In Bed With The Right - November 05, 2024


Episode 39: The Meme Wars with Morgan Sung

Topics
Episode 38: The 2024 Election A Very Special Announcement from In Bed With the Right

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 7 minutes

Words per minute

172.73

Word count

11,643

Sentence count

461

Harmful content

Misogyny

13

sentences flagged

Toxicity

71

sentences flagged

Hate speech

13

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 Hello, I'm Adrienne Dahn.
00:00:09.400 And I'm Moira Donegan.
00:00:11.100 And whether we like it or not, we're in bed with the right.
00:00:13.660 So Adrienne, today we are talking about the meme wars of 2024.
00:00:19.600 That is, we're talking about the way that the internet and online culture and the communities
00:00:26.100 and vernaculars that emerge there affect our political scene.
00:00:31.460 And we have probably the best person as our guest today to talk about that with Morgan
00:00:38.980 Sung.
00:00:39.500 Morgan, thank you so much for joining us.
00:00:41.000 Thanks for having me.
00:00:41.940 This is great.
00:00:42.600 So we should say Morgan is a tech journalist specializing in the intersection of digital
00:00:46.040 culture and politics.
00:00:47.180 She hosts the podcast Close All Tabs, which is an election podcast series from KQED here
00:00:53.660 in San Francisco.
00:00:54.200 And I've liked her work for a long time.
00:00:56.960 I think I first came across your reporting on the hounding of Miss Rachel, the popular
00:01:03.060 children's entertainer who my daughter is a huge fan of.
00:01:06.220 And so like this one hit home.
00:01:08.160 Justice for Miss Rachel.
00:01:09.120 Exactly.
00:01:09.860 And I also wanted to shout out your take on Meta's Twitter clone threads, which, you
00:01:17.380 know, we were just saying came out 48 hours after that product launched.
00:01:21.100 and to my mind still remains the definitive verdict
00:01:24.400 on why it was never going to go anywhere, right?
00:01:27.660 And the title is,
00:01:28.680 You Can't Post Ass, Threads is Doomed. 0.87
00:01:31.120 And like, yeah, that says it all. 0.60
00:01:35.020 And, you know, I really wish that Threads
00:01:37.720 was more fun than it is
00:01:38.880 because I would love a lifeboat off of Twitter right now.
00:01:42.400 Oh my goodness, yeah.
00:01:43.500 So we should say right off the bat
00:01:44.980 that like this isn't necessarily,
00:01:46.680 of course, a new conversation.
00:01:48.380 One of the things I really love about Close All Tabs
00:01:51.080 is that you really get into the long history of our online discourses, right? That this is not
00:01:55.980 really that new from, you know, spreading Santorum via $27 donations to alt-right memes and Cambridge
00:02:02.540 Analytica. It seems like we return to the question of online discourse and what it does to our
00:02:06.920 politics with some regularity. But it's also important to notice that I think we're not having
00:02:13.520 the same conversation each election cycle. It's actually, I feel like the conversation we're
00:02:18.400 having this year is different from the one we had in 2020, is different from the one we had in 2016,
00:02:23.180 right? Yeah, absolutely. And I think what really stands out, I think every election cycle when it
00:02:28.540 comes to the internet and covering the internet, it's kind of like, what fresh new hell is the
00:02:33.260 internet going to do to this election? And like you said, it's a little different every time.
00:02:37.760 And I think this year is really about the fact that we're all so divided. We all exist in such
00:02:43.040 siloed realities because of the way that social media algorithms kind of just, you know, suck us
00:02:48.720 into little worlds and then leave us there and, you know, kind of create our own little echo
00:02:53.420 chambers. And it started in 2016 to some extent. But really, I think this year we are not talking
00:03:01.540 to people outside of our political, or it's very rare to be talking to people outside of our little
00:03:06.120 political bubbles. Yeah. And I'm glad that you mentioned that sort of like siloing that these
00:03:10.720 algorithms can create because one thing that I think we're really dealing with this year
00:03:15.040 is that the election looks very different and is being handled very differently depending on which
00:03:22.920 platform you're on right so we're dealing with some platforms that are really looking to keep
00:03:28.500 political speech out and by that I namely mean like the meta properties right yes so we've got
00:03:33.820 the sort of like sinking ship of Facebook but we've also got their uh like assless charmless
00:03:39.980 Twitter competitor threads, and then we've got their mega juggernaut Instagram. These are all
00:03:45.380 platforms that have algorithmically deprioritized political content, right? But then we're also
00:03:52.900 dealing with the newly Elon Musk-owned Twitter, or shall I say X?
00:03:58.480 You shall not.
00:04:01.000 If you're asking.
00:04:01.960 It's not its government name. I can't make myself do it.
00:04:05.720 But that's a platform that is like totally refusing to combat this information at all.
00:04:12.240 And in fact, Musk seems to be using the platform to like spread some disinformation about like voter fraud, various like pro Trump sort of theories and memes that are getting amplified there.
00:04:25.340 But then on the other hand, it still has this, you know, addicted cohort of left-wing users who are doing things like, you know, spreading this viral, like, disinfo joke about J.D. Vance boning a couch.
00:04:41.960 Yeah.
00:04:42.380 I want to note that, like, it's not like there is some shadowy organization behind every social media platform being like, we are going to make sure everyone's divided in their own political bubbles.
00:04:52.360 It's really just the way like social media algorithms work where, you know, they show us what we like to see and then, you know, kind of depending on how we engage with it, they know like, okay, show more of that content and more of that content and not any content you probably won't engage in because again, like they want to keep you on the platform.
00:05:10.280 And so, yeah, with X especially, I mean, you mentioned this kind of Twitter-addicted left-wing
00:05:17.320 bubble. I think I'm one of those kind of clinging on to Twitter's glory days. But yeah, the whole
00:05:25.700 disinformation thing, I think we talk about this in Close All Tabs in our second episode, I believe.
00:05:31.920 Yeah, no one is invulnerable to spreading disinformation. I think that's a point we
00:05:36.700 are trying to make in this episode, where when we talk about disinformation, we're thinking about
00:05:40.700 some insult on the far right spreading horrific lies about a presidential candidate. When in
00:05:47.520 reality, it can be something as simple as retweeting a picture of J.D. Vance in the IKEA
00:05:53.320 sofa section. Can I ask, in researching the podcast, did the couch thing take off on Facebook?
00:05:58.740 I mean, the very fact that I have to ask you this question, hoping that you somehow reactivated or
00:06:03.520 created a Facebook account you may be too young to even had one but I certainly I've lost my I
00:06:09.080 lost my Facebook login years ago sorry to my Facebook followers which I'm sure I still have
00:06:14.320 so I have no fucking way of knowing actually um did the couch take off there did they have kind
00:06:19.980 of an echo discourse or did it just not happen okay so I do have a Facebook account um and it 0.94
00:06:25.240 is active but not to post on it I'm I'm very active on Facebook marketplace I'm really on
00:06:31.380 the hunt for that good, good vintage furniture, solid wood kind of thing. But really, as we
00:06:38.080 researched in the episode, this couch rumor started on and spread on Twitter specifically.
00:06:44.220 And the reason it was able to spread so quickly is because of the way that Elon Musk just stripped
00:06:49.580 away all of Twitter's moderation and disinformation reporting and any kind of guardrails when it
00:06:55.960 comes to spreading false information. I don't know if it made it to Facebook's post part. It
00:07:05.300 certainly didn't make it to Facebook marketplace. Wait, the couch section didn't go wild.
00:07:11.580 I mean, if anyone found it, please send it to me. But it did really... Basically, it spread
00:07:20.100 um across twitter kind of jumped platforms made it to tiktok made it to reddit made it to instagram
00:07:28.060 even though instagram uh and meta are known for suppressing political content this is kind of
00:07:33.920 what broke through you know i saw so many reels so many meme accounts posting it um and of course
00:07:39.320 like there is no disclaimer saying like okay jd vance did not actually um you know do anything
00:07:45.560 with a couch we should maybe clarify like for yeah for our listeners who are not like broken
00:07:52.640 brained internally online as three of us are this is a rumor that went viral i think around the time
