In Bed With The Right - February 11, 2025


Episode 57: Mark Zuckerberg

Topics
Episode 55: Emergency Episode: Mark Joseph Stern on Executive Action Episode 58: The Pelicot Trial with Manon Garcia

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 6 minutes

Words per minute

177.49

Word count

11,811

Sentence count

815

Harmful content

Misogyny

44

sentences flagged

Toxicity

47

sentences flagged

Hate speech

44

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 Hello, I'm Adrienne Dobb.
00:00:08.420 And I'm Moira Donegan.
00:00:09.460 Whether we like it or not, we're in bid with the right.
00:00:13.800 So Adrienne, I'm thinking of this episode as part of our series doing like profiles
00:00:20.880 in the gendered psychology of our new overlords, right?
00:00:23.980 Like a lot of the time on this podcast, we are implicitly talking about Elon Musk.
00:00:29.540 A lot of the time on this podcast, we're implicitly talking about Donald Trump, Peter Thiel, Peter Thiel.
00:00:34.780 There's like various characters who come up a lot in our like taxonomy of right wing masculinities.
00:00:40.320 We've got the Dave Portnoy's and the Mike Pence's and, you know, the Joe Rogan's.
00:00:47.420 And today we're going to talk about somebody who in many ways is the archetype of the creep, but who really clearly aspires to be a pervert.
00:00:59.540 And that is a gentleman named Mark Zuckerberg. Sorry, I just said Mark Zuckerberg and you let
00:01:07.960 out like the sigh of like exhausted defeat. Now, fun fact about me, I've thought about
00:01:14.940 Mark Zuckerberg way more than is merited probably. But I've been researching and writing about
00:01:20.640 Silicon Valley going on 10 to 15 years now. And for a long time, people sort of had difficulty
00:01:26.960 accepting the kind of strong libertarian slash right-wing element within Silicon Valley.
00:01:32.680 But that was mostly when it came to people like Elon Musk, where people sort of eventually
00:01:36.520 like grokked the fact that like, well, this guy is just a straight up reactionary.
00:01:42.240 Zuckerberg still might surprise some people showing up in a podcast about right-wing masculinity
00:01:46.960 because he's not known as one of those famous Valley right-wingers, right?
00:01:51.960 He's not Marc Andreessen.
00:01:53.000 He's not Peter Thiel.
00:01:54.140 He's not David Sachs.
00:01:55.780 He's not Elon Musk.
00:01:57.320 He's not, he's not, he's not.
00:01:58.980 And then the other thing is that, you know,
00:02:01.660 his gender sort of didn't seem to figure into it
00:02:04.320 quite as much until recently, seem, right?
00:02:07.640 So I think that this is a very good thing
00:02:10.300 for us to delve into him
00:02:11.400 because in looking at Mark Zuckerberg,
00:02:13.560 you look both at the way gender was woven
00:02:16.760 into the Silicon Valley ecosystem all along
00:02:19.740 and the way this wasn't noticed, right?
00:02:22.700 I think if listeners are like,
00:02:24.080 why are they talking about Zuckerberg?
00:02:25.780 Or if you would have asked yourself that question a year ago, I think it's worth interrogating
00:02:30.320 that question.
00:02:31.240 I still get requests sometimes from media to sort of talk about like what changed for
00:02:34.940 Mark Zuckerberg, right?
00:02:35.800 There's this idea like, oh, here's this wokester who basically went to the right. 1.00
00:02:39.240 And it's like, I don't know what to tell you. 0.96
00:02:41.260 Like, I mean, sure, he didn't talk like this five years ago, but like, was he therefore 0.99
00:02:46.120 a wokester? 1.00
00:02:47.020 Are you kidding me? 1.00
00:02:48.160 Right.
00:02:48.320 But like, there was this kind of readiness to think that both masculinity and conservative
00:02:52.660 politics had very little to do with this guy.
00:02:54.380 And I think it's both fascinating to look at him and to look at the way he was metabolized in regard with regard to that, because it turns out we've been historically very bad at sort of calling out far right ideas when they percolate or when they travel under a different flag, when they wear a hoodie or when they're they're offering you, you know, a vegan burrito or whatever.
00:03:13.460 Yeah, like he neither seemed particularly right wing nor particularly masculine in the way that he was publicly being understood. And what has happened to him over the past year or so is interpreted as a change. But I think we will articulate how it is really just kind of a continuation of existential trends, right?
00:03:32.920 Or possibly a return to form.
00:03:35.260 This might be a place where we kind of disagree a little bit.
00:03:37.900 All these Silicon Valley guys are followers, right?
00:03:40.380 And Mark Zuckerberg is no different.
00:03:41.980 And I think he may have found a different tribe for himself.
00:03:45.180 He's just a very, very dedicated follower of other people.
00:03:49.180 And there may have been a moment when he did think of himself differently.
00:03:52.060 It's just that that in some way was the put on.
00:03:54.700 That in some way was the camouflage.
00:03:56.560 There was plenty of data on who Mark Zuckerberg was
00:03:58.700 and how he thought politically for the last 15, 20 years.
00:04:01.440 Well, I think let's get into it.
00:04:03.240 Yeah.
00:04:03.660 I'm going to do your basic biography of Zuckerberg, OK?
00:04:08.240 He's younger than I thought he was.
00:04:10.380 He's only 40.
00:04:11.780 He was born in 1984, grew up in Long Island, had a bunch of sisters, kind of like secular
00:04:18.600 to reform Jewish parents.
00:04:20.780 His dad was a dentist and his mom was a psychiatrist who dropped out of the workforce to raise
00:04:26.560 her kids.
00:04:27.120 And along with his mother's interest in psychology, his father had an early interest in computers and tech and was kind of a computer hobbyist, right?
00:04:35.560 So Mark Zuckerberg picked up this computer science hobby from his father and was pretty good at it pretty early on.
00:04:46.800 This was something the kid really took to.
00:04:48.540 You know, now we are in an age where we're confronting the reality that a lot of people think of computer coding as requiring intellectual capacity that it doesn't.
00:05:00.200 Like, don't get me wrong, like coding is not easy.
00:05:02.920 I can't really do it.
00:05:04.280 But it's not as hard as the people who do it like to pretend that it is.
00:05:08.500 But Zuckerberg was quite good at it quite young.
00:05:11.140 And partly on the strength of his talent for this, he transferred from his, you know, public Long Island, wealthy suburb high school to Phillips Exeter Academy.
00:05:22.440 Do you know anything about Phillips Exeter?
00:05:23.960 Of course.
00:05:25.560 That's the one in New Hampshire, correct?
00:05:27.040 That's at the very bottom.
00:05:29.080 I think it's right over the Massachusetts border.
00:05:31.500 Yeah, right across the state border.
00:05:33.480 It's immense.
00:05:34.660 It is prestigious.
00:05:36.600 It is wealthy.
00:05:38.800 And yeah, a bunch of famous people went there.
00:05:41.140 One of these prep schools in New England that has like a bunch of presidents, you know, it's a factory that reproduces the elite.
00:05:48.880 Right. And then he hopped on over to the other one, Harvard, just a few miles down the road where he famously, you know, he had he had started a few companies by this point in his teens that had like a degree of commercial promise.
00:06:05.860 like he seems to have invented something called synapse which was basically just like an early
00:06:10.900 version of spotify it was like a machine learning program that would shuffle through a bunch of mp3s
00:06:17.220 and then pick up on patterns in the music and then suggest other music to you that you might
00:06:22.100 like if you're listening to music like this so like a an early sort of way of detecting consumer
00:06:28.240 preferences. And then when he got to Harvard, the sort of legend is that he went on a date
00:06:36.300 that went quite badly. And when he gets home from this date, he develops a program called
00:06:42.180 FaceSmash. And Adrian, could you like go through FaceSmash for us?
00:06:45.520 Yeah. I mean, it was one of many attempts by young software engineers, coders, et cetera,
00:06:52.680 to determine who was hot or not in the early 2000s.
00:06:56.780 The same way we devote enormous amount of computing powers
00:06:59.760 to generating pictures that look like, you know, 0.95
00:07:02.800 Leni Riefenstahl fucked a Hallmark card. 0.76
00:07:05.460 Back then, people devoted an immense energy 1.00
00:07:08.220 to like the ranking of hotness of the ladies.
00:07:12.740 And FaceMash was that trained, I believe, on the Harvard Facebook.
00:07:18.520 I mean, for those of our listeners who are too young to remember this,
00:07:21.320 Facebook was a literal book with people's pictures in it.
00:07:25.520 Facebook's only really existed at very elite schools, right?
00:07:29.680 It is a marker of elite status for schools to have these.
00:07:33.700 Harvard actually didn't have just one.
00:07:37.640 Various different dorms and clubs within Harvard had their own.
00:07:42.780 And what he did was he trolled the various websites of these different Harvard-affiliated institutions
00:07:49.500 and downloaded without permission the photographs that were posted there, right?
00:07:55.740 So he stole a bunch of images of non-consenting women in his peer group
00:08:01.900 and put those onto this hot or not comparison
00:08:07.080 that he then distributed among members of his Harvard community
00:08:11.120 so that they could, you know, rank and richly humiliate their peers together.
00:08:16.700 Yeah, an august start.
