00:07:27.500And then the other quote is he had a nasty tendency to deride or insult anybody he thought was not on his side.
00:07:35.820So we're already seeing this kind of black and white thinking and this like weird crusader mentality where he just becomes completely immune to facts.
00:07:47.160And it seems this is also when he starts falling down the conspiracy rabbit hole.
00:07:52.700Shortly after the 2004 election, he becomes convinced that it was rigged in favor of George W. Bush.
00:36:00.140Based on like how you ask the question really, really matters.
00:36:03.340And this seems like a core case of, like, folks asking the question in a way that, like, raised people's hackles more than it calmed them down.
00:36:11.880And so what's wild is this announcement that safe vaccines are about to become even safer ends up emboldening another wave of anti-vax organizing.
00:36:24.460And this is really the arrival of the anti-vax movement to the United States.
00:36:28.120I mean, the Wakefield stuff was kind of centered in the UK, but this then sparks a wave of media
00:36:34.400coverage around like, oh, there's a debate about the safety of vaccine. Did you hear about this
00:36:37.140Mercury thing? Right. This is like if you got a notification, if there was a big announcement
00:36:41.980from NASA that was like, hey, everybody, not to worry. There's a 99% chance that we're not
00:36:49.200about to be destroyed by an asteroid. Yeah, exactly. Yeah. This is also the period when
00:36:54.400the anti-vax moms find rfk jr he has been working on mercury that's getting dumped from coal plants0.95
00:37:02.860as part of his like cleaning up waterways work these like moms start showing up at his talks
00:37:08.220and they're like well if you're really concerned about mercury wait till you hear about the0.99
00:37:11.880vaccines anti-vax moms going around politicizing kennedys in a destructive direction is like
00:37:20.000bizarro world p flag yeah it's like what if p flag was he was evil what if i was an ally but
00:37:26.800for misinformation ally for lying an ally for weirdos i love my disinformation son okay so
00:37:34.720this finally brings us to the secret cdc meeting so just after this happens in early 2000 the this
00:37:46.120is really funny the head of the cdc's like immunization program was on vacation when all
00:37:53.040this like stuff was going on and this was before like zoom and shit so i guess he just like comes
00:37:58.940back from vacation and he's like wait we announced what he's got like the flip-flop tan line0.62
00:38:03.880he's got his back of macadamia nuts he's like hey man i'm still on island time yeah
00:38:11.940Yeah, yeah, yeah. He comes back and he's like, what the Mars roving fuck did we just do?0.99
00:38:17.060We just made this like pretty big decision and put out this big statement, but we still don't0.97
00:38:20.680actually have any information, right? There is no evidence that thimerosal is bad. And all evidence
00:38:26.900indicates that it's not, and that it has nothing to do with any of these things that people are
00:38:31.020linking it to. So like, we have to actually understand this, right? So he assigns Tom
00:38:36.660Firstraton, who's a researcher at the CDC, to look through their database. They have a database of
00:38:41.680like children's health records, couple hundred thousand kids, you know, separate the kids into,
00:38:46.320you know, vaccinated kids, unvaccinated kids, and just try to figure out, like, is there anything to
00:38:51.360this? Is there any condition that is linked to thimerosal in the vaccines? And so Tom Verstraten
00:38:57.820looks through the database and he finds that children who received vaccines are more likely
00:39:05.220to have attention deficit disorder, more likely to have speech and language delays, and more likely
00:39:10.600do have tics, these sort of twitches that are sometimes a symptom of autism, sometimes not.
00:39:15.880Importantly, he does not find an association with autism. So this head of the immunology
00:39:22.100of the CDC, the guy crunching on macadamia nuts, does something that like you and me are constantly0.92
00:39:28.460saying that we wish scientific institutions would do and which basically like Phil fucking Lancet
00:39:33.680should have done in 1998. They're like, look, we have this like really incendiary finding.
00:39:38.600before we publish this into what we know is the social and political environment around this issue.
00:39:45.060Let's stress test it a little bit. Let's talk about it. Let's make sure that it's correct
00:39:49.100before we put it into the public bloodstream. This is classic big if true territory. Exactly.
00:39:54.960And it's your job to make sure that it's true. And so they gather together. It's roughly 50 people.
