There Are No Girls on the Internet - December 19, 2023


Author loses her book deal after review-bombing authors on GoodReads

Topics
Rudy Giuliani ordered to pay $150 million; Verizon gives woman’s phone records to stalker; Discord bans misgendering; Twitter ads get gross; Women in AI are sick of sexist questions; Is ChatGPT on winter break? – NEWS ROUNDUP WHAT WE'RE LISTENING TO — Afterlives: The Layleen Polanco Story

Episode Stats


Length

45 minutes

Words per minute

163.05

Word count

7,356

Sentence count

397

Harmful content

Misogyny

10

sentences flagged

Toxicity

33

sentences flagged

Hate speech

17

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 This is an iHeart Podcast.
00:00:02.580 Guaranteed human.
00:00:05.140 Get Bell Pure Fiber Internet with Crave, Netflix, and Disney Plus
00:00:08.720 from $94 a month.
00:00:10.160 Price guaranteed for two years on Internet
00:00:12.040 with a two-year term and auto-pay credit.
00:00:14.400 Visit bell.ca for details and to check availability.
00:00:17.180 Bell. Connection is everything.
00:00:19.620 Run a business and not thinking about podcasting?
00:00:21.880 Think again.
00:00:22.520 More Americans listen to podcasts
00:00:23.980 than ad-supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora.
00:00:26.680 And as the number one podcaster,
00:00:28.060 iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined.
00:00:30.820 Learn how podcasting can help your business.
00:00:32.640 Call 844-844-IHEART.
00:00:34.920 If your bookshelf and your For You page
00:00:36.860 are equally important to your personality,
00:00:39.100 welcome home.
00:00:40.700 Pro Society is a weekly podcast
00:00:42.560 that's part book club, part group chat
00:00:44.480 for anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice
00:00:46.180 and Love Island deserve the same level of discourse.
00:00:48.920 Each week, we're connecting the dots
00:00:50.360 between books, the internet, and pop culture
00:00:52.460 with your favorite writers, book talk creators,
00:00:54.980 and plenty of overthought opinions.
00:00:57.080 Yeah, I'm obsessed. I'm obsessed.
00:00:59.040 Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:01:08.800 There Are No Girls on the Internet is a production of iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative.
00:01:16.900 I'm Bridget Todd, and this is There Are No Girls on the Internet.
00:01:19.620 okay so mike i desperately need to talk about what's going on with the goodreads review bombing
00:01:29.440 story honestly this is like probably one of the more wild stories i've heard in a very long time
00:01:37.420 and if i'm saying that somebody who covers weird wild stories on the internet if i'm saying this
00:01:44.260 you know it's truly wild. We were going to do this in this week's news roundup, but honestly,
00:01:49.940 I had so much to say about it that I decided it needed to be its own thing. That's because it
00:01:55.960 really involves a lot of stuff that I spend a ton of time thinking and talking about. First of all,
00:02:02.320 book communities online. I don't know how tapped in you are to like online book communities like
00:02:09.560 BookTok or Bookstagram. But the drama is always very deep when it's online book drama.
00:02:17.980 People who are voracious readers and connect about it on the internet, their drama is very
00:02:24.880 deep. I consider myself part of that community, by the way. So I can say that because I'm one of
00:02:29.600 them. Okay. This is good context to have. You often tell me about very intense internet drama,
00:02:36.900 And it often involves book clubs. So I didn't realize that this was like a particularly common thing of book communities, but it makes sense.
00:02:46.160 Oh, yes. So that's part of why I'm so interested in this. But there's also issues of how platforms impact marginalized people.
00:02:55.280 Like a lot of issues mixed up with what it means to be a creative professional in this day and age and how the Internet experience has sort of complicated that.
00:03:02.940 And also, good old-fashioned jealousy, something I know quite a bit about.
00:03:08.860 So there's a lot going on here, so let's get into it.
00:03:12.720 So this story really all starts with an author named Kate Corian.
00:03:17.580 She's an author who had a highly anticipated book coming out called The Crown of Starlight,
00:03:23.800 which was meant to be out in May of 2024.
00:03:26.220 I also read that she might have had, like, this book deal and then, like, a subscription box deal from this book and then, like, maybe even, like, a film publishing deal on the table.
00:03:39.300 So Kate is a writer who had a lot of positive things going on. 0.93
00:03:45.300 Like, she was really doing the damn thing, very successful.
00:03:49.440 But now, Kate's book has been shelved after she admitted using Goodreads to review bomb a bunch of forthcoming books, mostly by Black, Asian, and queer authors. 0.96
00:04:01.680 Kate is white.
00:04:02.360 It sounds like this had been going on for kind of a while, and that it was something that the writing community was aware of and knew was happening, but was up until this point kind of hoping to deal with privately.
00:04:14.100 They knew that she in particular was doing it or just that it was like a general problem in their community?
00:04:19.740 Okay, so great question.
00:04:20.960 I would say both.
00:04:22.180 I think that writers knew that this specific writer, Kate, was doing this.
00:04:27.840 And I think that writers were generally aware that Goodreads and Goodreads bombing, like submitting tons and tons of bad reviews for a book, even if you haven't read it, is an ongoing problem in the space.
00:04:40.160 So I think I would say both if I had to say.
00:04:42.080 So the first time that this came on my radar was when Canadian author Zeran Jezuao first tweeted about it, and that's when it really got more wide attention online.
