There Are No Girls on the Internet - December 07, 2022


Elon Musk’s “Twitter Files” is a whole lot of nothing.

Topics
Part Two: The Online & Real Life Harassment of Marginalized Elected Officials What is with those AI images all over Facebook right now?

Episode Stats


Length

56 minutes

Words per minute

164.92

Word count

9,398

Sentence count

561

Harmful content

Toxicity

3

sentences flagged

Hate speech

1

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 This is an iHeart Podcast.
00:00:02.580 Guaranteed human.
00:00:04.520 Run a business and not thinking about podcasting?
00:00:06.820 Think again.
00:00:07.440 More Americans listen to podcasts than ad-supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora.
00:00:11.620 And as the number one podcaster, iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined.
00:00:15.720 Learn how podcasting can help your business.
00:00:17.540 Call 844-844-iHeart.
00:00:19.920 I survived nine months in captivity,
00:00:23.080 and I've spent my life exploring how other people survive what should have destroyed them.
00:00:28.600 I'm Elizabeth Smart, and these are The Survivor Files.
00:00:32.200 Every week, I'm with survivors who live through the unthinkable, abducted, stalked, controlled, and nearly silenced.
00:00:39.740 These are stories about what it takes to make it out alive.
00:00:43.580 Listen to The Survivor Files with Elizabeth Smart on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:00:51.200 If your bookshelf and your For You page are equally important to your personality, welcome home.
00:00:56.920 Pro Society is a weekly podcast that's part book club, part group chat for anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice and Love Island deserve the same level of discourse.
00:01:05.580 Each week, we're connecting the dots between books, the internet, and pop culture with your favorite writers, book talk creators, and plenty of overthought opinions.
00:01:13.820 Yeah, I'm obsessed. I'm obsessed.
00:01:15.600 Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:01:20.980 There Are No Girls on the Internet is a production of iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative.
00:01:33.560 I'm Bridget Todd, and this is There Are No Girls on the Internet.
00:01:39.060 So it has been a wild couple of weeks at Twitter since Elon Musk took over.
00:01:43.240 And to talk through all of it, I'm joined with my producer, Michael Amato.
00:01:47.360 Mike, thanks for being here.
00:01:49.000 Hi, Bridget. Thanks for having me back. Always a pleasure.
00:01:50.980 So this might come as a surprise to you. I try pretty hard not to talk about Elon Musk too much on the podcast. From being in meetings and calls and stuff with you to make the show, that's probably surprising to you because I know that you know I have a lot of feelings and thoughts and opinions about Elon Musk.
00:02:12.400 Yeah, he's pretty hard to avoid these days.
00:02:16.620 It's true. And I guess I feel, you know, when making the show, the reason why I try to limit how much I talk about him is because I just don't think it's really helpful to report on or respond to every little thing that someone who clearly wants attention says or does.
00:02:33.620 I feel like I learned this the hard way back when Musk was first talking about buying Twitter.
00:02:37.760 You and I rushed to put out an emergency episode. We stopped what we were doing. It was like a stop the press moment.
00:02:44.220 And, you know, after that episode ran, I think it was like months and months and months and months and months until he actually bought Twitter. And during that time, it would be like he would say, oh, the deal is off. And everybody would rush to report on it and respond. And then he would be like, oh, the deal's back on. And everyone would rush to report on that and respond.
00:03:02.260 And I think it's a strategy that people like Musk employ that allows for them to set the tone.
00:03:09.260 And I just I don't think that being reactive, always reacting to the things that they say, every little move they make, is the most helpful mode to be in.
00:03:17.340 Because I think ultimately it really serves them in setting the agenda and capturing attention, which is clearly something they want.
00:03:24.880 Yeah, I think it's a useful strategy for people like him and like Trump.
00:03:29.640 And I think also it's a useful strategy that just happens to align with their own personal needs to constantly be the center of attention, you know, and to constantly control the narrative and have people, you know, jumping and reacting to what they say to fill that void where other people feel love. 0.64
00:03:50.700 yikes just coming at the gate with a a one-two punch on musk's inability to feel love okay wow
00:04:00.420 damn we're we're off to a good start off to the races sorry that wasn't my intention but it's
00:04:05.640 just it's it's been a real evolution for me the last couple weeks about him but that's that's not 0.96
00:04:10.280 what this episode is about i don't mean to distract i mean it might be a little bit right
00:04:14.620 And so, again, I try really hard to avoid just reacting to his little stunts because people who pull stunts, they want you to react, they want you to respond.
00:04:24.980 But this past weekend, something happened that really felt like a direct hit to my work and a direct kind of, I feel like, you know, if you watch Housewives, when Kenya Moore says, don't come for me unless I send for you, I feel sent for, as Kenya Moore would say.
00:04:43.600 And he brought up something that I actually have quite a bit of personal experience on and felt kind of compelled to talk about on this podcast.
00:04:52.000 Yeah, I know you do have a lot of experience in this area and you don't talk about it on the show much.
00:04:57.140 And so the fact that you, I think, felt so compelled to say something about it really speaks to that feeling of being called.
00:05:06.720 So, you know, speak it. Let's hear it.
00:05:10.160 So what's going on?
00:05:11.700 Well, this past weekend, Elon Musk tweeted that he'd given internal Twitter documents to journalist Matt Taibbi, calling it the Twitter files.
00:05:20.980 To be clear, that's what Elon Musk is like branding it as.
00:05:24.440 I'm not going to be calling it that because I'm not going to be just, you know, doing his work for him and running with this little branded thing that he's trying to make happen for him.
00:05:35.980 But that's what he is calling it.
00:05:37.920 He was very excited about this.
00:05:40.540 He was teasing it all weekend. He tweeted, what really happened with the Hunter Biden story suppression by Twitter will be published on Twitter at 5 p.m.
00:05:49.300 This will be awesome. Popcorn emoji. Right. And so this is someone who is really drumming up excitement about something they think is going to be big.
00:05:58.720 He finally got the opportunity to come up with his own nickname. And he's so excited for everybody to hear about it.
00:06:05.540 You can just tell how excited this dude is to be trying to make this happen.
00:06:10.740 Like, he's trying to make Fetch happen.
00:06:12.700 He is all in.
00:06:13.860 This is his thing.
00:06:15.540 So to talk about what's in this report, let's back up a little bit.
00:06:18.880 The reports appear to show internal debate at Twitter about how the platform should handle the contents of a report on the laptop that was alleged to belong to President Biden's son, Hunter Biden, that was reported initially by the New York Post.
