In Bed With The Right - April 08, 2025


Episode 68 -- Republican Makeup with Jessica DeFino

Topics
Episode 67 -- Project 1933, Part I: January to March 15 Episode 70 -- Project 1933, Part II: March 15 to April 15

Episode Stats


Length

39 minutes

Words per minute

171.33

Word count

6,713

Sentence count

309

Harmful content

Misogyny

28

sentences flagged

Toxicity

4

sentences flagged

Hate speech

18

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 You reject your humanity for the sake of becoming this godlike figure with a godlike power.
00:00:06.000 And that really is what Republicans are doing, particularly in this gender-affirming care space.
00:00:11.280 They're saying, I am a woman, so I am allowed to use these interventions, and you are not.
00:00:18.760 And you're really taking up this sort of, like, godlike authority.
00:00:22.160 And I think this pull to get rid of, like, all traces of human life on your face really is part of that sort of performance of authority.
00:00:36.460 Hello, I'm Adrienne Dobb.
00:00:38.200 And I'm Moira Dodigan.
00:00:39.360 And whether we like it or not, we're in bed with the right.
00:00:41.300 so adrian today for this very special episode we are talking about a little trend both in life and
00:00:52.040 on tiktok called republican makeup what do you know about republican makeup nothing okay great
00:00:59.560 literally nothing i'm so sorry i i mean i saw the topic on the schedule and i i sort of i conjured
00:01:06.840 some people. I was like, oh, yeah, there's like, well, I know about like Fox News hair. So I was
00:01:11.100 like, oh, OK, like would stand to reason. But that's literally as far as I got. I got to be
00:01:15.980 honest. OK, well, Republican makeup is a tick tock trend and a hashtag that arose from the fact
00:01:24.620 that, you know, I don't know if you've noticed, but Republicans look kind of different than us
00:01:29.920 mere mortals. I'm thinking like, you know, iconic high profile Republican women like Kimberly
00:01:34.880 guilfoyle melania trump christine noem our new homeland security secretary congresswoman nancy
00:01:41.340 mace they've got a particular look it's very specific yeah there is a lot of fillers especially
00:01:49.160 on the lips and cheeks there's usually like a nude lip there is foundation that's like kind of
00:01:56.660 the wrong shade, very large kind of feathery false eyelashes often. And there is a very specific
00:02:05.740 hair, the Fox News hair, which is these waist length coiled waves, right? And in our doc,
00:02:14.180 I've put in a couple of iconic examples. I've got Kimberly Garofoyle at the RNC. I've got
00:02:19.500 And Laura Loomer, the sort of like right-wing troll who's had, you know, some procedures done to look a very specific way.
00:02:28.820 I've got like kind of this picture of Kristi Noem at an ICE raid doing her, you know, Gestapo Barbie.
00:02:35.680 Honestly, when I looked at that in the planning, Zach, I was like, well, did this like migrate over here from our planning for the AI slop one?
00:02:42.660 Because this looks like someone was like, ChatGPT, generate Kristi Noem in an ICE uniform.
00:02:48.700 But this is really her.
00:02:49.780 This is a photo from an early morning ice raid, I believe, in New York City, where she showed up at the crack of dawn in full glam.
00:02:56.640 Right.
00:02:56.980 Her hair is on point.
00:02:58.620 And, you know, we're not the only ones who have noticed.
00:03:00.580 There is a TikTok trend, hashtag Republican makeup, in which women, liberal women, have begun to parody their right wing look with women doing their own makeup in dramatic Republican fashion.
00:03:13.700 J.D. Vance is like the patient zero of eyeliner abuse. Yes.
00:03:19.020 And here to discuss this trend with us, both Republican makeup, the makeup and Republican makeup, the sort of media phenomenon and the hashtag is Jessica DeFino, one of my favorite writers who is a critic of beauty and wellness, but also the author of the absolutely excellent substack, The Review of Beauty.
00:03:40.300 and I think one of the smartest people writing about gender right now.
00:03:44.180 Jessica, thank you so much for coming on the show.
00:03:47.480 Thank you so much for having me. I'm so excited to be here.
00:03:49.840 So let's get into it. Jessica, what is this trend, hashtag Republican makeup?
00:03:55.680 So Republican makeup, I believe it was started by this influencer on TikTok,
00:04:01.520 Suzanne Lambert, who first pointed it out, and she described the aesthetic as,
00:04:05.500 quote drained dusty and matte so the idea is that republican makeup is very overdone it's over the
00:04:13.740 top it's under blended like you can really see the lines of foundation the lines of contour it's
00:04:19.860 very conspicuous so the look is kind of like cakey the lips are over lined the eyebrows are like
00:04:27.240 giant and blocky and overdrawn there's very severe eyeliner like it's definitely um sort of a
00:04:33.220 caricature of femininity but worn sort of for the everyday yeah it does look very the skin looks
00:04:40.180 quite dry it uses a lot of product the foundation is put on very thick and it's often kind of an
00:04:47.600 orangey color i guess maybe in a nod to donald trump himself right the eyebrows look incredibly
