In Bed With The Right - August 07, 2023


Episode 4: Fag Hag with Moira and Adrian

Topics
Episode 3: Susan Sontag with Merve Emre Episode 5: Crisis of Masculinity

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 19 minutes

Words per minute

190.96

Word count

15,134

Sentence count

436

Harmful content

Misogyny

85

sentences flagged

Toxicity

187

sentences flagged

Hate speech

244

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 Wait, Adrienne, are you saying that all this cultural baggage around the fag hag 1.00
00:00:04.440 was actually anxious projections about heterosexuality all along? 0.99
00:00:21.520 I'm Adrienne Daub.
00:00:23.000 And I'm Moira Donegan.
00:00:24.180 And whether we like it or not, we are in bed with the right. 0.99
00:00:26.840 so moira what what is our topic today today we are talking about fag hacks the ultimate ally 0.87
00:00:35.240 well so let's start with the obvious so this is a podcast about right-wing ideas and how they 0.87
00:00:41.060 continue to fuck up our lives so point of order actually uh two points of order first up is the 0.98
00:00:47.460 fag hag somehow secretly conservative and i never realized and also like is she still a thing yeah 0.99
00:00:53.720 So I sort of hadn't given quite as much thought to fag hags as you had before we started researching for this episode. 0.96
00:01:00.680 And what I came to really appreciate was how profoundly our reception of the fag hag and her sort of place in the culture is shaped by really conservative understandings about sex and gender that maybe don't entirely map on to what's actually going on in these very close friendships between straight women and gay men. 0.74
00:01:21.420 And I also realized that, you know, the way that these friendships function is sort of shaped by a lot of cultural conditions that I'm not sure would, you know, exist in the feminist utopia we're all striving for, right? 0.91
00:01:34.860 The fag hag is both a product of gender conservatism and something that is misunderstood and demonized by gender conservatism. 0.96
00:01:45.700 And I think to your point, like, does she still exist? I think the fag hag is a bit of a endangered animal. She's sort of receding because of historical conditions. And I think we can talk a little bit about what those are. 0.99
00:01:58.660 Yeah, yeah. So I think that's right. I think the fag hack herself, on the one hand, she's clearly a figure that disrupts traditional kinship structures, upends gendered expectations, and is clearly a product of the sexual revolution to some extent. And so, you know, a bunch of things that conservatives tend to hate and or mischaracterize.
00:02:15.900 there's something in the natural order the quote-unquote natural order that gets upended
00:02:20.520 in this kind of friendship and i think that's interesting right like a man and a woman who
00:02:24.420 kind of hang out but don't have sex don't create a traditional family and so on and so on but i
00:02:29.280 guess yeah i'm with you that like whether that means that she's a break from traditional
00:02:33.420 heterosexuality or whether she isn't at least in certain version kind of a yassified version 0.89
00:02:38.860 of heterosexuality that's something that we'll need to talk about so mora already alluded to
00:02:43.080 this but full disclosure i was at some point going to write and maybe i might still write a whole book
00:02:48.180 about this figure so that means two things like i've i've thought about this quite a lot and what
00:02:53.620 it also means is that like uh you know frank castanza during festivus i have a lot of opinions
00:02:58.800 and you're all going to hear about him one thing in terms of housekeeping we should say is if you
00:03:03.700 are enjoying this podcast we're still quite new and we really want more people to find us so if
00:03:08.360 you wouldn't mind giving us a good rating uh wherever you get your podcasts and maybe writing
00:03:12.860 a review. We definitely will read those and we'd be very excited to hear from you.
00:03:16.780 Like, subscribe, tell all your friends, share it on social media. We want everybody
00:03:20.760 who might like our show to be able to find it.
00:03:42.860 It occurs to me that like, you know, there might be some listeners of the podcast who
00:03:46.680 actually don't know us personally, and it might be worth pointing out biographically
00:03:51.160 that, you know, I am a gay woman. 0.98
00:03:52.840 I have never been a fag hag. 0.98
00:03:56.420 I know, shocked. 1.00
00:03:58.340 Adrian, who just had brunch with me and my wife a couple of days ago, is like clutching
00:04:01.480 his pearls.
00:04:02.840 I had known.
00:04:03.640 But, you know, it's not really a... 1.00
00:04:05.640 Say something lesbianic. 1.00
00:04:08.480 But, you know, I feel like the fag hag in particular is sort of contrasted with the 1.00
00:04:12.680 lesbian as as you know sort of two genres of women who both sort of fail at heterosexuality or who 1.00
00:04:20.260 don't do it correctly but they are not the same and they are sort of really walking down different 0.92
00:04:25.240 if parallel paths even though they sort of get like mentally categorized together in the
00:04:30.660 conservative imagination but you know also as a you know a woman who failed at heterosexuality I
00:04:35.660 kind of have a personal canon of women figures in my mind who are sort of not talented at or
00:04:45.420 interested in the sort of traditional heterosexuality. And a lot of these are
00:04:49.100 straight women who have had a lot of affinities for gay men or personal closeness with gay men
00:04:54.840 throughout their lives or throughout their careers. And I'm looking at those figures and
00:04:58.420 thinking a lot about, well, like what, what are they getting? What are, what are these relationships
00:05:02.100 with gay men allow them to do the relationships with straight men don't but like maybe before we
00:05:08.300 get too deep into the weeds we should define our terms a little bit because when we first started 0.98
00:05:12.180 talking about this episode i realized that like the semantics of like what counts as a fag hag 0.78
00:05:17.340 and what doesn't is actually pretty blurry to me like is she a beard is she in on the joke is the 0.96
00:05:24.020 joke at her expense is she seeking something sexual from these men she's close with is she not 0.99
00:05:31.300 so like what what is your definition of like what is the platonic ideal of a fag hag well so i think 0.98
00:05:36.880 i think what's so interesting about the term is that like the very existence of it sort of like
00:05:41.640 has a bunch of presuppositions right and i think that figuring out what she's not is really really
00:05:47.600 helpful right like so i think to me the platonic ideal is a straight woman who hangs out with gay
00:05:55.020 men in gay male spaces let's say so it's not just someone who happens to have gay guy friends but
00:06:01.120 Who goes into bars, who sort of partakes and goes on gay cruises or something like that, who partakes of sort of stereotypical aspects of gay male life.
00:06:11.240 And I think people can already kind of hear why this might be a life form that has become a little less common, because it's just like there was a time when, you know, people heard gay men and they pictured people with handlebar mustaches, you know, gyrating to disco, like on a pride float.
00:06:28.760 And that's like one version of male homosexuality today, but it's certainly not the predominant one. It's one that we sort of understand as being historically particularly conditioned. But that is to me sort of the fag hag. And I think you're already pointing to the fact that like, you know, if you see someone walking down the street and you think that person is someone's fag hag, right? Like there's a bunch of things I think you're assuming is true of her, right?
00:06:48.960 she's aware she's with a gay man right she's not not you know liz taylor and sort of just
00:06:54.840 genuinely unaware where he slips off to every night right which is historically like i think
00:06:59.280 you mean liza minnelli not i could be wrong about the biography of liz taylor but liza minnelli is
00:07:04.480 one of the paradigmatic fact or beards rather yeah exactly so you know i'm sorry i can't allow
00:07:10.380 you to be smirch elizabeth taylor although she was i mean she was she did have a lot of very
00:07:15.400 cool gay friends but like very cool gay friends yeah not married to them yes but in on the joke
00:07:20.080 and liza minnelli was not was not exactly the other thing is that she's not there to pretend
00:07:25.280 at heterosexuality i think right that obviously there's there's some gradation to that like there
00:07:30.200 are spaces that were having a female companion for a gay man was very very helpful and in fact
00:07:36.460 could be life-saving but i think the self-appellation sort of really came about when people did it kind
00:07:43.120 for the hell of it. The other thing is a beard. You're trying to survive. You're trying to mime
00:07:48.020 heterosexuality for others. Once you're just hanging out because it's fun, I think that's
00:07:53.880 when the fag-hag dynamics start. We should talk about why we use maybe that word rather than 1.00
00:08:00.700 many others. There are a bunch of words for this phenomenon, and I should mention that.
00:08:04.240 There's the dick widow, the homo honey, the fruit fly. There's even one attempt by an analyst in
00:08:11.540 the early 70s to make the term homosexophilic woman happen. Happy to report he did not, in fact,
00:08:18.460 make it happen. My favorite is fairy godmother. I like that one. Fairy godmother. Yeah, and that
00:08:23.640 already sort of tells you a lot of things, right? There are a lot of family terms. You know, the
00:08:27.880 German word for schwulmutti is also like a gay man's mother, right? The idea that this is best 0.99
00:08:33.180 metaphorized by another relationship, a familial relationship, is really, really important here.
00:08:38.600 One thing I should also probably acknowledge.
00:08:40.240 So a few years ago, I did an online survey about the term and how people thought about
00:08:43.840 it.
00:08:43.980 And I got about a thousand responses.
00:08:46.220 Some of the data was really fascinating.
00:08:48.140 But the most fascinating thing was maybe that a bunch of people got offended by my use of
00:08:52.660 the term.
00:08:53.800 So first of all, sorry, like we're going to use that word today.
00:08:57.200 But at the same time, I think it's interesting.
00:08:59.140 I don't think that people got mad for no reason because the term certainly feels meaner, let's
00:09:03.800 say, than fruit fly, right? 0.93
00:09:06.060 Like there's something about it that, you know, I mean, for one thing, it has the word fag in it, which, you know, I don't like using in isolation either, but hag ain't great either. 0.97
00:09:15.840 And I think that, you know, more so than being homophobic, it's sort of implicitly, I think, misogynistic, right? 0.91
00:09:22.240 Like for a long time, I tried to figure out like, you know, we don't know who first applied this moniker to like a lady who was sort of hanging around the gay club.
00:09:28.980 but like i was i kept while working on on my book about this my book manuscript about this i kept
00:09:34.740 thinking about like where did they draw that that word from why was it hag that came to mind and one
00:09:39.480 thing that kept sort of occurring to me was was that the hag was having a real moment in hollywood
00:09:44.900 in the early to mid 60s right this this is the era of haxploitation i don't know if that rings a bell 1.00
00:09:49.940 for you right like where you got these vampy old aging actresses right the joan crawfords kind of
