Liberating Histories - March 07, 2024


A Reawakening of Internationalist Feminism

Topics
For Girls, By Girls

Episode Stats


Length

57 minutes

Words per minute

146.12

Word count

8,357

Sentence count

439

Harmful content

Misogyny

31

sentences flagged

Toxicity

5

sentences flagged

Hate speech

14

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 Spare Rib had this fantasy of being all things to all women. 0.65
00:00:14.840 One thing we wanted to show you was that women in other countries had different priorities.
00:00:22.840 It sort of makes me hyperventilate.
00:00:27.040 And that was a huge, lovely collective effort to all be there pulling an all-nighter,
00:00:34.540 but not at a club, but actually putting out right together.
00:00:40.080 Welcome to Liberating Histories, a six-part podcast series that explores feminist magazines
00:00:46.060 from 1968 to the present. I'm Victoria Bazin.
00:00:50.100 And I'm Mel Walters.
00:00:51.920 And I'm Eleanor Callas.
00:00:57.900 So Mel and I developed this project over many years, many cups of tea and many pastries.
00:01:03.360 It all started when we visited the fabulous Feminist Archive North in Leeds in 2013.
00:01:09.980 A great day indeed.
00:01:11.720 We spent that day exploring magazines like Shocking Pink, Spare Rib, Scarlet Women, Shrew, Women's Report, Outright.
00:01:20.120 All of those magazines that were written by women and for women. 0.60
00:01:24.340 And this is confession time for me. I actually remember reading Spare Rib back in the day and returning to the magazines really took me back to the sixth form common room and the debates we were having about the militant tendency in the Labour Party and also the stomach churning feeling of being 16 again.
00:01:43.040 Well, I don't have those same memories, but when we went to the Feminist Archive North,
00:01:48.920 we had our hands on these amazing magazines and we felt like we found this treasure trove of
00:01:54.280 material that needed to be explored in much more depth. The women in these magazines weren't the 1.00
00:01:59.720 angry, humorless, hungry-wearing stereotypes that we're all familiar with. They were motivated 1.00
00:02:05.120 instead by a range of feelings, including anger, but also feelings of loneliness, of hope, of joy,
00:02:13.040 And they were not humourless.
00:02:15.520 They were funny, creative, irreverent and shocking.
00:02:20.960 Yeah, that's absolutely right.
00:02:22.600 But it wasn't just the feelings, it was this sense of shared feelings.
00:02:26.580 That these women were not alone, that they were part of a wider community.
00:02:30.820 I mean, actually, I think that's what struck me most forcefully.
00:02:34.120 That the feelings were really alive in the magazines.
00:02:36.960 and that the magazines were still capable of making us feel enraged, dismayed, emboldened and excited.
00:02:45.360 Yeah, it's that political currency of shared feelings that has this potential to spark action.
00:02:52.640 So we then started to think about what happens when we look at women's activism
00:02:58.300 through the lens of the feminist periodical.
00:03:01.880 And so Liberating Histories was born.
00:03:05.160 It's an AHRC-funded project based at Northumbria University
00:03:09.360 and partnered with the Women's Library LSE.
00:03:12.880 And it was at this point that Eleanor came on board.
00:03:16.580 What I loved about Victoria and Mel's project
00:03:18.920 was the way it retells the story of the women's liberation movement
00:03:22.680 through the lens of feminist magazines
00:03:24.480 and how those magazines shift or change our understanding of that history.
00:03:29.480 And these magazines do complicate the stories we tell about the time.
00:03:33.860 Certainly they illustrate that there were many forms of activism and many kinds of activists.
00:03:38.640 Yeah, they're really good at doing that work of recording the on-the-ground grassroots activism taking place across the UK.
00:03:47.860 It's a kind of micro-history of the women's movement that sheds light on all kinds of issues and campaigns that have essentially been forgotten about.
00:03:56.600 We see the debates that are taking place behind the scenes, the non-events, the hidden labour that goes into organising meetings, rallies and protests.
00:04:08.360 And reading through the periodical lens disrupts the idea of feminist progress.
00:04:13.580 The story of feminism is the story of unfinished business, to borrow from the words of the British Library's recent exhibition. 0.74
00:04:21.200 As we know, many of these fights are still going on.
00:04:24.320 All the work being done by feminists now, such as the fight for reproductive justice, Me Too, the actions of groups like Sisters Uncut and campaigns against violence against women and girls, you can see all these issues in women's movement magazines from the 1970s and 80s.
00:04:42.160 So in this series, we are tracing these lines of resistance from the late 1960s all the way
00:04:49.200 into the present. We are asking magazine makers about the feelings behind the headline campaigns.
00:04:56.820 How do magazines stimulate hope, joy, anger, and other emotions? How do they mobilise women
00:05:03.960 as activists? How do they create activist communities and activist identities? And in 0.99
00:05:11.460 the answers, we hope to tell a new story of the movement, detailing how these magazines
00:05:17.480 actively shaped feminist debate and feminist feeling.
00:05:25.960 Right, so to kick off this series, we're starting off with a conversation on two very
00:05:31.700 influential periodicals from the 70s and 80s. One is Spare Rib, which remains the best known
00:05:38.080 and longest-running magazine of the women's liberation movement.
00:05:42.040 In a sign of just how influential it was,
00:05:44.220 you'll hear it mentioned in almost every episode of this podcast.
00:05:48.180 So, of course, we felt like it was a great magazine to begin with.
00:05:52.540 And the second is Outright, an anti-racist, anti-imperialist
00:05:55.960 and internationalist newspaper dedicated to providing news by women for women.
00:06:02.080 And the topic on the table, internationalist feminism.
00:06:06.000 So, Eleanor, you're taking the lead with this interview.
00:06:09.240 Why begin with internationalist feminism, and what is it exactly?
00:06:14.160 It's kind of a complicated answer, but a bit of context might help, so bear with me for a moment.
00:06:22.580 In 1929, writing in the Women Run Time and Tide magazine,
00:06:27.740 Vera Brittain wrote that, 0.99
00:06:29.380 The future must see a great reawakening of international feminism 0.99
00:06:34.020 if we do not want the women's movement to founder. 0.99
00:06:37.620 That great reawakening of international feminism 1.00
00:06:40.560 came about in Britain in the 1980s.
