For The Wild - February 03, 2021


VIJAY PRASHAD on Capitalism’s Erosion of Morality ⧸220

Topics
Dr. CUTCHA RISLING BALDY on Land Return and Revitalization ⧸219 DAVID HOLMGREN on a Quiet Boycott ⧸221

Episode Stats


Length

58 minutes

Words per minute

154.85

Word count

9,051

Sentence count

481

Harmful content

Toxicity

5

sentences flagged

Hate speech

12

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 For the Wild podcast is brought to you in part by the Calliopeia Foundation and listeners like you.
00:00:05.720 Calliopeia supports projects interweaving spirituality, culture, and ecology.
00:00:11.160 We are grateful for their support and the support of grassroots contributions from listeners.
00:00:16.020 To learn more about the Calliopeia Foundation, visit calliopeia.org.
00:00:20.840 To make a donation to For the Wild, visit forthewild.world slash donate or support us through Patreon.
00:00:30.000 Hello and welcome to For the Wild podcast. I'm Ayanna Young. Today I'm speaking with Vijay Prasad.
00:00:39.680 This is a canary in the coal mine, not of social systems that are not working and so on. It's a
00:00:47.260 canary in the coal mine about feeling, about the compassion, sense of compassion in a country.
00:00:52.880 Vijay Prashad is the director of Tricontinental Institute for Social Research, chief editor at
00:01:00.840 Left Word Books, and chief correspondent for Globetrotter. His most recent book is Washington
00:01:06.620 Bullets, just out from Monthly Review Press, with a preface by Ivo Morales Aime.
00:01:14.840 Well, Vijay, thank you so much for coming on to For the Wild.
00:01:18.780 great it's great to be with you and i just love the name of this podcast for the wild it's very
00:01:25.900 resonant of you know so much about the way we live in the world where you know well the wild
00:01:32.740 where is it now absolutely yeah i think about that a lot as i'm in the world and what i stand for
00:01:41.820 and thank you for picking up on that. So Vijay, as a journalist and commentator,
00:01:50.880 I'd like to start our conversation in recognition of how the corporate media is manipulating us
00:01:55.980 today. Certainly the U.S. media has always ideologically censored that which critiques
00:02:01.900 the state, but what I'm really noticing now is the ways in which right-winged media and left-wing
00:02:08.760 media are both pushing the narrative that the country is in peril because of the other side
00:02:13.900 and it seems to me that we're being fed a great contradiction where if neither end of the spectrum
00:02:20.720 is happy and both are blaming one another we're left to wonder what is actually happening
00:02:26.620 specifically i'm thinking about how many of us have become captivated by the sensationalized
00:02:33.320 nature of hate and violence, and whether or not you think we're becoming deeply addicted to this
00:02:39.020 type of media. If so, how does this prevent us from having nuanced conversations and reaching
00:02:46.360 out to one another? And how does this continue to serve the ruling class?
00:02:52.780 It's a great way to begin. For this, I think you have to plumb more than just the media. You have
00:02:59.660 to go deeper into the kind of cultural stasis that exists, not only in the United States,
00:03:07.460 but in a number of advanced capitalist countries, you know, in Western Europe, maybe even in
00:03:13.240 countries like Brazil and India.
00:03:15.540 You have to go deeper into a kind of cultural malaise which has set in.
00:03:20.620 The way I see it is about maybe 40, 50 years ago, as a consequence of, you know, changes
00:03:27.780 in the way goods are produced
00:03:29.660 rather than have big factories
00:03:31.900 inside one country, inside
00:03:33.860 a territory. The new technological
00:03:36.160 developments allowed
00:03:37.500 firms to be broken up
00:03:39.780 and you create what's known as the
00:03:41.840 global commodity chain. You create
00:03:43.760 disarticulated production.
00:03:46.180 A car factory isn't one
00:03:47.740 big factory. You make
00:03:49.180 50, 60, 100 components
00:03:51.760 of the car in 100 factories
00:03:53.500 which are based in 20
00:03:55.720 countries and the goods are moved back and forth and then they're assembled in one place. What this
00:04:01.040 did was it enabled the people who would have invested money in a factory in, say, Detroit,
00:04:08.400 it enabled them to actually not invest much in the world. See, when you have a big factory,
00:04:13.940 you have to invest a lot of money into that factory, you know, let's say millions of dollars.
00:04:18.480 If you've broken it up into 20 different factories, the investment in each factory is lessened.
00:04:24.200 Because these factories or these manufacturing plants are in Mexico or in, you know, Malaysia or in Indonesia, wherever they are, they're often subcontracted.
00:04:34.520 So somebody in Malaysia has to raise the funds, much less than, you know, starting a big car factory.
00:04:40.860 They have to raise the funds.
00:04:42.380 They invest the money.
00:04:43.680 And so the auto manufacturer doesn't actually have to invest a lot of money overseas.
00:04:48.540 You see this actually quite dramatically with Apple.
00:04:51.800 Apple doesn't make iPhones.
00:04:53.360 iPhones are made by Foxconn, you know, which is a Taiwanese company based in Shenzhen, China.
00:04:59.300 Apple doesn't make anything. They just design brands, they develop some technology and so on, and they patent it.
00:05:06.280 But they don't invest in China. That's a Taiwanese company that does that investment.
00:05:11.700 So these firms were able to first not invest a lot of money around the world to do manufacturing.
00:05:17.860 At the same time, they collected huge amounts of rent on the goods that they sold.
00:05:24.080 This money wasn't going towards taxation because the big companies were basically buying out the political system and they bought out the media and they sold this story that low taxation is good for the whole country, for everybody.
00:05:40.980 Well, they didn't pay tax.
00:05:42.860 They corrupted the political system in general, also the media.
00:05:46.380 I mean, look who owns the media now. Oh, well, Washington Post, who's the owner of the Washington Post, I wonder, you know, and so on. It's no longer a family that owns it, that's committed to the media. It's big business that owns these things. If you look at American broadcast networks, they're owned by arms dealers, you know, whether it's NBC or whoever, they're all owned by companies that manufacture weapons.
00:06:10.280 So you have this situation where they stop paying taxes, essentially, what we at our institute called a long-term tax strike.
00:06:18.940 They go on strike. They just don't pay taxes.
00:06:21.840 They use the enormous wealth they have to go into tax havens, or they buy media outlets and so on and start to produce a version of reality.
00:06:32.820 They influence the culture.
00:06:34.160 And at the same time, municipalities and so on are starved for funds, and they start privatizing and really eroding the basis of social life.
00:06:44.600 I mean, it's a perfect storm of, to some extent, worsened job prospects for people because a lot of manufacturing goes global, precarious conditions in the service economy for a lot of people,
