For The Wild - March 10, 2021


ENRIQUE SALMÓN on Moral Landscapes Amidst Changing Ecologies ⧸225

Topics
ELLA NOAH BANCROFT on the Intelligence of Our Intimacy ⧸224 CAROLINA RUBIO MACWRIGHT on the Intersections of Immigration, Assimilation, and Earth Based Wisdom ⧸226

Episode Stats


Length

56 minutes

Words per minute

119.24

Word count

6,713

Sentence count

155

Harmful content

Misogyny

1

sentences flagged

Hate speech

11

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 For the Wild is brought to you in part by the Calliopeia Foundation.
00:00:04.240 We are grateful for their continued support and the support of grassroots contributions
00:00:08.820 from listeners like you.
00:00:10.820 Learn more at calliopeia.org.
00:00:13.260 To make a donation, visit forthewild.world slash donate or find us on Patreon.
00:00:19.240 If you'd like to support us in other ways, consider sharing our episodes through social
00:00:23.860 media or leaving us a review wherever you listen to the podcast.
00:00:30.000 Hello and welcome to For the Wild podcast. I'm Ayanna Young. Today I'm speaking with
00:00:42.000 Enrique Salmon. The knowledge will re-emerge when it needs to re-emerge through this natural
00:00:49.160 process. Enrique Salmon is Ramuri. He is head of the American Indian Studies program at Cal
00:00:57.740 State University, East Bay. He holds a PhD in anthropology from Arizona State University
00:01:03.880 and has published many articles on indigenous ethnobotany, agriculture, nutrition, and traditional
00:01:10.740 ecological knowledge. He is the author of Eating the Landscape, American Indian Stories of Food
00:01:17.180 Identity and Resilience, and Iwikara. Hello Enrique, welcome to For the Wild. So lovely
00:01:27.220 to be speaking with you today. Good morning. It's nice to be here with you. Yeah, it is. It is a
00:01:33.940 good morning. It's sunny here at Cougar Mountain and the wood stove is crackling, keeping me toasty
00:01:40.280 in this winter, this dry but chilly winter. And yeah, I'm really looking forward to speaking with
00:01:49.000 you about concentricity. And I'd love to give listeners some background on the idea of
00:01:56.400 concentricity as it's an idea that courses through much of your work. And so how is
00:02:03.460 concentricity articulated in our lives? It's really about getting, helping people to see how
00:02:15.400 we as as humans are directly related to all the natural world around us to the plants the animals
00:02:26.540 even the stones and so on that they are our direct relatives and if we can get more of us to start to
00:02:39.380 recognize that reality, then it can have a huge impact on the practices and the choices we make
00:02:46.980 with regards to our interactions with the natural world and our relationship building that we can do
00:02:55.580 with this larger community. In concentric ecology, indigenous perceptions of the human nature
00:03:05.280 relationship, you write, quote, it's an awareness that life in any environment is viable only when
00:03:12.820 humans view the life surrounding them as kin. The kin or relatives include all the natural
00:03:19.040 elements of an ecosystem. Indigenous people are affected by and in turn affect the life around 1.00
00:03:26.180 them. The interactions that result from this kin-centric ecology enhance and preserve the
00:03:32.440 ecosystem. Without human recognition of their role in the complexities of life in a place,
00:03:39.140 the life suffers and loses its sustainability. And I think about how many feel that the teachings
00:03:47.440 of ecology remain mired in the paradigms of environmentalists and scientists who have
00:03:53.440 historically disavowed the human as a way to sanitize and exalt their respective fields.
00:04:00.520 And so I'm curious to hear what you'd say to those who are adamant that the Earth, especially now, would be better off without humans having any role in it.
00:04:11.160 Well, unfortunately, I think they would be sadly mistaken. To borrow terminology from ecology, I and other Native researchers and scholars like myself, we view humans as keystone species in environments all around the world.
00:04:36.400 meaning that like sawato in the sonoran desert those tall comular cactus that grow up being 40
00:04:44.380 to 50 feet tall if those cacti were removed from the sonoran desert it would have a detrimental
00:04:50.760 effect on the entire ecosystem that's all important a role that those cactuses play
00:04:58.360 in that desert that makes them keystone species well humans are this have been the same way
00:05:06.200 in ecosystems around the world and here in north america when europeans first showed up
00:05:13.780 they perceived this quote-unquote pristine landscape but in reality what they were looking at
00:05:22.660 was this carefully managed garden that spread across an entire continent and it was a garden
00:05:31.100 managed by native peoples there wasn't hardly there was hardly any place in north american
00:05:38.660 continent in this case that was not untouched by human hands you know only the highest mountain
00:05:46.340 peaks and maybe you know a few areas of say death valley um where there not really much going on
00:05:54.360 in regards to native peoples interacting with and sustainably managing these landscapes.
00:06:02.280 And we can demonstrate this, I guess, again, to borrow from, you know,
