There Are No Girls on the Internet - September 29, 2023


Taylor Swift fans prompt IRS scrutiny on ticket resellers; Linda Yaccarino’s cringey Code interview; Yelp versus Crisis Pregnancy Centers; New Deep Fake legislation – NEWS ROUNDUP

Topics
Just Pearly Things, Andrew Tate and beyond: Inside the Manosphere From those judgy bridesmaids to West Elm Caleb, has TikTik surveillance ruined gossip?

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour

Words per minute

177.38

Word count

10,763

Sentence count

481

Harmful content

Misogyny

19

sentences flagged

Toxicity

16

sentences flagged

Hate speech

8

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 This is an iHeart Podcast.
00:00:02.580 Guaranteed human.
00:00:05.140 Get Bell Pure Fiber Internet with Crave, Netflix, and Disney Plus
00:00:08.720 from $94 a month.
00:00:10.160 Price guaranteed for two years on Internet
00:00:12.040 with a two-year term and auto-pay credit.
00:00:14.400 Visit bell.ca for details and to check availability.
00:00:17.180 Bell. Connection is everything.
00:00:19.620 Run a business and not thinking about podcasting?
00:00:21.880 Think again.
00:00:22.520 More Americans listen to podcasts
00:00:23.980 than ad-supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora.
00:00:26.680 And as the number one podcaster,
00:00:28.060 iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined.
00:00:30.820 Learn how podcasting can help your business.
00:00:32.640 Call 844-844-IHEART.
00:00:34.940 I survived nine months in captivity,
00:00:38.460 and I've spent my life exploring how other people survive what should have destroyed them.
00:00:43.680 I'm Elizabeth Smart, and these are The Survivor Files.
00:00:47.300 Every week, I'm with survivors who live through the unthinkable,
00:00:51.020 abducted, stalked, controlled, and nearly silenced.
00:00:54.640 These are stories about what it takes to make it out alive.
00:00:58.680 Listen to The Survivor Files with Elizabeth Smart on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:01:06.580 Hey, it's Bridget.
00:01:07.660 So when I'm not making There Are No Girls on the Internet, I'm also the host of a podcast called Beef,
00:01:12.320 where we're serving up the juiciest historical rivalries that you've never heard of.
00:01:16.680 And I'm so pleased to share that Beef is a finalist for three Signal Awards.
00:01:21.460 So could you do me a huge favor and vote for Beef to win Best Writing, Best Emerging Podcast, and Best Host?
00:01:27.840 Just go to ncpodcasts.com slash signal.
00:01:31.760 Voting is open until October 5th.
00:01:33.740 Thank you so much.
00:01:34.940 It really means a lot.
00:01:40.380 There Are No Girls on the Internet is a production of iHeartRadio and Unblossed Creative.
00:01:48.480 I'm Bridget Todd, and this is There Are No Girls on the Internet.
00:01:51.460 I am here with my producer, Joey.
00:01:55.880 Joey, thank you so much for joining us.
00:01:57.640 Welcome back.
00:01:58.400 Hey, Bridget.
00:01:59.100 Thanks for having me.
00:02:00.560 So I think we should just get right into it
00:02:03.000 because everybody on Twitter is talking about
00:02:05.220 Linda Yaccarino's performance at the big tech conference, Code.
00:02:10.100 Oh my gosh.
00:02:11.040 Have you seen or heard anything about this?
00:02:14.080 I have not.
00:02:14.940 So usually we do a segment about like,
00:02:17.180 oh, what's Elon Musk done now?
00:02:18.860 What's Elon up to?
00:02:20.320 This is really what's Linda Yaccarino up to. 0.96
00:02:23.380 So Linda Yaccarino, for folks who don't know, was named as the new CEO of Twitter a while ago.
00:02:30.440 I would say it kind of seems like Linda is not as publicly involved as you might expect a CEO to be.
00:02:40.400 Like, it seems like Elon Musk will say something and she announced a big change and she won't even acknowledge it or anything like that.
00:02:47.680 The vibe has been like, is she really in charge? Is she really the CEO? When she came on board, she definitely was getting that treatment where she was talking about how she really loves a challenge. She's the person that you call when you want someone who is really going to turn a ship around.
00:03:03.520 And she was using a lot of language that I really quickly recognize as setting up a woman to come in and like clean up the mess of a male CEO, a male leader. 0.70
00:03:14.880 Like I heard a lot of like, this is someone who really wants to be seen as someone who is really like capable and going to come in and do a good job. 0.83
00:03:22.600 Well, her performance at the tech conference code did not go well and is not really doing a good job of aligning with what I think is her like public myth making around herself.
00:03:33.120 So first, Kara Swisher interviewed Yoel Roth, former head of trust and safety at Twitter.
00:03:38.620 Roth is someone who I've seen talked about in some ways that I would say are not exactly accurate.
00:03:43.900 You might remember that Roth was working at Twitter in the pre-Elon Musk days and then stuck around once Elon Musk took over.
00:03:50.620 I've seen him described as a whistleblower, but I really push back against that framing because when Elon Musk took over Twitter,
00:03:58.900 He was fine to go along with all the practices that Elon Musk was putting forth.
00:04:03.960 There are other folks who left Twitter when Elon Musk took over who I would say like were actual genuine whistleblowers who were blowing the whistle on Twitter's internal practices once Elon Musk took over.
00:04:15.020 I would not put Yoel Roth in that camp.
00:04:17.780 You might remember that Yoel Roth was like on board until Musk very publicly turned on him. 0.86
00:04:24.160 Musk kind of publicly insinuated that Roth, who is openly gay, is a sexual threat to children.
00:04:31.000 And after this happened, Roth and his family had to flee their home for their own safety.
00:04:36.740 So I will say this, had that been me, had Elon Musk taken over my company and then publicly smeared me as a threat to children and that I had to, like, leave my home, and I was invited on a big platform to talk about Twitter,
00:04:51.460 I can just imagine what I would have said.
00:04:53.740 Like, it would have come up.
00:04:55.220 I probably would have had a lot to say.
00:04:57.220 However, Roth really just kept it professional.
00:05:00.320 He talked about how there had been a rise in hate speech on Twitter since Elon Musk took over, saying, by any measure, it is worse, except by Twitter's own measure, which is basically what we've all been saying all along.
00:05:10.940 So even though Roth just stuck to like clear stats about Twitter, like talking about the platform, Linda Iaccarino seemed very rattled by him being there.
00:05:22.060 Linda was interviewed right after Roth and, to be honest, just came off really unprepared.
00:05:28.080 And it didn't do a ton to, you know, address concerns that like Elon Musk is still running the show and like, you know, running Twitter off of his whims without really consulting her.
00:05:38.040 Listen for yourself.
00:05:40.160 Elon Musk just announced a new monthly fee for users.
00:05:43.720 Yeah.
00:05:44.560 And my question for you is, do you want to start charging all users of X,
00:05:48.080 as he said, and how many users do you think you will lose as a result?
00:05:53.320 Can you repeat?
00:05:54.800 Elon Musk announced you're moving to an entirely subscription based service.
00:05:58.760 Yeah.
00:05:59.000 Nothing free about using X.
00:06:02.000 Did he say we were moving to it specifically or is thinking about it?
00:06:05.880 He said that's the plan.
00:06:07.080 Yeah.
00:06:07.440 So did he consult you before he announced that?
00:06:10.420 We talk about everything.
00:06:13.540 Man, I guess she sounds very PR trained.
00:06:18.220 It sounds like if I were the PR person for Twitter slash X, whatever you want to call
00:06:25.100 it right now, I would be like, yeah, let's let's, you know, do you say it or is it just
00:06:30.100 like an idea that's out there or thinking about it?
00:06:32.700 Like, yeah, that's so PR speak.
00:06:35.900 So Yaccarino then tried to give some big, impressive number about how advertisers are returning to the platform, but then those numbers were refuted by external analysis.
00:06:45.500 Then, when asked about the current rise in anti-Semitic content on Twitter, including from her boss, Elon Musk, according to Business Insider's Ben Bergman, she apparently looked down at her watch and said, I need to leave to catch a flight.
00:06:58.640 and that's just like I can't imagine a more awkward thing to say like uh I think someone's
