For The Wild - September 20, 2017


JODY HOLMES on Keeping the Great Bear Standing ⧸51

Topics
THERESA TWO BULLS on Uniting to Reclaim the Black Hills ⧸50 CALLA ROSE OSTRANDER and JOHN WICK on Carbon Drawdown in Abrupt Climate Change ⧸52

Episode Stats


Length

52 minutes

Words per minute

151.86

Word count

7,937

Sentence count

184

Harmful content

Toxicity

1

sentences flagged

Hate speech

4

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 The silence is broken by somebody crying, trying to be heard, never a word.
00:00:16.000 Always the attitude, sort out your own, always alone.
00:00:20.760 Wishing for something the world is denying.
00:00:24.660 Out in the wilderness somebody's crying
00:00:29.800 Somebody wishing for something to happen
00:00:43.100 Wishing to tell, wishing to help
00:00:46.540 Someone was listening, someone who cared
00:00:50.340 Never despaired
00:00:52.220 Someone to lean on and someone to trust
00:00:56.860 Who needs your assistance and finds your disguise
00:01:00.920 Hello and welcome to For the Wild podcast. I'm Ayanna Young.
00:01:14.840 This show is listener supported. Please visit forthewild.world to make a donation.
00:01:20.940 This episode is in collaboration with the Bioneers Conference, which is being held in Marin County on the weekend of October 20th.
00:01:29.260 I have the pleasure of speaking there this year, along with some of the most incredible thought leaders of our time.
00:01:35.420 I hope to see you there.
00:01:37.320 Today we are speaking with Jodi Holmes.
00:01:40.460 Jodi is a PhD project director for the Rainforest Solutions Project, a coalition of Greenpeace, Sierra Club of BC, and STAN.org.
00:01:49.820 She has dedicated 20-plus years to achieving healthy human and ecological systems in the Great Bear Rainforest and was one of the primary architects of the historic Great Bear Rainforest Agreements, protecting the largest expanses of old-growth temperate rainforests in the world.
00:02:07.700 Well, thank you so much, Jodi, for joining us.
00:02:10.520 It's such a pleasure to be here.
00:02:12.640 Well, I want to start off by saying that the temperate rainforests of Cascadia are deeply embedded in my heart.
00:02:21.400 And, you know, just as you have, I'm honored to dedicate my life to their protection and restoration.
00:02:28.340 And the work that you've been fundamental in for more than two decades in the Great Bear Rainforest
00:02:33.300 has been a compass and an inspiration for my work with what I do here in the redwoods of southern Cascadia,
00:02:39.740 as well as in the campaign that For the Wild is a part of with Earthjustice and other organizations
00:02:44.980 and working to stop old growth logging in the Tongass National Forest of Southeast Alaska.
00:02:50.860 You know the reality of how much old growth we have already lost,
00:02:54.660 which never ceases to fill me with longing.
00:02:57.740 You know, forests that took thousands upon thousands of years to reach the ancient state,
00:03:03.660 harboring incalculable wisdom and biological diversity.
00:03:07.240 and they've been almost completely obliterated in just a few hundred years since colonialization
00:03:13.340 here in the contiguous united states intact temperate rainforests cover less than five percent
00:03:19.560 of their historic range and for many people it's unfathomable what true old growth really looks or
00:03:28.180 feels like you know to be amongst the thousand-year-old western red cedars that remain in
00:03:34.600 isolated stretches of forest on the north coast of BC, or just to witness watersheds teeming with
00:03:40.460 salmon as grizzlies and wolves celebrate their return. And although the rainforests of BC have
00:03:47.520 not completely escaped the thralls of destruction, much more temperate rainforest remains in BC
00:03:53.460 devoid of human development than anywhere else. The Great Bear rainforest specifically harbors
00:03:58.500 one quarter of the world's unlogged coastal temperate rainforest. It stores immense amounts
00:04:04.080 of carbon, it sustains 20% of the world's wild salmon, 2,000 genetically distinct runs,
00:04:11.060 and it encompasses one of the most pristine marine ecosystems on the planet.
00:04:16.260 So the ecological and cultural significance of the Great Bear Rainforest is manifold,
00:04:21.200 but to journey past the scientific and definable significance, I'd love if we could start with
00:04:28.380 you giving our listeners a sense of what these forests feel like and what makes the Great Bear
00:04:36.060 so special to you and everyone else who has spent decades rallying for its protection.
00:04:42.100 Well, maybe the best place for me to start is kind of where and how I fell in love with the
00:04:48.100 Great Bear Rainforest. And it actually started first from a map that I saw on the wall, which
00:04:54.260 came from the Sierra Club of British Columbia. And it was one of those maps of remaining temperate
00:04:59.420 rainforest in the world. And they used yellow as the color for logged areas and green for
00:05:06.580 everything else. And I remember looking at that map and noticing that Vancouver Island was
00:05:11.940 basically obliterated. There was almost no green left on it, as was the lower mainland of British
00:05:16.300 Columbia. And then as you started moving north, all of a sudden there was this area of green that
00:05:21.780 stood out and was so much in contrast to the rest of the map that I got super curious and was like
00:05:27.900 what what is that where is that subsequently because I've sort of really noticed the green
00:05:33.900 area on the map and kind of fall in love with the idea of the green area on the map I went on a very
00:05:40.100 long kayaking trip with my then husband and a couple of friends and we kayaked from the northern
00:05:44.920 part of the Great Bear Rainforest down into the center of the Great Bear Rainforest which took us
00:05:49.280 three and a half weeks. And in the course of that kayaking trip, we spent just a lot of time
00:05:56.560 either sitting on beaches or wandering in old growth forests, where the first thing that you
00:06:02.940 notice and the kind of the first thing that hits you is the smell. And the smell is that of deep,
00:06:10.520 wet moss, of green all around you, of the ocean kind of lapping at your beachfront.
00:06:19.900 And in the course of doing that, we also really met a lot of First Nations in their communities.
