For The Wild - February 06, 2019


Dr. CARLOS NOBRE on the Shifting Future of the Amazon ⧸106

Topics
SUBHANKAR BANERJEE on Defending Arctic Alaska ⧸105 ERIEL TCHEKWIE DERANGER on Solidarity with Unist'ot'en ⧸107

Episode Stats


Length

58 minutes

Words per minute

114.33

Word count

6,644

Sentence count

312


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 This podcast is brought to you through support from our partner, the Kalliopea Foundation.
00:00:05.120 The Kalliopea Foundation envisions a future grounded in compassion, respect, dignity,
00:00:11.100 reverence for nature, and care for each other in the earth.
00:00:13.720 To learn more, visit Kalliopea.org.
00:00:16.400 Merging traditional knowledge with modern scientific and technological knowledge to really
00:00:37.480 to tap, to harness that potential, which is tremendous, is gigantic.
00:00:46.400 Hello and welcome to For the Wild podcast. I'm Ayanna Young. Today we are speaking with Carlos
00:00:56.120 Nobre. Dr. Carlos Nobre is currently science director of the research project National
00:01:02.220 Institute of Science and Technology for Climate Change, chair of the Brazilian panel on climate
00:01:07.560 change, and the creator of Brazil's National Center for Monitoring and Alerts of Natural
00:01:12.720 disasters. Dr. Nobre chaired the large-scale biosphere-atmosphere experiment in Amazonia,
00:01:19.920 an international research initiative designed to create the new knowledge needed to understand
00:01:25.060 the climactic, ecological, biogeochemical, and hydrological functioning of Amazonia,
00:01:31.360 the impact of land use and climate changes on these functions, and the interactions between
00:01:36.800 Amazonia and the Earth System. He has also been a member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
00:01:43.040 Change and was a member of the UN Secretary General Scientific Advisory Board for Global
00:01:48.400 Sustainability. As a climate and earth system scientist, his work focuses on the Amazon and
00:01:54.720 its impacts on the earth system, climate modeling, and global environmental change.
00:01:59.640 well i just want to say thank you so much again dr nobre for joining us today on for the wild
00:02:07.420 podcast i'm really looking forward to this conversation because i feel like there's so
00:02:13.660 much talk about the amazon rainforest but i i actually feel like there's very little
00:02:18.780 global understanding of the complexities of the situation and the forest and the policies and
00:02:25.240 climate change. So this is a really important conversation to be having with you. And I just
00:02:30.140 want to start off by giving you a bow of gratitude for coming on the show. Okay, my pleasure.
00:02:37.600 So I'd like to start by asking you to just briefly introduce your most recent and notable research
00:02:44.460 on the tipping points of the Amazon rainforest. And I'm wondering if you can share more on
00:02:50.580 Amazonia's stable equilibrium states, what increase in temperature or percentage of deforestation
00:02:56.660 you found to be detrimental to the rainforest hydrological cycle, and then where the Amazon
00:03:02.560 rainforest currently is in regards to these tipping points. Yes, I've been doing for a long
00:03:09.940 time, research on the stability of the forest atmosphere interactions, biosphere atmosphere
00:03:20.200 interactions. And I launched a long time ago in 1990, 1991, two papers, one in science,
00:03:29.580 the so-called hypothesis of Amazon deforestation.
00:03:34.980 Back then, we launched this hypothesis, which was, in simple terms,
00:03:43.500 something like, if we deforest all of the Amazon,
00:03:47.880 we replace the tropical forest by grazing land, by grass, by pasture land,
00:03:56.220 what would happen to climate, and even what would happen to the likelihood of the forest
00:04:06.020 reclaiming back the area if, let's say, agricultural grazing is abandoned.
00:04:12.020 So, to our surprise, the calculations back there with very initial stages of climate models,
00:04:23.280 That was late 1980s when I carried out that research.
00:04:28.580 The climate models were much less sophisticated than they are today.
00:04:33.200 But we got this surprising answer, which was, let's say, almost one third of the area covered by forest would not go back to forest.
00:04:46.960 It would become a savanna.
00:04:49.060 And we explore why would that happen.
00:04:51.820 And the reason was that as soon as you replace all of the Amazon with a different type of vegetation, let's say grass, the interaction between grass covered land and the atmosphere will be very different from the interactions of a tropical forest with the atmosphere.
00:05:16.180 Basically, the tropical forest is a very potent vegetation to draw water deep down with a very deep rooting system, several meters, 5, 6, 10 meter depth rooting systems.
00:05:37.020 So draw water from depth and then bring the water to the leaves and transpire that water.
00:05:44.560 all year round. So, during the dry season in the Amazon, the forest is pumping terrific amount
00:05:54.560 of water. So, it wets up the lower atmosphere and that helps to produce the elements for rainfall.