00:09:55.300 like vamping it up like in southern gothic style kind of you know what is that hush hush sweet 0.77
00:10:01.300 charlotte or something like that i think another name for the genre is psycho bitty so like you
00:10:05.520 know i think sunset boulevard right elderly actress freaks out on camera and i think that's
00:10:10.420 part of what's what's here it's not the kind of designation that people would self-apply where i'm
00:10:14.520 from you know but you know the fag hag it's interesting you bring up this genre of like
00:10:19.520 the glamorous or like sort of fading glamour of a hollywood woman in the 1960s and 70s because 0.99
00:10:26.640 you know what the fag hag receives or part of what the fag hag receives by proximity to gay men 1.00
00:10:31.600 is a way to sort of claim an ironic distance from femininity like gay male femininity is a little 1.00
00:10:37.680 bit disavowed it's very self-aware it's knowing and it is you know that style that affect is taken
00:10:43.480 very much from an earlier generation of Hollywood stars.
00:10:48.420 And we talked about the Mae West version of camp
00:10:51.540 that sort of emerged in the early part of the 20th century
00:10:54.880 on our episode with Mervé Emre.
00:10:56.860 And that's sort of a gleefully parodic,
00:11:00.720 self-consciously insincere version of femininity 1.00
00:11:04.240 that gay men have that allows them, 0.98
00:11:06.620 along with simply being male, 0.81
00:11:08.760 to embody femininity in a way that's a little bit safer,
00:11:11.000 that doesn't like sort of necessarily imply a acceptance of their inferiority, right?
00:11:16.320 And that's something I think a lot of straight women use proximity to gay men to access.
00:11:21.800 But, you know, like, let's just like go back to our like definition, right?
00:11:25.880 Because we have women who are straight or something like straight in close proximity
00:11:31.660 to men who are gay.
00:11:33.540 In my sort of use of the term, I'm usually thinking of like close one-on-one friendships,
00:11:39.960 which are like very intimate sort of bounded in time right these are not frequently lifelong
00:11:47.220 friendships these are closeness like intimacies that last for maybe a number of years although
00:11:52.140 we can get into that and i also think that that like one-on-one nature is part of why they are so
00:11:56.840 easily and frequently analogable to both heterosexual romance and like mother-son
00:12:03.100 dynamics. What you don't see is really a dynamic in which a gay man is acting as a father figure
00:12:12.220 to a straight woman. There's a little bit of infantilization of the gay men and a little bit 0.99
00:12:18.060 of sort of like desexualization and as such, like sort of premature aging of the straight woman 0.97
00:12:22.540 involved. Yeah. Just to underline what you just said, that's of course the tricky part, right?
00:12:27.460 Like, is there something genuinely destabilizing to the way gender roles usually are distributed
00:12:32.380 in society in this relationship or as the outside appellations very very frequently claim
00:12:38.440 is this just a defective or let's put more neutrally a version of that relationship that
00:12:43.760 sort of isn't actually as transcendent as it thinks right like you think you're transcending
00:12:48.220 heterosexuality but you're falling into reproductive futurism you're falling into
00:12:52.460 mommy-son relationships right like this is something that like in early discussions of
00:12:58.040 the fact that in the 70s and 80s, especially in the psychological literature, is brought up again
00:13:03.260 and again. We can talk about that in a second. But basically, these were largely therapists who
00:13:08.060 were trying to figure out how to rid men of unwanted homosexual urges and desires. 0.58
00:13:13.200 So like a proto-conversion therapy or the origins of a conversion therapy kind of philosophy. Yeah. 0.62
00:13:17.480 This is often still before the DSM-IV removed homosexuality from the list of mental illnesses. 0.91
00:13:22.560 And so they're just trying to, quote unquote, cure this mental illness. And of course, 0.91
00:13:26.440 their prescriptions are always like, you got to get your mommy out of your life. And you also got
00:13:29.860 to get your substitute mommy out of your life, which is the fag hack, basically. 1.00
00:13:33.180 Right. So there's a sense that in the fag hack relationship, both the gay man and the straight 1.00
00:13:38.980 women are sort of like delaying adulthood, right? Like the straight woman is not reaching sexual 1.00
00:13:43.880 maturity and accepting the limits of heterosexuality for herself. There's like often in a lot of 0.86
00:13:50.280 conservative approaches to the fag hack, there's an assertion that the straight woman is using 0.98
00:13:55.460 gay men as substitute romance because she like fears uh sexuality somehow and then in his turn 0.99
00:14:03.320 the gay man is remaining a child by retaining closeness to a mother and not having to like 0.52
00:14:09.300 reach into a masculine independence or later on i mean we'll talk about will and grace which is
00:14:14.480 probably one of the longest running explorations of this dynamic that show is not saying oh will
00:14:19.820 isn't able to embrace adulthood they are saying that to some extent but they're saying but the
00:14:25.440 adulthood they're thinking is he's not ending up with a nice boy right they're saying you should
00:14:29.160 just throw yourself into gay life you are withholding yourself from your community by 0.76
00:14:33.940 trying to play house with this girl you dated for one horrible month in college right that's the 0.97
00:14:39.420 story of will and grace so even as sort of the super heterosexualized or heterosexist version
00:14:44.980 of this goes away this idea that somehow there's something off about the temporality of this
00:14:50.540 relationship is really really important the prescription changes through time is what you're
00:14:54.080 saying so if it goes from both of you need to the prescription from people like a psychiatrist for
00:14:59.260 example goes from both of you need to reconcile yourselves into heterosexuality to this like
00:15:07.160 prescription embodied by will and grace of both of you need to reconcile yourselves to relationships
00:15:11.640 with men specifically yeah yeah well so one thing that that i really was impressed by sort of
00:15:17.360 thinking about the fact and tracing her through kind of culture at large was that i think we've 0.92
00:15:23.440 been talking a lot about how the fag hag can upset sort of heteronormativity and how really 0.94
00:15:27.700 that relationship can be something that armistead maupin has famously called a logical family right 0.98
00:15:31.960 rather than a biological family it just it feels right rather than having a purpose or something
00:15:36.540 like that what's interesting is the longer the figure is around and the more both gay men and
00:15:43.180 women are able to combine a certain level of liberatedness with the maturity and maturation
00:15:49.500 They could grow older in ways that felt safer than by themselves or in whatever associations 0.73
00:15:55.620 they chose that might have been possible 20 years ago.
00:15:58.520 The FACAC easily becomes this kind of figure for another set of convention.
00:16:02.120 And this is what the literary scholar Beth Freeman has called chrononormativity.
00:16:06.580 So the sense that our lives form these ordered sequences or structures that time organizes
00:16:12.340 our bodies and gives them secure meanings, right?
00:16:15.660 There's a time to sow your wild oats and then there's a time to settle down, for instance,
00:16:19.100 And I think it's such a simple point that we often don't dwell on it, but what behaviors, desires, and associations are deemed appropriate really varies with respect to gender, with race, and social class, but it also varies with age.
00:16:32.440 We're living through a moment where being exposed to drag when you're, quote-unquote, too young is understood as early sexualization.
00:16:40.580 We're also living through a moment where rapists are often excused as being, quote, just kids. 0.51
00:16:44.780 Right. So where we locate people along an age continuum is super significant and it's super contested, but it's also something that people have, think they have this innate sense about of the order of things.
00:16:56.160 And I think the fag hag kind of upsets chrononormativity. She delays things that people think shouldn't be delayed anymore. She doesn't take the steps at the moment when they quote unquote feel appropriate, right? Which is partly why a lot of these relationships start in college, but become noticeable, visible and commented upon only once people leave college. It's like, that was for college, you know? Fag hag until graduation. Yeah, basically. 1.00
00:17:20.500 Yeah. So the fag hag is a figure of extended adolescence, right? Or prolonged adolescence and delayed adulthood, which I think makes her very important for the kind of Freudian conservatives that we talked about, like Midge Dector, who want to encourage heterosexuality as a kind of maturity, a kind of taking on a responsibility. 1.00
00:17:43.640 and the fag hag and her and those friendships between gay men and straight women sort of stand 0.98
00:17:49.560 in opposition to that yeah exactly do you want to talk a little bit about how the fag hag has 0.99
00:17:55.340 been historically bounded right because we alluded to this but she's a product of very specific 1.00
00:18:00.200 cultural conditions that arose in the 20th century and are maybe starting to disappear now
00:18:05.440 yeah the simple answer is we don't know when when either the practice started or when people
00:18:09.460 started naming it maybe someone has done this and has found something i haven't been able to
00:18:13.420 but there are some educated guesses we can make right like we can say for instance one of the 0.93
00:18:19.160 things that a fag hack is not is not a criminal meaning if hanging around gay men exposed you to 0.93
00:18:24.180 legal jeopardy like that's something much more serious than what you know the activity of being 0.98
00:18:29.560 a fag hack was all about right so decriminalization and kind of a sort of coming out of the gay 0.92
00:18:35.260 community was super important to this figure surely i'm guessing that like around hyper 0.97
00:18:41.100 privileged groups right like i don't know think of the like parisian expats or something like that
00:18:48.380 i'm sure i was about to say expats in paris yeah there's a certain kinds of privileged bohemians
00:18:55.220 who might be in context where they are able to be more out more open at different moments in history
00:19:02.720 but there's also you know in the early 20th century there are relatively few dedicated
00:19:08.480 public spaces for gay men and much more enforcement of anti-sodomy laws right so
00:19:15.200 it's not like there's a ton of bars you can go hang out in that are operating legally and openly
00:19:21.220 you know yeah and i mean the bars you would go to would be mob run and people would be like i
00:19:24.860 really need you to go i don't think you should be here you're like no no no i understand what this
00:19:28.160 is like that makes it worse get out you know you can't be a nice middle-class girl hanging out at 0.77
00:19:33.220 the at the gay bars exactly so like i mean like probably in evil and was set you know or like
00:19:37.820 yeah, in Rive Gauche or something like that, we get this stuff, but it is much, much, it's really
00:19:42.720 kind of a bohemian thing. And it really appears to have become kind of an undefiable trope much
00:19:47.800 later on. One very early thing I noticed that it's not about the fag hack, it's about the missing 0.92
