In Bed With The Right - May 06, 2025


Episode 74: The Trustees (with Lauren Lassabe Shepherd)

Topics
Episode 73 -- Roy Cohn with Matt Sitman (Part 2) Episode 76: Depp v. Heard with Kat Tenbarge

Episode Stats


Length

50 minutes

Words per minute

176.07

Word count

8,861

Sentence count

582

Harmful content

Misogyny

1

sentences flagged

Toxicity

28

sentences flagged

Hate speech

28

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 A group of wealthy men and women walk into a talent scout's office.
00:00:04.160 We have an act you might like to sign.
00:00:06.040 Cool, the talent scout replies, what do you do?
00:00:09.240 One guy starts throwing dollar bills at two other guys who begin building an immense climbing wall,
00:00:13.820 while another provides athletes with get-out-of-jail-free cards.
00:00:16.880 Another starts a right-wing think tank that tells people how to use cooking oil to ward off infectious disease.
00:00:21.600 Another gets really into allegations of plagiarism until his wife is accused of plagiarism.
00:00:25.880 The talent scout goes, okay, okay, I get it, the joke's going on too long already. 0.99
00:00:30.000 What do you call this fucking thing? 0.99
00:00:31.220 And they go, the Board of Trustees. 0.99
00:00:34.560 Anyway, that's my aristocrats version with this.
00:00:38.400 Hi, I'm Adrienne Dobb.
00:00:40.100 And I'm Moira Donegan.
00:00:41.380 Whether we like it or not, we're in bed with the right.
00:00:45.560 Now, Adrienne, we have had a lot of occasion as Americans, as people who work for a university,
00:00:52.820 to think about all of the strange discourses surrounding American colleges and universities,
00:01:00.620 particularly the fancy private ones, and how there's a lot of interesting imaginaries like
00:01:06.620 sort of projected onto these, right? But today we have an opportunity to talk about the people who
00:01:11.320 are actually controlling these institutions, the shadowy, ill-understood, tremendously wealthy
00:01:18.520 individuals who make up the boards of trustees.
00:01:22.520 That's right.
00:01:22.940 When we hear about the university and media and political discourse, and we talked to
00:01:26.980 Samuel Catlin about this most recently, we normally hear about students.
00:01:31.620 They occupy a lot of real estate in the minds of our pundit class.
00:01:35.480 We talk about faculty and we sometimes hear about administrators.
00:01:38.700 It's their foibles and their peculiar rituals, right, like safe spaces, trigger warnings
00:01:44.060 or whatever that we all hear about.
00:01:45.520 and, you know, it's their viewpoint diversity
00:01:48.600 that we worry about.
00:01:50.180 But in this episode of In Bed with the Right,
00:01:52.360 we're going to talk about a group that this leaves out,
00:01:55.080 which is actually central to the functioning
00:01:56.780 of American universities
00:01:58.560 and has influenced how they function
00:02:00.420 pretty much since the beginning.
00:02:02.440 I almost called this,
00:02:03.380 oh, this is the story of a hidden group
00:02:05.340 in American colleges,
00:02:06.260 but they're not super hidden 0.99
00:02:08.060 in the sense that their name's on the fucking buildings, right? 0.96
00:02:11.560 They're in the name of Vanderbilt University, 0.98
00:02:13.900 Carnegie Mellon, Rice, Clark, or Stanford. Or if you think about HBCUs, our guest today alerted me
00:02:21.920 to the fact why Spelman College has the name that it does, which is that it was this tiny school and
00:02:28.380 was then endowed by John D. Rockefeller and is named Spelman after Rockefeller's wife as kind
00:02:33.700 of a gift to Laura Spelman. But I'm glad you mentioned our guest today, Adrienne, because we
00:02:40.000 should introduce her. We are very lucky to be joined by Lauren Shepard. Lauren, thank you so
00:02:45.140 much for being here with us. Yeah, thank you. Great to be here. So Lauren is a historian of
00:02:50.580 American higher education and in fact runs an amazing podcast, American Campus, that is just
00:02:55.740 billed as that. It's a history of higher education in the United States, and it is that. It's
00:03:00.560 absolutely brilliant. It tackles questions ranging from pushbacks on affirmative action
00:03:05.680 via the movement to create free college and what happened to it,
00:03:10.040 all the way to questions like, why do U.S. universities have dorms?
00:03:14.480 She's also the author of Resistance from the Right, Conservatives, and the Campus Wars,
00:03:18.340 which came out two years ago from the University of North Carolina Press,
00:03:21.900 which is absolutely excellent.
00:03:23.020 And she is the co-editor of a forthcoming volume, Decolonizing the Campus,
00:03:28.200 which she put out with John R. Legg.
00:03:30.560 Welcome, Lauren.
00:03:31.820 Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. I appreciate the introduction.
00:03:33.800 So why are we talking about these people? Maybe one little anecdote to get people started, right? During the recent attacks on Columbia University, there were a lot of people asking me like, hey, how come the university caved so hard to the Trump administration's demands?
00:03:51.640 And I kept having to explain to them that like, this was not the Trump administration negotiating really with a bunch of faculty or a bunch of administrators at Columbia. It was the Trump administration really negotiating with the Board of Trustees, which, spoiler alert, is a little bit more aligned with the Trump administration than, you know, if you had asked the English department at Columbia University, let's say.
00:04:15.280 You could even tell in the coverage, which was very much driven by the Wall Street Journal, the fact that a lot of financial journalists appear to be very well informed what, quote-unquote, Colombia was thinking about the negotiations with the Trump administration.
00:04:28.680 Well, that's because they didn't hear it from whoever the interim president of Colombia was that day, who changed like every three minutes anyway.
00:04:36.960 It was because they had the cell number for the board of trustee members who really were making the decision.
00:04:45.280 Well, cell number, or maybe they were in a signal group chat.
00:04:48.460 But yeah, I mean.
00:04:50.000 So Lauren, is it accurate to say that campus stories often don't focus on the trustees
00:04:54.380 because sort of their demographics and politics, by and large, don't lend themselves to the
00:05:00.420 kind of left-wing censorship framing that campus critics tend to like?
00:05:04.360 Yeah, the campus critics who like to rail against left-wing censorship are almost always
00:05:08.540 talking about students, those censorious and powerful 18 to 24-year-olds.
00:05:12.960 But yes, I'm sure a trustee has probably never been accused of being, say, like a Marxist, just because it's the opposite worldview required for a trustee's job.
00:05:23.540 So the job of the trustee is to be a fundraiser and a fund manager of the institution.
00:05:28.640 And this differs somewhat between private and public schools.
00:05:31.280 So I'll concentrate on private colleges because those are the ones that always make a splash in the New York Times and the Atlantic op-ed pages by some of this show's favorite cultural critics.
00:05:41.380 But yeah, the trustees are the ultimate authority over the university.
00:05:46.380 So anytime you see a headline that's questioning, you know, the motives or the activities of college students, that's something I would recommend readers sort of like second guess, right?
