In Bed With The Right - September 23, 2025


Episode 96 -- Phyllis Schlafly, Part 2

Topics
Episode 94 -- Phyllis Schlafly, Part 1 Episode 98 -- Project 1933, Part VII: September 1 - September 30

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 18 minutes

Words per minute

167.83

Word count

13,233

Sentence count

921

Harmful content

Misogyny

195

sentences flagged

Toxicity

106

sentences flagged

Hate speech

100

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 Hello, I'm Adrienne Dopp.
00:00:08.800 And I'm Moira Donaghan.
00:00:10.040 And whether we like it or not, we're in bed with the right.
00:00:14.300 Okay, Adrienne, welcome to my insane document that I sent you.
00:00:20.060 It's just like 10 pages and it's all walls of text.
00:00:24.660 So I hope you're ready.
00:00:26.160 Yeah, just to give people a little peek behind the curtain here.
00:00:29.180 um normally we always people who listen to the show a lot know this we share kind of not a script
00:00:35.860 but like a background document and some of those can be two three four pages and sometimes with
00:00:41.140 1933 i go pretty wild with like 12 to 15 um moira i think is more you know being herself a journalist
00:00:49.380 is a little bit more parsimonious usually like she wants to hit bullet points visually arranged
00:00:55.200 but when she goes overboard she goes crazy and this is one of those i'm very excited to see what
00:01:04.180 this sounds like on the air because i was just like scrolling through block text being like
00:01:08.720 oh lord no lord well so we'll see well this is my opus right because this is our part two
00:01:16.060 of our deep dive into phyllis schlafly and we did sort of the origins of phyllis
00:01:23.880 in part one. I encourage everybody to listen to that. But today we are tackling
00:01:29.160 the thing that Phyllis is best known for and one of the biggest catastrophes
00:01:37.300 in American feminist history, the failure and conservative triumph that has led us to 1.00
00:01:44.140 so much of where we are today. And that is Phyllis Schlafly's defeat of the ERA. 1.00
00:01:52.580 That's right.
00:01:53.240 I also like want to pause for a moment and reflect on the fact that I'm about to end a research project because we've wanted to do Schlafly basically for the entire time that we've been doing this podcast.
00:02:06.920 And I have been passively and then more actively researching the ERA fight really for like the past two years, right?
00:02:15.620 You have no idea how many tabs I just closed before we started this recording.
00:02:19.600 Nice.
00:02:19.920 So this is a big deal for me.
00:02:22.000 So just let me fly my freak flag here.
00:02:24.800 You guys are going to come on this journey with me for as long as you can handle it.
00:02:30.540 Adrian, tell us where we left Phyllis at the end of our last episode. 0.50
00:02:35.780 Not in a good place. 1.00
00:02:36.760 She had pushed heavily for Barry Goldwater in the 1964 presidential election, which was a bloodbath. 0.85
00:02:45.640 And so the Republican Party was humiliated, and Phyllis Schlafly was just bit noir for the Republican mainstream.
00:02:54.040 She doesn't go away, and she, of course, makes, like many of the cranks of our own day, that are remarkably effective.
00:03:01.760 You know, I'm guessing she made her real money with all the subscription stuff, newsletter stuff, and books about nukes that we need to drop on Vietnam.
00:03:10.280 for a long time in sort of like the latter half of the 60s phyllis understands herself as sort
00:03:17.900 of like a has-been she has her newsletter she's still plugging along she's got this
00:03:22.820 leadership position in the national federation of republican women she was the head of the
00:03:28.300 illinois federation of republican women but then when she got elected to national one of her like 1.00
00:03:32.280 bitch enemies got illinois so she was like always like punching down at illinois and was sort of 1.00
00:03:38.480 like angry at having given it up. 0.99
00:03:40.900 She's writing her newsletter,
00:03:42.360 the Phyllis Schlafly Report,
00:03:44.100 but she doesn't really see herself
00:03:46.900 as sort of in the game
00:03:49.000 the way she was in 1960, 1964.
00:03:52.140 And a lot of other Republicans
00:03:53.720 feel that way about her too.
00:03:56.160 They're not really like turning to her
00:03:57.840 for leadership or for ideas
00:03:59.940 the way they were.
00:04:00.780 The far right is licking its wounds
00:04:02.900 and the Republican Party
00:04:03.820 really, really just wants to move on
00:04:05.680 from Goldwater.
00:04:07.280 So everybody...
00:04:08.480 you know, sees her as kind of washed up.
00:04:11.620 And this story is the story of how she finds a new cause
00:04:16.620 and rebounds to leadership of the right-wing movement.
00:04:19.980 The worst instance of someone finding a new hobby in history. 1.00
00:04:25.500 So in this episode, Phyllis is going to recover 0.56
00:04:29.700 from this professional nadir that she's at.
00:04:32.840 She's going to find a new cause
00:04:34.480 and she's going to really rebuild the Republican Party 0.99
00:04:37.980 as a movement made in her own image.
00:04:41.180 And in the process, she is going to propel herself
00:04:44.060 to, like, genuine national fame
00:04:46.260 of a sort that she has not experienced before
00:04:48.300 through grit and threats
00:04:52.040 and, you know, the sheer power of her personal malice.
00:04:56.820 So she is going to, spoiler alert, defeat the ERA.
00:05:00.400 So at the end of last episode,
00:05:02.020 I kind of joked about, like,
00:05:03.240 did she pull over by the side of the road?
00:05:05.060 And there was, like, a big sign being like,
00:05:06.420 past the ERA. It's like, ah, Eureka, I found it. But obviously that was a joke. You said at the
00:05:11.140 beginning of last episode that this wasn't an obvious fight to pick. It really felt like one
00:05:15.980 that was already lost. How did she come to discover it? And follow-up question, can we trust her
00:05:22.440 account of how that happened? Why no, Adrienne, you can never trust what Phyllis says about her
00:05:28.600 own motivations, about her own private life, about her own thinking, because she lies constantly
00:05:35.600 about her own career. 0.92
00:05:38.180 Was she like, oh, gee willikers, 0.92
00:05:39.980 I found it on the back of an orange juice bottle and... 1.00
00:05:42.920 Like, almost exactly, yeah. 0.55
00:05:44.740 Phyllis is always pretending she's just this humble housewife 0.99
00:05:48.040 who, you know, just does politics as a hobby 1.00
00:05:51.000 because she's so moral and so much believes in right and wrong,
00:05:55.660 you know, that she's compelled to by Christ, I guess.
00:05:59.280 And that is a story that requires her to be very dishonest
00:06:02.320 because she, in fact, is a really savvy 0.88
00:06:04.100 an incredibly ambitious political operator, right?
00:06:06.840 So Phyllis's version of the story is that in 1971,
00:06:11.320 in her capacity as the head of the National Federation of Republican Women,
00:06:16.580 a housewife from Connecticut asks her to debate a feminist
00:06:21.680 about the ERA at a conservative women's book club in Connecticut.
00:06:28.100 And Phyllis says, you know, I said no at first
00:06:30.580 because I didn't really know all that much about the ERA.
00:06:33.080 You know, she says it like she had heard about it.
00:06:37.180 She's like, I was too busy thinking about making cookies with my kids, also nukes from space.
00:06:45.600 Yeah, you know, just like aprons, apple pie, nuke from space.
00:06:51.420 You know, she's like, I didn't know much about it.
00:06:53.900 I thought it was, the quote she gives is somewhere between innocuous and helpful.
00:06:57.920 But her husband, and in these fake-ass stories, it's always her husband who has the good idea that she ultimately winds up following. 0.97
00:07:05.500 Just as a quick reminder to our listeners, her husband appears to have been by all objective accounts an absolute doormat. 0.87
00:07:12.080 Yeah, not a strong character, Fred.
00:07:15.280 Not an ideas man.
00:07:16.580 But in her account, you know, it's her husband who encourages her to learn up and do the debate anyway.
00:07:21.780 So she asks the woman with the book club to send her some reading material, and she discovers that this little amendment was, in fact, quite terrible and went on to, of course, defeat the feminists at the book club debate, and then everybody claps.
00:07:36.200 Right.
00:07:37.140 That's what Phyllis says. 0.97
00:07:39.000 In reality, what happened is that Schlafly knew exactly what the fucking ERA was because she had been trying to get the ERA out of the Republican Party platform for years. 0.98
00:07:48.780 years. And by 1971, when she places her discovery of the issue in time, she was already in touch 0.96
00:07:56.180 with women across the country from these Republican women's networks who were gearing up to oppose
00:08:01.560 ratification in their own states. It was not a housewives book club either. It was in fact a
00:08:06.920 stage debate in an auditorium. And it was just one of many, many of these big public events that
00:08:14.300 Phyllis would participate in over the next decade, where she puts herself in front of eyeballs,
00:08:19.920 in front of cameras, to oppose the ERA and to be the voice of ERA opposition. 0.99
00:08:26.120 Next thing you'll tell me that there was no pie. And that is where I draw the line.
00:08:30.480 Disinformation is one thing.
00:08:31.960 There actually are pies coming in this episode.
00:08:34.000 Oh, thank God. Because I'm weirdly hungry. I don't know why. I'm just picturing apple pie
00:08:38.220 now the entire time. Thanks a lot, Phyllis Schlafly. So the ERA was introduced in 1923 by
00:08:46.760 Alice Paul. And it was in recognition that the 19th Amendment, which had been ratified in 1920,
00:08:53.620 was already not being interpreted as this big transformation of social and familial life
00:09:00.280 that the suffragettes had imagined it would be. Reva Siegel, who's this really fascinating legal 0.96
00:09:06.360 historian, she talks about the ambition of the 19th Amendment for the first wave feminists as 1.00
00:09:11.860 being like to introduce democracy to the family, right? Like really transform women's lives. That's 1.00
00:09:18.000 not what it did. It was a very, very narrow suffrage law, right? Meanwhile, over the ensuing 1.00
00:09:23.060 decades, the Supreme Court rules a bunch of times throughout the first half of the 20th century
00:09:29.100 that women can be treated as different and lesser than men, especially in things like employment
00:09:34.920 and in family law. So the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment is not interpreted as
00:09:41.860 applying to women or as giving women the same protection of the laws as men, right? It is just
00:09:47.440 sort of a weird legal interpretation regime that just writes women out of the 14th Amendment. 0.98