00:19:53.380 fag hack, is San Francisco Public Library has this amazing collection of the Mattachine Society 0.97
00:19:58.960 Archives, the earliest homophile organization in the United States that operated sort of 0.85
00:20:04.320 semi-publicly. And one thing they did was they sent out these mimeographed surveys of their
00:20:10.020 members just to understand what, quote unquote, we are like. It's like an early attempt to be like,
00:20:13.640 who likes what? Let's talk about this. And one of the interesting things about this survey is
00:20:18.060 basically that they ask about women and your relationship to them, but they're asking about
00:20:23.780 wives and that's it. The idea that you could cohabit with a woman just because, you could even
00:20:31.340 have a beard is not really mentioned like there's the idea like oh this man is obviously married
00:20:35.600 but like this is in the 1940s so they're so 1940s that they're like well surely if you
00:20:39.500 if you're with a live with a woman and you must have put a ring on it like of course you thank 0.99
00:20:43.160 god and you know get your dick sucked but like in between in between like she'll obviously make 0.99
00:20:47.900 you dinner right like so it's like this very funny thing where like it's kind of telling that whoever 0.99
00:20:51.900 put together that survey like it didn't occur to them to be like well that's an interesting thing
00:20:55.600 to ask about and part of it is because i think they couldn't imagine it part of it is probably
00:20:59.520 that they wouldn't have cared if if that were the case right they're trying to measure how
00:21:03.580 thoroughly closeted people are and they are not looking to these less formalized relationships
00:21:11.520 it's like who do you hang out with and they're interested in themselves they're interested in 0.96
00:21:15.020 men they're just like who gives a shit why a woman hangs around us like right it also should 0.99
00:21:19.680 be said that the marasheen society was an all-male gay like call that homophile organization pre 0.99
00:21:24.600 stonewall it was actually caught they were communists for a while although i think they
00:21:28.360 moved out of communism in the later 1950s. But they were pretty well organized. And then this
00:21:35.520 coincided with the rise of one woman's group called the Daughters of Bilitis, but they were
00:21:40.920 much smaller. But yeah, this was a self-regarding gay group that was not really interested in sort
00:21:46.280 of these attachments or satellites of gay culture, partly because there just wasn't,
00:21:51.480 seems like there probably was not enough of a visible gay culture for other people to attach 0.87
00:21:55.900 themselves too like you had to seek it out it was dangerous yeah it was hidden you had to know where 1.00
00:22:01.520 to go and so you had to know somebody who would tell you well the other thing though and that this
00:22:05.280 survey kind of reveals and i don't know to what extent this is always true for the mattachine
00:22:08.940 society i'd have to ask a specialist for that because there are people who've done really
00:22:12.000 really good work on this but another thing that you notice in that survey is that like they ask
00:22:15.780 about whether people would sleep with men of other races and by other races they mean not white right
00:22:19.920 so basically their assumption was that this this survey was going out to white gay men and probably
00:22:25.880 middle-class white gay men which is interesting right so like there is every chance that there
00:22:30.200 were ethnically inflected racialized kind of queer underground societies and communities out there
00:22:38.420 but they just didn't have them out of these societies to even ask the question right so
00:22:42.500 who knows right i mean like i would imagine that cohabitation in working-class neighborhoods was 0.96
00:22:48.120 just a matter of necessity now if we would call that a fag hag relationship i don't know 0.91
00:22:51.780 but like it's very noticeable that like when the fact that becomes visible and that's not to say 0.98
00:22:57.020 that that's all she was but when she becomes visible she becomes visible as a kind of middle
00:23:01.960 class phenomenon right because as you say if you can just receive friends at your country estate
00:23:08.000 and no one asks any question like well then it's just not the same thing likewise if you just move
00:23:12.920 in with a bunch of people because you can't make rent again it's not quite the same thing right
00:23:17.880 Like Will and Grace, like part of the point is that they are both young urban professionals who could live alone, but don't, right?
00:23:25.260 So I think that that is key here too.
00:23:28.120 It's not to say, again, I want to be careful about this.
00:23:30.120 I am not saying that the FACAC is a middle-class figure, but like people were able to point to her and say, oh, this is something new and unusual.
00:23:37.820 Once there was a certain kind of middle-class stability, right?
00:23:41.240 It's like this woman could choose to do something different, but she doesn't. 1.00
00:23:45.260 Right. The relationship became visible. And also, I think that this is, on a related note, like money of the most stereotypical or famous fag hag relationships we have are between two white people, right? There's a limiting of the visibility and perhaps of the imagination around these kinds of closenesses. 0.98
00:24:04.520 I think that I would say yes and no right like on the one hand like I think in the imagination 0.60
00:24:10.340 popular imagination I think this is very much kind of a white middle class thing but then it's 1.00
00:24:15.660 also very noticeable like a lot of the fag hags around the factory for instance were African 1.00
00:24:19.960 American there's a kind of persistent figure of the Asian fag hag and then don't forget that like 1.00
00:24:25.560 the two groups that really are made fun of in Will and Grace it's like you know you have the 1.00
00:24:29.780 gays and you have the jews because grace is jewish in a way that seems to inflect her femininity 0.63
00:24:34.660 right she is like uncouth and unrefined in ways that read as non-waspy so i don't know i mean like
00:24:40.740 there might be a kind of a covert racialization here too and i wouldn't want to say it's an
00:24:44.920 absolutely you know unproblematically like i think i think race actually factors into it more than
00:24:49.860 than one would think it does appear to be something that that is remarked on early non-white subcultures 0.72
00:24:56.940 That's really interesting because part of what has always struck me as kind of cool about fag hags is precisely their uncouthness that many of them have, their differential, exaggerated, self-aware kinds of femininity, which it's sort of the stereotype of the fag hag advanced by conservatives is as somebody who has failed or fled traditional femininity. 0.97
00:25:25.260 but it might be somebody who doesn't have access to them and might seek to parody it, right? Which 1.00
00:25:30.460 I'm sure could be further inflected by things like Jewish identity or by racial marginalization.
00:25:37.560 Well, and I mean, we'll talk about that a little bit later when we talk about Will and Grace in
00:25:41.000 more detail. But of course, also, it's a woman who uses men in ways that men are used to using 1.00
00:25:49.520 women, right? So there is a kind of phallic femininity there that is often in the United 0.98
00:25:54.080 States racialized, right? A woman who exceeds the dictates of femininity that can be very much 1.00
00:26:00.060 a racialized body, right? Like the way African-American women are often portrayed, 1.00
00:26:04.400 for instance. And I think that that's a characterization that this is one of the
00:26:08.660 really fascinating things where, as you say, conservative descriptions of this phenomenon
00:26:12.660 sometimes can coincide with ones that are very much centered on and made for gay men, right?
00:26:19.880 So there's this film, if people can find it, it's definitely worth checking out.
00:26:23.000 I want to back us up a little bit because we're a little off track from the chronology.
00:26:27.240 Well, yeah.
00:26:27.540 So, okay, that's true.
00:26:28.260 Let's back up.
00:26:29.280 And so then the next thing, the next step, I think, is also that there's the ability to cohabit, which is not nothing. 0.53
00:26:33.720 That's not to say that every fat guy lives with gay men, but certainly the way to be able to sleep over in each other's apartment without it getting closed down as a potential brothel is pretty important. 0.55
00:26:44.020 Non-married people cannot cohabit or cannot even, in some cases, spend the night, depending on what the rules are.
00:26:52.100 And then the other thing is that you need to have a concept of coming out. You have to have a concept of outness, openly lived homosexuality. So you can say, this person is not this man's dupe. This person is not his beard. She is his hag. I think that's really, really key. 0.95
00:27:10.340 there's a great book that some people might know by christopher isherwood a single man which is
00:27:16.920 also a beautiful movie of it if people want to see it have you have you read it have you seen it
00:27:20.200 i read your description of the tom ford film and i was like this sounds gorgeous it sounds very
00:27:24.360 luscious it's the guy who super gorgeous nicholas holt and colin firth i know and then who is the 0.71
00:27:31.560 who's the woman who plays her there are two women in this movie that are basically that function 1.00
00:27:36.800 as these kind of well that's the thing like are they fag hags we don't know right like it's kind 1.00
00:27:41.860 of still too early what they know or don't know when is the movie set 63 yeah 62 63 so this is 1.00
00:27:48.280 another historical condition for the fag hag is that women have to be able to earn a living 1.00
00:27:53.660 to support themselves exactly i think almost by definition is not married yeah yeah she is a 1.00
00:27:58.780 single straight woman who is financially independent or widow in the case of truman
00:28:04.160 Capote. Right. Yeah. Or at least not dependent on a husband for her room and board. So she has
00:28:10.920 more personal freedom to spend time with men who are not supporting her. So by 1963, that is
00:28:18.560 becoming more possible. Yeah. So the book is basically about a single day in the life of a
00:28:24.600 LA college professor, model clearly on Isherwood, who lives kind of where Isherwood lived. But
00:28:30.400 unlike Isher Wood is sort of dealing with the death of his partner a few months prior, I believe.
00:28:36.120 And you kind of get the sense as the book or as the film goes on, it's one of the most depressed
00:28:40.280 things ever, but like it may well be his last day that we might be following his last day.
00:28:46.640 And as part of this, so we follow him to what's clearly a Cal State campus where he teaches,
00:28:52.940 we get to see him teach. And he then sort of keeps running into one of his students named
00:28:57.700 kenny and then he also meets up with this woman who was a mutual friend of both his and of his
00:29:04.720 dead partners they end up being kind of these two figures that are both sort of liminal but both 0.97
00:29:09.400 on the edge of being fag hags and one is is the character played by none other than julian moore 0.98
00:29:14.340 in the movie go big or go home right um that's she's a tricky one right like so she isn't she's 1.00
00:29:19.860 a always unhappily in love she's this kind of she's this big mess she gets drunk with him
00:29:24.960 there's an amazing scene of colin firth and julian were just dancing to i forget which which