00:05:57.520 So the trustees tend to focus on their fiduciary responsibilities, but they technically have the final say over every matter of the institution, right?
00:06:05.480 So strictly speaking, trustees have the final say over everything from awarding degrees to hiring groundskeepers to approving book manuscripts acquired by the university press, though they will delegate those tasks out.
00:06:17.360 So, yes, if the question is how come Columbia caved, these are the people we're talking about.
00:06:22.600 We're not talking about, like you said, the English department.
00:06:25.680 And so we might add the nomenclature differs, right?
00:06:28.880 Like by the trustee, a regent, a supervisor, those are not substantially different, right?
00:06:33.120 It's just what's on the can.
00:06:34.420 Right. Yeah, it's all essentially the same thing.
00:06:37.020 So let's say we have listeners who are, you know, super wealthy and want to, you know, exert some influence over higher education.
00:06:46.420 How do we do it? Let's give the folks, you know, some news they can use.
00:06:51.000 A step-by-step?
00:06:51.720 Yeah. How do I become a trustee at a private university?
00:06:55.620 Okay, well, here is the game plan.
00:06:57.300 So typically, you have to be an alum and a mega donor, meaning you've donated millions of dollars.
00:07:03.240 And especially if your family has a legacy of bequeathing large gifts.
00:07:07.680 And private university boards are self-perpetuating too.
00:07:10.720 So honestly, it's hard to just wake up and decide you want to be on a private university board.
00:07:15.400 You've got to be selected by current members.
00:07:18.960 And at public state schools, the process is a bit more democratic and the board is more sensitive to serving public interests.
00:07:24.980 but at private institutions, the board is almost singularly concerned with growing the endowment
00:07:30.540 or the college trusts. So yes, to answer the question that you asked earlier, by the nature
00:07:35.720 of their job to hoard and grow wealth for the benefit of a select few, these people are not
00:07:40.540 left-wingers, though they may often be pretty censorious. I will say like generally the radical
00:07:46.560 left Marxists I encounter are not very good at like making, keeping or raising money. It seems
00:07:52.780 like sort of mutually exclusive skill sets.
00:07:56.500 And we might say that like it also tends to tie universities to specific industries, right?
00:08:01.760 Like so Stanford's trustees are disproportionately from tech.
00:08:04.940 I would bet Columbia's are predominantly Wall Streeters.
00:08:08.460 Is that accurate?
00:08:09.620 Well, I actually don't know.
00:08:11.420 I know Columbia has a pretty large board.
00:08:13.960 They probably are very lopsided towards having experience in Wall Street.
00:08:18.940 But yeah, like you said, the nature of the institution.
00:08:21.480 So if a school, for example, is known for its business school, you know, those self-perpetuating trustees, they're going to be alum.
00:08:27.960 They come from that career field.
00:08:29.660 So where did this institution or like forum for funding universities come from?
00:08:36.000 Is this like a Gilded Age invention or did it arise earlier?
00:08:40.760 Like where does the tradition of the board of trustees begin in the history of U.S. higher education?
00:08:48.280 Yeah, it's actually it goes back way further than that.
00:08:50.680 One of my colleagues in critical university studies, Ashish Kapur-Sadiq, has explained this the best way that I understand it and the way that I explain it to my students.
00:08:59.280 So the trustee model as it exists for colleges in the U.S. is a vestige of the British Empire.
00:09:05.560 So during the 16th century, European states were creating corporations over all of their colonies, right?
00:09:11.180 So it's just a legal arrangement that allows the European monarch to grant investors to run an institution, such as a college, in the colony in the name of the king, right?
00:09:21.880 While they assume all the expenses and all the risks.
00:09:23.980 So these investors are the trustees. 0.99
00:09:26.300 But it's an interesting question because many people will know that the U.S. college model goes back to, like, early medieval European institutions meant to train the clergies. 0.51
00:09:36.900 But those actually did not have boards of trustees, right? 0.88
00:09:39.820 Yeah.
00:09:40.040 The people who ran those medieval institutions were the faculty themselves.
00:09:43.460 So it's much different in the U.S.
00:09:46.280 Interesting.
00:09:46.780 And it's because of that legacy of empire.
00:09:48.860 And that started almost at the beginning with Harvard and College of William and Mary, basically.
00:09:53.900 Yeah.
00:09:54.280 So Harvard was our first institution in 1636.
00:09:57.720 William and Mary a couple of decades later.
00:09:59.520 But yeah, they brought that trustee model here.
00:10:02.060 Wow.
00:10:03.140 So I thought we could focus on a couple of sort of episodes,
00:10:06.600 the stations of the cross, if you will, in this very difficult relationship between a bunch of
00:10:12.640 people doing research and then the sugar daddies that sustain and or don't sustain them. And I
00:10:20.040 thought given that, well, I'm currently in San Francisco, but Moira is sitting on the Stanford
00:10:24.760 campus, we could start there with a first episode that we might call Jane Stanford v. Edward
00:10:31.760 Osworth Ross. I love this story. And not only because it includes a alleged murder towards the
00:10:40.380 end and begins with a ghost, right? Yes. Yeah. There's several ghost stories you could tell
00:10:45.920 about Stanford University and several murder mysteries you could also tell. But this is one
00:10:51.000 of the more fun ones. Yeah. Stanford has a great lore. So the Roth affair is a great example of
00:10:56.820 what happens when a university has one trustee. The Roth case is a piece of 19th century lore in
00:11:02.920 the history of academic freedom and institutional due process in the U.S. And so this affair took
00:11:08.640 place at Stanford in the context of a national economic depression and the 1896 election. So
00:11:15.140 that's populist William Jennings Bryan versus pro-business Republican William McKinley.
00:11:20.580 And one of Stanford's highly regarded economics professors, Edward Ross, gave lectures across the
00:11:26.220 country advocating more or less for that populist free silver campaign as a way to restore the
00:11:31.020 economy without ever explicitly endorsing William Jennings Bryan or the Democrats.
00:11:36.480 So Stanford was founded in 1891 or opened its doors really in 1891. It's named after Leland
00:11:42.460 Stanford Jr., who was at that point already dead, but who was around was Jane Stanford,
00:11:47.240 his mother and widow to Leland Stanford Sr., who was the single trustee, I believe, at the time,
00:11:53.400 and was, in fact, the president of Stanford University
00:11:55.740 with David Starr Jordan,
00:11:57.680 who we would today think of as Stanford's first president
00:11:59.960 really being more of a caretaker.
00:12:01.760 She hated this guy, Edward Allsworth Ross,
00:12:06.120 partly because he criticized exactly the kind of place
00:12:10.400 where the Stanford family had made its name, right?
00:12:13.400 There's also some racism thrown in there,
00:12:15.220 so we shouldn't, like, under no circumstances
