know
00:48:16.560 based on major epidemiological work by katherine fliegel and others at the cdc that the relationship
00:48:24.240 between weight and health looks like a u-shaped curve with people who are in the quote-unquote
00:48:29.380 overweight category actually having the lowest all-cause mortality statistically speaking
00:48:34.900 and people who are even in the quote-unquote moderately obese category with a bmi between 30
00:48:40.580 and 35 have similar mortality statistics to those who are quote-unquote average weight which is in
00:48:47.000 fact a lower weight than yeah i was gonna say right because like those people are also known
00:48:51.920 as the average which they're not average people have the most average costs it would make perfect
00:48:57.600 sense right yeah so it's just like a lot of this fear-mongering and the excellent podcast
00:49:06.240 maintenance phase called these zombie statistics really just they don't pan out and look even if
00:49:14.060 they did people cost what they cost medically and we deserve adequate health care and right
00:49:19.020 The idea that, you know, the ever rising medical costs of the health care system are the fault of fat people rather than due to horrific medical inflation and a system that is not actually geared towards helping most people in an adequate or integrated way.
00:49:38.040 Anyway, you can see where all of this is going.
00:49:41.200 But yeah, a lot of those statistics are both fear mongering and really inaccurate and stigmatizing in other ways.
00:49:47.200 I too am a fan of maintenance phase and I think I can't read these kinds of statistics anymore without freaking out because I'm like, what's your solution here? If three quarters of Americans weren't around, it would be cheaper? Like imagine if we made that argument about age, right? Like we're entering soil and green territory. It's really weird. Like we wouldn't allow ourselves that thought experiment because it's like fucking ghoulish.
00:50:12.860 It's straight up a modest proposal stuff, right? 1.00
00:50:14.820 It's like, why do we not simply eat the Irish children? 1.00
00:50:17.360 Yeah, yeah. 0.99
00:50:17.840 Exactly.
00:50:19.280 I mean, and it's not even like there's no actual modest proposal type plan to do this
00:50:26.380 because no society, no town, no city, no jurisdiction to my knowledge has actually succeeded in reversing
00:50:33.720 its so-called obesity epidemic.
00:50:35.700 Like this is actually something we don't know how to do at a population level,
00:50:39.580 which is unsurprising because we don't know how to do it at an individual level in the long term.
00:50:44.880 So making populations thinner on average is just not something that has been successfully done
00:50:51.100 at any scale. I mean, it would be headline like major news if it had been done. So yeah,
00:50:57.780 what is the plan? And the plan seems to be to actually continue to do the thing which is
00:51:02.900 responsible for people with a certain BMI above 35 or 40, you know, a lot of the correlations
00:51:10.020 with health problems there shouldn't be assumed to be causation because the correlation with
00:51:16.080 having greater mortality could be partly due to weight stigma, could be due to having terribly
00:51:21.540 inadequate medical care, could be due to the fact that the doctors are dismissing these people and
00:51:27.360 saying just go lose weight instead of seeing the true cause of someone's symptoms and giving them
00:51:31.800 the kind of advice that they would give to a thin patient who had that kind of issue or complaint
00:51:37.360 or concern. So yeah, it's just, it's such a mess. And to regard fat people as the problem and our
00:51:45.440 bodies as the failure, rather than reflecting that the healthcare system is really radically
00:51:51.060 failing fat people who do constitute the majority of Americans. It just shows how incredibly fat 0.84
00:51:58.120 phobic the discourse is around this topic and i think it's it's an interesting moment too where
00:52:02.660 we can see why this is why this trends conservative in its in its logics right because it diagnoses
00:52:09.960 societal problem but as you say there's never an attempt to offer a societal answer i mean i guess
00:52:15.420 sometimes people yell about food deserts but that's pretty much it other than that it's basically
00:52:19.420 individual solutions right have you tried eating differently or less right like here's a diet that
00:52:24.860 worked for me you should try it right like it's perfect like it's the same way that like we're
00:52:29.760 supposed to marry our way out of poverty it's the same way we're supposed to you know pull ourselves
00:52:34.660 up by our bootstraps it's this completely phantasmatic construction of politics where
00:52:39.380 large populations are supposed to be changed by like i don't know stick-to-itiveness and just
00:52:45.680 grit or something like that yeah totally and i mean it's frustrating too because even some of
00:52:51.400 these tropes about food deserts are somewhat mythical. I mean, as you both know, like people
00:52:57.900 who are poor face enormous food injustice and inequity, but are often going to supermarkets as
00:53:03.920 much, but are just having to travel very long distances to access food. And then our son has
00:53:09.960 also making different choices, somewhat different choices on average, when they get there for a
00:53:14.120 variety of reasons, including expense, including what is appropriate for a particular family who
00:53:20.260 might need more convenient food, including, you know, culturally appropriate food choices and
00:53:25.860 all sorts of factors. But instead of having a sort of nuanced, complicated picture of this,
00:53:33.940 the supposed solutions to this problem tend to be along the line of, well, you know, just put
00:53:39.800 farmers markets in so-called food deserts. And I mean, I am completely in favor of having access
00:53:47.300 to fresh food and health equity of every kind.