00:06:34.080 You probably recall this story if you were in the United States and paying attention to domestic politics in the presidential election.
00:06:41.280 Hunter Biden has dealt with addiction issues, and this laptop purported to show evidence of all this unseemly behavior on the part of President Biden's son, Hunter.
00:06:52.900 I should say it is not clear to me how this laptop was obtained, if it was actually Hunter Biden's laptop.
00:06:59.760 And thus, there was a lot of confusion around how folks could, you know, responsibly report on it or talk about it.
00:07:06.340 Yeah, that's I remember that, obviously.
00:07:08.900 And I feel compelled to remind everybody that the reason we know about this Hunter Biden laptop story, which, you know, maybe it was his laptop, maybe not.
00:07:18.760 We don't really know. You know, I did some research ahead of this show. And like, it's basically unverifiable. But the reason that we know about it is because a concerned citizen brought it to Rudy Giuliani. Right. And I think that says a lot.
00:07:34.940 If you think about the source of the information being Rudy Giuliani, earlier this morning he was at a hearing here in D.C. before the bar facing possible disbarment for his frivolous, ridiculous actions in the 2020 – contesting the 2020 election.
00:07:54.180 And his defense there was that he didn't have the time to verify that what he was filing to court was accurate.
00:08:05.900 And so if he doesn't have the time to verify his legal briefings, what are we to make of his – everything else in his life?
00:08:18.820 I don't know. I'll just leave it there.
00:08:20.020 I don't mean to make the story about that, but anything even connected to Rudy Giuliani, let alone originating with Rudy Giuliani, I feel needs to be taken with a pretty big grain of salt.
00:08:32.120 Are you trying to suggest that when Rudy Giuliani is in the mix on something, that it's not on the up and up?
00:08:38.340 If he's in the mix, God help everyone.
00:08:40.140 So you can sort of get an idea as to, like, why there was a lot of skepticism and confusion early on around this Hunter Biden laptop story.
00:08:51.240 And that confusion very much extended to social media platforms like Twitter.
00:08:55.540 Twitter staff independently decided to block posts about the Hunter Biden laptop story and prevented people from sharing the New York Post story in DMs, citing that the content fell under its hacked materials policy.
00:09:06.880 because at the time, the thinking was that the contents of the laptop had been obtained through hacking.
00:09:11.860 This decision was made after a lot of internal debate at Twitter.
00:09:15.440 Taibbi's report shows a lot of back and forth internally at Twitter
00:09:18.760 about how to moderate tweets about this Hunter Biden laptop story.
00:09:22.580 Trenton Kennedy, a Twitter communications official, wrote in an email,
00:09:26.140 I'm struggling to understand the policy basis for marking this as unsafe.
00:09:30.020 Kennedy advised that the company should say that it is waiting to understand
00:09:33.300 whether the New York Post story was the result of hacked material.
00:09:36.880 I have to say, Twitter, it sounds like they really erred on the side of caution here.
00:09:40.980 You might remember that White House spokesperson Kayleigh McKinney, her Twitter account was locked for sharing a tweet with the laptop story in it.
00:09:48.260 Twitter took a lot of heat about this with conservatives who said that this was evidence that Twitter and big tech in general was biased against them as conservatives.
00:09:58.560 Then Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey spoke about the backlash publicly, saying,
00:10:02.580 we made a quick interpretation using no other evidence that the material in the article were
00:10:07.520 obtained through hacking, and according to our policy, we blocked them from being spread.
00:10:11.700 Upon further consideration, we admitted this action was wrong and corrected it within 24 hours.
00:10:16.680 And so, again, you really see the sort of messy, nitty-gritty of this company having to decide
00:10:22.620 in real time how they were going to moderate this story that they could not verify and didn't know
00:10:27.720 its origins. And at a time when everybody was felt the same way, like they were not alone in
00:10:33.140 that thinking. So I guess the question might be like, was this the right call? I honestly could
00:10:39.600 not tell you this is like way above my pay grade. But I do think that reasonable people could and do
00:10:46.240 disagree with whether or not Twitter should have allowed that report about the laptop to be on the
00:10:51.120 platform. But I will say that it seems like fairly new ground for a platform to have to sort out
00:10:57.420 you know, this kind of situation that is so potentially sensitive, right? So I can understand
00:11:04.220 why there was some debate about it. I can understand why folks internally disagreed,
00:11:08.820 why folks externally disagreed. It's really kind of new territory for a platform to have to sort
00:11:15.280 out. And the emails really reflect that, that there was a lot of what seems like healthy
00:11:20.160 discourse about how they should best proceed. Right. So there's two different things, right?
00:11:25.280 You can disagree with the conclusion that they came to to moderate the content, which maybe that was the right decision, maybe not, depending on your point of view.
00:11:33.700 But to take some time and, like, have a discussion about whether it should be moderated, like, there can be absolutely nothing wrong with that, right?
00:11:41.660 Like, they had a discussion about it.
00:11:43.640 Just the act of discussing it is not in itself anything nefarious.
00:11:48.640 And to suggest that it is is really disingenuous.
00:11:52.500 Well, enter the big Elon Musk bombshell that he dropped.
00:11:59.380 It's going to change everything.
00:12:02.560 Nothing will ever be the same.
00:12:05.180 So get this.
00:12:05.620 The Twitter files.
00:12:06.500 So get this.
00:12:07.380 If you're driving, pull over because it's going to blow your mind.
00:12:11.180 I want you to be safe.
00:12:12.560 Before Joe Biden was elected, his campaign staff flagged tweets containing sexually explicit images.
00:12:21.780 of hunter biden for the twitter staff and those tweets were removed i know i know
00:12:29.180 cancel the constitution that's it that's it america is over so in an email from a twitter
00:12:38.820 employee from 2020 uh it included six links to tweets and the line more to review from the
00:12:45.060 biden team the employee wrote another twitter worker replied handled these interestingly enough
00:12:50.700 Taibbi's reporting did not show the Biden team contacting Twitter over the initial reporting
00:12:56.640 about the laptop. It was the tweets containing sexually explicit photos that they were raising
00:13:01.960 an objection over. So when the first New York Post story dropped with a laptop, Biden's team
00:13:07.160 did not reach out. It was the images with Hunter Biden, you know, nude that they were objecting to.
00:13:13.420 Taibbi shared five tweets that the Biden campaign flagged. Four of those still have archives
00:13:18.660 available online, and they did include nude images of Hunter Biden. So these images were already
00:13:24.160 pretty clearly in violation of Twitter's rules around non-consensual explicit images,