00:09:55.740 So women, for instance, like it's really hard for them to initiate divorces. When they do initiate 1.00
00:10:01.100 divorces, they tend to lose custody of their children. They have way fewer rights in inheritance.
00:10:07.720 A lot of like, you know, rules around who can be the executor of an estate often go to men by 0.80
00:10:14.620 default with the rationale that they're better at math. I wish I was making that up. Women are 1.00
00:10:18.940 considered the responsibility of and under the control of their husbands when married, 0.99
00:10:25.060 which means that men have a legal right to rape their wives and a de facto right to beat them.
00:10:30.620 They are excluded from many high-skill, high-wage jobs perfectly legally, and along with all of that, a lot of institutions that receive public money, like universities, like hospitals, can just say, oh, we don't really want to admit women, or we don't really want to treat this woman who, you know, is pregnant out of wedlock. 0.95
00:10:50.100 That's all legal. Right. So after Alice Paul introduces it in 1923, the ERA languished largely because it's opposed by unions, which is a whole can of worms that we can get into. 0.99
00:11:05.560 But mostly unions are trying to protect their male membership from female competition is sort of like the short version of that story.
00:11:12.520 Right. But just because it hasn't been taken up, it doesn't mean that the ERA doesn't have like a kind of broad but soft support. Right. It's something that virtuous civic activism types always think that the country should probably get around to doing eventually.
00:11:29.500 Feminism in many instances is something that lots of people like vaguely feel that they agree with, but very few feel any kind of like urgency about. And this is it's like that. It just doesn't have an activist class pushing for it. But it does get added to the party platforms. 0.99
00:11:48.080 The Republican Party adds support for the Equal Rights Amendment to their party platform in 1940, and the Democrats add it in 1944.
00:11:56.720 So I think something that people forget about the second wave is that when the second wave feminist movement arose, a lot of the first wave activists from the suffragette era were still around.
00:12:09.500 Right.
00:12:09.560 It's a little bit analogous to like the second waivers now, right? 1.00
00:12:12.760 There are these old ladies who receive this mix of like resentment and awe from the younger feminists who are following them, right? 1.00
00:12:20.860 And who sometimes will come down from the mountain to issue proclamations, right?
00:12:25.980 So in 1967, Alice Paul is still alive.
00:12:29.240 Oh, wow.
00:12:29.540 She is extremely old and she has all of this moral credibility because she earned women the right to vote, right? 0.99
00:12:36.540 She was the forefront of the suffrage movement.
00:12:38.340 and she talks to this group of liberal feminists who go to her apartment in manhattan they talk
00:12:45.820 about it like entering like a temple and they say that they don't understand most of what she's
00:12:50.300 saying she's like naming all these women that she organized in the suffrage movement with and like
00:12:54.600 these younger feminists have never heard of any of them and there's this kind of like generational
00:12:58.720 grief going on but she tells these women like listen you need to take up the era cause because 0.86
00:13:05.280 if you get the ERA, then that is a legal foundation for you to get all of these other social changes 0.83
00:13:11.860 that you're looking to create. Betty Friedan hears this argument from Alice Paul, and she
00:13:17.920 buys it. She's like, I'm in. And at the time, she's the president of NOW, right? So she gets NOW to
00:13:23.900 endorse the ERA at their 1967 National Convention. I believe that Alice Paul is there in the room at
00:13:30.020 the convention when it happens. And this, for one thing, it gets a ton of media attention that NOW
00:13:35.520 did this. And it brings more members into NOW. A couple of, like, ladies' auxiliaries of labor
00:13:41.620 unions leave, but a ton more women come in. Because, again, the ERA has been a popular but
00:13:47.960 languishing reform cause for decades at this point. It's analogous, I think, to, like, electoral
00:13:53.980 college abolishment, right? It's something a lot of people feel strongly about but haven't had a
00:13:59.060 way to try and make it happen before. Now there's a way to try and make it happen. And then in 1969,
00:14:05.420 just two years later, this newly elected member of the House of Representatives, a young lady
00:14:10.780 named Shirley Chisholm, she gives a speech on the House floor called Equal Rights for Women,
00:14:17.580 which is a really passionate endorsement of the ERA. So you have these second wave figures 0.98
00:14:22.360 of high profiles, like lending their charisma to this cause. This begins a pretty robust
00:14:29.940 lobbying effort to pass the amendment through Congress. And honestly, it's kind of an easy
00:14:35.300 sell, right? The amendment was non-controversial at the time. Both parties had endorsed it in
00:14:41.280 their platforms. It seemed like the right thing to do. And it passed both houses of Congress in
00:14:46.900 1972 pretty easily, and it is sent to the states for ratification. So the ERA is ratified by
00:14:56.620 Congress. Now it has to be ratified by, I think, three quarters of the states, so 38 states.
00:15:03.700 That's right.
00:15:03.940 And there's a deadline by which that has to happen. The ratification by Congress is going to expire,
00:15:09.220 And that deadline is March 22nd, 1979.
00:15:14.080 Nobody expects it's going to take that long.
00:15:16.380 In fact, they will ultimately extend this deadline and they still miss it.
00:15:21.200 So the ensuing ERA fight is something that you can see as the story of a changing far right.
00:15:29.120 We talked last time about the grassroots anti-communism era of the 1940s and 50s.
00:15:35.300 The domestic far right is moving away from this focus on foreign policy and military strength and towards more domestic issues, so-called social issues or cultural issues, namely like really race and gender. Right. Yeah. And that's what the ERA fight is for the Republican Party. It's a story of turning their right wing sort of agenda from the foreign world to the domestic world and the social life of the U.S.
00:16:02.800 For the country as a whole, the story of the ERA fight is a story of backlash, right? Because Phyllis finds a way to revive this degraded and embattled far right by harnessing fear and resentment of social movements of the 1960s. 0.96
00:16:21.980 And she did it in a way that inaugurated the kind of, like, organized backlash politics that we see in our own time.
00:16:28.600 So I wanted you to read this paragraph from Schlafly's biography that is sort of like a summation of the ERA fight from a conservative perspective.
00:16:41.060 The strange career of the ERA. Political fate.
00:16:44.620 Ironically, the ERA helped revive the GOP right and the GOP generally.
00:16:49.200 After Nixon resigned from office, the Republican Party stood arguably at its lowest point
00:16:52.960 in its 120-year history, even lower than when Hoover left office in 1933.
00:16:57.960 In 1974, only 18% of voters identified themselves as Republican.
00:17:02.880 Yet within six years, many voters came to see the GOP not as a party of big business
00:17:07.300 and the wealthy, but as a party of the little guy, the regular American Joe and his wife.
00:17:12.160 While the Democratic Party belonged to elitists who imposed schemes of social engineering,
00:17:16.600 social privilege, and special interest, all at the expense of the hardworking middle class. 0.99
00:17:21.840 The catalyst for this transformation was to be found in the grassroots reaction against feminism,
00:17:27.140 legalized abortion, ERA, and the ban on prayer in school. Writing after the ERA had been lost,
00:17:34.160 feminists Sylvia Ann Hewlett observed, quote, it was sobering to realize that the ERA was defeated 0.93
00:17:39.540 not by Barry Goldwater, Jerry Falwell, or any combination of male chauvinist pigs, but by women
00:17:45.840 who were alienated from a feminist movement, 0.83
00:17:48.300 the values of which seemed elitist and disconnected
00:17:50.700 from the lives of ordinary people, end quote.
00:17:53.460 What does that remind me of?
00:17:54.940 Yeah, resentment politics placing the right wing
00:17:59.820 in a reactive role and as the harbingers
00:18:05.440 and spokespeople for a oppressed
00:18:08.640 but authentic asylum majority,
00:18:11.380 chafing against high-flying, ambitious, 0.85
00:18:13.640 but kind of remote democratic social engineering done by a scheming backroom elite.
00:18:22.060 The scheming backroom elite, in this case, being the elected representatives of just about all Americans. 0.75
00:18:28.420 But it's straight bircherism, right? 0.99
00:18:30.780 Yeah.
00:18:30.980 And it's also straight MAGA.
00:18:32.740 Yeah.
00:18:33.000 Like, I really think you see in Phyllis the through line between, like, the Charles Lindbergh old right
00:18:39.420 and the Donald Trump, like, nativist authoritarian revival.
00:18:43.640 Like, she kept this flame alive, 0.93
00:18:46.700 and she managed to get that politics sort of smuggled into the 21st century 1.00
00:18:51.460 through anti-feminism. 0.93
00:18:53.940 Phyllis is a woman of our time before our time, right?
00:18:58.060 Adrienne, could you read this one other little piece of dialogue?
00:19:01.400 This is from a 2011 Schlafly interview,
00:19:04.960 but she's talking about the time when she was raising her kids in the 1950s and 60s.
00:19:09.420 I was really into healthy food before it was cool to be into healthy food.
00:19:12.760 For many years, every Saturday, I would drive to a farm in Edwardsville
00:19:16.860 and buy 12 gallons of unpasteurized milk, oh brother, and 12 dozen fertile eggs.
00:19:22.120 And that would last us for the week.
00:19:23.720 You ask me what's the difference between unpasteurized milk and milk you buy at the grocery store?
00:19:28.340 I'll tell you.
00:19:29.580 It's about the same differences between fresh strawberries and canned strawberries. 0.99
00:19:33.680 First of all, I just want to, like, dwell on how much fucking food this is. 0.98
00:19:39.880 12 gallons of raw milk and 12 dozen eggs. 0.99
00:19:45.180 Are you making cheese?
00:19:46.740 I mean, it is an eight-person family.
00:19:48.860 I guess that's true.
00:19:49.640 But it's just a shocking amount of milk.
00:19:51.920 Like, I'm eating anything that is not milk and cheese.
00:19:55.520 These themes, these bugaboos, these weird conspiracy theories,
00:19:59.100 They're so much older, even in their specificity, that I think we typically assume them to be.
00:20:05.700 Well, again, she's kind of a conduit here, right?
00:20:07.440 This is the direct path from water fluorization truthers to RFK Jr.
