In Bed With The Right - October 13, 2026


Episode 160 -- Science Fiction Fandom, Part 2

Episode 159 -- Science Fiction Fandom, Part 1

Episode Stats


Length

48 minutes

Words per minute

179.22

Word count

8,720

Sentence count

665


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
00:00:00.000 Hello, I'm Adrian Daub.
00:00:07.200 And I'm Moira Donegan.
00:00:08.380 And whether we like it or not, we're In Bed with the Right.
00:00:13.400 Hello, I'm Adrian Daub, and you're with In Bed with the Right.
00:00:15.960 This is the second installment of our two-part series on science fiction fandom.
00:00:22.200 And just in case this opening crawl leaves you confused as to why Palpatine would have returned,
00:00:28.080 Here is a little rundown of what we talked about last time.
00:00:32.300 We started with an episode from the mid-2010s when a slate of voters named the Sad Puppies,
00:00:41.120 later joined by a group called the Rabid Puppies,
00:00:44.580 tried to sort of stage a right-wing takeover of the Hugo Awards.
00:00:49.540 Now, this is admittedly a tempest in a teapot, the kind that we delight in here at In Bed with the Right.
00:00:54.700 Well, we use that to sort of zoom out and think about what kind of fandom it is that sort of champions right-wing causes through attachment to science fiction properties or uses science fiction properties to sort of smuggle right-wing thinking, white supremacist thinking, etc., etc., into a mainstream, kind of induct young people who are, you know, primarily fans of a particular IP into a kind of what they would call anti-woke.
00:01:24.320 but we would probably call white supremacist view of the world.
00:01:28.360 And today, in the second part of this series,
00:01:31.140 we're going to be looking at what I call the right-wing canon.
00:01:34.440 Not what is their mode of appropriation,
00:01:37.700 their mode of laying claim to certain pieces of pop culture ephemera,
00:01:42.440 but rather what are the pieces of pop culture that they're drawn to?
00:01:46.680 What are the kinds of texts they like grouping around,
00:01:49.700 that they like defending against the wokesters,
00:01:51.920 that they like to explain to you, you've misunderstood,
00:01:55.900 that they like to congregate in, you know, web forums
00:02:00.160 to discuss not just the book itself,
00:02:01.960 but also maybe what to do on January 6th, 2021.
00:02:05.860 So this is going to be the second part of that series.
00:02:09.500 As I said in our first episode, this is a vast territory
00:02:12.900 and I'm at best on the margins of it.
00:02:16.020 So it's quite likely that I've gotten things wrong here.
00:02:17.740 Feel free to let me know.
00:02:19.120 And I look forward to hearing from everyone.
00:02:21.760 Enjoy.
00:02:27.920 A lot of times right-wingers sort of infiltrate these spaces to use,
00:02:32.760 hey, you love this book and look what the SJWs are doing to it,
00:02:35.880 to kind of especially get young people inducted into sort of right-wing thought, right?
00:02:40.620 This was a lot of what the alt-right did.
00:02:42.720 Like, don't you hate this kind of woke bullshit, blah, blah, blah?
00:02:45.800 Well, check out my white supremacist blog or my QAnon shit, right?
00:02:50.340 So there is some of that, where people are sort of floating along with the stream in order to sort of siphon off folks for their other causes.
00:02:58.460 But there also very clearly was a community on Parler that just loved military science fiction and hated Democrats and now found themselves on the Baines Bar forum and were like, yeah, fuck it, let's let it rip here.
00:03:12.940 But that gets us to a segment that I would like to call the reactionary canon.
00:03:16.960 Because in the end, like, yes, there is something opportunistic about the way these people kind of fixate on certain properties.
00:03:24.680 At the same time, I would not say that, like, every right-wing sci-fi fan or anti-woke movie reviewer or whatever is not genuine in their appreciation of the work state champion.
00:03:35.160 I think they have things they like.
00:03:36.960 And I think it's worth thinking about why they like it and how they like it, what their particular mode of appreciation is.
00:03:44.240 And some of these are, like, the same properties, right?
00:03:48.140 Yeah. Oh, yeah.
00:03:48.880 I mean, Peter Thiel famously loves Lord of the Rings, right?
00:03:51.900 And you could say it's a misreading, but it's not fair to be like, this is insincere, right?
00:03:58.960 Yeah, exactly. Yeah, he genuinely likes it, whether or not he understands it.
00:04:02.880 Or he has a particular mode of understanding it, right?
00:04:05.060 This is something that we talked about with Jordan Carroll.
00:04:07.860 And so for this part of the episode, I'd like to do some close reading, actually.
00:04:11.040 because I do think it's really interesting to think about both the canon
00:04:14.040 and the way that they relate to the canon.
00:04:16.340 So this is the publisher of Bain Books, Tony Weiskopf, in 2014.
00:04:20.940 Do you want to read what I put in the doc here?
00:04:23.320 Okay, here we go.
00:04:24.320 Once upon a time, all the fractious lands of science fiction fandom
00:04:28.220 were joined together and worshipped at the altar of Heinlein.
00:04:31.820 But in these fallen times, lo do many refuse to worship Heinlein,
00:04:36.800 preferring instead their false idols and evil ways.
00:04:39.920 What shall we, who continue to attend the Orthodox Church of Heinlein, do with these dirty, dirty people?
00:04:46.840 Perhaps we shall wall ourselves away in his sepulcher, for we are the one true church and should not have to sully ourselves with the likes of them.
00:04:55.000 P.S. Also, their awards don't mean anything because we don't get nominated for them very much, and maybe we don't want to be nominated anyway.
00:05:02.260 Yeah.
00:05:03.180 So this is a Benedict option for nerds.
00:05:05.820 Yes.
00:05:06.480 Yeah.
00:05:06.720 Yes. Also, Bane Books, by the way, a publisher of a lot of the books that the sad puppies would end up championing, right?
00:05:13.780 Of course, yeah.
00:05:14.900 What's interesting about what Weisskopf is doing here is, right, true fandom is about a canonic guy, right?
00:05:20.540 Author Robert Heinlein, but it's also about being the orthodox church of Heinlein, right?
00:05:25.440 Like the true fans versus the fallen fans.
00:05:28.100 And as John Scalzi put it back then, at the same time, she also suggests that despite being the one true fandom, Bane folks are also outside the mainstream in science fiction, thus playing the hand of rhetorical cards that includes both heirs to the throne and belittled outsiders.
00:05:43.700 It's a nice trick.
00:05:45.480 Yeah.
00:05:45.760 He's got her number there.
00:05:46.700 It's both, we really understand this guy that, like, everyone still reads and loves, but we understand him in ways that the mainstream doesn't.
00:05:55.300 But also, we don't really care about them and their awards anyway.
00:05:58.580 Did you know much about Robert Heinlein?
00:06:00.240 No, not really.
00:06:01.220 What's his, like, shorthand?
00:06:03.040 A giant of science fiction.
