For The Wild - September 09, 2020


STEPHEN JENKINSON on Closing Time [ENCORE] ⧸199

Topics
Dr. KATE STAFFORD on What the Whales Hear ⧸198 REBECCA BURGESS on Soil to Soil Fiber Systems ⧸200

Episode Stats


Length

57 minutes

Words per minute

135.53

Word count

7,840

Sentence count

375

Harmful content

Misogyny

2

sentences flagged

Toxicity

7

sentences flagged

Hate speech

9

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 For the Wild podcast is brought to you in part by the Calliopeia Foundation and listeners like you.
00:00:05.760 Calliopeia supports projects interweaving spirituality, culture, and ecology.
00:00:11.160 We are grateful for their support and the support of grassroots contributions from listeners.
00:00:16.020 To learn more about the Calliopeia Foundation, visit calliopeia.org.
00:00:20.660 To make a donation to For the Wild, visit forthewild.world slash donate or support us through Patreon.
00:00:27.040 Hey community, Ayana here. Before we begin today's episode, I'd like to share an exciting
00:00:34.560 project the For the Wild team has been tending for the past few years. Some of you may remember
00:00:39.900 an episode called The Day the Water Died back in 2018 with Dune Lankard, a tribal elder of the
00:00:46.900 Eak Eagle clan and a lifelong conservationist. Well, that interview changed my life. I ended
00:00:53.580 up rafting down the Copper River in Alaska with Dune that summer, and since then, we've been deep
00:00:59.080 in strategy around protecting the temperate rainforest, glaciers, and waters of his ancestral
00:01:04.800 homelands. Right now, we face a pivotal moment in Dune's 20-year struggle to preserve 11,000 acres
00:01:12.080 of the Bering River coalfield, which remains extremely vulnerable to mountaintop strip mining
00:01:17.680 under its current private ownership.
00:01:20.720 Dune and his organization, Native Conservancy,
00:01:23.740 have a short window of time to purchase the coal title
00:01:26.160 and to halt resource extraction.
00:01:28.820 We are putting out the call for large donors,
00:01:31.560 organizations, foundations,
00:01:33.780 or those who may be connected to such funders
00:01:36.500 to be in touch with us,
00:01:38.100 to partner in protecting the Copper River Delta.
00:01:41.040 This is big.
00:01:42.520 This could mean the permanent protection
00:01:44.240 of three million acres downstream
00:01:46.260 of one of the wildest places left on the earth.
00:01:50.360 The enduring subsistence of the Iyak people
00:01:52.640 and their salmon, eagle, bear,
00:01:55.040 and all the other more than human can depend on it.
00:01:58.760 There is a powerful shift afoot in the land back movement
00:02:01.700 and we are here for it.
00:02:03.860 Get in touch at engage at forthewild.world
00:02:07.080 and visit nativeconservancy.org.
00:02:10.720 This is what he said.
00:02:12.000 and I lift my glass to the awful truth
00:02:16.320 that you can't reveal to the ears of youth
00:02:19.720 except to say that it isn't worth a dime 0.99
00:02:23.400 and the whole damn place goes crazy twice 0.99
00:02:27.420 and it's once for the devil 0.99
00:02:29.260 and it's once for Christ
00:02:31.060 and the boss don't like these dizzy heights
00:02:34.300 and we're busted in the blinding lights of closing time.
00:02:42.000 The silence is broken by somebody crying
00:02:53.600 Trying to be heard, never a word
00:02:57.100 Always the attitude, sort out your own
00:03:00.620 Always alone
00:03:02.440 Wishing for something the world is denying
00:03:06.300 Out in the wilderness somebody's crying
00:03:11.440 Somebody wishing for something to happen
00:03:24.760 Wishing to tell, wishing to help
00:03:28.180 Someone was listening, someone who cared
00:03:32.000 Never despaired
00:03:33.880 Someone to lean on and someone to trust
00:03:38.520 Hello and welcome to For the Wild podcast. I'm Ayanna Young. Today we are speaking with Stephen
00:03:59.740 Jenkinson. Stephen teaches internationally and is the creator and principal instructor
00:04:05.020 of the Orphan Wisdom School, founded in 2010 for anyone with a desire to be useful
00:04:11.040 to those who will inherit an endangered and often dangerous world. It is for those who have an
00:04:17.240 instinct and a desire to be an ancestor worthy of being claimed. It is for those wishing to
00:04:23.020 learn something of the skills of grace in a graceless time, of mentorship and fierce and
00:04:29.040 exemplary compassion. It is for those elders in training. He is the author of Die Wise, a manifesto
00:04:36.220 for sanity and soul, angel and executioner, grief and the love of life, and money in the soul's
00:04:42.720 desire, a meditation. Stephen Jenkinson is also the subject of the feature-length documentary film
00:04:49.340 Grief Walker, a lyrical poetic portrait of his work with dying people. Stephen lives in a handmade
00:04:56.300 off-the-grid life on a farm beside the River of Abundance and Time in the Ottawa Valley in Ontario,
00:05:02.380 Canada. Well, welcome back to For the Wild, Stephen. It is such a gift to be sharing space
00:05:08.500 with you in this way again. You're very kind. Thanks for the invitation. Since we last spoke,
00:05:15.680 you have composed a new book, Come of Age, The Case for Elderhood in a Time of Trouble,
00:05:21.920 which is to be released this summer. And I listened to a recent interview and it led me to reflect
00:05:28.200 upon how dominant culture neither encourages nor celebrates elderhood. Instead, it exalts
00:05:36.260 youthfulness. And I think this obsession with youth is entwined with capitalist ideals of
00:05:43.240 limitless growth. In this interview, you said, quote, elderhood is a consequence of life's limits,
00:05:49.620 not life's extensions and victories. So, Stephen, I'd love you to open up this conversation
00:05:56.500 by speaking about your case for elderhood and what transpires in its cultural vacancy.
00:06:04.780 Okay. You want to start off easy and then we'll get to the tricky stuff later, is it?
00:06:09.900 Precisely.
00:06:10.940 Okay. Well, let's see what we can do with this. I mean, it's a very, your question cuts a wide
00:06:16.640 swath, of course, even though you've quoted me in there somewhere. But let me start with something