00:06:09.000 this ecological terminology on an empirical scale and using empirical evidence when,
00:06:16.880 for example, in the desert, the Mojave Desert in Southern California,
00:06:22.600 I was part of a meeting years and years ago with Park Service folks and some Paiute and Chemuewe people there, and the Park Service people were trying to explain to the Native folks why it was important to leave some of the landscape, the desert landscape, untouched so that it can regenerate itself.
00:06:46.900 and I'll never forget this elder woman who got angry with the park service people and telling
00:06:55.040 them you're just letting the desert go to trash you're destroying the desert she said you're
00:07:03.480 making it a waste and she went on to explain how by allowing native peoples in this case of the
00:07:11.580 mojave desert to come and to collect the pods from mesquite trees that it had a positive effect on
00:07:20.100 the biodiversity of the landscape because the pruning of the trees through the collection of
00:07:25.480 the pods was good for the people because there was an important part of their food source
00:07:30.400 but also by collecting the the pods it actually caused the mesquite trees to grow more pods and
00:07:41.020 And part of the process of collecting was to have controlled burns, to do some pruning and coppicing below the mesquite groves.
00:07:50.460 And that created more space for small mammals to move in the mesquite groves.
00:07:58.640 And it decreased competition for the mesquite trees and other useful herbaceous plants.
00:08:04.900 And so, in other words, when Native peoples in this situation were using the desert in a sustainable way, it actually creates more diversity, not just for the people, but it's a positive thing for the animals, the insects, and the plants.
00:08:21.440 thank you for sharing that story i was imagining the mesquite pods and yeah just that sacred
00:08:32.200 relationship that we've been conditioned out of some of us beaten out of and yeah it's
00:08:42.120 feels so important to speak about this reconnection and i understand that this notion of
00:08:50.100 concentric ecology was something that you created in order to address the lack of indigenous
00:08:55.800 perspective in Western paradigm. And I do think it's interesting how captivated and attached
00:09:02.760 Westerners have become to certain concepts like ecology and cosmology, but it feels as if many
00:09:10.080 get stuck in the abstract cultural realm. So what are the challenges of cross-cultural approaches
00:09:16.980 to knowledge? I think the biggest challenge is our languages and the meanings that we connect
00:09:26.640 to certain words. You know, for example, I have difficulty with this notion, this concept of
00:09:36.520 traditional ecological knowledge. It's been around for a few decades, but because of this,
00:09:44.960 The words traditional and ecological, it reframes Native knowledge automatically, when we use this phrase, into a Western model of describing and trying to interpret how Indigenous peoples view our relationship to our landscapes.
00:10:06.040 ecology is as you know your listeners will know is just you know disciplinary study
00:10:13.960 interactions in particular habitats and ecosystems and so on but it's a western frame
00:10:22.300 it's a western frame that detaches the observer from what is being observed and so it becomes
00:10:30.480 this objectified approach to the natural world as if it's a thing and for native peoples those of us
00:10:39.580 who are you know we still are still see ourselves as practicing our ancestral connections relationships
00:10:46.760 to the natural world it is not just a thing it's a being it's a relative it's a part of us we are
00:10:55.100 part of it um i remember standing on the hopi mesas one day during a basket dance and one of the
00:11:04.280 my friends there was looking was with me we're watching these rain these these um pods of rain
00:11:12.240 coming across the colorado plateau coming from the south where flagstaff is the san francisco
00:11:18.740 peaks over there and you can see these pods of rains just moving across the desert and i remember
00:11:23.920 him saying you know we're looking at ourselves that rain is us we are that rain and this is an
00:11:33.240 exact way of how native peoples around the world perceive our relationship to these landscapes
00:11:41.720 around us it's not something that can be objectified and so when i come back to some of
00:11:47.780 This language, traditional ecological knowledge, becomes this static, objectified way of trying to describe this very complex and sophisticated relationship that indigenous people have.
00:12:05.000 I do a lot of work with American Indian foodways and agriculture, and there's been this newer idea of what's known as regenerative agriculture.
00:12:17.800 But again, it's this Western frame of trying to explain how Indigenous people grow food and, again, objectifies the practice when in reality for Native peoples it is something that we do that reemerges from a millennia of connecting ourselves.
00:12:47.800 to the landscape through our food it is a identity and that that traces its origins
00:12:57.880 to our clan histories and i can just keep going on that it's not something that can just be
