00:00:00.000classes in session. Hey, everybody, and welcome to unlearn 16 classes in session guys paramenopause
00:00:10.740is a situation I almost how my ear pods look, I almost just forgot the name of my podcast. I've
00:00:15.640been doing it for five years. That's wild. I also found this fidget spinner for those of you can't
00:00:20.160it's like a it's like a 3d printed model that you that you slide in out like fits together.
00:00:25.400and I don't know if it's Anna's, but now I'm super distracted. Anyways, for those who are
00:00:30.400just listening to me, it looks like a little red Christmas tree and an inner coil comes out of the
00:00:35.660bottom and then you slide it back in. Nonetheless, not the point of this video. Today, you just get
00:00:42.080me, but next week, I'm going to give you a teaser. Actually, you can wait to the end for the actual
00:00:47.620hint, but next week's guest is going to be awesome. Just saying, I'm just saying
00:00:55.840she's going to be awesome. Okay. I gave you a little bit of hint. There's a better hint coming
00:01:00.460at the end. I hopefully my ADH brain will remember the hint at the end. If I don't remember it,
00:01:06.300just put it in the comments. I don't know. I'll type it. Um, what do I want to talk about today?
00:01:11.120Well, I think we have to get a legitimate and a rational view of what goes on with our news. Is it created and curated? I hate to be the bearer of bad news. Of course it is.
00:01:28.980who's creating it, who's curating it, who has that power, and to what end. And I think
00:01:36.420a lot of people like to talk about government. They like to talk about propaganda. They like
00:01:41.660to talk about, you know, sort of governmental ability to obfuscate. Is that a word? Obfuscate?
00:01:50.500cloud reality for its people to maintain power, yada, yada, yada. Sure. But I'm going to say this.
00:02:00.320I believe that the news and information in general is controlled and curated,
00:02:07.680curated, curated. I'm going to have a problem today. Not necessarily by government,
00:02:14.840although government can be the conduit. I think it's always been controlled and curated by a
00:02:24.300certain group of people, the people with money, the people with power, in order to do one thing.
00:02:32.700And that one thing is more money. Even when, and we're going to speak about it today,
00:02:41.460Even when we talk about war and the government propagandizing war and censoring and bolstering and all of the things they do through media, although now it's much more difficult, it's always been to the end of winning, getting support for the war and winning the war.
00:03:36.080limited in news sources drawing from different realities, different perspective, different
00:03:43.060points of view, different points of the world right now. The problem is now they flooded the
00:03:49.700zone, right? It's just so much information. How do you know what's true? Who's selling it?
00:03:54.520What they mean by it? All of those kinds of things. And let's be honest, me with a cell
00:03:58.680phone somewhere is not the same as an investigative journalist. I'm going to be super clear about
00:04:03.800that. So I want to talk about the history. I want to talk because I think we need to understand it
00:04:10.380so we can stop pretending as though we're living in a unique time. We're not. We need to understand
00:04:16.040the history. We need to understand the goals. And then I'm going to serve up. I'm going to
00:04:21.400give you my possible solution. And not that it's going to be perfect, but I'm going to give it a
00:04:28.100Anyways, number one, yellow journalism. As long as there's been the spread of information, as long as there's been a way that people have tried to negotiate and gain power and gain support and change anything from their community to their cities, to their towns, to their countries, there's always been a level of propaganda.
00:04:55.700I mean, that's advertising, that's selling yourself. There's so many different words. Nobody rolls into the job interview and is 100% honest. No, no, no. Same with the relationship. You put your best foot forward and later they find out you don't want to hike.
