The Drama with Zendaya; BAFTAs Slur Fallout; Sheryl Sandberg Leans AI; Sex Pest Take-It-Down Conviction; Sex Toys Meta Ban; ANTIFA Terrorism Trial – NEWS ROUNDUP!
00:00:49.980If your bookshelf and your For You page are equally important to your personality, welcome home.
00:00:55.400Pro Society is a weekly podcast that's part book club, part group chat for anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice and Love Island deserve the same level of discourse.
00:01:04.060Each week, we're connecting the dots between books, the internet, and pop culture with your favorite writers, book talk creators, and plenty of overthought opinions.
00:01:14.080Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:01:19.460I survived nine months in captivity, and I've spent my life exploring how other people survive
00:01:26.780what should have destroyed them. I'm Elizabeth Smart, and these are The Survivor Files.
00:01:32.380Every week, I'm with survivors who live through the unthinkable, abducted, stalked, controlled,
00:01:38.200and nearly silenced. These are stories about what it takes to make it out alive.
00:01:43.380Listen to The Survivor Files with Elizabeth Smart on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:01:55.540There Are No Girls on the Internet is a production of iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative.
00:02:03.660I'm Bridget Todd, and this is There Are No Girls on the Internet.
00:02:09.360Can we dip into the drama around the drama a little bit?
00:02:13.380The drama, of course, being Zendaya's new A24 movie that is in theaters now, which you and I both saw over the weekend on opening night, mind you, which is always a little bit exciting for me.
00:02:24.240Yeah, absolutely. The drama is worth talking about. The movie was pretty fun.
00:02:29.600I really enjoyed it. The reviews are very polarizing, so it's not the kind of movie that's going to be for everybody.
00:02:36.440The theater was full of what I kind of clocked as young Gen Z types, which was very exciting.
00:02:43.380I actually saw a new poll that said that young people are going to the movies more.
00:02:48.460This makes me happy as somebody who loves going to the movies.
00:02:52.160The idea of people not going to the movies concerns me.
00:02:58.760So I feel kind of cool that I'm like, oh, yeah, me and Gen Z have the same pastime here.
00:03:05.480So youthful, so in touch with the kids.
00:03:07.400According to Fandango's annual movie-going trends and insights study, they surveyed 7,000 adults, and they found that 87% of Gen Zers and 82% of millennials saw at least one movie in theaters in the past 12 months, compared with 70% of Gen Xers and only 58% of baby boomers.
00:03:27.480huh so the gen zers are going to movies more than everybody else although it sounds like
00:03:33.060everybody's going to movies that's like the majority of american adults went to at least
00:03:37.220one movie which is uh surprising i thought the movies were dying what are they talking about
00:03:42.500well that brings me to a little bit of my own personal drama regarding the drama which was
00:03:49.160that i don't know i just want to have a little bit of a reset conversation about theater etiquette
00:03:56.680Because we were at the movies together. And if I stop me, if I'm lying, this is this was my this was what I remember of that experience. We saw it at a small art house theater. Everybody talked at full volume through the trailers, not the commercials that come on before the movies.
00:04:16.000I'm talking about the coming attraction, the trailers for new movies coming out.
00:04:22.540Everyone in that theater was talking at full volume, not just one or two groups of people.
00:04:27.740You and I were the only people who were not speaking, and they were speaking at full volume.
00:04:31.500Is that a correct assessment of what the situation was?
00:04:34.320I think you might be overblowing it a little bit.
00:04:39.420There was one group in particular that was sort of down front that clearly were there on some kind of like large group, triple date, quadruple date thing.
00:04:52.200And I think there were a couple of them that were really talking at full volume and then just sort of giving license to many others in the theater to just be talking through the commercials, which like, you know, who cares?
00:05:06.540but then through the trailers it was pretty distracting i mean you were taking it pretty
00:05:12.380hard i was a guest i i i truly was like am i missing something i guess that's i guess it's
00:05:19.140a question that i will pose has theater etiquette shifted where there is no longer an expectation
00:05:24.860that you will be quiet through the coming attract i i come early because i want to see the trailers
00:14:00.060I can only imagine it was forced. So what is Sheryl Sandberg up to now?
