In Bed With The Right - July 16, 2024


Episode 26: J.D. Vance with Gabe Winant

Topics
Episode 25: Richard Wagner: Act II Episode 27: Biden

Episode Stats


Length

53 minutes

Words per minute

171.14

Word count

9,104

Sentence count

437

Harmful content

Misogyny

4

sentences flagged

Toxicity

26

sentences flagged

Hate speech

27

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 Hello, I'm Adrian Daub.
00:00:09.380 And I'm Moira Donegan.
00:00:10.640 Whether we like it or not, we're in bid with the right.
00:00:15.100 So, Adrian, since we were last in the podcast feed, a lot of stuff has happened.
00:00:20.760 Yeah, yeah.
00:00:21.860 We should have just kept recording.
00:00:25.520 Us hours of, what?
00:00:27.820 No.
00:00:29.020 Really?
00:00:30.000 So we are recording now on Tuesday, July 16th, on day two of the Republican National Convention
00:00:38.340 and three days after an assassination attempt on Donald Trump and about 24 hours after the
00:00:47.140 announcement of J.D. Vance, Senator from Ohio, as Donald Trump's presidential nominee.
00:00:54.460 And I thought this was kind of an influencing confluence of events because, you know,
00:00:59.580 Trump's politics have always been about ventriloquizing a wounded middle American
00:01:06.060 white masculinity, right? And that has also been Vance's claim to fame, this sense of 0.51
00:01:13.140 embodying and vindicating the grievances of the forgotten white man. And now over this past
00:01:20.240 weekend, that wound has been made like really literal, right? Like it's actually a wound on
00:01:25.400 Trump's ear that is bleeding very picturesquely in those now famous photographs. And I thought
00:01:30.840 there was nobody I would really want to talk about this historical development with more than Gabe
00:01:37.420 Winant of the University of Chicago, who joins us here today. Gabe, thank you so much for being with
00:01:43.040 us. Thanks for having me. And so I should say you have sort of several connections to this. You've
00:01:48.680 written a beautiful essay in M Plus One about J.D. Vance, very prescient. And also your first book
00:01:54.860 was about sort of like the,
00:01:57.560 you in a scholarly way chart the transitions
00:02:00.320 that J.D. Vance kind of abreacts towards and against
00:02:04.400 in his famous hillbilly elegy, I would say, right?
00:02:07.460 Like you guys are sort of in,
00:02:09.260 however inchoate a form,
00:02:10.620 grasping at the same elephant,
00:02:11.800 except that he is running, you know,
00:02:14.800 kind of hog wild with it.
00:02:16.920 And you actually are analyzing
00:02:18.060 like how the structural transformation
00:02:19.640 of these areas really, you know, how,
00:02:22.540 well, I guess you're thinking more Rust Belt.
00:02:24.200 He's more Appalachia, but like he's from Ohio.
00:02:27.040 He's, you know, his grandparents left Kentucky.
00:02:29.840 So really he's thinking about,
00:02:31.220 there's a narrative of decline
00:02:32.580 that you kind of explore in a scholarly way.
00:02:35.260 And he kind of like turns, as Maura says,
00:02:37.720 into like grievance and trauma.
00:02:39.260 And so I'm really, really glad
00:02:40.800 that we get to talk to you about him.
00:02:42.940 Yeah, you know, I mean, I think he's actually,
00:02:44.900 he's an unpleasant figure to spend time with mentally,
00:02:48.460 but he's in some ways a rewarding one.
00:02:50.780 I think there's a kind of complexity to him
00:02:52.840 that Trump, for example, doesn't really have.
00:02:55.680 Right.
00:02:55.860 And so I'm looking forward to talking about it.
00:02:57.900 Yeah.
00:02:58.240 I also think Vance is a really interesting figure
00:03:00.280 because he's somebody who pitched himself in the 2010s
00:03:04.440 as sort of an intermediary or like a translator figure, right?
00:03:08.600 He's positioned himself with Hillbilly Elegy,
00:03:11.860 his runaway success of a memoir,
00:03:14.140 as someone who could be an empathetic and cogent
00:03:17.560 explicator of white working class grievance
00:03:21.580 kind of four liberal coastal elites, right?
00:03:24.080 He understood himself as,
00:03:25.380 or pitched himself as a bridge between the two worlds.
00:03:30.140 And that was a sort of marketing ploy
00:03:34.000 that a lot of white liberals really bought, right?
00:03:38.460 So, you know, J.D. Vance is also very much a product
00:03:42.360 of sort of elite liberal consensus
00:03:44.300 that I think also has to be the object of some soul searching.
00:03:49.940 So Gabe, would you walk us through J.D. Vance's rise
00:03:53.620 and sort of the myths that he wrote for himself
00:03:56.060 about his life?
00:03:57.060 And then we can maybe do some fact-checking.
00:03:59.020 Certainly.
00:03:59.840 So J.D. Vance, I think everyone knows at this point,
00:04:03.480 right, he, as you just said,
00:04:04.500 he first became well-known as a memoirist of a kind.
00:04:09.920 He's from Middletown, Ohio,
00:04:11.360 which it's true is not in Appalachia proper,
00:04:14.660 but there is an enormous kind of Appalachian,
00:04:16.580 some diaspora across the industrial Midwest
00:04:18.940 that he was part of and which does involve you know return in circuit migration and so on i
00:04:23.720 recommend max frazier's excellent book hillbilly highway on this and you know he grew up in and
00:04:29.980 this is the topic of the book a you know fairly difficult and sort of traumatic childhood
00:04:36.020 environment his mother struggled with addiction and much to his kind of chagrin in the book also
00:04:43.200 you know was in a sort of series of relationships with different men and he was raised in significant
00:04:48.380 ways by his grandparents, who are described in the book as mamaw and papa. His grandfather was
00:04:53.680 a steelworker, hence the connection to my own research, which is about Pittsburgh and the
00:04:58.220 transition from steel to healthcare. His grandfather was a steelworker, union member,
00:05:02.340 and his mother, in fact, was a nurse. Your other topic.
00:05:05.440 My other topic. So I wrote the essay that brings me here, actually prompted by Lisa Borst,
00:05:11.960 who works at N-Plus-One, when she observed that Hillbilly Elegy is a kind of upside-down
00:05:17.120 version of my book, or my book is an upside-down version of it in some way, that they seem to be
00:05:20.820 about the same thing. Anyway, Vance, you know, he had a kind of difficult childhood, I think
00:05:27.420 legitimately. That's what we're talking about. Made his way eventually, due in no small part,
00:05:31.980 to the help of his grandparents, first to the Marines, then to Ohio State, and then to Yale
00:05:37.240 Law School. And at Yale Law School, I met him there, actually. I did my PhD at Yale. I was
00:05:43.480 friends with Usha, who's now his wife, before they had met. Not very, very close, but actually
00:05:48.860 friends. And so when they started dating, I met him once or twice. I haven't had any contact with
00:05:53.320 her, much less him in more than a dozen years now. And at Yale Law School, he was mentored
00:06:01.420 by the infamous Amy Chua. 0.99
00:06:03.540 Chua pet. 0.61
00:06:04.860 Yes.
00:06:05.420 The tiger mom.
00:06:06.300 The tiger mom, exactly.
00:06:07.540 Who was also attracted controversy for her complicity or cover-up of her husband, Jed Rubenfeld's sexual harassment of Yale Law students, if I'm remembering correctly, this five-year-old scandal.
00:06:20.440 Yeah, there's been enormous kind of scandal circulating around Chua and Rubenfeld for years there now.
00:06:26.920 You can read any number of articles about it.
