In Bed With The Right - October 22, 2024


Episode 36: Jordan Carroll on Science Fiction and the Alt Right

Topics
Episode 35: Talia Lavin on the Christian Right's View of Marriage⧸Parenting Episode 37: We Need to Talk About Usha

Episode Stats


Length

58 minutes

Words per minute

163.37

Word count

9,527

Sentence count

512

Harmful content

Misogyny

11

sentences flagged

Toxicity

16

sentences flagged

Hate speech

31

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 hello i'm adrian dob and i'm mora dodigan and whether we like it or not we're in a bit with
00:00:11.600 the right so adrian what do we have on our plate for today today we're going to be talking about
00:00:17.840 science fiction a genre that is near and dear to my heart and i actually don't entirely know
00:00:24.280 how you feel about it. Are you a closet science fiction fan? I am not. You know, I have not
00:00:29.860 really indulged a ton in science fiction. I've seen all the Star Wars movies, and I could probably
00:00:35.480 tell you the plot to like one of them, maybe half of one. I think it's the same plot each time,
00:00:40.360 but yeah. My nerd side really is more into fantasy, like dragons, wizards, that kind of thing,
00:00:48.040 which is really like a past-oriented kind of imaginary world.
00:00:53.280 And I felt a little lame after our conversation
00:00:56.360 because I really got excited by what science fiction enables
00:01:02.520 in terms of imagining the future.
00:01:04.760 You know, I felt like I had this kind of stunted, conservative imaginary
00:01:09.640 after talking to you guys about science fiction.
00:01:12.480 Yeah, as our guest Jordan Carroll points out in the book
00:01:15.940 that we'll be talking about,
00:01:17.020 Speculative Whiteness, Science Fiction, and the Old Right, 0.85
00:01:19.660 there's something a little bit surprising
00:01:20.980 about the fact that neo-Nazis of all stripes
00:01:23.660 would be drawn to science fiction stories.
00:01:27.100 They tend to be about imagining a radically different
00:01:30.380 and maybe better future.
00:01:32.280 They tend to be pretty disrespectful
00:01:33.800 of established hierarchies.
00:01:35.760 Kind of feels like a leftist domain,
00:01:38.220 like a liberal domain.
00:01:39.460 And yet, he shows that basically between, you know,
00:01:43.020 the Gamergate dudes between Elon Musk, Matthew Heimbach, or Richard Spencer, there is a very
00:01:50.460 serious interest both in science fiction fandom and science fiction media and in kind of getting
00:01:58.100 to decide what it means. Yeah, you know, I have come really over the past like eight years or so
00:02:03.620 really since Gamergate to understand these online fandom communities and some IRL fandom communities
00:02:09.920 that grow up around science fiction as a site that really creates its own kind of masculinity.
00:02:16.840 This is something that you and I, Adrienne, have talked about in our taxonomy of conservative
00:02:21.180 masculinities as the creep, you know, the third in our triad of the pervert, the preacher,
00:02:26.660 and the creep. And the creep is often a kind of masculine figure who is coming from a place of,
00:02:33.700 wounded or doubted masculinity. It's something that needs to vindicate and prove itself through
00:02:41.380 feats of domination, or in this case, imagined domination, in which his superiority can be
00:02:48.240 demonstrated and proved to an undeserving world that has underestimated him or not appreciated
00:02:54.900 him. And I think that's a kind of masculine identity that has proved very, very fruitful
00:03:01.260 for these right-wing political movements to harvest.
00:03:04.120 Yeah, I think that's right.
00:03:05.100 We should be very clear, right?
00:03:06.720 Like we're all speaking as fans
00:03:08.480 of various imaginative media.
00:03:11.820 And we should say like, you know,
00:03:13.520 some of this is about film,
00:03:15.380 some of this is about novels,
00:03:17.260 but we're also getting into Warhammer 40K,
00:03:19.600 which is a miniatures war game.
00:03:22.460 And I think between the three of us
00:03:24.620 in the conversation,
00:03:25.220 we probably belong to fan communities
00:03:27.720 for many of these kinds of media.
00:03:30.200 So we're not trying to say that, like, you know, fandom itself has gone fascist, but
00:03:34.220 it's to say that there is a kind of fandom that has found itself, as you say, kind of
00:03:39.600 congenial, especially around its conceptions around gender and sexuality, with certain
00:03:45.140 streaks of a kind of elitist and kind of biologistic fandom that is out there.
00:03:51.640 And that in moments like Gamergate, you see that sort of become mainstream.
00:03:56.540 We really get into it.
00:03:57.400 I feel a lot smarter after this conversation about how these fictional genres get recruited
00:04:04.900 into political projects and how a community of imagination, like a fandom, can become
00:04:12.260 self-policing or can fail to self-police in ways that I think also reflect some of the
00:04:19.340 ways that our other communities might function too.
00:04:21.720 Yeah, exactly.
00:04:22.580 So I hope you guys enjoy the show as much as we enjoyed making it.
00:04:27.400 Enjoy.
00:04:34.380 So, Jordan, welcome to the pod.
00:04:37.820 Thanks for having me.
00:04:38.700 So, I love this book, and as will become clear, I'm a bit of a science fiction nerd myself,
00:04:43.400 and this is a book about science fiction nerds to some extent, and the very dark side that
00:04:47.720 they can have. But I do want to start with the first question that might sound more skeptical
00:04:52.140 than I mean it. Why is thinking about science fiction important for understanding certain
00:04:57.380 strains of right-wing thought. Many listeners will have noticed that there's quite a bit of
00:05:01.580 sci-fi thinking in the far right, especially when it comes to sort of the Silicon Valley
00:05:05.600 far-right nexus, but they may not know how load-bearing it really is. So can we tease
00:05:12.060 out what sci-fi does for or to the far right, to the alt-right, and so on?
00:05:17.240 Sure. I mean, yeah, we normally think of science fiction as something that is inherently progressive.
00:05:23.540 That's sort of the narrative that we tell ourselves often about science fiction, increasingly in the last couple of decades, the way science fiction is presented in the academy especially.
00:05:32.780 But actually, science fiction and fascism have been connected for a long time.
00:05:38.040 And I think that one of the reasons that's the case is that if you really think about the far right, it's an insurrectionary movement that believes that in order to maintain white supremacy and other kinds of hierarchies, they have to overthrow the state.
00:05:56.660 And so they need to imagine a radically different future. And often they draw on science fiction tropes or science fiction imagery in order to envision their all-white utopias. We see this, for example, with James H. Madol, David Duke, William Luther Pierce, as well as Richard Spencer.
00:06:18.520 But maybe even more fundamentally, the far-right, and in particular the alt-right, imagines whiteness as speculative. They believe that only white men are capable of imagining the future, and that includes science fiction speculation.
00:06:35.300 And they also believe that whiteness has a kind of promissory dimension or speculative dimension. It's a potential that can only be realized, they think, in a fascist utopia. So often as they're describing whiteness, they're describing not what white people are doing now, but what white people could be doing, like, say, colonizing the stars or creating other kinds of technoscientific marvels.
00:07:02.980 So science fiction is important in part to fascists because they imagine that tomorrow belongs to them.
