00:16:48.020it's the fact that we're authorizing these projects to be there forever.
00:16:54.900And in British Columbia in particular, these mining companies can come through, conduct their operation for 10, 20 years, and or file for bankruptcy and leave.
00:17:08.480They can just walk away from the project.
00:17:11.280Then who's responsible to keep up with the tailings storage?
00:17:15.300It's a lot. I mean, if you look at the province of British Columbia, there are more than 2,000 abandoned mines.
00:17:21.100And those tailings facilities are abandoned?
00:17:23.340Abandoned. And you look at projects like the Tulsa Qua Chief Mine that's just in the Taku watershed just over that mountain there. That mine has been abandoned since 1957. It's a tiny mine. It's been leaching acid mine drainage into the Tulsa Qua River, which is a tributary of the Taku River. And it has not been cleaned up.
00:17:43.840the current owner have filed for bankruptcy and so right now it's in the hands of the British
00:17:50.400Columbia government and they continue and have been saying for the last at least five years that
00:17:57.080they have to like sort through this bankruptcy ruling to determine who's going to be responsible
00:18:02.320for the bill and cleaning this up and we know and we have on record asking the BC ministry officials
00:18:10.740we know that the british columbia government has the authority to hold the historical owner
00:18:16.040responsible for the closure and cleanup of this project and the bc government can not only do
00:18:21.920that for this project but the other 2 000 abandoned projects in british columbia and yet they're not
00:18:27.720doing it but in instances like mount poly for example there is not adequate bonding put up
00:18:35.680front by these mining companies. So for that project that failed, you have $40 million worth
00:18:41.840of taxpayer money going towards the cleanup efforts there. And it's likely what will happen
00:18:47.320for the Tusca chief mine, because it's what the state of Alaska and Alaskans have been asking for
00:18:52.500for 60 years is for cleanup of that. And it'll likely be taxpayer dollars. There's a huge
00:18:58.980problem with the fact that not only is the BC government allowing the mining industry to not
00:19:06.500be held accountable, but there is no mechanism in place for downstream interests, states, and
00:19:14.120you know, US citizens to hold accountable the impacts from these projects.
00:20:56.300we're not under any illusion that we are going to stop mining whatsoever we we need
00:21:10.580mines we need them everything that we use is is a product of a mine to some degree or from a mine
00:21:18.580to some degree right but like we need to one ensure that there is a polluter pays principle
00:21:24.460If you're going to come in and operate and make money, you are going to ensure that you are applying best available practices and technologies and that there is money put up front from a mining company prior to a project being permitted so that what happens following closure is not left upon people of that land and downstream communities.
00:21:48.120and i think it's time that we start talking about it and about accountability and about like for
00:21:54.780example if mining is going to happen as it needs to we need to make sure that the demand so the
00:22:00.480companies that are producing apple products etc are utilizing material that is coming from
00:22:08.460mines that are adhering to the highest standards that they can especially when they are being put
00:22:13.660at the headwaters of large wild salmon rivers and in areas that are very essential and unique for
00:22:23.100connectivity and conservation of wild places and communities and culture etc when you first said
00:22:30.540because we need minds there was part of my body that's like no no we don't know you know it's like
00:22:37.180I so want to believe that we don't need these minds and at the same time like I absolutely have
00:22:43.620an iPhone and I certainly have an Apple computer and so I'm just as complacent as anybody else in
00:22:50.780this needing of minds so it's like I really want to believe we don't need minds and I also
00:22:56.100understand that industry isn't going anywhere tomorrow and so it's important to have these
00:23:01.060regulations in place but then I want to ask you is it actually possible to have a mind that isn't
00:23:08.420polluting is that possible not in my knowledge right it's not it's there are going to be impacts
00:23:16.240to the environment no matter what but I think we have to start asking ourselves where are where are
00:23:23.160we okay and by okay I mean it's going to be somewhat of a sacrifice right like do we want
00:23:30.140them to be at the headwaters of major salmon rivers do we want them to be in areas where you
00:23:36.760know there is geological activity and potential for for tailings disasters to continue etc it's
00:23:43.760it's starting to ask those questions of what types of mines where and why aren't we holding
00:23:52.460these mining companies to the highest standard certainly they can afford to apply these best
00:23:58.660available practices and technologies but they're not being required to do so so we need to start
00:24:04.060asking these hard questions of our government officials why that is the case and I would