00:06:29.980 They're also closely linked to Brett Kavanaugh, for whom Usha clerks, I believe, at the Supreme Court.
00:06:36.140 and that's a kind of career path that you know from Chua Menti to Brett Kavanaugh-Clerk
00:06:41.100 anyway much of the book what the memoir is about or the later part of it is about you know how
00:06:46.360 kind of alienating and difficult the environment of Yale was and how Vance kind of learned to adapt
00:06:51.020 to it um and indeed the book is the product of that adaptation as you were saying Moira
00:06:55.400 basically giving a kind of culture of poverty account of his own origins you know this kind of
00:07:02.160 wonderful, hardscrabble, but pathological world where I grew up, where people are loyal to a
00:07:08.520 fault, but don't have a strong work ethic. And it's kind of a classic, I mean, about Appalachia
00:07:15.480 and in fact, about lots of places, right? This is a classic genre.
00:07:19.060 Yeah. If anything, the innovation is that he uses racist tropes on poor white people, right?
00:07:24.360 That if you replaced Appalachia with the South side of Chicago, we'd all be able
00:07:32.060 to, it'd be quite legible what this book is doing, but because it's about, you know,
00:07:37.280 Papa, it kind of seemed to have slipped people's notice.
00:07:40.940 Also the fact that like the people that you think you're getting explained to yourself,
00:07:44.900 right, are being, you know, not so faintly condescended to words.
00:07:50.960 Also says a lot about 2016 that this could really become the best sell that it did.
00:07:55.900 There are like actually weird racism arguments deployed against those poor whites.
00:08:02.360 At one point, Vance assigns at least some responsibility for what he diagnoses as the 0.96
00:08:08.240 pathologies of his community in the fact that they're of Scots-Irish descent and therefore
00:08:15.460 belligerent and not very hard workers. 0.98
00:08:18.820 It's real 1840s style racism.
00:08:21.360 This is a shockingly enduring kind of myth in American political culture. You may remember Jim Webb, the senator also, who has a whole book on this theme. And it's the kind of idea that, you know, the Scots-Irish were this kind of frontiersman Jacksonian kind of ethno class who built the country, right?
00:08:41.180 They crossed the Alleghenies and they settled the interior and, you know, they fought the Indians and they built the country, right? And they have a certain kind of, you know, hardscrabble fighting populist spirit that linked them to Andrew Jackson in the first place.
00:08:55.580 and that somehow endures kind of intact down into the present.
00:08:59.400 And, you know, it's illustrative of the general kind of thing
00:09:02.900 Vance is doing where he is appearing to participate.
00:09:07.700 I mean, he's appearing to kind of glorify or, you know,
00:09:13.460 honor his origins.
00:09:14.820 And if you're kind of not reading closely,
00:09:16.360 you might think that that's what he's doing.
00:09:17.940 And then if you kind of stop and think about it,
00:09:19.840 you realize that the contempt and the scorn in this
00:09:23.760 is just, you know,
00:09:25.660 although he doesn't seem to be aware of it, actually,
00:09:27.640 I think, and that's interesting
00:09:28.480 we're talking more about,
00:09:29.580 but it's just off the charts, right?
00:09:30.980 As, in fact, any kind of, you know,
00:09:32.740 such racialization is bound to communicate.
00:09:35.380 Right, so he is, to summarize,
00:09:38.460 he is making an assessment of this region
00:09:42.660 and its problems that are not economic or structural.
00:09:47.820 They are in a kind of like essentializing,
00:09:50.680 patronizing like cultural diagnosis that locates the problem in an unchangeable inherited facet
00:10:00.680 of the population right exactly and it was an amazing thing about the book if you read it
00:10:04.700 closely is again and again and again he will consider the pathologies of his region and his
00:10:10.420 people and his family and especially his mother right his mother is the main target of this and
00:10:15.320 it even operates with a kind of exceptionalism right the grandparents are the exception even
00:10:20.140 though, as you point out on your N plus one piece, if you read it even not that carefully,
00:10:24.460 it's clear that they're fully emblematic of whatever it is he's describing. They are fairly
00:10:29.820 prototypical residents of that area and members of their class. But he thinks of them as like
00:10:36.080 somehow exceptional in a way that frankly, having just spent a lot of time thinking about Clarence
00:10:40.860 Thomas is exactly how Clarence Thomas thinks of his grandparents, right? And like same kind of
00:10:45.540 scorn for the parental generation
00:10:47.640 and, right, like, kind of fixation
00:10:49.700 on, like, on grandparents, I think.
00:10:51.680 Yeah, so there's, I think, two things to say about this.
00:10:53.360 One, you know, he again and again
00:10:55.620 and again, in these kind of considerations
00:10:57.060 of the various kind of emblems of pathology,
00:10:59.080 sometimes people close to him, sometimes people far from him,
00:11:01.600 will entertain the possibility
00:11:03.560 that there's a structural explanation, right? 0.98
00:11:05.900 He's not a moron, 0.99
00:11:07.280 and he's capable of kind of thinking, 0.99
00:11:09.780 well, maybe there's a structural explanation there.
00:11:11.440 And then, without fail, what he'll do is say, like,
00:11:13.600 maybe, maybe not. Anyway, there's not.
00:11:15.540 Without, without any actual engagement with what such an explanation might be and how it might work to understand the situation.
00:11:21.640 So what that allows him to do, and this is the second piece, right, is then assign blame where he chooses.
00:11:27.840 And so, like, as you're saying, Adrian, he wants to assign blame to his mother and not to his grandparents. 0.99
00:11:33.680 And I'm not here to say, you know, screw his grandparents, they're bad people.
00:11:38.080 Certainly not.
00:11:38.840 And in fact, you do get, you do come away from the book quite liking his grandparents and especially his grandmother in a certain way, right?
00:11:45.080 But I say in the essay, every moment in the whole book that's actually moving at all and
00:11:50.860 not totally contaminated by his worldview is about the actual love of his grandparents
00:11:56.880 for him.
00:11:57.380 And that's clear, right?
00:11:58.800 But what's important about it is that he's not able to see his grandparents as people
00:12:07.760 caught up in the structural disinvestment and abandonment of the working class and the
00:12:14.920 Appalachia in a way that's similar to say what is happening to his mother or to the various father
00:12:21.020 figures, uh, or to the other people in his community. Right. So like for some people there
00:12:26.700 is, um, blame for a few, particularly his grandparents, there's sort of, uh, exception
00:12:33.980 and excuse. And for no one is there actual analysis, right. Which would be to move beyond
00:12:40.860 the kind of moralizing view, right?
00:12:42.440 Like in my way of looking at the world,
00:12:45.020 you know, to understand what has happened to people
00:12:47.040 and the way that that has affected their relationships
00:12:49.280 is not to blame them.
00:12:50.620 And in fact, it's to understand them and humanize them.
00:12:53.340 But he's interested in dealing with the people around him
00:12:55.620 as kind of cardboard cutouts of good or bad.
00:12:57.960 Which is also kind of where the fact
00:12:59.660 that this is a memoir sort of,
00:13:02.280 you know, sort of this is,