00:06:06.440 So, in most of the Amazon, if you measure transpiration of the forest, it's higher during the dry season than during the wet season.
00:06:19.480 Just the opposite, what grass would be doing.
00:06:24.140 Grass has short roots, and during the dry season, it enters senescence.
00:06:31.780 It really almost shuts down transpiring water.
00:06:36.440 So much less water recycling.
00:06:39.540 So in sum, our study at that time really predicted that replacement of the tropical forest by grass would lead to less rain in the Amazon.
00:06:54.540 In that initial calculation, we said rainfall in the Amazon might decline up to 25 percent.
00:07:03.200 Of course, there has set off a very large number of research studies, many field experiments.
00:07:13.440 The most important one I was very involved with, it's called Large-Scale Biosphere Atmosphere Experiment in the Amazon from 1998 even to date.
00:07:25.540 It's still going on. You know, hundreds of scientists went to the Amazon, studied very in detail these interactions between the forest and the atmosphere between areas where forest was replaced.
00:07:38.860 So we have a very good understanding on this forest atmosphere interactions today. And indeed, there is much less water recycling when you when you replace the forest.
00:07:52.700 So basically, many studies have shown there is a very high risk of much less or significantly less rainfall if you replace the forest.
00:08:04.980 So that's really what is driving this hyvanization hypothesis or what might happen if we deforest the Amazon.
00:08:15.660 Of course, that was the initial result. Since the year 2000, I've been involved in trying to see what would be the thresholds, what would lead to the savanization. Some people call it forest dieback.
00:08:30.680 I call it savannization because the equilibrium vegetation that might replace the forest is the tropical savannas.
00:08:41.280 Tropical savannas, there is something like 2.5 million square kilometers of tropical savannas in tropical South America,
00:08:49.660 mostly in Brazil, but also in Bolivia, Venezuela.
00:08:52.160 And so that would be equilibrium vegetation that is consistent with less rainfall and also with very pronounced dry seasons.
00:09:07.420 In the Amazon, dry season is very short. It's not more than three months. In the central Brazil, in the savannah-dominated area, dry season is four, five, up to six months.
00:09:20.380 So then, you know, we also discover that savannas in the Amazon would be stable with this new climate.
00:09:33.020 So if the Amazon becomes a savanna, it will become a savanna for a long time because the rainfall will decline.
00:09:41.520 So more consistent with a savanna-like climate envelope, as we call it.
00:09:47.940 Longer dry season, four, five, six months dry season, typical savanna dry seasons, and also a very important element.
00:09:56.940 And savannas have evolved over millions of years, tens of millions of years, to be fire
00:10:05.360 resistant.
00:10:06.340 So fire does not destroy a savanna.
00:10:08.900 Of course, it reduces biomass after a fire, but that savanna, over time, it really comes
00:10:18.340 back.
00:10:18.700 It bounces back and it becomes a savanna, which is this mix of trees which are fire resistant
00:10:25.260 and the grassland. Usually, it's something like in the tropical South American savannas,
00:10:32.560 something between 30 and 40 percent of the area is covered by trees, and 60 to 70 percent of the
00:10:41.080 area is covered by grassland. So, then the next question was, what are the tipping points? What
00:10:49.060 are the important elements that might drive the forest into becoming a savannah.
00:10:54.980 And then we've done a lot of research using models, using observations from the Amazon.
00:11:05.180 And then recently, in 2016, we published a paper in which we analyzed several elements.
00:11:15.760 One is deforestation.
00:11:18.460 What level of deforestation might lead to this savanization?
00:11:24.120 With a student of mine, Sampaio, we published a paper in 2007 in which we made the first, we put out the first assessment.
00:11:36.640 That is, if only deforestation is in the play, only deforestation, there is no global warming or no effect of fire, forest fires, only deforestation, we came to this figure.
00:11:51.420 40 percent of deforestation was the threshold. If we transgressed 40 percent of the total forest area to become pasture, let's say, then that would lead to a regional climate change towards a drier climate, less rainfall and longer dry season.
00:12:15.520 And that's very compatible with the savannah. So then we picked our first figure, which is 40 percent as a tipping point, only considering deforestation.
00:12:30.620 Then with another student, Salazar, also in 2007, we made calculations what would be the
00:12:40.240 threshold for global warming.
00:12:42.140 If we did not have any deforestation, the forest was there, preserved, but we have climate
00:12:47.940 change due to global warming impacting the Amazon, and it does impact severely the Amazon,
00:12:54.140 what would be the thresholds for climate global warming?
00:12:58.500 And then, of course, the way global warming operates is that global warming changes tropical circulations, the important tropical atmospheric circulations, which provide the climate as we know in the tropics over the Amazon.
00:13:15.200 And the global warming, if we exceed a certain threshold in global warming, there will be very large and very large scale changes in the global tropical circulations.