00:06:04.900 The books that you might have heard of are Stranger in a Strange Land, very important.
00:06:08.860 I think 1962, but also the novel Starship Troopers, which was infamously turned into
00:06:15.220 a movie that right-wingers love to misunderstand by Paul Verhoeven in the 1990s.
00:06:21.400 And then, you know, he wrote until the late 80s and died, I think, in 1988, I want to
00:06:26.140 say.
00:06:27.020 The reason Scalzi, I think, cares about this attack on his lack of fealty to Robert Heinlein
00:06:34.120 is that Scalzi sort of made his name with Old Man's War, which is also a military
00:06:38.700 science fiction, but very much not the military science fiction of Starship Troopers. Starship
00:06:43.680 Troopers is a fairly sort of daring-do youth adventure novel about space marines, which,
00:06:50.200 you know, the Verhoeven film points out is more than a little fascist. Official politics lean more
00:06:55.520 towards the libertarian. We'll get to that later. The Moon is a Harsh Mistress is one of his great
00:07:00.200 works, and that's very much sort of a libertarian fable. But as you can imagine, military science
00:07:05.800 fiction from the beginning had an element of being largely affirmative of the U.S.
00:07:12.420 Armed Forces and their role in global conflict, right?
00:07:17.480 Various democratically elected governments that just needed a little bit of tweaking
00:07:22.420 and replacement with juntas of various kinds, yes.
00:07:25.840 Yeah, or like the obvious commie stand-in that like they had to blast away, right?
00:07:29.960 The bugs in Star Trek troopers that have no personality, right?
00:07:34.040 It's not hard to map that onto anti-communist propaganda from the 1950s.
00:07:38.640 But there is, within military science fiction, a counter-movement to that.
00:07:42.800 And I should say there are still, when we talk about right-wing science fiction writers today, a lot of them write this kind of stuff.
00:07:48.980 If you look at what the sad puppies try to nominate, a lot of this is like Space Marine Monster Hunter Part 4 or whatever.
00:07:55.560 But it's not like the genre as a whole is totally right-wing.
00:07:59.140 There's the Joe Haldeman, I think is his name, book, The Forever War from the late 1970s, which is like his reflection.
00:08:06.500 This is a Vietnam vet kind of trying to think about what if you had to fight a war in Vietnam, but Vietnam was so far away that due to space dilation, when you come back, you're literally out of time.
00:08:17.780 Like it's been 500 years and you realize you've suffered for nothing and you know no one.
00:08:22.500 So it's like this pretty poignant reflection on being a soldier in Vietnam, like in a really interesting science fiction story, but it's not rah-rah at all.
00:08:31.500 It's this existential horror story, really.
00:08:34.640 And Scalzi's Old Man's War is basically in that vein.
00:08:37.720 It's military science fiction that largely sort of is like, this fucking sucks.
00:08:42.660 Military, by the way, is not great.
00:08:44.140 Right. And so that's why I think he's taking this a little personally and being like, hey, you know, in a way I do react to Starship Troopers, but, you know, I'm not going to write some weird rah-rah jingoistic bullshit.
00:08:55.660 And it's really noticeable.
00:08:57.240 Like, this is the kind of juxtaposition between one kind of science fiction and another that very much underpins the sad puppies debate.
00:09:06.040 Here's what Larry Correa said when he explained why he wasn't getting nominated for the Hugo.
00:09:10.680 Quote, the fact that I write unabashed pulp action, that isn't heavy-handed message fic, annoys the literati to no end.
00:09:18.760 Okay, yeah.
00:09:19.680 He says again and again, like, oh, like he's writing against snobs.
00:09:23.220 His kind of writing is against the literati, against English professors, you know.
00:09:28.200 Yeah, I mean, then you get the classic sort of populist anti-intellectualism of a lot of the right in general, right?
00:09:40.020 It's like, no, I'm not for the snobs, and fuck you, I'm for the real lovers, I'm for their true heads, I'm for people who just are in it for the love of the genre convention game, right?
00:09:51.040 Exactly, right.
00:09:52.380 And therefore, don't tweak the genre convention either, right?
00:09:55.040 Like, don't play with, don't say, like, oh, I'm going to take Heinlein and do something interesting with him.
00:09:59.120 It's like, no, no, no, no, you have to have fealty to it, you have to repeat them, which is, as far as I can tell, what Larry Correa does.
00:10:06.200 And this is what he wanted in getting these things nominated.
00:10:09.120 He says, he basically wants these voters to have to think, quote, should I vote for the heavy-handed message fic about the dangers of fracking and global warming and dying polar bears and robot rape as a bad feminist analogy with a villain who is a thinly veiled Dick Cheney?
00:10:25.380 Okay, admittedly, that's funny. That's pretty funny.
00:10:27.740 Yeah.
00:10:28.240 When they're right, they're right. That's funny.
00:10:31.480 Or, he said.
00:10:32.860 Or should I vote for the Las Vegas explosion shooting everything dragon helicopter chase orc-sacrifying chickens book?
00:10:38.740 So that's the juxtaposition.
00:10:40.020 And he put that quote in all caps.
00:10:42.580 All caps.
00:10:42.600 And then there's like a gurgling or grumbling noise trying to be transcribed.
00:10:48.020 It's from his gut.
00:10:48.800 And then kaboom.
00:10:49.520 Yeah.
00:10:49.980 This actually goes back to what I said about childhood, though.
00:10:52.400 Yeah.
00:10:52.720 Because like in this kind of defiant, like a Las Vegas explosion, shooting, everything, dragon, helicopter, he's even imitating the cadence of an enthusiastic child.
00:11:03.520 Yeah.
00:11:03.680 Right. And there's clearly like a reach back towards a defiant simplicity that seems like a claim on childhood.
00:11:12.180 Right. Like, no, this genre is where I get to go to return to childhood and try to feel the way I felt when I was, you know, 13 and first read this.
00:11:20.580 And that's like a refusal of adulthood, not just personally, but like for the whole genre.
00:11:25.980 It's not just that I don't have to grow into responsibility and I get to be sort of like defiantly driven in my consumption and my creation of science fiction.
00:11:35.280 But like, I don't think anybody else should.
00:11:37.140 I don't think you should give me any spinach or any responsibility in my reading either.
00:11:42.780 Yeah, it's a regression, right?
00:11:43.940 I mean, in some ways, it's not like he's infantile throughout.
00:11:46.600 He goes from being fairly articulate to and boom, you know?
00:11:51.000 Yeah, yeah.
00:11:51.480 And I think the point about childhood is so well taken because notice that he says unabashed pulp action, right?
00:11:58.920 According to Mr. Head Puppy over here, there's something abashed about the kind of science fiction that the Hugos normally honor.
00:12:06.720 Is he accusing what he perceives to be as the Hugo Award winning science fiction as being like embarrassed of the genre?
00:12:13.540 Exactly. It's science fiction that doesn't want to be science fiction.
00:12:16.500 Of course, like his imagined winner is a feminist anti-rape Dick Cheney.
