For The Wild - September 16, 2020


REBECCA BURGESS on Soil to Soil Fiber Systems ⧸200

Topics
STEPHEN JENKINSON on Closing Time [ENCORE] ⧸199 SHANNON SERVICE on Slavery at Sea ⧸201

Episode Stats


Length

58 minutes

Words per minute

145.9

Word count

8,535

Sentence count

186

Harmful content

Toxicity

1

sentences flagged

Hate speech

6

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 For the Wild podcast is brought to you in part by the Calliopeia Foundation and listeners like you.
00:00:05.720 Calliopeia supports projects interweaving spirituality, culture, and ecology.
00:00:11.140 We are grateful for their support and the support of grassroots contributions from listeners.
00:00:16.000 To learn more about the Calliopeia Foundation, visit calliopeia.org.
00:00:20.720 To make a donation to For the Wild, visit forthewild.world slash donate, or support us through Patreon.
00:00:30.000 Hey community, Ayana here.
00:00:38.520 Before we begin today's episode, I'd like to share an exciting project the For the Wild team has been tending for the past few years.
00:00:45.880 Some of you may remember an episode called The Day the Water Died, back in 2018 with Dune Lankard, a tribal elder of the Eyak Eagle clan and a lifelong conservationist.
00:00:58.280 Well, that interview changed my life.
00:01:00.140 I ended up rafting down the Copper River in Alaska with Dune that summer, and since then,
00:01:05.840 we've been deep in strategy around protecting the temperate rainforest, glaciers, and waters
00:01:11.340 of his ancestral homelands.
00:01:13.580 Right now, we face a pivotal moment in Dune's 20-year struggle to preserve 11,000 acres
00:01:19.540 of the Bering River coalfield, which remains extremely vulnerable to mountaintop strip
00:01:24.760 mining under its current private ownership.
00:01:27.680 Dune and his organization, Native Conservancy, have a short window of time to purchase the coal title and to halt resource extraction.
00:01:35.980 We are putting out the call for large donors, organizations, foundations, or those who may be connected to such funders to be in touch with us, to partner in protecting the Copper River Delta.
00:01:48.480 This is big. This could mean the permanent protection of 3 million acres downstream of one of the wildest places left on the earth.
00:01:57.820 The enduring subsistence of the Eak people and their salmon, eagle, bear, and all the other more than human kin depend on it.
00:02:06.220 There is a powerful shift afoot in the land back movement, and we are here for it.
00:02:10.740 Get in touch at engage at forthewild.world and visit nativeconservancy.org.
00:02:27.040 hello and welcome to for the wild i'm ayanna young today i'm speaking with rebecca burgess
00:02:44.500 rebecca is the executive director of fiber shed and chair of the board for carbon cycle institute
00:02:50.660 she has over a decade of experience writing and implementing hands-on curriculum that focuses on
00:02:56.920 the intersection of restoration ecology and fiber systems. I think it's always been technology,
00:03:03.620 trade agreements, exploitation of labor and land that have continued to grease the wheels for rapid
00:03:10.060 consumption. Rebecca has taught at Westminster College, Harvard University, and has created
00:03:17.280 workshops for a range of NGOs and corporations. She is the author of the best-selling book,
00:03:22.900 Harvesting Color, a bioregional look into the natural dye traditions of North America,
00:03:28.640 and Fibershed, growing a movement of farmers, fashion activists, and makers for a new textile
00:03:34.400 economy released in 2019. She has built an extensive network of farmers and artisans
00:03:40.200 within our region's Northern California Fibershed to pilot the regenerative fiber systems models
00:03:46.000 at the community scale. Well, Rebecca, thank you so much for joining us. Our rooster cutie is
00:03:54.620 especially excited to have you on the show today. And yeah, I'm really looking forward to diving
00:04:01.320 into this topic, which we've never discussed on the podcast before, like I was mentioning earlier.
00:04:05.940 And I think there's so much good juiciness in this topic that will really shock us and also
00:04:13.700 give us a way forward that feels an integrity. Oh, thank you. And I love that your rooster's
00:04:21.440 name is Cutie. And I'm grateful for the opportunity to be here. And it's exciting
00:04:28.320 to be able to discuss this topic with you. I'm a longtime fan of the podcast and have always
00:04:35.360 been an avid learner and just so grateful to receive so much from the guests you've had on
00:04:42.500 the show and the way you facilitated the conversation so this is exciting thank you
00:04:48.280 thank you well i feel i feel the same way about all the guests including yourself so i i feel
00:04:55.340 very lucky and um cutie or sometimes we call him bach bach he's uh he'll yeah he'll be joining us
00:05:02.360 for a little bit until he finds himself his little um happy happy uh nest out there but 0.95
00:05:10.520 yeah, I'd like to start in the belly of the behemoth that is industrialized fashion.
00:05:16.820 Now, the global fashion industry is responsible for 8% of all greenhouse gas emissions. Today,
00:05:23.020 60% of all clothing produced is disposed of within the same year it was purchased.
00:05:29.180 And we're purchasing over 50% more than we did even 15 years ago, which is to say that it wasn't
00:05:35.920 always like this. So I'd love if you could start off by sharing when our society really started to
00:05:42.300 rampantly consume clothes, and how has the fashion sector been shaped culturally and
00:05:47.660 economically over the past couple of decades? Oh, that's a great question. It's interesting
00:05:54.140 to try to pinpoint one set of inflection points in our history that would have said,
00:06:02.700 you know that i could say this is the point at which the consumption really changed i could name
00:06:06.680 a few points that i think have been in have led to the quote-unquote progress of this problem
00:06:12.800 one is you know the the actual beginnings of the industrial revolution and the the cotton gins
00:06:20.640 um the eli whitney invented cotton gin which amplified the ability for people to
00:06:27.060 grow more cotton because it could be de-seeded very quickly. So that also amplified the slave
00:06:34.440 trade in the southeastern part of the United States, but it generally just created a lot more
00:06:39.240 raw material that could be processed in the northeast, also in Manchester, England. They
00:06:45.780 were processing a lot of Indian cotton. I think all the technologies on farm really started to
00:06:52.740 change the industrial nature agriculture related to fiber and so with all this raw material with