00:07:06.480 calling me in the other room I gotta go yeah no that's like like oh look at my wrist I gotta go
00:07:12.760 that is there's no way that's a real excuse yeah so of all the things that you could say
00:07:18.920 I feel like that's the most awkward like you know that emoji that awkward emoji that has the curly
00:07:24.380 mouth that's just like, oh, that was basically everybody's face in the audience because it was
00:07:28.460 so awkward. People have described this as like a scene from Arrested Development because that's
00:07:32.880 how awkward it was. Now, I think this is really just an instance of like, you work for a company,
00:07:39.060 you have fired or let go most, if not all of your comm staff. The person who like is at the very top
00:07:45.540 of the company, the owner, Elon Musk, is someone who is very erratic. I think that like this is
00:07:50.400 what you get when all of those conditions are met. And so some folks, some like pretty big name
00:07:56.320 tech folks accused tech journalist Kara Swisher, you know, the organizer of the conference of
00:08:01.620 sandbagging Yaccarino by booking Roth as a surprise guest. But this is not really what
00:08:06.500 happened. Swisher confirmed that Yaccarino knew that Roth would be speaking and was even given
00:08:11.600 the option to pick whether she wanted to speak before him or after him. And that apparently
00:08:15.680 Twitter like decided that they wanted to have the last word. So it's not like this was a total
00:08:19.580 surprise according to to Kara Swisher she texted Linda Yaccarino personally and she had about 12
00:08:26.020 hours notice that like hey this person's gonna be speaking too yeah like how how you were describing
00:08:30.840 Roth before and this isn't like a dig on him I'm sure whatever um but it seems like he's like the
00:08:39.340 most like mild sort of like center of the field person you could ask to talk about this because
00:08:46.740 again it sounds like yeah he didn't leave he was sort of like i'm just gonna keep doing my job and
00:08:50.560 see what happens and um yeah if you have a marginalized identity you will be targeted for
00:08:56.320 that regardless of how you know much of a team player you are and again this is like a good
00:09:01.840 example of that but yeah it sounds like he's sort of you don't really know which direction
00:09:06.660 you could go with this and yeah that's a good way to describe him and honestly to me like i said
00:09:12.420 if Elon Musk had targeted me for my identity and put my kids at risk, you can believe that
00:09:19.320 when I got on a stage, I wouldn't be talking about the platform stats, right? So like part
00:09:23.660 of me is like, well, this is like a testament to the fact that Raw is not going personal,
00:09:29.580 that he's just like sticking to the stats. I completely agree with your assessment of
00:09:33.300 who he is in this situation. And I was pretty surprised to see a lot of big names in tech
00:09:40.120 media, people like Jason Calacanis from the All In podcast, which is probably the number one tech 0.94
00:09:47.000 podcast in the world every fucking week. I have no problem with that, but it is what it is. 0.76
00:09:51.800 And a business reporter at Axios, they were on Twitter saying that, oh, Linda Yaccarino got 1.00
00:09:56.840 sandbagged by Kara Swisher. This is so unprofessional. And Kara Swisher is never going 0.99
00:10:01.980 to be able to book high profile tech leaders for this conference. And this conference is really
00:10:06.180 going to be not as big of a deal if this is how they're going to treat their high profile guests.
00:10:12.180 And I really need to push back on that framing because I think it really, it's one of those
00:10:22.100 situations where it's like, wow, you all have so little integrity as tech leaders and journalists.
00:10:29.400 People are supposed to be informing the public. You could not be making it clearer that what you
00:10:33.720 actually care about, what you actually value is access. This is something that Paris Marks,
00:10:39.220 the host of Tech Will Not Save Us, that podcast, speaks to quite a bit, which is like,
00:10:43.920 these people could not have made it any clearer that they don't care about holding tech leaders
00:10:49.220 accountable. They don't care about asking the kinds of questions that are actually going to help
00:10:53.360 us, the public, understand what's going on. What they care about is access. And it's not
00:10:58.220 a journalist's job to make Linda Yaccarino look good. It's not a journalist's job to, you know, 0.75
00:11:05.540 play nice with Linda Yaccarino or any other tech leader and, like, make them feel comfortable and
00:11:10.340 make them look good and give them, like, they're not in PR, they're journalists. And so I was
00:11:14.560 really surprised how quickly these journalists revealed that they don't care about that, that
00:11:19.960 all they care about is, like, ooh, is this really going to, like, hurt Kara Swisher's ability to
00:11:24.220 book, Big Guess. And I found that to be really telling. You know, Linda Yaccarino is running
00:11:31.820 one of the most important tech platforms in the world. It's not any journalist's job to make her 1.00
00:11:37.020 look good. It's a journalist's job to ask her questions that are going to be clarifying for us,
00:11:41.100 the public, and to hold her accountable for the things that she says and the things that she does.
00:11:44.560 Right. And even if it wasn't Linda Yaccarino herself, like she's the CEO of a company that's 0.91
00:11:51.740 owned by elon musk who has used that platform to spew just straight up nazi shit and yeah 0.99
00:12:00.180 apparently target a gay man in a way that is very much rooted in homophobia like it it totally 0.99
00:12:06.920 makes sense it's so weird to see like how accountability is like framed because yeah
00:12:13.940 like you said this seems like a situation where she needs to be held accountable for what's
00:12:18.040 happening at her company for what's happening in the name of her company and yeah like asking the 1.00
00:12:23.760 most basic questions is apparently too much I don't know poor Linda Yaccarino her and her 1.00
00:12:32.040 you know billion dollar company so sad they're being bullied by mean journalists
00:12:38.200 I almost see like a little bit of like sexism here like I think it's I think it's I think
00:12:46.300 it's important to like, not, I try really hard when I'm talking about Linda Yaccarino to make
00:12:51.540 sure that I'm not trafficking in some sort of like internalized misogyny. But the way that
00:12:55.160 people are talking about her, it almost swings back around. And it's like, we're not talking
00:12:59.440 about your best friend giving you a heads up that your ex might be at the party they're planning.
00:13:04.280 This is somebody who is running one of the most powerful, the CEO of one of the most powerful
00:13:08.060 tech companies in the world. Where is this idea coming from that she can't handle it if one of
00:13:14.460 her if a former staffer is there presenting his perspective as a former staffer it almost seems 0.82
00:13:20.720 like insulting to her this assumption that like she needs more notice than other tech CEOs that
00:13:28.900 have gone to this conference that somebody's being added to the lineup and that if Yoel Roth
00:13:32.700 got up there and spoke his piece about what he saw at Twitter that that's going to somehow rattle
00:13:38.160 her it almost feels like a like a weird kind of like a weird assumption that I just I don't know
00:13:43.880 where it's coming from and i don't see a lot of other tech leaders getting these same kinds of
00:13:48.840 like assumptions that they they will fall they will simply fall apart if they are asked to speak
00:13:53.960 after somebody who has presented an alternative perspective than their own i thought her whole
00:13:59.140 thing she's been saying this whole time that twitter is this place where oh you you need to
00:14:02.740 be able to to listen when someone's got an opposing view like you shouldn't you shouldn't
00:14:06.580 run away from it when someone's got a different opinion but yet here are all these people saying
00:14:10.320 Oh, well, Linda Yaccarino shouldn't have to listen to somebody's opposing opinion. And if she does so, it is it is reasonable for her to completely fall apart and shit the bed. I have a lot of questions about it. 1.00
00:14:20.320 Yeah. A big part of feminism is being able to acknowledge when women mess up, too. And women are benefiting from, like, you know, classism, anti-Semitism, general sort of fascist tendencies, you know, in this case. 1.00
