Under the Influence (with Jo Piazza) - July 07, 2026


The Art of the Heist: Why We Root for Thieves

Topics
Life After Ambition: The Midlife Crisis We Weren't Prepared For Laura Ingalls Wilder is Getting Her Due on TV

Episode Stats


Length

37 minutes

Words per minute

162.37

Word count

6,073

Sentence count

322

Harmful content

Misogyny

3

sentences flagged

Hate speech

4

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 Hey y'all, Jo here, and you are listening to Under the Influence.
00:00:09.600 As you all already know, The Parisian Heist is out on July 14th, and today's episode
00:00:15.220 is basically the behind-the-scenes of how the book got made.
00:00:18.760 So consider this a sign to pre-order, or come hang out with me at one of my events.
00:00:23.140 So, fun fact, the early reviews of Parisian Heist are really good, but a couple of them,
00:00:28.880 mostly the ones by men have said the heist wasn't exciting enough. And you know how I feel about
00:00:36.680 that? I feel really good. Because real heists aren't exciting. So I did my job. Okay? They're
00:00:43.000 not mission impossible. There's no lasers. There's no Catherine Zeta-Jones backflipping through a
00:00:47.400 security grid. There's no impossibly handsome men with impossibly handsome hair. Real art heists
00:00:53.720 are kind of boring, okay? They're by common criminals, and they involve a little bit of luck,
00:00:59.600 a boring security system, and usually somebody on the inside. And I know this because I learned
00:01:05.980 about it from the absolute best. Today, I'm talking to Anthony Amore. He's the director
00:01:11.540 of security at the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in Boston. Yes, that Gardner, the one that was hit
00:01:18.180 in 1990 in the biggest property theft in the history of the world. It involved two men dressed
00:01:24.940 as cops, it took 81 minutes, and they got away with 13 masterpieces. And not a single one of
00:01:31.800 them has been recovered. Anthony has spent more than two decades hunting those paintings down,
00:01:36.760 and he was my heist guru for the Parisian heist. He read my heist, he fact-checked my heist,
00:01:42.260 and he has the reason that my heist might be a little bit boring, okay? And I don't care,
00:01:46.900 because it's real. Today, Anthony and I are talking about why our culture is so obsessed
00:01:52.220 with art heists, and why we can't stop rooting for the thieves, even though we are people who
00:01:57.420 do not love crime and do not love robbery, okay? You're gonna love this. My conversations with
00:02:02.820 Anthony made me a much better heist writer, and they also make me feel really smart, which I love.
00:02:16.900 I could never, ever, ever have written a convincing heist in the Parisian heist without you,
00:02:24.160 even though I'm going to share this publicly and it's embarrassing.
00:02:26.940 All of my reviews have been like, the heist wasn't all that exciting.
00:02:30.880 And I'm like, because they're not in real life.
00:02:32.800 And you should ask Anthony that because he...
00:02:35.120 You're right. Realism is not what people are looking for.
00:02:38.540 No, no. Well, it's actually, it's funny because there's a distinct difference between male and female reviewers too.
00:02:46.440 Male reviewers have been quick to know.
00:02:47.940 They're like, I want the heist to be more exciting. 0.98
00:02:50.000 And women reviewers are like, oh, this seems like a really well thought out, well planned heist. 1.00
00:02:55.240 Yeah, kudos. 1.00
00:02:56.540 Kudos to you.
00:02:58.740 But I think that there's something interesting about the heist.
00:03:01.280 And that's what I wanted to start out talking to you about today.
00:03:04.340 The heist has really become mythologized in our culture.
00:03:08.060 Why do you think that is?
00:03:10.660 You know, I think it's, first of all, it's a great way to describe it.
00:03:14.660 I think it's because people, first of all, only know about art heists from what they see in movies.
00:03:22.260 And in movies, the people who pull them off are romantic figures.
00:03:28.000 They're like Thomas Crown or Sean Connery and Catherine Zeta-Jones or Ocean's 12, I think it was, was an art heist.
00:03:37.060 And think about the people I just mentioned.
00:03:40.120 They're all like these most famous, good-looking people in the world.
00:03:44.660 They're very, very good looking with excellent hair.
00:03:48.600 Excellent hair, except for a later, later in his life, Sean Connery.
00:03:53.720 Later Connery, right.
00:03:54.960 He looked great anyway.