00:06:57.120 A media that's basically pretending that it tells you a universal or truthful story, when in fact, it often just represents the viewpoints of the very rich. You have a government that basically succumbs to the very rich in the presidential election between Joe Biden and Donald Trump, $14 billion was spent on that election.
00:07:19.280 It's an incredible amount of money, you know, in an election.
00:07:23.620 I mean, it's in a democratic process.
00:07:25.840 It's insane.
00:07:27.400 The culture gets corroded over these 40 years.
00:07:30.720 You know, we have more and more people feeling precarious about their prospects.
00:07:35.080 They are listening to quite toxic things in the media.
00:07:39.260 And nobody, I mean, you know, Ayanna, I mean this, nobody, none of the major political
00:07:44.980 forces seems to have a project for the people that resonates in a way that is genuine and sincere.
00:07:53.940 Instead, what you get is political projects that just appear insincere at best and hateful at
00:08:02.600 worst. In other words, insincere, where politicians come and tell you just retrain for the next
00:08:08.420 generation jobs. You're a 50-year-old person who's just lost a job. It's not easy to retrain.
00:08:13.600 That's an insincere thing to say to somebody. And on the other side, you get this horrible,
00:08:18.960 toxic stuff about, well, you've lost your job, blame it on an immigrant, and most likely on a
00:08:24.800 body that's colored slightly different than yours. The range of political projects we have in most
00:08:31.820 of the advanced countries now are therefore between insincerity and hate. And my God,
00:08:37.880 that should make everybody a little sick. Yeah, absolutely. In one of Tri-Continental's
00:08:47.500 newsletters from this year, you write, quote, the idea of social bonds or even of society is so
00:08:54.140 compelling in our time. It is getting harder and harder to experience society in a civil manner.
00:09:00.500 Political discourse seems to have emerged from the sewers and a general compassion for suffering
00:09:05.440 seems to have evaporated as the neo-fascist propagate the hard steel of toxic machismo.
00:09:12.160 This is not merely a problem of the political class. It is a problem that should be associated
00:09:17.900 with the erosion of state and social institutions that would otherwise make individual lives richer.
00:09:24.960 End quote. And yeah, this idea dovetails with what we've been talking about, but also offers
00:09:32.300 a reality check for many that the disappearance of dignified discourse cannot solely be blamed
00:09:38.160 on individual failures, but is a byproduct of the gradual and calculated divestments from our social
00:09:45.000 and state institutions. So before we go on to discuss the shortcomings of the left and the west,
00:09:51.480 I wonder if you can begin by talking about how this moment in the United States culturally is
00:09:58.100 deeply connected to the privatization of life, the starving of economies of care, and the
00:10:03.780 bolstering of war industries.
00:10:06.480 There's so much to say here again, Ayana, and this is something I feel desperately moved
00:10:11.900 by because, you know, as a consequence of the lockdown and this pandemic, we estimate
00:10:18.860 that hunger rates have gone up dramatically.
00:10:21.780 And I don't know, maybe half the world's population struggles with hunger.
00:10:26.500 and there's something just obscene that about our world that we can do so many incredible things
00:10:32.780 you and I are talking to each other through a computer it's incredible Ayanna you are you're
00:10:37.880 in Portland Oregon we're just chatting as if you're sitting in the same room as me your voice
00:10:42.180 is very clear we can do all these amazing things you know we could put our cameras on if we'd like
00:10:47.820 and see each other it's incredible and yet just five minutes from where I am somebody will be
00:10:53.640 hungry. A young person can't study properly. Their brains are not developing because their 0.99
00:10:59.000 nutritional rates are down. Stay with the United States. Roughly 567,000 people struggle with 0.98
00:11:06.100 homelessness. You know, half a million people struggle with homelessness in this extraordinarily
00:11:11.040 rich country. This is a canary in the coal mine, not of social systems that are not working and so
00:11:19.000 on. It's a canary in the coal mine about feeling, about the compassion, sense of compassion in a
00:11:25.140 country. I mean, how does it, how does a country claim to be a civilization? You know, if you just
00:11:32.560 have no way, no project to address the fact that half a million people struggle with homelessness
00:11:40.360 and that increasing numbers of people struggle with hunger. I mean, how do you go on with your
00:11:46.620 own life. You know, there's something wrong with that when a country doesn't have that as its first
00:11:52.560 priority. You know, the principal priority in an election campaign should be we're going to just
00:11:58.400 not have people be homeless. It should be we're just not going to have people be hungry. We need
00:12:04.540 nutritious food for people. And it's not a question of creating giant, ugly, you know,
00:12:11.000 nature-destroying factory farms. Let's be creative in thinking of ways to, you know, grow nutritious
00:12:17.880 food near where people live, decentralize, you know, food regimes and so on. Let's have that
00:12:24.860 conversation and let's be serious about it. Let's not say this is some marginal thing for hippies
00:12:30.080 and, you know, people on the side. It's a ridiculous attitude. This should be at the center. 0.99
00:12:35.080 Why isn't a mainstream political party putting at its heart the question of homelessness and hunger and so on?
00:12:43.140 And they don't. And for me, what that says is that's the canary.
00:12:47.900 That's an indictment of a culture. It's nothing to do with this party or that party.
00:12:52.820 You know, the squad, you know, Alexander Ocasio-Cortez, Ayanna Pressley, Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib have put together these seven bills and others with them.
00:13:05.080 have put together seven bills to directly address the question of, you know, homelessness or
00:13:10.400 houselessness, as you see fit to say. They're very pragmatic and good steps that they're asking for.
00:13:17.100 There's nothing utopian about it, you know, but it's a direct challenge to the banks, to people
00:13:21.760 with money, to property owners and so on. And it's the same with hunger. I mean, we know that there's
00:13:27.660 enough food produced in the world. And, you know, I have my critiques of how food is produced, but
00:13:32.340 let's leave that for a moment. There's enough food produced in the world. And I often, you know,
00:13:37.260 think, I often think about this, that, you know, there's a place, there's a warehouse of food,
00:13:42.600 and then there's hungry people. What prevents the hungry people from getting the food from
00:13:47.900 the warehouse? Well, what prevents the hungry people from eating that food is they don't have
00:13:52.260 money. And if you don't have money, then you are condemned to starvation. There's something just
00:13:57.800 vulgar about the fact that we have people without homes, people without food, people without health,
