Culture Study Podcast - June 17, 2026


RF Kuang Answers Your Questions About Dark Academia

Topics
Intergenerational Friendships Rule What Made Our Boomer Moms... Like This?

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 7 minutes

Words per minute

164.02

Word count

11,057

Sentence count

413

Harmful content

Misogyny

1

sentences flagged

Toxicity

4

sentences flagged

Hate speech

9

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 this is the culture study podcast and i'm ann helen peterson and i'm rebecca kwong i write as
00:00:17.100 rf kwong i'm the author of the popular trilogy babble yellow face catavasis and the forthcoming
00:00:23.200 Taipei story. Melody sent me a very exciting announcement this morning because between when
00:00:29.660 we like first reached out to ask if you'd record and now you've announced, I mean, you kind of had
00:00:35.420 announced it before, but you officially announced your next book. So can you tell us a little bit
00:00:40.620 about Taipei story? Yes, I'm so excited about it. It's a coming of age novel about a college
00:00:48.440 freshman named Lily who is studying abroad in Taipei doing an immersive language program and
00:00:54.200 she's studying Chinese to reconnect with her extended family when her grandfather
00:00:58.780 unexpectedly passes away. And it's personal because I was in Taipei doing an immersive
00:01:05.160 language program a couple years ago when my grandfather suddenly passed away. So it was my
00:01:11.200 way of dealing with that grief and that sense of just waiting too late to have a proper conversation
00:01:19.380 with him about who he was and where he had come from because I wanted to wait until I was the
00:01:25.280 perfect subject in Chinese instead of feeling so inadequate and awkward but I waited too long and
00:01:33.340 now I never get to have those conversations so you know it goes back to my favorite themes of
00:01:40.460 language and translation and diaspora, but it's really lingering in that sticky and comfortable
00:01:47.020 middle space and between fluency and inadequacy. And it's asking, you know, aside from those
00:01:53.180 feelings of shame and alienation, is there something lovely or at least funny that can
00:01:58.900 come out of those encounters as well? Yes. I always tell people, like when I used to teach
00:02:05.280 film studies, I used to have my students oftentimes interview their grandparents about the movies
00:02:10.200 that they watched because it became a way to actually talk about like what it was like for
00:02:15.300 them to be children what it was like for them to be teens like just that structure of an interview
00:02:20.340 a forced interview was really useful in that way that's such a cool project I know I loved it and
00:02:27.840 also I love classic Hollywood so it was always like look like the way that you feel about this
00:02:32.840 contemporary star like these stars that we're learning about in class this is how your
00:02:37.000 grandparents felt about like Greta Garbo or whoever? Yeah, I love classic Hollywood as well.
00:02:43.980 And I'm always stunned by how my parents can quote the exact same scenes that I gravitate to.
00:02:51.000 Wow. My husband recently got a job in England. So we're moving to London. You know, it's going
00:02:58.120 to be a slow transition, but we're going to be British. And there's the scene in Casablanca
00:03:03.260 where this older couple is talking about how they're excited to go to America.
00:03:07.340 And they're like, my wife and I are only speaking English with each other
00:03:11.420 so that when we get to America, we will feel right at home.
00:03:14.620 What watch?
00:03:15.660 Nine watch.
00:03:16.860 Such watch.
00:03:18.160 And when I just said the words Casablanca
00:03:21.740 in reference to us speaking in British English with one another,
00:03:25.440 my parents were immediately like, such watch.
00:03:28.260 And I was like, oh my God.
00:03:30.260 We're on the exact same cultural wavelength.
00:03:32.440 this is really cool totally okay so we're going to talk all about the larger realm of what people
00:03:39.180 call dark academia but we're also going to talk specifically about your work in relation to it
00:03:44.020 and we're going to make our way through we have some excellent listener questions but I think
00:03:49.480 first we should talk a little bit about the two of your books that are often shelved under that
00:03:56.020 designation of dark academia, or we could say historical fantasy. Babel is set in Oxford and
00:04:03.460 I've been practicing. Katabasis is at Cambridge. In my head, I always pronounced it Katabasis,
00:04:10.480 like Calabasas or something horrible, but Melody has been coaching me. Katabasis. So when people
00:04:16.480 like meet you and they're like, oh, you write books, what are they about? Like, how do you
00:04:21.080 describe what these books are about to people in the elevator pitch version of it oh gosh i actually
00:04:28.400 have a really hard time answering the question what are your books about because i try i mean
00:04:33.780 i try so hard to completely reinvent myself in between genres and projects so um i think some
00:04:40.880 people are still shocked that the same person wrote yellow face um i think they don't belong
00:04:46.180 anywhere near each other in a bookstore. So I always blank on this question, but I do think
00:04:53.240 Babel and Katavasis form a nice little duology because they are both speaking to basically
00:05:02.460 everything that is broken about higher education and colleges and universities. And the way I
00:05:10.720 think about it is Babel does the big bird's eye view, socio historical critique, that's really
00:05:17.700 looking at the long history of universities and their complicity, and not just complicity,
00:05:24.340 but active participation in systems of colonialism and slavery and imperialism. So it crosses
00:05:31.500 continents, it has a wide cast of characters, and it's really making this structural argument
00:05:36.880 about the capitalist and imperialist foundations of the universities that we still idealize.
00:05:45.120 And on the flip side, katavasis is an interpersonal critique. So rather than a cast of dozens of
00:05:50.840 characters, it's really a triangle between Alice and Peter and Professor Grimes. And it's looking
00:05:57.440 at the dynamics, like romantic and otherwise, that form between rival students and students
00:06:05.760 and their teachers. So it is like a really zoomed in psychological portrait of just what being in
00:06:14.920 that pressure cooker environment does to you, how it draws out the worst in people, but also creates
00:06:21.120 opportunities for friendship and more than that. So yeah, one is zoomed out and one is zoomed in,
00:06:30.860 But they're all about how doing a PhD is one of the worst decisions you can make.
00:06:38.140 I had the pleasure of being able to read them like right after one another and really like see how they build on one another in a duology sense.
00:06:46.000 like obviously no no carryover in terms of characters but to me catabasis really hit me
00:06:53.260 where it hurt in terms of like touch the sensitive parts like all of the bruised parts in terms of
00:06:58.340 like um so much of like the emotional investment in academia and both of them though are so effective
00:07:05.520 in like bewitching you and then also turning things on their side like you get drawn into
00:07:11.720 like the systems so much like the the rest of academia um we're going to talk about this so
00:07:17.720 much more so i would love though before we even start a lot of the questions that we got or that
00:07:23.460 we received were before we like specifically said that you are going to be our guest for this
00:07:29.160 episode on dark academia so some of them are just thinking about the genre largely like at large
00:07:34.660 and it's lack of critique of some of these structures and i love that like we get to be
00:07:40.660 Like, oh, actually, there's such great interrogation that's happening.
00:07:44.700 But before we get to that, do you think of yourself as someone like, does that feel like a genre home or do you feel more like outside of that?
00:07:54.420 I'm like agnostic about genre.
00:07:56.940 I'm happy for other people to classify my books however they want if it brings in an audience that otherwise wouldn't have been interested.
00:08:07.420 So I don't mind either way when people call my books dark academia, but I don't think of it as