00:04:55.180 artificial it's like a solid like almost like a marker streak of eyebrow instead of the like
00:05:02.360 more naturalistic like drawing of little hairs that you see some people do right it's a very
00:05:07.400 peachy blush at least on this one that i'm looking at it tends to be like an interesting contrast
00:05:13.020 between like the pink of the blush and the more like yellow warm orangey tone of the foundation
00:05:20.760 yeah there's probably some like contour and bronzer going on underneath the blush as well
00:05:25.940 so you can see like these distinct shades like popping out from under one another yeah i don't 1.00
00:05:31.080 totally know like like technically i don't know enough about makeup to know what these women are 0.99
00:05:36.060 doing but i'm like oh yeah you look bad you know yes it's like it's very over the top and it's
00:05:42.400 taking a lot of cosmetic trends that i would say were really big in the 2010s like in the kardashian
00:05:48.860 era yeah and kind of like dialing them up to 11 so i think part of the kind of like critique and
00:05:56.360 what people are having fun with here is that the look is kind of passé yeah this was kind of how
00:06:02.340 everyone famous looked like you know 10 years ago i mean the trump echoes are hard to miss i mean
00:06:07.860 like i've never i can't believe i'm contemplating that man's lips but like the the lips from real
00:06:13.040 trump kind of the over application of lip gloss i feel like really gives them kind of a trumpies
00:06:19.460 thing and then the bronzer really you know i guess he is the most famous bronzer user is currently on
00:06:25.300 our TVs. I also think the big eyebrows really bring out the dead eyes, which, you know, if you
00:06:31.520 got it, flaunt it. You know, if your eyes are truly just fully dead, why not also have those
00:06:36.580 eyebrows? But I guess the other thing I was wondering, so one explanation for Fox News hair
00:06:41.580 I'd heard before, and I think this even came up in our episode about the Mormon housewives,
00:06:46.900 is that it's a somewhat maladroit way of showing off wealth. Because one thing it is is impractical 1.00
00:06:53.780 and expensive.
00:06:56.540 Yeah.
00:06:57.060 What are we looking at?
00:06:58.380 You know, I don't really go shopping
00:06:59.860 other than for other people at Sephora,
00:07:01.460 so I don't know.
00:07:02.600 Yeah, I would say it's expensive
00:07:04.020 and more than expensive, it's effortful.
00:07:06.680 Like a lot of effort and attention and energy
00:07:10.000 is being funneled into creating this look,
00:07:13.140 which requires constant product use.
00:07:16.460 I mean, the other thing that I didn't mention,
00:07:18.460 well, people call this
00:07:19.340 the plastic surgery element of it,
00:07:21.580 mar-a-lago face which is yeah excessive use of fillers and botox all of which require
00:07:27.840 upkeep every couple of months same with hair and hair extensions and the blowout is weekly if not
00:07:34.720 daily so it is it is um a signifier of a ton of like money time and energy funneled into like
00:07:41.580 controlling the body it's also a lot of product it's so much product if you're using high-end
00:07:48.780 you know, expensive Sephora makeup and not like the cheap drugstore makeup. Like just putting
00:07:56.020 this much product on your face has got to like deplete your bank account much faster.
00:08:02.420 Yes. I mean, well, not in defense of Republican makeup, but I will say I don't think that there's
00:08:08.140 a ton of difference in the amount of product and the amount of time that goes into achieving this
00:08:13.340 look versus the more popular in like liberal circles, like dewy, no makeup makeup that hinges
00:08:20.140 on a lot of skincare use. So I would say like the person who cares about their appearance
00:08:25.720 is probably funneling the same amount of time and money into what they look like. It's just
00:08:30.160 very different aesthetics that are popular with these different like subsets of the population.
00:08:35.800 And tell us about the emergence of this hashtag. So it emerged as kind of a way for
00:08:41.340 liberal women to like mock and critique this ascendant aesthetic of you know the group in 1.00
00:08:50.200 power using i guess like kind of like cultural cachet and coolness against a group that you 1.00
00:08:58.220 know antagonizes them in their freedom yes that has all the like institutional power right so
00:09:03.760 I'm interested in the use of this trend to like mock Republican women and where it came from 0.81
00:09:12.260 and what its tone is and why it's caught on so much. Right. So, I mean, these videos that are 0.93
00:09:18.740 mocking Republican makeup are often set to the trending audio of the song God Made Girls,
00:09:24.240 which I think is like the perfect way to really frame what's happening here.
00:09:30.080 Wait, I think we have to talk about this song, God Made Girls.
00:09:33.320 Adrienne, have you encountered Ray Lynn's God Made Girls?
00:09:39.140 I have not.
00:09:40.000 Let's all spend a moment here.
00:09:42.780 You guys ready?
00:09:43.860 I'm so ready.
00:09:44.720 All right.
00:09:45.080 Let's go. 1.00
00:09:47.380 Somebody's gotta wear a pretty skirt. 1.00
