A Bit Fruity with Matt Bernstein - July 10, 2026


The Technofascist Urge To Never Turn Down a Brand Deal

Topics
How Jerry Seinfeld Bombed His Legacy (with Emma Vigeland) Lindsey Graham Died In The Closet (with Moira Donegan)

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 52 minutes

Words per minute

171.32

Word count

19,245

Sentence count

675

Harmful content

Misogyny

36

sentences flagged

Toxicity

65

sentences flagged

Hate speech

38

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 Taylor Swift's wedding was on Friday.
00:00:02.340 I knew you know that I'd find a way to shoehorn that in here somehow.
00:00:06.080 Well, I found a way.
00:00:08.760 I found it.
00:00:09.720 Taylor Swift's...
00:00:10.920 Wait, I'm just going to do that again.
00:00:13.700 Do it as many times as you need.
00:00:15.460 You can never be too sure with your tone about Taylor Swift's wedding.
00:00:19.100 That's true.
00:00:23.660 Taylor Swift's wedding was on Friday.
00:00:30.000 Hello, hello, and welcome back to A Bit Fruity. I'm Matt Bernstein. Taylor Swift's wedding
00:00:37.320 was on Friday. It was held at Madison Square Garden, the largest entertainment venue in
00:00:43.780 one of the most crowded areas of Manhattan, on top of the busiest train station in North
00:00:48.880 America. And I have no opinions on it at all. What's notable, though, is that MSG, Madison
00:00:57.920 Square Garden has one of the most sophisticated and invasive biometric surveillance systems of
00:01:04.220 any entertainment venue in the world. Spearheaded by Trump sycophant and the New York Knicks owner
00:01:10.980 James Dolan, the network of cameras and computers in Madison Square Garden tracks every movement of
00:01:18.400 everyone who enters the venue, uses facial recognition software to build enemy lists,
00:01:24.660 track the social media accounts of visitors James Dolan doesn't like,
00:01:29.080 and a whole host of other things that would make George Orwell blush.
00:01:33.040 And this, I suppose, is a value add for someone like Taylor Swift,
00:01:38.580 whose every move requires airtight security, lest there be any snakes in her midst.
00:01:46.220 I'm just trying to be funny.
00:01:48.860 Guests of the wedding were not allowed to film or photograph anything,
00:01:54.160 And this anti-surveillance was itself enforced by Madison Square Garden's surveillance system, ironically, which, according to TMZ, scanned guests not just for the phones in their hands, but also for if they were wearing metaglasses.
00:02:12.420 The new AI glasses that photograph and record people without their knowledge.
00:02:19.300 Anyone caught wearing metaglasses at the wedding was promptly escorted out the back and shot by James Dolan himself.
00:02:29.840 Thank you. There's the studio audience I was looking for.
00:02:33.260 metaglasses we're told are the next frontier of consumer technology in their newest release
00:02:44.660 kylie jenner is their celebrity face a pair of the kylie starfire metaglasses will run you 400
00:02:52.980 and the built-in ai assistant talks to you in kylie jenner's voice fun i'm happy i really am
00:03:01.440 that Taylor Swift had a state-of-the-art security system to ensure people around her could not film
00:03:08.120 her with their glasses without her consent. But for the rest of us who don't have James Dolan on
00:03:15.480 speed dial, what's our recourse? Today, we are going to explore all of this. And I'm so excited
00:03:24.340 to be doing that alongside two friends of the show cat tenbarge writer of spitfire news and
00:03:31.860 ed on guesso jr of the this machine kills podcast and writer of the tech bubble newsletter welcome
00:03:40.080 back to the show you guys ed it's been a while yeah it's great to uh be here thanks for having
00:03:45.260 me back always glad to be here should i tell my story yeah because i just learned that you two
00:03:50.660 know each other ed and i have known each other for years because we're both like tech journalists in
00:03:55.720 the new york city media scene last year we were at the same party and i saw that ed had this amazing
00:04:02.100 hat and it's a hat that says if you talk to me about ai i will kill myself i went home and like
00:04:09.420 in the following days weeks i got a shirt on etsy that said this and i wore that shirt on the 4th of
00:04:16.100 July this year. I was like, this is my most patriotic shirt. And I took a picture wearing
00:04:20.520 it and posted it on Instagram. And then the next day I woke up and they were like, we flagged your
00:04:25.360 account because you're promoting self-harm and suicide. And I was like, well, I don't think
00:04:31.040 that's, I wouldn't, I wouldn't say that. I wouldn't say that. Right. Some world we live in
00:04:36.320 can't even joke about AI making me want to kill myself anymore. You know, anytime I feel like I
00:04:42.220 got a similar flag whenever i post a picture of myself with the hat i have them going you know
00:04:48.620 someone who follows you is concerned and wanted to check in totally totally not our large language
00:04:56.220 model behind the scenes it's a real person soon you won't be allowed to make jokes uh
00:05:01.360 about the pervert glasses you know yeah i was gonna say i was gonna say now that i'm doing
00:05:06.620 props and costuming on this podcast i'm gonna show up to the next episode with a hat that says
00:05:10.680 don't talk to me about metaglasses. I'll kill myself. But actually do talk to me about these 0.94
00:05:16.040 things because I can never shut up about them. So we're going to be talking a lot about metaglasses,
00:05:21.420 about the future of AI surveillance and all of this really fun stuff, as well as
00:05:26.900 Kylie Jenner and her transgressions today. But, you know, I thought that it would be
00:05:33.660 anti-feminist, dare I say, of myself to talk so much about Kylie Jenner's sort of lending her
00:05:41.080 face to the rise of a techno feudalist society if I did not also talk about what her boy
00:05:48.600 Timothee Chalamet is doing, which is in many ways the same thing. So our opener, our icebreaker
00:05:55.700 segment today is a look at the new
00:05:59.560 Timothee Chalamet Kalshi prediction market
00:06:03.280 gambling website ad. If you're not watching the video version of this
00:06:07.580 podcast and you're only listening to the audio, I apologize if this makes
00:06:11.520 little sense. I'll fill in the details for you in just a moment.
00:06:16.380 Well, there's a lot of infection in there, Timmy. You're doing really
00:06:19.660 well.
00:06:22.780 Are you feeling anything?
00:06:25.700 Kashi.
00:06:28.220 I don't understand, but this is going very well.
00:06:32.820 Kashi.
00:06:35.800 Kashi?
00:06:37.380 Kashi.
00:06:38.540 Kashi.
00:06:39.560 Kashi.
00:06:40.400 And that is the point at which I have to cut it for copyright purposes.
00:06:45.160 but the bottom line is it is timothy chalamet reclining in his uh you know dental chair with 0.99
00:06:53.820 the dentist putting all sorts of shit in his mouth and him just repeating the word 0.97
00:06:57.780 calci i was just like this ad isn't even funny or smart like there's not even any like redeeming 0.99
00:07:03.880 factor or quality to this it just was like humiliating and you sold your soul yeah i think
00:07:09.240 that's also the thing that a lot of these ads i feel like as they try to get more creative as they
00:07:16.540 try to be like what's a fun way we can get someone to feel like they're promoting us without feeling
00:07:22.520 like they're selling out to us they just get dumber and dumber and reveal the thing for what 0.87
00:07:27.920 it is right which is like very brazen cal she's spent a lot of time just doing very brazen how 0.95
00:07:33.540 can we do publicity stunts how can we get really popular public figures or really popular trends
00:07:39.860 you know how can we ride the next wave how can we get timothy in the midst of this movie star run
00:07:46.140 for people who don't know what calci is at all which can you broadly just explain what it is
00:07:51.180 ninth circle of hell so just imagine that's right you know a place you can you can bet on anything
00:07:57.900 it's ostensibly it's a prediction market which is you know a buzzword that these people use where
00:08:02.980 They like to be like, you know, imagine a world where instead of getting facts and news and, you know, finding out what's what, you would trust a bunch of degenerate crypto bros and people, you know, gamblers and others who are getting taken for a line, you know, to dictate the odds of something happening and that this will somehow give us more insight because we're democratizing.
00:08:31.560 You know, that's the buzzword. We're democratizing finance and information gathering and news generation through a prediction market.
00:08:39.020 Yeah. And the CEO of Kalshi famously said they want to financialize everything, meaning any difference of opinion. What's the weather going to be tomorrow? Will Taylor Swift get pregnant in 2026? What will, you know, the color of the dildo thrown at the WNBA game?
00:09:02.120 Like these are all, by the way, real bets that people are placing on anything where there is a yes, no difference in opinion split.
00:09:10.820 They want to say you can bet on the future of that.
00:09:14.560 One of the first times that they really came onto my radar was the day of the New York mayoral primary, because before the polls even closed, they tweet from their like their official X account as if they are the news.
00:09:29.080 It is super, super misleading.
00:09:30.620 I've seen tons of people, including like journalists, kind of get like fooled or tricked by this because it reads like a headline.
00:09:38.020 And even before the polls were closing, they were posting like fake election results and claiming like, oh, so-and-so is in the lead, like so-and-so is really behind.
00:09:46.960 And it was just completely made up, but they faced zero consequences for it.
00:09:51.860 Like what they were doing was dramatically flouting like advertising guidelines.
00:09:55.980 There was just nobody at the wheel to stop them. And they've only gotten worse since then.
00:10:01.460 Yeah, they've benefited from Trump administration corruption extensively, right? They've hired people that previously worked in the CFTC or the SEC. They have pretty close ties to the Trump administration. They are a firm, you know, them in poly market technically are illegal in the United States, but are allowed to operate through ridiculous sort of loopholes.
00:10:25.720 I mean, Polymarket, which is a similar venture to them, operated for a while the same kind of loophole that these crypto casinos overseas would operate by, where you'd have like these big firms that would do partnerships with streamers and essentially target children trying to be like, you guys should gamble on stream, we'll give you money for it so you're not really losing anything and we'll give you a big payout on top.
00:10:50.160 And you're not allowed to do that in the United States. And similarly, some of these, you know, for a while, if you weren't allowed to do it in the United States, whether it's digital gambling or gambling, you know, on these markets this way, but now it's coming home.
00:11:02.580 Now we're freeing the market to do God's work, which is to let people gamble on whether a town is going to get annexed by an occupying army or whether someone in your neighborhood is going to use a hairdryer to increase the temperature on a radar or on a sensor by two degrees so that they can get like a $30,000 payout.
00:11:20.720 And it's been so demoralizing to see, like, the Oscars bring this right in, like, no questions asked, like, we're going to put tickers on all of these major channels, like, the Super Bowl, the Oscars, like, all of these.
00:11:33.340 CNN.
00:11:34.220 Yeah, CNN did the Calci deal too, right?
00:11:36.120 News and cultural institutions bending over backwards to facilitate the slightest profit from this, like, blatantly not only illegal, also morally corrupt thing.
00:11:47.460 and all these decision makers are just like whatever like it's trump's america we're gonna
00:11:51.960 do whatever we want yeah and you know i've teased this topic many times on this podcast because it
00:11:57.980 makes me so so angry and like emotional um because it's gambling it's gambling and you know they'll
00:12:06.660 say oh well there's a difference between prediction markets and and gambling casinos and you know i
00:12:12.200 would argue that that's like spiritually uh the same argument that people in multi-level marketing
00:12:17.500 schemes make when they say we're not a pyramid scheme technically distinctions without differences
00:12:23.020 and and most importantly people using these prediction market websites if the websites
00:12:29.700 themselves want to say that it's not gambling uh well the bottom line is the psychological impulse
00:12:35.200 and the dopamine hits that you get from participating in it is the exact same as gambling at a casino
00:12:40.860 And the thing about casinos is if you go to Las Vegas and you walk into a physical casino or Atlantic City from my lovely home state of New Jersey, you see what gambling does to people.
00:12:58.280 You see how it destroys people's lives.
00:13:01.240 The thing with Polymarket and Kalshi is it allows people to destroy their lives in the exact same way, to go into financial ruin, to develop these gambling addictions from the comfort of their own home.
00:13:18.380 And in middle school, in many of these ad campaigns, look at what they're doing with Timothee Chalamet, target young men and boys.
00:13:28.280 gambling addiction has the highest suicide rate of any addiction and and and so you know for
00:13:35.480 timothy chalamet to be doing this to me it just for the sake of this podcast it opens up a
00:13:40.700 conversation that i am always wanting to have that i don't know if it's that interesting to people
00:13:45.320 who aren't like content creators and or make money this way but about saying no to brand
00:13:52.080 partnerships something that i think we the three of us right as creatives as creators
00:13:59.600 that we are all tasked with now to give you a sense of how rich timothy chalamet is before his 0.80
00:14:08.100 fucking calci ad and the rates that he commands timothy chalamet was the face of a chanel
00:14:13.740 blue de chanel fragrance campaign in 2023 for which he was paid a reported 35 million dollars 0.97
00:14:20.880 and you know that's one brand deal that is not to account for any of his movies any of his anything
00:14:29.980 he's so rich it's like we all have the capacity to draw lines for ourselves around what we will
00:14:37.420 and won't do I do a podcast the podcast has sponsors I have the task of deciding which
00:14:42.840 sponsors I will and won't accept for this podcast and I just think like you know for example I said
