If Books Could Kill - March 30, 2023


The Dumbest Campus Controversies Of The Last Decade [TEASER]

Topics
Hillbilly Elegy Rich Dad Poor Dad

Episode Stats


Length

20 minutes

Words per minute

171.07

Word count

3,481

Sentence count

238

Harmful content

Misogyny

4

sentences flagged

Toxicity

34

sentences flagged

Hate speech

9

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 Peter. Michael. What do you know about campus controversies?
00:00:04.360 I know that we're about to get very technical about the definition of banh mi. 0.94
00:00:23.220 So today I will be walking you through three of the dumbest campus free speech controversies
00:00:29.160 of the last decade in honor of our Coddling of the American Mind episode. 0.70
00:00:34.220 And yes, we are starting with the Bon Mi incident at Oberlin in 2015. 0.90
00:00:40.960 I knew it. 0.92
00:00:41.400 Do you want to walk me through what you know so far?
00:00:43.600 Yeah, my memory of this is relatively hazy.
00:00:46.620 But what I recall is that a student at Oberlin complained about cafeteria Bon Mi.
00:00:54.980 And I can't remember the format that they complained about it in.
00:00:57.880 but eventually this complaint trickled its way into right-wing media. And so what was a pretty
00:01:07.100 anodyne complaint about the quality of food at a cafeteria gets sort of laundered into a
00:01:16.360 meta discourse about whiny students complaining about woke stuff.
00:01:22.360 All of these college campus controversies are so much easier to understand as human behavior when you hear them in the order in which they happened.
00:01:32.340 So four years after this controversy, we finally get a retelling from the beginning from the Columbia Journalism Review of like what actually happened.
00:01:42.060 So we don't actually find this out until four years later.
00:01:44.080 The beginning of this story was basically a journalism professor at Oberlin was speaking
00:01:49.640 to one of his journalism students and she was pitching a story about how like the Vietnamese 1.00
00:01:53.640 food in the cafeteria like sucks ass. 1.00
00:01:56.300 The Chinese kids say the Chinese food sucks. 1.00
00:01:58.500 The Japanese kids say the Japanese food sucks. 0.99
00:02:00.380 And this is just like a pretty common gripe among international students. 1.00
00:02:03.880 I bet the American food sucks too. 0.97
00:02:05.180 Yeah, exactly. 0.99
00:02:05.800 It's cafeteria food.
00:02:06.980 This is an essential part of the student experience complaining about the cafeteria
00:02:10.560 food.
00:02:10.940 It's also an essential part of the student journalist experience. So the professor eventually is like, well, why don't you like write this up as a story? And like, this is so much student journalism is just like the lowest stakes, nothing burger ass thing. But it's like as a student journalist, you got to fill like 16 pages every week of the student newspaper.
00:02:31.540 My first article at My Student Newspaper was about seasonal allergies.
00:02:36.400 There wasn't any like new information or anything.
00:02:39.680 It was literally just like, it's April.
00:02:41.480 And so I remember like walking around the grassy areas of campus and just asking people
00:02:45.620 like, do you have allergies?
00:02:47.040 Do you have allergies?
00:02:47.880 And finally, I found somebody who did.
00:02:50.440 And the opening paragraphs of the article were like, every April, Jessica Smith gets 0.52
00:02:55.980 a stuffy nose and itchy eyes.
00:02:58.040 It's allergy season.
00:02:59.780 Nice.
00:02:59.940 That like that was basically the whole story, just like allergies exist. And one thing I really I like I deeply empathize with the people writing these stories, because it's like, this is student journalism, you're kind of practicing, right? You're learning what it's like to talk to random people, you're learning what it's like to package anecdotes and information into some sort of coherent structure.
00:03:19.920 so this student basically just like she trundles off to the cafeteria to like write up the fact
00:03:27.160 that international students have complaints about the international food and so i am going to send
00:03:32.660 you the first four paragraphs of her story okay deep win a college first year from vietnam jumped
00:03:39.600 with excitement at the site of vietnamese food on stevenson dining hall's menu at orientation this
00:03:44.560 year craving vietnamese comfort food win rushed to the food station with high hopes what she got
00:03:49.900 however, was a total disappointment. The traditional banh mi Vietnamese sandwich that
00:03:55.020 Stevenson Dining Hall promised turned out to be a cheap imitation of the East Asian dish.
