A Bit Fruity with Matt Bernstein - August 23, 2025


Sydney Sweeney and the Outrage Machine

Topics
The Trans Teen Imprisoned for Refusing to Join the IDF Dr. Phil: From Nice Guy to Nazi (with Aubrey Gordon)

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 10 minutes

Words per minute

176.5

Word count

12,502

Sentence count

448

Harmful content

Misogyny

58

sentences flagged

Toxicity

62

sentences flagged

Hate speech

39

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 Did you guys see that American Eagle is selling limited edition pairs of the Sydney Sweeney
00:00:06.040 jeans that have been washed in her bathwater? Wait, are they? Wait, is that real? Matt?
00:00:16.780 No. I made that up. Let's talk about it.
00:00:22.120 hello hello and welcome back to a bit fruity i'm matt bernstein and i don't care about sydney
00:00:35.200 sweeney i don't care about sydney sweeney and if you click this episode thinking i too don't care
00:00:40.780 about sydney sweeney then this is the sydney sweeney episode for you i usually pick episode
00:00:46.100 topics based on what I care about and want to dive deeper into. So this episode is sort of
00:00:53.080 reverse engineered in that I don't care about Sidney Sweeney. I have never cared about Sidney
00:00:58.860 Sweeney. So my job here today is to try to investigate why so many people are trying to
00:01:06.040 get me to care about Sidney Sweeney. Recently, the actor did a commercial for American Eagle
00:01:13.180 genes that I did not know about. Because like I might have mentioned, I don't care about Sidney
00:01:18.020 Sweeney. See, gay guys, we love to talk about celebrity women, but it's more like Lady Gaga 0.97
00:01:23.900 or Jennifer Coolidge or Beyonce. Gay men don't really get together and hang out and are like, 1.00
00:01:30.900 let's talk about Sidney Sweeney. She's not for us. And that's okay. That's okay. Or at least it was 1.00
00:01:37.900 until last month when the entire right-wing media apparatus coalesced around Sidney Sweeney's jeans
00:01:44.000 commercial and how allegedly angry the woke left was about it. But I'm the woke left and I wasn't
00:01:50.620 mad. I didn't even know what the hell was going on. It felt like a reverse Dylan Mulvaney Bud Light,
00:01:55.920 except I wasn't shooting a gun at piles of American Eagle jeans to protest Sidney Sweeney. 1.00
00:02:00.800 I didn't even know about the ad, much less give a shit. But Fox News mentioned Sidney Sweeney 0.99
00:02:05.900 181 times over a four-day period. So I realized that I have to care about Sidney Sweeney because
00:02:13.140 they're making me care. Greg Gutfeld, you are a terrorist and you will pay for your crimes. 0.99
00:02:18.500 Today, I want to do culture war anthropology. You know, when I started this podcast, I thought it 0.99
00:02:25.300 was going to be a sort of culture war podcast. Those were the days of right-wing meltdowns over
00:02:31.280 desexualized M&Ms. And at the time, it felt fun to observe the things that these people would get
00:02:38.000 mad at. But it doesn't feel fun anymore. Because I think most people across the political spectrum,
00:02:43.980 honestly, have at least a vague sense that there's a darkness underneath these increasingly
00:02:49.700 ridiculous culture wars. And today, I want to see if we can identify that darkness and why certain
00:02:56.280 And people would rather us talk about Sidney Sweeney until we turn blue in the face than face it.
00:03:02.240 I thought that was pretty well written, my little intro.
00:03:04.940 It was great. I loved it.
00:03:06.500 To help us do all of that today, welcome back to the show, two of my best friends and two of the smartest culture and political critics I have ever known, Kat Tenbarge and Taylor Lorenz.
00:03:18.500 Thanks for having us.
00:03:19.960 Thanks for having us.
00:03:21.580 I wanted to start with like an icebreaker question.
00:03:23.880 Before we get into anything, what about Sidney Sweeney do you think makes everyone act crazy?
00:03:31.600 Like, I can't remember the last time the public was so fixated on every inhale and exhale a celebrity takes.
00:03:39.040 Like, there's a very Britney Spears quality to it, almost. 0.58
00:03:42.180 It's interesting because I agree with you that she is not, like, a gay man's celebrity.
00:03:47.420 But with the lesbian gays, I do care about Sidney Sweeney. 0.99
00:03:51.760 Oh! 1.00
00:03:52.100 Just in the sense that I did not watch Euphoria. I've seen like two episodes of Euphoria. But I always found her very like attractive and very compelling in that sense. And I also think that Sidney Sweeney has been part of the like algorithmic treadmill for a while.
00:04:08.700 because the thing about like sydney sweeney and her like euphoria rise to prominence is that
00:04:16.980 obviously the sex scenes in that show and the sex scenes in a lot of sam levinson productions which
00:04:23.140 i could say a lot about sam levinson because i hate that man cat texted me beforehand and she
00:04:31.080 was like i'm gonna try not to rant about sam levinson and we are three minutes into the
00:04:35.020 here it comes go for it sam levinson my my biggest issue with him is that he takes women's work
00:04:43.820 and then he creates these productions that are really fetishistic toward women and it's not
00:04:50.580 inherently wrong to like make like a really sexy show but i think the problem i have with him is
00:04:56.120 that he has repeatedly been accused of like plagiarism essentially from women creatives
00:05:02.040 so like the aesthetic of euphoria petra collins alleged that like she came up with it and then
00:05:06.920 he stole it from her and that's the most popular best thing about euphoria from what i can tell
00:05:12.620 but anyways sydney sweeney was in these really raunchy sex scenes and from the second that they
00:05:19.180 debuted on television they became some of the like most viral clips of sex scenes ever because
00:05:27.360 Because, like, you go on Reddit where, like, these are, like, Reddit is a very male-dominated
00:05:31.780 platform, so anything to do with celebrity women on Reddit trends, like, sexually explicit,
00:05:37.740 and these just, like, immediately became the most engaged with clips ever.
00:05:42.360 And I think ever since then, you've seen Sydney Sweeney, like, so thoroughly embedded in,
00:05:48.000 like, what social medias are trained to recognize that it has had, like, a huge effect on how
00:05:54.100 popular she is and how much posts about her get traction yeah there is a there is a Megan Fox
00:06:01.020 quality to it too it reminds me of how insane men would be about Megan Fox like 15 years ago
00:06:06.760 but there's this added like political component to it now which we're going to talk about Taylor
00:06:11.920 I want to get your hot take onto why Sydney Sweeney makes everyone unable to act normally 0.82
00:06:17.600 every generation of celebrity there is like one usually extremely conventionally attractive like
00:06:23.980 blonde woman that is made into sort of like the bombshell of the era. And they sort of represent
00:06:30.600 like the pinnacle of female beauty of that era. Like we had Scarlett Johansson. We had like,
00:06:36.900 there's just endless generations of beautiful women like this. I think Sydney Sweeney is that 1.00
00:06:40.360 modern woman. And I think she leans into that role. Yes. And she didn't always. So I want to
00:06:46.380 do a little bit of Sydney Sweeney history slash background info for anyone who is truly, I always
00:06:52.600 say like if you're under a rock and you don't know what i'm talking about but like this one you got
00:06:56.300 to be like really like deep underground to not know what's going on with sydney sweeney and i'm
00:07:00.160 happy for you and i'm about to take that away from you so sydney sweeney is a 27 year old actor who
00:07:06.000 grew up in rural idaho sorry rural washington in the idaho panhandle on the washington idaho border
00:07:14.520 classic mix-up in a conservative religious family in a house that her family has owned for five
00:07:20.900 generations which by the way fast forward when it was revealed that sydney sweeney is a registered
00:07:27.280 republican in florida there was some like shock and awe around that but i'm like you know i don't
00:07:33.740 know five generations in the same house in rural idaho conservative religion i not to say you can't
00:07:39.640 break out of that but you know there have been more shocking political turns in my day anyway
00:07:44.260 she got into acting as a teenager and moved to la as a 13 year old to pursue acting she briefly
00:07:52.140 had a job at universal studios and she also briefly attended ucla before her acting career
00:07:58.360 really started to take off i remember the first time i saw sydney sweeney i think it was in sharp
00:08:02.860 objects where she played alongside amy adams in this small role as a mentally ill and disturbed
00:08:09.640 teenager and then she was in the handmaid's tale which a lot of people forget about i don't remember
00:08:15.740 her being in that she was in the handmaid's tale as like a young girl who was like in this like
00:08:21.540 public arranged marriage oh yeah oh my god i feel like this was before i paid attention to her well
00:08:30.200 and she was also it was years ago but also side note it's just kind of funny to me that like
00:08:35.700 The Handmaid's Tale starred Elizabeth Moss, who's a Scientologist, and smaller role but co-starred
00:08:42.460 Sidney Sweeney, who's this Republican. It's like, they read the script for The Handmaid's Tale and
00:08:47.920 they were like, let's do this. Yeah. Well, one thing about Sidney Sweeney is she's gonna show
00:08:54.140 up to work. So Sidney Sweeney would really shoot into the limelight as a star in Euphoria and The