00:03:55.960 And people see those, these people as being a little glib, but likable and only doing it because they love the art and very, very clever.
00:04:08.340 So people romanticize it that way.
00:04:11.140 They don't have this image in their mind of the common criminal who's depriving the public of, you know, the world's great art.
00:04:19.500 I think another thing is that sometimes the public views museums, here in the United States especially, because they're not government museums except for a few.
00:04:28.980 People view museums as like these bastions of the wealthy and they're only for like, you know, the blue bloods and well-heeled people.
00:04:37.940 um but that's not true at all either i mean museum the whole point of a museum is egalitarian
00:04:44.580 is to bring these priceless treasures that we could otherwise not have bring them into a place
00:04:50.280 where everybody can come see them and enjoy them so and they're most and they're mostly non-profits
00:04:55.100 so it's this perception that people have that doesn't match the reality and um you know the
00:05:01.920 reality is much uglier and can be violent. And, you know, it's one of my missions to try to get
00:05:09.460 that point across to the world. Yeah, yeah, exactly. And I do think it's so interesting
00:05:14.200 that so many people look at art thieves almost as this like Robin Hood, right? Because they
00:05:20.500 consider that the museums are, like you said, only for very wealthy people when the goal of museums
00:05:26.420 is to make this art accessible to the world as opposed to mostly being hoarded by rich people
00:05:32.860 in climate controlled chambers and then, you know, or sold as collateral in drug deals, which,
00:05:38.580 you know, I get it. I get into the fun stuff in the book, too. But yeah, I but I do think that
00:05:45.560 there is this kind of aspect of museums being fancy and the thieves are just doing this like
00:05:51.520 for the betterment of, of, of the average person. And that's, that's not the case.
00:05:57.440 It's so far from the case. You know, I hear that a lot too, the Robin Hood thing, you know,
00:06:02.300 steal from the rich and give to the poor. First of all, where's the give to the poor part? When
00:06:07.580 people steal masterpieces, they don't give them to anybody. They try to sell them and then find
00:06:13.400 they can't. So they hide them and nobody sees them. So the second part of that Robin Hood
00:06:18.620 myth isn't factual either so they're not stealing from the rich they're stealing from a non-profit
00:06:25.400 and they're giving it to nobody so you know there's nothing in reality that that comports
00:06:32.820 with that sort of mythology well and the majority of heists are just so much simpler than we imagine
00:06:41.880 them in movies you know i when i think about heists i'm like mission impossible and lasers
00:06:47.980 and computers and, you know, doors and gates sliding open and closed.
00:06:53.060 And it's not it's not like that.
00:06:55.300 And you know that very well because you oversee security at the Gardner Museum, which did
00:07:02.140 experience, you know, one of the biggest and most memorable and unsolved heists in history.
00:07:09.600 Right. You know, when I watch these movies and of course, you know, Hollywood has to
00:07:12.440 take liberties. It would probably wouldn't be so exciting if it didn't.
00:07:16.020 But you see all sorts of security mechanisms that you just couldn't do in real life because of fire codes, limitations in buildings, and the cost of the sorts of things you see in movies that just aren't factual.
00:07:30.980 In reality, what you try to do is build a lot of layers of security of different quality.
00:07:38.500 You know, some layers are very, very dense and some are lesser so, but you try to make the path between the public, the public part of the museum where the thief would enter in the art that you want to put layers between the two and then layers to keep a person from, you know, smashing grabs, pull a painting off the wall and run out.
00:08:00.420 you want layers to stop them on their way out too so so that's what reality is like it's not
00:08:06.260 you know these steel doors come down in galleries if there was a fire can you can you imagine just
00:08:12.460 trapping people in galleries that way like i think thomas crown of fear had something like that
00:08:17.720 but it's it's it's far different and uh you i can tell you rather than your research because it's
00:08:24.060 it's uh you've really got things down how did how how does my how does my heist end up stacking up
