Culture Study Podcast - July 30, 2025


All the Ways We Surveil Motherhood


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 2 minutes

Words per minute

181.52

Word count

11,363

Sentence count

229

Harmful content

Misogyny

10

sentences flagged

Toxicity

7

sentences flagged

Hate speech

8

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Hey, this is Anne with another update on the episodes that we need your questions for.
00:00:04.680 We've gotten some really interesting ones in about why men are less likely to believe in
00:00:08.980 climate change with some of your own stories included, but we need more. Keep those coming.
00:00:14.200 We're also working on a deep dive about Gwyneth Paltrow with the author of her new biography,
00:00:19.100 and we're still taking your questions on birding culture. That one's going to be so cute and good.
00:00:23.980 hoarding, and food trends of all kinds. As always, you can submit those and questions
00:00:29.840 you have for asking anything at culturestudypod.substack.com. Okay, thanks and enjoy today's
00:00:35.860 show. So the book opens with this 1950 short story, sci-fi by Ray Bradbury, and it's called
00:00:44.960 The Children the World Made, or more commonly taught as The Velt. And it begins with a pair
00:00:50.080 of parents their names are Lydia and George who are really excited because they've just bought
00:00:54.680 something called a happy life home this is basically an epic smart home it has taken over
00:01:00.440 every maternal and housewifery function and of course Lydia is both ecstatic and completely
00:01:07.820 depressed because this was her entire life they also and which is so depressing not to editorialize
00:01:14.220 of course they also have two children which is the norm they're twins their names are Wendy and
00:01:19.140 peter we can hear the sort of peter pan thing there and they have their own reality playroom
00:01:26.100 which sounds really cool basically they fantasize they imagine things this is the height of freud
00:01:32.000 mania so it's definitely psychoanalytic and then it's like a 3d vr room so they start to fantasize
00:01:38.620 the sahara and the children just become totally obsessed and they won't leave the room and
00:01:44.440 they're addicted to the room and slowly that vr becomes r it becomes reality and so when lydia
00:01:51.900 and george go to a psychoanalyst they're like what should we do oh my god you know a psychoanalyst
00:01:58.160 is like you must obviously remove the screen you must shut down the home the children catch wind
00:02:03.720 of this trap their parents in the room and of course are murdered by a pride of lions what's
00:02:11.280 left somewhat open is like is this just their fantasy or does it really happen it seems like
00:02:16.820 it really happened this is the culture study podcast and i'm ann helen peterson hi i'm hannah
00:02:28.240 zeevan and i'm the author most recently of mother media and also the distance cure both with mit press
00:02:34.080 and i'm an associate professor of history at uc berkeley okay so your book is so so interesting
00:02:39.920 to me and like just an example of all of the incredible work that's coming out of media studies
00:02:45.160 right now because when I was reading it I was like wait is your PhD in psychology or is your
00:02:50.020 PhD in media and that itself or in history right like in and you're in a history department now
00:02:55.920 right yeah yeah so like it's doing all of these things so skillfully so how how do you describe
00:03:03.840 but this is like the hardest elevator talk ever yeah so the book mother media you know i can say
00:03:10.360 a little a little bit about what it tries to do but basically the first observation i had in
00:03:15.880 writing it and i think this helps to sort of map the project is that we know as historians of
00:03:22.000 psychology or feminist historians that in the 1950s we have both this like really pressurized
00:03:28.220 image of the housewife at the center of her home. She's definitely white. She definitely like the 1.00
00:03:34.420 fictional Lydia has two or 2.2 children, and she's in the suburb. And we also know that in the 1940s
00:03:41.820 and 50s, there was this huge pressure on what that mother at the center of that, you know,
00:03:46.640 domestic console should be. She should be attentive, she should be libidinal, but not too 1.00
00:03:52.120 much, not too little. And we also know that this image is just a fake one. Or in the parlance of
00:04:00.660 Stephanie Kuntz, the great historian of American motherhood, it was a way we never were. But it
00:04:06.780 becomes this really important image. We see that now with tradwifery, etc. And so I looked at all
00:04:12.120 that psychology that was trying to instruct mother on how to be. And I saw even if it's behavioralists
00:04:17.820 who disagree with the psychoanalysts, et cetera, they all agreed that mother should be the sole
00:04:23.740 conveyance of care to a child, just as technology is really appearing in this other role in aiding
00:04:30.300 and child rearing. So the first argument is psychology decides the mother is a medium.
00:04:35.960 The second part is then looking at all of the people who fabricated the technologies that we
00:04:41.160 all know whether or not we love them the baby monitor you know that the high-tech crib and its
00:04:47.560 antecedents and on and on how they and television of course but also comic books how they all began
00:04:54.660 to think about media as doing the work of standing in for mother because mother actually can't just
00:05:00.720 be the the unique conveyance of all culture all transmission all love something else comes in
00:05:06.900 And so the book is interested in how mother as medium and media as mother play together and have shaped our understandings of mothering today. I'll give the contemporary classic example, which is next time you see a mother shushing her child with the iPad, go interior and see how you feel about it. And the book is sort of interested in offering a prehistory of how those feelings about children in front of TV, children in front of iPad came to be.
00:05:32.380 Yeah. So you write that during this formative time, 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, there was, as you say, new and exquisite attention to the nuclear family and these new definitions of what mother is, what father is, what a child is, and these definitions, which are not fixed.
00:05:53.300 Like, I think sometimes it's easy because they've been so naturalized for us to think, like, this is how we always thought of these roles, but that these definitions haunt us today.
00:06:01.620 So can you talk a little bit more about that just as we start our conversation?
00:06:06.600 Totally.
00:06:07.020 I mean, you know, I've had this exquisite luck myself to teach the greatest group of graduate students ever, History of the Family, my first semester at UC Berkeley.
00:06:18.040 and the first thing we did was read this and i promised them i was like this will be the most
00:06:23.320 boring week of the syllabus and i'm so sorry but we have to do it which is we read you know these
00:06:28.440 really intense debates from the 80s 90s about what american family life was and it was really
00:06:36.000 recent that we were like oh huh we didn't always live in nuclear families and part of what that
00:06:42.640 does that fixed image is it excludes or extrudes people who have had all kinds of different family
00:06:49.340 life and not just like in a new modern way historically um so the the first thing the
00:06:55.700 book wants to do is be like basically everything we think about immutable family life is wrong
00:07:00.040 and and like let's look at how that prescription came to be so there's a lot of free and directing
00:07:06.520 in the book like here's what all these people were pressurizing or putting on women whether
00:07:11.700 they're upper class women, lower class women, women of color, white women, because there are
00:07:16.480 all these different signatures for each of those groups. And the pressures are unevenly felt,
00:07:21.920 but they're not unevenly articulated, meaning everyone's a problem. And so I wanted to show
00:07:28.480 that too. Yeah, you have this, I think, who is it that you're quoting Melinda Cooper, that the
00:07:33.100 history of the family is one of perpetual crisis. So like, there's always these different solutions
00:07:38.080 that you're trying to deploy and it always has to be unsuccessful that family has to be in crisis
00:07:44.880 so nothing can ever actually work yeah i think the other way to look at that is the book tries
