There Are No Girls on the Internet - October 11, 2025


Drake Defamation Diss; Trump loses Nobel Prize; Robin Williams’ daughter slams Open AI’s Sora; Google Drops Women; YouTuber kills as "vengeance" for Charlie Kirk - NEWS ROUNDUP!

Topics
Mark Zuckerberg Doesn’t Want You Talking About Abortion on Instagram Is Taylor Swift a Trad Wife? The Internet Thinks So (w⧸ Jo Piazza)

Episode Stats


Length

59 minutes

Words per minute

176.24

Word count

10,402

Sentence count

524

Harmful content

Misogyny

18

sentences flagged

Toxicity

28

sentences flagged

Hate speech

15

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 This is an iHeart Podcast.
00:00:02.580 Guaranteed human.
00:00:05.140 Get Bell Pure Fiber Internet with Crave, Netflix, and Disney Plus
00:00:08.720 from $94 a month.
00:00:10.160 Price guaranteed for two years on Internet
00:00:12.040 with a two-year term and auto-pay credit.
00:00:14.400 Visit bell.ca for details and to check availability.
00:00:17.180 Bell. Connection is everything.
00:00:19.620 Run a business and not thinking about podcasting?
00:00:21.880 Think again.
00:00:22.520 More Americans listen to podcasts
00:00:23.980 than ad-supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora.
00:00:26.680 And as the number one podcaster,
00:00:28.060 iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined.
00:00:30.820 Learn how podcasting can help your business.
00:00:32.640 Call 844-844-IHEART.
00:00:34.920 If your bookshelf and your For You page
00:00:36.860 are equally important to your personality,
00:00:39.100 welcome home.
00:00:40.700 Pro Society is a weekly podcast
00:00:42.560 that's part book club, part group chat
00:00:44.480 for anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice
00:00:46.180 and Love Island deserve the same level of discourse.
00:00:48.920 Each week, we're connecting the dots
00:00:50.360 between books, the internet, and pop culture
00:00:52.460 with your favorite writers, book talk creators,
00:00:54.980 and plenty of overthought opinions.
00:00:57.080 Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app,
00:01:01.740 Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:01:05.020 I survived nine months in captivity,
00:01:07.980 and I've spent my life exploring how other people survive
00:01:11.700 what should have destroyed them.
00:01:13.700 I'm Elizabeth Smart, and these are the Survivor Files.
00:01:17.400 Every week, I'm with survivors who live through the unthinkable,
00:01:21.100 abducted, stalked, controlled, and nearly silenced.
00:01:24.740 These are stories about what it takes to make it out alive.
00:01:28.800 Listen to The Survivor Files with Elizabeth Smart on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:01:40.420 There Are No Girls on the Internet is a production of iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative.
00:01:48.540 I'm Bridget Todd, and this is There Are No Girls on the Internet.
00:01:51.280 you're listening to there are no girls on the internet where we explore the intersection of
00:01:57.580 technology social media and identity and this is another installment of our weekly news roundup
00:02:03.540 where we round up all the stories online that you might have missed so you don't have to
00:02:07.800 producer mike i think we have to gear up for a trump tantrum incoming because trump has been
00:02:16.920 saying for the longest time that he feels that he deserves the Nobel Peace Prize. I guess the
00:02:21.420 people who decide who deserves the Nobel Peace Prize and who doesn't disagreed because he didn't
00:02:27.420 win. He did not win. And also, he's like the only person on Earth who is aggressively campaigning to
00:02:34.820 win the Nobel Peace Prize. Like, it's so shameless. We were talking about this before we started
00:02:40.120 recording. But there was a time where most people did not care nor even know who the Nobel Peace
00:02:47.880 Prize winners were. I looked up a list this morning of the last the people who had won it for the last
00:02:52.640 30 years. I maybe I'm uninformed, but I only knew a handful of people on that list for the last 30
00:02:59.560 years. One of them, notably Barack Obama, did win it. I know who Barack Obama is. So anybody who
00:03:04.640 tells you otherwise is misinformed. However, you have these people who were acting like they were
00:03:09.480 very invested in who wins the Nobel Peace Prize all along. No, you weren't. You just want to be
00:03:14.160 a Trump sycophant. No, you weren't. Yeah. When we looked at that list, it really underscored to me
00:03:20.160 how American-centric our news bubble is. Like, I like to think of myself as a pretty informed guy,
00:03:25.580 but I didn't know, like, most of those people. And Donald Trump certainly did not.
00:03:30.380 No, of course not. So the Nobel Peace Prize's actual recipient is Venezuelan opposition leader
00:03:35.520 Maria Corina Machado. It sounds like a very deserved win. I did love this post on Blue Sky
00:03:41.780 from Kieran Healy. White House staff should just make and show Trump an AI-generated video where
00:03:47.180 he wins, fly him to Duluth and tell him it's Oslo, and dare the New York Times to say anything more
00:03:52.480 than experts disagree about whether or not Mr. Trump was awarded the Nobel Prize.
00:03:57.720 It's such a good solution because I know he would fall for it. And I know the New York Times would
00:04:02.840 go along with it like they wouldn't even need to be dared that would just be their default thing
00:04:06.600 that they would write no and absolutely a hundred percent for sure it would turn into a conversation
00:04:11.480 where who's to say what the truth is you know it just underscores this this fractured reality that
00:04:18.100 we're living in where some people say this some people say that and there's no expectation of
00:04:23.420 finding the actual truth anymore i genuinely feel that no and there would definitely be a new york
00:04:28.640 Times opinion piece about how, like, the truth is somewhere in the middle. But I do love this so
00:04:33.840 much. So as we're recording this, the news was just announced a few hours ago. So I don't believe
00:04:39.340 Trump has officially reacted yet or posted on his social media slash crypto platform. I can only
00:04:46.920 assume he is waking up and throwing things around in the Oval Office in a rage, which is a wonderful
00:04:54.240 image. But I just love this high level trolling from the Nobel committee, because after all of
00:05:02.400 Trump's bluster and like demands that he win, they chose to highlight this democracy activist
00:05:09.380 of a country that Trump is like murdering their citizens and threatening and perhaps actively
00:05:18.320 gearing up for war with. But like, it's really messed up what the Trump administration is doing
00:05:26.440 with Venezuela. And it's really scary. And I love so much that the Nobel Committee has lifted up
00:05:36.340 this democracy activist instead of giving into Trump. Yes. And speaking of this idea that if
00:05:45.660 the White House just told Trump that he won. You wouldn't really have people disputing that
00:05:50.440 probably in legacy media. They would be saying, oh, some people say he did, some people say he
00:05:55.400 didn't. That reminds me so much of this new open AI platform, Sora AI, their tool that lets anybody
00:06:02.080 make hyper-realistic AI videos from text prompts. It's kind of like Google's platform VO3, which
00:06:07.840 we've talked about extensively on the podcast. Have you seen any of the Sora AI videos on social
00:06:13.800 media? Or have you played with it yourself yet? I have not played with it myself. I'm actually
00:06:17.960 curious to, because we make this show. But I believe it's still invite only. So they're using
00:06:25.840 that exclusivity to gatekeep. And so I've seen a few videos, but have not directly used it myself
00:06:33.860 yet. So I have also not used it myself. And generally, I try to not give my opinion on
00:06:39.060 consumer tech that I have not personally played with. I've seen a couple of videos floating
00:06:43.480 around. I will say this. Some people, for whatever reason, do seem to like it. They seem to be