00:08:01.040 he was announced as the vp candidate back in july and i don't know morgan maybe you would know more
00:08:07.720 about this than i did but like the version i saw of it actually had like a photoshopped page
00:08:13.100 supposedly from hillbilly elegy describing this uh sexual act with a couch so it started with one
00:08:20.540 tweet from this person with like literally 1700 followers on twitter um a tiny account really in 0.99
00:08:26.800 grand scheme of things and you know it made the rounds on like shit post twitter on like chronically 0.94
00:08:32.100 online twitter where people when he was nominated as um you know the vp candidate people were like 0.97
00:08:38.260 ha ha, this is a joke about him doing explicit things with a couch. I don't know if we're allowed
00:08:44.520 to curse on this episode. Oh, absolutely. Okay. Well, the joke is that he fucked a couch
00:08:48.560 in lurid detail. And so it started with that, kind of never really broke through. And then 0.99
00:08:56.100 there was an assassination attempt on Trump. And then Joe Biden stepped down as a candidate.
00:09:01.740 And in that kind of excitement of it was like a two-week time period, this couch rumor started
00:09:07.060 going around again, which is it's not common for like a post or meme to pick up weeks after
00:09:12.660 the original one started. And so that's when someone posted this like photoshopped image of
00:09:19.720 like what seemed like a scan of a page from Hillbilly Elegy where it explains in very graphic
00:09:25.840 detail how this, it's again fake, I have to like say that, but in very graphic detail how much 0.94
00:09:32.960 jd vance wanted to fuck a couch when he was an adolescent boy it's so it's so interesting to 0.91
00:09:38.360 think about the fact that like it starts on twitter lives there for a while and then gets 0.98
00:09:42.200 resurfaced and only then secondarily makes it over to tiktok and instagram which kind of makes it a
00:09:48.480 bit unusual right i would i would imagine that in 2024 more meme material sort of comes out of
00:09:55.400 instagram and tiktok right and and um would then secondarily show up on twitter does that does that
00:10:01.140 seem right i think twitter used to be a great originator of memes um but i think when elon
00:10:07.420 musk took over everyone started kind of jumping ship and um that kind of there's still that kind
00:10:12.620 of fun chaotic energy on twitter but it's it's definitely dampened quite a bit um with i think
00:10:18.140 tiktok being the main originator of a lot of memes now and like having that spread over i think like
00:10:24.320 reels is just starting to like become an originator and having that crossover to tiktok and twitter
00:10:30.840 But yeah, I think this is the first time in a long time that we saw, or first time since
00:10:35.040 Musk's takeover, that we saw a meme take off on Twitter.
00:10:38.480 And I also don't think that it would have been able to spread as far as it did or cross
00:10:43.060 platforms the way that it did if Twitter had more robust disinformation on rails and any
00:10:50.360 kind of moderation whatsoever.
00:10:51.840 Yeah.
00:10:52.500 And as you point out in the episode, it's such a fun callback that one of the people
00:10:56.660 who spread the rumor initially was Dan Savage,
00:11:00.080 famous for spreading Santorum back in the day.
00:11:04.280 Maura, do you want to explain to our listeners
00:11:07.080 who might be too young to remember
00:11:09.480 what spreading Santorum is all about?
00:11:11.480 Rick Santorum was a really extreme evangelical politician,
00:11:17.660 I believe from Pennsylvania.
00:11:18.820 Pennsylvania, senator from Pennsylvania.
00:11:20.860 Very briefly ran for president, right?
00:11:23.680 In a Republican primary. 0.98
00:11:24.700 and dan savage the like sex columnist and podcaster uh assigned a very disgusting 0.99
00:11:35.880 um anal sex byproduct the name santorum and he held a contest to name to be fair 0.99
00:11:44.240 dan savage did not decide to do this dan savage said what should we name after him 0.98
00:11:48.720 And what you're referring to was the winner, I believe, of that contest.
00:11:52.800 And this ended Rick Santorum's political career.
00:11:57.760 Yes.
00:11:57.960 It destroyed his Google results forever.
00:12:02.300 It was a perfect sort of contrast between his extremely religious right political views and an extremely vulgar, like, inside sex joke of, you know, the outgroup that Rick Santorum with his political power antagonized, right?
00:12:21.660 And it's also, I think, one of the earliest moments when the internet became real life, when an online joke had a impact on national politics, you know?
00:12:37.520 Yeah.
00:12:37.900 And I mean, as I talked to my former TechCrunch colleague, Amanda Silverling, about this, and as she put it, in 2004, search engine optimization was like wizardry.
00:12:47.740 And so it was just like mind blowing that so many people search Santorum that if you
00:12:53.840 search Santorum back then, you wouldn't get Rick Santorum, the political candidate, you 0.99
00:12:58.060 would get Santorum, this very vulgar definition for anal sex. 1.00
00:13:05.200 Right. 0.99
00:13:05.340 Like it kind of shows not necessarily what online we kind of regard as objective.
00:13:11.700 It's about where we go to find something that is true of our world, right?
00:13:15.740 2004 was the age of Google.
00:13:17.460 It was the age where you assumed if it's on Google, it's got to be true.
00:13:21.640 And there, the first thing is about Lube.
00:13:24.620 Okay, so it must be that, right?
00:13:26.660 Right.
00:13:27.120 And today we go on social media platforms to find out what is the case.
00:13:32.200 And so that is where we're most vulnerable, I would say, to having someone show us something
00:13:36.400 that is not in fact the case.
00:13:38.240 And we're like, okay, cool, we'll run with that.
00:13:39.820 Like, I feel like on Google, I'd be a lot more suspicious, right?
00:13:42.900 Like, I can't believe they're baking recipes anymore.
00:13:46.160 Now that they've AI-ified, but like back then, like Google really was.
00:13:51.300 Yeah.
00:13:51.940 Extremely reliable.
00:13:53.280 Yeah.
00:13:53.480 If you saw a legitimate enough looking website and like the website that the Santorum definition was, I guess, like housed on, looked like a news site, you know, and it looked real enough, like you would assume it was real.
00:14:07.120 Well, I mean, I think the site itself actually acknowledged, like we want as many people to click on this.
00:14:11.900 And part of what happened was that TV hosts, I believe, including Stephen Colbert, would direct their viewers to do this.
00:14:20.120 There's also kind of an interesting old media integration.
00:14:23.640 But it is so fascinating to think back to that.
00:14:26.400 I mean, I was a constituent of Rick Santorum at the time, just in case any listeners feel bad for him. 0.99
00:14:33.500 The reason Savage did this was that he compared gay sex to man on dog sex. 0.99
00:14:38.040 So, you know, hold your sympathy a little bit. 0.98
00:14:41.500 But it's so fascinating to sort of see how this kind of replays in a different register on different platforms using kind of the different ways in which we maintain and communicate facts around elections, right?
00:14:56.560 Yeah, exactly.
00:14:57.480 I mean, it's, you know, the delivery is different, but at its heart, it's the same.
00:15:02.860 So that might be a good time to bring us back up current, right?
00:15:08.080 So what are the biggest platforms where memes about this election cycle have been going on?
00:15:15.000 What are the ones that you've noticed most, which is the most memeable of our candidates?
00:15:19.620 What has the climate been like on your beat this cycle?
00:15:24.120 I haven't noticed a lot of election memes on threads.
00:15:28.540 And like we talked about, threads is kind of a little bit like LinkedIn Lite, it feels
00:15:34.160 like at times, where it's very buttoned up.
00:15:37.300 It's a bit stiff.
00:15:40.980 I've noticed a good amount on Instagram, though, that can actually get around Meta's
00:15:45.640 political content suppression.
00:15:49.260 TikTok is a huge one.
00:15:51.280 But TikTok is interesting in that it's so algorithmically driven.
00:15:55.740 It's very, very unusual to be served any content outside of your preferences.
00:16:01.240 I think other social platforms, there's more of a chance to see things outside of your
00:16:06.340 own bubble. And on TikTok, I've noticed like, I see a lot of political memes that align with my
00:16:11.440 political views, but I have to go out of my way to find content that like conflicts with my political
00:16:16.500 views. But it doesn't mean that it's not there. It's still there. It's just harder to find if
00:16:21.480 you're not like in that audience. And shockingly, Twitter is still going strong. I think this