00:09:50.440 Somebody's gotta be the one to flirt. 1.00
00:09:53.540 Somebody's gotta wanna hold his hands to God Made Girls.
00:09:57.880 I think this song was invented in a lab to drive me personally and specifically insane. 0.98
00:10:06.160 Like, this song makes me want to kill somebody.
00:10:10.060 It's so perfect for this moment, though. 0.90
00:10:13.340 I know.
00:10:14.320 The layers. Oh, my gosh.
00:10:15.940 It also features, the music video features so many shots of a woman in a mirror singing to herself.
00:10:22.720 Yeah, this is a weird video.
00:10:24.480 And she is indeed wearing Republican makeup.
00:10:26.500 and then it's like a hodgepodge of like trad wifey aesthetics she's like in a ball gown 0.58
00:10:32.920 on the back of a horse in like a field and now she seems to be in a like a there's various children
00:10:39.680 who have magic of some kind i know it's um it's like like a ballerina farm k-hole you know it's
00:10:47.260 just like it's a very dark artifact yes so you think that this like trending audio is central to
00:10:54.600 the joke. I think it's central to the joke. I think there's a lot of like undertones that
00:10:59.820 really frame what's going on here with Republican makeup, too, because like the lyrics obviously
00:11:04.400 just hit on a bunch of like gender essentialisms in terms of like typically, you know, quote unquote
00:11:09.820 feminine traits. It's like somebody's got to wear the pretty skirt. Someone's got to be the one to 1.00
00:11:14.920 flirt. So God made girls like girls are beautiful and breakable, you know, all of that. And I think 1.00
00:11:21.580 it's an interesting background track to critique Republican makeup because of its religious
00:11:26.900 connotations, first and foremost. Like, I think that's appropriate because beauty in society
00:11:31.660 really does function as an ethical ideal, especially for women and gender nonconforming
00:11:36.680 people. So like, you know, meeting a beauty standard is not just about your appearance.
00:11:40.640 It's like a moral imperative that's tied to your self-worth and your social value. And it's like
00:11:46.540 messaged as this moral duty failure to conform to the standard of beauty like leads to moral
00:11:51.680 and social judgment and yeah i think this song is kind of an interesting way to to talk about the
00:12:00.580 way that the beauty industry has borrowed a lot of tactics from religion like even when you look
00:12:04.740 at the language of beauty you know it's a miracle product it's a holy grail it's a skin savior like
00:12:10.820 even something as simple as having good skin implies this like moral imperative to have it
00:12:15.620 like our quest to be beautiful is a quest to be seen as good and like i think the the promise of
00:12:22.560 like the optimized body like has a lot in common with like the promise of like christianity like
00:12:28.920 you get to move through the world with special protections and privileges because of what you
00:12:33.100 believe in i mean the virgin mary was so morally good that she literally didn't die yes well yes
00:12:40.540 And that's the same promise. It's like beauty and religion have like this ultimate promise of immortality, like agelessness.
00:12:47.600 You're never going to age. You're not going to feel the effects of like mortal life on your body.
00:12:52.920 I also think about like the incorruptibility of some corpses of saints, like they don't decay.
00:12:58.520 And this is a sign of divine favor that like your mortal coil will remain intact and unravaged by time.
00:13:07.060 Yeah, there's a there's a logic that is very consistent there.
00:13:09.740 I mean, in their defense, some of the pictures you've just shown me, for their bodies, at least, this may literally be true.
00:13:15.780 I don't think those bodies are decaying anymore, but, you know, the people will be dead.
00:13:19.560 No, they're preserved with monthly injections of neurotoxins, for sure.
00:13:23.740 Yeah.
00:13:24.180 Oh, my God.
00:13:24.660 And then I think the next, like, layer of why this song really hits on what people are getting at is that it's like these videos are kind of an attempt to expose the hypocrisy of Republican makeup and the Republican belief in gender essentialism.
00:13:39.020 because like this party is very much attached to the idea that God made man and he made woman and
00:13:43.600 he made them different for very specific reasons. And it's God's plan to have masculine men and
00:13:49.020 feminine women and nothing in between. And that like women being wives and mothers and objects 1.00
00:13:54.960 of beauty is their biological destiny. And of course, that all like falls apart when you look
00:13:59.200 at these like very extreme and unnatural interventions required for the Republican
00:14:04.060 version of femininity like you're claiming biological destiny and there's nothing biological
00:14:09.580 or natural or god given about like this caricature that you're embodying right like if it was so
00:14:17.560 innate it would not require so much consumption so much time so much effort and artificiality
00:14:24.960 right right right and i think that's kind of what the people making these videos are trying to get
00:14:29.820 at. Like, this isn't God-given.
00:14:31.900 This is man-made.