00:07:03.140 these um you know prices started to um come down and industry just started to basically take over
00:07:12.600 on the ag and the value addition side so there's that that's you know basically from the mid 1800s
00:07:20.800 forward. And then I think about fast forward to the trade deals. So you have the North American
00:07:28.320 Free Trade Agreement in 1994. And, you know, like, here's one example, 1960, they say about
00:07:36.080 98% of our clothes were made in the United States. Maybe 2% were from overseas. And now
00:07:43.440 today, as we sit here and talk, that number is completely reversed. And in fact, less than 1%
00:07:48.260 of our clothes are actually grown woven and sewn in the United States and you know 99 point
00:07:55.180 something percent is imported and the way that that occurred that import economy was through
00:08:00.800 trade deals like the North American Free Trade Agreement NAFTA and then CAFTA the Central American
00:08:05.760 Free Trade Agreement and then as clothing could be produced in the late 90s south of the border
00:08:14.560 overseas Pakistan India China Vietnam Myanmar these low-wage countries that had fewer they
00:08:24.860 just didn't anticipate the kind of aggression of the industrial system and so the environmental
00:08:30.860 laws were not prepared the labor laws were not prepared you were moving people in these other
00:08:36.400 countries out of subsistence village style textile production and moving them into industry 0.79
00:08:41.780 and factory jobs and low wages and so the fight has become I think to like to really see that like
00:08:51.360 a lot of the environmental and social issues are overseas now that we need to contend with there's
00:08:57.240 many still issues in the U.S. textile industry but so much of what we wear is overseas and we
00:09:02.680 were able to under these lax labor and environmental laws we were able to amplify production rates and
00:09:09.460 And again, just like the spinning jenny and the cotton gin and the mechanical looms brought more fiber through and prices down, then the trade deals, again, we were able to move these technologies into low-cost labor environmental standard countries.
00:09:29.000 and then that again ramped up production rates because people could consume more at lower costs
00:09:35.600 because the true cost was never being paid for and then fast forward a little bit more we our
00:09:43.520 consumption rates went up prices went down 2000s the early 2000s you saw the advent of
00:09:50.040 international brands in other countries actually like h&m out of sweden h&m is their class fashion
00:09:57.580 brand. And as they came on the scene, they pioneered these very quick turnover times where
00:10:04.980 you could design something and you could get it to the racks very quickly. And the idea of four
00:10:10.800 seasons turned into seasons every few weeks. So that was Zara as another fast fashion brand that
00:10:16.760 really pioneered that. But as we saw those companies, one was in Sweden, one in Spain,
00:10:23.140 start pioneering this idea of fast fashion like literally even called that it um that's when you
00:10:30.720 see the numbers just go through the roof on consumption and those numbers you just uh brought
00:10:35.360 forward you know that we're we're consuming this much the 60 percent of the clothes are
00:10:40.280 not even utilized over a year um of wear time those rates started to happen in the 2000s
00:10:48.300 and so now we're here still consuming it projected to increase consumption by greater and greater
00:10:57.280 rates globally actually there's no slowing down of the industry predicted outside of COVID-19
00:11:04.560 which has been an amazingly big swing of change but yes I think it's always been technology
00:11:13.880 trade agreements exploitation of labor and land that have continued to grease the wheels for
00:11:20.380 rapid consumption so here we are gosh just hearing that response it's really what a predicament
00:11:33.560 we've gotten ourselves into and yeah the the statistics are just crazy that that the fashion
00:11:40.620 industry creates more CO2 than maritime shipping and international flights combined. I was reading
00:11:49.740 that until factories started to feel the effects of COVID-19, the global fashion business was
00:11:54.480 producing 150 billion items of clothing each year, which far exceeds our needs, even for a population
00:12:02.640 of 7.9 billion. So yeah, it's really, it's really crazy. And there's just so many facets of the
00:12:10.760 fashion system worthy of exploration. But as someone who is incredibly experienced with natural
00:12:16.600 dye and bioregional textile culture, I'd really like to focus on the textile system and the
00:12:22.640 chemicals that are so pervasive in their creation. Again, in preparation, I was reading that 25% of
00:12:29.080 chemicals produced worldwide are solely used for textile manufacturing. And accordingly,
00:12:35.200 20% of global industrial water pollution is caused by the textile process. So as a precursor
00:12:42.520 to discussing Fibershed's work, I'm curious to learn more about the toxicity of the textile
00:12:47.720 process as well as the pervasiveness of synthetic dyes. What are the ramifications of synthetic
00:12:54.260 dyes in our clothing production and where in the cycle does pollution begin and where does it
00:12:59.060 end? That's a great question. Well, on the dye piece, the pollution begins at the extraction
00:13:05.740 of fossil carbon from the lithosphere. So synthetic dyes originated from William Perkins
00:13:12.980 in 1856 when he was trying to find a cure for malaria. There was an explosion in his laboratory
00:13:19.540 and the coal tar concoction that he had created blew this color that became mauve
00:13:27.980 all over the walls of the lab and you know fast forward it was like 400 pounds of coal tar
00:13:35.020 was needed to make one ounce of blue dye when they got to the creation of blue but so what you see
00:13:42.640 around the time we started extracting coal and other forms of fossil carbon to power the industrial
00:13:49.080 civilization that we are now living in the material culture that came from lithosphere-based carbon
00:13:56.460 And in large part, it was, you know, it was dye, this color no longer had to come from
00:14:01.340 leaves and roots, you know, which did that, you know, plant-based colors that proceeded
00:14:07.980 had their own set of colonial issues.
00:14:10.960 We can talk about another time, but the issue of pollution really does, again, start at
00:14:16.440 lithosphere-based carbon extraction, emissions of CO2E associated with that extraction.
00:14:21.760 that material is then often laden with heavy metals that help bind the synthetic dye to a
00:14:29.560 fiber so cadmium mercury even lead tin cobalt chrome these heavy metals become a part of