00:07:49.140 to show both from above and more from above as well as below the kinds of solutions that were
00:07:54.660 posited to various family crises the one i'm paying most close attention to is one that is
00:08:02.180 materially about labor how can new standards of reproductive labor new forms of mothering
00:08:08.960 coexist alongside new expectations and new desires that have a channel to leave the home say as well
00:08:17.540 as you know pressures on women who have always worked outside of the home that's like an uneven
00:08:22.080 part of the history of women at work and how that gets voiced as a problem that can be dealt with
00:08:28.360 with technology it can be dealt with you know it's this kind of techno boosterism stuff we're 0.56
00:08:33.180 totally used to in the present but i i'm also showing how that emerges so you know that's the
00:08:38.880 crisis and then what happens is mothers are both blamed for not being totally present
00:08:43.140 and for mismanaging the media and by the time we get to the ipad we know that one
00:08:49.160 but in fact this has been a question since they called tv the boob tube i always forget that that
00:08:55.180 actually is referencing like an actual boob and not like um i don't know like a thing that dads
00:09:01.000 say you know because it rhymes or something yeah um i mean that's a good tee up for this other
00:09:06.980 argument of the book is that all of these like panics and discourses around media were actually
00:09:13.920 like darkly twinning the same panics and discourses around mothering so like can we think of
00:09:20.220 maybe point us to a specific example whether the boob tube or comic books or something else that
00:09:25.300 comes to mind we're gonna we're gonna do so much historicization in this episode but that
00:09:30.340 starts us off with an example of that sure i mean here's here's an example so the book opens with
00:09:37.320 the story of the limbergh baby kidnapping which most most readers should be you know we've just
00:09:43.240 heard from the introduction we have ray bradbury the first chapter is on the question of paid as
00:09:48.480 well as unwaged caregiving beyond the mother because that's the first place this panic over
00:09:53.780 mother as the proper only exclusive quote-unquote pure medium of care comes from so there's so much
00:10:01.380 happening in terms of labor between the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century
00:10:05.760 and then again in the interwar period around shifts in who and why people are serving
00:10:11.680 in the role of the waged caregiver of child who is not mother. So the nanny is the term I use. But
00:10:19.280 of course, there are all kinds of figures at that time. There's the nurse who lives in with the
00:10:23.920 smaller children. There might be a governess who's with older children, lives in, lives out.
00:10:29.040 I use the nanny as a kind of catch all, though I'm careful about it. And there's this massive panic
00:10:35.060 about what nanny is bringing into the home. And of course, this is a panic of class and race.
00:10:41.680 Right. And so all of a sudden, the Lindbergh baby kidnapping happens, which, of course, is this like horrific thing to say that it is the most famous kidnapping in the United States, even though we have endless kidnapping happening all the time all around us now.
00:10:58.680 And and in fact, the history of the U.S. is predicated on all forms of kidnapping. But the Lindbergh baby in this classic, you know, crime paradigm is a white baby whose father is a very famous fascist, very, very wealthy, you know, pilot.
00:11:15.260 And it's the height of, you know, it's the Great Depression. 0.57
00:11:17.940 And so there are very few, very wealthy families who are living on these kinds of estates.
00:11:23.840 But the Lindbergh family is one. 0.82
00:11:25.500 They have a full team of domestic servants, so-called, you know, people who are doing that reproductive work for the wage in the home. 0.78
00:11:32.960 And the baby gets kidnapped. 0.76
00:11:34.420 and the first set of people who are blamed are his nanny who is the person who discovers him
00:11:40.400 missing and says to the mother and they've stolen our baby and the point i make in the book is that
00:11:47.400 the minute the baby was gone there was no hour like there was no solidarity between mother figures
00:11:52.720 um they interrogated both her and also a woman who is working as a maid the maid died by suicide
00:12:01.880 you know from the extent of the questioning and the nanny repatriated back to scotland
00:12:07.940 of course neither of them did it and immediately the move amongst a kind of very wealthy
00:12:13.860 community is to make a media make a medium that will convey what a nanny would do it's to remediate
00:12:22.920 the nanny oh well now we can do it ourselves and with this you know we know this one right like
00:12:28.580 technology is neutral it will just do what we want it to do it works the way we want it to
00:12:33.860 it works for us it's positive or whatever it solves a problem it's not you know i live very
00:12:39.540 close to silicon valley and i sound like where i'm from that was already true in the 1930s and
00:12:45.000 so thus the baby monitor came to be and it came to be in its first usage on a yacht at the height
00:12:51.060 of the great depression so that a baby could sleep down one end and a mother could sort of
00:12:56.080 attend to her other role as the housewife helping her husband play cards and hosts down the other
00:13:01.340 end right and without having a baby monitor exactly and that's where a baby monitor comes
00:13:06.320 from it's a ceiling of the nuclear family so this reminds me too the the Lindbergh kidnapping and
00:13:11.880 actually just like discourse around Lindbergh is really central to a lot of panic around the rise
00:13:16.960 of what was called personality journalism and like the 19 like around that era and people thinking
00:13:23.260 like that the press was essentially like high journalism was being degraded by stuff that
00:13:28.880 people wanted to read about. And so it just like it highlights to me like, oh, yes, this is a story
00:13:34.000 that's a panic about mothering. But then like in all of these echoing ways, it's also about what
00:13:38.940 is happening with media at the same time. Absolutely. Okay, let's take a quick break
00:13:44.300 and then we'll get into our listener questions. Today's episode is brought to you by Birch
00:13:53.760 Living. I have had my Birch mattress for more than two years now. And it is the first time
00:13:59.720 in my life I have not slept in a sinkhole. Mine is on the way here. I cannot wait. And
00:14:06.280 the reason why I was very excited is because when I texted you and was like,
00:14:10.560 do you have one of these? Like, I felt like you had talked about it before and you were like,
00:14:14.080 oh my god yes so most people don't feel that strongly about their mattress but you do
00:14:19.460 I feel so strongly about it like the mattress I had before this was maybe like three hundred
00:14:25.060 dollars that I got on Amazon and it was super comfortable for maybe like six months and then
00:14:31.960 sinkhole on my side sinkhole on Bobby's side and then there was just like a hill in the middle you
00:14:38.200 had to like roll up if you wanted to adjust yourself at all like my hips hurt I had to go
00:14:43.400 to physical therapy from my back twice. And note, I have not gone back to physical therapy since I
00:14:49.580 got my birch mattress. Wow. No. So I remember when you had to go to physical therapy when we were
00:14:53.480 doing our other podcast. And it's true. You haven't had to have nothing back. Yeah. In two
00:14:58.660 and a half years. It's super comfortable. It's super supportive. Bobby and I are both like bigger
00:15:02.880 people and it's really held its shape. Well, the other thing I noticed, I sleep with a smartwatch
00:15:08.880 and I have, I pay for a sleep tracking app and my sleep score immediately went up and stayed up
00:15:17.040 after I got my Birch mattress. Wow. Like you can look back. Like I have the data. Yeah. Like it
00:15:22.900 went from like yellow every night to green every night. Melody is Birch Living's official
00:15:29.760 spokesperson. Seriously. The other thing about Birch is that they offer a hundred night risk-free
00:15:35.980 trial to see how your body adjusts and they are shipped directly from their facility to your door
00:15:40.780 for free the mattress comes rolled up in a box and is super easy to set up this is really important