00:06:27.560 And this was before there was a lot of kayaking activity and tourism activity in the area.
00:06:31.720 So First Nations were incredibly friendly and I would have to say kind of tourist naive at the time and told us all kinds of things about places that had been important to them culturally and historically and sent us off looking for things,
00:06:47.520 which honestly today they would never do because they're trying to make sure that those areas get conserved
00:06:53.120 and that tourists aren't running roughshod all over them.
00:06:56.380 But one of the places that I will never forget is an area that was called the Stadium.
00:07:01.340 And it's found kind of almost dead center in the Great Bear Rainforest.
00:07:05.360 It's found on a little isthmus, which has three kind of crescent moon beaches that sit around on the isthmus
00:07:15.900 that are all white sand beaches.
00:07:17.520 and in the little section of the isthmus when you walk into the forest there's this deep pit
00:07:24.820 which has steps on it and that's all that's left of what used to be a gathering place for first
00:07:31.680 nations up and down the coast and it's just these mossy steps with some really big big logs that
00:07:38.380 have fallen down that used to be the roof logs and i remember stepping kind of into the undergrowth
00:07:43.940 And we'd been looking for it for probably six or seven hours at that point and stepping into the undergrowth and noticing that there was this pit and then thinking, oh, my gosh, look, those logs aren't just random.
00:07:54.920 And those logs are actually root poles and sitting there and realizing that for thousands of years, First Nations had been coming to this place, had been meeting, had been making decisions about marine use and allocation of resources and setting up marriages and learning songs from each other and establishing kind of territorial boundaries and things like that.
00:08:20.100 and there he was sitting in the middle of it and all that was left were just these mossy steps
00:08:26.300 and some big roofing logs and there was something about that experience of being in the middle of
00:08:34.280 the Great Bear Rainforest and not having seen a lot of other people or been engaged in kind of
00:08:38.820 western colonial culture for some period of time that I found incredibly moving and also just
00:08:44.540 it stopped me in my tracks. And in that moment, what happened for me was this
00:08:51.500 intense certainty and commitment to both wanting to look after the rainforest and make sure that
00:08:59.220 the rainforest itself didn't go away, but also really wanting to be engaged in and support
00:09:05.380 First Nations in a revival of their relationship with land, in an economic revival, and also in
00:09:12.020 a revival of their traditional laws and culture. So that was kind of my pivotal moment where I had
00:09:19.280 an experience going into the Great Bear Rainforest, kind of unexpectedly stumbling on something that
00:09:24.440 was really powerful and ancient, which completely changed my life and really caused me to turn my
00:09:33.040 direction to looking after and working on Great Bear Rainforest for the next 20 years. I'm going
00:09:39.180 to come back and then say to you a little more about the what's it like to be in the great bear
00:09:43.860 rainforest because I've had many trips back since then and in those trips back since then some of
00:09:51.640 the things that have absolutely blown my mind are in the Kwe river estuary and then walking up the
00:09:58.840 river you come upon these grizzly bear footprints in the moss and they're literally kind of the size
00:10:07.120 of dinner plates and they're deep down into the moss and they're actually like a grizzly bear
00:10:13.000 highway where grizzly bears walk over and over and so the moss never recovers and there's just
00:10:17.560 these deep indentations in the moss because grizzlies go up and down that valley to catch
00:10:23.400 salmon. I've sat in a little boat in an estuary watching grizzly bears literally 20 or 30 feet
00:10:31.940 away from me, rubbing their backs and shoulders on logs, jumping down into the water, sitting in
00:10:37.820 the water, scratching their heads, and then just kind of nonchalantly picking up salmon from in
00:10:43.760 the water. They just stick their head into the water, pick up a salmon, pull it back up again,
00:10:47.060 and then just crunch, crunch, crunch, crunch, crunch, right in front of me. I've watched
00:10:51.700 rainforest wolves cavorting on beaches where they don't think that you can see them because
00:10:56.660 they're incredibly shy they're really unusual they actually spend their time mostly on the beach
00:11:02.800 they're probably a subspecies and they eat a lot of crabs they do a lot of picking up rocks and
00:11:08.860 reaching under rocks to grab for crabs and they eat salmon which is unusual relative to other wolf
00:11:13.300 species and then there's just the experience of walking into estuarine areas where grizzly bears
00:11:22.100 kind of are rooting around and you see the results of grizzly bears rooting around in the sedges in
00:11:26.980 the springtime where they have just turned over huge amounts of soil looking for the sweet roots
00:11:31.560 of the sedges and then the other things that kind of were unforgettable are standing at the base of
00:11:39.380 a really big sitka spruce tree and looking up and kind of like realizing oh my gosh this thing's been
00:11:45.160 here for a thousand years and it goes up as far as I can see and then it disappears into the sky
00:11:52.820 and it's covered with moss and it's so integrally a part of this ecosystem and connected
00:11:59.220 under the ground with its roots to everything else and it's been a home for something and it's
00:12:04.060 been fed by the salmon that come up the streams and it kind of just again it's just one of those
00:12:10.280 moments where you realize i'm right in the presence of utter connection and um beauty
00:12:18.000 and then the final thing i'll mention is and i think you've already talked about it
00:12:22.520 the the great bear rainforest comes down and and meets at the intersect with the pacific ocean and
00:12:28.480 there's an incredible amount of biodiversity in the ocean as well and so often when you're
00:12:33.500 traveling around the great bear rainforest you're doing it by boat there are almost no roads so you