00:14:48.980 no to better help uh and i don't think i'm like a you know a model citizen for saying no to better
00:14:55.680 help i'm just like you know when you get a certain amount of listens on your podcast you get the
00:15:00.120 better help sponsorship offer and i looked up better help on reddit because i don't know that
00:15:04.760 much about the company but i was curious about what other people said and i saw enough bad or
00:15:08.380 dubious stuff to be like i'm gonna say no to better help i'm just like look if we can say no 0.68
00:15:13.960 to better help on the fucking leftist podcast circuit like come on timothy you can say no to 0.83
00:15:19.820 kalshi i know you can i know you can does that make sense i mean i think it does especially i 0.88
00:15:26.220 think about it a lot with these gambling because like you said gambling's a particularly pernicious
00:15:30.560 one right but i also think it's a perfect example of sort of traps people fall for primarily thinking
00:15:36.740 because something is digital that it's a little bit different right you know what is the reason
00:15:41.940 we have these online gambling markets is because we have physical gambling markets and why are
00:15:48.220 they interested in physical and gambling markets because they're incredibly lucrative why are they
00:15:51.280 lucrative because they're so intentionally designed to drain as much money out of you as
00:15:55.280 possible to get you in a flow state there to get you to lose sense of time and reality to get you
00:16:01.600 as comfortable and accommodated to spending as much money as possible which is you know the design
00:16:06.380 that we have incorporated into most of our digital interfaces and products.
00:16:11.280 But it's just so silly that given the general antipathy I think the public has for digital goods
00:16:17.780 and understanding that these firms don't have any of our interests in mind
00:16:22.020 and that they rarely, if ever, offer something that's pro-social,
00:16:26.660 it is silly to say yes to something that combines the worst of all these worlds, right?
00:16:31.700 which is gambling, addiction, insider trading, corruption, political connections to the
00:16:37.920 administration. But, you know, I guess you need like a second, third house or something. I don't
00:16:42.900 really know. It feels like to me the physical infrastructure of the casino is important
00:16:48.100 because if we're going to have like a market that we've created for this like social ill,
00:16:53.560 which like people can participate in gambling and not have it be a morally negative act.
00:16:58.020 but when you're in the casino you can very obviously see what's happening the downsides
00:17:04.360 of it if you go to like i remember i stayed at the rio in las vegas because they were doing hotel 1.00
00:17:08.580 rooms for like 14 a night and it's really depressing walking past like all of the elderly
00:17:14.600 folks who are sitting there at the slot machines and like you pass them at 9 a.m and then you pass
00:17:19.440 them again at 9 p.m and you know they've been there for 12 hours like that is an important
00:17:24.160 visual reminder of what gambling is with the prediction markets and specifically the celebrity
00:17:30.600 endorsements, it's now being morphed into just like a cool thing. And I also think that with
00:17:36.620 Timothee Chalamet choosing to do this, he's also doing this very cynical calculus because he's not 0.84
00:17:42.580 dumb. He knows this is going to be unpopular. He knows this is going to be controversial. 0.71
00:17:47.900 I think a lot of these celebrities have wised up to the knowledge that like they're going to do
00:17:52.000 these controversial ads and endorsements and people are going to get mad at them they just
00:17:55.660 know fundamentally it's not going to matter because they can afford they can afford to lose
00:18:00.640 even thousands of fans they know that the majority of people will not notice and or will forget and
00:18:06.860 or will not care so they're doing it purposefully and i also thought it was very funny like after
00:18:12.580 the timothy ad came out my little brother who is a college student who like is not like that tuned
00:18:18.480 into any of this stuff texted me and was like timothy's not cool anymore like he's like like
00:18:24.880 can't believe he did this call she had like i don't i don't ride for timothy anymore and i was
00:18:29.500 like whoa so it's like i do think that there is there's blowback to this and that is real
00:18:35.340 i think timothy is like by the time dune 3 comes out like no one's gonna care anymore
00:18:39.940 and he's probably right and like what of you to have of your own fans what have you what have you
00:18:47.680 to have of the people who support you that they're just like these lifeless sheep who will get over
00:18:55.260 it you know I know a lot of people love to make fun of like the people who would like engage with
00:18:59.700 something like Kalshi but I don't I think that they're all victims of you know an extremely 0.58
00:19:06.780 predatory business model that Timothee Chalamet has handsomely profited off of and you know like
00:19:13.920 ed said for what that money could hit or not hit his bank account and it would not change a single
00:19:19.120 thing about his life that's what drives me crazy we've been experiencing a wave of horrible celebrity
00:19:24.520 brand partnerships from this to what we're about to talk about to gwyneth paltrow doing luxury
00:19:31.300 apartments in herzalia israel and i'm like for what yeah that are filmed in new york filmed in
00:19:37.180 new york for what you guys all have so much money i also find like gambling addiction and gambling
00:19:44.740 marketing really interesting because it is so young male dominated and focused there was an
00:19:51.200 atlantic cover story that got a lot of attention a few months ago about gambling which was kind of
00:19:56.620 an insane concept because they gave a mormon reporter who had never gambled before because
00:20:02.240 it's against their religion. They gave him like $10,000 to go gamble with. And the cover story 0.80
00:20:07.980 was basically just like outlining what happened. And what happened is he got really into it and
00:20:12.940 ended up losing a ton of money. But along the way, like he was speaking to all of these like
00:20:18.840 experts in gambling, like going through a lot of the science behind it. And I learned from that
00:20:23.020 article that like 93% of people with gambling addiction are men and that many men start
00:20:31.620 gambling for the first time when they're like 14 years old. Sometimes it's because they gamble
00:20:37.880 with their dads as like a father-son bonding activity, which I find so sad and depressing.
00:20:43.300 Other times though, increasingly it's because kids are able to access these markets like
00:20:48.980 Polymarket and Kalshi and start gambling. And the fact that like that's part of the calculus of
00:20:55.360 doing a Timothee Chalamet ad is they know that he is a popular figure for among these like young
00:21:01.140 men and boys. And I'm like that in particular, I'm like, that's one of those, like, how do you
00:21:05.740 sleep at night knowing you're probably you've been chosen because they think that 13 year old
00:21:10.500 boys look up to you and are going to want to do what you did because it's cool. Like that is
00:21:15.680 really, really selfish. Yeah. I mean, these industries, that's what they thrive off, right?
00:21:20.140 To getting them while they're young. I mean, you know, Natasha Scholl in her book, Addiction by
00:21:24.280 Design, she's an anthropologist that studies casinos and gambling and writes the book at a
00:21:29.300 period where we're just about to be at the cusp of online gambling, but the industries are anxious
00:21:36.660 because they're realizing that they've had lifetime customers who they've relied on using
00:21:45.860 and engaging with casinos in a very specific way, and they're going to die. And it seems like
00:21:51.840 they're not going to be able to properly capture, convince young people to move on to casinos or
00:21:59.280 to, you know, to spend all their time in casinos. So what are they going to do? And, and online
00:22:03.560 gambling, right, emerges as a sort of solve, but, but it's also, I think downstream of some of the
00:22:09.800 same stuff that motivates the gambling and in of itself, right. You know, post 2008 kind of
00:22:16.140 desperation to make money, the, this, this insistence on, you know, the way that we can,
00:22:22.000 you know, make amends in one way or another, rectify what happened with the financial crisis
00:22:26.240 This is, you know, don't trust the bankers, trust the platforms, you know, trust the tech
00:22:30.900 companies, you should manage it.
00:22:33.040 And this sort of constant march of you should democratize more and more of the financial
00:22:37.340 system and bring it under your control.
00:22:39.660 And more and more of the world should be financialized, right?
00:22:44.280 And it should be a casino.
00:22:45.500 You should be able to make money wherever you want.
00:22:47.300 You should be able to rent part of your home.
00:22:48.780 You should be able to rent your car, you know, to pick up other people or rent your home
00:22:52.220 to other people who are traveling.
00:22:53.380 you should be able to turn anything you can into an asset that can generate some rent or revenue for
00:22:59.060 you and eventually of course we've come to one of the logical conclusions which is information
00:23:05.100 that you come across you should be able to bet on it against other people thinking that you have an 0.99
00:23:09.000 edge i love your cat your cat your cat is like fuck this it really is i also like i think about 0.98
00:23:20.680 the male the male lonely crisis as it has been termed and i think about how for the right the 0.99
00:23:27.100 supposed male loneliness crisis has been taken on as a project to like deny women's bodily autonomy
00:23:33.920 to say like men are lonely because women's standards are too high or like modern feminism
00:23:39.040 is the root of all ills and like it's the reason why young men are experiencing more depression
00:23:43.480 why people are less likely to get partnered why they're less likely to get married why they're
00:23:47.540 less likely to have children. Even if you were to complete this political project and ensure that
00:23:53.480 women are forced to marry men and bear children at a young age, it would not tackle some of the
00:24:00.240 roots of these issues, which include things like gambling. An actual political project that truly 0.97
00:24:07.160 cared about young men would address the corruption within this industry and address the marketing
00:24:13.480 that hooks men and boys onto this at a young age because it is such a male-dominated issue.
00:24:19.440 I think that those numbers and the way that this crisis operates is really staggering.
00:24:25.040 And there isn't, as of right now, certainly the right is not taking this on as a political
00:24:29.760 project. I also think it's fertile ground for people who do want to make the world a better
00:24:36.000 place for the youth and beyond is to address this crisis and the fact that it's only happening
00:24:42.940 because there is no regulatory teeth behind actually dismantling it.
00:24:48.280 I would like to take just a quick break from the show to give a shout out to the sponsors
00:24:54.200 of this podcast, which are hopefully comparatively normal. I think we have a
00:24:59.720 food and soap this week. But before we do that, I wanted to tell you that I completely forgot
00:25:06.860 while we were recording this episode that in 2024, I was asked by Kalshi if I could do a Kalshi
00:25:14.920 sponsorship for this podcast. And I went and I found the email exchange because I didn't even
00:25:20.780 know what Kalshi was. It was Better Times. And I wanted to read that email exchange to you. I was 1.00
00:25:26.700 asked if I wanted to do the Kalshi sponsorship and I responded, can you please explain exactly
00:25:31.600 what this company is, like I am 10 years old. What they wrote back, their sort of like one-liner
00:25:37.280 thing was, Kalshi is a platform that allows you to bet on anything. The outcome of the election,
00:25:43.940 the winner of the best new artist at the Grammy Awards, or the Rotten Tomatoes score of new movies
00:25:49.060 coming out. It's a platform for people to place bets and potentially win money if they are lucky
00:25:54.560 slash know their stuff. It's totally legal and is available to anyone over the age of 18 in the U.S.
00:26:03.560 And I just said, passing on this, I think if you have to tell me in your initial pitch that it's
00:26:10.400 totally legal, that's got me asking questions about why you needed to say up front that it's
00:26:15.680 totally legal. So in any event, here are the sponsors of this podcast. Our first sponsor is
00:26:22.480 Blueland. Plastics don't just disappear, they break up into smaller and smaller pieces that
00:26:28.960 embed themselves within our environments, within our water, within our food. These, as you may know,
00:26:34.700 are called microplastics. Blueland is a line of home cleaning products on a mission to eliminate
00:26:41.360 single-use plastic, and they have everything. Any home cleaning product that you have, including
00:26:46.500 all sorts of soaps, laundry pods, you name it, they have a plastic-free replacement for it.
00:26:53.640 And they've replaced those products in over a million homes, including mine.
00:26:58.800 Blueland is really simple. For most of their products, you just buy one of their forever
00:27:03.800 bottles. You fill it with water and you pop in a tablet for whatever product it is, be it
00:27:08.980 hand soap, dish soap, window cleaner, multi-purpose cleaner. And when you're done with that bottle,
00:27:15.860 You just fill it up with water again and pop in a new tablet and those tablets start for as low
00:27:21.140 as $2.25. So not just better for the planet, but also better on your wallet. If you'd like to try
00:27:28.340 out Blueland, you can get 15% off your first order at blueland.com slash fruity. That is
00:27:35.540 blueland.com slash fruity. This podcast is also sponsored by our friends at Factor. You know,
00:27:43.660 when you get home after a long day at work and you've got everything you need in the fridge
00:27:48.860 to cook the groceries they're looking at you but you just you just don't have the energy to cook
00:27:54.420 people who listen to this podcast a lot know that this is just me on most days i like doing a lot of
00:27:59.920 things i don't like cooking or maybe you're a meal prepper and right up front at the top of the week
00:28:05.820 you make chicken and rice to have for dinner for the next five days admirable truly but what if
