There Are No Girls on the Internet - June 11, 2024


As global elections loom, women leaders are under attack - STUFF MOM NEVER TOLD YOU

Topics
Korean pop band NewJeans subpoenas Google; Israeli disinfo campaign exposed; Transphobic lesbian dating app; Landlord price fixing scheme – NEWS ROUNDUP Remembering Lynn Conway, Tech Visionary that Transphobia Almost Erased

Episode Stats


Length

52 minutes

Words per minute

171.32

Word count

9,079

Sentence count

488

Harmful content

Misogyny

56

sentences flagged

Toxicity

34

sentences flagged

Hate speech

28

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 This is an iHeart Podcast.
00:00:02.580 Guaranteed human.
00:00:05.140 Get Bell Pure Fiber Internet with Crave, Netflix, and Disney Plus
00:00:08.720 from $94 a month.
00:00:10.160 Price guaranteed for two years on Internet
00:00:12.040 with a two-year term and auto-pay credit.
00:00:14.400 Visit bell.ca for details and to check availability.
00:00:17.180 Bell. Connection is everything.
00:00:19.620 Run a business and not thinking about podcasting?
00:00:21.880 Think again.
00:00:22.520 More Americans listen to podcasts
00:00:23.980 than ad-supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora.
00:00:26.680 And as the number one podcaster,
00:00:28.060 iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined.
00:00:30.820 Learn how podcasting can help your business.
00:00:32.640 Call 844-844-IHEART.
00:00:34.920 If your bookshelf and your For You page
00:00:36.860 are equally important to your personality,
00:00:39.100 welcome home.
00:00:40.700 Pro Society is a weekly podcast
00:00:42.560 that's part book club, part group chat
00:00:44.480 for anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice
00:00:46.180 and Love Island deserve the same level of discourse.
00:00:48.920 Each week, we're connecting the dots
00:00:50.360 between books, the internet, and pop culture
00:00:52.460 with your favorite writers, book talk creators,
00:00:54.980 and plenty of overthought opinions.
00:00:57.080 Yeah, I'm obsessed. I'm obsessed.
00:00:59.040 Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:01:08.840 There Are No Girls on the Internet is a production of iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative.
00:01:16.960 I'm Bridget Todd, and this is There Are No Girls on the Internet.
00:01:22.880 2024 is an important election year.
00:01:25.160 not just here in the United States, but all over the globe.
00:01:28.420 And we need to talk about how things like misogyny and misogynoir online
00:01:32.500 are already shaping up to impact elections.
00:01:35.820 So I joined my friends, Samantha and Annie, over at the podcast Stuff Mom Never Told You
00:01:40.740 to take a look at how bias against women, particularly Black women, might play out this election year.
00:01:52.380 Hey, this is Annie.
00:01:53.620 And Samantha.
00:01:54.160 And welcome to Stuff Mom Never Told You, a production of iHeartRadio.
00:02:05.800 And today we are really lucky because we are once again joined by the fabulous and delightful Bridget Todd three times in this month.
00:02:15.580 That's amazing.
00:02:16.700 I know.
00:02:17.400 I love it.
00:02:18.340 I'm like, keep coming on.
00:02:19.700 How often can we have you on?
00:02:21.360 Let's do more stuff.
00:02:22.060 I also love it. You know, the Hugh Hefner antics never end. Also, can I just say thank you for, if folks haven't listened to our Hugh Hefner conversation, I got a lot out of it. And thank you for, like, I don't know, I feel like it was a meaty one and people should listen to it. And yeah, I'm grateful that we had this space.
00:02:44.620 Yeah, I know. And of course, we stretched it out very long. We still left out so many things at the end that we do want to come back with maybe like a conversation about where Playboy and magazines that are today. And that will be a later conversation. I swear to God, it's later.
00:03:01.060 because there's so much and it is so deep and like having going through all of that
00:03:06.920 that conversation that it was kind of at one point like this is abruptly ending
00:03:10.380 and annie had to fix us because she's like y'all we can't do it like that because that's too much
00:03:15.280 but it was so much there was no like bits of it i was just like okay this is an easy
00:03:21.840 easygoing part there's no easygoing part no yeah it's so true and like what what a
00:03:29.560 But I don't know, I've been listening to a lot of nostalgia podcasts that are like, oh, remember when this? Remember when that? Like, you know, you're wrong about things like that. And it's like, what a weird time for the culture. What a weird thing that we all experienced together. Like it was normal and it really was not.
00:03:45.720 right i'm wondering though because we are aging slowly like slowly aging y'all slower than me
00:03:52.780 it's fine it's great uh but like looking back on things a lot of this conversation is because
00:03:57.620 things are revamping um and we're seeing the younger generation doing their thing similar to
00:04:02.960 what we already know and putting their own like style to it but watching it is kind of like huh
00:04:08.360 that's not as original as you think it's cute and i like your version but just know that this was
00:04:14.020 there before. But at the same time, I'm like, I wonder how many times the people before us also
00:04:18.940 felt that way. We're just coming into that same like generational glitch of like, yeah, there it
00:04:24.060 is. This is why now I understand that the older generation would just look at us kind of funny
00:04:27.920 and be like, what are you doing? This has been done. Anyway, I've had those moments lately.
00:04:34.560 I had one watching a group of like very young people wearing the oversized jeans that are so
00:04:41.260 long that that you are stepping on them and it was like a damp day and i was like oh i remember
00:04:46.200 that feeling of like the the jinko jeans that went over the back the heels of your sneaker and would
00:04:51.920 get wet and gross yes yuck you're gonna want the skinny jeans again one day yeah like yeah oh y'all
00:04:57.280 are back there again okay cool let's see how that goes i just have to put in here and i'm not going
00:05:02.260 to provide any more context than this but jinko jeans are very important in my dungeons and
00:05:07.360 dragons campaign that sounds about right can i ask a follow-up or no no no no i think my i think
00:05:15.660 peaches has something to do with this samantha's dog peaches is very much a inspiration in the
00:05:21.080 campaign yeah well i'll i'll say this as the i run the game sometimes you got to go with what
00:05:27.520 the players are doing and we're all from kind of the same generation that millennial level of like
00:05:33.900 Yeah. Anyway, we really appreciate you joining us today, Bridget. The topic you have for us
00:05:44.020 is one that I admit is giving me a lot of anxiety. But I'm very glad that you're here to talk about
00:05:50.020 it because it's so, so important. And there's a lot to break down. So let's go ahead and get into
00:05:55.420 it. Yeah, I feel the same anxiety and angst that you're feeling, I'm feeling. And that is that we
00:06:01.900 have an upcoming election. I've been doing this thing where I'm saying, I'm not going to even
00:06:07.880 pay attention to the election until we're like 100 days out. Generally for me around then that