00:14:37.540 and uh yeah like linda yaccarino took this job knowing who elon musk was and knowing what this
00:14:45.040 company had kind of positioned itself as at that point so it's sort of like i don't know it feels
00:14:50.700 like we're falling back into the whole like girl boss era where it's like it's okay if she does
00:14:56.900 bad stuff because she's she's doing it as a woman and it doesn't matter that other women are going 0.98
00:15:03.440 to get brutalized by the content that is produced by this company or whatever. It's weird. It is
00:15:10.760 a very weird thing to be watching. It reminds me of this meme I see often that I think about
00:15:15.920 all the time. It's not exactly like, well, whatever. The meme is, I don't support all
00:15:21.160 women. Some of you bitches are very dumb. And I always think about that of like, yeah, like this 1.00
00:15:26.560 is, she shat the bed out there and it really matters. It doesn't just matter from like a
00:15:31.560 business perspective, it matters for all of us. To put this in context, this comes just days after
00:15:37.100 a new study from the European Union that said that Twitter is the number one biggest source
00:15:41.800 of disinformation when compared to other social media platforms, with Spain, Poland, and Slovakia
00:15:47.160 deemed as countries with the highest risks. The EU's Values and Transparency Commissioner,
00:15:52.120 Vera Jourova, warned Elon Musk saying, you have to comply with the hard law. We'll be watching
00:15:57.040 what you're doing. And what did he do in response? Well, Elon Musk cut Twitter's election integrity
00:16:02.160 and disinformation team, despite pledging that he would not do that and removed the election
00:16:07.480 disinformation reporting tool, even though we're like, what, a couple hundred days out of an
00:16:11.900 election here in the United States. And so this stuff really matters. Like how this platform is
00:16:17.480 run really matters to people. On Friday, the day that this podcast comes out, Twitter's new privacy
00:16:24.320 policy goes into effect, which allows Twitter to take a lot more data from us, including our
00:16:29.180 employment information, our job information, maybe read our DMs, our biometric data, and of course,
00:16:34.940 use all of that data that they take from us to train their AI and a whole lot more. All of this
00:16:39.480 after Twitter's former head of security turned actual whistleblower, went before the Senate and
00:16:44.800 testified that Twitter is misleading the public about the platform's extreme and egregious security
00:16:49.680 deficiencies. So all of this is to say that it really matters how Twitter is being run,
00:16:55.820 not just because it's this big company, but because it really matters for global election
00:17:00.560 integrity and for our own personal security. So this is not a business story. This is not a story
00:17:06.540 about like, is Kara Swisher going to be able to get big, important guests on her show? Or will the 0.84
00:17:11.240 Code Conference continue to be really big and important? It's not a story about whether or not
00:17:15.540 this journalist was like nice to Linda Yaccarino, our global democracy is at risk. And these people
00:17:21.860 are just talking about like whether or not Code is going to be able to book guests. It's because
00:17:27.500 a journalist asked her about it. Like the conversation is so deeply unserious. And I feel
00:17:33.020 like we are watching tech journalists fail us in real time and be really public and open about it.
00:17:40.140 Like they don't even have the good sense to not publicly go out and say like, oh, the most
00:17:45.380 important thing is access. And because they asked Linda Yaccarino hard questions, they're blowing
00:17:49.660 that access. The most important thing that matters to me as a tech journalist, like it is so deeply
00:17:54.480 unserious and they're putting us all at risk and not even having the good sense to like not say
00:17:59.080 that publicly voluntarily. Yeah, I think coming from within the journalism industry in particular
00:18:05.860 and like having that perspective, this is really interesting because it kind of reminds me of like
00:18:11.400 and you mentioned the election, which this doesn't directly have to do with the election,
00:18:14.900 But, you know, again, Twitter is going to be a big platform for that.
00:18:18.980 This reminds me of back in 2016 when Trump was elected and there was sort of this like
00:18:23.080 conversation, I think, within the journalism industry and within newsrooms about like what's
00:18:29.140 the media's responsibility and, you know, what's the difference between holding people
00:18:33.840 accountable and like getting both sides or like hearing all the sides.
00:18:38.200 And like this this seems like we're falling back into that idea of like getting all the
00:18:43.900 sides and hearing letting everybody just speak their mind without without question is more
00:18:49.140 important than like actually holding people accountable and actually asking people the hard
00:18:53.800 questions about like their actual policies that are going to affect people yeah that that's that's
00:19:00.780 concerning to me too and again like this doesn't directly have to do with the election but twitter
00:19:04.920 is going to be a big platform when it comes to the election and are we going to see that sort of
00:19:09.360 cycle again where people are just like yeah we're we're gonna just hear all the sides and not hold
00:19:15.020 anybody accountable because that never ends well yeah i worry that folks in media have not really
00:19:21.320 learned a lot of hard truths so we will see let's take a quick break
00:19:29.280 We'll be right back.
00:19:59.280 podcaster, iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined. So whatever your customers listen
00:20:03.680 to, they'll hear your message. Plus, only iHeart can extend your message to audiences across
00:20:08.460 broadcast radio. Think podcasting can help your business? Think iHeart. Streaming, radio,
00:20:13.660 and podcasting. Call 844-844-iHeart to get started. That's 844-844-iHeart.
00:20:20.340 If your bookshelf and your For You page are equally important to your personality,
00:20:24.120 welcome home. This is Prose Society, the weekly podcast that's part book club,
00:20:30.920 part group chat for thought daughters, pop culture obsessives, and anyone who thinks
00:20:34.860 Pride and Prejudice and Love Island deserve the same level of discourse. I'm Eli Rallo,
00:20:39.660 and every week we're connecting the dots between books, the internet, and the conversations
00:20:43.860 everyone can't stop having. I'm going to have to look up this story. I'm obsessed. I'm obsessed.
00:20:49.280 From bestselling authors and your favorite book talk creators to the latest pop culture moments,
00:20:54.120 nothing is off the table.
00:20:55.780 It's like if you can hide some real messages
00:20:58.660 inside compelling characters,
00:21:01.360 then that is a Trojan horse.
00:21:03.240 Whether you're looking for literary deep dives,
00:21:05.420 smart pop culture conversations,
00:21:07.240 or a community of readers
00:21:08.560 who love to think a little too much,
00:21:10.760 you're in the right place.
00:21:12.460 Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app,
00:21:15.420 Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:21:18.380 See you between the pages.
00:21:24.120 And we're back.
00:21:28.220 So we have a little update for you.
00:21:30.520 Last week during our newscast, we told you that Andrew Tate's MLM scam app called The Real World, formerly called Hustlers University, was taken off of Google's Play Store for being a predatory pyramid scheme that charged subscribers $50 a month and offered them the chance to make millions through these like very scammy sounding courses on things like copywriting and cryptocurrency.
00:21:50.500 and also prompted users to share Andrew Tate's content on social media.
00:21:55.780 At the time of publishing our episode, the app was still available on Apple's App Store.
00:22:00.320 Well, right after our episode went live on Friday of last week,
00:22:03.820 Apple joined Google in taking Tate's app down from the App Store.
00:22:08.060 Thank you, Apple.
00:22:09.360 Tate's people say that they are appealing both of these decisions.
00:22:12.260 But for now, it is good news that Tate is being cut from this income stream
00:22:16.940 that just really just takes advantage of young people.