00:14:39.040 most dyes i'd say 60 to 70 percent they say of the worldwide dye use is still reliant on
00:14:45.180 heavy metal based dyes the dyes also the pollution so you know you you apply these dyes
00:14:53.000 there's many different ways in which they're applied depending on the fiber type some require
00:14:58.300 a lot of heat beat and treat manufacturing so you have again all this fossil carbon to
00:15:03.920 to get the dye to take to the fiber and then you have to rinse out the unbonded molecules from the
00:15:11.160 textile so that when you get them they don't wash off on your skin as much they still do but um you
00:15:18.180 know that's why they recommend you wash clothes before you wear them but the thing is these these
00:15:22.540 materials these molecules of dye they are often washed out and that's why i think where you know
00:15:29.600 there's there's kind of varying arguments around the impact of fashion because while i tried to
00:15:35.540 get the best stats i could about synthetic dyes when i interviewed reproductive health specialists
00:15:42.240 when i interviewed doctors who were looking at internal medicine and thinking about you know
00:15:48.940 internal disruption to our endocrine system all these physicians said we just don't have enough
00:15:54.400 data on natural dyes versus synthetic dyes we don't ingest the dye so it's hard for us to
00:16:00.540 understand how the pollution really truly affects our body we could there's some corollary science
00:16:05.420 we can kind of point to for dye toxicity and what it does to the human body but really i think the
00:16:12.880 toxicity you see most impacting our world's riparian and marine ecosystems is when we wash
00:16:20.380 these affluents out of the dye in the manufacturing process and untreated or unbonded dye molecules
00:16:27.340 getting out into major rivers in indonesia china vietnam india it's it's a mess it's a deep
00:16:34.640 really problematic mess and the other issue i would say in the countries especially that are
00:16:40.560 most impacted by the affluent or the rinse water or you know the dumping of the unused dyes that
00:16:47.960 molecule they've said in azo dyes which again i think azo dyes are about 60 to 70 percent of what
00:16:54.360 we're using the pollution we do know in the human body connects to our endocrine system so dyes are
00:17:03.820 noted endocrine disruptors. So that scrambles our body's ability to know, an endocrine disruptor
00:17:11.660 scrambles our body's ability to know how much estrogen, progesterone, and testosterone we have
00:17:16.440 in our bodies. And endocrine disruption is associated with a host of diseases, cancer to
00:17:23.660 autoimmune and nervous system disorders. So there is a lot to say there about how we should be
00:17:32.400 thinking about our own health but i think the most important thing right now is to be thinking
00:17:36.600 of the communities that are milling and processing and really be focused on their well-being because
00:17:42.980 they're kind of the canary in the coal mine and they are so overexposed to these materials
00:17:47.240 and in textiles you know people want their clothes to be wrinkle free or they want them not to stain
00:17:52.860 and so stain resistance wrinkle guards all of these materials even when you print a t-shirt
00:18:00.040 and you have like a visual on your shirt like a screen printed visual a lot of those inks
00:18:06.960 and these finishing agents they'll have bpa in them the kind of stuff we don't want in our water
00:18:12.520 bottles leaching into our water and then into our body it's in the inks on screen printings it's in
00:18:18.640 you know there's tallates in some of these materials as well and formaldehyde and the
00:18:25.300 list goes on in fact i'm not a chemist but the list of molecules that are created synthetically
00:18:31.240 for the textile industry as you said it's it's it keeps growing every year they find new
00:18:38.320 dupont and others find new ways to make it you know more accessible and cheaper and and yet the
00:18:45.920 costs just keep ratcheting up for our earth and really ourselves um so yeah i could say more i'll
00:18:54.100 probably stop there. Yeah, there's so much. There's so much to say about this. And I'm happy
00:19:00.860 you started just opening our eyes to some of these just insane atrocities. And I was also
00:19:10.580 reading that more than half a trillion gallons of water is used in the textile dyeing process
00:19:15.580 on an annual basis. And approximately 200,000 tons of dye is left unbound to the textiles
00:19:21.840 and is lost to effluent um so i mean there's just so much it's such a huge problem and i do
00:19:28.880 just feel uh horrified thinking of the communities that are more directly polluted from this process
00:19:39.480 although of course i think that it ends up polluting everybody's water because when you
00:19:45.420 put things in a washing machine and so on and so forth. But like I've seen images of where big
00:19:52.000 textile factories are located and the creeks and the streams in these regions are just so polluted
00:19:58.320 and the amount that they're able to dump every day is, you know, it's not regulated. So yeah,
00:20:05.160 it's really insane. But I also wanted to talk about your book, Fiber Shed, Growing a Movement
00:20:11.720 of farmers, fashion activists, and makers for a new textile economy, and it asks us why we don't
00:20:17.980 interrogate the fashion industry in the same manner that we do the agricultural industry,
00:20:22.700 seemingly forgetting that what we wear is also grown in the soil. For example, as of 2019,
00:20:29.660 the USDA stated that 92% of cotton grown in the United States is genetically engineered.
00:20:35.960 Similarly, we could draw parallels to the way in which the fashion industry plays a huge role
00:20:40.400 in the illegal seizure and deforestation of lands across the so-called Global South.
00:20:46.360 So how are the fashion industry and textile economy responsible for serious soil and land
00:20:53.500 contamination and degradation? And what does soil-to-soil textile make visible?
00:21:00.360 Well, wearing clothing is an agricultural act for the most part, unless you're wearing
00:21:07.600 something from the lithosphere which is the same place where natural gas cold tar and
00:21:12.900 all other fossil fuels come from so you know we really have two choices at the moment and i don't
00:21:19.320 think we're ever going to have other other than two choices these are the this is these are the
00:21:23.400 carbon pools that are on earth we can't you know we're not living any other on any other planet so
00:21:29.520 we're either deriving material from the biosphere or we're deriving it from the lithosphere in this