00:20:14.160 I thought about this not so much with Schlafly, who I don't know as much about, but Nita Bryant, who I do know a lot about.
00:20:19.840 The 70s, I think, kind of the mainstreaming of the concerned woman as a kind of political trope, right?
00:20:28.240 You have a moment in the 50s and 60s where there are conservative women who just show up as straightforward political actors. 0.98
00:20:36.720 When Phyllis Schlafly wanted to get Goldwater elected, she did it as like a housewife, but like she did it by like writing a book and being like, I think we should nuke the North Vietnamese, right? 1.00
00:20:47.440 The way a political thinker might. 0.78
00:20:49.260 but you get the sort of the Anita Bryans of the world in the 70s are like they're positioning 0.85
00:20:56.600 themselves as pre-political and they're trying to tap into something that's pre-political to anyone
00:21:00.700 who knew about the Birchers this whole like I don't drink pasteurized milk would speak a very
00:21:05.960 clear language about a kind of conspiratorial politics well but you're not putting it like
00:21:12.020 that you're like oh I'm just concerned about the kind of things we're not putting in our bodies
00:21:15.560 that we're putting in our bodies
00:21:16.720 and our children are our most precious resource,
00:21:19.320 et cetera, et cetera.
00:21:20.260 And this is exactly the kind of thing 0.99
00:21:21.900 that you get with Anita Bryant 0.99
00:21:23.100 where they're just like,
00:21:24.200 I leave all that stuff to the men,
00:21:26.000 but I'm just concerned.
00:21:27.240 And concern is really the language
00:21:28.860 in which she's like, 0.98
00:21:29.780 no, I'm making a fucking big political statement, 0.97
00:21:32.900 but I also don't want to own that. 1.00
00:21:34.680 And I want to give the women 0.64
00:21:35.860 who want to walk with me 1.00
00:21:37.460 a permission structure
00:21:38.540 to see themselves as non-political too.
00:21:40.880 It's a way to make these political positions
00:21:43.360 that are like violent, exclusionary, maximalist, sadistic, cruel, be packaged in a way that sort
00:21:50.380 of gives them this sentimental veneer of gender conservatism, right? It's like, it's not
00:21:57.280 threatening. It's family. It's not threatening. It's motherhood. It's not violence. It is a
00:22:04.540 mode of interacting with people that we have decided is virtuous through heterosexuality,
00:22:09.740 through the family. And that's, yeah, I think this is, you know, this is Phyllis in a nutshell.
00:22:13.880 You can use misogyny and visions of women as sort of distinct in ways that they are in fact not 0.96
00:22:23.760 from men to launder in all this other crap. Exactly. Because people will swallow that pill 0.98
00:22:29.800 really easily. Yeah. So Jane Mansbridge and her history of the ERA fight from 1988, how we lost
00:22:36.820 the ERA. She says, look, constitutional amendments are hard to pass by design, but many amendments
00:22:44.320 did pass in the 20th century. And part of the reason why a bunch of amendments passed in the
00:22:50.160 20th century, especially in the first half, was that people basically didn't really know about
00:22:54.880 them or they sort of softly supported them. For example, the 22nd Amendment. Adrian, this is from
00:23:01.620 your citizenship test. What is the 22nd Amendment? Yeah. As an explanation to that joke, I
00:23:06.720 did recently take the citizenship test. I'm Guba Gaba, one of you now. He's an American, folks.
00:23:12.860 We got him. Not historically how that's been used. That usually comes after a drone strike,
00:23:19.240 but okay. It's the one where no person can be elected to the office of the president more than
00:23:25.900 twice. And you're right. This is one that some people cared a whole lot about, and most people
00:23:30.560 certified something that had been standard practice and established practice prior to
00:23:35.640 the passage of the 22nd Amendment.
00:23:37.520 Mansbridge argues that in a lot of these similar amendment fights, the crucial factor was not
00:23:44.020 about actually the intensity of support, but the intensity of the opposition, right?
00:23:48.240 Yeah.
00:23:48.780 Amendments are easy to defeat.
00:23:51.040 And that means that the amendments get passed are the ones with like weak, divided sort
00:23:57.460 of soft opposition, the ones that people oppose, but not that many people, not that strongly
00:24:03.060 and not people who are acting together, right?
00:24:05.540 The amendments with strong and unified opposition cannot pass.
00:24:10.960 And so when the ERA was being sent to the states for ratification in 1972 after it passes through Congress, it looks like it's going to succeed exactly because it doesn't have much or very passionate opposition, right?
00:24:27.640 But when they have to get the ERA through Congress, they have to persuade people who can vote in two bodies, right?
00:24:34.160 members of the House of Representatives and senators. Now, what had been one fight in Congress
00:24:39.440 is now 50 different fights all across the country for getting the amendment passed through the 50
00:24:46.640 different state houses. Right. Yeah. So from 1972, when the amendment is passed through Congress to
00:24:53.760 1975, 34 states ratify the ERA in quick succession. Right. And remember, they only need 38. Right.
00:25:01.340 So this is really, really, like, basically a done deal.
00:25:05.780 Yeah. 0.56
00:25:06.320 And that's when Phyllis comes in.
00:25:08.640 And we should say, I mean, like, the way the issue now reverts to the states also starts playing into the hands of what we recognize today as Republican backlash politics, right?
00:25:17.640 Because on the one hand, national media don't tend to cover state stories quite as carefully.
00:25:22.960 So you can sort of lie in ways that, like, at least in the 70s, I think on a national news show, you wouldn't be able to.
00:25:29.260 Republican, especially Republican women's organizing at the state and local level was far stronger than on a national level.
00:25:36.420 And you do get this kind of nullificationist streak in a lot of U.S. states and a readiness to be against something just because it kind of comes from Washington. 1.00
00:25:46.860 Yeah, and I think that's, you know, what Phyllis really plays on.
00:25:50.480 By 1975, her anti-ERA movement has gained steam and the ratifications have stopped.
00:25:58.240 Ultimately, six states actually rescind their ratifications, which we're going to talk about, because that's like...
00:26:03.560 Can you?
00:26:05.300 Dubious.
00:26:06.960 In the 1860s, a couple of states tried to rescind their ratifications of the 14th and 15th Amendment because they were like, whoops, we didn't think you meant that black men could vote.
00:26:16.700 Like, what, what, what?
00:26:18.300 And in those cases, it was ruled that you could not rescind an amendment.
00:26:23.200 So we're not really talking about 10 years. We're talking about three that she did this in. How did this work? How do we go from 1972 when the amendment passes to 1975 when it all reverses?
00:26:38.200 She did the bulk of it in three years. 0.99
00:26:42.300 So what Phyllis does is she takes the sort of like weak and scattered and disorganized opposition to the ERA and turns it into a single hierarchical organization under her own central command. 0.99
00:26:55.940 from whose peak she can like direct strategy and from whose peak she can you know manipulate the 0.89
00:27:03.980 media into reproducing her own anti-ERA propaganda which is you know constantly raising the stakes 0.98
00:27:11.720 and raising the temperature and working to inflame you know sexist anger resentment and
00:27:19.080 woundedness. Phyllis's real first salvo against the ERA comes in February 1972 with a issue of 0.97
00:27:28.080 her newsletter, the Phyllis Schlafly Report. And in the Phyllis Schlafly Report, she publishes an
00:27:33.480 essay, What's Wrong with Equal Rights for Women? And it's sort of like an anti-feminist screed,
00:27:38.560 and it's a call to action to her supporters to join her in fighting against the ERA. So it's got,
00:27:45.180 you know, a couple of what will become sort of like boilerplate anti-feminist arguments.
00:27:51.900 The family is the basic unit of society in Judeo-Christian civilization.
00:27:56.460 Oh, yeah. Everyone's such an expert in Judeo-Christian civilization.
00:28:00.260 Yeah. You know, like I will say for Phyllis, her genius is in organizing and political strategy. 0.99
00:28:05.920 Her genius is not in like political theory. She's not like a particularly inventive thinker, 0.83
00:28:11.520 But she does strike this kind of tone that's like strident and sneering, right?
00:28:17.680 She's very good at getting her readers on her side by having a common enemy, right?
00:28:22.300 So she talks about Ms. Magazine a lot in this essay. 0.79
00:28:26.280 And she derides the sharp-tongued, high-pitched, whining complaints of unmarried women who talk about how satisfying it is to be a lesbian. 0.80
00:28:36.800 in. I do like imagining just like Phyllis Schlafly seeing my own life and just getting like Kool-Aid
00:28:43.600 man read with rage. The ability to like downright dehumanize single women on the right is just like 1.00
00:28:51.000 completely amazing to me. But like the real point she makes that I think is one that has had kind 0.52
00:28:57.440 of disturbing staying power is that housewives and women who are you know out of the workforce
00:29:04.540 are not oppressed.
00:29:06.520 They are, in fact, privileged, right? 1.00
00:29:09.260 She says the ultimate right of women 1.00
00:29:11.320 is to be cared for and supported
00:29:13.240 as they raise their babies.
00:29:15.560 So there's this dichotomy 1.00
00:29:19.060 between the single woman 0.96
00:29:20.300 and the conservative housewife.
00:29:22.400 This is a running theme for Schlafly. 1.00
00:29:24.320 She's like, feminists, 1.00
00:29:25.860 they are failed women. 1.00
00:29:28.040 They couldn't hack it. 1.00
00:29:29.940 They couldn't be pretty enough. 1.00
00:29:31.660 They couldn't get a man. 1.00
00:29:32.900 They are embittered at their failures of femininity. 1.00
00:29:37.380 Conservative women and married housewives, by contrast, they have been rewarded for the achievement of their femininity. 0.60
00:29:43.560 You did it. You were skinny enough. 1.00
00:29:45.680 You were submissive enough.
00:29:46.940 You were nice enough.
00:29:47.840 You made a good enough pie.
00:29:49.680 And here is your reward.
00:29:51.080 Here is your husband, your protector, your place on a pedestal, not excluded from, but in fact, above independence and work.
00:30:00.580 And he's asleep on the couch from the second martini.
00:30:03.700 Yeah. 0.98
00:30:05.540 This is something you see all the time, like casting women's status as like housewives, help meets, you know, legal children as protection, as privilege, as aspirational. 1.00