00:08:29.740 did I do an okay job? Yeah, because you focus it in reality. But, you know, I'm enjoying the book
00:08:36.460 because of just, you know, I'm like Van Gogh or Van Gogh or Van Gogh. You know, we're saying
00:08:44.240 Van Gogh in the audiobook because I think that Van Gogh will sound confusing to people and I
00:08:48.860 don't want to do anything to take someone out of the story. No, that'll mess up people. You're
00:08:52.900 right and um but when you read it you know to the eye it looks like joe van gogh but as you point
00:09:00.620 out in the book it's actually joe and it's more like in in in the netherlands would be joe van
00:09:06.080 gogh so it wouldn't it wouldn't be a rhyming name um but i just like that history part you know
00:09:12.560 everyone knows if you if you ask anybody on the street about van gogh they're going to mention
00:09:17.400 that he cut his ear but everyone knows that story but as far again the reality is far more
00:09:25.040 interesting with you know with him dying and then his his loving brother teo dying and and his
00:09:30.740 widow uh taking over this collection of art that turns out to be you know 100 years later the most
00:09:39.560 valuable art on the planet and it's just um it's just a really interesting story well i'm so glad
00:09:46.580 that you think so as someone I mean you spend your days surrounded by these wonderful masterpieces
00:09:53.460 and you love art uh you know the way that I do the way that so many of my readers do I do love
00:09:59.740 hearing the story of how artists not just became famous but how they became people that we know
00:10:06.560 right like how how how do their how do their names survive and so when I found when I found
00:10:13.960 Joe's story when one of my friends mentioned it to me. I loved it so much because I had never
00:10:19.660 heard her name. I had heard Tao's name, Theo Van Gogh, Vincent's brother, who was his tireless
00:10:27.560 art patron for his whole life. But the truth is he died about a year after Vincent. And after that,
00:10:33.920 Vincent's entire legacy was left to Joe to manage. And she was tireless in doing it. And I think I
00:10:41.000 would love to see her name mentioned as often as we we talk about vincent's brother and also when
00:10:47.200 we talk about these artists i want to know about the people behind the scenes i think you've helped
00:10:54.460 that and i really do mean that because you make it more accessible you know um i think people a
00:10:59.420 little less likely to go pick up you know i have a few a few of these biographies on on vincent
00:11:06.780 and they're so thick like they're daunting and um but yours makes it uh much more enjoyable i think
00:11:14.820 accessible stories like that especially in the mass media um because your book will be a huge
00:11:21.100 hit that won't be a big surprise to you or your audience and people start to learn hey there's
00:11:26.620 this person and i think it'll inspire um you know just the way the world's wide web works you know
00:11:32.800 people will start to read about it, the more clicks her name gets, the more interesting it
00:11:37.880 becomes and she'll take on a new life. So I think I think you've really contributed to that.
00:11:44.620 Well, thank you. And that's my goal, right? I wanted this to be fun. I wanted people to pick
00:11:48.060 it up and read it at the beach or the pool. Or as you told me, you were just reading it at the
00:11:52.520 laundromat after your washing machine broke. But and let it be a gateway drug into into the world
00:11:59.960 of art that too often does seem very rarefied and often inaccessible. Okay, let's take a really
00:12:08.840 quick break here. We'll be right back. And we're back. I do want to talk about the museum that you
00:12:23.220 work in, the Gardner, because I think it's such a special museum. And I think the Gardner, similar
00:12:29.580 to what the Barnes does in Philadelphia, has done such incredible work at bringing these
00:12:34.560 masterpieces that we might not have otherwise seen to the public.
00:12:39.420 Yeah, you picked a good parallel.
00:12:41.840 You know, the Barnes, the founder of the Barnes modeled his will after Isabella Stewart Gardner.
00:12:50.280 So when Isabella Stewart Gardner built this museum, which some people mistakenly call
00:12:55.580 a house museum, it is not.
00:12:56.880 She felt the country needed a great museum and in 1903 opened this building that she conceived of and dreamt up and paid for and populated with art.
00:13:11.060 It's the only place like it in the world, frankly, where every single aspect of it, right down to the name, is for a woman.