00:06:22.120 maybe easier to approach and not so conceptual. And it's something like this. Why did I take on,
00:06:28.480 was I drawn to this subject or how did this come about? And you could say, well, you know,
00:06:32.820 you're 63. It's kind of in the territory. Well, a lot of 63-year-olds don't write about elderhood.
00:06:38.520 In fact, virtually none of them do, in English at least, maybe in other languages I know nothing of.
00:06:44.640 So there's the first thing.
00:06:45.940 I mean, I look around, as I did when I worked in the death trade, and I looked around for
00:06:50.740 some sign, some indication that the dominant culture and all of its citizens were kind
00:06:57.220 of in the ballpark of what was happening.
00:07:00.140 Not on top of it, necessarily, because who can be these days?
00:07:03.620 But at the very least, that there was a combination of curiosity and something like concern that
00:07:10.580 drove people in the direction of what's happening now.
00:07:13.960 I don't mean what's current and sexy now.
00:07:16.620 I mean, what's happening.
00:07:19.380 You can't go to the news for that.
00:07:20.920 You have to be remarkably discerning and have the capacity for a real cultivated discipline.
00:07:28.580 Or as I've often threatened the people in my Orphan Wisdom School, one day the reading
00:07:34.000 list is going to be 20 books long and the assigned question will be, what's not in
00:07:39.520 any of the books that you've read?
00:07:41.300 So this is how I came to it.
00:07:43.180 I simply wondered, where's the elderhood function to be found? Because early on, that was my first
00:07:48.900 take on it, that elders are not personality types. You know, they're not in nice gowns and, you know,
00:07:56.100 nicely coiffed hair or no hair at all, depends on your style and things of this kind, that they're
00:08:01.480 not in fact, elderhood doesn't really have much regard for or use for, or maybe even ways of
00:08:07.800 employing particular personality types. But maybe it's a function instead of a person. Maybe it's a
00:08:15.480 way instead of a thing done. That's what I started to wonder about. So needless to say, I looked and
00:08:21.920 I looked and I looked in vain for something like a concerted, ongoing, recognizable elder function
00:08:31.640 in the culture and here's the irony i came upon very very quickly we no news to anyone listening
00:08:39.040 to this or yourself this is an aging population in north america and for the next i don't know
00:08:44.720 15 or thereabouts years that will be the case that the lion's share of the population will be over
00:08:50.880 i don't know 50 whatever the numbers are you would think then let's do the obvious math on it
00:08:57.520 If you have more old folks per square foot than you've ever had before, which we do numerically and as a ratio of the population, it would stand to reason then that we would have more elders than ever before.
00:09:15.580 Or would it? 0.91
00:09:17.320 Or does it even better?
00:09:19.340 Because it's not hypothetical.
00:09:20.280 I could simply ask you, is it your experience that the culture that has given you your education and your concerns and your style options and everything in between has provided you with so much elder presence in your life that you actually need a break from it because you're forever guided by its presence and its affable wisdom and its time-tested abilities and its sustainability?
00:09:50.280 I mean, I'm asking this somewhat in jest because I'm guessing you wouldn't even have this podcast and you wouldn't be having me on it if that was true about your life personally, that you were awash in the presence of elders in your life.
00:10:06.100 So how can this be then that we got more old people than ever before and we don't have a commensurate presence of elders in that demographic?
00:10:18.380 Well, it's in the reasoning where you look for the gap or the shortfall. 0.68
00:10:22.960 You don't look for it in the old people per se. 1.00
00:10:26.320 You ask yourself this instead.
00:10:28.280 From whence comes elderhood?
00:10:30.680 Does it come from age?
00:10:33.080 Does it come from the sort of cumulative sort of blunt force trauma of the thing that we call experience? Is elderhood an inevitable consequence of an aging population? And I think the answer to all those questions is no. It's none of those things.
00:10:51.940 As it turns out, our reliance upon experience as the midwife of elderhood has put the emphasis on the wrong syllable, culturally speaking, because it imagines that sheer endurance confers wisdom.
00:11:08.120 Let's just call it experience.
00:11:10.000 Experiences and wisdom, they're not synonymous, nor does one inevitably give over to the other.
00:11:17.480 in fact enough experience in one place and one person produces trauma just as likely
00:11:24.740 as it produces wisdom and then the next thing is to wonder well what is this wisdom thing if it's
00:11:32.120 not the cumulative consequence of just a lot of experience well you know you and I are contributing
00:11:38.380 to the dilemma surrounding wisdom right now as we're speaking because the notion of wisdom has
00:11:45.320 been so desperately, let's call it democratized through the new media that's available in the
00:11:51.980 last, I don't know, 15 years or something, that instead of an understanding of wisdom, what we
00:11:57.520 have is a kind of marketplace jangle of opinion. The understanding being that if enough opinion is
00:12:05.180 out there, you hear the theme again. If there's enough opinion out there, wisdom will just kind
00:12:10.120 inevitably out itself and emerge and become inherently useful. Well, we're well into the
00:12:19.660 experiment of social media now. And I would dare say that our encounters with wisdom are no more
00:12:26.640 numerous now as a result of this media than they were before it. If anything, the notion of wisdom
00:12:33.540 itself has taken a hit. Okay. So if you add all of the, I go on, of course, but if you add all of
00:12:39.780 this up, I'm answering the question from whence came my concern about the book. It found its