00:13:03.680 I mean, as a literary critic, right?
00:13:04.860 Like this is the demonic side of the memoir
00:13:06.820 and that it like relentlessly personalizes
00:13:09.360 And that can be very, very humanizing and wonderful, but it can also in the wrong hands
00:13:14.200 be deeply regressive.
00:13:15.780 I mean, this is so interesting, right?
00:13:17.480 You write in the piece that what links Vance the memoirist and Vance the politician is
00:13:21.620 a continuous policy of nearly absolute non-confrontation with what made him who he is, right?
00:13:27.580 And like, of course, the pitch of the book is finding out what made him who he is, but
00:13:32.100 it's just about the grandparents and the parents.
00:13:34.240 It's not about like, yeah, as you say, structures of investment, you know, class relations.
00:13:40.000 And even when we get to the kind of class questions, sort of fish out of water stuff at Yale, especially, right? 0.96
00:13:45.880 Like, you know, far be it from me to say what happened and didn't happen, but a lot of that shit didn't happen, right?
00:13:52.540 Like, it's just, he has, you know, it's this kind of, the kind of writerly flourish clearly takes over.
00:13:58.540 And like he names real disconnects and real kind of structural inequalities at Yale and about the fact that places like that don't draw equally from across the United States.
00:14:09.560 But the kind of episodes and anecdotes he provides for it feel very memoiristic in the sense, right?
00:14:18.320 Like that again, like there's no question about like no criticism of the institution, more of the people in it and sort of their individual shittiness kind of.
00:14:28.540 Right. I mean, I would be the last person to say you shouldn't feel bad when you arrive at Yale. I mean, again, I spent eight years there. Everyone I know who got there, who didn't come from the upper crust of the American aristocracy, felt the violence of the institution in some way. You can't not.
00:14:46.960 what's distinct about Vance's reaction
00:14:51.200 is that he feels it as like,
00:14:53.060 oh, I don't know which fork to use.
00:14:54.680 I don't know which wine to order.
00:14:56.040 Right.
00:14:56.600 Right.
00:14:56.800 And that's a fair way of feeling it
00:14:58.080 as a kind of first cut.
00:14:59.160 Sure.
00:14:59.840 Right. 0.70
00:15:00.180 And then, you know, Amy Chua or, you know,
00:15:02.840 Usha, his girlfriend says,
00:15:03.720 use this fork, order that wine.
00:15:04.880 And he's like, oh, okay.
00:15:06.800 All good.
00:15:07.680 Right.
00:15:09.180 And is unable to recognize in a proper way,
00:15:14.340 I think that the actual class dimensions
00:15:16.960 of what he's experiencing,
00:15:18.540 which is to say something
00:15:19.400 not particular to him.
00:15:22.340 He thinks something unique
00:15:23.600 in particular is happening to him
00:15:25.080 in this place that is like,
00:15:26.740 you just, you can't find
00:15:27.740 a better emblem
00:15:28.580 of American inequality
00:15:29.820 than New Haven.
00:15:31.000 Yeah.
00:15:31.520 You know, it's this de-industrialized 1.00
00:15:33.200 black and brown city with, 1.00
00:15:35.040 I mean, it used to be,
00:15:36.220 people would always describe it
00:15:37.700 and may still have when he was there
00:15:38.840 as one of the poorest cities in America.
00:15:40.260 I don't think that's true anymore,
00:15:41.400 but that was still certainly circulating
00:15:43.220 as I think people said
00:15:44.020 about New Haven in the 2010s.
00:15:46.060 Yeah. 0.63
00:15:46.960 you know, white, I mean, all students arriving there, especially white students are kind of, 0.52
00:15:50.280 you know, instructed in like the neighborhoods that shouldn't go in immediately and all this
00:15:53.520 kind of thing. And he just like, can't clock that as like that, that he's in a place like where he's
00:16:00.340 from, right. A place that has also been devastated by de-industrialization and is suffering a whole
00:16:05.580 bunch of really familiar problems as a result. And that's racism, right? I mean, the way to
00:16:09.900 understand that is that it's racism, but it's not just, it's analytically important, not just
00:16:14.020 because it's like, oh, let's catch J.D. Vance as a racist, although he is, but because it tells you
00:16:19.000 that his way of thinking about class and class inequality and class relations is completely
00:16:27.220 mediated and kind of permeated by race and racism, right? So he's not able to actually think the
00:16:33.840 thought that he has anything in common with this place. That's just like where he's from.
00:16:39.340 So let's move on to Vance's sort of post-Yale career, right?
00:16:47.220 Because he really plays up his origins as a, you know, orphaned son of de-industrialization.
00:16:58.100 But I think he pays a little less attention when he's making this public pitch for his own authenticity to his time as a, you know, a Silicon Valley venture capitalist.
00:17:08.980 Can you tell us a little bit about that part of his life?
00:17:11.960 Yeah.
00:17:12.440 So basically Vance, you know, he kind of bursts onto the scene around 2015, 2016.
00:17:18.220 He writes some things for National Review and places like this.
00:17:20.520 He publishes the book.
00:17:21.800 It's a huge sensation.
00:17:22.940 As you were saying, beginning of the conversation, Laura, it's very heavily promoted by liberals,
00:17:29.000 right, who are thrilled to have someone come along and explain the Trump phenomenon to 1.00
00:17:35.860 them in terms of you know these idiots in appalachia who can't help themselves right 0.99
00:17:43.440 that's a very convenient thing uh for the you know like elite liberal intelligentsia whatever 0.96
00:17:52.320 to hear and so that that is his creation as a kind of cultural um voice and the book is a huge
00:17:58.960 um right makes him rich um and then his kind of uh yeah he does a judicial clerkship and
00:18:08.140 usha more precisely legal career but eventually he winds up in san francisco working for peter
00:18:13.060 teal um the venture you know the i'm sure you have talked about him the friend of the show
00:18:19.420 talked about him. I've talked with him
00:18:21.380 many times.
00:18:24.640 And
00:18:25.160 you know, Peter Thiel eventually
00:18:27.700 seeds Vance's
00:18:29.860 own VC firm,
00:18:31.660 Narya Capital, which is
00:18:33.700 the Lord of the Rings motif
00:18:35.760 that the Thiel empire.
00:18:37.660 Yeah, it's one I don't even recognize, and I'm a
00:18:39.560 Tolkien nerd. What is Narya? 0.78
00:18:41.360 I hate Tolkien.
00:18:45.800 I don't know what it is.
00:18:46.960 I bet you that Peter Thiel
00:18:49.260 just has like a spreadsheet
00:18:50.420 some kind of thing of power
00:18:52.460 we have a taxonomy 0.99
00:18:55.360 of right wing masculinities
00:18:57.140 and
00:18:57.780 Thiel falls pretty firmly into
00:19:01.240 what we call the creep
00:19:02.340 JD Vance
00:19:05.500 is comfortable with the creep
00:19:06.860 anyway go on
00:19:08.660 so he starts his own he moved back to Ohio
00:19:11.480 I think in 2017
00:19:12.900 18 maybe I forget exactly when
00:19:15.680 he briefly runs a non-profit that's supposed to be you know kind of doing something about
00:19:22.060 the opioid crisis and never really does um and uh i think the most significant thing about him
00:19:28.540 across these years is that he politically reorients himself right so the curtis yarwin
00:19:34.140 contact right yeah yeah so and you know by the end of the decade he's clearly positioning himself
00:19:41.840 to enter politics
00:19:43.280 kind of on the right wing,
00:19:44.900 you know,
00:19:45.100 on the kind of populist far right,