00:05:10.060um but in in more established senses as soon as we started establishing the flow
00:05:19.020and the commercialization or the commodification of media and information
00:05:24.880books newspapers right we were doing it for one purpose to sell to make money now
00:05:36.940Some people could argue selling reality would make the most money
00:05:42.080Sure, unfortunately, and this is where people come in
00:05:46.080People don't necessarily want to buy, understand, go through all of the different levels that it takes
00:05:58.260All the different intellectual capacities and bridges it would take to understand the goings-on of the real world
00:06:06.480and what's going, you know, what's happening and what reality is. We kind of want bite-sized
00:06:11.440versions. I think we've always wanted bite-sized versions. We've just gotten to a point where the
00:06:16.480bites are about 30 seconds. Bites have just gotten smaller and we're not really chewing our food. We
00:06:22.600just swallow it and hope it doesn't get caught in our throat. I love a good metaphor. Well, let's go
00:06:27.760back to yellow journalism. So yellow journalism was this idea that if you sensationalize the
00:06:33.520heading okay yellow journalism i think was born i and i'm gonna i'm gonna get this wrong and
00:06:38.700somebody's gonna call me on it i believe it was born um of in a newspaper genre i think about the
00:06:46.780the uh american uh spanish-american war but this idea that if you sensationalized an idea
00:06:55.280um what happened that more people you know you just you just made it a bit bigger you made the
00:07:02.120headline a little bit bigger that people would want to buy in. So there's another famous headline
00:07:10.860that says, if it bleeds, it leads, right? That people, if given the option, they would rather
00:07:20.760see a headline that infers horrific, horrific, catastrophic realities. And you're much more
00:07:31.160likely to pick that up in order to get the whole story. And you might be disappointed
00:07:40.400by the story, but they don't care. You just picked up the paper. So who cares? The accuracy
00:07:45.420of the story becomes a secondary issue. That's been around since the late 1800s. If it bleeds,
00:07:56.400it leads, this idea of yellow journalism, sensationalized storytelling, using exaggeration
00:08:03.320and hyperbole to draw you in, to leave you as a cliffhanger. All of that has always been true.
00:08:12.920Why? To sell papers. You guys ever seen the movie Newsies? Highly suggested. But it's to sell
00:08:18.380papers is to sell the story. Because for the most part, people's lives are boring. You go to work
00:08:27.480for eight hours a day. Back in the 1800s, my God. There's a level of wanting to be entertained a
00:08:33.860little bit. So you go through that and you see, okay, well, that makes sense. You have newspapers
00:08:42.740and very few. Let's remember that back in that day, we would have had a lot of monopolistic
00:08:48.100formation, right? But you have newspapers wanting to sell and wanting to serve a certain element of
00:08:54.560the public. Do I think there would have been an agreement or a tacit underpinning between
00:09:01.620major newspapers and the government? Of course. Of course there will be. There will always be,
00:09:07.500but make no mistakes, it's always about money. So they run the right stories, they get the right
00:09:12.360breaks. They give support to the right politicians. They get the right zoning legislation or they get
00:09:19.340the right tax break, whatever the case may be. These connections, these pieces haven't necessarily
00:09:26.400been how do I control and manipulate the public? It's how do I get the public to buy in so the
00:09:34.400bottom line is to make more money? We'll go to World War I. So World War I, I know a lot of you0.79
00:09:39.440guys would have taken history and you would have done World War I. And one of the major assignments
00:09:43.060every teacher always does is this idea of propaganda. Those propaganda posters of World
00:09:51.340War I were awesome. It was awesome because there's no counterbalance to the story.
00:09:59.380So the United States, the Canadian government and the United States government and every
00:10:03.820world government, puts forward advertisements to get young men to join, voluntarily join the war
00:10:14.260effort. And in Canada, it was always these really sort of pseudo-cartoony drawings of young white
00:10:23.840men, because let's be clear, in the beginning, it was deemed the white man's war. Why? Because
00:10:29.740Canada was horrifically discriminatory, bigoted at that time. They didn't want anybody else
00:10:35.740joining. Don't worry, they'll change their mind as soon as they need people, which is, in all
00:10:40.360fairness, how everything changes in this world. It doesn't change because we realize we're bigots.
00:10:44.380It doesn't change because we think everybody deserves human rights. It changes because
00:10:47.780the government and the people in the industry realize that we need those people to do better.
00:10:52.200And all of a sudden you get voting rights for women and African-Americans have more rights.
