00:03:09.520and I wanted to read you a lecture that a professor, a German professor, gives in May
00:03:18.420of 1933. His name is Ernst Bertram. Dates are 1884 till 1957. There's no reason anyone would
00:03:26.460have to know about him, but he kicks off his new lecture course on the history of German literature
00:03:32.500at the University of Cologne by giving a kind of an intro speech, which he calls German Awakening.
00:03:37.840Now, for those of you who know your history and you know what Germany is like in May of 1933, you're like, oh, brother, that can't be good, right?
00:03:50.040So just to set the scene, Hitler had been anointed chancellor on, I believe, January 30th of 1933, and the Nazis had very, very swiftly consolidated power by basically purging people from the civil service, by hauling folks off to jail.
00:04:15.480A lot of the famous German authors of the time have already fled Germany, but there are those who've stuck it out, who've stayed behind.
00:04:23.960Some of them kind of hoping to make nice with the new rulers and others.
00:04:30.580Well, I'll just let Ernest Bertram speak for himself.
00:04:35.260So his German awakening, he wants to get his students excited about, quote,
00:04:40.660the enormous political-spiritual breakthrough battle in the midst of which we now stand.
00:04:45.480Our Volk requires all its spiritual powers and consciousness, and especially these.
00:04:52.220No spiritual movement in Germany will ever remain vital for long
00:04:55.480that does not succeed in conquering the German university from the inside out.0.71
00:05:00.180If this battle fails, it would mean the end of the white world, chaos, or a planet of termites.0.75
00:05:07.360So if you're following along at home,0.99
00:05:11.840yeah if you did not see that coming uh yeah that's some that's some nazi shit um i mean like0.98
00:05:19.600it's all there right like yeah the stuff about vermin the you know this and of course this kind0.99
00:05:25.600of conquest of the university from the inside out you know this is you know this is a professor
00:05:31.740kind of trying to make a case you know that the universities don't need to be brought to heal
00:05:35.840but rather that there are enough far-right professors within the academy that they
00:05:42.360couldn't sort of do the Nazis' job for them. This turned out to be true. The professoriate
00:05:47.440in 1933 in German universities was not particularly lefty. There were left-wing
00:05:52.560academics, obviously, but it was a fairly conservative voting bloc and many of them
00:05:58.580made common cause with the Nazis. Not all of them, in quite as termite-heavy language as
00:06:03.820Ernst Bertram. You know, this is a guy who, you know, really is kind of going all in on this
00:06:08.420stuff. Meanwhile, at a large book burning down the road in Bonn, his fellow German literature
00:06:15.460professor, Hans Naumann, quotes one of his lines of poetry, lines that are frankly, you know,
00:06:23.360scarily apropos, given what we're up against in our own present moment. I kind of have to quote
00:06:28.960them here so here are the two couplets from bertram's poem to youth reject what confuses you
00:06:35.360banish what seduces you what did not grow with pure will throw into the flames what threatens
00:06:42.040you it seems like it would leave a lot of intellectuals somewhat idle you know well
00:06:48.180it's it's basically it's it's anti-intellectual intellect or intellectual anti-intellectualism
00:06:52.540isn't it yeah it's saying gray zones confusions uh nuance are bad right like committed then to
00:07:00.480the flames now bertram had written this before 1933 but no one is quoting this at a book burning
00:07:06.760so uh just just to make the subtext text right the idea is they were literally purging libraries at
00:07:14.040this moment and and here is uh and here he's quoting uh you know these lines from from bertram
00:07:19.720And so I should say that both Nauman and Bertram sort of see themselves in the tradition of the person that we're mostly going to be talking about today. And you might think, well, this means that we're going to be talking about a Nazi. Well, it's kind of complicated.
00:07:33.580This is a story, what I hope to tell you today is a story of cultural conservatism, reactionary, openly reactionary politics, right, in the vein that we've examined in our Nietzsche episode, for instance, in our Wagner episode.