00:04:53.320 So they first noticed that Kate's book, Crown of Starlight, was getting good reviews from the same accounts that were also trashing other books.
00:05:01.760 Some of those books were not even out yet.
00:05:05.080 So Zirin tweeted,
00:05:06.660 If you as a debut author are going to make a bunch of fake Goodreads accounts,
00:05:10.220 one-star bombing fellow debuts that you're threatened by,
00:05:13.280 can you at least not make it so obvious by uploading your own book
00:05:16.760 on a bajillion different lists with those same accounts?
00:05:20.300 So they then posted a 31-page Google document,
00:05:23.940 which we'll link to in the show notes, of receipts,
00:05:27.060 screenshots showing the Goodreads activity of a number of accounts
00:05:30.460 with usernames including names like Chantal B. and O.C. Young that they suspected were actually
00:05:37.440 Kate, leaving good reviews for her own book and bad reviews for other people's debut books.
00:05:44.280 So the books that she left bad reviews for were mostly written by people of color,
00:05:50.540 including So Let Them Burn by Camila Cole, which was meant to be released in January of next year,
00:05:55.000 and to gaze upon Wicked Gods by Molly X. Chang, whose book is actually being put out by the same
00:06:01.520 publisher, Del Rey, as Kate's book. So this is essentially like trashing a fellow writer
00:06:09.680 whose book is being published by the same company. Pretty bad.
00:06:14.820 But it's also like not surprising at all, right? That like this sort of petty jealousy would be
00:06:19.980 happening within a single publishing house. I bet these women know each other and have been 1.00
00:06:26.700 in the same circles for a while. Notably, the authors of these books say that in some cases,
00:06:32.720 their books weren't even available yet. They hadn't been published. And in some cases,
00:06:36.480 they had not even sent out advanced copies or galleys. So how could someone be reviewing it
00:06:42.300 if there's no way to actually read the book? It's not out yet. They have not sent out any
00:06:47.600 kind of advanced copies, how are you, how is someone leaving bad reviews already on Goodreads?
00:06:52.560 Something else to note here is that these reviews are not just negative. In some cases,
00:06:57.980 they're like downright mean. In one review, Kate writes, I can't believe Del Rey spent half a
00:07:05.340 million dollars on this when they could have spent half a million dollars on anything else.
00:07:10.840 Sorry, not sorry. Like that's not even, that's just like a mean review. You don't deserve the
00:07:16.820 money that you were paid to write this book and literally anything else would have been a better
00:07:21.420 way to spend that money that is not a criticism of the book or the text it is like just a mean
00:07:27.700 insult yeah and it just drips with that same petty jealousy like they could have spent it on
00:07:34.700 anything else like one of my books yes that should have that money should have been my money
00:07:39.540 hold that thought because yes a million times yes and that's going to come up very soon so we also
00:07:46.040 need to talk about the fact that there is a very real like identity aspect to this like a very real
00:07:51.760 racial aspect to this I want to come back to that in just a moment but some of the names that Kate
00:07:57.800 chose are clearly meant to sound like they could belong to people of color names like O.C. Young
00:08:03.200 were some of the fake names that Kate used to leave mean reviews on other people's work and
00:08:09.880 then like using a fake name that is clearly meant to sound like it is the fake name of a person of
00:08:15.660 color to trash authors of color while also praising her own work as a white woman is like 0.99
00:08:23.040 so diabolically like messed up. That's just so, that's like, there's layers to how fucked up that 1.00
00:08:30.860 is. So using the fake name O.C. Young, Kate left this review on her own book. I love this book so 0.98
00:08:38.780 much that I regret reading it because now nothing on my to-be-read sounds as interesting by
00:08:44.200 comparison. So like, clearly that's not just hyping up her own book. It is a way to trash
00:08:50.060 other authors of color in the process. Zal, that Canadian author who was the first person that I 0.68
00:08:57.540 saw tweeting about this, really summed it up. They say, there's something extra despicable about
00:09:02.780 using clearly people of color names in fake accounts to upvote every negative review on
00:09:08.620 people of color books. So the top ones are all one and two star, like what in the yellow face?
00:09:15.100 What's also funny about that is that if anybody has read the novel Yellow Face, which was probably 0.56
00:09:19.660 one of my favorite novels of this year, it's like a plot point from that novel, a white writer being
00:09:26.900 kind of like pretending to be a person of color because they are so jealous of writers of color.
00:09:33.360 It's so interesting how this whole situation mirrors the plot line of a very popular novel that everybody should read.
00:09:39.920 It was the best novel I read this year.
00:09:41.620 So this is already, like, a really awful, messed up thing to have done.
00:09:47.780 But when Kate was called out on it, rather than just fessing up and coming clean and being like,
00:09:54.060 yep, I did this. Jealousy got the better of me. She made things so much worse by inventing a fake
00:10:02.000 friend to take the fall. So a bunch of these debut authors, including authors whose books
00:10:08.360 were targeted by Kate, were all in a Slack channel for debut writers. And of course,
00:10:13.760 they were discussing what happened and starting to suspect Kate. Meredith Mooring, who it sounds
00:10:19.880 like was friends with Kate, told them all like, oh, listen, Kate did not do this. She could not