00:08:18.280 And one should say trained on a archive of social reproduction, right? Like the Facebook existed cynically, I would say, in order for people to pick a husband slash wife out of that bunch and have many, many future Harvard going children, right? This is in some way using elite reproduction and hypercharging it.
00:08:42.360 Yeah. So face smash kind of goes like viral over the weekend at Harvard. It's only up for like two days or less than two days, in part because it crashes Harvard's server. So that is one reason Harvard wanted to shut it down. They also wanted to shut it down because some of these women who had not consented to be part of this humiliation ritual objected to the use of their photographs without their permission for this endeavor.
00:09:08.660 So he actually gets almost expelled. There are a series of disciplinary hearings over this. During one of those, his fraternity, he's part of like the Jewish fraternity on campus, and they throw him a party in anticipation of him getting thrown out of Harvard as a result of this, you know, misogynist, like little digital experiment.
00:09:31.640 and at that party that's where he meets priscilla chan the woman who he has been with ever since
00:09:38.840 and who is now his wife right so like we don't know a ton about priscilla chan she's not very
00:09:45.300 public or vocal but in like the subsequent months like later really over the past few months
00:09:51.400 something you'll hear a lot of speculation about among like the very online liberals is like oh
00:09:58.060 zuckerberg's getting divorced right his turn towards uh this kind of tacky performative
00:10:05.180 masculinity is something we've come to associate with like men who have been sexually rejected by 0.95
00:10:11.000 their wives right yeah the implicit hope there is that like then you know priscilla chand will 1.00
00:10:15.260 take a bunch of his money in the ensuing divorce and then go fund liberal causes which is the only 1.00
00:10:20.060 way that any liberal causes get funded anymore is when a tech oligarch gets divorced the old 1.00
00:10:24.320 Mackenzie Bezos. 1.00
00:10:25.380 Yeah. 1.00
00:10:25.740 May she live forever.
00:10:26.780 Yeah.
00:10:27.280 Call us. 0.58
00:10:31.340 Like from what we can see of Priscilla Chan, I don't think that's her vibe, right?
00:10:36.540 Because this is somebody who in college saw all of her friends and classmates get ritually humiliated and decided to go to a party for the guy who did it.
00:10:47.260 Yeah. 0.99
00:10:47.760 That's not a woman inclined to feminist solidarity, right? 0.85
00:10:52.520 Anyway, back to our timeline. 1.00
00:10:53.680 And Zuckerberg does not get kicked out of Harvard.
00:10:56.100 And what he does do actually is get recruited by a bunch of like insane, like the kind of character that only exists at Harvard, which are Taylor and Cameron Winklevoss.
00:11:07.260 Do you know about the Winklevoss twins?
00:11:08.540 Of course.
00:11:09.860 All right. Tell us about the Winklevoss twins.
00:11:11.380 So, I mean, they come from money.
00:11:13.040 They basically were already back then kind of sort of in the tech finance space, I believe, and today they're right-wing crypto grifters slash investors, right?
00:11:25.320 So the Winklevoss, I'm sorry, I keep saying like they're Swiss or something, Winklevoss, like they sound like elves, right?
00:11:32.560 Yeah, yeah.
00:11:33.200 Actually, they were rowers. They were on the Harvard crew team and they had an idea that they thought was a decent business idea, but they didn't know how to program it. Right. Their idea was basically just my space.
00:11:47.860 So, like, the degree to which social networking and, like, individual online profiles that enabled consumers to represent themselves online and to connect with their friends online and, like, you know, gather information about their social world in the digital sphere, that was already, like, very well established in late 2003 when the Winklevoss twins go to Zuckerberg with this proposal.
00:12:13.400 This is, like, kind of something that already exists in the market.
00:12:16.660 Yeah. Which I think becomes extremely important for the Zuckerberg story down the line, right? He seems to the present day obsessed with the idea that he had somehow innovated, that somehow he had had an idea that no one had had.
00:12:30.620 But in fact, it's pretty noticeable that his, I mean, he appears to have been quite good, as you say, at coding and that sort of thing.
00:12:37.860 But it's very noticeable that FaceSmash aped things that already existed and that in the end, Facebook succeeds in a space where Friendster and where MySpace had already sort of succeeded.
00:12:51.600 Not to say that it didn't do some things better.
00:12:54.380 The rollout appears to have been extremely successful, all that.
00:12:57.180 But it is to say that like he clearly thought and probably still thinks of himself as this kind of genius innovator and disruptor when in fact what Facebook was, was the best financed and best credentialed of the possible killer apps for Friendster and for MySpace.
00:13:15.740 It's a little bit similar to the way that like everyone's rolling out a Twitter clone now, right?
00:13:19.460 Like the name of the game is not innovation.
00:13:21.600 You know, you make a couple of choices about how you set up your user base and either you succeed or you don't.
00:13:26.100 And if you don't, you're Mark Zuckerberg. But it's very, very important that like, unlike, let's say, the PayPal mafia, like these guys were not really ahead of the game other than in the aggressiveness of their expansion and sort of the rollout itself, I think.
00:13:42.160 Yeah. So I think that's really good information, right? Because Zuckerberg does not come up with this idea. And the idea itself is not particularly new, right? It's already a proven success of a product, but it's duplicating something that already exists in the market. The Winklevoss twins want to call it Harvard Connect or Harvard Connection. And the idea is that it would be sort of an in-house social network for Harvard University.
00:14:07.580 Of which one should say there were also a bunch of these. There's the Daily Jolt and stuff like this. I went to college around this exact same time. Like there were a bunch of companies marketing this sort of a location dependent social network for college campuses.
00:14:20.860 Yeah. So like Zuckerberg takes this not very original idea and steals it. Right. He tells the Winklevoss twins that he like you don't have to hand it to these guys, but they thought they were hiring this guy to develop their IP. And then he just stole their IP and they eventually sued him and got a lot of money, which they have now used for, you know, various evil schemes, evil schemes.
00:14:43.060 Yeah. So he totally steals their idea, develops it into what he called the Facebook with the idea being that he was going to digitize this elite reproduction tool that he had previously used for like purposes of public misogyny.
00:14:58.820 He was now going to use it for like more broad based forms of social climbing.
00:15:03.620 And he promptly drops out of Harvard and moves to beautiful sunny Palo Alto because he has investment interest from a guy named Peter Thiel.
00:15:15.320 Do you want to tell us about Peter Thiel's involvement with early Facebook?
00:15:19.280 Well, so Peter Thiel comes out of the PayPal mafia alongside such luminaries, Elon Musk.
00:15:25.440 Yeah, our new overlord.
00:15:26.340 But Thiel basically, he was the CEO of it. And when it went public, he started the Founders Fund, which I believe is the vehicle through which he started investing in Facebook. And I believe he was the first to really do that.
00:15:40.320 Now, again, there is a kind of mythology around this
00:15:43.800 because like Thiel is a big Girardian
00:15:46.100 and he's big into this idea of mimetic desire.
00:15:49.380 And like, it's like, well, you know,
00:15:50.960 he recognized that people want to see each other
00:15:53.600 and want what other people want.
00:15:55.400 So this is a huge advertising vehicle, et cetera, et cetera.
00:15:58.500 I always have trouble with that narrative
00:16:00.660 because like, again, these kinds of sites did exist
00:16:03.680 and you didn't have to be a rocket scientist
00:16:06.180 and be like, oh, wait,
00:16:07.200 if people spend a shit ton of time on this thing,
00:16:09.020 we can probably sell them some products, right?
00:16:11.540 So there's a lot of sort of ex post facto mythologization here
00:16:15.220 where there's a lot of people sort of pretending
00:16:17.440 like no one that ever thought about this before.
00:16:19.580 It's like, no, there were tons of these products out there.
00:16:22.580 What Teal does seem to have recognized,
00:16:24.580 Teal was part of, and PayPal was part of that move in Silicon Valley
00:16:29.000 that really took the lesson of scaling
00:16:32.000 from the busts of the first dot-com era.
00:16:35.940 And he realized that basically this thing
00:16:37.900 couldn't just be a college phenomenon. This had to be bigger. I think this is something that sort
00:16:42.400 of comes with the move to Palo Alto, this idea that like we're not making a product for college
00:16:47.500 campuses. It might start there, but really this is for everyone. Yeah, I remember around this time,
00:16:53.600 like 2004, 2005, I had begun high school. And it was a big deal if, you know, somebody's older
00:17:02.620 brother had a Facebook account because they had a .edu email address. And by the time I was out
00:17:08.480 of high school, high school students and indeed all of our parents could and did have Facebook
00:17:14.520 accounts, right? It expanded through the market very quickly. I think it's also like interesting