00:07:47.680And it's about the role of sexuality and gender in both of those things.
00:07:51.920But at the same time, there are a bunch of people like Bertram in it who did go fash, it seems like.
00:07:57.780And then there are a bunch of people who don't, right?
00:08:27.100Here is a lecture that the historian Ernst Kantorowicz gave a couple of months later, November 14th, 1933, and where he talks about the topic that really we're going to be talking about today, which is this idea of a secret Germany, right?
00:08:45.580He says, the rulers of the secret Germany are immune against weaponization, and you will not get a hold of them by dragging their image into the street, making them resemble the marketplace and then celebrate them as your own flesh and blood.
00:08:59.020This is the intellectual reply to Bertram. He's saying, no, the Nazis do not realize a conservative vision for Germany. The conservative vision for Germany doesn't work if you drag it into the marketplace, if you drag it, if you make it real.0.51
00:09:14.260It was always supposed to be an idea. Now, you might be like, well, politically, that's kind of weird. And we'll get there. Right. But that's that's the idea here. He's saying we are not identical with the Nazis. Right. And I should say Kantorovich was Jewish. That was part of it. He would he would leave Germany before long and settle first at Berkeley, then at Princeton.
00:09:35.560but he also you know it's fairly clear that he that he just was kind of grossed out by these
00:09:42.860people begging basically like a pitch for like hey appoint me you know your you know your education
00:09:50.260czar and your new in your new third reich right like he's that's gross like that's not that's not
00:09:55.020what the conservative revolution was about either and then the third person i wanted to introduce
00:09:59.820you to. This is someone you might know. Do you know who Klaus Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg is?
00:10:05.440God bless you. No. This is someone you might know. Sorry. No, I don't know this person. Sorry. I'm
00:10:09.740woefully ignorant. That is perfectly fine. German history. So he is associated with the events of0.97
00:10:15.160July 20th, 1944. So this is the day when a group of generals plotted to overthrow Hitler and
00:10:24.380And Stauffenberg had the job of placing the bomb under Hitler's desk at the Wolfschanze in, what's today, Poland.
00:11:06.260And Stauffenberg closes out the evening of July 20th, getting led out before an execution squad in the Bendler Block,
00:11:14.440which was then, today again, the Ministry of Defense in Berlin.
00:11:19.580And as he gets shot, he is reputed to have shouted out the phrase, long live secret Germany, right?
00:11:28.980It's a little disputed because as in English, secret and sacred sound very similar and, you know, they were guns firing.
00:11:36.000But there is a long tradition that suggests that he basically dedicated this attempt, very belated, one should say, very belated attempt to rid the world of Hitler to this idea of a secret Germany.
00:11:49.740And so that's what I wanted to trace today.
00:11:52.740It's an episode about this secret Germany, about a strain of conservative thought that ended up leading basically these three men into very different directions, right?
00:12:02.300Where one identifies with fascism, one says, like, I don't even understand how this is anything like what I'm doing, that secret Germany is not fascist. And another who seems to take it as inspiration to try and assassinate, you know, the leader of the Third Reich.
00:12:22.940But it's also a story about masculinity, about sexuality.
00:12:26.260It's a story about descent and kinship, about these traditions.
00:12:30.800The Secret Germany, as we'll see, is an idea of a transmission line that is non-biological,
00:12:40.860You construct a lineage that you like.
00:12:44.140So it's about the family that we're born into, but much more about the family we choose,
00:12:48.520not just in the here and now, but sort of extending back in time.
00:12:52.180And listeners who know their queer theory can imagine why I'm interested in that, because that is something that, right, this is what Armistead Maupin calls the logical family.
00:13:03.700Part of queerness is the rejection of the family you were born into in favor of a community that is freely chosen.