00:15:46.540 for people like me who stress out about how they are going to freaking get a king mattress
00:15:52.540 anywhere in their house they also have a 25 year warranty which is unheard of we want all of our
00:16:00.540 listeners to enjoy the same, what did it go up from yellow to green sleep? Same sort of sleep
00:16:07.280 as Melody with a new mattress from Birch. So go to birchliving.com slash culture for 27% off
00:16:14.520 site-wide. This deal is just for culture study listeners. That's birchliving.com slash culture
00:16:20.560 and get 27% off site-wide. Birchliving.com slash culture.
00:16:30.540 so let's get into our questions they're so good and complicated uh this first question comes from
00:16:39.940 ellie and it's about how we talk about technology and parenting is technology just the new
00:16:44.940 breastfeeding over the past few decades breastfeeding has become a really contentious
00:16:48.800 parenting topic so first we have the introduction of formula and oh wow formula's great and everyone 0.72
00:16:53.560 should use it then came the backlash well breast is best everyone should breastfeed suck yourself
00:16:58.540 dry triple feed six times a day just sacrifice yourself with the altar of your child but also 0.99
00:17:04.040 don't breastfeed for too long because that's weird and why should you get special accommodations for
00:17:08.240 pumping and feeding then outcomes research showing that really breastfeeding only has
00:17:12.440 minimal benefits over formula and then that gets backlash well how dare you not support women doing
00:17:17.740 this magical thing now maybe there's somewhat of an uneasy truce now a lot of people breastfeed
00:17:23.320 some do formula some families do both but somehow we all still feel bad and judge for whatever that
00:17:28.520 decision was. I see technology as having a really similar path. At first, iPads in schools was going
00:17:34.260 to be a revolutionary teaching tool, and now there's this big backlash. And all parents are
00:17:38.500 using technology in some way, and we feel judged either about using it too much or in the wrong way.
00:17:44.260 Or maybe we feel like we're being overly superior if we're trying not to use it at all.
00:17:48.700 It feels like technology is much like breastfeeding. There's this narrow version of the right way to
00:17:52.660 parent, which is used as a cudgel to make parents, but especially women, feel bad and subjugated to
00:17:57.820 their parenting choices. So I feel like I should just send Ellie a copy of your book. Like she
00:18:02.480 just like wrote, like, this is the perfect reader. Yeah, absolutely. Give me Ellie's address. I'll do
00:18:08.380 it. So thank you to Ellie. I mean, the first thing I'd say is like, this question is so excellent.
00:18:13.080 And in part, because from a kind of history of technology perspective, we would see formula,
00:18:20.100 we would see the bottle, we would see the breast as a form of techne, as a form of technology.
00:18:25.560 so that's spot on and it really you know chimes with a lot of what i have in the book like the
00:18:30.920 second chapter is about sleep and the you know with feeding too it's the same i argue that that's
00:18:36.820 a fashion system we have sleep with your baby don't sleep with your baby and of course like
00:18:41.920 what is being covered over and naturalized is that when we had a kind of scientific mothering
00:18:47.860 that was pro formula and pro kind of standardization there was a lot of you know not
00:18:53.700 just social but like medical political power really attached to that idea and then same when
00:18:59.920 we have the backlash around breastfeeding right there's all the we have the same in sleeping
00:19:04.260 right put your baby on its stomach says dr spock anyone who was raised post 1990 knows about the
00:19:11.220 back to sleep campaign right where babies are put on their backs like you would never ever now put
00:19:16.800 your baby on the stomach and of course spock but some you know historians of public health have
00:19:22.260 argued that stock really contributed to a rise of SIDS as the most read parenting expert in the
00:19:28.200 history of the world. So I think we have that kind of, you know, tension. I think you're right to
00:19:34.120 bring it to screens, right? There is this tension between techno-optimism, techno-pessimism,
00:19:39.380 and then just also the truth that when we can batch process children in this case,
00:19:45.280 capitalism is going to want to do it, even if it isn't best. So there's this kind of boosterism
00:19:49.940 around yes the internet yes the ipad yes whatever at the same time of course like screen time is
00:19:57.200 exceedingly useful um i have a six-year-old he's not in the book i don't write about myself in the
00:20:03.580 book i'm not very interesting in a way right i'm just like a mom who works and uh sometimes it goes
00:20:10.440 well and sometimes it goes poorly and i have no advice to give but like i definitely use the
00:20:15.580 screen. And I've watched, right? Like there's this kind of social attitude towards like my kid
00:20:21.320 looking up iNaturalist, which is all he seems to want to do on the iPad, which is hysterical to me.
00:20:27.200 I'm from California. I'm like, who are you? And, and like, you know, me on my phone and then
00:20:33.980 seeing parents, you know, be like, oh man, you know, my child never is allowed. And we know
00:20:40.160 which one is quote unquote better i'm i'm less good right well it's just that language and i
00:20:45.560 think even when they like i don't like that you have to come up with this sort of armor around
00:20:53.060 your screen use because like a justification in the way that you narrativize it because you know
00:20:58.580 that whatever you're doing is actually not that great right yeah even though that's that we're
00:21:03.320 just trying the best we can and this technology is available the other thing is that we know a
00:21:10.460 little bit about what screens are doing to all of us it's the book is not like oh and therefore give
00:21:15.800 your child 11 million hours of ipad right um but it's also to say like you know in ellie's question
00:21:22.280 it's articulated there right there which is yeah all parents but especially mothers and my book
00:21:28.060 shows why mother and it's not just because mothers are assumed to be the center of everything the
00:21:34.140 book also shows why that is but also because at mid-century we opened this channel for slippage
00:21:40.300 between moms and the media they deployed in the home and the kind of pathologies whether it's
00:21:45.520 around autism which we can talk about you know whether it's about schizophrenia all the kind of
00:21:50.240 social panics right now it's literacy in the 50s it was you know communism we can talk about those
00:21:56.780 things too literacy versus communism um why not have both uh yeah this the last part of the
00:22:04.260 question where she says that like all of this conflict also like it all serves to make mothers
00:22:10.500 feel bad but also subjugated to their parenting choices absolutely can you talk a little bit
00:22:15.480 about that i mean i hear that in two registers right which is one is to like be at the altar
00:22:21.660 of one's parenting choices and commitments um and the other is of course subjugation more broadly
00:22:27.960 in society through parenting its limits in you know in the u.s context the book is only about
00:22:34.900 the united states um i'm in other books i work more transnationally we have such a kind of
00:22:40.480 particular history here that that you know the comparative book would have been twice as long
00:22:45.140 Yep. And mothers are variously, unevenly, really exposed to scrutiny at the level of social and political power. You know, thinking about Dorothy Roberts' work, you know, and so that's also part of it. There is this double sided both like I will die on the hill of Montessori because I have decided to die there, but also like the actual real pernicious overreach of the state. And both are featured in the book variously. 0.51
00:23:11.920 I'm really interested in this discourse around Jonathan Haidt's book, The Anxious Generation, which is everywhere. And he, it's just, it's so fitting that this dude is the mouthpiece of it. And all of the people I see wringing their hands about like, I have read this book, I need to change the way that I'm parenting. It's all women.
00:23:33.640 yeah absolutely i mean to quote my husband's favorite line it's the oldest gendered story