00:21:34.480 case and agriculture is producing still i would say from the fao stats i think 30 to 40 percent
00:21:44.000 by weight um we're still our wardrobes are relying on well primarily cotton um and around
00:21:52.240 70 percent is still is lithosphere based because we've moved to plastic clothing and and blends
00:22:00.280 cotton poly acrylic blends but um agriculture is still the main hub where biosphere-based
00:22:09.820 fibers come from tree farms i would put in there um so they the the tree farms that produce
00:22:16.340 eucalyptus tree product for um for the rayon materials um so tensile and modal are considered
00:22:25.020 very green green tree based fibers because they use closed loop chemistry but they're still coming
00:22:32.360 from tree farms and they're still virgin rainforest being used for some of these textiles too so any
00:22:40.500 of the tree based fibers really need to be evaluated even though they're biosphere based
00:22:45.620 i still have a lot of question marks about using a tree for a shirt um and then if you look at the
00:22:52.480 um the the reality of cotton systems yes in the united states um we are this is where bt cotton
00:23:01.200 was invented um this is where roundup ready cotton came to pass and we are the belly of the beast
00:23:08.620 when it comes to genetically modified cotton we um we pioneered it and now we plant it and we
00:23:15.980 plant it at a lot at a large scale and there's a lot of it available for textile production
00:23:22.320 globally we export a lot of our cotton overseas to be milled so the depletion of soil organic
00:23:29.760 carbon in these systems is great and some of the cotton systems in our area we know that
00:23:36.940 traditional california soils in our bottom lands had you know between eight and twelve percent
00:23:44.500 soil organic carbon some of the landscapes that we do irrigated agriculture on that are also used
00:23:51.100 for cotton, some of these landscapes are down to half a percent of carbon. And again, when we think
00:23:56.860 about how depleted that system is from a carbon perspective, we have to think about all the
00:24:02.380 underground life that depends on that carbon, all the microbes and the fungal networks that depend
00:24:08.360 on atmospheric carbon being moved into the soil as glucose or sucrose to feed underground
00:24:15.780 biodiversity you know those that liquid carbon pathway has been very disrupted by by roundup
00:24:22.360 it's been very disrupted by synthetic nitrogen and roundup and synthetic nitrogen are critical
00:24:28.400 to the production of genetically engineered cotton so for me to to think about the transformation
00:24:36.580 that we have to undergo the soil to soil framework was about daylighting the reality that
00:24:44.400 we can't continue to rely on plastic clothing it's you know the 70 percent of our wardrobe
00:24:50.740 that is plastic we need to transform that over time to think about how we can you know reduce
00:24:57.600 our overall consumption and rely on fibers that we can that can come from regenerating and healthy
00:25:04.180 soil and then return to healthy soil and become part of a healthy soil cycle and clothing is
00:25:11.720 carbon so if you were to you know all mending and repair attempts failed your clothing was too holy
00:25:20.600 and depleted to do anything but go into a compost pile we would like our clothes to be able to go
00:25:26.960 into a compost pile and then nourish the next round of microbes and fungal networks the next
00:25:32.120 season so soil to soil is just to kind of say you can we absolutely have in the past lived in this
00:25:39.460 way this circular way and i think the circular economic conversation in fashion has come forward
00:25:46.480 but it's really been focused on mechanical circularity like closed loop chemistry um
00:25:52.820 recycling the fibers but it hasn't really been focused on this idea this deeper idea of working
00:25:58.500 with earth's carbon pools and actively focused on the movement of fresh carbon through our lives
00:26:06.440 growing that fresh carbon tablizing it wearing it till it can no longer be worn and then returning
00:26:12.460 it to its source and i feel like that level of circularity is what fiber shed wants to bring
00:26:18.540 people's attention to because our soils are so depleted because our atmosphere is so filled
00:26:24.880 with concentrations of the legacy load of the industrial revolution's carbon we just need to
00:26:29.900 harmonize with that cycle and the soil to soil graphic that we have it kind of helps kind of
00:26:36.460 wake you wake a person up to this idea that yes your clothes are by and large an agricultural act
00:26:43.320 by purchasing and wearing you're voting for the kind of agriculture you want or don't want to
00:26:48.800 see in the world and depending on how your clothes break down you're either feeding microbes or you're
00:26:54.740 leaving the world of plastic pollution so we try to simplify it i mean it's not a simple
00:27:01.020 conversation but we but the idea of soil to soil is to try to get to be as simple as possible
00:27:06.140 i used to think i had a point
00:27:09.380 Be in pain and never move
00:27:13.640 Where the contours of us go
00:27:16.280 Tell me where you are today
00:27:21.640 I can't seem to put you on the page
00:27:29.120 Every line's a place but you're gone
00:27:39.380 And in all the spots he's been
00:27:43.080 The undergrowth has settled in
00:27:50.240 To save
00:27:51.780 Wiping away
00:27:55.560 So long built up and broken on
00:27:59.700 I was looking for something soft
00:28:03.460 Delicating the world
00:28:06.180 It's fascinating in a really disturbing way to hear this.
00:28:13.920 And I want to talk more about the greenwashed fashion industry a little bit later, but just to respond to the deforestation of eucalyptus trees for quote unquote green, sustainable fabric material.
00:28:31.920 I see this all the time on websites that are marketing towards people who care about the
00:28:39.600 earth, big fashion brands online, you know, oh, look at our new green fashion, you know,
00:28:47.560 this fabric doesn't use as much water, you know, all this touting of why this eucalyptus
00:28:54.000 pulp, for instance, is better than cotton.
00:28:56.420 and I think, oh my gosh, we are deforesting land halfway across the world so that we can say that
00:29:05.460 it's green. I mean, it's ridiculous. It's a horrible, horrible marketing scam. And I'm so 0.94
00:29:10.440 happy you brought that up. And to know that even old growth eucalyptus forests are being cut down
00:29:15.420 for our fast fashion dresses or sheets, it's really insane. And it makes me so sick to see
00:29:25.100 these false solutions marketed to people who are trying to do good, but really it's just another