00:14:03.880 people without access to education, and what prevents them from getting these things which we
00:14:08.640 have is the lack of money. This is what the capitalist system has done. It has eroded
00:14:14.840 the sense of morality in a culture where people in a society just get inured. They come to terms
00:14:23.300 with this they see homeless people on the street they just turn their face and walk by they see
00:14:28.520 hungry people they just don't know what to do they feel they feel assaulted by the presence of the
00:14:33.540 hungry person there on the street it's as if the hungry person is hurting them by just being there
00:14:39.500 you know instead of taking that hurt that you feel when you see somebody hungry and saying i need to
00:14:45.120 construct a political project i need to be involved in something to just end this you know to not
00:14:51.320 allow this. And again, this inured sense of break, where people just don't feel like the hungry,
00:14:59.900 the homeless, the people without medical care, the sense that they are not part of me,
00:15:05.140 they are alien to me, you know, we are alienated from them. That predates the pandemic. I mean,
00:15:11.560 that's been a long time in motion. And, you know, I think that there is really something
00:15:16.820 quite significant about trying to create a political project that, in a way, breaks the
00:15:24.100 alienation of human beings from each other and breaks the alienation of human beings from nature.
00:15:30.740 It's the same sort of detachment. I am detached from other people, especially those who are 1.00
00:15:37.860 struggling. I don't want to deal with them. I don't want to see them. We'll move them away.
00:15:42.500 We'll evict them and remove them. And I'm also detached from nature. I don't want to deal with
00:15:48.180 the vagaries of nature, the sense of nature. I just want to give you an example. In Cuba,
00:15:54.320 every year, as you know, there are hurricanes and the hurricane tears through the island as it tears
00:15:59.400 through other islands. It's a decentralized society. So in every village or town, there is
00:16:06.200 a committee to defend the revolution. And in their committee, there's often electricians.
00:16:11.180 when the storm is coming they leave their homes they go and they take down the power lines they
00:16:16.620 just dismantle it they remove it because they know that the lines will otherwise snap so they
00:16:21.400 preemptively put people without power then the storm blows right through then they go and put
00:16:26.660 the power line back up in other words they're planning for a certain eventuality and then they
00:16:32.180 remedy it in these countries like let's say the united states example puerto rico nothing is done
00:16:39.140 And then the storm comes in, knocks down the power line, and a population is completely disorganized.
00:16:45.840 They're not able to do these things.
00:16:48.160 These skills haven't been produced.
00:16:50.300 So now you have to wait for the electricians to come from the mainland or somewhere else to put up the power again.
00:16:56.880 And then you go weeks and weeks without power.
00:16:59.220 I mean, it's an example of two different models.
00:17:02.060 You've got the Cuban model where they put people before profits, you know, where people are organized, they're trained, they work in community to deal with adversity, to deal with challenges.
00:17:13.360 You have the other side where people basically are alienated from each other. 0.85
00:17:17.160 They don't have these skills.
00:17:18.940 You have to pay money to get these skills and so on.
00:17:21.700 And then you get these disasters.
00:17:23.480 And really, COVID has shown us that, you know, 29,000 Cuban medical students went door to door and tested all 11 million Cubans to see if they had COVID-19.
00:17:34.360 In the United States, most people, and I would hazard almost like to say everybody, nobody has seen anybody from the government come to their door, knock on the door and say, can I test you?
00:17:45.360 It just is not happening.
00:17:46.840 And yet it happened in a poor country like Cuba. 0.68
00:17:49.500 It's a different attitude to human beings.
00:17:52.160 That model says people come before profit. In this very rich society of the United States, there's no doubt that profit always comes before people and profit always comes before nature.
00:18:22.160 Dark place, dark place
00:18:26.920 Come, come, come, come into
00:18:30.040 Coming to, coming to, coming to
00:18:34.080 Into the darkness, darkness, darkness
00:18:41.360 Come, come, come, come and find
00:18:45.160 Come and find, come and find
00:18:48.600 Would you have lost, lost a long, long time?
00:18:56.320 Now, now, now, now it's time, now it's time, now it's time to look again.
00:19:07.160 You've long vocalized that so-called leftists in the United States have continuously failed to capture the power of community organizing
00:19:16.840 and instead settling for liberal identities and there's just so much to ask but I think listeners
00:19:24.580 would like to know as a precursor why you think it is that we have remained so limited in our
00:19:31.760 ability to pursue social and economic transformation why do we need to rectify or what do we need to
00:19:38.800 rectify in order to ensure that future generations and the current one do not remain stymied in their
00:19:45.180 efforts to build a movement to address labor exploitation, global austerity measures, and
00:19:50.420 climate chaos? You know, I mean, Ayanna, let's take two incidents, recent incidents. One is
00:19:57.440 the killing of George Floyd and before him, Eric Garner. Why was Eric Garner killed? Eric Garner
00:20:04.080 was killed because the police officers saw a black man in the streets of New York selling
00:20:09.240 loose cigarettes. That's what they alleged, that he was selling loose cigarettes. Now,
00:20:14.340 I'll come back to that in a minute. Why was George Floyd killed? Allegedly, because this black man
00:20:20.360 passed a counterfeit $20 bill. They alleged that he passed a counterfeit $20 bill. In both cases,
00:20:27.440 these were men. If indeed it is true that Eric Garner was selling loose cigarettes,
00:20:33.280 and George Floyd was trying to pass a $20 bill, if this is indeed true, we have an example of two
00:20:39.340 black men who are attempting in a very, very challenging economy, challenging economic
00:20:47.080 situation to get by, I mean, to take care of their families. These are economic crimes in a way, 0.97
00:20:55.000 if indeed they are true. One, selling loose cigarettes, it's a crime against the excise
00:21:00.160 department, and then passing a counterfeit bill. These are crimes, but they're not crimes.
00:21:07.300 Many years ago, Marx wrote something really important.
00:21:10.260 He said that peasants used to go into the forests in Germany
00:21:15.860 and they would collect fallen wood for firewood.
00:21:19.400 When a branch fell on the ground, they would go into a forest,
00:21:23.020 collect the branch, bring it, it was firewood.
00:21:25.620 And when the government in these parts of Germany,
00:21:29.220 it was not yet Germany, but in these parts of what would become Germany,
00:21:32.760 silesia etc the governments passed a law saying this is private property you can't come and collect