00:13:04.940 described in one way it's several things it's this overlapping complex of identity and worldview
00:13:14.620 and spiritual connections and these we're to keep coming back to this relationship
00:13:20.840 that implies a responsibility that we have to the natural world because it is so directly related to
00:13:31.780 us yeah this isn't the first time that i've heard critique on terms like traditional ecological
00:13:41.920 knowledge and regenerative agriculture, I feel like this challenge against these words that
00:13:50.960 have, you know, now been co-opted and used by a lot of non-Indigenous people to
00:13:58.900 get funding or attract attention. And yeah, it's very problematic. And TEK or traditional
00:14:08.480 ecological knowledge, have become very popular in the lexicon of environmentalism. And it often
00:14:13.980 feels as if everyone needs to publicly translate their understanding of these concepts for show.
00:14:20.800 But yeah, I know you've urged caution at the practice of transforming knowledge and taking
00:14:26.640 it out of context for the sake of preservation. So why is it that you think dominant society has
00:14:33.000 become so obsessed with memory banking? And what advice would you offer on moving into a
00:14:38.760 concentric practice of practicing living knowledge? I think there is this effort to
00:14:47.400 create these memory banks, partly because we're, as a larger society, are observing 1.00
00:14:56.080 We're observing the disappearance of libraries of knowledge as a result of language disappearing around the world among Native peoples. 0.93
00:15:09.760 And then the elders disappearing, who are the ones who have been holding on to the last vestiges of these libraries. 0.95
00:15:20.740 This pandemic has sped up this process, unfortunately.
00:15:24.600 I was very saddened recently watching an interview with a younger Navajo woman on the reservation explaining how the pandemic has disproportionately hit the elderly.
00:15:38.660 And she was describing how every time one of these elders dies, all that knowledge goes with them.
00:15:46.320 And this is just increasing exponentially around the world.
00:15:50.300 And so I can understand people wanting to develop these memory banks to try to hang on to some of this knowledge. 0.96
00:15:59.260 Unfortunately, again, from an indigenous perspective, it in a lot of ways kills the knowledge when we create memory banks.
00:16:11.800 This kind of knowledge that we're talking about is alive.
00:16:17.580 It is an entity of its own.
00:16:19.460 It has a spirit, it has a breath that we share with it, like we share the same breath with all the natural world around us.
00:16:28.840 And it is not something that can be stored and pickled like when we pickle chili peppers or cucumbers and that sort of thing.
00:16:40.160 And then we put it on a shelf to look at and use later on.
00:16:43.780 And this is the kind of knowledge that NADS needs to be kept alive through language and through practice, through actually living it.
00:16:55.080 I'll never forget when I used to teach in Ethnobotany Field School, and my students and I were visiting a Hopi elder in between 3rd and 2nd Mesa near a community called Kakotsmovi.
00:17:08.300 and my students were hoeing his field of weeds and and then he would you know stop there now
00:17:18.200 and explain uh some you know important ecological Hopi knowledge to my students and it was a great
00:17:25.700 exchange but I remember at one point one of the students asked the elder why don't you just
00:17:31.040 record what you know because he was the last member of his clan he was explaining how when
00:17:39.700 he passes away all his knowledge will go with him because he doesn't have any female children
00:17:46.760 the Hopi like a lot of native communities are matrilineal societies and so knowledge passes
00:17:53.000 down through the female side the matrilineal side and so the students were concerned and he said
00:18:00.160 When I leave, this knowledge leaves with me because that is just the way it has to be. 0.79
00:18:09.080 It's a part of the natural process.
00:18:12.680 The knowledge will reemerge when it needs to reemerge through this natural process.
00:18:19.480 Memory banking, as I said earlier, I understand why people want to do it,
00:18:25.020 but it just creates this static, again, objectified kind of knowledge
00:18:32.420 that is, as soon as it's recorded, it's taken out of context already.
00:18:55.020 Close your eyes and tell me that the sky's coming down
00:19:01.380 It's breaking at the seams
00:19:04.680 Or turn your head the other way
00:19:07.680 She's falling, she's not what she won't seem
00:19:12.640 I'm one of those that still believes in revolution
00:19:19.660 Yeah, my loads are still beliefs and are solutions
00:19:27.520 Don't you tell me this is how the world is going to end
00:19:41.000 I want to fall
00:19:43.040 I'd like to now ask about what a concentric approach to something like invasive and native
00:19:58.180 species looks like. Data suggests that, quote, at least 25% and perhaps as much as 85% of Earth's
00:20:06.280 estimated 8.7 million species are already shifting ranges in response to climate change,
00:20:13.740 end quote. And these sort of migrations are complex because on the one hand, invasive species
00:20:21.420 have been flagged as a key driver of Earth's biodiversity crisis. But I also hear perhaps a