00:17:19.200 to note that like a lot of things, this started off in the early 2000s as being coded for and
00:17:24.560 chic because it was both elite and young yeah and facebook's like share of the market at least in
00:17:33.180 the like flagship facebook product has really like moved down market very quickly now it's like
00:17:39.140 old and not particularly elite people were telling you about how hugo travis stole the 2020 election
00:17:44.660 you know it's just like it's it's generational tilt has absolutely inverted yeah yeah absolutely
00:17:50.120 And I don't want to undersell innovations that came about, you know, what just today met at, what was then Facebook.
00:17:57.000 But it's very noticeable that since basically 2012, the company has mostly subsisted by acquisition.
00:18:04.080 That is to say, bought WhatsApp.
00:18:06.280 And Instagram.
00:18:07.320 And these are their moneymakers today, right?
00:18:09.460 Like the hot influencer you follow.
00:18:12.300 I mean, you might mostly watch them on TikTok now, but they're still on Instagram.
00:18:16.640 Your aunts, they're on WhatsApp.
00:18:18.220 and your grandma's on Facebook and your grandma dead, you know, basically, I'm not saying yours
00:18:22.660 specifically, but. No, my grandma is dead and she did have a Facebook. Yeah. Like RIP. But like,
00:18:27.680 they really expanded globally when they bought WhatsApp because WhatsApp is like one of the
00:18:34.280 primary ways that people, particularly in the third world, access the internet. But you know,
00:18:38.880 it's not, it's not very big in the US. It's very, very big everywhere else. And then with Instagram,
00:18:42.880 it really retained its big share of the youth user base. But now even Instagram is just trying
00:18:49.320 to keep up with TikTok, right? It's just like copying their product with the worst version
00:18:55.320 of TikTok, which is Instagram Reels. It has not innovated in a while is what we're trying to say.
00:19:01.060 You don't have to hand it to this guy. He didn't have the idea for Facebook. Somebody else did.
00:19:05.880 It wasn't a very original idea to begin with. And then every other good idea that has emerged
00:19:12.460 or like meaningful long-term innovation
00:19:14.760 in the social media technology space
00:19:17.640 has come from somebody else, right?
00:19:19.380 He bought Instagram.
00:19:20.980 He didn't invent Instagram.
00:19:22.200 He bought WhatsApp.
00:19:23.060 He didn't invent WhatsApp.
00:19:24.280 And now his company is just running after TikTok,
00:19:26.620 trying to keep up and mostly failing.
00:19:29.260 So this is like, this is also a critique of Elon Musk.
00:19:31.300 He's actually not much of a programmer.
00:19:33.060 What he is, is like a really ruthless
00:19:34.420 and kind of careless manager
00:19:35.980 and bought a lot of other people's companies
00:19:38.880 after they started them and they invented their products.
00:19:42.060 and then like got a ton of financing.
00:19:44.280 Something sort of similar is happening
00:19:45.920 with Mark Zuckerberg, right?
00:19:48.000 He isn't really an innovator.
00:19:50.840 He is an acquirer.
00:19:53.160 Yeah.
00:19:53.560 And we should say,
00:19:54.940 we've just listed the ones
00:19:56.080 that sort of are maintaining
00:19:57.600 sort of the brand.
00:19:59.340 Facebook also has maintained popularity
00:20:01.240 in parts of Asia and Europe, I believe.
00:20:03.960 So there, like it does have a user base.
00:20:05.820 What we're describing
00:20:06.680 is kind of the uniquely American,
00:20:08.180 I think, situation.
00:20:09.240 At the same time,
00:20:10.080 There are also, like, lots of acquisitions that they've made that basically, I think, are either a wash or, like, sort of, like, are regarded as kind of a negative, right?
00:20:19.340 I mean, the most famous one probably is the 2014 acquisition of Oculus VR.
00:20:24.380 Do you remember Oculus at all?
00:20:25.960 No.
00:20:26.660 Ah.
00:20:27.220 They build VR goggles.
00:20:29.320 In fact, I have been to the Facebook headquarters to try it out.
00:20:33.880 I tried it out before it ever came out.
00:20:35.680 Really?
00:20:36.240 Yeah.
00:20:36.700 I fell over a trash can while doing it.
00:20:38.560 That was totally my fault.
00:20:40.080 They were like, watch out for the trash can.
00:20:41.820 I'm like, plonk. 0.99
00:20:43.360 Anyway, so that happened.
00:20:44.640 I got a free burrito out of it.
00:20:46.060 It was cool.
00:20:46.820 Yeah, so there's Oculus.
00:20:47.960 There's Onavo, which is, I think, a web analytics company.
00:20:51.220 I think there's another messaging service that they bought.
00:20:53.700 I think it's called Beluga, right?
00:20:56.200 So it's not that they were extremely brilliant in their acquisitions policy.
00:21:01.020 They were kind of indiscriminate.
00:21:02.340 It really felt like, you know, the way Yahoo kind of started flailing and just buying anything
00:21:07.720 that sort of had a pulse, there was an element of that at Facebook as well.
00:21:12.100 Yeah. So, you know, we're in this moment now, like 2004, 2005, Facebook has rapidly expanded
00:21:19.880 and its valuation is kind of exploding in this way that's very speculative. It reminds me of
00:21:28.600 like 19th century, like money panics, right? Because like people are bidding on advertising
00:21:34.380 on Facebook. They're bidding on like ownership stake in Facebook at prices that are not actually
00:21:41.180 borne out in terms of what Facebook is generating in revenue, because Facebook isn't really
00:21:47.120 generating revenue. Facebook isn't actually bringing in a profit. It's just got this skyrocketing
00:21:53.900 value. Could you like explain to me a little bit how that works? Because I have to say that this
00:21:57.600 part of it is sort of opaque to me. Yeah. I mean, I think it's what most of Silicon Valley was at
00:22:03.060 the time, right? It was the promise of huge growth, which was something that the VCs liked
00:22:09.200 and that people kept pouring money into. Basically, the whole thing was premised on
00:22:14.760 constant expansion. And for a long, long time, the actual making of the money was going to happen
00:22:20.840 later, right? They were like, oh, we'll defer that. We'll get to that part. And that was sort
00:22:25.660 of the way business was done in Silicon Valley at the time. And then they did start making money
00:22:30.820 when they introduced the algorithmic feeds and all that kind of stuff.
00:22:34.780 And that's exactly, I think, when most people started leaving the platform 0.89
00:22:39.180 because it was fucking unusable and weird. 0.97
00:22:41.940 And that's when your uncle showed up to get radicalized. 0.98
00:22:43.900 They didn't start making money until they hired a VP from Google,
00:22:51.040 a little lady by the name of Sheryl Sandberg. 0.98
00:22:54.040 So I think we're going to get to Sandberg in a second.
00:22:56.300 But I want to take a brief detour and talk about Mark Zuckerberg
00:23:00.300 as the sort of platonic ideal of the Silicon Valley
00:23:03.140 like avatar of the dropout.
00:23:05.100 Could you like tell me a little bit about the dropout figure?
00:23:07.020 Because this is a prominent theme in your book from,
00:23:09.860 I want to say like 2018, 2019,
00:23:11.800 What Tech Calls Thinking?
00:23:12.720 2020.
00:23:13.380 Oh my gosh.
00:23:14.180 Yeah.
00:23:14.740 It's a really great book.
00:23:15.780 And Adrian's a really fun writer.
00:23:17.480 So everybody should read What Tech Calls Thinking.
00:23:19.520 It came out from FSG and it's quick and hilarious.
00:23:22.440 And I think very useful to have in your back pocket 1.00
00:23:26.460 as we now are governed by these fucking people. 1.00
00:23:29.700 a little bit. Tell me about the dropout, Zuckerberg and the dropout figure. 1.00
00:23:32.860 Yeah. So the dropout, that's the first chapter of the book. I should say it's a book that is by now
00:23:37.360 five years old, and I wouldn't really change a word. These people have largely borne out what
00:23:44.420 I said about them then, none of it positive. And yeah, the dropout figure has, of course,
00:23:51.000 held a certain fascination in the tech industry for quite some time, right? Steve Jobs famously
00:23:56.020 dropped out. So did Bill Gates. But really, with the Zuckerberg generation, it sort of becomes
00:24:01.520 de rigueur. The Instagram guys like drop out of Stanford. Everyone sort of has to drop out of
00:24:05.520 something. The thing I point out in the book is that you can't drop out of anywhere. If you drop
00:24:08.980 out of, you know, Cal Poly, no one gives a shit. No, you have to drop out of Stanford. Yeah. Go 0.98
00:24:13.640 to Stanford, got to go to Harvard, got to go to maybe not even Yale. Does anybody drop out of
00:24:18.080 Yale? I feel like Yale creates like these guys' lawyers. Yeah. You leave for the vice presidency
00:24:24.660 once Amy Chua says you're ready.
00:24:26.680 Yeah, but you basically have to drop out
00:24:29.360 of a highly credentialed institution.
00:24:31.200 And to me, that is the secret sauce
00:24:32.700 of this entire figure,
00:24:33.860 which is to say it is anti-elitist
00:24:36.060 or pretends to be anti-elitist
00:24:37.780 in the sense it's like,
00:24:38.420 I didn't need a fancy college degree.
00:24:40.660 I learned everything.
00:24:42.020 I needed, you know, coding, et cetera, et cetera,
00:24:44.840 just by myself.
00:24:46.440 You both get the imprimatur
00:24:47.720 of the elite institutions
00:24:49.220 and you get the sort of like,
00:24:51.240 I don't know, like transgressive frisson
00:24:52.960 of having rejected them, right?
00:24:54.400 You get the best of both worlds.
00:24:56.300 Yeah.