00:53:51.620 But the interesting thing about these measures is that they could be done without regard
00:53:55.340 to people's body size and shape.
00:53:57.280 They could be done as direct health interventions because every community in every circumstance
00:54:02.400 deserves food access that is equitable and ready to hand in ways that are not the case
00:54:08.780 in America today by any stretch of the imagination.
00:54:11.140 but yeah having access to fresh food and leisure spaces and the time and ability to rest and get
00:54:18.740 adequate you know stress management and all of these things would be so great for our health
00:54:24.040 and we don't really know what they would do to our body size and shape at a population level
00:54:28.160 but yeah the good news is we don't need to know any of that in order to do the things that would
00:54:33.540 be healthier for many many americans living in ways that really demand forms of justice that
00:54:41.060 would be very easy to implement without any kind of this discourse about fatness that is so toxic
00:54:47.700 and stigmatizing. Wait, Kate, are you going to tell us that weight is neither a proxy for morality
00:54:53.860 nor health? It's a very imprecise proxy for health. And it's, yeah, has absolutely nothing
00:55:02.620 to do with morality. I mean, the funny thing, and I kind of joke about this in the book, but
00:55:07.380 the idea that fat people's will is not sufficiently strong. I mean, I can tell you that as a lifelong
00:55:14.780 dieter who, you know, I only gave it up in the last five years or so, my will is iron. I mean,
00:55:20.380 a life of dieting will make fat people's will iron in terms of sticking to diets. So even if
00:55:26.960 we did care about willpower as a measure of moral character, honestly, fat people are often in a
00:55:32.580 good position to tell you um how to do the stick-to-itiveness thing that is so bankrupt and
00:55:39.260 such a such a bad ideal i once heard a fat activist and i'm not her name is escaping me
00:55:45.680 right now which is very embarrassing but she said something to the effect of it's like well your
00:55:49.860 worst nightmare is to look like me yeah which implies not only like the the willpower that a
00:55:57.020 lot of people have to cultivate when they're chronic dieters but also a kind of psychic strength
00:56:01.420 to endure stigma when, you know, anti-fatness is sort of purged from the sort of approach to
00:56:11.540 living in the world that a fat person has to endure. They have to take on this willingness
00:56:16.380 to act counter to societal value and to have a sense of personal esteem that is divorced from
00:56:24.600 this, you know, like moral hierarchy of bodies that is imposed on them everywhere. And that's
00:56:29.560 that's a kind of like profound moral strength right and sort of insight too like i talk about
00:56:34.640 this in the intellect chapter and we touched on this before but the idea that fat people should
00:56:40.100 be excluded from the academy or from journalism or writing or cultural criticism like what a waste
00:56:46.220 because we're the ones oftentimes who are in a really good position to be really smart about
00:56:50.720 the vulnerability and intransigence and just frustrating mercurial nature of the human body
00:56:59.160 And the fact that we bend, we sag, we break and we die ultimately. And all of that is frightening. But for someone who has had to give up the illusion relatively early that their body is under their tight and conscious control, we'll actually have some insights into that that can be quite valuable for especially a discipline like philosophy that, as you said, Adrian, is sort of prides itself on being disembodied in ways that actually lead to us being kind of thoughtless and insensitive.
00:57:28.380 And ironically, not smart about these conditions of human nature that we need to be cognizant of.