00:08:12.620 a home. And I certainly don't build a literary identity around it, in part because I'm sort of
00:08:18.640 confused what dark academia even is. I have a lot of working definitions and we can talk through
00:08:24.140 them. And I think some are more useful than others and some are more charitable than others.
00:08:28.880 But otherwise, I think the overlap here is that so far, I have tended to write about students in institutions where they don't belong. I write about outsiders navigating power structures where they are at severe disadvantages.
00:08:47.040 um and because i think i'm a curious person who likes jumping down rabbit holes i end up writing
00:08:54.200 characters who are very passionate about knowledge and research and discovery and i think these are
00:08:59.600 all traits of a dark academia book so i'm happy to share that category um yeah as for the term
00:09:06.040 with capitals i think that's very fraught and right i know it's much more born of tiktok than
00:09:11.660 of like what is actually happening in the book.
00:09:20.460 The Culture Study Podcast is sponsored by Gooder.
00:09:23.620 This entire past weekend,
00:09:25.320 I don't think my Gooders came off my face.
00:09:27.860 I went with my mom and my brother
00:09:29.840 to go see Bonnie Raitt, who was amazing.
00:09:33.940 It was for my mom's 70th birthday
00:09:35.580 and before we went out to dinner
00:09:36.920 and that hot afternoon sun was coming down
00:09:40.040 And I was like, thank God I have my gutters, which no matter how much I sweat, no matter
00:09:44.400 how much I walk, no matter how intensely I garden, no matter how many miles I run, I
00:09:51.140 also ran 15 miles that day wearing my gutters.
00:09:54.240 They are perfect.
00:09:55.660 I don't understand how they so effectively work this transition between like athletic
00:10:01.800 outdoors gardening gear.
00:10:04.300 And they also look fashionable.
00:10:06.200 ball. I have the OG and it's white frames and then like a blue tent. And I get so many compliments.
00:10:13.140 Gooders have no slip technology. They are no bounce. This is so crucial. They are all polarized.
00:10:19.880 So glare reducing and they have UV 400 protection, which block a hundred percent of harmful UVA and
00:10:25.480 UVB rays. This is the one thing that my eye doctor told me when I came in the other day,
00:10:29.900 he was like, your eyes are fantastic. Your prescription, you know, I wear contacts. It's
00:10:33.980 It's not changing, great.
00:10:35.740 No signs of anything bad.
00:10:37.780 Just try and wear sunglasses even more.
00:10:40.740 And Gooders makes that possible.
00:10:42.540 And they come in so many colors.
00:10:45.020 Any feeling that you have,
00:10:46.940 like you can find a pair of Gooders to go with it.
00:10:49.660 And the price point is really great too,
00:10:51.880 because if for some reason you do lose them,
00:10:55.160 they are not at the price point
00:10:56.480 that you like feel horrible all day,
00:10:58.800 because I have done that before.
00:11:00.460 So if you are also ready to upgrade your eyewear
00:11:02.940 to something that is functional, super cool, really fun, really useful, affordable, better
00:11:09.360 for your eyes, head to gooder.com slash culture to claim $10 off your first order. That's
00:11:16.120 g-o-o-d-r.com slash culture. Support for today's episode comes from One Skin. Melody, you're
00:11:23.680 looking at my face right now. Doesn't it look like very even? It's so even. It's, you're
00:11:28.700 glowing, you're dewy, you're moisturized. Well, I'm using three one skin products right now.
00:11:35.240 Oh. So I have the original, just like the lotion that I use every single day. And then I have the
00:11:41.920 under eye cream, which I just put on to like feel a little bit more alive. And then I'm so excited
00:11:47.260 about it. I have the new OS1 broad spectrum SPF that comes in a slight tint. I have the light
00:11:54.600 medium and it goes on so smoothly and i mean i don't wear foundation forget about it but i do
00:12:02.180 like to wear a tinted sunscreen and this is one of my faves so the unifying property of all of
00:12:08.240 these products is the os1 one skin's proprietary peptide it's the very first ingredient proven to
00:12:14.080 switch off those damaged senescent cells actually slowing skin aging directly at the source one skin's
00:12:20.320 results are backed by four peer-reviewed clinical studies, over 10,000 five-star reviews, and they've
00:12:25.120 been recognized by Bloomberg as a leader in skin longevity. You really do not need a complicated
00:12:29.920 routine to get healthier, younger-looking skin that's also protected from the sun. Born from
00:12:34.720 over a decade of longevity research, OneSkin's OS1 peptide is proven to target the visible signs
00:12:39.940 of aging, helping you unlock your healthiest skin now and as you age. And for a limited time,
00:12:45.240 at try OneSkin with 15% off using code CULTURE at oneskin.co slash culture. That's 15% off
00:12:52.320 oneskin.co with code CULTURE. After you purchase, they'll ask you where you heard about them.
00:12:57.860 Please support our show and tell them that we sent you.
00:13:05.680 So let's start with our first question. It comes from Marie.
00:13:10.020 I have a question about dark academia and the question is, why now? Is it just a pandemic when
00:13:16.380 students couldn't be on campus so the fantasy of studying in libraries while wearing sophisticated
00:13:21.300 outfits was ever more tempting? I feel like there must be more to it and it is certainly related to
00:13:27.160 how classy the whole aesthetics is. It is also probably related to TikTok which made the secret
00:13:32.640 history hit again. I would just generally love to hear your thoughts as to why this particle trend
00:13:37.540 emerged and keeps persisting at this particular moment in time. This is super interesting to me
00:13:42.940 because I do think like oftentimes we fetishize current things from our past when those things
00:13:49.680 or those institutions are under threat. So how do you think about it? Oh, that's an interesting
00:13:55.280 theory. My gut instinct was just to deny the premise. I don't think that an interest in dark
00:14:03.760 academia is anything new i mean as the um person who asked the question mentioned the secret
00:14:10.420 history has been out for um what at least two decades now and it was very popular when it
00:14:17.020 first came out um and i think uh i think a more capacious or sister genre under which
00:14:24.520 either a sister genre or the genre that encompasses dark academia i think campus novels
00:14:29.700 those have been popular like for the whole past century um i do think there's also a bit of a
00:14:36.020 harry potter effect i think harry potter made the idea of the boarding school and the specific
00:14:42.520 social structure of the boarding school where you're in an isolated environment everybody
00:14:47.200 speaks in twee english accents you're away from home um and the entire social structure is um
00:14:55.240 or you know the pecking order is restricted to like who's in what house and literally how many
00:15:01.240 points do you get and who's cool and popular and rich and who has a scar on their forehead
00:15:06.660 I think you know that is so embedded in cultural memory um like fan fiction based on Harry Potter
00:15:15.840 is still very popular and becoming bestsellers now so I think that has fed some of the craving for
00:15:23.600 any fantasy milieu that has that very regimented um social structure so i think like as a literary
00:15:34.320 genre it's always been popular and i think will remain popular um as long as we're interested in
00:15:40.460 teenagers being nasty to each other well and also like the this the moral legibility of of a text
00:15:47.640 like harry potter of like okay you're actually sorted into houses right you have this like very
00:15:54.840 clear understanding of like who you are what you're good at what your fate is almost and then
00:16:02.340 also like a very clear like a not very subtle delineation between good and evil and i think
00:16:09.300 that the successful dark academia or campus novels interrogate that idea yeah i think you're
00:16:17.940 right but i do think like this idea there's also you know whether whether it's the the aesthetic
00:16:22.720 that's popular like as like a teens adopting aesthetics you know like we're gonna dress
00:16:27.960 essentially like wrong gossip girl um like it's just like you know trend cycling through like