00:12:17.800 do you have to hand it to Edward Allsworth Ross.
00:12:21.200 But she very clearly just took issue with a member of, quote unquote, her faculty engaging in public speech that she deemed inimical to the interests that, yes, had made this very, very rich university possible.
00:12:36.600 Yes.
00:12:37.020 So Ross had a lot to say about the railroad.
00:12:40.760 And as you mentioned, like all of his political speech kind of ran counter to her own plutocratic politics.
00:12:47.120 It's interesting that she didn't have a problem with any of the other Stanford faculty who actually openly campaigned for McKinley.
00:12:53.820 But yeah, we might classify Ross as like a progressive of the late 19th century variety.
00:12:59.340 So a nativist with some deeply racist beliefs, pretty standard among social scientists of the time, I fear.
00:13:05.860 But Ross wasn't exactly like a socialist, though he did speak to socialists in labor groups pretty often,
00:13:11.140 which Jane Stanford, the Dowager Queen, as one biographer called her,
00:13:15.580 thought made Ross dangerous and an embarrassment to her institution,
00:13:19.120 and she wanted him out.
00:13:20.360 And so, yeah, his firing was a huge deal
00:13:22.920 because it triggered a flood of other highly respected professors
00:13:27.080 walking out in protest, so also resigning,
00:13:29.700 going to other places like Chicago.
00:13:31.560 Johns Hopkins.
00:13:32.240 And Johns Hopkins, yes.
00:13:33.640 And Stanford, as a brand-new baby institution,
00:13:36.720 that was a pretty big sting, right,
00:13:38.420 to lose such esteemed members of its faculty.
00:13:42.120 Yeah, and I mean, these people then start sort of pushing towards
00:13:45.840 what will become the foundation of the American Association of University Professors, the AUP.
00:13:50.740 But it's really important to note too, right, this is about defending free speech.
00:13:53.960 This is about defending academic freedom.
00:13:55.840 It's also about maintaining the professionalization of the university, right?
00:13:59.520 This university at the time was like four years old.
00:14:02.720 If people came away with the sense that this was just a finishing school run by Jane Stanford
00:14:07.300 that just happened to have tons of money,
00:14:09.380 you're not going to be taken seriously.
00:14:10.780 So this is also,
00:14:11.980 the AUP is all about
00:14:13.540 kind of professional self-preservation too.
00:14:16.140 It's not just about the principles.
00:14:17.580 Also, this is the only way
00:14:19.180 we can be taken seriously internationally.
00:14:21.840 It's the only way we can really ask
00:14:23.100 for funding for this stuff.
00:14:24.460 If all we're doing is kind of like 0.97
00:14:26.320 investigating shit that Jane Stanford tells us, 0.99
00:14:28.700 like we're just a crank think tank 1.00
00:14:31.020 by another name, right?
00:14:32.000 We're the American Enterprise Institute.
00:14:35.060 Oops.
00:14:36.360 Which actually will be created shortly after this.
00:14:39.980 Yeah.
00:14:40.280 Yeah.
00:14:40.560 And it's a good thing that you mentioned, like, there's this international reputation
00:14:44.160 because universities were brand new in the U.S., right?
00:14:47.660 Maybe not brand new.
00:14:48.660 A couple of decades they had existed.
00:14:50.000 But our college model had extended back to the 17th century.
00:14:54.020 We were just now trying to adopt the German model.
00:14:58.680 And we didn't quite take all of the wonderful German concepts of academic freedom, especially
00:15:03.680 not for students.
00:15:05.400 But yeah, the AAUP came out of the Ross case, along with a couple of others.
00:15:10.840 Now, we should say that Stanford is obviously kind of an outlier here.
00:15:15.120 And, you know, Jane Stanford, as Moira indicated, was dead by probably poisoning before the AAUP was ever founded.
00:15:21.720 It was not the AAUP that did it, to be clear.
00:15:24.100 Although, would you blame them if it was?
00:15:26.720 Possibly not.
00:15:27.620 But the only culprit that's ever been suggested is, in fact, David Starr Jordan, right?
00:15:34.000 Either she choked on something or he did it.
00:15:36.840 He definitely covered it up.
00:15:38.480 Whoever did it, he was behind the cover up.
00:15:41.340 And there were multiple attempts, too.
00:15:43.380 Readers should check out the book, Who Killed Jane Stanford, by a Stanford faculty member, right?
00:15:48.280 That's right.
00:15:48.900 Yeah, by Richard White.
00:15:49.920 People should check that out.
00:15:50.860 Yeah.
00:15:51.280 So here we have really this kind of, I think, what you would call the monarchical model of the school's founder.
00:15:56.940 That's no longer really the case for any university, nor was it even normal back then outside of what was, you know, pretty recent acquisition in terms of territory.
00:16:08.080 Normally, a bunch of trustees will kind of jostle for influence or will be joined on a board.
00:16:15.460 You tend not to make yourself dependent on one single sugar daddy because there are inherent risks that come with it as young Stanford University learned to its own chagrin.
00:16:24.220 Yes.
00:16:24.700 And so I thought we could talk about another example. We could call this episode two, No Child of Mine. This is Charles Walgreen v. the University of Chicago. What happened there?
00:16:36.180 Oh, gosh.
00:16:36.840 1935.
00:16:37.720 Yes.
00:16:38.120 This is a tale of just one trustee really leading his thumb on the scale in a major way, right?
00:16:43.860 Exactly.
00:16:44.080 So even when you have sort of a diversified array of sugar daddies, one of them can really throw his weight around.
00:16:49.840 Oh, yeah.
00:16:50.100 Yes. Yeah. I mean, it's not uncommon for boards to have like dozens of trustees today.
00:16:54.700 So this case, this is a great example of a different type of plutocratic influence over
00:16:59.620 the college that doesn't necessarily come from the trustees, but from something quite
00:17:04.360 closely linked in that is corporate interest, right?
00:17:07.080 So this is an anti-communist story from 1935.
00:17:10.560 Charles Walgreen, founder of the pharmacy franchise, sort of lost his mind when his
00:17:16.080 niece, whose tuition he was paying to the University of Chicago, told him that she'd
00:17:20.420 been reading the Communist Manifesto and her coursework and that one of her professors was
00:17:25.580 advocating free love. Now, according to historian of the University of Chicago, John Boyer, she was
00:17:32.280 just teasing him, but he took literally her attempt to get a rise out of him. So he brought this claim
00:17:38.860 about, you know, Marxism and free love to the Chicago Tribune. And from there, it got picked
00:17:44.700 up nationally through the Hearst Press. And this is 1935 again. And at that point, the Illinois
00:17:49.740 legislature got involved and the state Senate opened an investigation into the University of
00:17:54.320 Chicago. And the entire investigation was pretty comical. Walgreens himself appeared before the
00:17:59.340 Senate hearing spouting off against, you know, communism and indoctrination. But the accused
00:18:04.880 faculty, when it was time for their defense, conceded like, yes, we did assign our students
00:18:09.480 to read from Karl Marx so that we could look at the Communist Manifesto critically. So after all
00:18:15.320 of the defense's evidence was put to the public, Walgreen kind of had a bit of egg on his face.