00:13:31.280 We have a name for those circulations.
00:13:33.460 They are called Hadley-Walker circulations.
00:13:35.980 They are global scale circulations.
00:13:38.580 Basically, they are originated in the tropics.
00:13:41.200 basically when you have rainfall
00:13:45.440 you have ascending air in the atmosphere
00:13:49.440 and then that air will descend
00:13:53.180 somewhere, wherever this air is descending
00:13:56.860 is a very dry area like the desert
00:13:59.720 so this hardly circulation shows
00:14:02.480 there is ascending air in the tropics
00:14:05.660 descending air in the subtropics
00:14:08.140 And the desert belt around the globe, let's say Mexico, southern U.S., let's say Patagonia, and Africa, Sahel, and China, all are in this desert belt associated with this Hadley circulation.
00:14:26.500 And also, we have this so-called Walker circulation, which is very similar to Hadley, but they are not north-south circulations.
00:14:35.480 They are east-west.
00:14:38.000 For instance, we have a lot of rainfall over the Amazon and over Indonesia, and that there is ascending air over those two areas and descending air over central and eastern Pacific Ocean, which is a very dry area.
00:14:54.080 So, global warming changes the nature of these circulations. It makes these circulations much stronger over the ocean, over the Pacific, over the Atlantic, and the end effect is less rain over the Amazon.
00:15:11.620 So basically what climate change scenarios indicated for the Amazon, for most of the Amazon, except the western most part of the Amazon near the Andes, they show a decline in rainfall, sufficient decline to change the vegetation to a savanna.
00:15:33.820 So again, a second tipping point. And if only global warming is operating, there is no deforestation. We came up to this calculation that four degrees warming in the Amazon, which associated hydrological changes.
00:15:52.820 So it's not only a temperature effect. Of course, temperature also affects the tree distribution. Very high temperature are not consistent with most tropical species in the Amazon. But our calculation look both at temperature extremes, but also at hydrological changes and particularly this reduction of rainfall and the increasing length of the dry season.
00:16:20.460 So then we got this four degrees threshold for global warming in the Amazon and the associated hydrological changes, meaning less rainfall, longer dry season.
00:16:32.840 So we came up with these two tipping points.
00:16:36.460 And then in 2016, we looked at if we put all those things together, basically looking at what might happen if all those things would be happening as they are simultaneously.
00:16:49.760 So we made a calculation in which there is deforestation, there is global warming, and one additional effect, which is the increase in forest fires.
00:17:03.120 Tropical forests, they are very much, you know, in normal states, they are impenetrable to fire because they are very wet.
00:17:12.920 Even if there is a lightning-generated fire to ignite a fire, the forest is so wet that the fire does not propagate except for a few tens or perhaps a hundred, 150 meters.
00:17:29.980 So the forest evolved without fire, by and large.
00:17:35.520 Very exceptionally, there are a large-scale fire in the Amazon.
00:17:39.340 However, with drying out, with roads, with deforestation, with this patchy mosaic form of land use change, so you really make the forest much more vulnerable to fire.
00:17:58.640 Because you have less biomass, you have much more solar radiation penetrating, drying out the litter over on the top of the forest floor.
00:18:12.200 So forest becoming flammable.
00:18:15.940 And we are seeing that more and more and more all the time.
00:18:21.520 You know, forest fires in the Amazon are something happening every year with higher frequency.
00:18:28.720 So we also factor in our calculations what would be the effect of increased forest fires, how forest fires reduces the increases vulnerability of forests versus savanna.
00:18:46.880 So we put that factor also.
00:18:48.680 So when we put all these factors together, then we concluded that given the current trends of global warming, we would be on the safe side if deforestation does not exceed 20 to 25 percent.
00:19:10.540 And we published that in last February, an editorial in Scientific Advances, just to really to draw attention, worldwide attention, that we might not be very far from that tipping point.
00:19:28.020 total deforestation in the Amazon basin is about 16, 17 percent. So we, in our calculations,
00:19:37.020 we have this range 20, 25 percent of total deforestation. And of course, this is because
00:19:45.760 we have at the same time, simultaneously, we have global warming. The temperature over the Amazon
00:19:51.660 forest is about 1 to 1.5 degrees warmer today than, let's say, 80 years ago, when we started
00:20:00.200 having the first temperature measurements in the Amazon. And also, as I mentioned, forest fires are
00:20:10.140 much more frequent, perhaps three, five times, up to 10 times more frequent than they used to be
00:20:17.100 only in a natural setting with lightning strikes, ignating fire.
00:20:24.160 So that, in sum, is our conclusion today.
00:20:29.480 That's why we decided to draw attention that we might not be that far from a tipping point
00:20:35.940 with 20, 25 percent Amazon total deforestation.