00:13:20.600 And when she died, her will said that nothing in the museum could be changed.
00:13:25.800 You can't move any of the panties.
00:13:29.040 You can't add or subtract from the collection.
00:13:31.700 I often give the example that, you know,
00:13:35.200 if the Louvre felt bad because our Vermeer is missing
00:13:38.760 and said, hey, you could have the Mona Lisa
00:13:41.820 just put it where the Vermeer was,
00:13:43.980 we wouldn't be able to because the will says
00:13:46.500 if you do make any sort of change,
00:13:49.340 then the entire collection has to be auctioned off
00:13:51.780 and the money goes to Harvard University.
00:13:55.280 So it stays exactly as she left it, and time has shown that she did an incredible job of designing this place and decorating and hanging her art.
00:14:08.660 And I'm lucky to be, I've been here for nearly 21 years, and I'm very lucky.
00:14:12.980 I still haven't seen everything in here.
00:14:14.900 There's just so many thousands of pieces of art, and it's a real privilege to get to be here every day.
00:14:21.760 That's incredible.
00:14:23.020 And to that end, the picture frames for the Vermeers that were stolen remain empty on the walls, right?
00:14:32.620 Yeah. So when the theft happened in 1990, it was March 18th.
00:14:38.100 So it was overnight just after St. Patrick's Day and two men disguised as police officers rang the employee buzzer at 124 and a guard broke protocol and let the police in.
00:14:50.540 and they turned out to be thieves.
00:14:52.660 I was heavily influenced by this sort of heist,
00:14:56.720 as everyone shall see as they start reading for these nights.
00:15:01.120 What's the release date? July 14th?
00:15:03.980 July 14th.
00:15:05.120 Yep, they'll see on that day.
00:15:06.300 So those two fake police officers tied the guards up in the basement
00:15:12.180 with handcuffs and spent 81 minutes stealing 13 works of art from our museum.
00:15:17.740 and it turns out it's the biggest property theft in the history of the world and none of them have
00:15:24.500 been recovered. So we, the will does not mandate that we keep the empty frames of the wall, but we
00:15:31.300 do it because we believe the public should know that something belongs in those spaces,
00:15:36.860 that those are the only spaces that these masterpieces can ever hang and that we believe
00:15:42.640 will get them back and that's where they will be. So we see these frames as signs of hope.
00:15:49.680 Yeah, I love that idea that, you know, they're gone for now and not forever. And I told you this
00:15:55.640 last time we talked, I'm like, you are going to recover these paintings. And then it is going to
00:15:59.680 be a really great movie of the man who recovered the missing Gardner Heist paintings. And I'm
00:16:07.380 happy to write the screenplay with you. Please do, you know, your lips to God's ears on this,
00:16:11.760 Joe, because, um, uh, I've been trying for 21 years and I'll die trying, but I'll say that,
00:16:17.480 um, you know, uh, the, the actual truth probably will never be told because there's so many people
00:16:24.300 who have, uh, told me things in confidence that I can never share. And I suspect that eventually
00:16:30.280 when the paintings are recovered, there'll be a lot to it that we won't be able to tell the public,
00:16:34.800 but that's not what's important. Um, the important part will be, uh, that these will be back in the
00:16:40.640 walls for hundreds of thousands of people to come and see and enjoy.
00:16:46.700 Well, and you told me, too, before that, you know, it matters less to catch the criminals
00:16:53.600 than to just get the paintings back.
00:16:55.900 And you're also more likely to just get the paintings back than to actually catch the
00:16:59.900 thieves, right?
00:17:01.200 Yes, we, you know, the statute of limitations ran out after five years.
00:17:05.980 So at the time of the heist, the statute was five years.
00:17:09.340 it's now 15 um because of our theft but uh who who took the paintings as such a secondary thing
00:17:17.880 only interested in in the sense that hopefully it'll lead us in the right direction towards
00:17:23.540 recovery but um nobody thinks about you know who did it we just think about the paintings back
00:17:30.280 in the frames that's that's job one you know i'd liken it to a kidnapping you know um that poor
00:17:39.020 savannah guthrie i mean my heart really goes out to her and her family and you know she the last
00:17:44.400 the the second thing she cares about is who who took her mother number one is where is her mother