00:20:27.420 more concentric approach would view this change as a natural migration. Ken are doing what they
00:20:34.600 have to do. So I'd like to ask your thoughts on this and how you think concentricity needs to be
00:20:42.100 applied to traditional ideas about native and invasive species and how we define desirable
00:20:48.320 environments. You kind of answered the question already. Remember that I like to use this example
00:20:58.260 here again in North America, where American Indians have been, if we take the most conservative
00:21:08.320 estimates of the populations here in North America of indigenous peoples, and how long
00:21:17.920 we've been here, some anthropologists suggest 20,000 years. I think it's a lot longer. I think
00:21:25.660 we've been here for at least 40,000, maybe even 100,000 years, even if we assume that we weren't
00:21:32.280 always here, as our legends and our cultural histories describe. But even if we take the
00:21:38.980 most conservative estimate of 20,000 years, that means that Native peoples have been observing and
00:21:45.300 interacting this continent and its natural workings for 20,000 years. European biologists
00:21:55.420 and so on have only been looking seriously at north america for maybe 200 years
00:22:03.540 that's quite a difference in the degree of understanding of the natural world in north
00:22:12.760 america and south america that native peoples have compared to that of european science
00:22:19.060 And so therefore, our stories, our cultural histories, our songs, our ceremony, our rituals, these are all reflections of this deep understanding of these complex workings that happen in ecosystems.
00:22:40.080 And part of that understanding is change, that things are a constant flux, and our ceremonies recognize it, our songs, our stories recognize these complex changes. 1.00
00:22:54.920 This is the reason why we have most Native peoples around the world tell trickster stories. 0.83
00:23:04.380 It's this recognition of that gray part of the universe, that part of the universe that we don't quite understand, but we know is there. 1.00
00:23:18.320 And that's trickster.
00:23:20.100 And here in North America, trickster is often personified as a coyote.
00:23:24.920 sometimes a rabbit or a skunk but these these trickster tales and legends and myths whatever
00:23:32.780 we want to call them are reflections of that recognition of constant flux and dynamic change
00:23:39.120 in the universe and so although it's a long-winded way of answering your question that for native
00:23:47.520 peoples when we have new plants invasive species show up we don't think of them as in a negative
00:23:56.840 way we think of this is part of the natural process and then we come up with ways to incorporate them
00:24:03.500 and adapt to them in our practices and in our our stories we even connect them to our languages
00:24:13.860 There is a classification of plants in my people's language.
00:24:19.120 I'm Raramuri, in case your listeners didn't get that yet.
00:24:25.040 Some people call us Taruhumara.
00:24:27.920 And in our language, we have words for certain plants that arrived more recently,
00:24:36.400 that came with the European contact.
00:24:39.180 And so it's just this linguistic, and then as a result, this metaphorical and worldview approach towards accepting and adapting to these new things that have entered into our lives.
00:24:54.620 wow that was so beautiful and relieving i've been really sitting with these western
00:25:03.960 thinking back to language and thinking about words like apocalypse and collapse and
00:25:09.020 anthropocene and how i've heard a lot of my indigenous friends and allies say like
00:25:17.320 you know we've been through apocalypse we've been through collapse before this is because you know
00:25:23.800 So many people are talking about that with climate collapse and just where the world's going at this point and the sixth mass extinction and the way you're bringing up Trickster and speaking to these huge shifts in the way that you are is, yeah, it just feels really potent.
00:25:41.120 And in your recent book, Iwigara, you write, quote, through trickster, we learn to embrace
00:25:49.300 nonpolarity.
00:25:50.900 Colorblindness is assumed as well as every variation of gender.
00:25:55.460 Therefore, trickster expands the indigenous consciousness by freeing all constraints and
00:26:00.980 creating an opening and threshold for flexibility and change.
00:26:04.540 Through this kind of consciousness, culture and society are in a better frame for resilient
00:26:10.720 thinking and adaptation, end quote. Oh, yeah, I just, I really think about trickster energy in
00:26:17.980 terms of ushering us through moments of collapse and apocalypse, because it feels as if many are
00:26:24.920 becoming snarled in the polarity of our projected futures. So I just, I would love if you could
00:26:31.120 elaborate a bit more on trickster in terms of resilient thinking and adaptation.
00:26:35.460 yeah um i often sign my emails to my colleagues in my department
00:26:43.060 the trickster you know trickster or if we were to focus on coyote as a trickster figure
00:26:53.600 coyote would never get his coffee from a starbucks coyote would never shop at a walmart
00:27:01.960 coyote probably wouldn't even have cable tv or direct tv um coyote does not want to be stuck