00:14:05.640Well, Sheryl Sandberg is trying to get women to lean out from wanting to be trad wives and lean1.00
00:14:11.340in to using AI. Lean In, her organization, just put out some new research that digs into how
00:14:18.620women use AI in the workplace relative to their male counterparts, which basically says that
00:14:23.580women are adopting AI less in workplaces. Lean In found that 78% of men had used AI in the
00:14:30.340workplace when compared to 73% of women. Men also reported using AI more regularly. About
00:14:36.060a third of men use AI daily, while only 27% of women did the same. We actually discussed a lot
00:14:42.200of similar findings in an episode of the podcast that we'll put in the show notes. In reading about
00:14:47.140Lean In's position on this, I think Sandberg is clearly adopting a kind of framing that says that,
00:14:52.740oh, women aren't using AI, and that means that women are going to be left behind professionally
00:14:57.220and economically. This framing is very, very common, but it's not framing that I personally
00:15:02.680subscribe to, which we get into in that episode that I'll put in the show notes. But that's like
00:15:07.460her framing, that we got to get more women using AI so that women don't get left behind economically0.98
00:15:12.880and in workplaces. She also hired a brand new CEO for Lean In named Bridget, spelled correctly,0.81
00:15:20.280by the way, as it should be spelled, Bridget Griswold, who is a former meta product manager0.97
00:15:25.860who just entered the workforce three years ago. So she's newly hired from her last position0.52
00:15:33.680as AI and product director to the chief executive from that position to now being the CEO of this0.51
00:15:41.620massive women's empowerment nonprofit lean in, despite having zero traditional nonprofit
00:15:48.940leadership experience according to the wall street journal when i read that in your notes for this
00:15:54.940episode i was like oh bridget must have made a typo here or something let me look this woman up
00:16:00.080and so i i looked at her linkedin which is just right there and you it's not a typo like0.81
00:16:06.200in 2022 her position was intern and then from that she catapulted to a product manager
00:16:13.720position at Meta and is now CEO of Sheryl Sandberg's organization, which is just a meteoric rise for
00:16:22.660anybody. That is definitely one way to put it. This is kind of interesting for a lot of reasons.
00:16:31.140A bunch of longtime staffers at Lean In quit after this Bridget was promoted. More than a dozen
00:16:37.200employees, roughly a quarter of the foundation staff departed over the last year through layoffs
00:16:43.400and resignations, with Griswold's rapid promotion and lack of non-profit experience being cited by
00:16:48.800insiders as a key factor driving the exodus, according to the journal. And I do have to
00:16:55.280just mention this. You kind of obliquely alluded to it earlier, but if you have read the memoir
00:17:02.740Careless People, which you should read because it's really a phenomenal piece of writing,
00:17:06.900That book makes allegations about how Sheryl Sandberg always wanted to have young, attractive female staffers around her.
00:17:18.080There's an allegation made that Sheryl Sandberg expected or invited these young, attractive female staffers to cuddle with her in bed during overnight trips on private planes and such.
00:17:29.780Sheryl Sandberg would reportedly buy them lingerie.
00:17:32.680according to careless people if these were not things that you were down with if you were invited
00:17:38.580to do these things and you didn't want to do them it could harm your career so I feel like I need to
00:17:43.700say that just because if I had read allegations of this kind of workplace behavior about a man
00:17:52.380I would definitely have something to say about it I would have some raised eyebrows and then0.99
00:17:57.440seeing a very young woman be you know i guess i don't want to i don't want to say the wrong thing
00:18:05.140i just think it's i think i think it's worth noting that this was a allegation made by someone
00:18:11.940who was working under cheryl sandberg i think that i think that's important context for people
00:18:17.560to understand this leadership change it feels like potentially very relevant context yeah i mean
00:18:24.140And promoting somebody to be CEO who has no nonprofit experience, who only entered the
00:18:31.760workforce as an intern a handful of years ago, it's a curious move, you know?
00:18:50.680And people have a lot of experience. And yeah, this is not really the kind of meteoric rise that I've heard of a lot. Someone going from, you know, intern to CEO of a big nonprofit in this a couple of years. That's not something that I have heard of a lot.
00:19:14.440So Sheryl Sandberg wants Lean In to focus more on combating tradwife sensibilities.
