Culture Study Podcast - January 10, 2024


The Mutated IP of the Mean Girls Reboot


Episode Stats


Length

52 minutes

Words per minute

183.37

Word count

9,640

Sentence count

172

Harmful content

Misogyny

35

sentences flagged

Toxicity

9

sentences flagged

Hate speech

17

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.820 How can we describe this for viewers who might not have seen it?
00:00:04.780 I think for viewers who've seen the original Mean Girls movie, imagine if you fed that movie to an AI and asked it to like rewrite the movie with 2023 jokes in it for like Zoomer kids.
00:00:20.820 And also like aesthetic choices. And I'm not just talking about fashion more like there's a couple different places where it's obvious that people are making like TikToks about the events that have transpired.
00:00:34.160 Which I think is a really fascinating choice because one of the things about the original Mean Girls movie that's so striking if you watch it now is it came out in 2004. So it predated social media almost entirely. I think Facebook had been around for like two months when that movie came out.
00:00:49.400 Yeah. And so in the movie, this like burn book is so crucial because, you know, that was like literally how people recorded rumors in this pre social media age. But now with TikTok, it's like, how are we meshing these digital and analog forms of bullying together in a way that's going to make sense to kids today?
00:01:10.700 Right. And so the other thing about the trailer, it's like all the different characters have been updated in some capacity. But Tina Fey is still there.
00:01:20.060 Yeah. And how would you describe what Tina Fey looks like?
00:01:23.540 Tina Fey looks like she did in the first movie. She's, I think, wearing the same outfits. And she has the same lines. Like, they could have just stitched in scenes from the first movie for Tina Fey.
00:01:36.360 She didn't update her wardrobe or her character or her dialogue.
00:01:40.000 Or her glasses.
00:01:40.320 She was like, no notes. Perfect.
00:01:48.120 I am Anne Helen Peterson, and this is the Culture Study Podcast.
00:01:52.400 And I'm Michelle Sisa. I'm a freelance journalist and a contributing writer to The Walrus.
00:01:57.320 Is this a musical?
00:01:59.100 It is a musical. And I want to ask, when did you learn that this was a musical?
00:02:03.460 When did you figure that out?
00:02:04.960 Because for me, it wasn't until like a month after I'd seen the first trailer.
00:02:10.180 As will become evident when we answer the questions, I didn't know it was a musical
00:02:13.460 until I started reading the questions that were submitted.
00:02:16.180 And all of like the first five were, why doesn't this trailer admit that it's a musical?
00:02:22.160 And there's a reason for that, that I think is fascinating.
00:02:25.000 We'll get there.
00:02:25.560 We'll get there.
00:02:26.480 We should also establish how old we are, because I think we're going to talk a lot
00:02:29.520 about positionality when it comes to this movie.
00:02:31.900 So I am, God, 42, and I don't have kids.
00:02:37.560 What about you, Michelle?
00:02:38.560 I am 36.
00:02:40.180 I had to think about that.
00:02:41.680 And I have two kids.
00:02:43.740 And when the first Mean Girls movie came out, I was 17.
00:02:46.160 And yet somehow in my head, that was only like 10 years ago.
00:02:49.480 Oh, yeah.
00:02:49.740 It was 100% just 10 years ago.
00:02:51.620 And I had just graduated from college.
00:02:53.220 So it was kind of that first foray into like being back into pop culture because at least
00:02:58.600 my college experience was like an extraction from pop culture into like this nebulous area where
00:03:05.380 you weren't connected with anything. I think that's changed a lot, but that was used to be
00:03:08.960 the case. Yeah. So let's talk a little bit about our relationship even more so to The Mean Girls
00:03:15.720 from 2004. Do you like this movie? Is it a funny movie? Is it a canonical movie for you? How do
00:03:20.860 you think about it? So when I when the movie came out, I was in my last year of high school. So it
00:03:25.780 felt like it was really like level with my demographic. I think Lindsay Lohan and I are
00:03:30.920 the same age. I was also like kind of a ginger haired teenager with no social skills. So I
00:03:36.900 really related to her. Uh, and, and I remember it being really funny. Like I remember all these
00:03:43.080 lines from Mean Girls still feel like they have some kind of cachet or relevance today, right?
00:03:49.840 Like, if you say, you know, stop trying to make fetch happen, I think probably 90% of millennials will understand that reference.
00:03:58.120 Right.
00:03:58.540 But even at the time, I remember, there's many jokes about it that feel like they were dated or, like, kind of jarring then, that on a contemporary view watch are, like, shocking.
00:04:10.980 Like what?
00:04:11.300 like there's a joke in the movie about how the gym teacher is having an affair with two like
00:04:20.080 Vietnamese students who are fighting over him do you remember that he's like their boyfriend and
00:04:25.380 they find out that they're both dating him and they're like hitting each other and yelling in
00:04:28.720 Vietnamese and this is seen as like really funny wow and also just like having like fighting over
00:04:34.320 having a relationship with a gym teacher like just wholly inappropriate and there's a lot of
00:04:40.400 kind of homophobic jokes that you know the idea like it's okay to call your friend gay 0.96
00:04:46.540 if you're doing it in a loving way yeah and the whole like he's too gay to function joke
00:04:52.240 at the time wow it's really wild to think back on it and be like yeah this is this is 2004 well 0.63
00:04:59.660 and the whole way that they play lindsey lohan coming from africa is really the joke that she's
00:05:06.940 from africa but she's white yeah like that's the joke like that's the duration of the joke
00:05:11.880 it's just that she's white and that as a white teenager coming from africa she approaches the 0.65
00:05:16.860 black students in the cafeteria and assumes that they speak swahili like there's there's many
00:05:23.060 layers to that i think it's and there's like all sorts of weight stuff going on right yeah i wonder
00:05:30.020 how that's gonna play in 2024 the the whole big prank being making regina george gain five pounds 0.83
00:05:36.920 right and hate herself and totally that she doesn't fit into her prom dress so that she's
00:05:42.060 like too fat to wear her size four dress okay my relation is that I think since I was coming out
00:05:50.120 of college like I think that I thought that it was like funny I feel like I've always had this
00:05:55.300 interesting relationship with Tina Fey where like I understood that she was supposed to
00:05:59.400 somehow be like the avatar of white feminist humor but then there was something weird about 1.00
00:06:08.280 her like she was just too she didn't seem to have um any sort of mode of like self-interrogation
00:06:16.340 or growth and I think that this is something that we're going to talk about is like I don't
00:06:20.240 think that her humor has grown in any capacity yeah or evolved I think that's a fair assessment