00:22:20.500 Yeah. First of all, adding on to last week's kind of discussion of this to be the third person now on this podcast to say, I don't know why copywriting is listed in there.
00:22:33.420 I also have experience with that. You do not make billions of dollars.
00:22:40.000 Yeah. Listener Sarah said the same thing as like, what is going on with copywriting? People don't make millions and millions of dollars from copywriting. And him promising people that they're going to make that is truly a wild claim to be making on his app.
00:22:55.320 Yeah. I think generally media, if a company is telling you that like a media related job is going to make you a lot of money, that's probably not true.
00:23:05.340 A rule of thumb.
00:23:06.400 yeah no I that's good to hear I feel like this whole Andrew Tate saga this is this is one of
00:23:14.260 those things where it's like this whole thing that's going on with Andrew Tate has felt very
00:23:18.260 big and like very difficult to address and it's like there's just so much so much harm he's
00:23:23.840 causing but this is like an example of like how any sort of action is good and I think I don't
00:23:29.540 know I think it's it's easy to get sort of caught up in all of the bad stuff that's coming out of
00:23:34.240 this but it is it's good to hear one one good things happen because because of you know people's
00:23:40.600 advocacy and people trying to combat this stuff yeah i take my w's where i can get them even the
00:23:47.680 small ones and if folks are interested to hear more about tate and the sort of ecosystem of
00:23:54.220 manosphere grifters that have popped up around him folks like just pearly things and sneeko all
00:24:01.300 of your mixed bag of misogynistic right-wing extremist online grifters, check out our episode
00:24:07.680 of There Are No Girls on the Internet that came out this week with Justin Horowitz, an extremism
00:24:11.620 researcher at Media Matters. He breaks down all of it. So if folks want to know more about Tate,
00:24:16.620 what he's doing, and the impact that it has on all of us, definitely check out this week's episode.
00:24:21.360 So over in Texas, Yelp, the review website that is mostly known for, I guess, like reviewing
00:24:26.600 restaurants and coffee shops. Well, Yelp is preemptively suing Texas to ensure that the
00:24:32.140 site can continue to tell users that crisis pregnancy centers, also known as CPCs, listed
00:24:37.760 on their site do not provide abortions or abortion referrals. So if you're unfamiliar with a crisis
00:24:43.180 pregnancy center, according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists,
00:24:48.520 always have trouble saying that word, CPC is a term used to refer to certain facilities that
00:24:52.840 represent themselves as legitimate reproductive health care clinics providing care for pregnant
00:24:57.300 people, but actually aim to dissuade people from accessing certain types of reproductive care,
00:25:03.100 including abortion care and even contraceptives options. So currently, Yelp puts a label on
00:25:09.520 crisis pregnancy centers that reads, quote, this is a crisis pregnancy center. Crisis pregnancy
00:25:14.760 centers do not offer abortions or referrals to abortion providers. This is just like fact-based
00:25:20.900 information that is just like a fact. I don't think that any CPC would object to that, that
00:25:26.000 they do not offer abortions or referrals for abortion. That is just like a true fact about
00:25:30.020 their services. But Yelp suspects that Texas is going to sue them to prevent them from applying
00:25:35.820 this label. So they are preemptively suing Texas first. According to CNN, in a complaint filed
00:25:41.340 Wednesday in San Francisco federal court, Yelp said it is suing the Texas Attorney General Ken
00:25:45.900 Paxton preemptively to head off a lawsuit it anticipates from his office as soon as Friday
00:25:50.660 that may seek to bar Yelp from applying its label to crisis pregnancy centers.
00:25:54.860 If the name Attorney General Ken Paxton of Texas sounds familiar to you,
00:26:00.520 that is because he just got finished facing a very serious impeachment threat
00:26:05.120 from his own party for corruption.
00:26:07.860 Now, he wasn't impeached. He won that battle.
00:26:10.880 But he is still facing a felony fraud case and an FBI investigation for securities fraud.
00:26:16.860 So Ken Paxton has a lot going on.
00:26:19.160 Like, you know, if I were Ken Paxson, I'd probably be focused on that.
00:26:23.260 But this is what he's doing instead.
00:26:24.940 Yeah, that's so crazy.
00:26:26.640 Like, just from hearing you explain that they're not doing anything illegal.
00:26:30.980 In fact, they're just, yeah, like they're just explaining what the service is, which
00:26:35.400 is what you're supposed to do if you're a service and you want to get business. 0.60
00:26:40.540 But, you know, it's almost like they don't want us to know that they don't have abortions
00:26:46.200 and they actually do other things.
00:26:47.860 crazy. I thought false advertising was illegal, but apparently not in this case. Yeah.
00:26:55.760 Okay. So what's interesting about what you just said is that back in February, Paxton went after
00:27:01.200 Yelp for putting a different label on crisis pregnancy centers. Their initial label described
00:27:06.700 crisis pregnancy centers as, quote, typically providing limited medical services and may not
00:27:12.220 have licensed medical professionals on site, which is also true. But Paxton objected to that
00:27:18.000 back in February. And so when Yelp changed their label to read what I read before about how crisis
00:27:23.780 pregnancy centers do not offer abortions or referral for abortions, Paxton himself commended
00:27:29.760 that disclosure as, quote, accurate in a press release that reads, Yelp has agreed to remove
00:27:35.180 its misleading label of crisis pregnancy centers and replace it with an accurate description.
00:27:39.640 So just as you said, right, that like Paxton himself said, oh, well, this new label, this label is accurate.
00:27:46.760 But now he is still coming after Yelp for this label that he himself in February said was accurate and was fine.
00:27:53.640 So the way that crisis pregnancy centers work is that they really they really take advantage of like scammy SEO practices to prey on people, many of whom are in desperate situations to confuse them with inaccurate information.
00:28:07.720 Crisis pregnancy centers, their whole mission is to basically waste the time of somebody who was pregnant to create an intentional delay that will delay them in getting an abortion in an attempt to trigger term restrictions that will prevent them from getting abortion care altogether.
00:28:21.760 So Yelp's lawsuit is asking the court to affirm that its labeling of crisis pregnancy centers was not misleading and that it was an exercise of constitutionally protected speech.
00:28:31.540 It is also asking the court to block Texas from suing over the labels in the future.
00:28:35.580 And I think, yeah, it's just another example of the ways that like abortion is a tech issue and that if you are trying to talk about technology, but you're not you're doing so in a way that does not talk about abortion care, then you're not fully talking about technology because abortion is a tech issue.
00:28:50.820 You know, tech companies should really be in the business of providing accurate information about people's health.
00:28:56.620 And a lot of times we know that they don't.
00:28:58.680 So in this case, when Yelp is actually trying to help people get accurate information about, you know, crisis pregnancy centers,
00:29:05.560 it's really sad that states like Texas are stepping in to prevent them from doing that.
00:29:10.700 Yeah. And again, it's like it's not like Yelp is doing anything that's illegal.
00:29:14.960 I use Google Maps all the time because like I never know where I am.
00:29:19.860 um but I mean one thing that like I rely on a lot is like the descriptions of places that I'm going
00:29:26.260 to matching the place that I'm actually going to and it is really frustrating when they don't
00:29:31.020 you shouldn't be hiding under the guise of medical care if that's not what you're doing but yeah I
00:29:36.140 hate yeah wow it's it's scary everything that's happening in Texas with this is terrifying and
00:29:43.420 again all the support to like abortion activists reproductive rights activists in Texas um
00:29:49.860 You guys are like, I admire the work you all are doing so much.