00:06:48.720 enjoying it. I have seen people creating videos using Sora and then posting it on social media.
00:06:53.480 And something that makes Sora unique is that it has a feature where people scan in their face or
00:06:58.540 their friends' faces and then put them in these AI-generated scenarios, which we'll talk more
00:07:02.460 about in a second. So I have a few friends, people that I trust who have posted Sora AI content,
00:07:09.800 and they were like, oh, it's so fun.
00:07:12.080 I'm having so much fun on this platform.
00:07:13.920 So I don't know.
00:07:15.420 I have not played with it myself
00:07:16.540 and maybe I will eat my words.
00:07:18.900 But I have seen people say this platform is so fun
00:07:23.000 and it's such a joyful experience
00:07:24.320 that it's going to rock social media.
00:07:26.920 And I just don't see it.
00:07:29.880 I really just don't see it.
00:07:31.360 Again, maybe I'll eat my words.
00:07:32.940 I'm happy to take this back
00:07:35.000 if it turns out that I'm incorrect.
00:07:36.140 But it really reminds me of a few years ago when a lot of folks were posting those AI-generated, futuristic-looking selfies on Facebook a few years ago.
00:07:46.120 I think the reason why people who are using it are saying it's so fun, they're just excited to see themselves and their friends in AI-generated scenarios.
00:07:56.100 Do you know what I mean?
00:07:56.780 I don't think that that necessarily means that the kind of content that is coming out of these platforms are interesting, unique, the kind of thing that's actually going to hold someone's attention.
00:08:05.580 i just think people are excited because hey that's me and my friend in a scenario it almost
00:08:11.020 reminds me of you might remember this do you ever yik yak i do from like the early internet like
00:08:18.420 we're talking early 2000s right yes so for folks who don't remember yik yak was this app from
00:08:25.420 i want to say 2013 oh apparently it just relaunched in 2021 so maybe we can get back on it
00:08:30.540 But you would take a picture of your face and you can put it in these animated cards.
00:08:36.500 So I remember making one for Christmas where it was my face and my best friend Kristen's face in the in like dancing animated elf.
00:08:45.320 So it looks it looks like our faces were on the bodies of elves and we were dancing and we sent it to all of our friends and we thought it was just hilarious.
00:08:51.800 That is genuinely what this reminds me of.
00:08:54.460 I think people are just excited to see their own faces and the faces of their friends in these AI generated scenarios.
00:09:01.260 When people post them on social media, they post in the handful of posts that I've seen.
00:09:05.880 People post them saying, oh, this is so incredible. Can you believe this? Can you believe this?
00:09:09.800 And it just reminds me of when people post super hyper specific to them content on social media.
00:09:16.140 And of course, they like it because it's about them. But will other people like it? I'm not so sure.
00:09:20.680 Yeah, I think you're absolutely right that it probably doesn't have a lot of staying power. Because for one thing, it's just like the novelty of like, oh, look, I can put myself in an AI generated video. It reminds me of something that one of my friends who is a visual artist told me about self portraits one time, how he considers them to be like one of the laziest forms of art.
00:09:44.680 art uh you can probably guess which friend this is uh because it's just it's just a subject that
00:09:50.600 is always there uh if you don't have any other ideas you can do it uh it's just like yourself
00:09:56.780 and i feel that that's a pretty good analogy for this kind of tech that is just like hey look it's
00:10:05.020 a picture of you this is like a mirror but there's some cool ai wizardry behind it well don't tell
00:10:12.600 that to Frida Kahlo but sure that's true yeah it wasn't my opinion it was his uh I know exactly
00:10:19.160 the person that you're talking about also I know uh that's true I should next time I see him I'm
00:10:25.280 gonna ask him about Frida but anyway we digress so I've actually seen tech tools that both remove
00:10:30.600 and add a Sora AI watermark to any video whether or not it's AI and whether or not it's made with
00:10:38.280 Sora because right now when you make these Sora AI videos there's a watermark that kind of moves
00:10:42.580 around that's kind of meant to be a way for anybody to see it and say, hey, that's AI,
00:10:47.680 even though it has not stopped people from commenting on videos that have that Sora AI
00:10:54.080 watermark as if these videos are real, which, again, I think it goes to show that it's not
00:10:58.720 just that these AI videos are hard to tell that they are AI, which it is hard to tell.
00:11:03.960 And it's not just that they're everywhere. It's that we live in this climate that has
00:11:07.820 completely eroded our trust in everything that we see online. And I know people are having fun with
00:11:13.660 it. I get it. I don't want to be a party pooper, but I just don't love it. I mean, I'll be a party
00:11:17.840 pooper. I feel that's like kind of my role on this show. Yeah, I think all those problems you
00:11:23.100 mentioned are also compounded by the ADD nature of social media, where everything is like fast
00:11:30.560 cuts super short form videos uh a lot of videos are only a few seconds long and no surprise people
00:11:39.140 when they're scrolling through videos are not taking the time to critically evaluate is this
00:11:44.840 real or not um before commenting which is unfortunate and we should do that but let's be
00:11:50.640 honest a lot of people don't uh i'm certainly guilty of the same and the algorithms uh in a
00:12:00.540 everything they can to encourage people to not critically evaluate. They just want to connect
00:12:07.160 with feelings and emotions to keep people clicking and engaged. Yes. And you know who is really
00:12:13.300 raising the alarm about that right now? Family members of famous dead people because Sora lets
00:12:18.740 anybody use the likeness of anyone, public figures, copyrighted characters, whoever.
00:12:23.520 So to back up a little bit, OpenAI's first position was that anybody who objected needed
00:12:28.380 to opt out of having their likeness used in this way on Sora, which to me is wild and
00:12:33.540 truly not how consent works in any other context where you would have to object and opt out.
00:12:40.080 Otherwise, it's just understood that you've given your consent.
00:12:43.020 But eventually, as Ars Technica reports, OpenAI was forced to change the way that Sora handles
00:12:47.840 fictional copyrighted works.
00:12:49.420 OpenAI CEO Sam Altman wrote this weekend that copyright holders now have to opt in to allow
00:12:55.080 their characters in Sora 2 videos rather than opting out as it was when the service first
00:12:59.920 launched. And those folks might share in some of the revenue from any Sora videos of their
00:13:04.780 characters. So OpenAI calls these cameos, which I do think is a pretty kind of genius bit of
00:13:11.940 marketing. This lets living users, including public figures, opt into Sora's cameo feature
00:13:17.660 by scanning their own face with their phone to drop themselves into any Sora scene with
00:13:22.580 remarkable fidelity. OpenAI says that Cameo users are, quote, in control of your likeness end to
00:13:28.500 end. And the feature is designed, quote, to ensure that your audio and image likeness are used with
00:13:33.840 your consent. Folks might have seen that Logan Paul opted in. And since then, there's been a
00:13:39.480 flood of AI videos of him coming out as gay, which he actually spoke up and said, oh, I don't love
00:13:45.360 these videos. They're kind of causing me issues. But I guess he opted into them. So what are you
00:13:50.040 going to do? Obviously, dead public figures cannot consent to opt into this feature, and they're all
00:13:56.600 over the platform. When OpenAI was asked about this, they basically said, yeah, that's the
00:14:01.560 situation. So already I have seen Sora AI-generated videos of things like Stephen Hawking in his