00:12:20.740 which I'm guessing was not, in fact, what was getting nominated in 2013.
00:12:25.500 That's right.
00:12:26.900 Well, we've been doing some close reading of Mr. Correa,
00:12:29.940 but here we have to do a distant reading
00:12:31.540 because I have no fucking clue what he's talking about.
00:12:34.460 He wrote this in 2013.
00:12:36.180 I looked up what was nominated the year prior for Best Science Fiction,
00:12:40.060 and it's really hard to map those books onto the complaint here.
00:12:43.700 So I'm guessing you won't have read most of these,
00:12:46.400 but maybe listeners at home could play along.
00:12:48.480 The nominees were Georgia R.R. Martin's A Dance with Dragons.
00:12:52.900 Oh, famously very feminist.
00:12:55.300 Famously a very robustly anti-rape series from a robustly anti-rape guy.
00:13:01.560 Yeah.
00:13:02.600 Next up, China Mieville's Embassy Town, which, have you read that one?
00:13:06.820 No.
00:13:07.440 It's good.
00:13:08.320 Yeah, people have told me to read China Mieville before.
00:13:10.860 It's very cerebral.
00:13:12.340 That is a bit grad student fiction, so like maybe a little bit of a point.
00:13:16.240 But no Dick Cheney stand-ins as far as I'm aware.
00:13:19.800 Then James S. A. Corey's Leviathan Wakes.
00:13:23.560 Okay.
00:13:24.040 Do you know what this is?
00:13:24.840 No, I don't know these.
00:13:25.900 So James S. A. Corey, that's actually two guys.
00:13:28.000 These are the Expanse novels.
00:13:29.400 It was a TV show on Amazon Prime, I want to say.
00:13:33.080 I guess I think Jeff Bezos loved them.
00:13:34.980 Apple TV and Amazon Prime, unfortunately, do make really good television.
00:13:38.340 I bet it's good.
00:13:39.020 Yeah.
00:13:39.360 Yeah, it's a good show and it's a good series, but it is not.
00:13:42.720 I mean, its politics are good, but it's a blue-collar Joes in space kind of fiction, right?
00:13:49.200 Like, I really don't think it's not a feat.
00:13:51.640 It's like space roughnecks, basically.
00:13:53.660 And it's anti-war, I would say.
00:13:55.600 But, you know, it's like a trucker movie, but set in space.
00:13:58.940 But it's not like woke.
00:14:00.320 Yeah.
00:14:00.660 It's not like preoccupied with identity politics exactly, which seems to be the thing that is pissing these people off.
00:14:07.700 Yeah.
00:14:08.260 And then the next nomination is Myra Grant's Deadline.
00:14:11.380 Myra Grant is a pseudonym for Seanan McGuire, which I think is a zombie apocalypse novel.
00:14:16.840 I have not read it.
00:14:19.120 And then the award went to Joe Walton's Among Others, which is a kind of coming-of-age novel about sci-fi fandom.
00:14:27.220 So that is maybe a little bit self-reflective.
00:14:30.380 It's like when the Oscar always goes to a movie about Hollywood.
00:14:33.600 It's actually about the magic of movies.
00:14:36.160 And like, you know, media stories are always go viral among journalists.
00:14:41.820 Yeah.
00:14:42.080 It's the navel-gazing tradition.
00:14:44.740 Yeah, and that's fine.
00:14:46.200 And I should say that that's kind of an outlier.
00:14:48.340 Like, I believe among others does not take place in the future or in an imagined place.
00:14:53.640 That's a very unusual pick, actually, for the Hugos.
00:14:57.000 So Matt, who was really instrumental in allowing me to make heads or tails of any of this.
00:15:01.760 Shout out Matt Hayward.
00:15:02.740 Thank you so much.
00:15:03.300 Yeah, thank you so much.
00:15:04.600 thinks that the robot rape thing
00:15:06.960 is in fact a swipe at
00:15:08.400 The Wind-Up Girl
00:15:09.360 by Paolo Bacchigalupi.
00:15:11.340 Have you ever seen that book?
00:15:12.480 I never read it.
00:15:13.280 It has a beautiful cover
00:15:14.180 and I've come across it a bunch.
00:15:15.760 Okay.
00:15:15.960 But I must admit
00:15:16.700 that I haven't read it.
00:15:17.940 It won the Hugo in 2010.
00:15:19.880 I checked
00:15:20.600 and there is no fracking
00:15:21.900 in that book
00:15:22.500 as far as I can tell.
00:15:23.460 so you know as is often the case with reactionary art the art that chief puppy pretends to be
00:15:47.860 reacting to doesn't seem to exist. Or at least it doesn't seem to have nearly the cachet or the
00:15:53.680 hegemonic status that he pretends. And I think that the sense that there's a wrong kind of sci-fi
00:16:00.320 fandom and the kind of shit they like and that it's important to write the opposite of that
00:16:06.280 has a really long tradition. It's a curious mix of the wrong objects and the wrong way of relating
00:16:12.420 to those objects, right?
00:16:13.740 It's not just that the books are bad, he thinks.
00:16:16.780 It's that anyone who relates to them positively
00:16:19.180 is therefore also a bad fan.
00:16:21.840 So for this episode, I did read and reread
00:16:24.220 a bunch of books that struck me as the kinds of novels
00:16:26.560 that the sad puppies probably like.
00:16:28.120 And I thought we could maybe close
00:16:29.700 this first part of the episode
00:16:31.280 by going through some of those.
00:16:33.980 Just in case someone wants to check them out.
00:16:35.720 I mean, some of these are garbage, to be clear.
00:16:38.600 But as you were saying, like,
00:16:40.180 Peter Thiel loves The Lord of the Rings,
00:16:41.680 which I think is a book very worth checking out if you have never read it.
00:16:45.620 And there are a lot of things here that I would say are pretty darn good.
00:16:50.260 So the ones that I sort of came up with that I think are good examples of this,
00:16:55.040 one is David Niven and Jerry Purnell's The Moat in God's Eye.
00:16:59.220 Have you ever heard of this?
00:17:00.780 No.
00:17:01.660 So I think Niven and Purnell are both sort of right-wingers.
00:17:04.500 I think mostly wrote in the 70s and 80s, but they've been active for a long time.
00:17:08.720 The mode in God's eye, so spoiler alert, if anyone wants to read this, fast forward a little bit.
00:17:15.200 Humanity, very quickly, humanity makes contact with an alien species that seems really peaceful, but that's hiding something.
00:17:23.420 And in the end, what turns out they're hiding is that they have to get pregnant or else they die, meaning they reproduce at enormous rates.
00:17:35.960 meaning that humanity is then faced with the question of whether they commit genocide or not.
00:17:40.720 Oh, how difficult.
00:17:42.760 It's a very, it's a good book, I would have to say.
00:17:45.760 It has interesting ideas in it.
00:17:47.600 But, yeah, like the Malthusianism in that one,
00:17:52.220 which is a common thread in a lot of these which we're going to be talking about,
00:17:56.260 is pretty pronounced, right?