00:06:25.580 And so I think that something felt weird about that at the time. I also knew about that book that the original is, quote unquote, based on queen bees and wannabes. Because social order is something that has always been really fascinating to me. And that, in fact, I felt like I was a student of social order when I was in middle school and in high school.
00:06:45.600 And so that idea that something was like laying it out so clearly and the difficulties of it, like that was interesting to me. But then I don't know that they make the movie so like satirical when it comes to these different groups and how they function and like how obviously bad the plastics are in all these different ways that I don't I don't think that it actually resonated with me or that I found it that interesting.
00:07:10.580 but I thought it was funny and obviously Lindsay Lohan is a charisma machine too yeah it's really
00:07:16.740 like peak Lindsay Lohan she's so charming she's so good she's like so believable in that role
00:07:23.480 because I think she was a teenager when they filmed it she's younger than her co-stars and
00:07:29.220 you know it makes it very like sad in retrospect when you watch it and you know how poorly she's
00:07:35.180 going to be treated by the media in you know coming out of a generation of teen stars who
00:07:39.920 were really like cannibalized by a media that loved to devour its young I feel like this is
00:07:45.880 the last moment that she had before that happened and so it is it's it's like watching early Britney
00:07:51.540 Spears in that capacity too yeah and then this is a more difficult question so I really wanted to
00:07:58.940 have you on the show and I was like what could we talk about that's interesting and this was
00:08:03.260 your suggestion so why do you think that you wanted to talk about this when did you first
00:08:07.760 see the trailer uh I think I saw the trailer probably like two days before you sent me that
00:08:14.540 dm and I was like this is what's been on my mind for the last 48 hours because I think that I'm not
00:08:20.140 alone in having this experience as like a millennial who's moving into midlife where I
00:08:26.040 can no longer tell reliably how long ago something happened because my like personal sense of time
00:08:33.360 is moving at a different rate than reality so it was similarly like very jarring to me to learn that
00:08:40.000 lord's album pure heroin came out a decade ago i was like no stop lying yeah 2013
00:08:46.680 and it's similarly like this week i've been trying to wrap my head around the fact that
00:08:54.180 you've got mail is having its 25th anniversary which means that movie and mean girls are only
00:09:00.220 five years apart. No, they're not. And yet those films feel like they're from different
00:09:04.620 generations to me. One is my generation, one feels older. And so I think it's just, you know,
00:09:11.160 this movie to me feels like it's really capturing the millennial midlife crisis that occurs every
00:09:16.420 time something like low rise jeans or Uggs become popular again. And we're like, hang on. No,
00:09:22.660 what's happening. And, and it's fascinating because, you know, I asked some of my friends
00:09:28.260 what they thought about this movie and by far the overwhelming reaction is like why are they
00:09:33.180 remaking this who is this for like is this supposed to be for us because it feels insulting
00:09:39.280 we're gonna get to that with the tag yeah okay so so i mean it's it's disorienting definitely
00:09:45.340 to see to realize that like you've lived so long that the things that were original in your youth
00:09:50.760 are being repurposed uh for a new generation that has like no cultural context for them
00:09:56.180 and and it really makes you feel in a very visceral way like you're old yeah and just
00:10:03.400 that entire understanding of like what does it mean to occupy oldness I saw someone post the
00:10:08.240 other day about like how what we can do as millennials is like especially people who've
00:10:14.360 entered into their 40s is instead of feeling like an old young you can feel like a young old
00:10:20.140 and that's a more interesting place to be interesting distinction yeah so a young old
00:10:26.100 is like you're you're young at heart but you're old and yeah in body and memory uh-huh like
00:10:32.360 all right if you're if you've like already seen mean girls cycle through and be regenerated
00:10:39.680 then you are old at heart but if you can like i don't know if you are game to question some of
00:10:46.240 what's going on in it and also immediately recognize the Olivia Rodrigo song you're also
00:10:51.640 young so we are young old yeah I mean it's wild it's uh it's funny that like having children
00:10:58.580 didn't make me feel as old as seeing a mean girl's reboot and we'd be like wait a second
00:11:04.360 didn't that movie just come out it's great didn't Lorde's pure heroine just come out yes exactly
00:11:11.180 Yes. I think it also has to do just generally with millennials. We're somehow still doing all
00:11:17.960 of the things like my student debt load is somehow still the amount that I thought it
00:11:24.260 should have been at 30. So shouldn't I be young if I still have this much student debt or for like
00:11:29.800 as a as a population like oh I'm still living in an apartment shouldn't I be young. Yeah I was
00:11:36.600 recently doing a rewatch of girls which also came out 10 years ago wow if you can believe it and
00:11:43.640 when girls came out I was the same age as the characters in that show and I remember it was
00:11:48.940 supposed to be this kind of like you know encapsulation of how a certain contingent of
00:11:54.360 like privileged white young women were living in their 20s and rewatching it now in my 30s I was
00:12:00.540 like well I still feel like a lot of this applies to the experience of my friends in our 30s like
00:12:05.260 you know people are moving all the time they're trying to figure out their careers they're
00:12:08.180 changing careers they're like flailing their way through relationships they're you know sorting
00:12:13.460 through their relationships with their parents as adults and you watch something like sex in the
00:12:18.020 city which was supposed to be about women in their 30s when it came out and i was like i don't know 1.00
00:12:21.260 anyone living like this like no you know miranda hobbs is supposed to be the loser of this cohort 1.00
00:12:25.600 and she's like a partner in a law firm who just bought a very expensive apartment everyone has 1.00
00:12:30.580 like very expensive clothes they're going to the hamptons like you know the way i think our
00:12:35.240 generation is aging is out of step with the depictions of that generation in a lot of media
00:12:39.720 and that's a disorienting experience too absolutely okay so our first question and this is the you
00:12:46.560 know i i kind of previewed this that this was the question that we received en masse when i first
00:12:52.320 asked for questions and it's about the specific way that this movie is portrayed or not portrayed
00:12:57.500 in the trailer so let's go this is from lily i saw the trailer for the new mean girls film when