00:09:04.080 White Lotus, two shows which I don't feel like are in the conservative zeitgeist at all,
00:09:10.320 which is also funny to me.
00:09:12.000 You're right.
00:09:12.760 But I do think it's also notable that her character in White Lotus was based off the
00:09:17.920 Red Scare girls.
00:09:19.120 And so they're supposed to be these like sort of reactionary young girls.
00:09:23.680 They had them watch or listen, subject themselves to Red Scare to train for that role.
00:09:29.920 But they're supposed to be this like disaffected kind of reactionary, like cool, young people, even though Dasha's not young. I think she's my age.
00:09:38.700 I totally forgot about that. And you're right. Her character on The White Lotus was this, I mean, Red Scare, it started, it's a podcast. If you don't know Red Scare, that's one that I'm actually not going to subject you to any information about because it's truly like the worst brain rot you'll ever experience.
00:09:54.380 But it's it's a it's a podcast that started framing itself as like a post identity politics left podcast run by these two women named Dasha and Anna. 0.99
00:10:02.780 And then it very quickly just became like a right wing trad Catholic trad wife, like crock of shit, really. 0.98
00:10:10.940 I think that's a great description of it. 0.99
00:10:12.560 I wonder if Sydney Sweeney got radicalized when she had to listen to that.
00:10:16.600 Well, I think this girl was radicalized.
00:10:18.160 I think she was raised conservative.
00:10:20.380 Sydney Sweeney is really hot, which is something that she and her team have leaned into more and
00:10:28.040 more as her career has progressed. In 2024, she hosted SNL and famously did this Hooters sketch 0.98
00:10:36.080 where the punchline revolved around her being hotter than all of the other servers at Hooters. 1.00
00:10:41.960 after the snl hosting gig conservatives ignited like a mini culture war around sydney sweeney's 1.00
00:10:49.560 hotness there was an article published in the national post by a woman by the way titled are 0.72
00:10:56.400 sydney sweeney's breasts double d harbingers of the death of woke wokeness is no match for sydney
00:11:03.340 sweeney's undeniable beauty and then there were a bunch of like conservative bloggers and stuff
00:11:07.980 who are online being like woke is dead sydney sweeney is hot and glorious and hosting snl
00:11:13.860 so queer people and fat people don't exist anymore i guess i don't know i remember talking
00:11:20.580 to moira donnegan the host of in bed with the right about this shift because i was like
00:11:25.400 i thought conservatives were anti-sex i thought conservatives wanted women to be modest but now
00:11:31.520 if you're like a hot blonde bombshell now that's conservative coded i mean i remember even like
00:11:37.220 years ago, Taylor, talking about this with you with like the whole Hawk Tua thing and like 0.55
00:11:41.220 how sex was conservative now or something. Moira Donegan explained this to me best.
00:11:46.900 Throughout the different eras of political administrations and culture, conservative
00:11:51.380 men have had varying attitudes towards modesty and sexuality. But what is consistent is that
00:11:58.400 they dictate the norm. It's not really about whether women want to be modest or whether
00:12:03.780 women want to show skin it's about them having control over the situation i also think that
00:12:08.720 there's like the whole like virgin horror dichotomy that conservatism pushes on women
00:12:14.840 where it's like you are either this like chased you know being that never puts an ounce of makeup
00:12:19.360 and you're just this trad barefoot pregnant you know woman or you're the sydney sweeney bombshell 0.70
00:12:25.660 slut basically is like the subtext on all of it where they sort of like put these women up as 0.98
00:12:32.300 sex symbols, but they're only seen as sex symbols. And their sort of like value in the eyes of these 0.96
00:12:37.020 men is like declines with every year they get older and all of that, you know? And so I feel
00:12:41.520 like what they don't allow is women to be anything, but those sort of two stereotypes.
00:12:46.500 I also feel like Sydney Sweeney, and I think we'll really get into this with the bathwater, 0.98
00:12:50.880 but it's like, she takes it about as far as it's acceptable without doing like porn, 0.62
00:12:57.560 because like we talked about with the euphoria clips it's like that is masturbatory material
00:13:03.480 and it is very popular material but she's not actually making porn nor is she a porn star nor
00:13:10.860 is she a sex worker she's able to capitalize on those aesthetics the material of her like serves
00:13:16.500 the same purpose but she still falls within the boundaries of like traditional society and so 0.95
00:13:22.520 therefore like the right still wants to claim her and they're not going to treat her like they would 0.96
00:13:26.840 treat an actual sex worker. So initially, it seemed like Sydney was very uncomfortable with
00:13:34.900 all of this being projected onto her by men. She did an interview after the whole SNL mini
00:13:40.880 culture war fiasco, where she said, quote, it's this weird relationship that people have with me
00:13:45.800 that I have no control or say over, which, you know, regardless of how you feel about Sydney
00:13:52.120 Sweeney or her politics or anything else. Like, yeah, it is weird. And I honestly can't imagine
00:13:57.620 what it's like to be in her position and have to grapple with that from the time that she was very
00:14:03.260 young. You know, she started acting as a child. In the following year, though, she's really seemed
00:14:07.780 to actively embrace this like strange psychosexual adoration from conservative men, or at least
00:14:14.540 she's been willing to monetize it. She keeps doing what I can only describe as like, every time I see
00:14:20.900 one i'm just like what is this like fuck ass advertisement because here's the thing right 0.99
00:14:27.040 sydney sweeney is one of the biggest actors of my generation and i've seen people say this online 0.98
00:14:33.800 like she should be the face of a major fashion house she should be the face of prada she should
00:14:38.560 be doing and instead it's like hillbilly jack's burger soda she keeps doing these weird advertisements
00:14:48.760 for brands that I've never heard of
00:14:51.880 and that are clearly aimed at men.
00:14:54.680 One thing I will say about the fashion stuff 1.00
00:14:57.380 and why I think that she's considered more commercial,
00:15:00.600 and I saw fashion people discussing this, 0.99
00:15:02.920 is her body. 1.00
00:15:04.480 To fashion people, she doesn't have a high fashion body. 1.00
00:15:08.000 Basically, her boobs are too big. 1.00
00:15:09.560 She's not seen as sort of like premium. 0.98
00:15:11.860 She's seen as like accessible, like commercial,
00:15:15.240 where it's like she can do the Dunkin' ad.
00:15:17.240 I feel like that's also like a branding on behalf of her team, though. They're like, we want her to be this highly commercial entity. And we want to lean into the sex. Like, I don't like when people talk about celebrities as if they don't make any of their own decisions. But there is definitely, you know, a team working together to decide who is the product of Sydney Sweeney, who keeps giving her all of these products to promote these again, these like fuck ass.
00:15:43.560 she also doesn't do like highbrow projects and i think that that feeds into it too like she's doing 0.88
00:15:50.360 like mass market netflix like rom-com and scarlett johansson went through this period too right where 0.92
00:15:55.300 like she tried to sort of like reinvent herself and do these more like cerebral type films and
00:16:00.820 be a real you know do more movies as opposed to tv and stuff and i don't think that sydney's made
00:16:05.260 that jump and you're right matt like some of that is definitely like positioning from you know her
00:16:09.180 agents or whatever somebody tweeted like she must be in like debt to like a mob boss or something
00:16:13.880 like she will hawk anything it's really interesting because like a period of time
00:16:21.360 where I actually both liked her and would have assumed that she was more liberal back in 2022
00:16:27.700 when she was really starting to take off and like ascend to this level of superstardom 1.00
00:16:33.660 she did an interview she she expressed frustration at nepo babies and how they don't have to work as 0.99
00:16:39.680 hard as she had to work to like get to where she is and she talked about how she couldn't take six 1.00
00:16:43.960 months off because she wouldn't be able to afford it and she talked about how like so much of the
00:16:48.780 money she makes goes to her publicist her agent her manager like all of these people and this was
00:16:54.720 a huge controversy people have basically accused her of being like more privileged than she was
00:16:59.580 letting on and like how dare she complain and like no one can take six months off from work
00:17:04.180 however there was an amazing article that Kelsey McKinney wrote for Defector which was basically
00:17:10.040 like it's true this generation of actors is not nearly as privileged as like the Jennifer Aniston
00:17:15.640 generation of actors where you could do a show like Friends and then coast off of that for the
00:17:20.180 rest of your life famously Writers Guild they don't get residuals the same way they used to
00:17:25.260 so they have to keep working and she has to like I think she truly does have to do a lot of
00:17:31.220 advertisements but what is so interesting about that too is like I agree with you Matt like there's