00:57:38.960 Two questions about that.
00:57:39.720 So first, when I read these statistics about, just because this is kind of a theme of this podcast, about the supposed costs of fatness, right?
00:57:46.520 The numbers are so large that you would think, why don't we just experiment with giving each American only 38 hours of 38 hour work week and just like cap it at that and see if that does anything.
00:57:55.940 that would probably still be cheaper than the supposed costs that they these fantastical like
00:58:01.020 estimates like but somehow then it's crickets right it's like oh no no no not like that
00:58:04.820 we'll yell harder we'll yell at them right it's like because i mean like if it were really true
00:58:10.400 it would be you know that would be actually a winning proposition so like yeah let's all work
00:58:14.840 30 hours and see what what that does maybe like yeah watch the price of these much touted and
00:58:20.980 much, I think, overhyped weight loss drugs not come down or be regulated and watch insurance
00:58:27.220 companies not cover them. Because when push actually comes to shove, again, this is a thin
00:58:32.480 pretext for getting to do what people want to do, which is, as you say, yell at and jeer at fat
00:58:37.900 bodies rather than actually offer some of the supposed solutions to what, in my view, is often
00:58:44.520 a bodily non-problem. But if people were really so concerned, there are things that could be done,
00:58:50.500 could be offered could be tried that oftentimes yeah it's the idea that this would actually be
00:58:56.300 implemented is a pipe dream yeah and then the other question i wanted to ask so this is something
00:59:01.680 that comes through in your book a couple of times but so you write for instance that you know that
00:59:06.320 weight sort of becomes not just an assessment but a quote commentary on my character right you talk
00:59:11.900 about this kind of weight loss is a kind of reprieve it seemed to you like a reprieve from a
00:59:16.300 fate both dire and predestined and like the religious language to me was always very striking
00:59:21.820 and i did think about this a lot of the modes by which we read bodies in terms of in terms of
00:59:28.540 morality of course are religious and like you know sort of the new protestantism comes up a couple of
00:59:33.200 times in the book i also thought of saint augustine is it saint augustine who talks about the monster
00:59:37.260 being the monstrous body being coming from monstrare to show it's basically god sending a sign
00:59:43.840 I'm wondering, like, is there like, I feel like you tell a thoroughly modern story of this, and I am fully convinced by that. But is there also like an old kind of religiosity that sort of finds its way into that discourse? It just seems like we're just, sometimes we seem downright archaic when we talk about.
01:00:00.680 Yeah, I think there is an older story there. But it's mostly as you touched on about gluttony and not fatness as such.
01:00:07.880 Right. So I think a lot of this actually comes from the ancient Greeks, and both Plato and Aristotle were so against gluttony. Interestingly, I mean, while they thought of gluttony as a profound lack of virtue, and in a way, one of the greatest threats to philosophical thinking amongst intellectual threats to what they valued and prized the most highly, they said they're very against gluttony as a vice, but they weren't really concerned with the fat.
01:00:37.400 or mega body as such because they did actually have the insight that people could be
01:00:42.620 gluttonous but not fat and fat but not gluttonous right and so it's yeah i think there are earlier
01:00:49.680 strands and this very much leached into early christian teachings on the vice of gluttony and
01:00:56.180 it certainly has a long history of being frowned upon but there was actually an earlier wisdom
01:01:03.100 that this, that gluttony was one thing and fatness was another, um, that has been kind of
01:01:09.460 stripped away. So yeah, it's interesting. I mean, I am also, you know, one line on this that I don't
01:01:17.080 like as well, fatness is fine, but gluttony really is a problem. And I think in fact, there is
01:01:23.360 contemporary evidence that while moderation and temperance are good for many things, like I would
01:01:29.480 nap all the time given the opportunity and i have to restrain myself but food restraint is actually
01:01:34.940 something that makes our brains go a little bit haywire yeah so most people who restrict and
01:01:40.220 watch what they eat and are try to practice temperance or moderation actually don't do very
01:01:45.480 well there is a big body of studies that go under the name of the milkshake studies that show that