00:19:21.560In a LinkedIn post, Sandberg criticized the tradwife online movement, calling it a recycled1.00
00:19:26.300idea that could push women to give up their careers and revert back to old-fashioned gender1.00
00:19:30.400roles, which I absolutely agree with and think that she's right on the money there.1.00
00:19:34.660She also raised alarm about the timing, citing data suggesting that younger men are growing
00:19:40.180more supportive of super traditional gender dynamics and marriage dynamics and encouraged
00:19:45.700women to push back against what she sees as these outdated assumptions about where women belong,
00:19:51.680both at home and in the workplace. So I don't disagree with any of that. I think that she's
00:19:56.880right on the money there. But I don't really see how telling women to embrace AI is going to be
00:20:03.700the thing that makes women want to turn away from trad white lifestyles. And I guess I just don't
00:20:09.660actually trust that someone like Sheryl Sandberg is going to know what will actually support women
00:20:16.120in this moment. Leaning in and girlbossing did not save women. I don't think that meaningfully1.00
00:20:22.840got women a lot. I would actually argue that a mindset that tells women to just lean in and1.00
00:20:28.700kick butt through things like systemic failures and systemic lack of support systems that you1.00
00:20:35.040did not create caused a lot of us to burn out. And frankly, it's probably one of the reasons why
00:20:40.920people are able to repackage tradwipery into something that looks kind of appealing online
00:20:47.200when it just actually isn't. So I would argue that leaning in, Sheryl Sandberg's big answer
00:20:54.740to all of these problems didn't actually work for women. So now it's AI. We already know that0.54
00:21:01.240emerging evidence suggests that women's labor may be disproportionately vulnerable to ai labor
00:21:07.260displacement so i don't know i'm not sure how telling people to embrace like full-throatedly
00:21:13.840embrace ai is going to be the thing that then combats women wanting to check out of the workforce
00:21:21.100you know what i'm saying i do it does feel like these are two pretty different things like
00:21:29.680confronting trad wifery which uh is a phrase that i had not heard before but i i do kind of like
00:21:37.180the phrase trad wifery uh not the concept just the the phrase itself but pushing back against
00:21:46.360that certainly seems like a good thing to do but like you said and therefore we need to
00:21:56.420encourage all women to embrace ai feels like not it doesn't feel like a solution to the problem
00:22:06.860of women being exposed to trad wife messaging like these these seem like two different things
00:22:16.800that don't really have a whole lot to do with each other so if anything i would argue that
00:22:22.860telling more people to just full-throatedly embrace AI, because we know there is such a risk
00:22:28.060for human labor displacement. I would actually argue that if you, if your whole thing is you want
00:22:33.740women robustly showing up in a workforce and being paid what they're actually worth and being able to
00:22:39.660make economic and professional and educational moves for themselves, I actually don't know that0.98
00:22:44.000full-throated embrace of AI will lead to that. If anything, I think it will lead to the opposite.
00:22:49.960Like, we'll all we'll all be able to be trad wives and stay home making bread because we're not having a fucking job.0.98
00:22:55.420Like, that's I feel I feel like she's not like thinking it through.0.97
00:22:58.080Yeah, that's the big gamble that we're all making right now.
00:23:01.440And I guess my larger point is maybe we should stop listening to Sheryl Sandberg.
00:24:40.840Every week, I'm with survivors who live through the unthinkable.0.98
00:24:45.380I knew if he woke up, without a doubt, he was going to hurt me.
00:24:49.940I started feeling that there was someone at the end of my bed, and I just started screaming.
00:24:57.380They are abducted, stalked, controlled, and nearly silenced.
00:25:01.340But these aren't stories about what's taken from them.
00:25:04.780They're stories about what it takes to make it out alive.
00:25:07.920Listen to The Survivor Files with Elizabeth Smart on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:25:16.860If your bookshelf and your For You page are equally important to your personality, welcome home.
00:25:22.800This is Prose Society, the weekly podcast that's part book club, part group chat for thought daughters, pop culture obsessives, and anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice and Love Island deserve the same level of discourse.
00:25:35.280I'm Eli Rallo, and every week we're connecting the dots between books, the internet, and
00:26:26.460Okay, so we talked about what happened at the BAFTAs earlier this year. The BAFTAs are kind
00:26:32.600of like the British Oscars. So just to give you a bit of a recap, John Davidson, who has the
00:26:38.040neurological condition Tourette's, was at the Baptist ceremony back in February to celebrate
00:26:43.200this film about his life. He has a particular kind of Tourette's that involves tics, where he
00:26:50.520sometimes uncontrollably shouts out things. And it's when that happens, it's like the worst thing
00:26:57.160that you could imagine saying. So the most contextually awful, offensive thing that one
00:27:02.920can say. And so at the BAFTAs, he yelled out the N-word at the first award of the night being
00:27:09.460presented by the Sinners team, Michael D. Jordan and Delroy Lindo, who were Black. There were other
00:27:15.100things that he yelled out, like yelling out pedophile while the BAFTAs award ceremony host,
00:27:20.500Alan Cumming, was speaking. But those did not make it into the broadcast. They were edited out.
00:27:25.900Also edited out was a speech where Ekinola Davies Jr. said, free Palestine during his winning speech. That was also edited out. However, the N-word was kept in the broadcast, even as Sony executives asked the Baptists not to include it in the broadcast. But they did.
00:27:45.840But after this happened, Davidson gave an interview where it sounded like to me he had been kind of set up by the Baptist.
00:27:54.060He said that the Baptist told him that he would be seated very far from the stage and that no one would hear anything if you were to experience a tick.
00:28:02.240But then somehow there was a live microphone in front of him for some reason.
00:28:08.440And, like, when he was experiencing tics, he did not realize initially that people could even hear them because he was told you'll be sitting in a place where people won't hear them.
00:28:17.740I remember talking about this story and looking into it, and that was my conclusion, too.
00:28:23.200Like, it did sound like he had been set up.
00:28:25.200Like there was just to believe that it was an unintentional accident, one would need to believe a whole series of really weird, almost unexplainable events transpired.
00:28:41.700That is exactly how I would describe the results of the investigation, which we now have.