00:18:20.480 There wasn't really any evidence of indoctrination taking place or not communist indoctrination
00:18:25.120 anyway. And of course, by the 1930 standards of yellow journalism, the Hearst papers ran these
00:18:30.760 stories as salaciously as possible. And they often made a mockery of Charles Walgreen, who
00:18:36.500 ultimately like was pretty embarrassed by the entire ordeal. So by the time everything was over,
00:18:41.320 Walgreens did like an about face and ultimately gave the university over half a million dollars
00:18:48.140 in the 1930s to found...
00:18:50.200 To indoctrinate the students.
00:18:52.080 To found a free market pro-American program at the university that would eventually become
00:18:57.700 the notorious Chicago School of Economics and ruin lots of economies in Latin America
00:19:02.300 and the global South.
00:19:03.880 Which is so interesting, right?
00:19:05.000 Like one of the sort of successes of the system seems to me that like that for a long time,
00:19:11.140 at least it was able to absorb these outside shocks and turn them into money it really took
00:19:15.560 literally the like the best cure for speech you don't like is more speech but in this case all
00:19:20.280 speech costs money and so they're like hey so if you're so mad at what we're teaching why don't you
00:19:25.440 donate some money and we teach you the opposite thing too right the fact that walgreen i don't
00:19:29.460 think it was an about phase in some way like the fact that walgreen gets like he gets rope-a-dope
00:19:34.340 to some extent by the university but on the other hand like that was sort of the agreement right
00:19:39.480 that if you don't like what the hose of cash is buying right now,
00:19:44.920 you create your own hose of cash and we'll accommodate that too.
00:19:49.020 Yeah, it's balance is actually what they like to call it.
00:19:51.940 That's something that goes all the way back to this period that we're talking about.
00:19:56.520 And so, yeah, I mean, we can say in the long run,
00:19:58.980 Dr. Walgreens got his way with the University of Chicago,
00:20:01.960 although it sounds like none of us are really convinced
00:20:04.280 that what was being taught was really actually counter to the pharmacist's own capitalist logic.
00:20:09.080 But I also have to say, do we know how much I actually I've told this story so many times myself?
00:20:14.820 Yeah, it's 12 million.
00:20:15.880 12 million. Right. But do we know how much the tuition was?
00:20:19.460 Oh, no, that's a great question. 1.00
00:20:21.160 Because I'm wondering, like, did he have this shit fit over like because like wasn't tuition like bupkis? 0.98
00:20:26.460 Like he's like forty five dollars. 0.99
00:20:30.640 That's it. I'm talking to the Illinois state legislature.
00:20:32.940 And they're like, well, I mean, you at least have to give him his money back.
00:20:36.160 This is a situation where a, I'm guessing, like, teenage girl who's teasing her uncle and trying to get a rise out of him accidentally, like a butterfly flapping its wings on the other side of the world, winds up setting off a chain of events that ruins several Latin American economies, right?
00:20:55.780 So, like, ladies, you never know the influence you can have just when you're trying to make fun of the old guy in your family.
00:21:03.540 Yeah. What is that famous video that's going around right now? We'll adapt that to say,
00:21:07.600 are you reading Karl Marx in school? Shut the fuck up. Don't tell your reactionary uncle. 1.00
00:21:14.880 Don't let him know, even though he might really like the lesson.
00:21:17.860 Yeah.
00:21:18.320 I'm still trying to Google tuition, but I mean, I don't think it was very much. There's no way it
00:21:23.220 could have been.
00:21:23.700 I mean, unless they fleeced Walgreen too, which at that point would have been awesome.
00:21:27.900 So Walgreen sort of exemplifies, at least in the way I've always understood this story,
00:21:33.540 the kind of more creaturely response, right?
00:21:36.580 He's the donor who doesn't like
00:21:38.480 what his donation is making possible, right? 0.62
00:21:41.160 As old as people forking over their money
00:21:43.580 for things they don't understand.
00:21:45.200 The way that the media were sort of treating it 0.81
00:21:47.160 and being like, look at this weirdo loon.
00:21:49.600 It was sort of unserious.
00:21:51.260 But after World War II, we get two things.
00:21:55.140 On the one hand, the trustees actually become less important
00:21:57.340 because the federal government starts stepping in.
00:21:59.280 But at the same time, we start getting
00:22:01.020 in the nascent conservative movement
00:22:02.760 really a theory of the case as to why Charles Walgreens was right, right?
00:22:07.900 Charles Walgreens does not appear to have had a theory past, I'm right, I hate communism.
00:22:12.680 But with the 1950s, we really start getting a theory as to why people like him are owed
00:22:18.260 this kind of deference and maybe more deference than the people actually teaching or running
00:22:21.660 the institution, right?
00:22:22.800 And for that, I thought we could go to episode three, getting our favorite guy in here, 0.97
00:22:28.580 William F. fucking Buckley versus Yale University, God and man. 0.94
00:22:34.800 Friend of the show, William F. Buckley. 0.99
00:22:37.980 Yes, that great theorist.
00:22:40.600 Yes.
00:22:41.400 Yeah, so here we go.
00:22:43.260 Finally, someone who will think of the trustees, right?
00:22:45.940 Buckley is their guy.
00:22:47.500 So William F. Buckley Jr., listeners will know, was the son of an oil magnate, Bill Buckley Sr.,
00:22:53.580 And then on his mom's side, he was the descendant of Southern planters and a 1950 graduate of Yale, where he was a member of the Storied Skull and Bone Society.
00:23:02.980 So you really couldn't design a more fitting caricature of an American conservative, actually.
00:23:07.360 And maybe the only mark against him was the fact that he was a devout Catholic in Waspie, Connecticut.
00:23:11.940 it. And we should say that he then reacted to graduating from Yale and having a gilded future
00:23:19.160 ahead of him in the most healthy way possible, which is he wrote a book about all the things
00:23:22.780 he didn't like, which I have to say is the last relatable thing that he did. But the idea of like
00:23:28.780 everyone graduating college should like writing a teardown screed of it a year later. I think more
00:23:36.200 people should do this. That's phenomenal. That's some Larry David shit. But yeah, he uses this
00:23:42.160 experience he had at Yale, which appears to have been not at all negative, really,
00:23:46.200 for a full frontal attack on liberalism. Yeah. Yeah. Everybody should write a screed
00:23:52.860 after graduating college and launch your career and launch a political movement because it's
00:23:56.620 basically exactly what this book did. But yeah, there's no greater champion of power or enemy
00:24:02.880 of liberalism than Buckley, who in 1951 published the book you just mentioned, God and Man at Yale,
00:24:08.820 The Superstitions of Academic Freedom. Superstitions. Exactly. And academic freedom,
00:24:14.840 by the way, is in quotes. It's in like scare quotes in the actual title. But the book's
00:24:21.800 central claim was that Yale faculty were indoctrinating the sons of the elite with
00:24:26.580 socialism and atheism. And his prescription was for parents, alumni, trustees, and anybody else