00:06:43.780 This decade saw the publication of 0.74
00:06:45.600 Internationalist Feminist Newspaper Outright, 0.95
00:06:48.420 Spare Ribs International Turn,
00:06:50.600 the launch of the International Black Book Fair
00:06:53.360 and the International Feminist Book Fair. 0.86
00:06:56.600 So this international turn was driven by a sense of anger at the whiteness 0.82
00:07:01.380 and sometime narrowness of the mainstream women's movement.
00:07:04.940 But it was also driven by initiatives such as the Greater London Council's
00:07:09.460 funding of hundreds of feminist projects in the early 1980s,
00:07:13.840 including the publications we're talking about today, Outright and Spare Rib.
00:07:18.680 We wanted to focus on internationalist feminism in our first episode
00:07:22.920 as a way, as Victoria has said, of exploring how looking at feminist magazines
00:07:27.980 can shift our understanding of the women's liberation movement.
00:07:31.860 The internationalism of this movement tends to be overlooked and underplayed.
00:07:37.540 So we're going to hear from the wonderful Sue O'Sullivan,
00:07:41.240 a member of Spare Rib from 1979 to 85,
00:07:45.040 and before that a member of the Red Rag Collective, a Marxist feminist magazine,
00:07:48.980 And from the brilliant Shaila Shah, a founder member of Outright, international feminist newspaper, which ran from 1982 to 1988. 0.51
00:07:58.960 Before that, Shaila worked for two years on WIRES, the internal newsletter of the women's liberation movement.
00:08:05.160 We're bringing these icons together to talk about all things feminist internationalist, plenty of mixed feelings, divisive breakfasts and burning the midnight oil.
00:08:18.980 So my first question for the both of you is,
00:08:27.760 do you think it's fair to say that up until the 1980s,
00:08:33.600 the women's movement tended to look inwards rather than outwards?
00:08:39.040 As far as we were concerned, yes. 0.99
00:08:42.500 This is why Outright was founded.
00:08:45.780 We thought the women's movement in the UK was concerned mostly with UK issues.
00:08:51.860 It had also kind of sectionalized into particular, for want of a better word, tendencies, the socialist feminist, the radical feminist, the revolutionary feminist.
00:09:02.260 And there were lots of single issue campaigns for nursery provision, abortion rights, violence against women and so on.
00:09:11.300 But actually, very little concern for what was going on for women elsewhere.
00:09:17.800 And we thought there should be more concern given Britain's role in many, many parts of the world.
00:09:26.280 Yes, I tried to have a quick scan through the thousands of articles from the 70s and 80s, which I didn't succeed at very well, the old spare rib issues.
00:09:37.820 And I was a bit shocked by how lacking in international issues the 70s were.
00:09:47.040 I had imagined that they were perhaps scarce, but I didn't imagine that I wouldn't find many.
00:09:55.580 Although it was interesting to me because in the earlier years of Spare Rib, the internationalism was expressed through the struggles that women were having here.
00:10:09.860 So ones, as I said, around abortion and so on, extended to different countries but didn't take in in the same way what was happening in different countries, if that makes sense.
00:10:23.800 and there were tensions around it.
00:10:26.480 This is one in which there were tensions 1.00
00:10:28.260 because it was women from Western countries 0.86
00:10:33.780 telling people in the countries 0.99
00:10:38.200 in which sometimes this practice was being carried out
00:10:41.460 that they were wrong and had to stop.
00:10:44.680 That's really interesting,
00:10:45.600 especially the way you both frame that
00:10:46.820 around the question of single-issue campaigns
00:10:49.900 and how that perhaps shaped the relationship
00:10:52.180 to internationalism in the early part of the women's movement,
00:10:57.160 and then the shift in the 80s perhaps allowed for a wider lens.
00:11:02.080 To think a bit harder about this term internationalist,
00:11:04.680 so outright described itself as a feminist internationalist publication
00:11:08.020 and Sperib published increasingly international content through the 1980s.
00:11:11.940 I was wondering how you both understand the term internationalist.
00:11:17.540 Well, at that time, we hadn't really given much thought
00:11:21.740 to the term itself. But before we actually started publishing, this is what we wrote
00:11:28.380 and circulated to women. We said we aimed to produce a newspaper by and for women and about
00:11:35.000 our lives, which will promote and serve the interests of a truly internationalist movement
00:11:40.940 for the liberation of women. One thing we wanted to show was that women in other countries had
00:11:47.440 different priorities. And a Western feminist agenda could not dictate that, for example, 1.00
00:11:54.300 let's say a campaign on abortion being a woman's right to choose should be central. In other 0.99
00:12:01.020 countries, women were being forced to have abortions or were being given contraception,
00:12:06.500 such as Deepa Puvera, or girl children were being aborted early. Priorities in different
00:12:15.560 countries were different women there needed to be respected for setting their own priorities 1.00
00:12:23.480 this is something we thought that feminists in this country were not looking at and and were a 1.00
00:12:30.740 bit ignorant of if you like and that was why we thought that feminism in this country at the time 1.00
00:12:39.060 had a kind of, was, I wouldn't say racist particularly, 0.93
00:12:44.400 but imperialist in its outlook
00:12:47.460 because it didn't understand different social and cultural landscapes
00:12:52.480 and therefore what would be important.
00:12:55.320 Yeah, and so a really key part of Outright's project
00:12:58.540 understood in that way is to de-centre those Western assumptions
00:13:02.200 of Western centricity.
00:13:05.280 Shaila, could we have a look at the front cover
00:13:07.140 of the first issue of Outright.
00:13:09.980 I think this is a really fascinating object.
00:13:13.400 So what we're looking at is a title,
00:13:15.880 Outright Women's Newspaper in purple,
00:13:18.460 the cost of the first issue, which was 10p,
00:13:21.720 the date, which was March the 8th, 1982,
00:13:25.260 that's International Women's Day,
00:13:27.380 and a headline, What the Papers Say, 0.61
00:13:29.640 which set out Outright's stool,
00:13:32.540 and a letter from Belfast, that's another article.
00:13:35.420 There's a cartoon about the redundancy of mainstream media,
00:13:39.120 a timeline of International Women's Day,
00:13:40.980 and a photograph of South African women raising their fists.
00:13:44.480 Shaila, could you tell us any more about how you came to the design of this front cover?