00:14:33.880 God did not design those eyebrows.
00:14:35.640 Like, that was not in his plan.
00:14:45.300 Now, our producer Mark Yoshizumi
00:14:47.820 points out that we never plug
00:14:49.560 the Patreon on the main feed
00:14:51.720 episodes anymore. So here's me
00:14:53.340 plugging the Patreon on
00:14:55.760 the main feed episode. So we
00:14:57.740 have a Patreon. That's it. There are three
00:14:59.480 tier levels. You get a lot of cool
00:15:01.640 extra stuff, extra episodes. You get
00:15:03.660 access to our Discord. I should also
00:15:05.640 mention that we have a merch store. I think we've never
00:15:07.780 literally mentioned that. We're very
00:15:09.680 bad at this. It's at TeePublic
00:15:11.680 and you can get a bunch of stuff with our logos
00:15:13.560 on it. Mugs, your
00:15:15.520 hoodies, your t-shirts, I think
00:15:17.580 baseball jerseys
00:15:19.780 or what they're called. It's cool.
00:15:21.560 So you should check that out. And
00:15:23.700 all that makes it possible for us to
00:15:25.600 continue doing what we're doing.
00:15:29.480 it's interesting, right? The trend is called Republican makeup. But as you say, these kinds
00:15:37.200 of interventions that are necessary to create this supposedly natural feminine ideal, like that 0.68
00:15:43.920 doesn't start with makeup. You're supposed to also inject and cut and modify surgically, right? 0.98
00:15:50.880 And I do wonder, why does that kind of drop out in the critique? Or does it drop out of the
00:15:55.960 critique and what is the role of those kinds of interventions here right no i mean i think they
00:16:01.440 play a huge role particularly in the republican attacks on gender affirming care which i think
00:16:07.200 is what a lot of people are trying to get at and point out like specifically i'm thinking of like
00:16:12.100 trump's recent like youth care ban executive order right which defines gender affirming care
00:16:17.860 as like quote chemical and surgical mutilation um and what's interesting there is that what
00:16:24.160 that order calls mutilation is normalized and even encouraged for cisgender people
00:16:29.880 of all ages and particularly the people in power of this party. So it's like those interventions 0.67
00:16:35.800 are okay so long as it's in the name of heteronormative beauty. Yeah. Just to give our
00:16:41.980 listeners a sense of that in researching a reaction piece to that executive order, 1.00
00:16:45.760 I looked up how many girls in the United States get breast surgery before they turn 18, 0.60
00:16:51.400 You know, cis girls, that is. And the numbers are obviously way higher than the number of trans kids who go in for any kind of treatment. It's utterly normalized. And then you're right. It's treated as this absolutely abhorrent, you know, an obviously immoral thing when it's done for the benefit of a different group.
00:17:13.360 what kind of procedures does the mar-a-lago face require we mentioned a lot of fillers yeah and you
00:17:20.960 do see like sort of this tightness or hardness of the face that i understand to be like a signature
00:17:29.380 of injectables right but then there's also like a lot of changing of the shape of the face
00:17:36.320 like much bigger lips much more like exaggerated cheeks like what are they going for there 1.00
00:17:44.740 totally yeah i mean i would say the procedures that these republican women are seeking out like
00:17:50.840 aren't particularly out of the ordinary like these are the procedures that are trending across the 0.95
00:17:57.440 political spectrum with people who are getting cosmetic work done they're just being done in a
00:18:02.200 different way. So the procedures are Botox, which is a neuromodulator that kind of relaxes and
00:18:11.380 freezes your facial muscles so that you don't get expression lines or like fine lines and wrinkles
00:18:16.480 from aging are kind of, you know, disappeared for however long the neuromodulator lasts.
00:18:21.760 There's fillers, which are used to like inflate the lips, inflate the cheeks, often like inflate
00:18:27.840 the chin you can even do like a nose job with filler as well a non-surgical nose job so all
00:18:33.300 of that's being done there's definitely a lot of facelifts like that tight look is usually the
00:18:39.520 result of like a surgical facelift or a half facelift brow lifts that will lift the brows
00:18:45.300 up to look younger blepharoplasty is something that's really popular right now which is like
00:18:50.780 the surgical removal of part of the skin on your eyelid like above your eyelid or a lower bleph
00:18:57.160 below the eyelid to like take away some of that puffiness and make the eye look more open and
00:19:03.020 animated. I mean, breast implants are a huge part of this. Liposuction is a huge part of this. 0.99
00:19:10.100 Even fat transfer, there's like fat transfer is very popular now where doctors will take
00:19:15.200 fat from a part of your body where it is not desirable and re-inject it into a different
00:19:20.220 part of your body where fat is more desirable, like, you know, the upper cheeks, for example.
00:19:25.860 So, yeah, that's all being done by a lot of people.
00:19:28.580 But in this subset of women in particular, I think what's different is that you want it to be noticed.