00:29:54.840 So important.
00:29:55.880 Absolutely.
00:29:56.740 Like, if you've got some spare coin and you're looking for a good home for it,
00:30:00.920 donate to an abortion fund because Lord knows they're doing important work and they could use it.
00:30:05.720 And I think this thing in Texas, I really think that Paxton is just trying to do a stunt to take away from his corruption investigation.
00:30:14.980 I think that, like, he is newly back from almost being impeached by his own party.
00:30:21.420 And I think that he is just, like, looking for some big grandstanding stunt.
00:30:25.280 And he already confirmed that the way that Yelp is describing CPCs is accurate.
00:30:31.420 So it's like, we're visiting this now.
00:30:32.840 It just seems like a stunt.
00:30:34.080 And I think it just goes back to the idea that a lot of these extremists, they don't
00:30:37.400 have a lot to offer their citizens other than stunts and grandstanding.
00:30:41.520 And I think that's exactly what this is. 0.62
00:30:43.000 Yeah, it's almost like the backlash against reproductive rights and trans people and all of this is just an attempt to get more votes.
00:30:54.680 But, you know, it's...
00:30:56.400 So folks might be familiar with Wirecutter.
00:30:59.960 The New York Times is vertical where they rate and review tech gadgets.
00:31:03.800 Wirecutter had been giving WISE, the security camera system, positive reviews for six years.
00:31:09.160 But all of that changed this week because Wirecutter announced that they were pulling their recommendations for WISE from all their site's guides.
00:31:17.300 Why? Well, because Wirecutter explains that on September 8th, The Verge reported an incident in which WISE customers were able to access live video from other users' cameras through the WISE web portal.
00:31:29.740 When Wirecutter reached out to WISE for details, a representative characterized the incident as small in scope, saying they believed no more than 10 users were affected.
00:31:38.100 So that's not great. Even if it's only 10 people, strangers being able to access your security camera and see what you're doing is pretty bad. But here's the kicker. Other than one post on its user-to-user online forum, Wise Communities, and communications to those that they say were affected, the company has not reached out to Wise customers, nor has it provided meaningful details about the incident.
00:32:02.800 Wirecutter writes,
00:32:03.940 We believe Wise is acting irresponsibly to its customers.
00:32:06.900 As such, we've made the difficult but unavoidable decision
00:32:09.600 to revoke our recommendation of all Wise cameras
00:32:12.300 until the company implements meaningful changes
00:32:14.520 to its security and privacy procedures.
00:32:17.220 The concern is not that Wise had a security incident.
00:32:20.180 Just about every company or organization in the world
00:32:22.060 were probably at the deal with some sort of security trip up,
00:32:24.280 as we've seen with big banks, the military, Las Vegas casinos, schools, and even Chick-fil-A.
00:32:28.960 The greater issue is how this company responds to a crisis.
00:32:32.260 With this incident and others in the past, it is clear that WISE has failed to develop the sorts of robust procedures that adequately protect its customers the way they deserve. 0.99
00:32:42.460 Damn. 0.98
00:32:43.820 Yeah, that's scary. 0.99
00:32:45.520 Yeah, I feel like security cameras, cameras in general, that's just such a sensitive issue.
00:32:51.240 It's like if you have any, like, if there's any break of that privacy, that should be notified to people that have the cameras that you sell.
00:33:02.740 Exactly. So I need to make this really clear. This is very unusual, right?
00:33:07.860 We talk about a lot of companies who behave in ways that are irresponsible, but this is irresponsible even by, like, irresponsible company standards.
00:33:17.120 Wirecutter spoke to other folks in the privacy space, including Jen Kaltrider, program director
00:33:21.580 at Mozilla's Privacy Not Included, whose work we've talked about on the show before.
00:33:25.460 All of the folks they spoke to agree that it is completely unusual and unacceptable
00:33:29.680 that Wise did not reach out to their customer base proactively and never said anything about
00:33:34.880 how they are planning to prevent these issues in the future.
00:33:37.540 And this is not even the first time that Wise has had issues like this.
00:33:41.700 In March 2022, a Bitdefender study showed that Wyze took nearly three years to fully address specific vulnerabilities that affected all three models of Wyze cameras.
00:33:52.120 Eventually, they did alert customers and told them that their, you know, their security, like that model of security camera was no longer safe and that they should not be using them.
00:34:01.320 And if they did keep using them, they were doing so like at their own risk.
00:34:04.600 So like you were saying, Joey, I would pretty much never advocate for someone putting an additional camera in their home that they didn't need.
00:34:13.080 But if you when you do like that is a trust relationship, as you were saying, that you're entering into with the company.
00:34:20.580 Right. You need to know that if that trust is broken, that the company is going to handle it in a way that is responsible.
00:34:26.660 That's the only way that having a camera in your house makes any sense at all, is that the company is acting in a way that really makes it clear that they understand that you're putting your trust in them.
00:34:39.480 As Wirecutter points out, the fundamental relationship between smart home companies and their customers is founded on trust.
00:34:46.020 No company can guarantee safety and security 100% of the time, but customers need to be confident that those who make and sell these products, especially security devices, are worthy of their trust.
00:34:56.060 WISE's inability to meet these basic standards puts its customers and its devices at risk
00:35:01.500 and also casts doubt on the smart home industry as a whole.
00:35:05.660 So Wirecutter actually listed out some specific steps that WISE would need to take in order
00:35:10.560 for them to reconsider looking at their products in the future.
00:35:14.600 It's very basic stuff, honestly, like reaching out to all customers proactively if there
00:35:19.280 is a breach and describing the issue in detail, including what steps are being taken to prevent
00:35:23.460 it from happening again.
00:35:24.220 To me, it sounds like very basic stuff. And I also think that it is a pretty big step for an outlet like Wirecutter that most folks probably know for gadget reviews to take this kind of action. And honestly, maybe it should be more commonplace. Even if you're mostly a review outlet, it is still sort of service-oriented tech journalism for regular people to inform their purchasing decision making.
00:35:49.160 Right. And so I think it's nice to see an outlet taking that responsibility seriously and using that as a way to advocate for a tech company, just being accountable to the people who are buying them, buying their stuff.
00:36:01.800 Yeah. A rare win for the New York Times, I guess, for a New York Times property.
00:36:10.580 Bridget, did you ever watch?
00:36:13.600 There was a like Disney Channel movie that I watched when I was a kid that was called like Smart Home.
00:36:18.580 yeah smart house you know i watch smart house you said the word smart home but i was like i think
00:36:25.120 that's why now i i think i'm realizing now because i've always been somebody that like even with like
00:36:29.720 computer cameras i've been very like anxious about and i know most of that is whatever i i
00:36:35.820 in theory it's safe but yeah i think i think that's how it started i think it was because
00:36:40.460 of that movie which uh this just goes to prove that disney channel was right apparently
00:36:45.700 yeah no that's that's so scary though I I've never had a security camera like that in a place
00:36:54.780 that I've lived but I know like I had friends growing up that like had that in their houses
00:36:58.240 and that's scary that is that's really scary what could happen with that yeah so first of all
00:37:05.920 like Disney Channel Disney Channel originals continue from like the 2000s continue to be
00:37:12.780 prophetic like it is written yeah maybe that's maybe that's our our origin story of paranoia
00:37:18.540 around certain technology I think it is I think I'm connecting the dots now I'm like that's that's