00:03:59.960 Instead of a crispy baguette with grilled pork, pate, pickled vegetables, and fresh herbs,
00:04:04.740 the sandwich used ciabatta bread, pulled pork, and coleslaw. I do feel like it was undersold in
00:04:10.160 the press, the extent to which these students were correct about the food being shitties. 0.99
00:04:15.480 It was ridiculous, Wynne said. How could they just throw out something completely different 0.97
00:04:19.960 and label it as another country's traditional food? Wynne added that Bon Appetit, the food
00:04:23.960 service management company contracted by Oberlin College, has a history of blurring the line
00:04:28.060 between culinary diversity and cultural appropriation by modifying the recipes
00:04:31.940 without respect for certain Asian countries' cuisines. This uninformed representation of
00:04:36.740 cultural dishes has been noted by a multitude of students, many of who have expressed concern
00:04:42.280 over the gross manipulation of traditional recipes.
00:04:45.740 So here we have it.
00:04:46.960 It's basically just like, here's a student who's griping about the food.
00:04:50.260 Turns out lots of students gripe about the food.
00:04:52.420 I've never been on a campus where people were not complaining about the food providers.
00:04:56.820 And then we get to the two paragraphs that will launch years and years of takes.
00:05:05.700 And you are going to read them.
00:05:08.520 Perhaps the pinnacle of what many students believe to be a culturally appropriative
00:05:12.500 sustenance system is Daskom Dining Hall's sushi bar.
00:05:16.200 The sushi is anything but authentic for Tomoyo Joshi, a college junior from Japan who said
00:05:21.100 that the undercooked rice and lack of fresh fish is disrespectful.
00:05:25.000 She added that in Japan, sushi is regarded so highly that people sometimes take years
00:05:29.080 of apprenticeship before learning how to appropriately serve it.
00:05:32.120 When you're cooking a country's dish for other people, including ones who have never
00:05:35.220 tried the original dish before, you're also representing the meaning of the dish as well
00:05:38.920 as its culture, Joshi said. So if people not from that heritage take food, modify it and serve it
00:05:44.500 as authentic, it is appropriative. It is appropriative. I want to put a very fine point
00:05:51.020 on this. This entire thing of like students at Oberlin think that the food is cultural appropriation
00:05:56.420 appears to stem from literally one random student from Japan. This is of course used
00:06:04.060 to portray all American college students as, you know, snowflakes or whatever. But
00:06:07.980 it is weird to me that the fact that these are foreign students didn't seem to come up in the
00:06:12.340 discourse about it. Like, I feel like if anyone is allowed to complain about sushi, it's probably
00:06:16.240 like a Japanese person. It's totally sensible. Do I think that this is like the spot on definition 0.85
00:06:21.420 of cultural appropriation? Probably not. But it's like, you see what she's saying. Right. And also,
00:06:26.820 So at worst, one random foreign student maybe used wording that wasn't the most precise,
00:06:34.620 right?
00:06:34.920 Even if you disagree with this complaint, it's sort of like, okay, you know, maybe she could
00:06:39.840 have expressed that differently or maybe I would have expressed that differently.
00:06:42.920 But it's like, I also think it's important to stress that like this person is talking
00:06:46.200 off the cuff, right?
00:06:47.140 This isn't like a letter that they wrote and like really deliberated over every single
00:06:50.720 word.
00:06:51.100 This is probably the journalist wandering around the cafeteria for like an hour or two with a notebook and like sitting down next to students and being like, hey, you look like a foreign exchange student. Do you mind if I like talk to you for a little bit, like ask you about the food? These people did not contact the media.
00:07:07.840 Right. I also think that there's I don't know if this person was sort of prompted to go in this direction by the student journalist.
00:07:15.720 Right. Right. Right. But like like you said, these are necessarily low stakes issues.
00:07:21.080 And the student journalist might have an interest in making them seem a little higher stakes than they are.
00:07:27.620 Right. Like perhaps this isn't just that the cafeteria food sucks.
00:07:32.140 Maybe there's an amount of cultural insensitivity baked into this, too. 0.83
00:07:35.480 Right. And that's just sort of like some kid trying to make their story interesting. Yeah. It's not like something that represents a widespread viewpoint on campus or anything like that.
