Liberating Histories - March 22, 2024


DIVA Now And Then

Topics
Campaigns! Black Zine Culture

Episode Stats


Length

53 minutes

Words per minute

171.12

Word count

9,102

Sentence count

333

Harmful content

Misogyny

58

sentences flagged

Toxicity

6

sentences flagged

Hate speech

34

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 We never had this conversation in the 80s, when we should have done, but we're having it now. 1.00
00:00:12.180 We were engaged in the lesbian sex wars. 0.98
00:00:17.300 On opposite sides, even maybe. 0.93
00:00:25.100 Hi, I'm Victoria Batten.
00:00:27.120 I'm Elena Callas.
00:00:28.060 And I'm Mel Waters.
00:00:29.480 and this is the Liberating Histories podcast.
00:00:32.640 The podcast that explores the last 50 years of the women's movement
00:00:35.960 through the campaigns, communities, conflicts and controversies
00:00:40.040 sparked by some of its most cherished magazines.
00:00:48.620 Today we're going to fast forward to the 1990s and the 2010s 0.67
00:00:52.540 and revisit, among many other things, the lesbian sex wars
00:00:56.620 which were famously trailed in episode one.
00:01:02.320 There's a great overview of the lesbian sex wars of the 1970s and 80s
00:01:06.500 in a recent article by Ellie Medhurst for Polyestazine,
00:01:09.900 which I'd like to read.
00:01:11.580 I quote, 1.00
00:01:12.860 On the one hand, there were feminists, often lesbian feminists, 0.99
00:01:16.420 fighting for liberation, shouting back against male violence
00:01:19.700 and criticising the misogyny of porn culture at the time.
00:01:23.300 On the other were pro-sex feminists, 0.53
00:01:25.740 again often lesbians, who were also fighting for liberation, only from a different perspective. 0.99
00:01:31.900 While anti-pornography feminists argued that porn normalized and reinforced violence against women, 0.99
00:01:37.980 pro-sex feminists thought that no type of sex or sexuality was innately bad, 0.98
00:01:43.180 and could in fact be a positive experience. They asserted that the patriarchy was the problem, 0.99
00:01:48.480 not sex itself. End quote. So little love was lost between anti-porn lesbian feminists
00:01:55.640 and sex-positive lesbian feminists.
00:01:58.640 And the lesbian magazine we're going to discuss today, Diva,
00:02:02.460 identifies strongly with the sex-positive camp.
00:02:07.000 Diva was founded in the 1990s,
00:02:09.360 when many of the feminist magazines we've discussed in the series so far
00:02:12.780 were folding, or had already folded,
00:02:15.500 from Outright to Spare Rib to Shocking Pink,
00:02:18.240 Foward, Women's Report and Harpies and Quines.
00:02:21.240 And Polyestazine and Galdem and the like
00:02:24.040 were not yet a twinkle in their editor's eyes.
00:02:27.560 In 1994, the year that Harpies and Quines published its last issue,
00:02:31.580 Diva was launched as a bold lifestyle magazine
00:02:34.500 which aimed to celebrate, I quote,
00:02:36.840 lesbians in all their splendid diversity.
00:02:40.400 30 years later and Diva is still going strong
00:02:43.020 and celebrating its 30th anniversary this year,
00:02:46.600 making it a longer-running magazine even than Spare Rib.
00:02:50.580 Now, Diva wasn't the first UK lesbian magazine.
00:02:54.320 It's one in a long line of queer women's publications,
00:02:57.180 which includes titles such as Arena 3, Sappho and Sequel.
00:03:01.400 And, as we'll hear, the landscape of alternative periodical publishing in the 1990s
00:03:06.120 was, in some ways, surprisingly lively.
00:03:09.800 Queer magazines such as Gay Times,
00:03:11.980 monthly aimed at gay and bisexual men founded in 1984,
00:03:15.260 and Diva's stablemate,
00:03:17.140 were going strong. For queer women, there was also Shebang, Quim, Lesbian London and Rouge. 0.62
00:03:26.240 Diva arrives on the scene bolstered by a starry roll call of contributors, from B. Campbell,
00:03:31.660 who wrote for Spare Rib and Red Rag, to our very own Sue O'Sullivan, who we heard from in episode
00:03:37.740 one. Unlike many of its feminist predecessors, however, Diva is a very glossy, celebrity-focused
00:03:44.900 magazine, which has featured cover stars from Gina Gershon, Jeanette Winterson and Shane McCutcheon
00:03:50.240 to Cate Blanchett, Michelle Visage and Janelle Monáe. But Diva is, in her own words, I quote,
00:03:57.800 not content with just waving the pink pom-poms of positive appreciation of all things lesbian.
00:04:03.560 It has also always been political, from its roots in sex-positive lesbian feminism to modern-day
00:04:09.940 Diva's proud and explicit trans-inclusive stance. Among the magazines we discuss in this series,
00:04:16.500 Diva is unique in that it was launched in the pre-internet era and has continued publishing
00:04:21.600 well into the 2020s. It's weathered the feminist backlash of the 1990s and the economic crisis of
00:04:27.600 the noughties and outlived the repressive Clause 28. Clause 28 was a piece of Thatcher-era
00:04:34.540 legislation that prohibited the quote-unquote promotion of homosexuality. It was repealed in
00:04:40.440 2003. By bringing Diva's founding editor into conversation with Diva's current editor, we're
00:04:48.040 getting an inside look at Diva now and then, and at what this might tell us about the cross-currents
00:04:53.300 between feminist and queer politics. So today I'm going to be talking to Francis Williams,
00:04:59.780 the visionary founding editor of D.Va, who remained at the helm for three years,
00:05:05.000 and Roxy Bourdillon, D.Va's current editor.
00:05:08.240 Roxy's has been a heady ascent from fangirl to editorial assistant in 2016 to editor in 2021.
00:05:17.600 Before we begin, I'd like to put it on the record that this episode of D.Va, now and then,
00:05:23.300 was recorded in the year of Janelle Monáe's iconic lipstick lover, 0.94
00:05:28.540 A glorious throwback to the lipstick lesbians of the early 1990s, which was when Diva first 0.98
00:05:35.060 appeared on our shelves. History has come full circle. 1.00
00:05:46.060 So I wanted to start by asking you about the history of Diva as a magazine. And Francis,
00:05:54.180 you were there at the very beginning. Roxy, you're there now. Diva will have been running
00:05:58.000 for 30 years in 2024.
00:06:01.340 And Frances, when Diva began its run in the early 90s, 0.98
00:06:04.080 many feminist magazines were folding.
00:06:07.380 But in the editorial to the very first issue,
00:06:09.580 you wrote that, I quote,
00:06:11.660 1993 marked an unprecedented sapphic extravaganza 0.94
00:06:15.740 and that Diva hopes to show lesbians
00:06:18.280 in some of their splendid diversity.
00:06:21.220 So I was wondering if you could conjure up
00:06:22.780 some of the atmosphere of that time for us.
00:06:25.560 What magazines were you reading?
00:06:27.360 and what influence did these publications, if any, have on Diva?
00:06:31.700 Well, the first thing is I can't remember saying that in the editorial,
00:06:34.380 so thanks for reminding me.
00:06:35.660 It's quite a while ago now, isn't it?
00:06:37.500 So, yeah, 1994.
00:06:39.280 So there was a lot of magazine activity.
00:06:41.300 When you say magazines were folding,
00:06:43.080 I was only aware of things that were starting up, really,
00:06:45.880 so forgive me, at the time I thought it was the time
00:06:48.020 where things were beginning and not ending,