00:17:57.960 Yeah.
00:17:58.100 So that's the moat in God's eye.
00:18:01.040 Glenn Cook's The Black Company really isn't a right-wing book,
00:18:04.360 but it is a book that right-wingers love.
00:18:06.880 It's basically Game of Thrones meets Platoon,
00:18:09.720 a bunch of roughnecks in a magical company
00:18:12.220 that sort of hires itself out to various evildoers,
00:18:17.160 but actually they're kind of good at heart sometimes.
00:18:20.160 Like the minions.
00:18:21.660 They are the minions.
00:18:22.780 They are the minions, yes.
00:18:24.080 They are also yellow.
00:18:25.100 I forgot to mention that.
00:18:26.080 The yellow company, yes.
00:18:27.940 So this is a book that is extremely popular
00:18:29.880 and has always been with members of the armed forces,
00:18:32.060 And therefore, like, given that right-wing sci-fi authors tend to sort of recruit from there, there's a lot of affection there.
00:18:38.240 As far as I can tell, the politics of the books are, if anything, a little anti-authoritarian, right?
00:18:42.960 And it really does feel more like an Oliver Stone kind of approach to talking about marine life.
00:18:49.360 Gene Wolfe's The Book of the New Sun is a very interesting kind of series, very postmodern, but told from the inside of a cult of torturers, people who literally torture other people.
00:19:01.360 and it's sort of like a reflection
00:19:02.920 on being part of the Catholic Church.
00:19:07.740 It's good.
00:19:08.620 It's a very good book.
00:19:10.000 Very worth checking out,
00:19:11.220 but hard to take.
00:19:13.620 And in the end,
00:19:15.020 weirdly affirmative
00:19:15.800 of like church hierarchy.
00:19:17.780 It's like, yes,
00:19:18.320 the torturing was good actually.
00:19:20.540 Like we had to do it.
00:19:21.980 Yeah.
00:19:22.120 Well, it's very focalized
00:19:23.720 through his main character.
00:19:25.100 And so the idea is like,
00:19:26.320 well, this guy isn't questioning it.
00:19:27.780 So the novel outwardly
00:19:29.940 is also not questioning it.
00:19:31.360 Obviously, Wolf is thinking his own part, right?
00:19:33.920 But I think it's an easy book to misunderstand, let's say.
00:19:37.460 Then, of course, Robert Heinlein, especially Stranger in a Strange Land and Starship Troopers.
00:19:41.920 But then there are also, like, specific subgenres we might think about.
00:19:45.120 As, like, reactionary, friendly science fiction, yeah.
00:19:48.320 Exactly.
00:19:49.380 Some such subgenres would be, you know, we're going to talk more about hard science fiction in the second part of this.
00:19:55.580 Do you know what that distinction means, hard versus?
00:19:58.840 Vaguely explain.
00:19:59.900 This is making the science very serious, taking the science very seriously, right?
00:20:04.120 So like space travel takes time, et cetera, et cetera, right?
00:20:06.880 Like you're taking the physical dimensions of your speculative fiction seriously.
00:20:12.320 If you're just like, oh, and then they go through the gate and then they are on the other planet, right?
00:20:16.720 Like that's the opposite.
00:20:18.220 Okay.
00:20:18.500 And of course, we already mentioned military sci-fi and especially post-apocalyptic sci-fi.
00:20:23.480 I think it's very, very strongly sort of right-wing compliant.
00:20:26.880 One particular sub-genre that I came across in my reading, super near-future dystopias, so I think like 10 or 20 years in the future, where Muslims have taken over.
00:20:36.700 There's like 20 or 30 of these.
00:20:38.920 Yeah, it's like that Huyebek novel.
00:20:42.600 Oh, yeah, Soumission, Submission.
00:20:44.780 Yeah, where he's like, what if we could have a detente between the, like, socialists and the Islamists, and all we had to do was sacrifice women's rights?
00:20:58.260 And I was like, I think that's wish fulfillment.
00:21:00.180 I don't think that's, like, actually a dystopian future for you.
00:21:05.820 Yeah, Huébec is super excited for it.
00:21:08.140 Yeah.
00:21:08.880 Or, I mean, Jean Raspail's Camp of the Saints, right?
00:21:12.100 Yeah.
00:21:12.300 The kind of Great Replacement classic is also in that sort of camp.
00:21:15.760 But yeah, there are books like John Ringo's Ghost.
00:21:17.800 I think he has like several set in that.
00:21:19.740 Tom Crapman's Caliphate is a similar one of those.
00:21:23.520 And this really broke my heart, Dan Simmons' flashback.
00:21:27.100 I don't know if you know Dan Simmons' work.
00:21:28.680 He died a couple of years ago.
00:21:30.200 So he had a real right-wing turn late in life.
00:21:33.600 He's the author of the Hyperion Chronicles, which are really, really phenomenal.
00:21:39.000 He also wrote that book, The Terror, that was turned into an AMC show a couple of years ago about the ship that gets stuck on an ice flow in the Arctic.
00:21:48.200 It's a historic story, and he invents, basically, they're stuck on the ice, and either they're all slowly going insane or there's a monster there with them.
00:21:56.600 And it's such a good book.
00:21:58.060 The novel Drood, where Wilkie Collins solves crimes, he was really good.
00:22:03.280 And then he wrote this book.
00:22:04.200 But then he went crazy.
00:22:05.340 Yeah.
00:22:05.540 It's like Van Morrison.
00:22:06.740 We just kind of pretend that he's dead now.
00:22:08.140 You know, you know, like we're just like, don't even Google it.
00:22:11.500 Yeah. Flashback is basically just like long diatribes.
00:22:15.020 Like the reviews are just like, it's not even people aren't mad.
00:22:17.820 They're just like sad.
00:22:18.900 There's like, I don't understand what I just read, you know.
00:22:21.300 And as you can imagine, like there's a huge range here between like, oh, I'm just imagining a possible future.
00:22:27.300 And like, holy shit, like this is an incitement to genocide or whatever.
00:22:32.860 Yeah. Yeah.
00:22:33.440 Oddly enough, or maybe not oddly enough, but sword and sorcery as a genre tends to have sort of a great deal of right-wing cachet.
00:22:40.400 Yeah, I can see that.
00:22:41.300 Yeah, it's like manly men and boobie women.
00:22:43.980 I guess that makes sense.
00:22:45.160 And it's all about an imagined past often as opposed to sci-fi being about like a planned future.
00:22:51.020 Sword and sorcery, like aside from the dragons, there's often a lot of like,
00:22:55.840 I don't have to imagine any black people here in this old like medieval Europe-y kind of vibe.