00:28:47.680So the BAFTAs said they were going to look into this. This week, we have the results of the investigation from the BBC's Executive Complaints Unit, or ECU, about what went wrong. What you just said, that you would have to believe so many random things all happened at once, just happened to happen, that's essentially what they're saying happened.
00:29:07.580So this is from Sky News. In its report, the ECU said members of the production team monitoring the ceremony in an outside broadcast vehicle said they did not hear or recognize the N-word.
00:29:19.120Investigators accepted their account, agreeing the word, quote, was extremely indistinct to the point where it might well have not been recognized.
00:29:28.100So they didn't they didn't realize it was the N-word.
00:29:31.740okay sure so they also say about 10 minutes later there was another recurrence of the n-word which
00:29:39.120was recognized and quote immediately edited out in accordance with the protocols of offensive
00:29:44.660language there is no reason to conclude that they would have applied the protocols in one case
00:29:49.960while deliberately ignoring them in the other the ecu report said um i mean that's a pretty
00:29:57.600generous assumption that they're making i'm so curious how they came to this conclusion but
00:30:05.380okay okay but remember one of the big issues was that the word was not edited out of the
00:30:11.980recorded version of the broadcast later because certainly by then all parties knew it contained
00:30:18.980the slur there was no confusion about what the word was by that point so what happened there
00:30:24.440Well, investigators said there was a, quote, lack of clarity among the team as to whether the word was audible, which resulted in a delay of several hours.
00:30:35.160This was a, quote, serious mistake because there could be no certainty that the word would be inaudible to all viewers, they said, adding that the unedited recording remained available, quote, for so long, aggravated the offense caused by the inadvertent inclusion of the word during the initial broadcast.
00:30:53.280So this part makes no sense to me, right? Like this part, if I'm understanding it correctly, they were saying that for several hours, which we know that almost immediately after it occurred, Warner Brothers went to the BBC, who is producing the show, and explicitly asked them to edit it out and make sure that it was edited out.
00:31:14.740So that happened right away. So according to this investigation, we're meant to believe that for several hours, the BBC production team was like debating with itself whether or not the word was actually audible.
00:31:31.080and so like my question is like why not edit it out just to be safe like even if it's like so
00:31:38.800quiet that nobody can hear it just edit it out and if it truly is so quiet nobody will hear it
00:31:44.920nobody will ever know the difference why not do that that part makes no sense also
00:31:50.700if you're doing if you're if you've got a tape delayed broadcast and you can make
00:31:57.300And they clearly, as we'll get to in a minute, they clearly had a lot of editorial decisions to make about what to cut and what to leave in. So you've got to broadcast. Let's say I believe them, which I fucking don't, but let's say that I do.
00:32:11.880why is it okay to have it be like well something was screamed out but don't worry it's not audible0.94
00:32:18.900people people aren't gonna be it's not it's not clearly recognizable as a slur it'll just be like
00:32:25.620an unrecognizable thing that is yelled out why is that better just like just you know what i mean
00:32:32.680like as you said just cut it out like why in why include that why include it i mean
00:32:40.400yeah it's a great question i i struggle to think of any answer why they wouldn't just cut it out
00:32:50.340and i just don't believe it i guess that's what i guess that's what it comes down to
00:32:53.140the whole thing of them saying we didn't know that was going to be audible or not
00:32:58.860what do you mean i i i feel like i need more information about what they mean about that
00:33:03.600because like yeah like they could hear it yeah but was it audible i don't sure you can hear it
00:33:11.540but is it audible but is it audible it's not even a good lie okay so what about the fact that free
00:33:18.500palestine was cut out of out of a speech for the broadcast while the n-word was left in well per
00:33:25.620sky news the investigation found that the production team's decision quote did not hinge
00:33:30.580on considerations of impartiality, but rather the main consideration was cutting out an hour
00:33:36.480of the three-hour show to fit the two-hour broadcast. Quote, as is usual in coverage
00:33:42.400of events of this kind, cuts were made in some of the longer acceptance speeches, including that of
00:33:47.240Mr. Davies, the report said. The ECU found the editing of the speech did not raise an issue of
00:33:52.860editorial standards. So just totally random that they cut Free Palestine. Yeah, just random. Just
00:33:59.920random that they cut Free Palestine. It could have been anything, you know, it could have been
00:34:03.640anything that they cut. I'm glad that they threw that part in there as well, just to make it clear
00:34:10.120that their conclusions are bullshit. Yes, yes. I will say this was nice to hear that the ECU1.00
00:34:16.300report noted that the complaints about the broadcast all showed a high level of awareness
00:34:20.920that Mr. Davidson's interjection was an involuntary result of his condition and that no blame was
00:34:26.760attached to him because he has a condition so he is not to blame for this the bath says and the bbc
00:34:34.380are to blame for this so i mean i guess i'm happy that most people are keeping the smoke on the bbc
00:34:41.700and the bath does where it belongs but i am disheartened to see that they're like and also
00:34:46.240it kind of wasn't our fault either you know no we were doing our best we were just locked in an
00:34:52.860internal debate for several hours about whether or not this thing that we all heard was actually
00:34:59.940audible and should be cut from the broadcast and that we were told to cut from the broadcast and
00:35:04.620we said that we would cut from the broadcast and we just didn't cut it from the broadcast
00:35:07.480the report didn't say anything that i saw about why davidson was sat next to a mic or why it took
00:35:14.540so long for the baptists or the bbc to meaningfully reach out to the sinners cast about what happened
00:35:20.080or what was being done to make any kind of amends
00:35:49.120And now an Ohio man who pled guilty to cyber crimes involving both real and AI-generated sexually explicit images has become what the Department of Justice says is the first person to be convicted under the Take It Down Act, that new federal AI statute.