00:40:00.960It's people from different fields of epidemiology. It's people from various departments of the CDC.
00:40:06.860it's different agencies. I think there's like FDA people there. It's like, let's get everybody
00:40:11.040together and just like talk about this. So they do, in fact, rent space at this like Methodist
00:40:16.460retreat center thing outside of Atlanta. They all meet. And Tom Verstraten, you can read the
00:40:22.420transcript. Tom Verstraten presents the data to everybody. He's like, here's what we did. Here's
00:40:26.740the methodology. Here's what we found. After he presents his data, people point out the massive
00:40:32.580flaws in the data. So the first is the thing that you pointed out earlier, that this is all
00:40:38.400completely correlational. And the problem with this vaccinated versus unvaccinated grouping is
00:40:44.700that vaccinated kids and unvaccinated kids are not identical in other ways. There's numerous
00:40:51.260vaccines that you have to get in the first two years of life. If you're getting all those
00:40:54.820vaccines, well, that basically means that you're going to the fucking doctor a lot, right? You're0.99
00:40:58.840go to the doctor 15, 20 times, which means you're way more likely to get diagnosed with things like
00:41:05.160speech and learning delays, with things like tics, with all kinds of other things that when you're
00:41:09.780at the doctor, the doctor, oh, is there anything else? Oh, you know, my son, he's not he's not
00:41:14.320talking as much as other kids his age. Yeah. And in the US, that's also going to be correlated with
00:41:19.320like access to care, period. Exactly. So it pulls in social factors. It pulls in like all kinds of
00:41:26.680other influences that are really complex and that you would need to account for in some way
00:41:33.440in doing this kind of research. The other thing that people point out is that a huge amount of
00:41:39.020their data is just garbage. So a lot of what they think of as like, this kid was diagnosed with this
00:41:45.240or like, this kid has like speech and learning delays. A lot of that is just stuff that like
00:41:49.820people might mention in a doctor's visit and gets written down on their chart, but isn't like a
00:41:55.060formal diagnosis so oftentimes parents will come in and they'll be like oh yeah his like language
00:41:59.700is like a little bit delayed it's you know it's not where we think it should be but then he comes
00:42:03.760in a month later and they're like oh yeah it's totally fine he caught up yeah i mean like listen
00:42:07.320this is one of the core lessons of early childhood brain development it's like kids move at different
00:42:14.600rates they're just all over the place yeah this is like of course he would flag these little things
00:42:18.920along the way. Those are snapshots of moments. They're not necessarily like a holistic sort of
00:42:26.020like we've evaluated this whole situation and here's what we think is going on.
00:42:29.780Well, this is why I think this kind of process is so important and ultimately
00:42:33.560why this meeting is really good that it happened. We found this data. There's some incendiary
00:42:39.300findings. Let's talk about it with people who are experts in other fields and people who have
00:42:43.820more familiarity with this data. This to me is like science working as intended. And so people
00:42:50.320at this meeting are like, you might want to actually go back and like, I know it's boring,
00:42:53.540but you have to actually cross check the kids' medical charts with formal diagnoses and figure
00:42:58.980out whether that's their actual condition because like the data is just kind of noisy like that.
00:43:02.980RFK Jr. describes this as some sort of like secret meeting where like scientists put pharma profits
00:43:08.620over the health of children. And actually what really happened is just like a bunch of scientists
00:43:13.200sat in a room like i've also read the fucking transcripts of this meeting they're unbelievably0.96
00:43:17.360boring it's like really technical methodological stuff think about how boring your meetings are0.98
00:43:24.040if you go to meetings regularly and then imagine reading transcripts of someone else's two-day
00:43:30.460meeting again it's like it's so funny that he casts this in rolling stone it's like so nefarious
00:43:35.160when like what actually happens is after this meeting tom frustrates like these are really
00:43:38.880useful comments. He goes back, they rerun the numbers and they find ways of like controlling
00:43:44.000for health access so they can actually compare vaccinated and unvaccinated kids. And they
00:43:49.120eventually in 2003 publish the data. And so there are some differences in health conditions between
00:43:53.980vaccinated and unvaccinated kids, but like autism is not on there. And the magnitudes are so small.