00:13:49.520 Do you remember how it was put together or how you felt when it was first published?
00:13:54.860 Well, we would have felt very excited.
00:13:57.620 We'd worked for at least 16 to 20 months together as a collective
00:14:02.540 before we actually published this first edition.
00:14:06.300 Looking at it now, we should have really done it quite differently.
00:14:10.120 We should have said a bit more about why we had set out to do what we did
00:14:16.280 and, you know, we haven't.
00:14:18.460 I'm looking at this now and thinking,
00:14:20.980 OK, there's a very strong photograph here
00:14:23.800 and that would have been kind of collectively chosen.
00:14:28.080 We had set up an editorial collective.
00:14:30.140 Everything had to pass through that collective.
00:14:31.920 There was no editor. So probably 10, 12, 15 of us would have together thought this was the best
00:14:40.160 we could offer at the time. Very few of us had worked on magazines previous to this.
00:14:46.360 So for most of us, this would have been our first attempt. And we must have thought, OK,
00:14:53.040 a photograph, a cartoon, a bit about what the media doesn't reflect on, thereby what we were
00:15:00.480 going to reflect on but not making that explicit enough. There's a lot going on there. Sue I was
00:15:06.800 wondering what your reaction to this front cover is and or if I don't know if you would have
00:15:11.140 encountered it at the time and perhaps how it would compare with a spare rib cover of course
00:15:16.060 they're quite different looking publications. I mean I was very aware of outright I think we all
00:15:21.740 were at Spare Rib definitely saw the first issue. I think the difference was, and what I was
00:15:30.800 quite wedded to, was that Spare Rib had this fantasy of being all things to all women and
00:15:43.000 to representing both daily life, small affairs of women in this country, and larger, much larger
00:15:51.740 larger concerns of the world and internationalism.
00:15:57.180 And so I see this very much setting out what outright wanted to do.
00:16:04.260 But I would have thought too much print on the front cover.
00:16:09.640 And I would have thought, oh, where are all the other things about women's concerns,
00:16:15.560 the daily life things, which you weren't in the same way concerned about.
00:16:21.240 that wasn't your aim so we were very different that leads me into my next question actually
00:16:27.380 which is that outright was a newspaper spare was a magazine and is this an important difference and
00:16:33.000 did the newspaper format which is as you say sue more text heavy more information based
00:16:37.300 did that allow for a more international focus there's something appealing about a newspaper
00:16:43.900 format because it's very approachable and you feel like you can read it because it's not going
00:16:53.740 to overwhelm you. But I don't remember feeling that much. They were both feminist. That's what
00:17:02.000 concerned and appealed to me. What did you feel? Well, for us, it was quite deliberate
00:17:07.700 that we have a newspaper format. This would be very different from all the regional newsletters,
00:17:13.640 feminist newsletters that were floating around, the single issue newsletters, you know, the cat
00:17:19.560 calls, red rags, etc. And of course, Spare Rib, which was a monthly magazine and a well put
00:17:25.180 together monthly magazine. And I worked for two years on The Wire's internal kind of women's
00:17:32.160 liberation news and exchange service. That was an internal newsletter. We wanted something that
00:17:37.880 was going to be more out there, a bit more popular. We had big ambitions for how we were
00:17:43.580 going to distribute this paper, not all of which were realised. But still, of course, it wasn't an
00:17:50.580 internal news exchange. It was very much with an external focus. And we thought the newspaper
00:17:56.840 format was more conducive to that. Right. Whereas we were much more based, if I understand it
00:18:04.900 We were much more based in the very original idea on taking a traditional women's magazine format and subverting and stretching and breaking that but keeping that traditional women's thing.
00:18:21.900 But for the same reasons, to appeal to a wider audience and to push out with the messages and stories and experiences of women's liberation.
00:18:38.720 And ours was taking inspiration from the left agitational newspapers and thinking, we need one of those.
00:18:45.400 And that's why having it in a newspaper format.
00:18:47.640 Brilliant. So yeah, I think that's a really interesting connection between the two that you're both occupying different media formats, but with a similar purpose to reach all women, or more women, as many as possible.
00:19:01.420 Sue, I had something I wanted to ask you about.
00:19:04.020 So in 1981, the Sparrow Collective looked back on almost 10 years of producing this astonishing magazine,
00:19:11.880 because it was, you know, the longest running feminist magazine in Britain.
00:19:15.620 And the collective reflected, and I'm just going to quote here,
00:19:19.400 they reflected that they often found themselves variously accused of being too lefty or not lefty enough,
00:19:25.720 too man-hating or not man-hating enough
00:19:28.880 or too parochial or too international.
00:19:32.940 I was wondering if you could say any more
00:19:35.600 about how the magazine navigated this tension
00:19:38.720 between the local and the international.
00:19:40.980 And when earlier you mentioned the way that Sparrow
00:19:43.220 perhaps tried to be all things to all women,
00:19:45.160 it reminded me of this dilemma. 0.84
00:19:47.800 Very, very much so.
00:19:49.540 And always kind of running the risk of not falling properly.
00:19:55.480 on one side or the other. So I think that the internationalism part of it was one of the areas
00:20:03.520 that we fumbled about on and sometimes fell over or off the middle of the road and weren't able to
00:20:15.380 come up with something creative about it. So the arguments, for instance, that we would have in the
00:20:22.680 early 80s about who can write stories that are looking in an internationalist way about those
00:20:32.400 different countries. There was no problem in saying someone who was writing an article about
00:20:38.320 abortion. We would want to have the experience of women who'd had abortions. But if you were
00:20:45.460 thinking about writing an article in solidarity with a country across the world, how did you then
00:20:53.260 make sure that that was not being about a different situation and was, as Roisin put it in her article,
00:21:03.880 that it was learning with women in different situations and getting, where possible, women
00:21:10.480 from those different global areas to write themselves.