00:10:57.100It's, it's, it's done for practical purposes. I don't think it's ever been done one time for
00:11:03.280ethical or moral reasons. I could cite the civil war in the United States, but I'm not going to
00:11:07.860go that far back. So World War I, you have these pictures of these young men pointing the, a gun
00:11:15.360thrown over their shoulder, huge smile on their face. And these images would say things like,
00:11:21.580Come see new places, investigate new lands, protect people across the globe, whatever it was selling, right? Clearly a lie. Clearly. Now, to what end? Was it really because we thought we were the good guys, they were the bad guys?
00:11:42.880Well, not in World War I, guys. World War I, if you look at the foundations of World War I and how it happened and why it happened, it was never good guys versus bad guys. It was all of these leading factors. You had rampant imperialism. Why do you have rampant imperialism? Well, to make more money.
00:12:03.000you had a heavy level of militarization why well because the industrial revolution it just spawned
00:12:10.100all of this stuff ahead you did have this idea this sort of notion that that our way of life
00:12:17.160was better and therefore we got to go teach them how to be how to be better you know as we are
00:12:22.580um but nonetheless again that was all leading to if everybody's doing things our way our way
00:12:30.920makes us more money, makes us more secure, makes us grow. That's the end game. And let's be crystal
00:12:39.840clear, war is about making countries money, selling to the right people, creating all of
00:12:46.780these munitions, creating guns, creating tanks, creating bullets. All of this stuff had huge,
00:12:53.160huge economic impacts to who? Only the winning country. War is a moneymaker to the country who
00:13:01.860wins. So it makes perfect sense that that level of propaganda would be pushed there.
00:13:08.040Now, when we're talking in the late 1800s and early 1900s, we talk about literature and who
00:13:12.980was allowed to write and why they were allowed to write. Well, it was all men. Particularly,0.99
00:13:18.140it was all white men well to what end well because they controlled that industry right that culture0.69
00:13:26.760that belief system any woman that tried to write well they used pen names they used fake they used
00:13:32.500pseudonyms in order to get their work published and in order to get it distributed because it
00:13:38.340it had weight it had meaning it had purpose but gatekeepers were there in order to make sure that
00:13:45.820only certain people's ideas got hurt. Well, to what end? The publishing gatekeeping is probably
00:13:56.180one of the most significant things that nobody ever really talks about, right? We don't have
00:14:04.340that issue anymore. But if you have a place like Random House or Penguin or whatever, whatever
00:14:09.860publishing company, they get to decide what has value and what doesn't. But I promise you,
00:14:16.500they're deciding what has value and what doesn't based on the market of the day.
00:14:22.360Not what is good. Not what is true. Not what is brilliant. Not what has foresight. What will sell?
00:14:57.900Is about to bring with it certain video imagery
00:15:01.420of what went on in World War II. And so now we need to carefully curate that.
00:15:08.340What gets on TV? How does it get on TV? Who has access to that technology? Who has access
00:15:14.060to that messaging? What messaging is going to serve the nation? And why do we want it
00:15:20.420to serve the nation? Say it with me, because it makes us money. So in World War II, the
00:15:26.020propaganda wasn't, you couldn't really sell it the same way as you sold the first one,
00:15:30.160right? Because all those young men who were convinced and those families that were convinced
00:15:36.820to send their 18 year old boys off to war, that it was going to be this incredible, amazing
00:15:45.160experience. And, and it, you know, everybody would want to join this adventure. You can't
00:15:50.940sell it that way anymore. It doesn't work because they're like, you are lying.
00:15:57.520it. So what do they do? Well, they shift. Now, obviously, World War II has some evil, horrific
00:16:08.180villains. Obviously, there's no question about it. But funnily enough, in Canada, those
00:16:19.320villains, the rise of that of that kind of mentality and ideology that was rampant over
00:16:26.000Canada. It was rampant over Canada as well, because we'd just gone through the Great
00:16:32.560Depression. Everybody was desperate. Nobody had money. It was scary. It was violent. It was
00:16:39.300devastating. And so in that condition, people tend to turn to radical extreme ideologies that
00:16:48.420say, don't worry. I know who's to blame. Them over there. And them always changes. Them over there.
00:16:57.980I'll get rid of them. I'll deal with them. And I'm going to make your life better. And what is0.99
00:17:02.180your life? What is the primary driver of your life? Economic security. Economic security.