00:28:12.460 food could be easy and varied. Factor is a meal delivery service with chef-made gourmet meals that
00:28:19.380 make eating well easy. And the best part, of course, is that they are all ready to heat and
00:28:25.580 eat in two minutes. No more refrigerator dread. Factor has over a hundred different meal options
00:28:32.380 on a rotating menu and a bunch of different sort of cuisines and dietary options. So whatever your
00:28:39.160 preferences are, they can accommodate them. If you'd like to try Factor today, you can head over
00:28:44.260 to factormeals.com slash fruity50off with the code fruity50off to get 50% off and free daily greens
00:28:55.220 with a new subscription. That is factormeals.com slash fruity50off. And now let's get back to the
00:29:03.740 show. This all reminds me of something that happened a few years ago, which some people
00:29:08.960 who are very online may remember, which was when a small group of young, mostly black and brown
00:29:15.860 female influencers took a brand trip to China with the fast fashion slave labor brand Shein.
00:29:23.340 The influencers were brought through a staged tour of one of Shein's factories, where, of course, 0.65
00:29:31.160 pre-planned employee slash actors told them how good their working conditions are.
00:29:37.020 Next day, we headed to the Shein Innovation Center. This facility blew my mind. It's over
00:29:41.320 600,000 square feet. There's so much technology and Shein is just such a developed and complex
00:29:46.300 company and it was so beautiful to see firsthand. I was able to interview a woman that worked in
00:29:49.760 the fabric cutting department and you guys know me. She's an investigative journalist. So I asked
00:29:53.420 her all of our questions and she answered them honestly and authentically. She was very surprised
00:29:58.020 at all the rumors that have been spread in the US. She told me about her family, her lifestyle,
00:30:01.700 her commute, her hour. And this was a mega controversy on the internet. And for good
00:30:06.960 reason, these influencers were being taken for a ride and themselves cashing in on an opportunity 0.98
00:30:13.640 to launder the image of one of fashion's most notorious violators of labor laws and human 1.00
00:30:19.920 rights. One of the influencers named Danny DMC, known colloquially as confidence activist.
00:30:26.880 she she became a meme and videos of her sort of like obliviously and unquestioningly
00:30:35.580 nodding along to Sheehan's sweatshop propaganda circulate regularly three years later and you
00:30:42.840 know to be clear I think these influencers deserved criticism for their lack of discernment
00:30:47.180 and a number of these girls again mostly brown and black beauty influencers have said in hindsight
00:30:55.080 that that was like the only brand trip they'd ever been invited on during an era where influencer
00:31:01.140 trip marketing was a really big thing. And when splashy opportunities with brands like Tarte
00:31:07.200 Cosmetics were overwhelmingly made available to white influencers, it felt like sad to me then 1.00
00:31:14.420 that these Shein girls seemed uniquely poised to be doing this brand's dirty work, which didn't 1.00
00:31:21.580 make it okay. It just made it like complicated. And I bring all of this up to say that that Sheehan 1.00
00:31:29.200 trip was the talk of the town in 2023. There were so many articles, so many YouTube videos, so many
00:31:36.460 TikToks, the commentary, the discourse, it was endless. There are multiple videos about it on
00:31:41.580 YouTube right now with between 500,000 and a million views. Comparatively, there was no widespread
00:31:48.780 spread backlash to timothy chalamet's calci ad like on leftist discourse internet you know a lot
00:31:56.640 of us were like dude really but i scrolled through youtube no commentary videos about this something 1.00
00:32:03.120 that he was no doubt paid a million times more than these sheen girls potentially literally 0.95
00:32:07.840 you know i was like scrolling on youtube trying to find like where was the outrage and the last
00:32:12.860 time that youtube commentators did have a field day with timothy chalamet was over his comments
00:32:17.840 about ballet's relevancy in the commercial market, 0.99
00:32:21.220 which was a comparatively stupid controversy. 0.96
00:32:25.200 Anyway, I'm getting off my soapbox now. 0.98
00:32:27.060 It's just like, it's again,
00:32:28.280 it's crazy to me what these people can say yes to
00:32:30.800 with no backlash.
00:32:32.380 Besides from your woke little brother.
00:32:36.660 It's true, but I think you're completely right
00:32:39.260 in that a lot of people had a knee jerk 0.95
00:32:41.320 like this sucks reaction, 0.92
00:32:42.880 but that is also exactly why I think he and his team 0.93
00:32:46.940 of, I imagine, very talented publicists were like, of course you can do the Kalshi ad.
00:32:52.820 You're going to make like, who knows how much he was paid, but like, definitely millions
00:32:57.320 for sure.
00:32:58.120 Millions, yeah, for sure.
00:32:59.680 Probably tens of millions, maybe even more.
00:33:02.700 But it's like that calculus comes into play where it's like you're going to get bad press
00:33:06.860 for about 24 hours and then people will just move on.
00:33:11.520 It's not the same calculus whatsoever for smaller influencers, for people in the public
00:33:16.720 guy who are women who are marginalized, like the calculus is totally different because we do have
00:33:22.240 such a social script of like haranguing people who have smaller platforms because they're just
00:33:28.020 easier targets. At the end of the day, those influencers who went to the Shein factory like 0.99
00:33:32.960 are not going to have a major blockbuster coming out later this summer. Like it is a much trickier 0.98
00:33:39.160 thing to do to rehabilitate your reputation or to have people move on when that's the only thing
00:33:45.040 they know you for is your public controversy versus like, I am the most bankable young man
00:33:51.220 actor of my generation. Yeah. I think also, you know, and over time people get normalized to
00:33:55.800 these sorts of things, right? People are more willing, forgiving, or maybe not even willing
00:34:01.440 or forgiving, but inundated with these sorts of advertisements all the time that it kind of
00:34:08.680 passes over their head in one way or another i mean i think about the reaction to crypto ads
00:34:16.880 you know what would we see crypto ads in super bowls uh they're peaking right i think you know
00:34:22.640 a few years ago in in outrage and then ads that have come up since then you know that have a
00:34:27.520 muted reaction to you know these sorts of spectacles marketing opportunities blatantly
00:34:32.480 corrupt developments by virtue of you know just flooding the zone with them like there's a lot
00:34:38.220 of room for people who want to make a quick buck and are scared of the publicity or might have
00:34:43.740 otherwise been scared of publicity to take advantage of the fact there's just so much
00:34:47.140 there's so much of this going on in almost every corner that they can take advantage of the
00:34:53.220 confusion that that the public might otherwise have and also i think you know the media in some
00:34:57.920 ways is to blame with this the way that it has covered you know crypto covered prediction markets
00:35:04.240 covered AI. Not to say there isn't great critical work, but I think the usual position feels a lot
00:35:12.440 of times like, let's just give this thing a chance. Let's check it out. It's kind of cool,
00:35:18.820 right? It's kind of cool that we're doing this, right? And that does a lot of work off the bat,
00:35:23.740 preventing someone who might otherwise have such a deep revulsion to it if you said aloud what it
00:35:30.780 was um when it's primed as you know part of it is good part of it is bad but we'll have to wait
00:35:36.600 and see how it shakes out yeah and i was fully ready by the way to get on my soapbox and defend
00:35:43.940 danny dmc aka confidence activist until i checked her instagram last night and saw
00:35:52.020 that her most recent brand partnership was with you guessed it
00:35:56.860 kalshi nope polymarkia metaglasses
00:36:04.360 she's on a she's kind of on a generational run they were like we liked what you did there
00:36:11.160 for the brand just got back from the sheen factory here to promote the pedophile goggles
00:36:17.280 like come on guys it's also like to ed's point there i guess that once your reputation has
00:36:23.840 become intertwined with this type of controversy and like taking a bad brand deal it's like
00:36:28.300 the initial uh pushback is going to be less and less and less every time it happens because i
00:36:34.120 think with the with the sheen ad it was like kind of framed as a shocking thing like why would these
00:36:39.440 like young women who are like seemingly so progressive and socially aware like go to this 0.98
00:36:44.920 factory with and like endorse these slave like working conditions but now that they've done it 0.92
00:36:49.960 it's like oh well now we have no expectation that they're not going to endorse like the
00:36:54.100 metaglasses or whatever just say no to some brand partnerships you guys you know like i don't think
00:36:59.500 better help is hitler iconic quote it's not great like i i think like i think like metaglasses and
00:37:12.360 i think kalshi are like much closer to hitler than better help but like it seemed shitty enough it
00:37:18.720 seemed like enough people had bad or ethically dubious experiences where i'm like let's we're
00:37:23.520 just not going to do better help another thing i won't do is like supplement ads there's certain
00:37:27.560 companies that love to sponsor podcast advertisements which is why you probably hear
00:37:32.060 all of the podcasts you listen to or a lot of them sponsored by the same companies and the
00:37:37.800 supplement industry loves podcasts and categorically that's just one that for example like i personally
00:37:43.360 i draw a line around the supplement industry i'm like i'm not gonna tell you guys to go buy vitamin
00:37:47.400 gummies i'm not i'm not getting my own bi sister debacle i don't think i'm like a i don't think
00:37:54.140 i'm like an amazing person for that like it's fine but you don't understand these supplements
00:37:58.100 worked for me yeah yeah they made me orange or you know whatever else they do it's also like
00:38:08.480 something that you had mentioned a little earlier matt was like these some of these influencers and
00:38:13.340 celebrities clearly don't view the people watching them as people. They view their followers and
00:38:20.020 their audience as just like numbers on a screen. And I do think that makes all the difference in
00:38:26.180 choosing like, am I going to do a specific sponsorship or am I going to endorse a specific
00:38:30.480 product? Because if you view your audience as people, you're going to think about the potential
00:38:35.300 consequences of your voice impacting and influencing their decisions. If you like care
00:38:41.900 about the people, even if you don't know who they are, it's almost like a weird parasocial
00:38:45.380 back and forth. Because it's like, obviously, we don't know who every single person individually
00:38:49.200 in our audience is. But you can imagine that like, oh, yeah, I probably have someone following me
00:38:54.800 who could then think because I put my name behind this supplement that this supplement would
00:38:59.100 actually work. And then does that matter to you? Or do you not like care about what will happen to
00:39:04.640 the people who watch your content? And I do think with a lot of these celebrities, they're like,
00:39:09.320 they don't care at all about the people who like watch their movies or like care about them at the
00:39:14.160 end of the day yeah well danny dmc confidence activist is selling meta glasses and in fact
00:39:21.040 seems like everyone's selling meta glasses they've been sponsored by doja cat by chris pratt by chris
00:39:29.860 hemsworth by chris jenner all the chrises by jenny of blackpink who that one really got me because
00:39:38.420 i'm like jenny you have the best solo career out of the four of them and i feel very passionately
00:39:42.600 about that why are you selling meta ray bands i will say you know shout out to meta for making
00:39:48.160 them very easy to smash you know we had a tribunal where we smashed them with a giant
00:39:52.900 fucking sledgehammer and that was it was pretty nice and easy so i want to i gotta thank him for 0.95
00:39:59.560 that you know that'll be good in the coming years we have uh we have some more meta glasses to smash 0.98
00:40:05.140 because like I said up top, Kylie Jenner is the official face of the new Meta Glasses launch.
00:40:13.040 And I would like to enter this segment by watching a 60 second commercial that Meta put out for this
00:40:24.220 Kylie Jenner collaboration that I don't think a lot of people really saw. They posted it to their
00:40:28.820 like Meta Glasses YouTube channel, which nobody watches. Kylie just, you know, to promote the
00:40:34.840 partnership she just posted like the photo shoot this ad is highly bizarre here we go
00:40:41.300 morning this new sample just came in all right where did you want this uh over there and then
00:40:56.180 and these flowers just came in from your mom.
00:40:57.640 Here you go.
00:40:58.480 Thank you.
00:40:59.480 Hi.
00:41:00.480 Hello.
00:41:01.480 Aww.
00:41:02.480 You're so cute.
00:41:03.480 I love you.
00:41:04.480 Can I just grab you real quick?
00:41:06.480 Wait.
00:41:26.180 i've watched this like 50 times imagine if you're if you could go through the day
00:41:42.900 and watch a video where your your hands were slightly further from your face than usual
00:41:49.740 wouldn't that be sick you could cut it up and share it with people for those listening to the
00:41:55.440 audio this is essentially the whole ad is just it's filmed with her meta glasses so it's from
00:42:00.700 kylie jenner's point of view she's walking around what i believe is her palm springs mansion
00:42:06.620 while her various servants do tasks around her like she really got the whole team out yeah yeah
00:42:15.100 wheeling around a large like art sculpture and asking her where she wants it bringing her flowers 1.00
00:42:21.920 to which she says a muted thank you one one woman rushes in to put a moisturizer on her hand 0.55
00:42:31.140 which I suppose is meant to be a tester yeah the most emotional she gets is when she like picks up
00:42:37.740 a cat which is you know relatable it's just to me it reads like a horror movie trailer like I'm
00:42:47.800 we're alone in a house we're being watched the the desire here is clearly to create something
00:42:55.020 aspirational and the aspiration is like what if you just woke up and made a series of decisions