00:16:27.380 election is keeping Twitter alive. It's like the last dying gasps of air are the couch fucking 1.00
00:16:34.260 memes. Twitter is an interesting one, right? On the one hand, we'll talk about the role Elon Musk 0.99
00:16:39.320 plays in this because, of course, having an owner who himself shares disinformation and shares
00:16:43.880 memes is really interesting. I mean, it's also morally objectionable, but it's also interesting
00:16:49.500 in that Zuckerberg was not out there helping Russian bots. He was very much like, oh, we're
00:16:57.260 just providing the platform. That's not what Musk is doing. He is a Twitter user first and the owner
00:17:01.560 kind of secondary but something i wanted to ask about is like is it just me or does twitter seem
00:17:08.520 to serve me ads that directly contradict my political beliefs oh yeah it's all just like 0.84
00:17:14.460 i mean not even just pro-trump shit it's also just like want to buy gold and i'm like what yeah i'm 0.91
00:17:18.820 not that i'm old but i'm not that old and i'm not falling for this right like it's weird stuff um 0.94
00:17:24.680 It's a weird crypto, like crypto, but political crypto for me.
00:17:29.600 Yeah.
00:17:30.220 And I'm just like, I'm not in this audience.
00:17:32.420 And then that and like bad t-shirts.
00:17:34.200 They're really trying to tell me like real like Facebook wine mom type pro-Trump t-shirts
00:17:39.380 where it's like, you know, like red, white, and blue with a random like eagle superimposed
00:17:45.000 on it.
00:17:45.400 That's just like, I stand with, you know, but in comic sans, but not ironically.
00:17:50.420 Yeah.
00:17:50.820 Yeah, I think, I mean, Twitter's advertising is kind of a mess, as is the whole platform,
00:17:55.180 but you know.
00:17:55.860 That's the interesting thing, right?
00:17:56.960 That like we're kind of, and this is something you get into on the podcast as well.
00:18:00.220 These are content delivery mechanisms that are really optimized for, they're supposed 0.96
00:18:06.400 to be optimized if they make money for getting us to buy shit, not necessarily to vote a 0.97
00:18:11.640 certain way. 0.97
00:18:12.840 And Twitter is the one that like is so bad at getting us to buy anything at this point
00:18:18.740 that like the political stuff gets interesting again right that you're like why am I seeing this 0.99
00:18:23.320 like someone paid money to like give a gay man in San Francisco like this shit like exactly yeah 0.99
00:18:29.060 like what what did you think I was gonna have like an aneurysm and like click on this like this is 0.99
00:18:33.800 the only way I would ever buy this but that kind of actually makes it a little wilder compared to
00:18:39.380 the as you say the over-confected kind of nature of of TikTok and and Insta where really you're 0.97
00:18:46.240 just like okay you you look deep inside my soul and we're like this is this guy's gonna fucking 0.97
00:18:50.680 love this shit and and i did and i did yeah the ads that were being served on twitter because 0.98
00:18:55.800 like all the major advertisers pulled out of twitter and now the ones taking their place are 0.99
00:19:00.360 like these advertisers that like would not have been vetted or would not have made it through
00:19:05.000 vetting on the old on old twitter when it was still twitter um and it's crazy because even like
00:19:11.420 right-wing political candidates are posting and getting these straight-up white supremacist ads
00:19:17.580 under their posts and saying, like, hey, I don't – that's not what I meant. Even political
00:19:22.840 candidates, very conservative political candidates are starting to distance themselves from this.
00:19:26.800 What about the stans? Because we had the entry, and I would say a kind of densely
00:19:36.480 memefied entry of kamala harris into the presidential race after joe biden's withdrawal
00:19:43.020 i remember there was a brief period in the internet time when there were like a hundred
00:19:49.260 thousand coconut tree jokes oh my god yeah because of this weird story she told about her mom
00:19:55.480 yeah like imploring her to like like historicize more right yeah it was like a very like i grew
00:20:04.200 my parents were bay area professors story whereas like my mother and you know she sounded kind of
00:20:09.360 like wacky and zanned out a little bit maybe and so like part of it was about harris's personality
00:20:18.540 and its perceived um incongruity with the office to which she was aspiring to right like that kind
00:20:24.460 of incongruity is always uh at the core of a lot of internet humor i think especially when it's
00:20:30.000 like, okay, this dignified or supposedly dignified position actually has this undignified person in
00:20:35.700 it. It's part of why Trump is so memeable, right? But then the coconuts almost took on a life of
00:20:41.680 their own in this very interesting way. And did you have any thoughts on that flash in the pan
00:20:46.440 moment? You know, I think a lot of it was, you know, yes, Harris is, I guess, she's just very
00:20:52.560 charismatic as a person. And it's so different from what we had gotten used to with Joe Biden
00:20:58.760 as president and Joe Biden's campaign. I mean, the resounding message among young people,
00:21:05.960 progressive young people in 2020 was settle for Biden. It's like, it's not Trump. Maybe we can do
00:21:12.240 something with this. And I think at the time, Harris presented this younger version of the
00:21:17.480 party where she's just a lot more charismatic. She's a lot more animated. She says these kind
00:21:23.720 of like zany things that you know your like cool aunt would probably say like when she's like three
00:21:30.880 glasses of wine deep you know um and i think like that i think like just that was so so vastly
00:21:38.600 different from what people were used to from the white house that they kind of ran with it um and
00:21:44.860 again i think a lot of it was kind of like desperation for anything different the the two
00:21:48.740 memes from 2020 involving her kind of already pointed in that direction right like there's the
00:21:54.720 the one where they're sort of editing her dancing into you about to lose your job and then there's
00:22:01.140 the we did it joe right which both yeah sort of exactly are like sort of her off the cuff and like
00:22:05.800 maybe right she's like in running short running pants and you're like this is a future vice
00:22:10.080 president it's a little funny and it's always you know i see what you mean there's a looseness
00:22:15.120 to her that that well biden couldn't really bring to the table and certainly couldn't the more he
00:22:22.880 declined i guess too yeah there's also just the in terms of the audience i think part of it was
00:22:28.160 the giddiness of relief right yeah especially after that debate performance which was also
00:22:34.160 memed uh like a lot of i remember a lot of internet jokes about biden's face from that
00:22:42.540 debate which had this look of like confused like absent confused terror right yeah um and it
00:22:50.460 was a still image that sort of represented the emotional state of the would-be democratic
00:22:56.840 yeah looking at that debate performance right and then so that um terrified despair that was
00:23:04.340 somewhat laughed about um in the ironized way that people uh deal with depression and anxiety
00:23:10.700 in online vernaculars then got like transformed into this like euphoric exhaling um when we were
00:23:19.160 all coconut pilled in yeah july and august yeah right exactly i mean when i think the energy after
00:23:27.280 that debate and you know after the assassination attempt on trump where you know kind of gave him
00:23:33.460 a lot of ammo and made him look very like almost like martyred in a way um and i think the energy
00:23:40.500 among a lot of like the left was just kind of like overwhelming despair um and um i think when
00:23:48.220 kamala harris stepped in a lot of that memeing was because people were just so relieved yeah
00:23:53.020 that there was you know maybe a chance like maybe a candidate who could debate trump accurately
00:23:59.160 Yeah, that gets a really interesting question, right? You're kind of describing a kind of shift of memetic energy from like the right to the left and then right from the left to the right and then back to the left. Now, of course, as you point out, this is it's a little hard to say for sure, because we're often being served only the content that we already agree with.
00:24:18.020 But like, do you think that there is such a thing? Like, is there, is there generally a side that has an easier time kind of winning these kind of online, online meme wars, right? Like, or is it just that we applaud the ones that we find funny and interesting? And then the other side is like, slaps their, you know, slaps their knees over something that like, they find funny that I look at, I'm like, that's not for me.
00:24:43.300 um yeah how do you do you think that there is a kind of object can we objectively say like no