00:06:49.580 but sometimes those things can be pretty close together, right?
00:06:52.720 So there were lots of different magazines around at the time
00:06:55.860 when I was in my early 20s.
00:06:58.280 There were two major kind of rival lesbian and gay publishing houses.
00:07:02.660 So Maliever's was one that published Gay Times
00:07:05.080 and then the other one was the Pink Paper Publishers.
00:07:07.500 There was more of a flimsy paper thing that you would pick up at a bar
00:07:11.020 whereas Gay Times I think you had to pay for it. 0.97
00:07:13.000 So they had different business models.
00:07:15.000 But there were also like more grungy underground things
00:07:17.580 that I'd been part of previously.
00:07:19.280 So there was Shocking Pink that was set up in a squat
00:07:21.700 in Railton Road in Brixton that was a lot of fun,
00:07:24.220 a lot of very anarchist-y Greenham energy vibes there from the women that I used to hang out with
00:07:30.180 and I actually got into publishing in the first place through a magazine called Rouge
00:07:34.340 that has an extremely anachronistic title now which was a lesbian and gay socialist quarterly
00:07:40.700 so four times a year and I volunteered after I finished up at art college I volunteered to
00:07:46.280 work there and wrote for them and yeah so it was from there that I got a job I'm rambling a bit
00:07:53.040 now but yeah i applied for a proper job my first ever proper job 17 and a half thousand pound at
00:07:58.200 gay times as editorial assistant and so that's how it started yeah wow what a lively scene of
00:08:04.820 magazine publishing and i'm really revealing the limits of my own perspective because of course
00:08:08.120 i'm thinking of it from the perspective of 1980s feminist magazines a lot of which didn't make it
00:08:12.700 from the 80s into the 90s but what you've just described sounds really exciting
00:08:16.320 yeah no it was and people were trying things out so there was um shebang was the pink papers
00:08:22.760 sort of a little copy of trying out a lesbian magazine.
00:08:25.460 So a lot of people sort of coming at it.
00:08:27.600 And actually, it was somebody called Megan Radcliffe
00:08:29.960 who published a column in Time Out saying 1.00
00:08:32.700 they really need to be a lesbian magazine.
00:08:35.180 So I snipped that out, took it to Chris Graham Bell,
00:08:38.100 who was headed up for Relievers at the time.
00:08:40.200 And I said to him, like, look, this is what Megan says.
00:08:42.980 Like, there's money in it for you, Chris.
00:08:45.700 So that was the pitch.
00:08:47.640 So that's how it started.
00:08:49.840 Amazing.
00:08:50.400 And how did you settle the name Diva?
00:08:52.100 I can't remember.
00:08:53.860 I can't remember.
00:08:56.080 I guess it's got a gay male slant to it.
00:08:58.560 It's a bit like, I do remember having discussions
00:09:01.060 where it sounded a bit like an opera magazine
00:09:02.740 and how that might be confusing for people.
00:09:06.100 I guess it was like first among equals kind of idea.
00:09:09.180 Tried to be a bit brash and a bit like we're here,
00:09:12.060 but that's not my personality type really.
00:09:14.140 But we went with it and it fitted on the masthead.
00:09:17.460 I'm sorry, I can't tell you more.
00:09:19.220 No, I mean, I think it's strong and it's straightforward, right?
00:09:22.620 It's not a forgettable name and it's really, it's bold and it's printed in bold.
00:09:28.460 Yeah, it is bold and it is printed in bold.
00:09:30.460 And I think definitely there is that idea of not being tentative
00:09:35.040 or trying to make a statement or trying to grab hold of something, you know, claim it.
00:09:39.120 Yeah, definitely.
00:09:40.860 Now we're talking about typeface.
00:09:43.200 Could you tell us something about the front cover of the very first Diva?
00:09:48.360 So there's like a gold frilly top hat with a peacock's feather
00:09:53.520 that the model's wearing who's crouching in a pair of tough-looking boots 0.98
00:09:57.520 with the laces undone, suggestively like she could kick them off.
00:10:02.080 Sort of peeling off a shirt in a sort of blowy wind moment
00:10:05.260 with nice pants and bra and this necklace
00:10:09.880 that hangs perilously close to her nether regions
00:10:12.540 that says, I am what I am, yeah.
00:10:15.640 and it's quite fierce expression on on her face but not not that fierce just natural
00:10:23.260 i think quite playful as well isn't it that's a nice word that's a nice word yeah inviting
00:10:30.760 that's it yeah that i think that was the come in come in playful inviting i like that yeah
00:10:36.920 we can also see some of the contents of that first issue on the front cover yeah we've got 0.81
00:10:41.960 an old style lesbian feminist there but a socialist lesbian feminist beatrice campbell
00:10:46.280 interesting talking about lesbian comedians sarah shulman short story i actually met sarah last week
00:10:52.700 for the first time in 30 years we had a bit of a laugh about the past which was nice something
00:10:58.040 about the lesbian scene in manchester which at that time was booming and actually come out and
00:11:03.240 been underground and was going over ground and was all lit up and nice i used to know the door
00:11:06.980 women there because i did my art college degree in liverpool so it's interesting it's a bit
00:11:11.560 manchester-y there so i guess it was always aiming to be a national magazine even then you could look
00:11:15.580 at it like that what else something about lesbians in fashion ads yeah it was it was interesting to
00:11:22.100 look through the contents when you gave them to me because i was thinking i don't know i can't
00:11:25.960 remember how political they were or not but looking at it yeah it's all right in there isn't it it's
00:11:30.380 like real sticking into the feminist debates quite squarely really with its own statement of intent
00:11:35.700 i think yeah yeah and i mean as you say you know you see these big names on the front cover and
00:11:40.840 this mixture of content from feminist writing to lesbian fashion and i mean roxy i want to bring
00:11:47.600 you in here and think about one of the much more recent diva front covers which you've got in front
00:11:53.020 of you and i wonder if you could talk us through this and as a bit of compare and contrast with
00:11:58.740 the first issue of diva and if you could describe this front cover from is it january 2022 this one
00:12:05.620 was february 2022 this cover great yes absolutely i mean first of all i just want to say on the
00:12:12.000 topic of the first ever cover of diva this is so iconic to me because in the diva office for years
00:12:17.800 we had a huge blown up picture of this cover on the walls i could probably recite all the cover
00:12:24.020 lines by heart but please don't test me um but yeah what a cover what a cracking statement and
00:12:30.540 And as well, like looking back at those early issues,
00:12:33.580 something that I love as a magazine geek and diva connoisseur
00:12:37.900 is going back through those early, early copies.
00:12:41.860 And I think, Frances, that they just burst with this energy,
00:12:45.740 like real feminist energy, real lesbian energy,
00:12:48.720 like they're sexy, they're raging,
00:12:50.920 they're just full of this energy that I really, really love.
00:12:55.180 And it's something that I hope diva still has.