00:24:09.840submit that it is the mining lobby as you mentioned earlier we are up against giants and
00:24:16.340again it's not to put a stop to all mining it's ensuring that they are held accountable for their
00:24:23.860ability to profit hearing that some of these minds are at the headwaters all of them to me
00:24:33.240are sacred headwaters is it is insanity it's like what the f how could we even consider putting
00:24:39.800minds in these places of course then i go well it does make sense that there potentially are areas
00:24:46.320that aren't in headwaters that aren't right near watersheds right but then again what that's kind
00:24:52.880of like this judgment call on this area is okay to be sacrificed and this area isn't. And in a
00:25:00.040sense of an ecological sense, I could be like, well, we could justify why that makes sense. And
00:25:05.140it's also this very challenging value judgment that we're having to place. It's hard. It's hard
00:25:14.140because there always are those sacrifice zones, sacrifice communities, sacrifice ecosystems,
00:25:19.200like the solar farms in the desert and oh it's the desert it's the mojave there's nothing here
00:25:25.000when really there's so much life in the mojave and there's all these endemic species that are
00:25:30.420being cut out and you know something that i try to sit with a lot of what as a civilization are
00:25:35.860we willing to sacrifice for these modern conveniences that we know aren't even actually
00:25:40.900fulfilling us it's it's not something that everybody's now happy because they have a tv
00:25:46.440and a computer and whatever but I mean that's a whole other conversation so coming back to
00:25:52.400transboundary issues it seems like in a sense working with transboundary or working as a U.S.
00:26:00.560citizen fighting against B.C. mines there's something that's kind of what do I want to say
00:26:07.560it's almost like the U.S. can almost point a finger and be like see Canada you're bad and a
00:26:13.800side note to that the falseness of bc to me and what the u.s thinks about british columbia and
00:26:20.620canada in general oh canada canada oh my gosh they're so environmentally beautiful british
00:26:24.860columbia that's how they market beautiful british columbia and bc oh my gosh they have such a better
00:26:29.780administration up there and they're so much more environmentally friendly and there is literally
00:26:34.680this picture painted about how eco-friendly and and forward-thinking canada is yeah and i feel
00:26:42.340like the U.S. has a lot of U.S. citizens has no effing clue the deregulations that are happening
00:26:47.940in Canada and British Columbia let alone the tar sand which is the largest industrial
00:26:52.680oil extraction project in the world right but somehow Canada has a great marketing campaign
00:26:58.860to make it seem like they're all hunky-dory when really they are just effing up things left and
00:27:03.860right and I drove through British Columbia to get up here and there are areas that there really are
00:27:09.660not a lot of people and so there's just no watchdogs there's just nobody around it's out of
00:27:14.940sight it's out of mind the tar sands northwest british columbia these places where it's kind
00:27:19.660of a free-for-all for development because no one's there it's northwest british columbia has
00:27:25.880about 2 000 people living in it whereas just across the border the political border into
00:27:31.500southeast alaska there's 75 000 people so to some northwest bc is like you know the middle of
00:27:38.420nowhere, but to us, it's the middle of everything, right? So yeah, I think it's unfortunate that it
00:27:44.100is that like concept of out of sight, out of mind. It's, you know, a lot of what we're doing
00:27:50.020with the Salmon Beyond Borders campaign is not putting it as an issue that is the United States
00:27:56.980versus Canada or Alaska versus British Columbia, but it is that these are shared watersheds and
00:28:02.960these are shared resources and we have to figure out how we want to manage them going forward right
00:28:09.520and I think it's going to take all of us in order to bring these places to the periphery of people
00:28:16.860down south especially that yeah don't have the clear story for for the way especially that bc
00:28:24.280operates especially in northwest bc they don't have a clue they don't have a clue like the mining
00:28:29.240industry is marketing northwest british columbia's the golden triangle like there are literally
00:28:34.160flyers and emails and maps that go out to shareholders and investors that say come join
00:28:40.540the party of the golden triangle in northwest bc like it's open for development how do we combat
00:28:46.600that how do we ensure that this land these resources it's it's not a free-for-all it's
00:28:53.740certainly not a free-for-all for the mining industry there are indigenous communities that
00:28:59.280you know the british columbia government and the mining companies suggest that they are
00:29:03.960in consultation with consultation is not consent there are so many so many issues inherent within
00:29:12.560this transboundary issue beyond just the impacts of mining to to water and salmon right it's about