00:10:25.540 have done this. And Kate has proof that she didn't do this. It was a friend of hers who did
00:10:31.020 this. Meredith told the writers in this debut writer Slack channel, hold tight. Kate will pop
00:10:37.420 in to explain. And eventually Kate does pop into this Slack channel and explains. She writes, 0.92
00:10:43.600 I did not, capital letters, review bomb anyone. I did not positively review my own book with
00:10:52.180 false accounts. So basically this is Kate's explanation. She says that somebody named
00:10:58.600 Lily in the Reylo fandom community, which is a particularly like dedicated online fan community
00:11:05.920 that centers on the romantic relationship between two Star Wars characters, Rey and Kylo Ren. And
00:11:13.120 She said that this person, Lily, she had met this person through this particularly dedicated online fan base, and that in this fan base, she would pick up people like this who were just very, very dedicated, and that that was the person who was behind these reviews.
00:11:32.940 This person, Lily, was just like a friend of hers, believed so much in her writing, wanted to make her writing a success, and that's why she was the one who was behind these reviews.
00:11:44.080 Kate wrote in the Slack channel,
00:11:46.120 This person is someone I knew from a time in Star Wars fandom, where I was a well-known fan fiction author and a lightning rod for unhinged behavior, the type of behavior that anyone else who was well-known in the fandom at the time still sees online.
00:12:01.320 I have no further details.
00:12:02.700 I haven't heard anything else from them.
00:12:04.480 I never responded.
00:12:06.620 So I got to give a, you know how we usually do like warnings when we're going to talk
00:12:11.780 about something that is like really bad on the podcast.
00:12:14.320 I have to give a cringe alert for this because, oh my God, is it cringy.
00:12:21.060 So the proof in quotes that Kate shares that she didn't do this and that Lily did is these
00:12:28.360 screenshots of faked back-and-forth conversations between Kate and Lily. Mike, are you down to do
00:12:36.840 a dramatic reading of these conversations with me? Yeah. Should I be Kate or should I be Lily?
00:12:43.940 You be Lily. I'll be Kate. Okay. It seems like the reviews were positive,
00:12:50.280 but I didn't do anything? Rating books high is against the rules?
00:12:55.220 question mark no but making fake accounts to rate them high is it's artificially inflating
00:13:01.260 a book's reviews that's against the rules grimacing emoji oh i didn't realize you could
00:13:09.720 get in trouble what please don't get mad um i made a couple accounts i think that was me
00:13:20.680 what why the other night you were worrying that your book would get overshown by bigger books at
00:13:28.320 your publisher i wanted to help so i made a couple accounts to rate your book high 0.94
00:13:32.780 i'm sorry i really didn't think it would be a problem what the fuck why i don't need fake 0.61
00:13:40.120 reviews to help me jesus christ i'm sorry i really didn't think it would hurt exclamation 0.88
00:13:46.300 point i was trying to be nice oh my god i don't even know what to say i don't need you to step
00:13:52.740 in and try to be nice with this do you have any idea how patronizing that is how humiliating
00:13:59.060 spelled incorrectly how much damage you could have done i'm gonna be sick literally going to 0.99
00:14:04.780 vomit please tell me that for the love of god you weren't actually stupid enough to use the 0.99
00:14:10.780 same accounts that you made to boost me to bomb other people. Well? I didn't think anyone would 1.00
00:14:18.120 notice. I'm literally going to be sick. I need to email my agent. This could literally cost me my
00:14:25.720 fucking career. I don't even know what to say. This is such a violation of my trust and of our 0.99
00:14:33.240 friendship. I'm so, so sorry, Kate. I'm really sorry. I didn't think it would hurt. She just
00:14:40.100 Types a bunch of letters, like, random letters.
00:14:42.980 How could it not hurt? 0.99
00:14:44.920 Who the fuck did you go after? 0.99
00:14:47.700 It was just the books you said you were worried would bury yours on social media, 1.00
00:14:51.700 Wicked Gods and Fate Inked and Blood.
00:14:54.300 You went after people in my imprint?
00:14:57.380 In my debut group?
00:14:59.460 Do you have any idea how much this could have cost me?
00:15:03.060 I could lose my deal.
00:15:05.120 I could lose everything, all caps. 1.00
00:15:07.800 If this is what Zirin was talking about, I'm going to kill you. 0.99
00:15:11.540 All day, I've been sitting here worried that someone was review bombing me, 0.96
00:15:15.740 only to find out that I wasn't the victim of a review bombing campaign,
00:15:19.680 but instead, someone I trusted and considered a friend
00:15:22.820 really thought I was so insecure and helpless 1.00
00:15:25.420 that I needed you to fuck step in and level the playing field? 0.99
00:15:30.200 I'm so sorry. 0.99
00:15:31.680 I didn't think people would think it was you.
00:15:33.400 I tried to make the accounts look real.
00:15:35.640 I don't even know what to say
00:15:38.420 that somehow makes it even worse 0.99
00:15:40.300 seriously what the fuck dude 0.99
00:15:42.240 I trusted you 0.99
00:15:43.640 I told you about stuff I was insecure about
00:15:46.060 and you literally turned right back around 1.00
00:15:48.260 and pulled this shit 1.00
00:15:49.420 you understand that we're done here 1.00
00:15:52.280 right
00:15:52.880 and scene
00:15:55.520 oh my god
00:15:57.700 so first of all I have to say
00:15:59.420 it just sounds so fake
00:16:02.500 like when you read it out loud
00:16:04.460 knowing this is a conversation between one person like someone's faking a like someone is playing
00:16:11.520 both parts of this it just sounds so fake there's like a long part of just straight exposition in
00:16:18.100 there i've been sitting here worried that someone was review bombing me only to find out that i