00:17:36.300 a little bit of like personal choice versus like responding to the market and what people want from
00:17:41.780 you and you see how she has been like driven to lean into that sexualization more and more and
00:17:47.280 more it's just wild to me that she can experience all these things and still walk away and be like
00:17:53.420 fiscally conservative and be a registered Republican. Yeah, well, I remember that whole
00:17:59.340 thing, too, where she was like, I can't afford to stop working for six months. And I do think that
00:18:05.360 in the last few years since she said that, she's definitely ascended to a level where that's no
00:18:09.680 longer the case. She did last year buy a $13 million home in Florida, which was when she
00:18:16.360 moved there, also the same time that she registered to vote as a Republican. Red flag, red flag. 0.99
00:18:21.340 so i mean i think it is very possible that she did attain a level of financial security that now 0.95
00:18:28.660 of course she has to do all of this shit to keep up with but i want to play for you one of the ads 0.70
00:18:33.480 she did recently it is for hey dude which is a men's shoe line and i have never heard of hey 0.97
00:18:40.300 dude in my life but clearly a lot of people are buying them because they could afford sydney
00:18:44.480 sweeney's day rate you can take the dude out of the country you can't take the country out of the
00:18:49.800 all of her ads are the same i had to watch that like six times before i knew what she was saying
00:19:06.440 you can take the dude out of the country but you can't take the country out of the dude
00:19:12.060 i'm i'm happy for her i just want to say like i'm happy for her if she wants to advertise hey dude
00:19:17.860 you don't even know what she's selling in these advertisements but but i bring this up i am
00:19:21.840 particularly interested and people have drawn attention to the voice that she seems to do
00:19:27.540 the intonation in her voice when she's doing these things it's there's no enunciation well
00:19:33.260 she's talking in like a like a phone sex operator voice and i am not making fun of her voice i'm not
00:19:42.340 As people on this podcast, especially Kat and I, who have had our voices mocked and thumbs down extensively, I am not making fun of anyone's voice, but there does seem to be a performative cadence to how she's speaking.
00:19:57.280 She also kind of famously had this micro-controversy around her partnership with men's soap brand Dr. Squatch, another company I've never heard of, to sell a line of soaps allegedly made with her bathwater.
00:20:12.020 Yes. As Taylor was saying, she does this like phone sex operator voice in these commercials.
00:20:18.480 And with the bathwater, it really clicked for me that like she is borrowing from this culture of 0.97
00:20:26.380 sex workers and porn performers and like e-girls. Bathwater, very famously, like selling your 1.00
00:20:33.240 bathwater became a thing when Belle Delphine did it over five years ago, I think now. 1.00
00:20:39.080 and it was a huge controversy and it was a huge pop culture moment because she was selling like 0.83
00:20:43.980 gamer girl bath water and people were buying it they were drinking it they were smelling it it
00:20:49.440 was all like gross men and when Cindy Sweeney did this it really like made me think that we are in
00:20:56.300 this moment of pop culture and there are other celebrities doing this too right now where it's
00:21:01.560 like the things that sex workers have brought to the cultural forefront are now being kind of
00:21:06.400 appropriated by this class of celebrity who can reap the benefits of how good that is for your
00:21:13.240 brand, for monetizing, for whatever, without having to reap the discriminatory consequences
00:21:18.480 of being a sex worker. Because Belle Delphine, when she sold the bathwater, her PayPal account 1.00
00:21:24.940 got shut down and all that money she made was actually seized from her and stolen from her 1.00
00:21:31.380 because she is a sex worker. So I just think that it is particularly egregious that Sidney Sweeney
00:21:37.680 is apparently like a Republican. Republicans want to ban porn. They want to jail all sex workers.
00:21:43.960 And so like she's profiting from this trend that was started by this woman, but she does not in 0.98
00:21:48.980 any way like stand for the women who made this possible for her. Oof. Well said. I would like 0.95
00:21:56.060 to take a quick break from the show to give a shout out to the Freedom From Religion Foundation,
00:22:02.000 which is perhaps the most fitting and easiest brand partner this podcast has ever had. Friendly
00:22:08.180 reminder, if you are living in the United States, Jesus is not your guidance counselor, and your tax
00:22:14.740 dollars should not be paying for a sermon in algebra. And yet, here we are. States are forcing
00:22:21.480 religious posters in classrooms, swapping out licensed mental health staff for unlicensed
00:22:27.740 school chaplains, and shoveling public money that should be going towards public schools 0.82
00:22:33.340 and making them better and giving teachers supplies and fixing the ruse into private
00:22:39.140 religious schools through these shady voucher schemes.
00:22:42.780 Let me know if you want me to make a separate episode on that, because it really is a whole 0.99
00:22:45.500 thing and it is quite literally end times shit, in my opinion. 0.94
00:22:49.700 Not in the way these people think, though. 0.92
00:22:51.480 Anyway, the Freedom From Religion Foundation is doing some really important work to fight the influence of religion in government and the people who are pushing it.
00:23:00.160 They're suing, educating, and fighting to keep religion out of government and out of your kids' classrooms.
00:23:05.900 You can join their fight, which is really all of our fight, by going to ffrf.us slash school or texting FREEDOM to 511-511, 511-511. 0.94
00:23:18.980 that's ffrf.us slash school or text freedom to 511 511 because you didn't survive purity culture
00:23:28.620 just to have it show up in your kids math class shout out to the freedom for religion foundation
00:23:34.160 for all the important work that they do go be a part of the fight and yes text fees may apply
00:23:40.560 i love reading legal disclaimer all right now let's get back to the show should we talk about
00:23:48.080 american eagle let's do it yes you can take the country out of the dude but you can never you can
00:23:52.640 take the dude out of the country but you can never take the country out of the dead i love it
00:23:56.420 so even through the bathwater scandal i was able to go about my day while getting very very few
00:24:05.260 messages from people asking me to like talk about it on the podcast like to do anything about you
00:24:10.960 know sydney sweeney and i was perplexed by the bathwater soap scandal but i did not want to make
00:24:17.420 a podcast episode about it. But then something happened recently that I mentioned up top that
00:24:21.600 got me so many messages, so many requests to do this very episode that I could not ignore it.
00:24:27.600 So middle of July, Sydney Sweeney and American Eagle unveil a series of commercial advertisements
00:24:34.420 that they did together. And I want to just start by playing a few of them for you.
00:24:38.900 I'm not here to tell you to buy American Eagle jeans. And I definitely won't say that they're
00:24:43.900 the most comfortable jeans I've ever worn or that they make your butt look 0.74
00:24:49.000 amazing. Why would I need to do that? But if you said that you want to buy the 0.86
00:24:56.740 jeans, I'm not gonna stop you. But just so we're clear, this is not me telling you
00:25:02.200 to buy American Eagle jeans. You see what I did there, right? My body's
00:25:08.340 composition is determined by my genes hey eyes up here sydney sweeney has great genes 1.00
00:25:18.980 okay am i crazy or is that giving like low budget 0.98
00:25:23.500 if you're not watching the video version of this it's just her walking around 0.95
00:25:29.080 an empty room or like next to a car in an empty room just like wearing jeans and like 0.98
00:25:34.740 caressing herself while speaking in this phone sex operator voice that I know isn't natural to 0.99
00:25:41.380 her. I've seen her in other things and she does not talk like this. She doesn't talk like that 0.94
00:25:45.980 in her movie roles, in her TV roles rather. She enunciates. She does enunciate. She can.
00:25:52.000 We haven't watched the main one yet. And I know you want us, if you're tapped into this
00:25:55.660 controversy already, you know we're going to talk about the main ad, but we're not there yet.
00:25:59.900 I just I saw these ads and I didn't find them as offensive as I did just like overly like self-serious and like poorly acted and almost almost a mockery of how easy it is to like performatively seduce heterosexual men.
00:26:17.900 like i feel like if she pushed the whole shtick of like i'm just a girl do you like my body like
00:26:24.380 it almost could be like an anna nicole smith like campy territory of like that like my body
00:26:31.360 but because it doesn't go full camp to me it falls like just shy of that you know what reminds
00:26:38.300 me of this so much is paris hilton who also put on an effect and do you remember the extremely
00:26:45.580 famous 2005 carl's jr commercial that paris did yes where she's like this is what gay guys talk
00:26:53.600 about eating a burger like washing a car like it is soft core porn basically it's honestly a lot of 0.62
00:27:01.980 uh sydney's ads remind me of sort of like the worst of the mid-2000s views of women and also
00:27:08.220 just like this like hyper sexualized like persona that paris as well took on and has and talks about