00:24:33.880 with power to quit cutting checks to the school until it righted the ship and went back to
00:24:38.340 professing Christianity and capitalism. It's really similar to Trump's approach to the Ivies
00:24:42.660 today, actually. But yeah, God and Man at Yale both launched Buckley's career as a thought leader
00:24:49.060 and the post-war conservative movement. It really kind of like put his name out into the public,
00:24:54.260 Like, even though the book wasn't well-received at the time, it got lots of negative reviews.
00:24:58.200 Yeah, there's that famous passage.
00:25:00.340 Let me read real quickly from Buckley here, because this really emblematizes what is essentially an autogolpe for the board of trustees.
00:25:09.700 Like, the people who graduated from this institution and who have somehow sustained it financially ought to be seizing the reins of power from the freaks that teach and study there.
00:25:21.000 So here's what Buckley says in God and Man at Yale.
00:25:25.080 One thing is clear.
00:25:26.800 It is time that honest and discerning scholars
00:25:29.280 cease to manipulate the term academic freedom
00:25:32.120 for their own ends and in such fashion
00:25:34.660 as to deny the rights of individuals.
00:25:37.200 For in the last analysis,
00:25:39.460 academic freedom must mean the freedom of men and women
00:25:42.480 to supervise the educational activities
00:25:45.120 and aims of the schools they oversee and support.
00:25:49.420 Yeah, he does this weird like Darvaux logic where the academic freedom is the freedom of the parents and the alumni, right?
00:25:58.440 And the trustees, yeah.
00:25:59.820 Yes, and not the freedom of the faculty.
00:26:02.040 Yeah.
00:26:02.420 In a characteristic move, William F. Buckley is in favor of the freedom of William F. Buckley and people like him.
00:26:08.940 Not so hot on everyone else's.
00:26:11.700 Yes, but I mean that book has really left a legacy, but the book's complaints were not original to Buckley, right?
00:26:17.820 We just talked about the Walgreens case in Chicago, and that was from 15 years before.
00:26:22.980 And in fact, one of the anniversary reprints of the book, in that Buckley credited much
00:26:27.920 of its content to his mentor, self-described right-wing radical Frank Chortorov, who was
00:26:33.280 himself a disciple of the anarchist libertarian Albert J. Knott.
00:26:37.480 And Chortorov is one of my favorite figures when it comes to enemies of the college.
00:26:41.320 He was sort of like a neocon 100 years before neocons.
00:26:45.220 He's a secular Jew born on the Lower West Side, Manhattan, to Russian parents in 1887. 0.54
00:26:51.760 And he attended Columbia at a time when the Ivies were doing everything they could to keep the, quote, socially undesirable out, meaning Jews, Catholics, other Eastern and Southern European immigrants.
00:27:03.160 And Columbia and Penn were both pretty exceptional for their small Jewish enrollment at the turn of the century. 0.85
00:27:08.920 But it was something that they were trying to tamp back on.
00:27:11.440 But at Columbia, Chordorov, again, this is the person that Buckley credits with lots of the arguments in his book. Chordorov was a contemporary of the educational philosopher John Dewey and others that he thought were like socialists. And he drew a lot of energy by doing battle against his classmates. And from those experiences, he determined that colleges were in need of a revolution, but the only way to achieve it was to train an entire new generation of faculty for the right.
00:27:41.120 So by the 1950s, Chodorov had gathered enough financial backing from sympathetic millionaires
00:27:46.280 to create a counter to the intercollegiate socialist society.
00:27:50.720 So he called his the Intercollegiate Society of Individualists, ISI, which actually still
00:27:56.340 exists, but they're the Intercollegiate Studies Institute today.
00:27:59.780 But yeah, Chodorov branded this as an alternative university within the university.
00:28:05.260 So this is like a long-term subversive project because it's happening on your campuses.
00:28:10.300 But basically, the way it works is that conservative faculty could identify promising undergraduates and connect them with donors who would pay for their PhDs to make sure that they joined the faculty.
00:28:22.580 And then we will just have future generations of faculty for the rights clauses.
00:28:27.020 And Buckley was ISI's first president.
00:28:29.040 That's right. And I mean, we might point out that like things like ISI, when you look at the kind of demands that the Trump administration just sort of sent to Harvard, which finally sent the universities into rebellion against the kind of dogefication of higher ed.
00:28:44.560 And for those of our readers who've not been fortunate enough to be blessed with the incredible letter that Harvard University got from the task force on anti-Semitism that the Trump administration created across various departments, here is one thing that this letter says.
00:29:03.220 And I quote,
00:29:04.760 By August 2025, the university shall commission an external party, which shall satisfy the federal government as to its competence and good faith, to audit the student body, faculty, staff, and leadership for viewpoint diversity, such that each department, field, or teaching unit must be individually viewpoint diverse.
00:29:25.280 Nothing chilling about that.
00:29:26.940 Sorry, that's me.
00:29:27.620 The letter goes on, quote, every department or field found to lack viewpoint diversity must be reformed by hiring a critical mass of new faculty within that department or field who will provide viewpoint diversity.
00:29:41.520 Every teaching unit found to lack viewpoint diversity must be reformed by admitting a critical mass of students who will provide viewpoint diversity.
00:29:49.620 diversity. So you just got to keep adding students, apparently, until enough of them
00:29:55.040 check the Republican box on, I don't know, on a survey you give them? Are you going to
00:30:00.040 depose them, right? When someone applies for a faculty position at Stanford, I don't ask
00:30:04.700 them how they vote. And if they're, you know, a specialist on Johannes Brahms, like, how
00:30:08.800 the fuck am I going to know how this person votes? Well, the one way you can know is through
00:30:13.020 the ISI Rolodex, which is essentially what the suggestion is, right? I'm not saying,
00:30:17.500 Harvard, you need to hire people who have conservative thoughts or feel conservative
00:30:21.740 feelings is to say people who travel in our right-wing networks, right? Like pick the people
00:30:28.660 that have been funded by IISI, that are in our speaker roster, that have had a sinecure at the
00:30:34.800 American Enterprise Institute, et cetera, et cetera. In some way, they've been creating this
00:30:39.420 kind of shadow university in order for it to, at some point, supplant the real thing.
00:30:44.220 Yeah, I'm glad that you brought up AEI. I like that description too, as like the Rolodex of
00:30:51.060 members who could be like qualified faculty for diverse perspectives when they literally all like
00:30:56.340 talk and read about the same things. Okay. So I have this like grand theory about the right and
00:31:01.240 its relationship with higher education. They sort of have like three approaches on how to
00:31:05.020 control it. One is like work from within. So that's ISI. That's the model that Chodorov set