00:16:22.260 wasn't the victim of a review bombing campaign but instead someone i trusted and considered a friend
00:16:26.320 really thought i was so insecure like nobody taught nobody explains like conveniently explains
00:16:31.960 what is happening in their life in such clear and explicit terms it's like when you watch a movie
00:16:37.380 and the main character is like oh well like convenient explanation of what's going on in
00:16:45.060 the plot yeah or like right when they've got james bond captured and the the villain is explaining
00:16:53.700 his master plan. So I cannot believe that this is what she published on the Slack channel to
00:17:02.060 prove in heavy quotes that she was not the person behind this review bombing. And I really got to
00:17:08.520 give it to the authors of color, some of whom weren't even targeted, who just like cared about
00:17:12.980 this enough to stay on it, who really stayed on Kate even after she dropped this very compelling
00:17:19.580 proof to get to the truth. So people were asking, like, can you show us earlier conversations
00:17:26.960 between you and Lily so that we can actually verify this person exists? Like, very convenient
00:17:33.540 that the only conversations that you're able to show are conversations where you're talking about
00:17:38.840 this specific incident and not any other conversations from somebody that you said
00:17:43.820 that you've had an online friendship with that was so deep that it led them to do this. Pretty
00:17:49.080 weird right yeah pretty weird pretty weak evidence very weak evidence like i honestly
00:17:57.480 can't believe that she posted this she's a novelist right like yeah like she's supposed
00:18:05.420 to make up stories that presumably sound plausible yeah it really kind of makes you
00:18:14.860 I think, like, oh, maybe this is why she felt like she had to do this review bombing scheme because she didn't think she was going to be successful on her own, maybe?
00:18:26.560 If this is the caliber of writing that she puts out.
00:18:30.600 It is pretty weak writing.
00:18:34.340 Let's take a quick break.
00:18:35.400 Get Bell Pure Fiber Internet with Crave, Netflix, and Disney Plus
00:18:45.660 from $94 a month, price guaranteed for two years on Internet
00:18:48.980 with a two-year term and auto-pay credit.
00:18:51.340 Visit bell.ca for details and to check availability.
00:18:54.120 Bell, connection is everything.
00:18:56.640 Run a business and not thinking about podcasting?
00:18:59.300 Think again.
00:19:00.280 More Americans listen to podcasts than ad-supported streaming music
00:19:03.340 from Spotify and Pandora.
00:19:04.600 And as the number one podcaster, iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined.
00:19:09.180 So whatever your customers listen to, they'll hear your message.
00:19:12.120 Plus, only iHeart can extend your message to audiences across broadcast radio.
00:19:16.340 Think podcasting can help your business?
00:19:18.220 Think iHeart.
00:19:19.260 Streaming, radio, and podcasting.
00:19:21.340 Call 844-844-iHeart to get started.
00:19:24.480 That's 844-844-iHeart.
00:19:26.920 If your bookshelf and your For You page are equally important to your personality, welcome home.
00:19:32.860 This is Prose Society, the weekly podcast that's part book club, part group chat for thought daughters, pop culture obsessives, and anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice and Love Island deserve the same level of discourse.
00:19:45.320 I'm Eli Rallo, and every week we're connecting the dots between books, the internet, and the conversations everyone can't stop having.
00:19:52.440 I'm going to have to look up this story.
00:19:54.340 I'm obsessed.
00:19:55.100 I'm obsessed.
00:19:55.460 from best-selling authors and your favorite book talk creators to the latest pop culture moments
00:20:00.440 nothing is off the table it's like if you can hide some real messages inside compelling
00:20:07.000 characters and that is a trojan horse whether you're looking for literary deep dives smart
00:20:12.280 pop culture conversations or a community of readers who love to think a little too much
00:20:17.020 you're in the right place listen to pro society on the iheart radio app apple podcasts or wherever
00:20:23.500 you get your podcasts. See you between the pages. And we're back. So after she released this proof
00:20:35.980 and writers were like, no, can you give us more proof? She eventually did admit the truth that
00:20:42.360 there was no Lily and that she was the one who had done the review bombing. Here is her apology
00:20:49.140 slash explanation that she posted.
00:20:51.600 Apology maybe is too strong.
00:20:53.240 You tell me, you be the judge.
00:20:55.400 She wrote,
00:20:56.260 Since June 2022, I've been fighting a losing battle
00:20:59.600 against depression, alcoholism, and substance abuse,
00:21:02.860 the full scope of which I've hidden from everyone in my life
00:21:05.440 out of shame and a misguided belief
00:21:07.840 that with the right medicine and therapy, I could beat it.
00:21:11.220 In late November 2023, I started a new medication,
00:21:14.600 and on December 2nd, 2023,
00:21:16.260 I suffered a complete psychological breakdown. During this time, I created roughly six profiles
00:21:23.200 on Goodreads, and along with two profiles I made during a similar but shorter breakdown in 2022,
00:21:29.000 I boosted the rating of my book, bombed the ratings of several fellow debut authors,
00:21:33.840 and left reviews that ranged from kind of mean to downright abusive. Two of those authors,
00:21:39.220 Molly X. Chang and Danielle Jensen, are fellow Del Rey authors. Camilla Cole and Bethany Baptiste
00:21:45.460 just happened to be on the wrong Goodreads list
00:21:47.540 at the wrong time.
00:21:48.880 I felt no ill will toward any of them.
00:21:51.460 It was just my fear about how my book would be received,