00:37:24.300 how it started yeah and it's funny because like I'm not like like for my life having things like
00:37:31.440 a google home or like a security camera it doesn't make sense for my life personally but I get that
00:37:36.660 people's security needs might be different like my parents have I actually don't know what they use
00:37:42.040 But they have cameras in every room in their house because my dad is disabled and sometimes has like bad falls.
00:37:48.780 And so it's like a way to be like, oh, well, if I'm downstairs, I want to be able to see if my mom is downstairs, she wants to be able to be able to see what my dad is doing and vice versa, because they're older folks who live in a big house.
00:37:59.200 And so I'm not, you know, if having devices that have cameras in them in your life makes sense for your lifestyle like that, do what you got to do.
00:38:10.500 As Wirecutter, I think, rightly points out, you should be able to do that and trust that you are going to get the information that you need to be able to be deciding what role you want this technology to play in your life.
00:38:22.480 And I feel like Wise is not being a good actor to allow consumers to really do that.
00:38:32.260 More after a quick break.
00:38:40.500 Pure fiber internet with Crave, Netflix, and Disney Plus from $94 a month.
00:38:44.700 Price guaranteed for two years on internet with a two-year term and auto pay credit.
00:38:48.960 Visit bell.ca for details and to check availability.
00:38:51.740 Bell, connection is everything.
00:38:54.200 Run a business and not thinking about podcasting?
00:38:56.920 Think again.
00:38:57.900 More Americans listen to podcasts than ad-supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora.
00:39:02.460 And as the number one podcaster, iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined.
00:39:06.720 So whatever your customers listen to, they'll hear your message.
00:39:09.440 Plus, only iHeart can extend your message to audiences across broadcast radio.
00:39:13.940 Think podcasting can help your business?
00:39:15.840 Think iHeart.
00:39:16.860 Streaming, radio, and podcasting.
00:39:18.940 Call 844-844-IHEART to get started.
00:39:22.080 That's 844-844-IHEART.
00:39:24.520 If your bookshelf and your For You page are equally important to your personality, welcome home.
00:39:30.440 This is Prose Society, the weekly podcast that's part book club, part group chat for thought daughters,
00:39:36.620 pop culture obsessives, and anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice and Love Island deserve the
00:39:41.200 same level of discourse. I'm Eli Rallo, and every week we're connecting the dots between books,
00:39:46.620 the internet, and the conversations everyone can't stop having.
00:39:50.040 I'm going to have to look up this story. I'm obsessed. So obsessed.
00:39:53.620 From bestselling authors and your favorite book talk creators to the latest pop culture moments,
00:39:58.480 nothing is off the table. It's like if you can hide some real messages inside compelling
00:40:04.620 characters, and that is a Trojan horse. Whether you're looking for literary deep dives, smart
00:40:09.900 pop culture conversations, or a community of readers who love to think a little too much,
00:40:14.980 you're in the right place. Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app,
00:40:19.600 Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. See you between the pages.
00:40:23.780 let's get right back into it so we've talked a little bit before about the threats that deep
00:40:35.800 fakes pose digitally rendered images of people often depicting them in sexual situations or
00:40:41.420 meant to be used for political deception now new legislation is trying to combat the harm
00:40:45.960 posed by deep fakes representative yvette clark who represents parts of brooklyn introduced new
00:40:51.120 legislation in the House that is meant to curb the harm of deep fakes, saying this bill is meant to
00:40:55.880 take us into the 21st century and establish a baseline so we can discern who is intending to
00:41:00.500 harm us. Clark said that the Deep Fakes Accountability Act would provide prosecutors, regulators, and
00:41:05.720 particularly victims with resources like detection technology that Clark believes they need to stand
00:41:11.260 up against the threat of nefarious deep fakes. This bill would require all creators of deep fakes
00:41:16.260 to include content credentials, which means the origins and entire history of a piece of content,
00:41:21.760 including how it was captured and how it's been changed. Under this legislation, online platforms
00:41:26.220 that host generative AI content would also be required to display the origins of that content.
00:41:31.680 Under this legislation, users who fail to label malicious deepfakes would face a criminal penalty,
00:41:37.460 including prison time and fines. So this category would encompass deepfakes related to sexual
00:41:42.780 content, criminal content, incitement of violence, and foreign interference in elections.
00:41:47.460 Now, I've looked into this legislation a little bit. It does seem like there is some
00:41:51.580 potential concern that the scope might be a bit too narrow because it really focuses on
00:41:57.240 people, so deepfakes that depict images of people. But what about when a deepfake
00:42:05.480 does not depict a person? Recently, faked AI-generated images of the Pentagon on fire
00:42:11.640 went viral and caused a disruption where i live here in dc and so i have i have read that there
00:42:16.820 is concern that this legislation is too narrow and that it does not account for those kinds of
00:42:23.360 deep fakes that are that do not depict a specific person yeah that also it concerns me that they're
00:42:29.900 being very liberal with like sexual content because and like i i don't know this might be a
00:42:36.100 little bit more extreme of a take but I feel like if you're making AI content of somebody that's
00:42:42.300 like sexual without their permission that's bad that is wrong I don't think that should be allowed
00:42:48.980 like period um so I don't know it feels sort of like concerning that they're just sort of like
00:42:54.820 you have to label this but it can still exist yeah that's another I mean like I just knowing
00:43:02.820 what i know about you know the way that platforms will sometimes add like oh this is misinformation
00:43:10.460 or like get the realist or like if you ever scroll facebook and it's like oh this post has been shown
00:43:15.680 to be misleading those are great and i like think that platforms should be doing that but if i'm
00:43:21.960 being honest there is a lot of research that suggests that people are not really like looking
00:43:27.060 at those because social media platforms move so quickly but people are not always clicking in to
00:43:31.180 be like, oh, this is here's some context for this. And so I'm concerned that the way that the
00:43:37.160 internet moves, the speed at which the internet moves, I think it's possible that deep fakes
00:43:41.600 could travel in a way because people are not necessarily looking at the context or looking
00:43:46.740 at the label because of the speed at which social media platforms tend to move. And so
00:43:50.720 it is concerning. I think that something needs to be done about the threat of deep fakes. I already
00:43:57.740 know, I'm sure we've talked about this on the show, that deepfakes have the potential to really 1.00
00:44:02.420 disrupt our democracy. And it's definitely going to be people who are traditionally marginalized, 1.00
00:44:06.560 who are disproportionately facing that reality. So like, you know, women, LGBTQ folks, people of
00:44:13.560 color, that's just a reality. And so like, I do think something needs to be done. And it's also
00:44:19.480 kind of hard to believe that right now there is no national legislation specifically addressing
00:44:24.580 deep fakes or the deceptive uses of generative AI. Earlier this month, technology executives
00:44:30.540 did have a closed door meeting with senators to discuss potential government regulation. But
00:44:35.380 right now, there is no national regulation of this. And I do want to say that this legislation
00:44:42.020 is being introduced by Representative Clark. And Clark is somebody that I've actually been
00:44:45.860 really keeping my eye on. Y'all might recall that during the TikTok hearings, we talked a lot about
00:44:51.100 some of the stuff that came up from lawmakers, the questions that they asked, Clark had some
00:44:55.460 legitimately very good questions about whether TikTok's moderation policies were biased toward