00:13:13.900and in that way we are kind of doing a super right-wing 1920s queer theory uh and i hope
00:13:22.580people like it i think it's a it's a weird it's a it's a weird story but it's a it's an interesting
00:13:27.060one i think you will only get this on in bed with her right that's right this is the kind of thing
00:13:31.400you're just not they're just not giving this out anymore that's right it's only here for the good
00:13:35.160stuff only here for the for the for the real and and you know like so obviously like super timely
00:13:42.000possibly possibly not but at the same time we've had a lot of discussions about our our gay
00:13:48.340conservatives episode so i think that like gay conservatism is something that we need to think
00:13:52.900about the question of um and this question of traditionalism right we you and i have come up
00:13:59.440against that again and again whether it's our trad wives or olympic games right this question of0.94
00:14:04.880um why do what what is it with you know why are conservative traditionalists so shitty at
00:14:11.520tradition well these are people who are conservative and who really have thought about what it means
00:14:16.160to have a tradition and they really think of tradition not as like oh it's just a bunch of0.61
00:14:22.020shit that came before us right it's what my dad did and so i'm going to do it too they're like no
00:14:26.780no no a a tradition is something that you will and you activate right these are post-nichean0.93
00:14:33.920traditionalists right nietzsche obviously big anti-traditionalists uh and and these guys are
00:14:39.120sort of trying to split the difference and say hey uh no no no no a tradition has to be kind of
00:14:44.740like freely chosen it has to be reactivated it has to be this kind of mystical communion with
00:14:50.520the past and it will exclude some people and it will include people that you don't think of as
00:14:56.060as uh you know your direct forebears well this might all sound very abstract i hope we'll we'll
00:15:02.200be able to to put some some meat on them bones all right let's dig into it let's dig into it
00:15:07.740So we have to get to the person behind it all.
00:15:10.940This is Stefan Georgiou, who gives the Georgiou circle his name and who, you know, spoiler alert, turns out like he is easily the weirdest cultural figure, I think, in the German tradition or any tradition that I've ever studied.
00:15:29.040I feel like that's a pretty crowded field.
00:17:27.800tend to think of the process of being in the closet, coming out, all that stuff,
00:17:33.580opening yourself up to other, usually men, but also in some cases, women. They think of this
00:17:39.660as actually describing a broader structure, right? Like there's something about having secrets
00:17:45.780that sort of gay men or queer men have deeper insight into than anyone else.0.96
00:17:54.160Right. I think we, in our contemporary discourses of the closet, we tend to understand the closet with some kind of, you know, with some reason as a forced dishonesty, right? But you can also sort of turn that around and see it as a way to cultivate a kind of intimacy with the self and a degree of self-knowledge that can actually transmit into a kind of wisdom.0.83
00:18:14.660Exactly. And, you know, the fact that some things are not meant for everyone, right? It is a way of, there's a kind of elitism. Thomas Mann is very big into this idea that there's a kind of elitism to having desires that you do not share with the vast majority of people and you don't care to tell them that. You're like, cool, yeah, no, that's super hot, man. Great. Wonderful.
00:18:37.300So it's not the closet as a kind of fear. It's the closet as a kind of elite refusal, right? It's not like, I can't tell you this because you're going to beat the shit out of me. Or it's not only that. It's also, I'm not going to tell you this because you don't deserve to know it.
00:18:50.800Exactly. Because it's, it's, it's more refined. It's more, it's, it's less animalistic. It's less obvious, right? Like there's, I mean, this is a little bit later, but if you think of E.M. Forster's novel Maurice, which is about a perfectly ordinary young man who is made less ordinary by the fact that he's gay, right? Like Forster, you know, 50 years later has the same basic idea.
00:19:15.180This man would be utterly boring, but thank goodness he likes dudes, right?
00:19:21.760There's one thing about him that gets to be unexpected.
00:19:26.020Exactly. And he doesn't have to tell anyone, right?
00:19:29.000This is a lot of this idea that this is sort of a privileged secret.
00:19:35.200It's a very, very important idea around the turn of the century.