00:29:30.080 song that is but it's like the one with the green onions is that what it's called you know anyway so
00:29:34.760 the idea there is very much that she clearly has a thing for him and it's just been unrequited in
00:29:40.980 the book there's even an intimation that she's slept with his partner so she is sort of all up 0.78
00:29:45.960 in their business in a way that feels very fag haggie but the book doesn't have a name for it 0.97
00:29:50.580 But it's tragic and it's about an unreturned desire and her sort of frustrations and inability to get into heterosexuality in the way that she aspires to. 0.97
00:29:59.840 Well, it's about both of these people's lives not having the shape that a life, quote unquote, property should have. 0.63
00:30:06.720 Now, I sure would a gay man is writing with extreme sensitivity there. 0.70
00:30:10.560 But, you know, in his mind, you know, George, the main character, should have grown old with his partner.
00:30:16.720 But because of a car accident, he doesn't get to. Right.
00:30:19.640 And similarly with her, like in a perfect world, maybe she would have ended up with someone, but it just sort of never happened. And so that's there too, that like these people are both living lives that are sort of bent out of shape, that are bent out of, that are out of joined in a certain way.
00:30:33.640 And then what about Kenny, the student?
00:30:35.020 Yeah. So right. And then there's this student, Kenny, played by Nicholas Holt, the amazing Nicholas Holt in the movie, who is around this woman when we first meet him. And that's something that Ford does beautifully and that Isherwood also gives us a lot of time with. And it's really interesting. Maybe I'll read to you the passage. This is where race and sexuality sort of coincide. So he says, Lois Yamaguchi sits beside Kenny because she is his girlfriend. At least they're nearly always together. Right. And I think that's such an interesting bit.
00:31:04.500 the entire book george will obsess over the fact like what this means right because kenny's
00:31:10.420 definitely sending out signals and definitely kind of or at least we're seeing all this through
00:31:15.000 george's eyes maybe this is someone projecting hopelessly but like as it's being reported to us
00:31:20.700 it's pretty clear that that kenny is vibing hard with george he's flirting with his professor yeah
00:31:26.800 yeah while there's this woman right and like that's never quite asked but like but george
00:31:32.940 is of course trying to figure out like oh okay who is she to you and he never asked like here
00:31:37.840 are the options but like you can imagine the options the options are does she not know does
00:31:42.020 she know and is okay with it or does she know and you're not even boyfriend and girlfriend right
00:31:48.240 so it's really really interesting so the ford takes that over there's even the line where sort
00:31:53.000 of we find out in the movie that kenny has slept with her once and george asks why only once and
00:31:59.780 kenny says i didn't say only once i said once come on the last thing i want to talk about right
00:32:04.820 now is lois and i think that that to me like this kind of dismissiveness is so so interesting because
00:32:09.820 in some way he's saying look whatever it is it's immaterial she is immaterial but like it doesn't
00:32:14.660 really clarify very much and the final thing i wanted to sort of briefly talk about is here's
00:32:19.960 a description of the lois character in the screenplay by tom ford so kenny 20 is a third
00:32:26.440 year student he has dark brown hair pale skin and piercing blue eyes kenny is not classically handsome 0.67
00:32:31.280 yet is attractive in a somewhat gangly way nois 20 is a stunning and very stylish blonde girl with 0.96
00:32:36.600 a bored beatnik feel to her manner like i think ford is sort of saying like this is a fag hack 0.98
00:32:41.760 she knows but i think it's also fascinating by the way that that knowingness goes along with i 1.00
00:32:48.060 hope people notice that with lois yamaguchi becoming a stunning blonde beatnik right like
00:32:52.860 Like, there's a whitewashing that goes along with the fact that, like, Ford basically decides he has to provide an answer to this question. 1.00
00:33:01.680 And his implicit answer is she is some kind of faggot. 1.00
00:33:04.620 She's just kind of hanging out with him. 1.00
00:33:06.080 They probably just hooked up out of boredom and because they thought it was cool.
00:33:09.960 She is not his dupe.
00:33:11.980 She is not his beard.
00:33:13.440 They're both just like, this is their beatnik early 60s way, right?
00:33:17.020 Whereas, like, that's not the sense we get from Isherwood.
00:33:19.260 It's one possible reading, but Isherwood in 1963 can't really say.
00:33:23.720 Right. I love the story of this film because there's two photos of the Fag Hack, right? Two portraits of the Fag Hack. There's the one with Dainty, who is cool. She is knowing. She is very importantly physically attractive and presumably desirable to straight men. 0.98
00:33:39.420 and then there is the version that is not cool she's tragic she's frustrated and disappointed 0.99
00:33:46.340 yeah she's usually depicted as unattractive in julianne moore's depiction i mean like imagine
00:33:53.100 trying to make julianne more unattractive but they make her so no she's she's attractive but 0.93
00:33:57.320 but she's a little lived down she's she yeah she's off she's not embodying the version of 1.00
00:34:03.980 femininity that would be aspirational dignified and respectable to like a fashion designer
00:34:08.860 director like tom ford yeah i'm trying to remember i mean like i haven't seen it in a while but i
00:34:13.840 kind of feel like right the movie is lit within an inch of its life it's beautifully oh i'm sure
00:34:17.740 it's gorgeous tom ford knows how to stage a fashion show and i think that you can really
00:34:22.040 see her freckles and i think that's kind of a small but telling detail like she's just kind of
00:34:26.660 aging she's ordinary it's a freckles are always a nod to ordinariness yeah yeah well or or that 0.65
00:34:31.960 she no longer tries to make herself attractive right like i think it also in the 1960s would 1.00
00:34:35.780 have probably meant not wearing makeup yeah like she's just like she's done prettying herself up 1.00
00:34:40.380 for the rest of the world she's just gonna be julianne moore and if she's drunk at 3 p.m then
00:34:44.380 so be it like that is not like the triumphant version of women's aging where it's like i don't 0.99
00:34:49.540 care what you think anymore she still desires male attention and male companionship it's not this 0.99
00:34:55.260 like fuck you i'm not wearing makeup anymore it's i'm not wearing makeup anymore because i'm so 0.99
00:34:59.040 fucking tired right but still yearning for the disappointed hopes yeah and so i think that movie 0.99
00:35:04.720 and that the combination of movie and novel really gives you a pretty good idea of what's in play and 0.83
00:35:09.360 like how the pieces of the puzzle are already kind of in place but there is as of yet no language to
00:35:15.200 really name what's going on there those are probably not an accident this is happening in
00:35:19.480 la right that like you know this isn't this kind of feels like an urban phenomenon you know and
00:35:24.700 You can sort of imagine how like this could become formalized and taxonomized even a few years after Isherwood wrote this novel.
00:35:32.640 So like the movie was made in what, like 2014, 15?
00:35:37.540 2009.
00:35:38.440 Okay, 2009.
00:35:39.200 So early 21st century, looking at a moment in mid 20th century. 0.60
00:35:42.360 And what you're seeing at this historical moment, 1963, when Isherwood sets his book, is that gay men have accessed a kind of semi-visibility. 0.70
00:35:53.980 Yeah. 0.84
00:35:54.380 Right?
00:35:54.700 It's pre-Stonewall, but they're not married.
00:35:57.300 They're not rigidly closeted the way they might have been in the Medellin Society's 1940s.
00:36:01.520 Right. 0.99
00:36:01.880 And straight women have accessed enough independence to be able to live these lives. 0.59
00:36:07.820 But as gay men and straight women are simultaneously becoming more liberated, maybe politically, economically, straight women are still under this psychic mandate to complete themselves through attachment to men.
00:36:19.960 Yeah, although I should say that, I mean, Isherwood is very clear and so is Ford to his credit that George is not liberated as a gay man, right? Like there is, you know, he has homophobic neighbors. This is kind of a content warning for anyone who wants to check out the movie. But like, there's an absolutely heartbreaking scene where you get a flashback of George being told that his partner has died by a family member of his partner.
00:36:41.780 partner must have been visiting his family or something like that when his car skids off the
00:36:46.100 road and at the same time he's being told that he can't come to the funeral that it's not wanted
00:36:50.800 and that only family is allowed right so like it's interesting right it's about it's not about
00:36:55.220 empowerment it's not about like visibility it is about the lack of punitiveness george is no longer
00:37:01.840 afraid of being arrested necessarily although he might well be but he thinks that the chance of
00:37:06.840 that is low. But in terms of visibility, that's very, very little. And for all intents and purposes,
00:37:11.860 he is still closeted. And that gives you kind of a sense of how important or how tricky the
00:37:17.280 fag-hag relationship is while that's still the case. Well, I'm interested in this notion that, 1.00
00:37:24.080 this is something we talked about before we started recording, that marginality of gay men 1.00
00:37:27.940 is to some extent, or at least their distinctness, it's to some extent necessary for the fag-hag 0.92
00:37:33.760 friendship to exist like if the the more integrated gay people are the more like undistinct 0.99
00:37:42.140 and undifferentiated from the straight world they are the less sense the fag hag friendship makes 0.99
00:37:47.540 there's this film from 1971 um some of my best friends are yeah among the very first to kind of 0.98
00:37:53.680 center gay characters in their lives made clearly for and by gay men and in it ruma clannan blanche
00:37:59.980 blanche from the golden girls from the golden girls blanche devereau herself plays this sort of 0.99
00:38:04.420 spiteful alcoholic blousy lady who's self-identifies as a fruit fly and she comes 1.00
00:38:10.280 into the this bar the blue jay bar in grange village and kind of just like spews kind of 1.00
00:38:17.360 curdled bomos i mean she's basically reading everyone she's she shows up there almost as a
00:38:22.060 like a drag queen kind of insult comic and kind of mirrors their self-loathing right this is still 0.73
00:38:27.120 sort of the boys in the band kind of era of gay filmmaking where like everyone hates themselves 0.90
00:38:31.460 and like pride is nowhere to be seen she then basically blows up the entire evening by kind of
00:38:37.980 pulling this weird prank slash not prank where she invites one of the men's mothers to the bar
00:38:44.160 yeah it's very embittered it's very horrifying and it's very like it's like a psycho it's like
00:38:49.720 psychological terrorism it's like yeah yeah and the funny thing is there right like while no one
00:38:55.680 in the blue jay bars is having the best time and no one is like winning at life clearly the
00:39:01.380 impression is of a place that has a certain stability even though it's a fairly marginal
00:39:05.680 group of people she's the force of instability right she's the one who doesn't have to hide who