00:45:01.440 black and brown creators and whether the platform was suppressing abortion content. I remember like
00:45:05.840 she was someone who was like, oh, she's like asking very substantive questions that clearly
00:45:10.940 reflect her constituents in a way that I thought was like very refreshing. She was also working to
00:45:16.920 regulate AI before doing so was cool. Way back when in 2019, she worked with Senators Wyden and
00:45:23.300 Cory Booker to introduce the Algorithmic Accountability Act, a bill that would require
00:45:27.620 companies to conduct impact and privacy assessments when they use automated decision-making tools. And
00:45:32.820 so we will definitely keep an eye on this legislation, how it moves, what happens with it.
00:45:37.860 But yeah, it's sort of hard to believe that there is no national legislation addressing the threat
00:45:45.300 of deep fakes or deceptive uses of ai and yeah it's it's we'll keep an eye on it yeah it it
00:45:52.580 definitely feels like there should be i feel like that should be covered under like libel or
00:45:59.040 something too where it's like and again i'm i'm not a lawyer i haven't looked at the concrete
00:46:05.920 laws that exist around this but it feels like an image and an image is like impact on somebody's
00:46:11.460 reputation that should have the same impact as like something that's spoken about somebody
00:46:16.720 but yeah like I'm it's it's good to hear that somebody is doing something about this and
00:46:22.100 somebody who it seems like has a history of actually addressing tech issues and not just
00:46:28.660 you know selling out to the sort of heritage foundation version of what the internet should
00:46:34.100 be that's a refreshing take for once but and again like you said this is a very narrow legislation
00:46:40.280 but it's a step in the right direction.
00:46:43.540 And I guess that's good to hear.
00:46:45.560 Yeah. And to your point that you were making earlier,
00:46:47.560 I think this is a situation that really shows that sometimes
00:46:50.340 our technology progresses quicker than our laws can keep up.
00:46:54.980 And so I'm interested to see if we get to a place where our laws
00:46:59.260 actually can be somewhat more aligned with the realities of the technology
00:47:03.540 that's facing us today.
00:47:06.220 Okay. So important question for you, Joey.
00:47:08.500 did you go first of all are you a swifty are you into taylor swift i love taylor swift oh my god
00:47:15.760 okay we've never talked about this so i i wasn't sure i did go to the eras tour i went to the
00:47:21.340 chicago one of the chicago shows um she played the lakes and um i wish you would for those of
00:47:28.900 you that are wondering the two of you that are wondering but it was a great show um that being
00:47:36.060 said the there's a lot of stress leading up to it so i'm sure you're gonna get into some of that
00:47:42.760 yes so i think i so i'm not a swifty i'm an aspiring swifty like i if i'm being honest i
00:47:49.280 probably other than the big hits that everybody knows i probably could not name a taylor swift
00:47:53.960 song but i i want to be a swifty if there are folks like someone send me a playlist someone
00:47:59.500 tell me what to get into i i feel like jealousy i wish i was i want to be part of the community
00:48:05.880 i'll send you a playlist i got you
00:48:07.940 yeah i respect taylor swift a lot and i i i want in i just don't know where to start
00:48:16.760 um so as you were saying like if anybody who tried to go to taylor swift's eras toward the
00:48:21.640 summer or beyonce's renaissance toward the summer i didn't make it to either of them so like
00:48:25.540 boo me i didn't make it to renaissance i really did want to go to renaissance and i could not
00:48:29.620 get a ticket. So at least I got one. Glass half full kind of situation. My brother went with his
00:48:38.700 wife and there was a time where I was like, well, certainly like he's going to ask me to go. He's
00:48:43.600 going to be like, Bridget, you should go to Beyonce. Take my ticket. And I was like waiting
00:48:48.160 by the phone and the call never came. So yeah, I did. It was heartbreaking, but I'll get him next
00:48:54.860 time. So if anybody went to either of those big summer concert tours, Taylor Swift, Beyonce,
00:49:00.360 y'all probably know already that the ticket buying process was plagued with predatory online ticket
00:49:06.600 sale platforms and resellers. It is so hard and expensive to get tickets that they actually end
00:49:12.860 up selling out really quickly and then wind up on ticket reseller sites for thousands of dollars.
00:49:18.840 And now the IRS is getting involved because they are putting more scrutiny on ticket resellers.
00:49:23.960 So I actually did not know this. How it has worked before is that ticket websites had to send 1099 forms to anybody who made more than $20,000 through 200 or more ticket sale transactions in a year.
00:49:36.540 And now that law has been updated as part of the American Rescue Plan Act, which lowers that amount from $20,000 to $600, regardless of the number of sales.
00:49:47.440 And sellers will only need to pay taxes on the profit that they make.
00:49:50.520 This is all part of Biden's plan to pump the brakes on the out of control antics of ticket resellers to crack down on predatory practices like tacking on hidden fees at checkout, which everybody hates. 0.98
00:50:03.040 It's like, it's like you'll buy tickets and then it's like, OK, the tickets are $50 and a $20 fuck you fee. 0.94
00:50:09.720 So now it's $70. And then, oh, you use the Internet. Oh, now it's $100. 0.96
00:50:12.720 Like it completely adds up. It's it's it's so predatory.
00:50:16.000 Yeah. The Swifties are powerful. I will say, I feel like the past couple months have shown the Swifties are powerful.
00:50:25.980 That is 100% correct. You know, when you look at the average prices of some of these big concerts this summer, it is clear that, like, something is wrong.
00:50:35.060 The Wall Street Journal reports that the average price for Swift's Eras tour was $1,095 and for Beyonce's Renaissance tour, $400.
00:50:45.160 Now, StubHub did say that, like, this might be partly due to COVID because the live event industry is, like, still bouncing back after, like, COVID shutdowns.
00:50:54.360 I can't confirm or deny the truth behind that.
00:50:57.340 That's what they're saying.
00:50:58.560 And as you were saying, Joey, we really do have Swifties, and they're organizing and advocating to thank for this.
00:51:05.080 After the Ares tour, Swifties reported not being able to buy Taylor Swift tickets, and then the site shut down.
00:51:11.120 When it came back up, tickets were sold out, but they were being listed for exorbitant prices by ticket resellers.
00:51:18.180 In a federal hearing, Ticketmaster blamed bots for this.
00:51:21.540 And then later, Ticketmaster shut down ticket sales in France for the Ares tour.
00:51:25.860 And so I guess Swifties were loud.
00:51:29.460 They advocated that this was not OK.
00:51:31.440 They wanted change.
00:51:32.380 They wanted to reform.
00:51:33.340 And I guess the moral of the story here is don't mess with the Swifties because they have the Biden administration's ear.
00:51:39.920 When the Swifties are upset about something, the Biden administration takes action. 0.95
00:51:43.920 Do not mess with the Swifties. 1.00
00:51:45.480 Yeah.
00:51:46.780 Okay.
00:51:47.260 Going back to the COVID point real quick.
00:51:49.360 Please.
00:51:49.840 That makes me real mad because, okay, it's 2023 now.
00:51:54.260 This tour has been 2023.
00:51:56.960 The COVID pandemic is not over.
00:51:59.240 It hasn't been over.
00:52:01.060 That being said, concerts have been open since 2021.
00:52:04.600 like I remember I had tickets to go to the Green Day Fall Out Boy Weezer show in 2021 and I decided
00:52:12.980 not to go because I was worried about COVID but I remember that concert still happened so concerts
00:52:18.400 have been happening for two years now and have been happening at these big stadiums with these
00:52:23.480 big artists so I think we're past the point where we can use COVID as the excuse for that
00:52:29.200 um but yeah no I I remember living through all of this trying to get my I I so I was on
00:52:40.040 all day like literally spent 24 hours straight like trying to get tickets could not
00:52:47.180 ended up like somebody I knew was able to get tickets so I was able to go through that but
00:52:52.780 it was insane and um I gotta say even uh most recently like I tried getting uh Boy Genius