00:21:17.400 Can you tell us briefly who Roshim is?
00:21:19.980 Roshim Boyd, by that time in the 80s,
00:21:23.540 Spare Rib had begun and was trying.
00:21:28.780 It sort of makes me hyperventilate with a bit of anxiety
00:21:34.460 because it was a very anxiety-producing time,
00:21:37.300 but we were trying to meet criticisms around the fact that the collective had been all white
00:21:44.420 and didn't represent in any way women from different parts of the world.
00:21:50.840 Well, one of those different parts of the world that had been represented more was Ireland,
00:21:56.080 but we didn't have an Irish woman on the collective.
00:22:00.580 So we hired Roisin Boyd from Ireland to come and join the collective.
00:22:06.800 Roshin was an absolutely lovely and fantastic person.
00:22:11.320 But boy, did we put a lot of weight on her, which I think was unfortunate that we weren't.
00:22:18.520 I've been in other situations where this has happened, where somebody is supposed to come in and represent something, but the support mechanisms for that person aren't there.
00:22:31.180 But Roisin came in and became, which she has told me many times since then, she felt quite resentful because she was expected to carry the Irish story authentically in the spare rib.
00:22:48.300 And speaking of collective members, I'm sure I was wondering if you could say any more about the members of Outright's collective in the early days. 1.00
00:22:54.940 Completely different from that of Sperib because it was majority black and third world. And that was one of the guiding principles that it would always be majority black and third world in the collective. And it was all this in inverted commas, of course, black third world women. I'm using that term because that is the term we used at the time. And that was what was current at the time. 1.00
00:23:17.580 Yes, and it was in 1982, wasn't it, that Swarib received Greater London Council funding for the first time
00:23:23.880 and that enabled Swarib to hire two black women, I'm using black in the same sense that Shiloh was then,
00:23:29.280 onto the collective for the first time, known as Fazanay and Mani, two Iranian women who were known by pseudonyms. 0.70
00:23:36.380 And of course there were other women who came from other backgrounds.
00:23:40.480 Arati was from the Indian subcontinent, and there were black women who were born and raised in this country who came in.
00:23:49.640 Again, this is a kind of simplistic way of putting it, but we were inviting women to join this Bare Rib Collective.
00:23:59.720 But it was as if we were saying to those women, come and join us at the table.
00:24:05.960 we hadn't thought fuck all about changing what was on the table or you know getting rid of some
00:24:14.000 of the people who were at the places at the table I mean I subsequently worked on Sheba Feminist
00:24:21.020 Press which is a book publisher and their position by the time I was part of the collective was as
00:24:27.940 Shaila describes. It was committed to being a majority of black women, as we used the word in
00:24:36.740 the 80s and 90s. Yeah, it was a time of real reconfiguration and change, that moment in the 1.00
00:24:41.980 80s. It was a wonderful moment in many ways, wasn't it? Yeah. So, Shaila, I'm wondering why
00:24:49.600 you decided to have a majority of black and third world women on the collective and why that was a 0.88
00:24:53.760 founding principal of the newspaper? Given the aims of Outright, that we wanted to bring in 0.99
00:24:59.780 international news to what would mostly be a UK readership, but not entirely, because we distributed
00:25:06.100 Outright in as many international spaces as we could. So when we first started, just to give you
00:25:13.960 an example, we wrote to all the women's groups functioning in different parts of the world
00:25:21.040 that we found in ISIS. Now, ISIS was an internationalist magazine, which was being
00:25:29.740 produced either in Switzerland or Italy at the time. That's how we first established contact.
00:25:35.500 We also had lots of personal contacts. Others had contacts because of their particular work
00:25:41.680 that they were involved in in the UK. And then we started exchanging magazines with many of
00:25:48.540 these countries where they did produce newsletters or they used to send us their press releases.
00:25:53.620 It was utter joy when we even got photographs. So we must have had a photograph. I can't remember
00:25:58.980 who would have sent us this photograph that we published in the first edition,
00:26:03.280 but somebody must have actually sent it to us. So that's how we managed to get the kind of news
00:26:10.520 that we did. You had lots of local sources on the ground. And that's really fascinating to learn
00:26:15.440 about that international network and I guess the same question I could perhaps ask Sue because I
00:26:21.300 guess you touched on this earlier this question of how do you find local sources who can report
00:26:27.580 on events happening in different parts of the world and it sounds like perhaps that's something
00:26:31.640 Sperib struggled with a little bit more. I mean I was thinking about what we did cover in news
00:26:38.600 because, of course, Sparib always had its news section.
00:26:42.860 And I know that when I was there,
00:26:45.900 one of the main women who was doing news was Jill Nichols
00:26:49.100 and that she was very concerned with would you call them internationalists
00:26:54.460 because there were questions of terrible immigration things 0.90
00:26:59.160 for Asian women coming in,
00:27:02.220 obscene and brutal searches and physical examinations and stuff.
00:27:08.480 Those were covered quite well, and there wasn't a problem because it was a news story in a sense.
00:27:17.260 And if we wanted someone to write about it who was experiencing it, it would have been a problem.
00:27:23.060 But, yeah, I mean, we had one occasion where someone who was deeply involved in Latin American politics spoke Spanish beautifully and had spent a lot of time in this particular country, wanted to write an article.
00:27:41.780 And there was a huge argument about whether she could do that.
00:27:46.900 And her position, which Roshin reflects on in her article, too, her position, which I had a lot of sympathy for, was these women are involved in a liberation struggle. 0.56
00:27:59.480 They are putting themselves on the line every day.
00:28:04.220 They need and want international solidarity.
00:28:09.300 They've asked me.
00:28:11.620 And she was not an egotistical woman, so it didn't come across in that way at all.
00:28:16.060 They've asked me to please write an article about what's happening and so on.
00:28:21.660 But the other side of the argument was that for something so important, something so fundamental,
00:28:29.320 it had to be someone from that country in that struggle.