00:12:45.680 parallel. You mentioned Die Wise kindly earlier on, which came out about three years ago now,
00:12:51.380 which was a book ostensibly about dying. But it wasn't really. It was about the refusal to die
00:12:57.340 in the dominant culture of North America. And the reasoning, the parallel reasoning
00:13:02.300 that informed my approach to come of age came to this you have more dying people when you have an
00:13:10.340 old aging population you have more dying people per capita than you've ever had before i don't
00:13:16.840 know anyone that even says that out loud but if you are as a culture you devote your technology
00:13:22.380 to the life extension business be not surprised you look up one day to realize that there are
00:13:29.360 more dying people around you than there have ever been, because they're not dying, you see.
00:13:35.020 They're not dead, I should say. They remain dying, and they can be dying for an awful long time,
00:13:41.160 and often they are. So we have that much more dying around us. Should that not translate into
00:13:48.300 kind of a death wisdom, a death-friendly way of life, death literacy, and things of that kind,
00:13:55.780 by sheer exposure to it. Well, that's not what I saw. That's not what prompted me to write the
00:14:03.360 book. I wrote the book because I looked in vain for a death wisdom that was deriving from all of
00:14:11.840 this presence of death among us, you see. It was then that I realized, oh yeah, cumulative consequence
00:14:19.600 is not the same thing as cause.
00:14:22.540 We have more death around us than ever before,
00:14:25.020 more death programs, more death on the front page,
00:14:28.260 more death books, and I've contributed to all of that stuff.
00:14:31.160 And the upshot is that it seems to me people are dying
00:14:34.740 more devastated deaths than they did even 15 or 20 years ago,
00:14:41.800 a direct consequence of there being more death around us.
00:14:45.900 So it's absolutely confounding.
00:14:47.460 until you begin to wonder about your basic assumption of where understanding comes from.
00:14:54.360 So that's what prompted me towards it all.
00:14:57.260 And no surprise, at least not to me, that when I came around to the subject of elderhood,
00:15:02.740 I was doing so as a kind of effort to wonder how we might achieve, obtain guidance
00:15:11.580 unto our dying time and unto our limits.
00:15:16.000 and then it hit me and I'll finish with this. I know you're thinking, my God, I'm never going to
00:15:20.020 be asking another question in this interview. He's just going to keep going. Well, that is true. I
00:15:24.460 could because it's close to my soul. But anyway, this is what hit me. You have all of these old
00:15:32.300 folks and there are so many of them because their lives have been extended. And I guess if things
00:15:39.140 continue to go as they've gone, I'm about to join the ranks and not too long from now.
00:15:43.700 and we have fewer elders and it could be that those two things are linked causally meaning
00:15:51.000 that if you have a lot of old people it's because the natural limits the naturally occurring limits
00:15:58.820 of the human lifespan are being confounded now people might say extended but i think confounded
00:16:06.800 is a better way of understanding what's actually happening take one more step and the loop begins
00:16:12.940 to close desperately and beautifully at the same time, and it's this. Could there be something
00:16:19.680 about the God-givenness or the natural order-givenness of limits upon human life,
00:16:27.460 including its lifespan, but not only that? Is there something about limits that create
00:16:34.140 elderhood in our midst? I think the answer is almost certainly yes. How can I tell? Because
00:16:44.860 when I look at our limit confounding life, I see that we are running desperately short of elders.
00:16:50.540 And it struck me that there's something about our unwillingness to live according to limits of all
00:16:57.040 kinds that confound the elder function to the point where after a couple of generations of
00:17:03.760 this confounding. There is no functioning social body or order called elderhood anymore. And 50
00:17:13.920 and 60 and even 70-year-olds are lining up at the trough, at the self-help center, at the retreat
00:17:21.320 center, looking for the same things that 20 and 30 and 40-year-olds are looking for. And that might
00:17:31.000 be a sign by which we, our era today will be recognizable in time to come as a particularly
00:17:38.100 confounded era. Wow, Stephen, I'm so mesmerized by the idea of limits in this dominant culture
00:17:51.520 and how that relates to elderhood, but honestly, how that relates to the predicament that we find
00:17:57.440 ourselves in right now in the Anthropocene, dealing with climate change and how our denial
00:18:05.740 of limits, how our desire to not live by limits have led us to this place. And you were mentioning
00:18:16.080 how there are more elderly people than ever before, both in sheer numbers and as a percentage
00:18:22.280 of the population. And then that means that these people are dying without dignity or unwisely. 0.95
00:18:29.600 And I wonder, what are the collective spiritual consequences of this? And are there places you're
00:18:37.080 seeing promise for resurgence of elderhood in modern civilization?
00:18:42.960 Well, you know, I'm not really the promise guy. I'm not really the hope guy. I think you probably...
00:18:48.480 And I love that about you.
00:18:50.100 you have a clear sense of that not a lot of fun at parties and of course i don't get invited to
00:18:56.340 them anyway but um not that i'm asking i'm just observing that well here's the thing first of all
00:19:03.800 you're kind enough to ask me to appear on your program but this does not confer upon me
00:19:08.360 or anything i say some kind of timeless sagely um i get it i've got it don't worry i'll let you know
00:19:17.500 kind of status at all. It's really important to keep saying this over and over again,
00:19:21.920 because in a time of phantom talking heads and so on, if you make it to the airwaves,
00:19:28.140 you're already trafficking in this idea that you've got something fundamental to say. I don't