00:19:47.060 much to the shock
00:19:48.340 of the liberals
00:19:49.120 who loves him,
00:19:49.940 you know,
00:19:50.440 who are not really able
00:19:52.560 to see the continuity,
00:19:53.860 which we can talk more about.
00:19:54.880 I think there's a really important
00:19:55.840 thread of continuity.
00:19:57.180 Yeah.
00:19:58.840 But anyway,
00:19:59.860 you know,
00:20:00.760 this eventually,
00:20:01.620 you know,
00:20:02.220 leads him to run for Senate
00:20:03.680 in 2022
00:20:04.760 when a seat becomes open.
00:20:09.240 Bankrolled by Peter Thiel, right?
00:20:10.600 Bankrolled by Peter Thiel.
00:20:11.480 I think in the biggest single individual expenditure on a U.S. Senate race ever.
00:20:17.120 Oh, wow.
00:20:18.060 And this was a pretty bad or at least worse than expected cycle for Republican candidates,
00:20:25.340 including a few that Thiel had backed elsewhere.
00:20:28.240 He had that odious little like serpentine guy in Arizona.
00:20:33.200 Yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:20:33.880 Blake Masters.
00:20:35.000 Blake Masters, I also do slightly in college.
00:20:37.660 I really feel like there's something cursed.
00:20:39.140 Oh my God.
00:20:39.660 Yeah.
00:20:41.480 Um, but you know, this is, he was, um, an outlier in that cycle when he won that Senate seat.
00:20:51.140 Yeah. I mean, Ohio has become a pretty Republican state. I think the general consensus is like,
00:20:56.760 uh, you know, in the current, in the current state of things, a Democrat is just,
00:21:01.120 you know, really not likely to win under almost any circumstance. I mean, you know,
00:21:04.620 maybe Sherrod Brown, the incumbent will win this year. I don't know. Um, but it, it, so
00:21:09.620 advance sort of slightly underperformed Republicans nationally and Republicans nationally slightly
00:21:14.400 underperformed expectations or whatever uh he ran against Tim Ryan who kind of did this like
00:21:19.720 uh you know populist but not in a left-wing way kind of thing um right anti-Chinese a Democrat
00:21:28.320 Democratic congressman from North Asian Ohio to you know anti-Chinese kind of thing um
00:21:33.700 that was a real centerpiece campaign.
00:21:35.700 It was not convincing.
00:21:38.480 And he did not have as coherent a message as Vance Vance Vance.
00:21:42.460 Yeah, and to be honest,
00:21:43.820 probably there was no Democrat and no message
00:21:45.680 that was going to win in that situation, I would guess.
00:21:48.660 But anyway, Vance wins in part,
00:21:51.420 or crucially, really in whole,
00:21:53.660 thanks to the endorsement of Trump in the primary, right?
00:21:56.900 There's a contested primary,
00:21:58.720 a bunch of really freaky candidates are running.
00:22:00.600 Don Jr.
00:22:04.160 Struck up a relationship with J.D.
00:22:06.320 At some point, I'm not sure when exactly,
00:22:08.680 in the run-up to the primary
00:22:09.640 and convinced his dad to endorse him.
00:22:12.260 And it's just great videos of Trump
00:22:13.960 campaigning for Vance.
00:22:17.780 And, you know, doing the Trump thing,
00:22:19.440 which just articulates in an unmediated way.
00:22:22.280 The things.
00:22:23.340 Yeah, and he just says, like,
00:22:24.780 J.D.'s kissing my ass. 1.00
00:22:26.080 He wants my support so bad. 1.00
00:22:27.740 After he's already endorsed him, you know?
00:22:30.600 I do think there's a kind of psychoanalytic thing going on with the J the Vance Trump relationship that we could also talk about um but uh yeah so that you know he he wins the primary on that basis he wins in general election on the basis of Ohio being a Republican state um and you know becomes a voice in Washington for the kind of uh you know populist right um you know including these very freaky speeches
00:23:00.580 He gives it CPAC periodically, you know, and he talks about like the debossification of the American government, you know, the purge of the left, you know, from, from civil service.
00:23:10.320 And, you know, his campaign involved tons of very obvious kind of references to great replacement theory and, right.
00:23:19.520 He just, he's in that world.
00:23:21.060 A lot of creepy, like pro-natalist, like almost trad wifey propaganda stuff going on.
00:23:30.580 He's like, we need to have more babies.
00:23:32.900 Quote, unquote, our people are not having enough babies.
00:23:36.900 He characterizes child care subsidies as an attack on, quote, unquote, normal people.
00:23:43.440 Says that women should not leave marriages in which they are being abused.
00:23:47.600 Has been one of these Republicans coming out against no-fault divorce.
00:23:53.360 You know, he's got a really specific, like, oppression of women agenda that he also starts stumping on about this time.
00:24:01.920 Definitely. 0.74
00:24:02.420 And, you know, I mean, in a way that I think is going to be not possible for Democrats to figure out how to communicate in national politics, he's just part of this kind of, like, Nazi internet world. 0.75
00:24:13.480 I mean, he, like, for example, I don't know if this will mean anything to you all, but, like, he was on Amy Teresa's podcast, for example, and he was running for Senate. 0.86
00:24:19.580 you know he like follows bronze age pervert on twitter he's just like he's in that scene
00:24:26.020 he is incredibly online i feel like there's um a way in which we have maybe understated the amount 0.85
00:24:33.820 that like this millennial republicans are just completely brain poisoned from the right-wing
00:24:41.540 social media sphere and how it is uh really shaped their politics in a way that i think is
00:24:48.840 much more commented upon when it happens to like democratic staffers who, you know, start saying
00:24:54.200 Latinx or whatever. But, you know, Republican staffers are too online and they become like
00:25:00.520 actual Nazis and monarchists. You know, it's a, it's a very asymmetrical.
00:25:04.680 Well, we notice it. We notice it when it happens to Silicon Valley billionaires, I suppose,
00:25:08.140 but we don't notice it that it's also happening to, yeah, to Republican vice presidential
00:25:13.540 candidates. I should also note.
00:25:15.500 He is the exact conjunction, right?
00:25:17.480 Silicon Valley, right-wing billionaires
00:25:18.900 and Republican politics.
00:25:20.020 Exactly, yeah.
00:25:21.120 I should also mention that he is,
00:25:22.580 on a personal note,
00:25:23.420 the first vice presidential candidate,
00:25:25.960 I think, younger than me, 0.99
00:25:26.920 which like, fucking A. 1.00
00:25:28.600 This just sucks. 0.99
00:25:31.720 Yeah, there's definitely going to be 0.99
00:25:32.700 a lot of like tedious generational commentary.
00:25:35.260 Like the first millennial VP, you know,
00:25:39.220 but I think we can maybe save that. 0.95
00:25:40.940 Break out the oat milk lattes.
00:25:43.980 Or avocado toast.
00:25:45.360 What do we do?
00:25:45.840 I don't even know.
00:25:47.340 But he's got a,
00:25:48.880 his cultural signifiers are actually pretty,
00:25:51.940 they're very heavy handed.
00:25:53.840 They're very deliberate.
00:25:55.560 Yeah.
00:25:56.380 They seem affected, right?
00:26:02.340 But like you mentioned, Gabe,
00:26:03.880 in your wonderful essay,
00:26:05.940 the M plus one that everybody should read,
00:26:08.100 this ad he says that he put out
00:26:10.440 when he was running for Senate
00:26:11.380 that was like,
00:26:12.020 are you a racist? 0.97
00:26:13.660 Do you hate Mexicans in this like kind of wink, wink way where he purports to be parodying like hyperbolic, hysterical liberal characterizations of Ohio voters. 0.98