00:28:34.900 So I think it was much more hit and miss for us.
00:28:39.460 Suze brought up the issue about languages.
00:28:41.920 And of course, this was very important because between us, we did speak very many languages, which was a great help.
00:28:48.720 So there was an Arabic speaker, Farsi speakers, and so on.
00:28:53.380 So that was a big advantage that we had.
00:28:57.040 This did also mean that coverage in certain areas, depending on who the collective members were at the time, was kind of greater and better than maybe coverage of other areas.
00:29:08.860 So the articles we had from various Latin American countries was kind of quite comprehensive.
00:29:17.520 And this is because our Chilean collective member, Teresa, kind of plugged into very many of these networks.
00:29:24.420 And this is how it kind of escalated.
00:29:28.800 You know, if I look at any edition of Outright, I think the majority of articles would be on international issues because that was the aim.
00:29:36.820 And, you know, there we did succeed in kind of keeping to one of our founding principles.
00:29:44.100 Yeah, it's an incredibly strong focus throughout Outright, as you say.
00:29:47.000 And this is interesting.
00:29:47.860 This sort of makes me think of the ecologies of feminist magazines that existed at this time.
00:29:53.260 And it's astonishingly rich, both in the UK, but obviously outside the UK as well.
00:29:58.020 And I know that, Charlotte, you already mentioned that you worked for WIRES, the national women's information newsletters, before you came to Outright.
00:30:06.040 And Sue, in a moment, I want to ask you about Red Rag as well.
00:30:09.700 But I wonder, Shaila, if you could say any more about working for WIRES before you came to Outright and how that sort of led you in a way to Outright.
00:30:18.340 Well, working on WIRES meant you were in a way at the centre of, you know, some of the arguments and conflicts, etc., that were going on within the women's movement.
00:30:29.440 But you were also at the centre of receiving news about all the positive achievements,
00:30:34.280 because Wires was a kind of clearinghouse.
00:30:36.380 There was no editorial policy, except that we had to print everything that came in and was submitted,
00:30:43.980 more or less as it was.
00:30:45.780 So it was a very lively newsletter, published fortnightly, kind of done on a duplicator,
00:30:52.840 if I remember right, with a very lively letter section.
00:30:56.720 and, you know, lots of tirades.
00:30:59.780 But it just showed that people were very, women were very engaged.
00:31:04.840 They were very engaged in shaping feminism at the time. 0.73
00:31:10.440 Of course, wanting to shape it depending on their own ideological biases.
00:31:16.140 It was an internal newsletter.
00:31:18.920 There were about four or five of us in York who put it together over the two years.
00:31:23.900 So we would produce it and we distributed it.
00:31:27.040 It was mailed out.
00:31:28.020 It was internal and by subscription only.
00:31:31.360 So quite different from this.
00:31:34.260 But, of course, there I learned a bit about, you know, just gathering things together, putting them together on the page, although that was, as I said, A4.
00:31:44.020 So, yeah, it was a very interesting time.
00:31:47.680 It also helped me make a lot of contacts nationally through wires.
00:31:52.680 Yeah, brilliant. And so you can really see all these forces coming together and producing this fertile ground for the production of an international publication like Outright. And I'm wondering, Sue, firstly, what you might remember of Sperib's relationship to publications like Wires? Because, of course, Sperib was, again, very different, very visual, very much meant to appeal to the reader in WH Smith's. And Wires, as you say, Shiloh was very internal, very informative, text heavy. It was really for the already initiated.
00:32:19.680 We read them all. We had them all. We got them in the office and wires. It was, at some points, almost 100% tirades and accusations and, you know, all sorts of things. So, of course, everyone ripped open. It was, they were, came, wound up and with some tape or something.
00:32:46.040 Yeah, with tape.
00:32:46.620 That's how wires would have been sent to you.
00:32:48.300 And they all were, I think.
00:32:50.760 So, yes, we had them all.
00:32:52.620 Many of us were absolutely riveted by everything that was going on in the women's liberation movement.
00:33:01.320 And then, yes, prior to working on Spare Ribs, you worked on Red Rag, a Marxist feminist magazine.
00:33:08.380 And can you speak a bit about your memories of working on Red Rag and how different that was to Spare Rib?
00:33:14.180 Well, I was thrilled to be part of the Red Rag Collective.
00:33:21.380 I had had my first experience in writing for these same newsletters we're talking about,
00:33:28.840 so I knew that I would be very pleased to be putting together something for publication.
00:33:37.000 But at the same time that Red Rag was publishing, in the 70s, what Shaila has referred to earlier, the kind of the development of different splits and strains and tensions was also developing, and questions of internationalism were coming up as well.
00:34:00.080 So what would we cover on red rag? And that I found very stifling in the end, I think. I've looked at the letter of resignation that I wrote, and I'm semi-embarrassed by it.
00:34:16.960 But, I mean, what the hell, it was of its time.
00:34:21.760 And it felt as if some of the more party, CP, Communist Party aligned members on the collective who were very important, very important.
00:34:35.560 They started it and they were excellent women in terms of what they could bring and write about and so on.
00:34:41.340 But they felt that really we should be, as a magazine, concentrating on women's issues completely.
00:34:50.440 Whereas some of us who were non-aligned, we wanted, I think, probably more than your position, which was that a feminist should be concerned with all the issues.
00:35:04.540 So you were at Red Rag for a few years. 0.99
00:35:06.360 Yes.
00:35:06.620 And then it got to the point where you felt that, yes, that there was this something of a split in the collective between the women who were part of the Communist Party of Great Britain and the feminists who were not necessarily part of the party and what that meant for the sort of issues you could cover.
00:35:22.140 And that led to writing quite a long resignation letter, which was published in Red Rag, issue 11.
00:35:27.800 Yeah.
00:35:28.060 That's right, isn't it?
00:35:29.100 Yes, it was published.
00:35:30.340 I'd forgotten that.
00:35:32.060 Yeah. 0.62
00:35:32.160 Yeah, it's a fascinating letter to read, and it really brings out that tension that you describe with the Communist Party women, who in some ways, surprisingly, were more inward-looking than you wanted to be. 0.73