00:06:13.300 I'm like, I got to join a campaign. But I think like I need to confront the fact that we're in
00:06:19.280 an election year. And it's not 2024. It's not just an election year. It is probably the election
00:06:25.420 year, not just here in the United States, but also globally. I did not know this. Around the world,
00:06:30.240 more voters in history will vote this year with at least 64 countries and the European Union
00:06:36.060 having elections. Combined, this is about 49 percent of people worldwide are meant to be
00:06:42.520 holding national elections in 2024. So it's a very big deal. The stakes are high. You are not wrong
00:06:48.060 to be feeling a little anxiety or a little angst or a little uncertainty around it, Annie. But given
00:06:54.120 all that, I think it really makes sense to think about whether or not elections are fair to women
00:07:01.680 who are running for office. Obviously, this is like a global issue, but right here in the United
00:07:07.040 States, things are also very bleak. And it's important because we can't have like an equitable,
00:07:12.840 functional democracy if women are not able to run for office without facing identity-motivated
00:07:17.860 attacks simply for showing up and daring to be women yes and you've talked about this a lot
00:07:24.620 before and i think it's so important because if you're considering running for office um as a
00:07:31.520 woman or any intersection of marginalized identity that's just like an extra thing to deal with and
00:07:37.740 like your family has to deal with like people who know you has to deal with and i can't honestly
00:07:42.540 blame people for being like you know what i don't want to deal with that and that's a huge problem
00:07:46.960 That is a huge problem.
00:07:49.680 Absolutely.
00:07:50.320 And even for folks who are not running for elected office, it's a problem because more
00:07:55.560 and more we're seeing it just harassment and identity-based attacks being part of showing
00:08:00.480 up to public or civic life.
00:08:02.400 And so if you want to be a poll worker for your elections in your town, or if you want
00:08:07.420 to speak up at a town hall meeting in your town, just these everyday, not exciting bits
00:08:13.900 of democracy, these everyday ways that folks should be able to show up and make their voices
00:08:18.500 heard and participate in their civic and public life, women and people of color and other
00:08:23.140 marginalized people are facing attacks just for doing that. And, you know, it makes me sad because
00:08:28.520 I've seen very clear research that suggests that women are shying away from public office and
00:08:36.640 shying away from this kind of civic participation because of these attacks. And on the one hand,
00:08:41.960 I get it? Like women are smart enough to know if I'm not protected. And when I do this, if I have 1.00
00:08:46.120 to pay lots and lots and lots of money to protect myself in a way that my male counterparts just
00:08:52.080 don't even have to think about, I don't want to do that. And so as much as I want to have the
00:08:56.880 representative democracy that we all deserve, I understand why more and more marginalized people
00:09:02.600 are checking out and being like, yeah, I'm just not going to sign up for this. Like, why would
00:09:05.580 you. I get it. Yeah. And I think one of the reasons for my anxiety, a lot of our anxiety,
00:09:13.200 as you said, you have been on here to talk about it being like disinformation and these attacks
00:09:17.500 and misinformation. It feels like it's gotten worse for a lot of reasons. Is that in my head?
00:09:26.300 I am sorry to say it is not in your head. You know, today in 2024, women in politics and 1.00
00:09:32.440 positions of power are the targets of just overwhelming volumes of gender disinformation 1.00
00:09:38.400 and online abuse in forms of character assassinations, fake stories, and humiliating or
00:09:43.640 sexually charged images. Something that is new is the proliferation of AI-enabled disinformation,
00:09:49.880 visual disinformation, so things like cheap fakes, deep fakes, all of that kind of stuff
00:09:53.360 that I think we really hadn't had to wade through before like we are now. And I also just think,
00:10:00.720 I mean, this is just my opinion. I think that the cultural landscape around these kinds of attacks have changed. I think that we're in a place where people are really willing to believe things that adhere to their worldviews already.
00:10:18.220 And so if you see a piece of disinformation or an AI-generated deepfake, even if there are all the things that you're like, that's probably not true, if it aligns to your worldview, anecdotally, I believe that I've seen more and more people being unwilling to challenge things that are clearly not true if it aligns to their worldview.
00:10:39.120 And we're talking about misogyny and sexism. So much of that is wrapped up in how people think about the world. And so if you already are somebody who is prone to think that women are untrustworthy or women are incapable or women are not qualified or not good leaders, when you see something that confirms that, even if it's like obviously AI manipulated or something are not true, I do think here in 2024, people are going to be willing to be like, oh, yeah, that tracks, you know, because it aligns to this like deeply held idea and attitude about women.
00:11:09.120 women that they already have.
00:11:11.460 Right. 0.63
00:11:12.680 You know, one of the things I was thinking about the last time we kind of had a similar
00:11:15.980 conversation about this, we talked a lot about like bots and we talked a lot about like how
00:11:21.320 Russia really did target specific women and marginalized people, even pretending to be
00:11:27.280 like marginalized people themselves in order to attack other people would be like, yes,
00:11:31.120 I'm definitely voting for so-and-so because I am this type of person who thinks that this
00:11:35.660 candidate will do the best for us, even though it's not true at all, which, you know, we've seen
00:11:40.340 plants essentially everywhere. But then these bots were the thing. Is there something different this
00:11:45.320 time around that we're seeing? Like as calculated as that was, obviously it's getting worse. What
00:11:50.460 are we seeing now? Yeah, that's a great question. I would say that I was somebody who really talked
00:11:56.400 a lot about the way that global forces were using and exploiting our online ecosystem to like
00:12:04.920 manufacture political conversation in a way that was inauthentic.
00:12:10.200 And I think that's important to talk about.
00:12:12.000 Like, there was an entire Senate inquiry report that said that Russia specifically was interested
00:12:16.540 in targeting Black people, Black voters, and get them to either vote for Trump or to stay
00:12:21.000 home in our last presidential election, right? 0.83
00:12:23.040 So, like, that's a thing.
00:12:25.780 However, I think in 2024, the conversation really has to be more involved because it's
00:12:32.040 not just foreign adversaries.
00:12:33.820 It is also people right here in the United States, you have the front runner for the Republican Party engaging in identity-based disinformation attacks all the time, right?
00:12:45.040 And so I think the problem has gotten more involved, and I think there are more parties involved.
00:12:51.960 And I also think it's been more normalized, right?