00:23:03.860 Exactly. And then the final one I would mention is cosmic horror, which I mean, it's not always
00:23:08.420 the case, but it is worth thinking a little bit about as well, because it's about like these
00:23:13.300 unseen forces slowly destroying your world, right? Like that sort of lends itself to like
00:23:18.300 rape replacement kind of thinking and or kind of stories of racial subversion. Like the classic
00:23:23.720 case here is someone that I've pitched to you for three years as a Halloween episode. And you're
00:23:29.800 always like, I can't do this. It's H.P. Lovecraft, who is like, you know, an insane racist. And it's
00:23:35.320 always about like these fish people breeding with the good old New England stock and destroying
00:23:40.360 their blood. And you're like, oh, my God. It's like, is this just about Italians? Like, what
00:23:44.460 did an Italian person ever say to you? Jesus. And so those are sort of the sub genres that I think
00:23:51.580 are particularly attractive to this far-right canon, if you will.
00:23:54.540 But there are also, of course, certain ideologies that I think sort of come through both in
00:23:59.280 the formal aspects of these novels and in their subject matters.
00:24:03.940 So one of the challenges of science fiction as a genre, and this might be why someone
00:24:08.780 like you doesn't enjoy reading them, the narrators have to quickly sketch worlds that
00:24:13.220 the reader has very little pre-existing knowledge of, right?
00:24:16.160 Yeah.
00:24:16.640 And what that presents as in reading these books is that there's a shit ton of nouns
00:24:20.800 and you're like, what the fuck does any of this mean, right?
00:24:23.140 Yes, yeah.
00:24:24.020 And libertarianism, especially sort of its mid-century variety,
00:24:28.180 works really well in having a narrator that's an outsider,
00:24:34.160 that doesn't understand the world that well,
00:24:37.060 that doesn't really want to be part of the social world,
00:24:39.300 that distances themselves from the social world.
00:24:41.340 So there's a kind of baseline libertarianism
00:24:43.520 built into a lot of science fiction narration.
00:24:46.180 It's almost like an authorly conceit more than it is a political conceit
00:24:49.900 because it allows the author to explain the world to us, right?
00:24:53.140 Someone who's happily ensconced in the power structures of their world
00:24:56.480 and doesn't bother explaining it to us,
00:24:58.880 that is indeed what Gene Wolfe experiments with in the torturer novels,
00:25:02.980 like being like, this guy's not going to explain it.
00:25:04.900 He knows, you don't have to know, and it's hard shit to get through.
00:25:08.840 Whereas like someone who's like always kind of a little bit at loggerheads with their reality,
00:25:14.200 that's like a really easy sort of pose from which to write a science fiction story or novel.
00:25:19.900 That's not the only way to do it. Ursula K. Le Guin sort of pioneered another one, which is sort of what we might call the anthropological viewpoint. Her idea is always, well, let's have an outsider come in and explain it, but also have that person be implicated in this in some way. Like what happens when you observe a system, right? This is famously what happens in the left hand of darkness. Like that's a way of solving the same problem without turning into a libertarian creep, basically, right?
00:25:46.760 But of course, there's an interesting asterisk to libertarian sci-fi sort of positioning.
00:25:54.260 A lot of them were proponents of space exploration at a time when space exploration was almost certainly a government affair.
00:26:01.440 So, for instance, Heinlein, who was exactly that kind of libertarian, right?
00:26:05.860 Like, Stranger in a Strange Land is about a Martian coming back to Earth and having to encounter Earth society for the first time.
00:26:12.080 And Heinlein, in the 1980s, sort of in the wake of Apollo 13, in the wake of the Challenger disaster, came out swinging against calls to, you know, stop wasting money in space.
00:26:22.980 He was like, the government needs to spend money so that we can get to this future in space.
00:26:26.440 You know, there's that old Stephen Colbert joke about how Republicans want a government small enough to fit into your bedroom.
00:26:34.020 Heinlein wanted one small enough to fit into the cosmos.
00:26:37.000 then the other thing about this libertarianism that i think we do have to talk about in a gender
00:26:43.160 podcast is you're fond of this joke about the type of libertarian whose definition of societal
00:26:49.080 overreach seems to revolve entirely around the age of consent yeah when we were talking about
00:26:54.620 this episode like a week or so ago and you were still writing it you were like they really all
00:27:02.020 want to fuck teenagers,
00:27:03.940 these right-wing sci-fi guys.
00:27:05.460 Like, it's uncanny.
00:27:07.060 You're like,
00:27:07.420 I don't want it to be that reductive,
00:27:08.960 but what if it is?
00:27:10.640 I mean, like,
00:27:11.360 I'm sure there's other things going on,
00:27:13.360 but that's a big one.
00:27:15.220 It's honestly a big one,
00:27:16.320 especially in the 70s and 80s.
00:27:18.200 We can talk about why probably
00:27:19.700 the 70s and 80s.
00:27:20.660 For this, I reread
00:27:22.360 Robert Heinlein's last novel,
00:27:24.480 To Sail Beyond the Sunset,
00:27:26.200 which is the life story
00:27:27.580 of this woman who'd shown up
00:27:29.060 in previous novels of his.
00:27:30.740 And it has a scene, Moira, that's just like...
00:27:34.320 It's just porn.
00:27:35.100 It's just him writing his own, like, jailbait porn.
00:27:38.420 Oh, that would be so much better than what it is.
00:27:40.340 Oh, God.
00:27:41.000 The main character decides to lose her virginity.
00:27:44.060 She's very close to her dad, and he's always encouraged her to explore and to be a free thinker.
00:27:48.860 And obviously that means losing her virginity to whoever she wants.
00:27:52.740 She picks this village boy, and they have sex, and Heinlein describes it in excruciating detail.
00:27:59.140 Well, it goes fine, but she doesn't get off.
00:28:02.800 Then she goes home to her dad, who's a doctor.
00:28:06.080 And she's like, well, I did it, but, you know, I don't think it really worked.
00:28:10.080 And he's like, well, let me examine you.
00:28:12.160 Oh, God.
00:28:12.940 And then he examines her and she comes.
00:28:16.260 Oh, that's so terrible.
00:28:17.720 I know.
00:28:18.700 I have not thrown a book into a corner in a long, long time.
00:28:24.600 And I was like.
00:28:24.980 Did Heinlein have daughters?
00:28:26.660 I don't know.
00:28:27.760 I didn't want to look up anything.
00:28:30.400 He wrote this when he was like 85 years old.
00:28:33.040 It's like maybe this is, I don't know.
00:28:34.900 It's rough.
00:28:36.220 It's this whole thing couched in this like free thinker kind of,
00:28:39.980 oh, don't give in to, you know, societal strictures and conventions
00:28:43.680 that you're always like, oh, that's fine.
00:28:45.260 That seems good.
00:28:46.220 This dad is telling, like the entire time, like, wait, where is this going?
00:28:49.180 I don't like this at all.
00:28:50.480 And it's, oh, again, like I've read Heinlein with some enjoyment,
00:28:55.580 But like, I have not thrown a book into a corner in quite some time.
00:29:00.800 And this, I was like, fuck this shit.
00:29:03.320 I'm out.
00:29:04.180 I do think once I was done vomiting all the contents of my stomach, I did start wondering, like, why was this kind of association so firm in the mind of sci-fi authors, especially ones that were kind of getting up there in age in the 1970s?