00:26:27.220 But he's actually just suggesting like, like you, I am a racist and that's why you should vote for me.
00:26:33.780 You know, it's very internet in that it is a simultaneous disavowal through ironic distance and like subterranean avowal with plausible deniability.
00:26:44.540 Does that make sense?
00:26:45.600 That's exactly right, I think.
00:26:47.060 Yeah.
00:26:47.920 I mean, you know, you would never be able to get him to answer, I think, like why it is that he simultaneously thinks our people need to have more babies, right, to reverse the decline in fertility.
00:27:01.520 And also we need to remove, you know, so-called illegal aliens or whatever you would call them, right, in order to increase American workers, you know, labor market power, right?
00:27:15.500 Like those two positions are only reconcilable through racism, right?
00:27:20.400 It's the only logic that makes sense there.
00:27:24.340 And, you know, he knows that, right?
00:27:26.400 um and he's friends with all these people as you were saying like curtis yarvin and so on who
00:27:32.380 and teal right who are very open about you know thinking the races are biologically different
00:27:38.540 and have different iq levels and are like differently likely to commit crime and all
00:27:42.500 of this stuff that's back now right he's just like he's in that scene he thinks that it's the
00:27:46.540 only way his position to make sense but he's um able to do this thing about saying yes and no at
00:27:52.580 the same time now. This might be a moment, Gabe, for us to circle back to that continuity, right?
00:27:58.320 Because I think over the past couple of days, since J.D. Vance got this nomination, there has
00:28:03.440 been a lot of talk about how he positioned himself, you know, five, 10 years ago as an
00:28:11.600 anti-Trump or a never-Trump guy, you know, called him the American Hitler, called him the heroine
00:28:16.260 of the population, et cetera, et cetera. But I think what I'm seeing from you here is actually
00:28:22.140 degree of intellectual continuity, right?
00:28:24.120 I mean, I think for one thing, it's a little bit credulous for these people to be pointing
00:28:27.280 out his previous statements as if those were the sincere ones, and now he has changed.
00:28:34.520 But, you know, you have sort of drawn this line of racist, essentializing, you know,
00:28:46.140 sort of willfully blind characterizations of what's happening in the U.S.
00:28:52.120 that I think, you know, are there in Hillbilly Elegy,
00:28:54.940 not just now in his like much more upfront racism?
00:28:59.780 Yeah, I mean, I think that, you know,
00:29:01.320 there's certainly a thread of continuity in terms of racism and essentialism and so on.
00:29:06.940 But I think there's even a kind of more profound one in a way,
00:29:10.140 which is about like the assignment of blame.
00:29:13.840 um right the kind of personalistic assignment of blame uh in place of the kind of explanation
00:29:22.300 of inequality and social you know processes through life structure right i mean this is
00:29:27.800 again i can't overstate how much you see this in the book if you read it right they just
00:29:32.540 like every page he's like maybe it's a structure no probably not um and that kind of energy that
00:29:39.220 he's devoting to suppressing that possibility I think uh opens up two possible kind of modes that
00:29:48.060 he could he could go or pass he could go down in terms of how did how he interprets the world
00:29:53.500 one is it's the fault of the victims right and that's like what hillbilly elegy does
00:29:58.060 um is like the people who have been abandoned by american capitalism and you know betrayed by it
00:30:05.020 and had their, you know, communities destroyed by it,
00:30:08.200 it's their fault because they don't work hard
00:30:09.820 for racial essential reasons. 0.91
00:30:13.700 And that was a very popular, you know,
00:30:16.940 that was a very popular line
00:30:18.160 for a certain kind of elite liberal audience,
00:30:19.800 as we've been saying.
00:30:20.900 Then when the opportunity emerged
00:30:22.680 to reorient himself politically,
00:30:24.940 he took the other route, which was,
00:30:28.460 it's the fault of a kind of shadow
00:30:29.860 and conspiracy of elites who are, you know, 0.80
00:30:32.220 malicious and evil.
00:30:33.480 And, you know, far be it for me to say
00:30:34.880 that the american elite is not malicious and evil but that's also actually not an explanation right
00:30:38.900 because like um he is also part of an american elite right as we've been saying he is a millionaire
00:30:45.460 he's integrated into this world of silicon valley billionaires who have their own elitist agenda
00:30:50.500 obviously um and uh so that's just a kind of line about like well we're good elites they're bad
00:30:57.580 elites right which is a very common kind of yeah really getting universal thing in fact in right
00:31:01.780 wing populism like right-wing populism universally is about an interpretation in which different
00:31:06.960 elites are in competition with each other yeah uh and and like the people are never actually
00:31:12.420 capable of ruling themselves um so he's gone from like it's the fault of the poor to it's the fault
00:31:17.980 of these bad rich guys not like us good rich guys but in either case is there like an ability to
00:31:22.260 actually think about um you know the structure of our society right and the way that like the way
00:31:28.220 that we've arranged our society the way that um you know american capitalism works uh being the
00:31:36.360 thing that uh you know is to blame as opposed to kind of personal you know shortcomings or villain
00:31:42.800 right so like the new version is the basically the great replacement theory and he you know won't say
00:31:47.600 like oh it's like jews plotting to bring in mexicans to replace white people but that's what
00:31:52.800 all his fought like his kind of ideological you know online buddies think and since he's been
00:31:56.900 nominated for vice president you know i mean i just saw on twitter this morning um you know like
00:32:02.060 benjamin braddock who's like a right-wing influencer guy yeah he's one of one of many
00:32:06.380 like him he's not distinctive in any way but you know um he was commenting on the fact that
00:32:10.840 vance's wife is indian uh to say um you know maybe there's an ancient symbol of renewal that
00:32:16.980 they could be displaying at the convention meeting a swastika right um and like that like he the kind 0.52
00:32:25.260 of personalization of, uh, blame for, you know, racial transformation and economic immiseration
00:32:35.120 onto a kind of malicious, sinister elite that's operating behind closed doors, right? That is,
00:32:40.880 it is Nazism, right? I mean, he hasn't quite articulated it at that level, but that is
00:32:45.600 basically what it is. So, um, that's, I think the threat of continuity, right? It's like how he
00:32:50.960 personalizes blame, as opposed to engaging with the very real thing that the book is
00:32:57.680 about, right?
00:32:58.660 Which is like the actual misery of people who have suffered economically, engaging with
00:33:04.200 it as something that can be explained at a level other than individual.
00:33:08.540 Yeah, it seems to me that the other one, of course, is, as you were saying, kind of about
00:33:12.240 the idea that the wrong elite is in charge, right?
00:33:17.160 I mean, he is very, very comfortable, clearly, in elite spaces.
00:33:20.760 And I mean, ironically, for someone who made his name kind of being the spokesperson for