00:35:43.640 Yes, yeah, and trying to take on some amount of self-criticism. Maybe not the best ones, but, you know, trying to. The CP women, as I said, were very important because they were the originators of red rag. 0.81
00:36:02.160 And although it was not a Communist Party official magazine in any way whatsoever, they were independent. 0.98
00:36:10.280 For instance, they used to caucus at our National Women's Liberation Conferences, but they never called it that.
00:36:19.400 They just all happened to have breakfast together with no one else from the collective.
00:36:25.600 And, you know, that kind of thing, I think people who were members of the CP didn't get why that rubbed some of us up the wrong way.
00:36:38.480 Because then when we would say that, they'd say, well, we're not caucusing, we're not caucusing.
00:36:42.880 They'd say, yeah, but you're meeting for breakfast every morning of the conference.
00:36:49.440 So it just feels a little bit weird.
00:36:53.640 There's always a denial that the CP had anything to do with what was happening on Red Rack.
00:37:01.780 I mean, it would have been helpful, I think, what was disappointing to be able to talk about that.
00:37:06.940 To have more transparency instead of separatist communist breakfasts.
00:37:10.160 Yes.
00:37:12.040 And speaking of difficult feelings, I wanted to ask you, Shaila, about the feeling of anger, which seems to be a very prominent emotion in Outright.
00:37:20.720 I just wanted to quickly read from the first issue where the collective wrote that in capital letters, we need to have our own media.
00:37:29.460 We need to let out some of our anger at the ways in which the media in this country is an insult to us.
00:37:36.240 Do you remember a feeling of anger propelling the first issue?
00:37:40.280 Maybe not propelling the first issue as such, but a general feeling of anger being marginalised.
00:37:46.900 We were the others. We were the othered, which is why we had come together in the way we had.
00:37:54.320 So there would have been anger about that, about being made to feel invisible,
00:37:59.820 marginalized, issues of racism, colonialism, imperialism not being taken as seriously as
00:38:07.400 we would want to. I mean, today there's a maybe not such a new word for it, but not a word we
00:38:12.580 to use at the time, intersectionality.
00:38:15.760 But that is what outright did without calling it that,
00:38:20.280 because of who we were, where we'd come from,
00:38:22.960 and the aims we had.
00:38:24.920 So, yes, there would have been an anger about all of that
00:38:29.380 that propelled us to put outright together in the first place.
00:38:34.040 I've actually got a lovely quote here from Yusu
00:38:36.360 in the June 1983 issue of Spare Rib,
00:38:39.580 in which you write, and this is another proto-intersectional statement,
00:38:44.600 I thought that the magazine should be more consistently internationalist,
00:38:48.380 more conscious of race and class and sexuality.
00:38:52.140 And then you add that when I get tired and lost in the demanding cycle of getting the mag out,
00:38:57.900 my ideals sometimes get left gasping at the wayside.
00:39:01.940 And I was wondering if you could talk more about the day-to-day business of getting the mag out.
00:39:07.100 What was that like?
00:39:07.740 um did they get lost probably not in our first year of production there were no paid workers
00:39:18.780 so we were all kind of doing everything till we realized you know that someone was better at kind
00:39:28.000 of doing some of the bookkeeping and someone was better doing something else or keeping the
00:39:32.820 subscription lists growing and so on and so forth. Once we had paid workers, they took care of a lot
00:39:40.660 of the admin in the office, you know, distribution lists, subscriber lists, correspondence, magazine
00:39:48.120 exchanges, etc, etc. And then the rest of the collective was kind of the editorial collective.
00:39:56.420 Now, there was a bit of a division, but actually, it made things a bit more comfortable,
00:40:01.660 Because when we met as an editorial collective, we could actually talk about what we wanted to put into the paper, what we received, the quality of it, if any of us were going to be writing articles, and many of us did.
00:40:16.160 So it did allow for that to happen.
00:40:19.140 Before that, there would have been a kind of jumble of roles and responsibilities.
00:40:23.660 And then when we used to come together overnight, a weekend, it would be a kind of Saturday all day and Saturday night when whoever could stay up all night and didn't have childcare responsibilities, et cetera, et cetera, we would all be in the office.
00:40:41.120 That is when we would lay out the paper, the 16 pages that we had.
00:40:47.160 and then at the end of it the following morning we would take it to our printers and these were
00:40:52.560 printers that printed private eye and also printed socialist workers east end offset and then we would
00:41:00.140 go to pelicis in bethel green road for breakfast and that was that was great fun somebody would
00:41:06.380 make a huge bean salad sometimes there might be a bottle of lambrusco if i remember right
00:41:11.640 on the go. And of course, lots of coffee. And we finished at five or six in the morning. And that
00:41:18.020 was a huge, lovely collective effort to all be there pulling an all nighter, but not at a,
00:41:25.520 you know, not at a club, but actually putting out right together, exhilarating.
00:41:30.400 Just amazing. What are your memories of Spareable Nighters?
00:41:33.660 Oh, I mean, it was fantastic. I had two little kids. And until halfway through my time on Spare Rib, I was also living with the father of those children, a husband, as a matter of fact.
00:41:50.800 And then all this stuff while I was at Spare Rib, we split up, and so I was undergoing all kinds of adolescent things.
00:42:01.960 So staying up all night for an all-nighter was having a new adolescence or a young thing.
00:42:09.460 Because there's something incredibly satisfying about laying out and making it.
00:42:19.140 And we made it with cow gum and with blue pencils and with the sheets.
00:42:26.460 And it was something so satisfactory about seeing the shape of it.
00:42:32.660 And in Spare Ribs' case, most of the time it was a race to make the train that you had to get to put the boards on the train to the printer.
00:42:43.660 It's amazing how physical this work was, especially to hear about it now in the digital age.
00:42:47.940 But laying out, you're talking about having, you know, big boards, aren't you, where you'd paste the text and the images and you'd be able to move them around if you wanted.
00:42:55.620 And you had to have razors, you know, scalpels.