00:36:07.140So according to prosecutors, James Straller II targeted at least six adult women between December 2024 and June of 2025, sending them harassing messages along with both real and AI-generated explicit images of these women.
00:36:23.960So he would obtain or make these images of the women and then send them to the women he was harassing.
00:36:28.720He used AI to create pornographic videos depicting at least one of the victims in sex acts with her father and then shared those videos with her co-workers as part of a larger harassment campaign.
00:36:45.940He also reportedly contacted the mom of his victims, threatening to distribute the explicit material that he had created of their daughters unless the mothers sent him nude photos of themselves.
00:36:57.080So he was basically like trying to extort the mothers of the victims that he was harassing in descending nude images.
00:37:06.040Prosecutors further allege that he repeatedly called the victims leaving voicemails of himself either masturbating or threatening sexual violence.
00:37:13.540So The Guardian reports that he admitted to cyber stalking, producing obscene visual representations of child sexual abuse and publication of digital forgeries.
00:37:22.120So that last charge, the digital forgeries charge, relates to the Take It Down Act, which
00:37:28.360prohibits non-consensual online publication of intimate visual depictions and AI forgeries.
00:37:33.980So this legislation prohibits anyone from knowingly publishing or threatened to publish
00:37:39.220intimate images, including AI-generated deepfake images, without consent.
00:37:45.040Social media companies and websites must remove the violating content within 48 hours following
00:37:51.300a victim's request. The U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Ohio said,
00:37:56.220We believe Stroller is the first person in the U.S. to be convicted under the Take It Down Act.
00:38:01.520We will not tolerate the abhorrent practice of posting and publicizing AI-generated intimate
00:38:06.820images of real individuals without consent. And boy, oh boy, do I wish that were true.
00:38:13.260Because Grok is still being used to generate non-consensual images of women and girls,
00:38:19.860Even while high school girls are taking Elon Musk to court over it, a group of high school girls just sued Elon Musk over Grok being used to create AI-generated images of them, and they are minors.
00:38:33.880Yet, Musk is still doing business. Payment processors are still supporting payment transactions for people to purchase Grok and X subscriptions, even as the EU says that Grok is being used to create illegal content of minors.
00:38:49.440so yeah i wish it were true that we won't tolerate this happening but i don't think
00:38:55.460that actually is the truth that's so disappointing because it's so true you know it's like you
00:39:02.600it almost feels like a little bit of a win like a creep is prosecuted and women who have been
00:39:12.940targeted by what seemed like pretty disturbing crimes uh get some justice and you almost feel
00:39:20.800good about that but then you just look at the uneven inconsistent way that the administration
00:39:30.320and the justice department apply things like this and it clearly is like two sets of rules right
00:39:40.100Like one for people that they want to target, which in this case, it seems like they targeted a legitimate creep, but then a totally different set of rules for their allies like Musk, who, like you said, is just continuing to sell subscriptions to software that does exactly the same thing that this guy was just convicted for.
00:40:03.820exactly it's so clearly two set of rules and unequal enforcement so yeah i wish i wish that
00:40:10.580we did live in a world where this stuff was taken seriously and that we wouldn't tolerate it but
00:40:14.380we don't because of exactly what you just said that the powers that be are invested in letting
00:40:19.700people that they like and their allies get away with it profit from it laugh about it diminish it
00:40:26.420continue to do it find new ways to do it build an empire on it and i hate it and so yeah i i think
00:40:32.660until that institutional wrong is righted, I just, I wish I could agree that we take it seriously,
00:40:40.100as this district attorney said, but I don't. All the evidence is pointing to the fact that we don't.
00:40:45.220The Take It Down Act only works if somebody complains. And so somebody has to know, like,
00:40:50.820if I'm not on X, I have no idea that this image of me is on there. And so like, nobody has to,
00:40:56.900no platform, I don't, I'm not a big fan of this legislation, because I think it puts a big burden
00:41:02.080on the survivor to, first of all, be on the platform where this is happening, make the
00:41:07.460request, and then follow through with it to make sure that that 48 hours window abides
00:42:55.920Every week, I'm with survivors who live through the unthinkable.0.98
00:43:00.120I knew if he woke up, without a doubt, he was going to hurt me.