00:13:29.440 which specifically prohibit sharing images or video that are taken in an intimate setting
00:13:33.980 and not intended for public distribution. Not to mention, state law in California,
00:13:39.640 where Twitter is based, also outlaws sharing non-consensual explicit images. So essentially,
00:13:46.600 this huge bombshell that Elon Musk has presented us is that Twitter was following their pretty
00:13:54.840 clear guidelines about removal of non-consensual nude images and like complying with with California
00:14:02.000 state law. Yeah. And the breathless tweet revealing that, you know, did not include any of that
00:14:07.760 context. You know, it's just like here's links to four tweets that were removed. Of course. Like
00:14:13.400 smoke and mirrors suggesting that something more nefarious was going on exactly so elon musk after
00:14:21.260 this bombshell revelation was dropped he tweeted if this isn't a violation of the constitution's
00:14:26.380 first amendment what is now first of all biden was not a government official at the time he was
00:14:32.660 still campaigning right and so it's not really clear to me how that would be a violation of the
00:14:37.260 first amendment which we know regulates how governments control speech but you know whatever
00:14:41.360 Honestly, who at this point expects Elon Musk to be either getting or making these kinds of distinctions at this point, right?
00:14:49.580 And so Musk and Taibbi say that this was evidence that Twitter was in the bag for the Democratic Party and the left.
00:14:56.120 They did not provide any evidence of this.
00:14:58.820 But Taibbi says, quote, this system wasn't balanced.
00:15:02.160 And if you're wondering why he thinks that, well, it's because he says the majority of Twitter's employees are Democrats.
00:15:09.460 How do you know?
00:15:10.140 because Twitter's team has greater campaign contributions
00:15:13.880 to Democrats over Republicans.
00:15:16.460 So as someone who has done this work
00:15:19.100 for the majority of my adult life,
00:15:21.600 this is an absolutely wild conclusion to jump to
00:15:26.320 for many, many reasons that I want to talk about
00:15:28.920 after this quick break.
00:15:36.300 An iHeartRadio experience.
00:15:38.660 With Cameron Wickham.
00:15:40.140 Live at the Ryman.
00:15:44.140 You and a pal with flights and two nights in Nashville.
00:15:47.420 To see Cameron Whitcomb at the legendary Ryman Auditorium.
00:15:50.640 Plus a thousand dollar spending cash.
00:15:56.000 Just listen to Pure Country for 10 minutes a day on the free iHeartRadio app and you're in to win.
00:16:02.160 Cameron Whitcomb.
00:16:03.240 Stream the new single, Kingdom of Fear.
00:16:05.200 Available now.
00:16:06.040 run a business and not thinking about podcasting think again more americans listen to podcasts
00:16:15.280 than ad-supported streaming music from spotify and pandora and as the number one podcaster
00:16:20.000 iheart's twice as large as the next two combined so whatever your customers listen to they'll hear
00:16:24.860 your message plus only iheart can extend your message to audiences across broadcast radio
00:16:29.820 think podcasting can help your business think iheart streaming radio and podcasting let us
00:16:35.680 show you at iHeartAdvertising.com. That's iHeartAdvertising.com. If your bookshelf and
00:16:41.440 your For You page are equally important to your personality, welcome home. This is Prose Society,
00:16:48.360 the weekly podcast that's part book club, part group chat for thought daughters, pop culture
00:16:53.180 obsessives, and anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice and Love Island deserve the same level
00:16:57.460 of discourse. I'm Eli Rallo, and every week we're connecting the dots between books, the internet,
00:17:02.820 and the conversations everyone can't stop having.
00:17:05.840 I'm going to have to look up this story.
00:17:07.760 I'm obsessed, I'm obsessed.
00:17:09.420 From best-selling authors and your favorite book talk creators
00:17:12.040 to the latest pop culture moments, nothing is off the table.
00:17:15.760 It's like if you can hide some real messages inside compelling characters,
00:17:21.360 then that is a Trojan horse.
00:17:23.220 Whether you're looking for literary deep dives,
00:17:25.400 smart pop culture conversations,
00:17:27.220 or a community of readers who love to think a little too much,
00:17:30.760 you're in the right place.
00:17:32.460 Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app,
00:17:35.420 Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:17:38.400 See you between the pages.
00:17:46.300 And we're back.
00:17:47.420 We were talking about Elon Musk and Matt Taibbi
00:17:50.420 dropping this bombless bombshell
00:17:53.780 about what they say is evidence of Twitter and big tech
00:17:58.680 being in the bag for the Democratic Party and the left.
00:18:01.800 And I have to say, as someone who has done this work, it's just a really out there conclusion to jump to.
00:18:10.400 First of all, social media platforms having a direct line of communication with political leaders is 100 percent normal.
00:18:18.740 And that is the case for all major social media platforms.
00:18:22.580 Facebook has them.
00:18:24.300 Instagram has them.
00:18:25.840 Snapchat has them.
00:18:27.320 It is totally a normal, commonplace thing.
00:18:30.500 You know, I have done that work professionally, both from the platform side and the advocacy side. When I worked at the social media platform Medium, I was essentially the person on the political team whose job it was to make inroads and connections with political leaders and activists and thought leaders on the left. You know, they could reach out to me with issues and questions, etc.
00:18:50.240 There was also a counterpart to this work on the right who did the same thing as me, but within the Republican Party. It was actually like a very fulfilling and interesting job. We had lots of like spirited discussions and debates about content on our team that actually remind me quite a bit of like the internal emails that we saw from this reporting.
00:19:10.160 It's also a fun fact why I attended the 2016 Republican National Convention and got to watch Trump officially accept the nomination for president in person, which is a story for another day.
00:19:23.300 But part of the advocacy work that I do now involves communicating with platforms to hopefully help influence their content moderation decision making to be less hostile toward marginalized people.
00:19:35.400 A lot of the time, that work looks like the same thing that the Biden campaign was doing to the Twitter folks, you know, flagging content that we think needs to be removed.
00:19:44.960 A lot of times it's like faked, demeaning, misogynistic images of women of color elected officials like AOC for removal being like, oh, actually, this image that purports to show a misogynistic, crude drawing of AOC, we think this might violate your guidelines.
00:20:04.160 Can you please remove it?
00:20:05.400 But we also have had some, like, really good wins doing this work.
00:20:10.640 You know, earlier this year, TikTok agreed to add deadnaming and misgendering to their community guidelines.
00:20:16.900 We got YouTube to agree to remove inaccurate information about abortion from their platform.
00:20:21.380 So it's, like, fulfilling work.
00:20:24.820 I don't actually bring it up a ton on the podcast, mostly because it's just not that exciting.