00:43:01.180 about where you wanted people to put things for you because that's literally how that's her 0.94
00:43:06.900 morning routine is like oh put this moisturizer on this hand like move that two million dollar 0.72
00:43:10.900 sculpture over there like like clean my pool like but yeah 15 minutes of it is like arguing
00:43:18.760 with them as they put it in the place a little bit to the left it may like and this this type
00:43:25.760 of aspiration as a brand has worked for the kardashians for a long time this is like a key
00:43:32.800 component of their success i do think like as i was watching this and as i saw like some reactions
00:43:38.900 to it i i don't think we've entirely moved past that i think is probably still works for people
00:43:43.980 but the juxtaposition of like them showing this as her real life with also the widely publicized
00:43:51.140 lawsuits from her employees against her where like i don't know if you both have seen this but
00:43:57.100 i have but you should tell people so basically this has happened i believe to multiple kardashian
00:44:02.340 Jenners. But as of late, a number of Kylie's employees have sued her and the company that
00:44:08.840 like procures these employees for the Kardashians for just like horrific allegations of workplace
00:44:15.280 mistreatment, including a woman who said she miscarried due to the strain of the labor that
00:44:21.180 she was performing and was then told that she was making Kylie upset because she was too emotional
00:44:27.360 about it so you compare that to what's on display here which is like my employees love me versus
00:44:34.500 like my employees are literally suing me for the abject misery of my life well i don't even think
00:44:41.540 this commercial is arguing that her employees love her i just think it's saying that she has
00:44:45.600 employees that's true that's totally because they're kind of just like where would you like
00:44:50.480 this thing miss jenner and i don't know i don't know i don't know i don't know i guess i'm so
00:44:56.220 like new york socialist summer pilled right now um sorry i i really shouldn't be like talking like
00:45:05.160 that i don't know hey listen until we stop winning you know like new york right now is so high on its
00:45:15.240 own community orientedness like it's such it's such good vibes in the city right now which i
00:45:20.720 think is a message that's really emanated across the internet and i've really been thinking a lot
00:45:26.040 about like the ideal of like human happiness that like people like Zoran but really this whole
00:45:31.560 movement has put forth where it's like we're in community with one another we're out in the
00:45:36.400 streets together we're having fun with one another we're like experiencing life and joy
00:45:41.420 and the joy of like reaching out and touching other human beings not just to put a moisturizer
00:45:46.420 on their hand and then I look at the idea of happiness that's put forth by Meta in this ad
00:45:52.820 And I'm just like, oh, no.
00:45:56.140 Kylie Jenner's surrounded by servants, but she's also very alone.
00:46:00.600 Yeah.
00:46:01.360 And this is what Meta seems to think we all want, is just to be, like, in our secluded estates.
00:46:07.980 It's such a misread of the moment.
00:46:10.820 And it also, I know we talk a lot about Jeffree Star on this podcast.
00:46:14.160 I thought about the exact same thing.
00:46:15.700 It feels so out of the era that made Jeffree Star really famous.
00:46:22.200 When Jeffree Star was famously like always in his like pink house surrounded by 16 dogs and like three pink Lamborghinis and a film crew and telling everyone where to go and what to do.
00:46:35.280 And I'm so rich. I'm so rich. Look at all my beautiful things.
00:46:38.520 And it's just like, you're right that I think that probably still works for some people.
00:46:42.740 But as a culture, it so does not feel current.
00:46:46.000 It also arguably has not always worked that well for Kylie. 0.99
00:46:49.540 like her her aesthetic and her public persona had changed a lot um after she got pregnant for the
00:46:57.680 first time they launched a Kylie Jenner spinoff show called Life of Kylie back in the late 2010s
00:47:03.400 that was canceled after just one season if I remember correctly because I don't think people
00:47:07.580 have are really that into like Kylie's version of this and that is something that also came to
00:47:13.160 mind for me when watching this ad was I was like I don't think she needs to be like like I don't
00:47:17.660 believe in, oh, as a mother, you always need to be with your children. Absolutely not. But I did
00:47:23.280 think it was striking that as a mother of young children, they're not present in this. You wouldn't
00:47:28.960 even know that they existed in this. It's so clear that her experience of parenting is to not
00:47:36.960 have to be hands-on because clearly there is a team of other people taking care of her kids for
00:47:41.880 her no almost no other young mother on the planet has that experience so I think that a lot of
00:47:47.520 people are sort of like not really like on board with with the Kylie of it all but it's more like
00:47:53.260 there's a fascination with watching her because of her the fact that her life is so surreal and
00:47:58.620 that she has grown up in this like bizarro world of wealth and privilege and what what a nice
00:48:05.220 option for her to have to not include her child in the metaglasses commercial if only mothers
00:48:12.140 everywhere could similarly have the option to not have their children filmed by these glasses
00:48:17.100 right yep on like such a base level what would the general person really be using this for right
00:48:23.640 just like filming the general day-to-day and constantly be what interfacing with checking
00:48:29.640 in on the metaglasses capturing very specific moments or trying to set that up instead of just
00:48:34.820 letting things happen. I think, you know, as is the case with a lot of Meta's products, the goal
00:48:40.460 is to kind of terraform social life and convince you that, yeah, of course, of course, it's nice
00:48:47.500 to hang out with your friends. Of course, it's nice to be offline. Of course, it's nice to go
00:48:50.860 outside and to have things spontaneously happen. But wouldn't it be better if you did it on the
00:48:56.000 platform? In fact, here's some reasons why it might be better if you did it. If you did dating,
00:49:00.380 If you did, you know, meeting new friends, if you did events, if you did communication, you know, and phone calls.
00:49:07.820 Here's why it would be better if you did an art ecosystem and trying to offload as much as that as possible.
00:49:12.560 But, you know, you still by doing that, you have to convince people there's a reason why or you have to change the way that the experience happens.
00:49:20.940 And I feel like the meta glasses, part of the move, part of the push is they're going to try to do is how do we convince people that it's normal, cool, and fun to not just film strangers in public, although that's already, you know, that we've kind of lost out war.
00:49:36.960 But how do we convince people that they should also be filming their private moments completely and consistently all the time and always be online, right?
00:49:45.800 There's no real reason to be doing this.
00:49:48.520 Most people have more digital detritus than they can handle.
00:49:52.660 You know how many people have thousands, tens of thousands of photos that they don't really need to sift through to the point where it's like you have to make a decision.
00:50:02.020 I'm not going to use some of these services because they encourage the sort of like thoughtlessness of perpetual piling on instead of being a little bit more present with the moment and cherishing it.
00:50:11.760 I think these are attitudes that the technology encourages, but also that the company encourages because that makes for a more amenable and reliable customer for this product and others, right?
00:50:25.640 Yeah, I think along with that, the only people who I've really seen using these glasses so far and the only type of content that I've seen created with these glasses so far are influencers.
00:50:37.700 influencers like when I'm watching like reels or something I will see because this being a meta
00:50:43.100 product they're using it as a form of advertising within the content so like if someone films
00:50:48.060 something with meta glasses and then uploads it to Instagram there's a little label that says like
00:50:52.500 filmed with you know meta AI I can see why for some content creators the selling point is like
00:50:58.120 you can go hands-free and you can just like literally just have this like instead of holding
00:51:02.820 a camera and like setting it down setting it up it's like you're just filming everything around
00:51:06.620 you there's one woman who her whole shtick is she eats like a stack of edibles have you guys seen 1.00
00:51:12.800 this woman she okay like edible like thc yes yes yes she's really really popular and i i don't have 1.00
00:51:22.120 anything against her as a person but i do have two problems with what she's doing so the whole
00:51:26.380 gimmick of her video the whole gimmick of her video is she shows you this massive stack of like thc
00:51:32.860 gummy edibles she puts them all into her mouth in one big bite and then she's like let's go eat
00:51:37.980 lunch together and she films the content from what i can tell with the some form of the glasses
00:51:42.960 she'll go into the restaurant and she'll be recording like her interactions with the people
00:51:48.540 who work there and she'll ask them on camera are you okay with me filming this to which they'll say
00:51:55.340 yes but my issues are twofold one i don't think you should be eating that many edibles and then
00:52:01.620 driving. I'm like, you should not be driving like under the influence, which I do think that a lot
00:52:10.080 of the people who are doing this are. Second of all, and this is the bigger issue with the glasses
00:52:14.880 and with content creators using the glasses, you're acting like you're asking for people's
00:52:19.400 permission to be filmed, but you're already filming them and they're in a social position
00:52:24.020 where they can't easily say no. If you are the customer and you're already filming the person
00:52:29.800 serving you and you're like can I film you it's almost a jerk knee-jerk reaction to be like oh
00:52:34.820 yeah sure because it's already happening and it's like there's so much there's such a balance of
00:52:39.860 power with like a paying customer and a low-wage employee where I think a lot of people in that
00:52:45.000 position would just say yes so I'm like I don't like the like the the way that I'm seeing these
00:52:50.860 glasses sort of be used in people's content already yeah working customer service or retail
00:52:55.680 Half the time, most of the time, actually, it's just so much easier to say yes than to risk stepping on some random landmine that activates a fight where you get disciplined, chastised, or lose the job.
00:53:13.380 I can't think of how many times I said no to a very innocent thing that I thought made sense, yelled at, and then get yelled at again by the boss like it's my fault.
00:53:22.920 It is funny that it's like the one person who seems to be asking is doing it after, you know, taking a million edibles to the face.
00:53:34.440 I never thought I would yearn for the GoPro.
00:53:37.680 Like, bring back tradition.
00:53:39.740 Let's all put our GoPros back on if this is what we want to be doing, kids.
00:53:43.660 But to do it with the glasses and to be like, just like asking the workers instead of just not filming them in the first place.
00:53:50.160 I'm like, I don't love this.
00:53:51.760 because even if they do consent they don't know you're not standing there and really like
00:53:56.100 telling them like oh by the way i have a million followers so like hundreds of thousands of people
00:54:00.320 could see you you just like it just it doesn't feel like these glasses and the function of
00:54:05.820 filming with them in public or even in private it doesn't feel like informed consent is even on the 1.00
00:54:11.180 table and mind you these are all the problems we have with the edible lady who just by virtue of 1.00
00:54:17.480 asking for people's permission sounds like the most ethical wearer of these goggles like this 1.00
00:54:24.680 is the best case scenario kylie jenner had a launch party for her meta glasses which timothy
00:54:31.820 chalamet attended ironically in a hoodie which he had pulled the string so you could basically not
00:54:38.960 even tell that it was him because he didn't want anyone to see or film him presumably which i just
00:54:46.540 thought was a beautifully ironic thing to do at the launch party for the surveillance goggles
00:54:53.200 surveillance for thee not for me you know that's usually how it is what we don't know is that he
00:54:58.220 was actually inside of that hoodie he was uh on his own meta goggles placing bets on calchi
00:55:04.920 do you think he'll do a partnership with uh meta ray bands like a his and hers i mean they really
00:55:13.460 You know, I have to say, I have to say, people, I remember when Timothy and Kylie started dating, and this is sort of heterosexual business that I try not to get too involved with on this podcast or elsewhere, but people were like, oh, my God, he, like, has these little chicken legs, and she's a voluptuous, beautiful woman.
00:55:32.440 What could they have in common?
00:55:33.680 He's, like, this artsy baby girl boy actor, and she's, like, this, like, shameless influencer.
00:55:40.000 Like, what do they have in common?
00:55:40.960 And they, my friends, are perfect for each other.
00:55:45.280 And I think as time goes by, we can see that crystallize.
00:55:49.580 Right.
00:55:50.040 A hundred percent.
00:55:50.840 A hundred percent.
00:55:52.220 So I want to spend time talking about these glasses and the future that Meta's predicting we all want.
00:56:00.120 And, you know, I disaffectionately call these pedophile goggles.
00:56:03.880 Those in the industry call them wearable AI.
00:56:07.080 meta ray-bans meta's earlier ai glasses release sold 7 million pairs in 2025 entrepreneur.com
00:56:16.920 called ai wearables the next big thing in personal tech is that true i don't know i hope not i know
00:56:24.600 meta hopes it is they've invested billions of dollars in that hope but to better contextualize
00:56:30.020 what meta hopes is the future of everyone wearing glasses that talk to us in the voice of kylie
00:56:35.380 Jenner. Which, by the way, just based on that commercial and how monotone she is, doesn't
00:56:40.260 sound that fun.
00:56:42.440 Where did you want this?
00:56:43.560 Uh, over there.
00:56:44.540 Just came in from your mom.
00:56:45.520 Here you go.