00:21:38.660 firewood and so the police would ride into this forest and they would beat peasants who were
00:21:45.280 coming to collect firewood as was their customary practice and in some cases even killed people
00:21:50.740 and marx wrote with great feeling he said the peasants understand the punishment the punishment
00:21:58.180 they are facing is they are getting arrested, they are getting beaten, and in some extreme
00:22:02.560 cases, they are killed. They understand the punishment. What they don't understand is the
00:22:07.140 crime. What's the crime in coming and collecting firewood? You know, they are collecting firewood
00:22:13.040 in a customary way for warmth. What's the crime? They don't understand the crime. They don't
00:22:16.900 understand that there is a crime here. Well, it's a crime against private property. In the same way,
00:22:22.300 in a society where there are large numbers of people who are without a home, who are struggling
00:22:27.980 because of lack of proper income
00:22:29.780 to feed their families
00:22:31.000 where there's no government support for this
00:22:33.180 or minimal anemic government support.
00:22:36.040 People are trying to get by
00:22:37.580 and this is not seen as a crime
00:22:40.400 because you're trying to feed your family.
00:22:42.240 You're just trying to get by.
00:22:44.680 I mean, imagine that 0.99
00:22:46.060 and then you get killed. 0.98
00:22:48.360 The punishment is easy to understand. 0.98
00:22:50.620 The crime is not clear.
00:22:52.480 Why is that a crime?
00:22:53.640 I'm trying to get by.
00:22:55.040 Meanwhile, big corporate banker
00:22:57.380 or somebody steals hundreds of millions of dollars
00:22:59.720 and they don't get killed.
00:23:01.560 In fact, they sometimes don't even get punished,
00:23:03.920 but we're getting killed for this.
00:23:05.900 We can see the crime, the punishment.
00:23:08.120 We don't see the crime.
00:23:08.920 So what's happened because of this lack
00:23:11.680 of an understanding of class in the United States
00:23:14.240 is the punishment is what is seen there. 0.60
00:23:17.340 In other words, when we say Black Lives Matter,
00:23:20.220 we say Black Lives Matter, meaning Black Lives Matter.
00:23:23.840 That means that police killing must stop. 0.87
00:23:26.700 that police killing must stop in other words the punishment must stop but what about the so-called
00:23:33.040 crime what when you say black lives matter you you surely don't just mean that the killing must
00:23:40.600 stop surely you mean that the precious lives of human beings must have access to food must have
00:23:47.540 access to housing must have access to education health care broad range of services and so on
00:23:54.440 Surely it means that whole preciousness of life, not just that, oh, you should be allowed to live. What's the point of living if I can't live with dignity, you know, is the issue. So in that sense, you know, there is no project that's articulated, particularly in the Democratic Party, which addresses the broader question of life.
00:24:19.640 You know, again, it's not enough to say we have to go and check the police and so on,
00:24:24.100 because it's not just about the police.
00:24:25.860 It's about the whole system is wretched.
00:24:28.420 People don't have the ability to feed themselves.
00:24:31.180 They don't have the ability to take care of their children.
00:24:34.080 They don't have the ability, you know, to have their health monitored on a regular basis.
00:24:38.920 Public services have faced total attrition.
00:24:41.680 That kind of broad, bold project needs to be articulated.
00:24:46.000 You know, you need something like that.
00:24:47.600 And it's out of a bold project like that, that you have to risk creating a majority, you know, a majority, as we say, is not found, it has to be made, you can't find a majority of people to back you, you have to make a majority, you have to make a majority around the program that unifies people and people will be unified by programs such as everybody agrees that feeding people is paramount.
00:25:15.020 People must have a full dignity of their precious lives.
00:25:18.960 And so that's what I think.
00:25:20.240 You know, I think that what's happened with identity politics and so on
00:25:23.440 is that we've ended up focusing on the punishment.
00:25:27.820 We've forgotten that we need to attack the idea that certain things are crimes.
00:25:33.580 There is no crime in trying to survive.
00:25:36.360 You know, survival is heroic.
00:25:37.900 and we need to find a way for us mutually to survive without having to hurt other people,
00:25:45.140 in other words, theft and so on. There are ways. We have to look at that as not a crime,
00:25:50.600 but as survival and make survival not something that requires a person to surrender their dignity,
00:25:57.460 you know, to steal from others and so on. But survival must be something you can do with
00:26:01.900 dignity. I think it's from there that you build a majority.
00:26:06.920 Wow. Thank you for that analysis. Well, I'd like to transition our conversation to explore how
00:26:13.860 countries have responded to COVID-19, because our media in the States has certainly been
00:26:20.040 fairly limited and biased in terms of what information is disseminated around COVID
00:26:25.060 responses. Tricontinental Institute published a study titled Corona Shock and Socialism,
00:26:32.600 which pointed out that there is a, quote, marked difference in the management of the pandemic by
00:26:38.540 countries with bourgeoisie governments and countries with socialist governments. The latter
00:26:44.040 has a science-based public sector, public action, and internationalist attitude, which has meant
00:26:50.820 that the areas of the world governed by socialists have experienced less of a catastrophe than the
00:26:56.900 countries of the bourgeoisie order, end quote. Now this shouldn't come as a surprise, but I do
00:27:03.500 wonder if you can speak to some of the most glaring differences between socialist and
00:27:08.660 bourgeoisie governments and what this implies for future crisis, or what this implies for future
00:27:14.760 crises? And perhaps what climate catastrophe responses will look like under socialist
00:27:20.800 governments? Well, the last question is very difficult, and I hope we can get there. But
00:27:26.780 there's something quite, I don't like to use the word ironic, by the way, because that song ruined
00:27:32.700 the word ironic. I understand that it's often a misunderstood word, but there is something quite
00:27:38.400 odd about how people assume that, let's say, China is authoritarian and the United States
00:27:45.540 is democratic. That's the basic Western framework. When the pandemic was finally understood in China
00:27:53.700 by about the 20th of January of this year, 2020, in other words, by the time it was clear to
00:28:00.960 medical experts that there was human-to-human transmission, and when the government in Hubei
00:28:06.480 province shut down Wuhan city and they put really emergency measures in built a big hospital and so
00:28:12.020 on that's what the government did that was what the state did but suddenly underneath that you
00:28:18.020 saw a whole different set of activities begin so just to give an example Chinese society not the