00:29:32.000 form of exploitation and degradation and community displacement. And it just, it really frustrates me.
00:29:42.200 But yeah, I do want to talk about this a little bit later, go into the so-called green fashion
00:29:48.440 industry in a minute, but I'd like to transition to discussing what your organization Fibershed
00:29:54.000 does specifically to create regional textile communities, especially when it comes to the
00:29:59.820 simultaneous strengthening of regional economies and carbon farming. So I'd love if you could share
00:30:05.280 a little bit about Fibershed's history and how a different kind of fashion can aid in sustaining a
00:30:10.680 place. Why is it vital that we begin to look at working landscapes as spaces to coalesce
00:30:17.080 multiple local systems like agriculture and fashion good question um so the the idea of
00:30:25.840 focusing on a locality um or a place to me has been central to like you know for me to answer
00:30:35.200 questions about the global system i always feel like um like i'll just put out there like a lot
00:30:41.740 of the data that i was able to collect for the book for instance um i've talked to some journalists
00:30:46.660 about this, it was very, you're working with very high level data that isn't always very well
00:30:52.640 ground truth. And, you know, we don't really know all the details of what's going on in these birch
00:30:58.820 tree farms in Sweden, where they use, you know, tree pulp for H&M's line, we don't really know
00:31:04.240 all these eucalyptus tree farms in Brazil that are being used for other supply chains for tree
00:31:10.160 pulp fiber, I would say in general, I always feel a little overwhelmed by the scale. And I think
00:31:16.720 you and I both in this conversation have kind of sighed, trying to even like contemplate the
00:31:22.940 complexity of this and the impact of it. It's very hard to even wrap one's head around. And
00:31:30.400 I think the way our society is designed right now, we don't have enough third parties. Our
00:31:37.440 governments are very responsive to business as usual. Business as usual does not want to tell
00:31:42.760 you a true story about itself. It wants to tell you a very wash story about itself. And I think
00:31:49.020 just the very structure of our industrial civilization makes it very hard to really
00:31:53.320 get down to the nitty gritty. And so I always feel a little overwhelmed trying to be a critic
00:31:57.420 of the big system. Even though I am a critic, I always feel a little bit like, I know I'm missing
00:32:01.980 a few beats here because no one's actually collecting true data. Like we don't have
00:32:06.880 governments that are truly responsible collecting data to know the impact of our material culture
00:32:11.940 but what I do know is when I focus on a place I can start to really understand my impact if I
00:32:18.960 focus on a home geography that I understand where these fibers are coming from I can measure the
00:32:26.480 carbon in the soil myself with the help of a lab I can help my fellow farming community
00:32:35.360 look at different practices that would enhance biodiversity on these lands I can be standing in
00:32:41.460 those fields I can be breathing that air with the farmer or rancher that I'm working with I can
00:32:47.420 talk them through their vision for the future I can hold we can hold each other's hand as we work
00:32:54.440 through developing a textile from farm to skin together and I just don't I don't know maybe it's
00:33:00.140 just how my neurology works, but I feel like if I'm not connected to a process, I can't truly
00:33:07.300 tell you what the impacts really are of that process. So much gets lost at this big gargantuan
00:33:12.860 scale. And I think to bring things home is where we can truly start to be responsive and able,
00:33:19.800 thus responsible to a system. And that's why Fibershed as an org has focused on place-based
00:33:25.880 strategic geographies where we can build textile growing processing and wearing hubs
00:33:34.180 and our northern california fiber shed is 51 counties which go from the pacific ocean to the
00:33:40.800 foothills the oregon border down to san luis obispo and we have we work with about 44 i want
00:33:49.220 to say to 50 affiliate communities who are also defining their home place and what they want to
00:33:57.940 see grown that work that grows well in their community and they want to be able to track
00:34:02.660 soil organic carbon they want to track and pay attention to biological diversity they're
00:34:08.560 interested in the intersection of wild landscapes and agriculture and how to synthesize those
00:34:13.520 harmoniously. All these decisions we make about a place, I feel like have to be made by the people
00:34:19.340 who live there. And I think defining a responsible textile culture, I just don't know if it can be
00:34:25.360 done outside of a place. You know, I feel like every time I get to, if I go to a ranch where
00:34:32.480 they're, you know, producing some very beautiful Rambouillet wool or Perrindale, you know, I end
00:34:40.840 up realizing each ranch is an ecosystem each ranch has specific relationships with water air
00:34:47.340 biological diversity and each each person stewarding that land has a different approach
00:34:54.320 and so really doing things at the community level allows you to understand things more deeply
00:35:00.620 and understand your impact in a more resonant way with that which i which i would say is a true way
00:35:07.220 you really start to not that we can ever know all of our impact ecologically our sense organs
00:35:13.220 don't really allow us to understand it all but I feel like our message is really try to come home
00:35:20.000 try to think about how you can make your material culture responsible to your place how can you make
00:35:26.740 it there how can you provide right livelihoods in your community and you know this is not a new
00:35:32.700 idea this is a very very old idea and it's worked for a very long time and it's how we had beautiful
00:35:40.300 endemic textile cultures across the world and i i was very inspired by the idea of a fiber shed from
00:35:47.360 the indonesian archipelago where we had every island you know east timor pejong bali i just
00:35:56.760 reflect on the fact that each each village with you know there could be many on an island would
00:36:02.500 each have like a different set of patterns that they would weave a different set of dye recipes
00:36:07.900 that they'd pioneered and it was such a beautiful and responsive way to be with the ecology
00:36:14.820 that when I came home from Indonesia I thought you know this you know western colonized land
00:36:22.380 that I live on and my ancestors were part of definitely the problem here how can I heal my