00:20:30.780 Like, it's fairly mundane work. And it's just, yeah, it's just not exciting. You know, completely normal and commonplace for folks in these positions to have a direct line with folks at platforms. You know, I have flagged things for them that they do not take down.
00:20:47.360 You know, so it's not like when you reach out and say, hey, this is problematic or hey, we believe this violates your community guidelines. It's not a guarantee they're going to take it down. But it's like that tedious work of relationship building for a particular goal.
00:21:01.580 And Musk trying to reframe that work that so many people do that is totally commonplace across platforms, him trying to reframe that as somehow nefarious or somehow a threat to our democracy is completely wild, completely wild.
00:21:20.200 Yeah, it really is, especially when you think about the role of advocacy in a democracy and advocacy groups making the case for their constituencies about issues that they care about to policymakers trying to get policies put in place.
00:21:35.120 And you can tell from those emails that the Twitter team was talking about their policies and how did this fit within their policies that had been crafted to describe the situations in which they would take action to moderate.
00:21:47.540 And even as I'm saying these words, it sounds so boring, but it's so crucial because without that, you end up with a situation that we have right now where everything is just, you know, whatever Elon Musk decides about it, right?
00:22:03.080 It's not clear what is and is not allowed on Twitter these days.
00:22:07.860 It's just by executive fiat, and also all those fiats bring more attention and news attention to him, which is a win-win for him.
00:22:20.820 I'm so glad that you said that because a few weeks ago, I think it was Sam Harris asked Elon on Twitter about whether or not he was going to reinstate Alex Jones.
00:22:30.540 And Alex Jones famously lies about babies who were tragically shot and killed in Sandy Hook and lies about their parents.
00:22:38.700 And Elon Musk replied, I will never allow him back on the platform because I had a baby who died and I held that baby in my hands and I know the heartbreak of a grieving parent.
00:22:48.120 And I actually think that that actually was one of very few genuine statements about how Elon Musk is planning on moderating Twitter.
00:22:57.140 If he can personally identify with the group that he is making a moderation decision around or based on, I think that you will get one thing.
00:23:09.860 If he cannot identify with them, if he cannot put himself in their shoes or see their experience in his own experience, I don't think it's going to be real to him.
00:23:19.760 And so I think that to me was the first honest assessment of how he plans to moderate the platform.
00:23:24.960 It's just based on what he personally likes or doesn't like, what he personally can understand or can identify with or see himself in or not.
00:23:35.000 And so, you know, he is a white, straight, cis billionaire.
00:23:39.400 I don't know that he would be able to really see himself in the experience of a trans person or a person of color or a queer person or someone who's not a billionaire and wants to start a union at their car factory.
00:23:50.720 Right. And so I think that really was a pretty clear indication of exactly what you're saying. It's just whatever Elon feels, that's how we will be moderating. And I don't think it's a great system. Right. Like he is someone who is going on and on about the need to build transparency into moderation to restore trust. Let's start with a little transparency around how he is going to make moderation decisions.
00:24:13.880 Yeah. And it's also a little bit like a high school student quoting Voltaire about free speech when he's talking about transparency. I think he still thinks or at least as a couple of months ago, he thought that transparency meant making all of Twitter's internal decisions and algorithms like open source so anybody could read it, which is a terrible idea because that just is like a blueprint for anyone who wants to abuse it.
00:24:43.040 and so it's this this spot of like reality where there's like he has the high-minded ideals of
00:24:53.020 transparency and free speech which are virtuous and good things but to actually like implement
00:25:00.040 them in the real world one needs to have a thoughtful approach and he lacks that second
00:25:08.080 part it's like how all of his tweets with polls about what he should do for twitter moderation
00:25:13.760 were all accompanied by latin but then like getting the latin phrases wrong it's like you
00:25:19.620 you kind yes you're kind of you almost have it like you oh you're oh you almost have it
00:25:23.800 you almost had it you you found the latin quote and you got the gist sort of and so speaking of
00:25:32.480 the kind of disingenuous nods to what they're calling free speech.
00:25:39.660 Musk really tried to frame this report as a bombshell that showed that Twitter is suppressing
00:25:47.160 the free speech of conservatives on the platform.
00:25:49.920 But Taibbi's own reporting shows that the Trump administration, while Trump was president,
00:25:55.760 made the very same kind of requests as the Biden campaign did.
00:25:59.520 And at least some of those requests were honored, right?
00:26:02.360 And so there's not, there's no, Taibbi includes that information. There isn't any more transparency or any emails around what those requests would be. The public is still just like left to wonder what a sitting president was successfully able to get removed from Twitter. Not worth scrutiny, not worth this transparency that Elon Musk says he wants to bring to moderation on the platform.
00:26:25.800 Musk said, quote, Twitter acting by itself to suppress free speech is not a First Amendment
00:26:30.940 violation, but acting under orders from the government to suppress free speech with no
00:26:35.420 judicial review is. But then again, Taibbi himself said, quote, there's no evidence that I have seen
00:26:42.060 of any government involvement in the laptop story. So truly, which is it? Like, both of these things
00:26:47.240 can't be correct. It can't be that, as Elon Musk says, that Twitter was acting under orders from
00:26:53.020 the government. And Taibbi saying, actually, after reviewing this, I saw no government involvement
00:26:58.220 in the suppression of this story. It doesn't, it doesn't like something's not adding up. The
00:27:01.560 math is not mapping. Yeah. It's almost like it's all just a big stunt and the substance doesn't
00:27:06.560 matter. Almost. And I think like, this is why, I mean, I personally, this is just my opinion,
00:27:13.480 but I think it's really, really irresponsible to release communications that folks have had
00:27:19.200 with Twitter over the years in this way.
00:27:21.300 You know, in doing this,
00:27:22.300 Elon Musk also released
00:27:23.580 the personal email addresses
00:27:25.260 of former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey
00:27:27.700 and an elected official in this release.
00:27:30.040 Not redacted, just tweeted them out.
00:27:32.340 He did later say on a Spaces
00:27:34.400 that he regretted this,
00:27:35.960 but I think it really shows
00:27:37.500 what we're dealing with here.
00:27:38.520 And so, you know,
00:27:39.900 I spent part of the weekend being like,
00:27:42.460 well, geez, is,
00:27:45.020 I've had communications
00:27:46.240 with Twitter officials.