00:12:38.100 spend most of your time in boats and then coming into little estuaries and then walking up into
00:12:42.640 the forest and while you're out on the boats you are very likely to see pods of killer whales with
00:12:48.660 babies cavorting in the shallows and feeding and at some point we were in kayaks out in a little
00:12:54.960 bay and about four or five humpback whales came and surrounded us this was just after the great
00:13:02.580 bear rainforest agreements had been signed and this group of humpback whales came and surrounded
00:13:07.460 us and kept coming up in the most incredibly gentle way and spraying great fishy breath all
00:13:14.220 over us and I just kept having this sense of it was like the great bear rainforest and the ocean
00:13:19.300 were sort of putting on this show for us and saying it was such a good thing you did it was
00:13:24.140 so good that you looked after this area because look what you've protected
00:13:27.960 Take me through the pine forest and over the mountains right up to the shore of the sea
00:13:42.080 And there in the evening we'll board that same vessel that's bound for adventure and me
00:13:49.560 For the journey I long to be easy, I know in my heart's not to be
00:13:57.040 For the danger unfolding enticed me
00:14:01.740 To wake up my bones from their sleep
00:14:06.540 And so we set sail across the wild ocean
00:14:12.920 With gold screaming leave them to me
00:14:15.820 And deep in my heart I can hear a voice crying
00:14:20.620 Go ahead, offer, be free
00:14:23.260 For my love with this land is not broken 1.00
00:14:27.500 Help me out with this cotton and string
00:14:30.860 If it's tied round my waist I won't lose you
00:14:35.840 Knowing home is where it all begins
00:14:53.260 As ecological awareness begins to permeate the mainstream,
00:15:22.080 the Great Bear and Tongass are now widely recognized as unmatched treasures of the natural world.
00:15:29.340 But prior to the 1990s, this region was kind of a blind spot in the public eye,
00:15:35.480 which logging companies were fine with.
00:15:38.820 You know, there were resistance efforts all along,
00:15:41.300 but they had limited leverage to challenge the industry,
00:15:46.300 which was the crux of BC's economy and the darling of the government.
00:15:51.240 But somehow the word got out, and just like Occupy Wall Street and Standing Rock, the
00:15:56.820 chemistry was ripe for this movement to just explode, and the demand was the end to unchecked
00:16:03.500 old-growth logging in B.C.
00:16:05.960 This beautiful, unified display of resistance has become sort of legendary, and is known
00:16:12.300 to history as the War of the Woods.
00:16:14.840 And I know that you were there.
00:16:16.700 So how did it all go down?
00:16:18.780 And in terms of strategy, what was discovered about how to successfully slow, and in many cases, stop the murder of a forest?
00:16:30.560 Well, you know what, it is actually really helpful and instructive to start on Vancouver Island with Clackwit Sound.
00:16:36.260 And also just to give you some context, so Clackwit Sound is quite small.
00:16:39.720 Relatively speaking, there are hundreds of Clackwit Sounds in the Great Bear Rainforest.
00:16:44.200 It's a small area with a small number of watersheds.
00:16:47.060 However, it captured Canadian attention because there were these huge, huge old growth trees that were being logged by Macmillan Bloedel. And for the first time in Canadian history, and it became the largest civil disobedience in Canadian history, people stood on the roads, linking arms, singing songs, and saying no more logging trucks will pass.
00:17:09.800 And that this was kind of like the first big civil disobedience blockade for logging in Canada of that size. And it was grandmothers and small children and doctors and lawyers. It really captivated the attention of a very broad range of Canadian society.
00:17:25.500 And as the types of tools were being fine-tuned in Claquant Sound, one of the things that was being fine-tuned there was markets campaigns, which involved creating a lot of negative public attention of companies that were using ancient rainforest in their supply chain, unfurling banners.
00:17:46.320 It's where the environmental community cut its teeth and really started to create much more sophisticated markets campaigns.
00:17:52.720 So two things, basically really affecting public branding for companies that were using ancient rainforest in their supply chain, and then developing purchasing policies for those same companies so that they would refuse to buy ancient rainforests, and then putting a lot of pressure on the forest industry in British Columbia in particular.
00:18:11.200 So that strategy and that particular technique developed in Clackwit Sound in the work that was done with McMillan Bloedel.
00:18:19.180 Those same groups who'd been involved in Clackwood Sound realized they had a strategy that was a whole lot more powerful than they'd ever had before in terms of environmental campaigning, using the power of the marketplace to shift forest industry behavior up until that point hadn't really been tried and certainly hadn't been able to be brought to scale.
00:18:38.840 So when we started working in the Great Bear Rainforest in the early days, and this is where things got interesting and a little more complicated.
00:18:49.820 In the early days, the forest industry in the Great Bear Rainforest, many of the same players, McMillan, Bloedel was one of them, really was operating kind of under the radar.
00:18:59.500 You've already mentioned how incredibly remote the area was.
00:19:02.340 Very few people went and saw it.
00:19:03.620 very few people kind of did what we call the BCTV test, which is fly over an area, see the size
00:19:09.100 of the clear cuts and get horrified. So they'd been operating with impunity. And the forest
00:19:14.600 industry, I would say by at that point in time, was also very much from a power block kind of
00:19:20.740 perspective, was very much in alliance with the provincial government, which meant that they had
00:19:26.320 a great deal of influence over public policy around forestry, had a great deal of influence
00:19:30.740 in terms of the rate of stumpage that was applied and were, generally speaking, dictating
00:19:37.160 how decisions were made on forestry.
00:19:39.020 And I'm overstating this for a fact.