00:07:46.020 So what's also amazing to me is the rest of this story is actually super constructive. So the journalist interviews a kid from Malaysia who's like, I actually think the food's fine. And then she talks to people from the sort of the cultural clubs on campus.
00:08:00.580 You know, there's like the Chinese American club and there's like the Filipino club and stuff.
00:08:04.800 And a lot of them are like, yeah, we'd love to meet with the cafeteria and like talk about the way to present our dishes or maybe the way to prepare them or what to call them.
00:08:12.000 And the food director is like, yeah, we'd love to talk more with students about like how we can represent their cuisines better.
00:08:18.380 and so after this article runs this article runs in november of 2015 in december we then get a
00:08:25.760 follow-up article about the meeting that took place between various cultural clubs on campus
00:08:30.640 and the food director and like it seems like everybody just kind of sat down like adults
00:08:35.040 it seems like they came to some sort of compromise where they like wouldn't call it a bon me anymore
00:08:40.060 yeah well maybe don't call it a bon me you can call it like bon me inspired or something like
00:08:45.060 that. But ultimately, it seems like, okay, there's this fairly minor gripe among the students. And
00:08:51.240 then the adults are like, that's a fair point. Let's talk about it. And then they address it.
00:08:57.020 It's like, right, right. This is just all very normal stuff. No one's melting down. No one is
00:09:04.340 protesting anything. Not a national news story so far. Don't really see why I need to have known
00:09:10.400 about this at all. There's also, as a total coincidence, there is a group of black students 0.93
00:09:17.720 who are actually protesting the cafeteria. Apparently there's like a residence hall for
00:09:22.320 black students on the Oberlin campus. And there's been a process of updating the food to make it
00:09:28.160 more culturally appropriate. This is like something that's been going on for a while.
00:09:31.680 And I guess the effort was not very good. So at some point, the black students write an open 0.70
00:09:37.560 letter to the food service company with a bunch of demands. There's food stuff on there. They're 0.52
00:09:42.560 like, you know, a lot of the food involves cream and like we don't really use cream in a lot of
00:09:46.940 our cooking. Like we'd like you to have more consultation about like what kinds of foods
00:09:52.020 are appropriate. And then there's also stuff like we want better working conditions and we want
00:09:58.020 better procurement practices. There's like this petition open letter thing that has a bunch of
00:10:03.600 complaints on it. That's like kind of an ongoing issue. And there's one article in the Oberlin
00:10:09.160 student newspaper that says that they did, in fact, stage a protest outside of this one
00:10:14.920 residence hall for black students over the conditions of the food and the fact that the
00:10:19.860 company nor the university had responded to this open letter. So it's not totally clear how many
00:10:25.740 students protested. I remember when I was on campus, you'd see these protests of like three
00:10:30.100 people like outside of various like campus things. So it's not it's not clear like how widespread
00:10:36.280 this was. But it is true that at some point, some Oberlin students did have a protest involving
00:10:43.480 food. Right. Geared towards the food service company. Yes. So then six weeks goes by. And
00:10:49.740 then we get the first national media coverage. Hell yeah. Do you want to guess what what the
00:10:55.940 headline is? It appears in the New York Post in case that's a hint. I don't think I can put my
00:11:00.080 in the mind space of a new york post headline writer so just tell me all right i'm sending you 0.96
00:11:04.280 a screen grab it's it's a masterpiece holy shit i know oh the layers students at lena dunham's 0.95
00:11:18.000 college offended by lack of fried chicken oh man so one of the complaints in this open letter from 0.97
00:11:27.280 the black students was like culturally appropriate foods such as fried chicken should be served more
00:11:33.240 often this was like one of many bullet points right the new york post plucks that out is like 0.99
00:11:38.140 the central concern of these students yeah of course and also just throws fucking lena dunham 1.00
00:11:43.280 in there for no reason the lean there's like a an insert with lena dunham's face in the corner 0.89