01:01:52.680 if someone is trying to restrain what they eat and they're not necessarily dieting but they're
01:01:58.040 practicing supposed moderation if you give them a big fatty sweet sugary milkshake they will then
01:02:05.000 go on if given the opportunity to eat more ice cream than a non-dieter or a non-abstemious eater
01:02:13.800 because they have a kind of screw it mindset so someone should feel fuller after this very big
01:02:20.880 and large and satiating milkshake, but instead they actually eat more because they have this
01:02:28.080 sort of, I think somewhat desperate, yeah, like sense of, well, now I can eat what I've been
01:02:34.740 restraining myself from eating. So I may as well, because screw it, the diets or the abstemious
01:02:39.340 eating is out the window. So I can just do this now. So it's part of a large literature suggesting
01:02:45.740 that, yeah, this frowning upon gluttony from the armchair of a Plato or Aristotle is actually
01:02:52.600 not borne out by the modern wisdom we have about people doing better when they're not restricting
01:02:58.820 access to food. Of course, this is dependent on a lot of privilege, a lot of access that many
01:03:04.440 people lack. But when people do have the means and the privilege to have ready access to food,
01:03:09.480 people tend to get less food obsessed and less fixated and less likely to binge and engage in
01:03:15.060 harmful behaviors if they're allowing themselves really to eat in ways that are not restricted
01:03:21.480 but then that's because gluttony is linked to other pleasures that people are even far even
01:03:28.080 more anxious to control right like such a sexual pleasure right like that totally it was very
01:03:32.820 linked especially for aristotle to the idea of indulging in both sexual and food-based appetites
01:03:41.320 that yeah there was you know a real anxiety about that christianity especially only ratcheted up
01:03:48.720 i think this idea of the appetite fulfilled and and to whom that reflects poorly and to whom it
01:03:58.360 can reflect quite well you're talking about you know the classical confluence of like gluttony
01:04:05.180 with lustfulness and the desire to control them and that has come in for sort of like a reconsideration
01:04:11.060 in some you know like sex positivity politics but also in some like conservative visions of
01:04:16.760 masculinity right like i'm thinking right now about helen rosner's i think excellent essay
01:04:20.780 on mario batali from the me too era and how mario batali is you know ethos of like indulgent
01:04:29.840 gratifying sensuality that he cultivated around his restaurants and food extended to this kind
01:04:36.100 of like incurious consumption of women as like another sort of thing he could imbibe you know 0.99
01:04:43.100 or intake which is would be fine if they were not people you know yeah but that that's a model that
01:04:51.480 kind of like almost falstaffian largeness of body and defiant indulgence and and like life of 1.00
01:05:00.460 pleasure that's that's not really something that women get to do right at least not they don't get 0.96
01:05:04.940 to do it and also be sort of praised for it and seen as as virtuous in their like cultivation of 1.00
01:05:11.440 a sensuality right so like i think this like comes back to your very useful point that like fatness
01:05:16.900 gets mitigated and refracted through these other kinds of hierarchies i think you conventionally
01:05:24.100 argue that it is a sort of oppressive framework on its own but it's also something that gets used
01:05:29.340 against people for whom there is already sort of a um like incentive to punish yeah i love that 0.96
01:05:35.680 it's a really nice point about the kind of batali partaking of people like one might partake of food
01:05:43.260 in a way that isn't problematic but when it comes to other human bodies that is a very different
01:05:49.720 proposition and i think part of what is an issue here is for girls and women one way to think about
01:05:56.520 it is girls and women are meant to be human givers not human beings so you know this is what I
01:06:03.480 argued in my first book Down Girl and it really has implications for the fact that we're meant to
01:06:09.360 be givers of pleasure and we're meant to feed people we're meant to cook for them and we're
01:06:15.480 meant to really be kind of cultivators of community and connection and all these things that are
01:06:22.020 associated with the family dinner table. I mean, women and in general and mothers specifically are
01:06:27.320 overtasked with food preparation and having the family meals go off smoothly and all of this.