00:17:11.440So listen to me. So we had huge problems in Canada. Want to know why we didn't care about
00:17:15.080World War II, even though we joined relatively early. We joined relatively early because we
00:17:20.840want to be on Britain's team. We want to be on the winning side. I wish it had to do with morality
00:17:28.160and ethics. I do not believe it did. There's a reason why World War II really started when
00:17:34.680Germany took over the port in Poland, right? And then it was about six months of a phony war.0.71
00:17:42.300nobody wanted to go to war because a they know it was horrible b they can't they have no way of
00:17:46.760convincing anybody of how to join and and the only time we ever had a significant push wasn't with
00:17:54.160the the destruction of minorities wasn't with taking away their civil rights wasn't with the0.67
00:17:59.960horrific levels of anti-semitism anti-communist sentiment the way they treated gays the romani
00:18:08.020It doesn't matter. None of that mattered. As soon as they stepped into Poland and took that port, we went rut row. Well, why money? So now we have a shift in propaganda, right? We have a shift to say, well, now we're fighting evil.0.85
00:18:26.620And then you started seeing, it was no longer propaganda imagery of the kid pointing and saying, oh, I'm going to have a great adventure. It was propaganda of the evil on the other side.
00:18:43.540And so now the images were, you're not joining to get a better life, to see the world. You're joining to fight evil, the Japanese and the German.0.98
00:18:54.640Now, again, I'm not going to disagree with the evils of war and what was going on, especially in Germany. But I am saying this. Right before we invaded and chose up a team, our government didn't care. Our people didn't care.0.92
00:19:14.460Some of the biggest billionaires in the United States, or not billionaires, millionaires at the time, didn't care, and they sided with what Germany was doing.0.69
00:19:30.380So you had big money making decisions and pushing in different ways to ensure certain things happened in order to make more big money and secure more money.
00:19:44.460so world war ii rolls around that ends people get stories and and as it comes back television
00:19:56.660is sort of front and center right 50s television 50s and 60s tv was on all the time as soon as
00:20:04.020everybody could afford that one black and white in their living room it was on 24 7 what do we
00:20:08.980put on that television station? Entertainment. How do we entertain? How do we get families
00:20:17.820to focus? And in the beginning, in the fifties, we had this huge economic boom. So it was
00:20:23.360flat out entertainment at all times. How do we draw people in? How do we make them laugh? How
00:20:29.240do we give them a break in their day? How do we keep them watching? And you keep them watching
00:20:35.440for one reason, so that they watch the advertisements, so the advertisements that are paid, pay for
00:20:42.820the program that they are watching. The program survives based on the advertiser's revenue
00:20:51.800of that program. Now, do I think that advertisers could have a vested interest in certain political
00:21:01.120outcomes in order to bolster sure can advertisers then kill the news and television programs of
00:21:07.820course i'll get to that soon but again even when it seems as though it's a polit it's strictly
00:21:16.060political and ideological i still make the argument it's it feels ideological
00:23:35.480counterbalance to, well, on a television show, they want to sit down, they want to watch TV,
00:23:43.220and they're watching all of this footage because it's brilliant and because they know, and it
00:23:48.860keeps them in their seats and they watch the advertisements because they're waiting for this
00:23:52.180horrific footage to come out. Because again, if it bleeds, it leads. Make no mistake. It had this
00:23:57.980negative side effect, but the war itself made money, made money for those television stations,
00:24:05.740made money for those news programs. It made money. It captured people in their seats.
00:24:11.000So there's a reason the government didn't have a blanket censorship law.
00:24:17.720What's more powerful? Propaganda. You don't think the government could have shut it down?
00:24:23.580Of course they could have. Bigger fish to fry, guys. Bigger fish to fry. It's actually probably an example of how money wins out over politics and governmental propaganda. Money wins out.
00:24:42.700The money of war and televising it wins out over the propaganda or the needed control factor the government would have wanted in order to spin that war.
00:24:59.680But it is the last fully televised war and there's also reasons for that.
00:25:06.880Now, in the middle of this war, you also have the power of TV come into play.