00:19:33.900 accept that assumption at all. So I have to earn my way towards being listened to. I don't assume
00:19:41.020 it by any stretch of the imagination, right? That's the first thing. So the second thing would
00:19:45.820 be this. I don't have a plan. I don't have a scheme. I don't have the answers. I don't feel
00:19:53.300 any obligation to have the answers. I think that is a seduction at least as fierce as anything that
00:20:01.060 comes from the marketplace. You asked me about the youth culture, I think, earlier. A little bit
00:20:07.060 of the new book has leaked out. In fact, I think I leaked it, but I forgot. But it's out there a
00:20:12.600 little bit, and there's already been responses. And as I predicted in the book, and as I've said
00:20:19.400 whenever I've taught this material, the lion's share of the volatile reactivity against what
00:20:25.840 I'm talking about comes from people my age and older. It's quite interesting. It's very important
00:20:32.760 to observe it because, ostensibly at least, I wrote a book about elderhood for those people
00:20:38.820 who are demographically in the ballpark, you see, not as an instruction manual, but as a plea.
00:20:48.160 I'm pleading for them to reconsider what the latter half of their life is for.
00:20:55.380 And they might say to me, who are you? And I say, well, I can answer the question,
00:20:59.580 but it's not that relevant. Who am I to do such a thing? But I waited, frankly, for somebody else.
00:21:05.940 and I stopped waiting and I just decided well I'll just I'll kind of wade into this thing
00:21:12.420 and one of the most relied upon offenses is this allegation about youth culture now I'm not
00:21:22.300 pretending for one second that there's not such a thing or that it's it's the sexy beast and has
00:21:28.040 been well since I was young myself probably you know youth in and of itself is a value
00:21:35.360 today. It's absolutely bizarre. And it's everywhere. I grant all of that. And it's
00:21:41.740 pernicious in how it leans upon aging people. And it leans upon people who begin to look their age 0.97
00:21:49.260 when that is no longer a compliment. If it ever was a compliment to say to someone that you look
00:21:55.800 your age, you don't look your age is more often a compliment. But for all of that, I would like to
00:22:01.800 raise the ante about it all and say, I don't think it is in the realm or in the job description
00:22:09.640 of being an elder to be thwarted in your elderhood by the dominant culture worshiping youth.
00:22:18.900 Straight up, that's what I'm saying. I am laying the gauntlet down before all the older people who
00:22:25.440 feel discredited by the youth culture, and I say, it's time to grow up. That's not a good enough
00:22:33.140 reason, okay, to take your marbles and go home, or stay inside the gated communities, or just stick
00:22:40.920 with your own age group, or whatever else the decisions might be that ensue from that, or the
00:22:46.540 offense, or the hurt, or the feeling that you enjoy at best a kind of liminal status that nobody has
00:22:53.520 any recourse to you anymore, that you've become, sorry, I forget the word in manufacturing terms
00:22:59.840 when the item is no longer necessary. It's been, you know, co-opted by the latest new version of
00:23:05.840 things, whatever the word is. It's just not enough. It's not good enough. And here's why.
00:23:11.480 Because the subtitle of the new book is The Case for Elderhood in a Time of Trouble.
00:23:16.860 That's a very important thing for me to put in there. Because it is one thing to talk about,
00:23:21.460 quote, elderhood in the abstract, although I don't think there is such a thing as elderhood
00:23:26.700 in the abstract. It's another thing entirely, though, to wonder about what has become of
00:23:32.700 elderhood in a time so utterly threatened and threatening, so utterly endangered and endangering
00:23:41.320 that the ante is upped on us all, because the time will come. It's already emerging,
00:23:49.520 But the time will come when someone one half your age, even one third your age, will ask you in one way or another, when you were my age, they'll say to you, did you know what was happening?
00:24:03.520 Now, with all of the information out there, how could you possibly say that you didn't know what was happening?
00:24:10.820 And yet, you know yourself that it is more than possible, quote, not to know what's going on.
00:24:18.400 More than possible.
00:24:19.520 You could be looking in the wrong places. You could be listening to the wrong things. You could be not listening. You could be deciding that it's too late, that there's nothing to be done, that you're tired, that you worked already for 40 years in the marketplace. You don't need this, whatever it is.
00:24:34.700 Okay, but that doesn't mean the question is not going to come. And it doesn't mean at some level, that person one third your age doesn't deserve an answer for the likes of you, once you hit your 60s, or your 70s. So what are you going to say? Because whatever you and I are doing today, will contribute to whatever answer you have to give, when that day comes.
00:24:59.800 So somewhere in there, the answer is going to come to something like this.
00:25:04.240 If you're willing to be really candid and not defend yourself, it might sound something like this.
00:25:09.880 Well, everybody who wanted to know what was happening when I was your age could have known there was enough ways of finding out if you were brave enough and if you're heartbroken enough, you could have found out.
00:25:26.580 But the truth is that when I was your age, not everybody wanted to know what was happening.
00:25:33.740 So not everybody did.
00:25:36.700 And that's a candid truth.
00:25:38.300 You know, here's the other question that will come along.
00:25:42.180 Okay, so what did you do?
00:25:46.400 And not only did I write the book with those two questions ringing in my ears, but I'm speaking to you now with those two questions ringing in my ears. 0.98
00:25:55.220 And I can't imagine looking someone your age in the eye and saying, you know, it's just such a drag that everybody's worshipping youth. I just feel useless. And I take it as a personal insult or tragedy or worse. And I'm defeated by it.