00:43:04.900I started feeling that there was someone at the end of my bed, and I just started screaming.
00:43:11.980They are abducted, stalked, controlled, and nearly silenced.
00:43:16.440But these aren't stories about what's taken from them.
00:43:19.900They're stories about what it takes to make it out alive.
00:43:23.500Listen to The Survivor Files with Elizabeth Smart on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:43:31.960If your bookshelf and your For You page are equally important to your personality, welcome home.
00:43:36.940This is Prose Society, the weekly podcast that's part book club, part group chat for thought daughters, pop culture obsessives, and anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice and Love Island deserve the same level of discourse.
00:43:50.360I'm Eli Rallo, and every week we're connecting the dots between books, the internet, and the conversations everyone can't stop having.
00:43:57.340I'm going to have to look up this story. I'm obsessed. I'm obsessed.
00:44:00.500from best-selling authors and your favorite book talk creators to the latest pop culture moments
00:44:05.500nothing is off the table it's like if you can hide some real messages inside compelling
00:44:12.040characters and that is a trojan horse whether you're looking for literary deep dives smart
00:44:17.320pop culture conversations or a community of readers who love to think a little too much
00:44:22.060you're in the right place listen to pro society on the iheart radio app apple podcasts or wherever
00:44:28.540you get your podcasts. See you between the pages. Let's get right back into it.
00:44:43.900So this is a quick story that I'm glad we're talking about because I think it has some
00:44:49.140very practical implications. 404 Media published an article today about what they said is the first
00:44:57.160trial in which people were charged as terrorists for antifa activities uh antifa stands for
00:45:03.420anti-fascist being opposed to fascists has been criminalized by the trump administration
00:45:08.440so uh despite the fact that antifa is really just more of like a general idea than any sort
00:45:15.360of organization uh trump declared it a terrorist organization in september and so in this particular
00:45:23.620trial, a group of people who allegedly set off fireworks and vandalized an ICE facility in Texas
00:45:30.340were arrested. And because of that declaration, they are being charged as terrorists.
00:45:38.260So one detail that's emerged from the trial is that a big part of the evidence that was presented
00:45:45.020against them is from the defendant's signal messages, which the FBI was able to recover
00:45:50.540from the phone of one of the defendants
00:45:53.680who was charged with setting off the fireworks.
00:45:56.980As listeners know, we are huge fans of Signal here at Tangody.
00:46:02.400It's the primary messaging app that we use
00:46:04.520for talking about show production stuff
00:46:06.380as well as just personal conversations.
00:46:09.040It's free, it's secure, and in my opinion,
00:46:13.060everyone should be using it all the time
00:46:17.420Both Bridget and I give monthly donations
00:46:19.820but not because we want to unlock some special features or anything because everybody gets all
00:46:26.060the special features uh for free uh it's just because we really like it and want to support it
00:46:32.400um it's run by a non-profit i think it's a great model for what valuable software can be
00:46:38.440they don't sponsor the show in any way um i'm just talking like this because i genuinely
00:46:43.460really like what they have built and put into the world as you said i'm a big fan of signal but
00:46:49.660I have to ask, if Signal is so secure, how did the FBI gain access to these defendants' messages?
00:46:56.340That is a great question, Bridget. And that is a big part of why I wanted to cover this
00:47:00.940segment here, almost as like a public service announcement for listeners. So like pretty much
00:47:06.900all messaging apps, when you receive an incoming text on your phone via Signal, you get a notification
00:47:12.720on your phone that tells you that you have a new message. By default, that notification includes
00:47:18.680a preview of the actual message contents, the first 100 characters or so of what it says.
00:47:25.940And this is the problem. And this is how the FBI was able to access the defendant's messages,
00:47:31.780even though they had been deleted from Signal. They were no longer accessible from the Signal
00:47:36.920app itself, but they were still able to be found in the phone's notification history.
00:47:43.520So even though the message had been deleted within the app, a copy still existed within that notification history in the phone's operating system.
00:47:53.760And so that's what the prosecutors presented in court.
00:47:57.200And it's a good reminder that despite all of the apps, like sophisticated encryption and very careful design features in so many ways, that one user setting and the way it was configured undermined all of that and left those messages exposed.
00:48:15.260Wow. So if anybody listening wants to fix this, what should they be doing?
00:57:01.900She is very much somebody who was in the middle of attempting labor while also being forced
00:57:07.560to do a Zoom court hearing with seven strangers, judges and court administrators.
00:57:14.180I looked at that video and it is horrifying.
00:57:18.100It's like something out of a parody because there's so many people in that Zoom call.
00:57:23.280And not only is she the only black person on that Zoom call, but she's like in a hospital bed, hooked up to IVs, in labor, in active labor.
00:57:38.680It it's it seems like a parody if it weren't so like horrifying and upsetting.