00:25:10.360Again, a little piece of propaganda, a little piece of how do we control, how do we manipulate. And I'm saying all this not just to say the oligarchs and the government and people in power, but guys, we bought in, right?
00:25:53.740ability and desire to want to be entertained rather than informed. That's on us. I can't
00:26:02.540blame somebody else for that. So right around that same era, you would have had JFK going up
00:26:09.180against Nixon in the first televised political debate. And right here, you're about to learn that
00:26:15.340But the perception of things is the only thing. So you have JFK, young, good-looking guy, coming on TV for the first time, but his camp understands the media a little bit. He gets a tan. He calls ahead. He finds out the background is going to be a light-colored background, so he wears a dark suit, right?
00:26:37.420Every time he speaks during that debate, for the most part, he speaks directly to the camera as though he were speaking to the American public. Nixon, who's way, way more accredited, way more experienced, in all fairness, way more intelligent politically, whether you agree with him or not, neither here nor there.
00:26:57.420um when he gets to the stage he realizes oh kennedy had a tan so i'm going to use makeup he
00:27:03.860uses makeup halfway through the thing the heat of the lights is melting him like a wax figure
00:27:08.100number one number two he wanted to wear a light color suit to look like more of a man of the
00:27:13.040people he blended right into the background because he never thought to check that to check
00:27:17.420that background coloration and number three every time he spoke because he was used to debating and
00:27:24.100winning a debate in real time against an opponent, he looked directly at Kennedy. He wasn't used to
00:27:31.020having to win over the audience. He was used to beating his opponent. And when you look at your
00:27:36.700opponent and you make points and you make them uncomfortable, that's how you win. So anybody who
00:27:44.980listened to the debate, Nixon won hands down, Democrat and Republican alike. Anybody that saw
00:27:50.340that debate, said JFK won it, hands down, Democratic and Republican alike. Well, what does
00:27:58.320that say? Everything we are just shifted. Now, it's not to say that prior to that, there weren't
00:28:05.380gatekeepers. What made the news? What didn't make the news? And I also want to point out this.
00:28:10.720It's just as important to check bias about what makes the news. Are you telling the full story?
00:28:16.700Because I think the full story, I think we've undervalued a lot of our investigative journalists because I think they're incredible about how they research the story, the vetting, everything that goes into before you put that kind of stuff on a news broadcast or in a paper.
00:28:36.840What we don't talk about enough, I don't think, isn't the ethics or the goal of those reporters to do their job, it's not the bias of the stories that are told, but the bias of the stories they chose not to tell.
00:28:56.660i think the biggest method of control is limiting information i think that's changed today but is
00:29:10.700limiting information what was left out purposefully what was left out because our culture
00:29:17.740and our intelligence and our awareness is limited what wasn't being said
00:29:23.380because as a citizen as an educator as a as a student i can't possibly understand the bias
00:29:35.060about what wasn't said how do i know the stories that weren't told i can check now the stories
00:29:41.460that are told and we'll talk about that in a bit you check the bias you you double check information
00:29:47.220You can try to vet it yourself. It is important, but what didn't get told? What story wasn't
00:29:57.500covered? And not just because they've decided it's not worth it, because the people don't
00:30:02.260want to listen to it, because it's too hard to understand, it's too complicated. That's
00:30:05.780problem number one. Problem number two is also what story doesn't make us money? Problem
00:30:12.680number two, meaning does it cost us more money than it's going to make us? Does it cost us money
00:30:17.440with advertisers? Does it cost us money with governments? What's going to cost us money?
00:30:21.860There's a ratio there. And number three, and this is the real scary one, we live,
00:30:29.460we have for quite a while, and I'm assuming every country does, we live in this cultural
00:30:35.900echo chamber about what's important, what has value, what has weight, and what do we just simply
00:30:44.320not understand. The reason why diversity is so incredibly important in our media outlets
00:30:49.120is for diversity of thought, is to say, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, this story in Sri Lanka that
00:30:54.060you're missing, you don't understand it because you don't understand the culture, you don't
00:30:57.300understand the language, you don't understand the history and the ripple effect because you're so
00:31:00.880wrapped up in what happens in North America or Western Europe. Those are incredibly important
00:31:08.200caveats. And like I said, I mean, all of this is shifting today, but with the shift that we have
00:31:15.260today comes something else. So we have Vietnam, we have the shift to televised war. And then we
00:31:25.000come to the Gulf War, the first Gulf War, 91, and the American government recognizes,
00:31:35.340as does everybody, war on TV makes money. But if we can curate war on TV, it can make news money.