00:31:11.260 off. But another approach is to set up like an alternate model. So going back to the 1920s,
00:31:17.920 there were religious conservatives who were sort of like horrified by the scientific consensus
00:31:23.460 around the theory of evolution. So they like trailblazed the separatist approach. So Bob
00:31:28.140 Jones College, now Bob Jones University, was founded in 1927 by the son of a Confederate
00:31:33.840 veteran who envisioned an evangelical college that would serve as this like Christian training
00:31:38.940 Center. And then shortly thereafter, getting into the 1930s, about the time of the Walgreens
00:31:44.760 University of Chicago debacle, there are all of these like anti-New Deal industry magnates that
00:31:50.540 provide seed money to create these free market think tanks, including American Enterprise
00:31:56.420 Institute, but also the Foundation for Economic Education, which Chordorov was a part of.
00:32:01.560 And these research centers are that separatist approach, right? The whole idea behind them at
00:32:07.800 the time was to produce capitalist educational materials as part of a propaganda war against
00:32:12.880 FDR's administration. Listeners will remember that Roosevelt had this brain trust,
00:32:18.340 a cadre of academic experts behind the president's Keynesian solutions to the Great Depression. So
00:32:23.500 these conservative groups saw the importance of having parallel academic institutes to sort of
00:32:30.420 like challenge the singular authority of academics in the college, right, on the U.S. economy in this
00:32:35.360 case. Yeah. And so just in case you thought that Bari Weiss ever had an original thought in her
00:32:40.140 life, right? She's running a virtually antediluvian model, right? Like you found an alternate
00:32:47.100 institution, you grift rich right-wing dudes into supporting it, third step, profit, right? Like
00:32:55.040 what is the phrase that then comes up, I think, in the 70s is the lunatics have taken over the
00:32:58.920 asylum and it segues straight into a pitch. We have to build our own institutions. All I need
00:33:04.500 is a couple of hundred million dollars
00:33:06.020 and a very good salary for myself
00:33:08.100 and then we should be fine, right?
00:33:09.960 You know, in some way,
00:33:11.040 what is happening now with the Trump administration
00:33:12.820 really is the dog catching the car.
00:33:15.240 This para-university system,
00:33:17.500 I think was never seriously meant
00:33:19.840 to replace the university,
00:33:22.020 but in some way they figured,
00:33:23.840 hey, we can get the same amount of money
00:33:25.760 out of rich people as Harvard does,
00:33:28.140 but we don't have to teach anyone Latin.
00:33:29.820 We're just gonna like put out
00:33:32.780 like weird trolly papers
00:33:34.100 about like how the consensus on climate change
00:33:36.520 is actually cancel culture or whatever.
00:33:38.520 We're going to like fund a study 0.99
00:33:40.100 that shows that race science was right all along. 0.99
00:33:42.640 Exactly. 0.98
00:33:43.160 A little more darkly put.
00:33:44.220 You know, it's interesting
00:33:44.980 because some of this is what we might call
00:33:47.660 like structural conservatism, right?
00:33:49.360 Because the kinds of people who sit on these boards
00:33:52.580 tend not to be, you know, wild, radical lefties, right?
00:33:57.080 So Buckley really was glomming onto something real.
00:34:00.380 It really is kind of remarkable
00:34:01.800 that for a long time U.S. higher education got and to some extent continues to get rich people
00:34:08.180 to shell out money for stuff that they kind of had to hate, that opposed their own material
00:34:13.220 interests, right? Like the rich folks who are structurally and personally incentivized
00:34:20.180 to be conservatives do wind up funding a lot of left-wing thinking, right? So following Buckley,
00:34:28.040 there's been also a drive to radicalize these trustees to get them to be more than just empty
00:34:35.660 suits. So what is this like trustee activism and where does that come from? Yeah, so there's a
00:34:41.740 central organization for this and it's the American Council on Trustees and Alumni. So ACTA is the
00:34:47.260 acronym. They are behind all sorts of stuff. Listeners may be familiar with the James G.
00:34:53.080 Martin Center for Academic Renewal in North Carolina. ACTA is behind that, as well as a bunch
00:34:59.880 of other initiatives that basically train trustees to push the argument that they should be determining
00:35:06.940 curriculum over their state institutions rather than the faculty experts. The right-wing
00:35:12.560 organization, National Association of Scholars, NAS, has literally challenged trustees not to be
00:35:18.660 empty suits. It's a direct quote. It's on their blog. But they urged them to use their authority
00:35:24.060 to do stuff like abolish DEI initiatives or even take away resources from faculty who have
00:35:30.080 suspicious politics. One of the big names behind this business mogul, Art Pope, funds three centers
00:35:37.300 and think tanks in North Carolina's research triangle alone. So the James G. Martin Center,
00:35:41.920 also the Civitas Institute, also the John Locke Foundation. Pope was also a key donor in the
00:35:46.900 red map project to secure racially gerrymandered voting districts in the state to the benefit of
00:35:51.880 Republican candidates. And he's now a trustee on the University of North Carolina board of
00:35:55.820 governors. So, yeah, I mean, when they call for intellectual diversity, like if you just like
00:36:00.580 peek behind the curtain, all of the money comes from right wing donors. All of the projects are
00:36:05.700 very conservative, even when they talk about like being in favor of a liberal arts or classically
00:36:12.640 liberal education. These are really just dog whistles. And they sound, you know, they're
00:36:16.880 convincing to people who are open-minded and not quite tuned into the dog whistle of what like
00:36:22.320 classical liberalism is. We hadn't really talked about HBCUs, even though initially I mentioned
00:36:28.260 them. What is the role of race in all this? Because it also, of course, is a group that is
00:36:33.240 overwhelmingly white. Has the role of race in sort of trustee influence at the university,
00:36:39.360 Has that shifted over time?
00:36:41.500 It shifted over time, definitely, because all of the trustees at our original HBCUs were white. 0.94
00:36:47.400 Right.
00:36:47.820 Well into, like, 70s, 80s, 90s. 0.87
00:36:50.800 It's not quite the case today, although there are lots of white trustees. 0.97
00:36:55.240 It's a good question.
00:36:56.340 I mean, the Trump administration, both in its current term and the first term, sort of positioned itself as a champion of the HBCUs.
00:37:06.640 I haven't really thought too deeply about that.
00:37:09.220 Of course, I'm extremely cynical about it, but I do think it's a way for them to say,
00:37:14.300 yes, we have black colleges. 1.00
00:37:16.140 We have colleges for people who aren't white and we need to keep them around because that's 1.00
00:37:19.940 where we want non-white students going. 1.00
00:37:22.000 Whereas at our state institutions and some of our elite private institutions, no wokeness, 0.99
00:37:28.280 no DEI, right?
00:37:29.320 That's sort of the outlook there.
00:37:31.340 We had a wonderful interview with Saita Grundy about the Morehouse man.