00:26:13.120 And given everything that's going on in this world right now, I'm afraid that that defeat is indefensible. It might be accurate emotionally and psychologically and spiritually accurate, but is indefensible given the troubled times that we're in.
00:26:30.060 So last thing I'll say on this subject, then you could imagine or reimagine that elderhood's function is not a universal function nor an eternal function, that the ways and means of elderhood are purely and properly a consequence of the times in which the elder finds himself or herself.
00:26:54.840 In other words, your understanding of elderhood is dictated to you by the times that you occupy.
00:27:04.800 So elderhood, first and foremost, is both a child of its time and in some way a redemption of its time.
00:27:13.640 And it takes enormous courage of the heart and enormous discipline to take what you know about what's happening in this world
00:27:21.940 and translate it to a purposeful or a purpose-driven life,
00:27:27.560 I guess I would call it.
00:27:29.040 But that is your practice for elderhood,
00:27:32.520 to do that very translating.
00:27:35.000 So I'll leave it there for now.
00:27:51.940 Tell me everything you know about consciousness
00:27:59.260 I don't know where we go, but I need you to be there
00:28:06.920 The sun's so high in the sky
00:28:11.780 We talk about halftime
00:28:16.160 Like we haven't seen the one all around
00:28:21.920 We'll be right back.
00:28:51.920 of your love on my days 0.90
00:28:55.880 Frankie's getting older
00:28:59.480 all around her eyes 0.73
00:29:04.420 I see the wire
00:29:06.880 I see the wire
00:29:10.360 Live like we're on top of time
00:29:15.280 The wave descends
00:29:19.520 The circle never ends
00:29:23.060 The circle never begins
00:29:27.700 Oh, my love
00:29:35.460 I could stay on a crescent way
00:29:39.480 In the sea of your love all my days
00:29:45.400 Oh, my love
00:29:49.560 I'm amazed, I'm amazed, I'm amazed
00:29:54.220 In the seed of your love on my days
00:30:15.400 Tell me everything you know about consciousness
00:30:21.160 We don't make time, we take time, we take our time
00:30:30.880 I see why all around our eyes
00:30:38.040 All around our eyes
00:30:41.320 I see why
00:30:43.800 I was leading some workshops last year with a dear friend, Nidia Alicia, and I remember
00:31:06.820 her saying to this group of people, she was speaking as if she was the future generation,
00:31:13.800 back at us when we're in our grandmother states and she said as as the grandchild what did you do
00:31:21.440 grandma what did you do elder when you knew this was happening and she would always say
00:31:26.320 look at these scars look at look at this worn body you know when I found out I gave my whole self
00:31:36.180 And I think it's such an important place to put ourselves in for those of us who are still in this youthful millennial state of how are we going to answer the future generations when they ask us, what did you do when you learned?
00:31:56.460 And I think being able to stand in honesty, like you were mentioning, and maybe the answer is, I didn't want to know. I didn't have the courage to know. I didn't choose to look in the places that had the answers because, of course, we're in a time of so much information and this headline culture that it's coming at us at all moments of the day.
00:32:20.700 this information becomes debilitating is one word but desensitized
00:32:26.540 thinking about that can you interrupt you just for a second yes please please don't forget what
00:32:34.240 you're about to say now but just on on the matter of too much information consider the real
00:32:39.220 possibility that what information is today is what consumer goods were 15 or 20 years ago it is the
00:32:47.940 current consumer good it's the principal consumer good it's what you can buy thinking that you're
00:32:55.680 not even paying for it right and the total exposure that you have to this stuff is no different from
00:33:03.260 walking down the main street of any town and being exposed to stuff and it is as you say
00:33:09.780 desensitizing in the extreme don't think for a second that that's not in the the scheme or the
00:33:16.740 design, because it would appear that more information is giving you, quote, more choices.
00:33:23.260 That's exactly what a consumer culture tells you about the number of brands of cola available to
00:33:28.940 you at Walmart. It pretends that's a choice. And it's the same thing with this information. You
00:33:34.220 know, the information in and of itself is a stillborn proposition. It has no inherent consequence
00:33:42.540 at all. But one of the first consequences I see is that people are awash in impotence the more stuff
00:33:51.380 they hear about. This is an absolutely staggering arrangement because it is so
00:33:56.820 widely distributed now. It's not just in your generation. It's across the board that the more
00:34:02.880 things that people quote unquote know, the more stymied they are. So one of the principles that
00:34:10.980 we engage here at the school and on the farm is put that damn thing away and don't take it out 0.98
00:34:16.900 while you're here and you see people get the shakes because they're uh it's like cold turkey 0.97
00:34:22.980 on cigarettes it's worse cold turkey on crack that's what it is and it's staggering to see
00:34:29.100 what it's done to people in such a short time because the allegation is you're learning you're
00:34:35.020 not learning by turning those things on and finding out what happened in the ukraine today
00:34:39.560 you're not learning but if you are you're learning a kind of program of impotence that is intensely
00:34:48.360 information fed it's so ghoulish it's so demonic in its fashion and it shows absolutely no sign
00:34:58.920 of doubting itself never mind reversing itself so it's a very important and i'll please let's go
00:35:05.960 back to what you're going to ask. But it's very important that people begin to seriously question
00:35:11.560 to the point of undermining the assumption that more of anything grants you greater opportunity