00:39:10.720 she is but she's actually the force of instability and that to me is this really interesting thing
00:39:15.640 that like whatever lois yamaguchi is or whatever julian moore is to george they're these stabilizing
00:39:22.220 figures these anchors in the phallic order right basically like they they confirm these are men and
00:39:27.120 you know you don't bother them or whatever whatever by 1971 you know blanche actually
00:39:32.180 lita is the is the character's name i'll just call her blanche though because she'll always be
00:39:37.020 you know it seems like these men have are sort of starting to figure out their lives if a word 0.97
00:39:41.260 for fucking lita is sort of like blowing in and fucking everything up for everyone right like 0.97
00:39:45.340 and and that is i think the idea that she's actually more unstable than the men she attaches 0.99
00:39:49.620 themselves to not in a mental sense but like just like her life is disordered more so than theirs
00:39:54.980 they have a community they know who they are etc etc she has a much bigger identity crisis i think 0.59
00:39:59.380 that's the big shift from 63 to 71 that like you have a gay male community that knows what it is
00:40:05.220 and then you have these marginal figures where no one can decide like are they cute are they demonic 0.92
00:40:11.440 are they positive are they negative are they a drag are they kind of cool are they a hoot or are
00:40:18.140 they to be pitied, et cetera, et cetera. Like that's really, I think that's really the big
00:40:22.220 shift there. And the more distinct and self-conscious the gay male community becomes, 0.99
00:40:28.040 the more the fag hag risks being an interloper or invader or a tourist or, you know, an unwelcome 1.00
00:40:35.020 figure. And maybe that's where the role of the maternal comes in, right? She sort of has to earn 1.00
00:40:42.720 her keep for this male companionship that she's seeking out.
00:40:48.140 one thing we could mention given that you know this is a this is a podcast that kicked off with
00:41:09.420 Midge Dector is of course that like you know this is also the period where Midge Dector you know
00:41:14.620 friend of the pod really cues into this into this uh into this figure gets really interested in it 0.79
00:41:21.420 and is also the moment where she thinks where she sort of witnesses what she thinks is the gay
00:41:27.700 community kind of turning in on itself turning into itself and kind of showing outward hostility
00:41:33.680 towards anything that doesn't fit and so like you know in her own bizarre way so mitch dechter is
00:41:39.360 watching all this happen on fire island is just hating every minute of it and it's just like
00:41:42.820 spewing bile about it but in her own sort of cockeyed way maybe she's picking up on on this
00:41:49.720 exact thing that like is a community that is starting to center a certain conception of
00:41:54.560 masculinity and figures that no longer fit into it like are having a harder time right i'm glad
00:42:01.140 you got to midge i was one of the reasons i wanted to do this episode with you was because
00:42:05.940 in medge dechter's really epic account of gay life on fire island and commentary called the
00:42:11.800 Boys on the Beach. It's a really homophobic screed that she's writing in 1980, as sort of the gay
00:42:19.100 rights movement of the 1970s has like achieved some wins and this backlash is fermenting. And
00:42:24.880 she's writing about her time vacationing on Fire Island in the 1960s with her family. And she has
00:42:30.540 this amazing paragraph about the fag hag, which I'm just going to read here. They're female 1.00
00:42:35.380 companions, for they had a kind of platoon of female companions who specifically belonged to 1.00
00:42:40.240 them and decorated their bars and hangouts. The fag hags, of whom I have already spoken, 1.00
00:42:45.260 were elegant and mun-must also. They were, most of them, photographers' models, or young actresses, 1.00
00:42:51.300 or jet-setters dropping in on what once surmised was an accustomed way station on their international
00:42:56.380 round of the good times and good places. They, too, were a living sneer at the straight men.
00:43:02.300 For Dunup to be in every way enticing, they were essentially, and provocatively so,
00:43:06.600 unavailable occasionally out of boredom or perhaps to avoid the trouble of refusal 0.71
00:43:11.920 one or another of them might surrender to the importuning of a straight man
00:43:16.060 but if so there would be little triumph or pleasure in it for him a man might make love
00:43:21.500 to them now and then but won't want to him if he attempted to touch them in any way or disarray
00:43:26.100 their lacquered hair they were on hand everything about them announced not for the messiness of 0.73
00:43:31.380 heterosexual engagement but to decorate in cool serenity the homosexual scene and nothing added 0.72
00:43:37.600 more than they to the impression of a great deal of excess uncommitted discretionary cash i love
00:43:43.760 this pretty good pretty good it's also very clearly articulating a different version of the
00:43:49.540 fag hag than what we're getting from isherwood right it's maybe close to tom ford's lois yamaguchi
00:43:54.760 cool beautiful aspirational specifically desired by straight men that is not the julianne maher 0.92
00:44:01.400 figure drunk and humiliating herself yeah with this like unreciprocated desire and it is not 0.97
00:44:07.920 the figure that i wanted to bring up from your lecture on fag hags it's hilton all it's not 1.00
00:44:12.960 grace of will and grace right who's like a little bit excessive in her femininity it is what minge 1.00
00:44:19.880 dector is talking about is sort of like pristine somebody who has not failed at heterosexuality so
00:44:25.400 much as transcended it mitch dector is always on the hunt for people who think they're too good to 0.99
00:44:29.840 be straight like this is her like worst nightmare and this is how she identifies the fag hag right 0.99
00:44:34.180 as somebody who's rejecting heterosexuality that's not really what you get in depictions of the fag 0.99
00:44:39.360 hag by gay men so much it's interesting to me that this is a straight woman looking at other 0.99
00:44:43.640 straight women and assessing them as thinking they're better than her yeah and like what the 0.99
00:44:50.000 gay men present is sort of a more tragic figure i'm looking for the alls here oh he's talking 0.62
00:44:55.680 about uh dorothy dean this is hilton all's 1996 memoir the women and he's talking about dorothy 0.95
00:45:02.980 dean a socialite who hung out around the factory and he goes even among as theatrical a bunch as
00:45:10.000 gathered around andy warhol dean seems to have stood out a star attraction among men who have 0.99
00:45:14.560 limited if any sexual response to her the fag hag all says prizes self-control but performs 1.00
00:45:21.060 outrageous acts gay men are her audience but they are also objects of her contempt for accepting 0.99
00:45:26.700 laughingly which she does not speak her fear of romantic intimacy yeah see that's really different 0.85
00:45:32.260 from what mitch dechter is looking at right that's somebody who's not coolly serene and sort of above
00:45:38.420 of the thrashing of heterosexual desire.
00:45:40.940 That is somebody who is seeking out attention, 0.87
00:45:42.760 who's a little bit hysterical 0.69
00:45:44.020 and who can't get into heterosexuality, right? 1.00
00:45:46.980 So like there's two visions of the fag hags. 1.00
00:45:50.200 The straight conservative Mitch Jector 1.00
00:45:51.840 is seeing her as somebody
00:45:53.360 who's rejecting heterosexuality,
00:45:55.520 who's too good for it. 0.98
00:45:56.920 And this gay man Hilton Alls 0.92
00:45:58.600 is seeing her as somebody sort of like desperate 0.94
00:46:00.620 and inadequate for heterosexuality,
00:46:03.060 which is why she's hanging out supposedly 0.98
00:46:04.560 with all these gay men. 0.93
00:46:06.120 These are both misogynists at all. 0.96
00:46:08.140 i should say um like neither one of these is a nice affirming or fair i think vision of these
00:46:15.580 women but it does say it does show to me that like people are interpreting the fact hack based on
00:46:22.140 their own positionality and based on their own relationships to heterosexuality yeah in each
00:46:29.240 case though the fact is someone who makes choices where the natural quote-unquote thing would be to
00:46:35.360 let yourself fall into something right he's a nice enough guy just go with him right like
00:46:39.720 she is a self-fashioner she is someone who makes decisions in some way which is going to be
00:46:45.400 different from the way will and grace function where in some way the show says look it's almost
00:46:49.500 kind of taking the dector position and saying both of you need need to just get your hands dirty with
00:46:54.900 real life because right now you're just living in eternal college but like and settle down with a
00:46:58.880 nice boy as the end as as the like skinectady for for real yeah even though i think i think that you
00:47:04.300 know in some way will and grace would have no problem if grace settled down with a girl but
00:47:07.460 like it's just you know you got to settle down with someone like this it's very much a coupley
00:47:10.760 show but of course it's the funny way in which we'll talk about this but like it's of course
00:47:14.840 the way most sitcoms work the kind of stability they have their telos also would make the comedy
00:47:20.160 not funny right like so the only reason the show can can continue is that they are in this delayed
00:47:25.620 lessons and this arrested development right and the fact that that's both something to be sort
00:47:30.180 of sneered at and it's really kind of fun to watch is something that you get in this too
00:47:35.260 here's another Truman Capote's answered prayers where sort of an aging woman reflects about you
00:47:42.040 know trying to find a suitable man as though there were any suitable extra men in New York 0.99
00:47:47.100 or London or Butte Montana if it comes to that they're all queer or ought to be that's what I 1.00
00:47:52.480 meant when I told Princess Margaret it was too bad she didn't like fags because it meant she would 1.00
00:47:56.760 have have a very lonely old age fags are the only people who are kind to worldly old women and i 1.00
00:48:01.400 adore them i always have but i really am not ready to become a full-time fags mole i'd rather go dyke 1.00
00:48:07.320 right so like the way she's like coolly surveying her options for retirement into kind of a new 0.99
00:48:13.820 form of femininity that is very much independent independent of where you are in life the fact that
00:48:18.940 this feels chosen and frankly that it feels chosen for kind of transactional reasons is also really
00:48:24.300 really interesting, right? That like the women of Fire Island likely, this is something that
00:48:28.460 Mitch Dichter, I think kind of Biden doesn't really think of, but they have created for
00:48:31.780 themselves a space where the threat of sexual violence from the men around them is pretty
00:48:36.060 minimized. They've chosen that. They've built that cocoon around themselves. And the same is
00:48:40.520 true here in the Capote text. These are the constrained choices that women make in order 1.00
00:48:45.720 to escape the omnipresent threat of violence and heterosexuality. What everyone sort of notices
00:48:50.760 is the fact that someone is sort of setting up their lives and kind of using men in a way that 0.97
00:48:56.760 men are not usually used right the gay men become kind of a means to an end which is kind of you
00:49:04.640 know your own biography in some way that to me seems really interesting yeah i think this might 0.95