00:19:39.620It's a wonderful classic study by the theorist Yves Kosovsky-Sedrug about this, called The Epistemology of the Closet, which is all about this.
00:19:47.640And one place I think where listeners can still test this out is that, like, if you've ever had a friend who sort of, like, doesn't date and, like, won't say why, and then people are like, well, maybe they're gay, right?
00:19:59.420And it's like, it's this idea, like, well, people might have hundreds of reasons for not doing that, right?
00:20:46.180Yeah, like there's something about the subordinate position of womanhood that almost creates a field of greater permission, right?0.99
00:20:55.260If you're already at the bottom of the hierarchy, you don't need to be like anxiously maintaining your place at the top of it.
00:21:02.100So gender nonconformity is often punished along different criteria, but often like much less severely, particularly historically. Right. So like, you know, classic example, Thomas Jefferson's laws banning homosexuality in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
00:21:23.020He wrote them so that for men, it was, I believe, castration on first offense and hanging on second.
00:21:31.080And for women, it was a facial mutilation, right?
00:21:41.420But they reflected an asymmetry in the perceived severity of the transgression between men and women.
00:21:48.460And that is something that which you still see a lot of like residual understanding. Right. And like even now, you know, like a lot of women experiment at college, you know what I mean? And then and then go on to be reintegrated into heterosexuality in a very fulsome way.
00:22:05.100Ooh, hiss. No, it's fine. It's fine. You know, it's a degree of social permission that is, I think it's easy to like construe it as a kind of privilege, but I think it also stems from the notion that like women's desires and women's lives more broadly are just kind of less serious.
00:22:22.840Yeah. At the same time, I should say that, like, we also don't want to project kind of the values of mid-century America back onto the 1880s in Europe, where men were able to be intimate with each other in ways that were not homosexual. But like, frankly, today, like, I feel like you're coming on to me, man. I don't know. Like, we're constantly in tents together, right?
00:22:47.820Right. Like this is the thing that they tell you when you read. I mean, sorry to bring it back to America, which is where all my experience is. But this is the thing that they tell you over and over when you read Herman Herman Melville's letters to Nathaniel Hawthorne, which seem frankly like such beautiful love letters. And you're like, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. Yeah. No, no, no, no, no, no. Like they. You shouldn't necessarily read it that way because homosociality is the buzzword of the 19th century. Yeah.
00:23:15.980Yeah. And I mean, so that's the thing, right? It could be, but it doesn't have to be. And that's going to be really, really interesting because this is going to be sort of the way Georgi's career evolves is that he keeps kind of falling in with these groups of like, usually young, usually hot, usually artistically inclined young men.
00:23:38.740and everyone's like kind of gay right but it's like it's never entirely clear they're like look
00:23:46.080we're all a little bit fruity right now it's the 1890s it's the 1900s are these people actually0.93
00:23:51.620fucking was yeah is difficult to determine from the historical record and probably was a little
00:23:55.920ambiguous to the people who knew them also i think it was ambiguous to the people doing it0.99
00:24:00.740yeah they are like if you look at a if you look at a biography of george the number of nude pictures
00:24:07.840is huge and yet if you look at some of their um of their letters like they're like oh no this man
00:24:13.720is stone cold straight he just was like i was i was uh modeling nude for another man like what's
00:24:18.640what's the i don't know what's the big deal right but so like yeah they like it was i think it was
00:24:25.420unclear to them like but also that ambiguity becomes itself that's a sometimes like a fixation
00:24:32.500an erotic fixation in its own right you know it could be yeah yeah or it could be that that you
00:24:36.780know that that basically they they had sort of in between gradations that you know in an age where
00:24:43.300we say come out come out wherever you are it just doesn't exist anymore right we're right this is
00:24:48.540also still the we're still dealing with it with people who would have inhabited a milieu in which0.84