00:44:00.740It says in the conclusion of the paper, they're like, we don't really think this means anything.
00:44:04.020like ticks for example these like twitches was actually more common among vaccinated kids and
00:44:09.640unvaccinated kids but like it doesn't make sense that a symptom of autism would be more common but
00:44:14.760autism itself is not more common we think this is probably just like some kind of weird coincidence
00:44:19.620random thing yeah so you know he he alleges this huge cover-up but like the data was published
00:44:25.620yeah but you can go read the paper two full years before this article came out no yeah yeah exactly
00:44:31.040So this this paper had been published for two years by the time he writes his Rolling
00:52:40.820Thimerazole was removed from vaccines in Sweden, Canada, and Denmark in 1992,
00:52:47.960eight years before. It had no effect on autism rates or ADHD or tics or anything else.
00:52:55.580If it was causing autism, we should see a huge reduction in autism in Canada, Sweden,
00:53:02.380and Denmark since 1992. We don't see that. We still see the same rises that we do here.
00:53:07.460it's the trajectory of autism and these other conditions is still happening perfectly in
00:53:13.320parallel, regardless of whether they have thimerizal in the vaccines or not. So like,
00:53:18.080there's no biologically plausible mechanism by which ethyl mercury would be causing these
00:53:23.300disorders because there's now millions of children who didn't get thimerizal.
00:53:27.520There's 10 years of real world data. Yeah. Being like, no, it's fine. It would be like if,
00:53:34.220you know five years ago or so you tried to trot out the old argument that was used in like mostly
00:53:41.860massachusetts around like same gender marriage yeah if you tried to make that claim today
00:53:48.480there would be many many many many many parts of the country that you could point to i'd be like
00:53:52.980hey yeah we have it look what didn't happen although the funny thing is they did actually
00:53:56.480make those arguments in the 1990s even though like the netherlands and denmark had already had
00:54:00.220gay marriage for like two decades by that point but it doesn't matter because other countries are
00:54:04.200not real other countries are not real yeah again not talking about facts and information talking0.98
00:54:08.620about feelings we could go through the whole fucking article it's like you can't go a paragraph0.98
00:54:11.900through this article without like losing your fucking mind i'm sure it's like the entire0.98
00:54:16.500the entire article there's the the most egregious one is he's talking about like the dangers of0.98
00:54:21.720thimerizal and he's like people in the 1920s like this ward full of people with meningitis
00:54:26.820were given injections of thimerizal and they all died and it's like right because they had0.99
00:54:32.420terminal meningitis they died of meningitis right right yeah they didn't die of the fucking shot0.99
00:54:38.040what the fuck are you talking about their terminal you just said that they're terminal man this is1.00
00:54:41.340the brain rot of like cancer doesn't really exist it's the chemo that's doing it and you're like0.99
00:54:46.640completely okay the whole fucking thing so this whole episode the fact that this article was
00:54:52.260published at all is like so embarrassing it's not totally clear to me how this article even got0.96
00:54:58.920published, but you and I have both been through formal fact checking processes. Yes. I have no
00:55:04.180direct evidence of this, but it is very obvious to me that this did not go through a formal fact
00:55:09.060checking process. A good fact checking process, like a really thorough one, makes you so mad at
00:55:16.420the fact checker. Oh my God. It's like, it's an insufferable process and it is essential, right?
00:55:22.900You're Googling like how to murder someone through Zoom. Like you're so fucking mad.0.99
00:55:27.140not because they're calling you out on stuff you don't want to be called out on not because0.96
00:55:34.580they're telling you you're wrong but because they're like uh you know you go oh this new0.98
00:55:41.660toy markets for you know like sells for $19.99 and they'll be like source oh my fuck I was just0.86
00:55:48.160about to say that you're like oh the sky is blue they're like how do you know can we prove how do0.84
00:55:51.340you know can we prove it yeah the the thing I kept thinking of throughout this article I mean
00:55:55.980we only covered the first, whatever, 6% of it or something, but like the staggering number of
00:56:01.580studies finding a link between fimerosal and autism, there's no fucking way that would have
00:56:07.840gone through a formal fact-checking process. None. Zero is a staggering number. Yeah, exactly.0.94
00:56:15.040Define staggering, Robert. Whoa, not one? Not even one?