00:21:54.140 running out of control.
00:21:55.940 My memories of this are extremely fuzzy,
00:21:57.940 so it's possible there are a couple of other authors.
00:22:00.060 If so, I take full ownership of what I did as well.
00:22:04.160 I'm sorrier than you'll ever know.
00:22:05.660 There's nothing I can say to erase what I did to you.
00:22:08.040 When I was slapped on the wrist by Goodreads
00:22:10.140 and vague tweeted by a handful of people,
00:22:11.900 I panicked that my secret was about to get out.
00:22:14.400 rather than taking responsibility for my actions I tried to cover my tracks still in the middle of
00:22:19.800 my breakdown I made up the world's sloppiest chat with a non-existent friend who was supposedly to
00:22:25.500 blame sent fake apologies for the action of said friend which only made things worse I betrayed
00:22:31.060 the confidence of my agent my pub team my readers my friends I betrayed my own deeply held values
00:22:36.440 I dragged one of my dearest friends and fellow debut authors into the mud with me when she came
00:22:41.160 in my defense i'll leave her name out of this so as not to pull her in even deeper however if she
00:22:46.520 wishes to come forward i'll apologize to her publicly as well let me be extremely clear while
00:22:51.560 i might not have been sober or of sound mind during this time i accept responsibility for
00:22:56.320 the pain and suffering i caused and my delay in posting this is due to the spending the last few
00:23:01.000 days offline while going through withdrawals i sobered up enough to be brutally honest with you
00:23:05.480 and myself i know some of you won't forgive me i recognize that you're not required to
00:23:10.040 No one ever wants to be judged by their worst actions, so it's not always up to us.
00:23:14.500 I'll be reaching out to everyone directly impacted, though that may take time,
00:23:17.960 since I'm checking into an intensive psychiatric care and rehab facility,
00:23:21.920 which means I'll be mostly off social media,
00:23:23.980 as I need to give 100% to the program if I want it to stick.
00:23:27.140 All I can do going forward is try to live my life in a way
00:23:29.820 that shows you that these are not empty words.
00:23:33.060 Wow, what a redemption arc for her.
00:23:35.060 She was struggling with addiction, a secret addiction that no one knew about.
00:23:39.780 But now she's over it.
00:23:41.600 So, yeah, I mean, I will say this.
00:23:44.840 I don't want to get too deep into this because, like, she may very well be suffering from genuine mental health and substance abuse issues. 0.89
00:23:52.400 However, I really do take issue with how she uses her mental and substance abuse issues as a defense.
00:24:00.800 Like, it is the very first sentence of this explanation, even.
00:24:05.060 And I just don't know that I would agree that mental health issues or substance issues would cause you to do something that is like so clearly racially motivated.
00:24:18.780 You know, I don't I don't think that is a defense.
00:24:24.500 And I take issue with how she is framing it of like, oh, I was suffering from some kind of a mental breakdown.
00:24:30.660 I know plenty of people who suffer with addiction issues and suffer with mental health issues.
00:24:34.680 And I don't know that this is something that I would say is a typical result of dealing with mental or substance abuse issues.
00:24:44.340 I'll put it that way.
00:24:45.900 Yeah, that's a really good way to put it. 0.77
00:24:49.000 Like, really mean racial behavior.
00:24:54.300 Not a typical result of dealing with mental health issues.
00:24:58.000 So after all of this, Kate's agent dropped her.
00:25:01.900 Her publisher dropped her.
00:25:03.420 It does seem like that at first her publisher, Del Rey, was like, oh, we're going to hold her book launch.
00:25:10.160 We're not going to launch it until later.
00:25:11.900 Like maybe we'll launch it when the heat dies down.
00:25:13.740 But then they said recently that they are just going to drop her permanently.
00:25:17.360 Her friend who stuck up for her in that Slack channel for debut authors, Meredith Mooring, has publicly said that she felt lied to and that she is, you know, saying like, I'm not going to talk to Kate ever again.
00:25:29.520 She lied to me.
00:25:30.900 I don't trust her. 0.68
00:25:31.840 honestly here is the thing it sounds like kate really truly had an amazing thing going
00:25:40.720 a well-regarded book deal a subscription a subscription box deal maybe movie rights
00:25:47.480 and she threw it all away because of her decision to do this like this is on her like she
00:25:56.120 lost it because of her
00:25:58.340 own choices.
00:26:00.200 Yeah, and we can 0.90
00:26:02.300 take her at her word that she did
00:26:04.260 this out of, you know,
00:26:05.900 fear of her
00:26:08.320 own success, but
00:26:09.860 or, you know, lack of success,
00:26:12.640 jealousy, I guess, but
00:26:13.820 even if that's true and that's what motivated
00:26:16.560 her, it doesn't
00:26:18.200 remotely make it okay, and
00:26:20.260 like you said, that
00:26:22.080 fear
00:26:24.120 drove her to
00:26:26.120 do this thing that threw it all away.
00:26:29.980 So I absolutely want to get into that
00:26:32.120 because I do think this is a story about
00:26:34.000 what happens when you don't check
00:26:36.620 some of your more destructive impulses and jealousy.
00:26:41.280 Like dealing with jealousy is certainly something
00:26:43.000 I know a little bit about, but like, yes, I agree.
00:26:46.400 So there is so much going on here.
00:26:49.900 First, I think there is a really clear
00:26:52.520 platform piece happening here.
00:26:54.800 It is not surprising to me that this is all happening on Goodreads.
00:26:59.560 Goodreads, which is owned by Amazon, does say that they have rules against review bombing.