00:56:45.860 Thank you.
00:56:46.480 But anyway, I want to first look back into a recent past that feels so, so long ago. The
00:56:53.540 year is 2013. We've survived predictions of the world ending. Obama's once again president.
00:57:01.100 Thrift shop by Macklemore is dominating the charts. Your host, Matt Bernstein.
00:57:05.380 as a freshman in high school.
00:57:07.120 And there's a new tech product on everyone's lips
00:57:10.720 called Google Glass.
00:57:14.360 Priced at $1,500,
00:57:17.000 the original smart glasses looked less like glasses
00:57:20.220 and more like orthodontic headgear.
00:57:23.940 Yet many at the time were convinced
00:57:26.060 that these would be the next big thing.
00:57:29.620 Vogue published a 12-page editorial photo shoot
00:57:33.440 devoted to them.
00:57:34.920 Diane von Furstenberg, the designer and former wife of gay billionaire Barry Diller,
00:57:40.640 it's a whole other thing, not only wore them to her spring 2013 runway show,
00:57:45.360 but sent all of her models down the runway wearing Google Glasses.
00:57:50.900 Yet the backlash was swift.
00:57:53.620 The Glasses did many of the same things that Meta Glasses are trying to sell you on today.
00:57:58.760 You could talk to them, tell it to take photos and videos,
00:58:02.220 and people in 2013 did not like this.
00:58:05.240 They thought it was creepy.
00:58:06.460 They thought people who wore them were creepy,
00:58:08.340 so much so that they were given a name, glass holes.
00:58:13.260 And so my question to the esteemed panel today
00:58:16.240 is do you think that metaglasses can overcome
00:58:20.700 many of these same concerns 13 years later or not and why?
00:58:25.920 I think that the problem slash the pro,
00:58:29.780 like why i think that they are overcoming it or maybe will continue to is that they are not as
00:58:36.160 hideously ugly as these glasses were and you cannot tell that they are recording you all of
00:58:43.960 the time and i think that with so many of these technological advancements around ai it's like
00:58:48.980 the whole point is that people have to be um coerced into a world where they exist by simply
00:58:54.440 not even knowing what is happening like if you saw someone wearing google glasses you'd be like
00:58:59.680 that i can see those those are weird looking like i know that that's not like just a regular pair
00:59:04.900 of sunglasses if you see the meta ray-ban sunglasses i guarantee you most people probably
00:59:11.220 don't even know that these exist yet so there's not that like skepticism and disgust factor built
00:59:17.120 into it it's like almost like a gaslighting thing where it's like these are just normal sunglasses
00:59:22.240 oh wait no you've been surreptitiously recorded this entire time the lack of consent really is
00:59:27.840 a huge through line i feel like yeah you know also uh meta tries to be like hey you know we
00:59:33.100 have implemented features that will let you know if someone is recording we'll put a little dot
00:59:39.440 but i mean the glass is also relatively easy to get into and get rid of the dot or you know as
00:59:46.320 you're mad you're sending me examples of this uh you can get a vendor to give you a little dot that
00:59:54.960 You can just put on it and it, you know, can blend in with the glasses itself.
00:59:58.900 I mean, I've also seen demos of people using it to docs people, right?
01:00:03.440 You can use the glasses, scan faces, right?
01:00:06.180 They have biometric code that you can upload or that's already, you know, on the glasses
01:00:10.400 itself.
01:00:12.080 Take publicly available information, voter registration, namely, and figure out where
01:00:17.740 someone lives, you know, and repeat that information back to them as they do in the
01:00:22.640 demo, right?
01:00:23.260 So on a few levels, I think that there is enough of what can go wrong and enough of a tech leap that there's an opportunity to get people to react as sharply as they did to the glass holes.
01:00:35.000 But it is possible that they'll win the war and that the pervert glasses will spread everywhere because there's been erosion of people's outrage, right?
01:00:43.940 As we've been talking about, we're just inundated with constant violations and revulsions.
01:00:51.300 Facebook is constantly doing something that pushes a boundary and is constantly getting
01:00:55.700 people to accept the boundary later.
01:00:58.440 This sort of surveillance is increasingly pervasive and people are being taught to accept
01:01:04.400 it as part of the price for living in a city.
01:01:07.840 And I think that they are going to and have been doing a good job of trying to latch on
01:01:15.640 to all the other ways it can be used outside of surveillance, outside of creeping on people,
01:01:22.960 outside of secretly recording people without consent, right?
01:01:25.700 They're trying really hard to graft it onto content.
01:01:28.780 And as Kat was talking about, onto hands-free content, they're trying to also latch it onto
01:01:34.160 this sort of personal, like, don't you want to fill out parts of your life and have these
01:01:40.400 things as cherished mementos forever?
01:01:42.240 I mean, this is similar to what they've been doing with the slow integration of AI features into photo albums that you already have, right?
01:01:50.460 Don't you just want like an automatic, you know, facetune or modification or adjustment of the photo?
01:01:56.820 It's no different than what your phone already does, actually.
01:02:01.220 When you take the photo, right, it already has to do some adjustments, algorithmically.
01:02:05.940 So what's the difference if we have an actual artificial intelligence or if we have an LLM that's interested in doing that for you as a product, right?
01:02:14.000 And so there's been a lot of slow encroachments over the years that I think have eroded people's defense mechanisms.
01:02:21.460 And these companies are also more desperate.
01:02:23.680 They need as many lines of revenue as they can, especially as they're burning all this money on AI infrastructure, right?
01:02:29.920 You need, they don't have another growth thing, right?
01:02:32.400 We don't have another search.
01:02:34.540 we don't have another new social media. The growth thing is supposed to be generative AI
01:02:39.640 offered to consumers and chatbots and enterprise. And if that doesn't pan out, you need to put your
01:02:46.520 money into a bunch of baskets, right? You need wereples, AIs, or you need what they tried to do 0.99
01:02:53.640 with the metaverse and AR and VR, right? You need some sort of crypto thing. I think of this as all
01:02:59.740 also constantly trying to figure out how can we just pull people in for another growth product.
01:03:04.540 I don't think it's going to work.
01:03:06.260 I hope not.
01:03:07.280 I don't think it's going to work.
01:03:08.700 That's my prediction.
01:03:09.840 That's my prediction market.
01:03:11.580 Hey, sorry. 1.00
01:03:12.700 Should I kill myself? 0.99
01:03:15.580 I don't think it will. 0.90
01:03:16.560 Because I was reading all these articles from 2013 in preparation for this.
01:03:21.280 And all of them were like, the Google glasses are creepy.
01:03:25.720 If someone around me is wearing them, I'm going to smash them.
01:03:28.980 It was identical to the things that we're seeing today online.
01:03:33.320 the sentiments that are going viral around the metaglasses. Did 7 million people purchase the
01:03:38.280 metaglasses last year? Yes. Did 7 million people ever purchase Google Glass? No. Do I think like
01:03:44.840 you said, Ed, that there has been an erosion in like, like the privacy that we feel we're entitled
01:03:50.560 to in this tech landscape? Yes. But I also perhaps naively, maybe optimistically, think that this
01:04:00.460 moment generally over the last year, especially with the proliferation of AI data centers,
01:04:05.460 everyone is feeling this like wake up of like, no, actually, I have agency and you can't just
01:04:09.980 do this to me. There is such a through line of non consent to all of this. This is it's just
01:04:18.100 happening to us. I don't know. I think people are tired. I agree with that. And I do think like one
01:04:24.700 thing that has heartened me throughout the force of AI. AI was forced onto people who did not want
01:04:33.760 it. And I think you can tell that one thing that I do to just gauge public sentiment about things
01:04:39.020 is go through all of people's Instagram stories, including people who I went to high school with,
01:04:44.400 including my family members who are not politically engaged, including people who
01:04:48.300 are relatively outside my bubble. And I have almost never seen anyone like organically within
01:04:54.980 these like networks of people be like, I love using AI. In fact, all the time I see people
01:05:01.600 like rejecting it and being like, I hate AI. I hate that I'm forced to use this at work. I hate
01:05:06.140 when my dad sends me like an AI generated picture. I hate all of this stuff. And I think that that
01:05:12.280 will continue to be the case. Like we're already seeing that with these glasses, the way that
01:05:17.000 people are kind of like drawn to it is when they when the companies can figure out a way to
01:05:22.160 engineer some sort of like participatory meme and the way that that the way that happened with
01:05:27.480 generative ai was like the ghibli challenge when sam altman do you remember the ghibli
01:05:33.060 challenge when everyone was putting their stuff into chat gbt and telling it to make it look like 0.99
01:05:37.040 a ghibli film they should have given miyazaki a gun oh and people would did that fucking stupid 1.00
01:05:42.600 fucking bullshit yearbook shit yes they're like fed photos of themselves do you know that people 1.00
01:05:49.860 were paying money to do that crazy people were posting those those ai generated yearbook me as 1.00
01:05:55.840 a jock in high school they were like paying like it was like eight dollars or something or like the
01:06:00.220 barbie doll where it was like this is me as a barbie doll and these are my little like props
01:06:04.100 my god people can be i think convinced to do things via the power of like participatory memes
01:06:11.100 and like participatory internet culture in general.
01:06:14.260 The challenge with the glasses
01:06:15.720 is if you aren't already a content creator,
01:06:18.900 I don't really see how they're gonna get people to do this.
01:06:22.060 I'm sure they will try.
01:06:23.380 I would not be surprised if especially
01:06:24.960 around like the holiday season this year,
01:06:27.080 we're gonna see a lot of people being like,
01:06:29.440 it's so easy to take a family video
01:06:31.520 when I don't have to pick up the camcorder
01:06:33.400 and I can just switch on.
01:06:34.940 We're gonna see a lot of cutesy videos
01:06:36.340 of like caught this moment of my kid unwrapping his present
01:06:39.340 or like, look at this amazing surprise I captured with my Meta Ray brand glasses.
01:06:43.940 But I don't think that this actually has a real utility for most people.
01:06:48.820 And so I think it would be short lived.
01:06:50.900 Yes.
01:06:51.580 And I think many people have correctly pointed out
01:06:54.840 that there really is one novel utility about these glasses,
01:06:59.980 which is that you can film people basically undetected,
01:07:03.520 which I think is useful for a very specific type of person
01:07:06.940 and for a very specific reason.
01:07:08.540 And the idea that these glasses are a tool for creeps isn't just speculative, it has materialized.
01:07:18.340 I want to talk a little bit here about this idea that Kylie Jenner and, you know, frankly, the many other women who have been hired by Meta and paid handsomely to do their dirty work are attempting to girlboss this digital panopticon for pedophiles.
01:07:35.980 that, I mean, sorry, I'm just going to come out and say it. Like, that's what it is that we're
01:07:40.240 creating. And BBC has done some extensive reporting into stories about women who've been caught on
01:07:46.580 camera, non-consensually by men wearing these glasses. And I'm going to read you some of their
01:07:52.320 reporting. Joy Kolekye, a 19-year-old woman living in Nairobi, Kenya, was approached by a man on the
01:08:00.840 street and did not know she was being filmed. She was one of many women filmed by this same guy
01:08:07.980 who made content for the internet secretly hitting on women in public. Well, I guess hitting on them 0.98
01:08:14.920 openly but secretly filming himself doing so. And the video that she was in went viral. She's told
01:08:22.000 the BBC, quote, it's like being a celebrity but not in such a good way. It led to men harassing
01:08:28.400 her in person, slut shaming her outside of her home, cat calling and the like. And the same
01:08:34.760 thing happened to a woman named Dilara, a 21 year old woman in London, who was shocked to see a
01:08:41.120 first person POV video of her getting hit on by the male creator of this video with 1.3 million
01:08:49.300 views on TikTok. In the video, the man asks for Dilara's phone number, which was then made public
01:08:56.220 in the video and led to her getting spam called for weeks, including in the middle of the night.
01:09:03.800 The article said, quote, on one occasion, she says she picked up the phone and a man said to her, 1.00
01:09:09.540 do you know how stupid you are? Do you regret it? Do you know how easy that made you look? 1.00
01:09:14.500 Men have also shown up to her workplace. And the same thing happened to a 56 year old woman named 1.00
01:09:21.240 Kim, who was filmed wearing a bikini in a video that got 6.9 million views on TikTok.
01:09:29.920 Kim only learned of this when her son called her one morning at 5 a.m. to notify her that a video
01:09:36.720 of her in a bikini had gone viral. She says she received thousands of messages from men,
01:09:42.500 including, quote, name your price to see your naked body and, quote, do you have an OnlyFans?
01:09:49.000 Six months later, the messages still have not stopped.
01:09:52.980 She says she didn't even think there was any point in asking the man who uploaded the video to delete it
01:09:58.440 because it had so many views that it didn't matter anymore and she had no recourse.
01:10:03.620 It's dark.
01:10:04.700 I mean, I think that this is kind of like this is something that happens alongside a lot of technological advancements.
01:10:11.600 And particularly I've seen this with AI.
01:10:13.420 Like when deepfake technology was first being engineered and hitting the internet and hitting the public, one of the original biggest purposes of this technology was to sexually harass women and girls by like deepfaking women and girls' faces into pornographic videos.
01:10:31.260 and today that's not the primary purpose of deep baking technology although it is still a major one