00:30:16.000 This is what every trad wife does. 1.00
00:30:18.140 Yeah. 0.99
00:30:18.280 This is I'm sorry to like bring it to the Internet, but there's so many women I know over the past week as I was writing this script, we're reposting the same like still from an old movie from the 60s was like Brigitte Bardot. 1.00
00:30:31.620 And she's like, I told you I can't work. 1.00
00:30:34.280 I'm no good for work.
00:30:35.380 It makes me ugly.
00:30:37.400 And they think they're being anti-capitalist.
00:30:39.820 Right.
00:30:40.260 In a cheeky way. 0.99
00:30:41.200 But I'm like, that shit is straight Phyllis Schlafly. 1.00
00:30:43.140 That, like, if you're a girl and you're hot enough and you're pretty enough, some man will come in and rescue you. 1.00
00:30:51.640 And that is how you know that you won at being a woman, is that you don't have to support yourself.
00:30:57.800 I'm an outsider, but it does seem to me that if you can't combine being super smoking hot and working, it's just a skill issue, man.
00:31:06.880 I will say, in defense of hot girls, being skinny is exhausting.
00:31:12.820 True. 0.99
00:31:13.540 Being pretty is expensive, and it takes a lot of time.
00:31:17.560 Yeah, yeah.
00:31:18.380 And these are, of course, the only reasons I have opted out of them.
00:31:21.820 I could totally do it if I wanted to.
00:31:23.340 phyllis schlafly knows that she's not exactly going into the past so much as trying to evoke 1.00
00:31:47.460 a future that is dramatically different from the present right right her mother only had two
00:31:52.280 children phyllis had six yeah uh and that is you know those are decisions that those women made
00:31:59.740 for material and also ideological reasons so she forms a group she calls stop era it's an acronym 0.98
00:32:09.120 do you want to read out or guess what the acronym is because it's so fucking stupid adrian stop era 0.99
00:32:15.500 I don't know. 1.00
00:32:16.780 Stop taking our privileges, ERA. 0.99
00:32:20.040 Oh, my God. 1.00
00:32:21.060 Isn't that so bad?
00:32:22.140 So the S in stop stands for stop?
00:32:24.380 Yes.
00:32:24.960 That's not how acronyms work, Phyllis.
00:32:27.100 That is not how acronyms work.
00:32:29.960 She forms this in September 1972.
00:32:32.700 The first meeting is at an airport hotel in Chicago.
00:32:36.820 And it's really just local people from the Illinois Federation of Republican Women.
00:32:41.300 Only good things happen at airport hotels in Chicago.
00:32:44.020 The O'Hare Marriott, yeah. 0.80
00:32:46.360 Dead possums, overdoses, and Phyllis Schlafly beginning the destruction of the ERA, yes.
00:32:51.620 I think this has actually come up on the podcast a few times.
00:32:54.340 I have like a real soft spot for Chicago.
00:32:56.520 I think Chicago's place in the American imagination is like really noble.
00:33:00.800 They're this like downtrodden, rough-hewn second city that I admire their fighting spirit.
00:33:06.480 I've been there like twice and I had a bad time each time, but I like Chicago as a concept a lot.
00:33:11.040 No, I love it. I love it. I'll go even further.
00:33:13.380 I even like their pizza.
00:33:14.640 Wow, that's sacrilege.
00:33:15.900 That's not good.
00:33:16.800 Chicago deserves better than Phyllis Schlafly, is what I'm trying to say.
00:33:19.620 Yeah, but, well, I think there's a comment on O'Hare.
00:33:23.540 O'Hare is a worse airport than Chicago is a city, by far.
00:33:26.380 And it's about airport hotels, where it's just like the level of divorce, sadness, and convention is just like out of control.
00:33:35.180 Even when people are not trying to take people's rights away.
00:33:37.820 But, you know, she works the phones, basically, and she gets her contacts from the National Federation of Republican Women, so women from a bunch of different states, to all meet her in St. Louis a couple months later.
00:33:49.660 And that's more than 100 people are at that conference.
00:33:53.600 And the intention is to create a national movement of right-wing women against the ERA.
00:33:58.400 So they choose a stop sign as their logo. So every picture of Phyllis from this era has her wearing like a weirdly oversized red stop sign on her chest that says Stop ERA. And they grew pretty quickly because it consolidated basically the entire scattered anti-ERA movement like very, very quickly. Right.
00:34:20.380 So they cannibalize groups like my favorite one, which is called Women Who Want to Be Women, WWWW, which is such a crazy name.
00:34:33.640 So, you know, the Stop ERA pretty quickly develops like a downline of these state orgs.
00:34:38.940 Right. So there's Stop ERA Missouri.
00:34:41.440 There's Stop ERA Virginia.
00:34:42.640 There's Stop ERA Oklahoma.
00:34:45.100 and these are like state groups
00:34:48.040 that will lobby against ratifications
00:34:50.200 in their own capitals.
00:34:52.560 And Schlafly personally chooses
00:34:54.500 the state directors for all of the state chapters
00:34:57.220 and they all respond directly to her.
00:35:00.720 So Stop ERA is Phyllis's first campaign
00:35:06.040 under an organization she later comes
00:35:08.680 to call the Eagle Forum.
00:35:10.440 Have you ever heard of the Eagle Forum?
00:35:11.980 Yes, only ever as someone saying
00:35:14.180 Phyllis Schlafly's Eagle Forum, yes.
00:35:15.900 Yeah, it's basically like more or less synonymous with her, but it is a big network.
00:35:20.060 So this is a group that Phyllis forms officially in 1975.
00:35:24.780 She calls it the alternative to women's lib.
00:35:27.320 And after the ERA campaign is won, she's going to use Eagle Forum and all of those mailing
00:35:33.260 lists and all of those contacts and all of those, you know, fundraising networks to continue
00:35:39.340 her anti-feminist and anti-gay work.
00:35:41.500 So for a while, they're calling themselves the alternative, but then they decide to stop calling themselves the alternative to women's lib because they're like, we're not the alternative.
00:35:50.700 We're the mainstream.
00:35:53.000 The numbers say otherwise at its peak in the 1970s.
00:35:57.840 Eagle Forum had about 60,000 members nationally, whereas around the same time now had about 220,000.
00:36:05.560 Right.
00:36:05.620 So, Stop ERA does some things that are designed to change the votes of state legislatures and some things that are designed to get attention, right? 0.96
00:36:17.580 So, whenever the ERA ratification is being debated in a state capitol, the state Stop ERA chapter will send women to the capitol.
00:36:27.260 They tell their members to dress up, to wear makeup, to look nice, and to bring baked goods.
00:36:35.440 So they bring pies, cookies, bread.
00:36:40.400 There's a lot of reports of like jam, like various jams.
00:36:43.140 I guess making your own jam was a bigger thing in the 60s and 70s.
00:36:46.740 They were all cooking with jellos.
00:36:48.220 So like it's just like a natural extension into marmalade making, marmalottery, if you will.
00:36:54.260 A single shrimp suspended in a big, wiggling, like, Jell-O tower.
00:36:58.300 That's right.
00:36:59.780 1960s Republican food.
00:37:01.680 So they, like, they deliver literally cookies and pies.
00:37:05.360 I did promise you pie.
00:37:06.640 With notes that say things like, I'm for mom and apple pie.
00:37:11.140 Bread maker is for breadwinners with loaves of bread.
00:37:13.840 That was a popular one.
00:37:15.640 And they've got this, like, dainty presentation with which they get their picture taken, right? 0.99
00:37:21.020 So it's ladies in, like, little matching skirt suits with pillbox hats and white gloves holding a pie and, like, displaying this big, ugly, like, stop sign on their chest. 0.94
00:37:31.740 It's my impression that for decades, the best way for a woman to get photographed in the United States was to hold a pie. 0.98
00:37:38.320 If you have anything to say at all. 0.96
00:37:40.260 Yeah.
00:37:40.800 Yeah.
00:37:41.220 Your opinion does not count unless you're holding a pie.
00:37:43.220 You're like, free Northern Ireland.
00:37:44.320 She's like, well, she brought a cherry pie.
00:37:46.700 So she's going in Time magazine.
00:37:49.100 And, you know, this is like a very, very dainty, proper feminine presentation, and it contrasts with the actual scenes that ensue at a lot of these state capitals, like in them and outside. 1.00
00:38:01.120 Because the Stop ERA protesters, they get into these screaming matches with the pro-ERA feminists.
00:38:07.680 It reminds me a little of, like, what you'll sometimes see outside an abortion clinic, right? 0.83
00:38:12.340 Like there's a bunch of, you know, feminist clinic escorts who are like they're trying to walk women into the clinic. 0.98
00:38:19.300 And then there's a bunch of like wild, drooling anti-feminists like chuds who are just screaming at you. 0.95
00:38:25.940 This also tends to contrast with the tone that the movement takes in its actual communications, which like Phyllis's tone a lot of the time is really sneering, really sarcastic. 0.99
00:38:38.360 Right. But Phyllis is personally at the forefront of almost all of the state capital demonstrations.
00:38:45.220 She's traveling constantly. And by 1975, she has testified at more than 40 state legislature hearings against the ERA.
00:38:55.180 Right. So she's really putting into work. And there's like two kind of genius ideas that Phyllis has that I think make Stop ERA a big success.
00:39:04.640 Right. And the first is that she's recruiting women from churches. 0.97
00:39:10.760 So in the first couple months of Stop ERA, Phyllis is mostly recruiting women from the ranks of the right wing activist organizations where she already has a lot of friends.
00:39:20.240 Right. The National Federation of Republican Women, the Illinois Federation of Republican Women, the DAR and some old friends from the Goldwater campaign.
00:39:28.700 She says she milks those contacts. But one problem is that like Phyllis.
00:39:33.200 They're old. 1.00
00:39:33.620 They're kind of old. Yeah. Phyllis is almost 50 at this point, which is not actually old, I think, in my estimation anymore. But, you know, she's not a photogenic hot woman. Right. She's not pregnant. She's not.
00:39:45.600 She's no gold water girl anymore. 0.98
00:39:48.500 She doesn't fit into the tiny little skirt and the cowboy hat anymore, you know. 1.00
00:39:53.580 And there's kind of a problem because the feminists are sort of hot. 1.00
00:39:58.000 They're younger. 1.00
00:39:59.380 They are long haired.
00:40:02.260 They often don't wear bras. 1.00
00:40:04.120 I think feminists of the second wave in our popular imagination now tend to be associated with a sort of like willful rejection of sexuality. 1.00
00:40:12.320 Right. 0.99
00:40:12.560 That's not actually how a lot of them were looking.
00:40:15.800 They looked like they were wearing miniskirts and they had long hair and they had no bras on and they were young enough for that to be like quite lovely.