00:56:20.100so i i do not know how this article got published i do know that rfk jr and jan winner the publisher
00:56:28.980of rolling stone are close personal friends and like go hunting together they go hang out with
00:56:33.620larry david yeah exactly like in aspen and shit so like what i think happened is like jan winner
00:56:40.140and rfk jr were like chatting like at davos or some shit and he's like hey you should write
00:56:46.020about this for us. And then he wrote about it and Jan Wenner like pushed it through the fact
00:56:50.240checking process. And so, I mean, in the same way, the Lancet really did not cover themselves in
00:56:55.980glory with the Wakefield stuff. Both Salon and Rolling Stone did not retract this article until
00:57:01.9402011. Wow. So it took six years and they appended a couple of corrections, but the corrections are
00:57:07.700all like dumb corrections. It's like, oh, this guy's like job title was wrong. And you're like,
00:57:12.360sorry the the basic factual error like they didn't find a link with autism you're not gonna fucking0.53
00:57:16.540add that part of what i find so frustrating about this is this is what this is what many editors0.84
00:57:23.100have thought that i was trying to do oh i feel like i get the fact checking that jfk jr should
00:57:29.320be getting yeah right like i absolutely remember like an extended conversation with a fact checker
00:57:33.780at one point where i had written at one point that there were no fewer fat children after x y
00:57:39.980policy interventions and the fact checker wrote back and was like well the rates did plateau for
00:57:47.680a little bit so it didn't increase and i was like yeah there are no fewer facts like i don't think
00:57:54.660that's an inaccurate thing to say right but like right boy i'm getting the rates plateaued a little
00:58:01.080bit and they're like yeah yeah secret meeting total government cover-up seems fine but so one
00:58:06.760thing i didn't know until i started researching this episode was how this article and rfk jr
00:58:13.320in general kicked off like a real glory day period for the anti-vax movement immediately
00:58:19.660after this article comes out he's on the daily show he is on oprah in 2007 she doesn't actually
00:58:26.520ask him about the vaccine stuff which is interesting and i feel like they probably just
00:58:29.640cut it out of the broadcast but like she's still adding to the idea that this is like a prominent
00:58:35.240figure worth listening to right she does this like very softball interview with him he goes on don
00:58:40.040imus a bunch don imus has an autistic kid and really like went for it boy it's actually really
00:58:46.160bleak the guest list on don imus he had joe lieberman chris dodd and john carrey all on to
00:58:52.800talk about vaccines causing autism it's really bad joe lieberman is like from a cursed non-partisan
00:59:00.620underworld or something these are people who have been trying to forget and this book made me
00:59:04.660remember and i'm really mad about it these are all the names of people who are like referenced
00:59:09.880in 30 rock episodes yeah the reason your kids don't get 30 rock yeah too many scooter libby
00:59:17.520jokes and then you know by by 2010 one in four parents thought that vaccines cause autism one
00:59:24.500in four it's bad this this this period was not a time of huge pushback that is bleak as hell
00:59:33.800Since 2010, the pendulum has kind of swung back a little bit. So I got very interested in this
00:59:40.180because I think the sort of we must ask questions about vaccines kind of wave has ebbed, thank God.
00:59:46.880And it's much more like stigmatized to be an anti-vaxxer now. Like I think the establishment
00:59:52.120institutions are much more comfortable just being like, fuck off with this stuff now.0.99
00:59:56.380The beginning of it was there were a bunch of measles outbreaks starting in 2008. And then0.99
01:00:01.640in 2010, we get Andrew Wakefield losing his medical license. And then fascinatingly in 2010
01:00:10.480or between 2009 and 2011, we get a bunch of court cases where parents tried to get compensation
01:00:18.240from this vaccine injury compensation board for their kids having autism. So we talked last time
01:00:26.500about how there's this vaccine injury process where if you believe that your kids were harmed
01:00:31.320by a vaccine. You can take their case to this board and you can get compensation. We also talked
01:00:36.360about how the standards of evidence are way lower. You don't have to prove it beyond a reasonable
01:00:42.080doubt. All you have to prove is that it's more likely than not that a vaccine caused the injury,
01:00:47.040which is actually a really low standard when you think about it. And even under this lower standard,
01:00:53.240people cannot prove that vaccines cause autism. All of these court decisions are public.