00:24:47.800 there is this kind of energy that that kind of shifts from one side to the other i think if
00:24:51.600 you're talking about like who has an easter time memeing um in a more widespread mainstream way
00:24:57.620 i would probably say conservatives do because they're just less uh i guess concerned with
00:25:04.320 uh you know they'll go for the throat in a way that a lot of very centrist democrats
00:25:09.300 are more reluctant to. On further left, in my very, very chronically online circle, it's like,
00:25:17.760 yeah, I see a lot of those memes just kind of responding in the same way. But I think for the
00:25:23.740 longest time until this election cycle, a lot of very centrist Democrats were really leaning into
00:25:31.340 Michelle Obama's whole, when they go low, we go high. We don't stoop to their level.
00:25:35.420 And I think the couch fucking thing was really the first time that we saw that kind of group of people be like, you know what? No, we are going to stoop to that level. 0.97
00:25:43.840 This was aided, I think, by the, in my opinion, really brilliant Tim Wall's political strategy that they completely stopped him from doing later in the campaign. And I sort of wish they just let him keep doing it because he went on TV and he called them weird.
00:25:59.860 Yeah. And he claimed the mantle that is very sort of native to these online formats of like judgment, of mocking judgment. Right. Yeah. Which is like a position of great confidence. Right.
00:26:16.420 You need to be sort of immune to shame and, as you said, Morgan, like willing to actually insult and hurt and be cutting towards your enemies, which had been completely absent from democratic politics, as you mentioned in that Michelle Obama model.
00:26:33.300 Yeah, exactly. And we see there is such a stark difference, I think, in the energy going into the DNC over the summer where you had people like Democrats, like career Democrats, calling Republicans weird. You had Elizabeth Warren, of all people, cracking couch jokes.
00:26:50.400 Yeah. And I don't know, just compare that to now where Kamala Harris is campaigning with Liz Cheney and, you know, trying to court very moderate Republicans. It's just a very stark contrast to how they started the campaign. 0.98
00:27:03.580 Yeah. The mocking fun. Yeah. Like sucked out of the room. It was something really turned on a dime after the DNC.
00:27:10.480 Yeah, exactly. I mean, we still see hints of it. I mean, we saw Tim Walls calling Elon Musk a dipshit on TV, and I think that was like a little breath of fresh air. But they didn't continue that strategy throughout this campaign.
00:27:24.900 There are kind of two things at work here.
00:27:27.060 On the one hand, we all participate in online discourses at their most rambunctious, let's say.
00:27:33.780 And at the same time, and I'm guessing that that's why, you know, an NPR affiliate asked you to do a podcast about it.
00:27:39.720 We're also kind of invited to judge them a little bit, right?
00:27:42.740 Like, oh, we're not at our best.
00:27:44.740 And this is something that I, in my own work, have really struggled with.
00:27:47.960 And I don't always think that that's a very productive way of looking at it.
00:27:51.060 To just be like, look, if we're going to be messy, let's be messy.
00:27:54.180 Like, it's not like, you know, you don't have to own the moral high ground. You don't have to. Right. If like if you're dealing with a bully, call them weird. It's totally fine. Kind of seeding the insurgent energy to the other side is clearly what 2016 was all about. Right. There's this book by Angela Nagel that I don't love, I have to say, but like it's called Kill All Normies, where she kind of makes the claim that basically by 2016, really the kind of subversive energy, the transgressive energy lived on
00:28:24.180 the alt-right with sort of an overly pious lefty online culture as its kind of perfect foil. Again,
00:28:30.280 I don't necessarily buy that, actually. I think that's contrasting the Hillary Clinton campaign
00:28:34.700 with like a bunch of shit posters, right? It's like, that's not the same thing. But at the same 0.99
00:28:41.080 time, there's something to that, right? Like the perception that whether a campaign will go down
00:28:46.280 a little bit into the gutter or into Twitter, which is often the same thing, the Democrats
00:28:50.620 don't seem to have a great deal of comfort with that, even in 2024, right?
00:28:54.960 Yeah. I mean, and we talked about this in our first episode of the podcast, but 2016 was,
00:29:00.040 and I think the Democratic Party for every election really since then has really tried
00:29:04.940 to take this moral high ground. And that was primarily perpetuated by like very centrist
00:29:11.500 Democrats who, you know, were kind of trying to maintain that like political civility.
00:29:15.700 But I mean, during 2016 on further left, like democratic, socialist and very progressive
00:29:22.500 areas of the internet, you had like Bernie Sanders' dank meme stash where these chronically 0.98
00:29:27.180 online shit posters were churning out memes at the same rate that 4chan's pro-Trump posters 0.99
00:29:33.020 were. 0.99
00:29:34.020 And so I think like this kind of willingness to engage in political discourse in a way
00:29:41.420 that isn't so civil and is a bit more vulgar.
00:29:45.700 has always existed on both ends of the political spectrum. It's just that I think more centrist
00:29:52.180 political figures are finally starting to engage with that and starting to let that moral high
00:29:56.980 ground slip now. Yeah, I mean, it's exactly right. I mean, it's the difference. Maura and I just did
00:30:01.200 an episode where we watched a video that Elon Musk posted, a pro-Trump, basically like fan edit,
00:30:09.440 and it broke our brains. It was horrifying. God. But that's the thing, right? It's the owner of
00:30:14.460 the platform, finding a meme and liking it and putting it on his feed, right? And same with
00:30:22.140 Trump. Trump, often some of his most offensive posts have been retweets of other people's memes,
00:30:29.160 right? And that's the difference. You will not get at POTUS under Joe Biden or Kamala Harris's
00:30:36.740 account being like, here's a dank meme I dug up from Dirtbag Twitter or whatever.
00:30:41.840 Right. This might be a moment to turn to gender, which is technically our beat, you know, because I think part of what we're sort of circling around and not saying here is that this vulgar affect, this sort of vernacular of like mocking gross cruelty, right? This is something men do, or at least they do it a lot better and more comfortably, and they have a ton more social permission to do it.
00:31:08.100 And so the Nagel thesis that the far right is where the insurgent, impish, irreverent energy is, I think is partly a symptom of this gendered realignment between the parties, right?
00:31:26.620 Because the Democrats have a lot less room to mouth off and be, you know, angry and cruel because a lot more of them are women, a lot more of their voters are women and a lot more of their candidates are women.
00:31:38.520 Yeah. I mean, just very briefly, just to give readers a sense of what Maura is saying, because this is exactly right.
00:31:44.220 Nagel writes that basically on the left there had been during the 2016 election, quote,
00:31:48.600 a strange mixture of ultra sensitivity, sentimentality and was what was once considered radical social constructionist identity politics.
00:31:55.920 And like, basically, all that is lady coded, right?
00:31:59.320 Because she's basically saying like, it was a bunch of outraged school moms versus like 1.00
00:32:03.920 male shit posters. 1.00
00:32:05.280 So I think Maura is exactly right. 1.00
00:32:06.700 Yeah.
00:32:06.900 I think it's starting to shift now, just because, you know, since the overturning of Roe v.
00:32:11.480 Wade, and since many younger people are starting to become of age and become more politically
00:32:15.700 conscious and able to vote, I think there's a shift there.
00:32:20.460 For example, when Roe v.
00:32:22.240 Wade was overturned, we saw a lot of young women on Twitter reposting memes.
00:32:25.920 being like, all right, well, here's how to send hate mail to the Supreme Court. I think there is 0.96
00:32:31.380 a bit more willingness to engage there or posting or primarily female K-pop stans flooding abortion 1.00
00:32:40.240 snitch hotlines with kind of vulgar fan edits or vulgar fan fiction. I think that as the younger 0.95
00:32:47.840 generation who has been online and has kind of been exposed to this more irreverent kind of
00:32:53.360 internet humor comes to age and becomes more politically active, I think that that's going
00:32:57.760 to change. But yeah, I agree for the most part. The younger the women, the more they're willing
00:33:04.500 to tell politics to go fuck themselves online. Exactly. That gives me hope of the future. 1.00
00:33:12.380 Yeah, exactly. I mean, I remember reporting on this, I think last year or two years ago, but