00:27:09.340 in this one polarized perception of of itself and i intentionally used the word it because coyote
00:27:19.880 does not have a specific gender um coyote is just coyote or trickster is just trickster and
00:27:27.360 And it's this, you lead me to another approach I've taken to my work.
00:27:33.840 You know, all my work as an Indigenous scholar has been about trying to help non-Native peoples better understand an Indigenous approach to everything, you know, not just the natural world.
00:27:49.880 And a few years ago, I adopted this approach to studying natural systems through what's known as resilience theory.
00:28:04.300 And in short, it's this idea that systems, any kind of system that is resilient, is resilient only because it was able to withstand and adapt to and learn from and reshape itself as a result of shocks to its systems.
00:28:27.420 and in the case of native peoples the shock would be european contact and a lot of native
00:28:36.480 communities resisted and unfortunately to their own detriment resisted and went extinct
00:28:44.260 and some communities like mine we figured out quickly how to absorb to and adapt and learn from
00:28:55.360 these new things that came as a result of contact and it's those indigenous communities that are
00:29:02.080 still resilient that it really that adopted the trickster approach to everything to recognizing 0.98
00:29:10.440 that change is constant and that are we have to allow our inner tricksters to emerge to come to
00:29:19.940 the surface so that we can survive and we can learn from and adapt to these these changes and
00:29:26.820 these new ways of doing things we therefore you know increased the emergence of tricksters in
00:29:36.620 our ceremonies to remind people about constant change you know we see more um koshari the clown
00:29:44.900 figures at pueblo dances you see more of the the gray one in the gone spirit mountain spirit
00:29:53.640 dances with the western apache and my people were seeing more of the trickster busco dancers
00:30:01.520 this is um in our our spring ceremony our planting ceremonies and so this is for we're
00:30:09.620 telling the rest of our society we have to continue to recognize this increasing and
00:30:19.240 speeding up of change so that we can survive. We are, as Native peoples, we're like juniper trees
00:30:27.400 in the southwest. Juniper trees aren't that tall. They're sometimes kind of scraggly looking on the
00:30:34.360 surface but the roots grow very deep and spread out and i'll never forget an elder at tells
00:30:43.080 probably telling me this story about how um european people you know americans for the most
00:30:51.120 part are like aspen trees they're tall and beautiful and showy and it's been a you know
00:30:58.700 in the fall but their roots are really shallow and next big wind that comes along there was a
00:31:06.000 lot of those aspen trees will fall over but us native peoples we're the junipers when the big
00:31:12.280 wind comes we're still going to be here afterwards wow i was getting lost in the metaphors of the
00:31:19.240 trees i was right there with those trees and yeah i'd like to ask about exploring concentricity in
00:31:30.140 places that the western paradigm has unequivocally denied as being a part of nature or the wild
00:31:37.640 so how can we work to disrupt the nature city binary and for listeners how can one begin to
00:31:46.080 incorporate kin-centric approaches amongst the wealth of natural ecosystems in urban areas.
00:31:54.700 You remind me of another chapter I wrote in another book. The book was about wildness.
00:32:03.320 And my chapter was about how in my language and in most indigenous languages, there's no word for
00:32:10.620 wild and this is because euro americans the language again coming back to language you know
00:32:18.380 important it is perpetuates this idea of the separation between us as humans and everything
00:32:28.380 else and so we have this category of wild and wilderness places that we're not supposed to
00:32:39.220 to visit or if we do we leave only you know footprints this notion of wilderness something
00:32:46.400 that is totally separate um from us as as modern day human beings that we are the things that are
00:32:56.040 wild or are untamed that they're they're out of control and so on and so there's this sort of
00:33:03.900 negative connotation with these notions of wild and wilderness and i think it expands into
00:33:10.980 notions of the of nature and increases this urban versus non-urban sort of schism
00:33:21.480 and when in you know for indigenous peoples if there's no word for wild no word for wilderness
00:33:28.080 then there's no category there's no no mental space for seeing a such a division even for
00:33:37.180 indigenous peoples living in an urban environment we still recognize that everything around us is a
00:33:46.180 part of the natural process even the urban stuff it's we're still directly related to it it is
00:33:53.360 still a part of us we are a part of it and even if we want to hang on a little bit to this this
00:34:03.260 urban versus non-urban division we can still find and celebrate the the natural that is around us
00:34:15.600 in this urban environment we can still celebrate the natural process of climate
00:34:23.220 we can still see insects and birds and you know listen to birds and pay attention to