00:29:19.260 You might say, like, look, they were just all pervy old men.
00:29:22.060 And, you know, hopefully this was just fantasy on his part.
00:29:25.420 I really, really, really hope.
00:29:27.880 But I wonder if there's also something else going on there,
00:29:30.400 if we can sort of tell the story of this, like, libertarianism
00:29:33.380 that seems to only ever get around to, like, age of consent shit in different ways.
00:29:38.600 Yeah, and the incest taboo, another thing they hate.
00:29:40.940 Oh, my God, exactly.
00:29:41.980 And this is a preoccupation for Heinlein.
00:29:44.440 It's jealousy, monogamy, and incest.
00:29:49.300 Very frequent sort of targets of the ire of his free thinkers.
00:29:54.180 Not so much the tax system,
00:29:55.760 which I'm like, I can get behind that.
00:29:57.280 I think my taxes are too high.
00:29:59.200 Can we get away from the daughter shit, please?
00:30:01.700 What the fuck?
00:30:02.720 But yeah, I think there are a couple of possibilities here,
00:30:04.980 and I think they're kind of worth delving into.
00:30:08.040 One that I thought of was,
00:30:09.860 we've talked about the fact before on this podcast
00:30:12.360 that there were spaces and there were groups
00:30:15.620 that were pretty right-wing in the 1960s and 70s,
00:30:19.000 but they were nevertheless touched
00:30:20.900 by the sexual revolution, right?
00:30:22.300 They went through some version of it, even though they were not like long-haired hippies and or, you know, consciousness-raising housewives and Betty Friedan readers, right?
00:30:32.180 They had their own version of what the counterculture was doing, at least when it came to sex, right?
00:30:36.780 And I think that the sexual rationalism of Heinlein, and that's how he always frames it, he doesn't actually say libertarian, it's just a rationalism, was a way to take on board the sexual revolution without really taking on the ideas of human dignity and especially women's dignity behind it, right?
00:30:53.520 That was a very popular way to encounter the sexual revolution.
00:30:57.140 I got to say, a lot of people were like, wow.
00:30:59.840 The perverts.
00:31:00.740 Yeah, exactly. The pervert's origins in that very gesture.
00:31:07.620 Yeah. And, you know, and libertarianism at the time, of course, in fact, grafted sort of sexual liberation onto a deep anti-humanism. The fact that, like, this is about the species. This is about genetics. This isn't about you treating another person with respect and with gentleness and care. No, it's about, like, not doing this actually, like, destroys the bloodline or whatever, right? Like, it's unscientific for us not to fuck right now, right? That's the idea, I think.
00:31:34.040 And that gives us that characteristic creep masculinity, right?
00:31:37.340 Being horny without treating the people that you want to sleep with any better for it.
00:31:41.300 You're not willing to, like, amp your niceness at all because, like, science says you need to do it, right?
00:31:50.060 Yeah, so that's possibility number one.
00:31:51.780 The second thing I thought about in terms of the second possibility for why did libertarians in science fiction sort of love taking this weird route has to do with the institutional history we talked about earlier.
00:32:04.040 Namely, this is the golden age of science fiction conventions.
00:32:07.420 And I would wager that sci-fi writers interacted with a ton of fans, and I imagine that they did a good amount of fucking at those cons.
00:32:16.040 And this is where, as I mentioned, it might tell us something that Heinlein's first target in all these, like, pro-free love diatribes is always jealousy.
00:32:28.740 This is like, you can't be jealous.
00:32:30.720 Yeah, it sounds like maybe one of his wives was like, hey.
00:32:34.040 Please stop fucking your fans at these conventions.
00:32:36.400 Yeah.
00:32:36.540 I think that's some of what's going on here.
00:32:39.160 You're just insufficiently enlightened and insufficiently liberated, and that's why you don't want me cheating on you.
00:32:44.600 Yeah, I know that kind of guy.
00:32:46.120 Yeah, you've got to be more rationalist and just let me go wild, you know, at the Boulder, Colorado convention hall or whatever, right?
00:32:53.580 We should be clear that, of course, like, again, at the fan convention, like, those people would have been of age, and hopefully this was all consensual, so I'm not, like, accusing Heinlein of anything particularly nefarious there.
00:33:03.020 But I do think, yeah, I think that's part of it.
00:33:05.520 But also the conventions had another side of them, right?
00:33:08.200 Conventions also meant that sci-fi writers' personal lives started to matter more to fans than to organizers, right?
00:33:14.760 We mentioned that H.P. Lovecraft was a, Stephen King I think called him a galloping racist, and that's even kind.
00:33:20.800 Like, he's an absolute monster.
00:33:23.160 But he was too frail and too old.
00:33:26.560 He was not around to be invited to a bunch of conventions and then say his regrettable stuff.
00:33:30.760 There was an award given in his name until 2015, but that then got scratched.
00:33:35.460 Jesus.
00:33:36.160 Yeah.
00:33:36.860 But basically, once these conventions sort of really gathered the community, people's private lives and the way they comported themselves at home or at cons sort of became part of how people thought of what the community should be like, right?
00:33:52.380 So, the good example here is the 22nd World Science Fiction Convention, which is Pacific Con 2, where the organizers were basically made aware of the fact that one invitee, the numismatist and sci-fi mega-fan Walter Breen, who was Marion Zimmer Bradley's husband, had been convicted of multiple counts of child molestation, and they were like, we've got to disinvite this asshole, right?
00:34:15.980 That is a bridge too far.
00:34:18.080 But most fans at the time, it must be said, were against that and said, like, look, this guy's personal life shouldn't matter in terms of whether he gets to come to the fan convention or not, right?
00:34:28.280 Like, if we can't even be child molesters anymore, what are we doing in this comic book convention?
00:34:35.080 I got to say, Adrian, I think you might be overthinking this, trying to look for particularities in the sci-fi genre or in libertarian politics that lead people towards pedophilia.
00:34:44.780 I think, like, a lot of men are pedophiles.
00:34:46.660 It's kind of the logical endpoint of a lot of the ways male heterosexuality is constructed, and it's not really particular to any subculture or politics.
00:35:00.280 It's just like not outlier behavior.
00:35:02.500 Like a lot of men are pedophiles.
00:35:04.300 Hashtag not all men are pedophiles.
00:35:05.840 But it's common enough that I don't think you're going to find any like subgroup of mostly male people where this isn't a thing.
00:35:16.080 At the same time, again, he's married to Marion Zimmer Bradley, a writer of a famous kind of feminist fantasy epic, right?
00:35:24.500 The Mists of Avalon, right?
00:35:25.740 Like, there's something—
00:35:26.580 She's not that feminist.
00:35:27.620 She's married to a pedophile.
00:35:28.820 Like, I mean, I'm sorry, this is a person whose politics, whatever they are, clearly have some limits.
00:35:33.720 Yeah.
00:35:34.040 Yeah, well, I guess I'm kind of trying to figure out what accounts for the level of tolerance for this kind of behavior and this kind of stuff.