00:12:57.500 Sorry, I'm just fangirling over some of my friends this week,
00:13:01.540 because it's not your question.
00:13:03.320 Fangirl away, please.
00:13:04.560 Yeah, let's have a look.
00:13:07.820 So to contrast the first issue with this one,
00:13:10.700 which was February 2022.
00:13:12.740 So I was editor-in-chief then as well.
00:13:14.920 And we've got on the cover of this for LGBT Plus History Month,
00:13:18.940 we've got Lady Phil, who is an awesome activist
00:13:22.180 and co-founder of UK Black Pride 0.98
00:13:24.900 and an absolutely awe-inspiring powerhouse of a woman.
00:13:30.800 And we had her on the cover.
00:13:32.820 And I think part of the reason for having her is that she's an icon.
00:13:36.200 And I think another part is to capture that spirit, 0.84
00:13:41.800 that powerful feminist movement. 0.67
00:13:45.100 And in the case of the amazing work Lady Phil's done,
00:13:48.420 the UK Black Pride movement
00:13:49.920 and bringing queer people of colour firmly into the conversation,
00:13:54.140 and this cover so to describe it for you we've got lady phil looking fabulous in a leather blazer
00:14:01.200 with lovely statement shoulder pads and she is holding up a gold loudspeaker and she is absolutely 0.99
00:14:10.160 she's very beautiful lady phil and she's very femme and she's got her makeup on she's got her
00:14:15.800 hair perfect she's looking strong powerful fierce and fabulous and she's got this big gold loudspeaker 0.67
00:14:23.160 and she's staring you right in the eyes in, I think, a defiant way, a confident way. 1.00
00:14:29.820 And we've got here that she's the queen of the protest, which is kind of how I see Lady Phil.
00:14:35.700 And then if we look at the kind of the cover lines as well, because that's interesting to look at, isn't it?
00:14:40.080 So we've got a real mix. So we've got Che Diaz isn't here for anyone's approval.
00:14:45.460 So this is Sara Ramirez, the star of And Just Like That, who is also a non-binary queer activist as well as an actor.
00:14:56.400 And I interviewed Sara for this issue and that was fascinating and wonderful because they had all sorts of things to say about representation.
00:15:05.740 That's the one Miranda leaves her husband for, right?
00:15:06.960 Yeah!
00:15:07.080 Oh my God.
00:15:07.740 That's Miranda's partner that Miranda leaves Steve for.
00:15:11.040 Oh my God.
00:15:11.560 I know!
00:15:12.420 I know!
00:15:14.180 So we've got that.
00:15:16.140 So that's kind of, I guess, bringing it to pop culture
00:15:18.680 and I guess mirroring the increasing representation
00:15:21.740 of queer relationships and identities
00:15:24.620 in big mainstream TV shows like Sex and the City. 0.92
00:15:28.940 We've got an investigation into the truth
00:15:31.520 about conversion therapy.
00:15:34.420 We've got, oh, lockdown made me rethink everything.
00:15:37.780 Is it time to open up your relationship?
00:15:39.720 So looking at the changing relationship structures
00:15:42.240 in the community as well.
00:15:43.360 I like the italicisation of everything.
00:15:46.920 I'm very particular about italicisation.
00:15:50.540 And then we've got as well the legacy of Anne Lister,
00:15:53.980 how the first modern lesbian changed our lives forever.
00:15:57.120 So I guess as well as wanting this cover to feel very current 0.99
00:16:00.560 and galvanising and full of action
00:16:03.840 and a motivating, powerful activist force,
00:16:07.980 there's also a place to look back
00:16:10.360 at one of our kind of lesbian ancestors you know ann lister the first modern lesbian
00:16:15.340 as brought to life in gentleman jack so it's so interesting to see them as a as a side by side
00:16:21.040 isn't it and see what's different but also what's the same like still covering a range of different
00:16:26.980 kinds of issues still got these powerful playful inspiring motivational women amazing it's incredible
00:16:35.780 to see that energy that you described that very similar energy and dear across the decades I also 1.00
00:16:42.700 wanted to ask you about winding back just a little bit now actually because because Roxy you've been
00:16:46.980 at Diva for a while since 2016 and you became editor in 2021 have I got that right yes yeah
00:16:53.680 so I was wondering if you could actually yeah tell us a little bit about what it was like
00:16:57.300 joining Diva in the 2010s and what was going on at that time both for you but maybe more generally
00:17:03.920 as well for sure so come with me now on a journey through time and space um so with with diva for me
00:17:12.000 it is a very personal job because when i was a closeted little lesbian and growing up in leeds
00:17:18.660 i discovered diva magazine in the wh smith in leeds train station to be precise and i discovered it
00:17:27.040 and i was still in the closet and i was you know dealing with all sorts of angst about my identity
00:17:32.200 as we do and I remember feeling oh my god I'm not the only one and not only that but oh my god
00:17:39.780 look at these awesome powerhouse sexy like raging people and there's enough of us to fill the pages
00:17:49.360 of a glossy magazine and I remember that being a really powerful thing and I've always loved
00:17:54.100 magazines I've always loved reading I've always loved writing and I was always obsessed with
00:17:58.540 magazines but I never found a magazine that like was obsessed with me back like I never found a
00:18:05.340 magazine that kind of spoke to who I was and that I felt so included in the pages of it so I was a
00:18:11.760 reader before I ever worked for Diva and then in 2016 I saw I was looking to get a full-time job
00:18:21.460 in journalism because I was still just doing bits and pieces and I saw the job advertised in Diva
00:18:27.620 because I was a reader so that's how I discovered there was a vacancy and I went along to the
00:18:33.560 interview and the then editor Chance Chiselska I remember Chance interviewed me and hired me
00:18:39.600 and it really was a bit of a pinch me moment because this was the magazine that I'd
00:18:45.760 had all those that private experience of coming to terms with who you are through the pages of
00:18:52.900 this physical print product that you hold in your hand and has an emotional resonance for you
00:18:57.560 to then go to to meet the people who created it and to start working there what an amazing story
00:19:03.840 so Roxy going back to the well the 2010s or maybe more specifically 2016 which was the year that you
00:19:09.740 joined Diva and what was going on then and were you aware of any sort of sense of you know what
00:19:16.200 that felt like for for people who were queer for gay women in Britain at that time it was the year
00:19:23.240 of Brexit. Yeah. Among other things. Very true. Definitely a time of great change. I feel like
00:19:29.940 at that moment in kind of pop culture history, certainly there was a boom in representation
00:19:36.280 of sapphic relationships and characters on screen. I remember there was also a lot of
00:19:44.320 anger among my queer friends about prejudice in the country, about hate crime, and also
00:19:51.940 bring it back to pop culture for a second about specifically i remember this because it was
00:19:57.460 a question in my diva interview which was right as an opinion piece about the fact that all the
00:20:04.560 sapphic characters are getting killed off tv shows and that was a big talking point in that time that