00:34:31.300 the stories that they're giving to us we can still even as my mother she got older and living in this 0.53
00:34:39.880 little apartment sort of complex as assisted living place she still found ways to grow her
00:34:47.020 favorite little herbs and chili peppers and so on outside of her front door and celebrated those
00:34:52.720 little tiny connections to to nature and never forgot the importance of singing songs to these
00:35:00.820 things and would go out even at night and sing songs to the stars because even in urban situation
00:35:06.660 we can still see the stars up there our relatives in the sky and we can still sing songs to them
00:35:12.460 and it's just a it's a mental game i think i invite urban dwellers to play to not focus so
00:35:24.180 much on the separation between the urban environment and the so-called natural world
00:35:32.580 but to celebrate what is still there with us and to invite more of it to join us in places like the
00:35:42.060 Bay Area, like Chicago, Los Angeles, Seattle, and to find ways to work to bring in more
00:35:51.380 of the so-called natural world into these spaces.
00:35:57.780 We're seeing this happening more and more with, I guess it would be sustainable architecture.
00:36:04.220 People wanted to create rooftop gardens to create more green spaces in urban areas.
00:36:12.060 you know we can we can work to do more of that yeah I feel so connected to what you're saying
00:36:20.600 in terms of the frame of mind of being connected or disconnected or a part of nature or separate
00:36:27.540 from nature and yeah to play to get into our mental games because my gosh our minds are so
00:36:35.960 complex but also i think our our needs and our desires are actually quite simple but
00:36:42.280 somehow this complex web in our heads make things so hard and yeah i i really appreciate that
00:36:50.780 invitation and can i can i speak to that please because i want to add to that the the importance
00:36:58.400 of story you know we as human beings we wake up to our stories every day and we live our stories
00:37:10.640 every day sometimes there's several stories we're living every day you know in in in this
00:37:16.220 european western society and we think of stories as like you know you know the beauty and the beast
00:37:24.720 Hansel and Gretel that sort of thing you know they all and once upon a time and then they all
00:37:29.280 lived happily ever after sort of thing but if we stretch this notion of story story is all that we
00:37:38.200 are we are stories and we we enjoy telling stories we enjoy um hearing stories because it's a way
00:37:50.420 for for humans to find commonality you probably noticed already in this this interview i like
00:38:00.360 accentuated things that i'm saying with stories because it's a way to help the listeners in this
00:38:07.700 case to find their own space within this these topics that we're talking about and to connect
00:38:15.020 to it in some way, to relate to it, develop a relationship with it. That's the power of story.
00:38:22.240 And so I think we need, as a society here in the West especially, need to find a way to change
00:38:30.980 our story. What if the American story was not the one connected to manifest destiny of, you know,
00:38:42.240 this ongoing desire to conquer and control the entire continent,
00:38:50.700 this need to be the rugged individual frontiersman and frontierswoman
00:38:57.400 and that sort of thing, to be the individual.
00:39:02.160 What if our story was more of, say, you know, to borrow from American history,
00:39:06.620 What if our story was not Paul Bunyan, but the Lewis and Clark expedition?
00:39:14.040 What if we borrow from how the core of discovery left what we call the shores of Missouri along the Mississippi River, traveled up to the Missouri River, interacted with countless native communities, made it all the way to the Pacific Ocean, made salt, ate a bunch of salmon and elk, and then came back.
00:39:41.160 and the whole time they only lost one member of their party that was only because of appendicitis
00:39:49.260 they accidentally killed a couple of blackfoot indians because of a misunderstanding over
00:39:57.160 some horses but it wasn't because of hatred or so on or racism it was just it was more of an
00:40:04.160 So the whole time, there was a story of collaboration. And what if we made that our story of finding ways to interact peacefully and to collaborate as opposed to the larger, unfortunately, American story today of individualism and conquering. And then we could slowly create a different society.
00:40:34.160 Kimbundo, Kikongo, Chokwe, Kwanyama, Oshikwanyama, Gangela, Lingala, Bangala,
00:41:04.160 Lunda, Ngoia, Nyaneka, Oshiwabo, Songo, Zynga,
00:41:33.160 I want to bring up Restoring Indigenous History and Culture to Nature,
00:41:52.620 which is a part of the Original Instructions anthology.
00:41:56.520 You write, quote,
00:41:57.960 The landscape becomes a moral landscape.
00:42:00.280 As we move across the landscape, it's not like we go across thinking of these stories all the time.
00:42:06.680 We are remembering this story and that story and so on, but it's just a sort of automatic subconscious connection to all these things in our environment, to the plants, to the animals, to geographic or geologic formations and so on.