00:07:10.600 It's really interesting, right? So many of our fascists, as you point out, are science fiction fans. And what's the sort of role of fandom in this?
00:07:19.880 This is a pretty common complaint, right? Gamergate has front-loaded gendered connections between fandom and reactionary politics. But the same is true, right? Like every time a beloved science fiction property is changed and people lose their goddamn minds over it, it does appear to be around these kind of like white supremacist eugenicist lines. So what's the nexus here? 0.99
00:07:42.620 I think there are a number of connections. I mean, one is historical. There have always been fascists among science fiction fandom or white supremacists among science fiction fandom. But more recently, this has been, I think, a crucial tool for far-right recruiting.
00:07:59.860 They know that this is where the conversations are, whether that be Gamergate or the Rabid Puppies Affair with the Hugo Awards.
00:08:09.120 Fascists know that they can pull people in by talking about science fiction and fandom in a way that if they're just talking about their politics, they might not reach broader audiences.
00:08:21.520 And I think this is a calculated strategy beyond just getting clicks or getting linked online.
00:08:26.740 I think that they believe that politics is downstream from culture, and they believe that they have to change the culture in order to enact a white supremacist politics.
00:08:39.340 They think that the reason that white people, or at least some white people, don't love their politics is that they've been brainwashed with this cultural messaging.
00:08:50.600 And so they see it as their goal to change the culture, to make fascism seem inevitable and appealing to larger audiences.
00:08:58.420 In the past, that's often been looking for what they think of as subversive messages in popular culture, messages that are supposedly put there to demoralize white people.
00:09:09.720 But in more recent years, fascists have been trying to find far-right meanings or subtexts in ostensibly liberal or leftist science fictional texts. And so they're trying to unearth these kinds of right-wing meanings that most of us don't see in order to appeal to this audience of fans.
00:09:31.000 In some ways, a lot of the techniques that they use for analyzing these texts feel a lot like academic cultural studies, but run through a kind of funhouse mirror of looking for the hidden fascist meaning in text so that they can pull people in.
00:09:45.520 That kind of reading that has an almost inventive determination to it. Yeah. As you're talking, Jordan, it occurs to me that the science fiction fascist who you're articulating reminds me quite a bit of the incel in it. And this might bring us to our putative focus on gender, right?
00:10:03.580 Like I'm thinking of, you know, the Ur-Incel Elliot Rodger, whose manifesto I had the misfortune of having to reread yesterday, as a incel who committed a mass shooting and ultimately a suicide in Isla Vista, California in 2014.
00:10:18.860 And his writings and his presentation of himself was as a quasi-messianic figure out to correct a corrupted world that did not validate his masculinity, right?
00:10:30.600 And that involves, I think in your terms, a kind of speculative gesture about the correct, righteous, sort of appropriately ordered world in which he would have been, to his mind, granted sexual access.
00:10:44.200 It's easy for me to see how white supremacy and the promise of whiteness can have this speculative dimension.
00:10:49.620 But what about sexual access and entitlement?
00:10:51.980 This seems like also a very common theme.
00:10:54.860 Definitely.
00:10:55.420 Yeah. I mean, gender and sexuality are constant anxieties for the alt-right. And we see this in a number of different places. One, I think, is the alt-right's discourse around risk. So they think of whiteness as speculative. It's looking towards the future.
00:11:14.060 But they also think of whiteness as gambling on a better future, as risking everything in order to enact some other future. And they believe that only white men have the drive to risk their bodies, risk their lives, risk all of civilization in order to build a space empire or colonize the stars or whatever.
00:11:39.040 And they frame this in very gendered terms. They think that white men are now too comfortable, they're too safe. They have this kind of dichotomy between Nietzsche's last man, who is this consumerist figure, but often described by people like Richard Spencer as emasculated or feminized.
00:11:58.760 And then on the other hand, they imagine themselves as these kind of astronaut ubermenschen who are capable of dealing with great dangers, and that makes them manly and powerful.
00:12:11.740 And they think that the incels would all be astronauts exploring the moons of Jupiter if only they lived in the fascist utopia.
00:12:20.220 And obviously this is an old narrative. We can hear echoes of Nazi discourses on risk and insurance, a risk versus safety. But also it's a very American kind of narrative. We could look back to mythology of the frontier and Teddy Roosevelt, this idea that you prove your manhood or you prove your white masculinity in particular by confronting great dangers. And that's one of the things that the alt-right promises. 0.64
00:12:47.080 Yeah, and it's fascinating. You point out that this is kind of fannish elitism, which is all about the potential, right? Like, I have the potential to do this thing because I am unique. I am different from all those around me. I don't do any of it, but I have this amazing potential, right? Like, in the event currently, I am reading a science fiction novel and or contemplating jerking off into a tube sock, but possibly I could go out and conquer a moon of Jupiter, right?
00:13:13.660 Like, the fact that it both has these kind of, I don't know, delusions of grandeur, I guess you would call them, and on the other hand, a sense of frustration, right? Like, if only, right? I would, if only. That strikes me as where the nerd figure as a sort of marginal figure in American masculinity discourses and the kind of, yeah, frustrated fascists meet, right?
00:13:34.600 Yeah, it's easy to call them losers, but it's also true. Like it's a sociological fact that these are people who were, at least in their minds, set up to do something better. They're often downwardly mobile men who maybe have some college education. A lot of them are failed grad students or they have like a law degree that they're not doing anything with.
00:13:56.100 They have this cultural training, and in some cases, credentials, and a narrative about promise of the gifted young men who were maybe in the gifted and talented program, and they didn't do anything with it either because a lot of these people are antisocial individuals with a number of personality flaws that probably got in their way.
00:14:17.460 Or it's the larger decline of the U.S. and global economy and the financial crisis and the general downward mobility of an entire generation of people.
00:14:31.160 Some people took that and broke for the left, and then others said, well, I was promised something greater. I had this potential, and they racialized that potential, and they imagined that what's missing is not a world where we are capable of using all of our talents, but they see their place as a hierarchy that they were promised and they didn't get to move to the top of, essentially.
00:14:53.520 Yeah, kind of a birthright that is unrealized.
00:14:55.840 Right, exactly, yeah.