00:14:09.780 wheelchair, but he's doing skateboard tricks on a skateboard ramp, or Kurt Cobain from Nirvana
00:14:16.260 eating a bunch of KFC chicken fingers.
00:14:19.220 I don't know why one of the early use cases in this
00:14:22.860 is bringing back dead celebrities,
00:14:25.680 but there you have it.
00:14:27.240 And that's also how you end up with content
00:14:29.340 like AI-generated Martin Luther King
00:14:31.620 giving his I Have a Dream speech at a podium,
00:14:34.420 but instead of words, he's making racist monkey noises.
00:14:38.640 I have seen a ton of MLK AI-generated content
00:14:42.480 being made with Sora.
00:14:43.480 I saw content where he was eating a crab boil with Malcolm X.
00:14:49.200 I saw content where instead of giving his speech, he gives that, do you know, that meme of the kid who is saying, do you ever believe you think you have dreamed that you think you could do anything?
00:14:59.400 Have you ever had a dream that you you had your you could you'll do you want you could do so you'll do you you want you want them.
00:15:09.200 Where when Martin Luther King gets up to give his speech, that's what he says.
00:15:12.220 And the wildest thing to me is that Bernice King, MLK's daughter, says that people send her these videos, not necessarily to try to troll her because they don't like her.
00:15:23.180 They send her these videos because they think she might like it.
00:15:27.700 And Zelda Williams, daughter of the actor Robin Williams, who died by suicide, shared that she also doesn't like this, that people will send her these AI generated videos of her late father, maybe thinking that she will like it or get a kick out of it.
00:15:41.400 In a statement, she said,
00:15:42.660 please just stop sending me AI videos of dad.
00:15:45.240 Stop believing I want to see it or that I'll understand.
00:15:47.480 I don't and I won't.
00:15:49.220 If you're trying to troll me, I've seen way worse.
00:15:51.360 I'll restrict and move on.
00:15:52.720 But please, if you've got any decency,
00:15:54.540 just stop doing this to him and to me,
00:15:56.560 to everyone even, full stop. 0.99
00:15:58.080 It's dumb. 1.00
00:15:58.660 It's a waste of time and energy. 0.99
00:16:00.040 And believe me, it's not what he would want.
00:16:02.640 To watch the legacies of real people be condensed down to
00:16:05.360 this vaguely looks and sounds like them,
00:16:07.340 so that's enough.
00:16:08.060 Just so people can churn out horrible TikTok slop, puppeteering them is maddening.
00:16:13.340 You're not making art. 0.87
00:16:14.460 You're making disgusting, over-processed hot dogs out of the lives of human beings, out 0.87
00:16:19.140 of history and art and music, and then shoving them down someone else's throat, hoping they'll
00:16:23.720 give you a little thumbs up and like it.
00:16:25.740 Gross.
00:16:26.640 AI is just badly recycling and regurgitating the past to be consumed. 0.88
00:16:30.820 You are taking in the human centipede of content.
00:16:33.380 And from the very, very end of the line, all while folks at the front laugh and laugh, consume and consume.
00:16:39.880 That is a powerful condemnation of AI.
00:16:44.540 And she's not wrong.
00:16:46.260 It's really pretty gross that this is like one of the big use cases of this technology.
00:16:52.780 And you mentioned that in response to threatened copyright lawsuits, OpenAI changed their policy to require copyrighted characters to be opted in.
00:17:00.160 And, you know, that seems all well and good for the owners of the copyrights. But that policy is doing nothing to protect the descendants of these recently deceased public figures like Zelda Williams or Steve Irwin's kids. And I think that's a pretty good example of the inhumanity of these tech companies and AI companies in particular, that they'll go out of their way to protect copyrighted assets before protecting real humans.
00:17:25.960 I can't help but think of that new law they have in Denmark to try to push back against this. It grants every living person in the country copyright to their likeness. As AI continues to blur the line between fiction and real life, I remain hopeful, I guess, that that kind of solution to protecting people is going to be viable.
00:17:47.680 Yeah. And I have to add, and this is a little bit of a tangent, but when my mom passed away last year, my mom was my mom was somewhat of a public figure. She was definitely a public figure in our town. And I don't know. I think that people really need to understand what it feels like when you are grieving someone, someone that you had an intimate, private relationship with that nobody else in the world had.
00:18:12.900 even though people might think that they had an intimate relationship with that person,
00:18:17.560 they didn't. They, you know, they might have liked them or enjoyed their work or respected
00:18:22.040 them, whatever. When your loved one, your deceased loved one, when their image and likeness and
00:18:27.660 story is taken in that way, it just really hurts. And it's so confusing. And the fact that there's
00:18:35.480 a dynamic where the people who do this and the people that profit from it think that you might
00:18:40.060 like it just disgusts me. So I've certainly never experienced this on the level of Zelda Williams
00:18:45.720 or Bernice King, but I know a little bit about how invasive that feels. And then the feeling of
00:18:52.380 it being out of your control, right? The feeling of, I cannot, I cannot stop this. I cannot stop
00:18:58.380 the internet. So, you know how they say like, once something's on the internet, it's on the
00:19:01.620 internet forever. Imagine that feeling when the intimacy and the privacy of somebody that you are
00:19:07.320 grieving somebody that you have lost, it's taken and you know there's nothing that you could do
00:19:11.240 about it. It's just out there in the ether because people decided it belonged to them and it doesn't.
00:19:16.400 I think there's really something so wrong about this. And then hearing people say, oh, but the
00:19:22.420 platform is a lot of fun. I can see myself and my friends. Look, I made a video where it looks like
00:19:27.280 we're doing a funny thing. I don't think that's a fair trade-off, but I also understand that we
00:19:32.720 don't have a culture that asks people to understand the stakes of that trade-off. They will only
00:19:36.980 understand it if it happens to them. And I hope it doesn't because it fucking sucks. So, yeah, 1.00
00:19:41.120 I'm very it's a little hard for me to see people just talking about how they don't care about any
00:19:47.780 of those issues that you just brought up, Mike, because this platform is fun for a laugh and it
00:19:51.920 gives them a dopamine hit and they can make a little bit of content with their friends and get
00:19:54.880 20 likes on it or whatever. Boy, yeah, thanks for sharing that. You mentioned consent a little bit
00:20:00.680 earlier in this discussion, and I do think that's a good framework to understand this, where I get
00:20:06.820 the sense that a lot of these videos that people are making are just for laughs or for trolling
00:20:11.740 which is messed up in its own way but it it's really interesting that some of these people
00:20:17.100 sending these ai slop videos to the to people that feature their deceased parents thinking that
00:20:24.360 they're going to like it it just seems really interesting and that seems like something
00:20:28.020 different than just fun and lulls it seems like this technology it's enabling the creators of
00:20:36.260 these videos to be in relationship with the deceased person. And, you know, it's certainly
00:20:43.840 not new that celebrities have had fans where the fans want to have be in relationship with the
00:20:52.080 person. And I think that's a big, you know, it's related to why people listen to podcasts. People
00:20:55.920 like to connect with the hosts that they like. And, you know, it can feel like a bit of a
00:21:02.120 parasocial relationship and hosts like to connect with their fans as well but there's a separation
00:21:07.280 there i think there's a way to look at this technology where it is a way to non-consensually