00:17:50.680 and getting her mother back there's so much more important and she would certainly sacrifice
00:17:56.280 the second part of that for the first getting her mother back so that's sort of how we look at the
00:18:02.520 paintings and i don't i don't want to be insulting in any way you know paintings no of course not
00:18:06.480 Right. But, you know, these paintings are important. These things are supposed to be on these walls and be for our education enjoyment forever, not for the lifespan of any one person. So we'll never stop looking for them. We never we never have. We we've been on the hunt ourselves as an institution since day one, unlike any other regime in the world.
00:18:32.840 Right. Right. Exactly. Exactly. Well, I and you write. So I've read all of your books when I was working on the Parisian heist. And, you know, thank you in the acknowledgments and the notes, because you really you did help me help me shape this heist in so many ways.
00:18:53.260 But more than the heist, you helped me shape how art thieves think about art, what their motivations are as well.
00:19:02.920 And I, you know, I thought about that so much when I was reading the Rembrandt heist that you wrote.
00:19:08.920 You know, the reasons that people steal art and the many motivations.
00:19:15.940 I mean, what are the reasons that people steal art?
00:19:19.680 It's not always just money because you can't always resell these things.
00:19:23.260 Like, it's kind of a myth that you could just, you know, take a Van Gogh or a Vermeer off the wall and then just resell it the next day to some rich guy.
00:19:32.040 Right.
00:19:33.700 Well, you know, that's where the problem is.
00:19:35.860 So there's two parts of that.
00:19:37.520 First, you're exactly right.
00:19:39.440 But thieves don't realize this.
00:19:41.380 You know, they only know what they've seen in the movies as well.
00:19:44.200 Just like most of the public thinks that when masterpieces are stolen, they wind up in some rich guy's secret lair.
00:19:53.760 And that never happens, ever.
00:19:55.400 But people that steal this stuff, they're common thieves, and they steal all sorts of things.
00:20:01.040 They commit all manner of crime, and this is just another job.
00:20:05.580 And if they find out that the masterpiece they stole is of no value to them, then so what?
00:20:10.820 They're going to keep continuing. They're going to continue to do other crime every week, right? So they steal them and they hide them. And that makes it far more difficult for someone like me. So that's the first part. But the second part is difficult, too, because if you if you read the Rembrandt heist, you see this character, Miles Conner, who is this great outlier in terms of art thieves.
00:20:36.600 his motive was rarely money, whereas every other thief is money. And the lesson you get from this
00:20:43.180 is you can follow profiles. Profiles are important. You should know the profile of the sort of
00:20:50.140 criminal you're seeking. However, you always have to consider that the person who committed
00:20:56.380 the crime you're investigating doesn't fit the profile. And you can never just discount people
00:21:03.420 based on theory. So it's a very, very important lesson for people, whether you're hunting down
00:21:10.740 an art thief or you're hunting down a serial killer, the person might be outside of the
00:21:16.400 profile. And that's one of the things you learn from the Rembrandt heist. Yeah. Yeah. And I think
00:21:25.400 that we do get very caught up in these archetypes of, like, who is a thief of anything, right?
00:21:34.120 And I will also say, one of the things I really wanted to flip the script on is that
00:21:41.260 in so many movies, art thieves are men. Are men more likely to be art thieves in real life than
00:21:50.180 women? Well, like I always say, men are more likely to be the criminal by far. Men do the bad
00:21:58.100 stuff. But again, you can profile a crime down to just men, but then you look and you find a
00:22:05.560 woman named Rose Dugdale about whom I wrote a book. Yes, which is also wonderful. We're going
00:22:10.220 to put it in the show notes. Thank you so much. She stole a Vermeer in 1974. Vermeer's paintings
00:22:17.580 are amongst the most valuable in the world, if not the most valuable. And so again, if you're
00:22:23.520 investigating that crime, you're going to think, well, this heist must have been pulled off by a
00:22:29.060 man. But in fact, it wasn't just a woman, but the woman was a mastermind. And what made her story