00:57:45.480Yes, ProPublica obtained that video of her Zoom court hearing and got her consent to share the story. In that Zoom call, you can basically hear her arguing her case for wanting to do this vaginal birth and not wanting a C-section.0.95
00:58:02.000And exactly as you said, it's, it's just horrifying. Like it's, it's like the, the image of a black woman who was like this hooked up to all the machines and very much in a hospital while having to kind of plead her case about what she wants to do with her own body to a bunch of white guys is, it's just horrifying.
00:58:23.420I don't want to be a statistic. And I came here out of precaution. However, I still have rights as an American citizen and as a patient that I am allowed to decide what goes on with me and my body and my baby.
00:58:42.500Well, let me ask you about that. What about the risks of the child? The doctors testified about some risks and help me understand that.
00:58:50.000in regards to what because she's saying that the uterine rupture can cause the placenta to
00:58:58.580to abrupt and it's a lot of what ifs and maybes anytime you go into childbirth whether you do a
00:59:05.700vaginal or a c-section there is inherent risk to the mother and the baby so
00:59:11.240if it's between them choosing whether i have to live or the baby has to live i did tell
00:59:19.880them that I want to live I have other children out here in the world that need me and that is
00:59:26.240my right because at the end of the day if I die from a c-section nobody on this call is going to
00:59:31.400take care of my children and that's just being frank okay so I am concerned about the well-being
00:59:38.160of my child but at the end of the day with my background I can read a trace just like they can
00:59:44.560And there's nothing that is saying that this is an emergency situation that I have to be rushed into a C-section within an hour.
00:59:52.780At one point on the Zoom hearing, she asked for an attorney or at least to have a patient advocate present for the conversation.
01:00:00.720But Florida courts do not require lawyers for pregnant women in hearings about their medical decisions.
01:00:05.700And the hospital, I guess, just didn't provide her a patient advocate.0.94
01:00:09.140So she has to advocate for herself.0.95
01:00:11.140I will say, though, I can tell that she's doing that thing where you're absolutely fucking furious, but you know you've got to hold it together because if you give them ammo for them to be like, oh, you're like a crazy, angry black woman right now, even though she is legitimately going through a situation that is genuinely enraging, I can tell that she is really trying to keep her composure and speak in a certain kind of way and advocate for herself.0.96
01:00:39.620And she's a doula, so she knows what she's talking about. And she's really drawing on her experience as a doula to advocate for herself. So I guess I say that to say, like, kudos to her for advocating for herself so well, under such duress, but she absolutely should not have to.0.97
01:00:58.960So she explains her reasons for not wanting a C-section, and they're very reasonable. They're things like infection and not wanting to have a long recovery along with the risk of death. She talks about how she is very worried that she will not be able to care for her other children if she is struggling with recovery from a C-section, which is pretty major surgery, and whatever potential complications might come from it.
01:01:24.040She also says to the Zoom court judges and administrators, if something happens to her and she were to die in that C-section, her children would go into foster care.
01:01:35.520And she says, nobody on this Zoom court hearing is going to take care of my kids if something happens to me while I'm getting this major surgery.
01:01:43.880So I don't feel like any of you all can tell me what I should do with my body in childbirth.
01:01:49.740So that hearing lasted for two hours. At one point, she asked if she could transfer to a different hospital. And they were like, oh, that's probably not likely because that new hospital would have to admit you was a patient.
01:02:02.180She also then asks if she can have a Black doctor or at least a Black nurse work with her.
01:02:08.120The judge, again, who was a white man, he almost sort of laughs at her and says, well, I don't see how race has anything to do with this.
01:02:15.940And he wouldn't be saying that if he knew the statistics around Black maternal mortality in this country.
01:02:21.400And she actually checks him on this.0.87
01:02:22.900She says, well, as a doula, I can tell you the medical outcomes are better when Black people have doctors that look like them.0.51
01:02:32.760Their health outcomes are better, which is just like a fact.
01:02:35.580Like, again, I can I can my heart breaks for her because I can see her having to draw from like very specific expertise and very specific experiences to communicate this in a way that might have a chance of getting through.
01:02:48.400So she doesn't just sound like some, you know, difficult Black woman.
01:02:52.220And she makes another good point where she says, I don't want anybody who is in involved in me having to do this, this like Zoom court hearing while I'm trying to give birth.
01:03:00.880I don't want any of these people involved in operating me on this when I'm under for a C-section, which I completely understand because these people already clearly, clearly see her as difficult and like argumentative and problematic.
01:03:14.220I can understand why she's like, now I don't trust any of these people to be operating on me while I'm under for a C-section.
01:03:20.000Yeah, they really talked down to her a lot in that hearing, too, in ways that are just, like, pretty surprising. Maybe shouldn't be surprising.