00:21:12.500 break down that separation and be like no we are in relationship whether you or your deceased
00:21:19.320 parent consent to it or not and it's gross and and people shouldn't do it and not for nothing
00:21:27.840 I promise you that if Zelda Williams or Bernice King wanted to use AI to make this kind of content
00:21:33.460 about their dead fathers, they could. You don't need to send it to them. They have access to the
00:21:38.560 same internet that everybody else has access to. If they wanted to make these videos, they could.
00:21:43.880 Yes, and making them with AI strips the uniqueness of these figures that made them
00:21:52.140 the exceptional public figures that they are. Every time you run something through AI,
00:21:56.680 It just makes it feel right based on all of the other data that was used to train the model and strips away a little of that uniqueness.
00:22:09.960 So in using these people, these deceased figures, it diminishes them, which which is another part of what's, I don't know, not great about it.
00:22:21.780 That's what when Zelda says that it's the human centipede of content, that's exactly what she's referring to, I think.
00:22:28.440 And it's yeah, I've changed my mind.
00:22:30.660 I don't think Sora is good.
00:22:31.980 I don't I don't mind being a party pooper about this one.
00:22:34.800 Not good.
00:22:35.740 I don't like it.
00:22:36.900 Yeah.
00:22:41.020 Let's take a quick break.
00:22:42.100 get bell pure fiber internet with crave netflix and disney plus from 94 a month price guaranteed
00:22:53.940 for two years on internet with a two-year term and auto pay credit visit bell.ca for details
00:22:58.980 and to check availability bell connection is everything run a business and not thinking
00:23:04.380 about podcasting think again more americans listen to podcasts than ad supported streaming
00:23:09.260 music from spotify and pandora and as the number one podcaster iheart's twice as large as the next
00:23:14.460 two combined so whatever your customers listen to they'll hear your message plus only iheart can
00:23:19.460 extend your message to audiences across broadcast radio think podcasting can help your business
00:23:24.140 think iheart streaming radio and podcasting call 844-844-iheart to get started that's 844-844-iheart
00:23:32.960 When I was 14 years old, I was kidnapped and held captive for nine months.
00:23:39.140 I survived, and I've spent my life exploring how other people survive what should have destroyed them.
00:23:45.500 I'm Elizabeth Smart, and these are the Survivor Files.
00:23:49.200 I just remember this low, taunting voice next to my ear saying, 0.99
00:23:54.620 Shut up. Don't say anything. 0.99
00:23:57.280 Every week, I'm with survivors who live through the unthinkable.
00:24:01.820 I knew if he woke up, without a doubt, he was going to hurt me.
00:24:06.280 I started feeling that there was someone at the end of my bed, and I just started screaming.
00:24:13.900 They are abducted, stalked, controlled, and nearly silenced.
00:24:17.800 But these aren't stories about what's taken from them.
00:24:21.240 They're stories about what it takes to make it out alive.
00:24:24.360 Listen to The Survivor Files with Elizabeth Smart on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:24:33.320 If your bookshelf and your For You page are equally important to your personality, welcome home.
00:24:39.260 This is Prose Society, the weekly podcast that's part book club, part group chat for thought daughters, pop culture obsessives, and anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice and Love Island deserve the same level of discourse.
00:24:51.720 I'm Eli Rallo, and every week we're connecting the dots between books, the internet, and the conversations everyone can't stop having.
00:24:58.840 I'm going to have to look up this story. I'm obsessed. I'm obsessed.
00:25:02.420 From best-selling authors and your favorite book talk creators to the latest pop culture moments, nothing is off the table.
00:25:08.360 It's like if you can hide some real messages inside compelling characters, then that is a Trojan horse.
00:25:15.840 Whether you're looking for literary deep dives, smart pop culture conversations, or a community of readers who love to think a little too much, you're in the right place.
00:25:25.460 Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:25:31.480 See you between the pages.
00:25:38.580 And we're back.
00:25:41.900 What else don't you like, Bridget? 1.00
00:25:43.600 Well, I don't love what Google is allegedly doing to their women in tech initiatives. 0.99
00:25:48.780 So this is a little bit of a developing story.
00:25:51.340 Is Google dropping their women tech makers initiative?
00:25:54.240 So I saw this post in the women in tech subreddit on Reddit.
00:25:57.260 It reads, I was part of Google's initiative, Women Tech Makers, or WTM for short.
00:26:02.760 Our job was to organize events and help other women find their way in the tech sphere.
00:26:07.380 Occasionally, we will be invited to Google events with travel costs covered and merch.
00:26:10.860 Nothing big, but it was nice to be acknowledged.
00:26:13.600 while also supporting women in STEM.
00:26:15.540 Since the end of last year, beginning of this one,
00:26:17.540 support was dwindling.
00:26:19.040 First, they stopped hosting webinars,
00:26:21.120 then made us request funding pre-approved
00:26:23.580 and would only pay us back what they thought was reasonable
00:26:25.780 and not what we had spent, our own money out of pocket.
00:26:28.780 The final blow was when they invited us to the event in Europe
00:26:31.300 and provided zero travel cost funding for us,
00:26:34.480 while Google Developers Group, their other initiative,
00:26:37.160 received what 100% of their travel paid for.
00:26:40.440 Like that wasn't bad enough.
00:26:41.680 They didn't allow us to come to the Community Mixer. 1.00
00:26:44.820 Women Techmakers was the only community not allowed to join the community event. 0.64
00:26:49.980 Now they straight kick us out of the platform, removing all access to the resources and new home us to some nonprofit, painting it as a fantastic opportunity and how cool it would be.
00:27:01.160 Seven years of being an ambassador, curated and organized more than 40 events, including huge IT conferences with 400 plus attendees, a team of 13 women.
00:27:09.580 Everything is now in shambles and demoralized because the big G decided that the community
00:27:14.040 that was promoting and supporting women in STEM is too DEI for their brand.
00:27:18.600 So that sounded pretty messed up to me.
00:27:20.720 A lot of the comments were essentially saying, yes, this has been the vibe.
00:27:25.220 You know, they have been, their support has been dwindling.
00:27:27.680 So I did some digging and I found a piece that explains that Google officially did hand
00:27:32.200 over their women technakers to a nonprofit called Technovation, a nonprofit that says
00:27:37.360 that they've spent nearly 20 years empowering young innovators to solve real world problems
00:27:41.560 through tech and entrepreneurship. I want to be clear that tech novation sounds good. Like this
00:27:47.440 is not to besmirch them at all. They seem genuinely interested in supporting women tech makers. And
00:27:53.100 it is entirely possible that they're capable of doing more with this program and taking this
00:27:57.320 program further than Google ever did or ever would. So I'm not trying to besmirch them at all.
00:28:03.240 But even the name Technovation, like taking identity out of it specifically is telling to me.
00:28:11.400 And I also really couldn't find this explained anywhere.
00:28:15.540 If this was really meant to be this fantastic thing, this fantastic partnership with these great opportunities,
00:28:21.680 like Google told the women tech makers ambassadors that it was going to be for them,
00:28:26.260 I would then expect Google to make some comment about it somewhere or announce it on the Google blog.
00:28:31.900 However, it seems like Google is keeping this move a little bit quiet.
00:28:37.020 When you go to the Women Techmakers site, it now just says,