00:22:35.720 really interesting to me was, if you read it, you read the judge's comments in 1974, they really
00:22:44.880 were a sign of their times because no matter what crimes this woman committed, the judge would always
00:22:49.580 just assume she was under the influence of some man. And that's why she did it. And he would go 1.00
00:22:54.680 light. They would go light on her. And the fact is, is she was always the mastermind and the strong
00:22:59.860 one. She was the leader. So it's this strange sort of anti-hero. Um, you know, I, I, I hate to think
00:23:07.760 of anybody who steals a Vermeer as a hero. But I think you get my point. It's sort of
00:23:13.920 she she shows how the architect doesn't work exactly as you would just mention it.
00:23:20.640 Right. Exactly. Exactly. I mean, it goes against casting in our minds. Right. And yet. Yeah. And
00:23:26.740 I don't think that we see them as heroes. But, you know, the one thing that I do want to unpack
00:23:31.760 a little bit when we get back from our next break is the idea that in movies and in books,
00:23:37.260 the audience is kind of rooting for the thieves.
00:23:47.280 The one thing that I do want to unpack a little bit is the idea that in movies and in books,
00:23:53.540 the audience is kind of rooting for the thieves.
00:23:56.820 Oh, yeah, they absolutely do.
00:23:59.080 I wrote this book, The Rembrandt Heist, that you mentioned, and I appreciate that.
00:24:05.220 And the subject is a man named Miles Connor, who's from Massachusetts, and I argue is the greatest art thief who ever lived.
00:24:14.440 And oftentimes when I do book talks, he's 83 now, but he is very spry and funny, and he'll come to my talks.
00:24:24.240 Oh, my gosh, I love this.
00:24:25.440 We have to bring him to one of my talks.
00:24:27.360 Oh, my God, he'll come.
00:24:28.320 He will definitely come. And people are over the moon for him. They ask him to sign the book. When I say a part in the story where he gets arrested, you hear the the audience go, oh, they clap for him. And I keep reminding him he's the criminal here. He's not the good guy. But people are just attracted to it. And it's just I think it's just a cultural thing that's very difficult to overcome.
00:24:51.800 Yeah, I mean, I think it is. And I think it goes back to what we talked about, you know, this idea of this particular kind of heist, unlike, say, maybe a bank heist or a home robbery, as feeling like a victimless crime, even though it isn't, does make it easier to make the art thieves heroes in a way.
00:25:16.700 And I think that that's just an interesting idea for us to think about. Like, who gets to be the hero or heroine of a story? And how do our pre-existing views shape that? Shape who gets to be the hero? And how do their motivations shape it?
00:25:33.140 I mean, I would say, you know, everyone has to read it.
00:25:37.620 No spoilers here.
00:25:38.400 We're in a no-spoilers zone.
00:25:39.540 But I am trying to give my thieves a motivation that I think is a good one.
00:25:47.560 That said, they are still stealing a priceless work of art from a nonprofit institution.
00:25:54.120 So, again, not a good thing.
00:25:56.420 Not the best thing to cheer for.
00:25:57.980 But I do want my audience to cheer for my art thieves.
00:26:00.760 Because you have to, to want to keep turning the page.
00:26:03.140 Right. And I would say that except for maybe one, if that many, your audience probably has not had a multimillion dollar masterpiece stolen from them. Right. So everybody who's reading it, they're thinking, well, you know, that's not going to happen to me. It hasn't happened to me or anyone in my family or anyone I know.
00:26:27.140 And you just, if you can't easily picture the victim,
00:26:31.000 it's easy for you to root for the clever thief.
00:26:35.640 Because so few of us know anyone that this has happened to.
00:26:39.880 And moreover, especially in the United States,
00:26:42.180 it's incredibly rare for anybody working at the museum
00:26:45.920 to be harmed in the commission of a theft.
00:26:49.360 So people don't think of it as a violent crime here.
00:26:52.100 ironically, in Europe, where guns are not easily accessible, you're far more likely to see
00:26:59.720 an art heist involving a weapon. Here in the United States, you don't. And I think this is
00:27:07.920 my back and napkin guess. I think it's because in Europe, if you're carrying a gun into a museum
00:27:16.920 for a heist nobody there is armed in the united states if you come with a gun you might be facing
00:27:22.800 someone who's armed so there's really no point in it so you see a big difference um and also if you