00:20:42.340 And that's why we are calling for a zero deforestation policy for the Amazon to be reached as soon as possible.
00:21:12.340 For many of us, we want to compartmentalize the issues.
00:21:39.920 we want to ask well what poses a greater risk is it deforestation is it temperature change is it
00:21:46.560 politics you know we're we're i think we're not taught how these complexities weave together and
00:21:53.060 so to hear from you that it's not just one threat it's how these threats play into one another like
00:22:01.940 i think about the fact that global warming and climate change is creating these more severe
00:22:08.180 weather patterns which then is creating less rainfall in areas that are typically very wet
00:22:14.120 and then you add deforestation on top of that which then releases carbon into the atmosphere
00:22:18.720 accelerates climate change and also dries out the soil which then totally messes up the forest
00:22:25.760 hydrology let alone the fact that the trees aren't calling the water in from the ocean
00:22:29.740 so it really is compounding it's these tipping points feed off one another and i think that's
00:22:36.060 really important for us to understand when we're trying to have a comprehensive understanding of
00:22:41.040 the situation. And I feel like that's missing so much in science and so much in the misinformation
00:22:46.980 of the media is that we're not hearing the comprehensiveness of these studies and these
00:22:53.020 understandings of why ecosystems are collapsing in the way they are. So I'm very grateful that
00:23:00.380 you have looked into all of the intricacies and are helping so many of us really learn
00:23:07.900 why the Amazon is so threatened right now and I want to talk about another threat that I kind of
00:23:16.040 briefly touched on and I know that at the beginning of 2018 you and your colleague Thomas Lovejoy
00:23:22.680 stated that not only does further deforestation need to be curbed but a margin of safety against
00:23:28.920 the tipping points must be implemented. However, since then, Jair Bolsonaro became Brazil's new
00:23:36.980 president, and Bolsonaro has been outspoken about his desire to end Brazil's environmental ministry.
00:23:44.860 And within a day of taking office, he actually signed an executive order transferring the
00:23:50.240 regulation and creation of indigenous reserves to the Ministry of Agriculture, which seems to be a
00:23:57.020 clear nod to big agribusiness. So I'm curious if you believe this presidency poses a genuine
00:24:04.100 threat to Amazonia and what are the global consequences of this election? I prefer to
00:24:11.900 go back a little bit this. I don't think it's only this particular government and not only
00:24:19.180 in Brazil. What we are seeing, I guess, it's, let's say, the very strong agribusiness sector
00:24:31.120 in the Amazonian countries' economy is very powerful economic and very powerful and very
00:24:37.640 important economic sector in Brazil, but also in Bolivia, in all Amazonian countries. Perhaps
00:24:45.900 The Amazon portion of those countries is more important in Brazil and Bolivia compared to Colombia, Peru, Ecuador and Venezuela and Kianas.
00:24:55.060 But this sector, they've been fighting very powerfully, economically and politically as well, for several years to, let's say, to lift any environmental legislation that would put controls on the pace of deforestation.
00:25:22.700 So let's say the election of the current Brazilian president is not the only isolated fact.
00:25:32.300 I mean, this in Brazil in particular, in 2012, the Brazilian Congress approved of a
00:25:40.420 flexibilization of the forest that really unleashed a process that is to expand deforestation.
00:25:49.960 Of course, we did not see that happening immediately after the new legislation was approved by Congress, 2012, 13, 14 years, or lower deforestation, lowest in 30 years.
00:26:05.980 However, the deforestation rates started to increase in 2015, 16, 17, and very likely 18.
00:26:16.220 So basically, I think, you know, the current president, environmental policies really follow very much what we are seeing over the last five years.
00:26:29.520 It's not something only that everything was going very well and now there is these completely different ideas.
00:26:37.220 I think he just is going to, he's trying at least to give much more muscle to a policy which is going on for several years.
00:26:52.120 And it's the policy that, let's say, fought back that very successful policy that Brazil and all Amazonian countries, in fact, had from, let's say, 2005 all the way to 2013, 2014.
00:27:08.120 So it's kind of, you know, a swing back to the old idea that there is no better use of the Amazon than to replace the forest by grazing land for beef or for soy.
00:27:26.280 So this is, let's say, a moment in the Amazonian country's history that we thought belonged to the past, but now it's the present.
00:27:36.620 So it's the dominance of this economic sector, which great representation in Congress, in all these Amazonian countries, the agribusiness sector is represented in large quantities in Brazil until the last legislature.
00:27:59.760 Something like 30% of the congressmen and women belong to this rural, as they call rural caucus. So they are very powerful politically. And I think, you know, this new government in Brazil really made that completely transparent and open.
00:28:20.300 Now it's it's they defend that kind of model openly until last year.