00:28:40.940 Women Techmakers is now with Technovation, a trusted organization dedicated to empowering girls and women in STEM,
00:28:46.660 and then redirects you to the Technovation site.
00:28:49.520 In a piece called Google Women Techmakers Moves to Technovation But Not Everyone is Cheering,
00:28:54.540 it explains, quote,
00:28:55.760 For many longtime ambassadors, this transition feels less like a celebration and more like closure for something that had already been quietly fading.
00:29:03.840 Several members say the signs were there as early as late 2024, with dwindling support, fewer sponsored events, and an overall sense that Google's enthusiasm for the program was waning.
00:29:14.060 That is disappointing. And just the way that this fits so neatly with the larger trends of companies that aren't just retreating from diversity commitments that they have made and have supported for years, but seemingly like performatively running from them to demonstrate to the Trump administration and their allies how anti-woke they are.
00:29:37.440 It's just so disappointing and depressing, but I guess it really shouldn't be surprising that these giant tech companies were not as firmly behind those commitments as they claimed to be back when that was the en vogue thing to do.
00:29:57.480 yes and when it was the in vogue thing to do they did it with such fanfare such pr pushes they really
00:30:04.300 wanted a lot of attention attention for doing this and now that they're retreating they want
00:30:08.620 to do it quietly and i just i i don't think that's fair if you said it with your full chest when it
00:30:15.200 was in vogue that you were doing this say it with your full chest that you are abandoning these
00:30:20.020 commitments that you no longer want to do this and that's what you're going to be doing i don't like
00:30:24.520 that they're doing it quietly.
00:30:26.060 It feels a bit sneaky to me.
00:30:27.860 And Google can say whatever they want,
00:30:29.700 but I do, as you said,
00:30:31.060 think it's a clear symbol
00:30:32.160 of how vocally championing women
00:30:35.020 and other marginalized folks in technology 0.59
00:30:36.900 is so easily and callously discarded
00:30:40.060 by some of these big companies and institutions,
00:30:42.500 especially given that tech layoffs
00:30:45.360 are rampant right now
00:30:46.540 and that they have disproportionately impacted
00:30:49.160 marginalized people like women.
00:30:51.480 One study by Eightfold AI
00:30:52.800 found that women are more than 65% more likely than men to lose their jobs in tech layoffs.
00:30:57.780 The Women Tech Council reported that women were 1.6 times more likely to be let go than their male
00:31:02.120 peers. Another study from Reveilio Labs back in 2022 found that Black workers make up 6.05% of 0.86
00:31:09.360 the tech workforce, but accounted for 7.42% of all tech layoffs. So they were laid off at a higher
00:31:15.600 rate than their proportion of tech employment. Same is true for Latino or Latinx workers who
00:31:20.680 are definitely overrepresented in tech layoffs.
00:31:22.900 And so I think against that backdrop, Google also backing away from all of these commitments
00:31:28.720 that they made for marginalized people in STEM and tech, it's just craven to be so sneaky
00:31:33.940 about it against that backdrop. 0.68
00:31:36.220 Yes.
00:31:36.540 And if the MO here is to do it quietly, you know, and we still notice some of these big
00:31:44.720 things like, you know, supporting a an initiative to organize conferences for women in tech.
00:31:51.180 When the funding for that goes away, people notice there's no way to do that, like completely
00:31:55.580 behind closed doors because it was a public basing event. But things like employment and
00:32:00.600 who gets laid off or not, that's so much harder to see. And so if they're doing the publicly
00:32:05.860 visible stuff quietly on the down low, it just makes you have to wonder what is going on with
00:32:13.100 things that are less visible like you just mentioned those employment or those layoff
00:32:18.400 statistics and also those layoff statistics they're all for uh you know you you mentioned
00:32:25.320 that women are more like we're being more likely to be laid off during this round of tech layoffs
00:32:30.520 uh black workers were latinx workers are and those are independent effects i have to suspect based on
00:32:38.700 decades of evidence uh that the interactive effects the the intersectional effects are even 0.63
00:32:48.560 greater right where like you can have the independent effect of uh if if you're a black
00:32:53.380 tech worker you're more likely being laid off as that revelio lab study found uh if you're a woman 0.88
00:33:00.380 you're more likely to be laid off than your male peers as that women tech council report uh found
00:33:06.240 I don't have the numbers in front of me, but I would bet good money that even above those independent effects, being a black woman in tech right now puts one at even greater risk of layoff than just the independent additive effects of being black and a woman.
00:33:25.440 We've seen that so many times in analyses of labor statistics.
00:33:32.020 Oh, absolutely. Right.
00:33:33.740 I mean, I can confirm they probably wanted to get rid of us first, you know, but let's use this tech climate to get her out of here.
00:33:41.740 And I think to put all of this back into perspective, even if you don't work at one of these companies, it is better for all of us.
00:33:48.380 It is safer for all of us.
00:33:49.660 Our tech landscape is better when the people who are making the decisions about the technology that we all use look like the people who will use that technology.
00:33:58.020 And, yeah, it's not just about, I know I've said this a million times, inclusion at tech companies is not just the right thing to do ethically, which it is.
00:34:07.720 It also makes technology in the entire tech landscape better, safer for all of us, everyone.
00:34:13.980 We just talked about Sora from a consent framework, right?
00:34:17.380 How it's, you know, from a certain perspective, it is violating consent in a way that is harming people. 0.51
00:34:22.880 You have to suspect that if most of the people working on that project were women, they might be weighting consent a little bit higher in their policies. 0.61
00:34:33.400 Oh, it reminds me so much of the story we talked about when Instagram rolled out that feature that displayed all of your stories on an interactive map. 0.74
00:34:42.860 I think that how they rolled that out would be totally different if they had more women making decisions about that kind of technology. 0.83
00:34:50.280 The way they, I really will take this to the bank, the way they rolled out a tool that allows you to see on a map where photos were taken, I think if they had more women making decisions, they would have rolled that out a little bit differently because most women will tell you, yeah, I don't really love the idea, even if it's not show it tracking my real-time location, I don't love the idea of giving the internet or whoever a visual map of my frequent locations. 0.89
00:35:14.780 Yeah. I mean, this conversation is getting pretty close to the core essential premise of this show, which is that women and girls are so often the subject of the Internet, but often left out of decisions about how it is shaped and how it functions. 0.57
00:35:38.200 Yeah, that reminds me of this thread post that I saw from Kento Morita that says,
00:35:43.000 us, we can make anyone, any being in the world with this new technology.
00:35:46.920 They can be genderless.
00:35:48.040 They can be a mystic creature. 0.69
00:35:49.400 What should we do first? 1.00
00:35:50.580 Developers, make a woman that does what we tell them. 1.00
00:35:53.740 References, Tilly Norwood, that AI actress we talked about last week. 0.68
00:35:57.360 Alexa, Siri, Google Assistant, Eliza. 1.00
00:35:59.680 The way that consuming and controlling women and girls is at the core of our entire tech ecosystem, it just is. 1.00
00:36:09.240 You see it everywhere. 1.00
00:36:11.540 Yeah, and we see it in the content that is produced.