00:33:26.480 people that sort of don't penetrate into a bubble like Yale, he spent really an inordinate
00:33:32.180 amount of time with some of the most insulated people on the planet, right?
00:33:37.040 Yale Law School, Silicon Valley, and the US Senate.
00:33:40.680 But, you know, like, you're, you know, there's just, there's also just kind of a, there's an incuriosity to all of it.
00:33:47.300 I mean, it's a wounded incuriosity because, you know, so much clearly comes, as you say, out of his own personal traumas, which are legitimate and right, like, and you're not going to sort of wave away.
00:33:57.340 But it's interesting that he rose to prominence miming kind of curiosity when in fact he is really matched only by his running mate in lack of curiosity what the Americans he seems so eager to represent are actually like and doing.
00:34:16.120 Yeah, I mean, I have to admit that I sometimes think that the whole essay I wrote is like, it is just like men would rather become fascist dictators than go to therapy.
00:34:27.340 i mean there is an explicit passage in the essay or in the book rather about uh you know how he
00:34:34.320 doesn't want to go to therapy therefore like tries to understand his you know genuine mental
00:34:40.360 health struggles which you can't blame him for having um for you know like kind of through
00:34:45.900 force of will or something like that right and i do think you can see his whole trajectory
00:34:49.420 as a series of displacements of you know this set of like real traumas from real challenging
00:34:55.820 childhood circumstances, he just places again and again and again as a way of not actually
00:35:03.040 understanding himself and his world and where he comes from.
00:35:06.400 Yeah.
00:35:06.660 Yeah.
00:35:07.040 You know, this might be a good place to return to your point about the psychoanalytic explanation
00:35:12.120 for Trump or for Vance's relationship with Trump.
00:35:15.420 I think there's like one like very vulgar Freudian analysis that just diagnoses this
00:35:20.580 guy as mommy issues, right?
00:35:21.840 And you can, you know, explicate his gender politics, which are very extremist and very resentful towards women and, you know, gender minorities in the sense of, you know, his mother failed to perform this nurturing subservient role of caretaking and presence and sort of fixated attention on him.
00:35:50.940 And therefore, he is going to compel all the nation's other mothers to do so by force, right?
00:35:57.560 Another recurring theme in his gender politics statements is his real hatred and resentment for childless women.
00:36:04.460 It's like a bizarre fixation he has that he returns to over and over again.
00:36:10.720 But then I think his relationship with other men are also really telling.
00:36:17.000 Could you tell us a little bit about that Trump endorsement and this sort of like,
00:36:20.040 uh almost like desperately sycophantic relation with trump himself yeah well i mean i think in
00:36:25.600 general like it's clear that uh or it's easy to see let me put it like that it's easy to see just
00:36:31.100 from his memoir from his public record the way vance is constantly reconfecting to new parental
00:36:38.420 figures mainly men although not only right i mean is an interesting character there too um
00:36:44.660 but like he lets these parental figures remake him really intensely right um and that's the story
00:36:53.880 he tells about Amy Chua is like he doesn't know what to do he's out of place at Yale she remakes
00:36:57.960 him um and then he repudiates that remaking right for Keel and then for Trump um and uh you know
00:37:08.080 But, I mean, the sycophancy for Trump, it's just like, you know, it's amazing he's not more embarrassed and humiliated. 0.75
00:37:16.020 It's absolutely slavish. 0.79
00:37:17.580 It's actually- 0.95
00:37:18.120 Had to have prostrated himself the way he, yeah.
00:37:20.380 And it works against his politics of masculine domination, right?
00:37:24.080 I mean, being Trump's vice president is always a kind of emasculating position.
00:37:28.820 I think Mike Pence was almost deprived of manhood by the end of his service in that position.
00:37:38.920 Well, almost deprived of his neck.
00:37:40.840 Yeah, I know.
00:37:42.360 But his pitch is that he is a strong man, right?
00:37:48.140 And the strong man necessarily has no boss.
00:37:51.260 But J.D. Vance is so clearly desperate
00:37:54.860 for this transformative,
00:37:57.440 redeeming father figure
00:37:59.580 that it very clearly seems like
00:38:02.060 there are people who can get J.D. Vance
00:38:04.720 to do things not in his interest and will.
00:38:08.540 Yeah, I'm not so sure.
00:38:09.980 I mean, I have to say,
00:38:10.860 I think the basic logic of what you're saying is true,
00:38:13.080 but I also think Vance betrays his parents systematically.
00:38:17.660 Not to say we should be hopeful
00:38:19.280 that he'll like betray Maga
00:38:20.480 or something like that.
00:38:21.460 But like, you know,
00:38:22.400 the whole book is a betrayal of his mother
00:38:24.200 and in a suppressed way, his grandmother.
00:38:27.700 I think it's like,
00:38:28.900 there's no other way of reading it
00:38:30.340 than a repudiation of these people,
00:38:32.360 an unconscious one, right?
00:38:33.460 Because he thinks it's praiseful,
00:38:34.500 but it's like the hatred is just under the surface.
00:38:37.620 Yeah.
00:38:39.860 And, you know,
00:38:42.500 he like betrays Amy Chua
00:38:44.360 in the world of elite liberalism and so on, right?
00:38:46.800 That he came out of there.
00:38:49.120 And like, that makes sense
00:38:50.920 in this psychoanalytic register.
00:38:52.720 He is trying to get parents
00:38:54.840 who will, you know,
00:38:57.080 like provide him the thing
00:38:58.260 that his wound wants.
00:39:02.440 He can't find them
00:39:03.380 because no one can do that for him.
00:39:04.480 Obviously, that's something
00:39:05.080 he has to do for himself.
00:39:06.460 And then finding that again and again, 1.00
00:39:08.020 he kills those parents. 0.99
00:39:09.380 I mean, symbolically. 1.00
00:39:11.540 The other thing you point to
00:39:12.460 is that his whole self-presentation
00:39:14.980 is, and I quote this,
00:39:16.160 built on the notions of willpower
00:39:17.520 and self-discipline
00:39:18.280 that are at the heart of pop psych and self-help genres.
00:39:21.280 And that's the other thing here, right?
00:39:22.420 This is our first millennial candidate,
00:39:25.720 meaning like, isn't this also how self-help gurus
00:39:29.940 kind of function, like the Andrew Tates of the world,
00:39:32.120 both this kind of like hyper-masculinity
00:39:34.400 that is so obviously lacking the thing it projects,
00:39:38.400 but also the fact that it's so obviously apes other people
00:39:43.440 and sort of follows, slavishly follows their prescriptions. 0.98
00:39:46.900 in order to then murder them, right? 0.89
00:39:49.660 Like there is this kind of, 0.99
00:39:51.100 like in order to substitute itself for them
00:39:52.780 because like they can only be one grift
00:39:54.260 at any given time.
00:39:55.380 And like, that's the other thing here, right?
00:39:57.400 Like that this is almost like two kind of grifters,
00:40:00.740 the aging one and the younger one
00:40:02.820 sort of doing one score.
00:40:05.900 And the question is who's gonna end up chained
00:40:07.660 to the vault when the cops finally show up, right?
00:40:10.340 There is a kind of element here of, you know,
00:40:14.300 the contradiction that Maura is identifying,
00:40:16.700 I think is both salient and actually so widespread
00:40:19.340 that I think it actually becomes a selling point.