01:03:29.920Yeah, it just is a really bad, horrifying situation. So the judge did not order an
01:03:37.360immediate C-section, but he did say the hospital could perform one in an emergency without her
01:03:42.020consent. In the end, her baby was born via C-section. And after the baby was born,
01:03:48.500immediately after, they made her do another session of Zoom court, even before she was
01:03:53.580taken to the neonatal unit to see her baby. At that point, she was like, you all can do this
01:03:57.900meeting on your own. I want to see my baby. Like, I don't give a fuck what you all have to say.
01:04:02.660I'm done. So the ProPublica journalist who wrote this piece, Amy Urkarian, covers reproductive0.99
01:04:08.360health and is based in Alabama. And she writes, throughout my career, I focused on women facing
01:04:13.160the consequences of the state's fetal personhood policy. That's the idea that fetuses should have1.00
01:04:18.540the same legal status as children. My investigation shows how a similar theory played into the cases
01:04:23.960of two women, Cherie Stoyle and Brianna Bennett, who was another Black woman who was also forced
01:04:28.920to have a court-ordered C-section. These women experienced eerily similar situations in Florida.
01:04:34.560In both cases, they found themselves fighting for their rights to make medical decisions
01:04:38.720because they were pregnant. And so her piece also goes on to sort of contend with the fact that
01:04:44.080OBGYNs do have a unique challenge in that they're simultaneously caring for two patients,
01:04:49.740the mother and the baby. And the needs of those two patients do not always align.
01:04:56.120And so when conflicts arise, which can happen, the American College of Obstetricians and
01:05:01.720Gynecologists, their own ethical guidelines say that doctors should put the mother's well-being
01:05:07.340first. But in practice, that does not always happen. And so they talked to this professor
01:05:13.760of law at Drexel University, Elizabeth Kukura, who says that basically these cases reveal this
01:05:20.360pattern of doctors prioritizing the fetus over the mother, which is a dynamic that is sort of
01:05:26.540rooted in this tendency to view women primarily through the lens of our reproductive function,
01:05:33.000that we're not kind of humans with agency and responsibility, let alone the need to like care
01:05:38.780for other children that we may have or live life or not want to be dead. We are meant to just be
01:05:45.780vessels for carrying children rather than patients with agency in our own right. And we also see
01:05:54.660Sharice talking to the doctors and arguing with them saying, you know, I've made it clear that
01:05:59.080if it came down to my life or the baby's life that I would rather live because I've got other
01:06:04.760kids I need to care for and I don't want those kids going into the system I think there is a
01:06:09.060little bit of a thing that if you are not willing to sacrifice your life for your child in childbirth
01:06:15.140then you're like a bad mom and it's just frustrating to hear her have to argue this
01:06:20.300case of like no I actually it's very important for me to be alive and healthy because I've got
01:06:25.440children to care for at home and just yeah it's just very heartbreaking yeah the judge explicitly
01:06:32.040called her a bad mom and said that a good mom would let herself be cut open yeah so
01:06:38.380just really horrifying okay so i have a less enraging story also about sexual and reproductive
01:06:48.280health though less horrifying the popular sexual health and wellness company bellessa boutique0.51
01:06:56.340said that Instagram permanently deleted their account for using the word clitoris.0.65
01:07:02.720Belsa makes sex toys for all genders, and they also have a sister site that is like a porn site0.98
01:07:07.580for women. On Instagram, they had over 700,000 followers and a decade's worth of content. I was0.65
01:07:13.640actually looking into them, and it sounds like they started on Instagram in earnest. That's
01:07:17.660where the company started. The company confirmed to Mashable that Meta said that their account was
01:07:23.400disabled for violating Meta's community standards due to sexually explicit language in organic
01:07:28.180content. There is no opportunity to appeal, and they also say they got no warning about this
01:07:33.880specific outcome. However, a Meta spokesperson told Mashable, quote, this account repeatedly
01:07:39.940posted explicit descriptions of sexual acts and over the last few months was alerted each time
01:07:44.700it violated our sexually explicit language policy. The CEO of the company told Mashable,
01:07:49.920For over a decade, hundreds of thousands of people came to the Balesko community to learn about and celebrate their own bodies, a safe, shame-free space to discuss sexual wellness and pleasure.
01:08:00.120Instagram deleted it for sexually explicit language, meaning discussing women's bodies in a health context is treated as inherently unacceptable.
01:08:08.140So they showed Mashable the email that Meta had sent them about this.
01:08:11.880the email said that examples of content that would not be allowed include sexually explicit
01:08:16.900language that uses explicit or graphic detail about the genitals, states of sexual arousal,
01:08:22.260or sexual encounters. But we actually know the truth about this. That truth is that that standard
01:08:28.900really only applies to the genitals of people who are not cisgender men, because meta totally
01:08:35.600allows ads for things like erectile dysfunction medication or other kinds of content or products
01:08:41.820that are geared toward men's sexual health and wellness.
01:08:45.900Back in 2023, a sex toy company called Unbound,
01:08:48.980which actually used to sponsor our show,