00:36:29.500 own relationship to place and so fiber sheds really kind of like a personal journey to be
00:36:35.720 more responsive and kind to myself in the landscape that you know is a colonized landscape
00:36:42.740 and try to think about the best possible ways of interacting with that landscape
00:36:47.300 so i'm not putting the impacts of my material culture on other communities internationally
00:36:53.540 how do i take all of what i need to do to create my life well and do it here and it's actually
00:37:00.060 very possible it's funny people are always like how how can you yeah how could you actually grow
00:37:06.000 and weave and wear all clothes within this geography and the irony is we have so much
00:37:12.400 more fiber than we even have uses for it. So we're actually growing in our fiber shed
00:37:19.940 millions and millions of pounds of fiber that go completely underutilized.
00:37:27.320 So that's the trick. We actually can do this and we can do it together. And we're starting to make
00:37:36.040 that happen. Yeah. Yeah. No, I love hearing that we can do this. It's possible. It's not some
00:37:43.840 far-fetched fantasy or some look back in our history thinking, oh, well, that was then,
00:37:51.160 but we can't do that now. It's like we can and we have to if we want to be in right relationship
00:37:56.800 with the earth. And yeah, I'm really excited to hear that. And there was this book that you had
00:38:04.920 recommended EarthLogic fashion action research plan by Kate Fletcher and Matilda Tham, and in it
00:38:13.220 they write, quote, when I think back to before, I see that now I am so much better dressed. I am
00:38:18.920 more a part of where I live. Yes, this is a bit down to the fact that I am now wearing things
00:38:23.700 suited to the weather here that were designed with this place in mind, but also because I am
00:38:29.040 contributing to life in this place people around here have jobs because of my wardrobe choices
00:38:35.320 we all want clean rivers flowing through our community so no one is dumping chemicals
00:38:39.620 we all know that the hidden system that make the visible fashion system run care practices
00:38:45.420 handing down of clothes haberdasheries laundrettes is cultivated and cherished by what we choose to
00:38:52.380 do each day when we get dressed end quote and i like that because it also is speaking to this
00:38:58.460 idea of place. And I agree that trying to think about the global scale is so big, but if we're
00:39:04.960 actually looking at the land, the land speaks and the place can help focus us. And I think that as
00:39:12.500 many places are contaminated and poisoned, it's clear that we need to dedicate our livelihoods
00:39:18.500 to care practices. So I'm wondering how does the re-emergence of local economies and cottage
00:39:23.800 industry ensure healthy environments? That's such a good question about the insurance policy
00:39:30.760 of doing things locally to protect all of Earth's biomes. It's really something I think
00:39:38.920 about a lot. And regional textile manufacturing is something that I find fascinating. There used
00:39:45.600 to be 12 wool mills in california that were vertically integrated they would you know harvest
00:39:53.660 wool during the spring season and produce all kinds of basic functional things that people
00:40:01.260 needed even in our state of california which people don't think of as a textile production
00:40:05.420 state and it was only when the trans-pacific railway came in in 1892 when we could import
00:40:15.140 into California textiles from the Southeast that were really running off of the backs of
00:40:21.940 a post-Civil War economy, which was still incredibly, incredibly powered by people who
00:40:27.680 were still basically somewhat enslaved. And so costs of textiles from the Southeast
00:40:33.060 were too cheap for California mills to compete with. And like all 12 mills closed immediately,
00:40:40.820 like by 1893 after that railway line came in and so you know the system has always been doing that
00:40:47.340 it's always been looking for who and what can we exploit faster and when you put it you're if you
00:40:53.300 focus on a place and an economy of that's in your community it's you're just not going to get very
00:41:00.500 far if you go out and you just say I'm going to just exploit everybody I'm going to I'm going to
00:41:05.080 exploit the water that I drink. I'm, you know, you basically can't, you know, pooping in your
00:41:11.080 own immediate nest is a very bad idea. And pooping on earth's nest and trying to live in it is what
00:41:16.600 we've, as humanity, we have been doing very poorly. But in your immediate community, you see
00:41:21.640 the impact of your actions so much more quickly, whether they're how you're relating to other
00:41:25.900 people, how to maintain relationships over decades, how to have families working together
00:41:32.500 over multiple generations in a tight community these are the kinds of questions that get
00:41:39.120 answered you really figure out your way about how to build an economy through relating properly to
00:41:43.840 others and integrity with others in integrity with all beings basically you get actually get
00:41:50.660 kind of forced to I mean it's actually a great crucible of learning to focus on a regional economy
00:41:56.260 and we've started to do that in northern california there's actually a very a very nice
00:42:02.360 emerging spinning mill in ukiah mendocino that was actually funded by a series of what we call
00:42:10.740 direct public offerings the idea was funding main street not wall street and so a lot of us got
00:42:16.580 involved and put money in and propped up this very beautiful small mill that this family of six
00:42:24.780 operates and the oldest daughter is a natural dyer and they spin they comb and they wash wool
00:42:31.800 all under their roof and they live on the same land the mill exists that's the mendocino wool
00:42:37.280 and fiber mill there's another small mill that we really want to see it grow to the valley oak
00:42:44.300 wool mill in winters california and then there's the houston family weaving mill in rancho cordova
00:42:51.620 California we're starting to see this next generation of millers they're all under the age
00:42:57.340 of 35 and they're all starting these new I call it the new blue collar basically working with your
00:43:04.520 hands to create essential goods for your community that's such an important offering and when you
00:43:12.580 yeah when you think about how to make material culture in your community you start to create
00:43:17.680 all these diverse livelihoods you know no longer is everyone just sitting at their computer
00:43:22.100 talking to each other you know you're out in the world making things growing things exchanging