00:23:40.200 in the book um and it is a book you know that's that's part of the advice industry um it's
00:23:48.580 partially why i'm really anti-advice that also has to do with other commitments i didn't want
00:23:52.920 to put myself in the book as i said for this reason and there was interest six years ago or
00:23:57.620 whatever and like well then have it be advice and it would end up just being like do what you can
00:24:03.980 that makes you feel okay while also privileging the safety of your child thanks and yeah and you
00:24:11.180 know like with real exceptions where I'm like very strongly believe in things like vaccines
00:24:15.900 but um you know which I have to say now in year 2025 but like this marketing has always picked up
00:24:23.020 on what is the panic and we are worried about what screens are doing to kids and like it's not
00:24:29.460 to say that we shouldn't be but if we're not conscious of what we're also importing which is
00:24:34.140 the pathologization of mothering the pathologization of a mother working and the pathologization of
00:24:39.720 children then it's a problem for me and that kind of also ableist language is all over the place
00:24:46.220 especially around the ipad and what it quote-unquote does to a child so this i think tees
00:24:52.200 up our next question. Well, this is from Kate. I'm curious if the surveillance tools and technology
00:24:57.400 we give parents actually provide more peace of mind for parents and give more independence to
00:25:01.720 children, or are these tools actually exacerbating anxiety of both parents and children by implying
00:25:07.620 that children must be under constant surveillance to be safe? And how much of these surveillance
00:25:11.920 tools are actually just performative, meant to show other parents that you are watchful
00:25:16.100 slash not a careless parent without actually offering real increased safety? And what price
00:25:21.220 you pay for not adhering to the pressure to monitor all the time. I'm mindful that which
00:25:25.860 kids get to be, quote, free range, unquote, versus which kids would just be considered neglected is
00:25:30.760 very contingent on socioeconomic factors. For some context, I'm a mom to a two and a half year
00:25:36.040 old, a six month old, and I interact with many parents of older kids at our local playground.
00:25:40.560 I'm wary of having my children think being under constant surveillance is normal,
00:25:44.220 but I also already have felt pressure about this. I noticed that it starts young with having a video
00:25:49.480 baby monitor as well as other cameras around the house and then checking them all the time even
00:25:54.260 when the parent is supposed to be out and getting a break from child care. I've had parents be vaguely
00:25:58.900 horrified that my husband and I don't have a video baby monitor and instead just use a radio. With
00:26:04.120 older kids like nine and ten year olds I have seen quote free range kids still be required to wear a
00:26:09.380 tracking watch by their parents. The kids often take it off once they get to the playground. Is one
00:26:14.220 even free range when they are required to be under surveillance and would a watch that can easily be
00:26:19.080 removed even provide more safety so for me this immediately brings us back to this like
00:26:25.300 pathologization of the child which is that like the child is inherently unsafe always the
00:26:31.820 surveillance stuff starts really young and of course it also starts on multiple fronts like
00:26:37.640 if the parent is out supposed to be having a break from kate's question right who is home with the
00:26:43.560 child who's also being co evilly coincidentally and big scare quotes surveyed. It's whoever is
00:26:49.620 with that child. And I think that's from where the impulse starts. And so you having the radio
00:26:54.980 means that you actually have to place trust in whatever's happening in your home to leave your
00:27:00.240 home. And there are a lot of parents and that goes back to the kind of nanny panic that I talked
00:27:04.680 about, which reemerges, by the way, in the 90s, when we start having nanny cams, which are the
00:27:10.560 same thing as a baby monitor no joke same technology redescribed yeah i think that's
00:27:16.080 really important um that's kind of capturing that so that's the first piece the second piece is like
00:27:21.840 no i don't think you can define children as free range if they're being surveilled although like
00:27:27.000 it is different to walk yourself to the playground than to never be allowed to walk to the playground
00:27:31.620 yeah again about this stuff i think it's really hard the technology exists now it didn't exist
00:27:37.940 when i was growing up i'm turning 35 on sunday you know what i mean like it didn't exist when
00:27:44.980 my brothers who are variously younger than me were growing up now parents have this option
00:27:50.000 and you can understand i'm always on the side of like why are people doing this let's be really
00:27:55.420 compassionate and it's easy in this case parents are worried about their kids and they've been fed
00:28:02.280 a century of social panic about their kids ever since viviana zelitzer describes this change the
00:28:07.920 child became priceless. And we have to worry about all kinds of things that parents didn't
00:28:14.560 30 years ago, in the sense that like our urban spaces have totally changed. You know, the suburbs
00:28:20.800 are, you know, their own problem spatially. And as you say, with CPS overreach, you know,
00:28:27.840 the question of who is merely free range and who is neglectful is an incredibly fraught one. I have
00:28:33.760 one brother who works as a family defense lawyer in brooklyn and you know this is the the the site
00:28:40.160 of his work again to reference dorothy roberts at the same time i have friends too who are parent
00:28:45.240 older kids and you know they when the kid goes to college and they turn the tracker off and it's
00:28:50.380 really hard because they're just having this constant feedback loop of my kid is safe i'm a
00:28:55.560 mom having my child means my heart exists in my hand outside my body i don't have a rib cage let
00:29:02.120 alone skin and i have to like deal with anything that comes to him as ruining my life i get it um
00:29:09.040 but i think that all of these factors just allow us to like make better decisions who is getting
00:29:14.500 caught in a surveilling dragnet what does that mean about our anxieties anxieties you know are
00:29:20.520 not to say that the thing is happening precisely not so let's really sit with them and figure it
00:29:26.740 out um and also really talk to kids about the fact that that you know they are being tracked
00:29:32.920 and how kids feel about that like they should be part of that conversation if not the author of it
00:29:38.380 well and I also think about how like when you're so thoroughly surveilled and you're so thoroughly
00:29:43.620 like you can feel the eyes you can feel like your parents reference to you like I checked your
00:29:49.180 grades today where is that assignment like I saw you where were you like at this time when I checked
00:29:55.280 you're like where you were on find my like all those things they internalize that surveillance
00:30:00.300 right and like you act as if you are always being surveilled and how like how is that connected to
00:30:06.120 I think feelings of anxiety feelings of like that just the development of self of creativity of like
00:30:14.120 oneself apart from who their parents like envision them to be vis-a-vis surveillance it's really
00:30:21.160 complicated and it's really a psychoanalytic question too right like which is how do you
00:30:26.400 separate both the parent from the child and the child from the parent and that is understood to
00:30:32.280 be like the cornerstone of development and we are you know we are changing it i also think at the
00:30:38.140 same time i was really interested in the book and even those kinds of notions of like the
00:30:42.520 pathologization say of the helicopter mother which grows right out of the very same paradigms from
00:30:49.160 the 1950s of like the refrigerator mother right both appliances yeah can you what is the refrigerator
00:30:56.200 mother so this is like the third chapter of the book it's it's adorable we're moving right in
00:31:00.740 order without trying to the third chapter of the book is called hot and cool mothers and it tries
00:31:06.240 to tell the story of how a kind of both pathologization of the white mother middle