00:40:23.260 You know, they were they were a look.
00:40:25.660 Right. So Phyllis sets out pretty deliberately to recruit younger women. 1.00
00:40:30.200 She's like, I need young moms. 1.00
00:40:31.960 I need young married women and I'm going to get them mostly from churches. 1.00
00:40:36.420 Let's milf up this ERA protest. 1.00
00:40:39.000 Kind of. Yeah.
00:40:40.820 This seems to us like a pretty obvious thing to do from the vantage point of 2025, right?
00:40:46.480 But this unified Christian conservative movement that we know as the Christian right, it doesn't really exist yet.
00:40:54.180 No, of course. Yeah.
00:40:55.100 Yeah.
00:40:55.460 We covered that in our Anita Bryant episode, right?
00:40:58.300 Yeah. 1.00
00:40:58.980 Protestants and Catholics didn't trust each other.
00:41:01.920 Protestantism and Catholicism were also stand-ins for ethnicity and whether or not someone was reliably white or not.
00:41:09.840 Mainline Protestants didn't trust the evangelicals, evangelicals didn't trust the Catholics, no one trusted the Mormons, right?
00:41:16.760 There was just a lot of energy and distrust going many different directions.
00:41:21.180 And which is all to say that, like, the Christian right, such as it is, doesn't exist yet, right? 0.97
00:41:26.520 Phyllis builds it. 0.96
00:41:28.260 And she builds it by getting women and, like, honestly, not more than just a few men from all of these different, like, mutually suspicious backgrounds and denominations to work together because she finds something to unite them around that they care about more than their divisions, which is anti-feminism.
00:41:48.380 Right.
00:41:48.480 So Tanya Melec is a former Republican strategist, and she turned liberal and had this conversion experience, specifically in response to the Republican Party's anti-feminism.
00:42:00.180 And she put it this way. Do you want to read this?
00:42:02.560 It was Schlafly with her authoritarian leadership and expert grassroots organizing who made the religious right a political player.
00:42:09.380 It was Schlafly, first of the Goldwater and then the new right team, who unearthed the political gold of misogyny.
00:42:15.000 It was Schlafly who translated fear of women's liberation into a political force in the Republican Party and thereby extended the foundation of the Republican Southern strategy.
00:42:25.080 Now, not only did the strategy flourish on the backlash of the civil rights movement, but it was broadened to include a backlash against the women's movement, too.
00:42:34.700 The political gold of misogyny is, I think, a phrase that's going to ring in my ears. 0.62
00:42:39.700 Yeah, that's really good.
00:42:41.480 She's right about the sequencing here, right?
00:42:43.280 the racial resentment of the Southern strategy was powerful, but it was limited, right? There
00:42:50.260 were parts of the United States where that was going to be really successful, and there were
00:42:53.560 other parts where, if anything, it might be unhelpful, or at least it wouldn't do very much
00:42:58.620 for you. Just on the merits, she's, I think, correct to say that without backlash to other
00:43:04.420 social movements of the 60s or their perceived kind of upending of what people felt to be
00:43:10.180 natural hierarchies, this probably would have stayed a regional phenomenon, right?
00:43:15.260 Right. She expands, like, pretty widely the constituency of the backlash. 1.00
00:43:20.960 So you said this was the first genius thing she did, the churches. What's the second?
00:43:24.820 The second is that she used women as ideological misogynists, right? And we talked about this
00:43:31.260 before, right, the rise of the concerned woman as sort of the face of some pretty, like,
00:43:38.000 oppressive policies that you see starting to bubble up on the American right in the 1970s. 1.00
00:43:44.660 And women are useful to a right-wing project because they can soften bigotry that can make 1.00
00:43:51.240 it seem less threatening and less serious. These white middle-class women are useful 1.00
00:43:56.800 precisely because they have an easier time appearing innocent, right? They're also useful 1.00
00:44:03.120 because they have a lot of time on their hands.
00:44:06.560 Many of Schlafly's foot soldiers are housewives.
00:44:10.220 They've got empty hours to fill. 0.77
00:44:12.820 And even better, they were religious,
00:44:15.320 which means that they are reliably reachable
00:44:17.320 at the same place every week. 1.00
00:44:20.020 Phyllis really tended to talk down to and about these women, right? 1.00
00:44:24.300 So she once described them as housewives 1.00
00:44:26.620 who didn't know where their state capital was. 0.56
00:44:28.960 And that's kind of overselling it for some of these women, 0.57
00:44:32.560 Like some of them were also like political operatives from the Republican Party. 0.85
00:44:36.140 But a lot of them were women who were just sort of like, you know, naive. 1.00
00:44:41.160 They had sort of a lack of political practice. 1.00
00:44:44.500 And for Phyllis, these were useful qualities, right? 1.00
00:44:47.800 They were women who were unused to thinking for themselves and who followed all of her orders. 1.00
00:44:52.860 She's like, in the defense of my followers, they're idiots. 1.00
00:44:56.360 Kind of, yeah. 1.00
00:44:58.560 She pitches that as a virtue, right? 0.95
00:45:00.780 Yeah. They're not fancy women with, you know, independent capacities for critical thought. So she also gets a bit of luck when Phyllis becomes allied with North Carolina Senator Sam Irvin. Do you know anything about Sam Irvin? 1.00
00:45:15.880 I don't. That's ringing a little bit of a bell. I mean, he's a North Carolina senator in the 70s. I'm going to guess he's a Democrat, probably a Dixiecrat, right?
00:45:23.420 He is a Dixiecrat. He will also, around the time that he and Phyllis start working together, become the chair of the Senate Watergate Committee.
00:45:32.840 Oh.
00:45:33.420 So he does, like, come up for other reasons, right?
00:45:36.660 Maybe that's where I've heard of him.
00:45:37.960 So, like, for our purposes, the thing we need to know about Sam Irvin is that he was a passionate and really committed ideological misogynist and a big ERA opponent.
00:45:49.040 He had been one of the only senators to vote against it in 1972.
00:45:54.460 And when he did, I'm sorry, this is like a little bit of a side thing.
00:45:58.540 But when the ERA was being passed by the U.S. Senate in 1972, Sam Irvin goes onto the floor to speak against the ERA.
00:46:07.420 And he reads this like really creepy poem on the Senate floor about this young bride quaking with terror on her wedding night when she realizes she's like alone with a man.
00:46:18.620 And I'm like, this is, it's just so many layers of wrong.
00:46:23.560 But Irvin allows Phyllis to use his Senate's office resources to distribute her newsletter and all of her Stop ERA and Eagle Forum mailers, which means that her direct mail campaigns no longer have basically any overhead since the whole bill is being footed by the taxpayers.
00:46:42.600 And another thing that Phyllis does is that she enrolls in law school at Washington University in St. Louis in 1975.
00:46:53.080 And she says that she only does this in an effort to get her son to go to law school.
00:46:58.180 Do you want to like read a little bit from this like Phyllis Schlafly interview where she talks about her decision to go to law school?
00:47:04.880 I'm going to try and do a Blanche Dubois.
00:47:07.080 No, I'm kidding.
00:47:08.960 Well, that's a story.
00:47:10.980 My husband's a lawyer and we have four sons.
00:47:13.540 I thought we should have a lawyer's son.
00:47:15.400 The first one rejected it.
00:47:16.620 And when the second son came along, I tried to persuade him to go to law school.
00:47:20.240 And he didn't want to do it.
00:47:21.620 So I made a bet with him.
00:47:22.980 We'll both take the LSAT and one of us will go.
00:47:26.280 So we both took the LSAT and he still refused to go.
00:47:29.160 Carrying on with this argument, I applied to Washington University Law School.
00:47:32.860 Of course, my children, who were in on this and knew what was going on,
00:47:37.060 I never told my husband.
00:47:37.920 But my children said, oh, they won't accept you, mother.
00:47:40.920 You're too old.
00:47:42.040 So I'll take things that never happened for 500 fellas.
00:47:45.660 This was 1975.
00:47:46.840 I applied and they accepted me.
00:47:48.700 And one night at the dinner table, I announced that I had been accepted for Washington University
00:47:52.860 Law School to start classes in September.
00:47:55.540 Fred had a tantrum.
00:47:56.860 What a charmer.
00:47:57.960 I'd never seen him like this. 0.99
00:47:59.100 He said, that's the most ridiculous thing I ever heard. 0.99
00:48:01.500 You're trying to beat the ERA. 0.98
00:48:03.060 You're making these trips around the country.
00:48:04.880 You don't have time. 0.98
00:48:05.740 It's ridiculous. 0.99
00:48:06.320 and it broke up the dinner. 0.97
00:48:08.400 I remember everybody left the table
00:48:09.880 and I walked up to my oldest son and I said,
00:48:11.980 I'm just floored.
00:48:12.940 I never saw him like this before.
00:48:14.480 And John said,
00:48:15.440 Mother, you have everything else in the world now 0.54
00:48:17.300 and now you're trying to take away his law practice.
00:48:20.800 I'm thinking of like conversations I've had
00:48:23.000 with women my own age about our mothers
00:48:25.100 where they're like, they're not allowed really.
00:48:27.620 They haven't been allowed to cultivate self-respect.
00:48:30.020 So whenever they're proud of something
00:48:31.800 or they think that they deserve something,
00:48:34.460 They can't just say that they have to create like this whole elaborate scheme in which they passive aggressively manipulate other people into saying it, you know, like like this is a whole long story, like largely fiction about how proud she is of everything she achieved.
00:48:54.060 Right. She's like, my Fred said, you're defeating the IRA. You're taking these trips around the country. You're raising six children. And now you're also going to law school. She's proud as shit of that. Yeah. Right. Yeah. This is a woman who's very, very invested in her own achievement. Right. But she can't or won't say that. Yeah. What she's doing is creating an elaborate story in which other people say that about her so that she can say it.
00:49:22.840 It's such a fucking mom thing. 1.00
00:49:24.680 It's a very particular emotional tick of 20th century American white women 1.00
00:49:31.160 who were just psychically warped by misogyny in this very strange way.
00:49:36.420 It also strikes me that someone like Schlafly is kind of a complementarianist, right?
00:49:41.520 So this idea that like, oh, the husband and the wife bring separate and distinct things into the marriage
00:49:48.260 and really only one can do one thing and the other has to do the other, right?