00:19:40.920 It's not completely true.
00:19:42.000 And I have forest industry colleagues who would completely argue with me about that
00:19:45.260 point.
00:19:45.600 But generally speaking, I would say, relative to where things are now, they had an enormous
00:19:50.380 amount of power and ability to affect decision making.
00:19:53.400 They also made enormous contributions to political campaigns and, generally speaking, were very
00:19:59.060 allied with governments and decision makers. And in contrast, what I would say in those early days,
00:20:06.860 First Nations and environmentalists, other than the fact that environmentalists had this
00:20:10.860 interesting new tool for markets campaigning, had relatively little power and had very little
00:20:15.740 ability to affect government decision making. As we turned our lens towards the Great Bear
00:20:22.060 Rainforest, and we're looking at the forest industry, it was a behemoth. It wasn't just
00:20:26.240 one company it was many companies and some of those companies kind of had a a psychology of
00:20:34.000 wanting to work well with their local counterparts and first nations and others of them were really
00:20:38.940 they were large companies they were they were often international companies
00:20:42.140 that could care less frankly about what they did other than ensuring that they turned a profit
00:20:48.740 and one of the first things that happened in the great bear rainforest kind of
00:20:54.760 announcing to the world that the environmental eye had shifted and had turned northwards into
00:21:00.600 the Great Bear Rainforest was that there was a blockade in Newhawk territory in a place called
00:21:07.500 Fog Creek, which was for the Newhawk, the place where their founding kind of mother had come down
00:21:14.780 and had come down from the heavens to earth and then had given rise to the Newhawk peoples.
00:21:19.420 and international forest products was moving through the valley and coming incredibly close
00:21:26.540 to logging the area that for them was deeply spiritually significant and they called upon
00:21:31.440 greenpeace and asked them to come and help them to please stop the logging in this area that was
00:21:35.800 really important to them and so you'll see on the internet there's a wonderful cache of google
00:21:40.840 images of first nations elders new hawk elders in full regalia standing on the blockade with
00:21:47.420 Greenpeace and others and Forest Action Network trying to stop Interfor from logging this area.
00:21:52.840 And they were successful in that particular case in stopping the logging. But the simple reality
00:21:57.780 was, and this is what we had learned in Clackwood, that stopping the forest industry somewhere was
00:22:03.060 useful for that immediate moment. But as soon as anybody's attention was turned, they would go back
00:22:08.680 because they had licenses that allowed them to continue logging there. And they were actually
00:22:12.280 required by law to continue to take out the amount of harvest level that they had committed to
00:22:18.340 and generally speaking other than markets campaigning what people had discovered was
00:22:25.700 that even when people did land use planning and engaged in conversations about how to change
00:22:30.040 behavior in the forest industry very little actually changed on the ground so that is when
00:22:35.740 the environmentalists as a whole kind of got together and started asking the question how do
00:22:41.200 we take the kinds of strategies and practices that we used in Clackwood Sound and scale them
00:22:46.300 up? Is that even possible? And how do we create a solution that is much more comprehensive than
00:22:51.740 just a valley by valley by valley fight, or even a Clackwood Sound by Clackwood Sound fight, but
00:22:55.800 that lets us accomplish this all in one big comprehensive whole, rather than using up our
00:23:02.740 very limited resources, trying to fight things valley by valley by valley. And in the early
00:23:07.220 days, there was still the valley by valley by valley fight, trying to keep them out of areas
00:23:10.640 that were really important. But as the markets campaigns kind of gained traction, and I would
00:23:16.440 say the war in the woods, in fact, continued from Clackawood Sound into the Great Bear Rainforest
00:23:22.660 for, you know, a two or three year period of time, which often, in our experience, has been necessary
00:23:28.500 to get the attention of the forest industry and to establish that you actually have power, that
00:23:32.560 they want to talk to you and they want to make changes so um in 1998 the forest industry said
00:23:41.260 that's enough we've had enough of this market campaign attention and these blockades and all
00:23:45.560 of this bad press uh we want to sit down with you guys and we want to talk about finding a solution
00:23:50.780 and that's when we did our first agreement in principle moratorium on logging so we we got a
00:23:56.540 moratorium on logging in a hundred of the watersheds intact watersheds on the coast
00:24:00.460 and from there shifted into a completely different set of dynamics related to working more in
00:24:06.920 collaboration with the forest industry, working in collaboration with First Nations, and spending
00:24:11.620 the next 20 years finding solutions to what I would describe as that age-old activist dilemma,
00:24:18.380 which is really typified by that moment in Seattle when the wall came down in the WTO protests and
00:24:24.000 it was like, so what do we do now? We've actually stopped them from doing it, but what we know is
00:24:28.400 that's not enough, we actually have to find a solution and figure out what to do next.
00:24:32.660 And we were naive and young and had no idea what we were doing at that particular moment in time.
00:24:38.580 But we were brazen enough. And this is where naivete is actually an advantage. We were brazen
00:24:42.700 enough to believe that we could do something and that we could figure it out. So that's kind of
00:24:47.920 the moment at which the forest industry started to lose its capacity to completely influence
00:24:54.120 forest policy and lose its capacity to completely define decision making. And environmentalists were
00:25:00.260 able to shift into equalizing the playing field with this markets campaign. So you're hearing