00:35:40.400 Most people don't—like, a lot of men are pedophiles, and most people don't think it's that big a deal.
00:35:43.700 Like, especially if it's, like, teenage girls.
00:35:46.240 Like, it's just rape culture, dude.
00:35:48.280 I guess that's true.
00:35:49.560 Of course these guys are doing this.
00:35:50.760 It's a metacultural, not a subcultural phenomenon.
00:35:55.400 I guess that's true.
00:35:56.020 And the girl in the Heinlein novel is, like, 15.
00:35:58.780 So, like, you know, this is exactly the kind of bean counting about—
00:36:02.640 They have to be, like, in diapers for, like, people to really object when it's a girl.
00:36:07.060 Yeah.
00:36:07.400 Yeah.
00:36:07.540 Yeah, 15 is like prime libertarian, your way into saying it's okay territory, I suppose.
00:36:13.960 Oh, yeah.
00:36:14.580 But I do think there's a third possibility here, and that is a kind of an interesting one.
00:36:18.100 It's the anti-politics of politics.
00:36:20.460 During the sad puppies fiasco, the same people who decried that, quote unquote, politics had taken over sci-fi fandom were happy to promote, you know, books for the Hugo, whose Wikipedia summaries include phrases like, quote, consenting BDSM harem.
00:36:37.540 There's nothing political about that, folks.
00:36:39.280 Nothing to see here.
00:36:40.940 So that's the other thing.
00:36:42.100 That's why I don't want to just say, oh, these people are themselves creeps and that's why.
00:36:45.840 No, there is something about the selective depoliticization of gender and of sex.
00:36:51.360 Again, not unique to sci-fi.
00:36:53.920 No, not at all.
00:36:54.160 Sorry, like, that is the red line.
00:36:56.600 Like, sexual politics in particular is where, like, a lot of men and, frankly, a lot of women are just like, do not bring feminism here.
00:37:03.760 Do not fuck with that.
00:37:04.700 Right.
00:37:04.940 There's the notion that, like, private life is not political.
00:37:09.140 Sex life is as private as it gets.
00:37:11.640 Ergo, if you bring politics here, you're overstepping a line of my human dignity.
00:37:15.900 And therefore, you cannot ask why I am so into the BDSM harem, why the BDSM harem has a bunch of female subs in it and, like, one unshowered dude.
00:37:26.500 It's consenting, Moira, please.
00:37:27.960 It's consenting.
00:37:28.540 Yeah, this notion that sex is beyond the realm of reasonable political inquiry or, like, reasonable political agitation, once again, not just a sci-fi thing.
00:37:37.660 No, absolutely.
00:37:38.460 But that is the claim being made here, right?
00:37:40.460 The politics that they excoriated that they didn't want in their sci-fi consisted in moving sex beyond politics, right?
00:37:47.540 Like, political contestation of it politicizes it.
00:37:51.360 And just not mentioning it and just having a, you know, consenting BDSM hair in your Wikipedia page is not political.
00:37:59.300 It's just a thing, right?
00:38:00.780 Yeah.
00:38:01.060 The final thing I sort of wanted to think about briefly here is another kind of right-wing trope that a lot of these books have.
00:38:08.200 And as I said, I read, until that scene, I read To Sail Beyond the Sunset.
00:38:14.260 And so I might as well make fucking lemonade out of those fucking lemons.
00:38:19.540 I can't believe you read this thing.
00:38:21.360 Oh, God.
00:38:23.520 Once again, we worked so hard for the podcast.
00:38:26.120 I know.
00:38:26.900 I should have read the Wikipedia page, which is on.
00:38:29.460 And I should have been like, oh, no.
00:38:31.040 And I didn't do that.
00:38:32.680 But there is a kind of Malthusianism that's really strong in 1960s and 70s and 80s, sort of right-wing coded science fiction.
00:38:41.500 At a time when I feel like it was sort of starting to wear off in the population as a whole.
00:38:48.840 I think it has to do with when these men were largely socialized.
00:38:51.920 You know what I mean with Malthusianism?
00:38:53.260 Like this idea that like, oh, the overcrowded planet is going to kill us all, right?
00:38:57.200 Like there was a moment when that was extremely present as a fear and as an image of the future.
00:39:02.920 And that sort of waned, but it remains a preoccupation of these guys.
00:39:07.640 I mentioned the example of Niven and Purnell, right?
00:39:10.140 Like the whole moat in God's eye idea is like, what if?
00:39:14.400 Like just unbelievable overpopulation of an other species, right?
00:39:18.480 They're not hostile.
00:39:19.620 An undesirable racial class, perhaps.
00:39:22.520 You know, like, it's not so subtle.
00:39:25.280 Well, Brynn and Pernell portray these motis, as they call them, as actually kind of cute and fine, right?
00:39:33.900 But they're like, it's not their choice.
00:39:35.940 Like, it doesn't matter how nice they treat you individually.
00:39:38.480 As a whole, they will have to outbreed you.
00:39:40.600 That is their biological imperative.
00:39:42.580 Like, they are committed to your destruction whether they would like to or not.
00:39:45.600 It's really fucking gnarly.
00:39:47.780 And same with this book from, you know, 1987, I think, is when To Sail Beyond the Sunset comes out, right?
00:39:53.720 Where our narrator talks about how Earth had been overcrowded.
00:39:57.960 Here's what he writes.
00:39:59.120 Remember that ancient Persian parable about doubling grains of rice on the chessboard?
00:40:03.520 Four billion people are a smidgen larger than a grain of rice.
00:40:06.360 You quickly run out of chessboard.
00:40:07.920 On one timeline, Earth's population swelled to over 30 billion before reaching final disaster.
00:40:12.920 disaster. On other timelines, the end came at less than 10 billion. But on all timelines, Dr.
00:40:19.460 Malthus had the last laugh. This idea that overpopulation is like super important, it's
00:40:25.960 sort of integrated with that kind of sexual rationalism that I was talking about, right?
00:40:30.200 And again, I don't think that there's a great mystery as to why they particularly indulge in
00:40:34.780 it, but it does have this kind of like population level interest again and again and again.
00:40:39.220 And this population imperative also always has the sort of like sexual demand rationalized and built in, right?
00:40:46.740 So it's a creep with pervert tendencies, we might call it, because it's about the sort of avatar character, the authorial voice, the stand-in for this like imagined, you know, straight white male sci-fi reader as having this like sexual entitlement that is actually very righteous in like natural and moral terms.
00:41:07.940 Exactly. So finally, I want to talk about this genre that we alluded to, this hard sci-fi, because I think that's another sort of gendered trope in right-wing science fiction. Again, like not all hard sci-fi is right-wing, but the way fans tend to congregate around it can have a great deal of right-wing sort of gender policing going on. And there is, again, as with The Mouth is Shit, a rationalist element to it.