00:49:52.840 Like they're matching halves, basically. 0.88
00:49:55.100 What's always struck me is that the way conservative women especially talk about this is laced with so much contempt. 0.98
00:50:01.940 She's basically saying, my husband is an insecure dummy. 1.00
00:50:05.700 She's like, I am to be a faithful helper and a quiet support to my idiot, no good husband. 1.00
00:50:12.100 Right. And you're like, I'm sorry. 1.00
00:50:13.840 It's like, it feels like you hate this man.
00:50:15.960 Like, yeah, it doesn't seem harmonious at all. 1.00
00:50:18.660 There's a little bit of a martyr complex in a lot of like women's gender conservatism, right? Like women are edified by suffering in a way like even more than souls under Christianity are, right? Like women in particular make a virtue of self-denial. And so they'll like show you how much they're denying themselves. They're like, oh, I wish I could have a cookie, but, you know, it just goes straight to my hips. And it's just like, just eat the fucking cookie, you know, like. 0.87
00:50:44.860 eat the fucking pies, Phyllis. 1.00
00:50:48.080 Yeah, this is taking forever. 1.00
00:50:50.500 Does she go to law school? 0.90
00:50:51.600 She does go to law school. 1.00
00:50:52.500 This story is complete bullshit, right? 0.99
00:50:54.160 She's not just like such a good mom 1.00
00:50:55.880 that she accidentally goes to law school
00:50:57.960 to try and get her son to go to law school, you know?
00:51:00.580 Also, I saw a picture of her children
00:51:02.600 in a pamphlet from 1964.
00:51:04.460 How old are these children?
00:51:06.120 She's not saying,
00:51:06.800 oh, they called me from Washington
00:51:08.520 or they called me from their job in Dubuque.
00:51:11.300 She's like,
00:51:11.980 oh, we were all sitting around the dinner table.
00:51:13.400 I'm like, these children are 30 or 25, I guess.
00:51:18.780 But like this is a fake story, right?
00:51:21.020 Yes. 1.00
00:51:21.360 So Lishwaki does not want to go to law school because she's such a good mom. 0.95
00:51:24.680 She wants to go to law school because, A, doing so will make her more credentialed in her political career and better qualified for a role in a future Republican administration, which is something she is already eyeing. 0.99
00:51:37.580 Right.
00:51:37.840 And also, it gives her more credibility as an anti-ERA campaigner, because at this point, Phyllis has spent a couple of years doing these televised and sort of like onstage debates with feminists about the ERA, and feminists are, on the whole, much better educated than anti-feminists, and they will pose Phyllis a question in this debate.
00:52:01.360 How can you speak so authoritatively about the ERA and say that I'm wrong in my interpretations of this amendment when I'm a lawyer and you're not?
00:52:10.000 This is something you see a lot in Phyllis's politics.
00:52:14.160 Like, she is now, at this point in her life, a rich woman, right? 1.00
00:52:17.860 She didn't grow up rich.
00:52:19.580 Right.
00:52:20.220 She didn't grow up in these fancy enclaves.
00:52:24.200 Like, somebody like Betty Friedan did grow up rich.
00:52:26.860 Yeah, yeah.
00:52:27.600 You know, and this is a real chip on her shoulder, right?
00:52:30.660 Like Nelson Rockefeller definitely grew up rich, right? Like these groups that she sees herself as rebelling against, be it the feminists or the Rockefeller Republicans, are people who I think she suspects are a little better than her.
00:52:45.240 And she has this, like, mix of anger at the thought that they might have that idea and, like, insecurity that it might be a little bit true.
00:52:55.720 And, like, Phyllis is, like many of us, somebody who's just continually driven by spite, right?
00:53:03.320 This I cannot fault her for because that's pretty much what gets me out of bed.
00:53:07.180 I know. 0.60
00:53:07.580 I had to look real hard for something I could relate to in Phyllis.
00:53:11.640 And what I actually came up with was like, well, I, too, am full of rage and hatred. You know, like I just had to lower my estimation of my own character. So like this legal training that Phyllis gets, it also gives her more ammunition for the anti-ERA campaign. Right.
00:53:28.260 And bizarrely, it also allows her to get on TV a lot. So I've, like, mentioned a few times that Phyllis is doing these televised debates about the ERA. She's doing them in, like, auditoriums, but she's also doing them a lot for, like, broadcasts.
00:53:43.920 And she did this dozens and dozens of times during the ERA battle.
00:53:47.660 And it was not, at least at first, because people were clamoring to have her on TV.
00:53:53.220 It's because she sued and threatened to sue anybody that wouldn't put her on TV or on the radio.
00:53:59.340 Because at the time, the FCC was still endorsing something called the Fairness Doctrine.
00:54:04.020 Really, it meant that if there were, you know, opposing sides of the issue, a broadcaster had to provide each side of the issue equal time, even when one side is very mainstream and the other is very fringe.
00:54:17.760 Right. So like this fairness doctrine applies even to topics of broad political consensus, like, say, the ERA in 1972.
00:54:27.120 So every time that a broadcaster wants to have a feminist on TV to advocate for the ERA, Phyllis Schlafly calls them up and says, I'm going to sue you if you don't put me on TV next to her. 0.50
00:54:39.220 Right. 0.99
00:54:39.720 Wow.
00:54:40.060 And she demands, in fact, the same amount of time to speak. 1.00
00:54:43.940 So around 1972, feminists start noticing that one of the only ways the ERA is being covered at all now is in the form of debates that are always against Phyllis.
00:54:56.420 Because there's lots of different women who are willing and able to go on TV to advocate for the ERA, and basically the only person who's ever there to oppose it is Phyllis, right? 0.97
00:55:07.860 So suddenly, she's on TV all the fucking time. 0.84
00:55:11.560 She's on Phil Donahue over and over and over again. 0.99
00:55:14.360 She's on all of these news magazine shows.
00:55:17.020 She's a debate me bro, right?
00:55:19.040 And like them, the actual performance that she puts on is not really like good faith exchanges, right? She's berating, she raises her voice, she misrepresents the amendment, she misrepresents the impacts of the amendment, she misrepresents her opponents, and she issues ad hominems and lies, right?
00:55:40.280 But this might be a good time to go through some of Phyllis's like big claims and arguments against the ERA. 0.55
00:55:50.560 So the first is a wife's right to support.
00:55:54.580 Have you heard of this? 0.81
00:55:55.960 Yeah, I know that that's one of the arguments, but it doesn't make any sense to me.
00:55:59.220 A wife's right to support was Phyllis's term for a series of state laws that designated wives as dependents of their husbands.
00:56:09.140 And Phyllis claimed that if the ERA went into effect, women who had been financially dependent on their husbands, like divorcees and widows, basically, would not be entitled to financial compensation or financial support if they were abandoned or left alone. 1.00
00:56:30.520 This is something that some feminists had actually sort of been trying to work around, right? 0.98
00:56:34.720 But functionally, what she's talking about is alimony law. 1.00
00:56:37.680 Which is, as you alluded to at the beginning, like trivially easy to make gender neutral, right?
00:56:44.280 Yeah.
00:56:44.640 But Phyllis sort of likes to gloss over that because what she's actually talking about is government and legal recognition of a default in which women are confined to the home. 1.00
00:56:58.460 Right. 0.99
00:56:59.300 She argues that it's going to give homosexuals rights. 1.00
00:57:04.540 Not the homosexuals. 0.97
00:57:06.600 She points to legal gay sex, gay marriage, gay adoption, and the right of gays to teach in public schools. 0.81
00:57:14.980 So she, like, raises the specter of gays and gay rights.
00:57:20.280 She's got this, like, anecdote.
00:57:22.060 She's like, well, firefighters risk their lives for us and they work in close quarters. 0.81
00:57:25.960 And now the ERA will mean that they'll have to tolerate a homosexual male firefighter in their midst. 0.93
00:57:32.060 And do we really want to do that to our brave firefighters? 0.95
00:57:35.020 Yeah, they have to tolerate a firefighter, a construction worker, a Native American dude in their trusty group of macho men. 0.98
00:57:42.560 Yeah. 1.00
00:57:46.020 She talks about sex mixing, which, you know, heaven pretend. 0.83
00:57:51.140 Yeah. Stop threatening me with a good time. 0.63
00:57:53.080 She's like, this would ban single-sex education is one claim she makes.
00:57:57.860 So you couldn't have, like, a girl's Catholic school anymore. 0.97
00:58:02.000 Yes. 1.00
00:58:02.400 But she really leans heavily onto the idea of unisex bathrooms. 0.98
00:58:07.880 Oh, my Lord.
00:58:09.120 They have not moved on for 50 years. 1.00
00:58:11.900 It's like, there's going to be a man in the woman's room if you let women have rights. 1.00
00:58:17.800 Yeah. 1.00
00:58:18.040 They may be the party of Social Security and the New Deal. 0.99
00:58:21.500 We are the party of having only people that you believe are of your gender while you're taking a big dump. 0.97
00:58:29.380 I'm a pretty ecumenical shitter, to be honest. 0.97
00:58:31.580 The Phyllis Schlafly Report, her newsletter, during this era has a ton of like crazy homophobic and transphobic cartoons of like men in dresses coming out of the women's room in a big long line. 0.77
00:58:41.460 And it could be something that the Trump campaign tweets today, you know.
00:58:45.280 Elon Musk has them like as a screensaver.
00:58:47.560 She's trying to, like, throw a lot of different issues at the wall to see what sticks.
00:58:53.000 She talks about abortion a lot.
00:58:54.800 By now, Roe v. Wade has happened in 1973, January 1973.
00:58:58.520 And she's like, well, this is a cockamamie idea, she says, that you can find a right to an abortion in, like, the 14th and 9th Amendment, which is what Roe found.
00:59:08.340 But if we pass the ERA, it won't be a cockamamie idea.
00:59:10.840 That will mean abortion on demand. 0.64
00:59:12.840 So she leans into that.
00:59:14.160 There's sort of like this nascent anti-abortion sentiment that's starting to be galvanized around Roe, and she does sort of like press on that button a lot.
00:59:22.000 The one I remember most is the thing about the draft, right?
00:59:24.780 She's like, oh, women would get drafted into the Army, right? 0.51
00:59:27.360 Yes. 1.00
00:59:27.940 This is kind of her main thing.
00:59:30.720 It's what seems to hit most for most of her audiences.
00:59:34.920 this argument that the ERA would mean that women would be eligible for the draft and that they
00:59:41.760 would be required to be placed in combat roles if drafted. And I think this is a moment where 0.67