00:24:56.620 This in spite of the fact that, of course, the dropout, as I say, was a pretty common figure at the time. 0.62
00:25:01.940 That is to say, this was also a well-trod path.
00:25:04.640 If you made billions be Mark Zuckerberg, you didn't come back to Stanford, or in this case, Harvard.
00:25:09.120 Potato, potato.
00:25:10.020 But of course, a lot of people left these places and came back if the company they set up didn't work.
00:25:15.360 So it was basically more of a semester abroad.
00:25:17.420 And the stories from the early years in Palo Alto is that basically these guys from Harvard just decamped for the West Coast.
00:25:24.400 set up essentially a frat house and just started a company, right?
00:25:27.980 Like they were continuing college while sort of very, very publicly
00:25:32.140 kind of turning their back on it.
00:25:34.340 And I think that's really, really important that in some way
00:25:37.300 it's a fake radical gesture, the dropout,
00:25:40.180 or at least that kind of dropout.
00:25:41.920 I mean, I think there are absolutely legitimate reasons
00:25:44.500 to drop out of American colleges, I should say.
00:25:46.740 I think that these people were not particularly courageous
00:25:49.220 and the way that figure was sort of imbued with this mystique
00:25:53.140 was really, really troubling.
00:25:54.400 was really a sign of what was going wrong
00:25:56.900 with America's and the world's relationship
00:25:59.780 to Silicon Valley.
00:26:00.860 If you want to see where this goes
00:26:02.940 in terms of how absurd you can make it,
00:26:06.260 it's when you get to the scammers, right?
00:26:08.980 Your Elizabeth Holmes is...
00:26:11.080 Elizabeth Holmes, my favorite. 1.00
00:26:12.860 I think more people should defraud, like... 0.94
00:26:15.220 Henry Kissinger.
00:26:16.140 Henry Kissinger, yeah. 1.00
00:26:17.620 Like, why weren't more women 1.00
00:26:18.940 putting on blonde wigs 1.00
00:26:20.620 and woo-going him out of his money?
00:26:23.200 I appreciate this. 1.00
00:26:25.380 I like women in male-dominated fields, like totally fake startups that don't contribute anything. 1.00
00:26:32.420 But she's dropped out of Stanford famously. 0.99
00:26:34.780 Yeah, and had a really interesting way of framing it, right?
00:26:37.140 Like this was a biotech company.
00:26:38.820 And she said, I'm paraphrasing, but like, I just thought university didn't have anything to teach me anymore.
00:26:43.480 Now, when it comes to coding, who knows?
00:26:46.020 I don't really know.
00:26:46.760 That might even be true. 0.60
00:26:47.980 Feels like when it comes to biology and medicine, a medical school would have a damn lot to teach you.
00:26:52.920 And you probably shouldn't drop out if you're going to be making medical devices.
00:26:57.560 There's actually a pretty good one at Stanford, a pretty large, good medical school.
00:27:01.700 I'm told. I'm told.
00:27:04.140 Was Sam Bangun-Fried also a dropout? I'm actually unsure now.
00:27:07.740 He didn't go to Stanford. He grew up at Stanford because his parents did and do teach there.
00:27:13.680 He went to MIT.
00:27:14.820 Yeah, but did he drop out?
00:27:15.640 And I don't know if he graduated or not. 1.00
00:27:17.600 No, he actually graduated like a chump. 1.00
00:27:19.860 Oh, wow. 1.00
00:27:21.520 Congrats, MIT.
00:27:22.920 This is typical of Silicon Valley's like early 2000s, like aughts era mythos is the dropout figures contrast between tremendous wealth and great personal immaturity.
00:27:37.600 Right. And boyish immaturity. Yeah. That was central to their mystique.
00:27:41.920 So like the refusal to wear a suit and the adaptation instead of a adolescent casual wardrobe, right, which became itself like a real form of affectation.
00:27:54.600 But that was seen as a kind of defiance of elite politesse that I think now we can see similar strains of in conservative masculinity of the Trump era, right?
00:28:08.980 Like I am rejecting your norms and that itself is a sign of my power, my personal vulgarity or immaturity in the face of things that other people are taking very seriously, like large amounts of money or like huge amounts of data privacy.
00:28:24.060 Right. That itself, that casualness is a sign of masculine domination.
00:28:29.940 Right. So you see it going from Mark Zuckerberg wearing a hoodie to meetings where people are trying to give him millions of dollars to Elon Musk talking about the Shiba Inu meme while he's taking away your grandma's Social Security.
00:28:43.140 You know, it's like the insistence on irreverence is itself a way to show personal power and exert domination over the week.
00:28:55.260 But it wasn't really cast in those terms.
00:28:57.680 It was cast as this, like, you know, motorcycle kind of useful irreverence.
00:29:02.960 Yeah, and one should say that, like, there had been a long tradition in Northern California of a kind of a refusal of kind of button-up work cultures, right?
00:29:12.300 This existed at Xerox Park.
00:29:14.440 Oh, really?
00:29:14.880 Yeah, yeah.
00:29:15.800 I mean, people sort of, like, rolling their bike down the hallway, you know, the famous beanbag chair lounge where they would have their meetings, that kind of thing.
00:29:22.620 But there it really was still a countercultural artifact. It was that these people had been hippies and were like, I'm not settling down into just a basic office. And there may have been tricky gender politics behind that too. But it's interesting that when Zuckerberg et al. sort of arrived, the signifier of dressing down is kind of double-coded.
00:29:42.440 On the one hand, like they can they can be read as like these latter day grandchildren of hippies, basically, irreverent and unwilling to do business and capitalism as usual.
00:29:53.280 Or it can be, as you say, a power move.
00:29:56.420 We continue the elite without having to put on a pinstripe suit in order to represent it.
00:30:02.300 No bless with no oblige, you know.
00:30:04.220 Exactly.
00:30:04.600 So this brings us to late 2007.
00:30:09.740 Zuckerberg by now is still in, I believe he's still under 25.
00:30:13.900 He becomes a billionaire at 23.
00:30:16.120 And he is one of the wealthiest men in the world already.
00:30:20.100 And he runs a company with tremendous valuation and no revenue model.
00:30:24.920 It's just like not bringing in money from its actual users, right?
00:30:29.000 So he gets introduced to a Google executive named Sheryl Sandberg,
00:30:35.360 who is 15 years his senior at a Christmas party and decides to hire her for a role that he hadn't
00:30:44.080 previously had or been searching to fill, which is Facebook's chief operating officer. Do you want
00:30:50.160 to tell us a little bit about Sheryl Sandberg? Yeah. So all I know about her is that she came
00:30:55.360 up through Google and represented kind of the opposite end of the Silicon Valley spectrum,
00:31:01.820 it seems to me, right?
00:31:02.900 Like Google had a far more corporate culture
00:31:05.460 by that point.
00:31:06.560 And it was seen, I remember the hiring,
00:31:09.140 it was in Silicon Valley at the time,
00:31:10.880 hiring was seen as a necessary maturation process
00:31:13.460 for the company.
00:31:14.440 Yeah, like mom's here,
00:31:15.460 she's going to make you clean up your room
00:31:16.820 if we want to like hone in a little bit 1.00
00:31:19.560 on the gender politics. 0.96
00:31:21.080 But like Sandberg, credit's where it's due. 1.00
00:31:23.800 She was very good at knowing how to make money
00:31:28.480 off of advertising, right? 0.94
00:31:30.100 Google wasn't particularly profitable before she came in either.
00:31:33.700 They had a four-person ad team, and she expanded that to being almost a 5,000-person ad team, right?
00:31:40.620 She had really grown revenue streams at Google and had a track record of professionalizing these tech startups and of making them extremely profitable quite quickly.
00:31:51.860 And she came in and she did that at Facebook.
00:31:54.100 The advertising sale revenue model was her intervention, right?
00:31:58.940 She's like, OK, we're going to be big boys and make some money off of this. Right. So the domesticating rules implying mother figure was like very much a role that she stepped into. Right. And they were actually like quite intimate.
00:32:13.860 It was a relationship that Sandberg's husband at the time, who has since died, described as like a courtship because Zuckerberg, who again was 23, would be over at their house for dinner like three or four times a week.
00:32:27.040 And they would be speaking long into the night. And she is taking on this role where she's working for him, but she's also becoming a figure of authority and of expertise in how to be a business person like an adult.
00:32:43.860 Right. Yeah. And the idea of bringing Sandberg in was that Zuckerberg was going to focus on
00:32:53.700 product. Right. She was going to run the business and he was going to make Facebook a better
00:32:59.320 product. Right. Which, as we have covered, isn't exactly his strong suit. Right. Yeah.
00:33:04.600 And this is one place where I think we can look really closely at Zuckerberg's personal control
00:33:10.560 over Facebook, the company, because most kids or young people in Silicon Valley or
00:33:17.320 doing these tech startups, their dream is not to run a company for their whole lives.
00:33:22.780 Their dream is to sell a company, right? You make something that proves valuable and then you get
00:33:30.520 rich by selling it to somebody bigger. And that's when you can, you know, sort of exit stage left
00:33:36.760 And you can use that to start another company or you can, you know, fuck off and surf for the rest of your life, you know, whatever it is that your dream is. 0.96
00:33:47.700 Well, but mostly what you do is what Peter Thiel does. 0.99