00:13:03.120 it went viral towards the end of 2023 and it gave absolutely no indication that this was a film of
00:13:10.980 the musical version and i then saw the full trailer in the pre-roll for the eras tour film
00:13:17.480 which was great targeting and it was much much more obvious that it's a film of the musical
00:13:23.460 not just a remake of the original film and i'd love to hear you discuss the musical theater
00:13:30.720 ness of it all okay so i vaguely knew that there was a musical of mean girls and i think i knew
00:13:38.700 that because a lot of films have been adapted into musicals in order to like uh because it's
00:13:44.960 more of a sure bet on broadway than an original production did you know that i didn't know that
00:13:50.340 until I looked up, I read the Wikipedia page for this reboot. And in there, it says adapted from
00:13:57.720 the musical. And I guess the the actress playing Regina George, Renee Rapp is originated the role
00:14:05.660 on Broadway. So that was a revelation to me, but it does feel like it was obscured deliberately,
00:14:12.900 maybe in the ads for this movie. And I found a very interesting article on Deadline about
00:14:20.260 how studios do this they apparently test audiences do not like musicals so they don't want anyone to
00:14:28.320 know that they're going in to see a musical they want them to buy a ticket and maybe they enjoy
00:14:32.180 the musical experience maybe they hate it but they've already bought their ticket uh it's the
00:14:37.120 same with the Wonka movie with Timothee Chalamet is also apparently a musical and they didn't make
00:14:43.180 that clear in the ads either and the color purple the new color purple is an adaptation of the
00:14:47.880 musical i will also say that what's interesting this is straight from the wikipedia page is that
00:14:54.520 the the musical version of this it started to be developed in 2013 so it wasn't even like that long
00:15:03.360 after the movie came out i mean a little bit but like not that long after and then it debuted in
00:15:10.920 2017 and now we have this movie in 2024 so we have this long like gestating like Mean Girls
00:15:21.200 is just always pregnant like it's just about to always have a baby and so I don't think like
00:15:27.260 someone woke up like in 2023 and was like oh you know what it's time for like you know everything
00:15:32.820 else is rebooting let's reboot Mean Girls instead it's just been like this gradual trickle almost
00:15:38.680 like Star Wars or something like that which I think is is more common so okay when you re-watch
00:15:45.160 the trailer with this knowledge that it's a musical I think you can kind of tell it's a
00:15:50.760 musical did you notice any tells yes I mean one is that there's a character saying dance break and
00:15:56.700 then the characters break out into choreographed dances which happens I guess at least two or
00:16:01.240 three times in the trailer and that really took me back to do you remember like teen movies when
00:16:06.100 were younger always had some sequence where characters would do a choreographed dance yes
00:16:10.420 like and it's just like going on 30 13 going on 30 um what's that movie with melissa joan hart
00:16:17.880 and adrian granier i i only know because it was like drive me crazy yes because drive me crazy
00:16:23.440 was the single from that movie i mean this was like a very 90s 2000s iteration of like a musical
00:16:29.940 where they wanted to have a single that they could market from the movie and how do you get the
00:16:35.880 song in the movie it's like a dance break in some way right yeah exactly and so that i mean that
00:16:43.020 brings us back to the question of why not use one of the songs from the movie in the trailer why use
00:16:48.920 olivia rodrigo you know blessed that we are to have her maybe the songs in the movie are not that
00:16:54.180 cool that could be it like this but in that case well and that's the difference right so you have
00:17:01.540 like musical theater type songs versus pop songs so like the version of musicals that we grew up
00:17:09.160 with that were popular when we were growing up in like the late 90s early 2000s were movies with
00:17:15.860 soundtracks integrated very forcefully like the soundtrack was a feature in and of itself
00:17:22.060 both to be marketed but then also as a vessel to allow characters to dance or to express emotion
00:17:28.660 in some way and i think that what we've seen whether it's through like this like trying to
00:17:34.980 milk everything that you can get out of the ip or just like the repopularization of like disney
00:17:42.140 movies as musicals right like the um the live versions and all that sort of thing or even just
00:17:47.640 the popularity of hamilton is that now they're actual musicals but maybe the like that form is
00:17:56.900 less palatable than the top 40 version of a musical yeah i think that's that's a very good
00:18:04.620 theory and my dumber theory is that by sort of trying to sneak the musical element past viewers
00:18:12.220 what they're trying to capture is people who are like oh mean girls i remember that i'll go see
00:18:15.920 that again with right with my kids and and people who know it's a musical who are like they're trying
00:18:21.280 to bring these two groups together without one another's knowledge and maximize like the audience
00:18:26.600 and the revenue for this sort of mutated frankenstein piece of ip yeah i think that
00:18:32.860 there's also like this nostalgia to some extent for those movies from the early 2000s like i've
00:18:39.500 seen on tiktok a couple of people being like do you remember the bonkers dance movies from this
00:18:44.340 time and specifically citing like the julia the last dance which is like not a good dancer
00:18:51.660 but i just saw that snl there's an snl skit performing the unforgettable dance that julia 0.98
00:19:01.420 stiles does in like the climactic scene of that movie which is mostly just like shuffling her
00:19:06.080 arms around because it's supposed to be modern dance right yeah yeah i i think that that was
00:19:12.680 like a revelation for every millennial who watched that movie and then later looked back
00:19:17.060 and thought wait a second why didn't they cast somebody who could dance why didn't they even
00:19:20.600 get her a body double like poor julia i will say there is a really good dance movie from the late
00:19:26.400 90s early 2000s and that's center stage which is cast entirely with dancers and very few of them
00:19:33.480 can act but and zoe saldana and zoe saldana both i guess act and dance plausibly yeah so i think
00:19:41.280 that like what we're kind of talking around here is that they wanted to like evoke all of these
00:19:47.620 feelings around movies that we as an audience as millennials like things that would make us want to
00:19:57.740 watch a movie even like leave our houses to watch a movie which is a tall order for many people in
00:20:03.620 this demographic but then they also want to attract this other audience like they're trying
00:20:09.260 to they're trying to attract every audience it's trying to be more universal but then i think they
00:20:13.900 kind of like what's that phrase split the baby like yeah and you know it it's interesting to 0.70