00:59:47.520 like a little bit of historical context is helpful. So the Vietnam draft was from 1964 to 1973,
00:59:55.260 so nine years, a good long time. Carter reinstitutes the draft registry system in 1980
01:00:02.060 towards the end of the ERA fight, right?
01:00:04.600 And then Reagan comes in just a couple months later
01:00:07.780 and is like really hawkish on foreign policy, right?
01:00:11.340 So everybody has these memories of how bad the draft was.
01:00:15.120 And then in the early 80s, they're like, 0.98
01:00:17.260 oh shit, we're going to be at war again. 0.99
01:00:18.960 There's going to be another draft. 1.00
01:00:21.060 And, you know, this is something
01:00:23.480 that increases in salience over time.
01:00:26.960 You know, when she puts out her 1972 first,
01:00:31.420 like ERA pamphlet, The Right to Be a Woman, which was written while the Vietnam War and the draft
01:00:37.060 were still ongoing. The combat role issue is only four paragraphs, but it becomes a central theme
01:00:44.720 of her ERA campaign by 1980. Observers at the time said that this was the decisive issue that
01:00:51.560 ultimately doomed the ERA. Wow. Yeah. And, you know, one thing to note is that like the feminists
01:00:58.640 didn't really have a good answer for this 1.00
01:01:00.560 because they said at the time,
01:01:03.200 like many of these pro-ERA organizations like now 0.99
01:01:06.680 were like, yeah, the ERMA means that women will be drafted 1.00
01:01:09.200 and they will be sent into combat. 1.00
01:01:11.580 That is the requirement of the law.
01:01:13.380 That is indeed something that happens in our army now
01:01:15.700 to like nobody's complaint about the actual effectiveness,
01:01:19.300 but it's become like an ideological hobby horse 1.00
01:01:21.360 for like Pete Hegseth to get women out of combat roles. 1.00
01:01:24.100 Oh yeah, good point. 1.00
01:01:25.000 So this is another thing that is like carried over
01:01:27.020 from the ERA fight.
01:01:28.180 But at the time, people really didn't like this idea. 1.00
01:01:31.940 Women are like, well, I don't want to get drafted. 1.00
01:01:33.680 I don't want to serve in combat.
01:01:35.240 People had very strong normative ideas that women should be excluded from war and now didn't really grapple with this.
01:01:44.080 They were like, well, we oppose war and we oppose the draft. 0.95
01:01:46.540 Right.
01:01:47.020 And they didn't really talk enough, I think, about what it would mean in practice for women to serve in combat roles in the military, in a world where there is the draft.
01:01:58.080 which is ultimately what they were advocating for. Right. Yeah. They were just sort of like, well, we'll lobby against the draft.
01:02:03.600 It's like, well, OK, but, you know, you're also advocating for a piece of legislation that will lead to this outcome.
01:02:13.260 So you like you have to be a little more accountable for it.
01:02:15.480 They just didn't really have enough political will within their organizations to get further than we oppose the draft.
01:02:21.580 Right. And then I think the other thing that we have to think of when we assess Phyllis's work with the ERA,
01:02:28.080 is that she really drew on this, like, infinite resource
01:02:32.740 that could power the economy if only we could harness it, 0.96
01:02:36.120 which is, like, women's hatred of other women, right? 1.00
01:02:39.460 Right. 1.00
01:02:39.700 The conservative white women who were mobilized by Phyllis Schlafly, 1.00
01:02:44.700 they were, you know, like, mostly middle class, married Republicans. 1.00
01:02:48.580 They were from the South, the Midwest, and the Mountain West.
01:02:51.660 And they had the same kind of resentment of coastal cosmopolitan elites
01:02:57.200 that men of those demographics did and still do, right?
01:03:01.540 So these are some of the same voters
01:03:02.980 who had been compelled to vote for Goldwater 1.00
01:03:05.540 in the 1964 primary as a fuck you 0.99
01:03:09.120 to the New York Rockefeller Republicans. 1.00
01:03:11.720 You can always mobilize people
01:03:15.020 into the most intense hatred
01:03:17.300 for those who remind them of themselves, right?
01:03:21.400 Like, when I think of the people who drive me crazy
01:03:24.840 and get really under my skin,
01:03:26.580 They're the people who are like flawed in the same way that I'm flawed or who seem like a version of myself that's like doing a little bit better, you know.
01:03:36.380 And these were women in Schlafly's movement who were able to much more fiercely hate feminists and to mobilize against them because they had this affinity, right? Because they had this like affective investment in these feminist women because they shared the category of women but were inhabiting it differently, right?
01:03:58.720 And they thought, OK, your feminism is an indictment of me and my circumstances.
01:04:05.340 And this is like, I think, central to Phyllis's genius and her ultimate success that she understood this.
01:04:12.660 Yeah, I mean, this is something that I think a lot about with Me Too backlash or with the way that Republican women were able to overlook all the very credible allegations against Donald Trump.
01:04:23.500 Essentially, once you live long enough in a compromising position within unfair and unjust system,
01:04:31.060 the lift for recognizing that injustice gets higher, right?
01:04:36.200 Because you have to sort of say everything that was true of my life up to this point is to some extent invalid.
01:04:42.080 And it is easier to kind of kill the messenger instead of say like, no,
01:04:46.720 like the fact that you're making me feel that shows that you're sneering and looking down at me 0.96
01:04:51.020 rather than saying, like, which also many women did in the 70s,
01:04:54.440 like, yes, I am ready to reassess my life.
01:04:58.100 And I mean, I kicked my husband out
01:04:59.340 and I'm going to treat my children differently
01:05:01.240 and I'm going to treat myself differently.
01:05:02.800 But it's very clear that there are going to be other people
01:05:05.720 who are going to look at that and shrink from that realization, right?
01:05:09.400 And the same, I think, is true in our own day
01:05:12.360 where you have the choice between either making many of the men in your life
01:05:17.280 super uncomfortable
01:05:18.800 and making yourself
01:05:20.060 super uncomfortable
01:05:21.000 for quite some time
01:05:22.140 or you come up with
01:05:24.420 this facultive way
01:05:25.380 to like rationalize it all
01:05:26.820 and make it the fault of people
01:05:28.740 who've been pointing out
01:05:30.140 the problem to you.
01:05:30.960 Does that make sense?
01:05:32.320 Yeah, I mean,
01:05:32.820 it's just so much easier
01:05:34.840 to delude yourself
01:05:36.660 and change nothing
01:05:37.720 than it is to like
01:05:39.720 accept a difficult truth
01:05:41.560 and have to change your life, right?
01:05:43.680 Yeah, yeah.
01:05:44.280 Like that is the choice 1.00
01:05:45.860 that feminism offers to women. 1.00
01:05:48.120 And it's really a difficult one.
01:05:50.560 And I think most women, even today, 1.00
01:05:54.020 like do not choose to live a harder feminist life. 1.00
01:05:57.520 They choose to live an easier anti-feminist life. 1.00
01:06:00.920 It is the path of least resistance 0.99
01:06:02.660 and least pain for a lot of them.
01:06:05.240 There are just these real limits of solidarity
01:06:06.940 because, right, if you're asking someone
01:06:09.100 who's lived 40 years in a patriarchal system
01:06:11.300 to raise their consciousness, basically,
01:06:13.140 you have to grapple with the fact that you've essentially conspired against yourself.
01:06:18.460 I think this is like really the kernel of Schlafly.
01:06:21.660 It's not that she's a woman who worked against women's liberation,
01:06:26.020 but that she's a woman who organized other women against women's liberation
01:06:29.800 because she understood that women could be very easily persuaded to hurt themselves
01:06:35.680 and to sacrifice their own material interests and dignity. 1.00
01:06:40.680 And this is also, I think, why she drives feminists absolutely insane. 1.00
01:06:45.660 In one of her televised debates, Betty Friedan said to Phyllis Schlafly, 1.00
01:06:49.300 I want to have you burned at the stake. 1.00
01:06:51.720 Wow. 1.00
01:06:52.540 Which is such a Betty Friedan thing to say. 1.00
01:06:54.260 The woman was a fucking nut job. 1.00
01:06:55.900 Like, I love her, but she was just like, had no filter whatsoever. 1.00
01:06:58.960 Nice. 1.00
01:06:59.260 She gets under our skin because Schlafly exploits and exposes the core vulnerability of the feminist struggle. 0.99
01:07:08.900 The thing that makes sexism unique among other axes of oppression and the thing that, to my mind at least, makes feminism kind of like ultimately impossible, which is that women will conspire against themselves and participate in their own subordination, right? 0.99
01:07:26.880 Yeah. 0.53
01:07:27.120 And this brings me to the sort of like explanations of Schlafly and like explanations of the phenomenon that Schlafly represents, right? Freud would say, okay, well, you know, women are inevitably, naturally, inherently masochists. 0.98
01:07:42.640 I sort of prefer the radical feminist understanding of women's anti-feminism, which is that like women avoid feminism and seek out subordination to men because they are, among other things, making a somewhat rational choice based on a realistic assessment of their own gendered vulnerabilities. 0.91
01:08:00.480 I think this is like basically what you've been saying, Adrienne. The fight is impossible. Doing so requires me to grapple with my own complicity in harming myself and others in ways that I'm not sure that I can handle, right? And even if I succeed in changing myself and in changing my life, I might be materially deprived. I might be vulnerable to violence, right?
01:08:26.980 What the anti-feminists offer women is this fantasy that there's an escape from the problem in the first place, right? 1.00
01:08:35.040 Which also makes it so significant that she's essentially peddling, as you say, a fantasy or a story, right? 1.00
01:08:40.060 In the end, you get a kind of version of domesticity that Schlafly herself didn't live, that her mother didn't live.
01:08:45.880 I wouldn't want to aspire to it, but also even if you were to aspire to it, it wouldn't come naturally to you, right?
01:08:52.260 Even if that is your life's ambition, it's not easy. 0.95
01:08:55.120 Or you get this kind of picture of, like, the gentlemanly husband who, like, just bears no relationship to the farting, cheating weirdo who, like, comes home and pours himself a fucking martini the first thing that he gets home, right? 0.70
01:09:10.000 You're like, why not just live in fictions? 0.99
01:09:12.080 Reality is too awful. 1.00
01:09:13.700 Come live with me in fucking fantasy land. 1.00
01:09:16.140 Right. 1.00
01:09:16.560 Pitching this exact dream, Shafley says, 1.00