00:28:25.940 state is highly organized people are organized in all kinds of associations whether it's neighborhood
00:28:30.980 associations, professional associations, and so on. And what you saw in Wuhan City is that
00:28:38.840 neighborhood associations kicked in, and so did the Communist Party. So what did they do?
00:28:44.720 Well, in every neighborhood, the neighborhood associations started to do temperature checks
00:28:49.040 of people who live in the neighborhood. You didn't need high expertise. They were quickly trained.
00:28:53.840 You had to go with masks and with gloves and go and take temperatures of people. If there are
00:28:58.460 spikes in temperature immediately you know medical experts must come test them and so on they can be
00:29:04.160 isolated they did contact tracing not through the government but through these decentralized
00:29:10.380 neighborhood committees secondly these neighborhood committees went made sure did surveys of they
00:29:16.180 already had information but did surveys of neighborhoods who are the elderly where do they
00:29:20.860 live do they need medicines do they need food delivered and so on so this is the kind of way
00:29:27.180 which society started to take care of itself. You know, remember I said we have this vision China
00:29:33.100 authoritarian state and therefore no society. Everybody's dominated by the state. State does
00:29:38.620 everything. It's not true. There the neighborhood associations took care of a lot of the basic
00:29:43.020 functions during the lockdown and Wuhan and Hubei province were able to beat the pandemic. It's
00:29:48.380 quite amazing that story of the city and the province both. In a place like the United States,
00:29:55.820 It's a really good comparison because, you see, you can say, look, I'm free, but you're also thoroughly disorganized.
00:30:03.560 What did you not see in the United States?
00:30:05.940 You saw people just waiting for the government to do things.
00:30:09.140 Even trade unions didn't come out there and feed people.
00:30:12.840 You didn't see, you know, the NGOs.
00:30:15.540 I mean, what's happened in a way is you've commodified public action in the West, in the capitalist countries.
00:30:23.200 But public action has become the province of non-governmental organizations that get grants and they have professionals running them and so on.
00:30:31.160 You don't have masses of people organized into neighborhood committees and so on.
00:30:36.380 You just don't have that kind of broad public action.
00:30:40.780 You don't have the habit for it.
00:30:42.540 So because you don't have the habit for it, what you did see is in some small localities,
00:30:46.980 you saw decent people sometimes organized in some left groups conduct mutual aid,
00:30:52.640 You know, tried to raise funds to go and buy groceries, deliver it to people who couldn't afford and so on.
00:30:59.840 So there were small instances of mutual aid conducted by really sensitive, decent people.
00:31:04.800 But it wasn't scaled up. You know, we didn't see trade unions participate.
00:31:09.480 In Kerala, for instance, which is a state in India governed by the left front, communist government,
00:31:17.060 their trade unions came, they built sinks next to bus stations.
00:31:20.680 So when people got off buses, they would wash their hands.
00:31:23.700 The trade unions didn't wait for the government to come and build the sinks.
00:31:27.360 They just built the sinks.
00:31:28.900 Youth organizations in public opened kitchens.
00:31:31.980 They would cook basic food in public under tents, and anybody could come and take food
00:31:37.560 and go home.
00:31:38.560 This was to ensure that people were being fed during the pandemic.
00:31:42.740 Schools, public schools said, whatever lunch you get children at school, we would like
00:31:48.760 to have it delivered to your home.
00:31:50.180 So student organizations from colleges said, we volunteer to pick up the food from the school and deliver it to people's homes. I mean, this is public action. You know, Ayana, this is a habit that develops in these societies.
00:32:05.400 They haven't attacked trade unions. They haven't attacked the organization of students and so on. You just don't see this in the West where people live much more atomized lives. You know, there is a greater sense that the culture promotes individualism. You need to get by. Don't work collaboratively or cooperatively.
00:32:25.400 cooperatively, and the cooperative spirit has eroded deeply in these societies. It's not like
00:32:31.700 the United States didn't have this at one time. Let's go back to the readings of 19th century
00:32:38.100 fiction, where you see, or I guess even the history books, where a community would come
00:32:43.120 together to raise somebody's barn. Their barn needed to be raised. The whole community would
00:32:48.060 provide their labor. Nobody asked to be paid. They just did it together as a community,
00:32:52.680 because they knew they relied on each other.
00:32:54.840 That's mutual aid.
00:32:56.280 You don't need anarchism to teach you about mutual aid.
00:33:00.540 Mutual aid is a basic, common, human, decent thing to do.
00:33:03.960 But that decency has eroded because of individualism.
00:33:08.680 Because rather than call your neighbors and say,
00:33:10.740 listen, can you people please come and help me move my stove?
00:33:14.120 You call up somebody, a handyman or whatever,
00:33:16.820 to come and do things like that.
00:33:18.480 And that culture of commodifying all social relations
00:33:22.360 it doesn't prepare you for a pandemic and how to respond to the pandemic in the end
00:33:27.760 in the places like the united states you wait for the state to act and otherwise you're paralyzed
00:33:32.800 in your home in in these kind of countries in country where you've essentially commodified
00:33:39.760 so many social relations you know where when you need help from for something you try to either
00:33:45.820 hire somebody to do it for you by paying them directly or you use your credit card or whatever
00:33:53.040 it is. But this idea of mutual community support is deeply eroded in the system and it has its
00:34:01.180 impact at the time of a pandemic. Absolutely. Yeah. I mean, you just brought up so many
00:34:08.040 important points about our mutual aid being eroded. And I feel that. And you've been working
00:34:17.360 to outline what a post-COVID-19 agenda needs to look like for parts of the world who have been
00:34:23.180 long held captive by global austerity measures. And I'd like to explore how the pandemic is
00:34:30.040 projected to affect the world in the long term and what strategies and policies need to be centered.
00:34:36.260 But before I ask about the 16-point agenda, I wonder if you can remind listeners about the extent of global debt servitude and just the amount of external debt countries have been forced to bear while trillions of dollars sit in tax havens and billionaires offer, you know, paltry philanthropic donations.
00:34:57.140 i mean this is extraordinary like you know it should be a slogan i mean i would like to make
00:35:04.040 a t-shirt ayana which says no philanthropy only taxation look the problem with philanthropy is
00:35:11.300 they give money and then they expect you to genuflect in front of them name buildings after