00:12:53.920 Like, I think, like, the idea that someone would just lie about a candidate and tell a lie that is only works because it is supported by bias or unfair attitudes or lies about somebody's identity.
00:13:08.800 I think that we're in a place where people are not calling that what it is.
00:13:12.940 And so the whole problem has sort of, like, gotten worse.
00:13:16.360 Yes. Yes. And I think like when you do call it what it is, we've just become so like, we don't trust anybody else's data. We don't trust where they're getting their sources. That's what my experience has been when I get in fights with people. They're always like, where's your source? And I'll tell them and they'll be like, no.
00:13:37.440 Don't even get me.
00:13:38.520 Like, where do I even start?
00:13:41.280 Like, I have had that same experience.
00:13:42.980 It's part and parcel of why I've kind of, like, given up on a certain kind of online discourse with strangers.
00:13:49.760 Because I'm just like, it's not worth my time.
00:13:51.820 If you're somebody who wants to be in the trenches arguing with somebody on Reddit, more love to you.
00:13:56.620 Like, good job.
00:13:57.540 Good luck.
00:13:58.180 And it's not my ministry.
00:13:59.480 I don't have the energy.
00:14:00.620 I don't have the time.
00:14:02.000 Because, and I guess that's the thing about people with these entrenched worldviews.
00:14:06.460 But it's very hard to have conversations with them in some cases because it's like, oh, well, here's a, like, reputable source.
00:14:16.300 And it's like, oh, well, the source is wrong.
00:14:18.520 Here's why you can't trust whatever source.
00:14:20.660 And the problem is, is really that, like, a lot of these institutions and sources really have given people legit reasons to be sus about them and to question them.
00:14:30.380 And so it just makes it that much more complicated where you're like, you know, well, yes, like, I don't want to go out here and cape for, like, the CDC or whatever, but, like, we have to start somewhere.
00:14:42.140 We have to have, like, a baseline understanding of just the reality that we're all sharing.
00:14:47.360 Otherwise, everything breaks down.
00:14:48.960 get bell pure fiber internet with crave netflix and disney plus from 94 a month price guaranteed
00:14:59.720 for two years on internet with a two-year term and auto pay credit visit bell.ca for details
00:15:04.760 and to check availability bell connection is everything run a business and not thinking
00:15:10.100 about podcasting think again more americans listen to podcasts than ad supported streaming
00:15:15.120 music from spotify and pandora and as the number one podcaster iheart's twice as large as the next
00:15:20.440 two combined so whatever your customers listen to they'll hear your message plus only iheart
00:15:25.380 can extend your message to audiences across broadcast radio think podcasting can help your
00:15:29.960 business think iheart streaming radio and podcasting let us show you at iheartadvertising.com
00:15:36.360 that's iheartadvertising.com when i was 14 years old i was kidnapped and held captive for nine
00:15:43.820 months i survived and i've spent my life exploring how other people survive what should have destroyed
00:15:50.200 them i'm elizabeth smart and these are the survivor files i just remember this low taunting
00:15:57.760 voice next to my ear saying shut up don't say anything every week i'm with survivors who live
00:16:05.620 through the unthinkable i knew if he woke up without a doubt he was going to hurt me i started
00:16:12.840 feeling that there was someone at the end of my bed and i just started screaming they are abducted
00:16:20.660 stalked controlled and nearly silenced but these aren't stories about what's taken from them
00:16:26.500 they're stories about what it takes to make it out alive listen to the survivor files with
00:16:32.520 elizabeth smart on the iheart radio app apple podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts
00:16:42.840 You are someone who has been working in the world of disinformation and misinformation for a while.
00:16:51.940 And I think it's interesting because when we talk to you,
00:16:55.820 there's always kind of like, almost like a game plan of like how things work or how people do things.
00:17:02.840 And as you've been saying, like, some of it relies on what's baked in already,
00:17:06.800 of like the sexism baked in already.
00:17:08.360 Totally. So that is a great way to put it, Annie,
00:17:11.500 because it really is like a game plan.
00:17:14.200 And I really, in the work that I do around missing this information,
00:17:17.860 I really encourage folks to like take a step back
00:17:20.540 and see the machinations of how this is working
00:17:24.120 to sort of see the ways that we are being essentially like hoodwinked
00:17:29.060 and grifters are sort of like getting something out of us
00:17:31.540 by following a very specific kind of game plan.
00:17:35.100 And so you can really think about the way that we're seeing
00:17:37.700 misogyny-based attacks work today as a sort of three-pronged attack.
00:17:42.240 Prong one is online violence.
00:17:44.660 So, like, threats of abuse, hate speech, harassments, beer campaigns.
00:17:48.180 Then you have, pronged two, disinformation by bad actors.
00:17:51.940 So, like, the kind of artificial activity that Sam was talking about, like bots,
00:17:56.180 coordinated influence operations, fake news,
00:17:58.900 combined with algorithmic preferences toward incendiary content, right?
00:18:03.360 Like, a whole body of research tells us that social media platforms, places like Twitter, Reddit, whatever, they really do prioritize content that is inflammatory, right?
00:18:14.640 And so if you are somebody who wants to tell an inflammatory lie that is identity-based about somebody, that is going to get preferential treatment on algorithms.
00:18:25.100 It's just a fact.
00:18:25.680 And then the last prong is what you were talking about, Annie, just good old-fashioned everyday sexism, right?
00:18:32.820 Just the general suspicion around women, particularly women of color and Black women, suspicion around our motivations, our abilities, our, like, motivations to lead.
00:18:44.040 Like, why do we want to lead?
00:18:45.380 How did we get to a leadership position? 1.00
00:18:47.600 All of this really allows gender-based attacks to take root in mainstream political discourse.
00:18:54.400 So I wish that we were talking about something that we only see festering in, you know, random dudes blog dot biz.
00:19:04.540 But a lot of this conversation does get amplified to like mainstream platforms.
00:19:10.940 It does. And that's something I've been thinking about a lot lately, too, is the you've talked about before, like how.
00:19:17.860 kind of like outrage gets more money like in it's monetized in our social media
00:19:25.520 and other platforms and I feel when women point that out the criticisms come again of like
00:19:35.100 well see she can't handle it or what have you but there are numbers to back this up
00:19:40.100 oh totally and something something about that is like men are not being asked to handle
00:19:45.500 identity-based criticisms when they run for public office.
00:19:49.620 They're just not.
00:19:50.240 And so I would argue that like a landscape 1.00
00:19:52.840 where women are asked to handle something 0.95
00:19:55.400 that their counterparts simply do not have to deal with
00:19:58.360 is not a fair landscape.