00:20:10.760 yes we were getting some representation but we were then not necessarily being served justice
00:20:17.300 in the way that these stories were being told.
00:20:20.380 And in terms of Diva's history, 2016 was quite a key year
00:20:23.940 because Linda Riley bought the magazine
00:20:26.480 and Linda Riley is the publisher of Diva to this day 0.99
00:20:30.380 and it was the first time the magazine had actually been owned by a lesbian.
00:20:34.260 So that's quite an interesting moment. 0.99
00:20:36.700 I missed a trick there.
00:20:40.320 It was the capital to raise it that was the issue.
00:20:43.380 Yeah, I really want to come back to that. 1.00
00:20:45.060 I didn't know enough rich lesbians at the time. 1.00
00:20:47.300 I've met a few since then but yeah it was piggybacking on Gay Times because they had 0.71
00:20:52.200 all the distribution they had all the things in place so because I was there I was able to pull
00:20:57.380 it through that route but you know ideally it might have been better if it was more community
00:21:01.580 owned or you know yeah I don't know makes you think about business models now looking back
00:21:06.960 yeah it's so interesting but like we've kept good relationships with Gay Times and I started as
00:21:13.360 editorial assistant a few months before Linda bought it. And we still shared an office with
00:21:19.200 Gay Times for quite some time after that. And I mean, at the time, I liked that we had such a
00:21:24.640 close relationship with this big male-dominated title, because it felt like we were working with
00:21:30.700 them to an extent and together we could have a combined strength. But I also thought it was
00:21:36.220 super exciting to feel that Diva was owned by the books by a lesbian who had a personal again 0.99
00:21:44.480 it's all about these personal relationships with Diva she had a personal relationship to Diva she 0.64
00:21:49.080 knew what that name meant to to her and to her community and she also had big ambitions of
00:21:55.120 wanting to grow Diva to expand what we did and to reach even more people. Amazing I actually really
00:22:03.460 want to sort of drill down on this aspect of Diva's history a bit more the business history
00:22:09.100 of Diva and giving a little bit of historical context you know many of the you know early
00:22:14.060 lesbian feminist magazines the 70s and 80s were run on a real shoestring and they looked very
00:22:18.620 different from Diva but from the start Diva was impressively glossy and so Frances I was wondering
00:22:25.340 if you could say a bit more about how Diva was set up in terms of where did you get the funding
00:22:30.480 from to start with um it was totally faking it till you make it so there was only a pilot issue
00:22:36.480 to begin with if it didn't sell enough we wouldn't do another one there was a really short print run
00:22:41.480 there's really shoestring elements to it in terms of who worked on it so it wasn't like it was
00:22:47.840 you know fully backed it might have looked like slightly better production than previously what
00:22:54.480 gone on before but actually i was frustrated that it couldn't be more than that or put more
00:23:00.380 to it without it having to prove itself first if you like you know i guess that's the nature of the
00:23:04.820 business model there but you know it was like a big deal when we got absolute vodka to take the
00:23:10.140 back cover of divas they do double sales they're like well you're going to put it in gay times why 0.70
00:23:14.300 don't we just whack in diva as well and we do a deal on it so there's a lot of that in terms of 0.68
00:23:18.160 getting the corporates on at that point because i think they weren't ready probably without that
00:23:22.320 to come on board at that point i was going to ask you about adverts yeah have a particular policy
00:23:27.160 in terms of advertisers you'd solicit
00:23:29.700 or advertisers you might turn away?
00:23:31.300 I don't know.
00:23:32.640 Well, that's an interesting question.
00:23:34.580 No is the answer.
00:23:35.480 So we'll go through Terry, 1.00
00:23:36.420 who is this flamboyant gay man 1.00
00:23:37.860 who used to do all the advertising. 0.98
00:23:40.060 So there was a lot of community,
00:23:41.860 small community adverts from bookshops
00:23:43.840 or small community initiatives.
00:23:47.120 But we just took whatever would work
00:23:49.140 and make the wheels go around at the time.
00:23:51.760 Yeah, I think I actually saw an advert for Rouge
00:23:53.780 in an old copy of Diva the other day.
00:23:55.420 Oh, there you go.
00:23:55.740 Yeah.
00:23:56.080 So the whole spectrum.
00:23:57.740 Playback.
00:23:59.340 Yeah, vodka ads.
00:24:00.720 Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:24:03.360 To stay on the business model for a moment,
00:24:05.240 Broxy, by the time you came to the helm, of course,
00:24:07.360 the publishing landscape had changed enormously
00:24:09.560 from what it would have been like, well, I assume, in the early 90s.
00:24:13.840 It was pre-internet.
00:24:14.800 Well, exactly, apart from anything else, the rise of the internet.
00:24:17.940 But we've also seen, I guess it's fair to say,
00:24:19.840 like ever-increasing waves of consumerism
00:24:22.360 and even the rise of the so-called pink pound.
00:24:24.940 And I'm just wondering how, you know, how Diva might fit into some of that, how it's funded now and whether its business model has changed.
00:24:32.260 So some things are the same, like the reality is we are an independent queer magazine run by and for queer people.
00:24:41.660 So there's always been kind of, you know, how can we do this for a smaller budget?
00:24:45.600 But in terms of like the thing about the pink pound, it's really interesting because I think that there's still a sense sometimes with some brands that they've got a diversity quota they're going to fill.
00:24:59.220 And if they have advertised with Gay Times or Attitude or a predominantly male queer title, then they think, well, they've ticked that box and they're not as enthusiastic to tick it with Diva because they've already been diverse.
00:25:14.100 And I think that kind of stereotypes about gay women and bi women, that also comes into play a little bit with that.
00:25:23.020 So in terms of selling advertising space, like there are definitely still obstacles and hurdles that you have to climb over.
00:25:30.340 But we don't just make revenue that way, as well as the selling the magazine and selling the advertising space.
00:25:36.960 We have now expanded a lot what we do.
00:25:39.740 So we do also have revenue that comes from things like events.
00:25:43.220 so we have the diva awards we have lesbian visibility week and we have some other events
00:25:48.620 and stuff that we do that that all kind of are additional streams of revenue that come into it
00:25:53.900 yes i just wanted to mention that it was quite a novelty to charge for diva at time
00:25:59.780 so when we were on stalls at pride people would just pick it up and go oh sorry sweetie you have
00:26:04.240 to pay for it and i thought at the time that that would enable the writers to get paid well
00:26:09.900 you know what I mean so it's disappointing that you should have to work to smaller budgets because
00:26:14.380 in a sense like all the wealth should be pouring through that way and at the time I thought that