00:19:36.760 Like being noticed is a big part of the appeal.
00:19:39.400 Whereas in other demographics, the idea is that you don't want anyone to know you've gotten work done.
00:19:44.220 You want to look like you just got like a really good night's sleep or something.
00:19:47.580 So, I mean, I think there's like a couple of different reasons for this.
00:19:50.580 I think obvious cosmetic surgery is a class performance.
00:19:53.660 It's like showing that you are funneling wealth into your face for the sake of like looking like you can. And then I think there's also part of it where like the more work you have done like this, studies show the less able you are to sometimes see yourself accurately. So you don't realize how far things are gone. You don't realize that you're like moving into caricature territory.
00:20:15.400 And then there's also like corruption of aesthetic doctors. Like there's been a lot of reports on the filler, like overuse of fillers. And doctors get paid by like how many units they put in. And the fillers also like wear away. And so doctors will often recommend you get them refilled sooner than you need to. And it creates this like very inflated look just because of, you know, that's capitalism, baby. So yeah, there's a lot of factors going on here, I think.
00:20:44.900 I'm really interested in this idea that they are trying to make their plastic surgery and their work look conspicuous, that they're like not trying to look au naturel.
00:20:56.480 They are trying to look like they spent time under the knife, like they put in a lot of money, like they put in a lot of effort.
00:21:03.120 And it like, I think, frankly, like endured pain to look the way that they do.
00:21:07.320 Yes. No, completely.
00:21:08.980 I mean, that's such a big part of it is just this idea that beauty is pain and beauty is a woman's duty and therefore being in pain for the sake of being beautiful is just part of what a woman must do or should do. And yeah, I mean, it signals like a really strong dedication to this sort of ideology. And I think, yeah, the uncanniness is a part of it.
00:21:31.880 It's funny. I've been taking this class on puppets and automata and marionettes, kind of wanting to study why these things are so influential in the beauty space right now.
00:21:44.600 Like, obviously, the most enduring beauty standard right now is this sort of mannequin perfect look. And what's been so interesting to me is this sort of object and God are two sides of the same coin.
00:22:01.260 So I think, you know, a lot of what we would say about this uncanny look about this sort of like mannequin puppet look is it's objectification, which it is. But the other thing that you become when you remove like your human features is more godlike, you know, lacking that emotion.
00:22:18.760 Some Henry from Kleist in there. I love it.
00:22:21.020 Yeah. It's sort of like you reject your humanity for the sake of becoming this godlike figure with a godlike power. And that really is what Republicans are doing, particularly in this gender affirming care space. They're saying, I am a woman, so I am allowed to use these interventions and you are not.
00:22:40.260 And you're really taking up this sort of, like, godlike authority. And I think this pull to get rid of, like, all traces of human life on your face really is part of that sort of performance of authority.
00:22:52.520 Wait, Adrian, who's Heinrich von Kleissen? This is a Germany reference I did not catch.
00:22:57.700 He wrote about the marionette theater.
00:22:59.320 Oh, really?
00:22:59.720 And that's his point, that, like, the grace of the marionette is both. It's both the perfect automaton and it touches on the divine.
00:23:07.860 So I was just making a guess as to what's on the syllabus there.
00:23:11.680 That is on the syllabus, yeah.
00:23:14.020 That makes so much sense to me.
00:23:15.220 And I also think that like we could even make a slightly darker reading and say like the inability to express emotions or to read other people's faces, which is something that this makeup trend, frankly, has in common with AI.
00:23:27.840 Yes.
00:23:28.380 It's a pretty easy way to disable your own empathy.
00:23:31.400 If you're gearing up to do something, say, really, really world historically regrettable.
00:23:35.820 So I just, you know, I do think there may also be that, that, like, these are people who are trying to sort of dull their capacity for empathy in anticipation.
00:23:45.460 Yeah.
00:23:45.680 I wanted to ask a little bit about, I didn't realize that, like, part of what we're seeing here might be that they're being taken for a ride by their doctors.
00:23:53.740 And that seems to me also so emblematic that in some way, I wouldn't call that the Republican thing, but certainly on the Trumpist right, I'm always struck by how everything is both a grift and not, right?
00:24:07.160 Like we called it the Mar-a-Lago look.
00:24:09.620 Everyone at Mar-a-Lago is grifting Donald Trump.
00:24:11.780 Donald Trump is grifting everyone at Mar-a-Lago.
00:24:13.800 Like who's the mark?
00:24:14.780 Who's the grifter?
00:24:15.560 Who can even say anymore, right?
00:24:17.180 And so what better way to implementize that in your face is to be like, did I get taken for a ride by my plastic surgeon? That's for me to know. That's for him to know and for me not to say, you know.