00:19:59.960 And you shouldn't have to put up with identity-based lies
00:20:03.480 and smears to run for office.
00:20:05.520 You should be able to handle criticisms about your record,
00:20:08.360 about what you say, about your behavior, about your policy.
00:20:11.020 But we're not talking about that. 1.00
00:20:12.220 We're talking about you can't lead because you're a woman. 1.00
00:20:14.880 I am suspicious of your motivations because you're a woman. 0.98
00:20:17.880 That's a different thing that men in public office simply do not have to deal with. 0.98
00:20:22.900 So let's look at some of the some of the data around this.
00:20:25.760 So discrediting and disabusing women candidates in the 2022 midterm election echoed these patterns that really took shape in 2020 when racist and sexist and ableist abuse was hurled at candidates like Representative Ilhan Omar and Senator Tammy Duckworth.
00:20:41.780 when multiple secretaries of state faced harassment
00:20:44.700 and legit physical threats
00:20:47.040 for ratifying the election results
00:20:48.680 and white supremacists plotted to kidnap
00:20:52.400 and hold ransom Governor Whitmere.
00:20:54.940 Side note, that is something that like,
00:20:56.720 I don't think that we ever,
00:20:58.400 like the fact that white supremacists
00:21:00.540 were foiled in a plot to kidnap
00:21:03.660 a public elected official,
00:21:06.700 we did not have nearly enough conversation about that.
00:21:09.720 I believe if that had happened in another country, we would be like we would be looking at it like, wow, look who can't do democracy.
00:21:17.820 Oh, my God. What is going on over there?
00:21:19.700 It happened here and I feel like it barely made made a blip.
00:21:23.720 I mean, it's kind of like any abuse situation or stalking situation.
00:21:27.400 Unless they're dead, they don't care.
00:21:29.560 Unless we die, they're not going to listen. 0.65
00:21:32.400 It's not an actual threat, which is the most absurd thing that they need to see it end in violence in order to give credit to what happened.
00:21:38.740 Like, that's unfortunately what's happening.
00:21:41.880 And that's sort of my point of this whole conversation, Sam, is that we shouldn't accept that we have to wait until somebody is dead or in the hospital to have these conversations, right?
00:21:53.240 Like, media platforms amplified violence and abuse against Nancy Pelosi, and somebody broke into her house and attacked her husband with a hammer, and he was hospitalized, right?
00:22:05.860 Like, it shouldn't take something like that to be like, oh, wait, is this a real thing?
00:22:11.300 It's a real thing.
00:22:12.600 And it shouldn't have to get to a point of violence for us to really take it seriously.
00:22:18.940 And these kinds of attacks are really expanding.
00:22:21.620 There was a recent global study shows that women government officials targeted with violence
00:22:25.420 is one of the largest categories of attacks in the U.S. compared to other regions of the 0.78
00:22:29.640 world, which includes public and civil servants, local authorities and nonpartisan political
00:22:34.140 appointments such as judges.
00:22:35.860 So, like, yeah, like, like, it's a global problem, but the problem is unique in the United States.
00:22:41.900 And especially given that we might have two women running for vice president in 2024, the way that we talk about gender and leadership and the way that we the kind of conversations that we normalize and tolerate around women and leadership, we are going to have to sort of get that straight.
00:22:58.300 Right. Because it's certainly going to be something that comes up.
00:23:01.440 In fact, I would say that we've already seen this when it comes to attacks on Vice President Harris.
00:23:05.860 yes
00:23:07.560 it's so sad
00:23:11.260 because I remember
00:23:13.120 having
00:23:15.360 these thoughts when like Hillary Clinton
00:23:17.260 was almost elected and
00:23:18.480 then
00:23:19.940 Vice President Kamala Harris
00:23:22.840 I was thinking they're going to be assassinated
00:23:25.260 I thought that and that's horrific
00:23:27.420 that I thought it but I was
00:23:29.260 like worried for them
00:23:30.820 and there's a reason to be
00:23:33.220 because there are
00:23:35.860 If you're living in a world where you're getting constant threats of, like, death and violence and sexual violence, it's hard not to think, like, one of these people might actually do something.
00:23:49.100 Yeah, especially in a country where guns are not really that difficult to come by, in a country that normalizes and amplifies this kind of violent rhetoric against women public officials.
00:24:01.380 Like, the conditions are perfect for that kind of violence to easily move from online violence to offline violence, just like we saw on January 6th, right?
00:24:10.580 Like, I'm not, like, pulling this out of nowhere.
00:24:13.200 We have already seen this.
00:24:14.540 Yes.
00:24:14.980 And, again, there are numbers behind this.
00:24:20.420 There sure are.
00:24:21.280 So, shout out to the Institute for Strategic Dialogue. 0.98
00:24:24.400 they have a study that found that women of color candidates
00:24:27.480 are targeted by the right at really alarming rates online.
00:24:32.120 A couple of key findings.
00:24:33.420 So abusive messages accounted for more than 15%
00:24:36.180 of those directed at every female lawmaker analyzed, 0.99
00:24:39.140 compared with around 5 to 10% of male candidates. 1.00
00:24:43.120 Women of color are particularly likely to be targeted.
00:24:46.080 And this piece, I think, is really important.
00:24:48.040 So male politicians who are ethnic minorities
00:24:50.620 are not more vulnerable than their white counterparts.
00:24:54.000 For instance, Cory Booker and Tim Scott, who are both Black men, got similar levels of abuse to white male candidates.
00:25:00.320 However, the attacks against them were more likely to be around race, ISD found.
00:25:06.620 So abuse directed toward women is more likely to be about their gender than abuse targeting men.
00:25:13.020 Abuse targeting men was more generalized and focused on their political stances,
00:25:17.160 while the messages directed at women are more likely to focus on things like their appearance or, like, general competence.
00:25:23.780 Female Democrats received 10 times more abusive comments than their male counterparts on Facebook,
00:25:28.840 and Republican women received twice as many abusive comments as Republican men. 0.71
00:25:32.920 So it's one of those situations where women of color and Black women are really
00:25:37.640 shouldering the majority of this burden, but it's not the same along gender and race lines,
00:25:44.600 right? It is very different if you are criticizing somebody because of their political
00:25:49.600 stances or policy versus if you're criticizing somebody because of the way they look or because
00:25:54.280 of like a like a general suspicion of who they are based on their identity like those things are
00:26:00.580 very different and as this report from the institute for strategic dialogue points out
00:26:04.700 everybody is not shouldering that burden equally yes and it's it's very frustrating for a lot of
00:26:13.200 reasons but as going back to like the whole like show me your sources thing it's really hard to
00:26:19.340 combat, right? It's really hard to fight against this.
00:26:27.100 It really is. Like, this is work that I have done professionally during various times of