01:10:37.140 but I think you see a lot of times with like these sorts of advancements that is oftentimes like one
01:10:43.740 of the mainstreaming purposes and these companies aren't really doing anything about it because they
01:10:49.180 know that it serves them in the end like that's part of the profit incentive here like you want
01:10:54.820 someone anyone to be buying these glasses so if your main target audience is like creeps and
01:11:00.540 purveyors of sexual harassment and abuse i they'll do like surface level like condemn that type of
01:11:05.560 behavior or not but they're not going to stop it because i just think that like they see that
01:11:10.360 there's a market for it yeah i mean you know this is the thing you know facebook runs into this time
01:11:14.780 and time and time again right it's it's profitable to have fraud on the platform right it's profitable
01:11:20.220 to have sexual harassment and abuse on the platform right it is profitable to have as many
01:11:29.400 people as possible and eat a tiny fine because everyone more or less has either been made
01:11:37.120 amenable to the regulatory frameworks that you've lobbied for or believes in you and your mission.
01:11:42.780 With products like this, you know, we have seen increasingly, increasingly over time,
01:11:48.440 what is some of the immediate use cases, right? It's, you know, how can I harass? How can I abuse?
01:11:55.800 You know, how can I stalk someone?
01:11:57.260 And these glasses in particular, when combined with biometric surveillance and combined, I'm sure, with deep fake tech, offer like a pretty frightening vector for people to be able to only expand this even further.
01:12:13.980 And is there going to be any real effort to impose guardrails on this sort of thing?
01:12:17.780 No, of course not.
01:12:18.580 I mean, even recently, there was reporting from Wired, I believe, that was talking about biometric code that was already present in one of Facebook's products. 0.62
01:12:31.400 They rolled out one of their chief PR people to basically call the journalists liars and say that this was slander, this is bullshit, they don't know what they're talking about, and then eventually have to take all that back and apologize because it's true.
01:12:46.200 Why? Because they don't care, right? They don't care that they're putting out antisocial products because in a way, it's actually good if it is antisocial. There's a market for antisocial behavior. And they've also monopolized so much or cannibalized so much of the social fabric that those who rely on it or those who integrate it as part of their lives when they're moving around, interacting with people, keeping in contact with family abroad through WhatsApp, keeping in contact with friends from earlier periods of their life. 0.98
01:13:16.200 through Facebook or through Instagram.
01:13:19.860 I mean, they have been able to pull a large chunk
01:13:22.480 of people's lives and communications onto the platform
01:13:24.760 that even if it becomes a hostile place,
01:13:26.740 even if it becomes a toxic place,
01:13:28.000 even if you're subjected to harassment and abuse,
01:13:30.860 you're still going to use it.
01:13:32.140 And now we have a secondary market
01:13:33.420 that has not been properly tapped into,
01:13:37.140 I'm sure that they would say, right? 0.83
01:13:38.980 Which is perverts, freaks,
01:13:40.920 and people who will use these technologies
01:13:43.700 only to hurt other people.
01:13:44.940 So I think this is increasingly only going to get worse and worse, because Facebook has no real incentive to actually do anything about it. It would cost them more to do this than it would to just simply profit from it. And, you know, no government seems to take it seriously enough to actually bring down the hammer on something as simple as, hey, let's, you know, make sure that this technology isn't going to be used for surveillance, for stalking, for harassment.
01:14:08.760 And they're not going to do it because there's so many other things that it could be done for.
01:14:12.280 I mean, we have this with these sort of AI license plate readers.
01:14:15.600 I mean, they are used regularly to stalk people.
01:14:18.100 What's the reaction?
01:14:20.100 Integrate them even further into the police systems.
01:14:23.380 Flock.
01:14:24.000 Flock surveillance, which, if my memory serves, is also integrated with ring cameras.
01:14:29.540 Beautiful.
01:14:30.460 That sounds right.
01:14:31.700 Yeah.
01:14:32.080 Every house a fortress.
01:14:33.500 Hello, hello.
01:14:34.460 Editing Matt here.
01:14:35.360 I fact-checked this, and what actually happened was Ring Cameras, the ones that all of your parents
01:14:41.460 have on their doorbells, announced a collaboration with Flock Safety, which is, if you don't know,
01:14:48.780 it is a surveillance company that makes cameras and puts them all over the roads everywhere and
01:14:53.380 collaborates with police departments so they can track all of our driver's license plates.
01:14:57.640 Yay! Ring announced a collaboration with Flock, which was also in nature a collaboration with
01:15:03.640 local police departments around the country. And that announcement got so much backlash that they
01:15:09.260 canceled the collaboration before it ever went into effect. So what have we learned here? Keep
01:15:14.600 bullying these bullshit surveillance companies. Yay. I should highlight that all those sort of 1.00
01:15:20.100 vignettes of women being victimized by this technology, that's just the women being surveilled
01:15:28.200 without their knowledge by content creators the vast majority of people of all the genders of all 0.91
01:15:35.640 of all the genders of all genders by the way who will have their privacy and bodies invaded by
01:15:42.200 all of the glasses that won't be content that won't get uploaded but it's still just as
01:15:48.000 bad that someone is now you know has that footage of you to do whatever you want and you know and
01:15:55.760 and of children. And there is a whole naturally what one Redditor called a creep economy that
01:16:01.100 has sprouted up a third party creep economy, which, like you said, includes people making
01:16:07.540 covers, little black circle covers that can stick on to the glasses and cover the already
01:16:14.540 very small light that pops on when you start recording, which, by the way, most people
01:16:20.320 don't even know what these glasses are, won't know what the light means in the first place.
01:16:24.500 yep but you know and i and i was on reddit and i was in all these different forums and there's all
01:16:29.320 these presumably men talking about how do you cover the light what's the best way to cover the
01:16:33.540 light it's not a secret meta knows this they don't care and for kylie someone who has been
01:16:41.400 you know i don't want to put all the weight on her she's being hired for a specific reason just
01:16:46.040 like timothy chalamet was hired by kalshi for a specific reason selling gambling addictions to
01:16:51.800 the people that Kalshi knows are most likely to be receptive to developing them. And in the case
01:16:59.000 of Metta, Metta knows that they have a women problem with this product. Just look at the 1.00
01:17:06.180 public discourse about it right now. They also know, and I talk about this a lot, that you need
01:17:11.940 women to make a product a quote unquote hero product. You need women, you need the women's 0.99
01:17:19.020 market to turn a product into a blockbuster, to make it worth all those billions of dollars that 1.00
01:17:24.620 you've invested shareholder money into. You know, women, through their own purchasing power and 1.00
01:17:29.640 also through their influence of other people's purchasing power, Forbes estimates that they 1.00
01:17:33.720 control up to 70 to 80 percent of consumer purchasing power. They need to convince women 0.92
01:17:39.800 to get on board. And, you know, who better to hire than the most famous woman on the internet, 1.00
01:17:46.220 who also happens to be not discerning whatsoever 1.00
01:17:49.720 and completely willing to throw other women and girls
01:17:55.160 under the bus of this technology, 0.78
01:17:57.400 despite Kylie Jenner being open
01:17:59.780 about having her own sort of traumatic experiences
01:18:02.940 being surveilled by paparazzi as a child.
01:18:06.440 But when I'm in LA, for some reason when I'm here,
01:18:10.160 it's hard for me to leave the house.
01:18:12.460 Why do you think that is?
01:18:13.540 paparazzi or in LA it's just easier to be spotted I think so the thought of like trying to find an
01:18:23.660 outfit and like getting ready and present and then I go back and forth because that's a silly way
01:18:29.140 to think about it but it's honestly the truth but do they just wait by your house for your car to
01:18:35.600 leave no because I don't really leave got it so they don't really wait for me anymore it used to
01:18:42.680 be so insane i don't even know how i'm like a normal person right now like what would it what
01:18:48.640 was it like things that they would say to me and how they would treat me as a child 0.74
01:18:52.360 is diabolical like inappropriate i would be coming out of a thing and they'd be like you 1.00
01:19:00.520 fucking slut what when i was 16 you're lying i'm not lying the things that they would say to me 1.00
01:19:07.220 i would never try to give them a photo so i would just jump in the car and then there would be like 1.00
01:19:14.040 six of them and they would stand in front of my car as i was like 16 like turning my car on
01:19:18.980 whatever and they would all stand out because i would just be like you know hiding and they would
01:19:23.560 just be like oh i'm pretend like you know mock me what they wanted to just make more money off
01:19:29.720 a scandalous photo and i was an underage girl by herself i didn't have security i didn't have
01:19:34.660 security till after I had my daughter. A lot of this comes down to like wealth and class because
01:19:40.200 it's like people like Taylor Swift, people like the Jenner Kardashians, like they are able to pay
01:19:46.820 for environments in which they are truly private and secure. Like they can create the conditions
01:19:53.320 necessary to have a party where no one is allowed to talk about or take pictures of them or like
01:19:59.580 what they wore, what they said and what they did, in a way by endorsing and sort of mainstreaming
01:20:05.680 these projects, they're creating an even larger divide between what they are able to create for
01:20:11.380 themselves with their money and the rest of us. They are actively participating in this project
01:20:16.380 to create like new ways to define class and isolate themselves away from the rest of the
01:20:21.740 masses. Being able to like prevent yourself from being recorded and surveilled in this way
01:20:26.420 is part of that. And it is ultimately really selfish. I remember a long time ago, again,
01:20:32.660 before she had her first child, Kylie Jenner did an interview where she literally said she would go 0.84
01:20:38.080 off the grid if given the opportunity because she had never been allowed to have that type of a 1.00
01:20:43.780 lifestyle, only then to turn around and expose herself to the world, create an economy around 1.00
01:20:50.480 her 10 times harder than before. And I don't think that that is because she's even necessarily 0.99
01:20:56.960 contradicting herself. I think it's because for her, she actually has freedom of choice
01:21:01.960 that the rest of us don't have. We already have such a massive societal panopticon around just
01:21:09.000 people in the background of TikToks. There have been so many controversies where so-and-so who
01:21:14.120 doesn't even know they're being recorded becomes this viral overnight villain for not smiling or
01:21:20.040 not dressing in a certain way or not looking a certain way. The potential with these glasses
01:21:24.580 to make that even worse, I think is true. And also just the social trust element of this is
01:21:31.800 a big thing too, because we've already seen this with the rise of generative AI. There's been this
01:21:36.520 erosion of social trust. Teachers don't trust their students to be turning in original work.
01:21:42.580 People don't trust that their friend or colleague is writing their own emails,
01:21:46.900 writing their own text messages. The what if, the not knowing is a big part of what is so
01:21:52.660 antisocial about all of this technology. And whether you are wearing recording glasses or not,
01:21:59.060 that's a new area of social distrust. Because now if this starts to become a big viral thing where
01:22:05.180 people are constantly being exposed, if you see someone wearing sunglasses or glasses,
01:22:09.820 now that question is going to be in the back of your head like, I wonder if they're recording me.
01:22:14.260 And I just think that is such like an enormous loss at a time when we really need to be building and reinvigorating social trust. These technologies and these companies and these celebrities are actively working against it.
01:22:27.400 Yeah. I was at Penn Station, funny enough, the other night waiting for a train. That wasn't me trying to coyly be like, I was at Penn Station. But I was sitting there waiting for a train and I found myself and I started to do this more and more.
01:22:45.660 anytime someone has like a black rimmed glasses of a certain shape i was like squinting trying to 0.69
01:22:53.640 see if there was that little camera on the side and i'm like what the fuck are we doing i don't
01:23:00.240 have any faith that meta like cares about this at all if they actually did i'm like a little red 0.63
01:23:06.260 light is not enough the it should be like a blinking flashing red light and it should be a
01:23:12.080 an audible sound yeah yeah literally you are being recorded yeah yeah yeah yeah yes i personally
01:23:19.200 think if you start filming with them that they should just spontaneously combust but you know
01:23:24.420 i'm asking a little too much if i had a wand okay you know i i'm hopeful and i want to be
01:23:31.140 optimistic also about you know us blocking these glasses from proliferating because i think
01:23:36.520 downstream of them are a lot of other developments that i hate and i don't want to see happen and
01:23:42.860 that would follow pretty quickly uh if they were used you know wide widely and i'm hoping also i
01:23:51.980 mean think that something that encourages me a little bit is the fact that people do smash them
01:23:55.960 you know i have read many reports of people taking them off people's faces and smashing them
01:24:00.560 you're doing lord's work right okay and that's what he wants you to talk about practical solutions