00:27:47.240 Like, are they going to,
00:27:48.020 I don't want my information released. I just know what can happen when you have someone who
00:27:55.880 is addicted to attention and stunts and sensitive information. It's concerning to me. And, you know,
00:28:04.180 I'm not concerned because I've ever had communications with Twitter that I would
00:28:07.840 regret or that I wouldn't want, you know, out there. But unfortunately, I think that we are
00:28:12.920 past the point of the substance of what is being released being important at all. And I think, I
00:28:19.960 mean, I might say that the first time that I really saw this happening for real was around
00:28:25.880 Hillary Clinton's emails, where it didn't really matter. The substance of the emails didn't really
00:28:32.660 matter. Just the reporting around them seemed to suggest, you know, nefarious behavior just like
00:28:40.520 by design, right? And so it was reported as a bombshell, a smoking gun, all of that. When
00:28:47.680 really, if you look at it, you're like, well, what are you, what actually is like newsworthy
00:28:51.700 here? What actually is the big bombshell here? And I think that we're in this place where
00:28:56.300 people, particularly online, can really drum up a lot of fanfare around something and be like, 0.99
00:29:04.340 this is going to blow your fucking mind. And then it doesn't really matter what's in it. 0.95
00:29:09.300 Because if you look at the reporting that Taibbi and Elon Musk did, nothing in there is really new, right?
00:29:15.960 Like the whole internal debate around how Twitter should moderate the Hunter Biden laptop story.
00:29:21.800 Eventually, they talked about it in public.
00:29:23.600 Like that quote that I read from Jack Dorsey was a public quote.
00:29:26.320 This is part of the public record already.
00:29:28.420 So is the bombshell reporting just that this presidential campaign had direct communication with someone at Twitter?
00:29:36.040 That's also common knowledge.
00:29:37.540 Like anybody who has ever worked in social media is aware of that. That's not a bombshell. So if they're not actually reporting anything new, how can you tweet about it in such a bombastic way that like, oh, we are going to blow the lid off of this thing?
00:29:53.600 You know, I saw people reporting about it like Jack Prasibik said, we will all remember where we were when this was reported.
00:30:00.160 Like the breathlessness that people talked about this for something that wasn't even any new information, I think is really, I'm going to say, irresponsible.
00:30:09.720 Yeah, it's an excellent point because the only thing that's new here is sort of the salaciousness of the illusion of leaks, right?
00:30:19.680 Like, ooh, there's some sort of secret emails that they didn't want us to see, but that's obviously not the case for, like, multiple reasons.
00:30:27.640 One, like, the emails were released by Twitter, right?
00:30:31.640 There are emails by Twitter employees that Twitter is releasing, so that's, like, not a leak.
00:30:36.400 And in the content of the emails that the people wrote, it's clear that they expect these emails or maybe they don't expect the emails themselves to become public, but they clearly expect – they are aware that there is intense scrutiny about how they are moderating this issue and they expect to be called to account for it.
00:31:00.160 And like you said, everything, you know, all of the decisions they made are already public record and not because of some sort of deep investigative journalism, but because Twitter like put out a press release about it and like said all the same thing.
00:31:14.700 So the only thing new here is just the framing as a leak that something inappropriate happened.
00:31:20.700 But the actual facts are completely unchanged. You know, like you said, like, what's the big reveal that that the Biden campaign didn't want the candidate's son's like naked photos published without his consent like that?
00:31:37.540 Yeah, they didn't want a crime, a literal sex crime to occur. But news at 11.
00:31:42.640 Yeah, that's the only thing new here. Just the illusion and framing of salaciousness.
00:31:48.200 And I think that Elon is doing this because he is speaking to people who I think already feel aggrieved. Right. And so he knows, even if this isn't really anything, nothing really new is being talked about or reported, that people that feel aggrieved are going to be like, oh, my God, mind blown.
00:32:07.520 This is huge. Oh, my God, this this confirms my persecution complex that I have been censored on Twitter.
00:32:15.140 And I think that's exactly why he is doing this, because he knows that all of this sycophants and hangers on are going to amplify that claim and be like, oh, my God, huge reporting, even though nothing new is being reported.
00:32:27.420 Here's how Representative James Comer from Tennessee.
00:32:30.540 Here's what he had to say about this.
00:32:32.640 story is just beginning jason because we're going to have every single person at twitter that was
00:32:37.680 involved in this in front of the house oversight committee as soon as possible so he's talking
00:32:42.640 about like investigating and hauling people in before a committee i think that it really is a
00:32:50.480 state a testament to the fact that we are not like anybody can say anything and the substance of what
00:32:56.140 is actually being said doesn't matter because people who are already predisposed to feel
00:33:01.420 aggrieved and be on the side of like, oh, yeah, we're being censored, are going to circle the
00:33:05.640 wagons to make sure that that claim is amplified and like treated with seriousness.
00:33:11.140 Yeah, like truth doesn't exist. It's all just framing and, you know, winning the narrative.
00:33:18.880 And right now, if you Google or take to Twitter to search her name, there are people talking about
00:33:23.780 how Vijaya God, who was Twitter's former head of legal policy and trust at Twitter,
00:33:28.360 The person who made kind of moderation decisions and was the head of, you know, combating things like misinformation and hate speech, how she should be arrested for her role in moderating content around the Hunter Biden laptop story and, quote, rigging the 2020 election for Biden.
00:33:44.480 So it's interesting how all of this, I think it's savvy on Elon's part because it feeds into this like big lie that somehow, somewhere, the 2020 election was rigged for Biden against Trump.
00:33:58.360 Yeah. And, you know, isn't it convenient that they finally found a woman of color to be the like poster child of this invented scandal?
00:34:08.740 You know, obviously it's a woman of color. And the other idea in here is that this one singular event is what rigged the election for Joe Biden.
00:34:20.520 Right. Like everybody still knew about the Hunter Biden laptop. We're still talking about it years later.
00:34:26.360 You know, it's not like Twitter's decision to not show those photos somehow killed the story and nobody ever heard about it again.
00:34:38.080 Right. So it's like even the part that they're aggrieved about is just completely fabricated.
00:34:44.640 More after a quick break.
00:34:46.020 We'll be right back.
00:35:16.020 And you're in to win.
00:35:17.680 Cameron Wickham.
00:35:18.780 Stream the new single, Kingdom of Fear.
00:35:20.760 Available now.
00:35:25.240 Run a business and not thinking about podcasting?
00:35:28.320 Think again.