00:16:34.120 you know clueless like uh i don't know heathers like from the 80s like there's always been these
00:16:41.080 moments where people are like what if i dress like a rich person what does that look like
00:16:45.060 yeah i i mean i'm personally just extremely offline so i'm super duper the wrong person
00:16:52.260 to ask about like when did the dark academia tiktok aesthetic take off and what that encompasses
00:16:58.820 and why um when i was touring for babble i was getting a lot of secondhand accounts of it and
00:17:06.040 obviously seeing some of this content because i was being tagged it and i was largely just confused
00:17:11.340 because uh like i i personally i really don't like that fashion style um at oxford it's called
00:17:20.500 subfusk i don't know what that stands for um the sort of black skirt and leather black pumps
00:17:28.200 and white shirt and the black ribbon bow.
00:17:32.440 I mean, that is the uniform that we had to wear
00:17:35.100 for matriculation.
00:17:37.260 Oh, for debate, yes.
00:17:38.320 I was just thinking of debate.
00:17:39.500 For matriculation and to take our exams.
00:17:42.760 And I don't know if you've ever taken an exam in tights,
00:17:46.520 but I had to poop the whole time.
00:17:48.300 I felt like I had to poop the whole time
00:17:51.660 because my tights were so tight.
00:17:52.900 And I was like, it's actually criminal
00:17:55.240 that I'm sitting here for three hours
00:17:56.960 and this deeply uncomfortable skirt um so that's like how i feel about some fuss but i guess
00:18:02.440 everybody else thinks it's really cute or whatever it does remind me of this like professionalization
00:18:08.640 right like as a costume almost that you put on that you immediately like that you take off
00:18:14.620 and in babel like the robes become this really fascinating like way that that gender can 0.91
00:18:24.080 disappear but race can't because for the robes you can hide some of like the way that your your
00:18:28.920 your body looks and you can cut your hair and you can fit in or somewhat you can fit in
00:18:34.460 regardless of gender but the the race remains a tell so babble's funny on gender in that
00:18:42.840 yeah it was my first time writing a fairly misogynistic main character uh it was also
00:18:49.340 the first time i wrote um from the perspective of a protagonist who was not a woman um i really
00:18:55.840 wanted to try out the subject position of a young man um from china in england in the 1830s and
00:19:04.740 and robin is just kind of sexist because he doesn't frankly he doesn't know any better he is
00:19:10.080 not grown up around any women all the women that he's encountered are in very servile roles um he
00:19:17.340 doesn't know any women scholars like he's like I mean he's got his own issues around sexuality but
00:19:23.380 he's just like he doesn't know what women are um and when he finally meets Leti and Victoire
00:19:29.960 at um orientation he's like sort of bamboozled by them and then he and Rummy like they very
00:19:36.760 much do go on to form their little boys club um where they're just totally blind to what the girls
00:19:43.520 are going through and there's a point in the book where the girls explain like we can't even check
00:19:48.500 books out of the library without a man being there to to vouch for us and guarantee that
00:19:54.560 like we won't steal all these texts it's very hard for us to move around this institution
00:20:00.080 um so i don't think that gender really disappears in the academy if anything katavasis is about
00:20:07.240 how the myth that if you're just smart enough, if you can just hang with the boys, if you just
00:20:14.220 pretend that actually you're not a woman, that mentality has actually been really damaging to
00:20:21.000 young women, especially in the STEM fields, because it feels like you're trying, you're
00:20:26.220 the tortoise racing Achilles, like you're running an impossible race. And like this on paper gender 1.00
00:20:33.860 equity has actually been really bad for our ability to have conversations about solidarity
00:20:40.120 and ways in which like women continue to need support systems within the academy so
00:20:44.340 absolutely i realize i'm just sitting here like denying the premise of all your questions
00:20:50.240 no well this is the thing is that some of these also were written referring to like a much larger
00:20:56.100 perception and this is what this show is for is to like think about okay like is this what's
00:21:01.300 happening? How do we build on what we might perceive is happening? How does someone who is
00:21:05.980 writing books that are filed or put into this designation, how do they think about that?
00:21:13.120 This next question, I think, will help us build on it even more. This one comes from Carolyn.
00:21:17.840 I think it's interesting that all the Pinterest boards show libraries with heavy leather-bound
00:21:23.060 books, while students now actually work on their iPads in actual libraries that are
00:21:29.380 solarless glass and steel buildings. So in my opinion, there is a desire for metreality
00:21:35.160 in these Pinterest boards, like the smell of coffee, the touch of wool sweaters,
00:21:40.700 the paper obsession. So my question is, what does it say about the reality gap between uni today?
00:21:48.520 Congrats to acing all your exams. Here are exactly no jobs, and you will never need the
00:21:53.000 study methods you have acquired so hard in any of the circumstances, because all you ever use
00:21:58.000 as Microsoft Teams, and the idea of what academia is like and what rewards it holds for, of course,
00:22:05.520 all the clever, diligent girlies. Why are we romanticizing certain aspects of academia while
00:22:12.260 real academia is like actually dark in the sense that only psychopaths, workaholics,
00:22:17.280 and people with a rich parent backup are able to survive it?
00:22:23.020 This, I will just say that there are a lot of ex-academics or people who have
00:22:26.480 complicated relationships with academia in our audience so there might be some of this coming
00:22:31.460 through but I this this fascination with the materiality and you know like I know I've read
00:22:38.460 some of your interviews where you talk about like the the fantasy of like just being a brain
00:22:43.440 essentially yeah like what that would be like right and I think you know this is there's the
00:22:50.100 materiality of like coffee or wool sweaters but there's also like this fantasy of like just being
00:22:55.240 a brain who doesn't have to deal with digital technology who doesn't have to think about these
00:23:02.740 like podcasts or like social media all of these things what would that look like and is it the
00:23:08.860 1830s not really but how where does this lead you I guess oh my gosh there's so much to unpack here
00:23:16.480 I think that is a that was a very good question um and I think it's actually two questions in
00:23:23.720 one Frankenstein suit. One is about the materiality aspect, which I have a lot of
00:23:28.560 thoughts on. And the other is just the classic question about dark academia and elitism and 0.58
00:23:35.760 privilege. But on the materiality issue, I find this so fascinating because I think my time in
00:23:45.220 between being an undergrad and now nearing the end of the PhD was exactly that transition period
00:23:52.080 when people were moving away from blue books and away from physically being in the stacks towards
00:23:58.280 this sort of totally digital form of scholarship. And a conversation I was having with some friends
00:24:07.380 recently was, when's the last time you physically went into the stacks to look up a text that you
00:24:14.000 needed for a research project? Because when I was an undergrad, I basically lived in the stacks
00:24:20.160 Every time I needed a text, I would get the call number.
00:24:24.620 I was well-trained in how to navigate the stacks and find things according to the call number.
00:24:30.400 And I wasn't special.
00:24:31.760 Every other undergrad was able to do this.
00:24:34.580 And I ended up enjoying a lot of what one of my professors called horizontal serendipity,
00:24:42.480 where you find not just the book that you're looking for, but all the books that you weren't
00:24:48.160 looking for.
00:24:48.960 everything clustered around the same subject matter or even things on totally irrelevant
00:24:55.700 subject matters, but you just happen to stumble into because you confuse an M for an N. I found
00:25:03.100 like so much. No, I always walked out with like far more texts than I thought I needed.