00:26:18.840 was going to lead to good things and I suppose subsequently we're really aware of how sometimes
00:26:24.080 those business models don't work out for like freelance writers or people that are freelance
00:26:28.440 artists or creatives generally so just like a full circle really of the 90s the kind of promise of
00:26:35.180 how that would pan out and where the wealth would be distributed
00:26:38.380 and in whose hands power and ownership and money would really lie.
00:26:43.300 So those are all still very pressing issues, I think,
00:26:46.080 in terms of to what extent we can represent community
00:26:49.060 or what are the structures that allow us to do that
00:26:51.400 in a way that distributes cash in a productive way.
00:26:57.920 Yeah, yeah.
00:26:59.300 Sobering reflections on the promises, as you say, of the early 90s.
00:27:03.300 Can I ask a question?
00:27:04.600 Yeah.
00:27:04.860 So can you give us a demographic, a little bit, of your readership now?
00:27:08.620 So is it British or is it international?
00:27:11.360 Can you give some indication of where people are reading it?
00:27:16.160 Yeah, of course, of course.
00:27:17.980 So the biggest chunk of our readership is still UK-based,
00:27:21.940 but we do have a lot of international readers,
00:27:24.500 especially in America and in Canada and in Australia.
00:27:29.720 But the biggest chunk would still be the UK.
00:27:32.680 That's interesting.
00:27:33.400 And young or older? 0.97
00:27:35.720 So this is another thing about Diva, which is a beauty and a challenge of Diva,
00:27:41.580 is that really the only thing that our readers have in common 1.00
00:27:45.060 is that either you are a member of the LGBTQIA community
00:27:49.020 or you are someone that wants to read an inclusive feminist publication
00:27:53.580 exploring women's identities and non-binary identities.
00:27:58.240 But apart from that, we're all sorts of different people.
00:28:01.480 where you know you get a diva reader who is 13 years old and figuring out who they are and wants
00:28:08.540 to read something that speaks to that and you get a diva reader in her 80s you know so it's a massive
00:28:14.500 cross-section I'd be interested to hear more about the readership in your day as well Francis and
00:28:19.340 what that might have looked like initially I think I came across a questionnaire on one of the early
00:28:23.400 divas which was surveying like a reader sample yeah it was I think a sample of 60 and it was
00:28:28.700 sort of age ranges and like where they lived in the uk things like that that's interesting well
00:28:32.280 you're there were people picking it up for free that were like oh there was that lot
00:28:35.460 the one thing that lodged in my brain from reading the questionnaire was that the age bracket was
00:28:40.700 mainly 25 to 35 yeah that would make sense a young woman's magazine for sure oh you know because well
00:28:47.280 i was young at that point and i suppose that was the moment where there was a sort of rebellion
00:28:52.740 against that particular kind of feminism where feminism with a big f fractured into all these
00:28:57.360 different parts and this was very much moving with one particular sort of sex positive aspect of
00:29:04.220 feminism so that is reflected in articles quite interestingly actually in terms of those tensions
00:29:10.560 between that moment that flip over between sort of what used to be called the lesbian sex wars at
00:29:16.560 that time yeah so i want to talk about the f word and francis you already touched on this
00:29:23.380 And although the word feminist doesn't appear in Diva's bylines, my feeling is that Diva's form and content is very much shaped by feminist thought.
00:29:33.280 You can see it everywhere. There's actually quite complex gender theory. 0.93
00:29:37.560 Judith Butler and the like gets elegantly wrapped into articles in very clear and jargon free prose.
00:29:44.200 There are several articles. I think so. Yeah.
00:29:46.540 Well, there's there are several articles about the acceptability or not of the F word.
00:29:51.400 going right back to early diva these debates about whether young lesbians for instance are happy
00:29:56.220 to adopt the label feminist or the label lesbian for that matter yeah in october 1995 diva ran a 0.99
00:30:02.640 piece that asked has feminism become a dirty word for young lesbians um so francis had you been 0.69
00:30:08.340 involved in other forms of feminist and lgbt activism prior to diva and how did the magazine 0.94
00:30:14.640 connect to that activism my first sort of touching with feminism was through books
00:30:19.040 so my sister-in-law was American and brought back books from America that were like feminist novels 1.00
00:30:25.900 like Marilyn French's The Woman's Room where there'd be one lesbian character and you'd be like 1.00
00:30:29.280 because I was hungry for that I'd be like rifling through her books thinking where's lesbians in
00:30:33.360 these books you know what I mean in that kind of way but then I also as well as Rubyfield Jungle
00:30:37.500 I was reading Claudette you know so I was a bit like mixed up I didn't have any reference points
00:30:42.580 at all like I actually went high femme at 18 and wore fancy kind of white gloves and thought you
00:30:48.280 You know, V&A posters and crinolines, I had no cultural references whatsoever.
00:30:51.760 I was more targeted by my hormones at that time to, like, seeking out lesbianism than feminism as such.
00:30:59.680 So my first activism would be with Lesbian and Gay Action up in Liverpool Art College when I came out of there. 0.50
00:31:05.680 We jumped on the map of Britain during this morning and we used to write graffiti lesbians everywhere outside, like supermarkets and daft stuff like that.
00:31:15.220 And so we mixed a lot with other groups that were doing that kind of politics at the time. 0.84
00:31:19.960 Liverpool was very derelict then.
00:31:21.700 It was just like a legacy of Thatcher, really, in that whole era of being, you know,
00:31:26.800 the state repression of Thatcher in Clause 28,
00:31:29.460 mobilised lesbians and gay men to work much closely together, as did AIDS.
00:31:32.520 So it was much more in that swirl of that kind of political action
00:31:36.360 rather than feminist, separate, discreet, only feminist action.
00:31:43.040 Quite a strong socialist backdrop there.
00:31:44.780 yeah trade unionism and um anarchism really it was the most fun place to be because they were 0.99
00:31:51.800 just so wild and you know i think when i came down to london it was ex-green and lesbians and 1.00
00:31:57.800 a football team in brixton that i used to hang out with and they were just so irreverent and would 0.99
00:32:01.620 you know squat live differently have san francisco bands over that wouldn't wear you know any tops
00:32:09.400 on punk bands they're all that sort of lot but in terms of like formal feminism i didn't really 1.00
00:32:14.400 understand what that meant beyond reading copies of Spare Rib, actually, which I definitely did 0.95
00:32:19.340 still pick up in News From Nowhere. That's a rambly answer, sorry. No, it's great. It's really
00:32:24.480 interesting. And actually, what really struck me was that, I'm sorry to quote you yourself again.
00:32:29.020 I know, it's really disconcerting. You wait till you have all this to you.