00:49:09.880 be a good place to position maybe like more formally to like what do the hags get yeah yeah
00:49:15.680 These relationships, like what does a straight woman, usually young, in the most visible and like sort of stereotypical instance, like a middle class, white, young, straight woman, single, independent, what does she get out of this closeness with gay men? 0.92
00:49:30.580 And I sort of looked around at a few of my favorite fagags, which for me were like the two stereotypical ones or emblematic ones in my mind are Donna Tartt and Nan Golden. 0.97
00:49:43.400 Donna Tartt, the author of The Secret History, very famous, reclusive. 1.00
00:49:48.000 Who somehow picked up some gay men in Bennington, of all places. 0.93
00:49:51.160 I know, God. 1.00
00:49:53.740 There's nothing sacred anymore.
00:49:57.140 But, you know, there was a- 0.99
00:49:58.280 There are gays at Bennington. 1.00
00:50:01.380 It's very idyllic. 1.00
00:50:02.800 It's very isolated.
00:50:04.000 There's not much to do.
00:50:05.120 But she was at Bennington in 19...
00:50:06.820 Like, I think she was famous in class of 1986.
00:50:08.980 Yeah.
00:50:09.420 Along with her close friend, famous gay conservative Brad Easton Ellis, who we should probably do
00:50:15.660 an episode about at some point.
00:50:17.440 Future friend of the pod.
00:50:18.600 And also Jonathan Lethem.
00:50:20.380 There's a wonderful podcast about that.
00:50:21.980 Really?
00:50:22.340 About their years at Bennington.
00:50:23.840 Yeah.
00:50:24.500 Once Upon a Time at Bennington College.
00:50:25.980 Yeah.
00:50:26.160 Yeah.
00:50:26.400 There's this sort of anecdote about Donna Tartt, who she started, a lot of the guys at Bennington in the 80s, apparently like the BBC's version of Brideshed Revisited had just come out and everybody was dressing like Julianne Falls in that movie.
00:50:43.180 And they were all sort of wearing these like ties and like Oxfords.
00:50:48.140 Oh my God, that sounds so insufferable. 1.00
00:50:49.840 Slacks. I mean, it just sounds like the movie version of The Secret History that plays in my head, right? 1.00
00:50:55.280 And they did have a very charismatic gay Greek teacher at the time at Bennington.
00:51:01.280 But she starts dating this guy who dresses like this.
00:51:05.120 And suddenly she starts dressing like this.
00:51:07.000 So I'm reading from a piece on this little bit of gossip by a New Republic writer named
00:51:13.900 Joe Livingston, who goes, several old college peers recall Tartt dating a slightly older
00:51:18.740 student named Paul McGloin.
00:51:22.320 Paul McGloin.
00:51:22.860 That is the most Irish name.
00:51:24.140 Paul McGloin.
00:51:25.280 One of the many Bennington denizens of this era who affected a faux Oxonian style. 0.73
00:51:30.200 All of a sudden, Donna became a small version of Paul, dressing in a blue blazer, a club tie, khakis, hair in this funky asexual bob.
00:51:39.560 Another friend, Todd O'Neill, recalls, describing a style that remains Tartt's signature.
00:51:44.560 A source identified as Student X then weighs in to say that, quote,
00:51:47.720 people were saying these weird things about her. 0.99
00:51:49.720 She somehow liked to have sex like a young boy. 0.98
00:51:51.940 I don't know what that means. 0.95
00:51:53.500 She wrote in her diary at the time that Tartt was, quote,
00:51:56.000 a girl who looks a little like a boy,
00:51:58.680 whose sexuality seems to be that she wants to be treated like a homosexual man.
00:52:02.620 Page Six found these details scandalous enough to describe, quote, 0.98
00:52:05.460 an allegedly gender-bending relationship with her male muse.
00:52:08.460 But it's hard to know what to make of these comments. 0.98
00:52:10.760 There is no such thing as having sex like a young boy, 0.93
00:52:13.380 nor is it clear what student X means by treated like a gay man.
00:52:17.640 It's their very vagueness that makes these claims sound suspiciously like speculation
00:52:20.800 by some people who didn't get whatever was going on but the podcast host pauses the trail describing
00:52:26.860 a letter to jonathan lasom from tarte dated january 24 1983 in which she says tarte recalls 0.96
00:52:33.860 a museum guard at a gallery muttering more faggots as she and paul walked into the room 0.92
00:52:38.160 she was dressed in pants and a loose sweater at the podcast host notes and the interlude 0.98
00:52:43.340 please paul to no end the podcast interprets the tart magloin romance as a fantasy mutual or so
00:52:49.920 it would seem, that they were two boys in a romantic and sexual relationship, suggesting
00:52:54.540 that they were a straight couple that perhaps gets a little jolt out of masquerading as
00:52:58.640 a gay couple.
00:52:59.720 So this is a description of a straight woman sort of using gay men and proximity to gay
00:53:06.280 men as a kind of like aspiration and as like a kind of ventriloquism. 1.00
00:53:10.160 And so you're saying that, you know, the fag hag departs from heterosexual convention 1.00
00:53:15.760 by treating men as like means to an end. 1.00
00:53:19.020 I'm not entirely sure that's actually outside traditional heterosexuality, right? 0.77
00:53:24.160 If you look at the way that women's lives have been constructed at the most oppressive and deterministic moments of patriarchy, men were women's only real way into the real world. 0.87
00:53:36.680 If you want to have access in public, you need to do it by proxy. 0.89
00:53:40.440 So you need a husband or a son.
00:53:42.680 And men didn't need to do that, right? 0.99
00:53:44.560 So gay male life is a kind, it's a model of sexuality that for women of Tartt's generation or before might have seemed like, you know, this is kind of the only way in which two socially complete adults who both have like legitimacy in the public sphere can actually fuck each other, like as equals. 0.96
00:54:05.180 This is not how gay men describe gay male life. 0.56
00:54:08.720 They're like why it's actually rife with inequality and there's all this kind of gender and I have a lot of notes about it.
00:54:13.220 But I think this is a perception of gay men's life that would be very tempting to straight women from a certain position, right?
00:54:20.180 It's like, wouldn't it be nice to be freed of the constraints of femininity, of heterosexual inequality, and to sort of pass as a gay man in my sex life or a man of some kind? 1.00
00:54:33.440 This is, of course, where I think one of the big knocks of the fag hag from gay men comes from, which is that she's a tourist, right? 1.00
00:54:43.220 that she can always up back out of it. 1.00
00:54:45.740 But Dale, right, the Lita and some of my best friends are, 0.91
00:54:49.400 like, can return to the heterosexual island no problem. 0.64
00:54:53.500 The boys in the bar don't have that option, right?
00:54:56.440 And in some way, like, I think we haven't talked about, like,
00:54:59.240 the fact that there isn't really a male equivalent
00:55:01.700 who hangs around lesbian women,
00:55:02.880 but the lesbian figure of this would be sort of the lug, right? 1.00
00:55:05.640 It would be someone who kind of experiments 1.00
00:55:07.540 and then abandons people for the safer shoals of heterosexuality. 1.00
00:55:11.320 right the lesbian resentment of the bisexual identified exactly who's going to go and marry 1.00
00:55:17.460 a man and tardif takes it as far as as you can in the sense that she's actually banging them but 0.54
00:55:22.860 like it is um or possibly or at least visiting museums which feels pretty committed to the bit
00:55:28.640 i mean that's it's more boring than you have um you have this sense that like this is something
00:55:37.100 that you can do for a few years and there's a privilege in that and that when you abandon that
00:55:43.080 the people you're using will still be in the same predicament they were in before right you won't
00:55:48.080 be you can opt out at any moment so this charge of tourism i think is is really key here and i
00:55:53.580 think is where a lot of this resentment comes from i mean in great credit to donna tart she still
00:55:58.660 wears the outfits this is still the uh her signature look so you know she never got rid of 0.99
00:56:03.500 the club ties. But I do think, you know, there was something that kept ringing in my mind as
00:56:08.280 I researched about fag hags was this position of both straight women and gay men as sort of both 1.00
00:56:15.060 in and out of gender hierarchy, right? Like gay men are men, and they don't have access to 1.00
00:56:21.340 heterosexual hegemony, right? But they do have access to maleness, and will sometimes trade in 1.00
00:56:27.180 misogyny in attempts to preserve male dignity and privileges and straight women are women and 1.00
00:56:35.580 are subject to misogyny that shapes and like can at times define and curtail their lives but they 1.00
00:56:41.940 also have this access to the heterosexual world that they could always disappear to it reminded 0.99
00:56:47.860 me a little bit of that bell hooks line uh which i'm going to read uh about white women and black
00:56:54.360 men. Oh, right. White women and black men have it both ways. Yes. Yeah. They can act as oppressor
00:56:59.780 or be oppressed. Black men may be victimized by racism, but sexism allows them to act as 0.85
00:57:05.460 exploiters and oppressors of women. White women may be victimized by sexism, but racism enables 0.98
00:57:10.440 them to act as exploiters and oppressors of black people. To a lesser degree, and in something of a 0.97
00:57:15.680 lower key, this is like the same kind of similarity of straight women and gay men's social positions.
00:57:23.860 there's this like simultaneity of the moral authority of a gendered oppression and the 0.99
00:57:29.480 social power of access to gendered hegemony. And that makes these friendships possible, right?
00:57:35.060 It makes them close enough. Like this is part of the reason why there is no similar phenomenon of
00:57:40.600 straight men who hang out around gay women. The gulf is not as big between gay men and straight
00:57:46.600 women as it would be otherwise, but it's also what makes these friendships unstable. So you 0.94
00:57:52.020 talk about like chrono normativity and like being a fag hag as something and or hanging out with 0.99
00:57:56.420 fag hags as something that gay men and straight women will necessarily sort of age out of but i 0.99
00:58:01.340 also think there's this sort of like seeds of its own destruction in these friendships where yeah 0.95
00:58:08.100 the positioning where each one has the possibility to betray the other like when kenny says the last
00:58:14.860 thing i want to talk about right now is lois that's dismissive misogyny and he's he's being
00:58:19.880 a little mean about her you know and because he's saying yeah and i mean that that's his way of 0.98
00:58:23.780 saying i want to fuck you right no it's it's the precondition right like exactly like his misogyny 0.99
00:58:28.600 is the come hither to to his professor right like it's that's the interesting thing it has a sexual 0.99
00:58:34.320 end but here's the thing i'm not that i'm not that convinced that it's a substantively different
00:58:40.220 comment in terms of its gender positioning as two straight men being like ah the old ball and chain
00:58:47.260 right it's just like male bonding over the dismissiveness of women either in the straight
00:58:52.020 men's case as about like shoring up their access and their masculinity and their solidarity and 1.00
00:58:57.820 in the gay men's case is doing that also with the the end of hoping to fuck you know uh it's right 0.99
00:59:03.440 i mean like we bought we bond of our love of wendy williams and then we like hook up in the bathroom 1.00