00:33:50.240 Yeah. You become a capital investor. Yeah.
00:33:52.080 Yeah. And then start mucking around with politics. 0.95
00:33:54.340 Yeah. And then destroy democracy because you read a, you know, narcissistic software engineer's blog. 0.93
00:34:02.080 But what we get with Zuckerberg is like an extreme personal identification with Facebook and a continued, I think even now, majority stake in the company.
00:34:15.380 This is like kind of weird in terms of corporate governments.
00:34:19.120 Exactly. Like the story sort of goes from like, oh, he was so smart.
00:34:24.020 He refused to be bought by this other company for this outlandish amount of money.
00:34:28.220 Yahoo for one billion dollars. Yeah.
00:34:30.080 Yeah. To like, oh, you probably should have sold at some point. Like there's this kind of personal union that you get in some of these companies. And that, frankly, I think Elon Musk is trying to sort of retroactively engineer with X slash Twitter. Right. But it is an anomaly in Silicon Valley. Most of these people are no longer involved with the companies that they've started. Many of them have been serial entrepreneurs, meaning they use that capital to start another company.
00:34:56.340 or, as you say, there are many, many off-ramps
00:34:59.660 and Zuckerberg is unusual in that he didn't take it.
00:35:02.840 So, Sheryl Sandberg comes in
00:35:05.700 and if Facebook has been sort of like metonymic
00:35:10.120 with Zuckerberg himself, right?
00:35:11.620 If his personality has sort of merged
00:35:15.320 with the identity of the brand,
00:35:18.420 Sandberg is the first person
00:35:20.120 who like almost displaces him a little in that role, right?
00:35:23.660 She is really involved in day-to-day operations of the company.
00:35:27.800 She is really, really involved in not just their revenue strategy, but in their marketing strategy.
00:35:33.100 She's really involved in their hiring and personnel strategy.
00:35:36.380 You know, she is the person who, for all intents and purposes, is running Facebook.
00:35:41.420 And this is also the era when Facebook, like a lot of Silicon Valley companies, has like pretty decent relationships with the Democratic Party and particularly with the Obama administration.
00:35:53.200 You want to tell us a little bit about, like, Facebook's relationship to Obama?
00:35:56.220 Well, I guess, I mean, Sandberg in particular, right, like through Lean In is very much connected to what we would think of as sort of a pro-business liberal wing of the Democratic Party.
00:36:07.620 Yeah, you know, she worked for Larry Summers before she went to Google.
00:36:11.520 She is a major donor to a lot of Democratic Party causes.
00:36:16.320 Yeah. 1.00
00:36:16.560 And she becomes personally an avatar of a kind of like quasi-triumphalist, I think like really defanged form of aughts era liberal feminism that like really becomes personified to a lot of people in Hillary Clinton.
00:36:35.440 But I think, you know, Sheryl Sandberg, if anything, is maybe like the other big avatar of this style of thinking about women's social advancement and public roles, because in 2013, she publishes a book called Lean In, which is pitched as sort of a self-help guide for women looking to ascend in corporate workplaces.
00:37:01.820 Right. And Lean In is known for its prescriptions.
00:37:08.500 She basically prescribes women who are torn between, say, work and family or who are encountering discrimination or harassment in the workplace to work harder.
00:37:20.000 Right. And it's weird because if you read Lean In, as admittedly, I haven't done in a long time, if you read Lean In, her prescriptions are, I think, like pretty reactionary.
00:37:32.420 They are all about personal responsibility. Right. But her diagnosis is not such that would necessarily like lead to those conclusions at all.
00:37:41.060 right? Like she's got a pretty decent diagnosis of like sources of the wage gap. She is pretty
00:37:48.280 interested in cultural factors that lead to women's diminished confidence. You know, 0.86
00:37:54.960 it's a little pop psychology-ish. It's very, it's like, it's a 2013 TED Talk in book form,
00:37:59.640 right? It's like, well, you know, we put on little boys t-shirts at Target that they're strong and
00:38:05.500 powerful and they're going to be inventors. And we put on little girls t-shirts that they're kind
00:38:09.080 and pretty. And it's like, OK, well, that's, I think, a symptom of maybe broader forces at work
00:38:13.980 that could be like diagnosed in a little bit of a more robust and less casual fashion. Right. But
00:38:19.220 she's not wrong in her diagnosis of these like underlying phenomena. She's like, OK, well,
00:38:24.920 there's cultural trends that punish women for character traits or behaviors that are actually 1.00
00:38:30.920 beneficial to like capital accumulation and professional achievement. And then there are
00:38:36.440 these like, you know, she doesn't ignore the role of things like motherhood penalties or like lack 0.60
00:38:42.140 of paid leave or sexual harassment. Like she does also sort of gesture to these more structural
00:38:47.220 kinds of exclusions. Yeah. But then her prescription is just like, well, work harder,
00:38:51.500 ladies. And it's just like, it is like kind of a depoliticizing of a political diagnosis,
00:38:58.120 which is like very strange to me, but was very, very typical of that period.
00:39:02.040 It's almost as though she had a really, really good researcher,
00:39:05.180 but was it Silicon Valley CEO who wanted to ask questions like,
00:39:08.460 what would you do if you weren't afraid?
00:39:10.400 Who was her researcher? Do we know?
00:39:11.980 I have no way of knowing this. I have no way of knowing this at all.
00:39:14.440 We can cut this.
00:39:15.300 But that's what it is.
00:39:16.680 Like Adrian every now and then will just like drop these little tidbits of his insider intel
00:39:21.740 because he's been in Silicon Valley for like 15 years
00:39:24.460 with like the kind of casual proximity to these people that comes from working at Stanford.
00:39:30.220 It's true.
00:39:30.440 And I feel like I've got my nose pressed up against the glass, just like fogging it up, asking for gossip all the time.
00:39:36.640 Yeah. Like the time I hired Peter Thiel.
00:39:38.580 You did not hire Peter Thiel.
00:39:40.440 All right. That's for another episode. Let's just keep going. Let's just soldier through this, OK?
00:39:46.640 But yes.
00:39:47.320 So, like, she becomes an avatar of what we think of as sort of like the superficial inclusion of the late Obama era.
00:39:59.600 And for Zuckerberg himself, she is not just this kind of like corporate feminism.
00:40:06.600 She's also sort of a mom figure to him.
00:40:09.400 Yeah.
00:40:09.680 And I think when we look at what's happened to Zuckerberg since, you know, like there's like biographies of Zuckerberg that cast him as motivated by like early sexual rejections, like the biopic The Social Network.
00:40:24.460 Yeah, from 2010.
00:40:25.420 Where he's played by Jesse Eisenberg, who is just like so Jesse Eisenberg.
00:40:29.680 Like every Jesse Eisenberg character is like so neurotic that he's on the verge of a nervous breakdown, you know?
00:40:33.940 Yeah. Who also plays him as borderline Asperger-y, which the real Mark Zuckerberg isn't at all.
00:40:40.860 The real Mark Zuckerberg is kind of affectless.
00:40:43.160 Yeah.
00:40:43.700 He's always very calm. He never betrays emotion. He is very practiced. He reminds me of Hillary Clinton, actually, a little bit.
00:40:51.700 I mean, Hillary Clinton will display these flashes of rage, which is actually what I like about her most.
00:40:58.160 But most of what she says is so—it's very lawyerly.
00:41:03.140 It's like practice. It's workshopped. It's focus grouped. It's usually kind of contentless.
00:41:08.740 Yeah. It's HR speak, you know, and that's kind of how Zuckerberg talks. He talks the way you're
00:41:15.880 like new boss's boss from the private equity company that just bought your employer talks
00:41:21.660 about how you're all a family and we're going to like move forward for innovative solutions.
00:41:25.560 And then you're listening to this and like suddenly it dawns on you that what he's actually
00:41:29.140 is saying is you're all being laid off you know like that's um it's like it's very very polite
00:41:34.760 and very very euphemistic yeah delivery of like actually pretty insane and like brutal content
00:41:42.800 that's the zuckerberg style yeah and that's that's not how he comes off in the social network but the
00:41:47.600 social network like invents this woman who dumps him in order to like attribute all of this
00:41:52.500 subsequent evil to like frustration and and like sexual rejection and that sense of wounded 1.00
00:41:58.300 masculinity. I think if we're looking for his like current evil turn, the reaction is less at like
00:42:05.480 wounded virility in that sense of social rejection. It's more about like reacting against a mommy
00:42:11.960 figure, like reacting against somebody who told you what to do, who had the audacity to be a woman 0.79
00:42:19.120 and assume a degree of authority over you. Possibly. I mean, I think the other thing is, 0.99
00:42:23.560 frankly both with him and Elon Musk
00:42:25.980 it's masculinity
00:42:28.040 plus time
00:42:28.960 this is a guy who
00:42:31.060 it's not a type of masculinity
00:42:34.080 that I aspire to or that
00:42:35.800 many people aspire to but the kind of
00:42:37.840 nerd genius and I mean I think
00:42:39.780 Eisenberg nails that part of it
00:42:41.360 I think as an image of Mark Zuckerberg
00:42:44.320 that movie is actually quite interesting
00:42:45.780 it's a form of masculinity