00:25:07.060 this kind of through my lens as a white colonial activist. I want to kind of add into this another
00:25:14.840 perspective, which is that First Nations had been for 50, 100 years been raising the flag and saying
00:25:23.400 it's not okay what's happening here it's not like they hadn't they didn't know and then and hadn't
00:25:28.460 been having these problems for a very long time they did they hadn't had access to public kind
00:25:33.540 of campaigns and public opinion and they hadn't had access to a whole lot of financial resources
00:25:38.860 in large part because Canadians have engaged in a rather shadowy underground cultural genocide for
00:25:46.300 an extended period of time here in Canada relative to First Nations so First Nations had started in
00:25:52.640 the last, I would say, kind of around the time that environmental groups were kind of shifting
00:25:57.220 their attention northwards to the Great Bear Rainforest, First Nations had started running
00:26:02.340 legal campaigns. And they were helped in that by several environmental groups. They'd started
00:26:07.500 doing legal campaigns and running legal challenges against the federal government and the provincial
00:26:13.200 government on the basis of the fact that there was unextinguished Aboriginal title. And when they
00:26:18.900 started the provincial government basically had just thrown all these cases out of court and said
00:26:22.940 no that's you have no rights you have the right to be on a reserve and you'll be looked after by
00:26:27.620 the federal government but you have no other rights according to that but the very interesting
00:26:31.700 thing in british columbia is that in fact there never were treaties negotiated for a very large
00:26:37.260 portion of the province and in in everywhere in the great barren forest no treaties had been
00:26:41.960 negotiated so there were a number of very precedent-setting legal cases that happened in the
00:26:46.720 late 1990s and early 2000s that established not only that First Nations actually had Aboriginal
00:26:52.380 tenure, which constituted a competing claim on the land, but the provincial government was
00:26:58.140 constitutionally required to consult with them about matters of harvest levels and how land use
00:27:06.580 was done in their territories. So that entire set of legal challenges completely changed the
00:27:14.720 landscape for the forest industry as well. So on the one hand, they've got people unfurling banners
00:27:20.600 on their customers and setting up purchasing protocols through markets campaigns. On the
00:27:25.040 other hand, there's these legal challenges going to court that say, you can't come and just cut in
00:27:29.060 our territory and talk to the provincial government. Now you have to come and talk to us too. So it
00:27:33.280 was creating this incredibly unstable business climate. And in that very unstable business
00:27:38.560 climate. Harvest rates suffered, profits suffered, forest industry executives were tied up in a whole
00:27:44.860 bunch of conflict resolution and trying to sort out their brand. And they lost some of their power
00:27:50.720 as the insider track with the provincial government and began needing to find solutions
00:27:56.840 that could deal with this business uncertainty and climate of conflict that they were in,
00:28:01.900 what you already mentioned as the war in the woods.
00:28:08.560 Choosing sides
00:28:15.760 I'm choosing sides
00:28:19.840 Man, I hate to be choosing, choosing sides
00:28:27.780 But I'm choosing sides
00:28:32.140 My side is the wild side
00:28:36.400 Lord, I wish I didn't have to be choosing, choosing sides
00:28:43.080 Indivisible humanity increasing to insanity
00:28:51.280 I find myself caught in the middle of a war against the wild
00:28:58.220 I am choosing sides
00:29:03.540 My side is the wild side
00:29:07.200 My side is the side of life
00:29:10.940 My side is the wild side
00:29:15.020 Caught in the middle one more 0.98
00:29:17.400 Individual human discerns
00:29:21.540 She is not alone
00:29:25.740 Her heart learns
00:29:29.540 I am choosing sight
00:29:34.940 My sight is the sight of the grids
00:29:39.120 My sight is the owls and the dreams
00:29:42.540 My sight is the whales and the sea
00:29:46.160 I'll shout it from the mountain peaks
00:29:49.540 I'll scream it in the city streets 0.85
00:29:53.620 I'll raise it in blood across my chest
00:29:58.020 I am human, I am human, yes, but I'm choosing sides, I'm choosing sides, Lord, I hate to be choosing, choosing sides.
00:30:17.040 Down to the wire, fight or flight
00:30:21.240 They try to tell me might is right
00:30:25.020 But there's no place left to run and hide
00:30:28.860 And I ain't going down without a fight
00:30:32.840 I am choosing sides
00:30:37.440 My side is the mountainside
00:30:40.700 My side is the rocks in the earth
00:30:44.520 My side is decay and rebirth
00:30:48.620 So much destruction our eyes can see
00:30:52.560 It's down to the split with humanity
00:30:55.540 We've been running out of time
00:31:00.460 And the chasm is bowing deep and wide
00:31:04.320 Let's be choosing sides 1.00
00:31:08.300 Our side is the white side 0.98
00:31:12.320 Our side is the side of life
00:31:16.140 Our side is the wild side
00:31:20.380 I'll shudder from the mountain peaks
00:31:23.500 I'll scream it in the city streets
00:31:27.220 I'll blaze it in blood across my chest
00:31:31.700 I am human, I am human, yes
00:31:36.640 But what she's inside
00:31:42.320 I just want to extend a bow of gratitude to you and the entire initiative.
00:31:49.780 The immensity of what you all accomplished is truly groundbreaking and so inspirational.
00:31:57.960 And it clearly was not an easy feat from the independent scientific team, which is the
00:32:02.760 Coast Information Team that conducted the most comprehensive analysis ever taken on
00:32:07.620 globally significant temperate rainforest to the coalitions of industry environmental groups the
00:32:12.800 first nations uh you know it what a collaborative process and one thing that i think about when i'm
00:32:21.340 imagining this collaboration is that sacrifice and compromise are inevitable when juggling so
00:32:28.880 many values particularly in an agreement regarding such a large piece of land the logging industry
00:32:35.940 and environmental groups probably both desire the intact and most productive valleys, places that