00:20:22.500 like look at this mean girls like kind of marketing plan side by side with barbie because 0.94
00:20:29.000 it feels very similar in some ways right they're trying to create this like viral sensation 0.59
00:20:34.800 that's very unabashedly feminine that's kind of like supposedly subversive or sardonic and that
00:20:43.500 that captures a lot of nostalgia that's that's like the formula they're going for but it doesn't
00:20:49.240 really work the way barbie worked like barbie had this enormously successful marketing campaign
00:20:54.000 people were so excited about that movie in like a very uncynical way yeah and mean girls feels
00:21:00.340 sort of like it's in this uncanny valley where it's like you know it's not close enough to the
00:21:05.460 original it's not the original it's like jarring to those who remember the original because it's
00:21:10.140 like a little bit wrong in every respect yeah and and I think for people who aren't familiar
00:21:15.220 with Mean Girls like if you're 21 and Mean Girls came out when you were a baby you know does this
00:21:20.000 scan for you does it like does it feel like it's evoking an experience or a point of view that's
00:21:26.900 like authentic to your adolescence I don't know that it does it's so it feels like it's you know
00:21:32.380 it's kind of a an awkward like dark twin of the Barbie effort and it both of them feel like their
00:21:39.340 their studio is trying to figure out like how do we how do we market to women like what do women
00:21:44.020 want to see how do we get all those girls in the theater and you can see in the parallels between
00:21:48.880 the experience how sort of condescending that strategy really is like how they how they're
00:21:53.540 pandering yep more so with with Mean Girls than with Barbie I think it kind of makes me feel
00:21:58.380 offended as an audience member to be like this is what you think I want right well and even what
00:22:03.440 you think of me when I think about the trailer for Barbie at least the one the first one that
00:22:07.080 i saw was the like hi barbie hi barbie right um which is a weird trailer like it does not follow
00:22:13.980 the rules of a trailer and i think sort of like how the reason that the barbie movie was so
00:22:21.000 successful is because they let greta gerwig just kind of like go be weird right yeah like both
00:22:27.000 mattel did and the studio did like and and margot robbie did as a producer and the star like they
00:22:33.900 figured out like we can we trust the audience to kind of roll with some of our weirdness here
00:22:38.860 which to be clear I'm not saying like Barbie is like avant-garde I'm just saying it's like it's
00:22:43.920 a little off kilter in a way that I think is actually works really well but this movie doesn't
00:22:50.140 do that yeah and part of that is you know Greta Gerwig brought with her the cachet of being Greta
00:22:55.480 Gerwig and being a filmmaker and an actress who's like cultivated you know a career being a little
00:23:01.680 bit weird and a little bit off kilter and being a really interesting original filmmaker. And what
00:23:07.280 Mean Girls is bringing us is Tina Fey. It's Tina Fey again. And like, does Tina Fey have that 1.00
00:23:11.700 effect on audiences? You know, I think we're really seeing the limits of the Tina Fey marketability.
00:23:17.760 Do you think, though, that there is a hunger? You know, you were saying like it doesn't really speak
00:23:21.100 to, I think, like teens experience of the world necessarily, because it's so retrofitted on
00:23:26.720 millennials experience of the world but i do think that there is a big hunger amongst that age group
00:23:32.960 for various aspects of like y2k culture right but is that just the fashion you know we just taped
00:23:40.660 an episode about the resurgence of early 2000s music and how part of the reason that that music
00:23:46.660 is coming back there's many different reasons that you can explain certain songs but part of it is
00:23:51.900 like those songs are easy to dance to like they're fun to dance to in a way that not a lot of music
00:23:58.260 from right now is as fun to dance to and sometimes you dance to board genius that's a question that
00:24:04.420 was exactly like can you dance to what you really eilish like you can't like there's just like a
00:24:09.140 downbeat on a lot of stuff then dua lipa is like the the rare exception there which to me dua lipa
00:24:16.100 sounds like it could come straight out of 2003 oh i agree yeah like it is sort of just that cyclical
00:24:23.100 trend energy right where like it's always inevitable that people get nostalgic or or
00:24:29.700 rediscover something that was popular in the past and it becomes popular again because it was good
00:24:33.700 20 or 30 years ago and whatever qualities made it good then are still appealing yeah when i was in
00:24:39.160 university we listened to fleetwood mac and that that was like very appealing to us because those
00:24:44.940 albums are still great but I think where it gets sloppy is like you see sort of these big
00:24:50.080 commercial ambitions for like throwing everything at the wall and and trying to make it sell yeah
00:24:55.500 and that's where you start to feel pandered to I think like you can only revive things if they're
00:25:02.020 worth resurrecting out of the ground and I don't know that everything is I don't know that this
00:25:07.400 particular franchise is well and I think you touch on something that's really crucial which is that
00:25:12.140 But I think that younger audiences might discover Mean Girls and love Mean Girls as Mean Girls, but that does not make millions and millions of dollars for the studio.
00:25:23.640 Exactly. And you have to, you know, this is the like the marvelification of every sort of filmmaking endeavor now where it's it's less about filmmaker ambitions or audience desires and more about, I think, like these studio ambitions to have these big, meaty, endlessly replicable.
00:25:42.140 pieces of IP that you can churn out every couple years. And I think that something I didn't know
00:25:49.020 until I was doing some reading in preparation for this episode was there was a Mean Girls sequel
00:25:53.740 that came out a couple years after the original that had Tina Fey in it. And I think it was kind
00:25:58.760 of a flop. It got bad reviews. It went direct to video in the parlance of the time. And so it's
00:26:05.940 like, this is always sort of the ambition of a film if it does well. It's like, how can we do
00:26:10.920 more of this thing how can we how can we multiply it and that can be sequels that can be sort of a
00:26:17.300 fast and the furious style universe building or it can be i think this like effort to sort of
00:26:22.960 retool the original for a contemporary sensibility in a way that kind of reveals like the limitations
00:26:29.040 of the original right like you can't just layer more diverse characters and like contemporary
00:26:33.840 jokes onto a scaffolding that's kind of fundamentally regressive right from from a
00:26:39.960 contemporary cultural perspective i'm trying to think now of anything that has done that