00:26:32.200 my career. And, you know, being in the space, we talk a lot about things like debunking,
00:26:37.380 which I do think has its place. However, it's a pretty frustrating endeavor because it's
00:26:42.000 like you're playing whack-a-mole, right? Like, I used to be the person who would have
00:26:46.220 meetings with Facebook or Twitter or Reddit and be like, oh, well, here's a bunch of examples of
00:26:51.760 content that violates your terms of service and seems to be violent threats or attacks on public
00:26:57.900 officials or women running for office. And they'd be like, OK, we'll take those down. It's like you
00:27:01.560 can't do that forever. Right. Like so it is a frustrating thing. And I think, you know, you need
00:27:08.400 more than just debunking to combat this stuff. You know, gender disinformation, I don't feel like
00:27:13.940 It can really be addressed through just fact-checking or debunking.
00:27:18.320 These attacks are often based in character assassination or just unverifiable information.
00:27:24.300 And so when that is magnified by algorithmic preferences of platforms that privilege fake and outrageous content to enhance profit, we have a real problem.
00:27:34.940 It's a tech problem.
00:27:36.280 It's a policy problem.
00:27:37.300 It's a democracy problem.
00:27:38.460 It's a cultural problem.
00:27:39.940 It's a lot of problems all rolled into one big ball that, like, playing whack-a-mole on individual pieces of content just ain't going to cut it, right?
00:27:47.320 And so I would say that this really needs to be combated by changing social media platform policies in the long term and also a cultural understanding of what's going on, right?
00:28:00.980 So not just being like, oh, well, it's just a platform problem, really understanding the role that like the way that we're all thinking about and talking about women who run for office and other marginalized people who run for office really does play a role in pushing back against this.
00:28:15.900 I mean, a part of the conversation is that the reason feminism is important, the reason intersectional feminism is important is to undo the misogyny and the conversations that happen that allow this to start with, that allow this type of rhetoric to begin with.
00:28:31.460 Like in this conversation, it's odd because I always go back to thinking how immediately like when a man specifically wants to threaten a woman, it's always some kind of sexual violence.
00:28:41.160 That's the immediate part.
00:28:42.680 It's like that's their go-to.
00:28:44.280 And we know when it comes to war crimes, that's one of the number one things that is used within these wars that are often so like awful.
00:28:51.860 We start thinking about it like the level of sexual violence that happened to show power and control.
00:28:56.200 And all of this has to do with the misogynistic take on power. 0.96
00:29:01.460 And it's kind of one of those questions of, like, how do you even begin, especially when it's so deeply rooted that any almost, especially, like, I'm going to say this, like, uneducated, ignorant people, that's their go-to. 0.99
00:29:15.760 Like, that's the first thing is, like, you deserve to be, like, raped. 0.99
00:29:18.620 Like, that's their comment. 1.00
00:29:19.660 And you see it so many times that it becomes normalized.
00:29:23.200 Yeah, I mean, how many of us, like, I know that I've experienced this.
00:29:28.040 I'm sure that you all have.
00:29:29.320 I'm sure that a lot of people listening. 1.00
00:29:30.380 How many of us have had some creep say, like, I hope you get raped, you deserve to be raped? 0.99
00:29:36.000 Like, the fact that that is hurled at us as a threat when we speak up and use our voices, I think that that illustrates exactly what you're talking about, Sam. 0.99
00:29:46.960 Yeah. So what what can we do then to address this online, perhaps?
00:29:59.140 So the first thing I would say is really understanding the kinds of attacks that stick and letting that kind of inform your thinking about how you respond, right?
00:30:08.560 Because not all of these tactics are created equal.
00:30:11.920 So let's look at the ones that are actually effective at impacting voting behavior.
00:30:16.120 Attacks that seem to pack the biggest punch on voter behavior focus on character, things like trust, qualifications, likability, and control.
00:30:24.160 With a constant backdrop of these like sexualized attacks that we were just talking about.
00:30:28.480 So you can sort of think of these attacks as manifesting in these candidates are untrustworthy. 1.00
00:30:35.040 So women are liars or hypocrites or too ambitious, right? 0.99
00:30:39.680 That like the very fact that this woman is running for office means that there is something off about her. 1.00
00:30:44.980 Like you can't trust somebody who wants it too much, right?
00:30:48.080 And then meanwhile, it's like, oh, so did like the male candidate just like accidentally fill out the paperwork to run and just like accidentally found himself on a podium?
00:30:56.640 And those attacks really work because trust is obviously a major factor in vote choice. 1.00
00:31:03.140 Another one is that women are unqualified. 1.00
00:31:05.480 Women are stupid, weak, incapable, inexperienced, right? 1.00
00:31:08.820 So historically, women must meet a higher threshold to prove their qualifications. 1.00
00:31:15.640 Another is that women are just unlikable. 0.99
00:31:18.820 I just don't like her. 1.00
00:31:19.860 I don't like her face.
00:31:20.900 I don't like what she stands for.
00:31:22.540 Difficult to get along with. 1.00
00:31:23.760 This is one that, like, you see a lot with women of color. 1.00
00:31:26.640 you know, they're angry or like never satisfied or like, oh, what a sour puss. No one likes them. 1.00
00:31:32.980 They have annoying personalities. Like women leaders are expected to be agreeable. 1.00
00:31:37.200 I remember when Elizabeth Warren was running for president, one of the attacks that her campaign 1.00
00:31:42.120 really saw a lot is that she was like too prepared and would evoke plans for too many things. So if 0.80
00:31:50.080 you asked her a question, she'd be like, oh, here's my plan on that. Or like, here's my policy
00:31:53.520 paper on that. And the people were like, don't like it. I can't get a beer with her.
00:32:01.480 I mean, it really I mean, like if you're if you are a woman who like dominated and led the group 0.98
00:32:08.740 project in class, I don't need to tell you that sometimes when you're really good and really
00:32:13.480 qualified and know what you're doing, that will be seen as an attack on you or like used against
00:32:20.460 you to be like, I just don't like her. Even though she's like, did all the work on this project that
00:32:24.280 I would have gotten an F without her. I don't like it. And lastly, that they're uncontrollable.
00:32:30.060 They're too angry, too crazy, too hormonal, too evil. All of that, that they're too whatever
00:32:36.780 to be voted into office. And you can really see how these are like things that kind of there's
00:32:42.580 really no way to win because they are sexually promiscuous or they're un-effable, right? So
00:32:49.760 it's like oh if you're too sexual or not sexual enough both of those are like attacks so it's like
00:32:56.160 what are you supposed to do like there's no way to win right a lot of these are very they're
00:33:01.240 conflicting with each other it's like you're too ambitious but you don't know what you're doing