00:24:27.920 That's such a good point. And it's also, I think like this idea, I think a lot of women try to embody the beauty ideal to escape the clutches of misogyny because we're told like the more beautiful you are, the better you'll be treated, the more power you'll have. And it's just, it goes to show that like you really can't escape that through beauty. Like beauty is part of that. And you'll, you'll kind of like always be in its clutches.
00:24:56.420 Yeah, it's interesting that there's something about these people who are very contemptuous of vulnerability, right? And there's one logic by which excessive cosmetic or like surgical interventions look invulnerable, right? They make you look less human. They make you like quite literally less capable of expressing emotion.
00:25:21.000 But on the other hand, they make you look very, very vulnerable, right? Because this looks like somebody who, you know, I mean, there's a judgment that I'm maybe not entirely willing to endorse. But I always do when I see somebody who's had a ton of plastic surgery done to the point where they look kind of unhuman. My thought is that's a person in a mental health crisis.
00:25:44.960 like that's a person who is suffering the effects of misogyny and no longer has a total grip on
00:25:52.780 reality right and there's a way in which it's both broadcasting invulnerability and broadcasting
00:25:58.300 your vulnerability to insecurity into the logics of misogyny at the same time well vulnerability
00:26:02.520 in another way too right like i've long been fascinated with why republicans like lindsey 0.94
00:26:08.360 graham and i've come to the conclusion they like him because he's a gay man who thinks he's fooling
00:26:14.160 them and part of the fun is the sadism of like oh this guy thinks he's fooling us he thinks he's in 0.57
00:26:19.320 the closet this man's not in the closet and there's something similar with plastic surgery
00:26:24.560 right oh she thinks she's getting away with it we can all tell and you're right Maura that is a form
00:26:30.120 of of great vulnerability and to accentuate that and to be like possibly either in on the joke or
00:26:36.780 not in on the joke that that's new right the idea is if you get caught out it's like well this is
00:26:43.420 obvious it gets embarrassing it's you're making a laughingstock of yourself you know if you deny
00:26:49.460 it like men with hairpieces who deny they're wearing a hairpiece right like that the vulnerability
00:26:54.620 is that other people can tell much more than these people think themselves they're giving away
00:27:00.220 and that that does i think often lead back to gender and sexuality that people oh you think
00:27:05.120 you're fooling me you think you're fooling everyone but you're not but so much about maga
00:27:09.760 about the rejection of shame.
00:27:11.780 Like, yes, I am lying to you,
00:27:14.220 and I will admit that I'm lying to you.
00:27:16.020 In this case, yes, I got terrible work done.
00:27:19.720 Yeah, and I'm going to show up on the RNC stage
00:27:23.520 looking like a deflated balloon.
00:27:26.720 And that is my prerogative as a cis woman,
00:27:29.060 as a white woman, as a paragon of this kind of status.
00:27:32.580 And as Matt Gaetz, let's be honest,
00:27:34.340 because I feel like every time he shows up
00:27:35.640 on a Republican stage, all of Twitter used to go,
00:27:38.000 oh, Jesus Christ. Yeah. What about the work that the men are having done? Because MAGA men also
00:27:43.560 have a very particular look, even though like hashtag Republican makeup seems to be directed
00:27:47.280 much more at the women. Right. Yeah. I think the longevity movement is a big part of this. I think
00:27:53.360 for men, anti-aging has been rebranded as longevity. And there's this sort of like tech
00:27:59.360 component to it. I mean, you even see it with all the MAGA tech guys who are next to these
00:28:04.600 Republican lawmakers, they're all using this technology and it's been rebranded like kind
00:28:09.560 of for bros. So, I mean, Botox is a huge part of it. The facelifts are a huge part of it. I mean,
00:28:15.040 the very masculine like caricatured jawline is really prominent. Is that done with fillers or
00:28:20.360 is that an implant? I think a lot of chin implants are happening, but you can get jaw filler to kind
00:28:25.820 of create that like very angular sort of square look. And then I think hair plugs are really
00:28:32.300 prominent as well. So it's, yeah, it's taking these like traditionally masculine features and
00:28:38.640 just caricaturing them through injectables and surgery. So there's like a way in which the
00:28:46.880 look itself serves as a signal of like membership in the group, right? Like just looking like this
00:28:57.640 broadcast something about you and it broadcast something about like your politics right nobody's 0.99
00:29:04.080 gonna look at christy noem and be like that woman definitely voted for kamala harris you know and 1.00
00:29:10.140 and by extension kamala harris would never have that haircut or those extensions or those lashes 1.00
00:29:18.920 or those lip fillers you know and and it of course part of this is a race thing yes and like something 0.82