00:24:55.760homosexuality would have been understood more as a behavior than an identity necessarily right is
00:24:59.960that still uh like a workable framework for this late in in time or not really i mean they're
00:25:05.520definitely living through a time when uh the first words for homosexuality are available so
00:25:13.420the earnings the iranians whatever it is like george is a we're in the 1930s or 20s right now
00:25:19.920no no no i mean like so i mean like the the first i think the first sort of like book about
00:25:26.080homosexuality is sort of 1850s 60s so that it's before george is born and he read a lot of this
00:25:32.860stuff he he would have known he would have been conversant with that literature but that that0.51
00:25:36.440is a conception of gay as something you are as opposed to something you do right like the invert
00:25:41.080as a figure more than just as a behavior exactly and so uh kraft ebing who writes the you know
00:25:48.360psychopathia sexualis um that would have been i think he might have been georg's exact contemporary
00:25:53.780it's somewhere in there maybe a little older than him but no no no he was of a generation where
00:25:58.440like you know these things undergo transitions hey that's a good i'm sorry it's a pun sorry
00:26:03.780oh sorry that's good i know a lot of people who are undergoing transition sorry like if you ask
00:26:10.360the person on the street right they might be like well no it's just a behavior but like especially
00:26:15.120people who recognize themselves in these identities they were starting to think of this as an as
00:26:19.800identities and i think his circle generally thought that sexuality was bound up with their identity
00:26:24.840um whether or not they thought it exhausted their identity is another question right they may have
00:26:30.880said like well this commits me to a whole bunch of other things that are way more important but also0.65
00:26:34.800i'm having sex with men right yeah okay that's part of it um and and definitely uh and definitely
00:26:41.140all the critics of the circle and all the outsiders that kind of kept making fun of them0.86
00:26:46.540were like you're just all you're all just doing it right like but it was like meant to take the
00:26:51.040piss right oh do you dress up in togas and are you wearing a uh you know laurel wreath and then
00:26:56.620like you go to town on each other is that what happens right like they're like oh i get it like
00:27:01.120the whole poetry thing is just kind of a pickup joint right um they were making doing it to make0.98
00:27:06.520fun of the artistic pretensions of this group aside from the nazi shit this doesn't sound0.85
00:27:12.500that different from poets i actually know okay yeah yeah it's about the work uh but you guys0.98
00:27:18.480are all going to the bar and you're all sleeping together and actually actually like if you're
00:27:25.460talking about new york in 2025 probably some of them are flirting with right-wing politics yeah
00:27:31.040like this doesn't strike me as a totally um incomparable scene dime square polycule yeah
00:27:39.080exactly yeah it's the dime square polycule but at the same time so as in the case of wagner you
00:27:44.640remember how in Wagner we talked about how he like has this like modernist aesthetic but at the same
00:27:49.700time this kind of anti-modern impulse like George is sort of part of that you know the same kind of
00:27:54.640ideology he embraces modernist poetry but on the other hand he kind of he hates the marketplace he
00:28:05.200hates you know the way you have to sell yourself for you know doing poetry now nowadays man right
00:28:11.140Like he's going to reject all that and has this like very funny duality.
00:28:14.740So his earliest volumes of poetry are these bibliophilic editions in extremely low print numbers.
01:03:53.860Look, we're a little bit more traditional. You think of Max Weber's The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, right? That entire book is about like, hey, why are Catholics so poor, right? Like why are Protestants so wealthy? Like he's trying to grapple with the reality of post-unification Germany where he's like, yeah, like there are real, right? Like there's a little bit of like real Germany kind of like red state, blue state kind of thing going on here where people are like.
01:04:17.520Right. So there's the, like, the elites who industrialized, even though there's a, like, a large proletarian working class in those industrial centers, they don't have the nostalgic claim to an agrarian authenticity that characterizes a lot of, like, nationalist imaginations in the European 19th century. Is that basically where you're going?