00:27:04.600 Their rules say, artificially inflating or deflating a book's ratings or reputation violates our rules.
00:27:11.180 This includes activity like creating fake accounts to manipulate book ratings, purchasing reviews, and incentivizing votes, likes, or other actions on Goodreads.
00:27:19.640 They have that as their policy.
00:27:21.420 However, this is far from the first time that review bombing campaigns have happened on Goodreads.
00:27:27.500 And also, this is not even the first time that they have been racially motivated.
00:27:31.640 Back in the summer, the New York Times published a piece called How Review Bombing Can Tank a Book Before It's Published.
00:27:37.840 In it, they described how the same things that make Goodreads work and a platform that people want to show up to talk about books,
00:27:44.900 you know, excitement and passion around books, also makes it an effective tool to sabotage writers.
00:27:51.960 And like most online attacks, it is more marginalized people who bear the brunt of it.
00:27:56.900 The New York Times talked to Cecilia Rabbis, a Black woman and a former data scientist at Google who left tech to write her debut novel called Everything's Fine, which is about a young Black woman working at Goldman Sachs who falls in love with a conservative white co-worker with bigoted views.
00:28:14.480 Her book was the target of coordinated review bombing campaigns.
00:28:19.040 Cecilia says,
00:28:20.280 It may look like a bunch of one-star reviews on Goodreads, 0.64
00:28:23.000 but these are broader campaigns of harassment.
00:28:25.980 People were very keen to not just attack the work,
00:28:28.560 but to attack me as well.
00:28:30.400 Some of the reviews actually say,
00:28:32.600 like, I didn't read this book,
00:28:34.120 I've never read this book,
00:28:35.320 but I feel inclined to leave this review anyway.
00:28:38.920 And Cecilia says that it's not just like
00:28:40.920 somebody leaving a mean review,
00:28:42.780 that this can actually impact how the book is received.
00:28:47.200 She says,
00:28:48.140 I was concerned about the risk of contagion and that readers and reviewers would dismiss the work
00:28:52.360 without really engaging it. I felt particularly vulnerable as a debut author, but also as a Black
00:28:58.100 woman author. So you're probably not surprised to hear how much Amazon has taken over the book
00:29:04.580 publishing space. We actually did an episode about it a while back with Jane Friedman after
00:29:09.060 somebody on Amazon was selling AI dupes of her books using her name. But since Amazon has purchased
00:29:15.560 Goodreads, Amazon has basically dominated the book publishing space. And Goodreads is an incredibly
00:29:21.420 powerful tool for authors to get their work discovered. So review bombing can actually have
00:29:27.160 a meaningful impact on writers getting their books read, and it can make or break whether or not an
00:29:32.700 author is able to successfully launch their work. So on Amazon, like the Amazon shopping apparatus,
00:29:39.520 it actually tells you if the person who is leaving a review on Amazon has actually purchased the book
00:29:47.240 or not through Amazon. And Amazon's shopping platform does not allow anybody to leave reviews
00:29:53.860 on books that are not yet out. However, that is not the case on Goodreads, which leaves it uniquely
00:29:59.760 open to coordinated attacks on books that aren't even out yet. I don't mean books that aren't out
00:30:04.900 yet in the like, oh, there's a specific release date further in the future sense. I mean, books
00:30:12.000 that aren't out yet in the like, this is still an idea in the author's head sense. You know,
00:30:18.200 like George R.R. Martin's long-awaited The Winds of the Winter, which is the next installment in
00:30:22.980 his A Song of Fire and Ice series, does not even have an official release date. Like, as far as we
00:30:28.400 know, it has not been written. However, that has not stopped it from amassing more than
00:30:33.600 10,800 ratings and 500 reviews on Goodreads. As far as we know, this book is not even on paper.
00:30:42.220 It is still in George R.R. Martin's head. That's pretty wild. I wonder what his rating is.
00:30:48.700 It's 4.40. He's got four and a half stars. I could see someone doing this because they love
00:30:55.000 George R. R. Martin. And so they'd want to like give it a five to give him a boost or something.
00:30:59.560 Or I could see people panning it because they really hate George R. R. Martin and giving him
00:31:03.680 a one. How does it get like foreign change? Who's coming in here and being like, yeah,
00:31:08.040 it'll probably be all right. So it's a lot of people just using this space. I'm looking at it
00:31:12.880 now. They're just like using this space to be like, when is this book coming out? Somebody has
00:31:17.440 been updating their review for years. Here's the top review. I have this plan that when this comes
00:31:23.620 out in 2015 i'm going to drop my child by then age four off at grandma and grandpa's house get
00:31:29.060 myself a hotel room and do nothing but read this for four for three days straight then an update
00:31:33.840 alas as 2015 begins to fade i have come to the realization that my plan will never come to
00:31:39.320 fruition it was a good plan i'll miss the plan maybe 2016 update of the update 2016 is half over
00:31:45.900 at this point i'm pretty sure when i purchase this book it's going to be a page that says
00:31:49.880 just watched the show, followed by 600 blank pages. New update. It's 2017. I give up. Another
00:31:56.120 update. It's 2020. And I returned to this hopeful snapshot of my optimistic youth from time to time
00:32:01.220 to wonder what it must have been like to be so innocent. Alas. Last update. Oh, my sweet summer
00:32:08.060 child. Do you remember what it was like to have such hope, such confidence? 2015? It was going to
00:32:14.100 be your year but as summer of 2022 fades and leaves begin to fall it is clear that no one