00:14:56.480 You point out in the book that this is really quite old. This kind of nerd metaphysics, the stories of Claude Diggler or A.E. Van Vogt basically already have a lot of this. And the other thing I didn't realize, just for maybe more casual science fiction fans who are among our listeners, the fact that the figure of Khan Noonien Singh in the classic Star Trek episode Space Seed, who is this kind of like the Superman, this Ubermensch, is basically kind of a reply already to that.
00:15:26.480 strain in science fiction fandom, what you call the mutationist romance, where basically you are
00:15:32.600 different from others, meaning you are better, you're above, and the future really belongs to
00:15:39.240 you and not to the weirdos or normies or, you know, I'm guessing also women around you, right? 0.75
00:15:45.660 That there's a kind of racial sort of promissory note. And that's exactly what's true of Khan. 0.78
00:15:50.420 And of course, anyone who's seen that show or who has seen Star Trek 2 and or that other Star
00:15:56.020 that did it again for some reason,
00:15:58.300 will know that he's very much the bad guy, right? 1.00
00:16:00.540 Like he's a delusional, genetically amped up psychopath. 0.98
00:16:03.860 And the future belongs to the collectivist,
00:16:07.560 friendly, thoughtful, and sort of communitarian federation,
00:16:12.240 not to this weird, malignant outlier
00:16:15.020 who's a remnant of a weird, false turn
00:16:18.880 that humanity took, I think.
00:16:21.100 Right, exactly.
00:16:22.000 And that, I think, points to a fundamental contradiction
00:16:25.220 that I had to grapple with throughout this project.
00:16:28.720 On one hand, we see that this idea of the fannish elite,
00:16:33.060 that fans are slans, they're mutants, 0.97
00:16:35.080 they're like higher beings than the rest of everybody else,
00:16:38.140 is so pervasive in science fiction.
00:16:41.060 And in some cases becomes the basis
00:16:43.260 of an almost eugenicist narrative
00:16:45.220 that fans are superior, that fans should breed more,
00:16:49.740 and that everybody else is inferior
00:16:51.660 and doesn't contribute to history.
00:16:54.400 But on the other hand, we see that science fiction fandom critiques that very early on and very forcefully. And yet, people like Spencer go back in and find the critique and flip it on its head.
00:17:08.540 And that's the contradiction is in the act of trying to unearth fascism in fandom and critique that fascism, these science fiction texts often preserve it and allow people who have a fascist agenda to come back in and try to resurrect it.
00:17:30.020 So yeah, the episode with Kahn is very clearly about condemning Kahn. And yet when Spencer looks at it, he loves this idea of the genetically superior ubermensch. And he hates Spock, who he sees as this kind of Jewish Marxist figure. In the show, it's precisely the opposite. Spock you're supposed to identify with and you're supposed to hate Kahn.
00:17:51.840 But he clearly is able to wrest some right-wing meaning from this text because that history of struggle in science fiction is unavoidable. We see it so often where science fiction is trying to correct itself, but inadvertently, again, preserving this right-wing tendency within it.
00:18:10.540 What about these seeming counter readings, right? Like you mentioned, some fans identifying with a figure that the science fiction project will very explicitly name as the antagonist. You see this happening sometimes in like video games as well. You know, there's a broad swath of genres. Like, what is the nature of that like reappropriation of the antagonistic role? Is it avowed? Is it a product of bad reading? How does that come about?
00:18:37.240 I think it is often a product of bad reading. And in some cases, it's pretty obvious that they know it's a bad reading. But I don't think it comes from nowhere. I don't think that they're just looking at these texts and completely projecting their fantasies onto it.
00:18:55.000 If we see, for example, the Paul Verhoeven version of Starship Troopers or Alan Moore's Watchmen, these are texts that are about looking at moments of fascist enjoyment that fans have had.
00:19:07.640 There are moments where we are seduced as readers or viewers into investing in a fascist project, and then they turn around and say, look what you've done.
00:19:17.420 Like, you are complicit in this.
00:19:19.540 Isn't this horrific?
00:19:20.940 We need to disavow it.
00:19:22.120 But what the fascists often do is they leave that last part off. They'll look at Rorschach, or they'll look at the space marines and starship troopers and say, isn't this wonderful? Don't we enjoy this violence? Don't we enjoy this elitism? And they forget the final turn, which is the moment of critical self-reflection, and which seems to be in short supply on the far right.
00:19:44.000 and that allows them, I think, to get past a lot of the kinds of messaging that we see in science
00:19:51.160 fiction to the contrary. Yeah, it's so interesting. You say at some point that they basically strip
00:19:57.300 science fiction of its speculative indeterminacy, right? Like the way a good sci-fi story can play
00:20:02.060 with meanings and can reverse your view of what you're watching. We're going to talk about Dune
00:20:07.060 later, but that's a classic case, right? Where like, you're with it, you're excited for it for
00:20:11.080 a while and they're like, oh no, oh no, no, no, no, no. This is going very, very badly.
00:20:15.580 And one of the things I feel like we keep echoing here, and I keep imagining someone
00:20:19.060 like Elon Musk also, as well as someone like Richard Spencer. And of course, it's the same
00:20:24.240 kind of dunderheaded sort of lack of indeterminacy that you get from Silicon Valley's readings of
00:20:30.320 classic science fiction. I was thinking here of a tweet I really have loved by a guy named
00:20:33.920 Alex Blackman, who I don't know anything about, about a tech company saying, at long last,
00:20:38.460 We have created the Torment Nexus from classic sci-fi novel,
00:20:42.200 don't create the Torment Nexus, right?
00:20:44.020 Like you can have a company calling itself Soylent.
00:20:46.820 You're like, are you, do you layer irony upon irony
00:20:50.500 or do you just don't know what irony is, right?
00:20:52.440 Like, and in some way there is something really interesting
00:20:54.380 that's happening here that like our technology seems to be losing
00:20:58.540 the exact same sense of indeterminacy
00:21:01.140 that these very online fandoms sometimes do
00:21:04.840 or these right-wing fandoms do.
00:21:06.160 yeah i came very close to putting the torment nexus tweet in the book it's the exact same
00:21:13.540 phenomena like we think of like we as critical readers of science fiction think of science
00:21:18.400 fiction as subjunctive it's about playing with possibilities thought experiments critiquing the
00:21:25.700 present and they see science fiction as an imperative like there's no kind of exploration
00:21:32.280 and I think in part it has to do
00:21:35.120 with their model of history
00:21:36.440 which is very much about destiny
00:21:38.340 and a kind of future
00:21:40.420 that's already pre-written
00:21:41.840 and just has to be realized
00:21:43.200 they don't see
00:21:44.780 like most great science fiction authors do
00:21:47.340 history as something open
00:21:49.000 and contingent
00:21:50.120 and indeterminate
00:21:51.120 and unpredictable
00:21:51.840 and so I think that they forget a lot
00:21:55.120 of that critical dimension
00:21:57.480 of science fiction
00:21:58.380 and yeah just see dystopia
00:22:00.060 as a blueprint
00:22:00.840 that they're now going to enact
00:22:03.240 in a kind of very simplistic
00:22:05.740 and kind of obtuse way.
00:22:08.800 Yeah, I mean, one other example of this
00:22:10.300 that's so Silicon Valley connected
00:22:11.460 because it's on Apple TV+,
00:22:12.960 is the Foundation TV show,
00:22:15.180 which takes a really interesting question