00:25:13.000 And that was just part of doing research for me, sitting down, like it was largely
00:25:17.940 off the screen, right? I was there with a notebook, taking reading notes and writing down
00:25:24.280 citations. And I, you know, I do like Asian literature. So there was also a lot of like
00:25:31.760 scratched out translations and flipping through dictionaries and it was so tactile. And as I got
00:25:40.620 deeper into my academic career, there were more and more tools that made this unnecessary. First,
00:25:47.360 it just became a trend that you can request the book you're looking for and the staff at the
00:25:54.360 library will have it for you often within the hour. And I grew like really lazy about this
00:26:00.700 in my early years at Yale. Like I was always going to the hold shelves and there are always
00:26:05.840 like five, six, seven books like sitting there with my name on it. And I mean, that just saves
00:26:11.640 like hours of your time, right? But it also means that you don't know what the belly of the stats
00:26:16.840 look like. You're not discovering books by chance anymore. And I think we also grew more reliant on
00:26:23.160 online research encyclopedias and dictionaries. And in important ways, like this is good for
00:26:29.220 scholarship. It exposes you to a larger range of material. It helps you do your research faster.
00:26:35.060 It helps you to be more thorough. I don't think anybody would argue that it was easier back then
00:26:40.380 to be a researcher than it is now. But you're also missing out on those special connections
00:26:46.700 when when you are off the screen um and and you mentioned like the fantasy of being a total
00:26:55.740 floating brain that doesn't have to deal with the baggage of the body or any bulky stuff but
00:27:02.040 i also think we're in an era where everybody's realizing like being that floating brain kind of 0.53
00:27:07.060 sucks totally being online all that time sucks like everybody wants to touch grass now everybody
00:27:12.320 has screen fatigue. Everybody is tired of being this disembodied persona with no real human 0.99
00:27:18.280 connection. So I was talking to some colleagues just yesterday about how no phone policies in
00:27:26.180 seminar rooms are much easier now to enforce with undergrads than they were even a couple years ago
00:27:32.580 because I think my undergrads are sick and tired of being on their phones all the time. They are
00:27:37.020 craving that human connection, they really want that excuse to disengage from the web and just
00:27:43.840 sit around the seminar room and, you know, flip pens in their hands and look at one another
00:27:49.140 in the face. So I think some of the romanticization of that earlier, like material
00:27:56.460 tactile period is not necessarily a fetish for a bad thing. Like it's good to be embodied. It's
00:28:03.340 good to wander in the stacks. It's good to slowly flip through a library and discover things you
00:28:09.040 didn't know you were looking for. I think about this all the time. My period in my research
00:28:14.940 was right before total mass digitization. So a lot of my primary texts were all on microfiche,
00:28:21.480 were all in like dusty old magazines that I would order off eBay. Like my research was so much
00:28:27.640 stronger because of the random things that I found around flipping through those pages,
00:28:32.720 right looking at the ad next to the piece like looking at even like some of the magazines you
00:28:38.680 know were owned by teens who like bought a movie magazine in the 1940s like what like what little
00:28:44.480 marginalia did they put in there that gives you so much sense of reception oh my gosh and finding
00:28:51.040 somebody else's handwriting in a book that you're consulting and thinking about somebody else's
00:28:56.360 research project yes i mean i want to talk about as by its possession but something i'd love to
00:29:02.700 forever I just made Melody read it I made her read it I was like Melody I've read this book
00:29:08.220 five times you should go read it and shoot Melody did you like it the whole time I was reading it
00:29:14.080 I was like I may not be smart enough for this and then when I finished it I was like well I can 0.81
00:29:18.460 understand that that was like a feat and then it was like the next day that I was like that was
00:29:23.660 amazing like it just had to kind of like settle in yeah yeah it's gorgeous I would love to write
00:29:30.700 book someday that is just comments in the margins traded between two people um talking about some
00:29:39.240 central text but speaking of unexpected discoveries I picked up my copy of possession
00:29:44.400 um at a used bookstore in New Haven a couple years ago um and it's the sort of bookstore where
00:29:50.180 everybody departing from campus yeah um like leaves all their books when they go so you find
00:29:55.880 like amazing stuff and I opened it and out fell a press clipping from 1996 um which I think is
00:30:04.420 the year that the book came out that contained a review of the book so I think that was the first
00:30:09.500 no it is the first edition and somebody cared enough to include the review and I was like oh
00:30:14.360 my god so that's lovely and that's what's lost and I think about this too with a lot of
00:30:19.500 tension that i think undergrads people of all ages are feeling with ai use and how to like what
00:30:28.380 what governors can i put on the ability to do as more like to completely optimize the amount of
00:30:35.120 work the amount of research that i can incorporate like because i think what we're realizing too is
00:30:40.280 that sometimes researching more reading more having access to everything does not necessarily
00:30:45.360 produce better research or better thinking it produces more of it more writing but is that
00:30:52.900 better writing is like what are the what are the standards in academia become I think like as we've
00:30:58.760 accelerated what you can theoretically produce as an academic we've also accelerated what you must
00:31:05.240 as an academic produce yeah I mean don't get me started on the AI in the classroom conversation
00:31:11.660 it is such a headache. I know, right? I am preparing this keynote that I'm giving in
00:31:18.820 Cleveland on Thursday. And the topic is the beauty of writer's block and the magic of writer's
00:31:25.160 block. And the whole talk is framed as a response to the promise of AI assisted creative writing
00:31:31.880 tools, which is that you just get to dream and do the fun part of writing and the hard part will be
00:31:37.920 resolved. And my whole talk is a defense of the hard part. And I'm arguing that it's in those
00:31:44.400 gaps when you don't know the right word, you don't know what you think, and you're confused by
00:31:49.800 yourself, you're confused by the world. Those are the most generative moments. Those are the moments
00:31:54.320 when we reach deep down into ourselves and really drag out the words that we're too scared or
00:32:02.600 ashamed or traumatized to admit. And that's often where the strongest writing comes from. So I'm
00:32:10.100 for like being at a loss for words and making the wrong argument and struggling as an academic, 0.99
00:32:17.320 because that's where the interesting thinking happens, as opposed to the slick polish that
00:32:23.280 AI promises, because like, nobody wants that. People want us that are messy and human.
00:32:29.540 do you use your fiction writing as a way to not like do you switch between modes as a way to kind
00:32:38.980 of like get the brain working because I used to find that when I would be writing for a more
00:32:43.360 popular audience it would allow me to process some ideas in a more informal way that maybe
00:32:48.640 would assist with some of my more formal ideas that I was working through for academic stuff
00:32:53.420 But I needed to be able to have like a brief vacation from each thing.
00:33:01.080 Yeah, it's very left brain, right brain for me.
00:33:04.240 I'm very glad to be able to switch between the modes of writing because sometimes I'm like tired of trying to sound profound and interesting.
00:33:13.000 And I just want to write like a very bland, factual statement.
00:33:15.680 And sometimes I'm bored of the bland, factual stuff and I want to make dizzying leaps of logic and rhetorical flourishes.
00:33:22.920 So I'm lucky that I get to vent both. But I do get in trouble with my advisor, because she continues to think that my academic writing is too flamboyant. And sometimes I say things without backing it up, which is true.