00:11:49.580 So the opening paragraph, of course, leans into just like the most incendiary aspects of this.
00:11:58.640 So it says, students at an ultra liberal Ohio college are in an uproar over the fried chicken, sushi and Vietnamese sandwiches served in the school cafeteria, complaining the dishes are insensitive and culturally inappropriate.
00:12:13.560 Gastronomically correct students at Oberlin College, alma mater of Lena Dunham, are filling
00:12:18.500 the school newspaper with complaints and demanding meetings with campus dining officials and
00:12:23.360 even the college president.
00:12:25.200 If you read between the lines, it's all kind of there.
00:12:28.260 Yeah.
00:12:28.540 It's just like there's an open letter from these students.
00:12:31.740 Basically, it quotes this one Japanese student saying that it's cultural appropriation.
00:12:36.160 Right.
00:12:36.560 Right. So you have one one student newspaper piece quoting a student using the terminology of cultural appropriation.
00:12:43.600 You have a meeting between students and the food services administrators and you have a protest.
00:12:50.420 Right. The separate protest by black students that together weaves into the narrative of an uproar.
00:12:56.720 Right. Right. When it's probably a total of 25 students. 0.91
00:12:59.580 If I'm being generous, what they're basically doing is they're presenting the set of basic facts,
00:13:03.780 but they're presenting all of them in the most incendiary way possible that invites you to fill 0.96
00:13:09.600 in the gaps with all of this pre-existing students or snowflakes bullshit. Right. So it says students 0.99
00:13:15.020 are filling the campus newspaper with complaints and demanding meetings with campus dining officials.
00:13:20.820 Yeah. I mean, I guess in a purely technical sense. Yes. They're like, we'd like to sit down
00:13:26.040 and talk about this. And they're also not filling the student newspaper. Right. They're trying to
00:13:31.900 paint an image in your mind of a college where like if you went there right now people would
00:13:38.100 be talking about fried chicken this wasn't even a front page story in the student newspaper
00:13:43.020 the front page was the the allergy story
00:13:45.740 what appears to then happen over the next couple weeks is that it bounces around like the sort of 1.00
00:13:54.720 right-leaning media as like look at these idiot fucking college kids and then it bounces around 1.00
00:14:00.440 like the liberal media as like, there's a controversy going on over the dining hall 1.00
00:14:04.860 food. Have our young liberal allies overstepped once again? This produces one of the worst
00:14:09.800 Atlantic articles I've ever read. This is by Connor Friedersdorf. And he basically ends up
00:14:16.040 whipping a debate out of this rather than straightforwardly describing what's going on.
00:14:24.040 So, I'm sending you a couple paragraphs.
00:14:28.580 All right.
00:14:29.420 This story is hardly all there is to Oberlin.
00:14:32.320 It's an outlying story about a small number of students plucked by the tabloid most adept at trolling its readers from the stream of campus news.
00:14:39.180 There are dissenters at the school, and students at many campuses often complain about food in overwrought ways.
00:14:45.640 Decent start? 0.99
00:14:46.380 He's basically saying, like, look, this is total bullshit whipped up by right-wing media. 0.97
00:14:50.480 with the caveat that this is false exactly still it's possible to glean insights from the most 0.97
00:14:59.480 absurd events at oberlin as surely as it's possible to learn something about america by
00:15:04.280 observing the biggest black friday sales every subculture and ideology has its excesses and
00:15:11.520 oberlin where the subculture is unusually influenced by social justice activism can
00:15:17.540 starkly illuminate the particular character of that ideology's excesses.
00:15:22.400 So it's like, okay, look, this is fake and based on nothing and is entirely a product
00:15:27.340 of right-wing media, but we can still learn.
00:15:30.180 But what if we still constructed a narrative using those lies and exaggerations?
00:15:37.020 What if we could still tell a story?
00:15:38.900 What is amazing to me about this article is that Friedersdorf read the original piece.
00:15:44.380 Right.
00:15:44.440 Right. Like he went back to the student newspaper, which like a lot of the right wing media didn't do.
00:15:48.900 Right. And he still manages to frame this as like, what if what if there's a real problem underneath this?
00:15:54.780 He knows enough and has read enough to to realize that a caveat is necessary.