00:59:07.600 like yeah like it's like absolutely that sounds so quaint you make it sound so nice um and poor 1.00
00:59:14.520 wendy williams and like you say like straight woman can also go back to the boyfriend she's 1.00
00:59:20.680 inevitably gonna get or to you know the straight women she's also had these series of intimate
00:59:27.180 friendships with and can also say like well you know him he's you know whatever homosexual trope 0.60
00:59:32.500 he's somehow less serious and real than us because he's gay and not reconciled to the more real 0.78
00:59:38.940 straight life yeah and this is like this potential for cruelty is almost built in yeah to this 0.95
00:59:45.040 closeness and it's like sort of the tragedy of it and that's why i didn't realize until 0.98
00:59:49.280 researching this episode how much of a sense of betrayal and like suspicion around fag hags a lot 0.87
00:59:56.560 of like gay men have yeah it's like oh you've all been hurt by this in a way that i didn't 0.77
01:00:02.140 totally appreciate not you personally i don't know anything about adrian's history with close 0.72
01:00:07.300 female friends but like i'm like it's a it's a genre of like emotional baggage that a lot of gay
01:00:12.440 men have that i didn't know about i mean do i have straight female friends who i only hear from when
01:00:17.100 they've broken up with a boyfriend oh yeah let's put it that way you notice the pattern after a
01:00:20.520 few times then it keeps going and you're like i'm gonna be your shoulder to cry on but i'm kind of
01:00:25.560 resentful of it gotta be honest uh you know yeah because i know i'm not gonna hear from you when
01:00:29.520 you when the next uh you know hinge date goes okay you become aware keenly aware in that moment of
01:00:34.740 being used. I mean, I think that that maybe might be the moment to turn a little bit towards
01:00:39.180 Will and Grace, because not only is it probably the most sustained, as I said, exploration of
01:00:43.860 this relationship, but it does it twice, which is really interesting, right? Like the show
01:00:47.480 centers on Will and Grace, who are kind of the emotional, who play out the emotional stakes that
01:00:52.400 you're talking about, right? Like he's a gay lawyer and she's a designer who definitely could
01:00:58.340 afford to live by themselves, but don't out of codependency. And they used to date in college
01:01:03.560 very briefly and they are each other's emotional support network and that's sometimes lovely and
01:01:08.720 sometimes the show says very clearly they are each other's personified refusal to grow up
01:01:12.880 and then you have the second main relationship that between karen and jack which is basically
01:01:19.860 what you're describing this is these two people are fully acknowledging from moment one of their
01:01:25.200 relationship we watch them meet on the show that they're just going to use each other jack keeps
01:01:30.200 stealing from her keeps having her finance she's married rich she is married to a man we never meet
01:01:35.440 and just spends his money and spends it largely on jack and he basically is just like scamming her 0.72
01:01:41.020 and meanwhile she uses him to kind of amuse herself because she's bored with her husband
01:01:46.000 she's bored with her life as a socialite we should say that karen is played by megan mullaly yeah
01:01:51.800 just absolutely perfectly very campy over the top vulgar funny and yeah very um good at playing
01:02:00.360 somebody who's like sort of self-consciously cruel and exploitative and out to get fulfillment of
01:02:05.960 their crass desires yeah in a way you almost can't be mad at her right like she's she's absolutely
01:02:11.000 she's so cynical and so open about it that basically this is what you're getting and the
01:02:15.380 same is sort of true of jack that basically he's this flippity jip that like basically
01:02:19.760 cannot but kind of always blather out that he's an angle that he's just refusing you etc etc
01:02:25.580 including sexually right like karen turns out not to have well she turns out to have many 0.97
01:02:30.440 sexual appetites but she doesn't seem to ever act on them and jack's just kind of a floozy
01:02:34.400 and the idea is that these are people are users and and that's okay and that's that's sort of
01:02:39.380 what their relationship is yeah it's it's lower stakes it's not like they're malignant or evil
01:02:45.180 they're kind of silly in their selfishness yeah yeah although the show really i mean you know i
01:02:51.320 think the show by and large is aged okay in certain parts but like they objectify each other in ways 0.85
01:02:57.600 that i don't think you'd write into a show today right like uh just constant comments about her
01:03:03.380 boobs and her butt and like you know it's very interesting and i like the way the show kind of
01:03:08.840 contains the true kind of truths of this relationship on the one hand that it is this 0.97
01:03:14.140 really interesting way this very modern way in which you can order the time of your life
01:03:19.700 differently you can think about maturation and the role of community in that maturation process
01:03:25.060 differently and that it's also about like um being your shallowest meanest self and just kind of
01:03:32.500 using other people for the kinds of pleasures you wouldn't normally admit to right like and i think
01:03:37.880 that it's a really interesting show for that for our topic yeah it's they're not aspirational
01:03:43.160 the show does not depict them as good people or well-ordered people no no but it does sort of
01:03:50.100 indulge in the fun of their sort of more honest appetites i guess one group that often comes in
01:03:59.420 as kind of you know how sometimes they have to have the straight man in the show who just kind
01:04:04.020 of calls everyone back to order there are a couple of groups that do that but and in the beginning of
01:04:09.320 the show it's very frequently a straight couple that will and grace happen to be friends with
01:04:13.220 from college later it becomes sort of there's there's an older gay couple that they are sort
01:04:17.600 of friends with but by and large it's lesbians who because they have biological clocks in the 0.99
01:04:22.400 world of the show basically come in and call both of these groups out on their bullshit or like 1.00
01:04:27.740 isn't it kind of time you did something else with your lives right like i think that's that's a very 0.96
01:04:32.280 funny thing that like in some way they have to be sort of the scolds but also therefore are sort of
01:04:36.780 positioned as maybe the most mature people in that entire the show's entire universe 1.00
01:04:40.900 yeah lesbians always uh get to ruin the fun it's interesting that they are sort of the 1.00
01:04:46.020 there's always a lesbian is sort of like the shadow of the fag hag like if the frat fag hag is 1.00
01:04:51.660 somebody who has rejected heterosexuality and sort of failed at femininity in this way that 1.00
01:04:58.400 is frivolous and and like takes her out of maturity the lesbian is always like the somber 0.93
01:05:03.520 one who has uh embraced responsibility yeah always here to kill joy that's that's my real lot in life 0.98
01:05:10.720 i mean you know i i think and yeah i mean it's obviously like it's a trope that i don't love
01:05:17.280 no but i think it's funny i mean you have to be able to laugh at this yeah yeah i mean it always
01:05:21.920 reminds me of like there's this um there's an snl skit from a few years ago where there was some
01:05:26.960 kind of show about fire island and they made like imagined like garden oh and then there was like
01:05:32.480 the lesbian part of fire island where everybody's just having a dinner party and falling asleep by
01:05:36.480 nine and like crying uh during transcendental meditation and like talking about the miracles
01:05:42.740 of home water birth uh you know oh there's one very funny line i remember from will and grace
01:05:49.160 where there are so that will and grace sort of get into a fight over like one of the things like
01:05:53.640 these people do have substantial disposable income, which kind of allows them to explore
01:05:57.980 sort of how privilege works for upper middle class, cis white men and women in the 90s.
01:06:04.580 And there's one where basically they're fighting over an apartment with a pair of
01:06:09.400 lesbian realtors. And it's this very funny 1990s kind of reference where basically they're trying
01:06:16.220 to threaten Will and Grace and they say something like, it's a beautiful building you got here,
01:06:19.240 it would be a shame of something moved in downstairs like a needle exchange.
01:06:22.940 or a Bennegan's.
01:06:26.360 The joke of like the fear of normalcy
01:06:29.440 that like nothing is worse than like uncoolness.
01:06:32.400 Nothing would address your urban property values
01:06:35.360 more than like, right? 1.00
01:06:36.780 So like the normalcy that lesbians embody 1.00
01:06:38.540 is not kind of stodgy normalcy. 0.98
01:06:40.720 That's Bennegan's, right?
01:06:42.100 They're going to use that as a threat.
01:06:44.020 They're not normies. 0.94
01:06:45.160 They're just refusing certain kinds of more anarchic things,
01:06:49.540 more anarchic sort of life decisions. 0.66
01:06:51.980 There's a way that like the lesbian embodiment of maturity is an extension of like the heterosexual paradigm of like hyper competent, hyper responsible women paired with sort of like eternally childish men. 0.64
01:07:04.180 And there's something of that I was surprised to read in your notes on fag hags, like also in a little bit of the fag hag relationship, you cite one gay man talking about how the presence of these older women or like unattractive women or just women like sort of help people tone it down.
01:07:21.620 yeah this actually reminds me of the one time i got dragged to a circuit party on fire island oh 0.78
01:07:26.080 wow yeah i same um you know i was out there with like another gay woman a friend of mine who's like
01:07:31.960 really into like electronic dance music and she's like my friend is deejaying you know it's our
01:07:38.400 culture too and i was like no it's not um but like you know she felt very at home in a gay male space
01:07:44.880 and i just sort of got dragged along and i've like never been so bored in my life um right but i could
01:07:50.060 also like among all these, like more or less naked men who were there on like a very specific
01:07:55.880 mission in which I could not help them, you know? Uh, but like, also I could tell,
01:07:59.980 I was very aware that my presence was inhibiting some of the behavior. I thought about this a lot
01:08:06.540 when we read the Mitch Dechter, I was like, I've been there girl. Yeah. You were, you were the
01:08:10.580 cooler. Yeah. And I'm just sitting there on the couch with my little white wine, you know? And
01:08:16.260 And it was, it was interesting to realize that I was the reason people were like reining it in a little bit.
01:08:21.340 Yeah, yeah. I mean, the other person we haven't sort of talked about, because she's not, you know, kind of a strictly speaking literary figure, but in the late 90s, who kind of really sort of sings the praises of this relationship and does kind of think that there is this kind of affirmative quality to the fag hag relationship is Margaret Cho, the comedian, who is very much thinks that in some way that people get into these kind of relationships for kind of nakedly selfish reasons, but she thinks it transcends that, right? 0.82
01:08:46.260 And she describes herself as this kind of chaperone who drives herself home after basically her charge has gotten lucky at a club, right?