00:33:36.780 she's always getting me to slow down and be methodical and really justify every single step
00:33:42.820 and I'm like but in my novels I can just like throw like completely disparate fields of discourse
00:33:49.000 together and like that'll be a beautiful image and obviously doesn't suit the requirements of
00:33:56.680 the dissatisfaction. But you know like a left brain and a right brain make a whole brain
00:34:00.320 and I love that like I can read your fiction and I see the signs of the research like and maybe this
00:34:06.620 I don't think this is exclusively because I was an academic, but like, even in the preamble,
00:34:11.500 I was like, this is a person who is used to people standing up in their conference
00:34:16.060 presentation. What about this? Like, where would those scones be? Like, you know, just like clearing
00:34:23.440 them table. You're like, here, just want to acknowledge these things. And now we're going.
00:34:27.860 But then also, I'm sure in your academic writing, you get those flourishes, you get those leaps.
00:34:33.380 And even if your advisor is trying to make you come back and, like, hone, bring it in a little bit, like, you still have that amazing, like, curiosity of spirit there.
00:34:44.240 I hope so.
00:34:45.640 I guess we'll see.
00:34:46.980 I know.
00:34:48.320 I'm going to have to, like, interlibrary loan your dissertation when it comes out.
00:34:51.700 People always threaten to do that to me.
00:34:53.220 And I'm like, do not do that.
00:34:54.600 Oh, dear God.
00:34:56.760 Or my undergrad thesis, which you can also ILL know.
00:35:01.440 Horrible.
00:35:01.840 Oh, I'm scared to, I hadn't even thought about opening that file, and I'm scared to look.
00:35:08.960 What was the title?
00:35:10.440 I don't even remember. I was writing about, so I was doing history back then, and I was thinking about a war memorial.
00:35:20.060 So I think I wrote three chapters about different forms of commemorating traumatic events and nationalism and keywords like that.
00:35:29.560 But it was so long ago.
00:35:31.580 Mine was about grieving voice in post-9-11 cinema.
00:35:35.840 Wow. Very ambitious.
00:35:38.800 It was also released. So 9-11 is 2001, right? I wrote my thesis in 2002.
00:35:47.760 Oh, my God.
00:35:49.520 Obviously, I was not timed to say anything authoritative about grieving voice in post-9-11 cinema, but you can't tell a 21-year-old anything.
00:36:01.580 the culture study podcast is sponsored by jones road beauty so the other thing that makes me look
00:36:10.240 a little bit shimmery today is that i am wearing my jones road beauty miracle balm it is this
00:36:16.400 perfect size it's like the size of a compact you open it up you just like put your fingers in warm
00:36:21.720 it up a little bit and then you can wear it anywhere that you want a little bit of color
00:36:26.020 just like a little natural color so i put it on my cheeks and it gives me exactly the like
00:36:31.360 cool girl effortless natural look that I'm looking for aka sort of like you're wearing like that
00:36:38.320 you're put together but that you don't actually spend a lot of time on your makeup. Jones Road
00:36:43.800 also just launched a foundation stick for those days when you feel like okay I just want a little
00:36:48.000 bit more coverage I just want things to look a little bit more smooth but I don't want to go
00:36:52.960 back to like a full complicated makeup routine and also who has time for that. The foundation
00:36:58.300 stick is available in 30 shades to match a wide variety of skin tones and it's dermatologist
00:37:03.440 tested and packed with skin loving ingredients like ceramides squaloline and sodium hyaluronate
00:37:09.660 to nourish while you wear it jones road is modern day makeup that's clean strategic and
00:37:15.760 multifunctional for effortless routines for a limited time our listeners are getting a free
00:37:20.660 gift on their first purchase when they use code culture at checkout just head to jones road beauty
00:37:26.340 and use code CULTURE at checkout.
00:37:28.680 After you purchase, they're going to ask you where you heard about them.
00:37:31.440 Please support our show and tell them that we sent you.
00:37:35.240 Today's episode is sponsored by Article.
00:37:37.720 Melody, in the Ask It Anything segment,
00:37:40.860 we talk a little bit about your giant stacks of books
00:37:44.000 that are threatening to overtake your entire workspace.
00:37:48.440 And this is not just a tee-up.
00:37:50.580 You actually have been looking at bookshelves at Article.
00:37:53.640 I have, yeah.
00:37:54.640 I particularly have my eye on the Crosa, K-R-O-S-S-A.
00:38:00.880 It's only two shelves, well, plus a top shelf, so I could put my plants on top of it.
00:38:05.620 Oh, yeah.
00:38:06.120 A couple of shelves.
00:38:07.100 Only 36 inches across.
00:38:08.880 I have the perfect little nook for it.
00:38:11.180 So I am very seriously considering getting it.
00:38:14.940 I have an article bookshelf.
00:38:16.340 I've had it for six years.
00:38:17.900 It's the Caliper.
00:38:19.620 And it's perfect for something that we describe in the Ask in Anything segment,
00:38:23.400 which is like taking hardback books and stacking them beautifully near and by one another in like
00:38:28.680 an artful way just treating books as a piece of art when i got that caliper bookshelf this is just
00:38:34.340 a testament to articles customer service so sometimes especially getting stuff onto the
00:38:39.200 island it's just kind of a rough journey and one of the white shelves came and had this little
00:38:46.060 ding in the corner and i messaged article and immediately they sent a replacement no questions
00:38:53.100 asked no complication just like total replacement and they took away the the one that was dinged so
00:38:59.560 I wasn't responsible for disposing of it and we should say this was before you were a well-known
00:39:04.160 podcast host receiving sponsorship from this is when you were a normal person this is when I was
00:39:10.680 a normal person just buying my article stuff in 2020 so take that as endorsement they have fast
00:39:18.060 affordable shipping and assembly they have support as we've talked about when you need it super
00:39:22.180 straightforward they're really great and they also have a 30-day satisfaction guarantee so you
00:39:27.120 can shop with confidence knowing that if you're not completely in love with your new furniture
00:39:30.580 you can easily return it so if you're in the market for a beautiful new bookcase
00:39:35.960 and any number of different sizes and forms and styles head over to article.com
00:39:42.940 we're gonna go next to this question from kale which talks a little bit about new england and
00:39:54.440 how something like the secret history is a little bit of a skeleton key i'm a big fan of dark
00:40:00.440 academia the secret history is a core text that helped me make sense of new england as a recent
00:40:05.900 transplant but something that i always find myself wondering is what's the actual relationship
00:40:11.240 between dark academia and privilege? Does the genre ultimately reinforce or subvert the oligarchy
00:40:17.540 that we find ourselves living under? Not to be all comrade about it, but I usually steer clear
00:40:22.880 of books, movies, etc. that lionize entrenched structures of class, patriarchy, and privilege.
00:40:28.860 The real world has enough stories already that glorify power and exclusivity. But what is it
00:40:34.960 about dark academia that still draws me in? Is it that protagonists are often outsiders who learn
00:40:40.180 to thrive despite their marginalized status? Is it that reading about the seedy underbelly of
00:40:45.420 vaunted institutions, cults, murders, black magic, cannibalism, gives us a fictional world where they
00:40:51.840 can be understood as fallible? How does dark academia uniquely, though predicated on the
00:40:57.680 existence of a system of elites and plebeians, give readers an outlet to explore their class
00:41:03.280 consciousness? I didn't just pick this because this person said not to be all comrade about it,
00:41:08.760 but I did enjoy that. There's a couple places in your books where I see the characters working
00:41:15.660 through these larger questions of what solidarity looks like. Can you have solidarity that's only
00:41:23.800 based on otherness? How do you actually think about class in relationship to this? All that