00:42:47.400 and it's tied up with this
00:42:49.960 kind of lone genius mythology
00:42:51.480 and what Sheryl Sandberg represented for him
00:42:53.520 was the fact that it wasn't his thing, right?
00:42:56.680 And it's the funny thing about the social network
00:42:58.220 that it's so critical of Mark Zuckerberg,
00:43:00.340 but it credits him in this one big way, right?
00:43:02.640 He's the one who holds it all together.
00:43:04.400 He's the one who has the vision.
00:43:06.100 And Peter Thiel's barely in that thing.
00:43:08.000 He's like, in a glimpse through glass,
00:43:09.820 like one brief moment,
00:43:10.840 there's an actor representing Peter Thiel.
00:43:12.460 And you kind of think like,
00:43:13.600 I hate to hand it to the guy,
00:43:14.880 but like definitely this company
00:43:16.280 wouldn't be as huge as it was
00:43:18.480 if he hadn't sort of come along
00:43:20.280 with this massive gob of cash early on.
00:43:22.720 But that's not really in it because it has to be about this lone genius. And, you know, that's got everything to do with the fact that the other person that movie is about, who also regards himself as a lone male genius, is Aaron Sorkin, the writer, right?
00:43:37.100 And there is a real kind of pipeline or a real kind of symbiosis between these genius writers writing about these genius CEOs at this time and basically creating these portraits of these CEOs as almost like artists, right?
00:43:53.420 Like the company is his work of art, right?
00:43:56.160 He's a tortured genius.
00:43:57.960 Yeah.
00:43:58.100 The fact that there are tons of people behind the scenes steering this thing, that there are people professionalizing this, that there are HR departments that are making sure that the best people get there.
00:44:07.100 That makes sure that, like, people stay out of the team's hair while they're trying to innovate, et cetera, et cetera.
00:44:12.600 That kind of all drops out.
00:44:14.180 And what it is is like, oh, it's this lone person kind of shaping the world according to his wishes.
00:44:20.520 And it's very noticeable that the people who fall for this stuff, whether it's, you know, Michael Lewis with Sam Bankman Freed or, frankly, Ken Oletta with Elizabeth Holmes or, although much more critically, Aaron Sorkin with Mark Zuckerberg,
00:44:36.220 They, I think, have a little touch of that self-conception themselves. And I think it's a really central, a key part of the kind of mythologization of Silicon Valley that really subtended its political efficacy in the 2010s. And that, frankly, we're still grappling with that. We're sort of trying to get ourselves out of.
00:44:57.220 right the reason why we couldn't be like oh these billionaires went right wing how fucking
00:45:01.960 surprising right when at the first sign that they were it was like but it can't be right like but
00:45:07.280 he's such an unusual guy he's he's so hard to play it's like no he's not hard to place he's a rich
00:45:12.200 guy who doesn't want to give up his money what could be more boring than that if he owned a used
00:45:16.440 Ford dealership you wouldn't think twice about it but because he's wearing a hoodie and because he 0.97
00:45:20.940 watched this movie about how he's a fucking genius I guess that makes it really hard to 0.92
00:45:25.520 hard to describe what's happening yeah i mean i think there's you've hit on a few things one is 0.98
00:45:29.760 the like mysticization of this kind of masculinity right the lone genius who is tortured by his own
00:45:39.680 gifts like into a tragic and almost like inevitable or accidentally anti-social stance
00:45:46.260 is i think like really like you know it's absolving right it sort of takes mark zuckerberg 0.99
00:45:52.720 out of responsibility yeah he's an asshole because because he's so brilliant not because it's in his 0.99
00:45:58.100 self-interest to be an asshole or not because he like doesn't particularly care about other people 1.00
00:46:01.180 right yeah and then there's the other thing that you're noting on like maybe a psychological level 0.99
00:46:05.820 which is the need for these tech innovators to see themselves as singular geniuses who have created
00:46:13.040 something you know sui generis out of their mind that is creating all this value yeah which is kind
00:46:18.040 of antithetical to how social media companies actually work, which is that the people who are
00:46:22.480 creating the value, well, the people who are creating a value on Facebook are Facebook users.
00:46:27.700 That's what the other users are going there to see. They're going to see one another, right?
00:46:31.360 The people who are getting paid are merely kind of supplying like a container for that to happen
00:46:37.200 in, but like, it's not the actual source of the value, right? The actual source of the value
00:46:41.260 is dispersed across the user base. Network effects. Exactly. And so that is, I think,
00:46:45.800 also like a contradiction in terms for the conception of zuckerberg as a genius because
00:46:51.000 like he's a genius because we are right right the the source of his supposed genius is is
00:46:56.420 entirely located in other people yeah maybe that's just an extension of the metaphor of like what how
00:47:01.100 you talk about a company working right like actually this is a lot of people adding in a
00:47:05.440 ton of value by working and it's a lot of other investors adding in a ton of value by like dumping
00:47:11.240 money in and making it happen that way you know there's this like distribution of the actual work
00:47:16.520 and effect and then like a concentration of credit yeah but we should note what i think does make
00:47:22.900 these platforms unusual is that a lot of the labor that does make them so effective that
00:47:26.340 accounts for their network effects is rendered for free and that it is often rendered by people who
00:47:33.140 are very very different from the people who build the actual algorithms right who build the actual
00:47:37.060 platform, and this is by now, I think a little bit of an old example, but the review platform
00:47:42.420 Yelp, that was very open about the fact that like they really were trying to solicit restaurant
00:47:48.020 reviews from women, mostly, I guess, moms, which they weren't paying for. But that was driving all 0.78
00:47:53.820 the traffic to the site. I had an interview for my book with an early employee there who said like,
00:47:59.420 yeah, I mean, like power users did not get paid. Power users got spa coupons, right? And he's like,
00:48:05.380 think about that like it's very obvious who we envisioned right this wasn't you know some pimply
00:48:10.820 17 year old like in his mom's basement it wasn't you know a grandpa this was we were envisioning 0.99
00:48:16.700 a middle-aged woman who was doing this for free and of course the ability to take women's labor
00:48:22.540 that is rendered for free and say well this is not really work is a really really old thing but it is
00:48:27.360 the number one means of value generation for most of these social media companies facebook moms
00:48:33.120 It's where all the money is.
00:48:35.160 So do you want to get into what has happened to Mark Zuckerberg over the past, like, two years that has changed his public reputation?
00:48:45.400 You know, before he went on Rogan and talked about the need for more masculine energy, before he showed up at Trump's inauguration and, like, ogled Jeff Bezos' wife's weird bustier, before he went into the category that he's gone into now,
00:49:01.220 There was kind of a transitional period in his public image.
00:49:04.600 Yeah, and I think it started really in 2016.
00:49:08.620 2016, 2017 really was kind of an important year for Facebook in, I think, three ways.
00:49:14.880 One was the 2016 election, a lot of people blamed on Facebook, fairly or not, whatever.
00:49:20.020 And one should say, one group that seems to have thought that Facebook did have some responsibility were a lot of Facebook employees.
00:49:26.160 And so this whole talk of like, oh, we're just one big family really got a couple of cracks.
00:49:31.220 Because now Zuckerberg's family was like, I don't know, buddy, it feels like we did
00:49:34.940 something bad here and we should probably be better about this.
00:49:37.820 Meanwhile, he kind of doubled down on this bet on the metaverse.
00:49:41.780 Basically, this was going to be his true stroke of genius, right?
00:49:46.040 Again, doing something that for once was just entirely his bailiwick.
00:49:51.440 And it crashed and burned so hard.
00:49:53.980 He was trying to get out from under the weight of, you just had the most ruthless
00:49:57.620 MySpace clone on offer and that's why you succeeded.
00:50:00.480 Well, no, the metaverse was going to be Mark Zuckerberg's Shea Doeuvre.
00:50:04.600 It was going to be his big masterpiece.
00:50:06.380 And all they did was sink unbelievable amounts of money into this.
00:50:09.880 And no one wanted it.
00:50:11.060 No one went there.
00:50:12.040 Everyone hated it. 1.00
00:50:12.980 It looked like shit. 1.00
00:50:13.660 People at Facebook were embarrassed by it. 1.00
00:50:15.820 Really, really bad.
00:50:17.060 And he had never had like a very stellar online reputation.
00:50:21.220 But he really fell into what I like to call the VC trap, which is that like these Silicon Valley super rich, like go on social media and do a thing. 1.00
00:50:28.820 and then everyone's like, God, what a fucking dork. 0.99
00:50:31.880 And then they're like, what? 1.00
00:50:33.140 Why would you say that to me, right?
00:50:34.420 Like everything Mark Zuckerberg did
00:50:36.520 from the weird way he put on sunscreen
00:50:39.260 to every new pursuit this extremely bored 30-something took up,