00:42:59.500 So if you had an article and for some hideous reason, which happened all the time, there was a sentence over or a hanging word at the end, you had to get your scalpels out and manipulate the lines and squeeze things in.
00:43:15.580 That's right. We did exactly the same thing.
00:43:19.840 I mean, people working today on even print magazines, they would have no idea about the skills and the time and effort and the expense it took to actually manufacture these.
00:43:34.180 Because this is what we were doing. We were creating tangible objects, weren't we?
00:43:38.540 Yes.
00:43:38.940 Which were then being reproduced at the printers.
00:43:41.280 But also people did say, I can't remember what wiser person than me said to me, look, we aim to be as good as we can, but if we make a mistake, we can correct it next issue.
00:43:54.400 And that was sort of something that I thought, yes, I mean, we are trying to be right and to be as good as we can.
00:44:04.700 But a mistake in those circumstances, if necessary, can be corrected.
00:44:11.900 Yeah, and you can really see that.
00:44:12.980 It's interesting, both of you talking about the magazine or the newspaper as a learning process.
00:44:17.400 Mistakes can be corrected.
00:44:19.080 The visual design changes, of course, over the issues.
00:44:21.900 And people learn how to do things in different ways.
00:44:24.120 I mean, Sparib went through several different redesigns, I know.
00:44:26.920 And I think if you look at the different International Women's Day covers from outright over the years,
00:44:31.020 you can really see, like, the increasing visuality of the magazine.
00:44:33.820 Yeah. But I should add in here very quickly that what I've been talking about from the late 70s when I joined and up, let's say, to 85, 86, changes hugely when the last permutations of the Spare Rib Collective came in.
00:44:57.040 It was internationalist, but it was also kind of seems to distance itself from a lot of other aspects of the magazine. And it certainly wasn't trying to be all things to all women, I would say.
00:45:12.440 Yeah, it really undergoes really quite radical changes at this time. And I mean, I was going to ask both of you, what do you think happened to that promise of a more international feminism by the late 1980s, by which time Outright had come to an end and Sparab was shortly to also cease publication in the early 90s?
00:45:34.840 It's kind of a bit of a difficult question for me to answer.
00:45:39.260 Once the outright came to an end, it partly came to an end because many of us were quite tired.
00:45:44.880 We'd lost our funding. We couldn't go back to just sustaining it on a voluntary basis.
00:45:51.340 Some of us needed to earn money. We needed to get jobs, etc., etc.
00:45:56.720 So life took a different turn.
00:45:59.340 But I think on the international front, lots of international forums have since been set up, there have been conferences, and of course today the world is a different place because so much of it is happening online.
00:46:12.360 And I'm sure there's an exchange possible if you want to look for it.
00:46:17.640 That's very easy.
00:46:18.700 You know, I could find out things about women in the Philippines or women in Guatemala or Mexico within two or three minutes.
00:46:27.780 Thanks to the internet.
00:46:28.760 Yeah, thanks to the internet. They absolutely couldn't do that then. So, yes, I think the possibilities are much greater. But today, for me, from what I see, the women's movement is fractured.
00:46:46.000 although I do see that there are some young feminists
00:46:49.440 taking an interest in periodicals like Spare Rib and Outright 1.00
00:46:54.520 and, of course, the project that you're involved in,
00:46:58.200 which did surprise me that there was this interest
00:47:01.300 in what had gone before rather than what is coming next
00:47:05.940 or what people are involved in here and now.
00:47:09.440 That's an interesting take.
00:47:11.460 Sue.
00:47:11.880 Well, I mean, I have maintained for a long time that Bear Rib was not just a reflection of the women's liberation movement, nor was it an instigator of the women's liberation movement.
00:47:29.840 It was somewhere between and somewhere, you know, the energy flowed back and forth.
00:47:36.100 And that the movement as a social movement was not just fractured, but I would say dying out.
00:47:48.400 And that doesn't mean that there aren't projects, there isn't interest, there aren't exciting things happening, but we're in a different historical time.
00:47:58.740 And that kind of excitement that carried us along and the social conditions that meant that women on outright and women on spare rib, many of them, could claim benefits, live in squats, and get by, not forever, but, you know, for that time.
00:48:24.760 that isn't true anymore so i think the conditions have really changed i agree about online but i
00:48:34.020 also think that the loss of a sense of collective energy is something that we really used i mean we
00:48:45.160 use collective energy to keep going and to keep our our ability to keep slogging away at things
00:48:53.660 up. And I just don't think that happens now. And we live in a world dominated by fucking
00:49:00.060 global capitalism. I mean, it's just one. It's the one. And I mean, a lot of women I know feel 0.99
00:49:10.620 they have to struggle to keep some of the social services that the state provided in the 80s going.
00:49:17.720 you know things are in a pretty dire state so i think the fact that there are these groups and
00:49:25.800 younger women interested is fabulous yeah i'm trying to learn history's lessons from the past
00:49:31.520 i suppose but i'm also just to sort of i guess maybe a closing question i'm really interested
00:49:36.440 in the role that the magazine or the newspaper play in this activist landscape and especially
00:49:41.040 what you were talking about, Sue, the way that perhaps individual energy can become a more
00:49:48.360 collective energy, perhaps in part through objects like the newspaper or the magazine.
00:49:53.420 And I'm thinking here as well of Shaila, what you were saying about that extraordinary
00:49:56.420 experience, collective experience of staying up all night, putting the magazine together
00:50:01.020 and, you know, sort of looking back and seeing how the movement did have this shift in the
00:50:05.360 80s.
00:50:05.880 I'm wondering how significant you think the role of the feminist magazine or newspaper was to the increased internationalism of the women's movement at that time.
00:50:16.960 One way I'd like to answer that would be to think about the effect that Outright had, not just on readers in this country, but on readers in other countries.
00:50:26.760 because that is partly what we were seeking to achieve was this news exchange, you know,