00:31:10.360 class mother as over educated and frigid emerged alongside the pathologization of black mothers as
00:31:16.500 overpowering dominant etc and so this had huge impacts on child psychiatry what could be wrong
00:31:24.180 with the child was determined by what could be wrong with the mother i tell the story of you
00:31:28.280 know dorothy groomer for instance is a black mother trying to get her child diagnosed with
00:31:33.240 autism and being told she couldn't and she says quote unquote i couldn't be a refrigerator mother
00:31:38.620 the irony of it all you know and so like i tell that story but i look at its its travel through
00:31:44.960 to things like the helicopter mother the snow plow mother the tiger mother and all of these
00:31:50.340 new maternal pathologies and so it's you know part of that is to say like we get sold you know i'm a
00:31:56.820 college professor i'm inundated all the time with this fantasy that there are parents overreaching
00:32:02.000 into my classroom or something in my experience it's never happened once you know um but we have
00:32:08.920 this fantasy that there is this kind of parental overreach. On the other hand, you know, we have
00:32:14.780 also this really new and very tempting technology. And it has all these meanings, but we can also
00:32:22.460 make our own with them. I'm with you, Anne. This is a side note. But one of the most interesting
00:32:28.620 parts to me of like your ability to do this research and to look at what was happening
00:32:34.080 historically is that during these formative periods like 30s 40s 50s there were an abundance
00:32:40.280 of kids who had different family arrangements in part because of the war in part because of deaths
00:32:46.040 like so there was an ability to essentially like study kids who didn't have moms study kids who
00:32:52.700 were with only moms like study kids who were orphans and then come up with ideas right or
00:32:59.600 wrong about what role mothering, fathering, family, like the role of that in the child's
00:33:05.860 life.
00:33:06.440 Absolutely.
00:33:07.300 And it allowed for this very weird cluster of theories to come on mother-infant interaction.
00:33:14.080 It's the antecedent of something like attachment theory, but also behavioral theory, where
00:33:19.440 we had this like crystallized moment where, you know, the idea of like, there must be
00:33:23.980 mother.
00:33:24.680 That's what we gleaned from that.
00:33:26.100 and there are all different kinds of you know psi psi scientists working on that question
00:33:32.220 and that's why this kind of like over attention to mother which twins with the economic material
00:33:39.320 history of like the fantasy of the family wage and keep the woman at home and someone's with 0.86
00:33:43.460 the kids and someone's with the domestic work and this pressure to not disperse it would be
00:33:49.760 the term of art through the nanny through the grandmother suburbanization was a bill of goods
00:33:54.380 sold to people like move away from your families separate yeah and you know now we always complain
00:34:00.000 like well why or I complain too why do I live 3,000 miles away from my parents you know and
00:34:05.880 all of that is tied up in this history I always think about the house I was just like very fixated
00:34:11.360 on this vision of the the 50s housewife and how that relates or has trickled down into trad wife
00:34:16.900 ism but like the the fact that so many families it was still so out of reach for so many families
00:34:22.580 but that it still was like a desired norm like it was like if i'm a working class family
00:34:28.360 i will be made respectable if my wife can stay at home absolutely you know and his story you know
00:34:35.740 historians sociologists have really detailed that like the fantasy the perniciousness of it
00:34:41.980 and yeah so i think that you know we see that re-emerge with the trad wife stuff yeah like the
00:34:50.400 what i don't follow this stuff super closely because it really upsets me um but i know there's
00:34:56.260 like there's one trad wife who has seven children or so and has a big ranch and she's like considered
00:35:01.860 the ballet or the ballerina farm i can tell you all about her and there was a beautiful essay in
00:35:08.240 the baffler about it i think it's like the best on the trad wife and you know of course the whole
00:35:14.400 thing is that she's massively supported by her husband's fortune airline money yes but also on
00:35:20.540 top of that a huge staff who are disappeared from all the content absolutely disappeared like in an
00:35:26.620 uncanny way like they don't even have anyone helping on their farm but they do absolutely
00:35:31.140 they have people helping on their farm but that is completely disappeared yeah it's wild it's the
00:35:37.440 fantasy of like you and your husband and your eight children can run a massive cattle operation
00:35:42.280 and a social media operation as well um let alone reproduce yourselves and and for him do the
00:35:48.260 productive work so like i think that if we can see how false that image is we should basically
00:35:53.220 import that feeling back to what we were told is the natural setup or the dominant setup which
00:36:00.240 again it wasn't and the the sort of really great and as i told my students not the most scintillating
00:36:07.180 demography shows us. That work is essential, right? It's just not the most scintillating
00:36:12.800 reading. But I find it actually to be the crux of the whole damn thing. Yeah. 0.97
00:36:18.100 So this next question is very important to me as a former nanny. So I am very eager to talk
00:36:23.360 about this. It comes from Natalie. I've just found out through a Facebook mother's group that I'm in
00:36:27.700 that apparently it's a common thing to have surveillance cameras in daycares now. I don't
00:36:32.320 know whether it's just because I'm Australian, it's not something I've encountered here,
00:36:36.020 or because I've only experienced three different daycares for my kids that definitely didn't do
00:36:40.740 this but I was horrified when I found out that parents can access the cameras at any time of
00:36:45.240 the day via an app and check in on what's going on at their child's daycare. Surely that's not
00:36:50.140 only a violation of the kids privacy but also of the typically female staff. Having the technology 1.00
00:36:55.720 to be able to keep an eye on our kids all day every day is one thing but should this be something
00:37:00.980 that we do? Have we taken helicopter parenting too far? I appreciate that Natalie actually
00:37:07.060 thinks of something like the kids' privacy or the childcare workers' privacy, because I think
00:37:12.520 that's often wholly discounted in these conversations as like parental rights trump
00:37:17.100 all of that. Yeah, I mean, I'm so with you. So that was also the impulse between making that
00:37:22.360 chapter on wage care beyond the home, in the home, part of it. I mean, we know about the
00:37:29.200 antecedents here are probably more likely than the earlier stuff because of the satanic panic
00:37:34.220 and how much kind of weight it still carries and richard beck's excellent book on it you know and
00:37:40.200 i also want to say that like it's absolutely correct that the panic is not so much about
00:37:46.420 what's happening with child but who is taking care of that child so we have the nanny cam in
00:37:51.380 the home which then trickles down to the the sort of daycare worker cam at daycare it's always
00:37:58.100 cutified and I did I do get it like one of Mally's preschools did have like a photo at the end of the
00:38:05.580 week of the kids doing cute stuff and I love that like put that into my veins but a photo is so
00:38:12.560 different and they were curated and also by the way we had to log on and say we would never
00:38:16.960 disseminate them because there are other children in it but Mally didn't consent to have his photo
00:38:21.720 taken was my point you know and so like I think about someone like Madeline Lane McKinney who's
00:38:27.040 working on you know child liberation and children's rights as being really essential
00:38:31.840 to that kind of conversation but then also you know i've had many many many emails from a nanny
00:38:38.780 union from you know people who had worked as you know veterans of that work in daycares etc
00:38:45.520 being like oh my god this part about the book because it's been weirdly the most circulated
00:38:51.220 part is the work on the nanny cam and i get that because i think it impact you know it's such a