00:32:34.200 But when you mentioned graffitiing the word lesbian outside supermarkets, that is how the
00:32:38.660 first editorial of Diva begins. Lesbians are everywhere. And you're quoting some graffiti 1.00
00:32:43.200 that you've that maybe you've either seen or perhaps been involved in outside I think a
00:32:48.500 Liverpool supermarket and then you riff on this this phrase lesbians everywhere and you think
00:32:52.860 about whether or not that is the case and whether Diva can help it be the case. I was just going to 0.99
00:32:58.200 say actually one of the reasons we were sort of anti-feminist in some respects because there was
00:33:03.280 a really big divide between radical lesbian feminists and a slot and I think in a way we're
00:33:11.940 not against feminism, but that version of feminism
00:33:14.640 that was seen as being quite authoritarian
00:33:16.320 and like thatching up to some right-wingers
00:33:19.500 in terms of McKinnon's anti-pornography debates in America. 1.00
00:33:24.340 There were a lot of alliances between feminists at that time 1.00
00:33:27.280 around issues around pornography, for example, 1.00
00:33:29.340 and sex workers' rights, where we were on the other side of that. 0.97
00:33:33.260 So there was a sort of anti-feminist element to it as well.
00:33:36.760 Can we just sort of talk about that divide very briefly?
00:33:39.260 Because I think, correct me if I'm wrong, Frances,
00:33:40.880 we're referring to the lesbian sex wars somewhat now. 0.76
00:33:44.520 Yeah, no, for sure. 0.60
00:33:45.420 That would come in under the category.
00:33:46.900 So, for example, something like pornography,
00:33:50.040 there would be like massive debates around that.
00:33:52.600 And I think it's almost like a bit of a prequel
00:33:54.300 to what's happening with the trans issue now, 1.00
00:33:56.700 where you've got some lesbians, let's call them that, 1.00
00:34:00.700 who are kind of teaming up with the anti-trans agenda 1.00
00:34:03.220 and some right-wing actors that you need to distinguish yourself 0.64
00:34:07.140 and they're like, well, we're not that kind of lesbian. 0.99
00:34:09.160 and and so there was a lot of that going on with the within feminist debate at the time
00:34:14.880 no that's really fascinating I mean there's a lot of very complicated activist histories actually
00:34:19.340 that come into I guess divas relationship to feminism and of course yeah the lesbian sex wars 0.60
00:34:26.280 which yeah unfolded initially in America in the 80s of course happened in the UK as well and then
00:34:32.860 as you say I guess continue to play out in different ways and it's interesting the parallel
00:34:36.900 you drew there, Frances? In a way, looking back at it now, there was an element that was captured
00:34:41.160 there as well. So although we were very sort of pro-sexy and positive and everything, there was
00:34:46.180 that sort of ladette culture coming in and the sort of lad mags that it was sort of beginning
00:34:50.620 of the backlash that actually eroded everybody's rights and women's rights in terms of a very kind
00:34:55.980 of commercialisation and capture of that spirit. So there were some really negative aspects to
00:35:01.420 winning that lesbian sex war and so it was kind of complicated i wouldn't like to say that
00:35:07.840 you know all the battles have been won and everything's can be celebrated because there
00:35:12.300 were some losses within within the fact that the sex positive lesbians won what do you think the 1.00
00:35:17.880 losses are of sex positive feminism i guess just the rampant commercialization now of everything 1.00
00:35:25.200 to the extent that the women-owned businesses 0.98
00:35:27.860 haven't played out quite the way that perhaps we would have wished 1.00
00:35:33.420 or there's still a lot of control in the hands of, you know,
00:35:37.340 really big corporations and industries.
00:35:39.740 And even EDI, to some extent, I would argue,
00:35:42.480 controversially, Roxy, forgive me,
00:35:44.460 is that if you give, you know, EDI awards to companies
00:35:47.060 that are actively destructive, like Shell or whatever,
00:35:50.740 that that's like a really retrogressive move as well.
00:35:53.100 So it's like the politics has become not so simple as we got the funding, we're sex positive and it's gone into a new area, I think, in terms of how that problematises something like Diva.
00:36:08.660 And so, yeah, I mean, I think you mentioned when we met the fracturing of feminism in the 90s is also the backdrop against the sort of founding of Diva.
00:36:15.040 And the neoliberal capture, you know, because it was meant to be this moment of progression from Thatcher.
00:36:20.060 And it was, but to a lot of extent, a lot of what Tony Blair carried on was Thatcher's legacy
00:36:25.300 in terms of the neoliberal models of business and commercialisation.
00:36:30.100 So there was community contact, was lost perhaps a little bit in terms of accountability
00:36:35.620 or who is actually making the money. 1.00
00:36:38.800 So, yeah, so we've got this sort of all these, you know, different moments in feminism, 1.00
00:36:43.740 feminisms I should say you know we've got I guess what is often called the girl boss feminism 0.91
00:36:47.940 of you know the late 90s perhaps and then I mean more recently of course we've had
00:36:53.320 me too and we've you know we've seen the emergence of terms like intersectionality
00:36:58.220 which have become much more sort of widely used than ever before and Roxy I mean how does that
00:37:04.140 speak to your experience of editing diva and the the sorts of currents that you have to navigate
00:37:10.540 feminist political currents which can get pretty choppy at times I know. Indeed yeah those currents 0.99
00:37:16.860 do definitely get quite choppy. So in terms of I mean conversations around intersectionality for
00:37:23.400 instance that's definitely something that everyone at Diva is very familiar with and that we talk
00:37:28.840 about a lot and it was certainly something that when I became editor that was part of my sort of
00:37:35.560 mission statement with Diva was to to try and reach out to everyone in all different
00:37:43.280 intersectional identities within our community to give them that same experience I had as a
00:37:48.840 closeted teenager with Diva magazine and so certainly we talk a lot about intersectionality
00:37:54.380 and certainly we try and look at passing the mic to people from intersectional identities to tell
00:38:02.040 their own stories and speak to their own experience and to hone in and drill down on specific
00:38:07.860 nuanced lived experiences of, for example, a trans person of colour navigating the dating world or
00:38:14.540 a bisexual woman in the workplace, you know, like going into those very specific experiences.
00:38:21.580 So certainly we think about intersectionality. And then in terms of the feminist conversation,
00:38:26.860 as you've touched on Francis
00:38:29.260 unfortunately we do see 1.00
00:38:31.180 divisions within feminism
00:38:33.140 we see divisions within the LGBTQIA
00:38:35.800 community
00:38:36.600 and in terms of
00:38:38.820 we've made our position on trans
00:38:41.500 inclusion very very clear
00:38:42.900 That's to be really applauded
00:38:45.600 it's a very important framing that you
00:38:47.380 bring in there. And you've won awards