00:32:42.900 harbor the oldest, biggest cultural sites and trees. You know, those are also most of the time
00:32:49.600 the most profitable because it's the largest trees, it's high grading, that's the easiest to get to.
00:32:54.780 So I'm wondering, how did the individual coalitions within the GBR agreements grapple with
00:33:02.700 uh such compromise and i guess i'm also wondering who has the final say who has the right to decide
00:33:10.820 um okay well let's let's deal with this issue of competing overlapping values you nailed it
00:33:18.900 i'm sure you have this experience where you come from as well the big trees the big salmon fishing
00:33:24.620 areas the places where first nations have had cultural use are the most productive ecosystems
00:33:29.660 most of interest for ecological purposes, and obviously most of interest to the forest industry.
00:33:36.000 So it became increasingly like this, trying to fit a camel through the eye of a needle.
00:33:42.220 There was a very, very small sweet spot that we could all kind of agree on.
00:33:46.480 And the process of getting there involved a lot of refining our underlying principles and values
00:33:53.000 and agreeing that it was, in fact, important to all of us to come up with a solution that included
00:33:58.940 both low risk ecological integrity, but also a viable forest industry and much better living
00:34:07.940 conditions and economics for First Nations. So it was the coming to that kind of, we called it the
00:34:16.100 egg of well-being, right? The idea that you needed to look after every single one of those values,
00:34:22.000 that you needed to keep everybody whole, and the recognition and understanding that we weren't
00:34:27.560 willing to compromise while at the same time we weren't willing to compromise on any of those
00:34:32.720 individual values at the same time as understanding that we were everybody was going to have to take
00:34:37.940 some hits so it was in large part workable because we had all of this kind of independent
00:34:45.300 science from the coast information team that had clearly identified risk thresholds it identified
00:34:51.460 the answer to how much is enough ecologically speaking and first nations have gotten very
00:34:57.180 clear about what they needed to see in order for these agreements to work for them. And the forest
00:35:03.400 companies, quite frankly, ended up having to be the ones that retooled their businesses and rethought
00:35:09.080 how they went about doing business in order to be able to make this work at some level. So there
00:35:16.020 were definitely compromises on the ecological side. Did we get every single valley that had
00:35:19.740 the best possible values and the most fabulous big old trees? No, we did not. But what we did
00:35:26.940 do, and we're really clear about in the negotiations, was we were able to meet those
00:35:31.420 thresholds of, in order to be able to maintain low risk to ecological diversity, what we needed
00:35:36.080 to be able to do was ensure that 70% of the natural levels of representative ecosystems
00:35:42.520 were set aside. That's a pretty big number, right? But we had the forest industry on side,
00:35:48.020 we'd been able to really kind of carve that agreement with them about the importance of
00:35:51.360 those thresholds and so when it came time to come up with solutions we ended up kind of looking at
00:35:56.240 things and going well yeah I know we know you want to have that but you can't hit 70 percent without
00:35:59.900 that valley so that valley's got to get set aside or you can't you can't hit 70 percent without that
00:36:04.220 particular set of trees because you're not going to be able to meet the requirements of the agreement
00:36:09.020 so spending a lot of time and building all of that leverage initially was really important in
00:36:16.380 terms of setting the constraints around which the agreements got made.
00:36:23.680 Yeah, I can only imagine the back and forth that had to happen to get a solution and just all of
00:36:30.620 the intricacies. It's easy to say, well, of course, we have to stop all industrial logging.
00:36:37.500 But when you realize the predicament that remote resource dependent communities face,
00:36:42.900 lines begin to blur there's always this kind of tension the issue of immediate personal survival
00:36:50.520 versus the survival of the forest on an evolutionary scale it's definitely easier to make a more hard
00:36:58.060 line ecological argument that we have to curb this activity to avoid game over but it's more
00:37:04.200 of a challenge to show how a local economy can continue in the absence of clear-cut logging be
00:37:10.500 it by growing shellfish in the bays or edible mushrooms or understory medicinal plants or
00:37:16.800 producing biochar even. The phrase ecosystem-based management or EBM appeared a lot and it definitely
00:37:25.520 has an old paradigm ring to it but I assume that was the strategy to make deep ecology palatable
00:37:32.720 or at least less threatening to human supremacists because at the end of the day trees are standing
00:37:40.060 that would otherwise be dead. So before our dear tree sitters and monkey wrenchers in the audience
00:37:46.320 raise objections, think about it. That means less trees to defend by other means, and that is a
00:37:54.820 multi-tactical approach. What were the arguments you made against large-scale logging for the
00:38:01.800 well-being of the land and her First Nations? And how did they hold up in the actual negotiations?
00:38:10.060 Such great questions. I'm going to see if I can answer this quickly. So I would say the primary difference between ecosystem-based management and kind of traditional logging behavior is that the rate of cut of logging is an outcome of planning in ecosystem-based management, whereas it's usually an input in traditional logging.
00:38:34.540 traditional logging usually says well we want to get these many logs let's just go out and get them
00:38:38.480 and we don't think too much about what happens to the rest of the ecosystem while we're doing it
00:38:42.620 so in this case we did a lot of planning that was geared towards meeting targets relative to salmon
00:38:50.380 and representative ecosystems and red and blue listed plant communities and focal species habitat
00:38:56.180 we did a lot of planning relative to that that was all informed by science that had determined