00:35:29.320 More Americans listen to podcasts than ad-supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora.
00:35:33.620 And as the number one podcaster, iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined.
00:35:38.200 So whatever your customers listen to, they'll hear your message.
00:35:41.140 Plus, only iHeart can extend your message to audiences across broadcast radio.
00:35:44.940 Think podcasting can help your business?
00:35:47.260 Think iHeart.
00:35:48.240 Streaming, radio, and podcasting.
00:35:50.340 Call 844-844-IHEART to get started.
00:35:53.500 That's 844-844-IHEART.
00:35:55.940 If your bookshelf and your For You page are equally important to your personality, welcome home.
00:36:01.880 This is Prose Society, the weekly podcast that's part book club, part group chat for thought daughters,
00:36:08.300 pop culture obsessives, and anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice and Love Island deserve the same level of discourse.
00:36:14.340 I'm Eli Rallo, and every week we're connecting the dots between books, the internet, and the conversations everyone can't stop having.
00:36:21.440 I'm going to have to look up this story. I'm obsessed. I'm obsessed.
00:36:24.960 From best-selling authors and your favorite book talk creators to the latest pop culture moments, nothing is off the table.
00:36:30.980 It's like if you can hide some real messages inside compelling characters, then that is a Trojan horse.
00:36:38.440 Whether you're looking for literary deep dives, smart pop culture conversations, or a community of readers who love to think a little too much, you're in the right place.
00:36:48.060 Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:36:54.120 See you between the pages.
00:37:01.560 Let's get right back into it.
00:37:02.940 It is not surprising to me that a woman of color, a brown girl, is at the center of this story.
00:37:10.660 There are memes on Twitter right now. It says, Twitter head of legal policy, I knowingly subverted your election process.
00:37:18.360 I did it with the intent to throw the election. That makes me guilty of treason under Article 3, Section 3 of the United States Constitution.
00:37:26.860 It's not surprising to me that like earlier today, I saw a picture that had that was a explicit image of Hunter Biden where they had doctored her head on the body of another woman and they were involved in a sex act.
00:37:40.640 It's not surprising to me. I think that when you talk about this kind of thing, and I know I beat this drum a lot, misogyny and racism is all linked.
00:37:50.740 And when you talk about this kind of thing, it is not surprising to me that, you know, the fallout is not measured discourse.
00:37:59.180 The fallout is talking about arresting this woman and making crude memes of her that are sexually explicit.
00:38:06.640 it yeah it's so sad and just like the same old story of like once again it's just racism and
00:38:16.180 misogyny finding new stories to turn into memes to feed that same narrative exactly and it has to
00:38:26.720 be said i mean i i didn't want to bring him up in this episode but here i am in response to this
00:38:32.120 reporting, Trump took to Truth Social to advocate for throwing out the Constitution and throwing out
00:38:39.980 the 2020 election results. And so, you know, if this whole thing was meant to be a crusade
00:38:45.640 around free speech and it led to Trump, who is the presumptive Republican presidential nominee,
00:38:53.420 being like, oh, I'm coming out in favor of throwing out the Constitution, the First Amendment is part
00:38:58.860 of the Constitution. So like where where are all these like free speech crusaders who are like
00:39:04.040 trying to protect the free free speech of the First Amendment when the presumptive Republican
00:39:09.460 presidential nominee comes out against just throwing the whole thing out because of their
00:39:13.920 reporting? It's a great question. It's almost like, you know, something it's like selectively
00:39:19.540 applies here, but not there. You know, today they care about the Constitution. Tomorrow,
00:39:25.840 Let's cancel it. I mean, I guess to Republicans credit, not many people like rallied around Trump's cry to cancel the Constitution, whatever that would mean.
00:39:36.080 I wonder if part of this whole thing is just like Elon really being desperate to try to like get in Trump's good graces.
00:39:42.580 You think? I mean, some of those images he was tweeting a couple of weeks back about him and Trump were definitely an appeal to get into Trump's good graces, I'll say. I'll just keep it at that. We can move on.
00:40:00.000 I feel like Good Graces is the title of a movie here.
00:40:05.200 So, yeah, I think it's really scary how commonplace communications are being reframed as indicative of, like, nefarious, inappropriate behavior.
00:40:18.260 And I also think that it's confirmation bias at work.
00:40:20.980 Some people on the right, which at this point I think includes Elon Musk, already believe that they are being censored on social media platforms.
00:40:28.760 A really interesting 2020 study by the Pew Research Center found that 90 percent of Republicans believe that their views are being censored.
00:40:36.200 And 69 percent of Republicans or people who lent Republican believe that social media companies generally support the views of liberals over conservatives.
00:40:45.460 And so I think that, you know, it's this confirmation bias at work where anything, even something that is like not anything, can be used to confirm this previously held opinion that they have.
00:40:58.760 And Elon Musk repeatedly parrots this claim that Twitter has previously had an anti-right-wing bias and thus, quote, the Twitter files is just another part of that, you know.
00:41:11.120 But there are entire bodies of academic research that disprove this time and time again.
00:41:17.860 There are studies from NYU, MIT that debunk this claim that there is anti-conservative bias on social media platforms.
00:41:24.860 It's just not a thing, right?
00:41:26.620 And so there was also a study done internally at Twitter. In the pre-Elon Musk days after Trump was banned from Twitter, the team was facing a lot of criticism saying that they were censoring the right. So they looked into it.
00:41:38.960 The internal research team at Twitter found that folks on the right are actually amplified on Twitter, both within the United States and globally.
00:41:47.300 Our results reveal a remarkably consistent trend.
00:41:50.140 In six out of the seven countries studied, the mainstream political right enjoys higher algorithmic amplification than the mainstream political left.
00:41:57.940 They released a whole 27-page report.
00:42:00.300 It is fascinating.
00:42:01.100 And so here's my thing. Either Elon Musk is woefully uninformed about the realities of, quote, right wing bias at Twitter, or he's just lying to get attention from right wing extremists. And that's really kind of what bums me out. You know, there are entire bodies of work and studies and school of thought dedicated to answering all of these thorny, complicated questions that are raised by social media and how it is moderated. Right.
00:42:27.780 But Elon Musk is demonstrating time and time again that he does not care about any of that because he thinks that he knows better, despite never having done this work before.