01:24:06.120 It's what the Pope wants is what we want. I've seen more of that and heard of more of that than when I look back and see how people reacted to the Google glasses. That does give me hope, I think. But the solution is really only going to come from us, right? Because the company's not doing it and God knows the government's not doing anything except somehow figuring out a way to make it worse as long as Trump is in control here.
01:24:32.520 Instead, they're going to pass a moratorium on legislating anything to do with AI surveillance glasses for the next five years.
01:24:40.380 That's going to be great.
01:24:42.400 We have to let the tech develop and mature.
01:24:45.640 But this is why it's like we need to look and imagine solutions bigger than the law because like these tech companies and products are moving faster than the law.
01:24:55.320 The law is moving especially slow as long as people are in charge like the people we currently have.
01:25:00.160 And so it's just like, I don't know.
01:25:01.960 I think we need to use social ostracization as a skill. I think we need to brand these as
01:25:06.900 pedophile goggles even harder than we currently are. Yeah. And speaking of all this, we've up
01:25:12.300 until this point talked about how this quote unquote surveillance creep, as it's often referred
01:25:16.980 to, is being used to victimize women in the public sphere. But who's taking care of all the data
01:25:24.520 produced by these goggles, including what's not posted publicly? In February 2026, a Swedish
01:25:30.080 newspaper called svenska dog blooded pronunciation that was really impressive i don't know if it's
01:25:38.600 right but it was impressive nonetheless released a bombshell report called quote she came out of
01:25:45.440 the bathroom naked an employee says it described sama s-a-m-a sam altman also yeah not which is
01:25:54.740 also sam altman's twitter handle but yeah i don't know if precedes sam altman i think which is a
01:26:00.080 quote-unquote data training company headquartered in san francisco but the real work happens in
01:26:06.040 africa in cities like nairobi kenya where thousands of employees sit in rows for 10 hours at a time
01:26:13.680 and do something called data annotation essentially they are fed an endless stream of photos and
01:26:20.920 videos stolen from internet users across the world and label what's in them. Those are hot dogs,
01:26:27.760 not legs. These are legs, not hot dogs. That sort of thing. Quote, on the screens, they draw boxes
01:26:34.740 around flowerpots and traffic signs, follow contours, register pixels, and name objects,
01:26:40.320 cars, lamps, people. Every image must be described, labeled, and quality assured.
01:26:45.620 all to make sure the next generation of smart glasses is a little more intelligent, a little
01:26:51.540 more human. Meta subcontracts companies like SAMA to quote-unquote process your data. So not only
01:26:59.040 are the tech companies stealing our data, our artwork, our content, what have you, they're also
01:27:03.780 hiring people across the globe and paying them pennies to label our data and identify its
01:27:08.780 contents. This is what machine learning really is. Swedish reporters interviewed Nairobi-based
01:27:15.600 data annotators anonymously. These laborers revealed that on the daily, they review footage
01:27:21.240 from, quote, Western homes of people using the restroom, getting changed, watching porn, 0.98
01:27:28.720 and having sex. One worker who spoke to the journalist anonymously described a man hitting 0.57
01:27:34.660 record on his metaglasses, setting them on his nightstand and leaving the room before his wife
01:27:40.360 enters the room to change her clothes while being unknowingly filmed. If the workers speak up about
01:27:46.580 their discomfort of having to review this type of content footage, they risk expulsion and financial
01:27:54.560 insecurity. Whenever you ask metaglasses to do anything, all of that data is sent to meta servers
01:27:59.960 for processing. So it's a process of sharing you can't turn off. Another worker said, quote,
01:28:07.200 you'd think that if they knew about the extent of the data collection, no one would dare use
01:28:11.900 the glasses. Two months after this investigation was published, Meta terminated its contract with
01:28:17.900 SAMA, quote, because they don't meet our standards. But Meta subcontracts at least 30 companies
01:28:25.040 globally to annotate user data. So I don't know. To me, I think this one company got caught because
01:28:32.160 a few of their employees spoke anonymously to journalists to say, basically, look, we can watch
01:28:37.820 these people go into the bathroom. And Meta was like, this is a bad look. So for PR cover up,
01:28:42.320 we're going to ditch this one company. But I think it's happening all the time.
01:28:46.320 They basically were like, people spoke up about this anonymously to it. So to chill that and make
01:28:51.460 sure that never happens again. We're going to fire, essentially, ensure that all these people
01:28:55.160 lose their jobs. And they did, over a thousand of them. Wow. This is a reliable method from
01:29:00.780 Facebook. How many times have they had stories about working conditions for subcontractors,
01:29:05.680 and their response is, we hear you, we are listening, we are going to fire every single 1.00
01:29:11.040 fucker at that company. We're never working with them again. We're not going to fix the conditions, 1.00
01:29:15.460 and we're going to replicate them. And the firm also persists. I mean, this firm,
01:29:19.380 Sama in particular, I was wondering where I recognized that name.
01:29:22.700 And, you know, funnily enough, they work with OpenAI.
01:29:24.640 Oh, my gosh.
01:29:25.520 In 2023, when there was that story that reported about Kenyan workers being paid $1 to $2 an hour to label the data was this firm, Sama.
01:29:38.620 These companies are used precisely because the understanding is, you know, we're going to offload everything onto you. 0.66
01:29:45.640 you know you're gonna have to deal with you're gonna get the psychic baggage and trauma and
01:29:50.200 you're gonna also get the brunt of the blame and the liability if something goes wrong right we'll
01:29:55.060 cut you off you'll find another firm you'll find another hyperscaler you'll find another
01:29:59.520 sas company who cares right we'll be able to move on you without much reputational damage and it's
01:30:06.220 a system that's like so cynically constructed they you know it's one of the things tech does
01:30:11.620 best, right? They do this to distance themselves from unethical labor. They do this to distance
01:30:16.380 themselves from slave labor. They do this to distance themselves from any sort of toxic
01:30:23.540 sludge that's integral to their operation. It feels like deja vu from all of the amazing 2010s
01:30:32.240 reporting on the content moderators and all of the horrific violence that these people had to see
01:30:37.640 get uploaded to social media platforms 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
01:30:42.760 But instead of addressing that, instead of doing anything at all to address that,
01:30:46.440 we're going to make it worse. We're going to ensure that exponentially more of this horrific
01:30:51.600 content exists. Because at the end of the day, they realized that to have all these problems
01:30:57.100 in the world is the greatest boost to their net worth. And they just will steamroll over
01:31:04.060 everything in their quest for more and more money. Yeah. And you don't want the threat of a good
01:31:08.080 example either, because if you have some sort of precedent where it's like, OK, then we are
01:31:12.660 providing for them. You know, maybe we create some workers fund. Maybe we hold ourselves
01:31:16.680 accountable. Then that just gives a little bit of a legal scaffolding for more ambitious
01:31:21.240 lawsuits to be brought up in places where we acted even more egregiously.
01:31:26.260 I think so many people who are relatively low information when it comes to AI, which is most
01:31:33.820 people, which is me most of the time, I mean, this isn't my area of expertise, but they think
01:31:38.480 that if they were to buy, for example, the Kylie Jenner meta glasses that talks to them in Kylie
01:31:45.020 Jenner's voice, that it's like some algorithms that really smart people at meta wrote. And now
01:31:51.040 I can talk to a fake Kylie Jenner inside of my glasses. And it's like more or less technological
01:31:56.700 magic but it's not the entire system that we're talking about here relies on a labor force and
01:32:05.980 this is that labor force based in africa consuming the way that you're using these products and
01:32:12.400 potentially consuming the first person videos of people who are having sex with these glasses on 0.54
01:32:18.600 yeah and telling the machine exactly what they're seeing to better train the next model of the
01:32:24.900 machine. There's a lot of discussion about the way that AI and the way that it's changing the
01:32:31.480 American workforce and going to create a permanent underclass in the American labor force and all of
01:32:37.880 that stuff is awful. And it has already in many ways created an underbelly in other countries 0.51
01:32:46.640 where they can exploit workers for even less and do hideously traumatic things to them. I mean,
01:32:53.480 not to be such like a downer, but it's like, again, it's just, it's all so unbelievable to me.
01:32:59.160 I mean, this makes me think of the luxury surveillance idea from Chris Gillard, right,
01:33:04.520 where that, you know, there are populations that have surveillance forced upon them or are forced
01:33:10.440 to interface with technologies that either scan their faces or monitor where they're going,
01:33:16.260 whether that's because they're on probation or coming out of the corrections industry or because
01:33:21.960 they are in a heavily policed area, but then there are populations that willingly subject
01:33:26.620 themselves to surveillance as a status symbol of some kind, right? And that's a lot of that
01:33:31.860 is the wearables, you know, these sort of VR, AR devices where the idea is, you know,
01:33:39.140 by turning the camera towards myself and offering these companies free training data, free insights,
01:33:47.420 I will also get a little bit more data for myself and, you know, the company will presumably get something in aggregate.
01:33:53.640 And this sort of is a dynamic, I think, also is overlooked.
01:33:58.100 Like there was a little bit of an understanding that was being cultivated in the 2010s that none of this stuff is free.
01:34:05.020 And in a very real way, you know, you are the product.
01:34:08.780 And the question was, you know, product to what end?
01:34:12.080 For example, with advertising, where it's like we're selling, you know, advertisers access to you.
01:34:17.080 And our value as an advertiser revenue-based business, which Facebook is, is getting as many people as possible, getting as many groups as possible, getting as many insights in those groups as possible, which means moving almost all their lives onto this so that advertisers can pay us some obscene fee to get that privilege of your eyeballs.
01:34:37.860 And I think similarly, it feels like so much of the push to put the surveillance inwards, right?
01:34:47.600 And integrate these sort of wearables constantly on always recording, always learning devices.
01:34:54.620 Some of it is, you know, how can we monetize this?
01:34:57.000 How can we introduce advertiser revenue?
01:34:59.460 Some of it is what other insights can we get to develop additional products and services that will get you to use?
01:35:06.120 And if you spend all your time on it, then we'll get the answers we need to maybe tinker it and iterate it better, right?
01:35:12.480 But I think to your point where when I think about are people low or high information, I think it's really like everyone is saturated in information, but it's propaganda.
01:35:23.180 You know, we're just saturated in propaganda about how these things work.
01:35:25.900 We're lied to constantly about how they work, what their capabilities are going to be, what they're going to do to our livelihoods, where you should use them, where you shouldn't use them.
01:35:38.140 The only people who are really sending out messaging constantly is these companies who are screening about how they're going to destroy everything in our civilization, but they're also the greatest thing that we've ever made.
01:35:49.000 You need to integrate them to get ahead of the workplace, but they're also going to take your job away in a few years.
01:35:54.400 They're magical devices that are smooth and frictionless, but they also need a fleet of slaves to teleoperate or to, you know, label and to treat constantly.
01:36:04.680 So I think that's the thing where it's like most of what people do know is just like, oh, usually a bold faced lie or misunderstanding that a company is selling.
01:36:15.280 And through a very thin layer on the flip side is how it's actually working.
01:36:20.280 But it is hard to break through that barrier when every day, all day, you go on the subway, you go on the highway, you go on your phone, you go on your TV, there is some message about why it's okay to have this pervasive surveillance, why it's okay to have AI, why it's okay to port your life over to this or that platform.
01:36:40.920 Yeah. I also feel like the way that we're being introduced to this technology is through the lens of like Kylie Jenner's morning routine or the woman who eats a shit ton of edibles and then goes to lunch. But also like the police are going to be wearing these like police officers are going to have like these cameras all over their bodies.
01:37:02.640 And 404 Media, just an amazing story this past weekend about a woman who was being stalked by a police officer.
01:37:09.960 And they outlined how this police officer, he was working in private security at an event.
01:37:14.880 He saw this woman.
01:37:16.040 He went up to her and harassed her for her number.
01:37:18.560 She told him, no.
01:37:19.960 She told him, I have a boyfriend.
01:37:21.620 This police officer, this who was working as a security guard, he then went to the station or wherever he had his technology.
01:37:26.740 And he was able to use like Palantir-esque surveillance networks to track her license plate and then put out an active alert so that he was notified the next time she passed like a flop camera.
01:37:39.500 And then he drove out and pulled her over to harass her more.
01:37:43.680 So it's just like, yeah, it's just like when you outfit the police, when you outfit the military, when you outfit the private companies with this type of surveillance, like we're constantly bombarded with the message that it's done for our safety and for our benefit.
01:37:57.680 But the reality is they're giving these abusive creeps and individuals the power to like torment