00:32:20.740 will be reading this book even now some seven years later in 2022 what could have been
00:32:26.460 wow george rr martin like ruining this guy's life taking away his childhood
00:32:34.880 he's been leaving these reviews for years
00:32:38.860 More after a quick break.
00:33:08.860 More Americans listen to podcasts than ad-supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora.
00:33:13.420 And as the number one podcaster, iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined.
00:33:17.420 So whatever your customers listen to, they'll hear your message.
00:33:20.700 Plus, only iHeart can extend your message to audiences across broadcast radio.
00:33:24.920 Think podcasting can help your business?
00:33:26.800 Think iHeart.
00:33:27.840 Streaming, radio, and podcasting.
00:33:29.920 Call 844-844-iHeart to get started.
00:33:33.060 That's 844-844-iHeart.
00:33:35.280 When I was 14 years old, I was kidnapped and held captive for nine months.
00:33:41.440 I survived, and I've spent my life exploring how other people survive what should have destroyed them.
00:33:47.800 I'm Elizabeth Smart, and these are the Survivor Files.
00:33:51.520 I just remember this low, taunting voice next to my ear saying, 0.99
00:33:56.920 Shut up. Don't say anything. 0.99
00:33:59.560 Every week, I'm with survivors who live through the unthinkable.
00:34:04.120 I knew if he woke up, without a doubt, he was going to hurt me.
00:34:08.580 I started feeling that there was someone at the end of my bed, and I just started screaming.
00:34:16.200 They are abducted, stalked, controlled, and nearly silenced.
00:34:20.100 But these aren't stories about what's taken from them.
00:34:23.560 They're stories about what it takes to make it out alive.
00:34:26.680 Listen to The Survivor Files with Elizabeth Smart on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:34:41.080 Let's get right back into it.
00:34:42.700 So beyond this being like a tech and platform story, I do think there is something to the fact
00:34:51.080 that Kate was review bombing and targeting marginalized writers, queer authors, authors of
00:34:58.120 color, and that these specific authors were the ones that she was concerned were going to outshine
00:35:03.460 her own debut. I do think that there's this attitude that people of color are like the golden
00:35:09.480 children of publishing right now. Last year, James Patterson, who is this ridiculously successful
00:35:15.500 writer, said that older white men like him basically cannot get writing jobs right now,
00:35:21.800 saying, can you get a job? Yes. Is it harder? Yes. It's even harder for older writers. You don't meet
00:35:28.300 many 52-year-old white males, he insisted. Now, keep in mind, this is somebody that has sold more
00:35:33.260 than 450 million books during his storied 30-year career where his books have been turned into
00:35:39.820 blockbuster movies. Joyce Carol Oates, who I have to say is kind of my like forever problematic
00:35:49.080 fave. Joyce Carol Oates, she's like the Azalea Banks of the book industry. Like 0.99
00:35:58.240 nine times out of 10, she's super wrong. But when she is right, she is so right. That's how I would
00:36:07.560 describe her. I cannot quit Joyce Carol Oates. She is my forever problematic fave. Well, she said
00:36:12.980 the very same thing. She said, a friend who was a literary agent told me that he could not even get
00:36:17.920 editors to read first novels by young white male writers, no matter how good. They're just not
00:36:23.500 interested. This is heartbreaking for writers who may, in fact, be brilliant and critical of
00:36:29.360 their own privilege. So there is this attitude that the only people who find success in the
00:36:34.720 book world are people who are traditionally marginalized, but it's so laughably and
00:36:40.340 frustratingly untrue. And the data could not demonstrate how clearly untrue this is more
00:36:46.440 clearly, that it is white people who still and always have been the majority of the book publishing
00:36:53.040 space. Penguin Random House did an audit where they found that white contributors accounted for
00:36:58.180 76% of books released between 2019 and 2021. 34% of those writers were male. A 2020 analysis by
00:37:06.760 New York Times surveyed more than 7,000 popular novels published by the largest publishing houses,
00:37:11.800 Simon & Schuster, Penguin Random House, Doubleday, HarperCollins, and Macmillan.
00:37:15.820 Of the books surveyed, 95% of them were written by white people. In 2018 alone,
00:37:22.020 non-Hispanic white people wrote a whopping 89% of the books sampled so it's white people like 0.99
00:37:28.960 white people are the ones who are dominating the industry and always have I do think there is this
00:37:35.680 very persistent attitude that oh you have to be like a person of color or like somehow marginalized
00:37:43.460 to get a foothold in the publishing space but that just betrays the reality that that like the 0.50
00:37:49.440 people who are succeeding in the space are white people it's just it's just the truth yeah those
00:37:54.860 stats you just read were pretty overwhelming that in that uh analysis uh of authors 95 percent of
00:38:05.500 the books what were they uh it's a new york times study yeah 95 percent were written by white people
00:38:11.060 that's like way over the proportion of the population that is white and i also think it
00:38:17.460 mirrors this conversation that's sort of bubbling up now around diversity and inclusion
00:38:21.940 efforts. We'll have an episode diving into some of this next week about that
00:38:26.480 wild situation happening at Harvard. But I do think that people will sit here with a straight
00:38:32.340 face and say that they believe that Black and brown folks are being handed like cushy gigs or
00:38:38.240 cushy contracts in spaces that have mostly been dominated by white people, when the reality is 0.99