00:37:34.520 And she pointed to the fact that it just creates this very basic disconnect where almost, as you said, almost all trustees at major institutions are alumni.
00:37:46.160 And HBCUs find themselves steered by people who, as you say, until the late 90s, really overwhelmingly were not.
00:37:54.560 Meaning you really are in a situation where of a kind of paternalistic model, right?
00:38:00.060 But the Buckley thing doesn't sound quite as awful and tin-eared when you're saying, well, it's people who graduated recently, who were students not too long ago.
00:38:08.960 It's very different when it's like, oh, it's this nice white man who takes a great interest in you, but would never send his kids here, right?
00:38:16.700 Like, okay.
00:38:17.940 It's definitely paternalistic.
00:38:19.760 There's just no way around that.
00:38:21.800 Matt Seabold has, if I can do another podcast recommendation, Matt Seabold has a really great podcast called American Vandal.
00:38:29.040 This past season, season 11, I think he's done a lot of discussions of HBCUs and the problems that they face when they accept multi-million dollar grants from people who are sort of like kind of nefarious actors, right?
00:38:43.040 People who are interested in AI-ifying the school and things like that.
00:38:47.320 Jelani Favors is someone who's talked about this a lot as well.
00:38:50.600 Lots of smart commentators on that.
00:38:51.920 Yeah. So as our final act, I thought we could talk about the next interesting permutation and the evolution of the trustee, which is the, wait, does he even go here version? You know, this is a figure that I've become very, very interested in in my own work on Silicon Valley, which is the dropout.
00:39:09.420 As you say, a lot of time-building trustee relations is about the university intersecting with these, frankly, dynastic families that have long intergenerational connections to this particular school.
00:39:22.520 Well, this becomes a problem if the most famous people making boatloads of cash around you famously don't finish college. 0.97
00:39:31.040 But after a year and a half, they're like, fuck it, I'm out. 0.90
00:39:34.000 I'm going to be a billionaire now. 0.99
00:39:35.620 And then you're now chasing their cash.
00:39:38.280 That's not to say that like most of our trustees today, I mean, are still obviously like graduates, but it has sort of changed.
00:39:46.380 The Silicon Valley-fication of wealth has, I think, put pressure on some parts of the trustee model, hasn't it?
00:39:52.480 Yeah, I don't think the trustee model will go anywhere just because it's so baked in.
00:39:57.100 But I definitely think, you know, the Silicon Valley model, I mean, those guys brag about how they drop out.
00:40:03.800 They brag about how they never finish college.
00:40:05.940 So I'm not sure how that relationship is going to play out. But another sort of tendency I've noticed, though, is the broligarchs wear as a badge of honor the fact that they dropped out. 0.91
00:40:17.200 But also, it seems like they are trying to create their own parallel institutions, right? It's like on-the-job training or, you know, we do the inventions here. 1.00
00:40:25.800 It's sort of like, I mean, higher ed has long had this relationship with private industry where, you know, certain departments are sort of like in the bag of the RAND Corporation or what have you.
00:40:35.320 But this does seem to be something a little bit newer.
00:40:38.320 So, yeah, I mean, to be determined, it doesn't look good for the colleges.
00:40:41.680 No.
00:40:41.880 I mean, what is the Thiel Fellowship, if not an alternate institution directly competing with higher ed, right?
00:40:48.360 Like very explicitly, right?
00:40:49.540 You cannot get that fellowship unless you drop out.
00:40:53.040 And they are positioning the right wing money, the right wing sort of professional pipeline as an education that rivals or indeed surpasses that of the university.
00:41:05.660 Yeah, I think I do think it has some institutions sort of shaking a little bit, but but it almost seems like this is something that the Democrats have been faced with, like where it's like they're having to constantly try to move to the right because they feel like American opinion is moving to the right.
00:41:22.760 So if colleges feel like their perspective student body is no longer interested in going to college, they're going to have to do something to make themselves look like disruptors of, you know, the things that they are.
00:41:35.800 So, I mean, in that way, maybe some elite institutions, maybe some Stanfords might chase after potential students that way.
00:41:43.400 But yeah, I don't know.
00:41:44.500 It's curious to live through and keep an eye on.
00:41:47.360 Yeah. And I think the place where people can watch these kind of dynamics play out is actually, I think, in the recent fights around Harvard. So not the most recent ones, but the ones from last year, right? This is the Bill Ackman v. Harvard part of the episode. This is not about Ackman himself, but I was very struck by this. I don't know if you guys read this recent piece in The New Yorker by Nathan Heller. I think it's called Will Harvard Bend or Break?
00:42:10.900 where he talks about Sam Lesson,
00:42:13.800 a Silicon Valley venture capitalist
00:42:16.200 who graduated from Harvard in 2005
00:42:18.740 and I think like made his money as a Facebook guy
00:42:23.120 and as a long-term donor,
00:42:24.620 but I should mention,
00:42:25.420 I believe not a member of the board of trustees yet.
00:42:29.900 And he says to talk about how he thinks about
00:42:32.980 what the quote unquote problem is at Harvard,
00:42:35.780 which they're talking about antisemitism,
00:42:37.820 they're talking about wokeness,
00:42:39.580 they're talking about ideological capture, all the kind of stalking horses of sort of political
00:42:43.520 correctness, cancel culture panic. But he says, so I'm going to just quote Heller here quoting
00:42:48.040 Lesson. Lesson told me he shares a widespread donor view that at a moment when universities
00:42:52.840 become large and growth oriented, more like companies, scholars are the wrong people to
00:42:57.660 guide their trajectory. Now as a quote from Lesson, the wild card is the faculty. They're
00:43:01.940 the hardest thing to solve for, he said. The students change every four years so you can make
00:43:06.260 a mistake, put the wrong people in, select for the wrong things and fix it, end quote. Scholars were
00:43:11.780 often there for life and held misguided sway, quote, the faculty is a unique characteristic
00:43:16.440 of universities versus companies, he noted. It is not clear what to do about it. That to me, I was
00:43:22.240 like, holy mother forking shirt balls. Like this is the quiet part out loud, right? Like the faculty, 0.98
00:43:28.280 a problem to be solved. Students too, by the way, a problem to be solved by these kind of Silicon
00:43:34.420 Valley solutionists. And it's basically the university treated as, I don't know, your
00:43:39.000 unprofitable startup that requires the unbelievable brainpower of, you know, fucking Twitter or Tesla, 0.96
00:43:47.480 because we all know how much money they make, to function properly, right? The wording is so 0.98
00:43:53.280 chilling, but it's so confident. And it's like, it's funny because it's language that we see all
00:43:58.240 the time that we know so well, but I do think it's new to have it applied to higher ed in quite