00:27:14.820 it now how like that entire persona was an affect and it was really just for marketing because men 0.97
00:27:21.660 liked it and not because she speaks like that and she considers herself actually a tomboy and
00:27:26.000 doesn't speak like that in normal life but i think yes and then i also think a key difference between
00:27:30.740 what's happening here and what paris was doing was like paris i don't think you had to be that
00:27:36.180 smart to know that there was like an angle here and that this was a show like she was like she
00:27:41.740 was like dripping a burger on herself on top of a car like it was absurd and to me this is like 0.84
00:27:46.620 just shy of absurd i think it is absurd like i also think that now we look at that commercial
00:27:52.540 as absurd and i do think paris was so campy and over at the top and sort of there was like a
00:27:57.720 joke there almost but i i do think there's something about this like type of advertising
00:28:03.060 that sydney sweeney is really leaning into and even just like the script and the format and the
00:28:07.460 voice and the shots and everything that feels very kind of uh regressive it reminds me of hooters
00:28:14.140 and it reminds me of like an era that conservatives are wanting to reclaim culturally which was an
00:28:23.000 era where women were more commonly understood as like decor essentially like women were more 0.80
00:28:29.360 ornamental and women could be easily separated into categories of like prude or slut it's also
00:28:35.980 fascinating to me that like Paris Hilton also is like a like a voting conservative at least used 0.64
00:28:41.160 to be I believe voted for Trump and I find it interesting that these women like they have a lot
00:28:46.180 of nuance about the way that they were portrayed and how they portrayed themselves but at the end
00:28:52.100 of the day it's like I think that so much of their ultimate loyalty is to wealth and to capital and
00:28:58.560 so that is another reason why they so commonly support like the exact same types of power and
00:29:05.080 authority that ultimately like subjugate them should we watch the the ad ad we have to i've
00:29:12.820 watched this so many times in the last few weeks that it makes me want to die okay here we go
00:29:19.800 genes are passed down from parents to offspring often determining traits like hair color
00:29:24.960 personality and even eye color my genes are blue sydney sweeney has great genes
00:29:33.840 my jens are blue jens are passed down from parents that voice is it is really grating
00:29:41.980 she starts like speaking and like every syllable gets so slow in that one in particular that i'm
00:29:49.240 like girl like i'm afraid you're not gonna make it to the end of the sentence like you're gonna
00:29:52.840 run out of juice well it's ironically it's similar to the white lotus voice that she was doing yeah
00:29:59.200 yeah yeah where it's this like disaffected type drawl that ad obviously is also like a remake
00:30:05.360 of another yes very well-known ad yes and that's actually where my mind went to first when i saw
00:30:12.620 this i did not immediately think eugenics i immediately thought why are we remaking the
00:30:18.060 brooke shields ad which was also very eugenics by the way and and also pedophilic oh 100 she was a
00:30:24.400 child. Yes, exactly. So decades ago, a 15-year-old Brooke Shields featured in a series of very creepy 0.69
00:30:32.560 Calvin Klein advertisements that had a similar kind of like bare bones, it's just me in an empty
00:30:39.660 room in my jeans vibe. And in one of those commercials, Brooke Shields kind of struggled
00:30:45.000 to put on her jeans, like performatively posing in all of these different ridiculous ways, again,
00:30:49.700 as a 15-year-old, which is just bizarre to watch now. While she did that, she kind of just recited
00:30:55.580 an encyclopedic definition of genetics, genes, while putting on genes. And I think the key
00:31:01.720 difference between hers and Sydney's is that Sydney's is like, my genes are good. My genetics
00:31:07.720 are good. Whereas Brooks didn't quite say that. She was just making the pun of genes and genes.
00:31:13.840 But even still, those commercials were widely derided because they were quite pedophilic. I mean, in one of the Brooke Shields ads, she said, what gets between my Calvins and I? Nothing. And she was, you know, a high school freshman. So my mind when I first saw this ad was like, why are we remaking the Brooke Shields ad?
00:31:35.100 didn't that come out in the 80s yeah it was the 80s oh yeah 1980 i just think what's so interesting
00:31:39.640 is like we are seeing this resurgence of conservatism in a way that we haven't seen
00:31:43.940 since the 80s and we're like almost replicating like bar for bar so much of the worst of that
00:31:50.140 brand of republicanism and conservatism whether it's rank homophobia weird genetics ads like
00:31:57.480 i mean eugenics generally hyper capitalism like obsession with you know market economics and
00:32:04.340 wealth and greed. And obviously none of us were like, I don't even know if you guys were born.
00:32:09.200 I was barely sentient in the eighties. So like, I feel like none of us like lived through that,
00:32:15.040 but, um, a lot of culture today feels like it's like hearkening back to that era.
00:32:19.620 So because I am so online and so like deeply tuned into like leftist online posting and like
00:32:27.800 very niche, like leftist online posting, I could only ever see the, the, that ad through the lens
00:32:33.220 of like I did see that people were talking about it in the sense of eugenics so I never saw it and
00:32:38.840 like got to form an opinion without already knowing that there was backlash to it but I think
00:32:43.540 that it's like so impossible to separate it from the context of the political moment that we are
00:32:49.700 living in right now even if the ad just said like something about like having blue eyes and like 0.71
00:32:56.980 she's like a blonde haired blue eyed hot woman who leans into these like conservative cultural
00:33:03.840 roles so I do feel like even if it wasn't fully like intentionally like eugenics based I almost
00:33:11.740 think it doesn't matter because it's like even if every single person behind the creative direction
00:33:16.500 did not have that in mind I'm like it just fits so neatly into the moment we are living through
00:33:21.920 right now? I do think that it's impossible to separate from this moment of, again, the fifth
00:33:27.440 year of an ongoing pandemic where we're seeing eugenics also in regards to Palestine, where 0.60
00:33:31.760 like the Free Pest published this disgusting piece that was like, actually, the people dying
00:33:37.060 of famine were high risk anyway. So we're just seeing, I mean, just eugenics all over. And also
00:33:42.620 then you're seeing the rise of Ozimpek and all of these like, you know, plastic surgery procedures 0.98
00:33:47.760 and stuff where it's like, there's fewer and fewer like excuses for not conforming to society's
00:33:53.300 standards of beauty. And you're also seeing like conservatives try to make those standards of
00:33:56.700 beauty more and more rigid. And so I just think it's impossible to like separate this ad from
00:34:01.380 all of that because the reality is this type of ad would not be written or remade or even perform
00:34:06.260 well like five years ago. Yeah, 100%. I mean, the entire ethos of MAGA, which promises to return
00:34:14.260 America to a time when people who look like Sidney Sweeney had total control over society. 0.91
00:34:18.740 Yeah, I mean, it's not a good look to do a, you know, a thin white woman with blonde hair and 1.00
00:34:23.400 blue eyes has good genetics. I mean, the idea of good genetics implies bad genetics, which in and 0.99
00:34:29.360 of itself is the premise of eugenics. I mean, I will say again, the first time I saw it, I was 0.87
00:34:36.140 just kind of like, this is creepy. And this is corny. I didn't immediately think like eugenics,
00:34:41.480 I didn't immediately think about all of this stuff that we do, in fairness, talk a lot about
00:34:45.640 in different ways and different contexts on this podcast. I just saw it and I was kind of like,
00:34:49.840 this is another Sydney Sweeney ad where it's like extremely sexual in an extremely like male
00:34:56.080 gazey way, but with this added layer of like, but we're talking about genetics. So that's kind of
00:35:01.480 weird. But for me, it became a matter of scale. And the scale of this controversy, which in my
00:35:08.540 opinion could have just been like discourse on a few TikToks and a Reddit forum, which is initially
00:35:13.440 what happened. It was just like a few people tweeted, a few people made TikToks being like,
00:35:17.640 I don't know about this American Eagle. It's kind of bizarre. That was all inflated to an
00:35:22.180 unimaginable scale by specific people with very specific goals in mind. So should we talk about
00:35:30.340 the backlash to the backlash? Yes. Because like I said, in response to this ad, there are some
00:35:36.280 TikToks and tweets that start making the rounds where people with like tepid followings on Twitter
00:35:42.200 TikTok are criticizing the eugenicist undertones of the advertisement in my opinion correctly but
00:35:48.040 do I think there needs to be like national discourse around a jeans ad campaign in this
00:35:53.440 current moment when so many other things are happening that are like way more consequential
00:35:57.960 in my opinion not really and I didn't like the ad but again I didn't really catch wind of the whole