00:33:17.440 you know, when the trans snitch lines opened up where, you know, a lot of very conservative states
00:33:23.340 were trying to get people to report doctors who provided gender affirming care, people flooded it
00:33:28.580 with like straight up like Shrek porn. And so I think that that I think that respectability is
00:33:35.320 starting to shift a little as people realize that, you know, taking the world high ground isn't always
00:33:41.020 that effective. This might bring us to something you said on your podcast where you said that
00:33:46.980 Kamala's social media team is actually doing pretty well, right? What do you think that they've gotten
00:33:52.180 right? I think that they've been very good about being quick to respond to internet trends without
00:33:59.240 making Kamala Harris do the internet trends. Kamala HQ, for example, her TikTok page,
00:34:11.740 they're posting fan edits of Kamala Harris. They're posting kind of like dunks on Trump,
00:34:17.860 But you don't see Kamala Harris out here saying, like, Pokemon, go to the polls.
00:34:23.500 You don't see her – like, they're posting the brat edits.
00:34:26.380 But you don't see Kamala Harris herself saying, I am brat girl summer, you know.
00:34:31.040 And I think that's a difference here between – I think that's where the line is with, like, making politicians, you know, seem fun and approachable and kind of spreading their political messaging but not making them cringe.
00:34:45.520 it would ruin her immediately it would ruin the bit immediately if they had her do it yeah i mean
00:34:51.140 if you had kamala harris out here saying like you know i i want club classics you know it's over it's
00:34:58.620 like you know like that that video of uh president obama going over his summer playlist and they're
00:35:04.980 like oh you like 365 by charlie xcx and he was like yes i love 365 by charlie xcx
00:35:11.160 One of your guests, Katten Barge, points out that this kind of fandom is really effective only if it feels bottom up, right? If it actually kind of, if it feels democratic, right? I think she even says, we the people make these memes. It's not, you don't get to tell us what we mean.
00:35:30.840 I think that for me that clarified two things. One is that may well have been why Trump memes in 2016 were so successful because he didn't have a good campaign. So he like you had these shit posters basically creating an online campaign for him that he may have been mostly unaware of or like only sort of like dimly aware of.
00:35:52.120 And then the other thing that made clear to me is that most of the time when it's not an election year, of course, we watch corporations interact with memes in some way. 0.99
00:36:05.980 And that is where that line you're describing between, oh, that's cool and that's cringe is so clear where he's like, oh, yeah, you had it.
00:36:16.280 You were riding the wave just for a second and now you're just getting crushed under it.
00:36:19.640 you know um and it's this interesting thing that we that it is a relationship that we are learning
00:36:25.800 mostly in dealing with like pepsi yeah much more so than we learn it in dealing with elizabeth
00:36:31.720 warren yeah exactly i mean trump's uh digital strategy in 2016 was completely different than
00:36:37.600 it is now i mean now he's on the podcast circuits he's trying to like court the whole yeah you know
00:36:41.840 like edgelord boy side of the internet and you know back then all he had to do was retweet you
00:36:47.720 know, those memes of himself as Pepe the Frog and people went wild, like that just fed the
00:36:52.760 meme making more.
00:36:53.840 But it's not like his campaign was the one pushing out Pepe memes.
00:36:57.920 morgan you just talked about trump like trying to be on the like young dude edgelord podcast
00:37:23.680 circuit right which means that there is this new way where it's not as organic this time around
00:37:31.000 right he's trying to make this like very deliberate very avowed and candidly very online
00:37:37.980 pitch to young men right and young men in this election were recording uh on november 1st so
00:37:46.740 they are projected at least to go pretty sharply to the right and towards trump and how have the
00:37:52.600 memes been gendered this time around? Yeah. I mean, well, Trump got the clearly
00:37:58.640 coveted Jake Paul endorsement. So I think that's all you need to know.
00:38:03.080 Oh my God. Yeah. Jake Paul, the very controversial YouTuber who's gotten kicked out of
00:38:09.080 West Hollywood many times. And over the summer, Trump really did go on that kind of like podcast
00:38:16.400 Circuit. He went on Logan Paul's podcast, Jake Paul's older brother. Logan Paul is also very
00:38:23.660 controversial and most known for trying to sell energy drinks to children. I'm sure their parents
00:38:29.300 love that. Yeah. Very highly caffeinated too. Oh my God. It's a Panera lemonade for children.
00:38:36.740 And yeah, he went on Aiden Ross's Twitch stream and Aiden Ross is like literally – he's like
00:38:42.480 a white – or aligned with white supremacy and got kicked off Twitch for hate speech.
00:38:47.780 And so he's really – he was really making this appeal to like teenage boys.
00:38:53.300 And I think it's interesting that, you know, Kamala Harris's campaign has really
00:38:58.000 campaigned on like reproductive rights, like the – especially since Roe v. Wade was overturned.
00:39:03.740 They went on Call Her Daddy and did a whole episode specifically on access to abortion.
00:39:10.040 um and she i think kamala harris is like her whole messaging has really been targeted toward women
00:39:16.920 they're putting out ads you know saying like hey like your your husband can't intimidate you out 0.99
00:39:22.900 of voting like your vote is private and there's you know a lot of controversy over that too on
00:39:27.620 the right where people on the right are saying like oh you think like conservative women are
00:39:32.180 just all married to abusive men but like i think that kind of messaging is necessary and i will
00:39:37.380 note, though, that in the last few weeks, the Kamala Harris' campaign has really started
00:39:43.860 shifting gears and trying to target young men online. They may not be the same young men who
00:39:50.600 would watch Aiden Ross' stream or listen to Jake Paul, but they are still young men online. They
00:39:56.960 did a stream. Tim Walls streamed with AOC and played Crazy Taxi on her Twitch stream.
00:40:05.120 um Kamala Harris went on like all the smoke which is primarily a sports podcast but um yeah so they
00:40:13.120 are trying to engage with like men online and I don't think you know the men who consume that
00:40:20.120 kind of media would vote for Trump or would even listen to you know Jake Paul or Aiden Ross but
00:40:26.320 it's still the same demographic of like young men online is there a way for a campaign to be
00:40:32.240 too online right because i remember during the like ron de santis very brief presidential run
00:40:38.440 one of his staffers actually got fired because he posted this video full of these like really
00:40:43.700 dense obscure references to right-wing memes that you would only really even be able to recognize
00:40:50.060 if you were spending like like several hours a day on 4chan right and that included the white
00:40:55.300 supremacist symbol something i only learned about through this um episode called the black sun
00:41:01.020 And so this kid gets fired, right? But it added to this general sense of the DeSantis campaign and DeSantis himself as being this sort of like unwholesome, uncool kind of the internet, right?
00:41:18.340 Like it turned off the normies.
00:41:22.460 And I'm wondering like where the line is between like courting this like very specific audience that you can see online and then like alienating everybody else.
00:41:32.260 Yeah, I think it's interesting that Kamala Harris's campaign has really tailored their digital strategy to each platform.
00:41:40.060 So their TikTok strategy, for example, is kind of like this irreverent fan camp style humor that you wouldn't have seen in 2020 at all versus her Instagram strategy tends to be a little bit more buttoned up and a bit more official versus her like TV ads. 0.99
00:41:57.220 She looks like your standard basic politician.
00:41:59.640 It's like you're seeing different versions of her in every part of the Internet, depending on where you are.
00:42:05.100 So I think it's more about how you tailor your digital strategy.
00:42:08.400 I will say one example that stands out to me as someone who was artificially online was John Fetterman in 2022.
00:42:16.920 He had a very brilliant digital campaign led by Annie Wu, who's now working with the Democratic Party, I believe.
00:42:24.440 But, you know, she was very smart in the way that she presented him as this, like, very fun, relatable candidate who could respond to memes, who could be on trend, who could, you know, be relatable to, like, some random 21-year-old in Pennsylvania.