00:31:47.520We can use propaganda to control it. And then we can still make money off the back end as well
00:31:54.520as a government, and I think a deal was hatched. So in this war, for example, it wasn't unfettered
00:32:03.280journalism, right? It wasn't fully televised and uncensored. It was heavily, heavily curated and
00:32:08.700censored. So if you were part of the media, you would be put in media pools. You would stay in
00:32:13.540one particular hotel. A general would walk in once or twice a day, give you the news of the day.
00:32:19.840you're not going to find it you're there just to hear it in in country but in a very closed
00:32:28.960limited curated system if any journalist was going to leave that system they would and they
00:32:36.620would do this they would have to go with military escorts and those military escorts would take them
00:32:43.060to places they wanted to take them when they wanted to take them and they would make sure
00:32:46.900that the picture and the imagery was exactly what they wanted them to see. And then CNN ran that war
00:32:53.180for 24 hours a day for the entire duration. My mom watched it as though she thought she was
00:32:59.960watching reality. Smart bomb after smart bomb after smart bomb hitting the target. Do you know
00:33:05.540in that war, number one, they use the same video on loop. Number two, only 7% of all the bombs
00:33:12.040dropped were smart bombs? 7%. So even if the smart bombs were 100% effective, let's assume they were,
00:33:23.760they weren't, but let's assume they were. Let's assume that every video, this idea of a smart
00:33:30.080bomb, 7% of what was dropped, but that's all we ever talked about during that war. During that
00:33:37.480war they created playing cards like like bubble gum baseball cards operation desert storm yellow
00:33:46.860ribbon campaign you could trade you have a cut there was gum in the packages you could trade
00:33:53.020an osama bin laden for a george w bush for this missile for that tank baseball cards
00:33:59.820They created this yellow ribbon campaign
00:35:54.780um and it changes everything that and this shift in in a crazy way also coincides with 9-11 so you
00:36:07.020have 9-11 happening 2001 september 11th obviously and then you you almost right on its tail end
00:36:14.320Right on its tail end, you have the explosion of the internet, information at mass, and then you have that overwhelming access to information, the obsification of who we're fighting, why we're fighting.
00:36:39.900You have this idea of the war against terror. So rather than clearly legitimize what's going on in war, you cloud it all. You cloud it all in like, you never know where they're going to be. They could be over there. They could be over there. 9-11 cost 3,000 lives, but what it really cost was a boatload of economic potential.
00:36:58.700not only like you you can't find osama bin laden all of a sudden there's a gear shift
00:37:05.020going into iraq iraq arresting saddam hussein him getting hanged in their public square why
00:39:13.980Well, now what's happened is there's been a flood of information. So on the internet, how do you discern what is true, what is real, what is manufactured? And you used to be able to sort of delineate between sources.
00:39:31.680But now our real problem is the advent of AI
00:44:41.120In this age of we can know everything, we literally almost want to know nothing.
00:44:50.600We want to think the solutions are simplistic and painless.
00:44:55.100We want to think technology will save us.
00:44:57.880And for the most part, the majority of us are all waiting for the billionaire to come along with a conscience to lead the world down the right path, whatever the hell that means.
00:45:24.160I think part of the solutions would establish that if you want to consider yourself a democratic nation, a truly democratic nation in the pursuit of truth, you have at least one television station dedicated to such.
00:45:37.640One television station that nobody touches, that has a consistent economic basis, that is required to have different perspectives on that show, that is required to vet and be held accountable by the court system, by judicial externalities to make sure they are telling.
00:45:59.520And when they don't tell the truth, that they own it, that they go back and that they actually change the...
00:46:06.280It needs to not be contingent about who's in government, what advertisers they're putting on air.
00:46:14.800But the second part of that solution is the real big problem.