00:33:04.600 like it's like too okay i came prepared i guess that's bad too okay cool absolutely and so like
00:33:14.040 And all of these attacks work and they stick despite being like contradictory or like seemingly really silly.
00:33:22.140 They work because of this larger system of unchecked misogyny, misogynoir and bias against women that is worse for marginalized women.
00:33:30.400 And so the reason why these are effective at actually, you know, not just existing out there, but actually impacting voting behavior is because of this larger cultural climate of bias against women and marginalized people.
00:33:43.160 Absolutely. And I know a lot of us have experienced that just in our lives, just seen it.
00:34:13.160 than ad-supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora.
00:34:16.500 And as the number one podcaster,
00:34:18.280 iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined.
00:34:20.780 So whatever your customers listen to,
00:34:22.420 they'll hear your message.
00:34:23.860 Plus, only iHeart can extend your message
00:34:25.800 to audiences across broadcast radio.
00:34:28.180 Think podcasting can help your business?
00:34:30.100 Think iHeart.
00:34:31.180 Streaming, radio, and podcasting.
00:34:33.340 Let us show you at iHeartAdvertising.com.
00:34:35.920 That's iHeartAdvertising.com.
00:34:38.300 If your bookshelf and your For You page
00:34:40.300 are equally important to your personality,
00:34:42.040 welcome home. This is Prose Society, the weekly podcast that's part book club,
00:34:48.900 part group chat for thought daughters, pop culture obsessives, and anyone who thinks
00:34:52.840 Pride and Prejudice and Love Island deserve the same level of discourse. I'm Eli Rallo,
00:34:57.640 and every week we're connecting the dots between books, the internet, and the conversations
00:35:01.820 everyone can't stop having. I'm going to have to look up this story. I'm obsessed, so obsessed.
00:35:06.980 From best-selling authors and your favorite book talk creators to the latest pop culture moments,
00:35:12.040 nothing is off the table. It's like if you can hide some real messages inside compelling
00:35:18.380 characters, then that is a Trojan horse. Whether you're looking for literary deep dives,
00:35:23.380 smart pop culture conversations, or a community of readers who love to think a little too much,
00:35:28.760 you're in the right place. Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app,
00:35:33.380 Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. See you between the pages.
00:35:42.040 Do you have any tips on how we can counter this or fight back against this?
00:35:49.000 Totally. So the biggest one, I think, is just to share positive, accurate content about women's participation in civic and political life.
00:35:57.460 You know, I would say the most effective form of inoculation against this is not like debunking each specific individual attack.
00:36:05.600 It is demonstrating that women belong in political life, that women are good leaders.
00:36:10.980 So really demonstrating women as trustworthy, qualified and competent, that's the kind of content that we need to really correct the narrative and protect women leaders and emphasize the need for women and marginalized people's place in political involvement.
00:36:24.460 So take all of that to mean that probably the worst thing that you can do if you're trying to combat this kind of thing is to directly respond or engage with individual attacks because that could amplify them or legitimize them.
00:36:37.000 This is something that I think is really tough and I have to check myself on because when I'm scrolling social media and I see like a lie about a woman, my first instinct is to reply and be like, that's not true, blah, blah, blah.
00:36:49.740 But because of the way that algorithms work, you actually might be amplifying that because the algorithm is like, oh, you're engaging with this.
00:36:56.440 It must be good content.
00:36:57.540 Let me show it to more people.
00:36:58.720 So that is not what you want to do.
00:37:01.620 Instead, push out positive, proactive counter-messaging
00:37:05.180 that supports women leaders as qualified 0.60
00:37:07.240 and also acknowledge the kinds of identity-based harms
00:37:10.300 that they are facing. 1.00
00:37:11.520 So if there's a particular woman candidate
00:37:13.060 that you're like, like, yay, I like this person,
00:37:15.680 emphasize that woman's credentials, her expertise,
00:37:18.680 her background, and her shared values. 0.69
00:37:21.420 According to research from Gretchen Barton
00:37:23.060 of the Worthy Strategy Group,
00:37:24.620 there are six intangible qualities
00:37:26.380 that Americans look for in their leaders.
00:37:28.060 They want somebody who's a challenger, a nurturer,
00:37:30.100 an innovator, strong, stable, and visible, and meets the moment, right? And so there is a huge
00:37:35.840 disparity in women being an underrepresented in each of these categories that Americans cite when 0.95
00:37:42.080 they're asked to envision what they want out of a leader. And so we should really be working to
00:37:45.560 flip the script a little bit and show all the different ways that these dynamic women leaders 1.00
00:37:50.760 that dot our political landscape fit those things that Americans say that they want out of their 1.00
00:37:56.200 leaders, right? So highlighting the ways that women are innovators, highlighting the ways that 1.00
00:38:01.320 women are strong and stable and visible, highlighting the ways that women really are the
00:38:06.920 ones who are rising up to meet the moment and challenging the status quo, right? All of these
00:38:13.220 things that we know make women great leaders, a good way to challenge the lies that women are
00:38:19.360 facing in our current media climate is to highlight the truth about the fact that women do make really
00:38:24.440 good leaders and that we want a pluralistic society where women are well represented. 0.53
00:38:29.940 Yes. And it's really unfortunate because there are examples of this, plenty of examples of
00:38:35.720 women being good leaders. But it always feels like either they're ignored or like if I'm thinking
00:38:46.120 of cases from outside the United States, like that's not the United States, though. Like she's
00:38:49.580 a good leader for Europe okay okay cool I don't like that one thing I have to say I have had
00:39:03.560 some experiences where I've tried with liberal white men to do this and let me tell you how
00:39:13.320 angry they got. I was shocked. So if that that's like a to me, that was a wake up call of how
00:39:19.900 embedded this is that I thought they would at least hear me out. And they did not.
00:39:26.900 Yeah, I mean, I hate to say it. I have had the same experience. And I think there are a lot of
00:39:32.380 men in my life that think of themselves as like progressive or radical or lefty or like
00:39:38.080 promoters of democracy, but then even they don't see the ways that misogyny and sexism
00:39:45.360 threaten our democracy, even as those things are so clear to me.
00:39:49.120 And so I've really experienced what you're highlighting, that like, even from men who
00:39:54.900 are like ostensibly with it, it's just, I think it's just, I don't think that men see
00:39:59.880 it that way all the time.
00:40:00.680 I just think that they're like, oh, well, sexism ended back in whatever.