00:36:04.200 thing until I saw prominent conservatives reacting to the online liberals saying that the wokeness
00:36:11.140 has gone too far, that once again, Sidney Sweeney will be the death of woke. I don't know about you
00:36:16.220 guys, but I just, I started seeing so much more of this once conservatives were telling me that
00:36:22.120 people were angry about it. Well, because they did what they always do. It's like the Chris Rufo
00:36:27.500 playbook, right? Or the lips of TikTok playbook. It's like, take some little thing, take a few
00:36:31.740 examples of leftist sentiment wildly mischaracterized the very nuanced point by the way that they're
00:36:38.660 making and then use that to generate outrage and then they just sort of feed this outrage machine
00:36:43.200 where it's like the left wants to cancel sydney sweeney for you know the like for being beautiful
00:36:49.300 it's like the worst sort of bad faith reading of everything and and conservatives especially fox
00:36:55.260 news like this is what they live for this is all they do and once they seize like once they find
00:37:00.860 one of these things, especially if it's celebrity related, they will drive it into the ground.
00:37:04.960 I do think the digital media and like clickbait journalism like plays a role in all of this too,
00:37:09.800 because like they are framing backlash as like this like widespread thing. And then they're
00:37:14.800 taking tweets from people with like seven followers where it's not even clear if they're
00:37:18.920 like on the left. And then that's like being amplified in this article to potentially millions
00:37:23.380 of people as some example of discourse when it's like, is that even real?
00:37:26.260 I was reading so many of these articles as I was piecing together this outline of these, like, everything you missed about the Sydney Sweeney American Eagle drama. And all of them, it was like Ben Shapiro was saying this, and Laura Ingram is saying this, and Greg Gutfeld is saying this, and Candace Owens is saying this. And they're all saying it's gone too far, based on criticism from some users on X, formerly known as Twitter.
00:37:50.700 and then it'll link maybe it'll link like a single tweet uh you know backlash to the original
00:37:55.540 advertisement and it's always someone with like 1200 followers i'm like that would be a lot i feel
00:38:01.280 like if it's double digit followers like i'm not convinced that some of these fox news assignment
00:38:05.360 editors like aren't making up some of these tweets i i get a little conspiratorial later in my outline
00:38:10.000 as we follow this saga so just wait the point about digital media is so true and it's something
00:38:15.760 that i think about a lot whenever this happens because i feel like first of all this happens
00:38:19.720 regularly. This is a whole playbook. And second of all, when I first started out in digital media
00:38:25.060 and I had to write like five articles a day for some website that you've never heard of before,
00:38:30.720 because that's like also the BuzzFeed model, you would be assigned to find as many tweets as you
00:38:36.700 possibly could about something that they're just simply, the demand was not real. It was not
00:38:41.800 actually there. So I have so much experience. Like I would be sitting there on my fourth article of
00:38:47.160 the day, making like, I don't know, $20 a day. And I would be like searching on Twitter, like
00:38:54.540 needing to find tweets to like fit these quotas. The difference between when like an outlet like
00:38:59.880 BuzzFeed does that for the most part, and an outlet like Fox News, they do it with a clear
00:39:05.720 agenda. They do it with like a conservative narrative in mind. And then especially right now,
00:39:11.680 they have the actual institutional backing to cause like consequences. And when conservatives
00:39:18.700 do this, they are often speaking to a status quo that they will then materially benefit from.
00:39:25.880 Whereas when like people on the left do this, and I'm thinking about like the articles that I would
00:39:30.420 write about like people are offended by something that was honestly probably actually offensive.
00:39:35.880 like when I would write an article like that, that article would have no power and it would
00:39:41.440 not reflect the biases of people who had authority. But I feel like part of the reason why American
00:39:47.480 Eagle made this ad is because like, yeah, their stock jumped because the people who like influence
00:39:53.940 the stock market are like more in tune with like a pro eugenics advertising campaign. So like it all 0.95
00:40:01.480 works out really well it becomes a treadmill of itself on the right because it just reinforces
00:40:07.120 the power that they already hold this exact model of faux outrage and faux controversy
00:40:14.280 is responsible for like so much legislation and especially like basically the entire
00:40:20.660 anti-trans movement anti-trans 100 anti-lgbtq as a whole women's rights porn tech that like
00:40:28.920 weird kids online safety stuff, the TikTok ban, which was driven by fake, completely made up fake
00:40:34.600 TikTok challenges. I mean, think about how much legislation and transphobic sentiment and
00:40:40.660 elections were won off of the myth of litter boxes in bathrooms, in school bathrooms that
00:40:48.520 right wing media outlets were alleging were for students who were identifying as cats.
00:40:54.480 Taylor, didn't you report on that? I did. And the litter boxes were,
00:40:58.420 it was like extra it was like litter bags basically for like uh if somebody had to go to
00:41:02.820 the bathroom when they were locked in for a school shooting just crazy and bleak but it reminds me of
00:41:07.980 the tiktok stuff too because it's it's just like moral panic fake outrage they know that it's made 0.52
00:41:13.820 up but it's it's just manufactured outrage and you have these like youtubers and podcasters and
00:41:18.920 then fox news and then it trickles like up to the politicians who are basically like creating
00:41:24.700 outrage about nothing or about, you know, fractional leftist discourse that's happened
00:41:29.980 in a very specific place online. I pulled a bunch of instances of this sort of being whipped up.
00:41:36.900 So Brett Cooper, the very famous conservative YouTuber made an hour long video. Feminists 1.00
00:41:44.040 are crashing out over Sidney Sweeney's good genes. Donald Trump Jr. posted an AI generated
00:41:50.380 image of it was like from the sydney sweeney ad campaign but with trump's face on sydney sweeney
00:41:57.140 and then fox news starts covering this around the clock like i mentioned in a four-day period they
00:42:01.540 talk about this 181 times new sydney sweeney ad accused of being racist and then another segment
00:42:08.220 sydney sweeney ad sparks liberal meltdown online it's just like triggered sjw bait type stuff from
00:42:16.080 like 2018 like that's just what we're living in now in our entire media ecosystem do you know who
00:42:20.360 made a an instagram reel about this uh among all these other people who a mainstay on the pod Lizzie 0.93
00:42:27.800 Sivetsky of course Lizzie Sivetsky who's gone from like liberal Zionist to just like MAGA culture
00:42:34.960 warrior in like the lowest way but she made it a reel where she was like I don't know guys I 1.00
00:42:40.340 suddenly have the urge to shop at American Eagle now and then she like had her husband film her 0.92
00:42:45.400 going into American Eagle. Like this kind of stuff also reminds me of how the same kinds of
00:42:51.080 campaigns will start against like in the Amber Heard or like the Blake Lively case. They will
00:42:55.680 invent controversies out of thin air, launder them through traditional media by creating this
00:43:00.660 was literally the PR strategy that like Justin Baldoni used in part to get like hit pieces about
00:43:06.200 Blake Lively that would be churned out of places like the Daily Mail. And it would be based on like
00:43:10.480 a handful of TikToks, a handful of tweets, no views, no engagement. But like his publicist
00:43:15.500 would like send those tweets to like a reporter at one of these tabloids. And then because of like
00:43:20.720 the algorithmic treadmill effect, you have all these random content creators. Like why are you
00:43:25.260 weighing in on this? It's because at this point, if you weigh in on it, it's guaranteed engagement.
00:43:30.140 It is guaranteed placement. It is recommended to people. And so it's like with something like
00:43:34.740 the Sydney Sweeney ad campaign, it's like, we're all so sick of it, but influencers will then carry
00:43:39.620 that into like stage four which is just like everyone's now trying to cash in on the outrage
00:43:45.480 to the outrage to the ad and oh my god and every time this stuff happens and i didn't really talk
00:43:51.340 about this on my outline but like i was talking about it with you guys the other day and in our
00:43:55.720 in our we have a group chat uh we have a group chat called yappy hour y-a-p-p-y whoa don't dox
00:44:01.340 our uh we have a group but like if you go on youtube during any of these cycles it's just
00:44:08.880 like every youtube creator and their mother has made a video that's like sydney sweeney it gets
00:44:14.860 worse i feel like i've seen a million thumbnails where it's just like someone's face and then it
00:44:21.280 gets worse it's over i realized now from doing my own youtube channel that if you put the words
00:44:27.380 it's over on any thumbnail it increases the click through like significantly should i put
00:44:33.060 it's over next to sydney sweeney's face on this one you you should and it will help performance 0.62
00:44:38.340 if you guys see it's over in the thumbnail keep your mouth shut