01:08:52.760 And basically, you know, she thinks of herself as, exactly as you're saying, like the support that keeps things from going too far out of control, right?
01:09:00.100 And I'm going to quote from her autobiography.
01:09:02.440 We were there from the beginning.
01:09:04.020 I went to the prom with you, buckled up your cummerbund, did the safety dance, right?
01:09:08.320 She kind of tries out caring for another human being and plays sort of mommy through this figure.
01:09:14.660 and at the same time is able to kind of find a real joy and real love in that.
01:09:19.700 I think this vision of the like caretaking, you know, on the one hand, there's like a cynical,
01:09:24.880 this is my cynical feminist take, which is just like, oh, great, you've just re-embodied
01:09:28.640 the notion of the woman as a service provider, providing support to the actual action of life,
01:09:34.260 which is all monopolized by men. But I also think you have to find a degree of admiration and,
01:09:42.020 you know, love in what is being offered in this relationship, which is a kind of safety.
01:09:47.000 And I don't think you need to ascribe as Will and Grace does, or as like conservative thinkers, 0.92
01:09:52.420 like Hilton Owls, or like really like right wing people tend to, to the safety of the fag 0.99
01:09:56.900 hack relationship. Like, I don't think you have to say that it's cowardice. I think you can say 0.99
01:10:01.800 that safety are the preconditions that allow like maybe a more authentic and mutual care to emerge. 0.99
01:10:08.640 And the person I'm thinking of as a real emblem of this kind of fag hag is Nan Golden. 1.00
01:10:14.700 Nan Golden is a very famous photographer and now a sort of anti-opiate activist who had kind of a really unimaginably brutal early life. 1.00
01:10:26.840 She was born to a middle class family that was like very sort of psychologically and emotionally unstable.
01:10:34.680 And her sister committed suicide when she was 11.
01:10:39.440 Her sister was 18.
01:10:40.560 In The Wake of Her Sister's Suicide, she writes about sort of becoming aware of the dangers that women face trying to be authentic or full persons in a heterosexual world.
01:10:57.400 So she writes in her introduction to her famous photography book, The Ballad of Sexual Dependency.
01:11:02.240 This was 1965 when teenage suicide was a taboo subject.
01:11:06.020 I was very close to my sister and aware of some of the forces that led her to choose suicide.
01:11:11.100 I saw the role that her sexuality and its repression played in her destruction.
01:11:14.940 Because of the times of the early 60s, women who were angry and sexual were frightening, outside the range of acceptable behavior, beyond control.
01:11:23.560 By the time she was 18, she saw that her only way out was to lie down on the tracks of the commuter train outside of Washington, D.C.
01:11:31.080 It was an act of immense will.
01:11:33.680 and literally immediately after her suicide nan golden is brought into a sexual relationship by a
01:11:41.660 much older male relative and it suggested that this man was also behaving the same way with her
01:11:48.080 sister before her death i want to be really careful here because nan golden does not describe
01:11:53.500 this as sexual abuse she describes it as a awakening of source and that's all i'm going
01:11:58.940 to say there but you know this is somebody who had been uh made very aware through like brutal
01:12:05.680 experience of what heterosexuality could do to women what it could mean what kind of risks they
01:12:11.960 take embarking on it and then you know she goes to school and she meets another photographer named
01:12:16.840 david armstrong a gay fellow student who eventually became a photographer too and was golden's closest
01:12:22.100 male friend for decades this is from hilton all's piece on nan golden it was armstrong who re-christian
01:12:27.560 Nancy Nan. The two were involved from the first in a kind of marriage blanc. They went to movies
01:12:32.380 all the time, were fascinated by the women of Andy Warhol's factory and in love with 30 stars
01:12:36.580 like Joan Crawford and Betty Davis. We were really radical little kids and we did cling to
01:12:41.280 our friendship as an alternate family, Fletcher told me. Even at the time, we could have articulated
01:12:46.400 that. And so, you know, when Nan Golden eventually moves to Boston and then New York and becomes
01:12:52.180 involved in this circle of drag queens you know there's a lot of danger in it she's using drugs a 0.97
01:12:59.760 lot many of her friends died of overdoses and later of aids but she's also sort of shielded 0.88
01:13:07.200 from the brutality that is also awaiting women who might not fit you know we we've talked about 0.99
01:13:14.780 the fag hag like the julianne moore character in a single man as a figure of indignity but it's also 0.98
01:13:19.800 a figure of vulnerability, right? If you don't do womanhood right, the world can be very, very hard 1.00
01:13:27.380 on you. And gay men aren't hard on you in the same ways. Even though we've critiqued their 0.91
01:13:34.300 misogyny, they are a place where their marginalization might sort of rhyme with yours. 0.71
01:13:41.340 Their punishments might sometimes look like yours, and they are not likely to beat or rape you. They 0.95
01:13:47.260 provide something else. And I think, you know, it's worth looking at that, not just as a failure,
01:13:52.980 but also as a kind of like admirable emotional resourcefulness that these people who are sort of
01:13:58.400 put at the edges of society, men who are gay, women who aren't quite right at being straight.
01:14:04.400 And they find each other and make connections that serve them. 0.54
01:14:08.320 Well, or women who sort of understand what the risks might be if they played along, right? I 0.88
01:14:12.920 I mean, I think here, like Hilton also in the book, The Women, one of the subjects of the book is the African-American socialite Dorothy Dean, who was, you know, huge in Warhol's factory, appears in a bunch of his movies. 0.94
01:14:23.960 I think also good friends with James Baldwin and, you know, kind of this acid-tongued wit and, you know, died quite early, but has this sort of, I think, very early on, uses her association with gay men to kind of position herself safely out of, outside of, I mean, she, I mean,
01:14:42.020 And Al's almost thinks like she's using it to position herself outside of her race too.
01:14:45.400 It's like, it's a way of, to speak with Jose Esteban Munoz, to disidentify.
01:14:50.400 It's a way to sort of say, I'm not going to be part of any group that would have someone
01:14:53.940 like me for a member.
01:14:55.080 I'm going to blaze the eccentric path.
01:14:56.820 And then one other thing I think we might want to point out, because we talked now about
01:15:00.580 like, you know, the Margaret Cho thing about like, you know, that there is a kind of a
01:15:04.380 maternal, there's a kind of caring aspect to this relationship and people identify that.
01:15:08.320 And then you mentioned, you know, these impossibly glamorous women, such as Dorothy Dean, such as the women that Mitch Dichter is upset by on Fire Island. The Fire Island essay, we could never figure out when exactly it's about. It appears to be about the late 60s, early 70s.
01:15:24.320 But here is a quote from a book by Martin Levine, Gay Men, The Sociology of Male Homosexuality. This comes out in 1979. But he had done the studies that it's based on in 1968 to 73. So basically, the same years that Midge starts grumbling about her neighbors on the beach, he's looking at the gay community.
01:15:46.280 and he basically says that you know gay men would prefer lesbian women for stigma evasion for the
01:15:52.780 simple reason that quote in general the gay women were more attractive than the female heterosexuals
01:15:57.320 in the community many of whom were unattractive in conventional terms or of middle-aged or both
01:16:02.740 and basically that they had this kind of school marmish energy that as one of his interview
01:16:07.800 subjects points out quote keeps the men from getting too carried away from camping and carrying
01:16:13.340 on too much so she's like this ultimate wet blanket now why am i mentioning this again
01:16:18.080 just to point out this is the exact same time as midge dechter finding these impossibly model-esque 1.00
01:16:24.420 too cool for heterosexuality ladies on fire island from which i deduce that people were projecting 1.00
01:16:30.220 all kinds of shit and generalizing all kinds of things from about these women who may just have 1.00
01:16:34.980 been pretty heterogeneous to begin with right yeah what we're coming back to again and again here is 1.00
01:16:40.320 There were probably plenty of ways for women to be fag hags, but there was a desperate attempt to make them all mean this one thing. Oh, they're too schoolmarmish. Oh, they're too cool. Oh, they're too attractive. Oh, they're too unattractive. Oh, they're really gay. Oh, they're not really gay. Right? Like, who cares? Like, it's ultimately, like, it's very noticeable how society is trying to rein in the meaning of this practice, precisely because it might not carry any one of those meanings. 1.00
01:17:05.480 And just to add to that, so as part of my book project that is still on hold, I did a bunch of interviews with women who identified as fag hags and were all, for some reason, in their 70s. And I can't say much about that. Eventually, I'm hopefully going to be able to publish this, but it's covered by an internal review board, so I can't really say very much.
01:17:24.000 But I can say this. We've said several times now that there is a tendency to assume that these are fleeting, that these are tragic relationships, that they are not long for this world. I think that's absolutely right. That's part of the way we conceive of these relationships. Well, it ain't what I found in talking to them. They were largely still friends with the men that they were friends with 40 years ago.
01:17:47.940 Several of them said these were the most enduring relationships they've made in their lives.
01:17:51.700 I don't want to disclose anything that would be covered by research confidentiality, but
01:17:55.160 just to point out that the cultural investment in this not being for the long haul is all
01:18:02.120 the more noticeable if you talk to people who describe themselves this way and say,
01:18:06.440 nope, we still talk on the phone all the time, going on a cruise next month or whatever,
01:18:10.960 or like Brian nursed him on his deathbed or something like that.
01:18:13.880 Like it's really, really interesting to think about our investments, especially if we come face to face with people who have lived this life and who describe something totally different. And to me, that need to rein it in semiotically to sort of say like, this is what it must be about. This is what it must mean. This is what it must signify is all the more interesting when you see how messy and how heterogeneous these relationships really appear to be.
01:18:40.140 Wait, Adrian, are you saying that all this cultural baggage around the fag hag was actually anxious projections about heterosexuality all along? 0.99
01:18:49.400 I mean, am I? 1.00
01:18:51.460 And then we pull the mask off of the Scooby-Doo villain at the end. 0.98
01:18:55.840 They would have gotten away with it, too, if they hadn't been for these meddling hags. 0.99
01:19:00.440 I think let's end it there. Thank you so much. 1.00
01:19:02.620 Thank you. This was great.
01:19:03.760 in bed with the right we'd like to thank the michelle r claimant institute for gender research
01:19:08.240 for generous support jennifer portillo for setting up our studio our theme music is by
01:19:12.920 katie lao our producer is megan kalthus