00:39:02.260 this question around how much is enough so we did a lot of planning trying to ensure that we had as
00:39:08.020 much of those values overlapping in individual places so we could minimize the overall impacts
00:39:12.980 to the forest and then what we did was we looked at what's the amount of land base that's left over
00:39:20.080 and how much logging can it support we look at what we need to keep first and then we set logging
00:39:26.800 rates that's really the difference between ecosystem-based management and regular forestry
00:39:31.920 I think one of the interesting things here that often comes as a surprise to people is that, in fact, clear-cut logging is still allowed here.
00:39:42.900 The difference is that we've established what's the minimum amount over a large regional landscape of representative protection that we need to have.
00:39:52.340 and once we've managed to attain that and this would frankly this was a part of the reason why
00:39:57.560 this was appealing to the forest industry was that they didn't necessarily have to
00:40:01.120 change practices so much as they had to change where and how much of the practices that they did
00:40:06.500 so there's a much smaller portion of the land base that gets logged it's logged using quite
00:40:12.600 traditional methods although there are requirements for protection of salmon there are requirements for
00:40:17.180 set-asides for wildlife tree patches and things like that which frankly are still
00:40:21.140 quite a lot more conservative than most other regions in the world but from the perspective
00:40:26.720 of those of us looking at evm we think oh that's just so that's so normal but generally speaking
00:40:32.180 they can still use clear-cut logging practices in the remainder of those areas because it's
00:40:36.780 such a small amount of the land base relative to the area that gets set aside and then the other
00:40:42.440 thing about ecosystem-based management, in this case, in the way that we kind of envisaged it
00:40:47.120 here, is that it has a very strong emphasis on First Nations involvement and participation in
00:40:53.800 decision-making, creating dignity for the people who live in the area, and ensuring that economic
00:41:00.000 returns come into the communities that actually live within the area, rather than entirely leaving.
00:41:06.820 And you already spoke about the idea of creating conservation economies and diversifying economies.
00:41:11.820 so that forestry and mining and industrial fishery weren't the only game in town anymore.
00:41:19.920 There was a lot more emphasis on smaller scale sustainable enterprises in the region
00:41:24.680 so that First Nations in particular didn't have to make decisions that were defined by a hierarchy of need
00:41:30.220 that said we need to be able to feed our children and so therefore we have to go with the only industry in town.
00:41:41.820 When I'm in the woods, I know what to call you now.
00:41:46.940 When I'm in the woods, I know what to call you now.
00:41:50.720 Hey, my, my, oh, hey, my, my, oh.
00:42:05.420 Well, maybe the mountains know what to call you now.
00:42:09.140 Maybe the mounds know what to call you now
00:42:13.060 Hey, my, my, whoa
00:42:14.960 Hey, my, my, whoa
00:42:19.960 When I'm in a womb, I know what to call you now
00:42:32.020 And when a belly blooms, I know what to call you now
00:42:35.720 Hey, my, my, whoa
00:42:38.720 Well, thank you for explaining those complexities in more detail.
00:43:05.780 And I have one last question for you, although I probably have 30 more questions for you, but which I'm sad about because it's just incredible the depth of understanding you have of how to bring people together and actually manifest solutions.
00:43:26.720 you know we just spend so much time discussing solutions and concepts of conservation
00:43:34.560 and then contemplating how to stop oil extraction envisioning what we're going to do when our
00:43:40.560 systems begin to collapse and although i think it's completely important to talk about it
00:43:46.040 talking about such things only goes so far and while many in this realm of thought like to shy
00:43:53.240 away from the nitty gritty from the way things transpire when you are working within the system
00:43:58.680 you know the story of the great bear shows us that it is possible to work within the system
00:44:04.220 and that it can be done it actually really needs to be done but it's also difficult to
00:44:12.900 contemplate that it took 20 years not to say that it didn't need those 20 years but when we're
00:44:18.160 looking in the trajectory of the Anthropocene and biodiversity loss, it feels like we don't
00:44:23.960 have those 20 years to safeguard the biodiversity, or 20 years into the future, more years to
00:44:28.960 safeguard the biodiversity that is currently on the brink of extinction on our planet.
00:44:33.280 You know, the oceans can't wait another 20 years if we want to safeguard what's left.
00:44:38.000 And the last tracks of tropical rainforest slotted to be logged can't wait. And I really
00:44:44.280 want to ask you how we can take these lessons to other parts of our world that are in desperate
00:44:50.660 need of our attention one thing i consider is bc is relatively undeveloped and wealthy and peaceful
00:44:58.460 and first nations people are acknowledged you know kind of uh and a lot of land is publicly owned
00:45:06.480 and also environmentalist groups have a strong sway but i'm wondering how does
00:45:14.300 how do these solutions also translate to more tumultuous places so it's a kind of a two-part
00:45:20.720 question of what are the lessons we can take from canada and the united states but also
00:45:27.200 how do we translate those lessons to places that don't have the same privileges that we do here
00:45:34.480 um also an excellent question and one that i am spending considerable amount of time
00:45:43.280 contemplating right now i think i would say first and foremost the most important lesson
00:45:50.660 from my perspective in the great bear is about power and when we turn our thinking to anywhere
00:45:57.640 else and think about trying to shift timelines and do this a whole lot faster because i agree
00:46:04.540 with you we have to be able to do this a whole lot faster in other places really the most important
00:46:09.800 lesson is getting a very sophisticated analysis of power and systems and learning how to create