00:26:44.160 successfully i did not watch the babysitter's club reboot but i think that people really appreciated
00:26:50.180 it from my sense um like something that has reimagined it in a way that is not just like
00:26:57.580 repeating the regression yeah i watched the first season of the babysitter's club reboot and i found
00:27:02.840 it very charming and i think it actually channels some of the millennial and nostalgia well there's
00:27:08.180 like really good stunt casting of alicia silverstone as one of the moms uh that's great
00:27:14.700 but but you know that's that's sort of the the same problem with the sex in the city
00:27:20.200 reboot too is they've attempted to like retrofit diversity and inclusivity onto a show that was
00:27:28.000 like fundamentally about very privileged white women and it's it's bizarre to see the results
00:27:33.680 It's like you can't just sort of glue these things on top and and hope that audiences will accept it.
00:27:39.000 And like so bizarre that that becomes the reason to watch it is to watch how bizarre it is as they attempt to retrofit it.
00:27:46.000 Melody just came into the chat and mentioned the League of Our Own, a League of Our Own that reboot, which I think works. 0.74
00:27:53.460 I don't think that the race element of that reboot works as well as they want it to work. 0.80
00:27:58.780 right they're like oh let's have a subplot where we have a black baseball star who is trying to 0.66
00:28:04.480 like be part of this league and can't be what works really well is the very explicit queerness
00:28:10.600 which was there in the you know it was implicit in the original movie and they're like oh yeah 0.99
00:28:16.080 all these girls are probably gay right and they're like okay let's female baseball team probably has 1.00
00:28:21.600 some queers yes true even in the 1940s can you imagine um and so i think that that part actually 1.00
00:28:28.440 worked well because they were making something that was implicit explicit yeah well and often 0.94
00:28:34.740 I mean something that I found jarring thinking about remakes is how often they're not more
00:28:40.900 progressive or more feminist than the original like the one that drives me wild is Jurassic Park
00:28:46.440 which was an important movie in my childhood and Laura Dern is a great character in that movie
00:28:51.360 you know she's like a scientist she runs around in hiking boots she has like a wild adventure in 1.00
00:28:56.480 that movie and meanwhile for male yes great style great perpetual halloween costume potential there
00:29:02.380 and meanwhile sam neill is forced into this role of caregiver he's shepherding these two children
00:29:07.040 around he's like discovering whether he wants to be a father he embodies this role that's usually
00:29:11.860 played by women in movies and then when they remade that you know 20 years later we get
00:29:16.540 bryce dallas howard in a white skirt suit and high heels like learning how to embrace her femininity 1.00
00:29:22.900 yeah and like Chris Pratt's like teaching her that maybe she wants to just be like a girlfriend
00:29:27.740 and a mom maybe it was wrong of her to focus on her career and that that feels like an example
00:29:33.100 of you know sometimes we're going backwards with these remakes so like what are we trying to do
00:29:37.800 here so I want to like segue here into an explicit line from the beginning of the trailer we talked
00:29:46.940 about some of the stuff to do with this but I think this is like we should address it head-on
00:29:50.780 This is from Natalie.
00:29:52.080 Can we talk about the decision to include the line,
00:29:54.860 this isn't your mother's mean girls in the trailer? 0.81
00:29:57.780 I feel like half the audience for this movie will be women in their 30s
00:30:01.680 who loved the original movie when they were in high school, myself included.
00:30:05.980 Of course, there are people in their 30s who have teenage children now,
00:30:09.780 but it honestly just feels like we're being called old and out of touch.
00:30:13.640 So why risk alienating half your audience before the movie even comes out?
00:30:18.120 So I wanted to do this question because I think it allows us to talk about who is this movie even for and how studios oftentimes make these movies or create content just generally where you're like, who are they thinking of?
00:30:31.120 What is this imagined audience?
00:30:32.520 Who is this for?
00:30:33.440 Why are they trying to market to everyone and thus no one with this film?
00:30:38.100 What do you think is going on here?
00:30:39.460 Again, I think I see little echoes of like the Barbie marketing strategy here where I think that marketing campaign.
00:30:46.020 and to be clear like I have lots of critiques of the movie itself but I think the marketing
00:30:50.420 campaign is like inarguably incredibly successful and what they did was really played on the fact
00:30:55.640 that people had a lot of criticisms of Barbie you know they were like if you hate Barbie you
00:30:59.280 should come see this movie it's not just for people who like Barbie it's for people who think
00:31:03.180 they hate Barbie and to me it feels like this is like trying to attain a similar like cheeky
00:31:08.920 vibe of being like oh you think this is for your mom it's actually for you uh but again the problem
00:31:16.380 there is like who who are the moms and who are the presumably daughters in this you know in this
00:31:22.760 audience persona because again yeah i i don't think many of the teenage viewers of mean girls
00:31:28.340 have teenagers themselves now though some do and i'm sure they'll make great tiktoks about seeing
00:31:32.940 the film together but to say this is not your mother's mean girl suggests there's something
00:31:38.320 about it that's new and different and like more with it than the old one they're tiktoks
00:31:43.920 they're tiktoks yeah it's suggesting that this one is going to be like edgier and you know more
00:31:50.820 contemporary with the tiktoks but it's confusing because the imagery in the trailer is like so
00:31:56.100 dead on the original like the you know the pink outfits the like get in loser line yep and so
00:32:04.020 it's you know it is trying to have it both ways it's trying to like capture the nostalgia and
00:32:08.640 maybe neg elder millennials into going to the theater and proving that they're still cool
00:32:13.280 by embracing those new edgy mean girls and maybe it's trying to appeal to teens but if i were a
00:32:19.460 teenager i'd be confused either because i don't know what the original mean girls was about
00:32:23.680 and i wouldn't know how this one is different from it or maybe you just like don't watch
00:32:28.640 trailers at all because watching a trailer is like a very elderly i think that that's
00:32:33.940 like a practice yeah that's something that olds do i think teens watch them on tiktok
00:32:39.840 where they show up as ads between like the skincare videos it's true i think too you know
00:32:47.540 there are these parts of the trailer that are trying to be edgy like so john ham plays a health
00:32:53.340 teacher is my understanding and there's a part where he's like he's supposed to be teaching
00:32:58.300 sex ed and it's like we're going to talk about you know i don't know normal stuff and then also