00:41:28.140 sort of thing. So where does this question lead you? Yeah, I mean, my thinking about elite
00:41:34.220 institutions has always been guided by this audrey lord essay called learning from the 60s
00:41:40.420 and there's a part of it where she's speaking to um you know like a hypothetical young student
00:41:46.860 at an elite university and she basically says don't make the mistake of thinking your personal
00:41:53.460 success is a victory um if that's all that you set out to achieve then you've just become a token
00:42:00.280 and you're just the lucky one.
00:42:04.400 So you always have to be thinking about
00:42:05.900 what are you doing there?
00:42:07.700 And what is your position at this institution
00:42:10.700 allow you to do in terms of helping your community?
00:42:14.320 What are you taking from it?
00:42:15.840 What are you doing with those resources?
00:42:18.200 And it's an essay that still guides me
00:42:20.600 as I navigate finishing up my PhD
00:42:24.380 and thinking about what my future in academia looks like.
00:42:28.020 Because I know I don't want the kind of traditional tenure track job where I'm only interfacing with like undergraduates who had to jump through a lot of hoops to be there.
00:42:40.600 And I'm always thinking about public facing knowledge sharing and ways in which the academy can open up its gates.
00:42:48.000 So I hear you, comrade.
00:42:50.460 And I'm really glad you asked this question.
00:42:52.820 But to answer the question more directly, I think the appeal of at least some texts in this genre is precisely that they're told from the perspective of outsiders, people who really don't belong in this world.
00:43:07.720 I mean, if you look at the seminal text of this still undefined genre, we're still working without any real definition. Donna Tartt's The Secret History. The protagonist feels kind of lucky that he ended up at this school and he's looking at this click from the outside.
00:43:27.220 he desperately wants to belong. He's studying their codes and mannerisms, and he's imitating
00:43:33.920 them. And he wants to get through to them and feel included. And I think we all have this
00:43:39.860 instinctive desire to be included and acknowledged. And part of it is schadenfreude. And really the
00:43:47.300 same kind of schadenfreude you get from watching Gossip Girl. Is this outsider going to fall flat
00:43:52.260 on their face when they try to succeed. And part of it, I think, is jealousy and this desire to be
00:43:57.820 a part of that society. But again, I have very little patience for the kind of novel where a
00:44:05.480 happy ending looks like successful integration into the school's elites, I think. It's telling
00:44:12.720 that both of my quote-unquote dark academia novels end with all the protagonists leaving
00:44:18.740 the academy, or in fact, the academy leaving the face of this earth. So I'm interested in the
00:44:27.140 protagonists who are really, really conflicted about their position there, who have been sold
00:44:31.840 this illusion their entire lives that they just have to jump through enough hoops that they
00:44:36.680 personally have to prove themselves worthy. And then they get acknowledged and included by the
00:44:43.440 wealthy elites. I like to write stories where they're very troubled by this, and they're looking
00:44:48.480 for a way out, not just to quit and leave entirely, but to ask, what do alternative
00:44:53.460 futures look like? And what do alternate models of the university look like? And I think that's
00:44:58.060 a much more interesting question than how do you get the hot, rich guy to look at you?
00:45:04.360 I think, you know, there's, we got a lot of questions that were basically like,
00:45:09.160 can you set a dark academia plot at a public state institution? And I think so. But I would
00:45:17.460 be interested in your thoughts here like do you need because to me like the public institutions
00:45:21.580 where I've taught they do reproduce the same class dynamics they're not as legible as like
00:45:28.000 this person is paying full tuition this person's grandpa's name is on this building and this person
00:45:34.820 is here in full scholarship but they're still there but maybe it's like too muddled to actually
00:45:39.760 work if you don't have that starkness I think the specific New England private academy association
00:45:45.820 is fascinating to me. And I mean, as a very proud New Englander and Maskell, my first answer is it's
00:45:52.960 just because it's the best up here. We have four seasons, we're cold and underfed, and we're good
00:46:00.140 at clearing out the snow. So why wouldn't like all fantasy settings be up in chilly Massachusetts?
00:46:07.540 But I have a like historical theory, which is just that the earliest academies were in New England,
00:46:13.080 Our oldest universities, which were, and I give this spiel all the time when I'm explaining the inspirations for Babel. These were colleges built by slave owners for the express purposes of kidnapping Native American children and converting them and holding them hostage. 0.78
00:46:29.660 That was not just the unfortunate byproduct, but the stated aim of Harvard and Princeton and the College of William and Mary. So that very ugly history that stretches back to the founding of America that is specifically rooted in New England, which is to deny lots of shady stuff was happening in California as well.
00:46:54.460 Um, I think also as a genre matter, um, well, so one quick anecdote here is I, when I was deciding between PhD programs, I visited Stanford and it was the first time that I'd ever stepped foot on that campus.
00:47:12.160 And I was like, this feels like, like Disneyland, like it's too warm, people are walking, like people are moving in rollerblades and short shorts. And I was very angry about it. I was like, this is not a place for serious people. This is a place where research gets done. Research gets done in a place where you don't want to be outside and you can't see the sun.
00:47:33.160 So I think we have those associations that like, like in a Logan Roy voice, frankly, like the West Coast are not serious people. I'm joking. Obviously, amazing stuff.
00:47:46.440 No, but I do think that, like, I would love to see a dark academia-like novel set at, like, Vanderbilt or Ole Miss or SMU, which you're familiar with from being from Dallas.
00:48:03.000 Like, those are schools where you get also these, like, incredibly rigid understandings of performance of gender and then, like, even more, like, I think noxious and still very present racial dynamics that, like, people pretend don't exist.
00:48:24.780 or even like UT like I mean there's been so much subtext made text in white people suing to get
00:48:31.440 into UT or like suing basically reverse discrimination by not being able to get into
00:48:36.600 UT and that sort of thing but I think like that touches too close and we got to like we'll get to
00:48:42.700 a question a little bit here about like why actually this is a great way to tee up this
00:48:47.020 next question about why you've set your books in the past specifically not yellow face obviously
00:48:52.940 but in the past so let's actually read that and that'll allow us to to segue i have one more thing 1.00
00:48:57.940 to say on the yeah yeah new england west coast divide um i i was thinking about legally blonde
00:49:05.480 and like the really jarring contrast in between uh i ucla someplace like ucla where l is doing
00:49:13.840 her undergrad degree and then harvard for serious people um but i i couldn't agree more i think that
00:49:19.660 there's amazing material to be plumbed at, at state schools and on, you know, other parts of
00:49:25.620 America that I must acknowledge do exist. I think Olive E. Blake's work is actually pretty good on
00:49:32.200 this. There's a lot of critiques of the Greek system in dark academia, but I noticed not many
00:49:38.420 people write books about sororities. And she's just put out a book called Girl Dinner, which is
00:49:43.040 a cannibalism horror in a sorority. It was tons of fun. I think it's a state school as well.
00:49:49.020 So, yeah, I think dark academia outside of Boston could be fascinating.
00:49:55.540 I haven't heard of it, but it could be fascinating.
00:50:00.000 Okay, let's do the second question from Abby.
00:50:03.380 I love Babel and Catawba Seas, and I'm really curious why you set both in the past when they seem to me to be very much about the dynamics in academia now.