00:22:17.400 about what would happen
00:22:18.460 if you could map out the future.
00:22:21.100 Be like, we will now celebrate this man
00:22:23.020 who invented the Torment Nexus, basically.
00:22:24.940 And very clearly, in a way that kind of anticipates
00:22:28.640 or resembles what a tech company can do.
00:22:31.680 And that strikes me as another place
00:22:33.340 where, frankly, the show just seems to misunderstand
00:22:36.300 its source material to some extent.
00:22:38.200 Sorry to be the undergrad who hasn't done the reading,
00:22:40.820 but for those of us who haven't seen all these texts
00:22:44.300 or haven't seen the foundation,
00:22:45.500 could you give us just a quick gloss?
00:22:47.340 So should we try this together, Jordan?
00:22:49.100 It's tricky.
00:22:49.660 It's a kind of unnarratable story,
00:22:51.840 but basically the idea is in the far future,
00:22:54.640 the galactic empire is on the verge of collapse, but no one knows that yet. It's basically an
00:23:00.760 Edward Gibbon kind of riff on the decline and fall of the Roman empire. And the question is,
00:23:05.560 what would happen if you knew, if you could predict this? The story is really about this
00:23:10.220 group of engineers who figures out how to truncate the time and minimize the losses for galactic
00:23:16.580 civilization from this inevitable collapse. And the show, I would say, I stopped watching it to
00:23:22.060 be honest, because I was bored out of my skull. Basically, Jared Harris, who's wonderful, has
00:23:27.180 always figured everything out before everyone else has figured it out. There is some of that
00:23:30.980 in the book, absolutely. And the nerds do know best in that novel as well, very clearly. But in
00:23:36.660 some way, the book is grappling with the question of what do you owe to the future if you really
00:23:40.900 have scientific ways of predicting it? And then in the show, it's basically like, ha ha, you dumb 0.99
00:23:46.160 losers. I knew that you were going to do that and that this person was going to try and stab their 1.00
00:23:51.020 lover and then like get into cryosleep and whatever. I'm sorry. What? How? No. Right.
00:23:57.180 And it very much is the Silicon Valley version of what Asimov's original novels are about.
00:24:04.800 Yeah. I mean, it seems like this is really appealing to people like Elon Musk and the
00:24:08.740 effective altruists, people who believe that they have everything mapped out in advance
00:24:13.800 and that gives them the right to have more say in how the world runs, essentially.
00:24:19.020 Sounds like it might be an opportunity
00:24:20.180 for just a smidge of epistemic arrogance.
00:24:22.700 I don't know.
00:24:22.900 Yeah, definitely.
00:24:25.340 So the other thing I wanted to ask you about,
00:24:27.760 well, so maybe we'll walk our listeners
00:24:29.620 through one example of like a place 0.77
00:24:31.540 where this kind of fannish eugenicism
00:24:34.160 seems to almost win over.
00:24:36.540 Someone very clearly thinking 0.83
00:24:38.500 they're parodying eugenics, right? 0.97
00:24:40.780 This is CM Kornbluth's Marching Morons, 0.97
00:24:44.640 and which we will recap it
00:24:46.380 for people who have not read a science fiction story
00:24:49.080 from the 1950s,
00:24:50.400 but that, am I right to understand
00:24:51.500 that Kornbluth very much thought
00:24:52.840 he was writing a parody,
00:24:54.680 a liberal parody of a right-wing kind of thinking
00:24:57.580 about gender, about sexuality, about eugenics,
00:25:01.460 and how then in the hands of certain readers
00:25:04.500 became exemplar of the very thing
00:25:06.880 that it was meant to parody.
00:25:08.240 Right, so essentially the story is
00:25:10.820 a person from the present day
00:25:13.200 of when the story was published
00:25:14.640 is thrown into the distant future and he finds himself in a world where everybody seems to be
00:25:23.420 less intelligent. This is a lot of ways like the film Idiocracy, which is also a big touch point
00:25:29.680 for the alt-right. Normally, this is just read as a matter of intelligence. The people of the future
00:25:34.640 aren't as smart. He's very smart. And there's a small cognitive elite secretly running the world
00:25:39.920 in a kind of Ayn Rand fashion, and they know better.
00:25:43.420 But if you look at the narrative,
00:25:44.800 it's really about not just intelligence, but foresight.
00:25:48.940 The people who looked ahead
00:25:51.640 and thought about the consequences of their actions
00:25:54.500 and planned for the future, according to this narrative,
00:25:57.960 used family planning so they had fewer children.
00:26:01.940 The people who were more present-oriented,
00:26:05.440 more impulsive, more unable to delay gratification
00:26:08.260 are outbreeding the people with foresight, essentially.
00:26:12.940 So it's a very eugenicist narrative.
00:26:15.500 In the narrative, though, we see the protagonist propose essentially a genocidal plan to get 0.89
00:26:24.460 rid of all of the short-sighted people who can't plan for the future by shooting them
00:26:31.140 off into space in these spaceships that aren't designed to allow them to survive, essentially.
00:26:38.260 This plan takes place, and then the small, gifted few who can see forward into the future realize how horrific this is and condemn him, and he's sent off to his own doom.
00:26:52.180 It's, again, ambiguous.
00:26:54.760 The narrative is loaded towards a eugenicist narrative.
00:26:57.340 It's just a narrative fact that being short-sighted or foresighted is genetic in this story, unless we're really reading it against the grain.
00:27:05.720 But nevertheless, it's intended to kind of condemn this idea of looking forward, looking ahead, giving you more rights than other people, and this fanish elitism where fans say, oh, yeah, we are capable of looking into the distant future, and that makes us better than everybody else.
00:27:22.220 But when it's taken up by the far right, they don't see that kind of satire. They just see it as here's how things are. And several alt-right intellectuals or far-right intellectuals have kind of pointed to this story, and especially to the similar narrative, Idiocracy, as an example of where the world is actually going.
00:27:42.960 But all this points to, I think, an ongoing narrative about who's capable of imagining a future, but also who has the discipline to actually bring that future into being.
00:27:56.140 And it's clear that at least one interpretation of this suggests that that's a genetic potential, that not everybody can do that. And only this small group of hyper-intelligent individuals are capable of seeing past the present, essentially.
00:28:12.960 So I want to drill down on that last thing you said. Where did they get this idea? I mean, like, sure, the science fiction fan thinks about the future more, right? The same way some people apparently think about the Roman Empire more than other people, as we found out last year through everyone's shock.
00:28:28.280 But on the other hand, right, like forethought
00:28:31.880 and like space colonization
00:28:33.840 do appear to be two different things.
00:28:35.460 Now, in my everyday life, I'm a Germanist by training.
00:28:40.400 And about in page 20 of your book, I was like,
00:28:42.520 is this all Spengler?
00:28:43.760 And then Spengler showed up.
00:28:45.440 And so I did want to ask about that.
00:28:47.160 How much of this is just the decline of the West
00:28:49.860 where basically, as well as Spengler,
00:28:51.920 this is his sort of interwar,
00:28:53.820 well, it's written at the very end of World War I,
00:28:56.020 but becomes a phenomenon really between World War I and II in Germany and beyond, one should say.
00:29:01.980 And it's this story about the difficulties of what he calls the Faustian element,