00:35:16.180 them praise them to the skies i mean this is medieval you know this is how kings and noble
00:35:22.520 people said look i am giving you something and then you had to make you know to fall on the
00:35:28.280 ground before them what's the difference you know the donor comes oh my god the donor is coming
00:35:33.400 tomorrow everybody's smart enough and you know you're like hello no you know i mean what this
00:35:38.020 is medieval the attitude towards philanthropy is positively medieval i don't want philanthropy
00:35:43.940 pay your taxes fair and square and then let's have a democratic you know discussion of how to
00:35:51.880 utilize that money not allow one rich person to define the agenda you know with society when you
00:35:58.160 have somebody like bezos you know 700 billion dollars plus you know that they're sitting on
00:36:05.140 um you know they have more money than the the wealth of countries you know they can move
00:36:12.020 enormous agendas by their whim that's what i mean by it being medieval i mean what gives one person
00:36:18.120 the right to move a major social agenda, you know, whether good or bad, you know, I'm not
00:36:23.060 judging it. It's just the structure is wrong. You know, we should have democratic control over our
00:36:28.820 social wealth, not allow WIM to define it. Well, you know, we know that right now the situation
00:36:37.280 with debt is just obscene. You know, it's literally obscene. You know, the best estimates show us
00:36:44.620 that there is about $11 trillion in external debt in the developing world. And the wealthy
00:36:52.060 bondholders, they just don't want to give these countries a break. I mean, right now,
00:36:57.220 if you're smart, and we live in a smart world, we'd say, oh, wait a minute, let's just forgive
00:37:02.740 all the debt, you know, this $11 trillion. I mean, after all, after all, there's $32 trillion
00:37:08.340 sitting in tax havens. And that's, that's just the number that we were able to find, you know,
00:37:13.660 $32 trillion, and we went and looked at this, $32 trillion is more than the total value of gold
00:37:23.380 that has ever been brought up from under the earth. All the known gold reserves are less than
00:37:31.600 $32 trillion. So we've got $32 trillion sitting in tax havens. Let's use some of that money,
00:37:39.500 which is sitting idle, to essentially forgive the debt.
00:37:42.540 These countries, for instance, if you take an example, Ethiopia,
00:37:47.440 Ethiopia doesn't need aid.
00:37:50.100 It just needs complete debt cancellation.
00:37:52.600 If you cancel the debt to Ethiopia,
00:37:55.120 they have enough resources in their society to drive an agenda. 1.00
00:37:58.440 The reason these countries have to keep coming with the begging bowl
00:38:02.340 is because their resources are essentially sapped
00:38:06.420 by this vacuum cleaner of debt servicing,
00:38:10.040 which is endless and perpetual.
00:38:11.900 It's a perpetual debt machine.
00:38:14.520 You know, countries have to keep servicing the debt.
00:38:17.380 You know, I said $11 trillion is owed this year.
00:38:21.080 Sorry, is currently owed as external debt.
00:38:24.560 The servicing on that debt this year,
00:38:27.600 about two months ago, was about $3.9 trillion.
00:38:30.440 So just about 40% or 37% of the total principal is owed as interest.
00:38:40.540 I mean, that's how miserable the situation is.
00:39:00.440 And the sign about
00:39:01.680 Ey ey ey, ey ey ey
00:39:05.000 Ey ey ey...
00:39:06.760 Ey ey ey
00:39:21.200 Ay oy廜na
00:39:22.980 Agar mahenna
00:39:24.280 Ey oy tum sayen
00:39:27.400 Ay ey ey
00:39:28.240 you've long called for the need to push the debate about the environmental crisis to not
00:39:49.800 only include more nuance and complexity but to also acknowledge labor and land struggles
00:39:55.760 And to address the question of deprivation, and I've heard you share sentiments that point out what is the point of a climate strike that speaks of an uninhabitable earth when people on this earth presently cannot eat, which is something you were just referring to.
00:40:10.800 And so this question is open-ended, but I wonder if you could speak to what agricultural workers could teach us about reorganizing the system and how does an extended movement actually translate into a stronger movement?
00:40:25.760 You see, right now, we have, in a place like India, we have increasing and long-term and what looks to be permanent agrarian distress.
00:40:37.400 You know, agriculture has been commercialized.
00:40:41.140 You know, big firms dominate the landscape, determine the outcome.
00:40:46.960 They are growing things essentially for markets all over the world.
00:40:50.840 And they're growing at massive scale.
00:40:53.160 in order to grow at massive scale they use just poisonous things that are ruining the soil um you
00:41:00.560 know that is both insecticide fertilizer uh they use seeds that are you know god knows what seeds
00:41:08.580 they they basically plow enormous landscapes you know and with no interest in in in the integrity
00:41:15.840 of the soil or anything i mean it's basically treating as we say treating the field like a
00:41:22.640 factory and hoping that the attrition of soil, the soil's depletion and so on can be reversed by
00:41:31.240 using intensive chemicals and so on and clever seeds and even sometimes in some cases, you know,
00:41:39.240 computerization in the field itself. So this is the great hope. And what this has meant is it's
00:41:46.020 completely taken the power away from the cultivators. And also it has thrown a lot of
00:41:52.260 people off work because you've mechanized. And in a place like India, 70% or so people in the
00:41:58.120 countryside, it has created enormous agrarian distress and small farmers have found it very 1.00
00:42:03.120 hard to survive. So for a long period, suicide rates among farmers were very high. In recent
00:42:09.520 period, agricultural workers and farmers in India have been leading these very large marches.
00:42:16.020 particularly in the states of Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, and Rajasthan.
00:42:20.440 These marches are very important because it shows that the leadership
00:42:23.940 in trying to transform rural areas is coming from the agricultural workers,
00:42:29.940 the small farmers, and so on.
00:42:32.080 You can't do this from policy to farm.
00:42:35.580 It has to be from worker to policy.
00:42:38.720 There is no other way, you know,
00:42:40.140 because you have to build mass support for some of these ideas.
00:42:42.880 And this is a long-term rebuilding project because around the world, farm worker organizing, farm worker strength has been greatly depleted in the face of giant corporations coming in with the full support of governments and basically eroding the capacity of agricultural workers and small farm owners to live with dignity.
00:43:08.320 I mean, that's what they were eroded. So, you know, we can talk as much as we want about agroecology, organic farming, good stewardship of the land and all that.
00:43:17.500 All of that stuff is abstractions, Ayanna. All of it is abstractions, because it's not a question of having the right ideas.
00:43:24.640 You know, you can have the right ideas. You can say, oh, look, you know, you shouldn't use so much fertilizer.