00:28:27.360 In fact, I mean, the legislation was being becoming more flexible, more flexible in that direction to open up not only the Amazon,
00:28:36.480 but also the savannas in central Brazil, to big, big, large-scale, industrial-scale agribusiness
00:28:44.520 and replacing the original biomes with soy and mostly grazing land for beef.
00:28:53.200 So, yes, the risks are there, and we are, all of us, are very concerned.
00:29:03.380 On the other hand, not to sound too optimistic, but this president was elected with a majority of people who hoped that he would or he will really take Brazil out of economic recession.
00:29:23.400 Brazil has 12 million unemployed people, largest unemployed rates in many, many, many decades.
00:29:31.980 And Brazil is one of the most violent countries in the world, urban and rural violent.
00:29:39.560 Homicide rates are very high.
00:29:42.260 So also people who voted for this president also hope that he will be able to reduce urban violence and also put Brazil back on economic growth trajectory to generate income and jobs.
00:30:03.540 However, in a democracy, we have really to pay attention that for over 20 years, always in any public opinion poll, over 90 percent of Brazilians are very strongly against Amazon deforestation.
00:30:22.760 So if we think that Brazil is a democracy and eventually this president and his ministers will have to start paying some attention back to what the population wants.
00:30:37.420 The population of Brazil is very strongly against a development model which reduces the Amazon forest, which cuts down the forest, which leads to forest devastation.
00:30:50.440 And really, there is very little economic reasons to do it, because the productivity of agriculture in the Amazon is very low.
00:31:04.780 The productivity of cattle raising in the Amazon is unbelievably low.
00:31:10.180 It's less than one head of cattle per hectare, 10,000 square meters.
00:31:16.020 This is one of the lowest in the world.
00:31:18.880 This is really against even good economic sense.
00:31:23.680 It does not make economic sense to have such a low productivity.
00:31:28.460 Also, even soil productivities, which are higher in central Brazil, in the savannah areas, still is way below the potential of productivity.
00:31:38.640 So, the more modern, the more organized agribusiness in Brazil stopped really calling for irreversible drive towards the forest or the savannas.
00:31:52.160 They are becoming more reasonable.
00:31:54.180 They are really calling for intensification of agriculture.
00:31:59.400 And some of these groups also talk about sustainable intensification of agriculture.
00:32:04.920 So I might say we are in a moment that if we believe democracy will prevail, then eventually the popular reaction against open deforestation policies, as it appears to be looking at one week of government after it was sworn in a few days ago, might change.
00:32:32.620 I think, you know, the reaction against pro-deforestation policy in the Amazon will be very strong in Brazil because the population does not want that.
00:32:44.020 And eventually, this government will also pay attention to the more modern agribusiness sector, which does not also want to really to move along those policies.
00:32:57.940 And so, but of course, I mean, this is an optimistic view.
00:33:02.420 We have to carefully monitor, follow every measure, policy measure, and then to monitor what will be the end result of that.
00:33:16.960 Gosh, there is so much in that last response that is swirling through my head.
00:33:21.780 I think a lot about what we're told up here in North America, specifically the United States,
00:33:29.360 about cattle grazing, beef production. I feel like there's a lot more activists that are saying
00:33:36.360 don't eat beef because carbon pollution and deforestation of the Amazon, but then maybe
00:33:43.820 they're not looking at soy products. And just becoming vegan or vegetarian and eating soy
00:33:51.440 isn't the answer either when that's also this great cause for deforestation and then on top
00:33:57.560 of that to learn that it's not even that productive is really you know it's not honestly
00:34:03.460 not even shocking because I see this constantly throughout this global capitalist system where
00:34:09.700 it doesn't even matter if things are efficient to an extent as long as somebody is making money at
00:34:15.380 the end of the day and I think that really fits into what you're saying about the crime issue it's
00:34:20.780 this catch-22 because many times crime is related, really directly related to poverty
00:34:27.500 and lack of access. But then what governments will try to do is create more projects for
00:34:33.540 jobs. But what that usually means is resource extraction, which then hurts the environment
00:34:39.280 even more. So there's this really big question mark of how do we move forward, especially in
00:34:46.300 Amazonia, which is so globally mandatory for the stable homeostasis of the planet. And so I've read
00:34:55.280 that, you know, you've previously stated that thus far approaches towards Amazonia are either solely
00:35:01.020 through the lens of preservation or consumption. And as I understand it, you also believe that
00:35:07.800 each of these methods is unsuccessful in yielding deforestation. So instead you advocate for a third
00:35:14.520 way which utilizes technology to create sustainable development and i'm really curious how you think
00:35:20.620 sustainable development of the global tropics is possible i i came to the conclusion of course you
00:35:28.320 know if you look uh about 47 of the amazon forest is under some kind of protection indigenous land
00:35:38.760 and or conservation units in all Amazonian countries,
00:35:44.400 which is highest in the world.