00:46:16.200 kind of the buckminster fuller concept trim tabs like finding ways to do low effort actions that
00:46:23.140 can tip a lot of and leverage a lot of change in our case it was this market campaign markets
00:46:30.420 campaigns it turned out while they didn't actually have enormous impacts on the economics of the
00:46:35.440 forest companies tied up their their senior leadership for extended periods of time and that
00:46:40.420 was untenable for them and so they wanted to come to the table and stop that from happening even
00:46:45.540 though we hadn't in fact shut them down or really had enormous impacts on them in terms of their
00:46:49.940 economics. So I would say understanding who the power players are, who make decisions,
00:46:56.980 who are influencing decisions, and finding ways that are efficient in trim tab to be able to
00:47:02.540 affect them is a really important learning from here that we need to kind of transfer to other
00:47:07.700 places. And what I will say right now is that I know a number of organizations who have done
00:47:13.980 exactly that, who are taking a number of these learnings and are taking that power analysis.
00:47:18.280 and the market's campaign capacity and shifting it to other places where there are far less stable
00:47:25.140 governments and a whole lot more problems. Because I think one of the lessons for us here
00:47:31.120 has been that, in fact, we never really lobbied the government to do a whole lot of stuff.
00:47:36.980 What we did was we put a lot of pressure on the forest industry who had access to the government.
00:47:42.340 And in the course of that, what we were able to accomplish was a whole lot of change because of
00:47:46.740 a strong player arguing for, we have to change this, we've got to do something so that you can
00:47:51.360 give us a certain business environment. So from a trim tab perspective, creating business
00:47:57.140 uncertainty can be very powerful. I think creating circumstances where there's a lot of
00:48:03.860 international public attention, so that the kind of repressive practices that happen in many other
00:48:09.660 places in the world don't go unnoticed, because let's not kid ourselves, there are places in the
00:48:14.340 world where people are killed for doing this kind of work we are incredibly privileged here
00:48:18.480 um and then i think the other thing to me that feels really really important is these unusual
00:48:26.660 collaborations out of left fields ways of and you know kind of like weird quirky unusual creative
00:48:34.200 ways of interacting with people who we would normally see as enemies and finding ways to
00:48:41.560 come up with solutions that neither of us would have come up with individually that arise because
00:48:47.160 of the kind of the crucible and fire of the conflict between you something about that seems
00:48:53.440 to have really created a very different solution here than often happens in other places and i know
00:49:01.440 i said that was the last thing but i think the other thing which generally speaking is harder
00:49:06.820 to accomplish in other places but was really pivotal here was a concept that we now kind of
00:49:12.280 call project finance for permanence and it had to do with bringing together commitments to fund a
00:49:19.600 large conservation financing package but not having the money flow or having the money kind of
00:49:26.000 finally show up in our coffers until such time as a whole series of requirements were met
00:49:32.180 And that created, it was $120 million that was jointly funded between the provincial federal government and private funders who the environmentalists had pulled together.
00:49:41.280 that concept of there's 120 million dollars waiting and it can be expended on all of these
00:49:47.260 great things but the following things have to happen we have to meet these requirements before
00:49:51.840 that 120 million dollars flows is a really great model for creating kind of like a way to compress
00:50:00.140 a whole bunch of change and press a whole bunch of of decision making into a short period of time
00:50:04.780 because it incentivizes it with money and i recognize that that's not necessarily going to
00:50:10.140 be a solution everywhere because it does also require governments and regimes that are able
00:50:16.140 to create certainty. Project Finance for Permanence does require guarantees around protected areas and
00:50:22.280 the fact that areas are never going to kind of change again. But it does really, really speed
00:50:28.540 the process up. So those are my big ones in terms of things that I think are important that really
00:50:35.200 could help speed things up here. It could have helped speed things up here even more if we'd
00:50:40.780 kind of been sophisticated enough to understand how to use them at the beginning. And I think
00:50:45.540 could be transferable to other places. It's incredible and heart enlivening what you and
00:50:53.900 this initiative people have been able to do. And I know I am taking a lot of lessons away from it,
00:50:59.820 and I'm sure our listeners are too.
00:51:01.720 So thank you, Jodi, for your work, your life,
00:51:05.380 and what you've dedicated yourself to.
00:51:08.200 You are so welcome.
00:51:09.740 It was really such a pleasure to talk about it.
00:51:11.860 We spent a fine, a tall western cedar
00:51:16.980 Drifting on the wind
00:51:20.260 Through the mountains like a river
00:51:22.660 Thank you for listening to For the Wild podcast.
00:51:28.940 I'm Ayanna Young.
00:51:29.820 If you enjoy listening to this podcast, please consider supporting us at ForTheWild.World.
00:51:36.680 We need your help to keep these projects rolling along.
00:51:40.520 The music you heard today was Through the Pine Forest from Magpie, Choosing Sides by Joanne Rand,
00:51:48.400 who will be at the 40th anniversary concert of the Environmental Protection Information Center,
00:51:53.640 or EPIC, on November 3rd in Redway, California.
00:51:56.540 we also heard
00:51:58.800 Devendra Banhart
00:52:00.260 with Hey Mama Wolf
00:52:01.480 our theme music
00:52:03.740 is Silence Returns by Bo
00:52:05.960 and Like a River
00:52:06.940 from Kate Wolf
00:52:08.060 I'd like to thank
00:52:10.200 our producer and editor
00:52:11.780 March Young
00:52:12.940 and our research director
00:52:14.680 Madison Migulski