00:43:30.560 or don't use so much this.
00:43:32.040 Some scientists will come in and say,
00:43:33.700 no, the optimum is to use only so much chemicals in the land
00:43:37.720 or don't grow three cycles, leave one fallow.
00:43:41.840 You know, okay, that's all fine.
00:43:43.800 But these are abstractions.
00:43:46.260 They have to be picked up and made alive by people,
00:43:49.580 by people's movements and so on.
00:43:51.720 You know, you can't save the world
00:43:53.060 by building a small organic experimental farm somewhere
00:43:55.760 that proves that small experimental farms are correct.
00:43:59.120 You need hundreds of millions of people who work the land to be gripped by the idea that we need to have a different way of doing agriculture.
00:44:07.940 And that's why I want to emphasize the importance of these agricultural workers' movements, farm workers' movements, these big marches being held in India.
00:44:17.660 Because in the marches, they are also articulating and debating their agenda.
00:44:21.720 And in that is certainly an agenda about letting the cultivator set the course for what agriculture should look like, listen to the cultivators and so on.
00:44:32.640 And I think this is not just happening in India.
00:44:35.620 In Brazil, for instance, the landless workers movement, they have experimented, built cooperatives, worked on the construction of what they call agroecological production and so on.
00:44:48.480 And that's entirely driven by formerly landless farmers and workers who now live in these collective settlements where they are experimenting with new forms of not agriculture for boutique consumption, you know, rich for the rich and so on, but agroecological food for themselves, for the communities around them and so on.
00:45:10.040 So I say that the beginning of the transformation doesn't come from, you know, a book somebody has written somewhere about, you know, let's do agriculture like this. It comes from these experiments and struggles of peasants, farm workers, who are literally, literally with their fingers in the dirt, trying to understand how to draw food from the earth without destroying it.
00:45:38.300 And I think we need to actually take the lead from them.
00:45:42.820 I loved how you spoke to that.
00:45:45.980 And especially the part where, you know, it's not just about good ideas.
00:45:50.580 It's about the people on the ground.
00:45:52.260 And I've been so disenchanted with just the folks who have the mic and have the power and how they try to, yeah, push their armchair philosophical ideas onto those who are actually the ones working with the land.
00:46:12.560 And I think that's just such a powerful point.
00:46:15.500 So, yeah, thank you for that.
00:46:17.160 And Navija, you've been very vocal about the recent coup in Bolivia and its relationship to lithium mining, as over 50% of the world's lithium resides amidst Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile.
00:46:30.360 So can you talk a bit about the United States' role in interfering with this election in order to gain fuller access to lithium?
00:46:37.880 And if you think more and more coups will ensue in the coming decades as corporate miners seek to propel, quote, clean energy forward?
00:46:47.160 Yeah, so, you know, I mean, I think the idea of the Green New Deal sounds great. And who's going to disagree with that? You know, we do want to transition away from fossil fuel energy. Of course, we want to transition from fossil fuel energy. But what are we transitioning to?
00:47:03.280 We're transitioning to energy that is derived from the sun, solar, we're looking to wind, we're looking to maybe tidal energy, different forms of energy from the earth, from the sun, as I said.
00:47:20.840 But of course, these forms of energy are erratic.
00:47:23.900 Solar energy is not available at night, you need energy at night, therefore you need to somehow capture the energy.
00:47:30.000 In order to capture energy, whether it's any of these non-fossil or what we call renewable energy, to capture these, you need batteries.
00:47:39.940 And thus far, the most efficient batteries we have use cobalt, use lithium and other such minerals and so on.
00:47:49.520 But cobalt and lithium are two important ones.
00:47:51.920 Well, where do you get cobalt from?
00:47:54.320 Cobalt comes from the tailing mines of copper.
00:47:57.180 And the largest amount of cobalt comes out of the Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where some companies with hideous records like Glencore, domiciled in Switzerland, these companies are the ones that essentially, by outsourcing the gathering of cobalt from the tailing mines, make a ton of money, you know, ton of money.
00:48:22.800 So the people who are mining this, you know, families, including children, are paid almost nothing, and these companies make a ton of money.
00:48:31.000 So in Congo, you don't need to do a coup because basically these corporations have enormous control of parts of the country already.
00:48:38.820 Then with lithium, there's big lithium production in Australia, but it's not enough.
00:48:44.340 The real scaled-up green transition takes place.
00:48:48.140 you're going to need a lot more lithium than is currently being mined out of Australia.
00:48:54.160 You know, there's lithium available in Cornwall in England.
00:48:57.080 But let me tell you, I don't think they're going to be mining in Cornwall.
00:49:00.720 This kind of dirty mining, it's always in somebody else's backyard.
00:49:04.580 So the big, big dump of lithium is in that ABC triangle, Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile.
00:49:12.260 You know, and in these countries, there is considerable lithium.
00:49:16.920 uh evo moralee's government when he was in power 14 years improved the conditions of his people
00:49:23.660 immensely he insisted that the government mining company would be in charge of the sale of the
00:49:31.240 lithium or going into joint ventures that you cannot privatize the mines um you know and they
00:49:36.940 also started making a deal which would allow them to process the lithium and make batteries in
00:49:43.840 Bolivia government run factory. In fact, they also mass produced a small car, which Evo Morales
00:49:51.460 was the first to drive off the lot in Bolivia. They were interested not just in selling raw
00:49:56.180 materials, but in going from lithium all the way out to electric cars with their own lithium
00:50:02.240 batteries in it and so on. And then the coup happens because this is unacceptable. Because
00:50:07.140 who actually should control the lithium? Not the Bolivian people and their government. No, 0.99
00:50:12.040 Certainly not. It has to be controlled by big multinational corporations. And that's the scandal. You're asking, will there be more coups in the future? Well, of course there will be, because this seems not to end. And these coups are getting more and more sophisticated as time goes by, because the apparatus to make you believe it's not a coup is quite sophisticated.
00:50:31.960 I mean, even people, sensitive people, people who lean toward the left after this coup in Bolivia, they spent weeks saying it's not a coup. Morales should not have run again. I mean, who are you to say who should or who shouldn't run again?