00:15:59.960 Right. Yes. He has seen the disparity between what actually happened and the coverage of it such that he is like, OK, well, I can't just credulously write about this.
00:16:10.840 I need to give the caveat up top that this isn't really of note.
00:16:17.520 Right.
00:16:17.900 And then I need to justify writing a piece for my employer, The Atlantic.
00:16:23.320 Two paragraphs later, he says, many people relate to the complaint.
00:16:27.280 Gosh, that food is awful.
00:16:28.680 Can't you dining hall people make it better?
00:16:30.640 Yet Oberlin culture reframed a banal, sympathetic complaint in a way that alienated millions.
00:16:39.720 Alienated.
00:16:40.240 It's one. It's a student complaining in a student newspaper.
00:16:45.940 It's literally not possible for that to alienate millions.
00:16:49.620 And also, like, they published this and then six weeks went by.
00:16:53.300 Right. They didn't alienate anybody.
00:16:54.840 They alienated like the four people that potentially read even halfway through the story to get to the Japanese student.
00:17:00.900 Am I alienating millions of people with my thought on the dining room food at Overland College?
00:17:06.980 Is is there something I mean, you know, I don't even I don't even have more to say about this.
00:17:11.860 This is just that's just like unreal language to use about a student's comment to a student newspaper journalist alienating millions of people.
00:17:22.100 He's like, in fairness, Lena Dunham is very annoying.
00:17:25.300 But then Friedersdorf quotes, I'm not kidding, a commenter on Rod Dreyer's blog calling this a cynical power play on the part of the students.
00:17:35.000 Yes. Connor then says, if this is a cynical power play on some level, its effectiveness
00:17:41.040 cannot be denied. And then he quotes from this article about how they sat down with the dining
00:17:45.840 director and how they came up with like this nice compromise plan. We play the national media like
00:17:50.500 a fiddle. The banh mi sandwiches at Oberlin are now called banh mi inspired. Like are people just
00:17:59.760 not supposed to make complaints about things that they want to change? Right. After this little
00:18:04.580 paragraph. He says the less cynical explanation is that these students really do feel culturally
00:18:10.220 disrespected by low wage dining hall staff making do with suboptimal ingredients. Oh, my God. Oh,
00:18:16.560 the less cynical explanation is that like the food sucks. Right. You're right, Connor. We should 0.96
00:18:20.540 entertain the possibility that everyone here was just talking about the food sucking in a completely
00:18:27.000 normal way. Thank you for inviting me to consider what is by far the most likely explanation.
00:18:32.580 You could be having this conversation by leading with that, because I think that is a fair critique.
00:18:38.780 Sure. You're looking at someone who's making almost no money and is being told, like, make this right.
00:18:45.040 Some cuisine they're totally unfamiliar with. But Connor is just using it as a cudgel to be like you insensitive pieces of shit. 1.00
00:18:54.880 And remember, the petition the black students circulated had better wages and working conditions for cafeteria workers on it. 1.00
00:19:02.300 Right. So they are actually concerned about it. Yes. What Conor is doing is the same thing that
00:19:06.980 conservatives always do, which is to when the left makes a complaint, point at another plight
00:19:14.120 and be like, well, you're ignoring that that person's plight. Right. Not because the conservatives
00:19:18.560 actually give a shit or have any interest in addressing that person's plight, but just so 0.98
00:19:24.980 that they can play marginalized people against each other. Exactly. And be able to talk about 0.98
00:19:29.900 how liberals and leftists don't actually care about this stuff, which they use as justification
00:19:37.760 for the fact that they don't care either.
00:19:40.380 It's always this is like such a common complaint about anybody pushing for social change.
00:19:44.120 Is it like they don't actually want this?
00:19:46.180 And it's kind of it's it's very funny to apply it to a case like this where it's like
00:19:51.760 they're eating in the cafeteria three times a day.
00:19:54.280 Right.
00:19:54.620 It actually makes a lot of sense to me that the food sucking would actually be something
00:19:58.840 that they genuinely want to change okay that was number one the the oberlin bon me controversy 0.99
00:20:06.200 it's so fucking stupid our next controversy is i think ultimately less important than the oberlin 1.00
00:20:12.520 one but far far dumber okay hell yeah this is the tale of the rapping librarian oh fuck yeah okay yes 1.00