00:29:06.820 which is this kind of striving, you know, blowing through any limits,
00:29:10.900 even if it ends up killing you kind of ethos.
00:29:13.720 I mean, those listeners of ours who've been listening to the Nietzsche episodes
00:29:16.600 will recognize that this is basically just a collectivized version of what Nietzsche was talking about.
00:29:22.600 And at the same time, it is for him characteristic of the European. He makes a claim that the West has its essence in the Faustian and that basically that is what's now being lost in a sea of collectivism, et cetera, et cetera. Is that where this is from or did this predate kind of Spengler?
00:29:40.640 I think that's definitely one element. For people like Richard Spencer, they're explicitly citing Spengler and they're citing other authors who are talking about the Faustian spirit.
00:29:53.440 And they definitely do believe that Europeans or white Europeans, I should say, and white European men are uniquely suited towards transcending the here and now and are constantly looking forward to the future, looking forward into the beyond, and as a result are exploring the world and building technology and ultimately are destined to go to the stars.
00:30:21.360 And so, yeah, I think it's definitely coming from that as well. Although in Spengler, there is a kind of melancholy note to that or a cautionary note, a sense that there's something almost horrible about this civilization of technology, of these massive projects. 0.58
00:30:40.840 I mean, if we go back to the original Faust narrative that inspired this in Goethe, ultimately at the end, he moves beyond his satanic drivenness to change the world and find something like peace.
00:30:54.340 We see some of that ambivalence in some fascists, like a feeling that white people are restless and driven, but I don't think that they really grapple with that sense that this is, even in Spengler, not only the source of grand projects like cathedrals, but also the source of modern misery.
00:31:18.680 Yeah, it strikes me that there is this kind of simplistic cheerleading in the speculative impulse. I'm thinking of things like effective altruism, which so quickly evolved from a speculative command over supposed knowledge of the future that commanded you to, say, give up your kidney, and then very quickly became, no, in fact, what you really need to do, brave Nietzsche and Ubermensch, is to make as much money as possible.
00:31:47.300 and then invest that money right back into AI, you know?
00:31:50.760 Like, how does the narcissistic impulse
00:31:54.980 in the right-wing science fiction reader
00:31:57.260 emerge so consistently in spite of these other,
00:32:00.960 like maybe less rosy or less gratifying
00:32:03.800 strains in the literature itself?
00:32:06.040 Yeah, I mean, it's totally narcissistic.
00:32:08.800 When Richard Spencer is analyzing
00:32:10.880 the science fiction film Solaris,
00:32:14.100 he takes from it this idea that all of space 0.66
00:32:17.280 is just a mirror for white men to gaze upon themselves 0.70
00:32:22.200 and to see their glory. 0.73
00:32:24.120 And we see in a lot of these fascist narratives,
00:32:26.300 there are no others. 0.99
00:32:28.560 Not only is it a world depopulated of non-white people 1.00
00:32:32.200 or anybody who might object to their project, 1.00
00:32:35.020 but they're not interested in aliens,
00:32:36.700 which is a central conceit of science fiction.
00:32:40.020 They don't accept maybe as a ravening horde to fight back.
00:32:44.500 But really, there are very few fascist narratives about extraterrestrials. It's a lonely universe. It's a narcissistic universe. Even though they talk about expansion and the beyond and the Faustian soul going out into the cosmos, it feels very claustrophobic and self-obsessed and narrow-minded in a way that's really, I think, fundamental.
00:33:07.860 all. Yeah. And that feels sort of, as you say, hyper-masculinized too, because there is of course
00:33:12.280 kind of also, especially at mid-century, a kind of science fiction of belonging, right? Like where
00:33:16.900 you find yourself, you realize that you belong to something greater than you. There's a story
00:33:20.840 sometimes taught back in the day by Robert Sheckley. Have you ever read Specialist? No. So
00:33:26.180 this is about a spaceship where you realize that different components are different beings. They
00:33:30.760 all, they've evolved to have different things that they do and together they can propel this thing
00:33:35.820 and their pusher has died.
00:33:38.340 I think it's what it's called, pusher.
00:33:39.840 And they're like, we got to find a new pusher.
00:33:41.340 And that sort of twist at the end of the story
00:33:42.820 is the pusher turns out to be a human being.
00:33:44.620 And they're like, look, we need you.
00:33:46.980 And he's like, I'm just a person.
00:33:48.480 Like, no, you may have forgotten
00:33:50.300 that you're part of this spaceship family,
00:33:53.060 but you are a pusher.
00:33:53.940 I think it's called pusher.
00:33:54.920 Please don't write me if I'm wrong about this.
00:33:56.400 It's been 10 years, right?
00:33:57.760 And then at the very end,
00:33:59.000 the story ends with like the human being basically being like,
00:34:01.460 oh, I belong in this bigger context.
00:34:03.440 So there's like this very, this acceptance of the fact that what is out there might in fact make you feel small, might make you part of something bigger, might make you collaborate and cooperate with others and might challenge your very sense of selfhood, right?
00:34:21.140 And there's a lot of science fiction that does that. But it's really interesting to sort of see the way that entire element, right, this sort of fundamental human fantasy can sort of be completely read out of it by these alt-right readers.
00:34:34.940 Yeah, I mean, it's interesting. The alt-right, in some moments, is obsessed with belonging and trust and friendship and comradeship of a certain kind, and yet seems totally unable to imagine a future where that is important or, for that matter, to enact it.
00:34:55.040 Part of the reason why the alt-right has fallen apart is they all seem to distrust and often hate one another, and so they're unable to collaborate on anything. Their vision of the future, I think, reflects that. It's a Darwinian struggle or a struggle to the death. They point to a very bad reading of Hegel to describe themselves.
00:35:16.560 Thank you. Everyone always repeats that as a reading of Hegel. I'm like, that's not what he means.
00:35:21.740 Yeah, and it didn't get to the end of even the chapter.
00:35:24.920 Yeah, yeah.
00:35:26.140 Like, if it were a novel, it would be one third in.
00:35:28.800 Like, read till the end, bro.
00:35:30.460 Yeah, yeah.
00:35:31.600 So yeah, their future is like this.
00:35:33.540 It's all death.
00:35:34.720 It's all struggle.
00:35:35.580 It's all conquering one another or conquering the universe.
00:35:39.100 They can't see space colonization as maybe a collective project of building a better world.
00:35:45.640 They see it as dominating the stars. 1.00
00:35:48.280 And the stars are especially appealing to them because they don't contain non-white people that they might end up coming into contact with. 1.00
00:35:56.460 And so it is like a very aggressive, a very dominating view of the world that can't conceive of other modes of sociality. 1.00
00:36:06.540 It strikes me that what you're describing really is a vision of masculinity, right? Solitary, domineering, conquering, adventurous, kind of broadly antagonistic, right? You mentioned earlier that a lot of these texts, or at least the right-wing misinterpretations of these texts, have a preoccupation with eugenics and with breeding, right?