00:42:40.440 But that didn't carry over it once he was elected into his actual politics.
00:42:45.780 You know, like now he is just known for taking money from APAC and being like very, very
00:42:54.240 vocally pro-Israel, you know, amid this horrific war.
00:42:58.880 And you don't see any of that kind of like goofy, like relatable side to him that you
00:43:04.680 saw during his campaign that you saw on TikTok because that wasn't him.
00:43:08.540 That was someone else being very smart about how they presented him and how they, you know,
00:43:13.020 strategized his digital campaign.
00:43:15.160 But so I think that's the difference is like whether or not a politician is being portrayed accurately.
00:43:21.740 And again, like it's not like you see Kamala Harris on TikTok doing TikTok dances.
00:43:25.540 It's her staff taking existing clips of her and making it fun. 0.97
00:43:29.060 So you can code switch, but you can't like outright bullshit. 0.99
00:43:31.380 Exactly. 0.96
00:43:31.940 That seems to be the distinction.
00:43:33.400 Yeah.
00:43:33.620 Yeah, exactly.
00:43:34.700 But the Santa's example, I think it gets to a second problem, right?
00:43:37.500 There's the inauthentic politician or the inauthentic online presentation that eventually kind of comes back to bite you.
00:43:43.040 But there's also another one, right, which I think you got in the case of DeSantis, which is that on the right, it seems the membranes between these different media ecosystems are really degraded, meaning you find yourself suddenly kind of giving a stump speech to a bunch of like, I don't know, like truck drivers or whatever.
00:44:06.660 and you're like basically just referring
00:44:08.880 to one Twitter meme after the other.
00:44:10.600 You're like, oh wait, like online broke my brain, right?
00:44:13.460 Like this is not the audience for that.
00:44:17.160 And I think that it's kind of,
00:44:18.440 I guess I'm pointing to the flip side
00:44:19.800 of what you were saying earlier
00:44:20.840 that like basically there's a lot more direct communication
00:44:24.220 between or there was in 2016, 2020 between Trump
00:44:27.460 and the kind of like meme lords of 4chan.
00:44:30.720 Well, that has an advantage.
00:44:31.860 It has also a huge disadvantage
00:44:33.360 because at some point you might be speaking 1.00
00:44:34.720 complete gibberish to just anyone else who is not currently you know you know a b-tard or or 0.94
00:44:41.720 whatever they're calling themselves these days yeah and then you get to the question of like 1.00
00:44:45.220 okay well which of like who from this demographic is actually going to vote who's actually going to
00:44:50.420 show up to the polls versus you know who's just engagement bait baiting yeah that's the other
00:44:54.440 thing right like i was thinking about this with with elon musk being right elon musk had like with
00:45:00.180 the with the combination of the blue check you know him handing out blue checks for money basically
00:45:05.040 and no one else having them anymore yeah um combined with like what you were talking about
00:45:10.860 like the fact that all these advertisers fled basically every single tweet that he that
00:45:17.640 sends out or anything that trump sends out like basically there's gonna be or that any
00:45:23.460 trump surrogate sends out basically um you're gonna get like pages and pages of these blue
00:45:28.840 check replies that are clearly just engagement bait right where you're like this is none of this
00:45:34.080 interesting none of this is funny um these are people hawking crypto or like weird weight loss
00:45:40.020 things or like commemorative coins or whatever like that is that that's the other problem right
00:45:45.740 that like at some point the the commercialism of it might take over and you might actually not
00:45:50.040 win anyone over to your cause you might win them over to the cause of commemorative coins but
00:45:54.340 you're not supposedly in this for the commemorative coins you're in it for
00:45:57.340 the presidency right yeah i mean and you're lucky if those are even real people i mean so many on
00:46:02.200 twitter now or so much of twitter now is just uh these blue check ai bots who are using chat gbt
00:46:08.300 to like you know come up with the most generic boring answer possible just to farm engagement
00:46:13.240 and further monetize their account like they're not they're not there to add to any sort of
00:46:18.180 political discourse they're just there to get their coin and leave all right so they're they're
00:46:22.200 basically they want followers and then they'll sell the account is the idea well i mean yeah
00:46:26.380 that and also now you can monetize your twitter account um based on certain like uh you know
00:46:31.540 metrics i'm not super familiar with like what the exact specific specificity is but like basically
00:46:36.560 if you have a monetized blue check account and you're just getting a ton of engagement it doesn't
00:46:41.820 matter you know where you fall in the political spectrum it's like you're you're just using chat
00:46:46.980 gbt to like respond to as many tweets as possible to get as much engagement as possible and amass
00:46:52.780 followers and you know get money i'm gonna throw away my phone i mean i know i know it's so bleak
00:46:58.340 i know i know and sometimes i like want to scroll like i see a funny video and i want to see the
00:47:02.620 replies and it's just all the same like yeah or you know it's and or like they're using other
00:47:07.900 people actual human beings responses and posting that and it's just it's bleak it's like a it's
00:47:13.820 kind of like a like wasteland out there but i can't give it up twitter twitter degraded so much
00:47:19.840 so fast just in its usefulness but also when it's like in its tenor i can like picture i can like
00:47:26.400 post like a cute picture of my dog on twitter now and then i'll get like like six to ten replies 1.00
00:47:33.360 immediately being like and you should go fucking kill yourself bitch and i'm like yeah my dog you 0.99
00:47:38.240 know it's like it's not it's nuts um god yeah and so like but this this is i think you're touching 1.00
00:47:46.620 on something that's like the the sheer quantity of slop not just on twitter but on all these
00:47:51.980 platforms now right has added to something that adrian and i have talked about a little bit before
00:47:58.780 which is just the like intense ephemerality of the news cycle especially as it gets metabolized
00:48:03.820 on social media and of the of the memes from the news cycle right like when i remembered the kamala
00:48:10.720 or kamala uh coconut memes that felt like i was talking about like something that happened
00:48:15.680 like 20 years ago. And it was actually just like eight weeks ago, actually. And there's a way in
00:48:24.960 which these things get made universal. Suddenly they seem like they're everywhere, especially
00:48:30.220 if you're in one of these online silos where they really can be everywhere for you. And then they
00:48:35.260 disappear, right? And something we were talking today about how the Washington Post just ran
00:48:42.880 a story about these new voters like gen z 18 20 year olds who are voting for the first time
00:48:50.600 and a lot of them had never heard of the access hollywood tape before yeah and now it's going 0.98
00:48:55.920 viral on tiktok because people are like i can't believe this guy said this shit and he became the 0.98
00:48:59.760 president yeah and it's it is an artifact of history it makes sense that they wouldn't have 0.99
00:49:06.340 heard that if they were 10 in 2016. But to me, it seems like such an indelible and specific part
00:49:15.960 of this historical moment, right? But it's also able to just be disappeared by this churn of all
00:49:22.060 the content. Yeah, exactly. And it's interesting because the Axe Hollywood tape, to me, feels so
00:49:27.900 burned into my memory. I think partially because – I mean, I'm in my late 20s. I'm almost 30.
00:49:33.780 But that was the first election where I could vote for president. And it just felt so like there was just such a cognitive dissonance in that. And it's shocking to me because that felt like such a historic election, being able to vote for a woman for the first time and then everything that happened after.
00:49:54.040 but you know to someone who's freshly 18 like that was you know just a blip in their day you
00:49:59.860 know and i do think that um i think that the internet has actually because the way that the
00:50:05.460 internet is kind of this like everlasting archive of content i mean it's becoming more and more
00:50:09.980 hellish every day to find that content but um because it's just such a like archive of content
00:50:14.320 i think that if anything that kind of memory what is allowed to continue to exist um i don't know
00:50:22.780 If, you know, if that had happened, for example, in like 2000 and people were voting in 2012, would we have remembered that versus now, you know, that Access Hollywood tape will always exist somewhere online.