01:06:34.720 And yet partaking ourselves is seen as antithetical to our roles. We're meant to be the givers of this
01:06:40.780 kind of food pleasure and not the partakers of it in ways that, yeah, really, I mean, it points to 0.97
01:06:46.100 this kind of deep ambivalence we have about women in relation to food, which is in some ways our
01:06:51.220 lives are extremely tied normatively to all of this but we're not really meant to be able to
01:06:59.180 enjoy it ourselves in ways that feel almost cruel to me and i mean like one one other way of putting
01:07:04.960 the point would be that in some way the body that rests in itself and that says i will do what i
01:07:11.000 enjoy and i do not need to suffer it's not a shock that women are the ones who are told well your
01:07:17.620 natural lot is to suffer you're opting out of that through your fatness right i mean like it's
01:07:22.720 it's like the idea that the constant dieting it's also just it's torture it's torment it is it's a
01:07:29.260 way to naturalize and to plausibilize a definition of femininity as justified suffering basically
01:07:36.740 yeah completely and we're meant to give and give and give in terms of not just you know food and
01:07:42.420 connection and pleasure but also we're meant to give visual satisfaction and right the biggest 1.00
01:07:48.960 ways to do that as a woman is to give enormous amounts of energy and time and money and bandwidth 1.00
01:07:56.720 in service of making your body small and as conforming as possible to pernicious aesthetic 1.00
01:08:03.860 ideals where that is to give visual aesthetic sexual and you know sometimes reproductive
01:08:11.180 labor in ways that are endorsed, rather than taking anything from the world.
01:08:17.380 Well, I mean, the pursuit of thinness sort of collapses a lot of these, like moral demands
01:08:22.440 of femininity that you're talking about, right? It's about making yourself desirable. And
01:08:26.780 simultaneously, it's about denying yourself pleasure and nourishment. It's about making
01:08:30.900 yourself desirable at the expense of your flourishing. It occurs to me that one of the,
01:08:36.220 you know, common symptoms of eating disorders, which are, you know, predominantly, though,
01:08:41.340 of course, by no means exclusively, pathologies exhibited in women, is to actually create 0.65
01:08:47.300 elaborate meals for other people, in which the, you know, suffering, disordered eater
01:08:53.640 does not partake, right? It is almost this like cannibalistic ritual, like, you know, 0.98
01:08:59.300 eat of my body, because I'm not eating anything.
01:09:02.720 Yeah, I mean, that really has eerie echoes of Ansel Keys' Minnesota starvation experiment where he did it to men, but this is men in the 1960s, who were put on a low-ish calorie, 1,600 calories a day.
01:09:17.580 They ended up licking recipe books and fantasizing about their next meal and often got very into cooking and really fixated on food in ways that are incredibly common for people who are constantly subjecting themselves to what you both said.
01:09:34.380 Exactly right. It is a kind of tormented, sometimes even torturous relationship with constantly denying yourself these very basic appetites, hunger that demand satisfaction. Our bodies being so geared to get not just adequate calories and nutrition, but also we're so geared to seek tasty, delicious foods.
01:09:55.240 This is a big part of our, you know, very basic drives.
01:09:59.500 And to be constantly in denial of that is to live in ways that are so energy sapping,
01:10:05.940 so depleting.
01:10:07.100 And yeah, I really think involve genuine suffering in ways that nonetheless, many people just
01:10:12.380 regard as either virtuous or neutral, rather than an independent moral ill, which it seems
01:10:18.420 to me diet culture so clearly imposes on us these pseudo obligations that our grave moral
01:10:25.220 ills they're causing suffering for no overarching purpose when you look at even if you did care
01:10:31.800 about the goal of weight loss that i really don't or the goal of a population being thinner which
01:10:36.780 again i'm dubious about dieting doesn't get people there nothing does with any humaneness
01:10:42.500 and reliability so again it's keeping people on this perpetual treadmill of effort in order to
01:10:48.940 keep them small, disciplined, meek, quiet, and low in energy, just as you said, Moira.
01:10:55.040 Right. Well, thank you so much, Kate. That's an amazing conversation and an amazing book,
01:10:59.820 and I hope everyone goes out and reads it. If the Murdoch press says it's bad,
01:11:03.700 we obviously say no more. Rupert, this is all the endorsement I need.
01:11:08.760 I'm so glad we got to talk to you. Thank you so much.
01:11:11.140 Such a joy to talk to you, Moira and Adrian. What a great conversation.
01:11:14.640 in bed with the right would like to thank the michelle r claimant institute for gender research
01:11:20.000 for generous support jennifer portillo for setting up our studio our theme music is by
01:11:24.680 katie lao our producer is megan kalfas