00:36:15.900 We see it in the boards and leadership of tech companies.
00:36:22.200 And we see it in the images and the language that makes up the Internet.
00:36:28.420 So it's funny that you bring this up because I was reading this study that basically suggests that on the Internet, in technology, all the grown women are actually girls.
00:36:38.380 This is according to new research from Solene Delacorte, who is an assistant professor at UC Berkeley's Haas School of Business and the co-author of this study published in Nature, where researchers looked at images and text across some of the most well-trafficked spots on the Internet, ChatGPT, Google, Wikipedia, IMDB, and found that women are regularly depicted as younger than men and devalued in the real world and real world spaces because of it.
00:37:05.460 This was such a cool study and just staggeringly impressive in its methods and its scope and its ambition.
00:37:14.860 I just wanted to shout that out before you get into it.
00:37:17.560 They had over 6,000 human coders rating over 650,000 images.
00:37:25.740 It's like a breathtaking amount of data and it's orders of magnitude more data than many studies that look at similar topics.
00:37:33.600 We'll link to it in the show notes. And it's and also I want to give him credit for like it is a pretty accessible read as far as studies go.
00:37:41.520 I found it quite accessible. Yeah. As our resident podcast scientist, I knew that you would be excited to talk about the methodology.
00:37:49.740 How did I know that you were going to have a little big up to the methodology used in the study?
00:37:54.760 But I read a summary of the study in Mother Jones called It's True. 0.99
00:37:58.340 the internet skews the reality of women and men in the workforce. And it really is quite
00:38:03.320 interesting. So basically, the researchers analyzed over half a million images from Google search
00:38:08.520 in which women consistently appeared younger than men. This serves as a measure of cultural bias
00:38:13.360 because it's basically trying to give you content that you are most likely to click on.
00:38:17.200 That is from co-author Douglas Gulbolt, who is an associate professor at Stanford. He said,
00:38:22.420 that has a way of being prone to bias because it ends up just amplifying whatever most people
00:38:26.540 click on. So across the internet, women are most commonly shown in their 20s, while men are usually
00:38:33.320 shown in their 40s or 50s. And it's not just that women in these images look younger. Often, they
00:38:40.000 are younger. On IMDb and Wikipedia, the researchers were able to collect information about the actual
00:38:45.560 ages of the people in these photos that were all over the internet, and that trend really persisted.
00:38:50.600 So importantly, this trend does not accurately reflect reality. In both online images and text, the researchers found similar skewed depictions of men and women in thousands of occupations and other categories.
00:39:04.460 But in census data across most of those fields examined, there were no age differences among men and women.
00:39:11.460 In the few professions where an age gap existed in the census data, the women tended to be older on average than men.
00:39:18.680 But the online images presented an inverted picture.
00:39:22.200 The pattern we see in the data just does not match reality, Devacourt said.
00:39:26.000 The average woman in the U.S. and actually in the world has a higher life expectancy.
00:39:30.380 The average woman is older, so what we see in online images and text and videos is wrong.
00:39:36.500 So the internet is really out here making us think that the only women around are younger than we actually are.
00:39:43.160 Even in situations where the data confirms, okay, women in these specific positions do tend to be older,
00:39:49.000 even in those situations, the women are still reflected as younger than we actually are.
00:39:53.640 Not just in the United States, globally.
00:39:55.320 And since, as the study said, this is all being shaped by our biases, I guess this is just anti-older woman bias being reflected back at us via the Internet.
00:40:05.420 It speaks to this assumption that underlies so many of these large language models and AI tools.
00:40:15.280 There's this assumption that the trading data, right, they're scraping data from the Internet, all the different corners of these huge corpuses of text and images.
00:40:25.000 And I think there's often an assumption that that data accurately represents the real world, the natural world.
00:40:33.400 But it definitely does not. It reflects what people want to see on the Internet, what platforms want to serve up to people on the Internet.
00:40:44.220 And so it is not at all surprising that, you know, the distribution of women's ages in photos on the Internet is not a perfect match for the distribution of women's ages among the living women on the world.
00:41:02.460 These are two different things. The internet, the images that are on the internet are serving a particular purpose. And like in that sense, it's not a new idea. But I think it's very easy to forget that fact when we're talking about training data or a bunch of other phenomena about the internet.
00:41:24.780 And I think this study has done a really good job of numerically quantifying that gap, that difference between the real world and the data that exists on the Internet.
00:41:39.720 Yeah. And something else about that study is that they really make it clear that even though these images do not reflect reality, it goes on to shape our perception of IRL reality.
00:41:50.920 This age gap myth impacts how people view women in the workplace.
00:41:54.680 As part of the study, the researchers asked participants to find photos of people working across different professions.
00:41:59.680 When the participants selected photos of women, they assumed that the people with that job would generally be younger and have less experience.
00:42:06.380 And it is funny to me, just as a woman of a certain age, you know, I do think that people have this idea that when you hit 30 as a woman, you basically dig a grave and crawl into it and die.
00:42:22.440 you are pretty much out to pasture. I do think that there is an impression that there aren't
00:42:29.460 women in their 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s out here living our dynamic lives that once you hit a certain age
00:42:36.260 as a woman, you just go out to a lovely idyllic farm and they give you some overalls and you're 0.59
00:42:41.380 never to be seen from again. You're certainly not in public. You're certainly not making podcasts
00:42:45.280 and living your life and on television. They just give you a pair of overalls, a sun hat,
00:42:50.700 some clogs a thriller novel and a mug of cranberry tea and they send you to that pasture i mean
00:42:57.380 except for the part of being sent out to pasture that does kind of sound like something that you 0.98
00:43:00.640 would like no being being a woman of a certain age fucking rocks right you don't first of all 0.99
00:43:05.780 you don't give a shit what anybody has to say about you you're like whatever you say about me 1.00
00:43:08.960 go ahead and say it that's fine with me you completely stop giving a shit about the way 0.99
00:43:14.440 that you present physically all of that all of that stuff is for you and anybody who doesn't 0.97
00:43:18.660 like I could kick rock, you basically become whoever it was you wanted to be or were at 15 or
00:43:24.040 16. But this time around, you're totally cool with it. You've got zero insecurity about it.
00:43:28.360 And if you're lucky, you've got a little bit of coin to support whatever that thing is.
00:43:32.740 Tea, herbal tea really hits different. I feel sometimes I'm drinking a lot less these days,
00:43:37.280 and sometimes a good mug of herbal tea really does hit different. Aging is awesome. And anybody
00:43:42.740 who tells you otherwise just hasn't hit that age yet. I've heard people say that this is what they
00:43:47.620 love about the Real Housewives franchises, that they show women in this age bracket that you're
00:43:55.200 talking about, just demolishing those stereotypes of what they're supposed to be doing with their