00:50:35.480 And every year someone is going to find it and that's going to somehow affect their political consciousness.
00:50:41.320 Everything lives forever online, even though it also disappears immediately.
00:50:45.800 Yeah, it exists somewhere.
00:50:47.460 You just have to find it.
00:50:48.740 Yeah.
00:50:49.260 Yeah. Some things disappear immediately. In other cases, you get, you know, Santorum and it's just going to be there forever, you know.
00:50:57.580 I was just so entertained when we were working on that episode. I was so entertained that Santorum is still like, I think, the third Google result.
00:51:05.040 I mean, it'll be in his obituary, right? I mean, that's really, I mean, it's powerful.
00:51:11.920 It really has cast a pall over that man in life.
00:51:16.160 I mean, like, and I say this with zero sympathy, but like, just kind of awe, just kind of awe.
00:51:21.100 Like, it's really, this dumb joke is going to be part of who this person remembered to be.
00:51:28.080 It's really kind of astonishing. 0.65
00:51:29.800 And it's really funny.
00:51:30.840 I think when we were working on the episode, we decided it was too vulgar to, you know, make NPR listeners listen to what Santora means.
00:51:41.920 So we were kind of just like tongue in cheek. We're like, well, you can look it up online. And after that, like three of my friends texted me and they were like, I had no idea what Santorum was. So I looked it up. I think it's just so funny. And they're like, and I think that's hilarious and also horrifying. And I just think it's so funny that 20 years later, it's like, this is still happening.
00:51:59.920 you know the santorum example is one where different communities could kind of join in on
00:52:06.420 it right google was there for everyone um and i think that's that's kind of significant whereas
00:52:11.820 a lot of the other memes we've been talking about really are kind of i mean you have an entire
00:52:17.240 episode on basically it's about stands and their relationship to political campaigns and that's
00:52:21.860 of course a little bit different there are fandoms that that kind of um transfer their
00:52:27.320 allegiance to certain cultural properties basically to the to the political candidates right um
00:52:34.900 and and that's a little bit different right like that that that's sort of like how moira and i did
00:52:40.660 an episode on warhammer 40k among other things and we found out that that's a big that basically
00:52:45.700 there are warhammer 40k stands super imposing trump's face on like space marines in that and
00:52:51.560 we're like what the fuck yeah we had no idea but like there it is right um but that's a very 0.68
00:52:57.020 different like you have to you really are becoming in that moment an anthropologist like sort of 0.98
00:53:01.300 like parachuting into you know another village and being like what are you guys doing here
00:53:05.540 whereas like santorum is all about the ability to buy in over and over again and like your friends
00:53:10.500 now googling it now being like lol or like yikes uh yeah um like the like in group and out group is
00:53:17.620 is a is a is a pair that comes up a couple of times in the in your podcast can you say a little
00:53:22.740 about that? It's like, is there, are there, what about inward facing memes and outward facing
00:53:27.900 memes? Cause most good memes, right. Do have an outside. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I would kind of
00:53:32.680 characterize it as like, there are some memes that just appeal to a broader audience. Um,
00:53:37.200 and some that are really just meant to stay within a community. Um, I mean, I've, for example,
00:53:41.900 like I have been in Stan culture for many, many years. Like I'm going to use one direction as
00:53:47.740 an example because RIP Liam Payne. But I was a huge One Direction fan in high school and in
00:53:55.600 college kind of fell out of it. And it's interesting because now we're seeing this
00:53:58.520 resurgence of One Direction and these kind of vintage 13-year-old One Direction moments and
00:54:04.960 people circulating these memes that were huge in 2013, 2012 that never really broke beyond
00:54:12.120 this little One Direction bubble on Tumblr and Twitter. And now, because they're now more
00:54:20.760 culturally relevant right now, they're breaking into the mainstream and people are just starting
00:54:25.380 to be exposed to these kinds of memes. So that's what I think by in-group, it's like people who
00:54:30.680 are involved in that specific community would be in on a joke versus the out-group is kind of just
00:54:36.200 like the broader masses yeah does it matter in that context that basically with trump we had a
00:54:43.060 candidate in 2016 who was a plausible object of standing because he'd been on tv right like
00:54:51.640 you didn't happen to stand the hot guy on the wb show you stand the mean guy from from the nbc show
00:54:58.400 instead and then similarly like that he kind of partook of twitter as basically twitter's victim
00:55:05.340 more than he was really a master at it and then same with elon musk right like in some way does
00:55:10.600 stan culture independent of like i mean you know i i too belong to some of these fandoms and i i you
00:55:16.060 know i we all know about toxic stan culture but stan culture can also be very lovely yeah but it
00:55:21.300 does seem to do is it does seem to kind of short circuit a little bit the the the connection between
00:55:27.240 the economy or between business and media on the one hand and politics on the other right that like
00:55:32.860 you get someone like Elon Musk, who's a media consumer first, and then is like, I have to buy
00:55:37.760 the platform on which I read things I do not like, right? And we have Trump, who is like first a TV
00:55:43.320 actor, who then sort of, you know, is able to transmit that kind of fandom into kind of a
00:55:50.560 political loyalism. So is that kind of, is stand culture kind of a sign that there are certain
00:56:00.200 firewalls between our media ecosystem and our politics are just kind of collapsing?
00:56:04.980 I think so. Yeah, absolutely. I mean, I think Trump's 2016 campaign, he wasn't necessarily
00:56:11.420 standable because in the traditional sense, he wasn't hot. He wasn't particularly charming. It's
00:56:18.160 not like he had a really broad following. I think the root of that standing was really because
00:56:23.400 he was seemingly an outsider in DC politics and he was running against Hillary Clinton,
00:56:30.060 who was incredibly accomplished, but, you know, was symbolic of this political institution that
00:56:36.760 a lot of people thought was broken. And I think like the root of the standing was because he
00:56:41.960 seemed so subversive to a lot of people at the time. And some politicians now, like I think some
00:56:49.580 politicians develop stans because – or develop this kind of like fandom around them because of
00:56:56.160 their actual politics or because of like their personalities. Like, you know, Alexandria Ocasio
00:57:00.900 Cortez, for example, has her – this like very wide group of supporters because she's so engaged
00:57:07.500 online and because she engages with the kind of people who would be very attuned to stan culture.
00:57:15.200 whereas someone like Bernie Sanders is completely different. He also has a lot of stands online but
00:57:23.280 he's just like a grumpy old man from Vermont. Just people like his policies. So I think there
00:57:28.160 are different reasons for standing but it's really about how you use your popularity.
00:57:33.800 It can be either about your organic comfort in those worlds or your complete
00:57:41.280 foreignness from those worlds right like yes like what is appealing about bernie sanders isn't just
00:57:46.680 that people love his policies it's also that they could love him in a way that they know
00:57:51.060 what is so asynchronous right how he lives his life right yeah exactly oh it is that gap
00:57:58.820 yeah yeah it's just like bernie sanders famously says that he doesn't have apps on his phone
00:58:03.840 and a couple weeks ago that's an accomplishment i know and a couple weeks ago he was on that
00:58:10.200 Twitch stream with a bunch of Twitch streamers answering questions, talking about why it's so
00:58:15.660 important to vote this year. And one of the streamers showed up as a VTuber. And there's
00:58:23.280 just like this moment of like, what is going on? Because Bernie is trying to talk about the
00:58:29.180 importance of abortion access and calling for a ceasefire in Gaza. And then this guy who's
00:58:34.500 a digital kind of like wearing a digital avatar as like a cat an anime cat boy is like like you
00:58:42.000 know senator sanders do you know what a vtuber is and bernie is like no i don't anyway yeah and so
00:58:49.720 yeah it's a kind of like again he seems like such an outsider to the internet that the internet is