00:40:06.240 And like, it's just not a topic that I think impacts our lives anymore when it so impacts our lives. And I guess that's one of the reasons why it's so insidious and why it takes such intentionality to combat it, because these things are so ingrained that people might not even realize the ways that they are contributing to it.
00:40:24.120 Yep. I had a guy tell me there was no sexism in the 2016 election. And I was like, you do know what I do for a living, right? It's like, I just don't see it. Okay, cool. I'm going to leave because I'm going to get real bad.
00:40:38.800 but just I don't agree and a part of that is this idea we shouldn't talk about it
00:40:47.720 or we should ignore it which is not really helpful always no there I mean I'm guilty of
00:40:56.800 this too there used to be this attitude that you know the only way to counter these unfair attacks
00:41:01.760 was to ignore them right like when they go low we go high like don't don't mention it like it'll
00:41:08.380 go away. I hate to say that that is really a page from an old, outdated playbook. Research
00:41:13.680 really suggests now that ignoring these attacks just doesn't make them go away. It just allows
00:41:18.040 them to fester, get amplified and become legitimized and become part of our political
00:41:23.680 discourse. And it can also kind of backfire for women who are running for office because 1.00
00:41:29.600 candidates want to see like strength and backbone and a candidate meeting the moment. And so if 1.00
00:41:35.160 you're like, I'm not going to respond to that, that can sort of backfire because it's like,
00:41:39.140 oh, well, why isn't she meeting the moment? So that doesn't mean that like a woman candidate 0.99
00:41:44.120 needs to get mired down in the bog of like defending herself against unfair lies and 0.99
00:41:50.980 attacks. But it's really about emphasizing your accomplishments and qualifications in a way that
00:41:57.140 corrects harmful narratives without repeating those narratives and without legitimizing those
00:42:01.500 narratives. It's like a little bit of a tightrope walk to do it correctly. And again, like, I just
00:42:06.400 want to emphasize that it's something that we should not have to do. Like, certainly male 1.00
00:42:10.880 candidates are not having to prepare counter messaging in this way to be like, well, I got to
00:42:15.160 respond to this attack, but in a way that emphasizes my values and doesn't legitimize it.
00:42:19.740 And also like, it's a minefield that not everybody is asked to wade through. So I just want to
00:42:25.640 acknowledge that, that we should not have to deal with this. However, I have seen a lot of candidates
00:42:30.200 who use these kinds of unfair identity-based attacks
00:42:34.240 as an opportunity to really create community
00:42:37.580 and contrast with the people
00:42:39.580 who are hurling these attacks at them.
00:42:41.200 Like, a good example is
00:42:42.820 the former Canadian Minister of Climate and Environment,
00:42:46.060 Catherine McKenna, exemplified this advice
00:42:48.380 when she pushed back against this hashtag
00:42:51.340 that she was facing that labels her climate Barbie,
00:42:55.720 which resulted in death threats.
00:42:57.000 And to respond, she tweeted, 1.00
00:42:58.520 do you use that sexist garbage about your daughter, mother, and sister? 1.00
00:43:03.240 We need more women in politics. 1.00
00:43:04.840 Your sexist comments won't stop us. 1.00
00:43:07.080 And so that's a really interesting way how she responds to an unfair sexist attack 0.78
00:43:12.140 that attacks her gender and makes it about all the other women and girls 0.98
00:43:16.620 who are watching this kind of garbage and being like, 1.00
00:43:19.340 don't we want a climate that supports these women and girls to be in politics? 1.00
00:43:24.260 These kinds of comments go against that.
00:43:26.700 And they're not going to stop us, right?
00:43:28.000 So, like, I have seen candidates that really challenge this in some unique ways.
00:43:34.460 Yeah. And going back to your point of, like, we shouldn't have to be doing this at all.
00:43:39.820 And this is a topic I think about a lot in terms of so many, so many things.
00:43:46.640 But it's not just women who are being targeted that should have to speak up or say something.
00:43:53.580 I'm so glad that you brought that up because, I mean, how many of us have been in a situation where somebody says something or does something and you're like, oh, I don't want to be the one that has to be like, well, that's actually offensive or like, that's actually not a cool thing to say in the workplace.
00:44:10.860 And it really shouldn't just be on the person who is targeted to respond to this because challenging a sexist climate really does take all of us to speak up.
00:44:19.760 So a good example of this is Bonnie Willis, which I think you all might know.
00:44:25.640 Do you all, I feel like in Atlanta, she might be somebody who's on y'all's radar. 0.98
00:44:29.520 As well as just kick ass in the primary. 0.96
00:44:32.300 So we're very excited. 0.96
00:44:34.720 So Willis is the Fulton County District Attorney prosecuting the Georgia Trump election case,
00:44:40.900 constantly under attack, right?
00:44:42.940 Really showing how Black women are attacked and undermined 1.00
00:44:45.920 and how that is a strategy to undermine democratic process. 1.00
00:44:49.000 So that was it was a really good example. On February 15th, Willis took the witness stand and right wing actors, including Fox News, surprise, surprise, they circulated this meme that suggested that she had worn her dress backwards.
00:45:04.200 So this is a caption that Fox News put out.
00:45:07.140 Bonnie said to take the hot seat again after day one packed with yelling, a wink and surprise backward dress. 1.00
00:45:14.040 So basically they were saying this black woman is so stupid and incompetent that can you believe she wore her dress backward? 1.00
00:45:20.920 What an idiot. Who would ever believe in her leadership? Right. 1.00
00:45:23.520 Like that was the substance of the attack.
00:45:25.600 However, a guy on TikTok delegitimized that attack that had broken into mainstream media by pointing out in a TikTok that, like, actually, here's the dress and she was wearing it correctly, right?
00:45:36.960 So this was, like, nonsense that a fairly mainstream news outlet amplified.
00:45:42.780 Just completely wrong.
00:45:43.560 He found the dress.
00:45:44.220 It's like she's wearing it perfectly correctly.
00:45:46.680 While he did that, other institutions put out positive counter content, avoiding the direct attacks while emphasizing Willis' leadership and qualifications in order to target them.
00:45:56.140 So it was this, like, two-pronged thing where the TikTok messenger was able to be like, look how ridiculous this attack is, y'all, while other institutions pushed out positive messaging about Willis' leadership.
00:46:08.480 And so, really, it should not be on just her, this person targeted, to respond to these garbage lies about her character and her values and her leadership. 0.83
00:46:17.920 It really takes a village to create the culture where sexism and misogyny is not able to thrive and take root in this way.
00:46:25.720 Yes, and I would like to say Elena backed her. 1.00
00:46:27.720 Like I said, she killed it in the primaries.
00:46:29.840 We all celebrate it.
00:46:31.760 Elena loves her.
00:46:33.060 We love her.