00:36:29.400 How do these readers engage with the appearance in these texts where they do appear of actual women and children?
00:36:38.200 I mean, they really do write women out of science fiction, it seems like. They don't really attend to the strong and longstanding presence of women in science fiction going at least as far back as Mary Shelley's Frankenstein.
00:36:55.700 And in their narratives about the future, they often don't have much of a place for women. Women are there to bear children for white men. Or in some of the more bizarre fantasies that they have, women are essentially replaced by biotechnology that will breed more white men. 0.96
00:37:15.060 And so it is a very hyper-masculine narrative and one that doesn't attend in any way to women or women's experience beyond a very stereotyped image of the trad wife, I think.
00:37:30.020 Well, that's catnip for Moira.
00:37:34.160 We should think about sci-fi tradwives at some point, but I do wonder, one book that you dwell on a little bit too that will be fresh in people's minds, and that might be kind of a confusing addition to the alt-right canon, is Dune, right?
00:37:48.980 It's an odd one at first glance, right? 0.82
00:37:51.100 I mean, with the marching morons, you could see how they got there. 0.99
00:37:53.620 But Dune is so obviously steeped in non-Western tradition. 1.00
00:37:58.320 The white savior trope is brutally, you know, deconstructed in it.
00:38:03.320 And women are super important in it, right? 1.00
00:38:06.320 Like, I mean, so they're super powerful. 0.91
00:38:09.240 I guess I'm answering my own question.
00:38:11.320 They're portrayed also fairly negatively, but so is everyone else, right?
00:38:14.280 But yeah, I mean, just given that, you know, Dune just came out as two very, very successful films.
00:38:20.080 We'll have Mark put in the, at this point, for the movie.
00:38:27.680 How do they grapple with the kind of dissonant aspects of the Dune universe for them?
00:38:41.920 Yeah, I mean, at first glance, it would not seem like Dune would be very appealing to fascists.
00:38:47.600 It is, in some ways, a cautionary tale against the figure of the superhuman dictator.
00:38:53.440 Paul Atreides, in some sense, is a mutant who can see further than everybody else.
00:38:59.420 He has this gift of prescience, and he utilizes that in order to remake the galaxy.
00:39:06.820 And yet, by the time we get to the end of that project, we see that he and his family
00:39:12.800 are transforming into monsters, and they have killed millions upon millions of people.
00:39:18.360 and ultimately the only thing left for them to do
00:39:22.060 is to create this vast plan
00:39:25.240 to try to undo their own power
00:39:27.360 and to make it so that no one else
00:39:28.920 can enact this project ever again. 1.00
00:39:31.200 And to fuck a worm. 1.00
00:39:32.920 Yeah, yeah, yeah. 1.00
00:39:34.380 Very important.
00:39:35.700 Definitely.
00:39:36.520 So yeah, you would think that like this parable
00:39:38.480 of the dangers of mutant fascism
00:39:40.780 would not appeal to somebody like Spencer,
00:39:44.340 but actually they, again,
00:39:46.660 read this in a very foreshortened way. They often focus on the first book, or when they do look at
00:39:52.920 later books, they kind of drop out key elements that seem pretty crucial. And so they valorize
00:40:00.820 the god-emperor of Dune as this figure that's capable of risking everything in order to create
00:40:06.900 this better world, and they see the world of Dune as embodying their project. It's a world that
00:40:13.840 contains archaic elements. It's kind of futile. Many technologies are forbidden. It's a world
00:40:21.460 where aristocrats are still very much in power and move history, but it also includes things
00:40:28.700 like space exploration, psychic abilities, and other kinds of science fiction nova,
00:40:35.880 science fiction innovations, essentially. And so they call this archaofuturism. This is the
00:40:40.880 the vision of the world that they want, a world that combines the distant past with the distant
00:40:46.220 future. And they really celebrate Dune in a way that I think would have probably disturbed Frank
00:40:53.120 Herbert, its author, quite a bit. I'm going to be stealing RKO Futurism. That's an excellent
00:40:57.780 coinage. Is that yours? No, it is. A member of the French New Right,
00:41:02.800 Guillaume Fay, came up with this term. We have this joke on In Bed With The Right where we
00:41:08.960 delve a lot into right-wing diagnoses of gender, right? Like what their description of what is
00:41:17.240 going on. And as a radical feminist, I always agree with the first half of the sentence. And
00:41:21.320 then I disagree with the second half where it's like, oh, you mean that's good? You think that's
00:41:26.080 good? And that's what I thought of when you described archaeofuturism as being actually
00:41:31.080 a coinage of somebody who in fact thought it was good. This is exactly what I want.
00:41:35.800 Yeah, yeah, yeah. This is perfect.
00:41:38.960 I feel like as we talk about archaeofuturism, I do have to ask you, I know you don't talk about it much in the book, but I know you've also written on Warhammer 40K.
00:41:49.340 Yes.
00:41:49.780 Which is sort of the classic archaeofuturist, I mean, text is putting it mildly.
00:41:54.720 Well, this is also Elon Musk's canonical misreading, right?
00:41:58.580 Does he like that? Oh, God.
00:42:00.600 I don't know.
00:42:01.140 I feel like 40K requires too much attention than Elon Musk is able to muster for the simple reason that it's a game that takes forever.
00:42:10.800 It has something like 60 novel cycles.
00:42:13.400 I cracked open one and I was like, wait, there's 60 more of these?
00:42:16.440 I'm sorry.
00:42:17.540 I am too busy for this.
00:42:19.160 I'm not very busy, but I'm too busy for this.
00:42:21.900 And it's this whole universe, 40 years old, and it's archaeofuturism.
00:42:25.700 So it's set in the distant future, but it is basically a fantasy story, right?
00:42:30.500 Like it has all the trappings of a fantasy story.
00:42:33.780 And I always assumed that that was,
00:42:35.860 I think this is a Thatcher era artifact.
00:42:38.400 And I always thought that like, exactly,
00:42:40.540 like Maura was saying,
00:42:41.320 the archeofuturism of it is meant to be parodic.
00:42:44.080 This is this horrifying vision
00:42:46.380 of what the end of history could look like, right?
00:42:48.800 Like nothing is ever new,
00:42:50.260 but it's getting more and more technologically destructive
00:42:52.300 and sophisticated.
00:42:53.760 And then I was like, whoa, they like that?
00:42:56.140 It's like basically people just get into this,
00:42:59.580 trump as god emperor like it's like it's quite astonishing like that that they really look at
00:43:05.140 that which like i feel like the creators of i think they're called games workshop right it's
00:43:09.440 called yeah that that games workshop really went out of their way to be like this is parody you
00:43:13.800 guys i really don't know like like heinlein was soft pedaling it you know herbert was soft pedaling
00:43:19.300 it like this is obvious you're committing genocide and like everything has a skull everywhere it all
00:43:24.760 looks like you know if the ss was mechanized like please don't take this seriously and or don't don't 0.63
00:43:31.040 take this as an endorsement and the the all rights like yeah it sounds like an endorsement to me you
00:43:36.500 know yeah definitely i mean i am obsessed with warhammer 40k and have been for decades and you're
00:43:43.060 right it's the same dynamic as a lot of these other texts where 40k is very much supposed to
00:43:51.180 be a satire um this was i think more explicit in the early materials in the 80s and 90s there was