00:33:04.740 like fisting and i think that the the implication is like oh wow like culture isn't what it used to
00:33:12.640 be when that seems like a a misunderstanding too right like school hasn't actually like the way
00:33:19.460 that people talk about sex in school hasn't actually changed if anything it's become more
00:33:23.600 aggressive in many places like you're not talking having a sex ed talk at all so that also doesn't
00:33:30.540 seem to like align with what is happening in high schools either I think it's also the dissonance of
00:33:36.000 the original movie which you know had some jokes that felt like they were aimed at an audience of
00:33:42.620 like middle-aged comedians like Tina Fey like like the joke about the gym teacher having two
00:33:48.120 like teenage Vietnamese girlfriends felt like a joke aimed at middle-aged men about how they
00:33:53.200 fetishize young Asian women but that's not a joke for teenagers like that's not something a teenager
00:33:57.340 finds funny no teenagers like oh it's so funny right they're like no this is weird and we don't
00:34:03.320 like it I you know sometimes I think about who came up with the marketing copy for something
00:34:07.800 like this and this isn't your mother's mean girls seems like something that was not necessarily in
00:34:14.340 the pitch but that some executive was like you know what we should market this as not your mother's
00:34:19.340 mean girls right yeah it feels like often the marketing copy for movies is by someone who
00:34:25.180 has not seen the movie and maybe has not seen any movie and maybe doesn't know any women or teens
00:34:32.220 or moms yeah which again is like the problem of so many movies that feel aimed at women and 0.79
00:34:38.360 especially aimed at this like ambiguous audience of millennial women where it's like what are they 1.00
00:34:43.360 what do these mysterious ladies want some of them don't have children some of them are interested 1.00
00:34:48.160 in their careers like who are they how do we sell to them oh we don't know anything about them let's
00:34:54.020 make something from 2004 um yeah i think next we should talk about something we've been circling
00:35:00.200 a little bit this is about tina fey who wrote the screenplay for both versions of this movie
00:35:04.740 and she also wrote the book for the stage musical let's hear from tj why is tina fey uncancellable
00:35:12.280 She has repeatedly included racist undertones in her jokes for 30 Rock, Kimmy Schmidt, etc., but none of them seem to hinder her success.
00:35:21.480 What's her secret? 0.99
00:35:24.740 This is a question I have about a lot of white female comedians and actors in their resilient uncancellability. 1.00
00:35:35.940 I mean, Amy Schumer's comments of late about Israel Gaza is another example of a kind of public conduct that I think would not be tolerated by anyone who wasn't white. 0.96
00:35:47.880 Yes, absolutely.
00:35:49.320 And I think this is the kind of like white feminism plague of the early 2000s that maybe, you know, is the specific nostalgia that Mean Girls, the reboot is dusting off, which is that this like insulation wrapped around white women, you know, that they've been oppressed on the basis of gender.
00:36:05.100 So they have a license to be edgy, you know, that kind of like raunch feminism idea that like we're just doing what men have done for ages.
00:36:12.760 And if you reprimand us for it, then that's just sexism. 0.97
00:36:15.420 And I think Tina Fey has has really like ridden that wave for most of her career. And I am a little bit surprised it hasn't run out for her yet. 1.00
00:36:25.280 And unapologetically, too. I think that's actually part of the reason why she has remained uncancellable. She doesn't actually address people's critiques of her.
00:36:35.920 Yes, I think that's a big piece of it, too, is, you know, this idea of cancel culture. I always find is a little bit disconnected from the reality because many people just, you know, they ignore the criticisms and they keep working. And at a certain point, the narrative changes, it like evolves to be focused on what they're doing now, or it picks a different target. And really, by not responding, she's she's managed to control that narrative or keep it focused where she wants it to be focused.
00:37:02.840 In a way that I think actually resembles how most white men and some men of color, but have negotiated different criticisms of them. So thinking about like Mel Gibson, who like, should be so canceled, like should never, he should be so far down the hole of cancelability, like that there's no way that he could climb out. And yet, here he is appearing in like mainstream movies, like, I don't know.
00:37:27.820 And I think so much of it has to do with, do you make money and do you have the protection of other people in power in Hollywood?
00:37:36.480 And so Tina Fey's really strong connection to Lorne Michaels, who I know was a producer of this stage play, and I am guessing still has a producer credit on this, on the film production.
00:37:47.700 Like, she's always going to be able to get this made.
00:37:50.920 She has this connection and the protection of Lorne.
00:37:53.940 Yeah, it's true.
00:37:54.660 Though it's also interesting to consider like what behaviors, especially in, you know, in female celebrities are considered condemnable. And I feel like racist jokes is not one of them. But like, think of Winona Ryder's shoplifting scandal that daunt her for years.
00:38:10.680 and like canceled yeah she was canceled for doing a little shoplifting which you know arguably a
00:38:17.120 victimless crime against a large corporation and and certainly I would say like a lesser harm than
00:38:23.680 propagating racist jokes in your right racist jokes and then like also just her like for me
00:38:30.200 the I think the difficult thing with Tina Fey or the reason why why she's so resilient is a lot of 0.83
00:38:35.920 the ideologies that she's promoting are a little bit more pernicious like it isn't as
00:38:40.860 obvious some of it's obvious like in kimmy schmidt and like in in 30 rock especially when you revisit
00:38:47.160 30 rock but then some of it too what is the name of the movie she was in um when she's a journalist
00:38:54.440 in the middle east oh uh whiskey whiskey tango fox trot totally forgettable
00:39:02.060 and it's all about her going to like be a journalist in afghanistan in 2003 like of 0.52
00:39:10.080 course this movie is going to be kind of fucked up right and that's the sort of thing that like
00:39:16.140 no one is there is no enduring conversation around this movie and all of the different 0.87
00:39:20.600 ways that it was fucked up i wrote about it at the time and i would have to go back and like
00:39:24.740 read the article to remember all of these ways but i just remember that like this movie is not 0.80
00:39:30.140 so offensive that it's causing an uproar but that doesn't mean that it's still not offensive
00:39:35.600 yeah well and something that is disorienting you know I think we've talked about like the
00:39:41.240 disorientation of seeing artifacts of your youth dusted off for a new generation realizing the time