01:38:04.680 us and make our lives hell. And at the end of the day, we do not have recourse. And I think the vast
01:38:09.920 majority of people out there don't even know how interconnected these webs of surveillance are to
01:38:15.400 the point where that creepy man who's harassing you at the event is going to be able to like
01:38:20.500 track you down and flag you down like a few days later. Can I just put out a call before I conclude
01:38:26.540 here like i i don't think you need a ring camera i don't think ring cameras do anything good for
01:38:34.080 you my parents have a ring camera your parents probably also have a ring camera everyone's 0.95
01:38:39.060 fucking parents have a ring camera everyone loves ring cameras this is like kind of a random side 0.99
01:38:43.280 tangent but but but not really because ring cameras are tied in with all of this like police 0.99
01:38:48.200 force bullshit amidst the disappearance of nancy guthrie savannah guthrie's mother where nancy
01:38:56.180 guthrie had a ring camera in the home that she was kidnapped from everyone was 0.95
01:39:01.900 sorry they're calling you matt yeah you've gone too far amazon's on the line
01:39:09.080 stop would you like a brand partnership
01:39:11.980 yeah exactly they're gonna they're gonna give me the timothy chalamet treatment
01:39:18.800 everyone was like oh thank god she had a ring camera so we could have this footage of the
01:39:28.960 men who kidnapped her and this is like this is like the most sympathetic this was like the most
01:39:34.300 fleeting sympathy i ever had for the argument of like ring cameras are good and what did the ring
01:39:38.960 camera footage do we never figured out the people who who kidnapped her because they were wearing
01:39:44.860 masks we got no recourse for her death and even with my parents i had this conversation with my
01:39:51.900 parents i was like why do you guys have a ring camera has anything good ever happened like have
01:39:55.700 have you ever as the ring camera says you can help find your neighbor's dog that's how they
01:40:00.640 that's how they spun it in the super bowl at and they said well no but it gives us peace of mind
01:40:05.200 and i said but has it ever done anything for you i said no but it makes us feel safer they did a
01:40:11.080 great job convincing people to be paranoid in their own homes i mean that's the whole thing right
01:40:15.000 yeah and it's like i understand because this is the messaging that is like conditioned into us
01:40:20.360 from birth but like people are under the impression that surveillance makes us safer
01:40:25.380 when the reality is that surveillance puts people in danger like surveillance it does not equal
01:40:30.620 safety in most cases i would argue surveillance equals like authoritarian danger and like the
01:40:36.360 ability for people with power to track you and harm you in situations where you will not have
01:40:41.660 recourse. I want to conclude by reflecting more broadly on my experience with technology. And
01:40:48.460 I don't know if you guys can articulate yours or articulate this feeling better than I could,
01:40:52.840 but in the realm of new tech launches, nothing feels exciting anymore. I almost exclusively
01:40:59.140 feel dread and this is distinct because back in the day I remember watching iJustine the YouTube
01:41:08.160 queen of tech iJustine I remember watching her unbox all the new tech products with wonder
01:41:14.360 I remember when the iPod got color and then it came in colors and then it had a touch screen
01:41:22.260 and when the iPhone got apps and when every iPhone it felt like the camera was actually
01:41:27.560 improving a lot. And every new iteration of the thing felt genuinely exciting and innovative.
01:41:33.380 And I can't pinpoint exactly when that feeling went away for me. But it doesn't exist at all
01:41:39.460 anymore. Nothing feels innovative or exciting anymore. I just feel like I am constantly being
01:41:46.920 taken for a ride by companies who hate me. There are no more value ads, just useless novelty.
01:41:54.120 And I'm always nervous that this is just me becoming like a proverbial boomer and resisting
01:42:00.340 change and being like, it was better when I was young.
01:42:03.140 And maybe there's some of that.
01:42:04.040 Maybe there's like the nostalgia factor.
01:42:05.560 But there is evidence that points me towards a different conclusion, like the fact that
01:42:10.140 young people are the most vocally against this sort of societal takeover of AI and are
01:42:17.620 leading the political backlash to it.
01:42:19.440 And that many young people seem to be more interested.
01:42:23.500 And I see this like when I go out at night, it's like they're like buying like Canon PowerShot digital cameras instead of headwear that like records your trips to the bathroom.
01:42:32.920 Yeah.
01:42:33.440 I mean, you know, I hear you.
01:42:34.900 I think it's hard to be excited for tech when a lot of it is used for the things that we've been talking about, you know, surveillance, projecting power from afar, hurting people, stealing cultural commons and creative wealth, you know, putting people out of jobs.
01:42:49.440 Jobs, creating working conditions and jobs that suck.
01:42:52.880 I mean, it's hard to be excited for these things when, you know, you would have thought if you talked to me as a child and you said when you're 30, you'll be able to tell your computer, hey, draw me a map.
01:43:06.980 It'll draw you a map and everyone will be obsessed with that.
01:43:09.900 And the company that has that will be worth, you know, almost a trillion dollars.
01:43:14.360 I feel like I might have had a little wonder, a little childlike wonder about it.
01:43:18.660 Whereas now, I think, like you said, it's dread because it's not even now it's not just a technology.
01:43:23.080 It's what impact is this going to have on the rest of our society?
01:43:26.380 Because every single one of these tech firms, they've not just made products.
01:43:30.320 They've also tried to terraform daily life around everyone using the product as much as possible in very specific ways so they can make more money.
01:43:39.100 So it's hard to get excited for tech because it's not it's never just tech.
01:43:42.760 It's, you know, packaged within it as an attempt to realize some sort of social reality as some sort of political project.
01:43:50.700 And that does actually strip out a lot of the wonder for it, right?
01:43:55.320 Well, I don't even – last piece of tech I feel like I probably got excited about was, you know, it's pretty lo-fi tech, which is what – my partner got like a new glucose monitor that was actually functional.
01:44:10.700 Yeah. 0.97
01:44:10.920 you know because a lot of them suck a lot of them really fucking suck am i excited by anything in 0.99
01:44:17.540 ai no you know even if on a technical level this stuff is interesting the company's pushing it 0.99
01:44:24.140 i'd rather anyone i'd rather any other group of people on the planet have a say on this and i'd
01:44:31.340 i'd actually want it to be us i'd want it to be democratized but it's not you know can i be
01:44:35.600 excited about you know any sort of advances in robotics no because this year they're trying to
01:44:42.560 roll out like 12 different lines of robot slaves that'll be tele-operated by people in the
01:44:47.700 philippines i mean i'm not too keen on on that can i be excited about autonomous vehicles no
01:44:53.320 because they're also tele-operated or they're the vanguard of some political project the musk
01:44:57.780 specifically that i don't like or some scheme to make cities look and feel a different way 0.54
01:45:02.420 You know, things that you shouldn't, that might, that you can make the case for being excited, it's hard to, which, which does suck, right? Because there are a lot of technologies that have the potential to radically change the world that could be pursued or developed.
01:45:18.540 And instead, a lot of the attention in capital is focused on fucking chatbots and surveillance, you know, and book theft and deep fakes and, you know, all sorts of horrors that I want nothing to do with. 0.82
01:45:33.800 Right. So I guess that's also part of why the youth are so against it. 0.96
01:45:38.100 I feel like you don't even get to have the period of being too excited about it.
01:45:41.960 And you're just kind of confronted with the horror almost immediately.
01:45:44.060 Growing up, it felt like there was a separation between the world of tech and the world of politics. And now we're at a point in time where it's very obvious that all of these tech companies are just completely intertwined with the authoritarian state.
01:46:00.740 And like Elon Musk, I think is like, you know, the perfect example of this.
01:46:04.840 But even more broadly, it's like these tech companies have amassed so much power, they've
01:46:09.620 amassed so much wealth that they essentially operate as like systems of government that
01:46:15.180 are completely devoid of accountability.
01:46:17.520 And but even on like the cultural level, too, I think I've become more disillusioned with
01:46:21.280 it because it's like when I see someone using their meta Ray-Ban glasses to make content,
01:46:26.780 like maybe 10 years ago, I would have been like, oh, that's so cool. 0.91
01:46:29.760 But now I just think like, there's a growing expectation and need for all of us to be monetizing every aspect of our fucking lives. So when I see someone like monetizing, like going to a restaurant, I'm like, damn, I wonder if I'm gonna have to do that. Like, I wonder, like, it's like this slow creep of like, being a content creator, being a creator, period, at one point felt like a very liberating thing. 0.97
01:46:55.620 And now it feels more like a ball and chain where it's, like, you are slowly having to record yourself, perform, monetize, and disseminate every single thing you do just to, like, keep up and, like, have all these various income streams because that's the way that the creator economy, like, that's, like, what ultimately was the result of this versus, like, an actual, like, liberating force of, like, building people's platforms.
01:47:21.780 it feels much so more that like our expectations and our potential is like limited through new
01:47:28.980 technology versus like oh it's building new ways for us to like say and do things it's like no
01:47:34.120 no you have to perform for meta and then they will censor you if you even like joke about it
01:47:39.380 you're still pissed about that shirt i'm so mad so mad and you're right yeah with all that with
01:47:50.440 all that being said though aren't you afraid as a woman of being left behind
01:47:53.680 that is even more insidious and i i do think that you know you are seeing more and more people wake
01:48:02.520 up to this which is that like that anecdote it's very haunting of like the man turns on his glasses
01:48:08.360 and puts them on like the bedside table and begins recording like a woman undressing herself like
01:48:13.180 it is so haunting and it is so disturbing and i also think that like more and more people
01:48:19.160 not just women like this also affects men and boys and people of all genders and identities like
01:48:23.940 it is not good to have the ability to be surveilled without your knowledge and i think
01:48:29.720 that more people are actually like waking up to that and are becoming more and more viscerally
01:48:34.440 aware of that meta reality labs which is the division of meta that's producing these glasses
01:48:40.220 and creating all sorts of bullshit nobody really wants they brought in in the first quarter of
01:48:46.160 2026 402 million dollars in sales of these glasses sounds like sounds like a good number 0.94
01:48:54.740 nope not really because in that same time meta reality labs lost four billion dollars and that's
01:49:03.420 on top of the six billion dollars that they lost in the quarter before the final quarter of 2025
01:49:09.720 and uh this is all part of a total loss of 80 billion dollars since meta reality labs opened
01:49:19.600 in 2020 so in the tradition of ending these podcasts on a high note yay people don't really 0.96
01:49:27.220 want this shit no matter how much they pay kylie jenner to try to make it look sexy i have no faith 0.97
01:49:34.680 that laws will catch up. And even in, you know, look how the laws that do exist around things like 1.00
01:49:41.160 sexual violence, look how those protect women. Not very well. And so what I am, you know,
01:49:47.000 advocating for officially on the A Bit Fruity podcast is, you know, as always, we need a
01:49:53.260 cultural shift around this stuff. It is not cool to film people without their permission. It wasn't
01:49:58.800 cool to do that with a phone and uh it's especially not cool to do that with fucking glasses that 0.97
01:50:05.980 nobody will know that you're filming on if you are in a reddit forum asking people how to cover 0.97
01:50:12.560 up the light on your glasses that signal that it's recording that the vast majority of people
01:50:18.060 already won't even know what that means you have gone too far bro we all just need a you know if
01:50:23.940 your friend if your family member gets these meta goggles like smash them throw them out 0.97
01:50:30.100 throw them on the ground and beat them with your foot or hammer 0.99
01:50:34.260 and hey if you need help finding a hammer a big hammer hit me up 0.99
01:50:41.800 i know i know a guy i know a guy
01:50:45.540 ed and kat thank you so much for joining me today it's never fun to talk about the uh
01:50:54.380 techno feudalist encroachment that we are all living through but uh i i do have faith that
01:51:02.840 knowledge is power and thank you for helping everyone understand it just a little bit better
01:51:07.720 today and uh just remind people where they can find you i'm uh big black jock have been on twitter
01:51:13.180 Still there until they ban me, I guess.
01:51:19.080 And the Tech Bubble newsletter.
01:51:23.020 And This Machine Kills is a podcast I co-host about technology and how it works and how it's developed.
01:51:29.420 And that's on Patreon, SoundCloud, Spotify, everywhere, every platform, essentially.
01:51:34.000 And I am at SpitfireNews.com.
01:51:37.040 That is my newsletter.
01:51:38.080 And you can also find me on Blue Sky and Instagram at Kat Tembarge.
01:51:43.960 And soon YouTube.
01:51:45.460 Teaser.
01:51:45.980 Oh!
01:51:48.320 We haven't talked about this.
01:51:49.900 Coming soon.
01:51:52.120 That's very exciting to me specifically.
01:51:56.180 I love you all so much.
01:51:57.900 Thank you for joining this episode of A Bit Fruity.
01:52:01.560 Thank you for listening all the way.
01:52:03.400 uh if you need me i will be putting various moisturizers onto kylie jenner's hand and
01:52:11.620 asking her which one she likes the most while she films me i love you so much and until next time
01:52:18.240 stay fruity