00:38:55.460 clear example but it also like really impacts so many people and they say the same right which is
00:39:00.700 that it's a massive violation that now has become the condition of work um i've only been filmed in
00:39:06.380 an archive once you know while i did my work and it was a horrible feeling horrible and i wasn't
00:39:12.600 trying to do anything right even the feeling changes the nature of the labor and it's very
00:39:17.400 different if you're interacting with paper than with a child obviously you know where you know
00:39:22.220 the stakes and you know the pressure and you know how the film will be read. And so I detail that
00:39:27.280 whole history, right, like of shaken baby syndrome becoming this massive panic because of the nanny
00:39:32.940 camera rather than the other way around. I actually, I wrote an essay for The Baffler,
00:39:37.920 interestingly enough, about being a liberal arts nanny, essentially, like the privileges that were
00:39:43.840 allowed to me because I was a liberal arts graduate who was like just doing it for a little
00:39:49.580 bit before I went to grad school that I was given much more freedom with the children and more trust
00:39:56.240 like and part of it I think it also assuaged some of their feelings about leaving the home they were
00:40:02.320 like well if they're with this smart lady then it's okay which is messed up um but I also resented
00:40:12.000 fiercely any time that they decided that they were gonna stay home and work from home because
00:40:17.780 I felt like I couldn't do my job with any sort of autonomy. And so many worker surveys like about
00:40:24.360 happiness on the job really come down to like your ability to have autonomy to do the job
00:40:30.080 the way that like feels right. And that that doesn't mean that like you parent that kid the
00:40:35.080 way that you would parent your own kid necessarily. Like you're still operating within the confines
00:40:38.740 of what you and the parents have talked about in terms of practices. But it does mean like
00:40:43.580 I don't have to feel weird when I like go to the bathroom or go get food or like there's just
00:40:51.040 there's so many different ways that you change and self-surveil when you feel like someone is
00:40:55.940 watching you even out of the corner of your eye and the advice that I've always given to other
00:41:00.000 people who are hiring someone is like as much as you can if you have to be in the home separate
00:41:05.520 yourself like actually separate yourself in really meaningful ways even if it would feel more fun for
00:41:11.600 you to be able to come and say hi to the kid every once in a while right yeah and that oftentimes
00:41:17.100 that separation whether it's in the home or like actually leaving the home like that is the
00:41:22.460 difference between making that caregiving job a good job or a horrible job absolutely i just think
00:41:28.700 about like how mad some of these parents would get if like they happen to check in and like their kid
00:41:35.220 was crying and someone didn't immediately go and pick up that one-year-old like it's surveillance
00:41:41.280 without context like what if there were four other babies that also decided to start crying
00:41:45.580 right in that moment right yeah like and like yeah like there's so many ways in which you're
00:41:52.820 just watching in this way that I think just regiments the people who are being watched like
00:41:58.360 and also I think it could be like you can judge your kid too like why isn't my kid playing with
00:42:02.920 the other kids that sort of thing yeah yeah so it's over surveillance of of everyone and you know
00:42:09.600 now it's standard in many nanny contracts you know i was researching that that there should be
00:42:14.660 no surveillance no air tag in the stroller which is now very common some informants told me um
00:42:22.220 you know no nanny cam at home and then the question you know if it's violated that the
00:42:27.240 right lies with the nanny to violate the contract to end terminate the contract without violation
00:42:32.720 and you know i think we'll start to see that more standard but there is that selection bias i want
00:42:39.100 to send my kid to a school that has an open stream i want to be able i want to add one more part of
00:42:45.120 this which is that the expert one of the things that's happening there is anxiety that punishes
00:42:50.640 the people in the other scene the caregiver and the child but on the other hand there is something
00:42:56.520 else to be said too which is that this mother who's trying to surveil also feels it's her job
00:43:02.100 to be both mother and worker at once at some level and we know that's a double bind right
00:43:08.120 Like, you actually can't watch a stream and do your job at the same time, per se.
00:43:13.460 And so I also think, like, that's, again, one of the symptoms of the kind of mother media thing, which is, like, she's supposed to be everywhere at once.
00:43:20.600 Or we have a sociologist who coined the term, like, always on mothering.
00:43:24.560 Well, what if half, you know, eight hours of the day you're at your job and two hours of the day you're in the car going to and from it?
00:43:29.960 For those 10 hours, that always on-ness is, you know, like Arlie Hochschild says, a second shift.
00:43:36.220 but she couldn't imagine those two shifts happening at the same time technology has made
00:43:40.380 that possible right and so you're worse at your job and you're worse at parenting yeah and feel
00:43:45.640 you feel worse at your job and feel worse at your parenting well also you just like have been given
00:43:50.040 too much by society to do and and also it harms the people who are also at their job watching your
00:43:57.600 kids and possibly your kid but again trying to think about like what motivates it is also
00:44:02.980 important to me because it's a kind of obvious pain and fear for that other parent who's also
00:44:08.500 doing something possibly harmful yeah this episode is brought to you by wild alaskan company
00:44:20.300 this is fish season in the pacific northwest and some of it i get wild cut at the market and some
00:44:26.340 of it i get from my freezer from wild alaskan and it tastes really good what did you make i made
00:44:34.080 halibut uh and really simple like just kind of like a a lemon marinade salt and pepper it's all
00:44:41.780 the halibut needs because halibut is so like i don't know robust and lovely tasting with just
00:44:48.140 like an easy marinade and then had it with some grilled asparagus put it on the grill it was
00:44:52.460 perfect it's wonderful yum you grilled the halibut yeah yeah yeah yeah oh that sounds so good i mean 1.00
00:44:58.260 i didn't grill it charlie is the grill master we don't do a lot of gender roles in our house but
00:45:03.140 we do do he is the grill master wild alaskan company is the best way to get wild caught
00:45:08.340 perfectly portioned nutrient-dense seafood delivered directly to your door when you get
00:45:13.120 this box of wild alaskan seafood it comes like there's all of the there's dry ice and then
00:45:18.220 there's these really cool insulated things that at first I was like oh this is so wasteful and
00:45:22.820 then I was like oh it's all recyclable it's amazing there's coho salmon there's halibut like
00:45:27.420 what I had there's cod that you can use for soups and other things that you would use cod for it's
00:45:33.520 all 100% wild caught and never farmed that means there are no antibiotics GMOs or additives just
00:45:39.220 clean real fish that support healthy oceans and fishing communities it's nutrient rich and full
00:45:44.520 of flavor it's frozen off the boat to lock in taste texture and nutrients like omega-3s
00:45:50.120 and it's sustainably sourced that means it's wild caught from alaska and every order supports
00:45:55.240 sustainable harvesting practices your membership delivers flexible shipments expert tips and truly
00:46:01.100 feel-good seafood right now you can try it risk-free with a hundred percent money-back
00:46:05.160 guarantee and if you're not completely satisfied with your first box wild alaskan company will give
00:46:09.600 you a full refund. No questions asked, no risk, just high quality seafood. Not all fish are the
00:46:15.600 same. Get seafood you can trust. Go to wildalaskan.com slash culture for $35 off your first
00:46:22.700 box of premium wild caught seafood. That's wildalaskan.com slash culture for $35 off your
00:46:29.800 first order. Thanks to Wild Alaskan Company for sponsoring this episode.