00:35:46.440 I mean, still, you know, we might say, well, the Amazon is protected.
00:35:49.960 And also, let's say in Brazil, this figure is over about 50%.
00:35:54.760 And also we have about still 20 to 25% of the Amazon forest is still public land.
00:36:05.400 It's not private property.
00:36:07.420 So, you know, government can still give a proper destination.
00:36:12.440 One might say, well, you know, 50% is protected.
00:36:15.860 But, of course, those protected areas, they are under threat.
00:36:21.360 Threat by encroaching deforestation.
00:36:25.540 You know, there is a big indigenous territory in southeastern Amazon.
00:36:30.780 It's called Xingu Indigenous Land, which is very large, 28,000 square kilometers.
00:36:36.400 But it's completely encroached from the south by soy farms, by cattle, ranches and things like that.
00:36:44.860 And also the climate change, the extreme droughts that we're observing in the Amazon in the last 13, 14 years also present a serious danger to these protected areas.
00:36:57.300 So, I came to the conclusion that only talking about protection would not be what we call first way, would not be sufficient, although, of course, it's very important to maintain all those areas protected and also to give proper destination to most of these, still 20% of Brazilian Amazon, which are public lands, also towards protection.
00:37:23.960 However, the second way we termed this very much large-scale, industrial-scale deforestation-led conversion of forests into grazing lands and crops, and we concluded that that would not lead to real development.
00:37:46.580 Not to the Amazon people, not to Brazil, because, as I mentioned before, productivity is very low, very, very low.
00:37:55.140 And, you know, most of the forest areas, clear areas in the Amazon are for grazing land.
00:38:03.960 About 70 percent is for grazing land.
00:38:07.000 And out of those 70 percent, about 20, 25 percent have already been abandoned.
00:38:13.800 So it's a very inefficient system in which the cattle rancher is operating a pasture for a decade, 15 years, and then productivity becomes very depleted, very, very low, does not have a way to keep the cattle in that property, and then moves on, clears more land, and this cycle continues.
00:38:40.100 So we said this second way is unattainable. We have to find the third way to see some economic benefit coming from the Amazon, but not second way, which is a resource intensive way, which is this large scale agriculture and also mining and hydropower.
00:39:02.820 So that's why we conceived of what we call third way for the Amazon, which would be a biodiversity driven bioeconomy.
00:39:15.460 It's a new concept. It's a bioeconomy with standing forests.
00:39:21.020 So it's a very clear principle of this third way is standing forests and also flowing rivers, because, in fact, the potential for new renewable energies in Brazil, mostly solar and wind, is so gigantic that there is no need for further big, big hydroelectric dams, which create a number of problems.
00:39:48.580 And that energy is no longer necessary for Brazil's development and also for other Amazonian countries' development.
00:39:57.200 In spite of the fact that there are many, tens of new dams planned to be developed over the next few decades.
00:40:08.300 But anyway, the third way then looks at what?
00:40:11.360 Looks at the intrinsic economic value of biodiversity.
00:40:15.560 diversity, the biological assets hidden in a forest have a tremendous economic potential,
00:40:26.180 which has not been tapped, hasn't been explored for lack of knowledge, for lack of science.
00:40:32.840 But we have some good examples coming from indigenous groups.
00:40:38.080 Let's say, think of, you know, manioc, a species native of central southern Amazon, which was domesticated perhaps hundreds of years ago, perhaps a thousand years ago by indigenous groups and spread all over the Americas.
00:40:56.860 And they have tens of different varieties of that maize.
00:41:03.560 There is one tribe in in Western Amazon in Peru.
00:41:09.220 And of course, maize came from Mexico thousand years ago, domesticated in Mexico by the Mexico, Central America, the Mayas and came to South America.
00:41:20.160 And one indigenous group in western Peru has developed 130 different varieties of maize.
00:41:28.680 So that agrobiodiversity is a very good example in which we could model a new development pathway for the Amazon.
00:41:39.140 So merging traditional knowledge with modern scientific and technological knowledge to really to tap, to harness that potential, which is tremendous, is gigantic in agroforestry systems, in the forest itself.
00:41:59.500 So the understanding the biology of this highly diverse ecosystem can bring so much knowledge that we could certainly convert some of that knowledge to process, to products, to basically to well-being, not only of Amazonian populations, but global well-being.
00:42:21.360 We have this good example of this fruit, this berry, it's called acai berry, which today is known all over the world, is becoming a niche market.
00:42:33.580 That was a product consumed by the indigenous people for millennia, as there are hundreds, not to say thousands, of other products.
00:42:43.400 And until 20 years ago and then, you know, there was a development in Brazil of the production of this acai berry coming both from forests and also from agroforestry systems.
00:42:55.840 And acai berry now brings about $1 billion to the Amazonian economy.