01:00:58.460Like, it was so cathartic to read the decisions, Aubrey, because it's like the court cases force the anti-vaxxers to, like, sit down and present evidence and, like, respond to criticisms, right?
01:01:22.920And then the other side can actually challenge that evidence.
01:01:25.840In 2010, there's a trial where the parents of a girl named Michelle Cedillo try to get compensation for their daughter having autism.
01:01:35.160And, like, you can see how much the goalposts have moved over the decades where they have this bizarre theory where mercury in the vaccines harmed her immune system, which gave her measles, and then measles gave her tummy stuff, and then the tummy stuff gave her autism.
01:01:55.840Basically, the other side in this trial, like, dismantle every single step along the way.
01:02:03.060There's no evidence that mercury affects immune systems.
01:02:06.840Like, that's not, that's, like, mercury has many very bad effects, but it doesn't actually weaken your immune system.
01:02:12.900There's no evidence that this girl has measles or had measles.
01:02:16.760And there's no evidence that measles causes stomach stuff.
01:02:20.540And there's no evidence that stomach stuff causes autism.
01:02:23.060Like, this whole thing is just complete nonsense.
01:02:25.840and rfk jr still references these trials now he's like we we presented 700 studies showing how bad
01:02:32.760the mercury is in the vaccines and like that is true that they presented a ton of evidence
01:02:36.600but all of the evidence was just about how bad mercury is so it's like there was this mercury
01:02:42.060spill and then like a bunch of kids had these horrible symptoms and it's like yeah yes correct
01:02:46.460agree yeah a different substance is harmful exactly and in very very high doses at one point
01:02:52.580They talk about a situation where kids were exposed to 500,000 micrograms of methylmercury.
01:02:59.740And the judge is like, oh, we're talking about children being exposed to two micrograms of
01:03:04.440ethylmercury. So that just isn't relevant to this case.
01:03:08.140This all feels like the same kind of class of health misinformation and sort of misleading
01:03:13.440health information that is like this, you know, supplement includes heavy metals.
01:03:20.120and you find out that they're just talking about iron yeah no but we need that that's like an
01:03:26.360important one but then the other thing that these court processes do is they reveal to what extent
01:03:31.800there's there's just no biologically plausible mechanism for this anymore so one of the things
01:03:38.100that comes up in the cedillo trial quite a bit is that you know mercury poisoning is a real thing
01:03:43.560and mercury poisoning has real like measurable effects right like kids typically lose their
01:03:49.240appearing. They have growth impairments. They oftentimes have like a small head compared to
01:03:54.200their body. Like it results in uneven growth. One of the things that the anti-vaxxers are doing is
01:03:59.260they're just sort of like shouting like mercury and vaccines. But like people who actually know
01:04:03.720this stuff are like, no, we can measure mercury in kids. We can take their blood and measure how
01:04:08.840much mercury they have. And we can measure their hair and their urine to see how much mercury
01:04:13.760they're excreting. So if there was a problem with mercury exposure for these kids through vaccines,
01:04:20.100we would find it. And like they've done tests where they've taken kids' blood the day after
01:04:24.600they get vaccinated. And like, is there a shitload of mercury in their blood? No. And so it's just
01:04:29.840like, no, if there was large scale mercury poisoning of the population, that would have
01:04:35.280specific effects. It wouldn't just be like, oh, there's more kids with ADHD now. And like a bunch
01:04:41.760of other random shit. Hmm. So the final chapter of this story is about where the anti-vax movement0.99
01:04:48.440is now. And to talk about that, we are going to watch a clip of RFK Jr. on a morning show.
01:04:58.820He's got a new book. It's called Thimerosal. Let the Science Speak. Rosanna, keep going.
01:05:04.080There's a mouthful here. It's a big, big title. Let the Science Speak. The evidence supporting
01:05:07.980the immediate removal of mercury, a known neurotoxin from vaccines.
01:05:12.760Robert Kennedy Jr., nice to have you here on Good Day New York.
01:05:16.380So, obviously the book is out now, and you know that the critics are gunning for you