00:41:32.620 The term originated in the 1950s, and it reemerges with a vengeance in the 1980s when there was a bunch of science fiction that was really influenced by New Age neo-spirituality, when science fiction writers sort of started imagining, you know, other worlds, other planets where, like, minds and objects interacted in interesting ways that were clearly influenced by, like, woo-woo hippies in, like, Northern California or whatever, right?
00:41:58.120 So this idea of hard sci-fi, it sort of makes a periodic reappearance.
00:42:02.200 People sort of re-articulate it against other things, and it's happening again today.
00:42:07.000 But it always presents itself as in battle.
00:42:10.000 It's getting crowded out of the marketplace by softer, squishier, poppier sci-fi.
00:42:15.320 There's too many Ewoks on your screen.
00:42:17.040 We need some hard fucking sci-fi in here, right?
00:42:19.800 Part of the problem, I think, is that a lot of hard sci-fi advocates do not, in the end, think of their literature as literature.
00:42:27.240 They regard their prose as pretty obviously a vehicle for thought experiment and philosophical puzzles, usually of a very particular kind.
00:42:34.780 Like, do you have to commit genocide? Do you put a kid through the airlock? That sort of thing.
00:42:39.460 Of course, Ursula K. Le Guin's Omelas is also a thought experiment and is also kind of scientific, but it's not hard sci-fi.
00:42:46.120 It's not meant to be. It's meant to be an anthropological kind of observation about suffering, about society, and about social cohesion.
00:42:52.720 The problem is then that hard sci-fi is almost set up to be marginal and then become upset about its own marginality, right?
00:43:01.020 Yeah.
00:43:01.220 These are sometimes interesting stories.
00:43:03.480 They're not usually books that are like super pleasurable as books.
00:43:08.460 This actually is making me sort of revise my old thought about the right-wing science fiction fan now as sort of somebody who's clinging to his childhood.
00:43:19.000 I do think that's like still like a decent insight into what's going on.
00:43:23.100 But I wonder if this is like an older phenomenon where like new age cohorts came in and absorbed sci-fi that was meant for children.
00:43:34.540 Like people who were kids in the 1970s when the first Star Wars came out are very, very attached to Star Wars.
00:43:40.200 And that's a very different kind of franchise in this like much more adult, much more severe kind of hard science fiction that you're describing.
00:43:49.000 Yeah, right. Like the astronaut in a 1950s space story is not C-3PO. There's definitely that. There's a kind of a revolt of adult nerds against the inkidification of their genre.
00:44:03.560 Inkidification. Good, cute spin. I love it.
00:44:06.400 At the same time, I would say that the early defenses of hard science fiction against this encroachment was also, I think, often an attack on editors, magazines, and publishers that saw it as their mission, because they wanted to make money, of depulpifying science fiction, right?
00:44:26.720 Like, this is where publishers were like, look, why can't we get space stories that are well-written, literary, and aimed at adults?
00:44:32.720 Because it turns out adults buy books and not children, right, back then.
00:44:35.600 Yeah. So the advocates of hard science fiction were pushing back, on the one hand, maybe in kiddification at certain points, but also at other times on an attempt to professionalize the genre, to make science fiction literature more literary and to move it away from the kind of story that might make a kid want to join the Jet Propulsion Laboratory or NASA.
00:44:56.740 Right? So it's weird. It's like, I think at different times, these people occupy a different generational space or a different age space imaginarily. Maybe the best way to think about sci-fi nostalgia is not that it ultimately returns us to childhood. What it does is it subverts the tyranny of chronological age. You get to be different ages at the same time. Does that make sense?
00:45:20.440 Put that shit on a bumper sticker.
00:45:22.360 Subverting the tyranny of chronological age.
00:45:25.980 Are we back to Lee Edelman already?
00:45:29.160 Yeah.
00:45:30.180 Or Elizabeth Freeman.
00:45:31.740 Yeah.
00:45:32.520 Chrononormativity, right?
00:45:33.540 Like, it ages you up and down at the same time.
00:45:36.800 It sort of allows you to cosplay different ages to get into these fights.
00:45:40.800 You know, I've been around the block a bunch.
00:45:42.540 And, like, you could be, like, 21 and say that.
00:45:44.340 Because, like, you have been to a bunch of conventions or whatever.
00:45:46.920 So there is a way here that, like, I think age really sort of changes roles.
00:45:51.540 Like, sometimes you're the young Padawan, sometimes you're the old Jedi, you know?
00:45:55.300 But I do think what it always promotes is a kind of real devotee versus Johnny-come-lately dynamic, right?
00:46:02.460 Where people who like different kinds of sci-fi are the wrong kinds of fans, or not even really fans at all.
00:46:09.960 And, of course, it also proves, again, that the whole agitas over politics and sci-fi is just completely nuts, right?
00:46:16.700 Like, the reason hard sci-fi existed was as an extension of a U.S. imperial project, right?
00:46:24.720 You might think that that's okay, but it's very clear that, like, if in 1950 you were trying to get youngsters excited about going into rocket ships into space, that was not an apolitical choice.
00:46:35.580 And in fact, as I mentioned at the 1939 Worldcon, right, that there were two fan groups that got into a massive fight over whether there should be a progressive utopian element in science fiction or whether the rocket ships were enough, right?
00:46:50.520 So it's at least a very old fight.
00:46:53.080 Yes.
00:46:54.000 Yeah, there is a politics here that is explicitly named and marked as such, right?
00:46:58.560 And that's about progressive politics, right?
00:47:00.680 And there's a politics, which is like pro-business, pro-government, pro-military, pro-law enforcement, that is kind of reframed as apolitical.
00:47:09.160 I think that's really, really central here.
00:47:12.120 Who has to be political and who gets to just be the genre?
00:47:17.040 Exactly. And I think that this defense of the walled garden of science fiction fandom has been more central to right-wing aggrievement politics in the 2020s than some other fandoms or some other subcultures.
00:47:32.540 It's driving at exactly the question that you just raised, who gets to just be, who gets to remain unmarked, which I think in the wake of Black Lives Matter, Me Too, but also of the COVID pandemic, I think like it's just a lot harder to maintain that fiction.
00:47:46.620 And so that's made this kind of long inside-outside kind of dialectic-run science fiction fandom such a rife space for these kinds of culture war kerfuffles.
00:47:58.340 All right, should we leave it there?
00:48:01.260 I am so glad that we got to do this, Adrian.
00:48:04.100 Thank you for taking me on this journey.
00:48:05.440 Yes, thank you for coming on this insane journey with me.
00:48:08.360 And I look forward to hearing what I got wrong from all our listeners who are more immersed in this than I am.
00:48:15.400 But for now, thank you all for listening.
00:48:17.420 And thank you, Maura, for coming with me on this insane ramble down sci-fi lane.
00:48:24.280 We'll see you next time.
00:48:25.300 See you next time on In Bed with the Right.
00:48:26.660 In Bed With The Right is made possible by hundreds of listeners who support us via Patreon.com
00:48:33.780 Our episodes are produced and edited by Mark Yoshizumi and Katie Lau
00:48:37.180 Our title music is by Katie Lau