00:29:24.820 that i see a little bit in republican makeup is an attempt to like minimize ethnically ambiguous
00:29:31.580 features like the nose is always very narrow yes like contoured so and like the lips are very big
00:29:39.380 in this way that as you mentioned seems like a little bit of a like appropriation of the 2016
00:29:43.980 like kylie jenner look like very much borrowing from black culture but that itself remains like
00:29:51.080 an assertion of racial privilege, right? Right. It's like cosmetic colonization of taking this 0.83
00:29:55.780 feature that is associated with one race or ethnicity and grafting it onto like your white
00:30:01.240 wealthy body because you can. But yeah, I think that's definitely a part of it. Like pretty much
00:30:06.880 all beauty standards are born out of systems of oppression. They're the physical manifestation of 0.65
00:30:11.380 those systems. And yeah, beauty in that sense is a power structure. And so of course, all of these
00:30:18.300 things influence what aesthetic signals we're adopting and why. And I mean, I think there's
00:30:24.560 obviously a ton of overlap with the way, you know, the fascist movement shaped beauty standards in
00:30:29.580 Nazi Germany, like physical perfection was a huge part of their political propaganda. It was blonde
00:30:35.680 hair, blue eyes, fair skin, symmetrical features, like symmetry was a huge thing. And that's
00:30:41.440 something that I think contributes to this uncanny look in the Mar-a-Lago face or the Republican
00:30:47.440 make up, trying to draw those eyebrows perfectly symmetrically, like trying to get your lips to be
00:30:52.780 a one-to-one perfect ratio. Like that's not what people look like. Like symmetry doesn't really
00:30:59.140 exist for most of the population like that. But yeah, a lot of this is like to reinforce this
00:31:04.760 like eugenics-driven racial hierarchy. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, there's a ton of overlap.
00:31:10.920 Yeah. I mean, I think this podcast gets back to the question of physiognomy quite,
00:31:14.980 quite frequently and it's true that like the idea there of course is that yeah that the face
00:31:19.940 expresses what makeup can actually hide so right like early 20th century physiognomists and
00:31:25.540 craniometrists were like well your bone structure doesn't lie it gives away what you can hide and
00:31:30.700 what you could hide often enough was traits that they hated right like race mixing quote-unquote
00:31:35.940 jewishness right right all these things and it's really fascinating to see it sort of here 0.90
00:31:41.000 put in the service of this exact same thing you create the norm face in order to be able to then 1.00
00:31:47.020 pathologize any deviation from it right because that's very much also implicit here that like
00:31:53.500 the deviations from this are softness right like right these men get these chins in order not to
00:32:00.680 look like beta cucks there's a very particular kind of soy boy they're not trying to be and that 0.50
00:32:06.680 they probably fear not so secretly they are in fact are right so to me the idea that someone
00:32:13.280 says i'm going to get some injectables in order to look the way i used to look five years ago as
00:32:18.500 opposed to the way i probably should look now totally the most understandable thing in the
00:32:22.660 world the idea that i don't want to be this other person that strikes me as different and much
00:32:27.780 scarier right like i i don't want to look like this other group um right not like myself but 0.58
00:32:34.200 a little bit more haggard like yeah that does suck but i don't want to look like these people
00:32:39.600 seems to be very much the name of the game here doesn't it oh completely and it it's also it 0.80
00:32:44.860 makes it harder for people who aren't part of those groups those in groups people who aren't
00:32:50.920 white to comply and part of the like evil genius of this system of of beauty standards is that 0.52
00:32:57.440 in incentivizing people to comply, you're stealing all of their resources in the process. You're 0.87
00:33:04.180 leaving them unresourced. They are funneling their time, their money, their effort, their attention,
00:33:09.220 their energy, their headspace into this project of looking as perfect as possible. And yeah,
00:33:16.080 they might eventually look that way, but what do you have left at the end of the day after you've
00:33:19.900 reached that like aesthetic standard it occurs to me that we might have like come back here to the
00:33:28.900 notion of like these very dramatic exaggerated sort of self-consciously artificial beauty standards
00:33:37.920 on the political right as being again a rejection of transness right an attempt to like exaggerate
00:33:46.600 and even almost caricature the sex binary right yeah because like both maga men and maga women
00:33:53.920 to me look like they've had a lot done but they look quite different from one another
00:33:58.540 and there's something about like a rejection of the trans or queer project of undermining the 0.83
00:34:06.400 social meaning of sex and the doubling down on like the sex binary and and their personal