00:50:48.920 You know, I mean, this is something that can be settled in the ballot box in Bolivia. You know, somebody sitting in Vermont shouldn't have the license to dictate to other parts of the world what should or shouldn't happen.
00:51:01.940 You're entitled to your opinion. But in this case, your opinion is not merely an opinion. You're being weaponized by the CIA, by the U.S. State Department. If you come out there and join the chatter saying, well, you know, he's been there too long, you're just legitimizing what they are doing by force on the ground.
00:51:19.740 And I find that to be quite shameful. I mean, people need to really introspect. Next time there's a coup, and as I said, there will be a coup somewhere, hopefully not in Bolivia, but somewhere, people need to really think about what they are saying and in whose interest they are saying what.
00:51:37.340 Look, you may not like the way somebody is governing. That doesn't give you the right to allow your government to overthrow them.
00:51:43.840 I want to go back to Tri-Continental, and in The Ruins of the Present, it's written, quote,
00:51:51.460 The culture of commodities and the idea of people as consumers has desecrated the idea of the human.
00:51:58.220 Bolivian socialists have looked deeply into their own traditions and elaborated a vocabulary to talk about human character,
00:52:05.180 of a human society that is not subsumed by capitalist social norms.
00:52:09.260 David Choke Iwanka, the executive secretary of the Bolivian Alliance of the Peoples of
00:52:14.860 Our Americas, speaks of kapaknian, the path of the good life, with the need to create
00:52:21.760 not consumers and owners, but iamba, a person without an owner.
00:52:27.520 Being a person without an owner is, as Choke Iwanka says, the future, the path of people
00:52:34.260 who look for the good life.
00:52:35.560 And as we come to a close, I wonder if I can ask you to speak about the world, the mass movements, and lives being lived outside of the West, remind you about the authentic agency that still exists and a sense of satisfaction that isn't sought through consumerism.
00:53:06.320 Well, before I answer that, I would just like to say that you quoted from our first document
00:53:12.720 and you quoted within that from David Chokyuanca.
00:53:17.120 David has just been elected the vice president of Bolivia.
00:53:20.940 He was the vice presidential candidate with Luis Arce.
00:53:25.060 And I'm very pleased that he is the vice president because what the sentiment that you read out
00:53:32.300 from our first document, it's something that I deeply believe in. You know, when he articulates
00:53:39.340 the view that a person without an owner, you know, that's the future. You know, that's what
00:53:45.960 a good life will be. We want everybody to feel like they don't have an owner. And whether it's
00:53:51.700 a tangible, real owner, another person, or it's us being owned by money, by, you know, by mortgages,
00:53:59.680 by these sorts of attachments to things rather than other people.
00:54:04.440 I mean, that's a beautiful way to try to construct a world.
00:54:08.960 And I'm very, very pleased that David is the vice president of Bolivia.
00:54:13.360 And I know that he will be alongside Luis Arce and all the people there,
00:54:19.160 including Patricia Arce, who was such a brave person,
00:54:22.620 was beaten during the coup and looked directly in the camera
00:54:26.520 as they cut her hair, put red paint on her face, threw gasoline over her.
00:54:31.040 She looked directly at a camera and said, we are not afraid.
00:54:34.380 And she has just been sworn in as a senator in the Senate in Bolivia.
00:54:39.620 What a brave person Patricia is.
00:54:41.520 So these are the people, in a sense, Ayana, who are going to construct with us the future.
00:54:47.740 These are the kinds of people, this is the caliber of person in the movements around the world.
00:54:53.280 You know, these are sensitive people. These are people who believe we have great faith in the capacity of other people. They're not afraid of people. You know, you've got to listen more. You've got to build projects in unity with other people, whether it be in Bolivia, as we see here, or it's in, you know, places where, like in South Africa and Durban, where Abba Khali-based Majondolo, the shack dwellers movement, you know, has incredible resilience.
00:55:22.640 You know, mostly these women who built networks, political networks of Abaklali inside the neighborhoods of the poor in Durban, but other parts of South Africa as well, which stood attacks and murder by, you know, property developers and so on to give themselves dignity.
00:55:41.000 You know, if you go to Colombia in the northern part of South America, where social movement leaders are being killed almost one a day, you know, at that rate. Nonetheless, people still stand up, unafraid, stand up to the kind of mafia state that's led by Ivan Duque. These are brave people. I mean, you know, it breaks my heart every time I hear the name of somebody who's been killed because they are trying to create a sensitive world.
00:56:08.160 It breaks my heart.
00:56:09.240 I mean, it's a very sad thing that these people, what is their crime?
00:56:13.460 You know, back to that old thing, right?
00:56:15.260 Remember, we know the punishment, we're getting killed, but what is our crime?
00:56:20.280 My crime is I'm sensitive and want to create an end to hunger.
00:56:25.260 You know, that's my crime, and for that you killed me.
00:56:27.440 Why did they kill Thomas Sankara in Burkina Faso in 1987?
00:56:32.180 Well, Thomas wanted to create diversified food regimes.
00:56:36.800 He said on every Wednesday, he said, we forbid women to work in the kitchen.
00:56:42.140 We forbid women to do any housework, any childcare, anything on every Wednesday, because men must get a taste of reproductive labor.
00:56:52.720 You know, you must see what it is. And if you see what it is, you'll start to enjoy it. 1.00
00:56:57.500 And then you can truly share with the women in the household the practice of reproductive labor.
00:57:03.240 what a fast-sighted intelligent way to go you know instead of just talking talking talking about
00:57:10.060 the need for men to involve themselves he said we're going to pass a law like it or not guys
00:57:14.980 you got to just go and try it try the kitchen try the laundry try taking care of your children
00:57:20.640 you'll find something beautiful in it initially you're terrified of it you think it's women's
00:57:25.560 work you think oh i can't do it you'll you'll find beauty in it you'll be like that child who
00:57:31.500 eventually jumps in the pool and doesn't want to get out you'll say wow i really do enjoy cooking
00:57:36.980 i feel less alienated you know when i do this when i see the happy faces of my family when they eat
00:57:43.120 what i have cooked but he had to be killed they killed him you know sensitive person what was his
00:57:49.360 crime his crime was he said i want to make a better world i want to make a better world in
00:57:54.400 our world apparently that's illegal
00:57:56.100 thank you for listening to for the wild podcast the music you heard today was by jonathan yance
00:58:11.540 nathan keck lisabeth russo and cd torre for the wild is created by ayana young
00:58:17.840 erica ekram francesca glassbell and melanie younger
00:58:26.100 Amen.