00:27:30.520 if you perform an armed robbery in the united states you're gonna and if and you're caught
00:27:35.860 you're gonna face a much stiffer sentence especially if someone is shot or killed right
00:27:41.600 right exactly exactly well and i think that makes a good point right if because so many of these
00:27:46.780 aren't so-called violent crimes uh i think it does make it easier to put yourself in the shoes
00:27:54.700 of the criminal i mean i have talked to so many people and i have this line in the book and like
00:27:59.480 you know how many of us have walked into a museum and thought could i steal that painting
00:28:05.060 and i think the answer is a lot of us i no longer think that after talking to you because you you
00:28:12.160 explained the hardware and the mechanics of many of the security measures and i'm like oh yeah i
00:28:16.760 don't think i could work on that security screw all right that seems that's that that's much harder
00:28:20.920 much harder than i thought it would be but it's harder in such boring ways right it's not lasers
00:28:25.420 it's like a little screw that only one screwdriver will fit that will get this painting off the wall
00:28:30.720 right well that's one layer you know like in the movies there aren't red laser beams but there are
00:28:36.400 invisible microwaves that are in the in the gallery that are detecting movement so they're
00:28:43.840 actually better. And that, you know, the next generation, and we're moving towards it here
00:28:49.640 at my museum, will be one of the first is to use artificial intelligence in your camera
00:28:56.260 surveillance system. So, you know, if you think about what happened at the Louvre, one of the
00:29:00.800 issues is that the people monitoring the cameras did not see what was going on in that balcony.
00:29:06.820 And at first glance, for the public, that sounds unacceptable. Like, how could they have not seen
00:29:11.220 it. Well, step back for a second and think about the enormity of the Louvre. It's gigantic. I mean,
00:29:16.900 they have hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of cameras and a handful of people cannot monitor
00:29:22.980 every camera all day, but artificial intelligence can. And the artificial intelligence software,
00:29:29.840 AI cameras and such, will tell the operator something's happening here, something's happening
00:29:36.660 there. So you won't have to look. It'll look for you and show you. So it's going to improve security
00:29:42.700 in places like museums drastically. It's going to force thieves to find different ways to
00:29:51.040 perpetrate heists, which they will. They always do. But it'll just be that much harder.
00:29:58.800 Do you think most thieves have to have some kind of inside knowledge about exactly what security
00:30:05.120 measures any individual museum has? Because they do vary so much by institution.
00:30:11.700 That's such a great question. Yes. 80 to 90 percent of all museum heists involve some sort
00:30:18.280 of inside information. You're exactly right. You know, museums aren't regulated in the United States.
00:30:24.940 So every museum does security the way they want to. So it's not easily discerned what a particular
00:30:34.020 the museum is doing to protect its collection. You know, it's not like say airports where
00:30:38.720 there were regulations and, and that's what the airports follow. Um, a museum may have no security.
00:30:45.280 It's their collection, or it might have, you know, Fort Knox level security like us at the
00:30:51.420 museum. So, um, you do have to have, or at least try to have some sort of inside info
00:30:58.580 as to what you're, you're going up against, because, you know, there are serious consequences
00:31:02.940 to being caught um so yeah you you hit on something really important uh if a theft happens
00:31:08.980 at a museum the first thing one of the first things uh that the investigatory team needs to do
00:31:14.700 is start to interview the uh employees to see if they were involved yeah that that that makes
00:31:22.420 sense to me and like i said i don't walk into a museum museum anymore and think wow i could pull
00:31:26.700 off an art heist i no longer believe that i can so you i think our book will actually do a lot to
00:31:32.600 dissuade people from stealing priceless priceless works of art even though my heist is simple
00:31:38.340 it is still something i do not think that i could do but someone might try you know and but i'm glad
00:31:45.760 you're taking that approach because when i first started in 2005 one of the things i noticed doing