00:43:27.700 things bartering collaborating to make a new thing and to me um that has built relationships that
00:43:35.460 I just they're not they're irreplaceable and they're priceless and I don't think there's
00:43:40.980 anything like working together to make a sweater that brings people together more like in my
00:43:47.800 experience it's like okay i'm gonna do the spinning you're gonna do the dying so-and-so
00:43:53.340 is gonna help market it so-and-so is gonna help us get it on this website the other person's gonna
00:43:58.660 raise the sheep i know so-and-so is gonna shear the sheep you have you start to get to know
00:44:03.900 everybody and they're your friends and they're and your colleagues they're not like a supply chain
00:44:08.880 you know yes it's a supply chain but it's really a community experience as our little mills grow
00:44:15.200 because they do want to grow they want to grow in their capacity not to become monoliths but to
00:44:21.020 definitely become an ecosystem of businesses that work collaboratively together with farmers and
00:44:26.400 ranchers and add value to farmed and ranch material so we can all wear it you know as we
00:44:31.880 build a little bit of capacity the prices start to come down because we use just enough of our
00:44:37.640 appropriate technologies to make our textiles locally so i i think of um the idea of yeah just
00:44:46.200 focused on how can we build this here as something that fiber shed has spent well since 2014 we've
00:44:55.580 been building the engineering specs the financial analysis connecting capital resources to
00:45:02.200 entrepreneurs, building coordinated sets of relationships between people who grow and people
00:45:08.660 who make, storytelling to make sure the community knows about each other, making sure we're telling
00:45:14.480 each other stories well, which is what you do so well here on this podcast. So I think together,
00:45:21.420 everyone in a local economy also just seems to find their place. And I always say that when
00:45:27.140 I first started the project, some people felt a little competitive with each other. I recognize
00:45:32.880 that maybe amongst some of the farmers or some of the makers. And I just kept reminding myself
00:45:38.900 if those feelings ever came up, that we each have literally a fingerprint. We're here to offer
00:45:45.820 something very unique to our community. And if we all just kind of remind ourselves that our
00:45:50.900 offering is distinct discreet but mutually supportive of other people's offerings
00:45:56.880 then we can situate ourselves and center ourselves in a sense of comfort that by being truly
00:46:04.240 ourselves we are offering what we need to to our community and that's what regional economies also
00:46:10.420 teach you if everyone just does what they love it works out and i've seen it over and over and over
00:46:16.760 again. It's a beautiful thing to watch. I feel eternally grateful for dedicating a lot of my
00:46:24.660 life to regional economic development. Well, I think part of the systemic oppression is to pit
00:46:32.080 people against each other, to pit local people against each other, to make folks feel like
00:46:38.260 they're in competition rather than in cooperation um and and then i think it that that type of
00:46:47.980 mentality disenchants us or makes us feel like it's not possible to actually do things like
00:46:54.940 local economic um support so yeah i definitely see that and i'm happy you spoke to that
00:47:01.660 now i'd like to get back to the green washing of fashion and over the past couple of decades
00:47:09.560 the ecological impacts of industrialization and globalization have become glaringly clear
00:47:15.380 certainly in the past decade the fashion industry has been confronted by its own impacts
00:47:20.320 yet we've not seen any sort of scaling down only new implementations of so-called techno fixes and
00:47:27.660 green solutions in order to maintain profit. And I'm thinking about the burgeoning sector
00:47:33.420 of the so-called green fashion through the refashioning of our plastic waste into wearable
00:47:38.880 fabrics. And while there's certainly some form of ingenuity in trying to address our waste problem,
00:47:47.240 these quick fixes also perpetuate the ubiquity of plastic. For example, around 70% of what we wear
00:47:54.520 today is already made up of plastic. You had mentioned this earlier, but materials like
00:47:58.960 nylon, polyester, spandex, and capoline. Now, of course, these non-biodegradable plastic fibers
00:48:06.120 are then released into our waters and marine ecosystems through washing. Actually, in fact,
00:48:11.420 40% of the plastic released in our washing cycles goes directly into rivers, lakes, and oceans.
00:48:19.120 so I'm wondering can you share with us the efforts of keeping plastic or really oil in
00:48:25.620 circulation in the fashion sector as well as the short-sightedness of all these new fashion
00:48:31.160 innovations well you you had mentioned um you know Matilda and Kate Fletcher's work
00:48:37.000 and I really really and I would you know it's a resource people would benefit greatly from
00:48:42.940 devouring because one of the basic primary things i've distilled from from kate's messaging um
00:48:51.100 and the concerned union of concerned fashion researchers is we must have our consumption
00:48:57.100 and double our use times to live within earth's biomes in a way that will sustain our role as
00:49:04.140 even existing on this planet think about that you know you double your use time and you have your
00:49:09.380 have your consumption and if everyone were to do that especially those consuming quite a bit
00:49:15.880 then we might make it so when i think about people coming into this scene especially like
00:49:22.060 silicon valley backed venture capital laden sector disruptors i see this all the time
00:49:30.320 people who have no idea what sector that they're getting involved in but they came up with some
00:49:35.200 newfangled thing um they genetically engineered this new thing and now they're gonna make you
00:49:40.820 know the next whatever um or using plastic in a new way like oh well we'll figure out another
00:49:48.340 thing to do with this plastic bottle and put it in your yoga pants again there's just really truly
00:49:54.860 no need for these new materials or i would say very there's very little need for where i see
00:50:03.560 the need for innovation, I would say this, the lion's share, 99% of where we need innovation
00:50:10.640 is cleaning up the mess we made and figuring out how to decentralize this system and to break open
00:50:19.880 the shackles of centralization and wealth concentration in the industry. That's where