00:44:05.200 so straightforward a fashion. And it's interesting that it's in an article, not about like Harvard's
00:44:10.580 finances, which are great. It's not about dissatisfaction with Harvard's education,
00:44:15.000 which I've not been, but apparently it's great. It is about ideological questions, right? Like
00:44:19.840 that's the backdoor through which it's let in. This is Buckley all the way down, but it in the
00:44:24.960 Anne says, like, no, this institution itself is subversive of American goodness in its constitution. 0.93
00:44:31.280 It must therefore be turned into your shitty, you know, cat picture startup or whatever. 0.95
00:44:36.800 Yeah, it needs to be turned into Hillsdale. 0.95
00:44:38.620 That's like the ideal model for what they want.
00:44:41.100 Can you explain a little bit what Hillsdale College is?
00:44:42.940 We have a lot of international listeners.
00:44:44.660 They may not get the same YouTube ads I get.
00:44:47.560 Oh, gosh.
00:44:48.560 Well, international listeners, I'm so sorry to burden you with this.
00:44:51.740 Hillsdale College is a religious college in Hillsdale, Michigan, and it has been touted by
00:44:58.640 right-wing thought leaders, people like the Christopher Rufos of the world, as like an ideal
00:45:03.400 model institution. It is an avowedly religious, I shouldn't even say religious, it's a Christian
00:45:10.000 institution, and they teach the classical liberal arts curriculum that the right is so excited about.
00:45:16.500 Now, I want to be very clear, when they say classical liberal arts, they want to focus on the history and philosophy of Europe, right?
00:45:24.940 The great books of Western literature, classical civilizations of Greece and Rome, legal and religious histories. 0.95
00:45:31.960 But it's telling what those subjects leave out, always the history ideas and literature of non-white America, right, and the rest of the world. 0.88
00:45:40.420 So, for example, at Hillsdale, your American history lessons about the founding will leave out the horrors of settler colonialism. 0.78
00:45:48.020 They won't even mention indigenous genocide. 0.52
00:45:50.720 They present American history as like of uniquely northern European heritage, as if the U.S. has only ever had a white past.
00:45:59.180 And descriptors of this type of education as classical will point to its openness and its humanness. 0.51
00:46:05.760 but it's ironic because they only ever focus on the works of so-called dead white men, right? 0.55
00:46:10.860 No other civilizations prize humanism.
00:46:12.900 So you can sort of see how this is like a departure from like the actual openness, right?
00:46:19.220 So when they talk about ideological balance or ideological diversity,
00:46:23.000 these are all just dog whistles.
00:46:25.020 It's all just language games.
00:46:26.580 Really, it's a curriculum of like genteel white supremacy.
00:46:30.540 Yeah.
00:46:31.260 What was I talking about before that?
00:46:33.320 I don't even remember.
00:46:35.580 You seem to have a slightly different interpretation of the quote that Heller brings.
00:46:40.960 Oh, yes.
00:46:41.540 From this Silicon Valley investor.
00:46:43.700 Yeah.
00:46:44.080 I mean, the thing is, like, that's actually already been solved for.
00:46:48.380 Like, not at Harvard, where several, I don't know the percentage of faculty that have tenure there,
00:46:53.540 but nationwide, only 25% of faculty actually have tenure and are problems to be solved if you don't like them.
00:47:01.780 For the rest of us, like, I work in a right-to-word stake.
00:47:04.080 I can be fired anytime, just contract's not renewed. 75% of our faculty or teachers on our
00:47:11.280 campuses do not have tenure. That's a very good point. And of course, my guess is that the solution
00:47:16.940 that Lesson is probably thinking of is further casualization of labor, right? That is,
00:47:23.720 you've heard me say this before, Lauren, these right-wing moral panics, especially around sort
00:47:28.880 of free speech and cancel culture are both often outputs of labor casualization.
00:47:33.960 That is to say, you know, the only reason we're hearing about it is because someone
00:47:37.100 might get fired and then they become a motor for more of it, right?
00:47:41.100 Like the only solution, quote unquote, or the only punishment that anyone can think 1.00
00:47:45.220 of is to throw the bums out. 1.00
00:47:47.440 It's basically a snake eating its own tail and the snake is casualized labor, labor 1.00
00:47:52.660 precarity.
00:47:53.320 Yeah.
00:47:53.760 Yeah.
00:47:54.100 One day they'll wind up with a university that is just a board of trustees and then
00:47:58.420 they'll finally be at peace. Just a board of trustees and a football team in a winning sports
00:48:05.500 program. That's it. Yeah. I mean, we could suggest to them, if they could still teach it at that
00:48:09.980 point, Bertolt Brecht's famous 1953 poem, The Solution. Do you all know this? No. After the
00:48:16.120 uprising of 17th of June, the secretary of the Writers Union had leaflets distributed in the
00:48:21.300 Stalin Allee, stating that the people had forfeited the confidence of the government
00:48:25.380 and could win it back only by redoubled efforts.
00:48:28.340 Would it not be easier in that case
00:48:30.000 for the government to dissolve the people
00:48:32.000 and elect another?
00:48:33.520 So yeah, wouldn't it be easier
00:48:35.100 for Bill Ackman to dissolve Harvard
00:48:36.820 and elect himself a new university?
00:48:39.380 I have heard that before
00:48:40.580 and I've always heard it in the context
00:48:42.160 of we need new voters.
00:48:45.740 Awesome.
00:48:46.320 Well, thank you so much, Lauren.
00:48:47.340 This was really great and really helpful.
00:48:50.220 I learned so much.
00:48:51.400 Thank you so much for sharing your time with us.
00:48:53.760 Yeah, I appreciate the invitation. It was great to be here.
00:48:56.780 We should, again, emphasize for people that, you know, we can really barely scratch the surface in the hour that we have here. Please check out American Campus. It's an absolutely phenomenal and really just impressive work. It really is what it says on the tin. It is a history of higher education answering questions you didn't even know you had.
00:49:17.440 Like I didn't, the dorm stuff, for instance, I just forgot that I had had that question.
00:49:22.400 I was like, oh, thank God, American campus is there for me.
00:49:24.860 And every time you find something fascinating to draw out with your guests, the only sort
00:49:30.400 of negative side effect it has is that it makes it even more impossible to engage with
00:49:35.360 these kind of bad faith, very distortive campus narratives, because you just end up sputtering
00:49:39.960 like, none of this is right.
00:49:42.320 That's not how any of that works.
00:49:44.320 So that's the problem.
00:49:46.020 But you get out of it really deep knowledge of a part of American society that both is
00:49:51.320 deeply consequential to our politics, it turns out much more consequential than some of its
00:49:55.600 critics had allowed, and that is frankly currently under assault.
00:49:59.580 So with that, thank you all for listening.
00:50:01.820 Thank you for supporting us.
00:50:03.160 And yeah, go yell at a trustee.
00:50:09.340 In Bit With The Right is made possible by hundreds of listeners who support us via
00:50:13.000 patreon.com.
00:50:14.080 Our episodes are produced and edited by Mark Yoshizumi and Katie Lau.
00:50:17.780 Our title music is by Katie Lau.