00:46:33.880 At this point, like, of course, you know, when it comes to judicial systems in the South, it can get ugly. But when you have a case like this and you realize you have someone who is firm and we love it, like it's it's representing what we want to see in Atlanta, which is we're not taking from you. So move on.
00:46:54.220 yeah and it's also so many of these attacks that we're seeing right now
00:47:02.020 are also distractions from like real things we should be talking about and it's i mean like
00:47:09.720 she's wearing her dress backwards it does have these as you said what they're trying to signal
00:47:15.800 is she is incompetent but it's also just so like okay but it's really important that we talk about
00:47:23.740 this because we are in an election year, extremely important election year, and all of this stuff
00:47:29.040 is very dangerous. Yeah. And I think like if you're listening and you're like, well, I don't
00:47:35.700 like Willis. I don't like Harris. I don't like Pelosi. That is your right. However, you should
00:47:43.160 be more than anybody wanting to have a climate where we are able to talk about these leaders
00:47:48.820 and their qualifications and their records in a way that is fair and honest, right? 0.97
00:47:52.920 Like, when the climate is cluttered up with all kinds of garbage, sexist lies and attacks, 0.98
00:48:00.140 you can't actually have an honest conversation about why these leaders are failing us 0.99
00:48:05.120 or why these leaders are not failing us.
00:48:07.180 It just creates a dynamic where, like, we're not having a conversation about the actual thing.
00:48:12.340 We're talking about backward dresses or whether or not somebody's face looks weird, right?
00:48:17.880 Like, we're just not having a substantive conversation.
00:48:19.940 And it does not just threaten the women who are targeted.
00:48:22.820 It threatens all of us. 1.00
00:48:24.160 Undermining women leaders is part of a larger anti-democracy agenda, right? 0.96
00:48:28.120 It is not just about these individual women. 1.00
00:48:30.320 It is about threatening our democracy. 0.66
00:48:32.160 And as you were saying earlier, Annie, like, it is unfortunate that it is very effective
00:48:37.020 because people might not always be able to see the ways that sexism and misogyny and
00:48:41.800 misogynoir really threaten the fabric of our democracy.
00:48:45.260 It is this insidious thing that can operate in plain sight, even amongst people who think of themselves as people who want to protect democracy. And so we really need to get a handle on it. We need to talk about it honestly. And we need to listen to the people who are targeted and come forward to talk about what they have dealt with just for trying to serve their country or be part of public or civic life.
00:49:06.200 absolutely absolutely and i think i'm sure we'll be talking about the election
00:49:11.720 for several episodes um but it's also i i would say sadly i've seen it in plenty of my
00:49:20.180 women friends who are like well i don't want to vote for her because they're 0.58
00:49:24.160 i'm honestly it sounds like i'm scared to vote for her because 0.97
00:49:27.160 what if she's bad or like i'm hearing all this stuff about her and she must be bad um 0.96
00:49:33.360 So it's a really, really toxic environment for like actual conversations and democracy. So. 0.86
00:49:41.900 Yeah. I mean, I remember like I have felt that like I have been I have been like, oh, I'm worried about having XYZ marginalized person in public office because we have this insidious culture that it's like, well, we tried one out and it didn't work. 0.77
00:49:58.540 so we can never have another one. 0.90
00:50:00.900 And that's just such a limiting mindset.
00:50:05.640 And it's a mindset that you can creep in
00:50:07.560 before you know it.
00:50:08.660 And we should really be doing the intentional,
00:50:12.280 sometimes internal work of unlearning
00:50:14.460 the way that these things have really been internalized, 0.93
00:50:16.940 sometimes by women and other marginalized people.
00:50:20.180 Yes.
00:50:21.400 Well, as always, Bridget,
00:50:23.540 thank you so much for doing this work,
00:50:25.800 for coming on to share it with us.
00:50:27.800 We always love having you.
00:50:30.420 Can you tell the good listeners where to find you?
00:50:32.860 You can find me on my podcast 0.99
00:50:34.040 at There Are No Girls on the Internet,
00:50:35.540 and you can find me on Instagram
00:50:36.800 at BridgetMarie in D.C.
00:50:38.560 Yes, and go do that, listeners.
00:50:41.580 That's so important.
00:50:42.840 So important.
00:50:44.880 And thanks, as always, yes,
00:50:46.760 to Bridget and to you for listening.
00:50:48.540 If you would like to contact us,
00:50:50.060 you can or email Stephanie at MomStuff
00:50:51.720 at iHeartMedia.com.
00:50:52.760 You can find us on Twitter at MomStuffPodcast
00:50:55.360 and on TikTok and Instagram
00:50:56.780 at Stuff Whenever Told You.
00:50:58.300 We're on YouTube.
00:50:59.580 We have a T-Pelix store
00:51:00.340 and we have a book
00:51:00.820 you can get wherever
00:51:01.340 you get your books.
00:51:02.260 Thanks, as always,
00:51:02.800 to our super producer, Christina,
00:51:04.160 our executive producer, Maya,
00:51:05.060 and our contributor, Joey.
00:51:06.160 Thank you.
00:51:06.980 And thanks to you for listening.
00:51:08.460 Stuff Whenever Told You
00:51:09.080 is a production of iHeartRadio.
00:51:09.980 For more podcasts
00:51:10.500 from iHeartRadio,
00:51:11.060 you can check out
00:51:11.480 the iHeartRadio app,
00:51:12.160 Apple Podcasts,
00:51:12.760 wherever you listen
00:51:13.320 to your favorite shows.
00:51:24.220 I survived nine months
00:51:26.660 in captivity, and I've spent my life exploring how other people survive what should have destroyed
00:51:32.280 them. I'm Elizabeth Smart, and these are The Survivor Files. Every week, I'm with survivors
00:51:38.560 who live through the unthinkable, abducted, stalked, controlled, and nearly silenced. These
00:51:44.640 are stories about what it takes to make it out alive. Listen to The Survivor Files with Elizabeth
00:51:50.560 Smart on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. If you're
00:51:56.560 bookshelf and your for you page are equally important to your personality welcome home
00:52:00.960 pro society is a weekly podcast that's part book club part group chat for anyone who thinks pride
00:52:06.840 and prejudice and love island deserve the same level of discourse each week we're connecting
00:52:11.140 the dots between books the internet and pop culture with your favorite writers book talk
00:52:15.780 creators and plenty of overthought opinions yeah i'm obsessed i'm obsessed listen to pro society
00:52:21.380 on the iheart radio app apple podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts
00:52:26.560 Hey, this is Hayes Davenport and Sean Clemens.
00:52:31.140 We host the podcast Hollywood Handbook.
00:52:33.300 Every episode, we're trying to help our guests improve their careers by mainly focusing on how they can help us improve our careers.
00:52:39.200 The show is famously super accessible, so you can easily jump into any of our 650 episodes and understand what's going on.
00:52:45.340 We recommend some of our recent episodes with Ben Stiller, Danny McBride, Riz Ahmed and Mary Steenburgen.
00:52:50.180 Listen to Hollywood Handbook on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:52:55.580 This is an iHeart Podcast.
00:52:58.620 Guaranteed human.