00:42:38.640 And I feel like everything in our culture is really coalescing around confirming that he has some kind of special, super special, innate genius ability to understand this stuff as a novice more than people who have been working on it for years and years.
00:42:54.740 You know, in his last few weeks, he came into Twitter and immediately blew up verification only to realize like, oh, wait, verification is actually important.
00:43:03.760 And then walked back those plans to blow up verification.
00:43:06.960 He said, oh, we don't need moderation.
00:43:09.780 And then Kanye West starts tweeting swastikas.
00:43:13.100 And he's like, wait, actually, we do need some moderation.
00:43:15.740 Just kidding, guys.
00:43:16.440 Let's bring in some moderation.
00:43:17.480 he is learning the very same lessons that every other social media platform even the ones like
00:43:23.960 truth social and parlor that started by being these fringe platforms that wanted to you know
00:43:30.120 be free speech zones or whatever he is learning what every single social media platform including
00:43:35.460 those french platforms has learned only he's getting to the game years and years late yeah
00:43:42.200 Yeah, I think you're right. He's just like pretty uninformed about these things. And, you know, I think a generous interpretation of his actions here is that he's bringing like a move fast and break things kind of attitude to the way that Twitter should do moderation.
00:44:01.540 And I think that sort of approach can work great for little scrappy startups trying to fight for a piece of market share to sell widgets.
00:44:11.800 But when you are making decisions about a cornerstone of society, right, like Twitter is or at least was how people share information.
00:44:25.200 And it's just like it's a really important thing.
00:44:28.560 And for him to just be making these huge decisions and then days later be like, oops, my bad.
00:44:34.860 Guess that was wrong.
00:44:36.380 It's just so reckless and irresponsible.
00:44:41.840 He should be ashamed, but he certainly is not.
00:44:47.080 Yeah, that's my thing is like he should be embarrassed.
00:44:51.120 I don't know that that is an emotion that he feels the way that you or I might feel.
00:44:56.880 A friend of mine, Justin Hendricks, who is brilliant, he runs a great organization called Tech Policy Press, which is they also have a podcast.
00:45:02.960 You should definitely listen to it.
00:45:04.640 But he works with students, you know, teaching them about social media.
00:45:09.680 And whenever the students are given like a thought experiment about how they should run platforms, they always at first are like, we're going to have no moderation.
00:45:17.380 It's going to be whatever people want to do and they can self-moderate.
00:45:19.900 And then immediately they're like, oh, wait, that doesn't work.
00:45:22.380 So it's like starting at the one, like the thing that like a 101 student would suggest, that's where Elon Musk is starting. But I don't feel like he's self-aware enough to be like, oh, wait, I'm actually starting at the ideas that a 101 student at this would actually come to the table with.
00:45:40.480 Yeah, I think that is exactly right with him. I think he thinks that he is this genius, but he's just not. He just doesn't know about these things. These things are complicated. And I'm not an expert in moderation, but I know that there are experts out there who spend a lot of time and ink on it and to just wade in and just make up rules. It's just so reckless.
00:46:08.400 Yeah, it is reckless. And I have worked in this space for a long time, for years. And I come to the table with people who are way smarter than me, who have worked in this space, who are content moderation experts. And even in those spaces, there is not consensus of how to do it right. It is an ongoing, complex, complicated body of work.
00:46:30.860 And people who have been doing it for years at the highest levels don't have consensus of how to do it right. And I really take umbrage with this idea that Elon Musk, someone who has never done this, has no background in it, no experience with it, is just uniquely a genius at it somehow.
00:46:53.520 And I reject that. And I honestly think that Elon Musk's tenure at Twitter, I think I'm seeing a little bit of the tides turning. I think being someone who works in tech spaces, we're so willing to give wealthy white dudes the benefit of the doubt that if they say they're a genius at something, then they're a genius at something.
00:47:16.040 If they say that they know how to do it, even if they've never done it before, give them millions of dollars of funding because they're going to figure it out. And if they don't, then, you know, they had to learn by failing. And I've just, I know how this story ends. You know, I've seen this story a lot. I have had to smile through this story being told to my face, even though I am screaming inside.
00:47:37.980 And I think we're all starting to peel back that curtain a little bit and say, well, wait, are you actually a genius? Is it possible that maybe you're not playing chestnut checkers? Maybe you're not even playing checkers. Maybe you're like eating the pieces and throwing the board on the floor.
00:47:53.980 Yeah, you totally nailed it. And you talked about how content moderation is like difficult and nuanced. And I think those sorts of things are like really difficult to talk about. And like you said earlier, they're kind of boring. They're not really exciting.
00:48:09.480 You know, there's certainly if you were to try to pack all of it into a single tweet, that tweet would probably not get a lot of engagement. Right. Because you'd need to write like a lot of them about it.
00:48:19.300 and i think uh you know when we think about some of those studies that find that right-wing
00:48:26.580 social media posts tend to get amplified more than uh posts written by people on the left
00:48:33.640 i think that's part of it that like on the left there is often a recognition of like
00:48:40.680 nuance and things are complicated and wanting to qualify things and provide caveats whereas uh
00:48:49.300 I mean, there's certainly thoughtful people on the right, but there's also a lot of people who are not interested in the thoughtful nuance and are just interested in, like, getting those likes, you know, getting those retweets.
00:49:00.820 Totally. And this is actually one of the reasons why, as you know, I was hesitant to even make this episode because content moderation is messy.
00:49:10.720 It's complicated and it's mundane. It's a lot of stuff not working and being like, oh, well, here's why this didn't work or here's what I thought about this.
00:49:17.560 Like it's never the the reality of the work that people like myself do is never going to be as flashy and exciting as the pithy but incorrect Elon Musk tweet about it.
00:49:32.500 Right. Like it's like we're at a disadvantage.
00:49:36.760 You know, the truth is actually, the thoughtful, complex truth is so much less exciting than the sexy bombshell with the popcorn emoji.
00:49:47.380 And I don't know, I struggled, like, when we were talking about how I wanted to respond to this, you were like, oh, maybe an op-ed.
00:49:54.900 And I was like, yeah, I know the reality.
00:49:57.000 And even I would still like to believe the Elon Musk version of things, that there are some files in Twitter that reveal the smoking gun, that the 2020 election was rigged and blah, blah, blah, and Soylent Green is people and all of that.
00:50:10.420 Like, I know the truth.