00:50:16.020 now. I'm an academic myself, and I'd say I've seen versions of all the abuse and misconduct
00:50:25.760 in Katabasis happen in real life to people that I know, at least all of the non-magical stuff. 0.57
00:50:33.640 And a lot of what happens in Babel also feels more like the academic toxicity of the 21st
00:50:42.060 century than necessarily the 19th century. So I'm wondering, is dark academia a genre that just
00:50:50.380 needs to be set in the past in order to not be a huge bummer? Or would it not work in the present
00:50:56.340 for aesthetic reasons? Oh, I can't wait for your thoughts on this. You can also disagree with the
00:51:01.160 premise of the question. We've established that. So I really got in trouble with my editor when I
00:51:07.580 said I really wanted to write a book set in the 80s because I love period pieces and he was like
00:51:15.540 shut up um so I'm always reminding myself that the 80s is not distant history for everybody in fact
00:51:22.540 that's just when they grew up um but I mean it's true I I love a good historical fantasy um and I
00:51:31.440 was fascinated by the 80s in particular, because I have done so much research into the Cold War
00:51:40.000 and in the shifting dynamics right after America kind of emerges on top as the imperialist power.
00:51:47.740 And I was thinking about the transition from the 60s to the 80s, where you have the civil rights
00:51:55.640 era you have this era of the third world united front you have this like really brief hopeful
00:52:02.580 moment of international solidarity and all of these decolonial movements and a time in which
00:52:10.020 it seemed like self-determination was really possible where a lot of former colonies were
00:52:15.560 throwing off those yokes and establishing their own governments and um international socialism
00:52:21.320 actually seemed like a viable future. And all of that progress and all those dreams were just then
00:52:27.360 violently crushed by the Cold War and the transition into the Reagan era and the rise
00:52:33.540 of neoliberalism in American culture where everyone really buys into this, pull yourself
00:52:39.800 up by your bootstraps. You are the sole author of your future. You can't blame any structural
00:52:45.900 forces. You can't blame discrimination. If you fail, it's not because you're a woman or a
00:52:51.060 minority. It's because you just weren't good enough. And I wanted to see how that shift 0.94
00:52:56.040 happened and how it was reflected in a young woman navigating the academy. So that's why I
00:53:02.380 set Katavasis in 1985. But I think you could easily apply all those same arguments to today.
00:53:11.520 It's just that I had just done a very contemporary novel and yellow faces. I think it's really hard
00:53:17.880 to write about the 2020s without a text being extremely online. And Yellowface was so much 1.00
00:53:25.300 about really how the grammar of social media destroys our ability to relate to each other
00:53:32.400 and kind of destroys our ability to think. And I wanted to think for a bit. I wanted
00:53:37.360 to go analog for a bit. I still really prefer the analog space. So that's why I avoided
00:53:44.700 a contemporary frame and then early 19th century britain like i i know you moved a couple of events
00:53:53.240 around to work for the storyline but like isn't like victoria coronated during the text like it's
00:54:01.260 just such an interesting moment and also like using silver as this magical force that actually
00:54:08.880 functions as like a really beautiful stand-in for both technological advancement
00:54:13.460 also just like extraction broadly um but now i think we can like also think of other things
00:54:22.600 that are serving that function now like the best stuff about our past like also allows us to reflect
00:54:27.540 on our future i love that yeah that's true i i also picked the 1830s because i was feeling
00:54:36.280 really cheeky after I finished the popular trilogy. And I just wanted to insert myself
00:54:41.700 in a canon where I really didn't belong, or I felt there was no space for me. And it seemed like
00:54:46.960 the whitest, stalest space was the Victorians and Victorian pastiche. And it turns out our
00:54:55.720 popular reimagining of early Victorian London is way more white than it was in reality. I mean, 0.84
00:55:04.080 And if you walked along the docks of London in 1832, you would have heard like a dozen different languages and you would have encountered people from all over the world.
00:55:13.400 It was an incredibly cosmopolitan, diverse and changing city.
00:55:18.400 But you watch a period film and like all of that gets erased.
00:55:23.160 So I wanted to juxtapose like real history with our like popular frame of that era and also see like how much elbow room I could create for people who looked like Robin and Remy and Victoire.
00:55:36.980 with your new book i know you i think you told um hua su for the new yorker profile who by the way
00:55:47.320 i was on a panel with him a billion years ago at mla and he was one of the first people who showed
00:55:52.680 me what like writing for a popular audience while also being an academic could look like
00:55:57.660 um this is when he was still teaching full-time and he was just kind of like writing for the
00:56:02.600 new yorker on the side so watching his career has just been incredibly inspirational but um i think
00:56:08.900 that i'm remembering that you said that your the new book is influenced by patricia lockwood oh yes
00:56:16.180 and she to me does she's one of the only people that i think can do contemporary really really
00:56:22.020 really well i mean she's a hero to me in a lot of ways um we've been talking about how dark academia
00:56:31.720 is so elitist and it's a world in which the gates are closed but her background um and the way that
00:56:41.180 she does literary criticism she's one of my favorite critics alive because the way that
00:56:46.800 she thinks about the text is so capacious and curious and it's not um it's not like
00:56:53.780 that she's dumbing down anything in order to invite the reader in but it's just the total
00:57:00.220 opposite of a form of criticism that I see more and more of now that really turns me off where
00:57:05.200 it's about like it's really about comparing like who is the best snob like who has the most
00:57:12.480 rarefied opinion on who has the most rarefied and coolest opinion on like increasingly like
00:57:18.160 minute issues and she will take a text and turn it over from all different perspectives and
00:57:23.760 situated in like a very large body of sometimes like totally surprising comparisons that just
00:57:30.180 get you excited to read not only the text, but everything in this insane cluster of ideas that
00:57:35.640 she's built around it. And that is such a great example of a public intellectual that really cares
00:57:41.180 about bringing people in and widening a conversation as opposed to keeping people out.
00:57:46.400 So that like, she's like such a role model for me. But yes, the way that she writes about the
00:57:51.620 internet uh no one is talking about this is one of my favorite books she's so funny she's so i mean
00:57:57.860 she nails it every time um so with taipei story i was really just trying to get like a fraction
00:58:04.100 of her humor i i love how like just in the span of three words right she'll twist the knife
00:58:11.460 and then this whole paragraph um you'll see in a new light and it'll seem hilarious um
00:58:17.020 and i was trying to do something similar so yeah she is endlessly funny and also i love that like
00:58:24.560 the some of the language the hilarious like it can be vulgar it can be made up words like whatever
00:58:30.760 that she uses also like to see it in the london review of books like that to me is just like a
00:58:36.500 triumph right to like an institution that you associate with a more stodgy or more
00:58:41.320 traditional form of criticism to have it live there it's just really lovely
00:58:45.960 Yeah, she's so fun.
00:58:47.860 Our last question, we have just a little bit of time, but I really wanted to get to this one because I think it's something that you've talked about a bit.
00:58:53.900 And I'm also super interested to see how you put the new book in Taipei Story into this larger schema.
00:59:01.380 So this question comes from Micah and Melody's going to read it.
00:59:04.460 Dark academia and fantasy at large often explore the same themes as lit fic, but gets marketed as narrow genre fiction.