00:29:18.960these mining companies coming in and dividing communities and providing two options to folks
00:29:26.220in communities you either work for the mine or you leave right and it's happening with people
00:29:30.160our age like younger generations are not staying in their communities because they're either not
00:29:36.540going to work for the mine and and they've just been so it's been ingrained in their in their
00:29:41.540minds that if they don't work for the mine they don't have anything to contribute to the community
00:29:46.580therefore they're leaving and they're they're not there to support elders or or the younger
00:29:52.940people coming up right so i think there's just so many so many issues that we could dive into but i
00:30:00.340think again it is just starting these conversations and changing the conversation where it's it's not
00:30:07.860about jobs and it's not about economy and that mining is the only way to achieve either of those
00:30:14.580things but really how do we want to manage these shared places these shared environments these
00:30:23.720these rivers that connect communities and cultures and create a way that we're all able to live here
00:30:31.000wow well I want to talk about salmon at this point and so we've heard about the mines and I'm sure
00:30:40.340there's years more to learn about and we've just started scratching the surface. But let's say
00:30:47.360there's a mining disaster on a headwaters and there's toxic water being poured into these
00:30:53.300rivers. What happens to salmon and subsequently other species, including humans, that are affected
00:31:01.400by mining disasters? What are some of the things that start to show up? Well, I mean, it's different,
00:31:07.660right with the various forms of mining and for example if you look at transboundary mining issues
00:31:14.680in the British Columbia Montana region there are over a thousand years of legacy mining impacts
00:31:22.260from coal mines in that watershed where they're seeing not only impacts to water quality but
00:31:29.180they're actually seeing deformities in fish and birds and they have been for a while right so
00:31:34.480it's these long-term impacts to water quality that take a while but do accumulate and are now
00:31:44.280of great concern right you actually have evidence that these contaminants are affecting fish
00:31:51.440populations as well as bird populations so you know then you move to the mount poly example right
00:31:57.600where this mine failed sent 6.6 billion gallons of toxic waste into nearby waterways and quenelle
00:32:07.080lake which is like this pristine spawning ground for wild salmon is now basically like a settling
00:32:13.280pond for that project and the sockeye return this year was good which was impressive because salmon
00:32:22.900are quite resilient right but you know and so a lot of people said like well it's it's indicative
00:32:28.760that you know my even a mining catastrophe like that is not going to significantly impact salmon
00:32:34.540scientists maintain that it's still too soon to tell long-term impacts from that disaster especially
00:32:40.880on that particular sockeye run because this is now four years in that same sockeye return
00:32:46.540but if you think about it in any of these instances for hard rock mining like mont paulie
00:32:52.880the heavy metals settle in the sediment and therefore remain at the beds of these rivers
00:33:01.080for a long time no matter what type of cleanup efforts happen there's always going to be
00:33:06.140the deposit of these heavy metals and so over time that will affect salmon's ability it will
00:33:12.360over time affect the quality of the habitat and you know in Alaska we have boasted for a long time
00:33:20.100that we have the best managed fisheries in the world and i would submit that we absolutely have
00:33:25.020really great fisheries management in most instances but the reason why we have such
00:33:30.480globally significant salmon population is because we actually have habitat because we haven't
00:33:36.780destroyed all of the habitat yet right so i think that you know these mining projects whether or
00:33:46.000not there are catastrophic events, they will inevitably begin just because of their discharge
00:33:51.900and the slow release of these heavy metals and the accumulation of them over time will impact
00:33:58.180salmon populations and their ability to return to their spawning and rearing grounds. We know that
00:34:04.360from other places and how salmon have interacted with mining in other places. You know, we're
00:34:09.740already seeing declines in our wild salmon populations in Alaska. This year especially
00:34:15.500was the first year where there were king closures throughout the state as well as into British
00:34:20.460Columbia. And the Taku and the Stikine and the Eunuch Rivers in particular, the three watersheds
00:34:25.720that we focused on for the Salmon Beyond Borders campaign, they produce 80% of Southeast Alaska's
00:34:31.680wild king salmon. Why would we even risk allowing more mines to be developed in these watersheds?
00:34:39.700And going back earlier to no-go zones and where mines are acceptable, what areas are sacrificial, et cetera, it's not even just one project at the headwaters of each of these watersheds.