00:38:45.440 that they don't give us shit if a black person or a brown person has wound up in a space where 0.99
00:38:53.120 there are not a lot of black and brown people best believe that is because that person earned 1.00
00:38:58.320 that shit they don't give us anything people are out here thinking that like oh they're just 0.99
00:39:03.520 handing out book deals and cushy reviews and like praise to black people i would like some of that 0.99
00:39:11.640 please if that if they're handing that out i would love to be the first in line to get some
00:39:15.380 because that has not been my experience.
00:39:17.840 And even beyond the racial dynamics at play,
00:39:21.040 I think that Kate's story really is like
00:39:23.660 what you were talking about before, Mike,
00:39:25.380 that it is one of what happens when you are,
00:39:28.360 as my father used to say,
00:39:30.000 when you're so busy looking at everybody else's plate
00:39:32.560 that your own food gets cold, right?
00:39:34.780 Like you are so focused on the comparison game
00:39:39.680 and looking at what other people have
00:39:41.020 and obsessing about it
00:39:42.020 And like really internalizing what's going on with others that you can't even focus on what you have, which in Kate's situation was a lot.
00:39:52.560 Kate had a lot of success and she ruined that because of her own inability to stop being jealous and stop obsessing and fantasizing about what other people might get.
00:40:05.480 Yeah, jealousy is so destructive.
00:40:07.680 it's true and like this is the reason why i know this like i'm speaking from experience is that
00:40:13.460 i mean like i have definitely had to struggle to deal with jealousy i wasn't handling it through
00:40:20.880 review bombing my colleagues thank god but you when you make something particularly like when
00:40:27.160 you're in a creative field but i'm sure anybody who is in any in any kind of field can relate to
00:40:30.720 this, you really have to work to learn to not let things like jealousy and comparison
00:40:37.780 get to you if you're going to make anything, right?
00:40:40.760 Like, especially right now, this time of year, where all of my very, very talented friends
00:40:48.220 and colleagues are making, like, best of lists and getting awards and things like that, it
00:40:53.940 can be hard.
00:40:54.680 I don't want to negate the fact that Kate probably was dealing with very real feelings that are tough to grapple with. I have had to do a ton of work to keep that kind of comparison and jealousy from making me spin out or making me second guess my own work.
00:41:13.440 if you're, if this is something that sounds familiar, I will give you, I will give folks a
00:41:17.540 tip. Like the way that I have learned to sort of reprogram jealousy in my own mind is by kind of
00:41:26.100 flipping the dynamic a little bit. And so training myself to see the wins of people in my circle,
00:41:32.240 the wins of people that I know as my own wins. And so like when a friend of mine gets on a best
00:41:39.180 of list, telling myself like, wow, how great for me that I am connected to such a dynamic
00:41:46.740 network of creators that I know somebody like this, like what a win for me, you know, this is,
00:41:53.300 wow, this is somebody that maybe I can collaborate with. Like, what a great thing for me. Like
00:41:57.620 really seeing the wins of other people as wins for yourself has really helped me sort of reframe
00:42:05.720 the game a little bit and like not be like salty when someone gets something that I want it could
00:42:11.900 be helpful so that's a little tip for folks uh but I also think it's it's about remembering that
00:42:18.080 success is not finite something good happening to somebody else does not mean that something
00:42:25.920 is being taken away from you they're like it is such a white supremacist and also like
00:42:34.120 patriarchal lie that there could only be one. There's only enough room for one person to be
00:42:39.380 successful. Capitalism and white supremacy and all of those other forces want us to think that
00:42:45.960 there is only enough room for one, but that is a lie. There truly is enough for all of us. There
00:42:51.200 is enough room for all of us to be at the table. There is enough room for all of us to be successful,
00:42:56.220 for all of us to have what we need. You do not need the voice in your head that says that other
00:43:01.960 people doing similar work are your competitors and not your collaborators. That voice is a liar. 0.95
00:43:07.840 There is truly enough room for all of us. And honestly, we can all be successful. We can all
00:43:14.160 win. And Kate, that's the thing is Kate really was successful, it sounds like, but she spoiled 0.99
00:43:20.120 it all. And you know what? It wasn't Authors of Color who blocked her bag. It was her own behavior.
00:43:26.880 like it was herself in the end that is the the main your main hater yourself yeah boy what a
00:43:36.380 what an arc to the story huh it's true so we'll add a link in the show notes to the different
00:43:43.200 authors who were impacted if you want to get their books show them some love um yeah a wild
00:43:50.900 story at the end of the day. Remember, don't let jealousy let you spin out and block your own bag.
00:43:57.880 You truly are enough. Don't leave fake reviews. Don't make up fake conversations with people who
00:44:03.060 don't exist. Just do your best. That's all we can do. Well, thanks, Bridget. I really
00:44:08.260 enjoyed that. That was a wild story. I told you it was wild.
00:44:12.380 I'm your host, Bridget Todd.
00:44:41.900 If you want to help us grow, rate and review us on Apple Podcasts.
00:44:45.480 For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, check out the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:45:03.320 This is an iHeart Podcast.
00:45:06.220 Guaranteed human.