00:50:12.380 And even I would be more entertained to believe this complete fiction that he is selling people.
00:50:18.340 But that fiction is always going to travel faster than the mundane, boring truth.
00:50:23.380 So that probably means that people listening to this were like, oh, glad I tuned in for 45 minutes of mundane accuracy.
00:50:31.500 Yeah, I think you got it right with it's more entertaining, right?
00:50:36.300 That popcorn emoji, we haven't really talked about that, but I think it says so much about Elon's approach to his shiny new toy that he bought for $44 billion, right?
00:50:47.440 Like it's he's he's the guy in charge. He's making all these decisions, but also he's like cool and detached and just like doing it for lols, y'all.
00:50:58.100 Oh, my God. Totally. And I think it's like so you don't I don't know if you know this.
00:51:06.000 Deep thinks about emoji choices are my like like that's my QAnon.
00:51:11.040 I'm like, I'm like, I gotta, I gotta like follow all the threads. But a popcorn emoji is inviting
00:51:17.560 us to watch the show, right? Like he knows it's a stunt. He wants us to watch. And I think that
00:51:24.380 he is betting, this is just my opinion. He is betting on turning Twitter into a drama machine
00:51:31.260 that people will pay a subscription to watch go down. And I think that popcorn, I think that
00:51:36.700 You're totally spot on.
00:51:38.440 That popcorn emoji is, I know it's a stunt.
00:51:42.040 Step right up, folks.
00:51:43.400 Watch the show.
00:51:44.300 It reminds me of something else that he tweeted.
00:51:46.140 I think it was the first week that he bought Twitter
00:51:47.960 and things really felt like they were on fire.
00:51:50.200 And he tweeted, well, at least you know,
00:51:52.300 the last days of Twitter won't be boring.
00:51:54.640 And I think that's really what he is counting on.
00:51:57.380 Us, our attention, our eyeballs,
00:52:00.320 really being glued to him
00:52:01.980 and locked into what's going to happen next.
00:52:04.260 It's the same way how he kept tweeting about how, oh, the daily average users has never been higher.
00:52:12.220 And somebody was like, yeah, that's like setting your house on fire and then being like, wow, I've never had more visitors on my lawn than when my house was on fire.
00:52:19.400 Yeah, I am so curious to see where this goes and like what Twitter looks like six months from now, who's using it, how many people are using it.
00:52:29.120 You know, what are they talking about on there?
00:52:31.520 But that's probably a story for another show.
00:52:35.700 So all of this is to say, I don't want to make it seem like pre-Elon Musk Twitter days were the best.
00:52:42.320 Certainly, if you listen to this show, you know that that's not how I feel, but I just want to say it explicitly.
00:52:47.840 And I do want to say, like, there are so many good questions to be asked about the way that Twitter moderates content.
00:52:57.040 And I think that more transparency around those conversations would be awesome.
00:53:02.540 But unfortunately, that's not what we're getting.
00:53:05.400 And it is so clear to me that Elon Musk is only interested in cherry picking instances
00:53:09.300 to blow up and exaggerate that tap into this right wing fantasy about being censored on
00:53:15.380 social media platforms.
00:53:16.320 And so I would absolutely welcome and love and applaud more transparency about how moderation
00:53:22.980 decisions are made.
00:53:23.960 But this is not it.
00:53:25.220 you know, cherry picking these examples, exploding them up and hyping them up as this big bombshell
00:53:32.280 and then flinging them to a group of people that you know is going to already be predisposed to
00:53:39.300 being like, yes, this is so true. This totally confirms my worldview about me being persecuted.
00:53:44.240 That is not the way that you achieve true transparency about social media platforms
00:53:48.720 and how they are moderated. And you know what? The way that social media platforms work and are
00:53:53.180 run in 2022, it can shape elections. It can shape democracy. It can shape what the world looks like.
00:54:00.260 And so we deserve true transparency as the people that fuel these platforms. But what Elon Musk is
00:54:06.640 selling us is not that. It is a stunt. We deserve so much better than these little popcorn emoji
00:54:13.520 stunts. Yeah, absolutely. It's a stunt. Transparency is great. This is not it.
00:54:20.080 Well, that's it for me. Michael, do you have anything else to add?
00:54:23.800 No, nothing else. Thanks for having me, Bridget. I always love talking with you here.
00:54:27.300 Thanks for being here. I'll see you on Mastodon.
00:54:29.520 See you there.
00:54:30.060 Got a story about an interesting thing in tech
00:54:36.660 Or just want to say hi
00:54:37.640 You can reach us at hello at tangody.com
00:54:40.100 You can also find transcripts for today's episode
00:54:42.220 At tangody.com
00:54:43.240 There are no girls on the internet was created by me, Bridget Todd
00:54:46.100 It's a production of iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative
00:54:48.680 Jonathan Strickland is our executive producer
00:54:50.880 Tari Harrison is our producer
00:54:52.440 And sound engineer
00:54:53.380 Michael Amato is our contributing producer
00:54:55.520 I'm your host, Bridget Todd
00:54:57.060 If you want to help us grow
00:54:59.020 rate and review us on Apple Podcasts. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,
00:55:03.260 check out the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:55:29.020 for anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice
00:55:30.800 and Love Island deserve the same level of discourse.
00:55:33.620 Each week, we're connecting the dots
00:55:35.000 between books, the internet, and pop culture
00:55:37.120 with your favorite writers, book talk creators,
00:55:39.920 and plenty of overthought opinions.
00:55:41.880 Yeah, I'm obsessed, I'm obsessed.
00:55:43.640 Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app,
00:55:46.360 Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:55:49.740 I survived nine months in captivity,
00:55:52.620 and I've spent my life exploring
00:55:54.880 how other people survive what should have destroyed them.
00:55:58.420 I'm Elizabeth Smart, and these are The Survivor Files.
00:56:02.040 Every week, I'm with survivors who live through the unthinkable, abducted, stalked, controlled, and nearly silenced.
00:56:09.580 These are stories about what it takes to make it out alive.
00:56:13.400 Listen to The Survivor Files with Elizabeth Smart on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:56:21.480 Honey, is it on? Is it on? Is this thing recording?
00:56:24.260 This is your girl T.S. Madison coming to you loud, live, and always and forever in color
00:56:27.920 from the Outlaws podcast with me, T.S. Madison.
00:56:30.440 This week, Laverne Cox is back.
00:56:33.120 We're talking about her new book, her controversial ex, and going off on the red carpet.
00:56:38.180 20 minutes later, he was like, let's squash this, let's talk about it.
00:56:40.500 I was like, no, you do not talk to me like that.
00:56:43.660 That is unacceptable.
00:56:45.180 I walked out and I was like, we need to break up.
00:56:46.620 And can you ever really change a man?
00:56:49.260 Listen to Outlaws with T.S. Madison on the iHeartRadio app,
00:56:52.780 Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:56:55.840 This is an iHeart Podcast.
00:56:58.360 Guaranteed human.