00:50:44.360 people were just like showering memes and jokes
00:50:48.360 and ridicule on him in a way that, you know,
00:50:51.420 couldn't have felt particularly good.
00:50:53.380 And then there was the fact that he essentially
00:50:57.700 was starting to age out of the kind of professional youth that sort of had been his
00:51:03.340 banner, right? Same way that Elon Musk still pretends that he spends all his day playing
00:51:08.200 a video game that he appears to never have played because, you know, he's fucking busy 0.96
00:51:13.040 raiding the treasury, right? The same way Zuckerberg sort of seems to have found the
00:51:19.160 aging process, which is admittedly just shitty, just straight up shit, very, very hard to deal 0.99
00:51:24.580 with. And so it started going into sort of like the MMA territory, the weird kind of supposed 0.98
00:51:29.560 bout with Elon Musk that was going to happen and then didn't happen, et cetera, et cetera.
00:51:33.040 Right. Elon Musk challenged him to a cage fight and Zuckerberg replies like anytime, man,
00:51:39.780 because Zuckerberg was like kind of ostentatiously, there's a weird amount of press around this
00:51:44.060 in the sense that made me think he tried to like launch this publicly himself and that he was
00:51:48.660 doing a lot of like violent martial arts training yeah he was like appearing at public contests
00:51:56.680 and in like crowds at professional mma fights and like like i think he just hired dana white or one
00:52:03.360 of the mma executives to to work at meta that's right so he got into this like real like theater
00:52:09.340 of masculine domination stuff and he got like a weird like midlife crisis look he like grew his
00:52:15.980 hair out a little he used to have this like julius caesar haircut that was very square and short
00:52:21.320 yeah and he grew out his hair and unfortunately it kind of looks like my hair now it's like kind
00:52:26.700 of this like shaggy oh it was tragic it was tragic for me my joke was molly dealer but i'm so sorry
00:52:33.280 now that i know it's yours he also wears like oversized like hip-hop looking t-shirts and like
00:52:39.420 a big gold chain he looks you know what he dresses kind of like billy eilish oh yeah it's just like
00:52:43.940 Everything's a little oversized.
00:52:46.300 They're birds of a feather.
00:52:47.380 He's not dressing his age.
00:52:49.400 So there's definitely this post hoc rejection of the fact that he is now 40 years old.
00:52:56.280 Yeah.
00:52:56.440 And so given that you started us with our famous canonic distinction between perverts,
00:53:02.020 creeps, and priests, it is very noticeable with both Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg that
00:53:08.500 their midlife crisis kind of eschews the one kind of royal road through the midlife crisis, 0.89
00:53:15.740 which is a younger woman, right? 0.77
00:53:18.140 Like there is a, I mean, like Elon Musk. 1.00
00:53:19.680 Elon Musk has plenty of younger women.
00:53:21.240 He's impregnating everybody who's ever worked for him. 0.95
00:53:23.240 He's impregnating them. 0.84
00:53:23.720 He's sexually harassed that woman on the plane, allegedly. 0.90
00:53:26.520 You know, I don't know. 0.96
00:53:27.120 Elon Musk has plenty of weird sex stuff going on. 0.75
00:53:31.020 His weird pro-natalist thing.
00:53:33.660 Because Elon Musk is in his mid-50s.
00:53:35.580 Yeah, yeah.
00:53:36.240 And, like, all the women who are giving birth to his children are not in their mid-50s.
00:53:40.480 Yeah.
00:53:40.780 Like, he has a harem, and he built them, like, a commune in Austin.
00:53:44.340 In Austin, where all the good harems are.
00:53:46.000 Yeah.
00:53:46.300 No, I reject this characterization of Elon Musk. 0.81
00:53:49.260 There's not one younger woman.
00:53:51.140 Like, they are, and they are largely kept out of his public persona.
00:53:54.400 Like, Jeff Bezos has Lauren Sanchez, who looks insane.
00:53:57.560 Yeah. 0.98
00:53:57.980 And that's very clearly a younger woman, you know, second wife.
00:54:02.040 But Zuckerberg is still with Priscilla.
00:54:04.200 Yeah.
00:54:05.040 Zuckerberg gives off enormous divorce data energy without actually divorcing, which I think is interesting.
00:54:10.960 Although apparently the rumor, and this is the kind of blind item that I'm going to caution as unconfirmable, but the rumor is that when Priscilla was pregnant with, I believe, their third child, Mark Zuckerberg, during their pregnancy, took a meeting with China's leader, Xi Jinping, and offered Xi the right to name their future son, which he had not discussed with Priscilla.
00:54:32.140 Wow.
00:54:32.380 And Xi basically told him, like, you know, get some self-respect.
00:54:37.040 Like, he was trying to get more deference for Meta's operations in China and more deregulation of his company in that market.
00:54:44.040 And Priscilla was very mad at him for offering Xi Jinping naming rights to her son.
00:54:50.540 And that's why he bought her that god-awful statue, that, like, weird statue portrait of her that is supposedly at their compound in Palo Alto.
00:54:59.160 Real healthy stuff.
00:55:00.420 It's like weird. It's like kind of like she's like windswept. It's kind of like copper. It's ugly. You guys should Google it. There's a photo of her in a bathrobe sipping coffee in front of this god awful ugly. I feel like if a man gave me that, I would divorce him. But she doesn't feel that way.
00:55:16.980 We should say these are all these rumors are unconfirmed. So take them with a grain of salt.
00:55:21.820 Who knows? I just I like I think that that is a wonderful story. And it's a great story.
00:55:29.100 If it was true, you know?
00:55:30.680 I mean, honestly, if I went on a date with Mark Zuckerberg, I would fully expect there to be a big and awkward and absolutely misbegotten gesture to be part of it.
00:55:41.840 Because every public appearance, including his tack to the right, I'm like, you're not even MAGA-ing right, man.
00:55:47.720 Yeah, it's awkward. His heart's not in it.
00:55:49.860 Did you listen to any of his Rogan interview that came out just after the election?
00:55:53.560 About 10 minutes. I couldn't.
00:55:54.700 It was awful.
00:55:55.700 I forgot how long Rogan episodes are.
00:55:57.840 They're about three hours.
00:55:58.680 How are they this long?
00:55:59.100 They're about three hours. You know what somebody's told me is that it's for guys who go to the gym and they spend all their time at the gym.
00:56:05.240 And what they're doing there is listening to podcasts.
00:56:07.560 So this is for your leg day or whatever. And you're doing one hundred thousand pistol squats.
00:56:12.580 And you listen to Mark Zuckerberg, where he complained a lot about covid era regulation from the Biden administration.
00:56:19.360 He's like they wanted us to suppress free speech. And he's not very convincing at it.
00:56:24.040 particularly what he's talking about is like Biden administration requests to like stop
00:56:27.300 algorithmically incentivizing disinformation about COVID vaccines. But he is using the rhetoric of
00:56:34.800 free speech. And the part that was really impressive to me was when he talked about
00:56:40.180 his resentment at being investigated. He was investigated by antitrust and consumer protection
00:56:46.120 administrations during the Biden era. And he really, really resented having his companies
00:56:51.940 be subject to regulation, so.
00:56:54.200 And you can tell that, like,
00:56:55.740 I mean, they have the whole hearing on tape.
00:56:57.760 He sits there in a suit and a tie
00:56:59.560 and he looks unhappy.
00:57:01.640 He doesn't look pissed at all.
00:57:02.880 He looks unhappy.
00:57:03.820 He looks physically ill being there.
00:57:05.380 And he looks like a schoolboy
00:57:07.340 who got called into the principal's office, basically.
00:57:10.440 And I think that that's exactly it.
00:57:12.360 He felt disrespected by this.
00:57:14.400 And one should say that, like,
00:57:15.940 people might think,
00:57:16.560 well, then it's not just about gender. 0.97
00:57:18.520 Well, it is about gender
00:57:19.320 because Silicon Valley has long thought
00:57:21.140 that regulation was basically the nanny state
00:57:24.440 trying to sort of tie down 0.98
00:57:26.200 the strapping masculine energy of these companies, right?
00:57:29.100 If only we could unleash
00:57:30.920 the untrammeled power of this company.
00:57:32.460 But they tell us that
00:57:34.220 if you tell someone they have diabetes,
00:57:36.260 they should have diabetes. 1.00
00:57:37.600 These Washington homos, right? 1.00
00:57:40.060 It is entirely about gender. 1.00
00:57:41.860 It's all about like thwarted masculinity.
00:57:44.340 It's not about femininity specifically. 0.64
00:57:46.060 It's about thwarted masculinity. 0.95
00:57:47.880 Well, it's also about the feminization 0.99
00:57:49.360 of rulemaking and authority, right? 0.94
00:57:51.780 The feminization of the regulatory state. 0.80
00:57:54.140 And care.
00:57:54.580 Yes, and care, the sense of being responsible for others.
00:57:57.820 These are understood as whining, unfun, feminine impositions on masculine joy.
00:58:04.880 You know, on Rogan, the only person Zuckerberg complained about by name was Elizabeth Warren.
00:58:10.700 Right.
00:58:11.300 Which was a name that issued like this like Bronx cheer,
00:58:14.620 howl of pain and disgust from Joe Rogan. 1.00
00:58:17.800 You know, the embodiment not only of womanhood, but of an aggressive regulatory state, of an aggressive antitrust regime.
00:58:24.940 Right. She is. She is the embodiment for them of feminized regulation. 0.73
00:58:29.460 Yeah. So then he talks about corporate America requiring more masculine energy. 1.00