00:44:02.020 lives. I'm sure that you got that from me because that is exactly what I love about these shows.
00:44:07.220 Like, Ramona Singer is almost 70 years old. Where else are you going to see a woman in her late 60s
00:44:14.320 throwing back box wine and throw an ass where else are you going to see that i want to see that i 0.99
00:44:19.520 want i want i think we need reminders that people live full dynamic lives into their 70s we we need 1.00
00:44:27.700 to dispel this notion that you just fall off a fucking cliff or crawl into a grave once you hit
00:44:33.000 30 especially as women and you don't there's not really a lot of places where you get to see what 0.97
00:44:37.780 that looks like bravo for better or for worse is giving it to us and i like it i don't know i feel
00:44:44.080 like every conversation comes back to Housewives with me. You know, I'm like an algorithm. I'm
00:44:49.940 just trying to give you what you want. It's talking about Housewives. More after a quick break. 1.00
00:45:06.540 Let's get right back into it. Okay, I have to give a trigger warning to this story because it is
00:45:12.060 very disturbing, but I don't think it's gotten a ton of coverage, so I did want to quickly talk
00:45:16.660 about it. And that is a story out of New Jersey, where 17-year-old Vincent Battalaro was charged
00:45:22.460 with intentionally hitting and killing two 17-year-old girls, Isabel Salas and Maria
00:45:28.340 Neotis, at 70 miles per hour with his car as they rode e-bikes around their house. So before this,
00:45:35.480 Vincent shared these rambling live streams. He was a YouTuber who would YouTube about sports,
00:45:42.060 but also, according to New Jersey Today, would also talk about his need for vengeance against
00:45:46.900 one of these girls. He would post these rants on YouTube Live about false allegations against him,
00:45:53.300 including child sexual exploitation material, and this one girl from his school who was causing him
00:45:59.800 legal trouble, he said. So he really blamed 17-year-old Maria, one of the girls that he
00:46:05.360 would go on to kill, and her mother for, I guess, legal trouble and legal problems he was having at
00:46:10.800 school. And he began harassing her, according to her neighbors and family. He delivered pizzas to
00:46:16.620 her house, the kind that you're meant to pay cash for upon delivery, as some kind of a bizarre
00:46:21.840 revenge for what he says was a critical post on social media that she made about Charlie Kirk
00:46:28.440 after Kirk's death. So after he delivered these pizzas to her house, Vincent went on YouTube and
00:46:33.220 said, whenever Maria sees the pizza guy come, better think of Charlie Kirk for making fun of 0.99
00:46:37.760 his fucking death. Stupid ass clown. Just remember that. So he started stalking her, even staking at 1.00
00:46:43.940 her home in the months before he struck and killed her and her friend Isabella as they rode their
00:46:48.360 bikes on the street. So her mom basically had been reporting this creep to the police for harassing
00:46:53.880 her daughter for a while. And it just genuinely sounds like nothing was done. According to NJ
00:46:59.380 Advanced, Vincent even referenced all of this, the fact that her mom had been reporting this and
00:47:04.860 nothing was done on his live stream. He referenced a police investigation several times on his live
00:47:10.040 stream this summer saying because I got into her relationship business and now the school and now
00:47:15.440 I'm going to tell you all this. Cops got involved in the school, got involved in the shit. Somehow 1.00
00:47:19.620 they're believing this crap. They suspended me basically indefinitely until they figured it out, 0.99
00:47:23.900 which makes, again, no sense. But by June, he said the police told him, quote, that the case is going
00:47:29.000 to be dismissed and I am not going to be facing any charges, he said during a live stream. He also
00:47:34.040 compared himself to an ex-Dodgers pitcher, Trevor Bauer, who was suspended over sexual assault
00:47:39.480 allegations back in 2021, but never faced any criminal charges. Vincent said on his live stream,
00:47:44.860 quote, I'm basically cleared of any wrongdoing. It says a lot. It says a lot. If they're closing
00:47:49.100 the case on me for this and they're bringing me back to school, it says how much of an innocent
00:47:53.000 I was in the first place. Now, people are trying to treat me like Trevor Bauer to make me feel like
00:47:57.300 the bad person. So I wanted to talk about this, one, because I don't feel like it's gotten enough
00:48:02.360 coverage that this person who was holding out a vendetta against one of these girls for comments
00:48:08.180 she allegedly made about Charlie Kirk ended up murdering her after harassing her both in person
00:48:13.140 and online. And I wanted to bring it up because it is absolutely tale as old as time that a woman 0.51
00:48:18.420 or a girl reports dangerous behavior that typically has an online component. Nothing is done. It is
00:48:25.680 it is belittled it is dismissed it is chalked up to just oh it's just internet whatever and then
00:48:32.640 when nothing is done it leads to larger violence that could have been prevented this it sounds
00:48:38.220 like to me this was preventable the fact that this girl's mom had been reporting this creep
00:48:42.640 for a long time and there's a documented even he talks about this documented history of these
00:48:48.540 reports and saying oh they found out i was innocent they dismissed it was nothing there
00:48:51.540 I was innocent. I was innocent. Just goes to show that when we do not take online harms against
00:48:57.100 women and girls seriously, it has violent consequences. Absolutely. What a tragic story.
00:49:03.720 I cannot begin to imagine the rage that that mom must feel that she clocked this guy as a threat.
00:49:12.780 She was reporting him to the authorities and nothing was done. And then he made good on that
00:49:19.920 threat. It's such a failure. And I don't know enough about this. I don't I don't want to just
00:49:27.200 blame the police. I don't want to blame the school. It's hard to know exactly who should be
00:49:32.340 responsible and accountable here. But clearly, this was a huge failure. And it's so tragic.
00:49:40.800 Tragic and preventable. OK, well, switching gears a little bit, will you allow me to talk
00:49:47.360 about drake really quickly yes please we need a palate cleanser after that last story okay so do
00:49:53.380 you understand how deep a diss track has to hit for the target of said diss track to try to sue
00:50:00.480 over it because that is what drake did so after kendrick lamar's epic diss track not like us that
00:50:08.420 basically was a song of the summer where lamar heavily implies that drake is a pedophile and
00:50:15.460 And I mean, not for nothing, Drake did have some kind of a friendship with Millie Bobby Brown when she was 14 and he was 31,
00:50:23.440 where Millie Bobby Brown said, oh, we're we're buds.
00:50:25.860 We text all the time.
00:50:26.840 And I don't know, maybe this is just the old woman in me talking. 0.99
00:50:29.440 But what the fuck would a 31 year old have to be texting a 14 year old about? 0.99
00:50:34.860 Nothing good. 0.99
00:50:36.140 Exactly.
00:50:36.620 So as we like to say in the South, a hit dog will holler, I guess.
00:50:40.960 And Drake was so hit that he took it to the courts. 0.99
00:50:44.580 Damn, that is sad. 0.98
00:50:47.280 Like, I grew up in the 90s when rappers were shooting each other, right? 0.99
00:50:53.460 Which is obviously, like, very bad.
00:50:55.520 But, like, we have come a long way to file a lawsuit.
00:51:00.880 Like, come on, Drake.
00:51:02.460 Well, this week, the court deemed that a song that implies someone is a sex criminal is not legally actionable.
00:51:10.000 So this is from Billboard.
00:51:10.860 A federal judge dismissed Drake's defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group over Kendrick Lamar's Not Like Us, ruling that a, quote, war of words during a heated rap battle did not violate the law in that some of the case was logically incoherent.