00:42:21.680 As a result, our morality is directive or becomes directly from a landscape.
00:42:27.560 consequently we find a way to interact in a kind way with our landscape end quote and so i'd like
00:42:36.600 to hear more about how the moral landscape functions and whether or not this will take
00:42:42.380 on new meaning as we find ourselves in an age of migration and changing ecologies the the land
00:42:51.360 is a living entity and it is constantly in conversation with those of us who know how to
00:42:59.900 listen to it and through those conversations there's there are lessons and this is an example
00:43:09.360 of how our histories our stories are encoded and embedded in the land itself the land our
00:43:23.660 stories that take are always take place on the land and include things that come from the land
00:43:30.200 natural entities animals and plants and insects and so on they all emerge from the landscapes and
00:43:36.760 We find ourselves as indigenous peoples emerging into this kind of mental space.
00:43:47.160 And therefore, our languages are actually voices of the land.
00:43:56.660 and so when we speak our native languages we're actually speaking the voice of
00:44:01.800 of our specific landscapes across the continent and around the world
00:44:07.600 um and so our morals are not human made we didn't develop the ways or values of
00:44:19.680 ideas of rights and right and wrong and so on from human constructs we develop them from our
00:44:26.440 experiences on our specific landscapes and so that's what i mean by the emergence of the
00:44:33.080 our moral or the idea of moral landscapes you know the land itself or this is a source of our
00:44:40.820 values of our morals and these values of morals are encoded in the stories about our connections
00:44:49.300 to the land um and in our our modern day society where we are in constant movement
00:44:59.300 and where a lot of us are so disconnected from anything from the natural world
00:45:07.500 it's increasingly difficult to recognize those morals it's increasingly difficult to even
00:45:15.180 hear what the land is telling us i want to go back to my example of the student exercise where
00:45:25.440 i had them watch sunset and sunrise and there were more than just a couple of students
00:45:31.580 who never realized that as seasons change the path of the sun changes that it would set or rise
00:45:42.180 um different parts of the horizon they have been so disconnected from the movement of the sun that
00:45:49.540 it took that awareness kind of practice to see that oh that's right the days do get shorter as
00:45:55.900 the year gets closer to you know october november december and so on and so that's how disconnected
00:46:03.300 our modern society is and it's even increasingly disconnected as we are having to do things more
00:46:11.540 online you know we're sitting in front of our computers and hardly spend any much time outside
00:46:18.560 and it's it's uh for people like me it's creating this increasingly sense of of dread
00:46:28.020 that our generations as we move you know more and more into this 21st century
00:46:38.060 are less understanding the need for us to be connected to even simple things like the sun
00:46:46.420 and the moon to understand the importance of just being able to hear bird song and so yeah this is
00:46:55.380 one of the responses that i don't have much of a positive reaction to because it's uh it's
00:47:01.860 it's kind of getting worse especially in this pandemic is making things worse as we are
00:47:07.200 increasingly forced to have less contact, not just with the natural world, but with each other
00:47:13.700 as human beings. It's such an important source of wellness to just be able to do something,
00:47:22.860 to see a person's smile that we're standing a few feet away from. We need that connection.
00:47:31.640 and it's it's um it's gone from us right now yeah that's a really challenging time for connection
00:47:42.780 and i hear you in that grief well going back to your book you cover the plants that are most
00:47:54.520 important to native north american peoples and i wonder if you could speak about how you define
00:48:00.480 importance when you look at something like that well you know when i was invited to write the book
00:48:07.060 by timber press you know they originally wanted me to write a larger sort of of um
00:48:14.380 i guess like a dictionary sort of thing of of indigenous ethnobotany and i you know i sat with
00:48:26.500 that for a little while and then I realized you know I really can't I don't really want to do that
00:48:30.960 because there's been there's been a lot of books about American Indian plant knowledge and they're
00:48:38.040 really just these sort of dictionaries like here's the name of the plant here's what its
00:48:41.520 name is and then Shoshone or Lakota and then here's what it's used for and I wanted to do
00:48:50.040 something deeper I wanted to be able to tell the stories of the plants so that the readers can
00:48:58.720 understand the plants more in just a sort of static dictionary kind of approach to ethnobotany
00:49:06.660 and so I proposed to Timber Press why don't I do a fewer plants but larger longer descriptions of
00:49:19.540 them and they liked the idea and then I what I did is I contacted my network of of plant knowledge