00:50:25.940 the innovation needs to happen. And that's like social architecture, financial instrumentation
00:50:30.800 development activism uh writers thinkers um avant-garde brands there are some but to me the
00:50:40.540 idea that we need new materials is just absurd i mean we just don't we don't need more we need
00:50:47.160 we need to use what we have like there's always these people trying to bring more materials into
00:50:51.940 the situation and i'm like yeah and i'm sitting on a hundred thousand pounds of wool that you know
00:50:57.300 a shepherd just sheared from his sheep that he used to help with a fuel load reduction project
00:51:02.140 in California or was grazing in BLM land to help manage goat grass and stimulate wildflower
00:51:08.700 populations. Like I, we work with so much material that is actually tied to different
00:51:14.840 ecosystem goals and we can just talk about it, but it's yet, it's not, there's nothing new or
00:51:20.260 shiny about our work. It's just very, it just is. And so I'm like, well, we've already got
00:51:26.560 I mean literally there's no there's no markets for some of the natural fibers we're already
00:51:32.040 producing so if you combine that that glut of natural fiber sitting in the market combined
00:51:39.300 with the fact that we're over consuming and we even have brands burning their inventory
00:51:44.900 because they don't want to let last season's clothing go out on sale or for free because it
00:51:51.060 would denude the cachet of their brand so you've got overproduction over consumption and a glut of
00:51:59.920 natural materials to me if you do if you're just a mathematician you would look at this and you'd
00:52:04.720 say so who said we needed new materials or more plastic i mean i just there's great places that
00:52:12.140 i'm sure we could find for all this plastic that we're pulling out of the oceans but it's not
00:52:17.640 textiles. Textiles are abraded. They are abraded when they are washed. They create plastic lint
00:52:25.900 faster than any other material on planet Earth. And I really think to take plastic and to shred
00:52:33.580 it, which is what we do when we make clothing out of it, and to make it more prone to leakage
00:52:38.780 into the biology of our planet is just heinous. And yet it's touted as green. It's quite
00:52:47.260 backwards sorry I get a little excited about this because I'm so taken aback by the by the level of
00:52:56.200 greenwashing of plastic clothing and recycled plastic bottles it's just so old and it's so
00:53:01.180 been done and it's just it's got to be done we have to let it go I'm with you I'm absolutely
00:53:08.760 with you I what you just said about the shredding plastic to make it even more likely to break
00:53:19.060 yeah leaky I mean it's it's really ridiculous and and let alone it's sold as a green solution
00:53:25.760 it's so backwards and I can say too in my own experience wearing plastic clothing which I
00:53:32.380 I know I have a bunch of from past life choices it doesn't let my skin breathe it makes it actually
00:53:40.640 isn't it doesn't feel good on my body even if it actually feels soft like my mom years ago bought
00:53:48.040 me this pink polyester robe that feels really soft it's kind of like a blankie that I would wear
00:53:53.860 but um yeah it it's it's like wrapping my body literally in plastic and it's really it's really
00:54:03.500 strange that we're doing this and to think that um it was found that 94 percent of americans
00:54:09.680 drinking water contains plastic microfiber pollution and the production of polyester which
00:54:15.980 is used in 60 percent of garments a day consumes 350 million barrels of oil a year and is responsible
00:54:23.020 for three times as many co2 emissions as cotton production and it just seems like this highlights
00:54:28.820 the bizarre chain in which oil and gas are pushing plastic to keep themselves in business
00:54:33.440 thus requiring more fracking more drilling etc thus creating more plastic pollution thus emboldening
00:54:39.960 these sort of green solutions and i also think there's something to be said about how many folks
00:54:45.320 readily buy these products because of the logic which we're so deeply embedded in which we feel
00:54:50.400 like we derive all this choice autonomy from purchasing power, which is, it really makes me
00:54:57.000 think of the marketing of it all again, just being, you know, us being so duped. And this has just
00:55:03.440 been such a beautiful conversation, Rebecca. I'm so inspired by you. I'm grateful. And yeah,
00:55:10.020 you've really gotten me feeling riled up to get involved in this, in this way. So thanks so much.
00:55:16.420 Oh, that's so good to hear. Thank you for this wonderful interview. This has been so fun. I appreciate it.
00:55:37.880 Thanks for listening to another episode of For the Wild Podcast.
00:55:41.760 The music you heard today was from Christopher Watkins and Gun Outfit.
00:55:46.420 I'd like to thank our host and founder, Ayanna Young, as well as the rest of our team.
00:55:51.960 Ada McRae, Andrew Storrs, Erica Ekron, Aaron Wise, Carter Lou McElroy, Chris Hudson, Francesca Glassbell, Hannah Wilton, and Melanie Younger.
00:56:16.420 I could go back
00:56:22.080 I'd laugh and I'd cry
00:56:24.300 How quickly we run
00:56:26.360 How slowly we die
00:56:28.620 Still fighting the battle
00:56:30.880 Love versus pain
00:56:33.180 But you left your heart
00:56:35.360 At the city gate
00:56:37.060 Yes you left your heart
00:56:39.620 At the city gate
00:56:41.280 In the wild
00:56:42.820 Open arms, open eyes
00:56:47.920 Open arms, open eyes
00:56:50.000 In the wild
00:56:51.280 Open arms, open eyes
00:56:58.540 Your part's coming out 0.82
00:57:02.620 It goes na-na-na
00:57:05.280 You ready?
00:57:08.580 Woo-hoo!
00:57:12.820 All right, here we go.
00:57:14.820 Everybody singing na-na-na
00:57:16.820 All together singing na-na-na
00:57:18.820 Everybody singing na-na-na
00:57:20.820 Na-yay
00:57:22.820 Sing it out na-na-na
00:57:24.820 At the higher ground na-na-na 0.81
00:57:26.820 Sing it proud na-na-na
00:57:28.820 Na-yay
00:57:30.820 Put your hands together 0.98
00:57:32.820 Na-na-na
00:57:34.820 All together singing na-na-na
00:57:36.820 Na-yay
00:57:38.820 In the wild
00:57:40.820 Oh, everybody's singing na-na-na,
00:57:46.260 na-yeah in the wild. 0.91
00:57:51.080 Oh, the girls singing na-na-na,
00:57:54.500 now, yeah, we got thefilled, na-na-na.
00:57:58.300 We're women up theusalem, na-na-na,
00:58:00.340 we're coming na-na-na, na-na-na.
00:58:02.720 Now, yeah, we got the wildwood, na-na-na,
00:58:06.320 you know the wildwood, na-na-na,
00:58:08.340 we got the wildwood, na-na-na,
00:58:10.820 In the wild
00:58:13.300 Open arms, open eyes
00:58:16.860 Open arms, open eyes
00:58:18.900 In the wild
00:58:20.820 Open arms, open eyes