00:43:01.120 It's a big industry with several products all over the world.
00:43:06.960 And that's bringing better quality of life to about 300,000 people producing acai.
00:43:14.680 Still, it's not high tech, but that is a good example.
00:43:19.640 And that maintains the forest.
00:43:22.260 So like acai berry, there are hundreds of such products.
00:43:27.140 So the third way, basically, is a proposal for us to bring the modern technologies of the fourth industrial revolution, which is almost irreversible, that the world will move towards that technology.
00:43:42.880 Of course, those technologies bring a lot of concerns in terms of job markets, what it's going to do with the jobs all over the world.
00:43:52.280 Everybody is worried about that.
00:43:53.900 But for the Amazon, we can think of a model in which we bring these technologies, which are becoming accessible, user-friendly, open access, to add value to the products of biodiversity.
00:44:05.960 So that's the concept we are developing.
00:44:09.460 those concepts. We wanted to start producing some pilot experimentation. We created this concept of
00:44:16.500 Amazon Creative Labs. Those will be traveling units, traveling labs that would move to community,
00:44:26.400 to community, to forest people, even to indigenous groups. And they will help to train, to show
00:44:35.700 to these groups, local populations, how to add value to their traditional value chains
00:44:44.580 of products they've been producing, but also to explore new potential, new possibilities,
00:44:50.580 new products, and also to try to build a bridge between traditional knowledge of their own
00:45:00.340 property, intellectual property, and how to make sure that they keep the traditional knowledge
00:45:07.540 and make traditional knowledge to benefit the local population, the forest people in the Amazon.
00:45:12.640 So, in a nutshell, that's the concept of this Amazon Third Way. We also call Amazonia 4.0 to
00:45:22.100 make a reference to the Fourth Industrial Revolution. And we are just trying to bring
00:45:28.520 link some of these elements into pilot projects to the Amazon in the next couple of years.
00:45:58.520 The For The Wild podcast team is so grateful for the continued support
00:46:22.660 through our Patreon subscribers.
00:46:24.040 If you haven't signed up yet, head over to www.patreon.com
00:46:29.240 slash for the wild to engage directly with our team, weekly guests,
00:46:33.820 to hear additional content, and receive access to other bonus material throughout the year.
00:46:54.040 being able to focus on biodiversity and traditional ecological knowledge
00:47:05.360 i think is the way forward and time and time again from people we speak to on the show
00:47:11.960 really that's that's the crux of i think what people are wanting to move to and do in a way
00:47:19.460 that is modern, because of course, we're not going to somehow get out of this modern world
00:47:23.900 anytime soon. Civilization has a stronghold on us. So I really appreciate hearing your thoughts on
00:47:30.680 that. Another question I wanted to ask about is definitely a topic that is very high in the
00:47:38.480 United States right now around borders. And it's just to humanity's detriment, the ramifications
00:47:46.680 of climate change are really appearing alongside a rise of nationalism. And I wonder about just
00:47:54.300 the impacts of national borders as we try to mitigate the effects of climate change, especially
00:48:00.280 in the case of Brazil, which contains, like you were saying, 60% of the Amazon rainforest within
00:48:06.260 its borders. So I'm wondering if you think that borders will be a shortcoming when it comes to
00:48:12.380 comprehensively addressing climate change? And what do borders mean when we are all globally
00:48:18.240 impacted by the health of the Amazon region? And then I also wonder who gets to speak and
00:48:24.200 make decisions on behalf of the rainforest? What good is the nation or what does the nation even
00:48:30.660 mean when we are rapidly dismantling our planet's ecological boundaries?
00:48:35.140 Yeah, those are very important questions. We have, although we are much less developed than Northern North America, U.S. and Canada, but perhaps we have one advantage in the Amazon is that historically countries feel more equal.
00:49:00.560 Let's say we do not have in South America a Monroe Doctrine.
00:49:07.340 It's not like, you know, the U.S. is the big commander of everything that happens in the West, in the Americas.
00:49:16.560 And so, so far, the diplomatic and commercial relations between all Amazonian countries are very good.
00:49:27.640 Of course, now there is some risks because Venezuela, unfortunately, also entered a very
00:49:36.020 nationalistic movement, ideologically to the left, but still is very nationalistic.
00:49:43.440 And Brazil is probably also moving into a very nationalistic moment to the right.
00:49:51.880 So, but again, I mean, we are, we do not have, we haven't had, for a long time, the type
00:50:02.760 of problem, let's say, that US, Mexico face with this.
00:50:11.440 We don't feel, Brazilians don't feel they are morally, intellectually or whatever superior
00:50:17.200 than any other Amazonian country population.
00:50:20.380 So I hope that this Amazon Third Way will be seen not as a Brazilian initiative, it will be seen as a Pan-Amazonian initiative, that we will learn more, for instance, the way indigenous groups organize themselves.