00:43:58.840 an element of ridiculousness to it that i think as it's become more popular has faded a little bit
00:44:05.400 um but there's a a kind of contradiction running through 40k that that we've seen before where
00:44:13.920 on one hand it's um a parody it's a satire it's a lot of british people looking in some ways at
00:44:22.460 american pop culture and making fun of it so you have like rambo is in there and terminator and
00:44:29.240 aliens and american science fiction and they kind of blow it up to hyperbolic proportions
00:44:35.400 And it's set in this universe where these armored space marines are protecting humanity from aliens, but they're doing so in the service of this grotesquely dystopian dictatorship where any kind of free thought is stomped out immediately.
00:44:55.420 And where there's often, due to this hidebound and traditionalist way of organizing things, we see a refusal to develop new technologies, or because it's so centralized, entire planets just get lost in this world and eaten up by aliens because nobody noticed them.
00:45:19.040 And so, yeah, it's really meant to satirize adolescent male power fantasies. And there's a large leftist fan base. Shoutouts to Snipe and Wibb and Arbiter Ian and a number of other YouTubers and commenters who are looking at this from a critical perspective.
00:45:38.920 and yeah like part of the enjoyment is a world where there's only war i think which is i think
00:45:46.120 a very right-wing fascist view that everything is this eternal struggle yeah i mean just to give
00:45:52.580 listeners a sense of just how absurd this world is i forget what he's called but the empire of 0.80
00:45:57.780 of the imperium of man right the the emperor is a psychotic zombie to whom 10 000 people a day
00:46:04.540 have to be sacrificed in order to sustain him it's like you've left the realm of metaphor and
00:46:09.260 you're just like okay it's like we're just we're just saying it at this point it is just so
00:46:13.440 obviously satirical but i hadn't thought about the gender dimension quite so much which is that
00:46:19.000 like the output for the player is a bunch of dudes hanging out and being bros together and
00:46:25.140 they're like sure the demented god emperor might be a bit of a problem but like in the end you're
00:46:31.020 in your armor, you got your guns, you're hanging out with your buddies. And like, you know,
00:46:34.780 there is a kind of male wish fulfillment fantasy bound up with this absurdly dystopian future,
00:46:41.760 right? Like really hard to top any of that in terms of just sheer bleakness. And yet it is
00:46:48.960 very much a story whose output is male purpose and male companionship.
00:46:54.700 Yeah. I mean, the space marines, they're all men. And this has been a subject of controversy.
00:46:59.500 the more progressive view of the hobby suggests that maybe we should change this whereas there
00:47:06.380 is a contingent of fans they're like no space marines have to be men this is canon but you
00:47:13.960 could see what is at play there beyond just sexism it's this fantasy of being a dude
00:47:21.060 encased in armor not having to feel anything and never having to deal with women and being
00:47:27.460 completely detached from any connections beyond these military relationships to other men.
00:47:33.300 So it's very much a fantasy of a certain kind of heterosexual, hyper-masculine adolescence
00:47:39.960 that never ends for this right-wing contingent of 40K fans.
00:47:45.040 How does it end?
00:47:46.160 I mean, spoiler alert for those-
00:47:47.640 There's no ending.
00:47:48.520 Oh, there's no ending.
00:47:49.340 There's war forever.
00:47:50.680 Like, it's just, basically, they just keep adding to the timeline, and then they're like,
00:47:54.460 and then a new war of space elves
00:47:56.400 and a new war with the chaos gods and a new
00:47:58.460 war. I mean, they're starting
00:48:00.220 to change the timeline a little
00:48:02.360 bit. I think Games Workshop has
00:48:04.300 rightfully recognized that
00:48:06.420 there's a problem with
00:48:08.220 the hobby that needs to be addressed
00:48:09.900 and they're slowly trying to alter
00:48:12.360 the setting and part
00:48:14.320 of that might be imagining
00:48:16.140 that history will move forward beyond
00:48:18.300 the way it's been stuck for a long time
00:48:20.500 but I think because it's
00:48:22.520 this open world franchise that
00:48:24.460 the main purpose is to sell little plastic miniatures and video games. There can't be a
00:48:30.600 narrative resolution. It's just, there will be more war and it has to be a stalemate so the
00:48:35.020 armies are balanced forever. It strikes me that that's like a common theme in a lot of
00:48:39.600 this right-wing imagination of science fiction. It's like, there's, okay, even if you get to a
00:48:43.620 triumphalist end, you do not then arrive at a utopia of peace, right? Which would be impossible
00:48:49.260 for them ideologically because war is its own end.
00:48:53.000 The proving ground for masculinity, exactly.
00:48:54.760 Right. And masculinity is like kind of, by definition, insecure and always needing to
00:49:00.060 be reproven and reproven. There's no like static masculinity that is unimpeachable,
00:49:05.200 right? So you have this kind of constant, words are failing me because I cannot actually articulate
00:49:11.780 the bleakness of this vision of just constant unending war and conflict and domination.
00:49:17.420 Yeah, yeah. Well, I mean, one thing about chaos that's worth mentioning, right? Like, so these space marines are always fighting the gods of chaos, which are these slithering, kind of changeable, mutational kind of apparitions that, you know.
00:49:31.720 Oh, yeah, I know her.
00:49:32.860 Right, exactly, right? Like, it's all very slimy and you don't want to go in there. And it's like, well, okay, like, you're scared of ladies. I get it.
00:49:42.640 Like, you need a gun in order to confront the ladies, which, of course, gets to the irreducibility of this. 0.69
00:49:50.960 There's nothing Faustian about it. 0.81
00:49:52.240 It's just repetition compulsion.
00:49:53.800 It's just, you know, neurotic, I guess, is the way to put it.
00:49:57.220 Yeah, yeah. 0.92
00:49:57.900 I mean, there is a literal god of sex and pleasure that is the enemy of these armored, joyless, hyper-masculine, incel, space marines.
00:50:08.860 That's fascinating.
00:50:09.620 And I mean, this is going too far afield and we need to do another episode on this at some point.
00:50:15.020 But there's also something interesting about how responses to kind of Thatcherism kind of leaned into masculinity in certain ways that are just very, very interesting.
00:50:24.460 On the one hand, like critiques, I think you hear V for Vendetta, which is another one of these that like ends up being weirdly sexist for the fact that like its politics are ultimately like supposed to be quite progressive.
00:50:36.080 and the same kind of changeability
00:50:38.540 seems to me true for 4DK as well.
00:50:41.140 Unlike, let's say,
00:50:42.360 the Verhoeven Starship Troopers 0.68
00:50:44.320 where part of the fascist future's appeal 0.61
00:50:47.280 is its horniness. 1.00
00:50:48.320 The fact that there are female space marines 1.00
00:50:50.640 and they're all showering together
00:50:51.840 and they're just hot and all making out.
00:50:54.580 And Verhoeven's point is just because 0.78
00:50:56.380 your war crime machine is diverse 0.81
00:50:59.280 and sexually liberated doesn't make it better. 1.00
00:51:02.860 War machines are bad. 1.00
00:51:04.240 Yeah, I mean, Thatcher is mocked in early Warhammer fantasy, at least.
00:51:09.560 So in closing, I wanted to ask a question about sort of our present moment.