00:34:13.180 investments in their place on it that seems like just really honestly kind of sad.
00:34:19.640 Yeah. Yeah. You know, when I look at Republican makeup and this artificial femininity as
00:34:26.440 contrasted with the fact that they are blocking trans people who need gender affirming care from
00:34:32.260 using these tools as well, I think they're sort of enforcing this new understanding of what is
00:34:38.400 natural and that like an obviously effortful beauty is a sort of natural beauty, not in the
00:34:45.680 sense that like these features are natural, but in the sense that it's considered a naturally
00:34:50.000 feminine quality to pursue physical beauty. And like that's part of the myth of the eternal
00:34:55.780 feminine, that women are meant to be beautiful. And if they're not, they're meant to make 1.00
00:34:59.400 themselves beautiful, to like put themselves through pain to do it. And the added element
00:35:05.640 here is that you're only allowed access to those like painful interventions if you are you know a
00:35:11.480 biological woman to begin with so there's sort of this strange acknowledgement of the fact that like
00:35:16.900 yes it is work and we are restricting who is allowed to put in the work to appear quote unquote
00:35:23.140 feminine or masculine in order to like preserve that hierarchy it also strikes me that like we
00:35:29.240 can get to that central contradiction over and over and sort of say like oh they say they naturally
00:35:34.040 know what a woman looks like they not know what a natural man looks like but then it's all totally
00:35:38.440 unnatural but of course like in some way that's only a contradiction if you take nature to mean 0.97
00:35:43.220 a certain thing what they mean is nature is the thing that we say that it is right yes i can do
00:35:49.480 this and i get away with it you can't right there are these kinds of people and these kinds of
00:35:55.420 people and i feel like these weeks we see a good demonstration of this where like they're not trying
00:36:00.060 to get away with everything they're trying to get away with things that other people cannot
00:36:03.700 They're trying to say that there are two kinds of people in the system, some for whom this law applies, some for whom it doesn't. And here the same thing is extended to our very nature and personhood, it seems to me.
00:36:15.860 Yes, totally. It's interesting because a lot of the sort of liberal critique of Republican makeup for these reasons is sort of tying into the same like moral judgments or ethical judgments that I think it's trying to be against.
00:36:34.120 Like, you know, there's plenty of studies that show like people judge those who use overt cosmetics like makeup and tanner as morally inferior. And that is what liberals are doing here in this critique. They're sort of playing into the same exact playbook that there is like a moral hierarchy to beauty or to what kind of interventions you undergo.
00:36:55.920 And so, yeah, I think there's like this element of like schadenfreude, you know, to be like, these are the women of the party that's policing our gender. But they're kind of saying, look, they can't even perform their gender correctly. You know, they're not even doing all the right things. 0.89
00:37:12.860 I would say, I think you're right in your critique of like the liberal, like hashtag Republican makeup trend, right? The mocking of the incorrect performance of womanhood by the standards that like those women who are making those videos are applying to. But I think that you touched on something really smart earlier, which is the actual standard isn't exactly beauty, right? It's definitely not naturalness, right?
00:37:35.600 The standard for femininity embodied by Republican makeup is masochism, right? It's about a willingness to punish yourself, to expend money and time and to endure pain and to become, I think we can say grotesque, out of a pursuit and a desire for that approval and that sanction of, you know, male attention and social validation.
00:38:01.140 Like that self-degradation that the beauty pursuit can imply is, I think, what the point is. And that's what they're considering, like the essence of womanhood. It's that masochistic drive more than the actual content of how they look. 0.52
00:38:17.080 Yeah, I completely agree.
00:38:18.460 On that entirely depressing note, Jessica DeFino, I'm so glad that we finally had you on the podcast. It's such a pleasure to see you always. And I hope all of our listeners will check out the review of Beauty because it's really excellent. And I learn something every time I read it.
00:38:37.860 Thank you so much for having me. This was so much fun.
00:38:40.580 Thank you so much for coming on. This is absolutely fascinating. And now I'll be downloading TikTok and just scrolling for hours.
00:38:47.640 God-made girls will be stuck in your head. 1.00
00:38:49.760 Yeah, it will be stuck in your head. 1.00
00:38:51.520 It's infectious in the worst way.
00:38:53.660 I'll be singing while on a horse in a wedding gown.
00:38:58.160 Thanks for listening.
00:39:00.960 The Embed With the Right is made possible by hundreds of listeners who support us via patreon.com.
00:39:05.380 Our episodes are produced and edited by Mark Yoshizumi and Katie Lau.
00:39:09.100 Our title music is by Katie Lau.