00:40:21.760 Like this is, there are young men,
00:40:23.540 especially in this country who are so inured to this pattern
00:40:26.200 that like it probably sweetens the deal
00:40:29.400 rather than making it any, giving them any pause.
00:40:34.040 Yeah, I think that's true.
00:40:35.180 I mean, I think the way in which like they are,
00:40:37.820 they will be read as a father and son team,
00:40:40.220 Trump and Vance, and the tension between them,
00:40:44.140 as well as the kind of collaboration between them
00:40:46.040 that is bound to come out of that,
00:40:47.680 I think it's easy to kind of see the outline of already, right?
00:40:50.440 I mean, there's no way that Trump doesn't retain some,
00:40:55.560 sorry, that Vance doesn't retain
00:40:56.900 some internal hidden kernel of scorn for Trump, right?
00:41:02.940 We don't know exactly how he would articulate it
00:41:04.900 or what the form of it would be.
00:41:07.680 I think it's wrong even to think of it
00:41:08.960 in terms of sincerity and insincerity and so on.
00:41:11.260 um but like the you know he surely thinks like trump was better than he expected as president
00:41:18.640 and i reoriented him or whatever but the things that he saw in trump can't be unseen
00:41:22.580 they're they're there obviously um and the initial betrayal uh of uh you know of that
00:41:33.920 right the advance called him american hitler and so on right like i mean trump obviously
00:41:38.440 relishes bringing this guy to heel but he also will remember that forever right and so like
00:41:43.060 you have to assume that that that will be the content of the form of a kind of father-son
00:41:49.400 rivalry right that will uh be collaborative in some way and also um you know involve vance
00:41:56.200 positioning himself to be the more serious you know intellectual ideologically committed version
00:42:01.360 and to, you know, distance himself subtly from Trump's idiosyncrasies and excesses.
00:42:08.480 And all that surely will happen, right?
00:42:10.480 And I wouldn't predict whether, you know, it will take the form in the end of Vance, like, you know, knifing Trump in some way.
00:42:16.880 But I do think that, I mean, he betrays his parents.
00:42:20.380 I think it is fundamental to who he is.
00:42:22.840 And he now has a new father, you know?
00:42:24.880 I can see a mob already screaming, hang JD Vance.
00:42:29.240 It's written in stone.
00:42:32.400 It almost feels like a prophecy
00:42:33.900 that there's going to be a rupture and instability.
00:42:36.780 I mean, the other problem though is of course
00:42:38.180 that that tension will work to their favor, won't it?
00:42:42.040 Because, you know, again,
00:42:44.440 a lot of the liberal commentariat and elites
00:42:46.680 helped make this guy
00:42:47.980 and they're still thinking that this man
00:42:52.100 that they liked in 2016 is still somewhere in there.
00:42:56.900 And if you think in that like people keep,
00:42:58.540 you know, that liberal media will look for a Trump pivot until the cows come home, right?
00:43:03.840 Like, they're going to wait even longer for J.D. Vance, right?
00:43:06.780 I mean, like, any tension within that White House, if they were to return to it,
00:43:11.120 would be interpreted, or even within the campaign, I think, would be interpreted in terms of, like,
00:43:16.220 oh, is Vance now staking out the more centrist ground that Trump sort of, you know, constitutionally can't occupy?
00:43:22.940 And, like, and of course, that's the thing.
00:43:24.580 he invites that kind of reading because, you know, the, you know, the newscasters of America
00:43:31.540 do not hang out in the spaces where he clearly gets most of his talking points and that we
00:43:37.400 have spent some time in and we're like, oh, oh, brother, no, this is not, this is not
00:43:41.520 moderation, my friend, you're hearing the boots clacking, you know, but that's not how
00:43:46.240 they're going to see it.
00:43:46.920 I think, I think that in some way there, that tension, that Oedipal tension is going to
00:43:50.940 make them actually really quite uh really quite um it's going to be really really difficult for
00:43:57.860 for american media to cover that uh you know adequately i think also there's a weird um you
00:44:04.120 know coalitional dynamic in the republican party where you know vance is associated and has worked
00:44:09.040 hard to associate himself with a kind of economic populist um you know element in the republican
00:44:14.660 party that has been an i wouldn't say dominant now but it's on the ascent you know for the last
00:44:18.940 few years. Uh, and that shows up, you know, in his kind of relationship to trust. Right. Um,
00:44:25.460 and at least in his symbolic gestures around organized labor, which have very little substance 0.96
00:44:29.880 to, um, but you know, are enough that like the fucking head of the team series who just gave
00:44:35.180 this speech at the RNC, um, you know, Sean O'Brien, um, you know, praised the Vance choice and so on. 0.60
00:44:42.420 And like, there's this great video, which everyone should watch events turning up at a,
00:44:46.000 at a UAW pick-a-line during a UAW strike last year,
00:44:49.280 where Marcy Kaptur is a kind of longtime, you know,
00:44:54.180 sort of working-class, old-school,
00:44:55.940 New Deal Democrat-type representative
00:44:57.600 from Norton, Ohio. 0.99
00:44:58.640 She's at the pick-a-line already.
00:45:00.320 And, you know, you see in the video,
00:45:01.600 J.D. Vance walked up and, you know,
00:45:03.020 she says, hi, J.D.
00:45:03.880 He says, hi, Marcy.
00:45:05.160 And she says, first time?
00:45:07.060 For first time?
00:45:07.560 Nice.
00:45:10.640 And he's like, yeah, I know she's close.
00:45:12.360 You know, she says, welcome.
00:45:13.120 Thanks for coming.
00:45:13.900 It's a very dead plan, you know?
00:45:16.000 Um, but like, I think that, um, question about what is the, what kind of alignment is he able to produce between, you know, the Republicans and a kind of, you know, nationalist chauvinist kind of populist politics.
00:45:33.800 Um, I don't know.
00:45:35.080 I mean, it's scary to me, honestly, I think like, it's not impossible that he will find some, although, you know, I mean, well, first of all, like the people at like compact magazine are totally exalted over this.
00:45:45.420 right they see this as the realization of that program and i think it's they're not totally
00:45:50.620 wrong too i think it's right for us i mean for me as someone who thinks of myself as a kind of
00:45:54.800 in the labor left i feel scared about that possibility um but i also think there are
00:45:59.340 real structural obstacles to that alignment really developing very far in the republican party and
00:46:05.060 you know we know that rupert murdoch tried very hard to stop trump from choosing vance
00:46:08.200 uh which is a kind of reflection of that uh so it'll be interesting i think if we see that these
00:46:12.740 tensions emerge it will be in part around this kind of thing right like republicans who just
00:46:17.620 want to you know further deregulate private equity and have taxes for the rich which is still the
00:46:22.500 predominant thing in the party um versus what vance wants to do which is not straightforwardly
00:46:28.000 populist but is you know he's interested in kind of weakening one elite in favor of another
00:46:31.880 through populist politics and that is likely i think to generate some fissures yeah i think
00:46:38.180 that's that's right i think there's a there's an interesting question here in terms of how exactly