01:04:37.280the the contradictions of modernity it's a little bit of a wagner thing right the
01:04:40.760contradictions of modernity would have been a lot clearer in berlin right than they were in bingen
01:04:46.080where he grew up and so like this anti-modernism does also have a kind of anti-capitalist edge
01:04:52.040oh my god this is so real i'm sorry this is just like reactionary anti-establishment
01:04:59.720traditionalism yeah it is it's like is this just peter thiel like is peter thiel funding this guy
01:05:07.420is what i want to know i mean there is some there's something like that right like i was
01:05:11.980thinking of peter thiel here too that like this idea of just right i mean or or william f buckley
01:05:16.820right yeah standing athwart the train of history yelling stop right like that is to some extent
01:05:23.020like progress was bad yeah this is not the progress that we wanted um i will just i will
01:05:29.100opt out i will nope out of all of this it's interesting that this arises this traditionalism0.53
01:05:35.320arises from a gay milieu like that is really fascinating to me yeah i mean it's it's not
01:05:41.220just them but like of course the idea of a identity that contains multitudes right he's like
01:05:47.660i'm a hyper nationalist also i'm a roman right like it's so funny right like if you think of
01:05:53.140someone like there's like the dumbest kind of national german nationalism of the time someone0.54
01:05:56.640like heinrich von treitschke who is just like the germans are the descendants of the germanic tribes0.88
01:06:02.220that beat the romans and this is our you know this you know siegfried ideal is our national ideal
01:06:08.180it's domination domination nationalism it's very trumpy yeah exactly and and then you it's like we0.98
01:06:13.740kick their ass and then we're going to go back to our pre-roman influences which are superior by0.99
01:06:20.120virtue of having kicked their ass yeah yeah yeah and and george is not that he is someone who0.99
01:06:25.480who's the identity he wants is one that contains kind of multiplicities thomas mann has a really0.99
01:06:32.180interesting book during his conservative phase in world war one he sort of switches sides during
01:06:37.240the weimar republic where he gets invited to do a talk about the evils of weimar republic and like
01:06:41.880actually, I'm for this. Sorry. I can refund your honorarium. I feel like everyone's looking real
01:06:49.460bummed right now. A lot of us probably should have done that at some point when we were invited
01:06:53.960to give a talk. It's like, actually, I think I've switched sides. And so basically, but he wrote
01:06:59.520this book, The Reflections of a Nonpolitical Man in 1918, where he sort of says, Germany,
01:07:05.240the german identity is to have carried to term all the contradictions of europe right he says
01:07:13.480like all the things right like catholic catholic versus protestant modern versus traditional like
01:07:19.060right the the brits know where they fall the french know where they fall the russians know
01:07:23.040where they fall we're like uh can i hear option a again right like he's like the the idea of
01:07:28.620german is to be kind of riven between these two things we like he thinks germans know
01:07:35.000all the advantages of what it would be like to be a western european and all the lure of not being
01:07:40.400that right like that's that's his idea like we we feel both is his idea george is sort of the same
01:07:46.540way he sort of says the nationalism that secret germany uh implies is multiple and it is the
01:07:53.840queerness and the multiplicity are maybe not the same but they're not distinct they're linked
01:07:59.080yeah so basically right german nationalism had been forward-looking right intensely forward-looking
01:08:23.340It had all been about the country, but creating a country that didn't exist, right?
01:08:29.360And its creation implied a massive reshaping of what was then this kind of, as you say,
01:09:12.080What we want now is secret Germany.0.89
01:09:14.580Right. And I can I can this is a very early version of this Paul de Lagarde in 1875, formulating basically an early version of this idea, quote, the Germany that we love and long to see has never existed and perhaps never will.0.51
01:09:30.120the ideal is something that is and is not at the same time people only thrive in the mysterious
01:09:36.180warmth of a star that has never yet been glimpsed germany would have been founded if we were to take0.58
01:09:42.260a negative stance against the current vices of a time that was obviously influenced by un-germans
01:09:48.020if we formed an open alliance to ward off and combat these vices which would not lack external
01:09:53.240signs and symbols, nor the strictest discipline, right? So I don't want to sugarcoat this. This is
01:10:03.540also like, you can see how this shades into anti-Semitism, anti-democratic politics, right?