00:46:34.120 this last question i think brings everything together comes from ashley how have advancements
00:46:44.840 in technology and media impacted parenting instincts my mom will sometimes poke fun at
00:46:49.920 my parenting anxiety when i ask her if she struggled when her kids were little she'll say
00:46:54.240 you just have to do the best you can with what you have i think that is a big generational gap
00:46:59.040 we have the illusion of everything every answer the perfect product the perfect routine it's all
00:47:03.800 out there somewhere and we just have to find it. I don't use Instagram anymore because I can't
00:47:08.140 handle all that advice. There's an overabundance of information regarding both parenting and the
00:47:13.280 terrible things happening in the world. It seems to outpace what previous generations have been
00:47:17.480 exposed to. What are the pros of all that information? What impact is it having on
00:47:22.360 parenting confidence? How do experts imagine these changes in parenting style will impact
00:47:26.760 child development? Where do you want to start with this? There's so much there. I mean, the first
00:47:33.140 thing i wanted to say is about that scene that the question raises between mother and daughter
00:47:39.060 thinking about grandchildren and one thing we see there is that like i'm gonna guess that your
00:47:46.300 mother whether or not literally or it was in the water is a spock person that's what i was just
00:47:52.420 gonna say and so that kind of trust you know spock starts and i i i tarry with this i'm not so sold
00:47:59.080 on it but spock supposedly starts a parenting revolution when he says page one of his best
00:48:04.880 selling book trust yourself you know more than you think and tonally it's a revolution the question
00:48:10.040 is why do you need about 500 pages after you say trust yourself you know more than you think
00:48:14.080 and that's a kind of continuation of a form of scientific mothering that's been rebranded
00:48:19.480 yeah but your mother had a bible right that she was subscribing to that told her to trust herself
00:48:26.380 Again, whether she read it or it was sort of fed to her through the pediatrician or her community, that was kind of the number one.
00:48:33.740 There were competing schools in the 70s, right, but none that had that reach.
00:48:38.100 So if you became an attachment parent early, you know, something had sent you down that mode.
00:48:44.880 Now we have both like what I call in the book neoscientific mothering, which is like I need my child on a nap schedule and the child has to be fed at these hours.
00:48:53.600 And also I'm using, say, something like Wonder Weeks to track development.
00:48:57.740 And I'm using, that's neoscientific mothering.
00:49:00.380 What fills each of those regimens is now no longer given to you by the state.
00:49:05.420 It's left to the individual parent consumer to figure out which thing is the quote unquote
00:49:09.920 truth or the best.
00:49:11.620 That's really difficult.
00:49:12.980 On the other hand, with libidinal, like neolibidinal mothering or the kind of neoattachment parenting
00:49:18.440 stuff, we also see this is the most natural.
00:49:21.100 this is that you know you go with the flow so you can't predict anything so either your life
00:49:27.000 is taken over by a schedule or your life is taken over by no schedule right we can see that these
00:49:32.880 things like end up being these very intense ideals that you know it goes back to that earlier
00:49:38.140 question that women are subjugated by and subjugate themselves to for obvious social
00:49:42.620 political economic reasons so then when we get to like the question of like does the media
00:49:48.800 environment harm or help we know it hurts we know it hurts at the level of health like literally
00:49:55.860 like what should i do about a vaccine schedule like we have people in power who are like no
00:50:02.640 vaccines thank you i mean right like so all of the received wisdom has gone out the window for
00:50:09.720 one example um on the other hand we have you know incredible you know that incredible fantasy you
00:50:16.680 describing the question of if i just get the right thing like anyone who's had a baby i have a friend
00:50:21.620 who has like a six week old right now and she was saying like we just need to get the baby to sleep
00:50:26.820 off a body and i was immediately brought back to like early mally time when like mally wouldn't
00:50:33.060 sleep anywhere but a body and my husband and i called them cups like we started borrowing these
00:50:37.360 little containers for babies from friends who were like i swear this is the thing that got the kid to
00:50:42.220 sleep i swear it was this we finally found one you know through our community where mallie would
00:50:48.320 sleep and we were like oh my god we found the right thing the thing is no algorithm was going
00:50:54.280 to tell us that no every single parent had like so many unused versions of whatever because everyone
00:51:01.220 had been like tragically trying to find the thing that worked with their baby so i think that that
00:51:06.900 if you broaden that out as like a kind of metonym it's like none of these algorithms no matter
00:51:11.920 how intensely pegged they are to our other activities can tell you what's happening in the
00:51:17.800 in the maternal say or the parent child dyad in infancy the least predictable thing i've ever
00:51:24.120 encountered and and so from there right it always is going to feel like a failure i was told this
00:51:30.580 was going to work for me right the problem must be with either me or my baby and i think that's
00:51:36.580 where a lot of that really insidious sort of emotion and reaction comes from because it's
00:51:42.800 you know if it's the thing that's supposed to be the gold standard why doesn't it work for me
00:51:48.240 and then you have the like that older generation that's kind of hovering over you saying like why
00:51:53.280 are you freaking out so much right like that makes it all worse absolutely absolutely it wasn't hard
00:52:01.200 when i was young this worked for us or like we just trusted ourselves and that's a rewriting in
00:52:06.680 some ways of their own experience but it also i think like exacerbates the other discourses that
00:52:11.820 are happening to have your own mother or your mother-in-law or whomever in your life that's
00:52:15.620 that older generation including like the moms the grandmas who stop you in the store like this 0.99
00:52:19.980 happened to me all the time when i was a nanny to like just say shit the idea too that like you are 0.95
00:52:25.120 a vector for everyone else's a medium as you would say for everyone else's like feelings about 0.99
00:52:30.180 parenting, just because you have a child with you is wild. Yeah. And I mean, to that point,
00:52:35.780 I think that, you know, I make this joke in the book when I'm talking about television and
00:52:41.900 surveillance, and actually that twin history, that like, you know, we do harness what I jokingly call
00:52:49.040 the oldest technology, which is peer to peer shame. Yes, you know, and that's like, really true.
00:52:55.660 um but also right the stakes are made out to have been since the 40s so high yeah right like that
00:53:04.060 each of these interactions is so it's so intense for the person offering the advice it's so intense
00:53:09.840 for the person receiving the advice and in part like i think our new media landscape inflames that
00:53:15.940 because it is so hyper fragmented whereas again yes whether it's the grandmother in the store or
00:53:21.640 the question asker's mother it was nine out of ten times spock yeah where do you place like the
00:53:27.800 emily oster style of like data-based parenting where does that go on this well i think that
00:53:35.160 that's a kind of that i would say that that inaugurated the return to a kind of scientific
00:53:39.880 or neo-scientific mothering in the kind of mainstream there are parts of it before it's
00:53:45.380 very fragmented you know so like you have people who are already writing about behavioralism
00:53:50.520 you know and and this is the the course of normative development you have people already
00:53:56.360 sort of pushing again for sleep training because that's again part of this fashion system
00:54:00.640 weaning sleep training yes no is the back and forth once the skirt is short then it goes long
00:54:07.480 right we know this one um but that's Roland Barthes term for it and I think it's really helpful