00:39:47.020 that's elapsed but something that's unsettling from like this point in your life when you're
00:39:52.440 looking back on cultural conversations is realizing that there's this narrative that like things used
00:39:56.980 to be different you know that we're in this woke culture now where like certain kinds of jokes are
00:40:01.640 not okay but it didn't used to be like that in the early 2000s which is the kind of thing I
00:40:06.020 remember hearing in the early 2000s about like racist jokes in the 90s and it's this eternally
00:40:10.620 renewable argument that like you know back in the day we didn't know this was offensive or like
00:40:15.360 people had a better sense of humor they could take a joke and I don't I don't actually think
00:40:20.420 that was true like I think in 2004 people were capable of you know noticing and condemning when
00:40:25.600 something was like homophobic or racist and so it's this sort of useful defense that's trotted
00:40:31.760 out and it is a little bit unsettling sometimes to see you know people who are in their teens or
00:40:36.400 early 20s now who are who are sort of believing that things are different than you know the other
00:40:41.200 example that I keep seeing people talk about lately is this nostalgia about cultural unity
00:40:47.340 after 9-11 right and how you know how the whole country came together which is such a revisionist
00:40:52.420 narrative that excludes the experience of um you know in particular muslims and and arab americans
00:40:59.100 who were not part of that unity and who were really targeted in that period and and in this
00:41:05.340 current period but you know it's it's really weird to see i guess things that you remember happening
00:41:10.760 and like conversations you remember having then sort of erased for the convenience of saying
00:41:16.500 you know what i did then was was fine it was all good it's not fair to retroactively critique
00:41:22.340 me for something that was acceptable it's a real revisionist history this is actually a great way
00:41:29.500 to talk about our next question which is all about like why reboots why this nostalgia for
00:41:35.820 especially I think this particular time period right now but a lot of different time periods
00:41:41.160 as well like the 90s so okay this is from Anna there are so many throwbacks for millennials
00:41:46.620 and I don't think other generations had this trend what is happening with us to drive this
00:41:51.600 I would just say that it's easy and understandable that we as millennials think that there are a lot of throwbacks for us. You know who had the most throwbacks in the whole world is boomers. There is so much boomer throwback content that happened over the course of the 1980s and 90s. And we don't realize it. We didn't understand it because it wasn't our stuff. Right. 0.59
00:42:15.420 A lot of it, I think, was slightly rejiggered.
00:42:17.880 So something like You've Got Mail, which is a remake of content that maybe might have been part of various boomers growing up understanding or like even nostalgia for things like, I don't know, like Happy Days.
00:42:32.460 In my mind, I thought Happy Days was like made in the 50s.
00:42:36.700 It was not.
00:42:39.020 Well, and I mean, part of Mean Girls, Lindsay Loren's two biggest roles arguably were remakes, right?
00:42:44.080 freaky friday was a remake and the parent trap was a remake and she's fabulous in both those
00:42:50.340 movies but those were also remakes of sort of like gen x era films and so i think like reboots
00:42:57.380 are a timeless a timeless cultural phenomenon but maybe what makes them feel more frequent now is
00:43:03.280 also just like the pace of remakes like what's happened in studio filmmaking feels like it's
00:43:08.680 changed a lot where there's this like sort of frantic pace of like recycling IP in order to
00:43:15.300 like maximize its value so that's why we get like a new Spider-Man movie every two years
00:43:19.940 and a new Marvel movie like every time I turn around there's a new one and so it feels like
00:43:26.340 it's happening more frequently maybe because it is happening more frequently but the phenomenon
00:43:30.940 itself is is not unique to millennials I think it's just that we're seeing it happen on this
00:43:36.860 like really rapid iteration. Yeah. And it's risk minimalization as well. Right. I think a lot of
00:43:45.400 studios, because of the way that Hollywood is organized now, only want to pour money into
00:43:50.940 projects that they feel like have a guaranteed audience in some capacity. And blockbusters are
00:43:57.560 one of those things. And then the other thing that they're willing to, quote unquote, risk money on
00:44:03.500 is stuff that is oriented towards women but with existing ip so barbie makes sense here
00:44:11.960 and mean girls make sense but like it's just to me it just feels very condescending it feels very
00:44:20.040 like pedantic like that we wouldn't like people wouldn't embrace new stories in any way and i
00:44:26.940 think that's you know you see sort of a similar phenomenon in publishing too where there's a lot
00:44:32.580 of emphasis on promoting like a few big titles every year and then there is you know all these
00:44:38.940 other books that get basically no promotion but maybe once in a while one of them reaches some
00:44:43.780 kind of like mainstream success like bottoms was a real breakout i think and a great movie for women
00:44:49.400 um or that reached a lot of women but didn't get that kind of studio support and and so you know
00:44:56.360 you have these like few big films that get all the resources and then a bunch that are kind of left
00:45:02.240 to fend for themselves that that might just endure because an audience discovers them but what
00:45:07.720 Hollywood has lost and I think what a lot of creative industries have lost is that middle
00:45:11.820 layer you know yeah like a movie like you got mail the whole rom-com genre is kind of depleted now
00:45:19.560 because there are these mid-budget mid-tier movies that are not big enough to justify sinking
00:45:25.440 that kind of money into a marketing budget but they're not small enough to get made maybe by
00:45:31.380 like an indie director so yeah i think a lot of that that energy has been moved into streaming
00:45:39.200 for better and for worse and it makes me sad because i love going to the movie theater
00:45:44.120 right i love going to see a mid-budget movie that's not a blockbuster that's not necessarily
00:45:51.040 a prestige picture because that's the other thing it's like i don't not everything needs to be like
00:45:55.480 something that has these like blockbuster performances where people wear a lot of
00:45:59.760 makeup in order for me to like it like i want that middle tier and it feels like no one is
00:46:06.840 listening to the millions of us who are so hungry for it well and i think again that's that's sort
00:46:13.360 of what energy mean girls and you know it's it's kind of parallel barbie we're trying to do is get
00:46:19.760 people to go to the movies by promising them like a moment like a really yes um a really experience
00:46:26.200 based you know movie going trip because it's true that the movie theaters and the studios are