00:50:39.880 When you have an indigenous group sitting right around the border with components of those groups on both sides of the border, they consider themselves to be one people.
00:50:53.820 So these national differences, I mean, fade away when you talk about more connectivity.
00:51:02.180 Connectivity is given by other elements, not by a border, a political border.
00:51:09.560 So the Amazon, we would like really to see, to think of that as a concept of one large area with all these countries, but as a continuous with many, many diverse ecosystems, highest biodiversity on the planet, many forest people, indigenous groups all over the Amazon.
00:51:34.340 I would like really to see that as a whole with diversity, as a whole with mega diversity, social diversity, agrobiodiversity, social biodiversity, all those elements compound and compose the Amazon as I would like to see the Amazon to develop, really to pay much, much less attention to strict borders and to see more integrated Amazon.
00:52:03.360 In the Amazon also, for a long time, for perhaps over 30 years, there is an agreement among all Amazonian countries.
00:52:12.120 It's not very active or effective agreement, but at least we haven't seen any major problems in terms of relations between nobody's thinking of erecting walls in the Amazon or even in South America, which is still good news.
00:52:33.660 uh and however of course because of this populist nationalist autocratic trend in many governments
00:52:44.020 and we are seeing that all over the world not only in south in the americas we one has to pay
00:52:50.320 attention to see how long or how strong this this swing of political uh movements will last
00:52:59.760 Of course, if Brazil or any other Amazonian country becomes extremely nationalist, then we might start seeing problems across borders in the Amazon, which we haven't seen to date.
00:53:15.620 Of course, there is a problem in the Amazon, which is organized crime.
00:53:23.020 Unfortunately, the unsolved question globally, speaking of drugs, is a major problem in the Amazon.
00:53:32.160 The Amazon produces a lot of drugs, mostly cocaine, crack, and Brazil is a way these drugs are exported to many other countries.
00:53:42.920 So there is organized crime operating in all Amazonian countries. A lot of these drugs travel through Amazonian rivers, Amazonian airstrips. There is a lot of smuggling of weapons.
00:53:57.680 So it's a very complicated situation, unsolved situation, organized crime, and all this organized crime is linked, for instance, the organized crime responsible for land grabbing, which is very common, still operating in the Amazon every day.
00:54:20.140 As you know, the Amazon, a lot of local leaders, environmental leaders, rural leaders, they have been assassinating the Amazon in the last several years.
00:54:35.220 World record always coming from the Amazon in the last year, few years.
00:54:39.560 So this is all related also to these criminal organizations responsible for land grabbing.
00:54:46.640 And so this is not a simple problem.
00:54:52.820 I mean, of course, border speaking is less of a problem because Amazonian countries are relatively, they have stable, peaceful relations for a long time.
00:55:05.180 However, the organized crime question, particularly related to drugs and also to land grabbing, is a very serious issue, which is increasing in proportion. And that's one that it's not easy to find solutions for.
00:55:22.860 Thank you so much for this interview. Thank you so much for all of your research, Dr. Nobre. This is globally important research and it's so comprehensive and I am really looking forward to re-listening to this interview so I can take more of it in because this is really something for all of us to sit with.
00:55:44.120 It's not it's not something that, you know, many of us are going to understand immediately because there's so much complexity and so much compounding issues on top of one another.
00:55:56.120 And we all as a global community need to be invested in the protection of Amazonia.
00:56:01.900 So thank you again. And I'm I'm here to support your work.
00:56:07.120 Thank you very much. And I'm really glad to hear about the existence of your project.
00:56:13.120 It's a very worthwhile project, and really I imagine a world with technology as well, with technology as well, because technology can play the good side, on the good side, in which really we can't, you know, even with 7 billion people or 8 or 9 billion people,
00:56:36.120 So we can't really occupy less than 50% as famous biologist Edward Wilson calls for.
00:56:45.500 We can't occupy less than 50% of the planet for our own good.
00:56:51.320 We can keep, make 50% of the planet to move back to wilderness.
00:56:57.800 So your project for the wild is a very compelling, very important, and I wish you the best success.
00:57:06.120 thank you for listening to for the wild podcast i'm ayana young the music you heard today was by
00:57:33.500 Leigh Halls. I'd like to take a moment and thank our podcast team, our co-producer and editor,
00:57:40.080 Andrew Storrs, our co-producer and writer, Francesca Glassbell, our communications director,
00:57:46.540 Aaron Wise, our music coordinator, Carter Lou McElroy, and our co-managing directors,
00:57:52.980 Mara Joy and Melanie Younger. Please stay in touch with us by signing up for our newsletter,
00:57:58.720 joining us on Patreon
00:58:00.460 and sharing with us on Instagram
00:58:03.080 Facebook or Twitter
00:58:04.600 alright, until next time