00:46:43.580 like how far exactly this kind of alignment can go but there's also of course the related question
00:46:48.440 which is can can his insistent moralization of these issues sort of like ultimately you know
00:46:56.100 unions are structural institutions they they they tend to think in in structural terms at least if
00:47:01.800 they're functioning i mean unless they're like police unions or something like that but there is
00:47:06.540 you know a real there it would seem to me that there are real limits to his pitch but then again
00:47:12.400 it only has to hold for the next three months for him to be vice president but um you know i i do
00:47:18.180 agree with you that like the kind of realignment that compact magazine is kind of hoping for
00:47:24.080 anticipating that that seems to me very difficult but the problem like can you peel off some union
00:47:28.900 voters like yeah that's the that's the other question yeah well and you know the democrats i
00:47:34.620 I think Vance is a very good symbol of the total failure of liberals and Democrats to comprehend the genuine problem of which Vance is a symptom and to confront it properly.
00:47:47.940 um right and instead they used vance and other symbols like vance as a way of kind of um
00:47:54.540 you know refracting and obscuring that um so that they you know even now that biden you know has
00:48:02.080 taken his own kind of pro-labor turn over the years and whatever right like it it doesn't wash that
00:48:07.120 well um so you know i think it's you know that in some ways the electoral question is already
00:48:14.700 that you're raising, Adrian,
00:48:16.560 like, it's already true.
00:48:18.060 It was true before this year.
00:48:19.480 Right.
00:48:19.880 You know, it depends on the industry
00:48:22.180 and the region and so on.
00:48:23.100 But lots of union members
00:48:24.020 voted for Trump.
00:48:24.860 Right, right.
00:48:25.700 He won a majority in 2016
00:48:27.080 of union households.
00:48:29.040 Is that right? 0.53
00:48:29.820 Yep.
00:48:30.340 Oh, wow.
00:48:31.400 The general kind of way
00:48:32.440 of thinking about it is like,
00:48:33.460 it's so in the service sector
00:48:35.100 and public sector unions,
00:48:36.440 you know, that's still
00:48:37.280 as democratic as ever.
00:48:38.760 In the industrial unions,
00:48:39.920 the auto workers and steel workers
00:48:41.160 and so on.
00:48:41.780 In 2016 and 20,
00:48:44.700 They more or less split 50-50 between Trump and Clinton and Biden and the building trades, which are the right wing of the labor movement traditionally.
00:48:52.360 It's more like two-thirds for Trump.
00:48:54.420 And those are different sizes and, you know, uneven until it's a rough kind of cut.
00:49:00.140 But it's worth saying also on this advance, you know, I mean, like he said that, you know, unions are good for some workers in some things, but, you know, not all.
00:49:09.320 Like he is very kind of interestingly on the record about, you know, the idea that there are kind of good parts of the working class and bad parts of the working class, right?
00:49:18.420 Good kinds of workers organization and bad kinds of workers organization, which is exactly in keeping with this idea that like what he's really interested in is a rival elite, which is able to partner with some kinds of organized labor, but not with an actually strong working class, right?
00:49:32.880 What he wants is a very managed from above form of, you know, partial redistribution.
00:49:40.060 And he's pretty explicit about that.
00:49:42.400 Along racial lines, I'm imagining. 0.93
00:49:44.780 Yeah. 0.99
00:49:45.240 That's the subtext.
00:49:46.800 Well, industries are racialized, right?
00:49:49.220 Like, I mean, like these, the three buckets that Gabe just outlined, right?
00:49:52.840 Like service sector unions are, I'm going to guess, not exactly the whitest organizations on the planet.
00:50:00.840 Right.
00:50:01.400 Right. I mean, like the, you know, obviously these industries are not as segregated as they used to be.
00:50:05.700 Right.
00:50:05.840 And, you know, I don't think the form of advances of racism is like a, you know, old fashioned Jim Crow, right? It's a, it's a newer thing than that. So like, you know, he's happy, I think, to, um, you know, build an alliance if he can with the Teamsters, right? Who are certainly not an all white organization, um, but it's an alliance on the basis of like hostility to immigration. 0.85
00:50:27.380 right which has obviously a kind of racist politics to it as we were talking about
00:50:31.800 and about the recuperation of a kind of you know single breadwinner model uh which has a
00:50:37.840 sexist politics obviously uh that is really central to who he is and um you know in general
00:50:45.300 like he you know he said this thing he's on he's on the record in terms of labor policy supporting
00:50:49.640 um what's called sectoral bargaining uh you know there is actually sectoral bargaining legislation
00:50:56.000 that he does not support.
00:50:57.780 So maybe this is just fake,
00:50:59.220 like lots of stuff with him.
00:51:00.400 But what he says about it is like,
00:51:01.700 yeah, we should have a model like this
00:51:03.180 that they have in Europe.
00:51:03.880 And this is a kind of traditional form,
00:51:05.940 in fact, in Europe of like state management
00:51:09.360 of income to different classes
00:51:11.520 through a form of collective bargaining
00:51:13.780 that's very heavily overseen by the state
00:51:16.120 and often doesn't involve
00:51:17.740 a lot of actual workers' initiative.
00:51:19.860 And I think this is really the key
00:51:20.940 with all of this right-wing populist stuff.
00:51:22.600 Like, for reasons of being interested in, you know, recuperating a certain kind of male breadwinner, you know, national citizen, punitively white kind of figure, right, they're potentially interested in some kinds of workers' power and redistribution and so on within limits.
00:51:46.380 But the limits have to be really sharply drawn because what you don't want is like workers taking initiative, reinventing their situations, building their own organizations that are independent and accountable to them.
00:51:59.880 Because in that process, all of those kinds of social boundaries start to break down around race and around gender and around citizenship and so on.
00:52:08.980 In historical moments where that kind of initiative is coming up from below in the working class, like you see that really clearly.
00:52:15.060 And so, like, J.D. Vance wants to give the working class a handout, right? 0.75
00:52:19.560 Like, he wants to, not in the kind of pejorative sense that conservatives use that about welfare, but rather in the sense that, like, he wants the government to aid and protect certain kinds of workers under certain circumstances in a tightly controlled way. 0.80
00:52:31.920 That might be a good place to wrap up.
00:52:33.840 Yeah.
00:52:34.400 Thank you so much, Gabe.
00:52:35.440 That was really amazing.
00:52:36.600 I mean, it's a great piece, and I really encourage people to read it in full.
00:52:40.320 But yeah, it was great talking with you through this and, you know, elucidating this particular sidestream of our long and meandering national nightmare.
00:52:52.980 Thanks, Anthony.
00:52:53.920 We've been talking to University of Chicago professor, labor historian, and absolute mensch, Gabe Winant.
00:53:00.820 Thank you for listening.
00:53:03.260 In Bed with the Right, we'd like to thank the Michelle R. Clayman Institute for Gender Research for generous support.
00:53:08.140 Jennifer Portillo for setting up our studio.
00:53:10.640 Our producer is Katie Lau.