00:44:43.220 but it is this like content machine i got the same thing on youtube every twitch streamer's
00:44:50.240 got to react to it and that's going to be clipped and like it just becomes this like
00:44:54.420 commoditized outrage bait, basically, that everyone's got to hop onto because the algorithm
00:45:01.040 rewards that. If you have listened to this podcast a lot, you probably know that I make this show
00:45:08.260 myself. I conceive of the ideas myself. I do all the research and outlining myself. I edit myself.
00:45:14.260 I do all the production myself. And I love doing that, mostly because I'm a control freak. And the
00:45:19.980 idea of giving up any amount of creative freedom gives me anxiety. The downside though is that all
00:45:26.760 of that takes a lot of time and sometimes there just aren't enough hours in the day to do other
00:45:33.780 things that one has to do to live and for me one of those things is cooking. So I like to pass off
00:45:39.420 the responsibility not to a chef but to Factor. Factor is a meal delivery service with chef-made
00:45:45.720 gourmet meals that make eating well easy. There are so many different exciting and varied meal
00:45:51.320 options and the best part is they are all ready to heat and eat in two minutes. I've always said
00:45:57.100 that I go for the protein plus menu which if you work out a lot or generally just want a lot of
00:46:03.140 protein in your diet they have so many great options there that are way better than just
00:46:08.920 meal prepping unseasoned chicken for two weeks at a time. And I know some gym rats are going to be
00:46:14.060 in the comments like hey i make chicken better than that i'm sure you do i just don't have the
00:46:18.180 time or patience to i love preemptively defending myself from criticism like inside of an ad
00:46:24.180 i love the internet if you want to try factor now you can get 50 off your first box at
00:46:31.980 factormeals.com slash fruity50 off and use the code fruity50 off that's factormeals.com
00:46:40.540 slash fruity50off with the code fruity50off.
00:46:45.260 Now, let's get back to the episode.
00:46:49.700 So content creators are doing this,
00:46:52.400 then podcasters start doing this,
00:46:54.180 then the mainstream media tags along,
00:46:57.340 and then we have politicians and people inside the White House
00:47:02.160 exploiting this non-controversy to further their own ends.
00:47:06.340 So Stephen Chung, who is the White House communications director under Trump, posted
00:47:11.860 on Twitter, cancel culture run amok. 0.98
00:47:14.660 This warped moronic and dense liberal thinking is a big reason why Americans voted the way 0.98
00:47:19.840 they did in 2024. 1.00
00:47:21.640 They're tired of this bullshit. 1.00
00:47:23.680 Ted Cruz. 1.00
00:47:24.680 What did Ted Cruz say about Sidney Sweeney?
00:47:26.780 He posted amidst this.
00:47:28.240 Of course he did.
00:47:29.600 Hold on.
00:47:29.960 I got to Google this one.
00:47:31.680 At Ted Cruz.
00:47:32.840 Wow. 1.00
00:47:33.260 Now the left has come out against beautiful women. 1.00
00:47:36.760 I'm sure that will pull well.
00:47:38.500 And then it is revealed amidst all of this that, like I said,
00:47:42.600 Sidney Sweeney is a registered Republican since 2024 in the state of Florida.
00:47:47.760 And upon this news, Donald Trump tweets out.
00:47:51.880 Truth.
00:47:52.480 He truthed it.
00:47:53.360 Oh, yeah, he truthed it.
00:47:54.400 Sorry.
00:47:54.860 One of you want to read this?
00:47:56.100 Sidney Sweeney, a registered Republican, has the hottest ad out there.
00:48:00.640 It's for American Eagle, and the jeans are flying off the shelves.
00:48:04.560 Flying off the shelves.
00:48:05.780 Go get them, Sidney.
00:48:07.720 And then that starts another round of coverage from Fox News.
00:48:12.100 Jesse Waters does a segment about President Trump defends Sidney Sweeney from woke mob. 0.99
00:48:17.460 And then the White House Twitter, which is, by the way, so fucking unhinged. 0.98
00:48:21.900 What is going on? 0.99
00:48:22.600 So evil.
00:48:23.220 The most evil Twitter account.
00:48:24.900 One day, the people running the White House Twitter account are going to be tried at The Hague.
00:48:28.240 they post a picture of donald trump kind of like calling to a bunch of people and they captioned it
00:48:34.520 quote have you seen the sydney sweeney ad this just went on for so many damn days where all
00:48:42.020 anybody in right-wing media the politicians you would have thought sydney sweeney's american eagle
00:48:46.720 ad was like the number one issue in this country and not wealth inequality and not the funding of
00:48:52.540 genocide and not abortion and not economic catastrophe from terror like you would have
00:48:57.500 thought it was cindy sweeney's advertisement which is by the way what they want right they
00:49:01.680 don't want you talking about all of those other horrible things that are happening or the fact
00:49:05.380 that ice is snatching people off the street like it is this like 24 7 manufactured outrage culture
00:49:11.660 war bullshit to distract from reality and that doesn't mean that we shouldn't acknowledge it 0.65
00:49:15.900 and talk about it and i do think like there are messed up stuff around it but like no one's mad 0.93
00:49:19.800 about the fact that she's beautiful like and i think that's what bothers me the most it's like
00:49:24.340 this like intentional mischaracterization of like a few people that had like some pretty nuanced
00:49:30.160 thoughts by the worst people alive who are doing the worst things imaginable as a result of that
00:49:35.560 sort of like co-opting of outrage i also think it's interesting and sad that like these culture
00:49:40.900 wars so frequently revolve around like a celebrity woman and it's interesting to me that like the
00:49:47.260 only way you can like quote unquote win and i don't think sydney sweeney is necessarily like
00:49:51.400 winning, but she avoided a lot of ire from like some of the most misogynistic people on the 1.00
00:49:56.420 internet simply by like conforming and essentially doing everything they wanted. And that sucks. And 0.99
00:50:02.680 it sucked to me when it came out. Like I was sad to hear that she was a registered Republican. 0.94
00:50:07.380 I wasn't surprised. I was disappointed. And I was just like not pleased that they would have
00:50:13.420 the ability to then run with this and like uphold her as like the perfect woman who does 0.83
00:50:18.600 everything they want up to and including theoretically voting for Donald Trump.
00:50:23.680 I will say watching all of the conservative backlash to the backlash, it really clarified
00:50:29.780 to me why I didn't think a whole lot about the ad to begin with, which is that while I agree
00:50:36.400 that the advertisement is gesturing towards, you know, celebrating Eurocentric beauty ideals and
00:50:42.020 whiteness, it's like we're kind of past the point of conservatives feeling like they have to dog
00:50:46.760 whistle. Because I was watching these segments on Fox News and in response to, you know, a few
00:50:52.680 critical TikToks and tweets from leftists, every conservative in media and government got on the
00:50:57.780 biggest platform that they had access to and proudly declared that they're tired of seeing 0.91
00:51:03.180 fat people and black people and queer people on screen. And they're tired of feeling like they 0.95
00:51:07.960 can't, as Megyn Kelly said, celebrate whiteness. We're sick and tired of the nonsense where you 0.98
00:51:16.580 You are not allowed to ever celebrate someone who is white and blonde and blue-eyed.
00:51:23.480 We are over this woke agenda.
00:51:24.980 We're over the Lizzo's.
00:51:26.120 We're over the Dylan Mulvaney's. 1.00
00:51:27.340 If this was a 300-pound non-binary person, they would be applauding her. 1.00
00:51:31.640 This ad is the final declaration that we're done doing that shit. 1.00
00:51:35.900 They don't need to utilize racist dog whistles because they know that they can use a racist 1.00
00:51:40.560 foghorn and they won't face any consequences for it.
00:51:43.440 That's why when I saw the ad, I was like, yeah, this is kind of bad, but also like just turn on Fox News. Like no one's relying on dog whistles anymore. They just say that they hate people of color and they hate queer people.
00:51:54.640 And I think that one of the things they relish so much about a moment like this is that to them, and perhaps rightfully so, it represents how like outside the boundaries of Fox News, like you're walking through Times Square, you see this ad. 0.93
00:52:09.820 They love the ability to have any incursion of their belief system into the ultimate mainstream where it becomes unavoidable. And I think that is something that like drives a lot of their attention and their obsession around this.
00:52:23.680 And also worth noting, like, at the end of the day, they're claiming like they're defending Sidney Sweeney. They love her. They're praising her. But this is the same group of people who just like a year prior were smearing and bullying this woman for a bikini picture where she didn't look flawless.
00:52:39.680 so it's like they will also turn on her and punish her and discard her as soon as she isn't this like
00:52:46.220 beautiful glamorous bombshell and like any woman who the conservative party like momentarily
00:52:51.860 embraces is on a very strict expiration date like they're they're not gonna love her forever they're
00:52:57.080 just using her to try to worm their way deeper and deeper into the mainstream they also don't
00:53:02.640 even really love her because they don't even go to see her movies right the movie that she just