00:53:02.700 tickets in in New York and it wasn't as bad as Taylor Swift but they also slipped out right
00:53:11.120 away it was also a whole weird thing with Ticketmaster um disclaimer I am going to the
00:53:15.980 show on Monday I was able to get show I was able to get tickets last minute but the day of when
00:53:22.060 the tickets went on sale like it was a nightmare and yeah they're a big band too but they're not as
00:53:27.980 big as Taylor Swift or Beyonce so it is just it is messed up right now I'm glad something is being
00:53:33.640 done the Swifties are very powerful the Beehive is very powerful yeah so I actually have a theory
00:53:41.320 that kind of speaks to your point it's not tech related this is just I have no evidence I have a
00:53:46.400 theory that I guess it's a little tech related. My theory is that the rise of social media has
00:53:53.900 completely changed what it means to go to a concert. And it used to be that if you liked a
00:54:00.860 musician or a live act, you went to see their concert because it's like, I got it. I love
00:54:06.240 whoever. I got to go see them. I think that the rise of social media has turned concerts from
00:54:12.260 just an experience to like a luxury event right where people want to go not even necessarily
00:54:18.700 because they like love the band but because it's like they want to flex for the gram that they
00:54:24.760 were there and so I think that like before you were just competing with people who were like
00:54:30.260 fans of whoever now you're competing with everybody because going to a concert is just like
00:54:35.060 you know a thing to do and that is making it this like luxury experience with these
00:54:42.260 frankly like absurd price tags like the the price of concerts has like i i don't i don't ask me to
00:54:49.060 back this up with facts because i cannot i've not looked into it i'm just like submitting this
00:54:52.220 this theory off the dome but like the i think the price in my estimation the price has gone up
00:54:57.740 and i think it's because people are seeing it as a luxury item and a luxury experience and
00:55:04.400 whereas it used to be like you you want you just wanted to go see the show now it's like oh well
00:55:08.840 do you want the backstage or like this experience or like that experience and like
00:55:14.420 live events places know they can just tack on a bunch of fees because people are already seeing
00:55:19.860 this as like a luxury experience you know does that make sense i don't know no i i totally agree
00:55:25.120 and again i don't have any evidence to back it up just my own experience but yeah like i think
00:55:31.400 my comparison here is boy genius which is still a very popular band and especially like now has
00:55:36.640 sort of blown up with their new album they're nowhere near like Taylor Swift and the fact that
00:55:41.500 I had like just as hard as time just as hard of a time getting tickets for them as I did with
00:55:46.180 Taylor Swift like it's gotten ridiculous I love me I know we've talked about this I love music
00:55:52.760 I'm a big music person but that being said like I feel like I don't go to a lot of concerts now
00:55:57.680 because it's just so hard to get tickets and I think Cozy Air was like the most recent ones I
00:56:03.120 I remember he was like, he put out his tickets for his tour.
00:56:06.320 And I was like, I'm not even going to bother.
00:56:08.120 Like, there's no way I'm getting those tickets.
00:56:10.120 Like, I might as well just sleep in that day when they go on sale at 8 a.m., which is early for me.
00:56:17.560 But yeah, it's concert tickets have gotten ridiculous and it is not fun.
00:56:24.420 Hopefully the Swifties can help us out with this and organize.
00:56:28.280 I know they are a very powerful unified force, as is Taylor Swift.
00:56:32.120 I don't know if y'all saw, but Taylor Swift on Tuesday, she posted a short Instagram post to her 272 million followers asking them to get registered to vote.
00:56:42.500 And according to Vote.org, the nonpartisan voter registration nonprofit, they got more than 35,000 new registrations.
00:56:51.900 And yeah, so they had a 23% jump over voter registration day last year because of the power of Taylor Swift.
00:57:00.660 So when Taylor Swift speaks, people listen. When the Swifties speaks, Joe Biden listens.
00:57:06.980 We got to think of like what else we want the Swifties to advocate for and be like, we need universal health care. Swifties, get on it.
00:57:14.480 I do think that fandom is the rallying sort of force of the future, apparently.
00:57:21.420 a contemporary political situation that I find fascinating is that whole thing with all the
00:57:28.680 k-pop stans were like managed to mess up the the trump speech that was supposed to happen in like
00:57:35.320 2020 I think organizing young people through the power of fandom being obsessed with a particular
00:57:43.500 celebrity that is so powerful and I'm so glad that that energy is being used for good right now
00:57:50.340 and, yeah, we'll see what happens
00:57:52.760 in the future, I guess.
00:57:54.520 We love it.
00:57:55.660 Joey, thank you for being here.
00:57:57.260 A pleasure as always.
00:57:58.700 Of course.
00:57:59.640 And as always, listeners,
00:58:00.980 thanks for hanging out with us.
00:58:02.120 If you want more ad-free content,
00:58:04.260 check out our Patreon
00:58:04.980 at patreon.com slash tangodi
00:58:06.580 and we will see you real soon.
00:58:10.820 If you're looking for ways
00:58:11.880 to support the show,
00:58:13.020 check out our merch store
00:58:13.960 at tangodi.com slash store.
00:58:16.780 Got a story about
00:58:17.740 an interesting thing in tech
00:58:18.820 or just want to say hi?
00:58:20.340 You can reach us at hello at tangody.com.
00:58:22.660 You can also find transcripts for today's episode at tangody.com.
00:58:25.980 There Are No Girls on the Internet was created by me, Bridget Todd.
00:58:28.700 It's a production of iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative.
00:58:31.340 Edited by Joey Pat.
00:58:33.200 Jonathan Strickland is our executive producer.
00:58:35.400 Tari Harrison is our producer and sound engineer.
00:58:38.020 Michael Amato is our contributing producer.
00:58:40.040 I'm your host, Bridget Todd.
00:58:41.520 If you want to help us grow, rate and review us on Apple Podcasts.
00:58:44.880 For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, check out the iHeartRadio app,
00:58:48.040 Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:58:50.340 if your bookshelf and your for you page are equally important to your personality
00:58:59.980 welcome home pro society is a weekly podcast that's part book club part group chat for anyone
00:59:06.200 who thinks pride and prejudice and love island deserve the same level of discourse each week
00:59:10.720 we're connecting the dots between books the internet and pop culture with your favorite
00:59:14.760 writers book talk creators and plenty of overthought opinions listen to pro society on
00:59:21.780 the iheart radio app apple podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts i survived nine months in
00:59:28.760 captivity and i've spent my life exploring how other people survive what should have destroyed
00:59:34.140 them i'm elizabeth smart and these are the survivor files every week i'm with survivors
00:59:40.420 who lived through the unthinkable,
00:59:42.380 abducted, stalked, controlled, and nearly silenced.
00:59:46.220 These are stories about what it takes
00:59:48.140 to make it out alive.
00:59:50.060 Listen to The Survivor Files with Elizabeth Smart
00:59:52.840 on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,
00:59:55.900 or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:59:57.920 New school year, same beautiful mess. 1.00
01:00:01.260 Good Mom's Bad Choices is back to talk 1.00
01:00:03.560 back-to-school realness. 1.00
01:00:05.640 The guilt, the giggles, and the choices
01:00:08.480 no other show is brave enough to admit. 0.98
01:00:10.420 Mom life is calling and I have my last motherfucking volleyball tournament of Irie's Club Team Volleyball. 0.95
01:00:17.240 And I can't wait for the thing to be over because I don't like participating and having to drive far distances. 0.94
01:00:26.560 Shout out to the moms and my mom who made it happen.
01:00:29.440 Listen to Good Moms Bad Choices from the Black Effect Podcast Network on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
01:00:36.820 This is an iHeart Podcast.
01:00:39.540 Guaranteed human.