00:51:13.760 So as a bit of a science fiction fan myself, right, in some way, this is a golden age.
00:51:18.800 A bunch of novels I thought I would not see represented on screen in a long time, if ever, are now on screen, right?
00:51:26.260 Like we mentioned Foundation, mentioned Dune.
00:51:28.560 I guess Dune had been filmed previously, but that was not a movie that when I saw it as a teenager, I really liked.
00:51:34.000 although I've come to like it quite a bit.
00:51:36.300 And there's all this other stuff
00:51:37.600 that they're working on, right?
00:51:38.760 There's going to be a 40K show pretty soon,
00:51:40.960 I've heard, with The Witcher guy,
00:51:43.000 which is great, Henry Cavill.
00:51:44.900 And part of that clearly is that
00:51:46.500 there is a kind of zeitgeisty overlap
00:51:49.140 with Silicon Valley.
00:51:50.380 And I feel like we've been dancing around that.
00:51:52.440 Like, we have the world's richest man
00:51:54.820 who is, I guess, an incel at heart,
00:51:57.080 even though he appears to not be.
00:51:58.800 Plantically impregnating everybody he can, yeah.
00:52:01.040 Yeah, but who makes his name
00:52:02.940 kind of building rockets.
00:52:04.620 We have, as Maura was mentioning,
00:52:06.220 we have the effective altruists
00:52:07.400 or long-termists as well
00:52:08.840 who indulge these very science fiction
00:52:10.460 tinged fantasies
00:52:11.820 and whose gender politics
00:52:13.280 tend to be pretty reactionary, 1.00
00:52:15.600 frankly, in most cases.
00:52:17.860 What do we make of the fact
00:52:19.600 that we have these tech overlords
00:52:22.560 who were science fiction fans
00:52:24.660 clearly once upon a time, right?
00:52:26.140 I mean, find the other person
00:52:28.080 that I was thinking of
00:52:28.660 is Peter Thiel,
00:52:29.360 who seems to be more of a fantasy fan,
00:52:31.280 naming everything after
00:52:32.520 Lord of the Rings gizmos.
00:52:35.620 That's a little bit different
00:52:36.500 and I would want to keep those two apart.
00:52:38.320 But still, we're living through a future
00:52:42.080 as created by science fiction fans.
00:52:45.500 And again, I say that as someone
00:52:47.400 who is going to have to log off in five minutes
00:52:49.280 to get to my D&D game.
00:52:51.080 But still, what does it mean for that kind of fandom
00:52:54.060 that conceives of itself as so marginal
00:52:55.920 to suddenly be kind of in control
00:52:59.640 of humanity's destiny to some extent
00:53:01.560 really having a serious impact on what happens to this planet. What do you make of it?
00:53:06.560 I mean, there's an argument to be made that fandom has become maybe not the new spirit of
00:53:11.980 capitalism, but a new spirit of capitalism. I've written a lot about the ways that Silicon Valley
00:53:18.080 culture is bound up, not just in science fiction imagery, but in fannish practices,
00:53:25.100 a kind of obsessiveness, an orientation towards repetition, going back to the same thing again
00:53:30.220 and again, and being lost in something. These are all things that both science fiction fans report.
00:53:37.320 They describe themselves as getting lost in a novel or in a game, but also software engineers
00:53:45.640 and other people in Silicon Valley often have this same relationship to coding. They lose track of
00:53:52.200 all time, they forget everything else, and they get lost in their own work to the exclusion of
00:53:58.400 all other concerns. So there is a hyper focus, I think, in fandom that's really useful for Silicon
00:54:05.020 Valley. You want your coders to ignore dinner, ignore social obligations, remain focused on the
00:54:12.620 one thing that produces profit for you. But it's also useful, I think, for culture industries.
00:54:17.780 They want a very predictable, dependable audience that's going to watch the 17th sequel as well as
00:54:26.140 the 16th sequel, to whatever it is that you are producing. And so I think that Hollywood
00:54:32.760 and other culture industries are cultivating audiences that look a lot like science fiction
00:54:40.720 fans, but maybe without that critical dimension or a speculative dimension that seems so important
00:54:48.960 for science fiction fandom. I mean, we kind of talked about this earlier where
00:54:52.900 it's a world in the future where not a lot ultimately happens. A lot of the temporality
00:55:01.560 of these new science fiction narratives feels like the way that, say, Umberto Eco described
00:55:09.300 Superman, where he fights these galactic empires, and then the story basically stays the same
00:55:16.620 for a lot of the comic strips or the comic books. It's the same thing with these new
00:55:22.460 franchises where every few years we're going to get a new Star Wars film, or we're going to get
00:55:29.140 a new classic science fiction text that's going to be adapted or rebooted or sequeled. And it's
00:55:37.260 not necessarily going to depict a fundamental break with the present. It's going to give you
00:55:41.820 the same repetitive, predictable enjoyment that you can hyper-focus on and that you will be a
00:55:48.280 good consumer of in the future. And of course, there's an element there where the new spirit
00:55:55.160 of capitalism, the kind of franchise, ends up pushing the limits of who these works are for,
00:56:02.600 right? They're interested in being inclusive because that's how they market, which will then
00:56:07.820 always outrage the sort of white supremacist element, right? Like, you're going to want a
00:56:11.400 black stormtrooper. You're going to want to have, you know, female space Marines because, like, 1.00
00:56:14.420 you can double your money that way. 0.95
00:56:17.800 And so I do think that this kind of spiral of escalation
00:56:20.720 where these corporations market these kinds of objects
00:56:24.560 that to some extent appeal to the exclusionary impulses
00:56:27.860 in their fans to an ever-widening fandom,
00:56:31.100 they're going to get these kind of counter-readings
00:56:33.260 that recover the exclusionary element
00:56:35.080 that has always been, I think, part of science fiction fandom,
00:56:38.420 even at its sweetest,
00:56:39.800 even at its most sort of anodyne moments.
00:56:42.540 And I do wonder where that's going to leave us and where that's going to go.
00:56:47.500 Yeah, I think you're right.
00:56:49.100 I mean, we might find a utopian dimension to the various cultural industries' attempt
00:56:55.760 to expand fandom beyond a small group of primarily white educated fans.
00:57:03.020 And I think this points to one of the things that we see throughout science fiction.
00:57:06.920 And we see the fascist element, but we also see anti-fascist science fiction that really suggests that the future is what we make of it. It's not just the unfolding of racial destiny of a privileged few.
00:57:20.440 One of the slogans that I kind of hit on at the end of the book is the idea that tomorrow
00:57:24.460 belongs to everybody, that the future is not just white men, that the future will be people
00:57:31.080 of all backgrounds working together to build something beyond the present, to overcome
00:57:36.640 racial capitalism and to imagine a better world.
00:57:40.380 And so I think that even though some of these franchises are cynical in some ways, we might 0.91
00:57:46.980 hold fast to those moments where they show a future where it's not so homogenous and it's
00:57:53.620 not so exclusive. Yeah. I think that's a perfect place to end. That's beautiful. Jordan Carroll,
00:57:58.780 thank you so much for being with us. Thank you so much. This was great. I learned a lot.
00:58:05.000 In Bed with the Right, we'd like to thank the Michelle R. Clayman Institute for Gender Research
00:58:08.440 for generous support. Jennifer Portillo for setting up our studio. Our producer is Katie Lau.
00:58:16.980 You