00:49:29.520 holders across the continent and because I've been doing this for several decades and so
00:49:35.580 I asked them can you give me a list of in your mind the top 10 most important plants
00:49:46.560 to your people and to where you live and so i got those lists back and from that list i came up with
00:49:54.200 the 80 plants that are in the book these are the plants that are most important in the minds of
00:50:01.340 indigenous peoples across north america and the word importance is is aligned with ideas of
00:50:11.840 important spiritually um important to us culturally important sometimes in the case of
00:50:21.420 that plant's place in the natural ecosystem that where it resides and as a result of that you know
00:50:30.780 like i said i came down with the ed plants and then proceeded to as best i could tell the stories
00:50:37.480 of each one of those plants
00:50:38.920 so that people who read the book
00:50:41.340 don't just have the name of the plant
00:50:44.220 and what it's used for,
00:50:46.300 they have been introduced to the plant
00:50:49.140 as a living entity.
00:50:53.120 And so that's the importance of the book, I think.
00:50:59.520 Well, Enrique, in closing,
00:51:02.720 one of our greatest challenges remains
00:51:05.100 the inability to recognize the sovereignty of land, to be able to ask, what does the land want?
00:51:13.140 And I think about wildlife restoration and land management, and it too is devoid of honoring
00:51:19.540 land's role. No doubt in my mind, because to do so would be incompatible with the profit-driven
00:51:25.660 world. So can you speak to the practice of asking, what does the land want? And how does one begin
00:51:32.940 to listen to this well we first have to begin with honoring and recognizing and speaking of
00:51:42.480 the land as as an entity as a being in itself and as a result of that recognizing that it has rights
00:51:51.480 watersheds have certain rights mountain ranges have rights you know desert scapes prairie scapes
00:52:01.340 have certain rights and oceanscapes have rights and if we recognize them as you know recognize
00:52:08.620 the rights of these particular natural systems then we can work to first listen to what its
00:52:18.340 needs are but we got to start first recognizing that this is not a human centered relationship
00:52:26.100 and unfortunately that's where that's the perspective and the vantage point that most
00:52:32.160 of the world has been working from for the longest time and if we turn that around then we can start
00:52:39.840 to leave these landscapes alone for a little while so that it would allow us to see what its
00:52:46.080 needs are and then work towards developing those needs and in a way where we can work in concert
00:52:55.660 as human beings with these natural worlds and it'd be amazing what we can learn from it from
00:53:02.360 being able to stop and pay attention and stop looking at the land in terms of dollar signs
00:53:11.440 you know we see these dollar signs for the most part when we see landscapes and start to look in
00:53:18.360 terms of what are i guess the um the possibilities from working in concert with what the land
00:53:25.560 can give us what are the things that we can celebrate from such a relationship and this is
00:53:33.680 i i'm i'm i'm sort of stuttering here because this is a difficult thing because we see this
00:53:41.920 every day happening you know in different landscapes around the world where it's all about
00:53:48.800 profit and we're increasingly destroying our relationship in these specific landscapes
00:53:56.480 and somehow leaders around the world need to recognize these living entities and that's
00:54:06.280 where it needs to to start but until that happens the destruction of natural systems is not going to
00:54:12.560 And fortunately, maybe unfortunately in the minds of some people, the earth is going to take over at some point and tell those of us who are destroying it in very harsh ways that it's time to stop.
00:54:40.680 i think you know i started thinking this way back in in january and february when we first started
00:54:48.540 getting word of covet 19 that this is just the opening salvo from the earth telling those of us
00:54:57.960 who have been destroying it you know you guys might want to stop it's uh it's time maybe in
00:55:03.800 the Hopi way for the fifth world to come about.
00:55:08.600 The Hopi believe we are in the fourth world.
00:55:11.300 The previous three worlds were destroyed. 0.68
00:55:13.660 Then we emerge into this fourth world.
00:55:16.440 And maybe the earth is telling us through this virus, you know,
00:55:20.800 this world might be ending pretty soon.
00:55:23.460 It's time to start over again.
00:55:25.840 Yeah, so anyway, it's a long-winded way of trying to answer your difficult question.
00:55:29.760 Oh, Enrique, this has been such a meaningful, deep and beautiful conversation. And it was
00:55:39.300 personally very moving to me. So thank you for your time and for the devotion you've put into
00:55:47.020 your life and the way that you have walked with it.
00:55:55.960 And my pleasure. I enjoyed it.
00:55:59.760 thank you for listening to for the wild podcast the music you heard today was by justin cromer
00:56:09.120 katie gray and sarah serpa for the wild is created by ayana young erica ekram francesca
00:56:16.260 glassbell and melanie younger