00:38:49.520 for it. We have yeah we have indeed
00:38:51.440 we have won awards for it which is
00:38:53.440 lovely but we're very explicitly
00:38:55.800 a trans inclusive space. And also, I think something that's great about Diva is that if
00:39:02.300 you look at mainstream coverage of trans issues and trans identities and trans stories, so much
00:39:08.000 of it is inflammatory. So much of it is overtly transphobic. We've got politicians saying overtly
00:39:13.400 transphobic stuff. So if Diva can be a counterpoint to that narrative that's out there in the
00:39:19.380 mainstream, I think that's really powerful and important that, I mean, we might be a smaller
00:39:23.960 a voice in the mainstream landscape but we are a voice and this is what we're saying. Yeah that's
00:39:30.800 so important and it seems also really interesting to me and really relevant that in a way you're
00:39:35.660 also confounding a narrative that would potentially oppose the lesbian community to the trans
00:39:40.560 community. It does reflect the reality though actually that is perhaps even a commercial reality
00:39:45.780 that most lesbians are trans inclusive in their thinking. It would be foolish to take a different 0.94
00:39:50.840 position. I mean, so many people you meet, if they just listen to the mainstream media come
00:39:54.780 away with the wrong impression, because that's all the information they get. So it is very
00:39:57.860 important to have that reflected in Diva, for sure.
00:40:01.600 Yeah, I know. I do think that it's a very powerful example of media activism,
00:40:05.880 intervening in what is an overwhelmingly transphobic media narrative with so much
00:40:10.100 conviction, especially at a time when online spaces and reactions can be so febrile.
00:40:16.760 On that note, can we talk about feelings?
00:40:19.340 For sure. I think that working at Diva is an all consuming job. And that can be an absolutely gorgeous, glorious thing. But you're also every day, the tools of your trade are both the queer joy in the community and the things that are wonderful about being part of this community, but also the divisions and the trauma and the pain and the serious things that are happening right now.
00:40:44.580 And I think that navigating that is a challenge, to be really honest.
00:40:51.320 And I think something I think about as an editor is the well-being, not only like looking after my own well-being, navigating all that, but making sure they're OK.
00:41:01.780 Like, you know, making sure the team is OK.
00:41:03.980 because when we're writing about something that's happened you know say we're writing about some
00:41:10.220 awful new legislation that's coming in or some horrible protest or some horrid transphobic thing
00:41:16.000 that's being said we're writing about things that affect our lives our communities our loved ones
00:41:22.200 lives and that's pretty heavy so certainly as well as thinking about how can we make the best
00:41:29.540 magazine we can make there is also a sense of making sure that we're all okay while we're doing
00:41:35.780 it because it is it's an intense intense job but that's not to diminish the glory and the
00:41:41.300 gorgeousness of it because I have so many warm lovely feelings about Diva and something in
00:41:47.460 editing each issue that I'm very conscious of is the balance of how you navigate that that tight
00:41:53.620 rope line of not shying away from the serious stuff that's happening. But also, I do want
00:42:00.180 readers to leave Diva magazine feeling good about who they are.
00:42:06.060 Yes, and that thread really runs through the whole of Diva, wanting to celebrate to make
00:42:10.640 visible but without denying or ignoring serious and difficult issues that affect the queer
00:42:15.440 community. I've just got one final question. Something that really struck me was that in
00:42:22.140 Francis's first editorial for Diva in 1994, you wrote that while lesbians may not be everywhere,
00:42:30.220 we're certainly getting somewhere. And Roxy, in a recent article for Cosmopolitan, you wrote 0.94
00:42:36.020 something sadly similar. So what does it mean, and I'm quoting Roxy here, to be a lesbian in 2023?
00:42:42.480 It means celebrating how far we've come, but understanding how much further we have to go.
00:42:49.020 So how far have we come since Diva was first published?
00:42:53.760 I'm not sure how much I think of myself as a lesbian these days.
00:42:56.940 There'd be other words within that one, you know.
00:42:58.980 I don't feel attached to it in the way that everything depends on it.
00:43:05.220 And I think that's quite a healthy outlook.
00:43:07.660 But I think all of these categories are evolving and reshaping.
00:43:13.180 And in a way, there's something reassuring about going back to Diva 0.81
00:43:16.880 because it's like quite clear this is lesbians is what lesbians do this is what lesbians like
00:43:21.420 and it's there so you can refer to that but ultimately you know we're constantly changing
00:43:28.980 over our life course how we feel about being lesbian you know it changes when you're 25 to
00:43:33.540 when you're 55 for sure and that that is a positive evolution to constantly adopt discard
00:43:41.480 adapt reject affirm celebrate despair all of that stuff it goes into how you might feel about the
00:43:50.580 word lesbian or being one over a lifetime so I think things are easier in many ways and are
00:43:58.080 better but the strength of the right-wing backlash at the moment is enormous and will require a new
00:44:05.280 kind of activism and conceptualisation of how we work together in order to fully resist as the
00:44:12.660 future? So I think that in many ways since the 90s, yes, the communities come on leaps and bounds.
00:44:19.800 Yes, we've got so much more visibility. Yes, more people than ever feel comfortable to come out
00:44:24.980 and claim an identity, whether that is lesbian or whether that's bisexual or non-binary or
00:44:31.460 transgender or queer or whatever, or asexual or whatever that is, whether that stays one thing
00:44:37.120 or whether that changes throughout the course of their life. So I think there's a lot of ways where
00:44:41.700 we can see we've come on leaps and bounds. Legally, in the UK, we've certainly got some more legal
00:44:47.480 rights than we had in 1994. But I am struck by how far we've come and yet how far we still have
00:44:55.460 to go. And as you've said, Frances, about the right wing backlash, that is very, very real and
00:45:01.220 very, very frightening. And the increasing recorded hate crime, both homophobic hate crime,
00:45:08.960 but also alarmingly transphobic hate crime, the way that people in government feel fine to say
00:45:16.940 things about, you know, queer refugees or trans people. And these are just issues that we're
00:45:23.780 talking about here in the UK. If you look, you know, farther afield, then my God, there's some
00:45:29.880 very serious progress that needs to happen around the globe for our community. So I do feel like we
00:45:36.460 still have a long way to go. In my optimistic, hopeful times, I feel I feel good about the
00:45:43.440 increasing visibility and the increasing ability that people feel able to express themselves. But
00:45:51.100 also visibility, I think, in a way brings vulnerability and can remind people that they