00:35:18.500 to respond, to react, to have a fulsome, heart-engaged reaction or response to anything at all.
00:35:26.320 It's demonstrably, in your generation, no longer true. If it ever was true, it's not true anymore.
00:35:34.320 I'm so happy that we're on this topic because I am somebody who was just consuming information.
00:35:45.660 And it was almost like this addiction to a type of suffering of trying to take in as much bad news as I possibly could.
00:35:56.140 and that's actually why I created the podcast because at that point five years ago I was just
00:36:02.020 in a state of just pure saturation and it did lead me to this place of how do I possibly
00:36:10.100 move on from here where do I go from here and I think I'm learning and perhaps this is one way but
00:36:19.840 I'm trying to think strategically, if we are to really shift circumstances, shift experiences,
00:36:29.120 shift the way that this global corporate system is strangleholding cultures and Earth's ecosystems,
00:36:39.140 it seems that we have to focus. We have to really focus and learn more deeply about
00:36:44.920 certain topics the headline culture is really specifically how it came to be as it is
00:36:53.960 if you're not careful this turns into yet another now you're going to focus on more stuff and that
00:37:01.560 focus is going to help no no no no we could say it this way my parents came out of the depression
00:37:07.420 now that might sound to you like about a thousand years ago but it's not that long ago and it had
00:37:12.300 enormous consequence for that generation. Because when they came into their parenting time,
00:37:17.560 they were desperate to see to it that their children had more in their childhood than the
00:37:24.300 parents had when they themselves were children, right? Kids deserve more than I had when I was
00:37:30.120 their age. That was a basic parenting strategy that was born out of trauma, the trauma called
00:37:36.000 the depression. I mean, it suited a consumer culture beautifully, but it was almost a religion.
00:37:41.440 okay so how do you call this into question and the answer is it's very dangerous to call a religion
00:37:48.640 into question now you're asking for it but i would challenge deeply the idea that that you
00:37:55.800 in your generation or your children in their generation deserve more of anything than you
00:38:02.880 had when you were their age or that i had when i was their age in truth your children will deserve
00:38:09.700 less of everything you had. Now, by deserve, I don't mean they will be punished for the excesses
00:38:18.520 of your generation or mine, although I think that's probably going to happen. I mean instead
00:38:23.800 by using the word deserve, I'm saying it is their proper birthright to not be inundated in the way
00:38:31.800 that we were, that they'd be spared in some fashion the pseudo choices of more of anything.
00:38:40.820 And if we have any respect for them, any love for them in principle at all, we will try our best to
00:38:47.820 engineer a world in which there are fewer or less of everything than there was when you came on the
00:38:55.400 seen or when I did. And that includes less frigging yammer. Okay, by which I mean,
00:39:03.400 wouldn't it be something if this ludicrous idea that everybody has an opinion, a right to an
00:39:10.240 opinion and a right to express it and to be heard was challenged fundamentally and held to a standard
00:39:17.780 of something like discipline or learnedness or something like wisdom, where the idea would come
00:39:25.400 around that maybe your right to an opinion has to have the consequence of deepening, feeding,
00:39:34.640 sustaining the culture, not sustaining you, but the culture instead. You know, last thing about it,
00:39:43.100 I'm asked fairly routinely now to lead people in various ceremonial endeavors.
00:39:50.700 I don't advertise it.
00:39:51.780 I'm not advertising it now.
00:39:53.540 But this observation comes from that.
00:39:57.020 When I'm asked to do these weddings, one of the things you see is there's an understanding of a wedding ceremony that it's a rubber stamp upon how two people feel about each other.
00:40:09.900 But that has never been what a wedding is. A wedding is to craft something that isn't there now, that isn't there as a result of cohabitation, for example, isn't there as a result of common law union, that there is something fundamental.
00:40:29.120 the word used is matrimony, that matrimony happens as a consequence of people undertaking
00:40:36.100 certain things, ceremonially speaking. Whenever I do these things, I see to it that symbolically
00:40:43.720 and materially and in every other way I can think to do it, that I insert the culture and its
00:40:51.080 problems and its betterment in between the two people that I am wedding. And I insist that it
00:41:00.180 be there throughout the ceremony and after it. I literally put the world between these two people
00:41:07.140 and their feelings for one another. My assumption being, at least, that how you feel about each
00:41:13.800 other, if it passes through the world, you see, doesn't go directly back and forth between the
00:41:19.700 two of you like a Pokemon game, but actually passes through the medium called the world,
00:41:27.040 that the world is the beneficiary of your willingness to enter into this matrimony.
00:41:33.180 Not the two of you, the world that has granted you virtually everything.
00:41:39.080 So this is my way of holding even the public yammer and my participation in it to some
00:41:45.100 kind of standard that can have deep efficacy, that I'm not sitting here, listen to myself talk,
00:41:52.740 admiring the sound of my own voice, even though clearly I talk a lot. But I'm trying to speak in
00:41:59.220 such a way that I would tend eventually towards silence, which I understand the responsibility
00:42:05.260 of any elder to do is to work themselves out of a job. You see, if you're doing the work,
00:42:11.980 you are less and less mandatory in the arrangement if you're doing the work they'll need you less
00:42:19.180 and less and i learned this when i was in the death trade people would ask me all the time