00:50:34.040 for Outright to be like a kind of clearinghouse.
00:50:37.760 And if I may, I'd like to read out some letters that we had from people at the time that we were closing.
00:50:45.180 Amazing.
00:50:45.700 So we had something from the Agenda Collective from South Africa saying how disheartening it was
00:50:52.120 to hear that Outright is closing down
00:50:54.200 due to the political and economic ravages of Thatcherism.
00:50:58.800 In the short time we have been receiving your newspaper,
00:51:01.780 it has both inspired us and kept us in touch
00:51:03.980 with the struggles of women in other parts of the world.
00:51:07.360 We will miss this information and contact.
00:51:11.420 And from Chile, from Femme Press,
00:51:14.180 which was a magazine in Chile at the time,
00:51:16.200 they said, we're deeply sorry you'll be closing Outright.
00:51:19.120 It was a publication devoted to solidarity.
00:51:22.120 and I will miss its periodical visit.
00:51:24.820 And I hate to see good efforts collapse for lack of funds,
00:51:28.420 political understanding, or a classic seven-year itch.
00:51:33.380 And if I look down this page of letters we had,
00:51:36.420 there are others as well.
00:51:37.900 There's something from Barbados, Holland, of course, people from the UK,
00:51:43.340 all bemoaning the fact that Outright had to shut down,
00:51:47.040 but also remarking on the effect it had had.
00:51:52.120 Here's something from the Forum Against the Depression of Women from India,
00:51:56.080 saying, Outright was the only feminist tabloid we received from the West,
00:52:00.160 which had an international perspective and a third world bias.
00:52:04.000 We're sorry to see it go.
00:52:05.520 Its impact cannot disappear.
00:52:07.360 It will reappear in another form, perhaps in another movement, at some time.
00:52:13.060 Hooray!
00:52:13.880 Wonderful. Thank you, Shaila.
00:52:15.960 What a lovely note on which to end.
00:52:18.740 Such beautiful letters.
00:52:20.140 yeah they were I love the letters pages I do too endlessly fascinating
00:52:26.640 thank you Shaila thank you Sue this has been a such a rich and wide-ranging discussion and
00:52:36.600 I've learned so much yeah thank you for having us and I like talking with Shaila
00:52:41.640 we never had this conversation in the 80s when we should have done but we're having it now
00:52:48.280 I'm so happy we brought you together. 1.00
00:52:50.280 We were engaged in the lesbian sex wars. 1.00
00:52:56.320 On opposite sides, even, maybe. 0.77
00:52:59.680 We haven't talked about this. Hang on a minute.
00:53:02.800 Let's not.
00:53:06.020 Brilliant. Thank you.
00:53:09.180 And fear not, we will be revisiting the lesbian sex wars in a later episode.
00:53:18.280 That's such a great conversation, Eleanor.
00:53:21.620 I love that we end with that throwaway reference to the lesbian sex wars.
00:53:27.760 It's lovely to hear them laughing as well, because through that conversation,
00:53:31.920 there were some really quite intense moments, you know,
00:53:34.820 when clearly Sue was reflecting back on her time at Spare Rib
00:53:38.920 and how difficult some of those conversations were.
00:53:41.420 But she was so insightful, wasn't she?
00:53:43.520 I mean, she really gave us a sense of how hard they were trying to work
00:53:47.820 at changing the magazine but she also gave us a great insight into I suppose a sense in which
00:53:54.340 she felt that they weren't really addressing the key issues and she's recognising there I think a
00:54:01.720 sense of perhaps feminists at the time kind of inviting other women into the movement but
00:54:09.520 actually there was maybe something structurally problematic about the movement itself. Yeah there
00:54:15.780 was a great moment wasn't it talks about bringing people to the table but not changing what's
00:54:19.540 actually on the table that's right yes yes still stuck with the table yeah yeah how how wonderful
00:54:26.500 to have those two titans in the same room together with their wealth of experience and and actually
00:54:33.660 that shared sense of solidarity which you know is still felt very sort of real and concrete today
00:54:39.900 you know what i really liked you know right at the end where after shiloh was reading the letters
00:54:46.500 from disappointed readers readers who were disappointed with outright folding and sue
00:54:53.560 lets out a little yay and that is the optimism of the feminist isn't it yes the magazine
00:55:00.140 has folded but the movement goes on yeah and actually speaking of those letters um one of
00:55:05.660 The letters mentioned that the ravages of Thatcherism in the 1980s, which refers to the dramatic social and economic changes under Margaret Thatcher's premiership in Britain at that time,
00:55:17.460 which included the advocacy of free market economics, the rise of the city, a culture of entrepreneurialism, very deep cuts to public bodies,
00:55:25.520 including the Greater London Council, which funded outright and also provided funding to Spare Rib in the early 80s,
00:55:32.520 which enabled Sperib, in fact, to hire its first black collective members.
00:55:37.080 So that question of funding and the loss of funding that occurred under Thatcher's government
00:55:43.480 is really critical to these magazines and whether or not they survived.
00:55:50.960 So that brings our first episode to its close.
00:55:54.540 There are many other things that were mentioned in this episode,
00:55:57.460 from the lesbian sex wars to questions of funding feminist magazines,
00:56:02.080 which are going to come up again and again
00:56:04.180 over the course of the series.
00:56:06.420 Next time, we're going to talk about girlhood
00:56:09.120 and feminist magazines
00:56:10.520 and think about how the feminist resurgence of the 2010s 1.00
00:56:14.340 has fostered the establishment of publications
00:56:17.240 such as polyestazine,
00:56:18.980 which are bigger and better than ever before.
00:56:24.540 This has been Liberating Histories
00:56:26.480 with Victoria Bazin, Mel Waters, and me, Eleanor Callis.
00:56:30.680 We have a fourth member of the team, Caitlin Mendes, who you've not heard on the podcast.
00:56:35.980 She is based at the University of Western Ontario.
00:56:39.200 This series is part of a larger AHRC-funded project based at Northumbria University and partnered with the Women's Library LSE.
00:56:47.640 This podcast was produced by Sophie McNulty and Alex Watson at Pixoo Productions.
00:56:53.880 You can find out more about our project at liberatinghistories.org
00:56:57.320 or follow us on X at libhistories or on Instagram at liberatinghistories.
00:57:03.600 You can also find links to magazines and covers mentioned in our show notes,
00:57:08.440 as well as additional resources.
00:57:10.680 Thanks for listening.