00:58:36.460 We should say that Sheryl Sandberg exited Facebook, or I guess it's called Meta now, in 2022, following the COVID debacle and the viral spread of misinformation on that platform during the pandemic. 0.57
00:58:51.060 And I guess now Zuckerberg has decided that he doesn't want any more of that feminine energy, whatever that means, in his company. 0.83
00:58:58.580 So do you want to talk about that remark? 0.82
00:59:00.740 Yeah, I mean, I think it's really remarkable if you know the companies.
00:59:05.100 Silicon Valley has made very tentative steps
00:59:08.420 towards alleviating the gender imbalance
00:59:10.520 in the upper echelons of its headquarters
00:59:13.580 over the last, I don't know, 10 years.
00:59:16.600 There's a recognition that this was a problem
00:59:18.320 for a while there,
00:59:19.520 and there were some attempts made, right?
00:59:21.600 And Sandberg, I think, did push for a lot of that.
00:59:25.500 At the same time,
00:59:26.900 you wouldn't walk into the meta offices
00:59:29.760 in Palo Alto or Menlo Park, I guess they are.
00:59:32.740 It's functionally its own city, you know?
00:59:34.340 It's like it's a very large place.
00:59:36.960 Yeah, it's huge.
00:59:38.200 And if you go there, right, there's the main quad, which I think used to be sort of Sun Microsystems before Facebook and then later Meta took it over.
00:59:45.500 There's a massive headquarters built, I think, by Frank Gehry.
00:59:49.900 And then there's a bunch of these Silicon Valley kind of office buildings that sort of got put up very, very quickly.
00:59:55.820 Every time you'd go down there, it'd be a new one.
00:59:57.940 And that's sort of where their like content moderation teams sit.
01:00:00.920 That's where their celebrity relationship sits, especially for Instagram.
01:00:05.280 That's where HR sits, et cetera, et cetera.
01:00:07.940 And as people sort of leave the buses to go to these places, my observation, I mean, I haven't been there since May 2022.
01:00:15.240 All the men go into one building and all the women go into the other. 0.86
01:00:17.780 Exactly. 0.76
01:00:18.280 Yeah, all the men go earn engineering salaries and all the women go earn content moderation HR salaries.
01:00:25.100 Yeah. 0.71
01:00:25.420 Exactly.
01:00:25.820 I mean, it's not 100%, but that has definitely been my impression every time I've been there.
01:00:32.020 And it's always noticeable.
01:00:33.460 It's visually noticeable, right?
01:00:34.680 You don't walk into the meta headquarters thinking that you're at some kind of daycare.
01:00:38.500 It is a heavily masculine place.
01:00:41.160 Maybe not as much as some other places where it's really uncomfortable, but it really is noticeable still. 0.63
01:00:45.820 Or it was when I was last there three years ago.
01:00:48.260 This is called the sex segregation of the workforce.
01:00:51.900 Yeah.
01:00:52.120 And I think what we can understand in Zuckerberg's comment is a commitment to the same kind of projects that, like, the Trump and Elon Musk and J.D. Vance regime has endeavored to instill in the federal bureaucracy, right, which is the resegregation along racial and in Zuckerberg's case, particularly sex lines of the workforce, right?
01:01:14.360 We're going to exclude women and people of color from positions of prominence, of decision making, of dignity and power. 0.56
01:01:23.380 And we're going to make power an exclusively white male domain. 0.99
01:01:27.760 Yeah. And power and prestige are concentrated where you're dealing with the data, which means the stuff that actually makes you the money, which is the stuff that, right, if you build the platform, you are important. 0.51
01:01:40.620 If you help moderate the content, you're not important.
01:01:43.620 If you have relations with the content, you are not important.
01:01:46.760 There was an ad up by 101.
01:01:49.060 It's not a meta ad, but it was a different company that Long had to add up, grab them
01:01:54.440 by the data.
01:01:55.440 This was after 2016.
01:01:57.240 I would encourage our listeners who haven't to, if you're ever in San Francisco, like
01:02:01.920 look at the billboards along the 101 between the city and Silicon Valley or like when you're
01:02:06.780 going over the Bay Bridge because it is like the most dystopian set of advertising that explains
01:02:11.660 so much about our terrible world. But it's all it's all shit like that. 0.99
01:02:15.640 Yep. And so I think the idea that data is feminized and that those who wield and control 0.99
01:02:21.980 and wrangle it into submission are, you know, the true studs and that they deserve all the 0.51
01:02:27.400 esteem and all the money and the stature within the company. It's how a lot of these companies
01:02:32.460 were always structured,
01:02:33.940 though I think, again,
01:02:34.940 there have been efforts made
01:02:36.300 by people like Sheryl Sandberg
01:02:37.800 to ameliorate that somewhat.
01:02:39.440 But like, that's what I was saying
01:02:40.900 when I was saying that Zuckerberg
01:02:41.940 really didn't change
01:02:43.080 if anything he returned to something, right?
01:02:45.220 Like this was set up
01:02:46.640 in the structure of this company
01:02:47.780 and he framed it on Rogan as a return, right?
01:02:50.660 He framed it as a restoration, right?
01:02:53.840 And it's the same way that like Elon Musk
01:02:56.360 sort of thinks he's restoring something at Twitter, right?
01:03:00.160 All of this is about this kind of,
01:03:02.120 Silicon Valley libertarian notion that there is a natural hierarchy of people. And if it weren't
01:03:09.540 for the nanny state, if it weren't for those namby-pamby liberals, if it weren't for the 0.62
01:03:14.060 social justice warriors and the feminazis, et cetera, et cetera, naturally, white men would
01:03:20.340 be at the top of that pecking order, right? Just like they were in the good old days of 2003.
01:03:25.740 You know, we talk a lot about like the conservatives imagined past, right? And this
01:03:29.540 like prelapsarian fantasy of white male dominance in like the quote unquote state of nature. Right.
01:03:35.640 Which is always like actually a very carefully created by policy era that they're reaching back
01:03:41.220 to and usually misremembering. And I think for a lot of people, like the shorthand for this era
01:03:45.200 is like the 1950s. Right. Yeah. Like that's when there was segregation and women weren't allowed
01:03:51.700 to have good jobs and they were all housewives stuck at home with their abusive husbands and 1.00
01:03:56.600 their shitty kids. Right. And that was like, that's a fantasy. Right. But sometimes the era 1.00
01:04:01.180 is much more recently. Right. Yeah. It's 2002. Yeah. Like Zuckerberg's imagined past is the
01:04:08.160 early aughts when, you know, Facebook was 15 people who all lived in one shitty house in
01:04:15.160 Palo Alto where they were doing beer pong and nobody ever told him what to do.
01:04:20.140 Yeah. In its own horrible way, it's it's almost a little touching. Right. You know,
01:04:23.860 it's like you or I going back to our college and being like,
01:04:26.820 well, I can't believe it's been X many years.
01:04:28.740 Like they're getting older and they're sad about it.
01:04:30.800 Like, I get it, Elon, I get it, Mark.
01:04:33.160 Don't take us down with you.
01:04:34.640 You know, you don't have to destroy democracy
01:04:36.800 just because you're getting older
01:04:38.740 and others have the impertinence to be young.
01:04:41.720 But that's what it is.
01:04:42.800 It's Musk bringing a mattress into the Twitter headquarters, right?
01:04:46.640 Like cosplaying startup.
01:04:48.920 It's both, it's a biographical thing, right?
01:04:51.640 But it's also deeply political, as you say,
01:04:53.680 Because it was a moment that really didn't reflect, didn't have to reflect on its own gender and racial presuppositions where a lot of that stuff was sort of accepted as natural or where there wasn't an HR department at all.
01:05:06.200 I mean, most startups don't have an HR department.
01:05:07.980 So they couldn't say, guys, this actually violates federal law.
01:05:11.240 Everyone was making too much money, right?
01:05:13.500 Like if you fired the one lady you had, she wouldn't sue because you didn't want to be that girl. 0.99
01:05:19.160 So you would just apply to another job and get a good recommendation.
01:05:22.600 And because you worked at Facebook, of course, you'd get that job and you'd make money.
01:05:26.160 So basically, there was no reason for any of this stuff that corporate America has built up to adjudicate fairness, hierarchies, promotions, et cetera, et cetera.
01:05:35.180 And as you say, they don't see that extremely anomalous state of affairs that was owed to just everyone pouring bathtubs full of cash into Silicon Valley.
01:05:45.080 They don't see that as anomalous.
01:05:47.520 They see it as the golden age that they want to return to, the natural state of affairs.
01:05:53.840 You can't be young again, but you can make everybody else miserable about it.
01:05:58.440 Yep.
01:05:59.460 That might be a good place to wrap up.
01:06:00.780 Thank you for coming along on this, like, depressing-ass journey with me, Adrian, into the life of one of our worst guys. 0.99
01:06:09.560 Yeah, just straight up sucks. 0.99
01:06:11.920 Anyway. 0.98
01:06:13.120 Rate and review us on iTunes.
01:06:15.700 Check out our Patreon.
01:06:17.640 Thank you for supporting us, and we'll see you next time.
01:06:21.560 See you next time.
01:06:24.180 In Bed with the Right, we'd like to thank the Michelle R. Clayman Institute for Gender Research for generous support.
01:06:29.220 Jennifer Portillo for setting up our studio.
01:06:31.640 Our producer is Katie Lau.