00:42:23.980 oh so you were there at the moment of death of all these hundreds of thousands of people i said no
00:42:29.220 no i wasn't there there is that many people that i was involved with but if i was there at the end
00:42:35.600 man that's a little ghoulish isn't it that i engineered an arrangement in which i was needed
00:42:41.440 up to the point of death and even beyond. When in actual fact, if I'm serving these people at all,
00:42:48.320 should I not be coming more and more obsolete in that function? Should they not be able to turn
00:42:54.600 to each other and to their circle of companions and so on in their lives? And this death wisdom
00:43:01.180 become democratic instead of more specialized, which is what's happening. It's becoming more
00:43:07.460 specialized. It's no surprise. The dominant culture has a remarkable capacity to not change
00:43:14.440 while appearing to change. And you are seeing that happen in this parallel universe now of
00:43:21.760 these alternative death practitioners, the death doulas and all that. If you pay close attention
00:43:26.980 to what they say that their job is, you will find it's another iteration of the job that's already
00:43:34.640 there to help somebody die. But it never wonders what happens when the somebody in question doesn't
00:43:41.980 want to die, refuses to die, won't understand themselves in those terms even. Who are you
00:43:48.040 helping now? And what's your repertoire for being helpful and comforting and all the rest? That's
00:43:54.860 what I called into question in that book, Die Wise. And this new one, I guess I'm calling into
00:43:59.980 question the very notion that older people simply by their presence should be quote reassuring
00:44:06.560 unquote there is a quote from the book that's handy in my mind right now so i'd like to tell
00:44:11.900 you because i'm proud of it proud of that i came up with it and it said something in the order of
00:44:16.800 this elders call still water to rise when the people have forgotten their thirst
00:44:24.560 I can feel your heart
00:44:47.920 Is it mine or is it ours
00:44:50.360 Outside something blooms alongside us
00:44:54.100 This love predates my name, my face, my age
00:45:00.720 So then this awakening, awakening
00:45:05.980 Baby, baby, baby, baby
00:45:14.480 There have been signs in the cards and in the sky
00:45:20.460 And in the back roads of my mind
00:45:22.720 I'm not taking you.
00:45:25.000 Now you're talking to the fire like a lover again.
00:45:30.240 Your place I've never been so dense is awakening.
00:45:36.260 Baby, baby, baby, baby.
00:45:52.720 Your hair in my bed is regarded as a reality
00:46:09.440 My past and my future envy me
00:46:13.040 Touch your shoulder, hear your breath in my ear
00:46:19.140 Bring you that much closer, something is awakening, baby, baby, baby, baby.
00:46:33.700 Awaken now, babe, awake now
00:46:38.760 Baby
00:47:03.700 I've been thinking a lot about the disparities between what we say we want as these children
00:47:14.420 of the dominant culture and what we actually want in movements for social and environmental
00:47:20.000 justice per se. And I see true equity as being unachievable and not even just true equity. I
00:47:29.320 I mean, all the things you've been talking about is unachievable as long as there is capitalism and addiction to consumption and addiction to staying alive and youthful and so on and so forth.
00:47:42.820 For example, even if racial fissures and economic fissures were equalized or healed in the United States, the surface of long lines of slave labor and earth suffering would barely be scratched globally.
00:47:57.300 So I wonder, what are your thoughts on equity, fairness, and freedom for humanity as realities
00:48:05.140 versus idealistic illusions that just make us feel better when we say we're fighting for them?
00:48:14.540 This is a very well-wrought question, and it's a bit overwhelming. You know, anybody who leaps
00:48:19.760 into the fray with a ready answer to the question that you've just asked is not to be relied upon.
00:48:26.580 necessarily. And so I don't have a one size fits all, don't worry about it kind of response to
00:48:34.600 that. I would say that confoundment that you described is a mandatory confoundment to have
00:48:41.520 when faced on the one side with the systemic deep injustices that you've identified. Yes,
00:48:50.260 indeed, historically and in a contemporary way, the dilemmas that you've articulated about
00:48:56.080 deep inequity. Our systemic show no sign of backing off and bedevil and bedraggle any attempt
00:49:04.520 to wrangle any other kind of fundamental change. Absolutely true. All I would say in support of
00:49:12.700 your confoundment would be this. One of the things that really concerns me about people
00:49:19.440 coming to me with this kind of global-scaled conscience
00:49:24.560 is that they tend, from what I can see,
00:49:29.640 to be in some fashion both enraged and paralyzed simultaneously
00:49:35.540 and without realizing that one begets the other,
00:49:40.340 that the rage, as understandable as it is,
00:49:44.020 is a midwife for the impotence.
00:49:46.480 you know you're rising up against nothing there's nobody there the forces that you're talking about
00:49:53.900 that you'd like to take on it's sort of don quixote style right you're looking for the windmill the
00:49:59.980 bad guys concentrated in one place but the bad guys quote unquote are way ahead of you in this
00:50:06.460 regard they don't sit in one place waiting for you to find them right that's not how it works
00:50:12.740 The caginess necessary to understand the arrangement confounds your easy take on right and wrong, okay?
00:50:23.480 Right and wrong are two possibilities now, but they're not, everything doesn't divide up that way into right.
00:50:31.100 It's too confounding.
00:50:32.100 The people that you would want to, quote, free from the shackles are also beneficiaries of the arrangement that you've articulated.
00:50:42.740 So you're not going to get a lot of takers as soon as you try to operationalize this kind of paralyzed conscience, kind of macro level insight thing.
00:50:55.640 The principal reason being that our take on what constitutes human has been really compromised by the dilemmas you've described.