01:09:19.760 women was and need protection.
01:09:22.500 Any male who is a man or gentleman
01:09:25.280 will accept the responsibility of protecting women. 1.00
01:09:29.240 I'm sorry, men don't protect you from shit. 0.99
01:09:31.880 They don't provide, they don't protect. 0.99
01:09:34.080 Like, that's not what they do. 1.00
01:09:34.640 Please don't ask me, ladies. 0.88
01:09:37.140 I'd be like, I really think you'd be better at this, honestly. 0.99
01:09:40.880 What if we were, like, out late at night
01:09:42.400 and, like, we got mugged or something
01:09:44.300 and I looked at you?
01:09:46.040 Like, I'm sorry.
01:09:47.300 My heart would stop.
01:09:48.860 We are both dying in that scenario. I'm sorry. I'm like, oh, we're going to die here. Yeah, this is bad.
01:09:54.860 I'm like, go ahead and fight him.
01:09:57.720 Yeah, I left something back there. Let's go retrieve it.
01:10:01.820 But, you know, like, when you are financially dependent on a man, as Schlafly encouraged women to be, that means you're dependent on their character, you're dependent on their whims, you're dependent on their moods, right?
01:10:17.520 And all those human failures that men have because they are, in fact, human beings and not these, you know, like gladiators that Phyllis wants to pick them as, they become your problem in a way that's really outsized, right?
01:10:32.760 It means if you are financially dependent on a man, you can't leave him if he hits you because you can't afford to leave him, right?
01:10:37.880 If you're financially dependent on a man, you have no say in where you guys move to or live.
01:10:43.220 If you're financially dependent on a man, it's really hard to talk back.
01:10:46.860 It's really hard to like win an argument or get your way, right?
01:10:51.340 When you're a housewife, you have a boss and the boss is your husband because you are in a dependent role in very material terms that extend out to emotional and psychic terms.
01:11:04.340 But, you know, Phyllis just kind of wants to wave all of this away.
01:11:09.620 So maybe as a coda, I have a question.
01:11:12.660 The type of person you're describing makes perfect sense to me,
01:11:16.920 and it's very moving the way you're describing them.
01:11:18.940 And I can see why in the 70s there were a lot of them.
01:11:21.740 At the same time, the 70s are also, of course, famous for women who took very different stances,
01:11:26.840 who did in fact walk out on husbands, who did in fact change their lives,
01:11:30.220 who did in fact join the movement, etc., etc.
01:11:32.420 So I do want to hear from you just as a coda, how was it actually done?
01:11:36.400 How did Phyllis marshal this considerably large group of women, but not the overwhelming majority of women, into this victory?
01:11:46.100 What did the victory actually look like?
01:11:47.340 What were these steps?
01:11:48.460 What connects these rhetorical and strategic gambits to what would become this ignominious defeat of this amendment? 1.00
01:11:57.900 She marshals votes and she makes it really unpleasant to oppose her. 1.00
01:12:02.300 So one thing I think we've alluded to is that, like, Phyllis is mean, but she makes it unpleasant and, like, almost logistically impossible for pro-ERA feminists to do almost anything at all, right?
01:12:14.460 I think we've talked off mic a little bit about, like, the women's year in 1977, which was this, like, big national conference in Houston, Texas that was sponsored by the federal government, and each state sent delegations to come up with recommendations for the status of women, right?
01:12:32.000 And it was supposed to be basically a victory lap for the ERA. But the ERA by 1977 has stalled considerably. And what Phyllis does is she sends her little foot soldiers to all of these state convention nominating events.
01:12:46.200 And she gets them to like sort of commandeer the state commissions for a lot of these Republican controlled conservative states.
01:12:55.400 So in Houston, you've got 16,000 people in an arena who are supposed to be coming up with ideas for how the status of women can be improved.
01:13:06.400 And the feminist coalition there is very big.
01:13:08.880 You've got Republicans, you've got Democrats, you've got first ladies.
01:13:12.040 And then you've got these anti-ERA women who are on the floor, who are shouting stuff down at the state nominating conventions. 0.98
01:13:19.640 They're seizing the mic. 0.99
01:13:21.040 They're giving it to their husbands who will take the mic and threaten violence.
01:13:24.040 They're not letting anybody else stand for election to these state delegations.
01:13:28.840 You know, it actually gets like really crazy.
01:13:30.840 And again, it reminds me a lot of trying to get an abortion, like the scene outside of an abortion clinic.
01:13:36.380 Like, how part of it is just that it makes the political arena so unpleasant and so stressful and so maximally taxing for even, like, minimal achievement and organizing that she basically harasses the pro-ERA feminists into, like, exhaustion, right? 1.00
01:13:56.240 And she makes the issue so toxic that a lot of legislatures just want to be done with it. 1.00
01:14:01.380 I know from your excellent introduction to Right-Wing Women by Andrea Dworkin that, in fact, that book, she doesn't sort of pick on right-wing women just as a curio. 1.00
01:14:12.860 She picks on right-wing women because they picked on her at one of these ERA fights, right? 1.00
01:14:17.020 She really was mobbed by them and is sort of trying to understand what the fuck makes these people tick. 0.97
01:14:22.440 Yeah, it's exactly the Houston Conference in 1977. 0.96
01:14:26.160 Andrea Dworkin goes there to cover it.
01:14:27.960 She's a journalist working, I think, for Ms. Magazine. 0.99
01:14:30.080 And she's trying to have conversations with these anti ERA right wing women who've been sent there by Schlafly. And eventually, you know, she keeps getting chased away from the like committees from Mississippi and Utah. And eventually a bunch of them surround her in this mezzanine. And she thinks that they're about to throw her off of a balcony. They're telling her to go the fuck away and leave them alone. 0.92
01:14:54.160 Jeez. And, you know, she finally, like, flees and goes and tells her editor, Gloria Steinem, who's like, well, you have to write about this. And that's where the book Right Wing Women has its, like, genesis. 0.98
01:15:04.620 Wow. And in 1977, Flafly also publishes The Power of the Positive Woman, which I must admit I didn't read, but I'm guessing is also an ERA book.
01:15:14.420 Don't read it. Yeah, it's an anti-ERA book. Like she pitches the introduction as a self-help book where she's talking about the positive woman in contra to like the dissatisfied, embittered, self-pitying feminist. But then the rest of the book, which is like 200 pages long, it's not like massive. It's pamphlet sized, you know.
01:15:34.900 Yeah, Schlafly, for all her many vices, at least was a pretty brief writer.
01:15:40.200 Yeah, she says a few things and it's the same ones over and over again. 0.98
01:15:43.620 Like half of the book is actually just evidence that the National Organization for Women is too friendly to lesbians.
01:15:50.040 And then she like reprints all their resolutions, like apologizing to lesbians and supporting lesbian rights.
01:15:54.720 And that's like a solid like 25 pages.
01:15:57.940 The last three weeks I was teaching a class at Stanford about LGBT history in the Bay Area.
01:16:03.600 And as part of that, I went to an archive and I read a bunch of interviews with gay and lesbian people around the Bay in the 1970s, late 1970s.
01:16:11.140 There was one interview with a lesbian couple.
01:16:14.040 And in the transcript, you can sort of tell that all these kids are running around.
01:16:17.340 And it takes about two or three pages into the interview for you to realize that these are only one of the women's children.
01:16:25.100 And the way the other woman sort of says, like, well, yeah, I can't see my children because I'm gay.
01:16:30.540 They were with us for years, but then he took them away because he suddenly decided to care
01:16:34.420 and the judge sided with him and he has them now. 0.99
01:16:37.420 It fucking breaks your heart. 1.00
01:16:38.680 And like Phyllis Schlafly, may she rot in hell, helped prolong and perpetuate that state 1.00
01:16:45.060 of affairs. 1.00
01:16:45.740 Like it is fucking disgusting. 0.99
01:16:47.160 Like this isn't about like, will a landlord slam a door in your face or whatever, which 0.99
01:16:51.800 is bad enough. 0.99
01:16:52.460 But like, no, it's about like, you can't see your kids kind of shit. 1.00
01:16:56.300 It's really fucking rough. 0.98
01:16:57.120 If you think about the Patricia Highsmith novel, The Price of Salt, right, the first lesbian pulp novel with a happy end, the happy end is that they possibly get to stay together and she loses custody of the kids, right? 0.98
01:17:06.560 It's just like, that's where we are, right? 1.00
01:17:09.280 This is the state of affairs that Phyllis Schlafly wants to freeze in fucking amber. 1.00
01:17:13.100 She talks at length in The Power of the Positive Woman about the horror of allowing lesbians to have custody of their children. 1.00
01:17:19.580 Fuck her. 1.00
01:17:21.020 Fuck her. 1.00
01:17:21.800 Like the intensity and the vitriol of her homophobia is quite disturbing. 1.00
01:17:26.880 And she stayed that way until the end.
01:17:28.980 One of her last accomplishments of her life was really like being a cheerleader and architect of some of the opposition to gay marriage in the 2004 George W. Bush re-election campaign. 0.99
01:17:40.700 And then one of the last things she did before she dropped the fuck dead was write a book endorsing Donald Trump for president. 1.00
01:17:48.060 And so Phyllis, rest in piss. 0.99
01:17:51.980 We don't miss you, but I do think she is a fascinating figure and a little bit of a cipher for our own time.
01:18:00.840 Thank you for letting me yap at you about this.
01:18:03.180 I think listeners are going to get hopefully a much shorter version of this, but I have like commandeered Adrian's entire afternoon just to make him like listen to me talk at him.
01:18:12.320 So like three cheers for Adrian for being such a good sport about Phyllis Schlafly.
01:18:16.800 Well, you sat through Wagner for a lot longer.
01:18:20.500 Thank you for walking me through this amazing story.
01:18:24.540 Thank you for sharing your magnum opus with us here.
01:18:27.640 As always, we're so thrilled that you all are willing to embark with us on these rabbit holes.
01:18:33.160 We look forward to speaking with you again in another episode of In Bed With The Right.
01:18:38.240 See you next time.
01:18:41.080 In Bed With The Right is made possible by hundreds of listeners who support us via Patreon.com.
01:18:45.440 Our episodes are produced and edited by Mark Yoshizumi and Katie Lau.
01:18:49.140 Our title music is by Katie Lau.