00:53:06.360 came out with just bombed at the box office this past weekend she's just a prop for them and and 0.88
00:53:11.400 she will be discarded as all of these other previous women have been discarded and you know 1.00
00:53:17.060 she's gonna turn 30 soon they're gonna start saying she's over the hill they're gonna actually 1.00
00:53:21.880 demonize her for you know embracing her sexuality because of course we only know that only young 1.00
00:53:27.960 women are allowed to do that even 27 they're probably thinking she's like pushing it there 0.95
00:53:32.220 were all these gross ai pictures of her like marrying baron trump so they're already envisioning 1.00
00:53:37.560 her as like her next role is to be like a conservative politician's wife and if she
00:53:42.920 doesn't do that it's over i want to tell you my conspiracy theory okay so on august 4th sydney
00:53:49.680 sweeney attended a screening for her upcoming movie americana actually it was upcoming when i
00:53:54.820 wrote this outline but it did just come out and it bombed because these people don't actually
00:53:58.200 supporter but as she was walking into the theater swarmed by paparazzi one person yelled at her
00:54:06.880 stop the ad that is being racist she was heckled let me show you
00:54:12.500 who's saying that we don't know who's saying it and it was never revealed who's saying it
00:54:26.560 And my wild conspiracy theory, welcome to the conspiracy theory pod.
00:54:31.120 It was Kat.
00:54:34.320 Can you imagine if I was like, no, Matt, actually, that was me.
00:54:39.240 My conspiracy theory is that this was planted.
00:54:43.460 By who? Her team?
00:54:45.340 Well, so the video was originally shared by TMZ.
00:54:48.860 And I'm not saying I'm not accusing TMZ of planting this person there.
00:54:53.260 I just think that there is a very real possibility based on the way that we know that these media cycles go and that we know how much money there is to be made off of the continuation of them.
00:55:04.300 It is my theory, unsubstantiated, that someone was like, here, random person or maybe a random person who works for this company or whatever, stand there and yell at her.
00:55:15.500 This doesn't even, first of all, this doesn't even feel like a real heckle.
00:55:18.120 If you were genuinely invested in like the belief that this is a racist eugenicist advertisement and this was like a hill that you were dying on and really advocating about, she says, stop the ad that is being racist.
00:55:34.480 It doesn't even feel like a real heckle.
00:55:36.740 What does that even mean?
00:55:37.900 Right, right.
00:55:38.980 It's not impassioned.
00:55:40.660 Okay, I'm with you, Matt.
00:55:42.460 But I'll tell you what I think it is.
00:55:44.100 I've covered so many protests.
00:55:45.760 at this point, I think hundreds of protests. Certainly I covered, I think, something like
00:55:49.440 80 protests in 2017 alone, back when it was Trump 1.0. We had them multiple times a week
00:55:54.580 and I was covering politics. Every single one of those protests, and even today you see them,
00:55:59.780 these conservative people, they're just like clickbait, basically. They're there to pretend
00:56:04.800 to be woke liberals, to get on the media, to parody woke liberals so that they can generate
00:56:10.140 viral content. And this is a very well-known strategy. So when I see a video like that,
00:56:16.700 I think it's probably one of those types of people where it's like, that person is a conservative
00:56:21.540 that's trying to keep it all going. I'm with you. Thank you. Thank you. It's a deep state.
00:56:27.320 Sure enough, this one video that TMZ posted of her getting heckled, heckled,
00:56:33.060 is posted by libs of TikTok. Chaya Rechik wrote, Sydney Sweeney was heckled and called racist for
00:56:37.820 her American Eagle ad. A beautiful white woman appearing in an ad is racist, according to 1.00
00:56:41.480 leftists. Unreal. Richard Hananiah, who is the right wing blogger, he posted the video of her 0.84
00:56:47.800 being heckled and wrote that all Democrats need to forcefully denounce the heckler.
00:56:54.160 They love a condemn. They all want everyone to condemn everything all the time.
00:56:58.820 The other thing that this always brings me back to is like peak SJW Tumblr culture,
00:57:04.880 which so much of the modern right is just an elongated response to and it's so crazy because
00:57:11.440 like what he's saying there when he's like you need to condemn this person he is mocking and
00:57:15.920 parodying when an actual like conservative politician will say something abhorrently
00:57:23.680 racist or misogynistic or ableist or whatever and people will rightfully call out the party and and
00:57:30.200 tell them they need to like condemn these viewpoints they're mocking it or like is a
00:57:34.080 rapist or something yes yes it is so annoying because it's like ultimately the people who were
00:57:40.780 leading the sjw charges of the mid-2010s like me age 16 on like my parents desktop computer
00:57:48.040 i didn't have any structural power you have the white house you are like instrumental in all of
00:57:55.620 these larger issues and so it is just so pathetic that to this day they are still clearly so mad and 0.66
00:58:03.400 so captivated by like whatever progressive momentum there was on the internet like 10 years 0.91
00:58:10.280 ago. And I think the fact that we don't know who that person is is interesting. Because until we
00:58:16.060 know who that person is, I'm 100% assuming it's some conservative or some person that was a random
00:58:20.960 person that was like paid off by a conservative. I'm saying Sky News Australia, the conservative
00:58:26.940 cable news outlet they did a segment on this world's gone mad sydney sweeney heckled at movie
00:58:34.320 premiere following gene's ad i'm like there's so many people making money off of this who's to say
00:58:39.660 it was one person it was one person how easily can one person be planted i'm just saying okay
00:58:44.980 that's enough conspiracy theorizing on the a bit fruity podcast i don't like to wade into those
00:58:48.660 waters i'm about to go use that facial recognition stuff and figure out who this lady is she's gonna 1.00
00:58:55.660 to be like the top comment on this video like hey guys so sorry that was actually me 1.00
00:59:02.220 did your camera just die yes now i know that sound
00:59:09.000 can you give me two minutes yeah so the new york times put out a really interesting piece that
00:59:18.380 actually taylor brought to my attention originally which kind of quantified everything we've been
00:59:24.000 talking about about this outrage cycle and by the way just i want to mention here i talk a lot of 0.78
00:59:29.080 shit on the new york times and it is a piece of shit institution but i want to clarify that there 0.98
00:59:33.460 are you know individual but they did one good article basically there are individual reporters 1.00
00:59:40.460 and journalists within the institution who do put out good work from time to time and and this was
00:59:46.440 one of those times i'm going to link this piece in the episode description but i clipped together
00:59:52.420 There's some quotes that kind of synthesize what they're trying to say.
00:59:56.220 The boiling social media frenzy over the American Eagle campaign has been driven,
01:00:00.660 at least in part, by the public's seemingly insatiable interest in Ms. Sweeney.
01:00:04.820 But it also shows how, on today's internet,
01:00:07.400 a controversy can sometimes be described as widespread when it isn't.
01:00:11.620 Instead, people pushing an agenda can cherry-pick from tens of millions of posts or videos
01:00:16.580 uploaded to social media every day to make their case.
01:00:19.660 Nearly three quarters of posts that were critical of Miss Sweeney or the ad had fewer than 500 views, data shows.
01:00:27.500 Many pro-Trump users amplified the critical posts in reposts and reshares, driving even more attention to posts that would normally reach only a few thousand users.
01:00:36.580 The tide began to shift on July 27th, days after the ad came out, when large right-wing
01:00:42.520 accounts such as Libs of TikTok began reposting critiques of the American Evil campaign,
01:00:47.280 mocking them as examples of triggered liberals. Libs of TikTok and another right-wing account
01:00:52.380 shared a video from a left-wing TikTok user who had 70,000 followers on the platform.
01:00:57.440 Their reposts were seen more than 4.4 million times on Twitter, far eclipsing the reach of
01:01:02.680 the original post. Then came the podcasters. Perhaps prompted by the viral success of posts
01:01:07.840 that defended the American Eagle campaign while attacking left-wing viewpoints, popular podcast
01:01:12.520 hosts Charlie Kirk, Clay Travis, and Michael Knowles jumped in on the topic, devoting increasing
01:01:17.780 amounts of airtime to what they described as evidence of a broken-brain Democratic culture.
01:01:22.680 Elected Republicans soon followed. And then it goes on. But I just think this is a really
01:01:27.900 interesting study that they ran, identifying how these reverse funnels always work, where a few
01:01:33.380 posts from relatively unknown people online about a topic that the vast majority of people wouldn't
01:01:38.780 organically care much about are picked up by these right-wing influencers and then the mainstream
01:01:43.680 media pundits and the politicians and whipped up into some, you know, broad indictment of the left,
01:01:49.820 even before the vast majority of the left has even heard about it.
01:01:53.780 Totally agree. I'm glad the New York Times did some journalism.
01:01:57.900 When this article came out, it got a decent amount of traction on Blue Sky, where everyone