00:59:11.700 Is it frustrating to see the discrepancy between how Babel is received, marketed, and reviewed versus a book like Yellowface, where the lit fic seems to be considered the more serious work?
00:59:23.620 So there's a section in the New Yorker profile where Tochi Onobuchi describes the two of you as like fantasy writers, the type of fantasy writers who also read like Brothers Karamazov, right?
00:59:35.080 And he says something along the lines of like, the Hugo is nice.
00:59:38.460 The Hugo is great.
00:59:39.200 I'm like so grateful for the Hugo.
00:59:40.580 It's an incredible honor.
00:59:41.700 but what about the booker and he says he predicts that like the booker is in your future
00:59:47.580 and to me that was such an interesting like what do we aspire to what does like excellence look
00:59:54.480 like but then also within that profile you talked about how like winning doesn't mean anything to
01:00:00.260 you or that it like once you win something it loses i don't just you have a complicated
01:00:05.620 relationship with winning or mastery. So how do you think about this with the genre as well?
01:00:14.360 Look, everybody loves to win things. But I mean, the way I think about awards is this.
01:00:21.640 The Alfie Awards, which is George R.R. Martin's personal awards ceremony that he puts on,
01:00:27.940 just like really for shits and gigs. It's like a really lovely thing. And he hosted a version of 0.91
01:00:33.340 the Alfie Awards for people who had been excluded from I think the 2023 I want to say Hugo Slate
01:00:41.920 for weird censoring reasons and he said all an award is is a group of people got in a room and
01:00:47.460 said hey you did this really cool thing and that's how I think about awards you know it is like it's
01:00:52.620 absolutely no statement on books relative quality or worth to one another it's just a bunch of
01:01:00.260 people saying hey you did a cool thing um yes so you know i don't winner them i lose them i don't
01:01:05.320 really mind um but as to like the lit fig fantasy categories i'm again a genre agnostic i'll take
01:01:13.460 whatever label will get somebody interested in a text um and i've seen this cut both ways um i think
01:01:21.000 yes people do still take fantasy less seriously though i think that is changing um there's also
01:01:27.980 this really weird contradiction where when Kazuo Ishiguro writes what is clearly fantasy
01:01:35.580 and science fiction, that's literary fiction. Jorge Luis Borges, Cormac McCarthy, Gabriel
01:01:41.360 Garcia Marquez, like they're all doing the exact same stuff that like Susanna Clark is
01:01:46.520 doing, right? And one of them is writing fantasy and one of them is writing literary fiction.
01:01:51.280 And some of that I think has to do with actually quite deliberate marketing decisions made by
01:01:56.900 publishers, what imprint you're at, what target audience they're appealing to. And I'm not going
01:02:03.080 to get into weeds with book design. Oh, my gosh. I mean, really, literally, what imprint are you
01:02:10.580 published by? Because there are some imprints that will just never be taken seriously as
01:02:15.400 literary fiction, no matter how amazing the book is. So I find that deeply annoying. On the other
01:02:21.860 hand um yellow face it is marketed as literary fiction but also sometimes it gets slotted into
01:02:29.280 this chick lit or like women's literature like genre um so people who liked babble or like that
01:02:36.480 sort of book like will take yellow face a lot less seriously um so at the end of the day i think like
01:02:41.920 all genre value judgments are i mean it's just like cultural sociology 101 right it is just
01:02:49.840 critics inflating their own value by putting down some books and like artificially praising other
01:02:56.140 books and it's all just sort of a nonsense game of influence and clout. But like I read across
01:03:02.280 all genres and I'm influenced by all genres and a good book is a good book. Yes. Can I just suggest
01:03:09.160 I so I went to a college that had one of the like top debate programs that those debaters
01:03:16.840 were down the hall from me because I also went back and taught there and their like little
01:03:20.760 cloister was down the hall from me so I could hear them practicing all the time and this was
01:03:25.760 a small liberal arts college so like you you knew everyone in your class but no one knew the
01:03:31.440 debaters because the debaters spent all of their time together they had all of their drama together
01:03:37.260 you could recognize them on campus because they were always carrying their little like like I
01:03:42.580 don't know, like suitcase rollies that had all of their research. They dressed the same. They
01:03:46.620 traveled all the time. Like, what about a dark academia or an academic novel about debate? Have
01:03:53.960 you thought about this? I would love to write a campus novel about debaters. It is like one of
01:04:01.260 my back burner projects because that was such a crazy and fun and strange experience to have.
01:04:08.540 Like that defined my adolescence. I was living and breathing debate. And if there's any high school experience that comes close to like the magical boarding school story, it really is debate because you are with your team all the time. Like you have rivalries with other teams. You would like die for your teammates. You know, the scene in Riverdale where Archie's like, you haven't known the highs and lows of high school football.
01:04:34.440 most people have not known the highs and lows of high school debate when i was writing the poppy
01:04:43.980 war there is a scene early on where there there's this martial arts tournament that's part of their
01:04:49.580 first year exams um and those big feelings around the tournament when people are cheering for one
01:04:55.460 person or another or when people get like knocked down in the ring like all of that is just projected
01:05:01.160 from emotions I had during debate it was like the single most defining experience of my life I
01:05:08.040 still keep up with former debaters and I still have debate nightmares but I think it's very rare
01:05:13.420 there's not a lot of opportunities if you're not very athletic to be like fighting for your life
01:05:19.500 every weekend and to have the chance to be the best at something in the country so
01:05:25.720 yeah, such a strange and sort of inexplicable world. But I think that would make for a really
01:05:32.340 funny campus novel. Well, and also just like the rhetorical style, like Lincoln Douglas style is
01:05:39.620 just so fascinating. Like there would just be so much to like, there's so many places to go. So
01:05:46.700 if you ever take that off the back burner, I would love to read it. If people want to find
01:05:51.660 more about you and connect to your work, your books, where can they find your stuff on the
01:05:57.420 internet? Where would you direct them? I'm at rfkwong.com and I send out updates through my
01:06:02.960 newsletter and I'm very happy to not have a big social media footprint outside of that.
01:06:07.380 Thank you so much for coming on the show today. It's just been such a pleasure. I can't,
01:06:11.900 I can't thank you enough. Thank you for having me. I had so much fun.
01:06:15.120 thanks for listening to the culture study podcast today paid subscribers got a bonus conversation
01:06:24.720 very detailed between melody and me about how we think about our book collections what we buy what
01:06:30.660 we loan out what we borrow if you want to support the show and be sure to always get that bonus
01:06:35.240 content head to patreon.com slash culture study it's just five bucks a month or 50 a year and
01:06:41.800 you'll get ad-free episodes, that exclusive weekly advice time segment, and a weekly discussion
01:06:47.340 thread for each episode. Also, be sure to follow the show wherever you get your podcasts. We have
01:06:53.400 so many great episodes in the works and I promise you don't want to miss any of them. So if you want
01:06:58.440 to suggest a topic, ask a question about the culture that surrounds you, or submit a question
01:07:02.920 for our subscriber-only advice time segment, go to our Google forum at tinyurl.com slash
01:07:09.140 culturestudypod or check the show notes for a link. The Culture Study Podcast is produced by
01:07:14.080 me, Anne Helen Peterson, and Melody Rowell. Our music is by Pontington Bear. You can find me on
01:07:19.120 Instagram at Anne Helen Peterson, Melody at Melodious47, and the show at Culture Study Pod.