00:31:53.060 my research into art theft was that every time a big heist would happen the police or the other
00:31:59.580 investigators involved would inevitably say this was clearly the work of professionals but
00:32:04.600 i was finding as i found out who was doing these heists that there really aren't professionals
00:32:10.640 so to speak they weren't this team of traveling art thieves like you would think in the movies you
00:32:16.140 know and um the more you can dissuade people from thinking this is some easy thing that can be done
00:32:23.100 uh like your your uh efforts are uh geared towards i think that will help and it will
00:32:30.100 also help investigators to understand who really does it and those things are all
00:32:34.060 great bonuses for the art world yeah no i i completely agree because i do not think that
00:32:40.000 the louvre heist did museums any favors uh because it did make it seem like it was so easy when i
00:32:46.300 mean in fact i think that you know i think they got very lucky and even though their plan was very
00:32:50.360 basic uh but I do think after the Louvre heist a lot of people are like yeah no I could 100% do
00:32:55.360 that yeah you know I think um one of the things I try to tell people when when when I'm asked about
00:33:02.200 the Louvre heist is excuse me I'm sorry is um every major museum has been hit so when when people
00:33:10.600 think boy how could that happen at the Louvre I always say well we'll point to a place where it
00:33:14.640 hasn't where hasn't it happened and it will continue happening and it'll happen again at
00:33:19.880 museum this month and it happened that one in italy last month um it it happens all the time
00:33:26.820 there are a heck of a lot of museums and um again with various levels of security so when you look
00:33:34.520 at what happened at the louvre instantly every other institution stops and says could this have
00:33:39.420 happened here and you know a lot of security directors will say no no no that couldn't have
00:33:44.740 happen here, but it probably could. So it depends that, you know, you have to be honest with
00:33:50.200 yourself as an institution. Can you be 100% secure? No. Your goal is to try to keep striving
00:33:56.660 towards that 100%, never become complacent. Exactly. Exactly. Because I do think so much
00:34:05.640 of pulling off a heist is just looking for an opportunity. It's opportunity and luck and some
00:34:11.280 planning and an inside job and i just feel so lucky that i had you as my heist expert
00:34:18.880 well i'm lucky to have somebody who gets it in you because you're exactly right um it's opportunity
00:34:27.360 there's uh an element of luck without a doubt you know like you you pulling a painting off the wall
00:34:35.360 god forbid imagine you know if the smashing grab imagine the frame breaks in your hands and it
00:34:41.000 ruins the canvas i mean there's some luck for the owner of the painting as well because that's a
00:34:45.940 worse result than sf is you know catastrophic damage to the art so um there is an element of
00:34:52.900 luck there's uh the opportunistic thief who visits the museum or hears from an insider
00:35:01.880 that they can pull something off you know but as they say there's the
00:35:05.840 a motivated offender, a suitable target in the absence of a capable guardian will entice thieves
00:35:14.460 every time. So, you know, if you have somebody who is intent on pulling off a heist, especially
00:35:21.120 one who's capable or willing to hurt people and they have a target that maybe they haven't
00:35:30.560 set information and the security isn't in a position where it can stop one of these thieves,
00:35:36.380 then you're in big trouble. Yeah. Yeah. Well, I want everyone to read all of your books. Will
00:35:42.840 you tell them where they can find them and order them and just find more information about you?
00:35:49.780 Well, thank you very much for that. My books are all available on anywhere you buy books. Of course,
00:35:54.880 They're available on Amazon and Barnes & Noble online and the other online e-tailers.
00:36:01.320 And you can get the latest one called the Rembrandt Heist at Barnes & Noble and other bookstores that you frequent, and I hope you do.
00:36:11.840 And you can read about me and my work at my website, which is simply anthonyamore.com.
00:36:19.060 That's anthonyamore.com.
00:36:23.660 Wonderful.
00:36:24.140 Thank you so much for being here, Anthony.
00:36:25.520 You're the best.
00:36:27.280 You are.
00:36:27.940 I really enjoyed it.
00:36:28.900 Thank you, Joe.
00:36:54.140 Thank you.