00:51:07.100 Here's an example.
00:51:08.880 We have one word, human, in the English language.
00:51:11.300 we have another word, humane. Ever wondered what the difference is between the two of them?
00:51:17.080 Because they're two different words. There's just an E that separates them. Or is there? Well,
00:51:22.360 I can tell you this as somebody who worked in the death trade. It was often claimed by people
00:51:27.740 who are in support of euthanasia that physician-assisted death is humane. How so? Because
00:51:37.200 it solves a world of problems. Does it? How does it do that? Well, it ends the suffering of the
00:51:43.920 person who's dying. Really? How does it end their suffering? By ending their life and their
00:51:49.620 consciousness, as far as we know. I see. Are there any problems that euthanasia doesn't solve?
00:51:59.040 Dead air. A question that's never wondered about. So I'll wonder about for you now.
00:52:06.260 Absolutely.
00:52:06.900 The answer is, oh, man, there's all kinds of problems that euthanasia doesn't solve.
00:52:10.540 Suffering problems that it doesn't solve.
00:52:13.080 Like what?
00:52:14.100 Well, like this one.
00:52:15.600 You know, when this person was dying badly and they finally opted for euthanasia and they lived in a jurisdiction where it's legal and they had recourse to it and they did it, quote, successfully.
00:52:26.440 Can you do the math on what the learning consequence is for the younger people in attendance at that event?
00:52:34.900 I'll do the math for you.
00:52:36.560 It's this.
00:52:38.240 Dying, I don't know if you can swear on your program, but here we go. 0.93
00:52:42.120 Dying can be such a f***ed up enterprise 0.76
00:52:44.480 that it can drive you to the absolute cliff edge of sanity and beyond.
00:52:50.220 That is in the nature of dying.
00:52:53.180 So the best death is the least death,
00:52:56.880 meaning the one that has the least conscious approach to it,
00:53:00.160 the least time to do it in.
00:53:02.660 These are all solutions too.
00:53:04.080 When you opt for euthanasia, you are reinforcing the idea that death is unendurable, unendurable. That's one of the inadvertent consequences of this pseudo revolution in the death trade of people having control over their own endings.
00:53:25.280 didn't we say at the beginning of our conversation well i did i guess that one of the signal features
00:53:31.320 of elders is that they are crafted by the troubles of their times and that our shortage of elders
00:53:37.840 is directly traceable to our shortage of limits our unwillingness to be limited okay then go back
00:53:46.100 to euthanasia and ask yourself is this an exercise of limit or is this a way of pushing the limits
00:53:51.780 ever further away from us so that you don't even have to die. No, I'll say it differently. So that
00:53:58.480 there's no longer any such thing as your time to die. And there isn't. That's happened during your
00:54:05.960 lifetime. And it's not coming back. So what God of life are you serving when you decide you'll die
00:54:14.000 when you want to die, not when you're dying? What God is being served? Well, you know which one.
00:54:20.800 the marketplace God, same old God. And by the same token, to take this confounding understanding
00:54:27.340 to the dilemmas that you've described, I really want to say I support enormously anybody wrangling
00:54:35.140 this thing and being utterly defeated by it from time to time. Because the young people who come to
00:54:40.900 me have two things in their hands. One is impotent rage. And the other one is this kind of mangled
00:54:49.260 conscience. It's a kind of anxiety conscience masquerading as a conscience. It's like a
00:54:57.520 program of being undone, imagining that this isn't a deeply achieved thing. Some people think that
00:55:05.520 that's what I'm advocating. All I'm talking about is learning how things got to be as they are
00:55:10.920 and having your peace of mind, your sense of well-being take a more or less permanent hit
00:55:16.440 by virtue of being willing to learn this stuff, then and only then do you begin, I think,
00:55:23.300 to craft the possibilities of a, quote, change. I'm not sure I'm someone who trusts
00:55:30.740 programmatic, large-scale, prescribed change, frankly. I don't know why, but I just don't.
00:55:39.520 Instinctively, it seems to me that the principal responsibility for a changed world lies with the
00:55:46.000 people who are this world's beneficiaries. Not the bosses, the leaders, not the new leaders,
00:55:52.580 not the leaders who claim they aren't leaders, not those guys, but the rank and file people.
00:55:59.020 And, you know, I just have to say it, and it's going to sound a little cynical,
00:56:02.300 but good luck appealing to people to try to change the world who are just making it through.
00:56:09.180 Well, thank you so much, Stephen, again, for spending this time with me and with all those
00:56:15.240 who will listen and the mind takes a deep sigh, a deep breath, and rearranges all of its little
00:56:26.440 tracks that it makes, which I'm very grateful to you for. You've definitely given us a lot to chew
00:56:32.740 on. Thank you for the invitation, and I'm honored by it as well. So let us continue as best as we can.
00:56:45.240 Thank you for listening to For the Wild podcast.
00:57:06.600 I'm Ayanna Young.
00:57:07.440 The music you heard today was by Jess Williamson from the record label Mexican Summer.
00:57:13.360 I'd like to thank our incredible podcast team
00:57:16.520 our producer and editor Andrew Storrs
00:57:18.840 research director Madison Migulski
00:57:21.420 media director Molly Lebov
00:57:23.580 and research assistant Francesca Glaspell
00:57:25.940 please help us continue making this podcast free every week
00:57:30.240 by heading over to DRIP
00:57:32.520 which is d.rip.org
00:57:34.440 to make a contribution
00:57:38.240 and sign up for our newsletter if you haven't already
00:57:40.960 thanks so much and until next time
00:57:43.360 Long away from this wild open sky
00:57:45.960 On the concrete trails of wine
00:57:47.940 Through the candles dark and white