00:45:57.900 don't like us yeah so i think it's it's a tricky thing to navigate and i think diva's place in that
00:46:05.300 is that we want to be a place that celebrates and records and documents this this visibility boom
00:46:11.860 and explores that but also hopefully we can be media for activism hopefully we can help to
00:46:18.900 work towards some of those changes that are so desperately needed yeah i'm so grateful for the
00:46:25.020 still small voice of reason and calm that publications like Diva provide in our checkered
00:46:30.720 and divisive media landscape. And Francis, it's so fascinating to hear your reflections on the
00:46:37.320 fluctuations of queer identity over a lifetime. I think there are similar fluctuations to be
00:46:42.460 tracked across Diva's run, thanks to the increased fluidity of sex, gender and sexuality in the 21st
00:46:49.460 century. There's actually an excellent recent Diva article, The L with the T by Christine Burns.
00:46:55.020 on this topic so I think that all that's left to say now is thank you a huge thank you to Roxy
00:47:03.040 and Francis for coming in and sharing all of your insights on working on such a powerhouse
00:47:09.320 magazine this has been Diva Now and Then thank you yeah thank you so much for having us
00:47:15.240 Wow, that was absolutely fascinating
00:47:24.380 to hear two editors from the same magazine
00:47:27.460 talking about their experiences
00:47:29.280 and how different those experiences were.
00:47:31.720 What an achievement Diva is to have lasted 30 years,
00:47:35.340 to span that period when we were a print culture
00:47:39.360 predominantly into the post-digital age.
00:47:43.020 Yeah, we don't see much of that longevity in the world of magazines, do we?
00:47:48.120 There is so much to unpick there.
00:47:51.280 I really love that conversation.
00:47:54.180 I especially like when we get yet another in a long line of references to the lesbian sex wars.
00:48:01.600 What did you make of Frances's connection between commercialisation and the sex-positive feminists winning that war, Eleanor? 0.77
00:48:11.040 Yeah, good point, Mel.
00:48:11.880 So what Francis picks up on there in the conversation, and I did want to expand on this, was the tie between sex-positive feminism and commercialisation.
00:48:21.360 So, as we all know, sex sells.
00:48:24.100 And no matter how powerful or liberating these representations are, there's always the risk that they can be co-opted and commercialised.
00:48:32.720 And I think that's what Francis was getting at there.
00:48:34.760 and it's also I think an interesting conversation from the point of view of
00:48:40.000 what we were talking about in terms of the 1980s and the emphasis on Thatcher
00:48:43.900 and when you started the conversation I remember you were talking to Francis I think it was
00:48:50.220 and you were talking about the ways in which a number of magazines had folded by the 80s the
00:48:54.480 late 80s partly as a result of the Thatcher cuts but Francis was saying well actually you know what
00:49:01.500 things were pretty lively you know and she was taking us back to Liverpool in the early 90s and
00:49:06.940 she's again taking us back to that really kind of vibrant culture of resistance in Liverpool and it
00:49:13.260 reminded me of the importance of municipal feminism and the ways in which feminism becomes located in
00:49:22.080 local councils and actually many feminists who were active in the 1980s move into local councils 0.95
00:49:29.280 and become active in those local councils 1.00
00:49:32.360 and start to change that culture.
00:49:34.120 So it's a kind of really important moment.
00:49:36.320 And we're always in danger, I think, of thinking in decades,
00:49:40.020 you know, and of neatly cordoning things off in historical terms.
00:49:44.220 But Francis's insights here remind us
00:49:46.840 of what was going on in Liverpool at the time.
00:49:49.480 And, of course, there was a huge amount of mainstream press antagonism
00:49:53.040 towards the council in Liverpool.
00:49:55.560 But at the same time, they were doing some really interesting things.
00:49:58.460 That's such a good point. And there's, as you say, a real counter-narrative to Frances's account in this episode where she talks about that actually, in fact, lively political publishing scene in the 1990s.
00:50:11.960 And doesn't she mention jumping on the This Morning weather map as well?
00:50:16.600 Yes.
00:50:17.040 Floating map.
00:50:17.720 Yes.
00:50:18.260 What a great moment. And Liverpool has this amazingly radical history. This is where Frances went to college.
00:50:25.120 And she mentions that in the 80s, Liverpool's Labour-run city council was led by a left-wing group known as the Militant Tendency.
00:50:33.940 And Militant were bitterly opposed to Thatcher's government.
00:50:36.740 And they had this amazing slogan that it was better to break the law than break the poor.
00:50:42.120 And it was out of these circles and this legacy in the early 1990s that Francis, you know, as she was describing, you know, became politicised.
00:50:52.860 I thought the other thing that really emerged from this discussion
00:50:56.480 was the importance of reading for young lesbians in particular.
00:51:00.800 I liked it when Frances was talking about playing a game of find a lesbian
00:51:04.800 in the novels she was reading.
00:51:07.620 And she also mentioned Shocking Pink,
00:51:09.600 which is another of the magazines we've been looking at in the project.
00:51:13.640 Spare Rib is mentioned as well.
00:51:16.160 And of course, Roxy's amazing trajectory from reader to editor and the way that she talks about her engagement with Diva magazine really hammers home the kinds of strong feelings that a magazine like that puts into circulation for particular constituencies of reader.
00:51:40.180 Particularly for marginalised communities, how important is it to see Diva on the shelves in your local newsagent and know that there are other people out there?
00:51:50.020 Yeah, that was really striking, the stories that we got there from Roxy and from Frances.
00:51:54.600 And that comes back to the physical object of the magazine, how important it is, the work that it does, how it sort of enables that sort of chance encounter that can transform a life.
00:52:05.120 If only someone would make a podcast about that.
00:52:09.040 If only.
00:52:10.180 that feels like a good place at which to wrap up this episode but stay tuned because next time
00:52:18.220 we're going to talk to two magazine producers who bring us right into the 21st century and the post
00:52:24.080 internet era this has been the liberating histories podcast with victoria bazin mel
00:52:31.000 waters and me elena careless we have a fourth member of the team caitlin menders who you've
00:52:36.140 not heard on the podcast. She is based at the University of Western Ontario. This series is
00:52:41.900 part of a larger AHRC funded project based at Northumbria University and partnered with the
00:52:47.120 Women's Library LSE. This podcast was produced by Sophie McNulty and Alex Watson at Pixoo
00:52:53.300 Productions. You can find out more about our project at liberatinghistories.org or follow us
00:52:58.940 on x at libhistories or on Instagram at liberatinghistories. You can also find links to
00:53:05.700 magazine covers etc mentioned in our show notes as well as additional resources thanks for listening