01:10:08.240One of the things that they reject from the West is parliamentary democracy, right? These are
01:10:14.060dyed-in-the-wool reactionaries. At the same time, they're looking at the Kaiser and are like, nah,
01:10:18.040not like that um so it's it's both right he's he's it's a germany that is a star that has never yet
01:10:27.340been glimpsed right it it it has its political role only in not being real this is what kantorovich
01:10:33.960was going on about in 1933 just be like guys we can't make this real the whole point of secret
01:10:38.560germany is it's not real yeah right you can't do it like the moment it becomes realized it is part
01:10:44.360of the same problem that it's meant to combat right and if you think about the the negative
01:10:49.420stance this is very much what the georgia circle would sort of end up with and be like not like
01:10:54.620that we are we reject the contemporary world we reject modernity we reject um just everyday
01:11:04.060politics we reject you know the industrialized world in favor of this this other thing that that
01:11:11.560will never come yeah return but only to my imagination yeah yeah right yeah return to this
01:11:16.940thing that i hope will never show up if you look at i mean this is it was a little hard to render
01:11:20.600this in english but if you look at lagarde's right um germany would have been founded right
01:11:25.840he's like very careful to be like yeah that's an extreme what is that like subjunctive tag tense
01:11:31.900yeah it's like it's past tense and also subjunctive in the past there was a possibility
01:11:37.980Yeah. Right. And it will not happen. But yeah. Right. And so in this context, Georgian is set, sort of have an interesting position, right? They are serious nationalists, but a nationalism that was sort of like not interested in the actual German nation, right? They're obsessed with the racialized German essence, right? They are interested in dissent, impurity and all that stuff. But one that seemed to transcend any actually existing Germans, right? They thought the Kaiser was degenerated.
01:12:05.340like they they weren't so worried about jewish people they were worried about the kaiser
01:12:08.820uh right like what an oaf right and like at the same time the interesting question becomes
01:12:17.780um you know what's the relationship between the actual germany and the real germany right
01:12:23.300like and this is sort of going to become the big the big um thing that that consumes them
01:12:30.880all throughout the weimar republic because they're like oh not like this either we hate this too
01:12:35.440but it was of course a republic that right-wing forces many of whom they were allied and friends
01:12:40.920with were actively starting to destroy yeah and so that is where you get that's where you get
01:12:46.120people like thomas mann being like okay this is where the fun stops yeah unlike the empire like
01:12:51.380i actually would be pretty sad if this ended and i think what comes after is much worse
01:12:55.100stop doing this right this is also like the complaint that a lot of people
01:13:00.220on the left have right now it's like oh liberal democracy is terrible and also there's such small
01:13:06.760portions right it's like this is not this is inadequate and you're really gonna miss it now
01:13:11.500that it's leaving yeah yeah exactly and and in some way they sort of never made they made their
01:13:19.100sort of baseline rejection kind of this this pose that they would take vis-a-vis everything and like
01:13:24.740And, you know, Mann really is the sort of big antipode here.
01:13:30.020It's like Thomas Mann is what happens when you mature out of this, like, kind of dime-square-y bullshit and become a serious intellectual.0.81
01:13:38.380You wind up in the position of Thomas Mann, which is like, no, people's actual lives and dignity are on the line.
01:13:44.700And we have to do what is necessary to preserve them.
01:32:46.960But it's important to note that like the seductiveness of that pose is pretty enduring, right? Like the idea that you're like, well, I just won't occupy myself with that. That's also stupid, right? And it's like, no, the humdrum, the everyday, the trivial is where a lot of these battles are waged and decided.
01:33:06.220And this kind of aristocratic withdrawal from it is its own kind of danger, is its own kind of problem, frankly, in modern society.