00:54:12.220 and so I think Oster is like really part of that and then I think you know is pushing for this
00:54:18.520 evidence-based you know and also it has this kind of have a drink don't have a drink eat the cheese
00:54:25.100 don't eat the cheese and so it it isn't hyper prescriptive in a way and it's saying basically
00:54:31.420 the entire industry of advice is bunk that's also a move that's been done for about 60 years right 0.99
00:54:37.780 buy my book because the rest of the books are stupid because they sort of inflame these fears 0.98
00:54:42.860 and so I think Auster got held up for middle class upper middle class especially white parents is a 0.99
00:54:48.140 kind of hero and then i think that that reception history is now changed by the stuff around school
00:54:54.300 closure and covet 19 but if we look at her emergence with the first book especially
00:54:59.580 it was like kind of uh much less than on the spock level but a kind of micro revolt um but i think
00:55:07.240 in the scientific mothering direction even as it's like do what you want it's through that
00:55:13.720 evidence base so in some ways we might say it's like the marriage of scientific mothering
00:55:18.100 and libidinal mothering. So earlier in the conversation, you teased two things that I feel
00:55:23.340 like if we don't talk about them, people in the comments are going to say, I want to hear about
00:55:28.260 this. So I'm wondering if we can retouch, if we can go back just quickly and talk a little bit
00:55:34.080 about them. And we can take this into whatever direction feels interesting to you. But one thing
00:55:39.520 that you mentioned was how vaccines figure into all of this, right? And I know we said a little
00:55:45.600 bit about this with like the idea of like how this fits into this regimen of um of scientific
00:55:50.680 parenting or rejection of scientific parenting but also how like fears about autism and where
00:55:56.360 autism comes from in terms of parenting how that figures into this as well so i'm wondering if we
00:56:02.500 can connect those dots a little totally and in a way they're the same thing i mean so one thing
00:56:07.860 that dr spock sets up you know and like perhaps i could have stressed this more in the book is
00:56:13.520 once you're at trust yourself you know more than you think and you're in a hyper fragmentary
00:56:19.160 landscape yeah um doing what's right for oneself automatically takes you out of collectively
00:56:26.800 minded thought vaccines require collectively minded thought to work right right right it
00:56:32.120 actually doesn't matter whether or not your kid my kid is vaccinated if 90 of the class isn't
00:56:38.680 we need to reach a threshold and the percentage number is different for each disease being
00:56:43.980 inoculated against each each virus but we saw that with like you know covid 19 vaccines but
00:56:50.720 it's also true of measles it's it's true of polio so we we are seeing right this return to measles
00:56:56.500 outbreaks etc so at the end of the book i knew i didn't really want to tarry too much with covid
00:57:01.620 19 parenting um the book is you know historical that touches into the present to give readers a
00:57:07.860 sense of how this is playing out in their contemporary lives. But the emphasis is on
00:57:11.740 providing the backstory to better assess the kinds of ideologies that attach to parenting advice,
00:57:17.760 particularly about media. So the example I chose is from a Waldorf school that, you know, is really
00:57:25.520 invested in no vaccines and these other forms of self care. And I try and detail the history of
00:57:32.460 Waldorf, which has a very particular like emergence in a kind of proto fascist pre
00:57:36.800 nazification moment that really takes on a kind of individualized health um almost like a christian
00:57:44.900 double predestination sort of thing where you're are you either gonna be healthy or you're not
00:57:49.840 like it has all these components of like eventually kind of occult nazi magic stuff
00:57:56.820 and it comes to us and it does really well it does really well with a broad set of parents
00:58:02.500 who would identify as interested in all kinds of self-improvement so often through the hippie
00:58:09.120 legacy the esalen legacy the s legacy who would maybe code in another moment as progressive or
00:58:15.800 left but begin to really drift far right on questions of individuality versus collective
00:58:21.400 kind of thought so that's like one piece of the story the other is like so autism question mark
00:58:26.480 right like so one of the things that's really important in the book is to give a disability
00:58:30.540 studies account of this kind of double punishment of moms and children but focusing on the children
00:58:35.740 and one thing that I sort of just try and walk people through is that once we identify autism 0.69
00:58:42.000 is only coming from others who are again middle class white and educated and they are frigid they
00:58:50.020 are cold the refrigerator mother thing comes from Bruno Bettelheim's misremembering of the sort of
00:58:55.700 american he was from vienna but like the american idea of autism leo canner um and for a deep dive
00:59:02.920 on this i did a podcast called this guy sucks about leo canner but basically in brief and it's
00:59:08.440 a great podcast people should check it out too but like to cross refer but of course like leo
00:59:13.760 canner calls it the icebox baby it starts with the baby who won't defrost and then when we get
00:59:19.600 to screens, right? There's this panic that screens are causing autism and parallel to one about
00:59:25.480 vaccines causing autism. And they're all in the same line and language. They're often sharing
00:59:31.220 almost verbatim the same language as the mother causing autism. Wow. And so it's looking at that
00:59:37.600 slippage of cause and effect that are all about a kind of purity, like giving the right message
00:59:43.480 to children, whether it's the mRNA message, whether it's the screen message, or it's the
00:59:49.220 maternal media message. And that's where the book kind of ends and tries to bring all the threads
00:59:55.600 together. That is to say that there is a panic about purity, about contagion that underlies
01:00:01.300 whether it's the nanny, or the television, the iPad, the vaccine, the mother herself.
01:00:08.140 And that in fact, that investment in purity, that absolute deep social panic about purity,
01:00:13.840 right is very in line with these kind of proto-ficistic ways of thinking and we live in
01:00:18.940 the aftermath of that story yeah and the quote-unquote panic goes by different guise but
01:00:24.880 of course it's just at its core it has the same ableism repeated refragmented re-articulated over
01:00:31.460 and over and over again yeah hannah thank you so much for coming on the show this is everything
01:00:37.720 that i imagined and more if people want to find more from you on the internet where can they find
01:00:43.300 you they can find me at zevin.org z-e-a-v-i-n and i'm on twitter and instagram um and i'd be happy
01:00:52.360 to keep talking and thank you so much it was these were amazing questions i couldn't believe
01:00:57.120 it thank you so so much yes thank you to all of our listeners you give us the best questions
01:01:03.340 thanks for listening to the culture study podcast be sure to subscribe wherever you
01:01:10.480 get your podcast because we have so many great episodes in the works and i promise that you do
01:01:14.900 not want to miss any of them if you want to suggest a topic ask a question about the culture
01:01:19.540 that surrounds you or submit a question for our subscriber only advice time segment go to our
01:01:24.660 google form at tinyurl.com slash culture study pod or check the show notes for our link if you
01:01:31.120 want to support the show and get bonus content this week's is really good head to culture
01:01:35.940 studypod.substack.com, I give Melody a huge pep talk on summer gardening. It's five bucks a month 0.85
01:01:41.920 or $50 a year, and you'll get ad-free episodes, the exclusive advice time segment, and weekly
01:01:47.660 discussion threads for each episode. These have gotten really good lately, so highly recommend.
01:01:52.640 The Culture Study Podcast is produced by me, Anne Helen Peterson, and Melody Rowell. Our music is by
01:01:57.600 Ponnington Bear. You can find me on Instagram at Anne Helen Peterson, Melody at Melodias47,
01:02:03.060 and the show at Culture Study Pod.
01:02:05.940 Thank you.