00:51:26.360 So Drake filed this suit earlier this year, claiming that UMG, the music company, defamed him by releasing Kendrick Lamar's diss track, which tarred him as a, quote, certified pedophile.
00:51:39.280 He likes to call himself a certified lover boy, more like a certified pedophile.
00:51:43.140 Drake argued that millions of people took that lyric literally, severely harming his reputation.
00:51:48.520 But this week, the judge granted UMG's motion to dismiss that case, ruling that Kendrick's insulting lyrics were the kind of hyperbole that cannot be defamatory because listeners would not think they were statements a fact.
00:52:01.560 The judge ruled that, quote, the artist's seven-track rap battle was a war of words that was the subject of substantial media scrutiny and online discourse.
00:52:09.580 Although the accusation that the plaintiff is a pedophile is certainly a serious one, the broader context of a heated rat battle with incendiary language and offensive accusations hurled by both participants would not incline a reasonable listener to believe that not like us imparts verifiable facts about the plaintiff.
00:52:26.440 This, I mean, it reminds me of the classic example of Bob Marley's track, right?
00:52:33.020 Like when he sings, I shot the sheriff.
00:52:34.980 No one thinks that he actually shot a sheriff, right?
00:52:37.040 This is singing.
00:52:37.880 This is, it's art.
00:52:39.460 So I do have a point that I do feel I need to make whenever we're talking about this Drake and Kendrick Lamar beef,
00:52:44.960 which is that ultimately we are talking about allegations of harm against women and girls.
00:52:50.360 And I think it's important that that not get lost in all the hoopla and fanfare around diss tracks and all of that.
00:52:56.800 I think it's incredibly easy for the fact that we're having a conversation about actual harmful allegations to go overlook because we're talking about something that is so amplified and big.
00:53:07.220 So I do think it's important to just name that.
00:53:10.260 But also, it reminds me of, I don't even know if I should tell this story on the podcast, but I once got in fairly serious trouble at a job because of a karaoke song choice that I did during a work conference where I sang LL Cool J's Mama Said Knock You Out.
00:53:28.660 and i dedicated it to um let's just say some public figures and uh and then i nailed the
00:53:38.420 rendition that is my song if you've ever heard that song it's like a it's like a tough one to
00:53:42.880 sing but i didn't really think about the lyrics that are actually quite violent and i didn't you
00:53:49.800 know when i got up to do this karaoke song i wasn't thinking this is going to be taken as a
00:53:54.800 literal promise or a literal threat. After the performance, I'm slapping high fives. I'm feeling
00:54:00.040 good. The next business day, the next Monday, my manager calls me into her office and she's got
00:54:06.100 the lyrics to Mama Said Knock You Out printed out for me to look at. And I know this song from
00:54:13.140 singing it at the gym and from being a fan of LL Cool J, but I had never actually sat down and
00:54:19.220 looked at these lyrics, which are quite explicitly violent. Like in the song, LL Cool J explicitly
00:54:25.540 says, these are lyrics that will make you call the cops. Like there's one in particular line
00:54:30.440 that he says, don't you never ever pull my lever because I explode and my nine is easy to load.
00:54:36.860 And I remember my boss reading that to me and thinking like, oh, is this really the kind of
00:54:42.080 song you want to be singing on stage with such a gusto? And, you know, she was right. Looking back
00:54:48.480 now i can see how it wasn't super appropriate and it wasn't super cool and i understood that but
00:54:52.780 yeah i i wish i wish i could i wish i could have pointed to this judge's ruling saying
00:54:57.180 a judge has ruled that we don't take song lyrics literally even at a work karaoke event i'm so
00:55:04.060 glad you told that story i think it's so funny i've heard that story before and i just love to
00:55:07.740 picture uh young bridget like screaming that into the mic i bet you did kill it oh not literally
00:55:13.460 killed anything or anybody but like no one is literally wanting to kill anybody the other
00:55:18.500 funny thing about this Drake story is that that same judge uh Jeanette Vargas she's been involved
00:55:23.080 in a lot of these Trump cases and like most notably earlier this spring was like weighing in
00:55:28.400 on whether Doge and Elon Musk could access treasury information uh so she's been involved
00:55:34.960 in like really high profile high stakes cases affecting like the way that America functions
00:55:41.500 and I just find something funny about the fact that she had to take time out from that
00:55:46.320 to weigh in on Drake's hurt feelings I know I wonder if she was like you know those half glasses
00:55:52.160 that judges wear kind of at the bottom of their nose is she pouring over these lyrics and watching
00:55:58.080 Kendrick Lamar kind of wink wink at the camera during his Super Bowl performance saying oh Drake
00:56:03.060 likes a minor you know was she pouring over all of this I'm so curious yeah uh I mean she seems
00:56:10.380 like a thorough judge, so I suspect she probably was. That's so funny. The world we live in where
00:56:15.760 one day you're making a ruling on high-level Trump administration shenanigans, and the next day you're
00:56:21.600 mediating a beef between Drake and Kendrick Lamar. What a country. Yeah, what a country.
00:56:28.600 So Bridget, we got to wrap it up here, but I wanted to promote the mailbag, if that works for you.
00:56:35.620 please promote the mailbag
00:56:37.560 yeah so we're going to do a mailbag
00:56:39.900 episode we've gotten some great submissions
00:56:41.840 thank you so much to everybody who wrote
00:56:43.960 in we need just like a couple
00:56:46.000 more to really
00:56:47.560 have like a full episode so if you're
00:56:50.060 listening please write in with a mailbag
00:56:52.240 question it doesn't even need to be a question
00:56:54.180 it could just be
00:56:55.300 something that you're thinking about
00:56:57.900 that you want to get Bridget's
00:57:00.200 take on
00:57:00.920 just write in and let us know or if you do
00:57:04.160 have a question for Bridget or for me or about the show or about anything, something you want us
00:57:08.240 to look into for you, happy to do it. But please write in to hello at tangody.com. And we're going
00:57:17.240 to sweeten the pot that if you if you want a free sticker, you get a free sticker for writing in.
00:57:23.500 We've got these cool new Tangody stickers. We'd love to give you one. Just include your address.
00:57:28.240 We're not going to use it for anything other than sending you a sticker. But yeah, write in and let
00:57:32.520 No, I don't know. We're going to leave it open for one more week.
00:57:36.260 We're going to extend it a little bit.
00:57:37.760 So, Bridget, do you have anything to add to that?
00:57:40.260 The stickers are vinyl. You can put them on water bottles, which I love.
00:57:44.240 Yeah, they're high quality stickers. These are not the cheap things.
00:57:48.000 They're the good ones.
00:57:49.380 So write in. Let us know. We want to do this mailback episode.
00:57:52.660 If we don't get enough submissions, I'll just answer the questions that we got,
00:57:57.040 I guess, to the two people who asked questions.
00:57:59.940 I will just answer them.
00:58:02.140 But yeah, Mike, thank you for being here as always.
00:58:05.420 And thanks to all of you for listening.
00:58:06.840 I will see you on the internet.
00:58:29.940 Tari Harrison is our producer and sound engineer.
00:58:32.500 Michael Amato is our contributing producer.
00:58:34.500 I'm your host, Bridget Todd.
00:58:36.340 If you want to help us grow, rate and review us on Apple Podcasts.
00:58:39.920 For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, check out the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:58:57.600 This is an iHeart Podcast.
00:58:59.940 Guaranteed human.