00:58:55.960 like kind of has kind of adopted him these fixated dare we say parasocial attachments that people can
00:59:02.700 get in a stand culture that have facilitated this like merger of political and consumer identity
00:59:08.820 it occurs to me and this might be like a decent like last note for us to end on right that this
00:59:15.080 is also something that happens in the inverse right because people also build these political 0.88
00:59:19.560 consumer identities around like absolutely hating shit yeah i think i think this was a real factor 0.95
00:59:26.380 in 2016 with Hillary Clinton. Yeah. And you do see a sector of the online, I think like specifically 0.98
00:59:34.680 like center left, like liberal community that has really organized themselves around hating the shit 0.99
00:59:40.860 out of Donald Trump and just like reviling him. And this is what brings, you know, one theory of 0.97
00:59:47.320 Kamala Harris's campaign is that people can, that people hate Donald Trump more than they hate 1.00
00:59:53.500 women right and she can bring them all together to hate this one fucking guy yeah enough to to 0.95
00:59:59.800 win the election um and so i'm interested in like yeah and and you know like adrian you noted that 0.96
01:00:07.420 this is a uh podcast called in bed with a right so like this is i'm not judging anybody for
01:00:12.020 organizing their identity this way this is also something i do this is an anti-fandom podcast
01:00:16.480 and you know and like who among us has not gone and like watch the instagram story of like 0.99
01:00:22.420 a frenemy you know just to be like and what is she up to now she looks like shit 0.97
01:00:28.120 um but like what is the force of this anti-fandom online is it like is it one-sided is it taking 0.97
01:00:38.000 root sort of everywhere it seems like it's a it's a really dynamic factor that i haven't really seen
01:00:44.820 theorized a ton. Yeah. I think it's really funny that you mentioned this kind of like blue wave
01:00:49.300 resistance lib genre of Twitter that unfortunately we don't really see as much anymore given the
01:00:55.680 quick, quick death of Twitter. But yeah, I think it's interesting because yeah, in 2016,
01:01:01.960 there was this whole cohort of people who really banded together in their hatred of Donald Trump
01:01:09.360 and their hatred of conservatives.
01:01:12.180 And I think that it was so effective
01:01:13.700 because they themselves didn't need to have
01:01:15.820 individual political stances
01:01:17.980 that were different from each other
01:01:20.080 because they were united under this combined hatred.
01:01:26.660 And so I think part of it is it's so successful
01:01:29.880 because you don't need to hash out
01:01:33.680 your differences with each other
01:01:34.960 if you have a common enemy.
01:01:36.780 me. You know, you don't see them like arguing over, I mean, sometimes you do now, but like
01:01:41.860 back then in 2017, 2018, you didn't see them like arguing over the intricacies of healthcare
01:01:46.680 or, you know, like their stances on, you know, car taxes. You saw them being like anyone
01:01:53.240 but Trump. And so there's that where like you don't, this combined hatred is, you know,
01:01:59.320 you don't need to have your own individual political stances that might conflict with
01:02:03.340 someone else's because you just share this one hatred. And the other is that it's really good
01:02:07.640 engagement. There was, for a minute, a whole cottage industry of people who built platforms
01:02:14.800 just dunking on Trump tweets. As soon as Trump tweeted, you had the quickest people just
01:02:20.840 absolutely dunking on him in the quote tweets, racking up a couple hundred thousand likes,
01:02:25.800 easy. And so I think that it's really easy to get engagement when you're hating on something
01:02:32.380 and it's it's easier than to get engagement when you're supporting something it's it's it lends
01:02:37.860 itself to humor more i think being a hater it there's just more jokes in it yeah and it's
01:02:44.240 something that we are again like i think we're more used to in pop culture right i mean like
01:02:49.460 we've talked about the stans but the anti-fan anti-fandom has mostly been theorized in pop
01:02:53.740 culture studies i think yeah right like hate watching fantypathy right um right haters are
01:03:00.320 gonna hate hate hate hate right like it's it is basically um the we much more frequently follow
01:03:08.940 cultural products with that kind of blinding blinding just distaste um then we do politicians
01:03:18.700 who after all kind of like i was once incensed about bobby jindal i haven't thought about bobby
01:03:23.520 jindal until i just said the words bobby jindal like i don't know what he's doing like he's
01:03:27.300 probably like me as a gardening show what do i know but like you know there are actors that are
01:03:31.800 still driving me to distraction and like they they're not going away right like in some way
01:03:35.660 we live longer with our with our pop cultural kind of fixations than we do with our politicians 0.95
01:03:41.800 one noted uh exception i guess being donald fucking trump but uh but largely right like um 0.94
01:03:48.940 democracy tends to be worse at serving us these kinds of enduring icons of our own hatred than 0.97
01:03:57.180 capitalism, right? If you're not a Marvel fan, well, the last 20 years have been a long,
01:04:02.440 darn trip, right? And I wonder if that's another moment where kind of our consumer behavior actually
01:04:09.640 sort of spills over into our political discourse. Yeah, totally. I think so. I mean, we talk about
01:04:16.540 stan culture, and I think stan culture is inherently consumerist. It's inherently built
01:04:23.660 around buying products from the people you stan or buying products of you know in relation to what
01:04:29.820 you stan whether that's you know funko pops or um make america great again hats um and i think
01:04:37.300 you mentioned like hating you know i think something like hating is just so low stakes
01:04:43.740 compared to supporting something yeah i wish i could like i go out of my way to watch to like
01:04:50.080 hate watch movies just so I can like give them one star and litter box. I wouldn't go out of my,
01:04:55.160 whereas like going to see a movie, like buying a ticket to see a movie that I might want to watch,
01:05:00.380 I'm a lot more reluctant to do that versus just waiting for it to come out and hating on it.
01:05:07.600 And I think right now the question is whether or not this kind of consumerism
01:05:11.300 will translate to showing up at polls. I think it's really easy to buy a hat supporting a
01:05:19.460 candidate or buy stickers supporting white dudes for Harris versus actually showing up to the
01:05:28.060 polls. And even now in the last week, I've seen so many tweets of people saying like,
01:05:33.680 oh my God, I didn't know you had to actually register to vote. That's crazy. I bought all
01:05:37.280 this stuff I thought that would make it. I didn't think I'd actually have to register. And it's
01:05:41.380 like, oh my God. Oh God. Yeah, I know. So it's interesting. This whole conversation about stan
01:05:47.860 culture and politics also is i think a bit fraught because there's just you can stand someone but
01:05:53.940 like lack there's the public education system is just so broken that you can stand so you can stand
01:05:58.920 a politician and and lack the knowledge about how to actually support them versus something as
01:06:05.340 simple as you know seeing a trump tweet and dunking on it a lot easier it is yeah yeah i think
01:06:10.040 you've what i've really learned is that no matter which way the election goes we're we're still
01:06:14.820 doomed yeah yeah yeah it's uh it's gonna be a long it's this whole cycle has felt so long i
01:06:23.520 don't know why every election feels longer this i'm like it's been a couple of months since harris
01:06:29.580 announced her campaign and yet i feel like i've lived there wasn't years there wasn't even a
01:06:34.620 primary really on the democratic side and i feel like it's been going on for several thousand years
01:06:40.280 i know morgan i learned so much from you i think you've got this like insight into these dynamics
01:06:46.100 and you told me things i'd never heard before and really helped me see this in a way so now
01:06:51.220 whenever i'm online getting yelled at by a bot i'll think of you and i'm so honored
01:06:58.280 don't hate him moira he's just engagement farming i know every time every time you post a picture
01:07:05.140 of your dog, I will think of the faceless people just posting their little AI-generated hate at
01:07:12.540 you. In Bed with the Right, I'd like to thank the Michelle R. Clayman Institute for Gender 0.67
01:07:17.160 Research for generous support, Jennifer Portillo for setting up our studio. Our theme music is
01:07:22.140 by Katie Lau. Our producer is Megan Kalthus.