00:46:33.160 competing against the the comfort of streaming where you can be at home on your couch you know
00:46:37.820 looking at your phone without anyone giving you a dirty look in the theater um you can be like a 0.56
00:46:42.940 total slob with no respect for the conduct of society at home but at theater hopefully you're 0.54
00:46:48.680 still muting your phone and and so you have to be like promising people not just a great movie but 0.81
00:46:53.880 like an experience that makes it worth dressing up going to the theater going with your friends
00:46:58.280 like planning a date around it and I mean I think the other movie that did that well
00:47:03.380 in the past I don't know if the third one was successful as much but Magic Mike as a franchise
00:47:08.540 was a cinematic experience like I've never been in a theater where so many people were
00:47:13.760 hooting and hollering at the screen I know well and that movie too I think took women's pleasure
00:47:19.220 seriously and like took some risks in terms of like the jokes and even like the cinematography
00:47:26.940 and like the first one particularly is dark and i kind of like how it's like oh like there's all 0.92
00:47:34.820 this like sexiness and then also this is dark as shit because like the life is dark these are 0.68
00:47:40.460 movies about the first one i think is about the 2008 recession in particular and and the newest 0.98
00:47:47.980 This one is also about, like, the current recession and, like, the economic challenges of being, like, in some ways an aging creative in a depleting industry.
00:47:55.340 I think that there are great movies about the economy that are also about women's pleasure.
00:47:59.960 We should do an episode that's just a – like, we could just watch all three and just go, like, deep.
00:48:04.520 Anytime.
00:48:05.480 Oh, my God.
00:48:06.100 I think there are incredible cultural artifacts.
00:48:07.820 And they're an example of how you can make a movie for women that's not just, like, what do women like? 1.00
00:48:11.960 They like pink. 1.00
00:48:12.900 They like jokes about how other women are mean to them. 1.00
00:48:15.280 this brings us full circle because i don't know if tina fey actually likes other women like i
00:48:23.520 think she likes amy poehler but i don't know if she likes other women i think channing tatum
00:48:27.560 loves women likes women is friends with women dates smart women is engaged to another smart
00:48:36.180 like you know like i think that there's just this um i like women that like escapes from him
00:48:43.100 without him even trying whereas i think i'm collaborating with rox and gay you know yes
00:48:49.680 i do not get that sense from tina fey ever ever yeah and i think that's you know that's sort of
00:48:56.120 the central tension in trying to update something like mean girls which i don't know that this
00:49:01.760 trailer suggests they've done well which is that in in the early 2000s it was still you know sort
00:49:06.740 of part of the culture to be really catty about other women and that's part of what mean girls
00:49:10.760 was sort of trying to subvert by talking about how girls should be nicer to each other and not 0.98
00:49:15.440 write mean things in this burn book but it was still sort of the you know the foundation of the
00:49:19.700 story like 2004 was when we had jessica simpson on newlyweds and the premise of that show was
00:49:26.960 people making fun of how she was like hot and stupid because she thought that tuna was the 1.00
00:49:30.640 chicken of the sea yes and you know and paris hilton's like the simple life was on tv then 1.00
00:49:36.220 like it was a time where the idea was like look how many dumb women there are and you're smarter 0.95
00:49:40.620 than them so you can make fun of them and I don't know that that scans very well in 2023 I think 1.00
00:49:46.880 we've moved past that idea that like making fun of you know dividing women into these camps of like 0.55
00:49:52.480 smart hot and dumb are a good way to to entertain and connect with each other yeah so we purposely
00:50:02.360 wanted to focus on the trailer because we wanted to make this episode accessible to everyone not 0.68
00:50:06.940 just people who could get out of their houses
00:50:09.000 and watch this movie in the theaters.
00:50:10.800 But we would love to hear your thoughts
00:50:12.500 once you have seen the movie.
00:50:15.000 You can find us and this discussion on the Substack page.
00:50:19.240 Now, Michelle, if people want to hear more from you,
00:50:21.600 where can they find you on the internet?
00:50:23.280 They can find me at,
00:50:24.800 unfortunately, I'm still on Twitter,
00:50:26.800 at Michelle Cisa.
00:50:29.020 I'm on Instagram.
00:50:30.040 And you can find my writing on The Walrus
00:50:32.240 as well as The Narwhal,
00:50:33.840 where I edit stories about indigenous-led conservation.
00:50:38.280 And, you know, media being what it is in 2023,
00:50:41.080 my byline is kind of all over the place.
00:50:43.700 Amazing.
00:50:44.240 Thank you so much.
00:50:45.820 Thank you for having me.
00:50:47.620 If you're a paid subscriber, stick around.
00:50:49.680 Melody and I are going to do advice time 0.63
00:50:51.620 answering a question about an awkward workplace bathroom situation. 0.99
00:50:57.340 This one is tops.
00:50:58.220 I don't know if I've ever given better advice.
00:51:00.820 So you really want to stick around and listen.
00:51:03.840 thanks for listening to the culture study podcast be sure to subscribe wherever you get your podcasts
00:51:11.840 we have so many great episodes in the works and i promise you do not want to miss any of them if
00:51:17.340 you want to suggest a topic ask a question about the culture that surrounds you or submit a question
00:51:21.940 for our subscriber only advice time segment check the show notes for a link to our sub stack
00:51:26.620 some of the shows we have in the pipeline include all things goodreads like why does it suck so
00:51:31.940 much? What's the deal with Moms for Liberty? Is it actually bad to sit all the time the way that
00:51:37.740 so many of us do? Like what's the deal with sitting? Is it actually a bad thing? And the
00:51:43.060 cultural force that was Christian rock music. If you want to support the show and get bonus content,
00:51:48.840 head to culturestudypod.substack.com. It's five bucks a month or $50 a year,
00:51:54.560 and you'll get ad-free episodes, an exclusive advice time segment, weekly discussion threads
00:51:59.520 for each episode and a link to a special Google form
00:52:02.300 so that your questions go to the front of the line.
00:52:05.040 By the way, if you already subscribe
00:52:06.600 to the Culture Study newsletter, you get a discount.
00:52:09.240 Just search your email for Culture Study Podcast bonus code
00:52:13.420 and it should come up.
00:52:14.560 If it doesn't, just send us an email.
00:52:16.840 The Culture Study Podcast is produced by me,
00:52:19.220 Anne Helen Peterson, and Melody Rowell.
00:52:21.400 Our music is by Pottington Bear.
00:52:23.340 You can find me on Instagram at Anne Helen Peterson,
00:52:26.580 Melody on Instagram at Melodious47,
00:52:29.520 and the show at Culture Study Pod.
00:52:32.240 Thanks for listening, and we'll talk again soon.