01:02:02.540 hates the New York Times. And there was a lot of people dunking on it in the sense that they were
01:02:08.560 like, this has been the pattern for a long time, which is true. But I'm still glad that they wrote
01:02:14.540 about it. And I thought they wrote about it really well. Because if you're going to learn something
01:02:18.580 from how conservatives accelerate their rhetoric, you have got to drill down over and over and over
01:02:24.160 again every time they try to do this like it cannot be overstated how much of a ruse it is
01:02:29.820 how much of it is media manipulation like it just can't be said enough and also like we who like
01:02:35.000 cover the internet and live on the internet and breathe the internet like we know how these
01:02:39.560 culture wars are created if you're listening to this podcast there is a good chance that you
01:02:44.220 understand how this process goes every single time since gamergate but like a lot of people
01:02:49.560 who read the new york times don't understand that people like my parents don't understand
01:02:53.100 how this stuff happens. And they, you know, see this stuff start cropping up across the media of
01:02:57.640 like, Democrats take a stand against beautiful women. And they just think it's like something
01:03:02.860 that is actually happening. So my outline kind of wraps up with like, what is the bigger picture
01:03:09.700 here, which we kind of touched on earlier, but I want to rant a little bit about what I think the
01:03:15.360 bigger picture is here. And I wrote this out. While the right wing media is engaging you in
01:03:20.820 a culture war about Sidney Sweeney, Donald Trump is scorching the earth to make sure that nobody
01:03:26.840 accesses the details of his involvement with Jeffrey Epstein. While the right-wing media is
01:03:31.820 engaging you in a culture war about Sidney Sweeney, your free speech and tax dollars are going out the
01:03:37.120 window to support a genocide, which is broadly unpopular across the political spectrum in the
01:03:42.860 United States. While the right-wing media is engaging you in a culture war about Sidney Sweeney,
01:03:47.020 the MAGA administration is keeping you uneducated, is keeping you poor, is keeping you sick,
01:03:52.900 because materially improving your life would be in direct opposition to helping the billionaires
01:03:59.380 they are bought out by. And so there's a real darkness here for me, because while it's fun to
01:04:05.580 argue about celebrities, or at least, I don't know, it used to be, there's a reason why all of MAGA's
01:04:11.480 media proxies from Fox News to Brett Cooper are giving this so much airtime, despite not a single
01:04:17.960 Democratic politician, by the way, or prominent member of the left talking about this at all.
01:04:23.720 And it's because culture wars are all the right has to keep you in the fold. They won't even
01:04:29.600 pretend to do anything about wealth inequality or social services or anything that would make
01:04:34.600 your life actually better. So they just jangle these, you know, Sydney Sweeney shaped keys in
01:04:41.000 front of your face and keep you angry enough at the woke lift that you'll never wonder why you
01:04:46.040 don't have free health care. Amen. But I also don't want people to do the thing that I see
01:04:54.060 online too, where it's like somebody tries to have a nuanced thought or perspective, especially on
01:04:58.920 something to do with women or celebrity culture. And then they reply like, oh, well, this is a
01:05:03.820 distraction from what Donald Trump is really doing. Like, because it's like, yes, it is a
01:05:08.140 distraction, but that doesn't mean that it's not worth like dissecting and having a nuanced thought
01:05:12.460 on, or as you said, like writing about in the New York times and revealing this strategy,
01:05:16.480 if it's covered, it should be covered that way. I think the distraction is the debate. Like,
01:05:22.580 you know, is it a problem that she's hot or whatever? Like that's the distraction, but like
01:05:26.600 having a thoughtful nuance take, or honestly this podcast, like this is not part of the
01:05:31.420 distraction machine. Like this is like doing essential work, like, you know, dissecting the
01:05:36.240 discourse like pulling apart kind of why these campaigns happen and what they hope to achieve
01:05:40.240 and i do think that that coverage is valuable yes just to be clear when brett cooper makes an
01:05:45.380 hour-long youtube video about sydney sweeney it is a distraction but when we make an hour-long
01:05:50.040 youtube video about sydney sweeney we are doing such important work i can be self-aware i promise
01:05:58.280 the last thing that i had here on my outline was do you guys know rt the russian
01:06:06.200 outlet? Yes. It was paying Tim Pool? Yes. Yeah. Okay. Can you explain what RT is? RT is Russia
01:06:13.280 Today or it used to stand for Russia Today. It's basically state media from Russia and they run a
01:06:18.480 lot of propaganda campaigns. It was the Department of Justice revealed a few months ago that they
01:06:23.360 were secretly paying a bunch of right-wing influencers, including Tim Pool and Benny
01:06:26.560 Johnson, hundreds of thousands of dollars a month, hundreds of thousands of dollars per month. That's
01:06:32.100 millions of dollars a year to make content that fed into whatever they were trying to push rt which
01:06:37.620 i think is now just rt yeah they rebranded it did used to stand for russia today but i think they
01:06:42.280 want to have you know more u.s involvement so being called russia today would stands for read this
01:06:47.700 they posted slop content about this sydney sweeney great genes controversy and they wrote
01:06:59.360 liberals freak out over sydney sweeney's great genes and you know it's just like interviewing
01:07:05.060 triggered libs on the street about sydney sweeney but i'm like why do you think russia today the
01:07:11.560 russian state-owned propaganda network is posting about this like fake sydney sweeney controversy
01:07:17.900 in fact rt regularly weighs in on u.s based fake culture wars including the current one where
01:07:25.680 people are apparently mad on the right that there are male cheerleaders in the NFL, which is just
01:07:31.360 like a wild thing to be mad about in 2025. George W. Bush was a male cheerleader. So was Ronald 0.57
01:07:35.860 Reagan. No way. Yeah. Yeah. So many icons. We really are getting the 80s back. Yeah. Yeah,
01:07:41.940 exactly. Exactly. Of what concern are these like American culture wars to Russia and Russian
01:07:49.100 state owned media? Like, does nobody find it weird? And I think that's an example that most
01:07:54.780 people can be like, yeah, they have no business posting about Sidney Sweeney's jeans advertisement.
01:08:00.480 Why do they care about this? And I would encourage everyone, especially maybe if you were
01:08:05.200 a conservative, sent this podcast by a liberal family member or something like,
01:08:10.260 think about how American media can do that as well. And influencers can do that as well.
01:08:15.660 You know, everyone has the ability to exploit fake culture wars for nefarious purposes to get 0.98
01:08:20.760 you to look away from like the fact that our president is a pedophile.
01:08:23.340 And they can use these culture war topics to reinforce the bigotries that help Trump get 0.97
01:08:30.660 elected. They can reinforce homophobia. They can reinforce misogyny. They can reinforce
01:08:35.780 cultural conservatism. They can kill two birds with one stone, essentially.
01:08:39.740 And after everything is said and done, American Eagles stock is down. So what did we learn today?
01:08:47.440 Hope it was worth it.
01:08:48.700 Their foot traffic is down, too.
01:08:50.300 you don't go woke what is it you don't if you don't go woke you go broke wait if go go be woke
01:08:59.660 and make money go anti-woke go broke that's the one silver lining out of all of this is that like
01:09:07.500 this will stick with normal people as like something that was kind of like longer than
01:09:12.640 it will stick with conservatives as like a good way to get engagement like ultimately this type
01:09:17.340 of ad campaign only works very briefly and very temporarily. And ultimately, it will hurt you
01:09:22.980 more than it will help you. I also think it's just was so short sighted of them to market this ad so
01:09:29.960 heavily towards men when they're trying to sell women's jeans. Lizzie Savetsky bought a pair.
01:09:34.560 The one and only sale made in New York. How do I wrap this up? Well, I guess I'll say I did not
01:09:39.460 care about Sydney Sweeney before this. And I do not care about Sydney Sweeney now, though I wish
01:09:43.740 her well. I can't wait to see what deranged Alibaba product she's going to be hawking 0.98
01:09:48.680 next. Thank you so much for listening to today's episode. If you made it this far,
01:09:56.400 wow, I appreciate you so much. Thank you for allowing me into your home, your car, your ear.
01:10:00.680 Taylor and Kat, thank you so much for joining us today, as always.
01:10:04.540 Thanks for having us.
01:10:06.720 Oh, that was kind of like a robotic.
01:10:08.040 thank you matt for having us no you sound like sydney sweeney doing the ad that's the point
01:10:18.020 wait should i should i do my sign off in um in the voice as always thank you for listening
01:10:26.480 and until next time stay fruity
01:10:29.960 is that good it was perfect stay fruity i can picture her saying it
01:10:38.040 you can take the boy out of the fruit but you can't take the fruit out of the boy
01:10:43.660 that sounds sexual okay i'm done i'm done i'm cutting it 0.67